Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  enigmahammer444 (@enigmashammer) reported 8 minutes ago

  Wow. Didn't know missiles could ignore flares. Happens nearly every game, so it must be a new mechanic because jets are super overpowered. Right @Battlefield Genuinely, the worst state I have ever seen jets. Even 2042 jets are better right now. Nearly unplayable. 30 killstreak, gone. Because you guys cannot fix your ******* game. Literally every SINGLE day this happens. What a failure. I can't imagine how bad the top gun collab is gonna be. So unfortunate.

• 
  Th3FaLL3nGh0St (@FaLL3nGh0St) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE BLACK SCREEN BUG!!

• 
  Liberty or Death (@SendMe1776) reported 14 minutes ago

  @SallyMayweather Strategic Misdirection: The core idea is to manipulate the enemy's perception of reality. By feigning weakness when strong, or inactivity when preparing to strike, a commander can lure the opponent into making errors or exposing vulnerabilities. Psychological Warfare: It involves provoking the enemy’s general, encouraging arrogance, and dividing their forces to ensure they are unprepared when the actual strike occurs. Not Just Lying: In this context, "deception" is less about simple dishonesty and more about strategic ambiguity and unpredictability. It is about controlling the narrative of the battlefield so the enemy fights a war that does not exist.

• 
  mgDuckyyy (@Duckyyy2142) reported 15 minutes ago

  @SgtDangerCow They can't. The prevalence of VPN's has made region locked/based match making a thing of the past. It's on every game. Just be happy Battlefield doesn't use ancient forms of Lag comp like Delta Force does. The Chinese are like t-800's on there.

• 
  Joshua Stubbles (@jstubbles) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Movement issues. Remove jumping from slide. Nerf weapon accuracy while airborne (ala BF3). Shoulder AA missiles are 90% useless unless you fire with groups of others. Being unable to lock aircraft near the ground is trash. RPG was nerfed too much, rocket in rear wont even do 50%

• 
  john canning (@johncan41163591) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Parssive69 @Battlefield no I don't think ill bother, I got banned from the steam forum for linking to a YouTube video showing a cheater after being asked to prove people were cheating :/ . the Gameplay is the problem its just die and respawn over and over, no fun.

• 
  A Japanese person living in America (@ko22188) reported 16 minutes ago

  @ajplus It began with a Japanese communist named Seiji Yoshida, who claimed that during World War II, while serving in the Japanese army, he abducted and forcibly transported Korean women from the Korean Peninsula and held them captive. However, this was later revealed to be a complete fabrication, and the man himself later admitted that it was a lie. But it was too late. In the early 1990s, this man's false testimony caused great shock and confusion, particularly in Japan and South Korea, and many people came to believe, based on this, that the Japanese army had abducted and forcibly transported women . They began to claim that the comfort women of the Korean War were the same women who　that the comfort women of the Korean War were the same women who had been comfort women for the Japanese army during World War II, even though they were actually abducted and forcibly transported byKoreans during the Korean War. As a Japanese person born and raised in Japan, I posted this article hoping to help dispel some of the misunderstandings about the comfort women issue that are spreading around the world. At that time, there were frequent cases of Japanese police arresting brokers of Korean descent for deceiving or kidnapping women from the Korean Peninsula. I saw many newspaper articles reporting on these incidents. The world believed that only the Japanese committed all the crimes and atrocities, and I myself had believed until then that Koreans were victims of the Japanese. While Koreans are viewed as victims of the Japanese, the reality is quite different. It was often Koreans, not Japanese, who were mistreating other Koreans. Because the Korean Peninsula consistently pursues anti-Japan !❗❗❗ In fact, most of the comfort women inJapan were Japanese.❗ There is, of course, a wealth of evidence of this in Japan.❗ However, media outlets around the world have suppressed these facts about Japan❗ and persistently promoted the idea that 200,000 women were forcibly taken from the Korean Peninsula, China, and other Asian countries by the Japanese military.❗❗❗ People harbor negative feelings towards Japan, hate it, and post slanderous comments like this online!❗❗❗ In fact, the Japanese military recruited comfort women. The comfort women were managed by Korean brokers. Because the comfort women profession was very lucrative, there were numerous incidents of Koreans kidnapping and forcibly taking women away, and being arrested by the Japanese police . This was because the Japanese government and military strictly prohibited the forced abduction of women. Newspapers in Korea and Japan at the time reported on the arrests of Koreans who kidnapped and forcibly took comfort women. During World War II, the Korean Peninsula was not a battlefield at all. Moreover, millions of Koreans worked for the Japanese army or related facilities. However, it is an absolute fact—an event that truly occurred—that Dutch women were forcibly taken by Japanese soldiers in Indonesia, a region of fierce fighting during World War II. The Japanese military strictly prohibited the forced abduction of women; indeed, the Japanese soldiers who forcibly took Dutch women were sentenced to death and executed at military tribunals held after the war. Yet, those tribunals merely mentioned the forced abduction of a handful of Dutch women, without a single word being said about the hundreds of thousands of women who had been forcibly taken. This fact is extremely inexplicable. How could the abduction and forced abduction of hundreds of thousands of girls not even be mentioned in military trial❗❗❗❗❗❗

• 
  dull8ird (@dull8ird) reported 19 minutes ago

  @DreamAnthems @BattlefieldComm Its not just xbox i was getting constant error codes on pc last night i just kept having to spam connect and eventually it would. And last night also got a time out error in the middle of a match i was playing

• 
  Jet_Pilot_PakFA (@Jet_Pilot_PakFa) reported 22 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Still no fix for air radar new bug. Hurry up.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 22 minutes ago

  like a puppet whose strings He jerks whenever sin comes near. He works within the believer, but He commands the believer to “yield,” “reckon,” “mortify,” “flee,” “put off,” “put on,” “watch,” “pray,” and “resist.” Grace does not remove human responsibility. Grace supplies the power by which responsibility can finally be obeyed. Chapter One Temptation Is Not the Same Thing as Sin One of the first victories the Christian must gain is the ability to distinguish temptation from consent. Many believers are defeated before the fight properly begins because they assume that the appearance of an evil thought means they have already committed the full sin. A wicked suggestion enters the mind, and immediately they conclude that they must be wicked beyond recovery. The devil then turns the temptation into an accusation. First he whispers the thought, and then he climbs into the witness stand and testifies against the person for hearing it. He throws a dead rat over the fence and then complains about the smell. The Bible, however, makes distinctions where religious people often create confusion. Hebrews 4:15 says that the Lord Jesus Christ “was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.” Temptation itself cannot be identical to sin, because Christ was tempted and remained sinless. The presentation of a sinful possibility is not the same thing as the deliberate embracing of that possibility. The knock at the door is not the same thing as inviting the visitor inside, feeding him supper, and giving him the spare bedroom. James 1:14–15 explains the progression: “But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin.” Notice the order. There is drawing, enticing, conceiving, and bringing forth. Temptation appeals to something within the fallen nature. The flesh sees, imagines, remembers, desires, resents, envies, covets, fears, or hungers. The object may come through the world, the suggestion may be sharpened by the devil, but the tinder is already present in the old nature. A spark lands where dry grass has been lying all summer. Yet even then, the believer is not required to pour gasoline on it. Temptation becomes inwardly established when the will begins to entertain it, cultivate it, excuse it, and cooperate with it. A bird may fly over your head, as the old illustration says, but you do not have to let it build a nest in your hair. The problem with many believers is not that the bird flew over. The problem is that they handed it twigs and called the lumberyard. This distinction matters because shame can either drive a believer toward God or away from Him. When every intrusive thought is treated as though it were already a completed act of rebellion, the believer may become paralyzed, frightened, and spiritually exhausted. He spends more time analyzing whether the thought was his, the devil’s, the flesh’s, or the neighbor’s cat than he spends resisting it. The proper response is simpler. Recognize the thought for what it is. Refuse to romanticize it. Refuse to panic over it. Refuse to identify your new man with it. Say what God says about it, and bring it under judgment. Second Corinthians 10:5 speaks of “bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ.” A captive thought is not negotiated with, interviewed for a cabinet position, or allowed to wander through the palace. It is seized, judged, and brought beneath the authority of Jesus Christ. Temptation is the battlefield; consent is the surrender. Do not confuse the presence of battle with the absence of victory.

• 
  SONS OF LIBERTY -MAGA MOVEMENT !!! (@eagameover) reported 28 minutes ago

  The Marine Corps just found a cheap answer to one of the most expensive problems in modern war. It takes a machine gun every Marine already knows how to use, the M240, and turns it into an AI-guided drone killer. The system is called Bullfrog, built by a Texas company called Allen Control Systems, and the Marines selected it this week to add teeth to their frontline counter-drone units. HOW IT WORKS Bullfrog is not a new gun. It's a robotic mount that uses artificial intelligence, computer vision, and precision robotics to turn an ordinary machine gun into a system that can detect, track, and engage drones on its own. The version the Marines chose is built around the M240, the 7.62mm machine gun that has been a fixture in the Corps for decades. The robotic station handles the hard part, spotting a small, fast-moving drone, tracking it, and calculating the shot. It's accurate to less than one minute of angle, a very fine degree of precision, and it uses passive sensors rather than radar, so it doesn't light up the battlefield and give away the unit's position. But it does not pull its own trigger without permission. A human operator always gives the final authorization to fire. The machine does the tracking and presents the solution. A Marine decides whether to take the shot. That human-in-the-loop design keeps it inside existing rules of engagement. WHY IT MATTERS: THE PRICE OF A KILL The reason this is a big deal comes down to money, and it's the same lesson coming out of Ukraine and the Middle East. A single attack drone can cost a few tens of thousands of dollars, sometimes far less. The interceptor missiles traditionally used to shoot them down can cost hundreds of thousands, even millions. That math is unsustainable. You cannot win a war spending a million dollars to destroy something that cost the enemy a few hundred. Bullfrog's answer is brutally simple. A well-aimed burst of machine gun ammunition solves the same problem for the price of the bullets. The company measures its cost per kill in the low tens of dollars. The M240 configuration fires 850 rounds a minute. FITTING INTO THE MARINE TOOLKIT The Bullfrog is being added to L-MADIS, the Marine Corps' lightest and most mobile counter-drone system, which normally rides on a pair of small all-terrain vehicles, one for command and control, one carrying electronic jamming gear. Jamming works well until it doesn't. Newer drones fly autonomously, without a radio link to jam. When electronic attack fails, the unit needs something that can physically knock the drone out of the sky. That's the gap Bullfrog fills, a kinetic backstop for when jamming isn't enough. The system is already in use or under contract with the Army, the Navy, US Special Operations Command, and allied forces including South Korea and the United Arab Emirates. The Marine Corps has requested more than $1 billion for its broader ground-based air defense effort in the 2027 budget, a measure of how seriously the drone threat is now being taken. WHY IT'S SMART The genius of it is that it doesn't reinvent anything. It doesn't create a new supply chain or a new weapon Marines have to learn from scratch. It takes a gun every Marine already knows how to feed, clean, and maintain, mounts it on a robotic station that never gets tired of watching the sky, and lets a human make the decision to fire. Familiar weapon. Cheap ammunition. AI doing the tracking. A Marine making the call. In a war where the sky is full of cheap threats, that combination is exactly what keeps a unit moving instead of pinned down waiting for something bigger and more expensive to come save them.

• 
  CGTN Europe (@CGTNEurope) reported 29 minutes ago

  Reports in Iran: 'Minister of Defense: Every issue on the battlefield must be transformed into a technological solution. 🔹General Ibn al-Reza, head of the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Support, emphasized the need for a problem-solving approach to the defense innovation cycle, stating: "Every issue identified on the battlefield must, in the shortest possible time, be transformed into a technological solution, an operational product, and a defensive capability."'

• 
  Sagzee (@IAmSagzee) reported 29 minutes ago

  Observer: I've watched several women in my adult life divorce their husbands, and in almost every case, the children's lives were completely disrupted and damaged. It seems obvious that initiating a divorce harms the kids. Analyst: When you observe that outcome, what specific mechanism are you attributing the damage to? Is it the legal signing of the dissolution, or something that happens before or after? Observer: It's the act of breaking up the family home. The mother decides she's unhappy, files the papers, moves out or forces the father out, and the kids end up anxious, depressed, and struggling in school. The mother's decision caused that collapse. Analyst: That's a natural conclusion because the parent who files the paperwork is the visible trigger of the change. In modern Western courts, women file approximately 70% of divorce petitions. But if we look at the underlying data, we've got to ask whether the legal filing is the root cause or simply the visible tipping point of a system that was already deteriorating. Observer: How could it just be a tipping point if the children were functioning fine until the separation happened? Analyst: That depends on how we measure functioning. Longitudinal studies tracking child wellbeing across decades show that child distress isn't produced by the single event of divorce. Instead, child outcomes are driven by 3 specific structural variables: the level of interparental conflict, the sudden drop in household economic capital, and the reduction in overall parenting bandwidth. Observer: Let's break those down. What does interparental conflict do to a child? Analyst: When 2 parents live in chronic hostility, whether it's active fighting or severe emotional withdrawal, children experience elevated cortisol levels and continuous stress responses. Research shows that children raised in high conflict intact families frequently fare worse across emotional and academic metrics than children whose high conflict parents separated. However, there's a critical nuance here. When a marriage has low visible conflict and parents separate unexpectedly from the child's perspective, the child suffers a severe disruption in predictability. That's where you see the sharpest drop in psychological stability. Observer: So if the marriage wasn't blatantly toxic, the divorce itself creates the harm? Analyst: It exposes the child to a drastic transition without the clear necessity being visible to them. But consider the 2nd variable: economic capital. Splitting 1 household into 2 independent residences instantly increases living expenses by roughly 30% to 50% for both adults. The exact same total income now has to pay 2 mortgages or rents, 2 sets of utility bills, and duplicate household goods. For the primary residential parent, who's statistically the mother in roughly 80% of custody arrangements, this translates to a sharp drop in per capita resources available for the child. Observer: Which leads to worse neighborhoods, worse schools, and more parental stress. Analyst: Exactly. That brings us to the 3rd variable: parenting bandwidth. A single adult managing a household alone has roughly 50% less time and energy to dedicate to emotional support, homework assistance, and monitoring. When a mother appears to have ruined her children's lives, what you're often witnessing is a human system operating under severe resource scarcity and cognitive overload, not necessarily a careless decision. Observer: But why do women initiate 70% of these separations if the economic and developmental outcomes for the household are so risky? Analyst: Because incentives and baseline expectations shifted dramatically over the past 50 years. Prior to the widespread economic entry of women into the workforce and the introduction of no fault divorce laws in the 1970s, exiting a marriage was financially impossible for most women. Today, financial independence means marriage isn't an absolute survival strategy anymore, but an ongoing value proposition. When women perceive a persistent imbalance in domestic labor, emotional safety, or marital satisfaction, the perceived cost of staying eventually exceeds the calculated cost of leaving. Observer: So the exit's an attempt to solve a problem, even if it creates a new set of problems for the children. Analyst: Precisely. It's a trade off under constraint. The human brain naturally connects the person who initiated the change to all the negative fallout that follows. That's a classic cognitive attribution error. It ignores the pre existing silent decay of the relationship, the systemic costs of running 2 households on 1 pool of wealth, and the chronic stress of sole parenting. Observer: If we wanted to predict which children survive a parental split with minimal harm, what variables actually determine the outcome? Analyst: Predictability and stability. The data's clear: children adapt remarkably well if 2 conditions are met. Condition 1: interparental conflict must drop to near zero post separation, meaning parents don't use the child as a messenger or battlefield. Condition 2: financial and structural stability must be maintained so the child doesn't lose their school, peer network, or consistent contact with both capable parents. When those conditions are absent, outcomes deteriorate rapidly regardless of which parent filed the petition. Observer: That shifts the perspective entirely. The problem isn't simply the mother leaving the marriage. The problem's that our social and economic structures aren't designed to maintain stability when a 2 adult system splits into 2 single adult systems. Analyst: That's the transferable principle. Whenever you analyze a failing system, whether it's a family, a business partnership, or a nation state, focusing solely on the party that triggers the exit obscures the structural pressures that made the original arrangement nonviable. Reality doesn't punish the formal act of dissolution. Reality responds to the redistribution of conflict, time, and resources.

• 
  G20Beamer (@pyramidwoodwork) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Who cares fix the ******* game

• 
  🇬🇹(J.K.O.)🇲🇽 (@BlackIceSheep) reported 34 minutes ago

  @DooM49 BF6 is looking like more of a BFV than a BF2042. One day, on some random Tuesday in early 2027, they'll announce limiting support with content and updates slowing down for the rest of the year, JUST as they finally addressed every major issue.