Amazon Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Amazon users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Amazon, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Amazon users affected:
Amazon (Amazon.com) is the world’s largest online retailer and a prominent cloud services provider. Originally a book seller but has expanded to sell a wide variety of consumer goods and digital media as well as its own electronic devices.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Manaus, AM | 1 |
| Cergy, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Welver, NRW | 1 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 18 |
| Edison, NJ | 1 |
| Chihuahua, CHH | 1 |
| Benito Juarez, CDMX | 1 |
| Piscataway, NJ | 1 |
| Rices Landing, PA | 1 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 1 |
| Lake Butler, FL | 1 |
| Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 2 |
| Frankfurt am Main, Hesse | 1 |
| Bridgeport, CT | 1 |
| Seattle, WA | 4 |
| Rochester, NH | 1 |
| Saint-Apollinaire, QC | 1 |
| Noisy-le-Sec, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Cuauhtémoc, CDMX | 1 |
| Iztapalapa, CDMX | 2 |
| Ciudad Jardín, MEX | 2 |
| Melrose Park, IL | 1 |
| Romeoville, IL | 1 |
| Kefar Yona, Central District | 1 |
| Monterrey, NLE | 1 |
| Monroe, NC | 1 |
| San Jose, CA | 2 |
| Santa Cruz, CA | 1 |
| Volta Redonda, RJ | 1 |
| Libreville, Estuaire | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Amazon Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported@rajkumarrpm_27 We are sorry to hear the issue with product. Please be informed that Amazon takes complete responsibility to assist you within the return window. Post the return window, brand/manufacturer will help you. Kindly continue to work with brand for further assistance. If brand/manufacturer deny to help, kindly acquire a service denial letter from the manufacturer. Appreciate your understanding. -Junaid
-
Solomon (@iamalijandro) reportedPRE-MARKET SNAPSHOT – JULY 30, 2026 Futures are pointing to a mixed open as traders brace for the most important data dump of the summer and two more Big Tech earnings after the close. INDEX FUTURES (pre-market) · Nasdaq 100: +0.6% - tech leading · S&P 500: +0.3% - modest gains · Dow Jones: +0.2% - lagging behind The bounce comes after Wednesday's tech-driven selloff. THE DATA DUMP GDP (Q2 Advance): forecast 2.1% annualised, matching Q1's pace. • JPMorgan cut its estimate to 1.5% after June trade data; • Goldman lowered to 1.8%. Strong consumer spending and A.I. investment are expected to offset trade drag. Core PCE (June): forecast 3.3% YoY, down from 3.4%. Monthly core PCE expected at 0.2%. This is the Fed's preferred inflation gauge any upside surprise cements September hike odds. Jobless Claims: forecast 201K, up from last week's 187K (a 1969 low). Continuing claims expected at 1.8M. The labour market remains historically tight, but the data will be parsed for signs of cooling. GDP Price Index: forecast 4.1%. Personal income expected +0.3%, personal spending +0.4%. EARNINGS AFTER THE CLOSE Apple (AAPL) – expected to show resilient demand despite the AI chip crunch. Options are pricing a ~4.3% move. Amazon (AMZN) – the AI cloud barometer. Options are pricing a ~7.2% move. OIL & YIELDS Brent crude spiked back above $90/bbl after the U.S. and Saudi Arabia struck Iran-backed groups in Iraq. Yields are also moving: the 30-year Treasury yield hit 5.211% on Wednesday — the highest since 2007. THE BIG PICTURE Three forces are converging: the Fed's hawkish hold (three dissenters, 80% September hike odds), a data-heavy morning that will shape the rate path, and Apple/Amazon earnings tonight. Markets are bracing for volatility. $SPY $QQQM $AAPL $WTI bitcoin:native
-
Edward Corona - The Options Oracle (@EdwardCoronaUSA) reported📌 Stocks in Focus Microsoft $MSFT Trading at $429.66, up $39.12, or 10.0%. Microsoft beat earnings expectations by $0.50, exceeded revenue estimates, reported Azure growth of 43% in constant currency, guided September-quarter revenue above consensus, and expects Azure growth of 45% in constant currency. Meta Platforms $META Trading at $530.31, down $55.61, or 9.3%. Meta missed earnings expectations by $1.01, reported revenue in line with estimates, guided third-quarter revenue in line, narrowed its fiscal 2026 capital expenditure guidance, and raised the lower end of its total expense guidance. Qualcomm $QCOM Trading at $146.90, down $8.78, or 5.6%. Qualcomm missed earnings expectations by $0.02, exceeded revenue estimates, guided fiscal fourth-quarter earnings below consensus, and provided revenue guidance in line with expectations. Starbucks $SBUX Trading at $110.56, up $6.42, or 6.2%. Starbucks beat earnings expectations by $0.19, exceeded revenue estimates, raised its fiscal 2026 earnings guidance above consensus, and reported third-quarter North American comparable sales growth of 8.1%. Apple $AAPL Scheduled to report quarterly earnings after Thursday’s closing bell. Amazon $AMZN Scheduled to report quarterly earnings after Thursday’s closing bell.
-
The Tech Buzz (@tbuzzdaily) reportedWhy is Europe lagging behind on AI development? Is a lack of scientists ? The engineers ? The technicians to make it happen? No. Europe has about 30% more AI talent per capita than the US and nearly 3x as many as China. The problem is retention and conversion to commercial power. Money is the blunt answer. AI salaries in the US typically run 30% to 70% higher than in most of Europe, with mid-to-senior AI engineers earning $140,000 to $210,000 base in the US versus $90,000 to $150,000 for the same seniority in Western/Northern Europe , and equity upside compounds the gap since stock options and meaningful early-employee equity remain rare across most European scale-ups. Beyond pay, there’s a structural pull. US research clusters around Boston, San Francisco, and Austin draw European scientists and founders because academic freedom and career mobility are perceived as far greater there than in Europe’s more hierarchical institutions. There’s also a compute-and-scale problem separate from people: Europe doesn’t have anything resembling the concentrated private capital of a Sequoia-backed OpenAI or the hyperscaler balance sheets of Google/Microsoft/Amazon funding frontier training runs. €30 billion in gigafactory investment is real money, but it’s a fraction of what US hyperscalers alone spend on compute in a year. So, is there any possibility that Europe can catch up with America or China? No.
-
evc (@evc189) reportedThe Trojan Port: A Quiet, Physical War on Cupertino In corporate warfare, the most devastating blows rarely arrive as a frontal assault. Instead, they come cloaked in the mundane—packaged in cardboard boxes, sold at unbelievable discounts, and slipped quietly into the daily routines of unsuspecting consumers. What happened to a standard iPhone 15 recently may look like an isolated hardware mishap, but it outlines a terrifyingly plausible blueprint for asymmetric corporate sabotage. The Vector of Destruction The mechanics are deceptively simple. A consumer, disillusioned with a budget-tier, $100 Android smartphone purchased from a major cross-border e-commerce giant, plugs a standard cable into the device. The experience is subpar—laggy performance, stripped-down app stores, a general sense of cheapness. The real danger begins when that same accessory intersects with Apple’s flagship hardware. Upon plugging the peripheral into the iPhone 15’s USB-C port, microscopic metallic debris—hitchhiking on substandard manufacturing tolerances—lodges deep within the port’s sensitive housing. The result is catastrophic: physical scratching of the internal pins, complete loss of charging functionality, and a bricked device. Unable to recharge, the user faces a cascading crisis: a broken device, a cancelled cellular contract, and lingering debt. Mainstream analysts will chalk this up to poor manufacturing or bad luck. But that dismissal ignores how modern economic warfare is waged. Asymmetric Sabotage For years, Apple held total quality control over every accessory touching its devices. The forced transition to USB-C stripped away that defensive moat, exposing Apple’s precision-engineered hardware to the unregulated wild west of universal manufacturing. When a dominant tech titan is forced to open its gates to a universal standard, the floodgates open for infiltration. Is it a coincidence that ultra-cheap electronics flooding out of foreign supply chains possess minute, invisible flaws capable of systematically degrading Western hardware? Or is it a calculated strategy of attrition? You do not need to hack Apple’s servers to hurt Apple. You simply need to weaponize the physical interface. Destroy the port, kill the battery, and break consumer loyalty. Multiply that by millions of users, and you have a slow-bleed execution of a competitor. The Corporate Fallout The downstream effects are already reshaping behavior. Driven away by hardware incompatibility, consumers migrate toward diversified ecosystems—bolstering competitors like Walmart or Amazon, while abandoning Apple. Meanwhile, the aggressor continues its expansion, maintaining footprints in Western strongholds like Boston while channeling goods from overseas—deniable and ruthlessly effective. What Comes Next for Apple? Apple now faces an existential dilemma. The paths forward are narrow: 1. Retreat to Proprietary Standards: Lobby to roll back universal port mandates and reintroduce an ecosystem engineered specifically to resist physical tampering. 2. The Legal Battlefield: Launch aggressive litigation against cross-border budget platforms, treating low-grade accessories as potential vectors of industrial espionage. If Apple fails to recognize that this is a war fought down in the microscopic depths of a USB-C port, the erosion will continue. Apple is still number one. But empires do not fall from a single explosion; they crumble one broken port and one invisible scratch at a time. Watch the supply chain. Trust no universal accessory. Good luck and Godspeed, @Apple.
-
Melvin (@MelvinInvests) reportedListen up, degens, all the high beta names are ripping today, so if you cannot handle this kind of volatility, sell now. For the rest of you, let me explain why we are going higher from here. Cooler than expected inflation and a blowout Microsoft print just flipped the entire narrative overnight. June PCE, the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, actually fell 0.1% month over month, the first decline in six years, with the annual rate easing to 3.7% and that's giving the market real hope the Fed has more room to ease up after yesterday's hold. Microsoft dropped fiscal Q4 revenue of roughly $90 billion, up 18%, crushing expectations on cloud and AI strength and that single print is dragging the entire tech and chip complex higher with it, Here's reason number two and it's the story everyone's buzzing about on X today. Leopold Aschenbrenner's AI focused fund, Situational Awareness, reportedly took heavy losses in this month's chip selloff after running highly leveraged bets on names and the fund apparently exited its entire public equity book in one giant block trade under margin pressure. Reports say Citadel scooped up the bulk of those holdings at depressed prices and the internet's having a field day with the timing, a heavily levered AI bull getting forced out right near the bottom, right before a rally powered by the exact kind of AI strength his fund was betting on. That's a textbook example of forced deleveraging shaking out weak hands right before the bounce, not evidence that the AI thesis was ever broken. Reason three, the actual demand for compute hasn't budged this entire week, no matter how violent the price action got. Hyperscalers are still fighting each other for GPU capacity, memory is still sold out with pricing still climbing and Microsoft just proved cloud and AI revenue is accelerating. The entire bear case built around AI capex isn't paying off yet just took a direct hit from the largest hyperscaler on earth showing real, accelerating revenue tied to that exact spending. If the return on AI capex was actually breaking down, you would not see numbers like this. Reason four, this rally is confirming that the two biggest macro headwinds from this week are both easing at the same time. Rate fears just got cooler PCE data to lean on and AI ROI skepticism just got smashed by Microsoft's results and when both of the things that were dragging this trade down start reversing on the same day, that's not a coincidence, that's the setup finally clearing. And reason five, we're not done yet, Amazon and Apple still have to report today and if either of them confirms the same AI and cloud strength Microsoft just showed, this rebound has more room to run. I am buying more in this, make sure to follow me @melvinInvests, I am an analyst at Milk Road Pro and if you want to see exactly what I am buying, you can join me using the link below.
-
Jav (@sleepywithcoffe) reportedThe problem I have with chewy it’s the shipping takes longer than Amazon for that $1 save? Is that $1 worth the 3 day wait?
-
Trade Research Ai (@TheBenchTrades) reportedTHE BENCH: STATE OF THE MARKET The market is no longer asking whether AI demand is real. It is asking who can turn that demand into cash flow. South Korea remains the warning. KOSPI: 5,593.56, -1.23% Week to date: approximately -16.4% Decline from June peak: approximately -38.6% KOSPI Volatility Index: approximately 86 Samsung Electronics: -0.7% despite record earnings Foreign selling during July: approximately 18.5 trillion won A smaller KOSPI decline is better than another circuit breaker. It is not stabilization. The index rebounded near 5,977 before sellers took control again. The physical AI boom remains intact. The financial trade is splitting apart. Microsoft is up after showing investors a path from AI spending to future cash flow. Meta is down sharply because the market sees investment costs rising faster than confidence in returns. That is the new divide. Current U.S. indications: SPY: approximately -1.5% QQQ: approximately -2.0% IWM: approximately -1.6% SOXX: approximately -5.5% NVDA: approximately $190, -3.4% MU: approximately $739, -9.9% TSM: approximately $375, -4.5% Bitcoin: approximately $64,500 Brent crude: approximately $92 30-year Treasury yield: approximately 5.24% MARKET REGIME: AI-capex bifurcation inside a high-rate, high-volatility risk regime RISK SCORE: 4.8 / 5 The biggest problem is no longer valuation alone. It is the cost of capital. AI infrastructure requires years of spending on chips, data centers, power, cooling and networking. The 30-year Treasury yield is near its highest level since 2007. Oil is back above $90. Investors now require proof that AI returns can exceed financing costs. Korea is telling us memory remains the weakest link. Micron is now the direct U.S. stress test. It may eventually become the best bargain in the semiconductor complex. It is not confirmed yet. BEST SETUPS AFTER CONFIRMATION: • MSFT if the post-earnings gap holds • NVDA if $188-$190 holds and it reclaims $195 • MU if $700-$725 forms support and it reclaims $750 • TSM if $370 holds and it reclaims $380 • SOXX if $460 holds and it reclaims $475 with broad participation • Energy while Brent remains above $90 KEY RISKS: • KOSPI breaks below 5,500 • Korean volatility remains near historic highs • MU loses $700 • SOXX loses $460 • NVDA loses $188 • Amazon disappoints on AI returns • Apple weakens the lower-capex refuge trade • The 30-year yield remains above 5.2% • Brent approaches $100 CAPITAL POSTURE: 20% to 35% deployed 65% to 80% cash The AI boom has not ended. The market has stopped giving every company credit for participating in it. Microsoft is being rewarded for showing the economics. Samsung, SK hynix, Meta and Micron are being asked to prove more. Do not buy the company with the loudest AI story. Buy the company whose cash flow the market is willing to reward. Proof, not hype. @TheBenchTrades Not financial advice. Educational only.
-
Protag (@T_H_E_Protag) reportedWalmarts and Amazon ship houses being allowed to operate during COVID while Maria’s down the street having to shut down should’ve told everybody that it was a scam. But retards gonna retard.
-
ellia (@elliafyi) reportedi find it funny how bad prime video's rental/buying process is because you can't just do it in the app. if you try to, it sends you an email with a link to the amazon website to sign in, make whatever payment, and then you can go back to the app app, email, website, app so bad
-
Signius (@SigniusNetworks) reported@Gypsypup13 Google "what is my IP" and click any of the sites that will show your IP address, jot it down. Turn your router for half an hour & then back on again. Got back to a show my ip site and compare to the one you jotted down. Hopefully you got a new IP that's not Amazon blacklisted
-
Bob Liberty (@TheBobLiberty) reported@luv2gohike If you are an Amazon Prime member, find the Reacher show and give it a thumbs down. Then find Alan Retard and do the same. The more people do this the louder the message to Amazon.
-
Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported@SatyamSingh0980 @SatyamSingh0980 Please copy the link and access it from a different browser. Make sure to delete all cache, cookies, history from device. Logout and login to Amazon account and try to access the link, it will redirect you to Amazon app, fill the required details, so that our team can check and assist you further. You will receive the response in 6 to 12 hours via email. -Sadrushya
-
Joe Harris (@_joe_harris_) reportedBold move by DoorDash. Similar playbook as Amazon, John Deere, Tesla: - Be a massive logistics network - Already have customers, routes, fleet ops - Robot becomes new node - The go-to-market problem is already solved - The moat is the data, not the drone/robot Expect some more logistics and delivery companies to follow
-
Puneet Patwari (@system_monarch) reportedI was asked this system design problem in 3 out of 11 Big Tech companies I interviewed at last year, including Amazon, Google, Atlassian, Salesforce, Walmart, and others. For context, I landed 6 offers this year during my 3-month job switch journey: 1. Amazon (Senior Eng. L6) 2. Walmart (Staff Eng.) 3. Atlassian (Principal Eng.) 4. Salesforce (LMTS) 5. Confluent (Sr. SWE 2) 6. Deliveroo (Staff SWE) What was the problem? It was: Design a distributed job scheduler. I was given different requirements and constraints each time.