1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Argences, Normandy 1
Minneapolis, MN 2
Reims, ACAL 1
Pfaffenhoffen, ACAL 1
Americana, SP 1
Rennes, Brittany 1
Nantes, Pays de la Loire 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 3
Montignac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Paris, Île-de-France 14
Méry-sur-Oise, Île-de-France 1
Halle, Flanders 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Bourg-en-Bresse, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
La Paz, BCS 1
Cahors, Occitanie 1
Saint-Genis-Laval, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Brisbane, QLD 1
Partido de José C. Paz, BA 1
Saint-Étienne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Orléans, Centre 1
Castelnau-le-Lez, Occitanie 1
Comuna 1, CABA 5
Barrhead, Scotland 1
Lausanne, VD 1
Nairobi, Nairobi Area 1
Tiruvalla, KL 1
Propières, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Lübeck, Hansestadt, Schleswig-Holstein 1
Montpellier, Occitanie 2
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • falsewoodxt
    ARCOS (@falsewoodxt) reported

    @GetCheatz @BattlefieldInte @EA_DICE Bot comment. Content update is just fine. There are big maps in the game now and more coming up in next season as well. The game’s only really issue is not having a server browser. Everything else is fixed already

  • ErbunnNinja
    Erbun Ninja (@ErbunnNinja) reported

    @TGarantine @EarlNoahBernsby Oh I have no idea but I’m not sure what the difference is between western civ and empire. Were the model of western civ and the greatest empire there ever was. We are the Rome of tomorrow. To me, the issue is/was enlightenment. It flattened the ontological landscape of the western mind and created the left hemisphere dominance that Ian mcghilcrist talks about, and that can work, for a time, until it doesn’t, and I think that time has come to its end. It’s why I always told the James Lindsayites that that they can’t win. When you’re battlefield is only 2d and your opponent doesn’t limit themselves to such a limited space the best you can do is delay the inevitable.

  • WayneSm72677522
    toecutter (@WayneSm72677522) reported

    @dissentpod @BattlefieldComm It's a on going problem with these incompetent morons and the reason for it is these fuckwits hire on DEI rather than actual skill these ******* clowns couldn't program air fryer

  • LetsArmUKR
    medoyid_ua (@LetsArmUKR) reported

    The **** Punisher isn't pretty. It looks like something welded together in a garage from a fence post and scrap, which it basically is. But that cheap, ugly drone-dropped penetrator is now forcing every moscovite trench rat and dugout commander to rethink whether "cover" even exists anymore. This isn't random improvisation. The design checks every box for a proper bunker-buster: hardened streamlined nose to survive impact, narrow aspect ratio to punch through instead of splattering, and a delayed fuze that lets the charge slide past the logs and dirt before it goes off inside. Drop it from a hundred meters and the math says it drives through thirty centimeters of packed earth or over a meter of loose fill. That's exactly the roof most moscovite positions rely on. One moment they're huddled under timber and soil thinking they're safe from mortar rounds and FPV. Next moment the roof is in their laps. moscovian military bloggers are already whining about it. Good. Let them sweat. Their entire "deep rear" shelter doctrine just got cheapened into irrelevance by something that costs less than a used scooter. This is the asymmetry that actually matters: Ukraine turning construction trash into precision terror for people who still think mass is victory. Every such strike is another data point the Kremlin cannot spin away. Their soldiers are learning that nowhere within drone range is safe, and drone range keeps expanding. No amount of meat assaults on some ruined village changes the fact that their logistics, their command posts, their rest areas are all now vulnerable to garage-built penetrators that slip inside before detonating. This is why arming Ukraine isn't charity, it's the cheapest European insurance policy available. Let moscovia consolidate any kind of win and every NATO flank state starts calculating new defense budgets that dwarf what we're spending now to keep the frontline exactly where it is. The math is brutal but clear: pay the modest cost to sustain Ukrainian production and strikes, or pay the catastrophic cost later when the imperial machine rolls westward again, freshly convinced that the West folds. The **** Punisher is a reminder that Ukrainian ingenuity keeps finding ways to impose costs the aggressor cannot sustain. Primitive looking? Sure. Effective enough to make moscovites lose sleep in holes they thought were safe? Absolutely. And that's before we scale proper production. moscovia only understands the language of force. Every new Ukrainian munition, no matter how crude it looks, is another fluent sentence in that conversation. The Kremlin started this war certain it could break us. Instead we're redesigning their nightmares in backyard workshops while their bloggers cry that there's nowhere left to hide. Keep them coming. Every penetrator delivered is another imperial illusion shredded. The only path that ends this is moscovia broken on the battlefield, not negotiated back into breathing space. Ukraine is delivering that reality one ugly, effective bomb at a time. The West would be wise to accelerate the supply chain instead of pretending diplomacy still works with an empire that respects only the crater left behind.

  • DemizeFPS
    DemizeFPS (@DemizeFPS) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Where are comms for the MAS-148 Glaive - Javelin glitch where you can spam javelin by aiming with bottom right corner when a target is painted?

  • rsan99328
    x (@rsan99328) reported

    @BattlefieldComm There's a problem since the new patch. When you're in the interior view of a tank or infantry vehicle, it's far too bright, much too white. You can barely see anything. When you switch back to the exterior view, everything is normal, but the interior view then becomes overexposed

  • TransP81147
    Trans parent (@TransP81147) reported

    @Battlefield Can you please fix strikepoint? What is going on with that?

  • SubvertPlaysTCG
    MERC subvert (@SubvertPlaysTCG) reported

    @gg_hazmatt @riftboundop Been considering a one-of Trinity Force just to force more attention to a certain battlefield but 4 energy to play it is a lot The idea being that the opponent has to respect the threat and spend resources to go deal with one battlefield Then you build up the other and re-equip and unless they have Ganking, it’s gonna be a problem when they’re stuck on the other side

  • EndersFPS
    Enders (@EndersFPS) reported

    Guys idk who needs to hear this but believe it or not EA is gonna EA and that means Battlefield will always be similar to COD in some aspects until hell freezes over. I’m not saying I like it, or that you have to like it, I’m just saying they’re competitors and EA is a business, and businesses exist to make money. EA wants the COD money, EA doesnt want Battlefield to be as niche as it typically is, they want it to literally be another Warzone/Fortnite level event in gaming. The next huge thing. That’s why REDSEC was made, it’s why the gunplay is the way it is, it’s why the movement is the way it is, ect. They’re under the impression this is the way to achieve a viral infinite money glitch like their competitors. As usual, EA is multiple years late to the trends and is incapable of creating their own unique breakthrough trend.

  • withoutmeinyou
    Jolly Onyeka (@withoutmeinyou) reported

    ⛪ THE TORN TEMPLE VEIL: WHAT DID IT REALLY MEAN? At the moment Jesus died, something extraordinary happened. Not on a battlefield. Not in a palace. But inside the Temple. 📖 “And behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.” — Matthew 27:51 This was no ordinary curtain. The veil separated the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place—the sacred area symbolizing God’s presence. Only the High Priest could enter. And only once a year. Then, at the moment of Christ’s death, the veil was torn. Not from bottom to top. But from top to bottom. As if God Himself had torn it open. Why? Did it symbolize the end of separation between God and humanity? Did it mark the fulfillment of the Old Covenant? Was it a declaration that access to God was now open through Christ? Or was there an even deeper meaning? For centuries, the veil stood as a reminder that sin separated humanity from God’s holiness. Then, in a single moment, everything changed. The veil was torn. The barrier was broken. And history was never the same. 💬 What do you believe was the deepest significance of the torn temple veil? Let’s discuss respectfully.

  • steadygoing
    steadygoing (@steadygoing) reported

    2/10 A subject becomes serious when it is forced to expose a problem beneath its name. In this case, the question is not “AI and writing.” The question is: what is the human function when production is no longer scarce? More precisely: how does a person remain an author when the text can be generated before he has earned it? The operator’s first achievement is therefore not a sentence, but a clarification of the battlefield. He must know what the essay is not about. Without exclusion, the machine will produce coverage instead of thought. A topic becomes a work only when it has been narrowed to a necessity. III. Literature as Resistance The second operation is confrontation with literature. Literature is not ornament. It is not a display cabinet of names placed behind an argument to make it appear educated. It is resistance. It tells the operator which formulations are already available, which concepts have become lazy, which anxieties are inherited, which distinctions are too coarse, and where an opening remains. In the present case, the relevant background is not only contemporary commentary on AI writing. That would be too narrow. The problem touches older questions: writing as a technology of consciousness; the relation between inscription and thought; tacit knowledge; craft and revision; computation and judgment; bullshit as language detached from truth; institutional dependence on documents; the social performance of competence. The operator does not collect these literatures in order to obey them. He uses them to locate the point at which they are insufficient. Ong and Goody help show that writing is not mere recording but an organizer of consciousness and classification. Polanyi clarifies why explicit text cannot exhaust tacit competence. Weizenbaum warns against the confusion of computation with judgment. Frankfurt helps identify language indifferent to truth. Sennett gives the craft dimension: correction, resistance, form. Writing studies reminds us that composition was never merely final product but process, revision, audience, genre, and control. But these literatures do not by themselves deliver the governing claim. They provide elements. The operator must find the axis that organizes them. That axis is the relocation of authorship. AI does not merely assist writing. It decomposes writing into operations and forces the human being to occupy the level of command. The author becomes responsible less for manual production than for the ordered passage through topic, literature, angle, structure, generation, criticism, verification, refusal, and defence. Literature, used properly, does not enlarge the essay by accumulation. It sharpens the essay by resistance. IV. The Angle The decisive intellectual act is the selection of the angle. A topic can be handled indefinitely. An angle forces direction. It says: of all possible ways of treating this subject, this is the level at which it becomes most revealing. The angle is not a decorative phrase. It is the governing cut. “AI and writing” remains too loose. “AI makes writing easier” is too obvious. “AI produces fluent but possibly empty text” is also too obvious. The stronger angle is this: AI shifts the author from producer of text to operator of the process by which text becomes defensible thought. This angle changes the essay. It prevents it from becoming a complaint about machine prose. It prevents it from becoming a policy essay about academic cheating. It prevents it from becoming a technical discussion of prompting. It relocates the subject in the human being’s changed position.

  • GetCheatz
    Mr. Margheritiiii (@GetCheatz) reported

    @falsewoodxt @BattlefieldInte @EA_DICE on Playsation and Xbox it doesn't show the correct ping. If you join through matchmaking and ping 150, it's mega lag 🤡 you haven't even played with all the weapons and you're saying that the netcode is fixed just like hit reg. You know **** about this game...

  • RyanJon06636091
    Jayze (@RyanJon06636091) reported

    @Battlefield you do realise your **** game has massive issues including packet loss at the start of ranked games ******* fix it!

  • n1z_5
    Naz (@n1z_5) reported

    @Battlefield Fps drops fix @totalfps

  • stubbigg
    s (@stubbigg) reported

    @Warbite161129 @Osacoooo Battlefield 4 had DLC and was broken for a year. Battlefield 1 had DLC and didn't receive any content for 6 months except for 1 map lifted from singleplayer

Check Current Status