Amazon Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  @LuvTX (@LuvTX76) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Anton_LA_ @Chicago_Goofies Seriously? Nothing warrants the blindsided fist to the side/back of the head. The Amazon worker has anger management issues that probably come with a healthy dose of entitlement.

• 
  Surfer (@SunsetBeachSurf) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Mappy6984 Not sure where this is but this phony gear came off of Amazon and is not US issue. Look at that goofy bike helmet. I'd suspect Israelis.

• 
  Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported 14 minutes ago

  @astro_nominally Hello! We appreciate you reaching out and sharing your experience with us. Although this feature is unable to be removed, you can dismiss or close the Alexa for Shopping window. If you're on the chat window in the Amazon Shopping app, you can dismiss the Alexa for Shopping screen either by swiping down the chat window, by clicking on the Alexa icon in the bottom of your app, or clicking on the down arrow in the top of the chat window. If you're on the Amazon website, you can close the Alexa screen by clicking on the Alexa button on top of your browser screen, or clicking on the down arrow in the top right hand corner of the chat window. We hope this helps, and that you'll give us a chance in the future. -Rhonda

• 
  Rekter (@Rekter) reported 16 minutes ago

  $CIFR | 8/23/2026 Cipher Digital closed Friday at 15.77, down 1.45 or 8.40 percent, after opening 17.52 and tagging 18.23. Volume was 55 million versus a recent average near 29 million, about double the usual tape. That is heavy supply after Thursday’s bounce to 17.21. After hours at 15.87 did not change the read. The question is whether 14.89 holds after this name sold an 8 percent day on the same week Bitcoin broke out. The loud fact is August 4 earnings. Second-quarter revenue was 24.8 million against a 31.7 million estimate, and the loss was 0.65 a share after a large warrant charge. Mining is winding down while the company tries to become a high-performance compute landlord. Black Pearl capacity for Amazon started early this month on a 15-year lease that can reach about 367 million a year when full, and Barber Lake rent is slated for October. Price has still fallen from 24.16 on August 3 to 15.77. What has to stay true is that those leases get paid and the 14.89 August 19 low does not break. It looks late if Bitcoin’s 78,000 print cannot lift this stock and 14.89 fails. Price sits below the 10-day average near 16.94, the average close over the last ten days and falling, below the 20-day near 18.64 also falling, below the 50-day near 21.50, and below the 200-day near 18.52. The daily 20-day Bollinger bands have their middle at that 20-day average, the upper daily Bollinger band near 23.45, and the lower daily Bollinger band near 13.83. Friday closed in the lower half of those bands, not through the lower one. Those bands mark where this stock has been living since the June 30.14 high; a close outside is a stretch. Daily RSI is 41. The 52-week range from 5.68 to 30.14 frames this as a slide off the high, not a test of the old floor. Friday’s 18.23 high is nearby resistance with the 10-day at 16.94 and the 20-day at 18.64. Support is Friday’s 15.48 low, then 14.89. Street talk still clusters near 32 and is not a trigger. If already long from the single-digit hole, the 30 high already printed and earnings did the damage, so hold only while 14.89 holds and trim rips toward 18. If flat, do not buy Friday’s 8 percent dump on 55 million shares. The add is a hold of 14.89 to 15.48 or a clean accept back above 18.64. A close under 14.89 would kill this bounce and open the lower daily Bollinger band near 13.83. This miner-turned-compute name sold a Bitcoin breakout week after an earnings miss. The 14.89 line is where that slide either stops or continues. Disclosure This note is for education and market commentary only. It is not financial advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Prices and indicators can be wrong or delayed. Check the primary tape before you act. Markets can take some or all of your capital. The writer may or may not hold a position, and any position can change without notice. Do your own work or speak with a licensed adviser.

• 
  jem⁴³ 🦑🏒 (@muffindaccord) reported 17 minutes ago

  @yapc3ntral it was a book selling site that we could use in australia. it was cheap but amazon shut it down here

• 
  Navnik | The Vtuber Ginger Coder Shaman (@GingerCoderSham) reported 21 minutes ago

  @smaulik1996 @Its_Nova1012 expense of the server it self is one issue. you'd need either a master of all employee, or a hardware engineer, network engineer (or really good negotation with ISP) and a systems engineer to maintain it (its like asking for a fullstack developer, and thats the software side..., we are talking about hardware). also hardware decays over time. amazon already has employees replacing hardware parts, thats completely invisible in cloud infrastructure, now that cost is completely visible to you. you probably need a certain deal with your iSP too since most ISP block port 80/443. you still need to register a domain with someone that points to a perma IP address. you (probably want) a way to prevent DDOS attacks (cloudflare is an option here too at small scale). but there other complications. although even cloudflare has outages. you (likely) won't get auto balancing servers, even with spare hardware you can't handle a 700% above expected traffic (lets pretend legit sources) while AWS could handle one active afternoon with load balancing any feature, that requires hardware, becomes something you need to impement manually, and it will be expensive. amazon gets unfair advantages too, they get better internet lines, better discoverability/SEO. servers are built for mass scale and you (likely) won't experience any hardware issues. and amazon servers are onstandby, either serving your app, or someone elses. they have less 'overhead and idle' time then if you did stuff by yourself. also most businesses rather operate with a month to month cost, they rather look at a 200 dollar monthly amazon bill, then replacing a hardware every 6 months for 800 bucks. I'm 100% sure I missed issues too. this is just tip of the iceberge as far as running a server in your basement or garage goes. businesses rather shift points of failure off themselves and onto others. sadly that is how we end up in the scenario where we have now that when aws is down, EVERYONE is down.

• 
  Jay Borders (@BordersJay26705) reported 22 minutes ago

  @WNBA did your announcers on Amazon Prime tonight just really safe how the defense of other teams seem to shut down Mitchell win if you watch all the news conferences after the game, they talk about how their defenses sit around Clark what the F..K

• 
  Thea Landen, ****** Author of Romance (@TheaLanden) reported 22 minutes ago

  @JackWarner16 None of this would be an issue if Amazon didn't take so damn long to ship author copies. (I've used Bookvault before, which is faster, but pricier, so it doesn't make sense for every book.)

• 
  Ilia M (@iliakonst7) reported 23 minutes ago

  $NVDA AI SERVER PRICES COULD JUMP 15%+ Nvidia customers are reportedly being told to expect price increases of more than 15% on many AI server systems scheduled to ship early next year, including Vera Rubin and Grace Blackwell. According to Bloomberg, the size of the increase will depend on the chip generation and memory setup, with sharply higher DRAM prices from Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron adding significant cost pressure. Server manufacturers supplying major hyperscalers have already started informing customers about the increases. Amazon, Microsoft, Google and Meta are developing their own AI chips, but Nvidia remains a critical supplier for their massive data center expansions.

• 
  Social Worker Team (@Sinhateam) reported 25 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Like millions of others, I trusted Amazon as a reliable marketplace, but I now feel completely cheated. Furthermore, I have repeatedly explained to their support team that I am currently severely ill and dealing with major medical issues.

• 
  Thomas James (@rocky7586) reported 26 minutes ago

  @RS00090 @HlNOMARUSUMO Simple. They won't eat the costs. These boxes with codes will not be made by them. They'll have an offshore company do it for a blanket cost that saves them money. Easy. Sony doesn't even need that pressure. It's even more simpler than that. They just need the ability to look out for their bottom line to supercede their own need to want to do something anti consumer. These companies NEVER do something because they want to be nice only. They do it because they know it will make them money. I can see Sony looking at what PC does from those standpoints, even the refund policy, and changing it up because they want people to spend money with them. They can't do that successfully if their competition is doing things they aren't. The need to commoditize things customers actually want will always set precedence over them simply wanting to do **** to screw us over. That's just historically true for successful companies. Amazon is a great example of this. They were in the red for decades to make sure they did all the right moves to convince shoppers to use their platform, including undercutting mom and pop stores amongst other shady ****. I think the irrational part of how you're thinking is because those things you're mentioning; raising prices on digital only even we see costs are actually going down, taking games away just because they can. These things just don't make sense in and of themselves. Companies cannot make money doing what you're saying they might do and they know that. Even if they wanted to try it, they'll lose. There's a huge difference in taking chances with new technology and just making dumb decisions because you can. Also, 360 was not very successful lol. It was their most successful console but it wasn't a success in terms of consoles in general. It's crazy to even say that because it was wildly popular but that's neither here nor there. Unfortunately inflation rates and the overall economy has done that to the hardware. That's no fault of either company, truly. I think consumers should be worried about costs, but not games being taken away arbitrarily. That's what I'm getting at. That's the irrational part to me. We weren't even discussing costs. I agree with you on that and I do think that will be what causes an issue not digital vs physical. Great time talking with you by the way bro. Truly mean that. Good responses from you overall. I love it.

• 
  Sneha Tiwari (@SnehaTiwariii) reported 30 minutes ago

  @amazon @amazonIN I want to return a parcel, and you guys are telling me to go to a post office, bear the expense of the courier, and then return it. Is it a joke ???? What pathetic service is this , your delivered product is already a disaster and the audacity to TELL ME TO RETURN IT ALL BY MYSELF. Fix it asap

• 
  Joseph (@Perma_banned_me) reported 34 minutes ago

  @TonyHursh @realsashastone X, Google, and Amazon aren't the Internet or AI. You just named some sites living on a server you send a request to using TCP/IP over the Internet. Those websites don't require AI or new hyperscale data centers. The Internet isn't defined by "things most people like". Those things operated without AI. Before telling someone else they don't know what ******** they are talking about, you should learn something about what ******** you're talking about.

• 
  Edwar (@Edward13T) reported 37 minutes ago

  @svocktigon @ariaradnia Did markets know something we don't when they sold google down to 150? Or microsft in the 340s? Or amazon in the 199s? Sometimes you gotta do the real research, not assume they know something or they don't. Realising that many prices action moves happem due to short term.

• 
  divyam (@whoisdivyam) reported 37 minutes ago

  Are we really solving the right problems?? we are solving two biggest issues. user faces subscription fatigue/ tools juggling, we created a pay per task model in agents world - something never done before. we are solving distribution for ai builders, taking care of all the compliances, payments etc Think of us as a amazon for ai agents. User pay per task, ai builder earns whenever their agent is used.