Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Wriggles (@GoldenWriggles) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation Latest AMD drivers have loads of issues with Battlefield 6, Sticking to the older set till it gets removed from the release notes.

• 
  Keyfer (@BamaSquama) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Yall fix not being able to play with 3 friends in a party without someone getting stuck in the pre game lobby yet? Or still clueless about that issue?

• 
  Dallas (@realdcm) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Can we get a fix for the spawn menu bug? Still not working correctly, can’t easily click a spawn

• 
  Danner Foundation (@DannerFoundati1) reported 11 minutes ago

  @ambrosecarol2 @MichaelDun32142 @iAnonPatriot It depends on what kind of an officer he is and what kind of rank he holds. He may either be Frocked, or hold Temporary or Brevette Rank. I was a Permanent E-5/Temporary O-1 and E-5/O-2 then W-1/O-3 before receiving a Commission as an O-3. Before that I held a Temporary Appointment to the Rank, what the Army calls a Battlefield Commission. A man I worked with was a Permanent CWO-4 (ELC)/Temporary O-6, he died on Active duty in his 60s...not sure he had any more education than I did since he joined at 17. I had a Jr. HS Diploma when I left the service as my highest education attained. I left when I was deep-selected to O-6 as I did not want to take the assignment out of Engineering and into a very Senior Admin position. I have seen MANY Air Force Officers reduced in rank from Major or LCol one day to Staff Sergeant the next and working on the line holding a can of Nev'r Dull looking for a plane to polish. These were Rif'd officers and they were glad for the opportunity to finish out theirmtime the way they started as troops rather tha simply being let go.

• 
  𝒮𝒜𝒯𝒪ℛ𝒰 𝒢𝒪𝒥𝒪 五条 悟 (@TwoBabyBlues) reported 12 minutes ago

  ( For a moment, 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖚 simply stood there... ) ( Not because he was frozen... not because he was afraid... but because even his eyes needed a second to make sense of what they had just watched... ) ( Death... then rebirth... then death again... ) ( The kind of cycle that would have made most people sick just from witnessing it... ) ( His gaze moved from the blood-soaked sand... to the injured dragon... then finally to the woman collapsed beside it, breathing like every inhale had to claw its way out of her chest... ) ( The smile was gone now... completely... ) ( Around him, the air shifted... ) ( The next arrow fired toward the woman never reached her... ) ( It stopped inches from 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖚’𝖘 raised hand, trembling in place as if the world itself had decided it was no longer allowed to move forward... ) 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖚 𝕲𝖔𝖏𝖔: “ Yeah... I think that’s enough... ” ( He stepped past the line of dead soldiers and broken weapons, his shoes pressing into sand stained too dark to belong on any normal shoreline... ) ( More arrows came... then a spear... then shouting... ) ( None of it touched him... ) ( Every weapon slowed before reaching his body, hanging uselessly in the invisible space between him and the rest of the battlefield... ) “ I don’t know what kind of war this is... ” ( His eyes narrowed slightly behind his lenses as he looked toward the soldiers... ) “ And I don’t know what she did to make all of you this desperate... ” ( He stopped beside the collapsed woman and the wounded dragon, his posture casual, but the pressure around him was anything but... ) “ But watching someone die over and over again while cheering about it... ” ( A faint, colder edge entered his voice... ) “ That’s a pretty ugly look, don’t you think...? ” ( Without taking his eyes off the soldiers, 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖚 crouched slightly near the woman, careful not to touch her yet... not when he had no idea what that flower, that blood, or that rebirth actually meant... ) “ Hey... you still with me...? ” ( His voice lowered just enough for her to hear over the waves and distant shouting... ) “ Because if you are... maybe now would be a good time to tell me whether I’m saving you... or stopping you... ”

• 
  Jexxits (@JexxitS) reported 18 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm As much as i like RedSec and think it's the best BR, personally, on the market right now. I don't see me playing this in autumn and beyond. There is literally nothing new in RedSec, the updates coming out is only to fix bugs, bugs and bugs. I honestly don't see a future for it.

• 
  JamesFennell MBE (@FennellJW) reported 18 minutes ago

  @TheRealBouchy Battlefield helicopters have proven death traps in Ukraine and drones are much better at ISR. Should we have kept the Fairey Battle in service even after they were shot down in droves during the air battles in France in 1940?

• 
  FUN (@FunzaaTV) reported 19 minutes ago

  @KobsonskaKaupa @BattlefieldComm It's well known that Asian players are strong, but the worst ones use VPNs for gaming against us in Apex; it's a recurring problem.

• 
  🦅N8🦅 (@Vine_Pines) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm How about a fix for AMD users? No amount of troubleshooting has helped this game launch

• 
  berserk415 (@Berserk710415) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield The game is broken and old bugs are back . We are on s3 nothings gotten better. Yet we still get timed game modes not stability or new maps. Plz get it together battlefeild

• 
  Jerry Luckheister (@luckington24) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Amazing that you ******* retards have to fix this every game... What kind of mongoloid farm are your devs being bred in? Absolute embarrassment.

• 
  daniel queiroz (@danielsuaveira) reported 23 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm What a retarded way to do things, two times a error message like this, this dumbfucks probably are working drunk at this point

• 
  Jexxits (@JexxitS) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BlackEaglesFRVR @BFBulletin I've played Battlefield since 1942 so whatever. But didn't they remove it bc they have problems with the mode?

• 
  beporo (@beporoh) reported 26 minutes ago

  @hFX10mhtIJ7q5KF when this guy shows up everybody is in trouble Or they call him Commander If they fight is big enough they call him in as the strategist F+1 Rank Be advised if seen on the battlefield

• 
  Shane (@shane3628) reported 26 minutes ago

  @matteopelleg @grok My point is that your own framing contradicts BIP110. If spam is primarily a vision problem, not a technical problem, then why are we trying to solve it with a consensus layer technical patch? The BIP text itself says spam cannot be solved completely and is “typically best fought with policy/filters, not consensus.” So if we are trying to solve a vision problem with a technical fix, how do we define success when the BIP itself acknowledges it does not solve the problem everyone is rallying around? SPAM reduced by X% on chain? X% less use of op return? What does success look like, and how is it quantified? It is like banning AR-15s and claiming you solved mass shootings. Maybe you made one pathway less convenient, but if the underlying behavior continues through other available tools, did you actually solve the problem, or did you just move the crusade to the next symptom and any/all the new symptoms created? That is the issue with BIP110, and why people question whether the treatment is worse than the disease itself. Maybe it reduces certain forms of spam. Maybe it makes some data embedding methods more expensive, fragmented, or inconvenient. But then the argument should be honest: BIP110 is not (as stated in the BIP itself) “solving spam.” It is using consensus to make a subjective statement about which uses of paid block space the community wants to discourage. That is a much bigger precedent than people are admitting, and opens a dangerous door. If Bitcoin should be money and not file storage, I agree with the vision. But policy, filters, miner preferences, relay rules, fees, and social consensus are the right battlefield for that fight. Consensus should be the absolute last resort, especially when the proposal itself admits it cannot actually solve the problem everyone has been falsely led to believe it can.