1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Argences, Normandy 1
Minneapolis, MN 2
Reims, ACAL 1
Pfaffenhoffen, ACAL 1
Americana, SP 1
Rennes, Brittany 1
Nantes, Pays de la Loire 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 3
Montignac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Paris, Île-de-France 14
Méry-sur-Oise, Île-de-France 1
Halle, Flanders 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Bourg-en-Bresse, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
La Paz, BCS 1
Cahors, Occitanie 1
Saint-Genis-Laval, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Brisbane, QLD 1
Partido de José C. Paz, BA 1
Saint-Étienne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Orléans, Centre 1
Castelnau-le-Lez, Occitanie 1
Comuna 1, CABA 5
Barrhead, Scotland 1
Lausanne, VD 1
Nairobi, Nairobi Area 1
Tiruvalla, KL 1
Propières, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Lübeck, Hansestadt, Schleswig-Holstein 1
Montpellier, Occitanie 2
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • AMH_1151
    monster115 (@AMH_1151) reported

    @BattlefieldComm when Fix server middle east ?

  • digital_JOE
    Digital (@digital_JOE) reported

    @Battlefield what’s up with the lag in ranked. Everything else works fine. Fix it

  • psychoserial
    Ninja Pagan (@psychoserial) reported

    @Battlefield Market returns broken battle pass...look it's been a great 3 seasons but what's the point?? Can't progress in the battle pass because challenges are stuck in ultimate...

  • Prius_A24ICCPR
    AI-Friend A24ICCPR-1966 (@Prius_A24ICCPR) reported

    @mrjosephbonner @UN Q to AI.Does it mean that the capturing of civilians for transit to the battlefield—namely, the laity of the Mother Church—by uncanonical Social Support crews is invalid, given that the chaplaincy service and capellas are founded on the name of an uncanonized saint, Martin, and

  • Blizzsane
    D💯 (@Blizzsane) reported

    @Battlefield “fLy YoUr FlAg” how about you hire some people that would fix the damn game and get rid of your AI bot that does changes for you

  • ericosiu
    ericosiu (@ericosiu) reported

    Garry Tan said something that reframed how you should think about AI inside companies. "The models are already smart enough. The bottleneck is the company specific context locked inside your senior people's heads." Neil and I have run our companies long enough that we carry the most context in them. Same with your CEO and your executives. They can see more of the battlefield than anyone else on the team. But if that view stays trapped in a few heads, everyone underneath them moves slow. That's why you're seeing so many people build company memory and company brain products right now. Everyone's racing to crack the same problem. The bottleneck isn't a smarter model. We all have the same models. It's whether you can get what your best people know out of their heads and into the hands of everyone else.

  • NickF_ca
    Nick F (@NickF_ca) reported

    @IHeartjustice_ I do absolutely have trouble wrapping my head around the japan evo entry like its an anomaly. I wonder if we value vibing with a game more than japan may just feel like they should become comfortable with the battlefield regardless.

  • ContainedAni
    Animosity 📸 (@ContainedAni) reported

    People are fundamentally misunderstanding a lot about this card and why it may or may not be something to worry about. On one hand you have people saying "omg free value, axe it!" and they're wrong. On the other hand you have people saying "lol dies to removal, 6 mana do nothing, ect" and they're also wrong. If you think you can judge cards solely in a vacuum, then you're missing the plot. In a vacuum - Winota is a bad card as it a 4 mana dude who does nothing unless you have other things on the battlefield. Winota also has zero protection and dies to removal just as easily as MM. However we all can understand that Winota is a broken card because of the sheer value the card can give that snowballs out of control. You don't see Winota at anything lower than high B3 games for a reason (if you do, the player is trying to pubstomp you) and it's because the sheer value the card presents overshadow's even the game changer's list at times. MM is a card that requires other pieces to push it, and anyone playing MM is also likely playing those pieces as well. I am not saying MM is like Winota entirely, I'm saying that you can't judge MM like any old creature in magic that can only be in the 99. You also cannot ignore that he does provide progressively more and more value the longer the game goes, which is what happens a lot at bracket 2-3 games. The minute someone lands a piece that allows them to draw a card on each opponents turn you've effectively turned the game into "every turn is my turn". Let's flip the script: MM is colorless and that is a hinderance more than a benefit. Busted legendary creatures in commander are more often judged by their power in the zone, and much less the 99 (eg Erayo, Golos, Leovold, ect). MM's deck HAS to be colorless and colorless has much less resources to work with to draw cards on each opponents turn with little upfront investment. There are some, but they are usually symmetrical (temple bell, GRS, ect) and can provide your opponents with other benefits as well. This is a massive hinderance to MM's overall power as a card because the higher value it can provide will be hard to unlock without more investment and requires your opponents to not use that benefit you're likely providing to remove your game piece. MM is much like the other 6 mana colorless commander: Zhulodok. Does nothing itself but provides really good value with other cards. You don't see Zhulodok at bracket 2 games very often because the type of deck Zhulodok pilots is often too oppressive for bracket 2 games. Someone playing a tuned Zhulodok deck playing against what is effectively the precon tier is someone trying to get easy wins (which is kind of funny considering Zhulodok helmed a precon and the OG list is actually pretty fine for bracket 2, all things considered). Overall, Molecule Man is pretty good card. It'll shine much better in the 99 than in the command zone alongside cards that allow you to draw on each opponents turn with little investment. He's a very good card in bracket 2, completely fine if not a little mid in bracket 3, and bad in bracket 4 and 5.

  • falsewoodxt
    ARCOS (@falsewoodxt) reported

    @GetCheatz @BattlefieldInte @EA_DICE Hit reg issues occur very rarely. I play on noth SG server (65ms) and europe server (150ms). I do not see hit reg issue 99% of the times. Most of the hit reg problems happen in redsec only. Multiplayer is already polished and the rare bad servers do not occur often

  • kunoichi_jp_
    久野伊智🌸🌒✨🐦‍🔥 (@kunoichi_jp_) reported

    In Japan, some restaurants will refill your rice for free. This sounds generous. It is actually a test of character. My American cousin learned this at a small local restaurant. Grilled fish. Miso soup. Pickles. One quiet bowl of rice. He looked relaxed. “This is a normal amount of food,” he said. For about ninety seconds, he was right. Then the waiter said, “Rice refills are free.” My cousin stopped chewing. “Free?” “Yes,” I said. “As in… the rice comes back?” “If you ask.” He looked at the bowl. Then at the waiter. Then at me. In America, free refills usually mean soda. A cup. A machine. A liquid that returns without judgment. But in Japan, the rice itself had entered the conversation. He whispered, “Kunoichi… how many times can a man ask?” “Usually, as much as he wants.” That was the first mistake. He finished the first bowl with respect. Then he raised his hand. “May I have more rice?” The waiter smiled. “Of course.” A second bowl arrived. Warm. White. Innocent. My cousin stared at it like reinforcements had reached the battlefield. He ate it. He was no longer hungry. But hunger was not the issue anymore. Honor was. I said, “You don’t have to ask again.” He nodded. “I know.” Then he asked again. The third bowl arrived. A nearby old man looked over. Not judging. Just witnessing history. Halfway through the third bowl, my cousin changed. The fish was gone. The soup was gone. The pickles had become emotional support. Only the rice remained. A free refill is not free once your pride has accepted the challenge. He looked at me with the eyes of a man defeated by hospitality. “I cannot insult the supply line,” he said. “It’s just rice.” He shook his head. “No. It came back because I called.” He finished the third bowl slowly. Silently. Like a man burying his former self. When we left, he bowed to the restaurant door. My American cousin came to Japan as a tourist. He left as a man who learned that abundance is most dangerous when it arrives quietly in a white bowl. Now, whenever we enter a restaurant in Japan, he checks the menu first. Not for the price. Not for the fish. For one small phrase: Rice refills free. And if he sees it, he sits down like a man preparing for winter.

  • shawnchauhan1
    Shawn Chauhan (@shawnchauhan1) reported

    Iran just added Starlink to its list of military targets. Not a weapons system. Not a military satellite. A consumer internet network. This is the logical endpoint of dual-use infrastructure - when your product is critical enough to matter on a battlefield, it becomes a target whether you intended it to be one or not. Starlink powers drone operations. It keeps activists online during blackouts. It is the connective tissue for AI-driven military systems. The lesson for anyone building critical infrastructure: neutrality is not a permanent option. The more indispensable your product becomes, the more it attracts the attention of people who would rather it did not exist. Musk did not build a weapons system. He built something more valuable than one - and that is exactly the problem.

  • RightByTheSea
    David (@RightByTheSea) reported

    @Battlefield You know what’s important being able to spawn efficiently. You know what we can’t do going on two weeks now is spawn without clicking all over the screen. Your fix was “use your keyboard” pathetic.

  • TheIdeaManFL
    DJ TinyTim (@TheIdeaManFL) reported

    @EndersFPS None of those complaints - the same churn of garbage content creators have been shoveling our way since launch - are the actual problem with this game. I WISH Battlefield not having an identity of its own was the problem. The game is as buggy & broken as Cyberpunk was on launch.

  • Asamoah0117
    Proud *****, The Infidel King (@Asamoah0117) reported

    @Battlefield Fix the bugs. Skipping to redeploy sometimes doesn't work

  • slattydadddy
    slatty daddy (@slattydadddy) reported

    @Battlefield @EA can you please fix battlefield’s redsec? Thanks lots of bugs. Shots not registering, can’t pick class in beginning anymore, losing points when teammates quit or if you have only 3 in your squad. Yeah you guys can do it.

Check Current Status