Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Kat (@justKatsblog) reported 2 minutes ago

  @itscalledtwitta @CertainlyBitch Skyrim was broken to an extent. Battlefield was broken to an extent. Halo moves backwards We just wanna play good games doesn’t matter when

• 
  Aaron Campbell (@AaronCampbell47) reported 5 minutes ago

  FIX YOUR GAME!!!!!! 2 MAPS ON BREAKTHROUGH?! @Battlefield

• 
  Mohamed Ibrahim (@m_ibrahim_21) reported 9 minutes ago

  have been broken and defeated. The world has finally won its long and arduous battle over my soul. There is nothing to be done now except to walk the bloody battlefield and gaze upon my fallen soldiers... and weep.

• 
  Generic Name (@BrianKelly59161) reported 9 minutes ago

  @2ray_degenemax I shot A1 in basic training and I was issued A2 for service. Still remember my battlefield zero, right 20, down 2. I kinda liked the carry handles too.

• 
  Vanja 🦘 (@vanjajaja1) reported 17 minutes ago

  ai will need alignment adjustment. alignment will be socially weighted and collected with real time games democracy to be decided on the call of duty 49 battlefield, because the play of the game will generate the data that the AI needs to fix alignment

• 
  SumbadyWansToldMeh (@ToolintehShad) reported 20 minutes ago

  @schizothotep I'm actually surprised they haven't yet invented a mobile version of the daemonculaba where it is sent out roaming the battlefield looking for any injured or dying Chaos Marines to devour and spit them out as a quick fix or just to outright produce chaos spawn lol

• 
  Miad Maleki (@miadmaleki) reported 25 minutes ago

  (15/17) On "[sanctions] have mostly failed to effect the policy changes they were designed to drive." This is the essay's central conceptual error. Nate, my friend, you know should better. Sanctions are not a standalone instrument for producing "policy change." They are one part of a coercion toolkit that includes military credibility, diplomacy, allied enforcement, coalition-building, and a defined off-ramp. The piece first attacks sanctions for not doing what only the whole toolkit can do, then attacks the current campaign for using more of the toolkit; blockade, regional enforcement, secondary sanctions, snapback. Its own examples refute it. The 2003 nuclear pause happened under converging military pressure post-Iraq invasion plus economic pressure. The JCPOA was accepted under converging 2012 CBI/oil sanctions plus a credible military threat plus a snapback structure. 1988 happened under converging U.S. naval engagement plus a collapsed war economy plus battlefield defeat. The essay even concedes: "Pressure helped push Iran to temporarily pause its nuclear program during George W. Bush's administration and, later, to accept the JCPOA." That's a concession that pressure works. The rest is a redefinition of "work" as "regime collapse without other instruments," a definition no coercion theory has ever accepted.

• 
  red (@Seramurai_) reported 25 minutes ago

  @dale_stoddard Battlefield isn’t a live service game lmao

• 
  oobie (@oobiewpb) reported 27 minutes ago

  $SPX $QQQ $IWM $NVDA $SPY DLMM EARLY-WARNING SHIFT — TUESDAY, AUGUST 25 — PREMARKETSTATUS: YELLOW — TECHNOLOGY IS ATTEMPTING A CHARACTER CHANGE There is one meaningful change from yesterday worth putting on the board. Monday finished with SPX at 7652.86, down 0.3%, while Nasdaq and Russell 2000 both lost about 0.8%. Technology was again the clear problem. This morning, that leadership is trying to reverse. QQQ has reclaimed roughly 710–711 in premarket trading, and semiconductors are participating in the rebound ahead of Nvidia earnings. Nvidia, Intel, Micron and Marvell are all trading higher early. That matters because yesterday's bearish confirmation depended heavily on QQQ continuing to lead lower. Right now, it isn't. SPX OPTIONS STRUCTURE Yesterday's closing gamma model still had: Gamma flip: 7713 Put wall: 7600 Call wall: 7900 Net GEX: approximately -$30.6B per 1% move SPX closed at 7652.86 — still well underneath that gamma flip. So the negative-gamma risk has NOT disappeared. But today's SPXW chain already shows substantial positioning around 7650. Tuesday open interest is approximately 1,589 calls and 1,678 puts at that strike. That makes 7650 an especially useful opening reference again. DLMM MAP 7600 — major downside gamma rail from yesterday's positioning.7650 — immediate decision.7670–7680 — first meaningful repair.7700 — major psychological/options battlefield.7713 — yesterday's gamma-regime transition. Here's what would constitute the next MATERIAL shift: SPX holds 7650 → reclaims 7670/80 → QQQ holds its premarket recovery → IWM participates → volatility does NOT expand.If that develops, yesterday's bearish gamma environment could become considerably less threatening because price would be moving back toward the regime boundary rather than away from it.The opposite sequence is equally important:QQQ loses 710/711 → SPX loses 7650 → attempted reclaim fails → IWM resumes lower → volatility expands. Then yesterday's negative-gamma thesis is back in control, with 7600 becoming increasingly relevant. The important change this morning is therefore NOT a new gamma number. It's QQQ. Technology spent Monday leading the market down. Tuesday morning it is attempting to lead it back up. That's an EARLY WARNING of a possible character change — not confirmation yet.I want price after 9:30 to prove whether this is genuine demand or simply an overnight reset. Trade the reaction, not the premarket move.

• 
  𝐁𝐒𝐏𝟑 (@RealBSP3) reported 28 minutes ago

  @kyrtuck @SandyofCthulhu @kreutzxcoldnow He's got a solid philosophical point. Both are required, but one can logically lend more weight to either side, and people have been debating that for thousands of years without a concrete result. Pacifists won't usefully band together. If they did, they couldn't stop anything; and that includes expanding grazing lands, or simply out-picking the berries. At what point do you have a war? Is it mere starvation, or does it require active strikes? Do both sides have to take up arms on a battlefield for it to be a war, or can one side just lay down and die? When in groups, humans must protect their resources. If they do not, other humans will take them in order to prosper. That is the way of Earth. Right now, people are being slaughtered over grazing lands, and nobody here cares. They will not collectively organize an effective resistance. As a result, the more organized group rolls right over them. Both are stuck in the same limited landscape. Because civilization largely wants to remain pacifist, when possible, that bloodshed continues. Nobody steps in to stop it, because it's below media interest. Your neighbors do not consider it a war. They consider it a scuffle over a few acres of grass, and unimportant. At what point, again, does a war exist? We may have different problems, in the civilized world but, in the end, it's always just berries and grass.

• 
  🌑🕷️RiskE80🕷️🌑 (@RiskE80_) reported 30 minutes ago

  @clarityysix But then again I guess it is kindve a vague definition cuz there are games that are considered live service but have a similar content cycle like Borderlands (CoD, GTA Online, Battlefield) where they make a game, make new content, then make a new game eventually, repeat

• 
  CasualSurvivor (@CasualSurvivor) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why doesn't the game start? Restarted my PC, relogged, checked steam servers and bf servers...no idea but the game won't start. Launcher works till it says "starting game" then closes itself without any error

• 
  NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS (@NATOJFCBS) reported 31 minutes ago

  Drones are the challenge of the present. 🇪🇺 Two recent stories say it all: 🇸🇰 In Slovakia, three people were arrested over an alleged plot to set fire to a drone manufacturing facility. 🇵🇱 In Warsaw, the city is investing around PLN 1 million in a system to detect and identify drones over sensitive areas. One story is about protecting our drones. The other about protecting ourselves from them. Drones are no longer just a battlefield issue. @Poland_MOD @Slovakia_NATO #WeAreNATO

• 
  Yaboy (@Noob99Pro) reported 33 minutes ago

  @InformedSceptic @HansFiene Problem with that is that they are not trained to have å own thinking! Take out the officer and they have no clue what to do on the battlefield

• 
  Half Man (@half_man2) reported 35 minutes ago

  Young Kenyans, do not allow flashy recruitment adverts to hide the reality of military service. A foreign battlefield can bring dangers you never expected. Verify before you commit. #KaaChonjo Fake Recruitment. Dont Be Scammed.