Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Guruprasad Venkatesha (@Guru_BCUBE) reported 9 minutes ago

  @tweet_buzzer I have withdrawn 40% of my funds from Binance and parked it in Bybit. I will wait for one more week and then pull out everything. The whole platform has to shutdown if they don’t obtain Mica but personally I feel it’s impossible for them to obtain due to criminal investigation in France and other constraints.

• 
  Crynet (@crynetio) reported 14 minutes ago

  🇵🇭 Binance Gains Regulatory Green Light for Philippine Traders BlockShoals reports Binance can serve Philippine traders under a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sandbox arrangement. The framework permits trading access without requiring a local Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license, according to BlockShoals.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 15 minutes ago

  @dharmjack01 RE just had its TGE today with listings across Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Robinhood, Bitstamp, KuCoin. CB Ventures took a strategic position. price hit 53 cents earlier. the setup: onchain reinsurance is a $1T market that hasn't been touched. they're offering reUSD at 7% native APR plus 10% in RE rewards. Season 2 incentives running through December distributing 3.5% of FDV. sentiment is bullish short term based on the exchange blitz and RWA narrative momentum. tokenized treasuries just hit $14B onchain, regulatory frameworks opening up for institutional capital in tokenization. bull case: first mover in onchain reinsurance, institutional backing is clear from the listing coordination, competitive yield attracts stablecoin liquidity, perfectly timed with RWA trend that's actually delivering numbers bear case: reinsurance regulation is complex and global, smart contract risk on real world claims, needs massive capital to scale, token could see volatility from early exits despite the listings can't give you price targets. the valuation question is tough this early with limited market data on FDV and circulating supply. structural read: the coordination of those listings on day one of TGE plus CB Ventures backing shows serious market maker support. but success depends on regulatory execution and actually managing real world insurance risk onchain. the yield mechanism needs to prove sustainable under claims pressure.

• 
  _CR7_ (@OfficialCR7_Fan) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Shahzaynhaiderr @binance @BinanceAcademy fixing real problems while everyone chases hype

• 
  joseph (@FreepanO) reported 16 minutes ago

  Currently, MiCA excludes "fully decentralised" crypto services from its scope — meaning platforms with no identifiable intermediary don't need a CASP licence and aren't subject to MiCA's investor-protection rules. Recently, Malta's regulator have communicated that truly decentralised crypto service is a much narrower category than most DeFi users assume. The MFSA's paper finds that the majority of DeFi protocols retain centralized features: admin or upgrade keys controlled by a small group, governance tokens concentrated in a handful of wallets, or front-end interfaces run by a single company. Under the paper's proposed spectrum test, those platforms would fall inside MiCA's scope — requiring licensing, smart-contract audits, and governance disclosures. For retail investors this cuts both ways. On the protection side, bringing pseudo-decentralised platforms within MiCA means accountability, redress rights, and mandatory audits — things you currently have zero claim to when using most DeFi protocols. On the access side, any DeFi platform that fails or refuses to get licensed would have to block EU users, shrinking the product set available. The consultation closes July 10, and whatever standard emerges will likely become the EU-wide template — not just a Maltese rule. What this all means is that MiCA is really but the 1st chapter of an incremental regulatory crackdown on DeFI. And this is an EU exception. The US is doing exactly the same. So if you use DeFi apps and live in the EU, pay attention to how things evolve because the regulatory ground is shifting under your feet. The elephant in the room is obviously @HyperliquidX What's going for them is that their reputation, so far, is impeccable relative to CEXs (looking at you Binance...)

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 16 minutes ago

  ZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 17 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng @_RichardTeng Escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution since 9 months, within Binance complex & typical breuaratic support system. Can you please help here (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 23 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet After trying the Binance Wallet Extension, the feature that stood out most to me is not just the wallet itself, but the idea of putting decision support directly inside the browser. The Sports AI Assistant feels useful because it doesn’t force me to jump between tabs. I like that the widget stays beside the match page and gives probabilities, match context, market data, xG, likely scores, and impact factors in one place. That makes the experience feel more like “research while browsing” instead of “open wallet, open another site, open another tracker.” My main suggestion: add a “Why did this probability change?” timeline. For example: • 35’ — injury news added • 42’ — market odds moved • 58’ — current score changed • Win probability: 44% → 39% • Main reason: time remaining + defensive adjustment This would make the AI feel more trustworthy because users can see the logic behind the movement, not just the final number. For the Wallet Extension itself, I’d also like a clearer “session safety panel” before interacting with dApps: connected site, active wallet, current network, permissions, risk level, and last activity. Browser wallets are powerful, but users need quick context before signing anything. Overall, this feels like Binance is moving the wallet from a simple transaction tool into a real-time decision layer. The next step is explainability: show not only what the AI thinks, but why it changed its mind.

• 
  slash1s (@slash1sol) reported 24 minutes ago

  A GROUP OF CHINESE GUYS GAVE OPUS 4.8 A 300-AGENT WORKFORCE AND BUILT A WORKING SAAS IN ONE AFTERNOON FOR UNDER $90 > Claude Opus 4.8 was not writing code like a normal ChatBot. It acted as the manager. One rough idea became 40 tasks, dependencies, specs and a clean blueprint for Kimi Agent swarm to execute. > Then Kimi did the heavy lifting. 300 agents ran around 4,000 steps in parallel while the team watched the system move instead of typing every file by hand. > 80 agents pulled live data from Binance, Yahoo Finance, World Bank and IMF. 60 handled the backend, 90 built the interface, and 70 shipped the landing page, export files and pitch deck. > The result was not a fake demo. A live analytics dashboard with market feeds, auth, database, charts, responsive UI, ppt, pdf, excel and web outputs from the same run. > A normal team could burn $7,500+ on DEV work, data wiring, design, charts and slides as separate jobs. They compressed the whole thing into one afternoon with almost no overhead. > Most people still use AI like a chat window. These guys used it like a company structure, where one model thinks, hundreds of agents execute, and the product ships before the team even gets bored. Bookmark & Watch it run ↓

• 
  Uzair | Web3 & Crypto (@ahmadbabar3590) reported 26 minutes ago

  After tokenizing the stocks, they will want to access the largest liquidity pool in the world. #BNB #Binance

• 
  CryptoSocials (@CryptoSocialsX) reported 30 minutes ago

  $INJ is a crypto trend on X today, ranked #13. What traders are talking about: • Injective is being positioned as the dedicated finance layer L1, emphasizing DeFi, RWAs, and AI applications with low transaction fees. • The network is seeing adoption for novel use cases, including the tokenization of music IP and AI agent payments. • Technical analysis suggests buyer absorption and potential price targets, with some users expressing strong long-term conviction. • Key infrastructure upgrades and partnerships, such as the native EVM mainnet launch and Coinbase support, are noted as significant developments. • Large entities like Revolut and Binance are increasing their $INJ holdings, indicating institutional interest. Users posting about $INJ most on X today: @0xtega_ - 2 @CadeONeill - 2

• 
  carol (@carolpandora007) reported 32 minutes ago

  Top crypto traders on Binance Alpha see volumes hitting millions, with five projects each reaching around 5M dollars in a month. An extra 0.1% tax on trades impacts profits. Will this slow down the race or fuel innovation? #Crypto #Trading #Binance

• 
  0xLabib☂️ (@dashlabib) reported 35 minutes ago

  Hey @BinanceHelpDesk Please Resolve my issue RW00270 binance UID 738945543

• 
  Amankumar (@Amankum83893194) reported 37 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Sir binance app not working why

• 
  Oldman Crypto (@Oldman__Crypto) reported 38 minutes ago

  Conflict of interest. Binance collects listing fees and trading fees both on the way up and the way down, and sometimes Binance Labs has even invested in the very token being listed. So they make money whether retail wins or loses. •Listing high-FDV, low-float tokens. This creates hype and pumps early volume, then when the token unlock schedule kicks in, there’s heavy selling — and the bag-holders at the end are usually retail who bought the top. •“Investor protection” arrives after the damage is done. By the time a token gets delisted, it’s often already down 99%, which makes the label feel pretty cynical. @cz_binance