Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  EcstasyDesignz (@EcstasyDegen) reported 12 seconds ago

  @Coachie01 I knew someone was going to question Ivar. His intelligence is more strategic than the others. Put them in a battlefield situation rather than a heist or prison, and suddenly Ivar becomes a very serious problem.

• 
  J_Omotola (@J_omotola28) reported 42 seconds ago

  and then you will be able to solve the problem at hand. Child of God, nobody prepares for war on a battlefield. Oftentimes, commanders and soldiers plan their battle strategies long before wars break out.

• 
  Jimothy Lewis (@RichardTLewis) reported 2 minutes ago

  @technotumbum @owenjonesjourno I am not besmirching veterans, I am commenting on the state of your third world American VA based on reports that seemingly emerge once a week. Its why the majority of service members die at home, not in the battlefield, but you don't give a **** about them..

• 
  Mark Farris DDS (@MarkFarrisDDS) reported 6 minutes ago

  Key Passage: Ephesians 4:30 — "And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.” Christian teaching commonly crashes into one of two ditches when dealing with sin in the believer's life. In the first ditch, every serious failure supposedly drives the Holy Ghost out, cancels salvation, reverses regeneration, breaks the seal, removes the believer from Christ's body, and forces God to begin the entire operation again after the backslider sufficiently proves his sincerity. In the other ditch, eternal security is twisted into an excuse for carnality, as though the blood of Christ were divine permission to live like the devil while carrying a certificate to heaven in the glove compartment. The first error turns salvation into a revolving door; the second turns grace into a pigpen. The King James Bible rejects both. The Holy Ghost seals the believer unto the day of redemption, yet that same believer is commanded not to grieve Him. The Spirit's permanent indwelling does not mean He approves everything done by the body He inhabits. He is the Holy Ghost. His holiness opposes bitterness, lust, pride, deception, greed, wrath, doctrinal corruption, and every other product of Adam's fallen factory. The believer can grieve the Spirit personally, quench His operation, resist His direction, refuse His word, walk after the flesh, and waste opportunities for service. None of those acts makes the Spirit nervously pack His belongings and move back to heaven. They do, however, produce serious consequences: broken fellowship, diminished spiritual power, chastening, a damaged testimony, barren service, and loss before the Judgment Seat of Christ. Security does not make rebellion harmless. It makes rebellion more shameful because it occurs inside property God purchased with blood. The Christian life therefore involves war. Galatians 5:17 says, "the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other." Salvation does not convert the flesh into spirit or persuade Adam's nature to cooperate with Christ. God creates a new man, places His Spirit within the believer, and commands the Christian to walk under the Spirit's control. The old nature remains present, hostile, deceptive, and eager for the steering wheel. The Christian does not need another birth every time the flesh wins a battle; he needs to reckon the old man dead, confess the sin, yield to the Spirit, and resume the fight. The war is real, but the Spirit did not enter the battlefield planning to surrender. -Paul Tackett Believing loyalty in Jesus, each day, is the way. It is known.

• 
  𝐵𝑖𝑙𝑏𝑜 𝑇𝐵𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑠 (@BilboTBaggins85) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Mallowed LMFAO, Battlefield has it's ****** issues, but god damn this looks wholly unfun.

• 
  Kroos (@apple_kroos) reported 9 minutes ago

  When the defense was broken, all hell broke lose! The Reserve Operators were forced to abandon position and fell back. Kroos, hurt and cornered, could see as much. And when she thought it couldn't get any worse, to her shock she saw Reunion join in the battlefield!...

• 
  Shlippi (@realshlippi) reported 9 minutes ago

  @fourboxesdiner @RealGunLobbyist I totally get wanting to push the issue considering the wins we have been getting, but we (the 2a community) needs to be strategic about it. To use a metaphor, this is a battlefield, and we have to make proper use of the circumstances and tools available to push forward and fight the enemy. If you push too far forward too quickly, you could get ambushed, or not have appropriate supply lines to support it. The losses incurred from one of those mistakes could hinder or make impossible future avenues of attack that could have a substantial benefit for winning. Personally, I want the NFA and GCA done away with, but we currently do not have a workable way of doing so. We want as many metaphorical supplies and munitions available as possible when that particular battle arrives, and to make that happen, we need to set up the groundwork for it.

• 
  不语jo (@rSg8ubzrCl9xg5h) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Battlefield I've played every Battlefield game since BF3, and you guys just keep getting more and more disappointing. Fine, you can't balance—whatever. But you can't fix bugs either, and you can't even be bothered to put out a notice. You're just a bunch of idiots.

• 
  Winfield Scott (@LtGenScott) reported 14 minutes ago

  @AHC1776 June 17, 1876 If I'm not mistaken, I think Crook had his own problems with Indians just a week before, and just south of the site of the Little Big Horn. I believe his battle was called The Battle of the Rosebud. It was a spirited affair, and while by no means a massacre, it nevertheless caused Crook to retreat south from the battlefield. The reason he was there (Northern Wyoming/Southeast Montana) at all was part of the grand strategy. To apply pressure to the Indians on several fronts at once. Well, Crook's retreat did two things: It gave the Indians a surge of confidence that they would use later on the 7th Cavalry, and it removed one of the army's pressure points. From Custer's point of view, it may have changed the entire complexion of the battle he went into 8 days later.

• 
  War Detective (@seekersomething) reported 15 minutes ago

  @JosephJakeKlein All these were presented in the media as starvation victims in the summer 2025, but every single one had pre-existing conditions: 1. Mohammed Al-Mutawaq: He has cerebral palsy, proven by the medical report signed by Dr Saeed Mohammed Al Nassan on 20th May 2025, also confirmed by NY Times later and by the Anti-Israel site Drop Site News. The death of his father was also used as a framing for this story, claiming that: "Mohammed's father was killed last year when he went to seek food". But footage and reports from that day and location showed that he was most likely killed on the battlefield, as a Hamas soldier. 2. Youssef Matar: Toddler with cerebral palsy. He was initially meant to be used by NY Times as the cover photo, but they agreed to not do it when they found out that he had the pre-existing illness. So NY Times then changed the image to Mohammed, that later turned out to have the very same condition as him. 3. Osama Al-Raqab: He has been in Italy receiving treatment since 12th June 2025. This was confirmed in September 2025 by the hospital in Verona, by the doctor there, where he was treated for leaky SCID. 4. Karam Khaled Al-Jamal: He was 27 years old but on the images he was so skinny that he was presented like a child in the media. On 31 July 2025 he was reported dead by malnutrition. According to the IDF he had a lifelong muscular dystrophy and partial paralysis, confirmed by both Palestinian media and Turkish media: "Karam, who had suffered from muscular atrophy and hemiplegia since childhood". 5. Abdullah Abu Zarqa: Has a genetic disease causing deficiencies, osteoporosis, and bone thinning. 4 months before the outbreak of the war, he traveled with his mother to receive medical treatment in East Jerusalem. 6. Atef Abu Khater: Was severely burned on his foot and hand in a soup kitchen. This led to a form of psychological distress by which he stopped eating and drinking. 7. Mosab al-Debs: He sustained a critical injury that resulted in a portion of his skull being removed and severe brain hemorrhaging, leaving him completely paralyzed. 8. Najwa Hussein Hajjaj: Suffered from a long-term condition that causes vomiting and requires specially prepared food for her to digest properly. 9. Hamza Mishmish: Living with disabilities since birth and was confirmed by Drop Site News to suffer from cerebral palsy. 10. Maryam Dawas: Suspected of having a serious undiagnosed stomach illness, causing diarrhoea, intestinal malabsorption and unspecified severe protein-energy malnutrition. Her mother and her brother can be seen looking healthy in the images from that location. Her illness is proven by the medical file from Al-Rantisi Children’s Hospital. 11. Najwa Hussein Hajjaj: She had esophageal stenosis. This was later confirmed by Drop Site News, in an interview with her mother: "Before the war started, we had taken her to the hospital, and she was diagnosed with esophageal stenosis. Her condition had not yet worsened, and a surgery was scheduled for December 4, 2023". 12. Jana Ayad: This story was first presented as being from 2025, but already in June 2024 she was seen in a hospital showing these conditions and then reported for the same thing still in September 2025. So if the conditions were ongoing during such a long time, is it likely that they came from the lack of food? Well Jana's sister Joury died of kidney problems in July 2025 and her father had left the Gaza Strip for medical treatment before the war.

• 
  Hugo Navarro (@HugoNavarroPer2) reported 15 minutes ago

  I tested the most promising counter-drone solution on the market. I flew to Prague, picked up a rifle for the first time in my life, and hit 4 out of 5 moving ground targets at 70-100m. The company behind it is publicly listed with no coverage and could be a multibagger if they execute. Smart Shooter ( $SMSH ) makes a 740 gram computerised rifle sight that turns a standard rifle into an anti-drone weapon. The soldier points roughly at the target, holds the trigger, and the sight tracks, computes and releases the round at the microsecond the barrel is on target. FPV drones costing a few hundred dollars now account for the majority of casualties on the modern battlefield. Soldiers are using shotguns to defend themselves. They add weight, only work at 40-50 metres, and give you a couple seconds of reaction time. It's a terrible solution. Combat-proven with the Israeli army. Every branch of the US military has bought it in the last 14 months through sole-source emergency orders. The US has effectively said there is no substitute. After a soft Q2 the stock sits at $330m market cap, $83m net cash, no debt. EV of $247m. Not cheap on this year's numbers but 5-12x 2028 EBIT depending on adoption, against peers at 18-20x. A slipped order held Q2 revenue growth to 30% when it would have been closer to 88% with that order included. Early stage product bet with real risk, but a real product solving the most urgent problem in modern warfare, a clean balance sheet, and limited coverage creating a window before this gets widely known. Full deep dive on Undervalued and Undercovered.

• 
  Julian Waller 📖 (@JulianWaller) reported 18 minutes ago

  Happy to state plainly that I'm going to need a *lot* more on how tactical nuclear weapon employment fits into the picture here. It doesn't match the pattern of horizontal escalation, it's not anywhere close to a doctrinal next step under any escalation model, there are no sudden battlefield losses or fundamental threats to the inviolability of the state, 'we need to shake ourselves out of stagnation seems entirely disproportionate, and it would be obviously destabilizing to both friendly foreign relations and domestic audiences. I have no problem withholding judgment or doing the 'analyst must just sit and wait' thing. But I'm really not convinced by the chatter.

• 
  BUZZ3R (@BUZZ3RX) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Battlefield For Christ's sake FIX YOUR KERNEL ANTI CHEAT ERRORS! Once again memory access error and this time it caused my PC to shut off! (0x000000D1 error in event viewer)

• 
  Daniel Faria Sampaio (@DanFSD) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Luuk__058 @BattlefieldComm First they need to fix matchmaking. Plenty of people playing Ranked on S. America but for some reason they throw us into N. America servers. When this happens, we're left we no choice but to enable such VPN tools in order to slightly improve latency, which benefits all parties

• 
  Big Brain AI (@realBigBrainAI) reported 20 minutes ago

  Palantir co-founder and CEO Alex Karp on why almost every company buying AI is getting nothing back for it: Karp's diagnosis is short and unkind: "The classic Silicon Valley way up until recently was just buy some large language model and have a nice chat with it, and that really doesn't create any actual enterprise value." That's the whole failure mode. A model gets procured, a chat window appears, nobody's revenue changes. His alternative starts with a definition he says Palantir arrived at years before the rest of the market: "We were years ahead for lots of reasons of anticipating what operational AI would mean. Meaning AI where you make more money or your revenue goes up and your costs go down." Two lines on the P&L. Nothing else counts. Karp claims the numbers follow from that. "We have a thriving commercial business. It grew 71% last quarter. And we're at a very pretty significant scale." He also flags something rarer in the sector: "We make money on our money, which is unusual in software. People have growth but no profitability. We have a lot of both." So why does the same underlying technology produce nothing at most companies and revenue at his? Karp says the answer is "a little more technical," and it isn't the model: "Our platforms are built to use large language models and machine learning in a way that is actually operationally effective. We had a relatively privileged insight into how you would do that and built this thing called an ontology which manages large language models in a way where they become crazily useful both commercially and actually on the battlefield." The ontology is the missing layer. A model on its own doesn't know what your business is made of. Something has to translate between the two before the model can touch anything that matters. What it gets used for is deliberately unglamorous. Karp lists underwriting, acquisition of real estate at scale, construction at scale, and supply chain management — "anywhere where you have volatility." He picks out one problem specifically: "Understanding the true cost of inputs into your enterprise, which is super hard to do at scale, especially if things are shifting or there's disruptions." And the larger version of the job: "reimagining your business into a digital as opposed to a non-digital business." Then he moves from the technology to the thing he actually treats as the differentiator — who carries the risk that none of it works: "Our claim to fame really is we absorb the risk of creating value." He contrasts that with how enterprise software is normally sold, in language he flags as the vulgar version: "The way you're taught to build a software company is your customer thinks they're getting laid but they're getting effed." Palantir's internal reframing: "We used to internally say no, we're in the mutual pleasuring business. Both sides should be happy." In practice that means the vendor is on the hook for the outcome, not just the licence: "We absorb the risk of value creation. So like you will make more money, your enterprise will work better. That's been a bonanza and we're pretty much alone in doing that in the world." Karp doesn't claim it's all his own execution. He credits the moment too: "The truth is we're also riding the back of the fact that this is just an American revolution." Underneath the specifics, he also frames the commercial work as secondary to something else. Asked what matters most, his first answer isn't revenue at all: "The most important thing we've done for you is help establish dominance on the battlefield with the DoD and stop hundreds of terror attacks."