Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nikola Tesla (@teslawarehouse) reported 45 seconds ago

  @EricLDaugh Within the margin of error, this shows Ohio is going to be a real battlefield this fall. Turnout is going to dictate everything in this race.

• 
  REDACTED (@AllOnMalone) reported 49 seconds ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Stupid decision. I’ve played nothing but ********** since the game came out with zero problems with matchmaking. Stupid excuse instead of admitting they f**ked up their ui creating the so called issues in the first place

• 
  Dude (@ThatDude_bro) reported 1 minute ago

  @Battlefield @EA Fix the UI ,bring back Rush and fix Breakthrough especially on tsuru reef. All these dumb issues and changes are essentially preventing me from wanting to even purchase the battle pass. Guess you all don’t like money

• 
  Tim Kubit (@KravMagaRoc) reported 3 minutes ago

  @PsalmWarfare Those of you who think Twitter is the battlefield, you’re making a category error. You’re either failing to distinguish, or conflating categories.

• 
  🇵🇸 (@RandomAhmad7) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm you guys focus on problems that no one cares about the most, while leaving the game breaking bugs still in the game FOR MONTHS, why are you guys trying to kill the game so bad?

• 
  Roccie Apollo (@killjoy77k) reported 5 minutes ago

  @ka1nfso1 @BattlefieldComm PS5 and maybe that’s my problem..

• 
  Trigglez (@Triggz02) reported 6 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Can you please address why I’m only able to play casual REDSEC in Australia and New Zealand ? Playing against a server that’s 60% bots is a terrible experience! I never had issue before finding or waiting for games.

• 
  SR (@PatternNotes) reported 6 minutes ago

  The Wrath of Khan Moment — Why CB-011 Is Still $CRBU’s Torpedo The Enterprise is damaged!!! Caribou does not currently have enough capital to comfortably fund the entire program through completion while simultaneously advancing CB-011. Management knows this. Shareholders know this. The market knows this. And that creates the trap: Management already used the ATM heavily around $2. It raised cash. It reduced spending. It extended the runway. It preserved the CB-011 H2 2026 catalyst. In other words: Management bought firing distance. But buying firing distance is not the same thing as winning. Something still has to change the battlefield. CB-011 is that shot That dataset matters for reasons much bigger than another response-rate update. There are actually two warheads on this torpedo Warhead #1: Valuation Suppose CB-011 expansion reproduces something close to the original signal. Suddenly the market has to reassess whether Caribou owns: another experimental allogeneic CAR-T or a genuinely competitive off-the-shelf multiple-myeloma asset with unusually deep responses. If CRBU re-rates from $1.50 toward $3, $4 or higher, the entire financing problem changes. A $60M raise at $1.50 requires: 40M shares. At $3: 20M shares. At $4: 15M shares. Strong CB-011 data therefore do not eliminate dilution. They make dilution cheaper. And that means existing shareholders surrender less ownership of both CB-011 and vispa-cel to fund the next stage of development. CB-011 can help finance vispa-cel before CB-011 itself ever reaches approval. That is the first warhead. Warhead #2: Regulatory path This is potentially even bigger. Vispa-cel is headed toward a large randomized pivotal trial. The question is whether CB-011 ultimately has to follow the same capital-intensive playbook. Maybe it does. RMAT does not guarantee otherwise. But CB-011 has several things working in its favor: heavily pretreated multiple myeloma deep early responses RMAT access and now deliberate enrollment of patients previously treated with BCMA-directed therapies That last population may be crucial. If CB-011 repeatedly produces deep responses after prior BCMA therapy has already failed, the regulatory question becomes different. It is no longer simply: “Can this compete broadly against existing BCMA CAR-T products?” It becomes: “What registration pathway is appropriate for an off-the-shelf therapy showing meaningful activity in patients who have already exhausted BCMA-directed treatment?” That is a potentially much more favorable question. Imagine three outcomes. Outcome one: Strong data, conventional regulatory path CB-011 looks excellent. CRBU re-rates. Management raises at a much better valuation. That alone can still save shareholders enormous dilution. The torpedo worked. Maybe not perfectly—but enough. Outcome two: Strong data + shortened registration path Now things become much more interesting. CB-011 gains value. CRBU re-rates. Financing gets cheaper. And Caribou potentially discovers that its second major asset can reach commercialization with substantially less capital than vispa-cel requires. Outcome three: Good data, no regulatory shortcut, no major re-rating This may be the most frustrating outcome. CB-011 works. But not enough to force the market to change its valuation. FDA still wants a large expensive development program. This is the actual Wrath of Khan moment The Enterprise does not need another routine weapon. It needs the weapon capable of changing the geometry of the fight. That is what CB-011 represents. Management has already done the maneuvering. They used the ATM. They conserved capital. They bought time. They preserved the catalyst. Now comes the shot. Because that is the moment we find out whether CB-011 really is different from vispa-cel— or whether Caribou has simply loaded another expensive weapon it cannot afford to fire. My personal notes. Not financial advice

• 
  Tupac_Senpai🇳🇬 (@IKTooMuch) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @tiggr_ man, DICE’s ability of creating new problems that never existed historically, to then have to waste manpower/energy in trying to “fix”, will never cease to amazing me. We told yall a Server Browser was critical BEFORE LAUNCH, but DICE always think they know better, smh

• 
  GuruVerseX (@GuruVerseX) reported 12 minutes ago

  Pink Floyd, qubits, and node software sound like three topics that should never appear in the same sentence, yet @quipnetwork somehow brings them together. What caught my attention is not just the quantum angle, but also the decision to keep classical hardware fully relevant. CPUs, GPUs, TPUs, and NPUs can all run nodes, compete through Proof of Useful Work, and help verify whether quantum computers are actually delivering better results. That matters. I have seen too many Web3 projects treat next-generation hardware like a magic sticker, instead of something that needs to be proven with measurable data. Quip’s first target, Ising Model optimization, creates a practical battlefield where different machines can be compared on useful business problems rather than marketing slides. The node manager also lowers the barrier to entry, which is important because infrastructure only becomes meaningful when people can actually run it. We need continued publication of transparent performance data and real-world workload benchmarks. If quantum advantage is real, then the numbers should do the talking. Would you run a @quipnetwork TestNet node if your existing GPU could help verify useful quantum computation?

• 
  Anci3nTKnowledg3 (@B3NJ3LAUW20) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Make this map a beach attack map in breakthrough, the maps looks realy good but the game have another problem its to fast paced like call of duty it totally don't feel like a battlfield

• 
  Alexander Jackson (@IamBatmaannnnnn) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @EA you need to get off your lazy entitled asses and fix this game. The rate of shot, breaking armor to death is insane. I should not get killed first if I am shooting at someone first and especially if I break their armor. Like wtf are you thinking

• 
  I AM (@SebasLoisk) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your servers, Delta force has bettter hit reg and stability and the **** is free you have no excuses

• 
  Matthew Wallis (@m15wallis) reported 14 minutes ago

  @PoshRitcher @AgroNationalism Skill issue tbh. Perhaps our great great great grandfathers should have been better warriors and fought better if they wanted to win. Their cause was not just, and the Lord saw fit to prove that to them on the battlefield.

• 
  Teacher João da He4rt (@OTeacherJoao) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm I simply can’t understand this fixation on matchmaking and game rotation. Just give us a goddamn server browser and persistent servers, problem solved. Cut the crap already