1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 4
Málaga, Andalusia 1
Montaulin, ACAL 1
Paris, Île-de-France 31
Mérignac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Cergy, Île-de-France 2
Casablanca, Casablanca-Settat 1
Courcelles-lès-Lens, Hauts-de-France 1
Aix-en-Provence, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Rennes, Brittany 2
Orléans, Centre 1
Haguenau, ACAL 2
Lavaur, Occitanie 1
Monthyon, Île-de-France 1
Nancy, ACAL 1
Argentan, Normandy 1
Cadiz, Andalusia 1
Nantes, Pays de la Loire 3
Bitche, ACAL 1
Aurillac, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 2
Arvert, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Angoulême, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Pessac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 5
Pont-Scorff, Brittany 1
Labenne, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Fort-de-France, Martinique 1
Montpellier, Occitanie 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Brewahha
    Brewahha (@Brewahha) reported

    I've been on the battlefield since Day 1, and I can promise you there's always been a narrative pushed by shills and bots trying to steer people away. That may not work on Anons, but it absolutely influences normies. Repetition and the appearance of consensus can shape how people perceive an issue. Whether it's accurate or not, people often use what they believe "everyone else thinks" as a shortcut when deciding what to believe themselves. Psychologists have studied this phenomenon for decades. It's often referred to as social proof or the bandwagon effect—the tendency for people to be influenced by what they perceive to be the majority opinion, especially when they're uncertain or don't have strong views of their own. That's why online conversations matter. A comment section filled with one viewpoint, trending hashtags, or overwhelming positive or negative reactions can influence how observers perceive public opinion, even if those reactions don't perfectly reflect reality. The lesson is simple: don't mistake the loudest voices for the majority. Think critically, verify information from reliable sources, and judge issues on the evidence rather than on which side appears to have the bigger crowd.

  • RCKaserman
    Richard Kaserman (@RCKaserman) reported

    @VetDad25 A major problem is that the "Military Profession" is inherently unsafe and is tough to balance between training soldiers for battlefield survival and doing it safely. "Safety" often becomes an excuse for excessive risk avoidance in training, which degrades wartime performance.

  • FoxxyUncMoxxie
    🔞̷Moxxie🔞🏳️‍🌈 (@FoxxyUncMoxxie) reported

    @BearForceCubHQ @CallofDuty Honestly, some of the biggest issues with it is that we genuinely never get enough times to spend and enjoy playing the game. The next game is always immediately right around the corner. And it's such a horrible business strategy. It's why battlefield does it better

  • Hinata_Kiyoto
    日向君 (@Hinata_Kiyoto) reported

    Test Your Word Power—Broaden your lexicon via global news outlets 2026-07-20-1 —Axios U.S. forces said Sunday they found the [ ] (the physical parts of a person’s body that are left after death, especially when recovered at a site such as a battlefield or crash location ) of an unidentified service member near the Jordan air base where two American troops were killed in an Iranianmissile attack.

  • Mathias8Wolf
    mathias wolf (@Mathias8Wolf) reported

    One more philippic holding general Syrskyi responsible for "Soviet style" military mismanagement and all the "avoidable excessive losses" of UAF. Yet decisionistically reducing all those problems to one of bad personal leadership without addressing systemic constraints and failures (lack of manpower and training, internal Ukr. problems with logistics and procurement, cases of fortifications remaining unmanned, inadequate equipment partly due to insufficient Western support, etc) may not be sufficient to overcome them. The failure of the Ukr.summer offensive, certainly not a masterpiece of strategic originality - there was no surprise effect - was also due to insufficient equipment, from modern battlefield missile and demining systems to tank rescue vehicles, but even more so to generally low numbers of heavy equipment, and the lack of direct air support (combat helicopters, airborne raids etc). This does by no means justify the removal of brilliant Fedorov from the MoD which remains a grave, self damaging error of Zelensky. What surprises is however the unusual overt public attack on mil.hierarchy by Fedorov after his dismissal, that's quite unusual and may hint to an ego too strong for the logics of mil.burocracy. Zaluzhny had shown restraint in this situation.

  • Nik0bi1
    Niꓘ0bi1 (@Nik0bi1) reported

    @EndersFPS And you know What ? BF7 Will have the same issue 🤡 battlefield is dead !!

  • NoLiquidity77
    NoLiquidity (@NoLiquidity77) reported

    @criptopaul Only issue is Iran has been preparing for this for decades, so not sure how such an attempt would go, this isn't just some clown invasion on a flat plain battlefield

  • LandsknechtPike
    Aristocratic Fury (@LandsknechtPike) reported

    The only thing that annoys me more than grey filter is how they even started abandoning heraldic surcoats in modern movies. Henry V (1989) vs some modern abomination of what's supposed to be Henry V. The reason why this annoys me the most is because there should be no excuse for this. There is no reasonable way to explain why you would not include heraldic surcoats in a movie depicting medieval warfare, considering how important part of warfare this was, serving as an identification for nobles and their units in a time when standardized uniforms did not exist yet. With most other things you could sort of make some lame excuse. Like for example grey filter - artistic choise (a completely horrible one that makes the movie unwatchable but ok), real historic armors are expensive, extras are expensive etc. But this is literally just a piece of cloth. It should be no problem for a movie of a budget of this magnitude to get historically correct heraldic surcoats and tunics for the soldiers, depicting their coats of arms, the colors of their factions etc. Also imagine how stupid and unrealistic this is, if the medieval armies had no heraldic surcoats and other types of colorful identifications like tunics, badges, it would be extremely difficult to tell each other apart on the battlefield, practically impossible in many cases. Yes in modern movies you have scenes of two armies with knights on both sides only wearing armors with no identifications whatsoever (even banners are rare), and the commoners wearing colorless rags, the infantry troops are not fighting under their banners. It's ridiculous. How could they even be able to recognize each other. So the fact that these modern movies don't include this shows me that they are not even slightly interesting in being historically accurate and giving a fair depiction of a certain time period, they have no interest in presenting history, in fact it obviously appears that they want to actively portray it in a much worse matter than it was, because they removed of the most colorful and coolest aspects of the time, which would have cost them absolutely nothing of significance to include.

  • DANNYonPC
    DANNYonPC (@DANNYonPC) reported

    @bee_fumo Battlefield with EAC call of duty with its own AC adobe premiere Windows isn’t giving me enough issues to make me switch

  • miscomputate
    Mason (@miscomputate) reported

    $INFQ @infleqtion The market is treating this like a busted de-**** while Washington / @DoWCTO is treating this category like strategic infrastructure. That is the huge disconnect and where most of my angst comes from. The stock price is ugly. No way around it. Macro is not friendly. Semis have been derisking. High beta names are getting hit. Oil/Iran/rates/small cap sentiment are all real issues in the short term. But the company specific and government specific story is moving in the opposite direction. That’s what I must focus on now. The market is asking: Where is the immediate revenue? Where are the awards? Where are the contracts? Why is this still trading like a speculative quantum name? Fair questions. But Washington appears to be asking something very different and is requesting it as soon as humanly possible: Who can field quantum sensors? Who can support GPS denied environments? Who can improve timing and navigation? Who can detect RF signals? Who can miniaturize cold-atom systems? This is becoming a big one. Who can support ISR, defense, space and critical infrastructure? Who can turn quantum from lab hardware into deployable systems? That is where $INFQ keeps getting stronger. Because Infleqtion is not just sitting in the “quantum computer someday” bucket. They are sitting across the table and working on the exact questions that Washington needs answered: Cold neutral atom compute/sensing. Atomic clocks. RF sensing. PNT. Defense. Space. Networking. Miniaturization. Field deployment. And the federal roadmap keeps moving straight into those lanes. Commerce LOI. White House EO signing. Matt Kinsella in the Oval Office. White House quantum summit. CNBC visibility. Barron’s coverage. QED-C Capitol Hill showcase. Army / ARL RF sensing work. Farseer quantum sensing initiative. DARPA Perrseus. Quantum Genesis. Quantum World Congress. None of these alone makes the thesis. But together, it looks less and less random. @DARPA Perrseus is a great example. That program is not asking “who has the best stock chart?” It is asking how to build microscale ultra high-vacuum systems for compact cold-atom devices, MEMS, photonics and quantum sensors. Translation: make atomic systems smaller, more rugged, more manufacturable and more field ready. That is exactly the bottleneck for clocks, sensors, PNT, RF and battlefield deployment. That is Infleqtion’s language. That is Infleqtion’s roadmap. And that is the quiet part the market does not price until it has to. The stock can be ugly before the thesis becomes obvious. That is how these things work I guess. The market looks at $INFQ and sees a $9 stock with early revenue and **** baggage. Washington looks at this technology and sees timing, sensing, navigation, defense, space, RF, quantum networks, ISR and national security infrastructure. Those are two very different messages. Important dates I’m watching: August 3 — DARPA Perrseus abstracts encouraged August 18 - Q2 Earnings August 21 — EO deadline for DoW to identify at least 3 next-gen quantum sensor projects September 1 — Perrseus intent to propose deadline September 20–23 — Impact 250 September 23 — Perrseus full proposals due September 23–25 — Quantum World Congress I don’t know when the market wakes up. But I do think this is the kind of setup where the real move happens after most people have already gotten tired, shaken out, or convinced themselves nothing is happening. Wall Street is still trying to value this like another early stage quantum-computing stock. I think Washington may be telling us it is something much more important than that. $INFQ is an atom based infrastructure company. And right now, the government seems to understand that far better than the market does.

  • DeleteTheNats
    Trans-Inclusive Misogynist (@DeleteTheNats) reported

    @Rust_Belt_Red @KarnesMellagio It's more that some westerners used to the USA solving all of its problems with air power are unable to conceive of a battlefield where both sides have a competent and sophisticated air defense so you can't just strafe every enemy with A-10s.

  • RyanO_ChosenCoy
    Ryan O'Leary (@RyanO_ChosenCoy) reported

    @Longtstanding I assure you no one still thinks the CiC of the mil has done a good job or reversed the problems and put Ukraine at a better level on the battlefield. Quite the opposite

  • Jet_Pilot_PakFa
    Jet_Pilot_PakFA (@Jet_Pilot_PakFa) reported

    @T0TALfps @Battlefield Return of land, vehicle and Air without fix the air radar once you broke it again in the 30TH patch? And you have the audacity to make a Collab with Maverick with this horrendous jet gameplay without even Loadouts?

  • stevedeleeuw
    Steve in a Truck (@stevedeleeuw) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Xbox freezing glitch not fixed hey?

  • IsaiahG6969
    Isaiah Gonzales (@IsaiahG6969) reported

    @atangofficial_ Some people really need to think about that. You are in service to your creator. This is not home. This is the battlefield you have been deployed, it’s time to wake up and get to work.

Check Current Status