1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Amazon
  4. Outage Map
Amazon

Amazon Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Amazon users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Amazon, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Amazon users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Amazon (Amazon.com) is the world’s largest online retailer and a prominent cloud services provider. Originally a book seller but has expanded to sell a wide variety of consumer goods and digital media as well as its own electronic devices.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Kefar Yona, Central District 1
Monterrey, NLE 1
Monroe, NC 1
San Jose, CA 2
Santa Cruz, CA 1
Paris, Île-de-France 18
Volta Redonda, RJ 1
Libreville, Estuaire 1
Warner Robins, GA 1
Flers, Normandy 1
Owego, NY 1
Mississauga, ON 1
Grand Coulee, WA 1
Sanguinet, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Bigastro, Valencia 1
Perth, WA 1
Dallas, TX 1
Seattle, WA 4
Barcelona, Catalonia 1
Oak Lawn, IL 1
Castelsarrasin, Occitanie 1
Salzburg, Salzburg 1
Fort Smith, AR 1
Los Angeles, CA 4
Chicago, IL 4
Fléron, Wallonia 1
Melbourne, VIC 1
Township of Evan, KS 9
Lillers, Hauts-de-France 1
Ciudad Jardín, MEX 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • ukhosla
    Umang Khosla (@ukhosla) reported

    @amazonIN @AmazonHelp - I have written a mail yesterday to customer service asking about my refund & got no answer. When I raise a question here, I am told to write to customer service via mail & even then I get no answer or solution to the problem. Pathetic service from Amazon

  • RiteChoice23
    Babatunde E. Daramola (@RiteChoice23) reported

    Within minutes, 85 percent of Fastly's global network started returning errors. Amazon, Reddit, the New York Times, the UK government's own website, all down at once, not because of an attack, but because of how tightly coupled the edge network was.

  • subaruyourichi
    miru (@subaruyourichi) reported

    @help_delhivery @DelhiveryLtd This is getting absurd. Yet again my Amazon parcel AWB 13372288728993 is marked "delivery attempted — incomplete address" with NO call, NO message from your agent. Same address has received 3 other parcels without issue. Peak carelessness from your agent!

  • rinkumalik297
    Rinku Malik (@rinkumalik297) reported

    @AmazonFresh I am trying to order by Amazon fresh delivery pin code 143001 Amritsar Punjab receive error message all location, is We're temporarily unable to deliver orders please help and provide reason for this error

  • LearnInvest2026
    LearnInvest (@LearnInvest2026) reported

    ⚡ Customers are funding part of the GPUs. Why does Oracle still face credit pressure? 【Daily · 2026-07-22】 Oracle now presents a striking paradox. The prepaid and customer-supplied hardware portions of its large AI contracts total $75B. That can include customers prepaying Oracle to buy GPUs or supplying GPUs themselves. Yet on July 9, S&P Global Ratings cut Oracle's long-term issuer credit rating from BBB to BBB-, with a stable outlook. The rating remains investment grade, but it now sits at the lowest rung. Meanwhile, a 902MW AI campus in Wisconsin has exposed Oracle to a conditional financial-security estimate of more than $7B. S&P's action addressed Oracle's overall rising business risk and weaker cash flow. It was not a ruling on Wisconsin or the $75B hardware structure. The value of placing these clues together is different: They show that customer funding can remove one layer of capital risk without removing the others. The short answer is that an AI data center is not one GPU purchase. It is a stack of long-term contracts across four balance sheets. 〔Chart 1: One AI campus, four balance sheets〕 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1. The AI customer It may sign a multiyear compute contract, prepay for hardware or supply GPUs. Its risk is long-term payment and demand. 2. The cloud operator It integrates GPUs, networking, software and facilities into usable compute. Its risks include execution and utilization. At Lighthouse, Oracle subsidiary OACS is the entity taking electric service. 3. The data-center developer It prepares land, buildings, cooling and long-term facility capacity. Vantage describes Lighthouse as a 902MW development with roughly $15B of investment. 4. The utility It may arrange generation, grid and dedicated interconnection assets before the load arrives, then recover those costs over years. At very large, dedicated and power-first AI campuses, technology investment increasingly needs to be understood through the financing logic of infrastructure. Contracts can move risk. They cannot make it disappear. ━━━━━━━━━━━━ The $75B and >$7B solve different problems Oracle's $75B addresses who funds part of the hardware upfront. It is not all cash received by Oracle, and it is not specific to Lighthouse. Wisconsin's >$7B estimate addresses a different question: If a data center ultimately uses less power than promised, who pays for the infrastructure built for it? Oracle says Lighthouse could need more than $7B of financial security if the current tariff rule applies and OACS receives no exemption. The amount would cover unrecovered asset costs for subscribed generation and dedicated distribution facilities, plus certain tariff charges. Bank letters of credit would be the more likely form of support. This is not a bill, fine or cash already paid. If Oracle performs, it does not pay $7B as a bill. But it still pays for the support and uses credit capacity. So the two numbers cannot be netted: ▸ $75B shifts part of the hardware funding burden ▸ >$7B addresses exit risk tied to dedicated utility assets ▸ Oracle sits between the two, receiving customer support while potentially committing its own or bank credit to remaining risks 〔Chart 2: Hardware funding and utility exit protection are different layers〕 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ The real risk is not high spending alone. It is a mismatch between revenue timing and asset recovery. Amazon says AWS must lay out cash for land, power, buildings, chips, servers and networking gear 6 to 24 months before customer billing begins. But those assets do not expire together: ▸ Chips, servers and networking: about 5 to 6 years ▸ Oracle uncommenced data-center leases: 15 to 19 years ▸ Certain WEC wind and solar resources: 20 years under its May 2026 presentation, then still subject to the Wisconsin PSC's final written order ▸ Data centers: more than 30 years Microsoft also had $196.6B of additional leases, primarily for data centers, that had not yet commenced at the end of March. Their terms range from one to 21 years. Oracle's fiscal 2026 10-K disclosed $260B of additional data-center lease commitments that had not yet commenced. Neither number is current borrowing or cash due today. But both show why current capex and operating cash flow miss long-term facility commitments that have already been signed. A mismatch appears when: ▸ Rent and power obligations begin before the workload is ready ▸ GPUs need another refresh while facility and power costs still have years left to recover ▸ The original customer exits while the site's scale, location or design slows alternative use The reverse can also be true. If contracts, prepayments and minimum payments cover the main recovery period, and other creditworthy tenants can use the site, the mismatch may remain a construction-phase timing issue rather than become a credit problem. 〔Chart 3: Billing, hardware, facilities and power have different recovery periods〕 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ Why does Oracle's pressure reach the credit market faster? This is not a story in which Oracle carries risk and the rest of Big Tech does not. Microsoft's uncommenced leases and Amazon's cash-cycle explanation show that even cash-rich hyperscalers lock in years of facilities and customer commitments. The difference is how much operating cash flow can absorb the gap, and how much risk must be placed with bondholders, shareholders, landlords, customers and banks. Oracle generated about $32.0B of operating cash flow in fiscal 2026, spent about $55.7B on capex and reported negative $23.7B of free cash flow. It has also used debt and equity financing to support the expansion. This does not mean Oracle cannot raise capital. The $75B customer-hardware structure is a real buffer. But if power is delayed, customer terms change or financing costs rise, and customer payments or asset reuse cannot absorb the gap, pressure is more likely to reach the next campus. The BBB- downgrade highlights a crucial distinction: Having a large order book and safely carrying the balance sheet until those orders become cash are two different achievements. Investors should ask three questions: ▸ Who pays upfront? ▸ Do revenue and cost timelines align? ▸ If demand changes, do cancellation payments, guarantees or reuse arrangements cover unrecovered costs? The next AI infrastructure winner may not be the company announcing the most gigawatts. It may be the one that converts announced capacity into financeable, monetizable megawatts with clear exit compensation or reuse arrangements. 〔Chart 4: Announced MW is not necessarily bankable MW〕 Sources: Oracle, Microsoft, Amazon and WEC Energy Group official materials; Wisconsin PSC and Oracle regulatory affidavit; Vantage Data Centers; S&P Global Ratings. Charts: LearnInvest.

  • SUCCESSMAPPERS
    Pietro Mappers (of Success Mappers) (@SUCCESSMAPPERS) reported

    Amazon SEO isn't just stuffing keywords; it’s diagnosing your funnel. No impressions? You have an indexing or bid problem. Impressions but no clicks? You have a Main Image or Price problem. Fix the exact bottleneck before changing random variables. #AmazonSEO

  • tdharris20
    Tom (@tdharris20) reported

    Bezos is a terrible person. The way he runs Amazon nobody should want him anywhere near LFC but as usual, all the idiots on here are just going "omg he's so rich!" 🤤🤤

  • FearlessVoicee
    Daniel Kinley (@FearlessVoicee) reported

    @AmazonHelp I’m gonna reply really quick. I did replace the order by updating my drivers license information. I think I fixed the problem, but I will send a message and have you take a look just to make sure. hold on one second

  • Bobby1479644
    Bobby (@Bobby1479644) reported

    @nyy10453 @pittsburghfan68 @thehdroom Amazon lost mine too! Was lucky enough to get in on second round. But that’s been first real issue I’ve had with amazon in over a decade!!

  • cjtrapp
    🇺🇸 Chris Trapp ₿ 🟠🌎 (@cjtrapp) reported

    @amazon Seeing a new trend with orders of anything sold as a "multi pack" showing up as only one item. Happened 3 times in the past 2 months after years of zero issues with this. Anyone else experiencing this?

  • AmazonHelp
    Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported

    @rinkumalik297 We are sorry to know that you are facing an issue with us on ordering products from Amazon Fresh at your location. Kindly check periodically and place an order once the service restores. -Siddarda

  • jainarpan13
    Arpan Jain (@jainarpan13) reported

    Between all this got a call from Mohit again today because I gave him 1star rating in everything. Now he is insisting me to remove that and then he will be able to resolve the issue. I am surprised by this behaviour of yours @AmazonHelp how can you insist customer to give goodr

  • curraheevet
    randomtexasdude (@curraheevet) reported

    @PlumbNick Florida workers are getting ****** over so Amazon can shut down and FULLY AUTOMATE two warehouses for the next two years. (FIFY) Once fully automated, they won't hire the employees back.

  • Blackwellboy
    BlackwellBoy (@Blackwellboy) reported

    for all of those following along this bs scenario I had to endure. I finally have an outcome. amazon: we need the police report police: we legally cannot give him that report amazon ecr team : we need the police report my bank: here's your money back case closed i guess. not by amazon though. amazon is still waiting on the report. only issue is now, i dont trust to order through the same place again and the prices have went up by several thousand dollars where i live. why dont they have a service that records high value items as they are packaged to avoid issues like this? my guess is it by not doing so, it saves them a lot of money by being able to drop the items back in to new stock that were returns. @NVIDIAAI best price you can ship me a new founders? haha.

  • ExMachina498
    DeusExMachina (@ExMachina498) reported

    @rupertsmom1 @ImMeme0 @amazon How did you find a number for Amazon? I’ve only been able to chat with bots whenever I had an issue

Check Current Status