Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  haitham (@theonlyhaitham) reported 1 minute ago

  Amazon does not charge you to ship what your box weighs. It charges you for whichever is bigger: the weight, or the space. I ran the numbers on one of my own 3-packs. Actual weight, just under 1 pound. But the box measures 17 x 8 x 2 inches, and Amazon turns that space into a billing weight of 2.1 pounds. So I pay to ship 2.1 pounds of a product that weighs 1. The three pouches inside fill about a third of the box. The rest is air, and air is the thing being billed. Here is the check. Multiply your box length by width by height, then divide by 139. If that number is bigger than what the box actually weighs on a scale, you are paying for empty space on every order you ship. Fix the box before you touch your ads.

• 
  Abby 🦅🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇸 (@purplessounds) reported 4 minutes ago

  @MuttleysDad @AmazonHelp I hear you but Amazon prime promises tracking. I had one package on the way and they gave me two tracking numbers one from USPS and one from UPS and it was not a sure post thing and neither was updating anything and the problem is that Amazon never handed my package over to either shipper. When they finally got off their butts and did their job then my order was 4 days late. It absolutely was Amazon prime screwing up. And then they closed my account because I asked questions over and over because they were not answering my questions and resolving the problem. I got my account opened again but it should have never been closed. It's my property once I paid for it I have a right to know where it is and when I'm going to get it and in a reasonable time and Amazon prime knows all those stuff so if things are going to be late because of the people that they choose to ship our orders with, it's their responsibility to be honest and let us know that it's going to be late and how late it's going to be before we even check out because they know this crap is going on. But no they wait till after we pay and then they move the goal posts because they know what the hell is going on. And you assume that I have not contacted the people who are going to be delivering at such as USPS or UPS when I actually did. They also told me that they were going to replace my order for free because it had not yet shown up. So they reordered everything for me and then I'm supposed to do returns. What happened to the they're going to replace my order for free? Yeah I know what they're doing. There's no excuses for that. The guy said since you order is late and you don't want a refund on it we will replace everything for free and you get to keep whatever shows up if you get the first package that you ordered. He lied. So I called back to get that straightened out so I wouldn't have to do a return and then this guy says he would just give me a refund. Guess what never happened, yeah the refund never happened. They lie and they lie and they lie. The guy that said he would give me a refund also said that he would fix that return thing. No I'm still required to replace part of the items even though they told me I could keep them all for free. They did not ask me permission if I wanted a second shipment they just went and did it and told me now I'm supposed to return part of the first shipment or pay for it. Do you understand they just lie and lie and lie and lie. And this happens repeatedly over and over. Then they have the nerve to tell people that it happens occasionally. Another lie.

• 
  JM Jones - UNCANCEL RIVERDALE (@JMayer121) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MikeIsaac Yeah I still disagree. If you swapped any of these Amazon distribution centers/data centers with a paper clip factory, you'd get the same exact pushback from communities. From my experience in a town that fought an Amazon warehouse, everyone's issues were standard...

• 
  Standard Issue Blueberry (@epibates) reported 9 minutes ago

  @unconquered_sol I loved that this entire movie was little more than a vehicle for Klaus Kinski to look deranged floating down a raft on the Amazon.

• 
  Matt Bramanti (@mattbramanti) reported 10 minutes ago

  "Earlier this year, Amazon said artificial intelligence investments were a factor behind its $66.1 million increase in equipment and property purchases" that should read $66.1 billion a thousand-fold error by @marissaluck7 with the usual assist from editorial negligence

• 
  CJJ (@ChristoJelly) reported 18 minutes ago

  Bittensor as a Different Kind of AI Bet in a Higher-Rate Environment Long-term bond yields are starting to become a real problem for the concentrated AI equity trade. As of mid-August 2026, the 30-year U.S. Treasury is around 5.33–5.34%, the highest level since 2007, while the 10-year is sitting around 4.72–4.74%. We are seeing similar pressure across other developed markets as well. A big part of this is persistent government deficits, inflation concerns, and a massive amount of new corporate debt coming to market. The hyperscalers are spending an insane amount of money building out AI infrastructure and data centers, and a lot of that expansion has to be financed somehow. As more debt gets issued, it competes for capital and helps keep yields elevated. That matters because higher rates hit high-multiple growth stocks harder than most other parts of the market. A huge portion of the value being assigned to these AI companies is based on cash flows and monetization that investors expect years into the future. When the discount rate goes higher, those future cash flows are simply worth less today. At the same time, the actual cost of building the AI infrastructure goes up. These companies are trying to fund enormous data-center, semiconductor, energy, and compute buildouts while the cost of capital is moving against them. That creates a pretty interesting setup where the AI thesis itself can still be completely intact, while the traditional companies being used to express that thesis start becoming less attractive. This is where I think Bittensor gets really interesting. Bittensor is fundamentally structured differently from the hyperscaler model. Instead of a handful of massive companies using their balance sheets to build centralized AI infrastructure, Bittensor allows independent participants to provide models, compute, data, inference, and other forms of intelligence across specialized subnets. The network then uses competitive incentives to determine which contributions are actually valuable and rewards them in TAO. So instead of one company raising billions in debt, spending billions on capex, and hoping it can monetize that infrastructure later, Bittensor is essentially creating an open market where the resources can come from everywhere and capital can flow toward whatever is actually producing value. That difference becomes much more important if the cost of capital stays high. Bittensor does not completely escape broader financial conditions, obviously. TAO is still a high-beta crypto asset and it can absolutely get smoked in a liquidity-driven risk-off environment. But the underlying network is not dependent on the exact same financing structure that companies like Microsoft, Meta, Google, Amazon, or the major AI infrastructure providers are relying on. That gives it a genuinely different exposure to the AI theme. If hyperscalers continue issuing huge amounts of debt to fund AI capex, while rates remain elevated, investors are eventually going to become much more focused on the return they are actually getting from all of that spending. The question stops being simply, "Who is spending the most money on AI?" and starts becoming, "Who is allocating resources the most efficiently?" That is basically the question Bittensor is designed to answer continuously. Subnets compete. Miners compete. Validators measure performance. Capital moves. Weak systems lose emissions and stronger systems can gain them. It is far more market-driven than the traditional model of one corporation deciding internally where another few billion dollars of capex should go. There is also a potential rotation argument here. If investors still want exposure to AI but become less willing to pay massive multiples for companies carrying increasingly expensive AI infrastructure commitments, decentralized AI becomes a very interesting alternative. You are still getting exposure to the growth of machine intelligence, but through a completely different capital structure. And that is probably the biggest point. I don't really view TAO as just another AI token. I view it as a bet on an alternative economic architecture for AI. If AI becomes one of the largest industries in the world, there is no reason all of that intelligence necessarily needs to live inside five gigantic corporate ecosystems. Bittensor is essentially making the bet that intelligence itself can become an open market—where models, compute, data, agents, and other digital resources compete directly for value. If long-term yields stay high and the traditional AI buildout becomes increasingly expensive to finance, that architecture could become even more compelling. It doesn't mean TAO becomes immune to a selloff, and it definitely doesn't mean decentralized AI automatically wins. But it does mean Bittensor gives you something very different from simply owning another semiconductor stock or hyperscaler. If the bond market continues repricing the cost of capital for these massive, long-duration AI investments, I think the market could eventually start placing a much higher premium on AI systems that can scale without requiring the same gigantic centralized balance sheets. And right now, Bittensor is probably the clearest and most developed expression of that idea. bittensor:native

• 
  Joe (@WickedJ8) reported 18 minutes ago

  @N_Penn10 @amazon I see people on here talking about their delivery is hella slow. Like how? My **** was delayed 5 hours.. im at work so ok lol

• 
  NARAN (@KPNarayanan1) reported 19 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp @Amazon is regularly acting the same DRAMA . Not issue my REFUND. INDIAN'S not believe this fruadent AMAZON. this is my humble request for all INDIAN's

• 
  HOMEGIRL-RH Realtor (@316missy) reported 23 minutes ago

  Amazon, you said my packages would be here today they are not. This is happening more and more. You give me a delivery date and it doesn’t come? That’s not the prime I pay for and I made plans to use my items today. Where are they? Not a weather issue! @amazon @JeffBezos

• 
  shellMithra (@shellMithra) reported 26 minutes ago

  @MarioNawfal If you have a problem with Flock, stop using Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Apple. These are way worse than Flock

• 
  Billiardsjunkie (@IUstillsucks) reported 26 minutes ago

  @amazon why is your website timing so bad I cant upload 5 photos 3mb of the broken lamps your guy just delivered?

• 
  Kat (@KStargateFan) reported 27 minutes ago

  Seventh chevron we want locked To other planets we want to flock Always ready for Amazon's post Really a let down as we were so close Gates we want spun again Amazon let Gero's show begin Time is now, don't make us wait Ending Stargate was a big mistake #BadPoemDay #SaveStargate

• 
  Tired of Yimby Nonsense (@ELJ999) reported 32 minutes ago

  @paulkruegersd @KenPlatt45 They got competition coming from Zoox (Amazon) and CyberCab (Tesla). Competition is good for the consumer as it should drive pricing down.

• 
  Alice (@RationalBlonde) reported 35 minutes ago

  Amazon: “Please verify all the information we already have.” Me: submits correct information Amazon: “Wrong.” Me: “What’s wrong?” Amazon: “We don’t know.” Also Amazon: “You have a few days to fix this or we shut down your business.” Absolutely ******* insane.

• 
  Liz Kelleher (@DogMom23) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Kris10Voe You’d spend more than that on a new machine, so if it’s in otherwise good shape, I’d fix it. I have Speed Queen, by the way, about two years old, and this part already broke (washer lid lock bezel). Ordered on Amazon and fixed myself although it has a 7 year warranty. Wasn’t worth the hassle to deal with a warranty call. Just hope it’s not a sign of things to come.