1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Paris, Île-de-France 4
Firmi, Occitanie 1
Garons, Occitanie 1
Manchester, NH 1
Ihlow, Lower Saxony 1
Pearland, TX 1
Brussels, Brussels Capital 2
Buenos Aires, CF 1
Chaniá, Crete 1
Équancourt, Hauts-de-France 1
Wilhelmshaven, Lower Saxony 1
Holbæk, Zealand 4
Comuna 1, CABA 1
Vitória da Conquista, BA 1
Montréal, QC 2
Copenhagen, Capital Region 2
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Plougastel-Daoulas, Brittany 1
Montpellier, Occitanie 1
Melbourne, VIC 1
Annonay, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Brownville, NY 1
Hagerstown, MD 1
Edinburgh, Scotland 1
Aix-en-Provence, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Enumclaw, WA 1
Ealing, England 1
Eggenfelden, Bavaria 1
Puteaux, Île-de-France 1
Weißenburg in Bayern, Bavaria 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • mary1585dva
    Mary (@mary1585dva) reported

    April 27 was supposed to be sentencing day. Instead, the Court paused on its own, citing complexity and unresolved issues. That pause matters. Guo warned: the battlefield between the CCP and America is inside the U.S. If America fails to expose the ***** money linking the CCP to the DOJ, FBI, law firms, and courts, no American is safe. This was never just one man’s fight. In year ten, the Movement has forced America to confront the CCP’s shadow over its justice, sovereignty, and freedom. When America wakes up, everything has just begun. 4月27日原本是宣判之日。然而,法庭却以案情复杂且尚存未决事项为由,主动暂停了审理程序。这一暂停举动意义重大。郭先生曾发出警示:中共与美国之间的战场就在美国境内。倘若美国未能揭露那些将“中共与司法部、联邦调查局(FBI)、各大律所及法院”勾连在一起的“黑钱”,那么没有一个美国人是安全的。这从来就不是某一人独自的抗争。如今已迈入第十个年头,这场运动已迫使美国正视中共投射在其司法体系、国家主权及公民自由之上的阴影。当美国真正觉醒之时,一切才刚刚拉开序幕。 #MilesGuo #NFSC #TakeDownTheCCP

  • ChrisSlaske
    chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported

    @Battlefield Easy red sec player count changes. Quads 80. Trios. 60. Duos 50-60. Solos, send it back. 100 player meta needs to be broken

  • JimmySecUK
    Jimmy Rushton (@JimmySecUK) reported

    No Western military, let alone the UK, is prepared on a battlefield saturated with small drones. And it's a problem on two levels; the MOD doesn't really understand the problem, and the Treasury flatly refuses to release any funding to meaningfully address it.

  • ChelUs0
    Chel (@ChelUs0) reported

    I don’t understand where this sudden wave of love for BF2042 is coming from. It was never a good Battlefield game, and it never really became one. At best, by the end of its lifecycle, it turned into a decent shooter - but that happened way too late, not at launch. At release, almost everything was bad: gunplay, vehicles, netcode, overall technical state, boring air combat, specialists instead of classes, lack of real factions, terrible maps, and basically no balance. Sure, it had some positives: helicopters (so strong they broke the balance), a large amount of vehicles at launch, and Portal, which actually stood out. I’ve put a lot of hours into BF2042 - and I have no desire to go back. BF6 isn’t perfect, but at least it didn’t launch completely broken, it gets content more consistently, has a clear visual style, and actually tries to feel like Battlefield from day one - not two years later. BF6 is better than BF2042 even now.

  • AcealphaOnyt1
    LJ 🇵🇸 (@AcealphaOnyt1) reported

    @aimxfer @zaykk76 The issue is routing, Most of the internet providers in India route from Mumbai and idk why but in Fortnite specifically that leads to inflated ping even though I could play on EU or Japan servers on battlefield without the ping inflation.

  • starsaver94
    Melody6 (@starsaver94) reported

    @Lordbaron84 @dreamabtdon If he stayed dead, then All Might would’ve died and Deku would’ve had two problems on the battlefield to deal with (A powered-up Shigaraki and Prime AFO).

  • AlpHa_VriiXx_2
    JeSuisUneFougère (@AlpHa_VriiXx_2) reported

    @Battlefield 6 months and the game still have the same problems

  • 4410Grave
    Grave 4410 (@4410Grave) reported

    @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Will this fix being one shorted by either a heli or tank from across the map? Didn’t think so 💩

  • JeffJoestar_VT
    jeff (@JeffJoestar_VT) reported

    @Battlefield Anything but fix the ******* netcode

  • DEXWrecks
    DEX (@DEXWrecks) reported

    At some point saying "thank you for your service" to a "veteran" whose role was limited to serving cafeteria food for 2 years on a base in Brampton MO feels like stolen valor when there are actual combat soldiers whose last meal was a piece of shrapnel on the battlefield

  • THe0GAmer
    Master of Controversy ⚠️ (@THe0GAmer) reported

    @Battlefield A hidden 25 dollar pre order pass drops after ea layoffs for a game with 21k peak players and a broken hit reg on the new train map

  • EverythingBubbl
    Bubble Boy🫧📌 (@EverythingBubbl) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Make matchmaking random like previous titles. Not difficult. Also if you do anything to the ROF for weapons and nothing to the velocity and damage, you’re just bandaiding the problem. Slightly increase recoil and adjust velocity/damage. A simple fix

  • BF6Updates
    Battlefield 6 News (@BF6Updates) reported

    Battlefield 6 Update 1.2.3.5 is live today. Here is what got fixed: Stability and Netcode - Crash fixes and improved gameplay stability - Better netcode sync for 1st to 3rd person transitions - Fix for dying behind cover due to desync - Game no longer freezes after resume Progression - XP bug with Assault 3rd weapon slot is fixed - XP now correctly tracks to the weapon in hand UI - Missing "Game Started" UI bug fixed - End of Round screen now shows the Battle Pass tab - Updated squad names, vehicle names, and icons - Improved Battle Royale lobby and spectator UI - Post-revive weapon visuals improved AI - Improved bot redeploy logic Redsec - Spectator controls keybind fixed - Camera clipping in vehicles fixed - Invisible weapons in Gauntlet fixed - DMR mesh no longer disappears after revive

  • hasan_trabelsi
    Nothing could hinder your radiant dreams, except t (@hasan_trabelsi) reported

    @Angeli2518 - The body is a battlefield, and love an attempt to repair what has been broken inside a person.

  • Rhianna_1989
    Rhianna ریانا (@Rhianna_1989) reported

    @DMBrookfield @FuriousManiati @AdamKinzinger Reducing civilian harm is a valid concern. But saying, “they know how, so just do it” ignores the structural reality of the battlefield and the need to actually dismantle an embedded armed group- not just manage its growth. “Planners know how to reduce civilian casualties” mitigation exists (warnings, precision targeting, timing, etc.). But none of those eliminate the core constraint: Hamas operating in dense civilian infrastructure. Every military that’s fought in similar environments (Mosul, Raqqa) still saw high civilian casualties despite using those same tools. So the issue isn’t lack of knowledge, it’s the nature of the battlespace. “The response drives the threat, so it’s impossible to neutralise it” Yet but that’s only half t the equation. Hamas’ capability isn’t just sentiment, it’s material infrastructure Those don’t disappear through restraint alone. If you don’t degrade that capability, the threat persists regardless of public sentiment. Proportionality in the law of armed conflict isn’t about matching casualties, it’s about whether expected civilian harm is excessive *relative* to concrete military advantage. You can argue specific strikes fail that test, but broad claims of disproportionate without case by case analysis aren’t really how the standard works. On revenge- of course emotions exist in any war. But operationally, the targeting focus (launch sites, tunnel networks, commanders) aligns directly with military objectives, not random or purely retaliatory violence. That distinction absolutely matters. And again you’re arguing there’s a better approach, but the only alternative you’ve suggested (more ground ops / hearts and minds) has historically resulted in longer conflicts and often higher total civilian casualties ***in dense urban insurgencies****. Link me Adam’s article and I’ll have a read. Thanks, David.

Check Current Status