Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Adrock (@Adrock318) reported 14 seconds ago

  @Battlefield The options menu is broken in the firing range since yesterday's update. It doesn't load. @DRUNKKZ3 @tiggr_

• 
  HAGOV NacionalBord (@HagoVNacional39) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the servers in Latin America, they're a disaster! I live in Argentina and there's always packet loss.

• 
  It's Absurd (@ExtraSmallBrain) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the crashes! Fix the bugs! Played just now and in the middle of the game, I was back on desktop. No other game I play crashes. Battlebug is a shite game!!! 100%

• 
  Enders (@EndersFPS) reported 7 minutes ago

  Yes yes, always about how the game looks and never about how the game plays. That’s the problem with this community. Constantly cherry picking what’s ok and what isn’t purely based on how much it annoys them / how badly they get styled on by it, and using “immersion” and “atmosphere” as a shield while simultaneously rarely using the mechanics they criticize themselves. If they had it their way Battlefield’s gameplay would have almost zero gameplay mechanics, but to them it’s fine because it benefits them and they didn’t use the mechanics anyway. Zero consideration for the bigger picture, and for the history of the franchise when it comes to what was possible in previous titles. People have been jumping around in Battlefield for 20 years. Deal with it, or quit. It’s part of the franchise.

• 
  UNSC John-117 (@HaloSlayer2560) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm did you fix the net code issue cause its gotten far more worst for me

• 
  ⛩️JACOB⛩️ILITIA_LIBTARD_DESTROYER (@JACOBDPTRO) reported 12 minutes ago

  @pcgamer Nothing will fix this game, just like 2042 the core game is once again trash and not battlefield. I'll wait for battlefield 7 maybe they'll listen next time Spoiler: they won't

• 
  Pọ́ọ̀lù (@__abioye_) reported 14 minutes ago

  @nytimes @TheAthleticFC That Canada vs. Qatar match was painful to watch—truly painful. Let's hope Ismail Koné is not badly injured, because that pitch was a battlefield of bad decisions and broken rhythm. The game was so poor, Qatar made Canada look like a Premier League side. Let that sink in. Absolutely amazing—and not in a good way. ASE.

• 
  Conan C. 🇲🇾 (@conan_c06) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Guess what? still broken tho

• 
  Wriggles (@GoldenWriggles) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation Latest AMD drivers have loads of issues with Battlefield 6, Sticking to the older set till it gets removed from the release notes.

• 
  Enders (@EndersFPS) reported 18 minutes ago

  Yes yes, always about how the game looks and never about how the game plays. That’s the problem with this community. Constantly cherry picking what’s ok and what isn’t purely based on how much it annoys them / how badly they get styled on by it, and using “immersion” and “atmosphere” as a shield while simultaneously rarely using the mechanics they criticize themselves. Go ahead, try to “bunny hop” in BF6. Your death streak will be historic. If they had it their way Battlefield’s gameplay would have almost zero gameplay mechanics, but to them it’s fine because it benefits them and they didn’t use the mechanics anyway. Zero consideration for the bigger picture, and for the history of the franchise when it comes to what was possible in previous titles. People have been jumping around in Battlefield for 20 years. Deal with it, or quit. It’s part of the franchise.

• 
  ErisQT 💜 Hiatus (@ErisQT) reported 20 minutes ago

  hey @EA @awscloud @EA_DICE fix your servers for dallas I'm having 80 latency

• 
  Shiban Lal Pandita (@lal_shiban) reported 21 minutes ago

  @MarkhorSindh "Issue will be settled in battlefield " That's what Bilawal Bhutto is saying. He talks sense. If America can travel 11000 kms to bomb Iran why can't Pakistan do it?

• 
  Bo (@couleestomper) reported 24 minutes ago

  @gunpolicy The next major battlefield will be with shall issue regimes. Requiring permits for enumerated rights is facially unconstitutional. And that is precisely the next step after these authoritarians lose their ability to regulate rifles. All shall issue schemes need to be squashed.

• 
  ناصر بن تركي (@nasserturki11) reported 28 minutes ago

  This is exactly the problem with Washington’s hardline Iran debate. It treats the Middle East as a battlefield for ideological theories, while the region itself has to live with the consequences. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Oman, and others did not push for de-escalation because they trust Tehran. They pushed for it because they understand geography, energy markets, shipping lanes, and the cost of a war that no one can fully control once it starts. Every time, outside hawks promise a clean outcome. Every time, the region is left dealing with the consequences. Israel may want permanent pressure on Iran. Some voices in Washington may want regime collapse. But regional states have a different responsibility: protect their economies, their societies, their infrastructure, and their long-term stability. That is not appeasement. That is sovereignty. The real question is not whether Iran should be trusted. It should not. The real question is whether endless escalation has ever produced the stable Middle East its advocates keep promising. It has not. The countries that chose diplomacy, deterrence, and regional balance were not being naive. They were being realistic. And this war proved their point.

• 
  Stan Falk (@StanFalk) reported 29 minutes ago

  @daltonwelbern Baron should do it but under the condition that Andrew lays out his specific contention in the core claims Baron has days worth of material for Wilson to cherry pick for gotchas, points that are easily misrepresented, select routes to steer away from inconvenient points and build a case against an established record. Otherwise is the battlefield favors the sophist. I’ll explain what I mean. He could pull a “gotcha” by saying “oh yeah? What about those maroon shirts?” It’s an angle of inquiry. And honestly not a bad one to run down. But it may be nothing. What can you say was worth looking at. If Baron questions odd behavior from Erika, he could say “Are you saying Erika killed her husband and father of her kids?” It’s cheap, but that’s where it always goes. Or if it’s ballistics, he knows 75% of listeners don’t know a 30-06 from a Crossman 760. Do you know? Let’s just say of those they do know the difference, no explanation of a 30-06 stopping on 4in of flesh and a single ****** is not even possible in a million tries. Ormaybe it hit two bones if it split cervixes which would increase odds even more of an exit wound. It’s 1 million pounds per square inch and the bone fractures at 25,000psi. Whatever soft flesh it hit first barely slowed it down and if it disintegrated into dust the mass and momentum are the same but maybe a bit dispersed. But it isn’t going to deflect 90 degrees a bone. It goes forward. Everytime. At least for 12in and deflects less than 30 degrees on any part of the human body if it’s a close range shot from a 30-06. If he brings up WWI, soldiers were frequently hit under a fusillade of lead fired from a 30-06 two miles away. The guns we’re sighted to be used like featherweight artillery. But 2000 troops racing led on an airfield from two miles is going to make it tough to operate. But in a debate Wilson is bound to say “Are you a green beret? Cuz Gary melton is. Are you saying you know more than him?” No. He’s a paid expert witness and he’s going to cast a reasonable doubt on people that hear all that like it’s Greek and the physics wont matter. Wilson should state his case in several key issues and the moderator should hold them to answering the question asked. Otherwise it’s just scoring points on people that are new to the terrain. It could be good. But if it was some Piers Morgan circus itd be pointless and annoying.