Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Capy Research (@Capy_Research) reported 6 minutes ago

  Perp DEX volume fell for a fifth straight month. Perps just had their best year on record. Both are true. The gap between them is the story of 2026. Four things that changed in perp market structure this year: - Perps went onshore. The CFTC cleared KalshiEX and Coinbase to list bitcoin perps, and this week the White House said the agency is working on a compliant path for @HyperliquidX. The regulator would rather hold the leverage than export it. - Perps stopped being a crypto product. TradFi perps climbed from 2.7% to 28.3% of Tier 1 crypto exchange futures volume in seven months, per Binance Research. Roughly $80B to $691B, while total crypto futures volume fell from $2.95T to $2.44T. > One book growing while the other shrinks is a migration, not a cycle. - The exposure now trades where the exchange cannot. Hyperliquid ETFs gained close to 20% in a single session and Nasdaq-listed Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR) closed up 30.4%, while US traders remain restricted from the platform itself. - Permissionless listing became the binding constraint. The July 28 flash crash in the SK Hynix perp is what a contract with no expiry looks like when the underlying has no depth. The common thread is coverage, not leverage. A perp is the cheapest way to quote an asset traditional markets never covered, on the days they refuse to open.

• 
  Cheeky Crypto (@CheekyCrypto) reported 6 minutes ago

  XRP Supply Shock... XRP is leaving exchanges fast XRP has hit a seven-year withdrawal extreme while price, momentum and ETF demand remain weak. This video breaks down why withdrawals reached 56.85% of seven-day XRP exchange activity on Binance and 54.9% across centralized exchanges, and why that contradiction matters for holders. But the key detail changes how the numbers should be read: these figures measure transaction counts, not XRP volume, so they do not prove accumulation or a supply shock. We examine exchange balances, large-holder activity, ETF demand and the conditions that could strengthen or weaken the bullish case. Subscribe for more in-depth crypto breakdowns. #XRP #CryptoNews 00:00 XRP seven-year withdrawal extreme 01:03 XRP price weakness vs withdrawal activity 02:40 Why the timing is so strange 05:01 XRP market backdrop turns uncomfortable 06:27 XRP price and technical analysis 08:12 What 56.85% actually means 10:02 XRP withdrawals vs deposits 11:25 Large XRP holders and accumulation 12:31 Why exchange withdrawals matter 13:46 What would confirm the bullish case 16:17 XRP conditions, not predictions 17:39 Three XRP scenarios to watch 19:31 Does this prove XRP accumulation 20:18 XRP withdrawal extreme revisited 23:04 XRP data framework and conclusion

• 
  lia (@Lia_Norden) reported 14 minutes ago

  @DefiWimar The data says inflow, not purchases. Coins landing in a Coinbase or Binance wallet are customer deposits and internal transfers, not the exchange buying for itself. A broker generally doesn't buy crypto on its own account, it holds it for clients.

• 
  rb (prediction arc) (@rb_tweets) reported 18 minutes ago

  a fresh Polymarket account (funded $500k using Binance) has put 180k across 2 bets, is he worth trailing?! a trader called "monkeyking42" bought 186K NO shares for $110K on Fed raising interest rates by 25 bps, and another $70k on buying 250k YES shares for the CLARITY Act to pass in 2026 what's interesting is during July's Fed decision, he took his first trade and bet $198K on No rate change making $71k in profit in 48 hours. few things to note: > high conviction trader, mostly buys using limit orders > funded $500k using binance, no other activity > no panic sells, even when he’s down 13k on clarity act have seen similar wallets run it up before, might be worth watching this one!! may or may not be trailing him : ) (link below)

• 
  0xNox (@0xNoxxx) reported 19 minutes ago

  Sometimes Binance delisting news does something strange: instead of price falling, it spikes. NFP jumped 515% on July 2, right on the futures settlement day, in the middle of delisting news, with no real catalyst behind it. We've seen a similar pattern with HFT before. It doesn't happen with every delisting, but when thin liquidity meets the right setup, even a small amount of capital can move price disproportionately. We went through ICX, SCRT, and STORJ in detail in separate threads. Now let's compare all three against the same question: which one has the setup most prone to this? A manipulated move needs three things: thin liquidity, a leverage-heavy book, and a narrative worth chasing. Here's how the numbers stack up. $ICX - OI/mcap at 7.2%, the lowest of the three. DEX volume down to a few thousand dollars a day, nearly dead. Funding flat at zero. Nobody's building size here because nobody's watching. The setup is too thin for this kind of move. $STORJ - OI/mcap at 19.4%, mid-range. But there hasn't been a single onchain transfer over $100K in 4 days, dead quiet. Low interest, thin volume. Possible, but no clear trigger. $SCRT - OI/mcap at 22.3%, the highest of the three. Futures volume is 6.3x spot, so leverage is doing most of the work on price. On top of that, there's an active and conflicting news cycle: Labs proposing an exit to Arbitrum, and a 4x dilution proposal that just passed with 94.8% of the vote. Price fell 18% while OI grew 27% in the same window, fresh positions arriving even during the drop. Thin liquidity, a strong narrative, and active leverage, all three at once. Bottom line $SCRT looks like the setup most prone to this. High leverage, thin spot support, and a news cycle that can pull speculation in either direction. $STORJ comes second, its quiet cuts both ways. $ICX has no real trigger, nobody's paying attention.

• 
  Dathan Smart (Muska) (@MuskaSmart) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Sharkx Why do you still care about $CRO and CDC. They are both as broken as eachother. Leave them and go to Binance.

• 
  GPDog🐾 (@DigDugTrader) reported 22 minutes ago

  The most likely way Binance could fail is not through a dramatic, overnight hacker theft, but through regulatory strangulation, regional exclusion, and the financial pressure of its fixed corporate overhead. Because public Proof of Reserves (PoR) logs show customer assets are backed 1:1, a failure would most likely trigger a corporate unwind rather than an instantaneous FTX-style collapse.

• 
  Gains (@MissionGains) reported 22 minutes ago

  @BreezyDegens it'll be like a binance US thing, so if you log in without VPN you will need to be KYC

• 
  Paulo/Паша (@paulopavlovski9) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Audiera_web3 Please @zachxbt investigate situation around @Audiera_web3 and their token BEAT that is down -92% just in 7 days. Just wanna know if it they who non-stop sell. Because this coin is everyday -30% minimum for the las 7 days, everyday top fall on binance.

• 
  crescendovski 𐤊 (@Kaspanyan) reported 26 minutes ago

  Great News! 🎉 Coinbase has removed Kaspa from its futures trading. Hopefully, Binance will follow doing the same. Futures trading without a spot listing only hurts Kaspa. It’s basically just a casino game like: will the price go up or down? Buy Kaspa on the spot market and transfer your coins to your Ledger! Less futures trading, less bad manipulation. #coinbase #crypto #kaspa

• 
  Edwin & Sandra (@Edwin21081969) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Portalcoin @Dreamer_585 Wtf is going on,the price is crasi nog, monitoring by Binance,please tell the community whats going on

• 
  Coinelius 🟦 961,634 (@CoineliusX) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Zhangbei0 @NYX_Capital @HyperliquidPC >So you expect me to believe that a government would allow a company to run an illegal, money laundering, platform on one end. And then a legal one in the US? Yes, have you heard of Binance and Binance US or Polymarket and Polymarket US? It’s really not that complicated, they make a new frontend accessible to US IPs with KYC and it’s a watered down version of the full platform that’s compliant with US laws. It’s still an L1 blockchain, there’s no stopping US citizens now from using VPNs to access the current front-end or using other alternate frontends that already exist. Making yet another one but with KYC and limited to certain markets is obvious.

• 
  THE CHAIN INSIDER (@TheChainInsider) reported 28 minutes ago

  @AshCrypto This industry is garbage. Totally manipulated. Do not trade crypto. Fully manipulated by binance and others CEX.

• 
  MegaWhale Crypto (@The_MegaWhale) reported 29 minutes ago

  The BTCC situation is insane Probably the most insane liquidation wick ive ever seen in crypto from BTCC exchange Force long squeezes, liquidity vacuums due to forced order book thinning (exchange manipulation), API failures, fragmented margin engines ect.. Remember the avg deviation should be 0.01% to max 0.05% for BTC and ETH across exchanges. This equates to a few dollars at the most for BTC and an few cents for ETH. A deviation like this is either, complete back end exchange malfunction, or purposely wiping of order books to force liquidations. Ether way after an event like that BTCC exchange should not be trusted unless a clear explanation is provided and all lost funds are recovered. The same issue of deviations on wicks >0.05% avg is present on Bybit, okx, blofin, kucoin a few others. Again this is why I personally only trade where I trade. As someone who personally trades hundreds of millions in volume a month, I do have a stake in the game, I need to ensure I am trading on exchanges that have the lowest risk for things like this occurring, even the small deviations that you may not notice. Once again, Bitunix based on my experience is still by far the best in the industry for solid prices as they index their assets against Binance, bitget and bybit to ensure the best and most stable prices without fluctuations »0.05% market standard. -------------------UPDATE ------------------- Turns out the head BD from BTCC was in the telegram channel They blocked me on twitter the second I called them out for their shady tactics to avoid me tagging them and calling me out there Unreal Their current excuse is “a rouge marker maker” Anyone with a brain knows that this is a poor excuse. Market makers add liquidity to order books and make profit on spreads, any sort of forced liquidation sweeps from market makers often resemble a cascade down, similar to Oct 10th But this was a whole other ball game. This was a split second wick from 52-84k It’s significantly more likely the exchange rug pulled them own liquidity to flush the order books and cause a mass liquidation Ofcourse I can’t prove any of this without reviewing the market books seconds before the liquidations, if anyone miraculously has a video of the market books at the exact time and seconds before the liquidations please send that to me, otherwise this is just my assessment of what I deem to be likely, not an accusation of wrong doing -------------------UPDATE ------------------- Peoples accounts have been credited their funds back, but any losses from active trades at the time of the scam wick has NOT been refunded or returned via compensation to the users yet (this info comes from testimonies from users who were affected I am in contact with) Brutal, BTCC completely scamming people I have been blocked on twitter by them so I am unable to voice my support for the victims on social media

• 
  Harb (@Harb07950864) reported 34 minutes ago

  YOU ARE THE PREY OR THE PREDATOR ? WorldGPT Debunk WorldGPT is an unregulated crypto platform posing as an AI trading bot that promises daily profits. It has zero connection to Sam Altman’s Worldcoin. The “GPT” name is pure brand-laundering to steal OpenAI credibility. No legitimacy anywhere • No company registration, no owner info, no contacts • Not regulated by any financial authority • Trust score ~31/100 • Browser phishing warnings are common • No FinCEN MSB or US Treasury approval — any such claim is fabricated Red flags • Claims AI trading bots but shows no trading history, no audits, no real tech • Promises 2% daily returns — mathematically impossible and a classic Ponzi signature (paid from new deposits) Clone network Part of a cluster using similar names ending in .top, .vip and .club. Operators just spin up a new domain when one gets flagged. How the scam works (4 stages) 1. Recruitment — social ads, fake trader DMs, referral incentives, pig-butchering style trust building 2. Trust-building — fake reviews, staged profit screenshots, fake demo withdrawals 3. Escalation — small “risk-free” deposit → pressure to reinvest and upgrade tiers → turn victims into recruiters 4. Extraction — withdrawals blocked with “unlock fees,” delays, partial payments, then total cutoff Mechanism: Brand laundering + false precision (daily %) + fabricated authority + urgency/FOMO. Recovery scams that appear next to these reviews and charge upfront fees are usually a second-layer scam targeting the same victims. China No licensing. Mainland China banned crypto exchanges in 2017 and all crypto transactions in 2021. Operating with Chinese users is already illegal. Chinese-language networks moved an estimated $16.1 billion in illicit crypto in 2025 (~20% of the global total). Hong Kong No SFC VASP/VATP license. Operating or marketing without one is a criminal offence under Hong Kong law. Binance Zero connection. Not listed, never announced. Note: the real, separate project ChainGPT (CGPT) is listed on Binance and has partnerships with Google, Nvidia and BNB Chain. WorldGPT has nothing to do with it. Any “Binance partnership” claim is fabricated. Same pattern in every jurisdiction: no license, no registration, no legal footing #cybercrime #cybersecurity