1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 6
Châteaubriant, Pays de la Loire 1
Cesson, Île-de-France 1
Rillieux-la-Pape, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Brest, Brittany 1
Paris, Île-de-France 21
Criciúma, SC 1
Saint-Ouen, Île-de-France 1
Oyonnax, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Cluses, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Mont-Bonvillers, ACAL 1
Triel-sur-Seine, Île-de-France 1
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 2
Lille, Hauts-de-France 1
Moirans, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Villefranche-sur-Saône, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Meyzieu, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Nantes, Pays de la Loire 2
Carvin, Hauts-de-France 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 2
Ornans, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
La Garde, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Brunstatt, ACAL 1
La Crèche, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Sarreguemines, ACAL 1
Saumur, Pays de la Loire 1
Le Blanc-Mesnil, Île-de-France 1
Saint-Nazaire, Pays de la Loire 1
Bracieux, Centre 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • gagaruano
    RuaninhoBR - Hardware e Tecnologia (@gagaruano) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Fix freezes on AMD Gpus in the Spawn Screen!

  • CryptoXb32567
    CryptoXB (@CryptoXb32567) reported

    @Battlefield I KNOCK A GUY AND HE LEAVES THE GAME. I DONT GET MY KILL. FIX IT!!!!! NOW

  • DanteTakashiX
    DanteTakashi (@DanteTakashiX) reported

    @EpicNNG heres the problem with boarderlands in general THEY HAVE COOL CHARACTERS BUT WE CANT SEE THEM IN GAMEPLAY!!!!!!!! if this was COD Or BATTLEFIELD WHo gives a **** but DUDE 3rd person

  • DraekoSilver
    Draeko Silver 🔞 (@DraekoSilver) reported

    @Lathrix The problem is they are only good when paired with a lot of phobos units and you really only want MAYBE two 5 man squads in any army list. They make more phobos units to forfill all battlefield roles (melee guys, anti tank, etc) rather than just objective monkeys.

  • mastersabin
    Sabin (@mastersabin) reported

    @Battlefield fix your ******* game, we don't care about maps where we will not see ****

  • elhigadodmarita
    Mαr Mounier 🌐 (@elhigadodmarita) reported

    @mhfmvc Dear brother, I deeply appreciate the candor of your analysis. You present a position of impeccable logical rigor within a closed system, yet you commit the very error of those you criticize: you reduce the Mystical Body of Christ to an administrative problem to be solved at a desk. You employ the sedevacantist thesis to denounce the ‘inconsistency’ of others, but to what does your position lead in practice? To a total atomization where every believer becomes their own Pope, awaiting a restoration that, by your own premise, is humanly impossible. Absolute sedevacantism ultimately manifests as a form of quietism: since you posit that there is no authority, there is no mission, and therefore nothing to do but await the apocalypse from the comfort of one’s home. And that is the very triumph of the ‘sect’ you so adamantly oppose! They need not persecute you if you have already excluded yourself from the combat. Furthermore, you accuse me of caring only for ‘externals’ rather than doctrine. On the contrary: precisely because I am concerned for doctrine, I understand that the Church is NOT a corporation whose legal validity is automatically annulled by the errors of its managers. Remember that the history of the Church is a record ad infinitum of Popes who have been weak, erratic, or deeply questionable, without that signifying that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the sacraments or the apostolic succession. The fact that you require the entire ‘protocol’ of history to be flawless to believe in the validity of the hierarchy reveals that your faith depends on bureaucratic perfection, not on divine Providence. Then, you criticize the SSPX for its ‘inconsistency,’ yet in practice, they are the rearguard trench of a war you have already declared lost. Is the SSPX position perfect? No. But the ‘purity of doctrine’ you demand is, at this historical juncture, a LUXURY that does not permit the building of a single chapel, the formation of a single priest, the protection of the Tridentine Mass, or the salvation of a single soul from destruction. The SSPX, conversely, for all its limitations, is fighting the war, taking bullets, missiles, and bombs. They remain in the field because they know that the General on the line is CHRIST and the fortress to be defended is HOLY. Finally, you argue that it is ‘utterly inconsistent’ to recognize the Pope while rejecting the Council. Brother, it is entirely Catholic to acknowledge the historical facts-that Rome is occupied by an anti-theology-and, simultaneously, to maintain that Christ has not abandoned His Sacred Spouse, but has allowed a trial of purification where Tradition remains the only guiding thread. Do you prefer the theoretical purity of self-destruction? So be it. I prefer the resistance in the trenches, with all its wounds, abuse, suffering, and contradictions, for as long as the occupation lasts. But we must not leave the enemies of the Church an easy path. Remember: being Catholic is NOT for the cowardly. To be a militant Catholic, one MUST BE BRAVE. I understand your position perfectly, but we have been pushed into a FRONTAL war, and doctrinal purity is useless if it merely becomes a shroud to bury the cause of Christ. The ‘inconsistency’ of which you accuse me is not a weakness; it is my refusal to let the enemy dictate the rules of my own surrender. No. If the Church is to be defended, we must step directly onto the battlefield. And we do not care about appearing with pressed and perfumed uniforms. All we care is: we are under fire, and we MUST save lives—and souls. Even if there are only twelve of us.

  • Duckey141
    Ducky (@Duckey141) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Most out of touch clueless devs currently out there, genuine monkeys, just adding things and fixing **** all while we still have beta bugs rampaging in season 3 with no fix in sight

  • krisnair
    Kris Nair (@krisnair) reported

    The battlefield is not a geometry problem. It never was.

  • Menergyfuture
    ME Energy Markets (@Menergyfuture) reported

    Newly revealed defeat of America by Iran: In Saudi Arabia, more than 10 important radar sites were targeted and destroyed by Iranian drone and missile attacks, of which only two were made public in the media – a THAAD system radar east of Riyadh and another system on the coast of the Persian Gulf. However, as you can also see in this image, the locations of two other defense sites that were destroyed must be added to the previous information, which, together with a radar destroyed at Dubai airport, shows a total of three additional radars. Some of the most important Saudi radars, located in areas near Iraq and Jordan, were targeted – radars that were part of an extensive network established by the U.S. military to protect the Zionist regime. The destruction of these radars by Iran disrupted their communication chain, and this issue led to the deployment of expensive AWACS aircraft to the battlefield – and these AWACS were also destroyed in significant numbers by Iran (2 at Al-Kharj base and several at other bases).

  • TheRobbieBlair
    Robbie Blair (@TheRobbieBlair) reported

    @OhmanEU @BattlefieldComm I play RedSec too, when I need a good laugh But I'm on SeriesX with fiber optic internet and hard-lined with a CAT8 ethernet cable I usually have crossplay off, but you cant get a match Putting crossplay on brings many bugs/glitches/issues that don't exist without crossplay

  • GeezerJx
    GeezerJx (@GeezerJx) reported

    @Battlefield fix your game, i shouldnt have to alt-f4 to get back into a game

  • __abioye_
    Pọ́ọ̀lù (@__abioye_) reported

    @JamaicaGleaner That Canada vs. Qatar match was painful to watch—truly painful. Let's hope Ismail Koné is not badly injured, because that pitch was a battlefield of bad decisions and broken rhythm. The game was so poor, Qatar made Canada look like a Premier League side. Let that sink in. Absolutely amazing—and not in a good way.

  • Arminius214
    Arminius Secundus (@Arminius214) reported

    Where’s the fudd from yesterday who was splerging about ARs not working on the battlefield bEcAuSe oF ThE mUd.

  • PardonMyMess
    Pardon My Mess (@PardonMyMess) reported

    @WhiteHouse Bullshit. We utterly capitulated. This was a massive failure for the US and a victory for Iran. Vance is a historically illiterate clown. Every single one of our service members who won this war in the battlefield is probably wondering what the hell they were fighting for.

  • FlacoG_2023
    Libertad_24 (@FlacoG_2023) reported

    @GrimBF6 @Millitings @BattlefieldComm "Buddy," how many more months do they need to fix this? Are they waiting for MW4 to come out and there will only be 2000 people left...? "We are working." Game from 2025...

Check Current Status