Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Cheat Code (@SumDumbPlayer) reported 1 minute ago

  @ZakkenKloot Xbox One wasn't that great.. -The controller input lag was so bad I couldn't even play Battlefield 4. -Half of the UI I didn't even use & navigating was a pain. -The online social features & Privacy features was bad. Etc..

• 
  Clutchy (@ClutchyyyyF) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Another useless update which doesnt fix any of the 3526363 bugs in redsec

• 
  Gunnar Riise (@gunnarriise) reported 6 minutes ago

  @TheInfamousEG Battlefield has had problems like this from the beginning. It's not just hitreg, but the fundamentally flawed spray patterns with random bloom. Bullets don't go straight even if your aim is true.

• 
  Reece scott (@Reece__scott) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Battlefield has the biggest cheating problem I’ve ever seen thought I’d give another chance and you can’t find one game were someone is not cheating there’s *** off

• 
  MOISES FERREIRA (@MOISESFE11) reported 9 minutes ago

  @AwakeChristian1 @Battlefield They are scamming people and dont resolve the hackers problems in the game

• 
  SR (@PatternNotes) reported 12 minutes ago

  The Wrath of Khan Moment — Why CB-011 Is Still $CRBU’s Torpedo The Enterprise is damaged!!! Caribou does not currently have enough capital to comfortably fund the entire program through completion while simultaneously advancing CB-011. Management knows this. Shareholders know this. The market knows this. And that creates the trap: Management already used the ATM heavily around $2. It raised cash. It reduced spending. It extended the runway. It preserved the CB-011 H2 2026 catalyst. In other words: Management bought firing distance. But buying firing distance is not the same thing as winning. Something still has to change the battlefield. CB-011 is that shot That dataset matters for reasons much bigger than another response-rate update. There are actually two warheads on this torpedo Warhead #1: Valuation Suppose CB-011 expansion reproduces something close to the original signal. Suddenly the market has to reassess whether Caribou owns: another experimental allogeneic CAR-T or a genuinely competitive off-the-shelf multiple-myeloma asset with unusually deep responses. If CRBU re-rates from $1.50 toward $3, $4 or higher, the entire financing problem changes. A $60M raise at $1.50 requires: 40M shares. At $3: 20M shares. At $4: 15M shares. Strong CB-011 data therefore do not eliminate dilution. They make dilution cheaper. And that means existing shareholders surrender less ownership of both CB-011 and vispa-cel to fund the next stage of development. CB-011 can help finance vispa-cel before CB-011 itself ever reaches approval. That is the first warhead. Warhead #2: Regulatory path This is potentially even bigger. Vispa-cel is headed toward a large randomized pivotal trial. The question is whether CB-011 ultimately has to follow the same capital-intensive playbook. Maybe it does. RMAT does not guarantee otherwise. But CB-011 has several things working in its favor: heavily pretreated multiple myeloma deep early responses RMAT access and now deliberate enrollment of patients previously treated with BCMA-directed therapies That last population may be crucial. If CB-011 repeatedly produces deep responses after prior BCMA therapy has already failed, the regulatory question becomes different. It is no longer simply: “Can this compete broadly against existing BCMA CAR-T products?” It becomes: “What registration pathway is appropriate for an off-the-shelf therapy showing meaningful activity in patients who have already exhausted BCMA-directed treatment?” That is a potentially much more favorable question. Imagine three outcomes. Outcome one: Strong data, conventional regulatory path CB-011 looks excellent. CRBU re-rates. Management raises at a much better valuation. That alone can still save shareholders enormous dilution. The torpedo worked. Maybe not perfectly—but enough. Outcome two: Strong data + shortened registration path Now things become much more interesting. CB-011 gains value. CRBU re-rates. Financing gets cheaper. And Caribou potentially discovers that its second major asset can reach commercialization with substantially less capital than vispa-cel requires. Outcome three: Good data, no regulatory shortcut, no major re-rating This may be the most frustrating outcome. CB-011 works. But not enough to force the market to change its valuation. FDA still wants a large expensive development program. This is the actual Wrath of Khan moment The Enterprise does not need another routine weapon. It needs the weapon capable of changing the geometry of the fight. That is what CB-011 represents. Management has already done the maneuvering. They used the ATM. They conserved capital. They bought time. They preserved the catalyst. Now comes the shot. Because that is the moment we find out whether CB-011 really is different from vispa-cel— or whether Caribou has simply loaded another expensive weapon it cannot afford to fire. My personal notes. Not financial advice

• 
  RG | Rehsto (@Rehsto) reported 13 minutes ago

  Battlefield 6 is actually ragebait lmao, insane how the company doesn’t fix bugs that have been in for MONTHS

• 
  Pseudo Moi (@moi_pseudo) reported 13 minutes ago

  On once more being reminded of just how gawdawful our URC teams are relative to the Boks, having to sit Clockwork Orange-fashion through two hours of what-even-was-that about as pleasant as changing particularly nasty diapers. for two hours… I shall now with conscious cringe and vanity commit the twittering sin of reposting: Cryptic criticism jokingly cast as ancient Chinese saying, being honest but harsh to the point perhaps unfairness So expected at least some response, angry or sad, but it went into the void to the tune of precisely zero like or reply Figure either it was thought actual ancient sayings (very few of which are rugby-related)!or it’s too long, which it is, or just sucks, which is fine too Anyways: Apropos of nothing, nothing at at all, no siree bob, a few ancient Chinese proverbs: Never appoint an interim you cannot fire, unless you like losing, in which case… One can make sentimental appointments and one can succeed, but one cannot do both If criticising a general is prohibitively uncomfortable, you’ve got a major effing problem that will lead to much suffering and also to years without end of your opponents pointing and laughing Good generalship shows regardless of the how good or bad the army. An army well-led may look out of their depth or outmatched but never a shambles. As sure as pap goes with sous, so surely is a shambles begotten by shambolic generalship Do not be too loud with the music, for Heaven’s sake. Whether at revelry or contest. Or, Heaven forefend, both The dogs come for the dog food and care not one wit about the packaging. Such a concern obsessed with prettifying packaging over improving product is in the wrong business and will soon be selling well-packaged dog poo. Go to war as if with the army you have, not as if with the army you wish you had and which just so happen also to be your former army from glories past On the battlefield, employ tactics that maximize — or if that is beyond you, at least align with — the strengths and mitigate the weaknesses, preferably both, of your army, not the opponent. The sage may think this so blooming obvious as to go without saying, but no… Abstractions over whatever actually works is vanity, all vanity. It is good for a general to be humble in civilian life, but if his war-fighting decisions are in the least colored by, let alone governed by personal predilection as to ideals or style or aesthetics, then he is not humble, actually, for the purpose of winning. To the contrary… Judge a general by his fighting, not by his talking. He who sells himself likely does so because his battlefield performance is not and will not do the selling. Five year plans never work except by serendipity and/or in hindsight. Also for immediate job security, for that a five year plan works a charm Stage a play in the slums and, even if it were the best play since man first wrote, prepare for an empty theatre. The producer will blame the audience. Cash is king. Or at least better than credit

• 
  (TCAG) Командир Бред Кроуфорд (CDR Brad Crawford) (@evo1tactical) reported 14 minutes ago

  Yeah, they’re called DELTA and Kropyva, and they’re extremely effective. But here’s the problem. The U.S. Army won’t adopt systems like these or seriously ask the Ukrainians to share their battlefield experience with them because General Dynamics, Raytheon, and the other major American defense contractors cannot make money from systems they didn’t develop. Anyone who has been around the defense industry long enough understands that the United States does not prioritize efficiency or getting taxpayers the most effective equipment at the lowest possible cost. What matters is connections, lobbying, government contracts, and protecting the share prices of the major military industrial corporations. It is as simple as that. Слава Україні! Героям слава! 🇺🇦

• 
  Joyful American 🇺🇸 (@joyfulAmerican9) reported 17 minutes ago

  "Were it not for the Navajos, the Marines would never have taken Iwo Jima." Major Howard Connor In the first 48 hours of the Battle of Iwo Jima, the Navajo Code Talkers transmitted over 800 battlefield messages coordinating naval gunfire, ammunition requests, medic evacuations etc. without a single error! Later when the flag was raised on Mount Suribachi, it was Code Talkers on the ground transmitting the radio message to command that Americans have taken the high ground. The Navajo Code Talker stories were quietly declassified in 1968. And it wasn't until National Navajo Code Talkers Day was declared in 1982 that their stories became more mainstream. #OldGloryStory

• 
  D_The_Producer (@D_The_Producer) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Community_Gears This Gears has HUGE performance issues. With an RTX 4080, a Ryzen 5800x3D, medium detail, DLSS, and playing in 1080p, I can't even hit a steady 60 FPS. I play most games at 200 FPS in Ultra settings, like Battlefield 6, which has way better graphics. I'm not buying it until fix

• 
  Kiwibom (@HDTX4) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Cdawgg99999 @BattlefieldComm *** gud AA on BF6 isn't strong at all dude. If you get killed and blame aim assist, then the problem is you, not aim assist. This isn't Cod aim assist where i agree that in that franchise, its cheating as it literally does everything for you but in BF6? Nah, it doesn't.

• 
  Ed Rofezz (@Ed_r0w_feeziac) reported 22 minutes ago

  @SDSLLC_USA Anybody still focusing on blaming the left for destroying the country is the problem. The lefts agenda is no secret and hasn’t been for quite some time. The real fault at this point falls on the GOP. In our faux two party system the GOP is our only defense against the left. They have proven time and again that they are incapable of viably opposing the left and stopping them. They are, at this point, the most immediate threat to our country. They are subversive and cowardice, corrupt and impotent. They do nothing to stop the left when dems are in power and do nothing to prevent/reverse the left when the GOP is in power. A clear enemy on the other side of the battlefield is less dangerous than having someone on your own side working against you to lose. The GoP fear mongers about starting a third party while they have done nothing as a party

• 
  fitrah_life (@fitrah_life) reported 22 minutes ago

  The discourse influenced by feminism practices a dangerous selective manipulation in reading the Prophet's Biography (Seerah), wherein it inflates the exception and marginalizes the foundational rule, in order to fabricate a role model of the female Companion (Sahabiyyah) that suits the functional and materialistic spirit of contemporary times. Thus, you find that the role models these proponents persistently export are always: A female Companion who fought on the battlefield. A female Companion who issued religious verdicts and taught knowledge. A female Companion who treated the wounded. A female Companion who killed seven Romans with a tent pole! (which is a weak story that is not authentically transmitted). Meanwhile, they overlook the broad legislative model upon which the greatest women of the worlds lived: They do not mention Fatimah—may Allah be pleased with her—who ground flour with the hand-mill until her hand grew calloused in service to her husband and home. Nor Asma', who used to fodder Al-Zubayr's horse, tend to his animal, and crush date stones. Nor Khadijah, who was the support, the sanctuary, and the homemaker of that grand house. Nor the daughters of the Prophet ﷺ, who were homemakers, shaping the glory of the nation from behind their screens and within their modesty. Deliberately ignoring the general way of life of the female Companions—and ripping exceptional scenes out of context to present them as the rule—is a falsification of the noble innate nature (Fitrah) upon which the purest homes in history were established.

• 
  John Wilkes (@DaRealJTCBT) reported 26 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm I just quit a ranked match because of the lag, can't believe I left cod for this ****! How was the game better at launch 😩