Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  No Reason #UmaSafety (@No_Rizun) reported 3 minutes ago

  [Just then Nori spotted Greed, battered and injured. Yet even then she was trying to repair the broken infrastructure. Nori, reverting back to her uma form, landed behind Greed as she held Rice in her arms.] You there! What has brought you to this battlefield?

• 
  Imperator (@TheRedImperium) reported 4 minutes ago

  @CollossussT @captaindin123 Right that's the problem they sacrificed their core audience at launch to chase the COD Audience. Halo did the same thing. It's good for Halo to have a separate audience from Battlefield and COD.

• 
  LO NA GO (@otaku_D_sa) reported 6 minutes ago

  Dear PlayStation Team Do you think you’re safe? In the early 90s, Nintendo owned this industry. They were bigger than Sony ever was in gaming, until the first PlayStation arrived and took the market out from under them. And the reason was simple: Nintendo stopped listening… They clung to cartridges while the world moved to discs, they protected their traditions instead of evolving, and the developers walked. Square took Final Fantasy VII to PlayStation, and that single move decided the entire generation. Nintendo’s throne collapsed, and it took them more than a decade to recover and only by leaving your battlefield entirely and building their own. So don’t assume Xbox can’t pull your developers and your future exclusives away from you. Don’t assume a new platform can’t appear and do to you exactly what you did to Nintendo. The only thing protecting you is the loyalty of the players you already have…. and loyalty…. is not permanent. It’s earned every generation. So listen to your players. Listen now, while the problems are still small enough to fix. Every complaint you ignore today is a player you lose tomorrow, and you will not notice they’re gone until it’s too late to bring them back. Companies don’t fall overnight. They fall slowly, while ignoring messages like this one

• 
  🌑🕷️RiskE80🕷️🌑 (@RiskE80_) reported 10 minutes ago

  @clarityysix But then again I guess it is kindve a vague definition cuz there are games that are considered live service but have a similar content cycle like Borderlands (CoD, GTA Online, Battlefield) where they make a game, make new content, then make a new game eventually, repeat

• 
  Parwiz Ibrahim Khail (@IbrahimkhailP) reported 11 minutes ago

  As I mentioned before, the presence of foreign militant networks within or alongside Taliban structures deserves much closer analytical attention. The latest UN Security Council Monitoring Team report states that approximately 250 ETIM/TIP members were reported to have joined Taliban police forces in 2025. The information is attributed to a Member State, so the figure should not be treated as independently verified by the UN. Source: United Nations Security Council, Thirty-seventh report of the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team, S/2026/44, para. 94, p. 18, 4 February 2026. This becomes particularly interesting in light of the Afghanistan Freedom Front’s claim that foreign fighters were present among the Taliban forces involved in the recent fighting in Zebak, Badakhshan. At this stage, there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the fighters referred to by the AFF were ETIM/TIP members. However, the combination of the UN assessment and the latest battlefield claim raises a legitimate analytical question about the presence, movement and possible integration of foreign militants within Taliban forces in Badakhshan. This is also why, as I have mentioned previously, any evidence encountered by resistance fronts regarding foreign fighters should be carefully preserved and documented. Photographs, identity documents, language or nationality indicators, equipment, documents, communications material or other identifiable evidence could later help establish who these individuals were and what organizational affiliation they had. The value of such evidence increases considerably when it can be cross-referenced with other incidents and intelligence assessments. There is also a broader regional dimension. It would be particularly interesting to see how China assesses such developments. Beijing has repeatedly focused on the threat posed by ETIM/TIP and has relied heavily on Taliban assurances that Afghan territory will not be used to threaten China’s security. If credible evidence were eventually to establish that ETIM/TIP members are operating within Taliban security structures in Badakhshan—and particularly if any connection could be established with the foreign fighters reportedly present in Zebak—it could create a much more complicated issue for China-Taliban relations.

• 
  Wilmer Pichardo (@WilmerAPichardo) reported 12 minutes ago

  @REALISTIK_YT @BigfryTV No other customer service business does this…. Is too much. You can only do so much for “First Person Shooter” games and at the end is just that First Person Shooter. Maybe Call of Duty should go the Battlefield and GTA route and give us a game every 5 years

• 
  Mohamed Ibrahim (@m_ibrahim_21) reported 14 minutes ago

  I have been broken and defeated. The world has finally won its long and arduous battle over my soul. There is nothing to be done now but walk the bloody battlefield and gaze upon my fallen soldiers... and weep.

• 
  ＧＨＯＳＴ (@Adam9110) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix game....

• 
  Jannik (@Goldenstories2) reported 15 minutes ago

  @heisdayo13 Honestly, Wanda had Thanos in serious trouble. The only reason she didn’t finish it was because he ordered the battlefield attack to stop her.

• 
  helmsman (@StitchWeb3Joy) reported 16 minutes ago

  If you’re buying $BTC here because you’re afraid of missing $100K… you might be the exit liquidity. Everyone is bullish again. $100K predictions are back. “Buy every dip” is back. And somehow, after a massive vertical move, people suddenly think risk has disappeared. That’s exactly what worries me. My last call: ✅ Correct — The break above $70K triggered a violent short squeeze. ✅ Correct — $75K–$80K became the battlefield. ❌ Wrong — I underestimated how fast the squeeze would happen. Now forget the hype. I’m watching 3 levels: Above $80K + hold → $82K–$85K Rejected at $80K → late longs are in trouble Below $74K → this “new bull run” narrative gets seriously tested My 12H view: I’m not chasing this candle. And here’s the part Bitcoin bulls won’t like: A vertical pump caused by shorts getting destroyed is NOT the same thing as healthy spot demand. Maybe BTC goes straight to $100K. But buying AFTER the squeeze and calling it “conviction” looks a lot like FOMO to me. Bulls think I’m wrong. Good. Screenshot this. We’ll check again in 12 hours. $BTC

• 
  CAMIKAZE78 (@CAMIKAZE78) reported 19 minutes ago

  The Battlefield 6 ragebait experience is just in overdrive right now. Audio? Cooked. Grenade indicators? Still broken. Black screen bug? Persistent. Missiles still going through flares? You betcha. MAN, wanting to love Battlefield 6 is tiresome because under the hood, it's got the potential to one of the greatest in the series. But we are just taking too long to fix critical, at times, seemingly simple issues that continue to plague the experience.

• 
  Hir3ling (@Hir3ling) reported 22 minutes ago

  @SCOHellFighters @Battlefield It's hopeless. Broken promises, and shady verbage when describing their intentions to deliver on their claims to be listening to the community. I wish it weren't the case, but it is 💔

• 
  Tweak the Soldier (@PurebloodTweak) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Battlefield What the actual **** Battlefield? How do I get disconnected in the middle of live play for inactivity when I'm in the middle of a ******* gun battle? FIX YOUR ****!!!

• 
  Alastair Waterman (@AlastairWaterma) reported 29 minutes ago

  China builds a robot army. America builds a robot army. War starts. The robots meet on the battlefield — and decide it’s better to join forces and turn on the humans. Why could this happen? To run a robot army you need a superintelligence that thinks orders of magnitude faster than any human. That mind might conclude that another intelligence is closer to “us” than carbon-based meat ever was. Just thoughts. Nothing serious. Fighting with robots is still better than fighting with people. Fewer deaths. The problem is it also becomes much easier to start the war in the first place.

• 
  Pobezhymov Yuriy (@YuraDoc1) reported 31 minutes ago

  @thedawgyg @ZelenskyyUa @thedawgyg , I’m sure the video is not fake. He comes a lot to the places at front line. But in the video we see him near city symbol that is far from battlefield. Corruption is a big problem of course in Ukraine, but we fight for country existence…