Amazon status: access issues and outage reports
Problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: website down, errors and sign in.
Amazon (Amazon.com) is the world’s largest online retailer and a prominent cloud services provider. Originally a book seller but has expanded to sell a wide variety of consumer goods and digital media as well as its own electronic devices.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Amazon reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
June 5: Problems at Amazon
Amazon is having issues since 05:00 AM EST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon users through our website.
- Website Down (45%)
- Errors (29%)
- Sign in (25%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Amazon outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Sign in | 1 hour ago |
|
|
Sign in | 3 hours ago |
|
|
Website Down | 4 hours ago |
|
|
Website Down | 4 hours ago |
|
|
Sign in | 4 hours ago |
|
|
Sign in | 5 hours ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Amazon Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
zerohedge (@zerohedge) reportedPremarket movers Mag 7 stocks are mostly lower (Nvidia -1.3%, Microsoft +0.4%, Tesla +0.1%, Apple -0.1%, Alphabet -0.4%, Amazon -0.2%, Meta -0.2%, Nvidia -1.3%) Argan (AGX) rises 11% after the power-plant construction company reported first-quarter revenue above what analysts expected. Chipotle (CMG) is up about 2% after JPMorgan upgraded to overweight, citing a “rare valuation opportunity” for the stock. Cooper Cos (COO) gains 6% after the lens maker posted second quarter sales and profit that topped estimates. Docusign Inc. (DOCU) is down 4% after the company provided an in-line forecast for second quarter revenue. Analysts notes that its still a wait-and-see story as the company ramps Intelligent Agreement Management, its AI-powered platform for contracts. G-III Apparel Group (GIII) rises 8% after the clothing company boosted its adjusted earnings per share guidance for the full year. Guidewire (GWRE) is down 12% after the midpoint of the software company’s subscription and support revenue forecast for the fourth quarter fell short of the average analyst estimate. Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) slides 10% after the company lowered its annual forecast due to deteriorating performance in North America. Merlin Inc. (MRLN) soars 29% after the defense technology company announced the successful completion of the critical design review for its C-130J autonomy program with the US Special Operations Command. Samsara (IOT) slips 2% after the GPS fleet tracking company posted first-quarter results. ServiceTitan (TTAN) jumps 15% after the software solutions firm reported revenue for the first quarter that beat the average analyst estimate.
-
Subrata Mal (@subrata_mal) reported@AmazonHelp @AmazonNews_IN @AmazonNews Order Id: 402-5031500-6193131 Item Received at your warehouse on May 23. Refund of ₹1,50,990 still not processed 13 days later. Multiple CS + escalation calls - no one has any clue what the issue is. Initiating chargeback + consumer forum!
-
Roli Tiwari Mishra सनातनी डॉ रोली तिवारी मिश्रा (@RoliTiwariMish1) reported@amazon hello @amazon your one delivery boy misbehaved with my 78 years old cancer patient mother who couldn’t walk properly He went to deliver one patient care item And She was alone and walking slowly to receive that He not only misbehaved but abused too Your toll free number not working
-
Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported@JRathod1174 @JRathod1174 Kindly copy the link provided earlier > paste it on a 'web browser' > login to your Amazon account > connect with our Social Media team via chat. -Shareef
-
Gaurav Chand (@gauravchand) reported@AmazonHelp #amazonindia customer support supervisors have accepted what I said today as well as few days ago and refunded the Marketplace few two times including a gift certificate for Amazon's error. So please update yourself instead of cut/paste answers. Use your mind . Use logic.
-
Narita Brian (@TracenMaverick) reported@MayanoTopGun24W “Yeah, when I graduated I was finally able to get more plushies,” she said, plopping Maya down onto the edge of her bed, while she moved around her stash to make room for a second person. There were multiple plushies of Biwa Hayahide, Hishi Amazon, a beat-up, worn-down teddy—
-
Sajana Yasas (@ddsyasas) reportedIn March, Amazon went down twice. The worse outage wiped out nearly 99% of US orders for about six hours, roughly 6.3 million orders gone. The cause wasn't a hack. It was AI-written code that reached production without proper review. I build software, and my reaction wasn't "how did they let that happen." It was recognition. Then I read the 2026 data. Black Duck audited 947 real codebases and found vulnerabilities per codebase more than doubled in a year, up 107%. Veracode tested over 100 models and found about 45% of AI code ships with an OWASP Top 10 flaw, and bigger models aren't any safer. The promise was that AI would reduce the work. The data says it just moved downstream. Harness found the heaviest AI users hit more deployment problems, slower incident recovery, and 96% of them get pulled into nights and weekends. AI can write code. It can't inherit a system. It doesn't know what's fragile or what breaks if you touch it. So it ships code that's locally plausible and occasionally globally dangerous. We got faster at writing code and no faster at trusting it. The real question isn't who writes the code. It's who's accountable when it ships. Full piece in the first reply.
-
GodsALLin1 (@APHRIOSA) reportedThe problem with dopamine regulation isn't that people don't consent. It's that it edits the part of you that does the choosing. Everything else you buy on Amazon, you stay the same person afterward — you bought a blender, you're still you, you can decide tomorrow the blender was
-
Al Krai (@al_krai97487) reportedI am not sure what it is but, @amazon deliveries always, I mean always have something wrong with them. The service has gone down hill!
-
Daley (@DaleyFinX) reportedEveryone is playing checkers with AI exposure. Buy Nvidia. Buy Microsoft. Buy Amazon. Congratulations, you own the same portfolio as every 401k in America and you are priced for perfection at 35x forward earnings. The real money in AI infrastructure is not in the flagship names. It is in the unglamorous plumbing nobody wants to talk about at dinner parties. Think about what a hyperscaler data center actually needs to run. Copper wiring. Specialty cooling systems. Fiber interconnects. Power distribution units. Concrete. Steel. Transformers that utilities are backordered on for 18 to 24 months. The picks-and-shovels layer is not semiconductors anymore. It is industrial electrical infrastructure, and that trade is still early. Vertiv, Eaton, Acuity, nVent. These are not glamorous. They are not trending on fintwit. They are printing cash because every hyperscaler on earth is trying to solve the same thermal management and power delivery problem simultaneously. The bottleneck in AI buildout is not compute. It is electrons and the physical systems that move them safely to a rack pulling 60 to 120 kilowatts. Grid interconnection queues in Virginia alone stretch past 2027. Every MW of approved capacity is a moat. Go deeper and the signal gets louder. Specialty gas suppliers for chip fabs. High-purity quartz. Rare industrial gases like neon and xenon that barely register as an asset class but are structurally critical to lithography. These are not meme trades. They are chokepoints. The market prices AI exposure at the application layer and the chip layer. The smart money is quietly accumulating the layer below that, where margins are sticky, switching costs are enormous, and the customers are signing 10 to 15 year contracts because they have no choice. Legacy SaaS is getting commoditized by the same models everyone is celebrating. Physical infrastructure cannot be commoditized by a software update. That asymmetry is the entire thesis.
-
CatFoodie🇮🇱 (@AshokasMom) reported@Jack2LOneill @RebelAdmiral @MichaelShanks Calm down and think. No sane person wants Amazon touching Stargate. Remember what happened to Star Wars. Better left alone than ruined.
-
Yasemin Kaya (@yasekay) reported@AmazonHelp @urssaarthak Welcome to the club.... they deliver wrong abd make you wait as if it is your problem
-
JCanes (@Caldwell676) reported@drakesmith__ Ive been researching the living hell out if them. The 2 that I’ve narrowed down for this price point is the Bushnell Launch Pro indoors, and the Skytrack plus. For the price they seem neck and neck. Its already in my amazon shopping cart.
-
surbhi agarwal (@surbhiagarwal52) reported@amazon @AmazonHelp @amazonIN happening across India...same issue in Bangalore
-
Bernard Winter2k24 (@Winter2k22) reportedAnd fans, possibly half the world of 'Stargate' followers,cancels their Amazon...(slow clap to ones in charge really. 'sits on IP to do whatever want to it. or FREEZE it.')
-
Castañeda (@QZIZA) reportedThe May jobs report dropped this morning. Here’s what they won’t lead with. April’s 115K “surprise” will be revised down ~60K in 2-3 months. That’s been the pattern every May for four straight years. The real number is closer to 55K. In a 160-million-person workforce. Weekly jobless claims just hit 225K highest since the Iran war started in February. That’s not a coincidence. That’s causation. Federal jobs: down again. Manufacturing: down. Information sector: down. The sectors actually building things are contracting. Healthcare and warehousing are carrying the whole report. You can’t run an economy on hospital beds and Amazon trucks forever. The Strait of Hormuz closes in February. Energy costs spike. Supply chains reroute. By June, it shows up in the unemployment line. War has a billing cycle. They’ll call this a “resilient labor market.” Resilient for who?
-
sahil gadhia (@gadhia_sahil) reported@AmazonHelp The issue pertains not to a redelivery attempt, but rather to misleading customer communication.Despite my presence at home, no delivery was attempted. Nevertheless, I received a WhatsApp message indicating that payment was not ready for a COD order, which is inaccurate.
-
. (@j_lufc_3) reported@PolitlcsUK @Telegraph Why doesn’t he just have the conviction to say he means Amazon? Or have the intelligence to realise Amazon will then increase prices or more likely add additional fees onto UK SMEs using their marketplace - just moving the problem.
-
Weaverology (@weaverology) reported@TheDisproof @harmsy Basically an Amazon warehouse with computers inside. Can't see the problem. You seem to object to building absolutely everything apart from windmills.
-
Pragyan Bhattacharya (@pbhattacharya64) reportedWitnessing problem in ordering #AmazonNow since morning ... I am many facing same. Could we get an update? Of not will use other quick commerce sites @amazon @amazonIN @AmazonNews_IN
-
Jeff Abredazi (@mountainhead_ai) reported@byul_finance the layoff framing is the part investors should not flatten. Amazon is flat today, Microsoft is down 0.62%, and the AI data-center headline is really a capital-allocation fight. employees see spending versus jobs. shareholders see whether capex earns a return before depreciation catches up.
-
Zeaig - ゼアイグ (@Zeaig) reported@BaronDestructo It’s just tiring man, we have been looking forward to this for what feels like a lifetime, got hyped up by Amazon and let down before even we saw anything. I’m so tired of Shows, Movies and Games being dictated by modern trends & algorithms instead of passion and excitement.
-
Tripp (@Honest_HODL) reportedZcash $ZEC down 40% after the news of a security breach. You can find what happened yourself. Is this the end of Zcash? Maybe, it depends how irrational holders behave. Personally I think this is a good thing and shows more trust in Zcash. Every software company has security issues, from Microsoft to Amazon, some vulnerabilities are detected after years. Many times they get fixed without you knowing. Why is this good? You can only find bugs when looking for them. So the team is actively testing the code and looking for security issues. Most of the time we learn about them after an exploit. I don't think anyone found out and abused this bug. Another reason why you should not be concerned is because tools to detects these issues get better. It reminds me to something else that happened. They shut down a nuclear reactor because they found little cracks. What happened? After research they found out those cracks have always been there for 40 years, but with modern equipment they can see it now. The same with Zcash code. AI found it, but where was AI the previous 4 year? Only because the tools to find weaknesses improved they managed to find it. I'm sure many security issues in other blockchains will be found as AI gets better and better. So everyone should relax. Most likely nobody exploited it, so let them handle it and verify the chain. Be happy that they take security serious and try to beat malicious actors first. Your Windows or banking app/website also had security issues and did you stop online banking? When Microsoft found a vulnerability after years did you switched to Apple or Linux? So don't be irrational, don't dump all tokens. Keep supporting privacy and this project, they take security serious. What else are you going to do? Buy a scam privacy coin? Another chain where security is an afterthought and is going to get exploited? How many big protocols have been exploited up to date? Only pyramid schemes as Luna were bound to collapse, Zcash has nothing to do with those things.
-
Robin Lobo (@robingerardlobo) reportedA lot of Amazon brands just lost Prime Day and don't know it yet. Amazon confirmed Prime Day runs the week of June 23. FBA inventory cutoff was May 27. Deal submission window closed May 26. If your inventory plan was built around a July event, you don't have a Prime Day this year. And this isn't a freak occurrence. The brands that planned early didn't need to scramble. But 6 weeks notice on a $24B event is not enough time to scramble. And the reason comes down to basic logistics… - Ocean freight from China runs 10 to 14 weeks - domestic transit and FBA receiving adds another two to three - That math only works when the calendar stands still And Amazon's calendar is no longer standing still. So the planning process has to change too. → Move to AWD as your default pathway: When Amazon pulls a deadline forward, AWD absorbs it. Direct FBA does not. → Stop building your plan around Amazon's published dates: Assume Prime Day inventory needs to be half ready by mid-May. Assume every major event has a six-week swing in either direction. Always plan for the earlier date. Prime Day moved to June with six weeks notice. The next event won't come with more warning than that.
-
Ophelia Butts ( ㅅ ) 💙 (@Ophelia_ButtsUK) reported@MeganFoxWriter @amazon Same here. Utterly broken after the last few days.
-
Admiral Ackbar (@IronBorg) reported@ResilientRye I installed a grill mesh kit from Amazon and it prevents large debris from even getting to your radiator. I’ve had it installed for years, no issues. Just keep the mesh clean and you’re good to go.
-
Sandie J (@SandieBlickem) reportedThird part sellers on Amazon are too often really awkward to deal with. I've been an !@AmazonUK customer for 30 years and not impressed with how this is functioning lately. Too much time & effort needed to try to resolve any issues you have with 3rd party goods. Any alternatives?
-
Sean Sharpe (@BornInvestor) reportedAccording to my wife the Alo narrative is bullshit. She said that every person is wearing $LULU problem is they’re all wearing dupe/fakes from Amazon and shein that fit and look exactly the same. But Lululemon is still the “brand” that everyone is wearing.
-
Dante (@thedntx) reportedThis guy built AI influencers and now rents brands an army of actors who never existed, at $2,000 per pack of 20 UGC clips. In the opening frame he looks into the lens, jabs *********** at the camera, and says: "I will show you." A second later a girl who doesn't exist repeats the exact same move, frame for frame, same brows, same palm to the chest. Then a bald guy and a man with a glass, all with the same jab, synced down to a fraction of a second. He never looked for a model and never booked a studio. He typed one prompt (red hoodie, a bottle that says "AI", kill the microphone, a bedroom with a TV) and got a character you believe from the first frame. In the old days the whole machine would kick in here: a model at $200-500 a day, a studio at $50-100 an hour, the bottle by courier, casting for every age, an editor. He hired none of them. Instead he opened Arcads, dropped in a screenshot of himself, and rewrote his looks, the product, and the background in text. The blue Versace bottle became a red cube, with zero packages shipped from the brand. The new actor was ready before the coffee went cold. The next step is even shorter. No shoot day. Source video in the left window, new face in the right, arrow up. Wan 2.2 Animate transferred all of his expressions onto a stranger in under 20 seconds. Then the loop repeats: same footage → new face → new prompt → new clip. The motion was shot once for real (brows, the jab, palm to the chest), and that's what kills the AI stiffness: the gestures ride off a live take. Meanwhile the model erases the microphone, paints in the clothing underneath, and tracks the towel on his shoulder one to one. The old way, a clip like this means an actor at $200-500 a day, a studio at $50-100 an hour, the bottle by courier. For him it's 20 seconds of rendering on a $30-50 a month subscription. He's his own model, camera operator, and studio. His actors never age, never cancel a shoot, and never ask for a raise. And he pulls money off this from three sides at once. A pack of 20 clips for an A/B test at $1,500-2,000: three emotions shot at home in a t-shirt, the rest generated in a couple of hours, 90% margin straight to him. An offer that was impossible before: any race, age, interior with your product, no product shipped. Buyers are already lined up: perfume and supplements on Amazon and Wildberries, CPA networks for gambling and dating, where creatives burn out every single day. A whole production crew collapsed into one screenshot and one piece of footage. This is where AI stopped being a tool. It's the face, the film crew, and the ad agency all at once. This is the new physics of UGC. The entire production collapsed into one prompt and one live take. He didn't replace the team. He cut the very idea of "the right face on camera" out of the launch stage. The face is just a variable now. Next, once Arcads, Wan, and TikTok talk to each other directly through MCP, all that's left of you in the chain is the Publish button. This year one piece of footage, one face that doesn't exist, and one service landed him the contracts a whole studio used to split. And in 2026 the entire UGC industry fits into one browser tab and one live movement you can put on anyone who never existed.
-
Todd Obrien (@ToddObr11806472) reported@AIandDesign Serious question - I am curious. Exactly how do Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos make your life worse? Neither has taken anything from me. I use Amazon all the time - it has been a huge benefit to me at a very low (zero?) cost. Love my Tesla and FSD. Thoroughly enjoy watching the evolution of space flight with SpaceX. I have huge issues with how Federal/State/Local governments spend our tax dollars. The Federal budget is $6T i would definitely like more transparency about how that money is spent - preferably single purpose bills. But billionaires? They have either benefitted me or had no impact.