Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  shameen suleman (@shameensuleman) reported 4 minutes ago

  🟥 REGIONAL 🔳 Iran and the United States exchanged further strikes overnight as the conflict continued to expand across the region. Iranian media and affiliated sources reported that U.S. forces struck the Shahid Mirzaei Tunnel entrances in Bandar Abbas, the Imam Ali missile base in Khorramabad, the maritime control tower on Larak Island, and a water desalination plant in southern Iran. Additional footage reportedly showed the entrance and exit of the Shahid Mirzaei Tunnel being struck, along with two bridges near Minab, indicating that transport infrastructure was also targeted. 🔳 Explosions were also reported in Bushehr, Darab, Kharg Island and Ahvaz. 🔳 The IRGC announced attacks on multiple U.S.-linked military sites, claiming strikes on Arifjan Base, Ali Al Salem Air Base, a weapons maintenance facility, a U.S. Navy fuel support pier and communications centre in Kuwait, Sheikh Isa Air Base and a military intelligence facility in Bahrain, and Muwaffaq Al-Salti Air Base in Jordan, where it claimed two U.S. fighter aircraft and three additional aircraft were destroyed or severely damaged. These battlefield claims have not been independently verified. 🔳 Reports also indicated that Iranian missiles and drones targeted the Saad Al-Abdullah Academy for Security Sciences in Kuwait. The reported strike has not been independently verified. 🔳 Separately, regional reports claimed air raid sirens were activated near Yanbu Port in Saudi Arabia, while Kuwait reported damage to a desalination plant, power station and petroleum facilities following Iranian attacks. Videos circulating online purport to show missile impacts at Prince Sultan Air Base, Muwaffaq Al-Salti Air Base and energy facilities in Kuwait. These reports also remain unverified. 🔳 Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei called on the Iranian people to remain united behind the country’s institutions, urging continued trust in officials across all three branches of government. He warned that the enemy must not perceive any sign of weakness and said that if Iran maintained its vigilance and precautions, “the enemy will inevitably be defeated.” 🔳 U.S. Central Command confirmed that two U.S. service members were killed in Jordan while responding to Iranian attacks, marking the first confirmed U.S. military fatalities from the latest escalation.

• 
  Mino (@MinoTheRealest) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Pecanskin30 @Battlefield A feature that does not work as intended = skill issue? I hope that’s rage bait, otherwise you must be incredibly retarded.

• 
  Niꓘ0bi1 (@Nik0bi1) reported 13 minutes ago

  @EndersFPS And you know What ? BF7 Will have the same issue 🤡 battlefield is dead !!

• 
  BALA (@pestersebester) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Useless update once again. For the love of god, fix netcode, audio and gunplay.

• 
  Canadian Professor 🇨🇦 (@canadianprof) reported 16 minutes ago

  @remarks He has bigger losing issues than to think about the things dont matter. He is losing big time in the battlefield btw.

• 
  Mason (@miscomputate) reported 19 minutes ago

  $INFQ @infleqtion The market is treating this like a busted de-**** while Washington / @DoWCTO is treating this category like strategic infrastructure. That is the huge disconnect and where most of my angst comes from. The stock price is ugly. No way around it. Macro is not friendly. Semis have been derisking. High beta names are getting hit. Oil/Iran/rates/small cap sentiment are all real issues in the short term. But the company specific and government specific story is moving in the opposite direction. That’s what I must focus on now. The market is asking: Where is the immediate revenue? Where are the awards? Where are the contracts? Why is this still trading like a speculative quantum name? Fair questions. But Washington appears to be asking something very different and is requesting it as soon as humanly possible: Who can field quantum sensors? Who can support GPS denied environments? Who can improve timing and navigation? Who can detect RF signals? Who can miniaturize cold-atom systems? This is becoming a big one. Who can support ISR, defense, space and critical infrastructure? Who can turn quantum from lab hardware into deployable systems? That is where $INFQ keeps getting stronger. Because Infleqtion is not just sitting in the “quantum computer someday” bucket. They are sitting across the table and working on the exact questions that Washington needs answered: Cold neutral atom compute/sensing. Atomic clocks. RF sensing. PNT. Defense. Space. Networking. Miniaturization. Field deployment. And the federal roadmap keeps moving straight into those lanes. Commerce LOI. White House EO signing. Matt Kinsella in the Oval Office. White House quantum summit. CNBC visibility. Barron’s coverage. QED-C Capitol Hill showcase. Army / ARL RF sensing work. Farseer quantum sensing initiative. DARPA Perrseus. Quantum Genesis. Quantum World Congress. None of these alone makes the thesis. But together, it looks less and less random. @DARPA Perrseus is a great example. That program is not asking “who has the best stock chart? Who has the most revenue? Who is making their own fabs?” It is asking how to build microscale ultra high-vacuum systems for compact cold-atom devices, MEMS, photonics and quantum sensors. Translation: make atomic systems smaller, more rugged, more manufacturable and more field ready. That is exactly the bottleneck for clocks, sensors, PNT, RF and battlefield deployment. That is Infleqtion’s language. That is Infleqtion’s roadmap. And that is the quiet part the market does not price until I think it has to. The stock can be ugly before the thesis becomes obvious. That is how these things work perhaps. Visions, dreams, money, timelines seldom move in straight lines. The market looks at $INFQ and sees a $9 stock with early revenue and **** baggage. Washington looks at this technology and sees timing, sensing, navigation, defense, space, RF, quantum networks, ISR and national security infrastructure. Again, those are two very different messages - moving in opposite directions. Important dates I’m watching: August 3 — DARPA Perrseus abstracts encouraged August 18 - Q2 Earnings August 21 — EO deadline for DoW to identify at least 3 next-gen quantum sensor projects September 1 — Perrseus intent to propose deadline September 20–23 — Impact 250 September 23 — Perrseus full proposals due September 23–25 — Quantum World Congress I don’t know when the market wakes up. But I do think this is the kind of setup where the real move happens after most people have already gotten tired, shaken out, or convinced themselves nothing is happening. Wall Street is still trying to value this like another early stage quantum-computing stock. I think Washington may be telling us it is something much more important than that. $INFQ is an atom based infrastructure company. And right now, the government seems to understand that far better than the market does.

• 
  michael fitchett (@FitchettMicael) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Battlefield will not buy another ******* season pass no cosmetics or anything til they fix the ******* game on console and not just for the ******* cheating *** cronus useres either. the cheating is so bad on pc cronus is a breeze

• 
  Yevgen Kryukov (@OgSaid) reported 20 minutes ago

  @MooseFPS Right now I start to think bf2042 at the very and of its service was better game in general

• 
  fdecollibus (@fdecollibus) reported 20 minutes ago

  The current situation around open-weights AI—and the panic it’s triggering in the U.S.—was the most obvious, predictable outcome imaginable. It’s been clear since early 2023 that, under the current paradigm, nobody has a real moat—nothing strong enough to justify the massive investments poured in. We don’t even know how much it cost to train Chinese models like Kimi K3 or GLM 5.2. Even if it were billions, releasing them as open weights inflicts damage on the U.S. industrial and military system comparable to sinking a dozen aircraft carriers. The $5T poured into data centers, AI, and debt-financed bets by OpenAI and Anthropic now look increasingly questionable. With relatively modest costs, you can burn your opponent’s granary. Framing AI as a race like the space race or the atomic bomb was a colossal mistake. Kai-Fu Lee helped plant the “mental bomb” that emerging, still-uncertain technologies like AI should become the battlefield for a supposed Armageddon. The U.S. bought into it—and bet everything on this train. U.S. market indices are bound to blow up. If China can build reusable rockets (and Japan follows the next day), how does SpaceX justify a $1.5T valuation? If Moonshot AI or DeepSeek can track U.S. models this closely, the entire AI market narrative collapses. This isn’t about “only China can.” With enough investment, anyone can—and that’s the problem. If $1T buys you just a six-month lead, the game simply isn’t worth it. AI remains an incredibly powerful technology, capable of unlocking unprecedented heights. But the Moloch built around it in the U.S. can only collapse. I struggle to imagine any scenario where it doesn’t—at least with these technological foundations.

• 
  Ryan (@Hoskins1st) reported 22 minutes ago

  @ModernWarzone How about they fix the store so people that bought the battle pass can actually get the free items that are given to them but they can’t because they store link is broken it’s been months now or 2 battles passes that have been broken @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm

• 
  Antonio Kapochani (@AntoiineMnd) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix footstep ffs

• 
  Joseph (@TrudoJo) reported 24 minutes ago

  @imbalancedtherm @LilithDatura Achilles returns because Patroclus’ death transforms the quarrel. Before that, Achilles is refusing participation because Agamemnon has dishonored him. His absence is deliberate: he wants the Greeks to feel the cost of treating him as expendable. Even when the Greeks begin losing badly, gifts and apologies are not enough. His pride is still stronger than his allegiance to the war. Then Patroclus dies wearing Achilles’ armor. That changes the meaning of Achilles’ withdrawal. What had been a defense of dignity now appears to Achilles as something that helped create the conditions for the death of the person he loved most. Hector killed Patroclus, but Achilles experiences the death partly as his own consequence. His rage therefore turns in two directions: outward, toward Hector; inward, toward himself. He returns because remaining outside the battle is no longer morally or emotionally possible. The war has crossed the boundary he created. How he returns He does not return through calm reconciliation or renewed loyalty to Agamemnon. First, he grieves. He collapses, covers himself with dust, tears his hair, and cries out so violently that Thetis hears him beneath the sea. He tells her that he no longer wishes to live unless he can kill Hector. At that point Achilles knowingly accepts his own death. Thetis warns him that Hector’s death will soon be followed by his own. Achilles chooses to return anyway. That is crucial. He does not believe he is returning to resume his former life. He returns after deciding that the life available to him without Patroclus is no longer sufficient reason to avoid his fate. Then comes the practical problem: Hector has taken Achilles’ armor from Patroclus. Achilles cannot immediately enter combat properly armed. Thetis goes to Hephaestus, who creates new armor for him, including the great shield depicting an entire human world—cities, marriages, courts, harvests, war, dancing, animals, stars, and the surrounding ocean. So Achilles reenters wearing not merely replacement armor, but armor containing an image of everything his grief has temporarily made him unable to see. Before he fights, he publicly ends the quarrel with Agamemnon. Agamemnon offers compensation and attempts to explain his behavior as a kind of divinely induced blindness. Achilles accepts the settlement, but almost impatiently. He is not deeply reconciled. He simply refuses to let the old dispute delay him any longer. His return therefore occurs through four movements: Patroclus dies. Achilles accepts responsibility and grief. He knowingly accepts the cost of returning. He receives new armor and relinquishes the quarrel. What he returns for Initially, he returns for vengeance. Not for Greece. Not for Agamemnon. Not even primarily for honor. He returns to kill Hector and answer the intolerable fact of Patroclus’ death. That is why his return is both magnificent and catastrophic. The same love that brings him back also makes him nearly inhuman in battle. He kills without restraint, fights a river, refuses mercy, kills Hector, and abuses Hector’s body. He has reentered relationship with the world, but only through the narrow gate of revenge. His deeper return happens later. When Priam comes to retrieve Hector’s body, he kneels before Achilles and kisses the hands that killed his son. He asks Achilles to remember his own father. That appeal reconnects Achilles’ private grief with another person’s grief. Achilles weeps for Patroclus and for his father; Priam weeps for Hector. For a moment, enemy categories dissolve beneath shared mortality. Only then does Achilles truly return to the human world. So there are really two returns: The first return is to battle, caused by grief and driven by vengeance. The second return is to humanity, caused by recognition and expressed through mercy. That second return is why the story does not end with Hector’s death. Victory is not the completion of Achilles’ arc. The completion is his decision to stop using Hector’s body as a vessel for his rage, return it to Priam, share food with his enemy, and allow mourning to occur. Achilles comes back to the battlefield because Patroclus dies. He comes back from the battlefield because Priam reminds him that grief does not belong to him alone.

• 
  StoneRainbow71 (@StoneRainbow71) reported 26 minutes ago

  @alex71421672700 @DannyDrinksWine Again, the heel of Italy (where Spartacus' army was trying to escape to) is, at best, 30% forest 200 years before Spartacus. It would be even less so 2 centuries later, in his time. Which is why I'm OK having a battlefield be a FIELD without trees. Not sure what the issue is.

• 
  KILL_J0HN091 (@GAMER_1411) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Battlefield times out by running/ looting and shooting really? Came back and the bs still persist in the game and no fix.

• 
  Aristocratic Fury (@LandsknechtPike) reported 30 minutes ago

  The only thing that annoys me more than grey filter is how they even started abandoning heraldic surcoats in modern movies. Henry V (1989) vs some modern abomination of what's supposed to be Henry V. The reason why this annoys me the most is because there should be no excuse for this. There is no reasonable way to explain why you would not include heraldic surcoats in a movie depicting medieval warfare, considering how important part of warfare this was, serving as an identification for nobles and their units in a time when standardized uniforms did not exist yet. With most other things you could sort of make some lame excuse. Like for example grey filter - artistic choise (a completely horrible one that makes the movie unwatchable but ok), real historic armors are expensive, extras are expensive etc. But this is literally just a piece of cloth. It should be no problem for a movie of a budget of this magnitude to get historically correct heraldic surcoats and tunics for the soldiers, depicting their coats of arms, the colors of their factions etc. Also imagine how stupid and unrealistic this is, if the medieval armies had no heraldic surcoats and other types of colorful identifications like tunics, badges, slashes, it would be extremely difficult to tell each other apart on the battlefield, practically impossible in many cases. Yes in modern movies you have scenes of two armies with knights on both sides only wearing armors with no identifications whatsoever (even banners are rare), and the commoners wearing colorless rags, the infantry troops are not fighting under their banners. It's ridiculous. How could they even be able to recognize each other. So the fact that these modern movies don't include this shows me that they are not even slightly interesting in being historically accurate and giving a fair depiction of a certain time period, they have no interest in presenting history, in fact it obviously appears that they want to actively portray it in a much worse matter than it was, because they removed of the most colorful and coolest aspects of the time, which would have cost them absolutely nothing of significance to include.