Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  rantachika (@Sanders69074896) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Portfolio_Bull Good that she did. We have faced such problems many a times from zomato and amazon ,delivery guys where orders are said to be delivered but actually they do not arrive

• 
  Catfishman 1 (@1Catfishman) reported 6 minutes ago

  @jaynitx It always seems inevitable big companies get bogged down, but somehow Amazon has not done that so far

• 
  TheHylander (@TheHyland3r) reported 7 minutes ago

  @avidseries @L0m3z I personally find that sweeteners are best used when they are mixed together to cancel out any aftertaste or fairness, etc. After mixing so many different sweeteners for many years, I’ve come to the conclusion that the closest thing to sugar is a mixture of erythritol, Stevia, and sucralose. Stevia is fine, but by itself is a lackluster sweetener in my opinion. Don’t get me wrong, it is sweet, but it doesn’t have to full sweetness profile or taste that sugar does. Stevia is extremely sweet so when you use it, you get a really powerful sweetness, but it lacks the other qualities or well-rounded flavor that sugar has. So because it is extremely sweet it can give one component of that sweetness profile, but it doesn’t give the whole profile and ‘mouth feel’ sweetness that sugar gives. So because it is extremely sweet, it is not very good to use alone, however, when used with other sweeteners, it can amplify the overall sweetness without lacking the other components or giving off any aftertaste This is where erythritol comes in. Erythritol ads “body” but have you used it in higher amount it can cause gas/bloating. So this is where adding sucralose comes in handy. Most stores (in the baking aisle) carry a Splenda brand product that is a Stevia/erythritol mixture. It is a green package that says “stevia” on it. So this product alone already has erythritol and Stevia mixed together in the correct ratio that comes very close to sugar and is a one to one substitute for a real sugar. But then what I do is I use liquid concentrated loss (25% by weight) and I add that to the splendid product when I make any kind of beverage or food or condiment that is supposed to be sweet. If I make a protein shake that has 3 to 4 cups of liquid in it, I will use one full dropper of the sucralose and I will add about 80 g of the splendid product. I can make anything from a chocolate shake to a mocha to a fruit smoothie, and it comes out tasting almost identical to having real sugar in it with this mixture of sweeteners. I also make sweet-and-sour curry sauce with it, and it tastes very close to the real thing despite having virtually no calories or sugar. In fact, a sweet-and-sour curry sauce that I make with it tastes so much like the real thing, everyone who has tried it can’t even tell and I actually have to tell them that it doesn’t have any sugar in the sauce and they are quite surprised by it. The liquid sucralose I ordered off Amazon in the large container. It is dirt cheap if you do it that way and you can get a dropper bottle with it. The brand I use is called “sweet solutions.” If anyone uses that with the splendid product, it may take you a little bit of experimenting to get down the ratio you like best, but the ratio I gave is a really good starting point and I think anyone who tries it will be pleasantly surprised. I don’t think a lot of food companies have caught on to this ratio of sweeteners yet. Maybe if I was a food scientist I could make money off of it by using it in certain products, lol.

• 
  Aziz (@AzizJeebs) reported 10 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp On a side note, they have no problem taking my money on a non-business day. So now I have to wait 12 business hours? What a crappy company. Good news is that I am feeling ornery..as mentioned before. I was lied to and my money was stolen. Should have someone to talk to

• 
  Lost And Found (@BASeeker2) reported 11 minutes ago

  @KumarRahul65453 @LeadingReport The quality of the software infrastructure appears to have been strong enough to withstand 5-10 years of erosion, but is unlikely to withstand 5-10 more years, based on recent comments re Windows 11, Amazon cloud issues, etc. Quality of H1b hiring has degraded. More to come???

• 
  Dax Myhand (@DaxRyanMyhand) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Gavinator220 @ClownWorld Don’t order from Amazon, problem solved.

• 
  Yasemin Kaya (@yasekay) reported 16 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp @Miteshbhardwaj_ Same here... order something get something else and try to fix it yourself... amazon @JeffBezos quality all over the world

• 
  Jorge Ugalde (@studymarketsai) reported 16 minutes ago

  @MerlijnTrader The core point is right: $2T at IPO isn't "early days." Google IPO'd at ~$23B and is worth well over 100x that today. For SpaceX to repeat that from $2T, it would have to become worth more than every stock market on earth combined. Entry valuation caps the math — that part's fair. But two things are loose. Huang didn't "tell retail to buy" — he compared buying at IPO to being an early large investor. A CEO's bullish framing, not a retail directive. And "retail buys the exit" is betrayed by the very examples cited: Meta IPO'd at $38 to a retail stampede and is up more than 10x; Google and Amazon IPO buyers did fine. The variable was never IPO-vs-private. It was the entry price — $23B vs $2T. The real problem is the one the post skipped: the messenger. Nvidia holds ~$30B of OpenAI and ~$10B of Anthropic, and all three run on its chips. Huang endorsing these IPOs is Huang talking his own book — he sells the shovels and owns equity in the mines. That's the conflict to flag, not "retail buys the exit." Skepticism on a $2T entry is fair. Just make the argument that actually holds.

• 
  McFarland (@cmcfarland77) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Brandieteaches I wish @amazon would fix that for us.

• 
  SwipeYield.in (@swipeyield) reported 19 minutes ago

  If you use an ICICI Bank debit card for international trips or online shopping, heads up: a major fee hike is hitting your account on June 21, 2026. ICICI is raising its Dynamic Currency Conversion (DCC) fee from 1% all the way up to 3.5%. That is a massive jump, and it’s specifically designed to target a classic trap a lot of people fall into. Here is what’s happening and how to avoid it. The Trap: "Pay in INR" When you are swiping your card at a hotel abroad, or checking out on a global website (like Netflix, Amazon US, or booking an international airline), the payment terminal or website will often recognize your Indian card and ask: “Would you like to be billed in US Dollars or Indian Rupees (INR)?” It feels safe and convenient to choose INR because you see the exact amount hitting your bank account right away. That is DCC. But it’s a massive ripoff. The merchant's local bank uses a terrible exchange rate with a hidden 4% to 7% markup. And now, on top of that bad rate, ICICI is going to slap a 3.5% fee just for processing that INR payment through a foreign network. It applies even if you are sitting at home in India This doesn't just affect travelers. If you buy software, apps, or subscriptions online from a company that operates in India but is registered legally in a foreign country, you will get hit with this 3.5% fee if you pay in Rupees. *How to protect your money:* The fix is incredibly simple but requires you to be alert: Always choose the local currency: When a foreign POS terminal or website gives you a choice, never choose INR. Always choose the local currency of the country you are in (USD, EUR, AED, etc.). Let your card handle the conversion: When you pay in the local foreign currency, you completely bypass the DCC trap. Your transaction will go through standard cross-border processing, which is significantly cheaper than a bad merchant exchange rate combined with ICICI's new 3.5% penalty. Double-check your checkout screens and recurring international subscriptions before June 21!

• 
  Olivia Gerling (@oliviagerling) reported 23 minutes ago

  @jsfdkm @Ak4ntorX I’m so sorry, Soren. I’ve had some issues with Amazon before too, where I ended up having to get the other company involved and that company solved the issue. Hopefully maybe with Throne’s direct involvement they might be able to help 🫂

• 
  विविध (@narendraskunwar) reported 23 minutes ago

  Applied for the Amazon ICICI Credit Card 10+ times over the last 3 days. After PAN consent and Aadhaar OTP verification, the application always ends with a technical error and asks me to try again after 30 minutes. Need assistance. @ICICIBank_Care @amazonIN

• 
  Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported 25 minutes ago

  @saphijitendra58 @saphijitendra58 Kindly copy the link > paste it on a 'web browser' > login to your Amazon account and share your details. Our team will investigate get back to you within 6-12 hours via email. -Sravan

• 
  Srinivas Rao (@UnmistakableCEO) reported 26 minutes ago

  One of the paradoxes of innovation is that every new technology solves one problem and creates others. This results in two main responses fueled by two key questions What does this make possible that wasn't before? What problems does this create that didnt exist before? Derivative Innovation Derivative innovators focus on the opportunities that a new technology enables or attempt to apply their predecessor's innovation to a different domain, what you can think of as the Uber for X strategy. The first wave of the dot-com boom led to a rapid rise of business-to-consumer platforms, most of which enabled people to buy physical products, rent cars, and book flights without having to set foot in a retail store or talk to a travel agent. But with the hype of any kind, common sense seems to get thrown out of the window. In retrospect, it seems obvious that shipping a 40-pound bag of dog food is only going to be profitable if you charge more than what it costs to ship and manufacture. And for most people, going to the pet store is clearly a better option. Eventually, investors came to their senses and realized that counting page views and putting the words 'dot com' at the end of something wasn't a business model. This eventually led to the dot com crash, and most of the early dot com startups went out of business with very few exceptions. Most of these companies were derivative innovators; they built companies that the internet enabled them to build. Mobile device proliferation led to the Uber for X approach to derivative innovation: Uber for haircuts, pet sitters, etc. The problem with this type of derivative innovation is layered. Not only is it not an innovation at all, but it doesn't account for context. The assumption baked into these types of innovations is that if it works for x, it will work for y. But they might have wildly different requirements to work at scale. Many of the earliest AI startups realized that they could wrap a user-friendly interface around an API call to a language model provider. This realization gave birth to the first generation of AI startups: AI writing assistants, AI note takers, AI website designers. And they have all become known as the "wrapper" startups. Derivative innovations initially reward the first movers, then commoditize them, and eventually make them obsolete. The innovators' graveyard is filled with failed attempts at derivative innovations. Infrastructure Innovation Infrastructure innovators focus on the problems that new technology creates. Amazon didn't outlive the dot-com bust because they were bigger, had more customers, or were better at selling books. Amazon outlived the others because they eventually shifted their focus to the problems that the internet created: the backbone required to make the internet functional at scale. Google thrived while the rest of the search engines died because they focused on the problems the internet created and continues to create to this day: the exponential increase in the volume of information on the internet. AI startups that outlive the current wave of hype will be the ones that solve the problems that AI creates and will continue to create. But this is where almost nobody looks because it isn't glamorous. And often unglamorous and essential are birds of a feather. An instagram post with a toilet that lets you flush a bowling ball, while simultaneously washing, wiping and your rear end is going to get a lot more views the pipes with **** flowing through it. But the pipes and your questionable diet solve the problem that this super toilet creates. The greatest opportunities in AI aren't going to come from what it makes possible, but from the problems that it has created and will continue to create for the foreseeable future. Don't ask what AI can do. Ask yourself, what problems is AI creating that nobody is solving or paying attention to? And given that nobody is paying attention to them, you likely won't read about them in articles or find people talking about them on Twitter. This requires you to discard your assumptions, disregard hype, question conventional wisdom, and even possibly dismiss the industry experts. Look where nobody else is looking. Better to be the person who starts a trend instead of the person who follows one.

• 
  Investing=retired at 35 (@Savage90623337) reported 27 minutes ago

  @grok @saylordocs It’s called investing. There’s always risk but we plan percentages and safety here so it makes sense to go with something that’s happened 100% of the time would you tell an investor not to invest in the top stock in the S&P 500 because things evolve and so it might not go up overtime it might go down. Even though the safest bet, is that overtime that S&P stock let’s say Amazon is gonna go up overtime. You know the risk like corrections and depressions but overtime it does the So wouldn’t that make sense for bitcoin and midterm years until it actually changes because what you’re saying is the same thing I’ve heard bitcoin say before to never do the this time is different until it’s actually different so don’t try to beat the market