Amazon status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon users through our website.

• Website Down (46%)
• Errors (29%)
• Sign in (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Gretz-Armainvilliers	Errors	2 hours ago
Marquette	Website Down	6 hours ago
Doncaster	Website Down	6 hours ago
Paris	Errors	7 hours ago
Vancouver	Errors	8 hours ago
Ingwiller	Sign in	8 hours ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  JayCap (@JayCap27) reported 30 seconds ago

  @FLCons The problem is Amazon never investigates. They just let people steal. They really don’t care until a police report is filed with proof.

• 
  Neffoc (@neffoc21405) reported 4 minutes ago

  @shkeela1278 Yup. Not a problem. People suck and Amazon/whole foods delivers.

• 
  Martin Lostak - $12M in Ads - Creative Strategist (@Martin_Lostak) reported 7 minutes ago

  Biggest shifts that actually moved the needle for DTC brands I work with: - ditching "vibe-based" creative for research-backed angles - reading Amazon reviews like a copywriter, not a consumer - Creative Strategy as the system, not the afterthought - matrix testing winners instead of chasing new concepts - mapping awareness stages before writing a single hook - ignoring what competitors are doing and listening to what customers are saying - killing ads early, doubling down fast - treating Meta like a direct response channel, not a brand one - never guessing on positioning

• 
  Steb (@StebieVunder) reported 9 minutes ago

  @TwitchSupport wtf is this about? do yall have zero accountability @amazon do I have to make my infinite support ticket again for another issue along with yall seemingly stopping my google chrome from accessing your website on both mobile and windows? yall ever gonna answer my support questions here or you just not good for nothing

• 
  jrbergsten (@jrbergsten) reported 13 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp @amazon Hi Brandon. This post has all of the information you need. A DM only makes the issue private and less embarrassing to @Amazon.

• 
  Manu (@manueth13) reported 14 minutes ago

  @PanasonicIndia @AmazonHelp @PanasonicIndia As a customer, this entire experience has been extremely traumatic for me, both mentally and physically. Instead of enjoying a product I paid for, I have spent weeks dealing with constant issues, follow-ups, technician visits, and uncertainty. What makes it even more frustrating is that the problem was not caused by me. The defect existed from the beginning and should have been identified during installation. Customers should not have to suffer because a defective product was not properly inspected.

• 
  Vermontexan (@vermontexan) reported 16 minutes ago

  @GraduatedBen They unfortunately do not sell incandescent bulbs at Target, ACE Hardware or anywhere I know..one must purchase from Amazon where most of them are broken upon delivery. ???

• 
  Johnny (@Johnnyblu84) reported 16 minutes ago

  Part4/4 Only orders I had delivered without issue was trough "Shipped with Amazon/Amazon Logistics" I understand the USPS is in rough shape right now and I am not trying to knock them down more, But come on, are my items getting lost of the truck or what

• 
  Sean Polley (@SeanPolley) reported 17 minutes ago

  SpaceX Is Three Businesses Wearing One Name Ask ten people what SpaceX does and most will say rockets. A few years ago that answer was complete. It isn't anymore. The company lists publicly this week under the ticker SPCX. Before the headlines settle on what it's worth, it's worth understanding what it has actually become, because the single name on the ticker covers at least three separate businesses, each with its own economics. Here is how I'd break it down for an investor trying to see past the noise. The part that actually makes money Most of SpaceX's revenue has nothing to do with sending anyone into space. It comes from Starlink, the satellite internet network now serving more than 10 million subscribers across over 100 countries. More than 10,000 satellites support it, and the subscriber count has nearly doubled in 15 months. The old telecom giants needed decades to reach customer bases that size. The financials follow. Starlink revenue climbed about 50% last year to $11.4 billion, roughly two-thirds of everything the company takes in. It's also profitable, and it grows more profitable with scale. Each subscriber pays every month, and that predictable income funds the next batch of satellites. The closest analogy is the cloud business buried inside Amazon. A quiet compounding machine sitting inside a company most people file under something else entirely. The part that built the moat The rockets are still the foundation, even if they aren't the cash register. Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, the Dragon capsule, and the much larger Starship handle NASA flights, defense payloads, and commercial cargo. That work brought in about $4.1 billion in 2025, and SpaceX carried more than 80% of everything humanity put into orbit that year. That last figure is the real story. If you build satellites, sensors, or anything else headed for space, you generally need SpaceX to get it there. The company owns the on-ramp. What it doesn't own yet is easy profit from this segment. A single Falcon 9 flight runs somewhere between $15 million and $28 million, and developing Starship has already absorbed more than $15 billion. The launch business buys position and leverage. It hasn't started handing back cash. The part most people miss Here's where it gets interesting. In February 2026 SpaceX acquired xAI, the company behind the Grok models, and with it the X platform. So a share of SpaceX is now also a share of one of the larger artificial intelligence operations on the planet. The pieces fit together. xAI supplies the models, X supplies real-time data and a distribution channel, and two of the world's largest compute clusters, Colossus and Colossus II, supply the horsepower. That segment generated around $3.2 billion last year, and the contracts keep getting larger. SpaceX recently agreed to rent computing capacity to Anthropic, the maker of Claude, for a reported $1.25 billion a month. That's one customer. The company estimates the long-term market for this work near $28.5 trillion. Seeing the whole company Put the three together and the picture changes. SpaceX is a global internet utility, the gatekeeper to orbit, and a major AI platform, all operating under one roof and one ticker. For the investors I advise, the takeaway isn't whether SpaceX is impressive. It plainly is. The real questions are quieter. How would a position like this change your concentration and liquidity? Does it move the plan you already have forward, or just add excitement to it? This is exactly the kind of decision that should start with a conversation, not a click. Have it before the listing opens, while there's still time to think clearly. Sit down with your advisor, walk through how a holding like this fits the portfolio you already own, and decide whether it belongs there on the merits rather than the momentum. Whether SpaceX is right for your investment portfolio is a question worth answering deliberately, ahead of the moment everyone else is reacting.

• 
  William Stickevers (@wstickevers) reported 26 minutes ago

  It's not just Bitcoin that's down: The percentage below from their All-Time High: Eli Lilly: 0% S&P 500: -3% Apple: -8% Google: -11% Amazon: -12% Nvidia: -12% Tesla: -21% Gold: -24% Meta: -27% Microsoft: -27% Palantir: -36% Silver: -46% Bitcoin: -51% Ethereum: -67% MicroStrategy: -78%

• 
  Pulkit Saraf (@Pulkit_Saraf) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Sharanyashettyy @amazonIN amazon lost the plot shortly after bezos stepped down.

• 
  Matt (@MattNDallasTX) reported 29 minutes ago

  @amznsellerhelp 5. I paid $1,500 to get an Amazon children's product certificate, but Amazon allowed the other sellers to quickly jump on my listing without also paying to for the product to be tested. 6. Other Amazon sellers will keep lowering the price, so your ROI is always going down

• 
  Kitty (@Kitty__Jenny) reported 31 minutes ago

  Was somewhat heartbroken by just how bad The Devil Wears Prada 2 was​ For a film that claims to criticise big tech’s encroachment on the arts, it sure does a lot to perpetuate the problem (What sort of production team bases their villain on Jeff Bezos while also featuring Amazon product placements?!?) I have channelled my rage into investigating how AI, algorithms, and social media are reshaping Hollywood But also arguing that there are better, more hopeful ways for tech and art to min

• 
  Boney Eyes Smith (@JohnKrawczykJr) reported 33 minutes ago

  @hansenry @Rivian If it weren't for Amazon, Rivian would be in big trouble.

• 
  Mr.Marwadi (@marwadimoney) reported 35 minutes ago

  Flipkart is hands down the worst e commerce store in India. Never buy from them. You will waste your money and time. Pay a bit more on Amazon but spare yourself the headache at Flipkart. @Flipkart @flipkartsupport

• 
  AL822 (@AAmbler34651) reported 35 minutes ago

  @its_The_Dr This is how you cure animal rapists to never **** ever again. It's a livestock castration tool. Just put the band on the tool, stretch it open and place one around the penis and release the tool and repeat with one around the *******. With in an hour, problem solved. Buy on Amazon

• 
  Soham jain (@Jsohamm) reported 41 minutes ago

  @amazon @AmazonHelp @amazonIN Pls let me know till what time you guys will goona resolve the issue. I am not here to loss my money on platform fees again and again.

• 
  🍃🍓🌸Mercy🌸🍓🍃 (@glowin_melanin) reported 41 minutes ago

  Instagram is just as big as Amazon. How in the hell do they not have a tech support number???? As many times accounts get h*cked, disabled, or shut down out of the blue, there needs to be a number. That help center is just a dead end “solution” that just makes everything worse.

• 
  Chris Hawkins (@upgradeoptimism) reported 43 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp any way you turn off Alexa shopping? It activates with no rhyme or reason, is slow, is not helpful. It’s seems to just add an ai generated blob of meaningless text at the top?

• 
  Johnny (@Johnnyblu84) reported 43 minutes ago

  I submitted a @USPS Missing Package request including a detailed letter outlining the on going issues of @amazon packages not making it to me. Amazon support member told me that all my packages were handed of to a Rep of USPS according to their records Part 1/4

• 
  Sir Ricky Allot (@BraRicky) reported 43 minutes ago

  Amazon update — Week 2 of building in public. Products listed: working on it. Sales: slow. Revenue: not much yet. Here's what changed this week: I stopped checking the dashboard every 20 minutes. Marcus Aurelius wrote: "Confine yourself to the present."

• 
  Dave Morgan (@mrdavemorgan) reported 43 minutes ago

  The online shopping experience for @Walmart is just crap. Have to sign in with my password. Then they have to send a code to my email. Then I go to buy and they have to send a text to my phone. UX rule no. 1: don't interrupt a customer when he's ready to buy. Amazon got the sale

• 
  CMA Ram (@ram4durgamaa) reported 44 minutes ago

  @CostarCosmos @amazon Costar is not answering, customer warranty issues. It just creates a tickets and forgets. Anyone can help? is this company still open? i had bought a product from amazon, it has warranty until Dec2026. But i doubt costarcosmos replies by that time.

• 
  Sean Polley (@SeanPolley) reported 47 minutes ago

  SpaceX Is Three Businesses Wearing One Name Ask ten people what SpaceX does and most will say rockets. A few years ago that answer was complete. It isn't anymore. The company lists publicly next week under the ticker SPCX. Before the headlines settle on what it's worth, it's worth understanding what it has actually become, because the single name on the ticker covers at least three separate businesses, each with its own economics. Here is how I'd break it down for an investor trying to see past the noise. The part that actually makes money Most of SpaceX's revenue has nothing to do with sending anyone into space. It comes from Starlink, the satellite internet network now serving more than 10 million subscribers across over 100 countries. More than 10,000 satellites support it, and the subscriber count has nearly doubled in 15 months. The old telecom giants needed decades to reach customer bases that size. The financials follow. Starlink revenue climbed about 50% last year to $11.4 billion, roughly two-thirds of everything the company takes in. It's also profitable, and it grows more profitable with scale. Each subscriber pays every month, and that predictable income funds the next batch of satellites. The closest analogy is the cloud business buried inside Amazon. A quiet compounding machine sitting inside a company most people file under something else entirely. The part that built the moat The rockets are still the foundation, even if they aren't the cash register. Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, the Dragon capsule, and the much larger Starship handle NASA flights, defense payloads, and commercial cargo. That work brought in about $4.1 billion in 2025, and SpaceX carried more than 80% of everything humanity put into orbit that year. That last figure is the real story. If you build satellites, sensors, or anything else headed for space, you generally need SpaceX to get it there. The company owns the on-ramp. What it doesn't own yet is easy profit from this segment. A single Falcon 9 flight runs somewhere between $15 million and $28 million, and developing Starship has already absorbed more than $15 billion. The launch business buys position and leverage. It hasn't started handing back cash. The part most people miss Here's where it gets interesting. In February 2026 SpaceX acquired xAI, the company behind the Grok models, and with it the X platform. So a share of SpaceX is now also a share of one of the larger artificial intelligence operations on the planet. The pieces fit together. xAI supplies the models, X supplies real-time data and a distribution channel, and two of the world's largest compute clusters, Colossus and Colossus II, supply the horsepower. That segment generated around $3.2 billion last year, and the contracts keep getting larger. SpaceX recently agreed to rent computing capacity to Anthropic, the maker of Claude, for a reported $1.25 billion a month. That's one customer. The company estimates the long-term market for this work near $28.5 trillion. Seeing the whole company Put the three together and the picture changes. SpaceX is a global internet utility, the gatekeeper to orbit, and a major AI platform, all operating under one roof and one ticker. For the investors I advise, the takeaway isn't whether SpaceX is impressive. It plainly is. The real questions are quieter. How would a position like this change your concentration and liquidity? Does it move the plan you already have forward, or just add excitement to it? This is exactly the kind of decision that should start with a conversation, not a click. Have it before the listing opens, while there's still time to think clearly. Sit down with your advisor, walk through how a holding like this fits the portfolio you already own, and decide whether it belongs there on the merits rather than the momentum. Whether SpaceX is right for your investment portfolio is a question worth answering deliberately, ahead of the moment everyone else is reacting.

• 
  The Source Approach (@sourceapproach) reported 50 minutes ago

  High Amazon TACoS is a brand pollution symptom, not just a bid issue. Fragmented messaging causes Brand Signal Loss. Unify your D.U.B.S. with a Brand OS to win.

• 
  Naman (@UserStoic69) reported 50 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Not working

• 
  RAJ KUMAR NUKALA (@RaazKumarNukala) reported 51 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Your representatives, Bhargavi (07 June) and Alekya (09 June), assured me that the order would be delivered by EOD. I have now been informed that the shipment was being returned to the seller due to a quality issue. Why was I given incorrect updates?

• 
  Javier Uribe (@Spectralegato) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Wario64 Amazon took the page down 😬

• 
  Melissa Bradshaw 🤠🐴🙏🇺🇸 (@JewelMeone) reported 54 minutes ago

  .@RepMaryMiller @SenatorDurbin @SenDuckworth Oracle: 3,126 H-1B petitions, 30,000 laid off. Amazon: 2,675 petitions, 30,000 cut. H-1B workers paid 15% less. The cap is broken. Pass S. 2941 to close the loopholes.

• 
  Venky S (@svenky608) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Kilaruness @Swiggy @SwiggyCares Most of these 10 min insta companies inc Amazon IN have taken the customer for granted. Of course some of us squeezed their nuts so hard that now most of us have to endure the pain. Boils down to the civility, accountability and decorum among us inc Indian Corporate which ~ 0