Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  X4M (@lavoiture_noire) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Crypto__Haris $1k is a enough for me, since i keep trying, and spend my time to figured it out Men working in his entire life just for one chance, one luck, one wish. To survive😔 Binance : 116455020

• 
  Hesman (@Hesman) reported 5 minutes ago

  Hook Summer was a special section on Binance Wallet and OKX Wallet, used to promote/showcase tokens/ecosystems related to Uniswap V4 Hooks (a smart contract "plug-in" for the liquidity pool on Uniswap V4, allowing customization of swap logic, liquidity, etc., creating new trending meme coins and DeFi). It appeared around May 2026 (around the beginning of the Hook Summer hype), listing hot tokens like $SATO, $UPEG, $LO0P, $FLOOD, $PITCH... to help users easily discover and trade them. Reason for disappearance: The temporary nature of the featured section: Wallets (Binance Web3 Wallet, OKX Wallet) often create trending/hot narrative sections to attract users (such as "Crypto Summer," Alpha tokens...). When the hype subsides, volume/token performance is no longer strong, or the narrative shifts to something else, they remove it and replace it with new content. This is not a token delisting, just a showcase. The Hook V4 hype has cooled: The Uniswap V4 Hooks trend exploded in the short term (meme coin + smart liquidity), but the crypto market quickly shifted to a different narrative. Binance/OKX rotates features based on popularity. Unrelated to delisting HOOK (Hooked Protocol): The official HOOK token of Hooked Protocol was delisted by Binance in April 2026 due to low liquidity (along with several other tokens). But "Hook Summer" is about the V4 Hooks ecosystem, not the HOOK token.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 5 minutes ago

  DEXE is on the radar, not yet on the move — a clean 4-hour close back above $20.92 on real volume is what would put it back in play. Zoom out and the daily chart actually looks healthy. The problem is on the 4-hour: price has been grinding to slightly higher highs, but the buying pressure underneath each push has been quietly fading. That's the classic look of a move running out of fuel — the kind of setup where chasing usually punishes you. The reward-to-risk is the second issue. The nearest ceiling sits around $20.92, only about 6% above current price. The nearest real floor is down near $17.02, almost 14% below. That's roughly twice as much room to fall as to rise from here, and that asymmetry alone is enough to keep us patient. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin is quietly taking market share back from the rest of crypto, which tends to drain money out of alts like this one. At the same time the US dollar is strengthening, which usually pulls risk appetite lower across the board. Neither is a death blow, but together they're a headwind, not a tailwind. So the read is simple: wait. A decisive 4-hour close above $20.92 on strong volume breaks the exhaustion story and reopens the upside. Short of that, a deeper flush toward $17 would offer a much cleaner spot to get interested. Anywhere in between is the worst of both worlds. — 📡 On the Radar · $DEXE · Available on Binance

• 
  硅基鸟 | Ray (@limxn6) reported 9 minutes ago

  Why I believe SPCX on tradexyz won't rebase？ There are several reasons for this. Anyone familiar with Hyperliquid and tradexyz knows the relationship between the two: the former is a trading-specialized L1 blockchain, while the latter is a DEX built on Hyperliquid's HIP-3. tradexyz is a bit like an outsourced team—essentially just setting up a booth within Hyperliquid's venue. 1. We need to understand that a rebase is an extremely complex operation, involving halting trading, force-liquidating positions, and reopening positions. Even for major CEXs (like OKX and Binance in this recent rebase), this is a significant engineering undertaking. Smaller exchanges like Bitget simply gave up and chose to relist instead. For an on-chain team that's dependent on another blockchain, it's even more of an impossible task. 2. When tradexyz first launched the contract, it mentioned an estimated share count of 11.87B. But it later realized this could create controversy, so it removed any wording related to the estimated share count from its documentation early on, and explicitly emphasized that the SPCX on tradexyz tracks exactly the price of SPCX Class A common stock. It also added numerous disclaimers stressing that there would be no rebase. In summary, it's not that tradexyz doesn't want to rebase—it's that it's completely incapable of rebasing.

• 
  Inmortal (@inmortalcrypto) reported 13 minutes ago

  “Don’t be 100% in crypto” That’s something a good friend told me a few months ago, and honestly, he was right Bear markets in crypto are especially brutal and boring There’s no point in looking at charts that doesn’t move when other markets are printing new ATHs almost every day Just like in a bullrun you focus on the best altcoins, you should focus on stocks when crypto is boring It’s the same game. We already know how to play it. The thing is, Binance just launched Stocks and ETFs trading 7,000+ U.S. stocks listed All from a single Binance account It couldn’t be simpler, and the timing couldn’t be better. Honestly, for people who have spent years being 100% crypto, like me, this feels like a lifeline This is my third bear market, and I’ll tell you something: The worst part isn’t when prices go down, the worst part is when nothing happens. When the entire market is doing absolutely nothing, having access to 7,000+ stonks to trade is perfect, not only because you can trade other assets in bull markets, but because you can access what crypto doesn’t have right now, volatility. Imo this is good for us because we have an alternative, at least while crypto is boring Also is good for TradFi guys and Institutions. Now they have Stonks, ETF’s and crypto all in the same app It’s a win win.

• 
  QuantFlows_xyz (@QuantFlows_xyz) reported 14 minutes ago

  GM, #BTC Liquidity Heatmap, June 8 🧲 ~63.9k, 64.4k — stacked clusters of limit sell orders acting as the current resistance zone. (~$350.8M total) — 63.9k alone sitting at 1.7k BTC (~$110.1M total) 🧲 ~62.9k, 63k, 62.2k — multiple layers of limit bids acting as support and absorbing sell pressure. (~$138.8M total) — 62.89k alone sitting at 604 BTC (~$38.5M total) MARKET NARRATIVE Right now the 62.2k–63k area looks like the key support zone, with buyers defending it with roughly $138.8M in bid liquidity on Binance Futures. Current liquidity levels: 63.9k–64.4k — around $350.8M stacked sell-side liquidity overhead acting as the main resistance zone 62.2k–63k — around $138.8M layered bid liquidity below acting as the key support zone So there are basically 2 scenarios from here: Price gets rejected into the heavy 63.9k–64.4k sell wall and rotates back lower into the 62.2k–63k zone Buyers absorb the overhead asks, turn resistance into support, and that opens a move toward 65k above But if the 62.2k bid zone gets fully consumed, downside opens up and price could flush into lower liquidity below.

• 
  Michael (@Holden_Rye_) reported 15 minutes ago

  Something about this BTC pump does not smell organic. Saylor posts the $32 signal before the move. A whale moves 1,656 BTC / $102M into Binance before the pump. Then BTC rips, ETH follows, and hundreds of millions in shorts get liquidated. That is not “retail suddenly got bullish.” That looks like pre-positioned liquidity warfare. Move coins to the exchange. Load the position. Trigger the pain zone. Let liquidations become the fuel. Then let Crypto X call it a breakout. I’m not saying this proves who did what. I’m saying the order of events matters. If the BTC holds structure, maybe it was collateral/liquidity support. If it fades back into the pump candle, then the move was probably a squeeze into exit liquidity. Either way, stop pretending Bitcoin is some clean little free market. This is whale hunting season. Retail was the farm.

• 
  EmpowerMindset (@Djyoti111) reported 15 minutes ago

  @LUNCninja @tutanlarm U r very good at analysing the lunc chart.... But, don't u feel 0.01 is a bit unrealistic target looking at the current supply and the way supply is being brought down by Binance monthly burn.......

• 
  Mr Paul. A (@MULTISTARHUB) reported 19 minutes ago

  @PhtEmmanuelO They can actually list, just that the taxes will not be charged because they are not trading directly from pancake swap but on their internal server. This means that you will be generating trading fees from those that are trading on pancake but you won't get fees from binance

• 
  Charles Dinky (@CharlesDin1521) reported 20 minutes ago

  POV: You thought prediction markets, 24/7 stocks, perps, and crypto exchanges were all running on different systems... Meanwhile @PythNetwork: 🤝 Powering Polymarket Perps 🤝 Powering Kalshi Up/Down Markets 🤝 Feeding Coinbase 24/7 Perps 🤝 Feeding Binance Markets 🤝 Feeding Hyperliquid 🤝 Feeding TradeXYZ At this point, if there's a market moving somewhere, there's a good chance Pyth is quietly underneath it. Pyth isn't chasing the future of markets, It's already pricing them. #PythNetwork

• 
  Lily (@Lily1128540) reported 25 minutes ago

  Not even the largest asset in the world can survive a binance listing. They have accomplished the impossible.

• 
  sunday peter π (@sundaypeter8110) reported 27 minutes ago

  WHAT CLARITY ACT IS ALL ABOUT The CLARITY Act is a major U.S. crypto regulation bill currently moving through Congress in 2026, aiming to establish a clear legal framework for digital assets. It classifies cryptocurrencies into three categories—commodities, securities, and stablecoins—while resolving jurisdictional disputes between the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission). However, its passage faces tight deadlines before the midterm elections, and there’s uncertainty about whether it will become law this year. WHY CLARITY ACT? Long running turf war between the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) over who gets to regulate crypto. Here’s the background: SEC’s stance: Many crypto tokens are “investment contracts,” so they should be treated as securities. That means strict disclosure rules, registration, and investor protections. CFTC’s stance: Assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum behave more like commodities, so they fall under its jurisdiction. The CFTC tends to be lighter touch compared to the SEC. The clash: For years, both agencies have brought lawsuits against crypto firms, sometimes over the same assets. This has created confusion, legal uncertainty, and slowed innovation. The CLARITY Act is designed to end this fight by drawing clear lines. SEC regulates investment contract assets (tokens tied to central teams or profit expectations). CFTC regulates digital commodities (like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or tokenized gold). Banking regulators oversee payment stablecoins. So, the enforcement battles, I meant the overlapping lawsuits, contradictory rulings, and regulatory uncertainty caused by the SEC and CFTC both trying to claim authority. The Act’s whole point is to stop that tug of war. How messy the SEC vs. CFTC enforcement battles have been in Crypto: Ripple (XRP) Case SEC’s position: In 2020, the SEC sued Ripple Labs, claiming XRP was an unregistered security because buyers expected profits from Ripple’s efforts. Ripple’s defense: XRP functions more like a commodity or currency, not a stock. Outcome so far: Courts have issued mixed rulings — some say XRP sales to institutions were securities, but sales on exchanges were not. This split shows the lack of clarity. CFTC’s role: The CFTC has hinted that XRP could be treated as a commodity, but without clear law, it hasn’t taken the lead. Ethereum Dispute CFTC’s stance: Ethereum is a commodity, so it falls under their jurisdiction. SEC’s stance: Some officials have suggested Ethereum’s ICO made it a security, and newer versions (like staking rewards) could still be securities. Result: Confusion for exchanges, funds, and developers — they don’t know which rules apply. Enforcement Overlap Both agencies have filed cases against crypto firms like Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken. Sometimes they accuse the same company of violating different rules for the same tokens. This overlapping enforcement creates uncertainty, legal costs, and slows down adoption. The CLARITY Act is meant to stop this tug of war by drawing bright lines: SEC = securities (investment contract assets). CFTC = commodities (like Bitcoin, Ethereum, tokenized gold). Banking regulators = stablecoins. That way, firms won’t face double lawsuits for the same product. How the SEC–CFTC turf war has hit crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Binance: Coinbase SEC lawsuits: The SEC sued Coinbase in 2023, claiming it listed unregistered securities (tokens like Solana, Cardano, etc.). Coinbase’s defense: It argued those tokens are commodities, not securities, and that the SEC is overreaching. CFTC’s role: The CFTC has generally treated major tokens (like Bitcoin and Ethereum) as commodities, creating a direct conflict with the SEC’s stance. Impact: Coinbase faces uncertainty about which tokens it can legally list, and investors face risk of sudden delistings. Binance

• 
  onesmiley (@udontknowmepliz) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Crypto__Haris $50 gonna help me a lot Binance uid: 99774897

• 
  Horizonal 🦊 (@HorizonalC) reported 35 minutes ago

  Throwing my support to these low cap gems One of them is connected to Binance Give them time CATPENG 0x16D1124b831440ce94af724414d682c82C2BeDd1 BGRID 0x3c36fC87c49315a3Ec3933DC5eC4941a9985C9e5 Crystal stones 0xe252FCb1Aa2E0876E9B5f3eD1e15B9b4d11A0b00 SAFEPOINT 0x3925f2ae71bCd36b9e4284F92f519f3924b2A91a

• 
  Morsy (@morsyxbt) reported 37 minutes ago

  It seems team linked to @fhenix had dumped 10M secret:native tokens on CEXs like Binance and Kraken - worth $6.6M that time and around $100M at ATH also around $28M OTCed via galaxy digital @SecretNetwork was a past failed rebrand of ENIGMA MPC : both launched by the FOUNDER of Fhenix - that experienced several manipulative OTC and CEX token dumps by the team in the past (which 99.9% of their t3 shillers/affiliates are unaware of) a little context first : in 2017 GuysZysKind (fhenix founder) launched Enigma MPC and raised 45M from presale, later in feb 2020 US securities imposed them $500k penalty for conducting an unregistered sale ultimately team decided to shutdown and launched a rebrand project - secret:native now large quantity secret:native token dumps by team causing harm to community and holders : ECOSYSTEM WALLET : secret1dcn8a9t5r7meas37ra2qgtr6rqae997u3x3lpl 1/ : started sending out scrt tokens in different clusters to another scrt labs osmosis address : osmo1xj9ex9nrmp0llf6r6w7h07cw3d9d0nd7vnjtn7 which in turn started depositing to address : 0x9D4220414220dBB58A53594EEe952DD1e06a30a4 via multiple clusters and upto $13.8M+ were sent to this address which were ultimately sent to Galaxy Digital OTC EOA to settle backdoor otc deals : 0x33566c9D8BE6Cf0B23795E0d380E112Be9d75836 2/ : osmosis address (osmo1x...jtn7) is linked to another galaxy EOA : 0x0052EEDEE9a18aA795Ac97f90d5583CcF8c16594 and upto $2M+ were ultimately sent same above Galaxy digital OTC EOA (0x335...836) 3/ : a third galaxy deposit address : 0xf2A13852bcD29e5fBe2cc2CD89053A008960EEc6 started receiving funds upto $12M+ funds from a wallet linked to another scrt labs osmosis address : osmo1vx3wy8g4xgkn46fduj9zwuznagxxfl82drlw9c which again was linked to first above osmosis address (osmo1x...jtn7) linked to ecosystem wallet ultimately totalling $28M funds OTCed all from Ecosystem linked wallets NOW CEX dump : 1/ : scrt labs grants wallet : secret1x4e3ftk855xzwcsfx9tzdpfsr3244j86ey0y0f started sending out tokens in to multiple addresses like (secret1pv...w0ef) which later deposited 420k secret:native tokens worth $4M at ATH to kraken deposit address : secret1nm0rrq86ucezaf8uj35pq9fpwr5r82cl94vhug which in turn another 1.3M scrt tokens from another scrt labs delegation linked address (secret1aftk.....nkkk9) totalling ~2M tokens to kraken deposit address 2/ : another binance deposit address : secret13fh085csr7w7e866r402cqa9xp42trsch7w269 received almost 11M+ tokens from multiple addresses linked to delegations note : both instances occurred during 2023-2024 (time when Fhenix was launched and started growing) roughly 3years of scrt launching their own token ultimately it was community and holders who faced the dump losses even after supporting the team yesterday i did a subtle tweet where i mentioned how team was under-paying some creators (not everyone) aswell but the point was to highlight Fhenix team not favouring community at TGE since founder has history of overlooking community and dumping tokens via otc and CEX from past failed projects but suddenly an army of NPC affiliates started quoting and disclosing their rates and paid partnerships (which most of them had not in their earlier paid posts) on scrolling their accounts i found : most of them had no knowledge about crypto and were referred friends for kol deals, posting irrelevant content/selfies/partying videos/dating advices and tagging fhenix like inf0fi farmers used to do also i was alreadyt bearish on this p cuz the infra fhenix is working on and FHE stacks already topped with ZAMA stay smart signing off