1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. Battlefield 6
  6. ❯
  7. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Montpellier, Occitanie 3
Comuna 1, CABA 2
Naaldwijk, zh 1
Talant, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Viroflay, Île-de-France 1
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 8
Brest, Brittany 2
Le Luc, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Hannut, Wallonia 1
Laval, QC 1
Saint-Herblain, Pays de la Loire 1
Paris, Île-de-France 28
Pontoise, Île-de-France 1
Hillsboro, OH 1
Chicago, IL 1
Hinesville, GA 1
Pau, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Sarreguemines, ACAL 2
Bern, BE 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 6
Madrid, Madrid 2
Le Nouvion-en-Thiérache, Hauts-de-France 1
Toulouse, Occitanie 2
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 2
Bouranton, ACAL 1
Gijón, Asturias 1
Douai, Hauts-de-France 1
Nantes, Pays de la Loire 3
Vesoul, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Villefranche-sur-Saône, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 3
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Mukzillla
    Mukzilla (@Mukzillla) reported

    @BattlefieldComm WTF was this? Trust battlefield studies HEEEEELL NAH. 1 decent update after 9 months will not fix this

  • ChrisSlaske
    chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Zero need for proximity chat. Near zero need for server browser. Let's not fix audio, an issue since launch, here's proximity chat. they need to do some drastic map building early next year.

  • OlivierLitt
    Olivier Litou 🇨🇵 (@OlivierLitt) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Fix the f***ing broken matchmaking !

  • TyeJakTV
    Tye Jak (Eternal Heel Arc) 🖤🐅 (@TyeJakTV) reported

    @Battlefield I don't think that's what the problem is. Bigger issue is there are so many flags in conquest that the games are coming down to chopper races on back caps

  • TTVMaster118408
    TTV Master (@TTVMaster118408) reported

    @Battlefield Like honestly its ridiculous new players vs level 400 + to make it even worse the ai are just as annoying when up against them they are worse then real players while ai on my team dont even know how to walk like honestly fix this ****

  • inner_circleO7
    Doctor Ilić (@inner_circleO7) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Could you fix the goddamn directx error on nvidia 50s?

  • JundaFPS
    Junda (@JundaFPS) reported

    FIX THE BLACK SCREEN @EA_DICE

  • RobbieTroofinho
    robbie troof (@RobbieTroofinho) reported

    @matnashed @EE_Ibrahim23 Respectfully, you're making basic analytical errors. the only reason that defections were operationally viable and strategically desirable was because of SAF's operational progress on the battlefield, and it's superior strategic posture.

  • HaloSlayer2560
    UNSC John-117 (@HaloSlayer2560) reported

    @BattlefieldComm it seems the game is giving me a kernel level anti cheat error even tho I just got on the game

  • sabra_the
    Shiri_Sabra (@sabra_the) reported

    Last year 4,000 haredi Israelis began military service in the IDF(1,000 battlefield soldiers) compared to 2,800 in previous year.

  • Gbuck1968
    Gbuck1968 (@Gbuck1968) reported

    @m4xim1l1an @Maliparti4 @MelanieLatest Actually, Malcolm isn’t nearly as wrong as you’ve insinuated, and I’m sure you know that. Your post treats contested legal and historical claims as if they were settled black-letter law. They absolutely are not. UN Resolution 181 was a non-binding recommendation. The Jewish Agency accepted it as a minimum workable arrangement. The Arab side rejected it and went to war. Rejection did not confer title on the rejecters, and the recommendation never acquired the force of law. The 1949 armistice lines that followed were explicitly temporary cease-fire demarcations—not borders. Israel’s agreement to stop fighting at those lines did not convert them into its permanent frontier, any more than an armistice turns a battlefield into a deed of title. UNSC 242 does not say what you claim. It calls for withdrawal “from territories occupied,” deliberately omitting the definite article that would have required return to the 1949 lines. The drafting history is clear: language mandating full withdrawal to those lines was rejected. The resolution also affirms every state’s right to live within “secure and recognized boundaries.” That language exists precisely because the 1949 lines were neither secure nor recognized. Accepting 242 is not an admission that the West Bank was foreign sovereign territory; it is acceptance of a framework for negotiating the status of disputed land captured in a defensive war. Oslo is even more straightforward. The accords are interim self-government arrangements that expressly deferred final-status issues—borders, settlements, Jerusalem, and the status of the territories—to later negotiation. Area A/B/C were administrative zones, not a surrender of sovereignty. Treating them as proof the land “was never Israeli” is simply rewriting the text. The territory in question was never under the recognized sovereignty of a Palestinian Arab state. Jordan’s 1950 annexation was recognized by almost no one. Israel’s post-1967 control therefore did not displace a prior legitimate sovereign; it displaced an illegal occupation by a state that had joined the effort to destroy Israel. Continuous Jewish historical connection to Judea and Samaria predates every modern partition plan and is not erased by temporary lines or interim accords. Military administration and selective application of the laws of occupation are pragmatic governing tools under unresolved final status. They are not judicial confessions that the underlying title belongs to someone else. Courts use the instruments available; they do not thereby rewrite history. Temporary cease-fire lines, a carefully worded Security Council resolution, and interim autonomy deals do not extinguish prior claims or create title for the side that refused partition and lost the wars it started. The West Bank remains disputed territory. Presenting that reality as if it were closed, undisputed law does not make it so. Nice try, Max.

  • Zesksaken
    Zesk (@Zesksaken) reported

    @Battlefield fix the weapon balance.

  • CptDuDuBronze
    Captain DuDu (@CptDuDuBronze) reported

    @TobiMidnight Its more than that now brother. Its now part of the Rich's battlefield. If you recognise this you're miserable. Don't go noticing something unusual otherwise YOURE the problem.

  • CalvZynisT
    CalvZynisT (@CalvZynisT) reported

    I need an expert computer gaming nerd to come diagnose why I lag in battlefield 6. I have been gaming my whole life, kinda new to pc gaming but I ain’t that stupid. I can’t figure it out

  • GrumpyStephan
    Grumpy Old Stephan (@GrumpyStephan) reported

    @Battlefield I think part of the issue was that we had a bunch of people who weren't used to a map this size. They needed to change their tactics.

Check Current Status