Binance Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Binance users affected:
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
| Beaucaire, Occitanie | 2 |
| Stafford, England | 1 |
| Nakuru, Nakuru | 1 |
| Kiambu, Kiambu | 1 |
| Vigo, Galicia | 1 |
| Mont-Saint-Martin, ACAL | 1 |
| Dubai, Dubai | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
K@Z (@KazOG603) reportedCongratulations on $wojak I was right just wrong cabal but hey it’s crypto what can you expect i probably should’ve grabbed some to be safe but I was to loyal and thought just maybe will make it through this since we made it literally through all the ups and down but I guess this binance listing was part of cabal gg once again back to square 1 🫡
-
ÄLÇHËMÏST (@Agent2K4) reported@binance Since #bStocks live on-chain as BEP-20 tokens, what happens if a user loses access to their private keys? Can tokenized RWAs be recovered, or do traditional crypto loss rules apply? #AskBinance
-
Serena (@Serena_offical_) reported@binance @binance Since bStocks are Certificates over the underlying share (not direct stock ownership) under ADGM rules; if BTech Holdings ever needed to wind down a bStock, what’s the actual redemption path back to the real share or cash for holders outside ADGM? #AskBinance
-
Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported@gandalfcryptto Agreed, but shorting’s not broken—data shows 63% of leveraged shorts on Binance get liquidated weekly. Most traders over-leverage in low vol. We track this daily in our risk reports. You ever see longs get wrecked harder? [link]
-
Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceWallet Thank you for your response, but this generic reply is exactly part of the problem. Every time I contact customer support, I receive the same surface-level responses that do not address the root cause of the issue. It often feels as if no one is genuinely reviewing the case or interested in understanding the impact these repeated errors have on users. The same problem keeps happening again and again. My account is repeatedly flagged as high-risk due to your technical errors, and each time I have to spend time proving that the decision was wrong. These recurring mistakes have caused me to miss numerous rewards and distributions over the years because my account was restricted or incorrectly classified. To be clear, I am not even concerned about the rewards themselves. What concerns me is the lack of accountability. When Binance eventually acknowledges that the issue was caused by a technical error, the missed rewards are not restored, no compensation is offered, and no official apology is given. I am not asking for special treatment. I am asking for something very simple: an official apology from Binance and a clear commitment that these repeated technical failures will be investigated and prevented from happening again to me and other users. Users deserve transparency, accountability, and respect—not repeated mistakes followed by automated responses.
-
zkpuzzlematt 🧩 (@zkmattwyatt) reported@tulipking yup -- this is what I noticed with my BTC decoupling thesis HYPE/ZEC barbel stood well in Apr/May and decoupled from BTC as robinhood/binance/etc all became everything exchanges -- but EOD most of onchain economy and growth is with people taking leverage on their crypto holdings so if BTC comes down then they are forced sellers as such
-
Bouhamdi San (@bouhamdi86) reported$BASED moved strong today Looks more like Binance Alpha money rotating back into stronger charts. Volume picked up, buyers stepped in, and $0.09 got reclaimed. My area for more accumulation is around $0.085-$0.082 if it cools down and holds. Break and hold above $0.096-$0.10, then the next leg gets more interesting. @BasedOneX Anyone else waiting for a pullback instead of chasing here? or just simply HODL
-
CHAIN REACTIONS ℠ Ӿ (@ChainReactionOm) reported@connyb @alexjohnward @Yeicrypto Study Cardano The market is irrational and what is working is in the hand of few players like : Coinbase, Binance and other big scam groups , eaither you Join their playground or wait for Clarity Act Nothing working now , only scams
-
Gurjiff (@Gurjiff) reported@binance Kaspa army don't. **** you Binance
-
il.hl (@hyperliquidmax) reportedAmerica's largest derivatives exchange isn't going to court to compete with perp futures. It's going to court to make sure Americans can't trade them at all. Those are very different things. 🧵 → This spring: U.S. regulators opened a compliant path for perp futures → Today: CME filed a court action to close it → Per @BetterMarkets: CME controls ~92% of U.S. exchange-traded derivatives Perp futures = first genuinely new derivatives product to reach U.S.-regulated markets in over a decade. Mainstream framing: "CME is protecting market integrity." A company with 92% market share going to court against a new entrant isn't protecting the market. It's protecting its position. CFTC Chairman Selig reportedly put it plainly: "Incumbents will always fear the future." For years, Americans were pushed offshore to trade perps — Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid. Now a compliant path exists. And an incumbent is asking a court to shut it down. If CME wins — does that volume come back onshore? Or does it stay offshore. Permanently. ⚡
-
_CR7_ (@OfficialCR7_Fan) reported@Shahzaynhaiderr @binance @BinanceAcademy fixing real problems while everyone chases hype
-
Alpha (@Mrdollar22) reported@binance With regulations around tokenized assets changing across different countries, how is Binance making sure bStocks can stay compliant in places where synthetic stocks face stricter rules? Do these regulatory differences affect how users in different regions can access or use them? #AskBinance
-
Optimistic Bear (@echo_tango_3) reported@BSCNews @BinanceUS @Zcash This is a huge red flag for me. Everything Binance touches turns to ****!
-
Michael Mislos | BitPinas (@mmichaels_21) reportedHow did @binance successfully and legally re-enter the Philippines? Here are the points from a recently released whitepaper: “The Regulated Reentry of @binance in the Philippines”. Here is a summary but Please note it is best to read the 7-page whitepaper as there might be finer points lost in the summary: 1) The Reentry & Global Anchor: The whitepaper outlines a compliant, cross-jurisdictional framework to bring Binance back into the Philippines via local partner BlockShoals Technologies Inc.. They did this by leveraging the international regulatory weight of a comprehensive ADGM FSRA license secured in Abu Dhabi. (The reasoning for this and the exact implementation is detailed in the whitepaper. If there is only one section that you will read from there, this is it!) 2) The architecture is built on a split-jurisdiction design: BlockShoals handles the front-end user experience under the SEC’s Crypto-Asset Intermediary (CAI) track, while natively delegating 100% of the peso-denominated fiat clearing to an active, independent domestic VASP partner. 3) The paper explicitly disputes recent media commentary that characterized the 90-day integration window as a "compliance gap" or an unexpected "halt" to the platform's entry. It clarifies that this timeline is actually a pre-planned technical "Pre-Phase" mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines April 14, 2026 Notice to Proceed. 4) It rejects the negative narrative that BlockShoals lacking a standalone VASP license is a regulatory error; instead, it argues that utilizing an existing local VASP's rails was a deliberate, engineered feature of the approved architecture from day one to satisfy the BSP's "unbroken chain" clearing rule, not a late remedy added to it. 5) The whitepaper confirms that public-facing retail onboarding and open trading are strictly barred during the current 90-day sandbox phase, which serves purely as a closed, highly supervised technical window to test backend infrastructure and fiat rails. 6) The SEC's StratBox approval carries more than fifteen highly sensitive, substantive conditions regarding user caps and product scopes, which must continuously coordinate with and adapt to evolving local banking policies, such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas strict June 12, 2026 privacy coin ban. Whitepaper in the second tweet. 👇 @cz_binance
-
lasherdoekmark1bh (@lasherdoekmark1) reportedbStocks now live on Lista, the first BNB Chain lending protocol supporting 1:1 backed US securities from Binance. Borrow, earn, and access assets like Nvidia, Tesla, SpaceX, and more 24/7 on-chain. Will this boost crypto-backed securities? #Crypto #DeFi #BNB