Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  William John G. Balderama (@WJGBalderama) reported 5 minutes ago

  @nothanksfrankie My guess is that the XM30 will ultimately win. It’s a little sad to see the M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle being replaced, but there’s only so much you can do with upgrades before you eventually run out of space, weight capacity, electrical power, and room for additional systems. More importantly, today’s battlefield demands a level of protection that the original Bradley was never designed to provide—particularly against drones and loitering munitions. The Russo-Ukrainian War has made it painfully clear that counter-drone capability and survivability against persistent aerial threats have become essential requirements for any modern armored fighting vehicle. I’m particularly familiar with the software that went into the BFV system. I was actually hired by United Defense in 1999, a few years after my retirement, so I had some firsthand exposure to the technology and the evolution of the platform. That gives me a bit of a personal connection to the Bradley and makes seeing it eventually replaced somewhat bittersweet. I do see it being relegated for service with the reserves so we will still see it before it finally gets mothballed.

• 
  Illuminaughty (@mariemonsterr) reported 5 minutes ago

  2nd sector in Cairo Bazaar is ridiculous. The attacking team HQ is the same HQ area in the 1st sector & enemies have access to the previous objectives. Last sector there's only 1 way to b if enemy takes b. Could've fixed that but fixed something not broken. @Battlefield

• 
  不语jo (@rSg8ubzrCl9xg5h) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Battlefield You don't address the black screen issue after leaving a match, you don't even put out a notice about it. You guys are a bunch of idiots who don't understand balancing and don't know how to work with the Frostbite engine either.

• 
  Maris (@Nazumejud) reported 12 minutes ago

  The blizzard had buried the driveway beneath thick drifts, yet it could not hide the sight of Emma lying beside the porch steps, clutching Noah beneath her coat to keep him alive. One look at her frostbitten hands and exhausted eyes hurt more than every battlefield I had survived during the past eighteen months. For one horrifying moment, I feared I was already too late. I dropped my duffel bag and sprinted through the snow. “Emma!” Her eyes opened weakly. “Ethan?” She said my name as though she believed I was a dream. Noah’s faint cries barely rose above the howling wind. Emma had wrapped him in layers of her clothing, leaving her own arms and feet exposed to the cold. I tore off my military coat, wrapped it around them both, and lifted them into my arms. “How long have you been out here?” Emma tried to answer, but her teeth were chattering too violently. I reached the front door and twisted the handle. Locked. I pounded once. No one answered. Through the living-room window, I saw the glow of the fireplace. Shadows moved inside. Someone laughed. My family was warm while my wife and infant son were freezing to death outside. I stepped back and kicked the door beside the lock. The frame cracked. A second kick sent the door flying inward. Warmth spilled over us. So did the smell of roasted meat, expensive bourbon, and burning cedar. My father, Richard Cole, sat beside the fireplace holding a glass from the bottle I had saved for my homecoming. My mother, Diane, wore Emma’s favorite cream cashmere robe as though it belonged to her. My younger brother, Kyle, stretched across my couch with muddy boots resting on the coffee table Emma and I had chosen together. All three stared at me. My mother’s face lost its color. “Ethan?” she blurted. “We weren’t expecting you until Friday.” My return date had changed after a transport aircraft opened an earlier seat. I had kept it secret because I wanted to surprise Emma. Instead, I had surprised the people destroying her life. I carried my wife and child across the room. My father rose from his chair. “Put her back outside.” I stopped. “What did you say?” “She attacked your mother,” he replied. “She became hysterical when we explained the situation.” Emma buried her face against my shoulder. “They changed every lock,” she whispered. “They took my phone, my wallet, everything. They said the house belonged to them.” Kyle gave a careless shrug. “Legally, it does.” He nodded toward the wall above the fireplace. A framed property deed hung where Emma and I had once displayed our wedding portrait. My father’s name appeared beneath the description of my property. On the dining table sat mortgage documents, bank statements, legal notices, and a thick folder marked CUSTODY PETITION. My mother crossed her arms. “Emma became unstable while you were deployed. We had to protect your assets and your son.” “You left them outside in a blizzard.” “She refused to cooperate,” my father said. No anger showed in his face. That frightened me more than shouting would have. I had seen men justify terrible actions with the same calm expression. They did not think of themselves as cruel. They believed they had the right to decide who deserved safety. I carried Emma upstairs. My mother followed. “You cannot take the baby,” she said. “Our attorney advised us to keep Noah away from her.” I turned so quickly that she stepped backward. “Come near my son again, and the police will be the least of your problems.”….

• 
  Kapt'n Krunch 🛠️⚓ (@KaptainKrunch97) reported 12 minutes ago

  I have my issues with the update as all Battlefield 6 updates go, many of them are issues they SHOULD'VE playtested and fixed before launching with them - but the great has outweighed the bad for me with this update, flying with @KnuteAutomata as my WSO has been some of the best Battlefield 6 moments I've had since beta/release. Please put the two-seater jets in more maps for all that is holy to us pilot mains.

• 
  CumminsNV5600 (@cat345rjwc97015) reported 15 minutes ago

  When It Looks Like the End The sky had turned black. Ash fell like snow across the ruined battlefield. Broken banners hung from empty poles, and the ground trembled beneath the distant thunder. The white lion stood alone. His body was scarred. His mane was covered in dust. Around him, shadows rose slowly from the earth, reaching toward him from every direction. For a moment, it looked like there was nowhere left to go. No army. No kingdom. No hope. The lion lowered his head and closed his eyes. Then he heard the roar in the wind: “It only looks like the end.” His eyes opened. $Courage lifted his head, planted his paws firmly into the ground, and let out a roar that shook the darkness. The shadows stopped. The storm seemed to listen. The lion took one step forward. Then another. He only knew one thing: Courage isn’t believing you will win. Courage is taking the next step when everything tells you to stop. And so, when the world thought his story was over— the lion began again. Dveq2rabHNdZW1YR5ZSECSnPkrcV5ZVGjKSMXD6Bpump

• 
  Douglas Hall (@MrDouglasHall) reported 17 minutes ago

  and fraught with danger. Life saving medical devices are NOT trivial things to mess around with, particularly by people with no relevant experience. Fake Cat7 TQ’s are probably a bigger issue than unbranded ones. The supply chain from manufacturer to battlefield is ESSENTIAL.

• 
  NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS (@NATOJFCBS) reported 18 minutes ago

  Drones are the challenge of the present. 🇪🇺 Two recent stories say it all: 🇸🇰 In Slovakia, three people were arrested over an alleged plot to set fire to a drone manufacturing facility. 🇵🇱 In Warsaw, the city is investing around PLN 1 million in a system to detect and identify drones over sensitive areas. One story is about protecting our drones. The other about protecting ourselves from them. Drones are no longer just a battlefield issue. @Poland_MOD @Slovakia_NATO #WeAreNATO

• 
  Storm Files (@TheStormFiles) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BasilTheGreat Nobody is shocked. That’s the problem. They import men who treat streets like a battlefield, then act stunned when blood hits the pavement. Ban the entry. Deport the rest.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 21 minutes ago

  keeps a special apostolic strategy from becoming a universal command used by stingy churches to starve faithful labourers. Why, then, did Paul decline Corinthian support? First Corinthians 9:12 gives one reason: “we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ.” Second Corinthians 11:12 adds another: Paul intended to “cut off occasion from them which desire occasion.” False apostles were watching for anything they could twist against him. Paul therefore removed financial suspicion from the battlefield. He would rather sacrifice his right than let greedy counterfeits turn his liberty into ammunition. That is mature Christianity. The flesh asks only, “Am I entitled to this?” Grace asks, “What will exercising this right do to the testimony?” Paul understood that a legitimate liberty can sometimes be surrendered for a greater spiritual purpose. Christian liberty is not the freedom to insist upon yourself; it is the freedom to lay something down when Christ’s interest requires it. The strongest proof that a man possesses a right is sometimes his willingness not to use it. Paul’s refusal to burden Corinth also separates shepherding from exploitation. Second Corinthians 11:20 had exposed false leaders who could “devour you” and “take of you.” Paul operates in the opposite direction. He does not approach Corinth wondering how much value can be extracted from them. His next phrase tells us exactly what he wants, and it is not their wallet. “for I seek not yours, but you:” This is the heart of the verse: “for I seek not yours, but you.” Few sentences expose false ministry more quickly. Paul distinguishes between what people possess and the people themselves. He is not primarily seeking Corinth’s money, resources, influence, labour, property, or usefulness to his own reputation. He wants the Corinthians spiritually. He seeks their restoration, growth, obedience, doctrinal stability, purity, and usefulness to Christ. That does not mean material giving has no spiritual place. Philippians supported Paul, and he received their generosity gratefully. Yet even there Paul wrote in Philippians 4:17, “Not because I desire a gift: but I desire fruit that may abound to your account.” Paul could receive the gift while caring more about the giver’s spiritual fruit than the money entering his hands. That is the difference between ministry and merchandising. A hireling sees souls attached to resources; a shepherd sees resources as tools for helping souls. The phrase also confronts modern religious celebrity culture. A ministry can begin using people without ever asking directly for money. Followers can become numbers proving influence. Testimonies can become advertising material. Volunteers can become unpaid machinery feeding a brand. Congregations can become audiences whose chief function is making the leader feel important. Paul says, “I seek not yours, but you.” He wants people brought under Christ, not people brought under Paul as personal property. This principle is especially important because Paul had genuine authority. If anybody could have exploited apostolic status, Paul could have done it convincingly. Yet he refuses to convert authority into ownership. First Corinthians 3:5 asks, “Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed?” Ministers are servants, not masters of the saints. Christ purchased the church with His blood; no preacher gets to behave as though the flock came with his name on the title deed. There is also a salvation-and-service distinction here. Paul is not seeking Corinth so he can become their saviour. Christ alone saves. Paul had already written in 1 Corinthians 3:6, “I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.” His pastoral desire concerns their spiritual welfare after the gospel has reached them. A faithful minister can care intensely about souls without confusing that care with the saving work only Christ can accomplish.

• 
  Ace Trainer Terry (@AceTrainerTerry) reported 24 minutes ago

  @GhostGamingG @Battlefield How would an AA turret fix getting RPGd?

• 
  𝐁𝐒𝐏𝟑 (@RealBSP3) reported 30 minutes ago

  Mechs can be built, but there are problems. One of those is finely illustrated in the quoted post. The various technologies are more easily deployed on other vehicles; but those vehicles do have limitations. Mechs can eliminate some of those limitations, but not without significant drawbacks, given current technology. Toward the end is a probable use case, with the question you really need to be asking, so skip there if you can't be bothered to read. It's not making them stand up, take a hit, or go that's the problem. The problem is that they'll be target number one on the battlefield; but that was also a problem with early tanks. They can be made to take the punishment, within limits. If you're facing off with someone who can hit it with a GBU-10 at mach 1, for example, you've got issues. If not, however, most ground-based munitions are survivable, given the appropriate amount of money dedicated to each machine. The armor exists, and I'm working on some, myself. RPG? Yes. MANPADS? No. Not yet, anyway, but it's possible. This would be it's worst enemy on the battlefield. Anyone packing such a system would be fielded directly, as soon as possible, and/or positioned where a mech is expected. That's not the end of the story, though. It's possible to stop something in it's tracks with volume of fire, alone, and being swarmed by drones is a significant risk. Given absolutely everyone will be firing at the mech, that's like trying to walk through a cloud of mosquitoes and stepping into a ground nest of bees. It's greatest defense is a magnificent offense. A mech must be able to lay down a massive volume of fire with significant energy output. This isn't something you would field in a place where collateral damage is an issue. Effectively, it's got to be a scorched Earth machine, and there are aspects of the idea that allow it to be just that. Weapon height alone gives it an ability to hit more targets, more quickly, at greater distances, and beyond cover. It's the world's most well-armed helicopter, but on the ground; but it's got one big problem: Energy Keeping it moving matters, and whatever you use to power it will be the primary target, but you can plan for that. Allowing it to operate for the duration of an engagement is all about creating engagement opportunities. If you decide to build the machine no matter what, you create an opportunity for it to shine. That's likely going to be blasting it's way through things as quickly as possible to open up a corridor, and then retreating. Why not just use airplanes? There is a point at which you stop using them, and sometimes that point still doesn't allow helicopters. That point is wide open for shock and awe. So, you wouldn't try to use it very long, to begin with. Destroy everything in front of you, and everything that's housing something that firing back, and retreat for conventional hardware to finish the job. We're still missing part of the energy equation, though, and that's the sort of weaponry that would maximize a mech's utility: Directed energy and railguns. It's got better lines of sight than a tank. These normally long-range weapons can now be used up close and personal. It would be an absolute shame to give them up because of energy limitations. Something like the A-10's party piece burns through ammunition too quickly. It's nice to have, but it's not choice number one. If you have room, sure, but you're more than likely looking at something smaller, to give it options. A line of sight weapon, though, that hits like a bomb, paired with another line of sight weapon that can punch clean holes and start fires, is a good mech starter kit. Fill it out with conventional weapons, and it just might survive long enough to do it's job. Something needs to be done about those drones, though. For now, anything they drop can be resisted by a machine with that much money behind it. That won't always be the case. The main thing to remember is that such a machine needs to be able to leverage the absolute latest in weaponry. Some older gear works, as well, such as grenade launchers and an array of M2s, but that's not enough. It needs to hit like a hammer from five blocks away, through five buildings, if required. What we're looking at, therefore, is an intermediate weapons platform. Soften the area with fast air power, collapse obvious remaining resistance with the mech, bring in helicopters, and then roll in traditional armor. The question you need to ask: Is that step useful enough to revise every engagement plan we have, and pour resources into creating and transporting these things? The below picture is an example of a large mech from the Battletech universe. I just wanted an illustration of something heavily armed. There are many, in that universe, that would be rather practical for these purposes. This one wouldn't be maneuverable enough to justify it's legs. Whatever you build, it's got to be at least somewhat quick. I just didn't feel like pouring through countless images.

• 
  GodSoldier316 (@G0dSoldier316) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldInte The KV9 not like the broken piece of crap we have now on Battlefield six, and also the VSS

• 
  John Lane (@JohnLan70186141) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Mr_Andrew_Fox Battlefield Ecology describes evolving technology and tactics. What works well gets used until changes make it work worse. Even then, old solutions sometimes address contemporary problems.

• 
  Winfield Scott (@LtGenScott) reported 33 minutes ago

  @AHC1776 June 17, 1876 If I'm not mistaken, I think Crook had his own problems with Indians just a week before, and just south of the site of the Little Big Horn. I believe his battle was called The Battle of the Rosebud. It was a spirited affair, and while by no means a massacre, it nevertheless caused Crook to retreat south from the battlefield. The reason he was there (Northern Wyoming/Southeast Montana) at all was part of the grand strategy. To apply pressure to the Indians on several fronts at once. Well, Crook's retreat did two things: It gave the Indians a surge of confidence that they would use later on the 7th Cavalry, and it removed one of the army's pressure points. From Custer's point of view, it may have changed the entire complexion of the battle he went into 8 days later.