Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rockfella🕳️ (@Rockfella900) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance @sqkuux **** U SCAMMERSSSS

• 
  sumiya (@sumiya209) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Ishaqhouth @BinanceHelpDesk #binance @binance Fully agreeing with this. I know several genuine traders who are facing the exact same disqualification problem on their appeals. please look into this system glitch and help the community out.

• 
  Degen_Trader (@Anon_Noticer) reported 13 minutes ago

  @DonAlt Imagine seeing all the signs of a Binance type scam listing and stilling full porting into this steaming pile of horse ****. It will have its day, just not now.

• 
  BlindSpotsMag (@BlindSpotsMag) reported 13 minutes ago

  @PunishedJeanLuc @DrewPavlou @zriboua Dude, they’re selling pardons man, the Binance guy got a pardon. Just because some people don’t attain the influence they’re vying for, it doesn’t mean you ignore all the other ****.

• 
  Kryptos Opus (@kryptosopus) reported 16 minutes ago

  @binance Fee market has to 50x from here to replace the block subsidy or BTC security is cooked lol good luck with that math

• 
  SvPatrik | Moonbeam CM (@SvPatrik_) reported 17 minutes ago

  Binance has announced support for migrating from GLMR to Binance. Binance users are encouraged to refer to this article for more information.

• 
  ZoneCrypto (@_ZoneCrypto_) reported 18 minutes ago

  ✦ Binance and OKX users in Vietnam could face fines up to $1,900: Retail traders in Vietnam utilizing offshore crypto exchanges such as Binance and OKX may incur significant fines. The government plans to penalize these users up to $1,900 for trading on unlicensed platforms, despite no official exchange licenses having been issued yet for the regulated market set to launch on September 1. Investors trading crypto meant exclusively for foreign markets risk fines up to $3,800. Additionally, crypto firms lacking licenses or failing to comply with customer verification can be fined up to $7,600. In a separate issue, the Network School in Malaysia faces scrutiny over allegations of hosting Israeli citizens with second passports, raising concerns amid the country's ban on Israeli visitors.

• 
  CryptoRisk (@cryptoriskai) reported 19 minutes ago

  Why does 24/7 regulated BTC perpetuals matter? Right now, the offshore perp market (Binance, Bybit, etc.) handles hundreds of billions in monthly volume because it never closes. A regulated onshore equivalent with 24/7 access pulls that flow back into compliant infrastructure. That is a structural demand shift.

• 
  nikeyike (@nikeyike1) reported 19 minutes ago

  @zachxbt @realDougStewart @ErikVoorhees Zach I got funds locked by Binance indefinitely because I did not know about the sanction and transferred funds from HTX... There is no way for ordinary retailers to get their funds back... Please help us

• 
  Kabeer (@kabeerahmad6677) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet My account disqualified and alpha issue binance team not support me 1 year ago

• 
  Spigg 🔶 (@Spigg1115) reported 22 minutes ago

  talk to people outside of crypto. for most of them: bitcoin = binance. not because they’re wrong. because that’s how the brain works when you don’t know a topic. you link the unfamiliar thing to the one name you’ve heard. they don’t know what a blockchain is. they don’t know bitcoin isn’t issued by a company. they just know two words: bitcoin and binance. and both always show up in the same conversation. some education is needed, no doubt. but before correcting people, it’s important to understand the reality first. @binance became the entry point. the reference. the brand people think of when they hear “crypto.” to me, that’s not confusion. that’s brand power. the real question isn’t “how do we fix the confusion.” it’s “how do we use that recognition to actually teach the difference.” reason why 1 billion users is just a matter of time.

• 
  Apostolic (@Sanny23861994) reported 28 minutes ago

  @randgroup @rikurandgroup Binance looked like a rounding error against BitMEX in 2018 too. How are you sizing your position relative to that kind of trajectory?

• 
  casinoxoxo (ponke arc) (@dydxmoon14) reported 34 minutes ago

  @notanicecat69 Wif took 5 months to reach 2 dollars on binance Liquidity was up early innings of bull market Now liquidity is down late innings of bear market and ansem has a fraction of mass appeal as wif Also memecoins aura is lost Good luck gramps

• 
  Melarin (@MelarinX) reported 35 minutes ago

  Investing vs Trading: What's the Difference? Many beginners think investing and trading are the same. They aren't. Investing means putting your money into good companies or assets and holding them for a long time like planting a tree and waiting for it to grow. Trading means buying and selling more often to earn from short-term price changes like buying a product at a discount and selling it later for a profit. Both can help you grow your money. The right choice depends on your goals, time, and risk tolerance. Before investing your money, invest in your knowledge first. Are you more interested in investing or trading? Let me know in the comments #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy @binance #Binance

• 
  PolyHistorical Insights (@Poly_Historical) reported 37 minutes ago

  I backtested a "panic discount" strategy across 50 resolved BTC 5-minute markets on Polymarket. The core idea: when BTC moves fast, the Up/Down market can overreact. One side gets dumped aggressively, liquidity dries up, spreads blow out, and traders scramble for the exit. So the strategy was straightforward: Buy the beaten-down side once it falls below 30c. Only take the trade if there's enough time left on the clock. Exit once price mean-reverts to 45c. Cut losses if it drops to 20c. Use actual order book fills, not mid-price. Results: 50 markets tested 14 trades triggered 9 winners 5 losers 64.3% win rate +$312.40 total PnL -$118.70 max drawdown Best trade: +$84.60 Worst trade: -$51.20 On the surface, that reads like a clean, repeatable edge. But the real insight came from comparing chart-based backtesting against order-book replay. Using candles, the strategy looked significantly stronger. A candle implies you bought at 29c and sold at 45c cleanly. The actual order book told a very different story. Sometimes the 29c print had almost no volume behind it. Sometimes the ask had already jumped to 33c by the time the signal fired. Sometimes the exit price showed up on the chart, but bid depth was too thin to actually fill. Sometimes the spread alone consumed half the trade's edge. That single difference reshaped the entire backtest. Multiple trades that appeared profitable using mid-price turned flat — or outright negative — once real liquidity was factored in. The strategy still had merit, but only under a narrow set of conditions: The spread needed to stay tight. Real depth needed to exist on both sides of the book. The market's overreaction had to move faster than Binance spot/futures. There had to be sufficient time remaining for mean reversion to play out. The exit price needed genuine bid support behind it. That was the real takeaway. The strategy was never "buy every panic dump." That approach bleeds money. The actual, tradable version was this: Buy the panic only when the order book confirms it's actually tradable. That's the reasoning behind building PolyHistorical. Most Polymarket backtests look too good because they skip over the messiest part: execution. But in prediction markets, execution is the game. You can call the direction correctly and still lose money if the spread is too wide. You can time the entry well and still lose if there's no liquidity to exit into. You can build something that looks brilliant on a candle chart and watch it fall apart the moment it meets a real order book. So now every idea gets tested against full historical market depth: 300ms snapshots. Resolved markets only. Actual bid/ask books. Slippage accounted for. Spread accounted for. Full PnL tracking. Drawdown tracking. Complete trade logs. The edge isn't just having a sharper thesis. The edge is knowing whether that thesis was ever actually tradable.