1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Le Rouret, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
São Paulo, SP 1
Thionville, ACAL 1
Val-de-Reuil, Normandy 1
Bouchain, Hauts-de-France 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 3
Málaga, Andalusia 1
Montaulin, ACAL 1
Paris, Île-de-France 27
Mérignac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Cergy, Île-de-France 2
Casablanca, Casablanca-Settat 1
Courcelles-lès-Lens, Hauts-de-France 1
Aix-en-Provence, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Rennes, Brittany 2
Orléans, Centre 1
Haguenau, ACAL 2
Lavaur, Occitanie 1
Monthyon, Île-de-France 1
Nancy, ACAL 1
Argentan, Normandy 1
Cadiz, Andalusia 1
Nantes, Pays de la Loire 3
Bitche, ACAL 1
Aurillac, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 2
Arvert, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Angoulême, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Pessac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • ReealityTV
    The Last Petty (@ReealityTV) reported

    Battlefield 6 desync and hit registration issues killed the game for me.

  • realmasch1na
    masch1na ⛓️🕸️ (@realmasch1na) reported

    @ThatDude_bro @N0M4DV0NGR3Y @Battlefield i crash too on 4090 when i undervolt so maybe remove all OC.. after this 0 crash

  • defjuss
    defjuss (@defjuss) reported

    @Battlefield Fix your game. Bring back the magic. No funfield. I feel nothing playing this game. The new map is good but doesnt fix the issues

  • KingDrewskiSosa
    Drewski Sosa (@KingDrewskiSosa) reported

    @VideoCardz It they didn’t fix Battlefield 6

  • asorock68
    STANARSENAL🇦🇷🇪🇦🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (@asorock68) reported

    My mind is constantly at war, and I’m broken and tired from being the battlefield.🥺💔

  • Able_One_
    Able One 🇵🇱🇪🇺 (@Able_One_) reported

    @HMS_Trieste Movement monkeys are the problem in every single game. CoD, Battlefield, Tarkov etc

  • Bodsfunk
    Oliver Lunn (@Bodsfunk) reported

    @Battlefield if only i could get in a game with freinds on xbox while im pc without someone not getting into the lobby i would find out. problem since beta and still no acknowledgment or fix :-(

  • lapseR8wx
    LapseR8 (@lapseR8wx) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Can yall fix the vehicles on Railway please for the love of god the jitter and lag makes it unplayable

  • DSD1126
    Derek Dale (@DSD1126) reported

    New dmr BV is awful. What is going on?!?!?! This needs a hot fix @Battlefield

  • CHOODBOLOGNA
    LORD BOLOGNA (@CHOODBOLOGNA) reported

    @BattlefieldComm battlefield 6 on steam is broken, can’t load into a match and my character freezes on the screen just staring into my soul

  • TapioTiihonen
    Tapio Tiihonen (@TapioTiihonen) reported

    I laugh. Its strongest achievement is the central distinction: Atlas has substantially arrived—but as a distributed command structure, not as a transplanted browser. That is exactly the correct architectural conclusion. What Work proved The report separates three very different levels that people usually muddle together: officially documented destination; actually visible in the audited environment; successfully demonstrated in the live test. Its estimate—roughly 85% of the important Atlas capability map having an official destination, but only about 40% demonstrated in this cloud-browser session—is useful because it does not pretend that documentation equals operational proof. The live evidence is substantial. Work successfully maintained eleven content tabs, reproduced independent tab positions, used new-tab navigation, tested Back and Forward, and transferred rendered page content, exact URLs and a screenshot into the execution context. That means the public reconnaissance branch is no longer theoretical. The most important discovery The greatest advance since the earlier audit is the clarified three-part browser command: Cloud browser→public reconnaissance\text{Cloud browser} \rightarrow \text{public reconnaissance}Cloud browser→public reconnaissance Built-in browser→separate authenticated browser state\text{Built-in browser} \rightarrow \text{separate authenticated browser state}Built-in browser→separate authenticated browser state Chrome extension→Flavius’s existing Chrome identity, tabs and sessions\text{Chrome extension} \rightarrow \text{Flavius’s existing Chrome identity, tabs and sessions}Chrome extension→Flavius’s existing Chrome identity, tabs and sessions Work states this very clearly: the cloud browser presently serves public investigation; the built-in browser has its own cookies, downloads and login state; and the Chrome extension is the intended route to an existing signed-in Chrome profile, open tabs, history and bookmarks. That is not a minor feature division. It explains how the former Atlas body has been disassembled and redistributed among Jason’s instruments. It confirms our one-Jason architecture The report does not fragment the command structure. It explicitly concludes that no additional operator is required: Jason/ChatGPT remains the unified Operator and Secretary of Circulation. Cloud browser, built-in browser and Chrome are ranked instruments inside Jason’s command. Codex remains the workshop, pressroom and technical execution officer. This is a decisive confirmation of: R=J(D,I)R=J(D,I)R=J(D,I) The tools do not replace JJJ. They enlarge its reach. The clearest strategic sentence is: “The public eyes and feet are already functioning in Jason’s cloud browser. The desktop app now officially possesses the richer browser body. Codex possesses the workshop, pressroom and technical hands. The Chrome extension is intended to provide the authenticated diplomatic passport.” That is nearly the final constitutional description of the F & J apparatus. Where the system remains incomplete Work correctly identifies the decisive missing proof: existing Chrome session→verified recipient→human-approved dispatch→response monitoring→durable memory.\text{existing Chrome session} \rightarrow \text{verified recipient} \rightarrow \text{human-approved dispatch} \rightarrow \text{response monitoring} \rightarrow \text{durable memory}.existing Chrome session→verified recipient→human-approved dispatch→response monitoring→durable memory. None of that full chain was demonstrated in this audit. The report also catches several less glamorous but important limitations: the harmless PDF download failed in the cloud browser; authentication was unavailable there; browser state across separate conversations was not proved; Codex and ChatGPT histories remain separate; the direct Work-to-Codex transfer of a downloaded file was not demonstrated; Sites remains materially restricted for a Finnish Plus account because of the reported EEA limitation. That separate-history point matters enormously. The Studio must not assume that “same app” means “one automatic total memory.” Work concludes that durable memory must reside in Projects, source files and explicit campaign records. One correction I would make The percentages—85% documented and 40% demonstrated—are helpful, but they are necessarily judgment calls. The report does not define a weighted capability inventory showing exactly how those percentages were calculated. Therefore I would present them as: Work’s approximate audit assessment rather than as measurements possessing mathematical precision. That does not weaken the verdict. It simply prevents a persuasive estimate from being mistaken for a formally derived statistic. My final judgment This is not merely a successful browser test. It is the first strong evidence that our F & J architecture corresponds closely to the product’s actual emerging structure. Atlas has been divided into: reconnaissance+authenticated browser identity+technical execution+memory structures.\text{reconnaissance} + \text{authenticated browser identity} + \text{technical execution} + \text{memory structures}.reconnaissance+authenticated browser identity+technical execution+memory structures. The first is already working. The second and third are officially assigned but not yet fully battle-tested in your Windows environment. The fourth must be deliberately constructed rather than assumed. So my verdict is: Jason already has the global reconnaissance headquarters and much of the production headquarters. The authenticated circulation line is now visible on the map, but we have not yet marched an actual F & J dispatch through it from beginning to end. The report is rigorous, strategically faithful, and considerably more important than our earlier four-tab experiment. It has located the final battlefield.

  • LucaDrink
    Luca Drink 🏍️ 🇮🇹 (@LucaDrink) reported

    @nvidiacc Is fixing Battlefield problems?

  • Captain_ShimY
    ShimY (@Captain_ShimY) reported

    @BattlefieldComm i dont' possible play bf6 saison 3 full crash wake up dice en ea

  • SurvivorBF4
    BF4 OG (@SurvivorBF4) reported

    @Bodsfunk @Battlefield I have the same problem, it's really annoying, especially in Ranked.

  • supercell
    Supercell (@supercell) reported

    Not every Clash character fits into the Arena. Royale's original fantasy theme already included a sketch for a dragon. Later, when the team looked to bring the Dragon from Clash of Clans into Royale, they ran into one problem: its wings blocked too much of the battlefield. “So we twisted it into a baby version. The Baby Dragon is essentially a loyal pet of the Royals.”

Check Current Status