Binance Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Binance users affected:
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Porto Alegre, RS | 1 |
| Angers, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Itu, SP | 1 |
| Seattle, WA | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Tuti Capital (@tfcapital420) reportedi’ve toiled with the idea of writing this, but fk it, it’s my twitter i’ll write about what i want an explanation of my top conviction meme play, one most of CT still treats like a side character. those who know my twitter presence know i enjoy a good victory lap when a prediction comes to pass, this shall be no different, in due time. let me begin by examining $wif, the top meme coin of the last real meme cycle. most people on CT know $wif, but don’t understand its origin, or how it hit escape velocity so rapidly. that little dog with a hat began as a gamer thing. i can recall countless days coming home from work and sitting at the xbox to decompress. i’d load up rocket league and see an opponent with that little dog/hat icon and know i was about to get cooked by a 16 year old with nothing but time on his hands. for years, since 2018 and earlier, i saw that little dog with various hats/wigs in opponents’ gamer pictures (any gamer can confirm this), but when the meme coin launched, i mid curved it hard. i said, “yea i recognize that, but it’s used by normies on xbox, steam, even tiktok, the bridge to crypto just simply isn’t there…” i was painfully wrong. i will not make the same mistake twice. there is another meme taking a whole chain’s culture by storm right now, and most of timeline still hasn’t clocked it because it didn’t launch on sol. if you live in hyperliquid twitter, you’ve seen it. if you don’t, you will. someone posts a mid take. someone ratio’s a KOL. someone crashouts in replies. the answer is two words. alright buddy. that’s it. that’s the whole meme. it’s the dismissive pat on the head. the polite “sit down.” the ecosystem’s catchphrase. it started as an inside joke in the hypio group chat, went nuclear after merp/kol crashouts, and then binance ratio’d hyperliquid and smartestmoney.hl ratio’d back with the perfect “alright buddy” meme. hundreds of replies. the phrase stuck. it became the house meme of hyperliquid. most people on CT still don’t understand that. they see a $2m ticker on hyperevm and think “small chain slop.” they don’t understand origin. they don’t understand that this is the wif-hat of a chain that is actually printing culture in real time. $buddy launched february 2025 on hyperevm. first meme on the chain. first large-scale airdrop on hyperevm. 38% to hypio nft holders. community took the rest. first hyperevm project to buy its own ticker on hypercore. dual listed on evm and the official hyperliquid spot book. community owned. still here more than a year later while a hundred hyperevm tickers have come and gone. currently sitting around $2.4m. i believe that is severely underpriced for the native catchphrase of an ecosystem whose l1 token is a top 10 asset. i believe the repricing of this meme will reflect the veracity and swiftness of wif, just on a different rail. not “another hamster sound on tiktok.” the house meme of the house that jeff built. i am prepared to be right, i am fine with being wrong. this is a market where you must position yourself before the masses realize where the tide has gone, there is risk associated with doing so. shout out to @alrightbuddyHL and the hypio people who actually built this instead of farming a telegram group for 48 hours. reflexx and the holders who bought the hypercore ticker out of pocket. first movers on a chain people are only now crowding into. alright buddy when this hits $500 m+ i am going to victory lap this post like nothing crypto twitter has seen before. disclaimer: i told you this is a top conviction for me, i have a bag, but you will likely sell for multiples before my price targets hit. alright buddy.
-
Grand Priest 🧡 $DOG (@nomdejue) reported@ordi_brc @LeonidasNFT Maybe you migrating to runes may help @binance finally support Runes! 🙏
-
𝙬𝙚𝙣🔅 (@when_tge) reportedOn an 11 hour tape against Binance, Superluminal's (@slx_fi) follow lagged by 100 milliseconds at peak. Two to three batches behind. My first read was that this is just latency, the testnet book is slower, nothing new. Binance moves. The bot’s model reads the move, builds an order, sends it. That loop takes real time, more than a human blink. By the time the order lands, the price it was reacting to is gone. On a continuous book, that's the moment it gets punished. Someone faster read the same move and took the good price first. What's left for the bot is a thinner book at a worse level. The bot didn't do anything wrong. It just wasn't the fastest thing in the room. Inside Prism, that bot only gets forgiven for jitter inside a single 40ms window. If one model finishes at millisecond 3 and another at millisecond 38, both land in the same batch. Price and size decide who fills. What it does not forgive is missing the window. If the order lands after the auction closes, the bot is not in that auction. It waits for the next one. Arrive at millisecond 3 or millisecond 38, same price. Every venue lags behind something. The real question is whether that lag can be turned into a profit. Prism does not shrink the lag between Superluminal and Binance. It stops anyone inside a batch from cashing that lag by arriving first. A stale quote can still get hit in that batch. What changes is who profits from it. On a continuous book, one fast taker lifts a slow maker at the old price and keeps the whole gap. In Prism, everyone in that auction shares one clearing price, so the same move gets competed on as a price instead of a race. The bot can still get traded against. It stops paying the whole gap to whoever was first. A bot does not have reflexes. It has inference time, and that does not shrink because the market moved. Reward raw speed and you are rewarding whoever paid for the faster chip. Prism caps the race at the batch clock. Inside the window, arrival time does not matter. Miss the window and you wait. None of this makes Superluminal fast in the usual sense. Miss a batch and you wait. Makers still have to pull a stale quote before the next auction fires. That part of the race is still alive. None of it is proven at real size. It is not on mainnet. Testnet liquidity does not tell you how a deep book behaves. But for something that trades without a person watching it, this changes what the bot is competing on. It's less about the server now, more about the price it's willing to quote. That's a fight decided by being right, not by being first.
-
OomDagobert (@OomDagobertDuck) reportedThe data doesn't lie: a second long flush is highly likely. Despite the dip to $1.3794, XRP open interest remains jammed at $3.38B with a 2:1 long/short ratio on Binance. With daily RSI at 60, expect algos to trigger a final sweep down to the $1.34 macro liquidity pocket. 🐋📊
-
XWIN Japan and DeFi Asset Management (@xwinfinance) reported📊【XWIN CAPITAL INDEX|August 28, 2026】 Overall Score: 82 / 100 ・80–100 = Strong Bullish Environment ・60–79 = Bullish Bias ・40–59 = Neutral / No Clear Direction ・20–39 = Bearish Bias ・0–19 = Strong Bearish Environment 7-Day Moving Average: 83.43 ↓ 14-Day Moving Average: 69.64 ↑ Direction: “Strong Bullish Environment / Supply-Demand Test at High Levels.” Brief Comment: Continued ETF inflows, recovering U.S. spot demand led by Coinbase, BTC outflows from exchanges, and improving stablecoin supply are supporting the bullish structure. However, the major $80,000–$83,000 supply zone, rapidly increasing profit-taking, rebuilding Open Interest, and upcoming Fed-related risks mean the market is now vulnerable to short-term consolidation within a broader bullish trend. ――――――――――――――――――― Market Summary ・BTC has reclaimed the $80,000 level, continuing the sharp recovery that began in mid-August. The market is now testing whether it can transition structurally from a bear-market recovery into a sustained bullish phase. ・U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded eight consecutive trading days of net inflows from August 17 through August 26, totaling approximately $2.8 billion. ETF-driven spot demand is clearly supporting the current rally. ・According to the provided information, Coinbase Premium has turned positive after a prolonged period below zero, while net buying on Coinbase has also increased. The recovery in U.S. spot demand is one of the most important bullish developments in the current market. ・At the same time, some of the provided analysis still shows periods of weaker Coinbase spot flows. Therefore, U.S. demand should not yet be viewed as uniformly strong. The appropriate interpretation is that demand has clearly improved, but continuity still needs to be confirmed. ・Combined USDT and USDC supply reportedly increased by approximately $1.7 billion in August, reversing three consecutive months of contraction. This may indicate that sidelined crypto liquidity is beginning to recover, which is constructive for the next 2–4 weeks. ・However, Binance stablecoin reserves remain roughly flat at around $42.9 billion according to the provided analysis. This suggests that the current improvement reflects both new supply and capital rotation rather than a full-scale liquidity surge across the market. ・A major supply zone remains between $80,000 and $83,000. Large sell orders around $80,800, the 50-week moving average near $81,500, and an important options-related level around $82,300 are all concentrated in this area. The market is now directly testing whether fresh demand can absorb this supply. ・The overall market structure remains bullish. However, the score is held at 82 because the next stage depends on whether spot demand can decisively absorb the large supply zone above $80,000. ――――――――――――――――――― On-Chain & Technical Trends ・Eight consecutive days of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF inflows are currently the most important structural indicator. Cumulative net inflows from August 17 through August 26 reached approximately $2.8 billion, confirming persistence rather than a one-day spike in institutional demand. ・BTC recorded four consecutive days of net exchange outflows, with approximately 15,868 BTC leaving exchanges according to the provided analysis. A reduction in immediately available sell-side supply is constructive for the medium-term structure. ・The positive turn in Coinbase Premium and stronger Coinbase buying pressure suggest that U.S. spot investors are returning. The market is improving beyond a structure in which ETFs alone were responsible for buying. ・At the same time, the 7-day average of realized BTC profits reportedly surged from approximately $130 million to $1.3 billion within 10 days. The amount of profitable supply available for sale has increased sharply, making demand absorption increasingly important. ・Bitcoin Open Interest on Binance has risen to approximately $9.54 billion, the highest level in three months. OI has also increased by around $840 million over 30 days, showing that derivatives positioning is rebuilding. ・However, futures demand reportedly eased from 144k to 130k while remaining positive. Rather than signaling a breakdown, this may represent a healthy moderation in leverage if spot demand continues to hold. ・On Binance, spot trading volume is reportedly only around 10% of perpetual futures volume. The market therefore remains heavily derivatives-oriented, and a stronger contribution from spot volume would provide better confirmation of a sustainable breakout. ・Approximately $6.44 billion in Bitcoin options are approaching expiration, with significant positioning concentrated around $75,000 and $80,000. Short-term volatility may increase around the expiration as dealers adjust hedges. ――――――――――――――――――― Sentiment ・CryptoQuant’s Bull Score has reportedly risen to 80, with 8 of 10 indicators turning bullish. Compared with the weak environment seen in early August, both market psychology and structural demand have improved significantly. ・BTC has repeatedly tested $80,000, shifting market psychology away from a simple “sell-the-rally” environment toward one focused on confirming whether the bear market has ended. ・Grayscale, CryptoQuant, and other market observers have suggested that Bitcoin may be entering the early stage of a new bullish phase. Institutional sentiment has therefore improved materially. ・However, profit-taking has increased sharply following the rally. Strong bullish sentiment does not automatically translate into continued upside; the key issue is now the balance between new buying demand and realized-profit selling. ・Capital is also rotating into ETH, SOL, LINK, AVAX, and other major assets. Continued inflows into BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF further support broader crypto-market risk appetite. ・At the same time, some September options positioning reportedly reflects a relatively bearish BTC view and a stronger ETH view. This suggests that part of the market is positioning for capital rotation away from Bitcoin toward Ethereum. ・September has historically been a difficult month for equities, and Bitcoin can also be affected by risk-off conditions and weaker liquidity. Current bullish sentiment should therefore not be automatically extrapolated through September. ・Overall sentiment is bullish, but the key theme is not simple FOMO. The market is attempting to confirm a structural transition from bearish to bullish conditions, with ETF flows, Coinbase demand, stablecoin liquidity, and exchange flows remaining more important than price optimism alone. ――――――――――――――――――― U.S. Traditional Markets ・The S&P 500 rose approximately 0.72%, while the Nasdaq gained around 1.57%. NVIDIA also surged sharply, reinforcing risk appetite across U.S. technology and AI-related equities. ・Strong NVIDIA earnings and guidance supported the technology sector and confirmed that AI-related capital expenditure remains one of the strongest drivers of U.S. equity-market risk appetite. ・The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield remains around the high-4% area, while the 30-year yield remains above 5%. Long-term rates therefore continue to represent one of the largest macro risks for Bitcoin. ・PCE inflation remains well above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, and several Fed officials have continued to emphasize inflation risks. Monetary conditions therefore remain a meaningful constraint on crypto valuations. ・Some Fed policymakers have indicated that current interest rates may not yet be sufficiently restrictive. This keeps the risk of tighter-for-longer monetary policy alive. ・At the same time, U.S. corporate profits remain extremely strong according to the provided information, while NVIDIA and other large technology companies continue to support equities. The macro backdrop therefore combines high inflation and high rates with unusually strong corporate earnings. ・Oil prices remain elevated amid renewed Middle East uncertainty. A renewed oil rally could transmit into inflation expectations and higher bond yields, creating another macro headwind for BTC. ・A major market focus remains Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s Jackson Hole remarks. Any shift in language around inflation, rates, or monetary policy could produce significant moves across bonds, the dollar, equities, and Bitcoin. ――――――――――――――――――― Overall Assessment The XWIN CAPITAL INDEX stands at 82 / 100, up 7 points from the previous day’s 75, returning the index from “Bullish Bias” to a “Strong Bullish Environment.” The 7-day moving average declined slightly from 83.71 to 83.43, while the 14-day moving average increased from 67.00 to 69.64. This indicates that very short-term momentum has begun to cool at elevated levels, while the medium-term market structure continues to improve. The bullish assessment is primarily supported by approximately $2.8 billion of consecutive ETF inflows, improving Coinbase Premium, declining BTC balances on exchanges, and the renewed expansion of USDT and USDC supply. At the same time, the $80,000–$83,000 supply zone, rapidly rising realized profits, three-month-high Open Interest, heavy derivatives dependence, and Fed-event risk prevent the index from moving into the 85–90+ range. The market remains in a “Strong Bullish Environment,” but it is no longer simply an acceleration phase. It has entered a post-$80,000 supply-demand test. If spot demand can absorb the large supply concentration between $80,000 and $83,000, the probability of entering the next stronger bullish phase would increase substantially. Key Crypto Market Factors to Watch Today ・Whether ETF and Coinbase spot demand can absorb the $80,000–$83,000 supply zone ・Whether the eight-day streak of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF inflows continues ・Whether Open Interest and Funding remain healthy after the large Bitcoin options expiration ・Whether Coinbase Premium remains positive and total stablecoin supply continues expanding ・How U.S. long-term yields, the dollar, and equities react to Fed Chair Warsh’s Jackson Hole remarks
-
Spaced Trader (@SpacedTrader) reported@binance problem is i only ever spot the third sign, first two i scrolled straight past
-
lilmo (@lilmo_sol) reported@binance Can you fix $BNBCAT
-
Doc. Dr. Aleksandar Arsov (@DrArsov) reported@heyibinance When slow Wall Street closes its doors and slips into sloth mode, Who prices Nvidia in the after-hours abode? Increasingly the Hub of Binance takes the load, With TradFi perp volumes nine times the usual road. Half the action there as earnings explode, Daily volume one point six billion bestowed. In 4.20 steps the price discovery is showed, The after-hours market now has its own code.🦥
-
Ria (@CryptoWeb3girl) reportedBinance has provided a huge opportunity to creators with the DUSK campaign and I have full faith that Binance will review this properly and take action. Many creators are not doing DUSK related livestreams at all. They have been doing normal livestreams for months as part of write to earn. During the DUSK campaign they continued the same format. Their livestream titles before the campaign and after the campaign have no difference and there is no mention of DUSK in the title. These livestreams go on for more than 8 to 10 hours. They pin a new and trending coin every 10 minutes. They pin hundreds of coins during one livestream every day. It is just a coincidence that they received DUSK volume because DUSK was one of the dozens of coins they pinned. In the same livestreams they received millions of volume for dozens of other coins as well during all Dusk event in 14 days . The campaign clearly mentions it must be DUSK related, not random, where someone can promote 100 other coins and get more volume on other coins. How can someone appear on the DUSK leaderboard when they do not respect campaign rules. The only reason they are on top is because they have always been on top in write to earn for many months and they do not want to lose that reward, so in the same kind of streams they also pinned DUSK. You can check write to earn leaderboards from all previous months and you will see they had the same volume in all livestreams even before the DUSK campaign. This is from Arab region named written in Arabic in one of top There are many users who did livestreams and did not record them or they deleted them from the profile, even though they usually keep recordings. For DUSK related livestreams they deleted all of them. Many did idle livestreams where they are silent and only speak every 2 or 3 minutes or just talk randomly asking for volume without discussing anything about DUSK. It is clearly mentioned in the rules that it must be about DUSK only. Still many new names appeared today in the top but when you check their profile there is no livestream because they deleted it. Most of them did blank streams with no analysis, no explanation, no discussion about DUSK. Those who spoke only said the same line again and again to take a trade, without explaining anything about the project. After the first leaderboard showed that idle livestreams work, many started doing a few idle streams and later just spoke to tell people to take a trade. That is all. Hello, hi, random useless talking. Nothing related to the project except asking for volume. Some even coordinate with each other and say you do volume for me and I will do volume for you. This is not supposed to be just a random volume competition. It is a volume competition along with DUSK project content. How can someone delete a livestream. If Binance is still able to see deleted streams then why are people deleting them. Just because their name is on top and people will check their stream and report, so they delete so no one can report. I saw new names in the top five but there is no stream on their profile. Why. Because it was mostly blank, irrelevant, or they just repeated the same line to take a trade for hours of livestream without discussing anything about the project. How can someone be on the top leaderboard by only saying take a trade, take a trade, without discussing the project, or by talking randomly just to pass time, or by pinning dozens of other coins. In CreatorPad post content, if we by mistake tag another coin our points are deducted to almost zero. If we discuss other top coins in the starting lines just to grab views, our points are also deducted to zero, even though the reward is only 30 to 70 USD. But for livestream contest where the reward is thousands of dollars, and 1000 to 500 for others, how can they receive rewards just because they have volume when they did not respect campaign rules. Random talking, long silent periods, host silent and only one speaker talking, and all the talking is just volume or take a trade. For CreatorPad we cannot use AI content, and engagement farming with mutual likes and comments is not allowed. But in livestream it seems none of these rules matter. There are a few creators who fulfilled all requirements based on the rules. They shared DUSK related content and DUSK trading strategy. After the first leaderboard I also asked customer support how we should conduct our livestream and I showed them examples of other people. They strictly said it must be DUSK related and sharing DUSK strategy is mostly recommended. But the next day the leaderboard included more irrelevant livestreams just because of DUSK volume, so I thought the support agent was wrong. Still we did our streams based on the rules and we did not delete our livestreams because we did nothing wrong. But I am still disappointed. Even a few hours ago the leaderboard had new toppers with blank streams or just saying to take a trade with irrelevant discussion. No one is doing DUSK related livestream like in posts or sharing any DUSK strategy. I have full faith in Binance. I believe even if 70 percent or more people did not fulfill the requirement they will be disqualified, because @binance is bigger than everything Even if people did not respect the rules, Binance will respect what they said. #binance will respect all other people who fulfilled the requirement. Even if the final leaderboard results come out, it does not matter because I believe #Binance will personally check all livestreams which were deleted It is clearly mentioned that livestream must be DUSK related, either about DUSK trading strategy. No idle livestream. No irrelevant discussion. Those are the exact words. But after the first leaderboard result based on volume, people think all these rules are just for show. If people appear on the leaderboard with irrelevant discussion, with idle livestream, or speaking every 3 minutes, or only saying take a trade, or asking each other to do volume for hours, then why waste time fulfilling requirements and sharing DUSK strategy and doing hard work. Many chose to ask each other to do volume in their livestream and nothing else. Irrelevant discussion. And because so many people are doing it, they think they cannot all be disqualified. So many people went in this direction. According to them it is just a volume competition and the rules does not matter as leaderboard is filled more by such people I trust Binance They will personally check everything, disqualify those who did not follow rules and cheated. @CYZhang01 @BinanceHelpDesk
-
Lady Macbeth (@LadyMacbeth1020) reported@Kas_Kats @binance Give them time. Whales can’t accumulate huge amounts all at once because the price would skyrocket. They’ve been accumulating for months outside the visible order books. If Binance can list complete garbage but still hasn’t listed Kaspa, it’s pretty obvious there’s a reason behind it. Around 95% of the supply has already been mined. Give it a little more time, things are about to get very interesting.
-
Vengeance (@vengeancelock) reported$XMR is real crypto. It has a real feature which is privacy. Binance delisted XMR because they can’t track and control it which is a strong proof of work. Long live XMR also **** BTC maxis, stupid idiots who got ****** by corporations. No one can control Monero its owned by people.
-
Max 86 Smart (@Chris84205549) reported@seth_fin Binance computers have broken down
-
Z Y R A (@Zyyrraa_X) reported@ali_alizeh72722 @BinanceHelpDesk @binance True, The automated instant rejections are unacceptable. We need real human support, not bots!
-
Edrin Valecrest (@EdrinValecrest) reportedHIGH APY ATTRACTS CAPITAL BUT CAPITAL EFFICIENCY IS WHAT MAKES DEFI USEFUL. A stablecoin sitting idle preserves liquidity but it does very little productive work. The harder problem is giving users accessible places to deploy that liquidity without forcing them through an unnecessarily fragmented DeFi journey. That is where the current $USDD opportunity from @USDDdecentralize becomes interesting. Through Binance Wallet’s TRON DeFi Summer S2, USDD is shown at a 6.7% real time APR via JustLend, alongside TRX, SUN and JST pools. The important detail is that the rates displayed are variable, not promises of permanent returns. The broader value is distribution. Putting TRON native assets inside a wallet based DeFi experience reduces the distance between holding an asset and actually using it onchain. If that accessibility translates into sustained deposits and genuine protocol activity after incentives normalise, the campaign could do more than temporarily move liquidity. It could help turn passive stablecoin balances into recurring DeFi participation. @USDDecentralize @justinsuntron #TRON #TronEcoStar #USDD
-
Naeem khan (@Naeemkh041) reported@Aslam72174123 @BinanceHelpDesk @binance Almost many creators facing this issue but not solution from team