Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  OneFordyBoi (@OneFordyBoiv2) reported 38 seconds ago

  @ii_flyy Thats stupid. You aren't what you indulge in. If you can't separate fiction from reality then you are the problem, not the game. I'm not murdering people or illegally street racing, I'm not joining the military because of Call of Duty or Battlefield etc.

• 
  Jeffrey’s Aura Farm (@HolyMulletMan) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Battlefield My sons will grow up without a father bc I will kill my self unless you guys fix Strikepoint

• 
  TheCreatorNyvlem (MLVNS) (@TheCreatorOneM) reported 4 minutes ago

  @obviouslyhud @BattlefieldInte @Battlefield Wtf is the problem? Just a extra mode you can play or not play

• 
  Ken. L (@KendogxX) reported 7 minutes ago

  @4Thund3r @BattlefieldComm Any netcode changes won’t matter until they fix the gunplay

• 
  Libertad_24 (@FlacoG_2023) reported 8 minutes ago

  @GrimBF6 @Millitings @BattlefieldComm "Buddy," how many more months do they need to fix this? Are they waiting for MW4 to come out and there will only be 2000 people left...? "We are working." Game from 2025...

• 
  It's Absurd (@ExtraSmallBrain) reported 12 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield You fix the spawn issue and reintroduced the mouse not working to select spawn point... How useless you guys are...

• 
  Adrock (@Adrock318) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I still cannot remap the ping button for the big map ui. It does not work at all when trying to remap ping to RB. Been broken since launch. @tiggr_ @DRUNKKZ3 please, please please fix button remapping once and for all.

• 
  ناصر بن تركي (@nasserturki11) reported 15 minutes ago

  This is exactly the problem with Washington’s hardline Iran debate. It treats the Middle East as a battlefield for ideological theories, while the region itself has to live with the consequences. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Oman, and others did not push for de-escalation because they trust Tehran. They pushed for it because they understand geography, energy markets, shipping lanes, and the cost of a war that no one can fully control once it starts. Every time, outside hawks promise a clean outcome. Every time, the region is left dealing with the consequences. Israel may want permanent pressure on Iran. Some voices in Washington may want regime collapse. But regional states have a different responsibility: protect their economies, their societies, their infrastructure, and their long-term stability. That is not appeasement. That is sovereignty. The real question is not whether Iran should be trusted. It should not. The real question is whether endless escalation has ever produced the stable Middle East its advocates keep promising. It has not. The countries that chose diplomacy, deterrence, and regional balance were not being naive. They were being realistic. And this war proved their point.

• 
  Mαr Mounier 🌐 (@elhigadodmarita) reported 17 minutes ago

  @mhfmvc Dear brother, I deeply appreciate the candor of your analysis. You present a position of impeccable logical rigor within a closed system, yet you commit the very error of those you criticize: you reduce the Mystical Body of Christ to an administrative problem to be solved at a desk. You employ the sedevacantist thesis to denounce the ‘inconsistency’ of others, but to what does your position lead in practice? To a total atomization where every believer becomes their own Pope, awaiting a restoration that, by your own premise, is humanly impossible. Absolute sedevacantism ultimately manifests as a form of quietism: since you posit that there is no authority, there is no mission, and therefore nothing to do but await the apocalypse from the comfort of one’s home. And that is the very triumph of the ‘sect’ you so adamantly oppose! They need not persecute you if you have already excluded yourself from the combat. Furthermore, you accuse me of caring only for ‘externals’ rather than doctrine. On the contrary: precisely because I am concerned for doctrine, I understand that the Church is NOT a corporation whose legal validity is automatically annulled by the errors of its managers. Remember that the history of the Church is a record ad infinitum of Popes who have been weak, erratic, or deeply questionable, without that signifying that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the sacraments or the apostolic succession. The fact that you require the entire ‘protocol’ of history to be flawless to believe in the validity of the hierarchy reveals that your faith depends on bureaucratic perfection, not on divine Providence. Then, you criticize the SSPX for its ‘inconsistency,’ yet in practice, they are the rearguard trench of a war you have already declared lost. Is the SSPX position perfect? No. But the ‘purity of doctrine’ you demand is, at this historical juncture, a LUXURY that does not permit the building of a single chapel, the formation of a single priest, the protection of the Tridentine Mass, or the salvation of a single soul from destruction. The SSPX, conversely, for all its limitations, is fighting the war, taking bullets, missiles, and bombs. They remain in the field because they know that the General on the line is CHRIST and the fortress to be defended is HOLY. Finally, you argue that it is ‘utterly inconsistent’ to recognize the Pope while rejecting the Council. Brother, it is entirely Catholic to acknowledge the historical facts-that Rome is occupied by an anti-theology-and, simultaneously, to maintain that Christ has not abandoned His Sacred Spouse, but has allowed a trial of purification where Tradition remains the only guiding thread. Do you prefer the theoretical purity of self-destruction? So be it. I prefer the resistance in the trenches, with all its wounds, abuse, suffering, and contradictions, for as long as the occupation lasts. But we must not leave the enemies of the Church an easy path. Remember: being Catholic is NOT for the cowardly. To be a militant Catholic, one MUST BE BRAVE. I understand your position perfectly, but we have been pushed into a FRONTAL war, and doctrinal purity is useless if it merely becomes a shroud to bury the cause of Christ. The ‘inconsistency’ of which you accuse me is not a weakness; it is my refusal to let the enemy dictate the rules of my own surrender. No. If the Church is to be defended, we must step directly onto the battlefield. And we do not care about appearing with pressed and perfumed uniforms. All we care is: we are under fire, and we MUST save lives—and souls. Even if there are only twelve of us.

• 
  Zachary Davidson (@Ryangofett_2490) reported 19 minutes ago

  @JundaFPS Love this update man. I'm seeing it wasn't a skill issue after all. I'm getting much more kills now. I hope we never have to deal with this again.....until Battlefield 7 😭😭😭

• 
  berserk415 (@Berserk710415) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Battlefield The game is broken and old bugs are back . We are on s3 nothings gotten better. Yet we still get timed game modes not stability or new maps. Plz get it together battlefeild

• 
  Bustin Cider 🔞🇺🇲🇺🇲 (@DominusFlorum) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Therealrobtutor @Battlefield Have the same issue with one of the carbines lol

• 
  Arminius Secundus (@Arminius214) reported 31 minutes ago

  Where’s the fudd from yesterday who was splerging about ARs not working on the battlefield bEcAuSe oF ThE mUd.

• 
  monster115 (@AMH_1151) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm when Fix server middle east ?

• 
  Paul Eggs Nolan LFS6B (@paul_eggsNolan) reported 37 minutes ago

  Major James Capers Jr. earned the Medal of Honor for March 31–April 3, 1967 actions near Phu Loc, Vietnam. As a 2nd Lt leading 9-man Force Recon Team Broadminded, the patrol was ambushed. All were wounded. Despite severe wounds (abdomen ripped open, leg broken, heavy blood loss), he refused evacuation. He directed close supporting fires, led the defense, and twice stepped off the evac helo so others could leave first—ensuring every Marine got out safely. Trailblazer: first Black enlisted Marine to earn a battlefield commission and command a Recon company. True hero. 🇺🇸