Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Pen the Stellar Queen 🇵🇪🇺🇸 (@SenranHime97) reported 2 seconds ago

  Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017). My absolute favorite live service game I ever played my time on Playstation 4 back during launch (granted I had massive issues with it until September 2018) all the way to its final DLC update. Yes the lootbox scandal was awful, yes the story was awful thanks to typical Disney SW storytelling, BUT... Dear lord was it a massive improvement over the first poor excuse of a game and it was just as addictive to play similar to Battlefield 4 in some cases. Shame this was the last time this felt like a true DICE game because after this game... most of the good devs that made up of DICE... fully left after Battlefront 2.

• 
  Marwan Takchi (@TakchiM) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ziyad_kayyali @jacksonhinkle Shame on me? Shame on you for glorifying a militia that “liberated” nothing and destroyed what was left of Lebanon. Yes, Israel withdrew in 2000. And what did Hezbollah do with that moment? Build a state? Rebuild the South? Strengthen the army? Grow the economy? No. It built a state within a state, kept its weapons, and dragged Lebanon from one disaster to the next in service of Tehran. Should I remind you what your “holy resistance” actually gave Lebanon? May 7, 2008: Hezbollah turned its weapons inward and invaded Beirut and the Druze mountains, attacking Lebanese civilians because the government dared challenge its telecom network. August 4, 2020: while Hezbollah controlled the port, the airport, the border crossings and terrorized every judge who got close, Beirut was blown to pieces and over 200 people were killed, thousands wounded, and entire neighborhoods destroyed. October 14, 2021 – Tayyouneh: armed men opened fire in Ain el-Remmaneh and turned Beirut into a battlefield again to intimidate Lebanese who dared say enough. So spare me the “they paid in blood” sermon. Every thug, militia and warlord pays in blood. That does not make them patriots. It makes them armed men willing to sacrifice Lebanese lives for an Iranian project. You call it “resistance.” I call it what it is: an Iranian proxy that assassinated, occupied, intimidated, bankrupted, and isolated Lebanon. You put Hezbollah before Lebanon. We don’t. We put Lebanon, its sovereignty, its army, its constitution and its people above every militia, every mullah, and every fake resistance slogan.

• 
  FlamingApes (@FlamingApes) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Battlefield 0h stop acting like you guys are apart of the group. you can post and sell stupid stuff but you can't fix hit reg and cheaters taking over your games.

• 
  Operation Detachment Gaming (@ODGactual) reported 9 minutes ago

  Breakthrough on Liberation Peak is trash. Defenders have zero tanks, smh. It was decent but then changed for no reason! @Battlefield give defenders some vehicles!!! Fix launch maps on BT! Add Operations back! @BattlefieldComm @EA_DICE

• 
  Boyishdude (@DisposedZero) reported 11 minutes ago

  @AzraelSch @FreeTalkLive Anyway, the reason copyright is an issue here is for the reasons I already mentioned. The real fans can't come in and make a proper Battlefield game (that's named as such) that does justice to what the series is at its core because that's illegal;-

• 
  UniqueSkillez (@UniqueSkillez) reported 12 minutes ago

  @CynderFlamez Eomm is the problem within Battlefield 6. Battlefield 2042 looks and plays better to me.

• 
  asmarino ደጀና💪🇪🇷 (@azmarinoss) reported 13 minutes ago

  @LJeganu No question 100%. If this the problem for them why they are silent when they see the pp massive preparation for war? Why d9 you silent for ongoing war in amhara, Oromo, and other Ethiopian? Even do you think not preparation for war save Tigrayans if pp create war with Eritrea? Wehere do you think the Battle ground if pp strat war for annex Assab? And what choice you see the Tigrayans ppl at all? question—100%. If this is really their concern, why were they silent while PP was openly preparing for war? Why stay silent about the ongoing wars in Amhara, Oromia, and other parts of Ethiopia? Do they honestly think ignoring military preparations would protect Tigrayans if PP started a war with Eritrea? Where do they think the battlefield would be if PP tried to annex Assab? What realistic choice would ordinary Tigrayans have in that situation?

• 
  A. (@Alejandrobv_) reported 16 minutes ago

  Fix your Game @Battlefield

• 
  Dan Haberern (@ServReasoning) reported 17 minutes ago

  I spent the entire last week at the AI Engineer World's Fair in SF with where top AI labs, founders, Fortune 500 CTOs & AI Engineers meet. Really perfect timing - having boots on the ground right before we deploy SERV Reasoning v2, because the problems v2 ships against are exactly what i heard in meetings, over and over. To give you a quick recap, it was a fruitful week overall: 60+ new companies from the fair now in our structured pipeline, from two-person agent teams to trillion-dollar clouds (a few that you'd recognize instantly, and at least two are infra your own stack probably touched today). One of the most interesting part was the Startup Battlefield where new startups pitched their projects. After numerous meetings, one thing is clear: everyone in Enterprise AI is doing it backwards. The current flow: 1.) Tune the model 2.) Ship the agent 3.) Debug a black box after it embarrasses you in production A version of the same confession kept surfacing: "we shipped an agent, it did something weird in front of a customer, so we pulled it - cause nobody on the team could explain a single decision it made." Others told me they burn anywhere between $10-$90k (!) a month on inference and can't drive it down. It became "cost of doing business." Now that SERV v2 is here, we are solving both these issues. Two confessions with two direct answers in v2: 1.) The black box: SERV makes agent reasoning traceable - you see how the agent thinks, not just what it outputs. And with Shadow Agents, every output gets reviewed against the original brief by a separate verification agent before anything ships. The "weird decision" gets caught in verification. Trust first, then scale. 2.) The burn rate: the reasoning engine lets you run the same workloads on much smaller models with better outputs. Verification Hints give agents signal on what a correct output looks like before they generate, cutting expensive re-work. And you don't have to take our word for any of it - Benchmark Tooling shipped in v2 shows you the cost savings on your own workloads before you integrate. That's the whole idea behind SERV Reasoning v2. Judging by last week, it's exactly what the room is starving for. Q3 is starting off with a bang.

• 
  💎 Jewels 💎 (@JewelsVEVO) reported 17 minutes ago

  Top 3 Battlefield of all time for me Such a shame EA shut the servers down like a month or so ago

• 
  Grouse Beater (@Grouse_Beater) reported 18 minutes ago

  DATA CENTRES MEET RESISTANCE Datacentre planning proposals are facing all kinds of hurdles, including suspicion and an antipathy here in Scotland, pushed back from securing energy supply to sky high construction costs. One example: the 2,000 acre Prince William Digital Gateway site in the US state of Virginia had another problem: its proximity to a Civil War battlefield. Questions asked are: why should the taxpayer pay for data centres because the big electronic companies want AI to develop their services? Who asked for more services? Where is the public clamour for greater costs and lost land? “If the development is allowed to proceed, the solemn nature of this historic site would become marred by sitting in the shadow of the monstrous datacentres, along with their associated electrical infrastructure,” said one legal brief against the plans. The US Gateway project is now in doubt after a local court ruling halted the project and a key backer pulled out. It is one of hundreds of large-scale datacentre projects around the world that are in various states of development, from chancier attempts at riding the AI boom to the more committed projects that have the support of tech behemoths like Microsoft. But while models produced by cutting-edge AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are improving rapidly, the central nervous systems behind their technology – datacentres – are being built at a much slower pace. The Uptime Institute, which inspects and rates datacentres, has identified 250 global datacentre projects exceeding 100MW in energy demand – equivalent to around 300,000 homes – that have been announced between 2021 and 2024. It said approximately half of those projects will either not happen, or their completion will be delayed. Even if the cancellations and delays came to fruition, there will still be an “unprecedented and rapid” increase in the power required over the next five years, according to Uptime. Mega-projects cancelled last year include Project Range in the US state of Arizona and the Cyberjaya campus in Malaysia. The Prince William Gateway is also on the cancelled list. This backlog poses problems for AI firms that need data centres to train and operate their models. Google admits its cloud business – which uses datacentres to provide AI services like chatbots to companies and users – is “compute-constrained”, as demand for ever more powerful AI models and services increases. But who needs chat bots? Why do we feel the need to talk to a computer? It is clear the big companies are shifting their costly ambitions onto the shoulders of the public. Photo - Horst Friedrichs: Didcot data centre.

• 
  𝐎𝐅 𝐁𝐀𝐓𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐓 (@OfBattlefront) reported 19 minutes ago

  ㅤ Raiden went farther than anyone else, he searched every place Shinei would normally go. when he found nothing, he started over and He crossed the battlefield once. Then again. And again. Every ruined street, every collapsed trench, every broken road. He retraced them all, refusing to believe he'd overlooked something. ㅤ

• 
  Andrew Lyerly ☦️ (@andrew_lyerly) reported 21 minutes ago

  @wokehammer Pariahs were absolute beasts on the battlefield though. Totally broken and could one-shot a Leman Russ if you rolled right. Could break a Custodes in half (if there were any) and do AOE damage to Psykers. The only thing that saved you was they couldn't regenerate and were slow.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 23 minutes ago

  while still having a doctrinal home. Third John’s doctrinal home is Church Age local church life. It addresses how believers should walk in truth, love in truth, receive faithful brethren, support the Lord’s workers, and resist proud men who hinder the truth. This is why the book is so useful for pastors, teachers, Bible students, and ordinary believers sitting in the pews. Church trouble is not new. Proud men are not new. Slander is not new. Gatekeeping is not new. Casting out faithful people in the name of authority is not new. The Holy Ghost put 3 John in the canon because Church Age believers would need it. The local church is supposed to be a pillar and ground of the truth, according to 1 Timothy 3:15, but whenever truth is present, the devil looks for an entrance. Sometimes he attacks from outside. In 3 John, the trouble is inside the walls. Chapter Two: The Elder Stands Where the Battle Is John calls himself “the elder,” and that is significant because local church battlefields require tested spiritual oversight. The elder is not writing from a throne of religious vanity. He is not acting like a pope, prince, or owner of the saints. He is writing with aged discernment, apostolic truth, and pastoral care. That is the right kind of authority for a church battlefield. The wrong kind of authority wants preeminence. The right kind of authority serves truth. John’s authority strengthens Gaius and exposes Diotrephes. Diotrephes’ influence protects himself and harms the brethren. There is the difference between Bible authority and religious control. An elder who stands where the battle is must be able to identify the real issue. Many church conflicts are deliberately clouded by personalities, rumors, hurt feelings, side conversations, and religious language. Diotrephes could have claimed he was protecting the church. He could have said he was guarding local autonomy. He could have accused the brethren of being outsiders. He could have made Gaius look rebellious for receiving those whom he refused. But John sees through the fog. The real issue is preeminence, malicious words, refusal of faithful brethren, forbidding others, and casting people out. A faithful elder does not let the proud man define the battlefield. That is needed now. The Church Age is full of men who can manage meetings but cannot discern spirits, men who can run programs but cannot smell pride, men who can quote leadership books but cannot handle Diotrephes. John is not that kind of elder. He is not neutral between the faithful and the abusive. He is not confused between charity and compromise. He is not intimidated by the local church boss. When the battlefield appears, the elder stands in truth. That is what church leadership is supposed to do. It is not supposed to protect the institution at all costs. It is supposed to protect truth, brethren, testimony, and the honor of the Lord Jesus Christ. Chapter Three: Fellowship Is a Battlefield Third John shows that fellowship is not a harmless social category. Fellowship is a battlefield because whom you receive and whom you refuse says what truth you are standing with. Gaius receives faithful brethren. Diotrephes refuses them. John commands, “We therefore ought to receive such, that we might be fellowhelpers to the truth.” That word “such” is important. It does not mean receive everybody who owns a religious vocabulary. It means receive those who went forth for His name’s sake and took nothing of the Gentiles. Fellowship in 3 John is not blind hospitality. It is truth-governed charity. Second John and Third John must be read together if a man wants balance. Second John says not to receive the false teacher who brings not the doctrine of Christ. Third John says to receive the faithful brethren who go forth for His name. There is no contradiction. The same Bible that closes the door on heresy opens the door to faithful servants. The same truth that rejects antichrist doctrine

• 
  PLA_Overwhelm (@junshiguancha1) reported 23 minutes ago

  @alpha_defense Bro, it’s time to retire this aircraft—it’s an embarrassment to India. The return on continued investment is simply too low; if it can crash at an airshow, what kind of survivability could it possibly have on the battlefield?