Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Viral_Votarist. (@Viral_Votarist) reported 31 seconds ago

  @Rainbow6Game 3 games today. 3 people cheating. Well done with the hot fix! Didn't bother playing R6 after that. Battlefield fit the win!

• 
  monster115 (@AMH_1151) reported 42 seconds ago

  @BattlefieldComm when Fix server middle east ?

• 
  Jolly Onyeka (@withoutmeinyou) reported 2 minutes ago

  ⛪ THE TORN TEMPLE VEIL: WHAT DID IT REALLY MEAN? At the moment Jesus died, something extraordinary happened. Not on a battlefield. Not in a palace. But inside the Temple. 📖 “And behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.” — Matthew 27:51 This was no ordinary curtain. The veil separated the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place—the sacred area symbolizing God’s presence. Only the High Priest could enter. And only once a year. Then, at the moment of Christ’s death, the veil was torn. Not from bottom to top. But from top to bottom. As if God Himself had torn it open. Why? Did it symbolize the end of separation between God and humanity? Did it mark the fulfillment of the Old Covenant? Was it a declaration that access to God was now open through Christ? Or was there an even deeper meaning? For centuries, the veil stood as a reminder that sin separated humanity from God’s holiness. Then, in a single moment, everything changed. The veil was torn. The barrier was broken. And history was never the same. 💬 What do you believe was the deepest significance of the torn temple veil? Let’s discuss respectfully.

• 
  JP ✭ 🦌 (@jphilinTX) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the heli dive bomber ****

• 
  The Bitcoin-Wife Paper (@BitcoinWifePapr) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX ******* SPAWN DEPLOY CAMERA ITS SO ******* ANNOYING DESTROYED THE GAME

• 
  Grant Almond (@GrantAlmond) reported 9 minutes ago

  @XBOXSupport Honestly. The one morning I have off work and the kids are at school and my wife decided to have a lay in. All I wanted was to play a few games of battlefield maybe some arc raiders. You've been down all morning over in the UK come on fix it!

• 
  Michael (@CanadianPixelz) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX.HIT.REGISTRATION.

• 
  steve (@Troll81357830) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Battlefield You lot gonna fix the bullets just going through people ?? its bloody pathetic

• 
  Hsho (@hsho00om) reported 15 minutes ago

  @rsan99328 @BattlefieldComm Same issue with sniper when aiming with scoop.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 20 minutes ago

  The Bible believer rejects the scholar-pope system. He does not need Rome with incense, and he does not need Alexandria with footnotes. He does not need a pope in a white cassock or a pope in a bow tie with a Greek grammar. The words of God are not floating in manuscript space waiting to be assembled by experts. God preserved them. The English-speaking believer has them in the King James Bible. That is the line James White will not cross. He can debate Rome all day about tradition, but when he puts the preserved Bible under the scholar’s apparatus, he has created a Protestant version of the same authority problem. The final authority moves away from the Book and into the hands of men. Chapter Seven: Postmillennialism and the Reformed Kingdom Drift James White’s eschatological move is also important. He was raised in the dispensational premillennial world, but moved away from it and into the Reformed/postmillennial orbit. That is not a small adjustment. Eschatology is not a hobby chart in the back of a study Bible. It affects how a man reads Israel, the Church, the kingdom, prophecy, Matthew 24, Romans 11, Revelation, and the future reign of Christ. Once a man moves from dispensational premillennial truth into Reformed kingdom theology, the lines begin to blur fast. Postmillennialism is attractive to Reformed men because it fits the system. It gives them a victorious kingdom program in history. It lets them read the Great Commission through cultural conquest categories. It lets them talk about nations discipled, Christ reigning now in a way that progressively subdues the world through gospel influence, and history moving toward Christianized victory before the Second Advent. That sounds bold. It sounds optimistic. It sounds masculine in a soft age. But if it blurs Israel and the Church, denies the plain force of prophetic passages, and pushes the Church into a kingdom program not assigned to the Body of Christ, it is not Bible optimism. It is Reformed reconstruction. The Bible believer is not pessimistic. He is realistic because he believes the Book. The Church is going out before the wrath. Israel is going through Jacob’s trouble. Christ is coming back ****** and visibly. He will sit on David’s throne. The kingdom promised to Israel is not the Church’s cultural project. Revelation 20 is not a metaphor for gradual Christian influence. Romans 11 does not teach that Israel is permanently absorbed into the Church. God still has a program for Israel. Paul’s mystery doctrine still matters. The rapture still matters. The blessed hope still matters. White’s drift from dispensational truth into postmillennial Reformed categories is another reason Bible believers must test him carefully. Conclusion James White is strong where many men are weak. He is strong against Rome. He is strong against Mormonism. He is strong against Islam. He is strong against Jehovah’s Witness theology. He is strong in debate. He is strong in public confrontation. He is not afraid to name false systems. He believes doctrine matters, and in an age of doctrinal jellyfish, that alone makes him stand out. Those things should be acknowledged. Truth does not require us to pretend a man is wrong when he is right. But his errors are not small. Calvinism is a major error. Limited atonement is a major error. Regeneration before faith is a major error. Treating Calvinism as the gospel is a major error. Rejecting the King James Bible as final authority is a major error. Submitting the text to modern critical scholarship is a major error. Moving into Reformed postmillennial kingdom theology is a major error. These are not tiny disagreements over preference. They touch the gospel, the Bible, the sinner, the cross, the will, the promise of preservation, and the prophetic program of God. So the verdict is simple. Take what is useful, but do not follow him into Geneva, Alexandria, or postmillennial reconstruction. Let him expose Rome battlefield.

• 
  sʎɹʞ (@planetkaijee) reported 21 minutes ago

  The problem I’m having is the lovely dovey ones don’t caption the battlefield enough and the battlefield ones don’t caption the lovey dovey enough. Sigh

• 
  Ser Crispin Cool 🧡✨🌻 (@ser_crispincool) reported 23 minutes ago

  Quite literally nothing about Halo lends itself to an MMO setting. A Battlefield or Arma type game absolutely, but not an MMO. I hope this is just bait from Destiny diehards desperate for their fix.

• 
  현스타.grvt (@MINDBRIDGEE) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Please look into this issue and fix it so that Mouse Button 4 can both open and close the minimap, just like in previous series. Thank you.

• 
  Nicholas Drummond (@nicholadrummond) reported 24 minutes ago

  THE BRITISH ARMY AND THE DIP 🧵 ✅The British Army aspires to field a NATO reserve corps with two deployable divisions. Each division will have 2 or 3 brigades or a total of around 20,000 troops. For an army of 73,000 this structure is entirely achievable. Within a NATO context such a contribution is credible / respectable. ✅ The British Army ideally needs another 7,000 regular troops and 10,000 additional reserves. Returning to the 2010 headcount cap of 82,500 is highly desirable, because it would allow sustainable unit rotations. At an average cost of £60K per regular soldier per annum and £10K per reservist, extra headcount would require an additional £520 million per year. ✅ The two divisions with 4 to 6 brigades would generate 4 combat units per brigades or 24 primary battalion sized groupings. Each division needs artillery, engineers, signal / intelligence, REME / logistics, and medical units to support them. There is nothing unreasonable about wanting this level of capability. Every other NATO member in Europe plans to be similarly configured. Ultimately, however. the issue is not force generation but ensuring the units we do have are properly equipped. ✅ The Army’s most critical capability gap is in artillery. It’s acquiring 72 Boxer RCH155 - enough for 4 regiments. It has 2 GMLRS regiments, but needs an additional 2-4. In particular, it needs to restore munitions stockpiles. This requirement implies an extra £1.7 billion beyond the £3 billion already allocated. ✅ In drone saturated battlefield environments, the Army needs to invest in air defence on an unprecedented scale to regain freedom of manoeuvre. This requires £2 billion in addition to the £800 million already allocated. ✅ The Army’s Bowman communications system is obsolete. Replacing this with a fully digitised architecture is already budgeted at £7 billion, but nothing has yet been approved or delivered. Without this investment, the much vaunted kill chain is only an aspiration. ✅ UAS, tactical cruise missiles, loitering munitions, and other aerial drones for surveillance and strike roles are here to stay. They need to be embedded across the force. That’s another £2 billion. ✅ Finally, another significant gap is combat vehicles to get to the fight and to manoeuvre. Under present plans, it is acquiring 623 Boxers, 148 Challenger 3, 589 Ajax, and 1,100 protected mobility vehicles. That’s around 2,460 vehicles. It needs twice this amount or an extra £10 billion. So, those are the Army’s most important priorities. A lot of what I have listed is already in the Equipment Plan. But it needs around £18 billion in additional funding over 9 years to deliver all this — that’s £2 billion per annum over current funding. Clearly, the Army is not going to get anything like the extra funding I have described, but now you know the scale of investment needed to deliver a minimum viable contribution to NATO. The need for this level of funding is what happens when you stop investing in defence for 30 years.

• 
  S p r i n t e r (@SprinterPress) reported 27 minutes ago

  Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: "The best time to end the war is when we are in a favorable position; we are actually winning on the battlefield - we confronted a seemingly superpower for 40 days. An agreement and the end of the war will consolidate our victory... The agreement includes two stages, and we have moved on to the second stage on the nuclear issue... In this agreement, the United States will declare in writing that they respect Iran's sovereignty. The memorandum of understanding includes the nuclear issue, the lifting of sanctions, the restoration of and blocked/frozen funds... There are opponents of this agreement, and primarily the Israeli regime, The end of the war in the agreement means the withdrawal of Israel from the occupied areas in southern Lebanon The nuclear demands of the United States at this stage were absolutely unacceptable to us... We are dealing with people in the United States who do not fulfill their obligations; we must prevent them from abandoning their responsibilities. If the agreements reached in the first phase are not implemented, we will not proceed to the second phase. The Strait of Hormuz is under the sovereignty of Iran and Oman... Fees will be charged for services in the Strait of Hormuz, and these services will no longer be free. This important issue has been confirmed: payment of fees is mandatory... According to the memorandum of understanding, if it is signed, Iran's frozen assets will be unblocked. None of our assets will be frozen again.