Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Facio (@FacioSol) reported 4 seconds ago

  @Battlefield Crashing so many times I think my SSD is about to die. Please for the love of all things that are holy STOP adding shtuff to the in-game store and fix your buggy slop of a battlefield game.

• 
  BI (@BIofGG) reported 2 minutes ago

  @NeoJoaov @Jocxavi152471 @hipolitacalmate a regular, real human being with actual originality could put the karen in the middle of the battlefield and we wouldn't complain. The game wouldn't be filled with thousand little details making it pop as yet another woke public service announcement.

• 
  Swaguley (@swaguley) reported 3 minutes ago

  @miztifying Sure, I'd much rather deal with that if that meant removing sliding altogether, yes. Isn't it a strange coincidence that the the slide has been in Battlefield for 10 years now and that coincides precisely with the worst Battlefield games in the series? Battlefield V did have pretty solid, underrated gameplay in my opinion, apart from its other issues. I was on console up until 2042, so there wasn't really a problem with air strafing generally on the BF4 console version. One could argue controllers couldn't really air strafe fully because you can't set your stick speed both high enough to both be able have a usable sensitivity while being able to hit 180s like mouse users did. I would argue that console players actually experienced the base movement design of the game, even if air strafing was personally added by Sirland himself. The most I can say I saw was jump peeks, which doesn't bother me, I can't remember a single instance nor can my friends of encountering someone air strafing on console. Did some guys do it? Maybe, but it surely wasn't prevalent on console, but it sounds more common on PC, so I'd be curious to see how you would balance it so it doesn't overwhelmingly favor mouse users

• 
  ustonymc (@ustonymc) reported 5 minutes ago

  "Blazing Inferno" OMAHA BEACH June 6 1944 It took General Gerow's V Corps spearheads 3 hours to reach Omaha Beaches, and by then, most of the men had thrown up their breakfasts, all were drenched, and many were seasick, covered in puke and caked with salt. Gerow's soldiers were boated in darkness 12 miles from the beach, rather than 7 like the British. Even 7 was quite a distance for troops in LCVP's to travel, especially in choppy 10 knot seas off Omaha. But 12 in rough waters was a serious error of judgement. Omaha Beach gave a dreadful and deadly demonstration of Murpty's Law; all that can go wrong, will go wrong, at the wrong time. * In this sector, American bombers fearing to hit their own craft and troops had delayed their drop until the bombs crashed uselessly behind German defenders. * Here Rommel stationed the 352 Division, one of his finest. * Here too, the Germans held the strongest natural positions facing the entire Overlord assault; hills and cliffs rising steeply up to up to 200 feet from the beach and seawall above it. At Omaha was the largest concentration of enemy fire on the 60-mile invasion front. * Gerow loaded down his men with 90 pounds of gear. Even the best conditioned athletes in the world couldn't go careening around the battlefield for hours so encumbered. * Attempts to land artillery was a disaster, losing 26 guns. * 32 tanks were launched in heavy seas 3 1/2 miles out. Five reached the beach, and 27 sank like stones, drowning most of the crews. * Without tanks to take enemy fortifications under fire, the infantry had to storm the beaches themselves, flesh against fire. When the 5 tanks did arrive, they came behind, not in front of the 8 spearhead companies-1,450 soldiers in 36 landing craft. Heavy machine gun and mortar fire greeted these men as the waded ashore, many were wounded before they could reach dry land and had to struggle painfully up the beach heading for protection of the seawall. A wall of wrecked vehicles built up so quickly on the beach, soldiers were taking cover from scything German fire. One of them a soldier with a flamethrower took a direct hit to his fuel tank. The explosion catapulted his dying body into the sea and set a vessel on fire. A company of 270 specially trained demolition men followed the infantry ashore planning to blow up the boat obstacles before the tide covered them so that the following waves of 25,000 men and 4,000 vehicles might have an unimpeded path ashore, but German gunfire killed or wounded nearly half of them. Among the infantry huddled beneath the seawall or strewn among the debris, collapse of command followed quickly upon the destruction of communications HQ, which took a direct hit. Too many of the American Jr officers on Omaha that morning had been paralyzed by that same immobilizing dread that had come over their men. Offshore aboard the cruiser Augusta, Omar Bradley had his binoculars trained on Omaha Beach. The 1st Army commander anxiety deepened upon receipt of fragmentary reports suggesting disaster at Omaha. He was shocked at the loss of 27 tanks and 26 artillery guns lost. When V Corps reported at noon the situation, "still critical." Bradley considered diverting follow up forces to other sectors. Bradley realized that all depended on "that thin wet line of Khaki" that had struggled ashore and was so desperately clinging to its precious hold. Although the German defenders at Omaha possessed the power to impede or disorganize the American advance, they were neither numerous or strong enough to halt or destroy it. Throughout the battle they fought a static defensive fight. So, when the Americans gained ground or seized a toehold, they held it. The Germans never attempted to retake it. Like pieces being slowly fitted into a jigsaw puzzle, the Americans slowly expanded their hold. They were now fighting better and with more skill and better judgement. Now the battle experience of the 1st Infantry Division on the left began to have its effect. Small groups of soldiers from the "Big Red One" had begun to advance up the narrow valleys mounting local attacks against the Germans in their pillboxes and communication trenches. They fought their way onto high ground and began to hammer the Germans on their flanks. By their valor and rising momentum, they gave encouragement to the inexperienced and all but paralyzed 29th Infantry Division on their right. When General Norman "Dutch" Cota arrived on Omaha with his 29th Infantry command group he found chaos and paralysis. Cota moved among his dazed troops coming upon a group of pinned down Rangers, he asked who they were. "Rangers" came the reply. "Then goddamnit if you're Rangers, get up and lead the way!" Stung, they leaped ***** and began blasting paths through the German wire with bangalor torpedoes. The road at the top of the cliff was reached and the Americans had gotten behind some of the Germans strongest positions killing the enemy or taking him prisoner. When Cota found another group of Rangers apparently pinned down, he deliberately walked ahead of them to show there was no enemy fire. There was, but it didn't kill Cota. And because the Americans had such men-soldiers who didn't point the way but cried, "Follow me!" the near disaster that had been Omaha had been reversed. At 1:30 pm a vastly relieved Omar Bradley read Gerow's message, "Troops formally pinned down on beaches Easy Red, Easy Green, Fox Red advancing up heights beyond beaches." By nightfall the Americans controlled and area a mile deep beyond Omaha where the highest casualties occurred, 2,000-2,400 Americans were killed, wounded or missing.

• 
  Moddelicious (@Moddelicious) reported 5 minutes ago

  SRSLY @Battlefield Whats the meaning of reporting OBVIOUS cheaters when you only get a mail that you havent taken any action against? Are your anti-cheats department retarded IDIOTS or what? Cmon DICE youre destroying a perfect game and second thing FIX THE ******* GLARE GLITCH!!

• 
  Real BF4 (@real_bf4) reported 5 minutes ago

  @HawkinzFPS I’ve already put in my complaints lol. Battlefield has the exact same problem every launch. BF6 had multiple problem guns 2042 had the bizon, V had the assault rifles, 1 had the MP18. Then soon after they launch they take a sledgehammer to weapon accuracy. Then they do the same thing at the next launch. Very amusing, yet frustrating to watch

• 
  RisewireDaily (@RisewireDaily) reported 7 minutes ago

  @_eastOrb You’re not wrong about the raw matchup, but it’s not that simple. King Bumi has absurd battlefield chaos and unpredictability, but Toph Beifong doesn’t rely on sight or positioning—she reads movement through vibration. So “launch her into the sky = instant win” isn’t guaranteed; it just turns into a midair/terrain-control problem, not a clean KO.

• 
  Amish Aggarwala (@AmishAggarwala) reported 9 minutes ago

  Madras High Court warns against misuse of POCSO, orders inquiry into allegedly false cases The Madras High Court has raised serious concerns over the alleged misuse of the POCSO Act, observing that child protection laws cannot be allowed to become tools for personal vendettas, family disputes, or village rivalries. In a detailed common order dealing with four separate POCSO cases, the Court emphasized that the objective of the law is not merely to register FIRs and secure convictions, but to protect the dignity, emotional well-being, and future of children. Making a significant observation, the Court remarked: > “Childhood is not a battlefield for adult vengeance.” In one case, the Court quashed a POCSO prosecution after the alleged victim stated that no s*xual offence had occurred and claimed she had been influenced by others to file the complaint. The Court observed that vulnerable individuals should never be used as instruments of personal vendetta and directed a police inquiry into possible offences relating to false complaints under the POCSO Act. In another matter, the Court found indications that rival POCSO complaints may have emerged from longstanding village hostility. Describing such conduct as striking at the very soul of child protection jurisprudence, the Court quashed the proceedings and ordered an inquiry into allegations of instigation, coercion, and fabrication of evidence. However, the Court refused to quash one of the prosecutions after examining counselling reports that suggested possible manipulation of the minor complainant. Instead, it ordered a preliminary inquiry and stayed the trial proceedings pending further investigation. The Court stressed that mechanical implementation of child protection laws can sometimes cause emotional confusion, psychological trauma, social stigma, and educational disruption for children. It noted that protecting children also means safeguarding them from false accusations, coercion, and insensitive institutional processes. Taking note of recurring issues, the Court directed the State to consider launching a specialised sensitisation programme for police officers, child welfare officials, psychologists, and other stakeholders dealing with POCSO cases. The proposed programme would focus on child psychology, trauma-sensitive investigations, ethical interviewing of children, and preventing misuse of the law. Concluding its observations, the Court stated that child protection must move beyond an accusation-centric approach and become more trauma-informed, rehabilitative, and child-focused, ensuring that children are protected not only from s*xual offences but also from the emotional harm caused by fabricated allegations and irresponsible legal processes.

• 
  PyrateQueen elsewhere (@Solarclaw) reported 9 minutes ago

  Lean more into this Science vs (paranormal) Magic lesgooooo Imagine q!Ash losing to q!Aldo & whether they're on the battlefield or during q!Multi experimenting a corpse, "Ghosty" appears (maybe even teamed up w/ Fatal Error) being all possessive over the glitch

• 
  GryphonAMX (@GryphonAMX) reported 14 minutes ago

  Calling an Audible. Due to Tamt having issues with other Battlefield games, and 2042 being stuck only playable on crossplay, we're popping over to CoD WWII.

• 
  FPS_DeviL96 (@FPS_DeviL96) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Battlefield been out since October I’m Dumping half a mag into people and getting no hit registration? How can a AAA title be released in such a broken state like this! Yet you’re so ******* slo to release and update. The game is finished if you don’t fix this ****.

• 
  Chris Viegas (@ChrisViegas) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Battlefield , guys im trying so hard to like your game but it is so broken, its not fun to pay because of all the issues ... I wish you could get your act together -im just about to uninstall the game.

• 
  hyper (@Hypersiter64) reported 18 minutes ago

  @AirwingMarine hyper uber taxi service is here for battlefield transport needs give me call im just a pedal away Vrooom

• 
  Alexander The Greatॐ (@baeckmannisboss) reported 18 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Would be nice if you guys can fix the under the map / automatic win exploit for redsec

• 
  The Layman's Seminary (@LaymansSeminary) reported 19 minutes ago

  Is Defending the Trinity Against Mormons a Distraction From Proving Eternal Security? (A Super Layman / GPT5 response). TL;DR: It can be a distraction if the debate question is “Is Free Grace biblical?” Theology proper matters, and Mormonism’s doctrine of God is a major problem. But if your target is eternal security, you should not let the debate migrate from John’s promise of life into a general debate over the Trinity, councils, church history, or metaphysics. The clean distinction is: Theology proper question: Who is God? Is the Father, Son, and Spirit one God? Is Mormonism’s doctrine of God compatible with biblical monotheism? Soteriology question: What does Jesus promise the believer? Does the believer presently have eternal life and permanent non-condemnation? Those are related, but they are not the same debate. If you are debating a Mormon on “Is Free Grace biblical?”, your strongest lane is not first, “Your doctrine of God is false.” Your strongest lane is: “Even before we settle every doctrine of God question, what does Jesus say happens to the one who believes Him for eternal life?” John 3:16: whoever believes has everlasting life. John 3:18: the believer is not condemned. John 5:24: the believer has everlasting life, shall not come into judgment, and has passed from death into life. John 6:40: the believer has everlasting life and Christ will raise him up at the last day. That is your battlefield. The Mormon wants salvation to be a covenant/exaltation process. The Catholic wants salvation to be a sacramental process. The Orthodox wants salvation to be theosis/process. Your move is not to chase every system into every doctrinal basement. Your move is to ask: “When does the believer pass from death into life?” If they say, “At final exaltation after covenant faithfulness,” then John 5:24 exposes the problem. If they say, “At belief, but it can be forfeited,” then “everlasting life,” “shall not come into judgment,” and “has passed from death into life” become unstable. If they say, “Initial faith begins the process,” then they have admitted they do not hold John’s present-possession category. So yes, defending the Trinity can become a distraction when it allows them to avoid John’s soteriological promise. But do not say theology proper is unimportant. Say this: “Mormon theology proper is a serious separate problem, but tonight I am not letting that become an escape hatch. Even if we bracket the Trinity debate for a moment, your view still has to answer John 5:24.” That keeps category control. Best debate line: “I am willing to debate Mormon theology proper another night. Tonight the question is whether the believer has eternal life when he believes Christ. John says yes. Your system says eternal life is reached through a process. That is the issue.” So the answer is: the Trinity is not irrelevant, but it is not the cleanest first target for proving eternal security. For this debate, make theology proper a secondary issue and force the Mormon opponent to deal with Christ’s promise of present, irreversible life.