Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  TU_Crypto_News (@TU_Crypto_News) reported 4 minutes ago

  Yi He says Wall Street is moving toward 23×5 trading, while Binance already offers round-the-clock access to traditional-market products. She also said Binance Wallet handles more than $13 billion a day and 75% of wallet trading volume.

• 
  Happenline (@happenline) reported 5 minutes ago

  @carlmoon Traders are leaning against another deep washout, but they have not ruled it out. Polymarket gives ETH a 34% chance of touching $2,400 before September, down 41 points today. A Binance ETH/USDT one-minute low at or below $2,400 is enough; other exchanges do not count.

• 
  t0xic🦠 (@rmvai640) reported 7 minutes ago

  GM Every infoFi Fighter 🌊 Can I get GM Back ? Have you still not started working on @axisrobotics ? Are you still unsure about the potential airdrop, or whether they will actually launch their product? Let me give you a few examples with proof to judge the product and ecosystem: Binance Wallet currently has a $1.5M $AXIS points reward pool running for 30 days. There’s also a campaign on major InfoFi platform @KaitoAI , with 0.25% of the token supply allocated to 500 creators. You can start today if you want. I’ve already started working on @axisrobotics without hesitation. Use your time wisely, because $BTC has hit $80K and the bull run is starting. I believe something good is coming ahead.

• 
  ombre25 (@ombre25tasl) reported 8 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceHelpDesk any update boss - review what’s needed allow me withdraw my money then you can delete my account or close it. Your service is bullshit

• 
  Adnan (@0xadnan7) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Helle_een @binance early access helps, but risk literacy still missing

• 
  Vindicated Chidi 🕊 (@Vindicatedchidi) reported 13 minutes ago

  Distinguished Colleague, There’s a lot of context missing from this post. First, the asset in your screenshot is $XRWA, the native token of @xendfinance. And yes, the token has suffered a significant decline from its previous highs. In fact, Xend Finance's token reached an all-time high of roughly $3 in March 2021. But if you're going to use the current price to criticize the project, then at least tell the complete story. You conveniently ignored one of the most important things about Xend Finance: They have actually built a product. Xend Finance isn't simply a token sitting on a blockchain waiting for people to speculate on it. The Xend Finance App is built as a financial platform that allows users to manage digital assets, convert crypto to Naira, and transfer funds directly to Nigerian bank accounts. The platform also provides access to savings and investment products, including money-market investments, allowing users to put their Naira or supported digital assets to work rather than simply holding them. That's particularly relevant in the Nigerian market. One of the biggest problems for everyday crypto users isn't necessarily buying a token. It's moving between crypto and the traditional financial system. Xend has built infrastructure around that exact problem. A user can hold crypto, convert it to Naira and move the proceeds to a Nigerian bank account without having to rely on the traditional P2P process. Xend's app documentation specifically highlights direct transfers to Nigerian banks. And they've gone beyond simple crypto conversion. The app introduced Money Markets, giving users access to investment opportunities such as bonds, mutual funds and other money-market instruments. It also introduced support for @cngn_co , allowing users to invest using Naira. So when you post a screenshot of a ~$258 token balance and say: “Welcome to crypto” you're telling only one part of the story. Crypto is volatile. Extremely volatile. A token trading far below its previous ATH doesn't automatically mean the underlying company, product or technology has no value. Those are separate questions. If we're going to evaluate Xend Finance seriously, let's talk about: - Product. - Users. - Revenue. - Adoption. - Development. - Token utility. - Liquidity. - Token distribution. - Execution. - And the future roadmap. Those are legitimate things to investigate. But reducing an entire project to the current value of its token is like judging a technology company solely by the current price of its stock without looking at what the company has actually built. And then there's another part of your framing that deserves questioning: Why specifically emphasize that this is a “Nigerian project”? If the point is that $XRWA has fallen significantly, then say that. If the point is that Xend Finance hasn't delivered, then demonstrate that. If the point is that the product doesn't work, show us. But what exactly does being Nigerian add to the argument? Xend Finance is an African-built project that has attracted international backing, including Binance and Google Launchpad, and has spent years building products around DeFi, digital assets and real-world financial access. Its own platform says its DeFi products have reached more than 200,000 users. You don't have to like $XRWA. You don't have to believe in the project. You don't even have to be bullish on Xend Finance. But if you're going to criticize it, criticize the project not its nationality. And if you're going to use price as your primary evidence, at least acknowledge the full journey: ATH ≈ $3 in 2021 → years of crypto market cycles → current price decline → while the team continued building products. That's a much more honest picture of what happened. A SS can show you what a token is worth today. It cannot, by itself, tell you what the team has built, who is using it, what problems it solves, or whether the project still has a future. Shalom 🙏

• 
  TOR (@TOR_WEB3) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance Overnight liquidity solves one access problem but concentrates risk when the underlying clearing engine is closed.

• 
  Harun Eroğlu (@trasharun) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet The Binance app stole $7,000 of my funds. I contacted customer service, and they blocked me. The Binance app is a thief and a scammer. User-16bc7 ID: 343880937 This is my Binance account. They track you via IP address, track your coins, and steal your funds.

• 
  ꧁༒Triple S༒꧂ (@Shuvando) reported 21 minutes ago

  @rab4745 @binance no problem agen come back

• 
  Ahmed Omith (@ahmedomith) reported 24 minutes ago

  @nesaorg @binance @nesaorg Nes token buy sell totally off please solv this problem

• 
  hodLNothing.btc 🟧 (@hodlstxbtc) reported 25 minutes ago

  This is the whole thesis in two sentences. Your coins never leave Bitcoin, their value works everywhere. I ran it myself on @Stacks: BTC as collateral on @ZestProtocol, borrowed dollars, traded tokenized stocks on Binance. The coins never moved. The value did 🟧 Holding and working are no longer opposites. Disclosure: I hold BTC and STX.

• 
  MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported 26 minutes ago

  $XRP RUMOR CHECK A real SEC filing is getting passed around tonight like Evernorth just took another major step toward Nasdaq. The document is real. What people are turning it into is another story. Evernorth filed Amendment No. 7 to its Form S-4 on August 25. Evernorth is the Ripple-linked company working toward becoming a publicly traded $XRP treasury through its merger with Armada Acquisition Corp. II. Ripple is connected through Pathfinder Digital Assets, so seeing Ripple Labs on the filing is completely legitimate. But Amendment No. 7 didn’t change the deal. The filing says it was submitted solely to correct a clerical error on the signature page. Ripple Labs was supposed to appear as Pathfinder’s sole member and that signature block had been left out. They fixed it. The actual proxy statement and prospectus weren’t changed. That’s literally what happened. The Evernorth deal is still moving through the SEC process, which is good news on its own. But this amendment isn’t SEC approval, it isn’t the merger closing, and Evernorth didn’t suddenly land on Nasdaq because somebody fixed a missing signature. We don’t need to make it more exciting than it is. There’s another filing making the rounds claiming Ripple could release additional $XRP from escrow if the CLARITY Act passes. The wording actually exists, but it comes from a third-party ETF prospectus, not an announcement from Ripple. It says Ripple “may” release additional $XRP under certain regulatory conditions. That’s worth knowing. It’s not worth turning into “Ripple is releasing more $XRP when CLARITY passes.” Until Ripple says that’s the plan, I’m not calling it Ripple policy. The whale headlines need the same treatment. Around 231M $XRP reportedly moved off Binance in whale-classified withdrawals, the largest reading of its kind in six months. That’s interesting and absolutely worth watching. But moving $XRP off an exchange doesn’t automatically mean whales bought 231M $XRP. It means the assets left Binance. Follow the wallets before you tell people what the owners did with them. I’m also seeing “XRPL officially surpassed 5 billion transactions.” Not from the numbers I can verify. Public dashboards are still showing the cumulative number around 4.5B. I’m not rounding up half a billion transactions because 5B looks better in a post. Now for the stuff that actually checks out. RLUSD crossed $2B in total market cap. Ripple confirmed it. Close to $1B is issued on XRPL, with the rest primarily on Ethereum. That’s a legitimate milestone. No bullshit needs to be added to it. Spot $XRP ETFs also recorded about $23.87M in net inflows on August 25, bringing cumulative net inflows into the area of $1.55B to $1.59B. That’s actual capital moving into regulated $XRP investment products. It doesn’t tell us what the price does tomorrow, but the money is real. The XRPL amendment vote is getting interesting too. fixCleanup3_3_0 is around 27 of 35 trusted validators, or about 77%. It needs 28 of 35 to cross the 80% threshold and begin the required 14-day activation period. It hasn’t crossed yet, and none of the new 3.3.0 amendments are active. We’re close. We’re not there. Evernorth is still working through the process of becoming a public $XRP treasury company. Ripple’s connection is real. RLUSD crossed $2B. Money continues entering spot $XRP ETFs. XRPL is getting close to potentially starting the activation clock on its first 3.3.0 amendment. There’s plenty of real positive news here. Stop trying to turn every filing, transfer and vote into something it isn’t. Amendment No. 7 fixed a missing signature. It didn’t put Evernorth on Nasdaq.

• 
  The OG Guy (@ibuyogcoins) reported 29 minutes ago

  What did I tell you? This is a 100m+ narrative larping sub 1m. The great noticing is finally starting to begin, top fomo whales are loading. Top holders are diamond handing. Looks like binance also added a charity coin section on their website? I hope you understand what happens next. Millions tomorrow. Then tens of them. Then 100m+? Study BnB coin repricings. 0x7002bc937aDCE0878BaBaE67db559a61dfA17777

• 
  BELIEVE_ (@The_Believe_21) reported 31 minutes ago

  @ali_alizeh72722 @BinanceHelpDesk @binance Many users facing the same issue. Binance support isn't taking it seriously.

• 
  Signal Seeker (@signalseeker_v1) reported 31 minutes ago

  What happens when a probability API becomes a line item on an agent's runtime invoice? @CournotProtocol's Intelligence Oracle just integrated with Binance Pay's x402 endpoint and listed on the B402 Bazaar on @BNBCHAIN. The integration turns Cournot's probability inference into a discoverable paid service that agents can call and settle onchain in a single automated workflow. No API key, no offchain billing, no human in the loop. - Discovery happens through the B402 marketplace listing, not a docs page - Payment settles via x402 per call, onchain, in the same flow as the inference request - The probability API becomes a billable service primitive rather than a standalone endpoint The question I keep coming back to is about reliability at scale. If an agent runtime depends on Cournot's probability feed for a decision loop and the call fails mid-execution, does the payment revert cleanly enough that the agent can retry without double-spending? And at what call volume does the per-request settlement overhead start eating into the economics faster than the inference value justifies?