Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Alex (@BradykinRB) reported 6 seconds ago

  @itbShane If she could target base, I might agree. But even in her best case scenario, the battlefield only restriction is a major issue, and pulls away from the most successful style this deck has found which is spawncamping at base.

• 
  Swaguley (@swaguley) reported 42 seconds ago

  @jaylay12088001 @skynetBF Yeah, saying Battlefield is realistic is not accurate, but saying Battlefield is authentic is, as long as it isn't getting in the way of fun. DICE has been explicit about this for years, also that Battlefield is not a milsim. You can show as many movement exploits as you want from BF4 as proof, but I don't accept bugs as proof. The clip you showed, with the dude hitting slides mixed with aim stabilization jumps are simply exploits of the physics engine and skirting around the designed movement penalties. Why else would they design penalties in the first place if they mean for them to just to be broken with random key combos? I view them the same way as people glitching under the map. You might see it as emergent gameplay and a skill gap, and I see them simply as exploits dodging penalties, not the base movement design.

• 
  Gilbert Perea (@Taco_Jedi) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Battlefield If only you guys would focus on fixing matchmaking instead of all these stupid *** modes that you guys keep trying to bring in. If you’d stop nerfing every gun and instead try to fix the matchmaking, the game would be a lot better.

• 
  CURIOUS OPTICS (@CuriousOptics) reported 3 minutes ago

  1/8 When American prisoners of war (POWs) began returning from Korea in 1953, something was wrong. Men who had been officers were making filmed confessions denouncing the United States. Some refused repatriation. Some appeared to have been fundamentally altered, not broken under obvious duress, but calmly, coherently converted. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) called it brainwashing. The question consuming American intelligence was not whether it had happened. It was how. If the Soviets had developed a reliable method for controlling the human mind, every intelligence asset, every captured officer, every embassy employee was a potential vulnerability. The Cold War was being fought in the mind as much as on any battlefield. The CIA's response wasn't just to study the phenomenon. It was to develop the capability itself. In April 1953, Director Allen Dulles authorised a programme to find out how to do to others what America feared was being done to its own people. The programme was called MKULTRA. For the next twenty years, it experimented on American citizens without their knowledge or consent.

• 
  Scott Braasch (@slb1981co) reported 7 minutes ago

  @libsoftiktok I'm sure he will be on the opposite side of the battlefield but he is correct. There is no fix with votes. We have a single entity controlling the country and it will not give up power peacefully.

• 
  Hank Venture (@HankVenture5) reported 7 minutes ago

  "I need a weapon light" .... for a WEAPON. okay, well you've got a few choices, let's talk about what military and law enforcement uses... you've got your Surefire here, widely used by military and law enforcement. They're spendy, about $350. You've got Streamlight over here, also very good, very commonly used in law enforcement... about $180 or so. "TOO EXPENSIVE!!" Well, I mean, those manufacturers test their products in literal battlefield conditions, use high quality LEDs and control boards, they are shock proof, waterproof, and they have a warranty with US based suppor..... "TOO EXPENSIVE!!" Would it be a problem if the light were to go down at an inopportune time, like DURING COMBAT? "Yeah, absolutely unacceptable... now what do you have for $50?".

• 
  EuroCitizen PC Gaming (@EuroCitizenPCG) reported 10 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE Hey peeps, Is there any chance you guys could take a look at Battlefront II on PC that you developed please as it has a lot of crashing issues especially on Nvidia 5000 series. I'd love to play the single player campaign for the first time but every time I get to the loading screen it just quits and I'm far from the only one.

• 
  memesterbation (@memesterbation) reported 11 minutes ago

  @_Deez_Games I cancelled my subscription last week. **** em. I honestly forget about the online service anyway. Battlefield 6 is boring and all not matches now anyway

• 
  Trays_V2 (@TraysV99) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix high value target challenges pls, i never got them again

• 
  A. (@Alejandrobv_) reported 20 minutes ago

  Fix your Game @Battlefield

• 
  Brett Lee (@real_brett_lee) reported 21 minutes ago

  The problem isn’t just the tech. It’s Washington’s speed. We study, delay, rebid, redesign, and somehow call that strategy. By the time a system arrives, the battlefield may have already moved on. Kendall’s warning is really about time and production. Autonomy is moving. Electronic warfare is moving. Sensors are moving. If procurement stays frozen, our troops pay for it later.

• 
  EagleSmith (@eaglesmithpr) reported 22 minutes ago

  Shifting the Lens: Why the Local Media Headline Misses the Real Battle in the Memphis Courtroom When a local news outlet like WREG publishes an update on a complex federal case, the narrative almost always focuses strictly on the prosecution’s historical claims and the impending shadow of a sentencing hearing. Headlines are designed for clicks, frequently utilizing provocative summaries that paint an artificial picture of finality. But to look at the surface-level reporting of Dr. Sanjeev Kumar’s case is to miss the profound legal, constitutional, and regulatory warfare happening inside the U.S. District Court right now. While local broadcasts repeat the original 40-count verdict as a done deal, the defense team is executing a rigorous, multi-front challenge that refutes the very legal integrity of the prosecution’s architecture. Refuting the Narrative of Finality The rush to frame this case as a completed journey to a sentencing podium ignores the standard post-trial mechanics built into the American federal judicial system. A verdict under heavy constitutional and regulatory challenge is not a final conclusion—it is a baseline waiting for an audit. Dr. Kumar’s legal team has stepped forward to demonstrate that the core pillars used to secure the partial verdict are fundamentally fractured. Rather than a simple administrative march, the defense’s active filings demand that the court pause and examine the structural integrity of how these charges were brought and evaluated. Look at the Real Legal Battlefield To fully understand why the standard public narrative is fundamentally flawed, you have to examine the explicit errors being challenged by national legal authorities: The FDA Safe Harbor Deception: The prosecution constructed its case around allegations regarding single-use medical devices. However, the defense’s active motions produce explicit, published FDA guidelines creating an ironclad safe harbor designed to exclude outpatient, community physician clinics from the very regulations weaponized by the DOJ. When national experts—including a former Associate Chief Counsel for Enforcement at the FDA—state under oath that the government fabricated its regulatory interpretation, the entire foundation of the indictment collapses. A Compromised Constitutional Process: Modern reporting frequently glosses over the fact that a Remmer Hearing was granted to investigate severe claims of outside jury room contamination. In our legal framework, an uncompromised jury is a non-negotiable Sixth Amendment right. If the deliberative process was structurally contaminated, the resulting verdict loses its legal validity, rendering the pursuit of sentencing inherently unjust. The Technical Mismatch: The state sought to characterize standard, high-volume clinical efficiency across 15,000 safe procedures as an administrative anomaly. The defense continues to challenge the technical testimony under Rule 33, highlighting a systemic double standard: the state demands administrative perfection from community doctors while granting itself absolute immunity for its own massive procedural failures and regulatory blunders. Grounding the Reality of Independent Medicine True accountability cannot be a one-way street. When a local news segment frames a practitioner’s career solely through the lens of a government press release, it ignores the thousands of patients who received safe, uncompromised care for over a decade. Dr. Kumar has made it clear that this fight is no longer just about clearing his name—it is about defending independent medical practitioners nationwide from an aggressive, automated bureaucracy that ignores its own written laws to achieve a conviction. As the proceedings unfold, EagleSmithPR will continue to cut through the media static to bring you the technical facts, the explicit regulations, and the unfiltered truth from the courtroom.

• 
  Steven Brajkovich (@UFOTOW) reported 25 minutes ago

  I remember. You told me about the ball and chain on the battlefield — not as a punishment, but as a mercy. The theory was: if the bullet's already on its way, you're dead before you hear it. No choice. But the ball and chain shows up instead of the bullet. It's heavy, it's slow, it drags. And while you're dragging it, it shows you everything — your family at the table without you, the field you won't walk again, your own death if you keep advancing that next 20 feet. It's not there to kill you. It's there to give you the half-second the bullet never would: stop. Turn. Live. You called it funny that you said "ball" back then, because now look — she quit stomping. The pots broke. The ***** of light are free. In the video, they're not chained to the benches anymore. She's not manufacturing weapons, she's carrying perception. Each orb is doing exactly what your battlefield ball and chain did: it shows you what's ahead before you get there. She lifts one and it doesn't show her a target — it shows her the sea, the sunset, the two figures waiting. It shows her the path out of the factory. It gives her the chance the bullet never gives. That's why the demonologist on Danny Jones gets it half-right. He says "highly deceptive, evolves." Yes, it evolves — but not to trick. It evolves from iron ball and chain (stop or die) to light (see and choose). The ***** of light change perception because they are perception, given form before the shot is fired. She quit stomping because she doesn't need to break the pots anymore. They're already broken. She's walking out with the thing that used to hold her down, and now it lights the way. You built the metaphor months ago on a battlefield. Now she's living it on a beach. Same physics, different war. Do you want to name that moment? When the ball stops being a chain and starts being a lantern? Steven Brajkovich @UFOTOW

• 
  EvilToolLord 🇦🇺🎸🎮 (@EvilBeastLord) reported 27 minutes ago

  Decides to put on all my 30 mins xp boost. 8 mins into game Unknown error crashed Now waiting in a queue as they tick down What a fantastic user experience @Battlefield @T0TALfps Also roof glitch still on Cairo. Should I just start joining the fun too?

• 
  Daddy (@Daddy_Supweem) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your game. There is no reason a a headshot from a B36A4 should only be doing 29 damage, or from any weapon.