Binance Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Binance users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Binance, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Binance users affected:
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Angers, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Itu, SP | 1 |
| Seattle, WA | 1 |
| Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
| Beaucaire, Occitanie | 2 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Ultimate indicator (@machielsrobin1) reported@skullopener @binance Indeed or fix this. Crazy to see them doing nothing and pushing away responsability
-
Marcus | Macro Strategist (@Marcus_Analyst) reported@lookonchain ****** governance. Dude stole millions and dumped on Binance. Classic shitcoin. Glad I'm not touching that garbage.
-
Opaque (@Opaque1555) reported$cashcat wicked down to $50m MC, that's a ~80% retrace, all memes tend do this - especially after Binance perp listings. I think worth allocating some here, it's still the RH meme with deepest liquidity and most attention on the chain. Asteroid did not get HL or nance perps btw.
-
DeFiHubSpace 🏁🌱🪐 (@defihubspace) reported@realSatoshiGold Great point — AI drives productivity gains that lower prices and can even create deflationary pressure, just like China's post-WTO manufacturing boom. This doesn't conflict with Bitcoin's hedge against monetary inflation. That said, in crypto/token markets there's another layer: shitcoin/token supply inflation. AI can help protect against it through better analysis, utility-driven projects, and real value creation. But Binance's history of revolving project listings (and especially Binance Alpha's constant flow of new early-stage tokens) doesn't protect against it — it often fuels the cycle of new speculative supply, hype, and dilution. Thoughts?
-
The Wolf Of All Streets (@scottmelker) reported"It's very much a one-size-fits-all solution. When you're building a mobile app you build it for Android and iOS, we're building it for EVM and for SVM" Rand, founder of Zama, on why core infrastructure has to be cross-chain from the start "There's a version for EVM that works with any EVM chain, Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Binance, and then there's a Solana version for SVM. The protocol is designed to be cross-chain on day one. There isn't going to be a different version on every chain, there's just going to be one encryption layer" "You've got confidential assets, shielded USDC on Ethereum, and you can move it shielded to Polygon and Solana. It solves the interoperability issues, even of transactions and bridges, just by using the layer" "Whenever you're building core infrastructure today, you have to build it cross-chain by design. Liquidity is fragmented, people have money on Solana, they have money on Ethereum. Just because you're doing it confidentially shouldn't mean you have worse access than someone using blockchain today. The baseline is what people have today, on top of which we add confidentiality. We cannot make things worse than they are, otherwise people are just not going to use it"
-
Joel John (@joeljohn) reportedTake into account for the number of AI/fintech deals that are crypto adjacent & you'll realise the market didn't die. The nature of who is writing checks, and what the write into (tokens ->equity) evolved. The marginal customer is not on binance, bidding tokens. Such is life
-
david (@david89199360) reported@myStankFace @Broski_2503 Millions can be transferred onto an exchange and taken off at anytime bud. How do you think MemeCoins pump so hard? They get listed on Binance remove supply pump into thin books and wait for liquidity to sell into the fishes that take the bait. People like you help ;)
-
COINTURK NEWS (@Cointurknews) reported🔥 Binance burns $932 million in $BNB, cutting supply to 133 million. 📈 Technical analysts set a $647 price target if resistance at $590 is broken. 🟢 Circulating supply drops after the platform’s largest-ever token burn. 🌍 Binance Pay expands to 21 million merchants and bStocks hits $100 million in volume.
-
Formanite (@formanite602) reportedImagine carrying a digital dollar in your phone that you can send to anyone, anywhere in the world, in seconds. That's the idea behind stablecoins. They don't promise life-changing profits or dramatic price swings like Bitcoin. Instead, they solve a much simpler problem: How can money move as fast as the internet? Most stablecoins are designed to stay close to $1, making them useful for everyday transactions instead of speculation. That's why millions of people use them to: • Send money across borders without waiting days. • Pay for products and services online. • Trade cryptocurrencies without converting back to a bank account. • Access DeFi for lending and borrowing. • Hold digital dollars during periods of market uncertainty. But here's something many people overlook. A stable price doesn't automatically mean a safe investment. Not all stablecoins work the same way. Some are backed by cash and government securities. Others are backed by cryptocurrencies or use algorithms to maintain their peg. Before using one, ask: • Who created it? • What backs its value? • Are the reserves transparent? • Has it held its peg during market stress? Stablecoins may not be the flashiest part of crypto, but they're one of the most useful. They bridge traditional finance and blockchain, making digital payments faster, cheaper, and more accessible. The future of money isn't just about owning crypto. It's about making money move as easily as sending a message. And stablecoins are already making that possible. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance
-
Gname.n⨀d10.10.10.10 (@Biikiefacti) reported@binance Why you didn't help some of us to secure our @Cristiano NFT on @binance , to be transferable to wallet whenever one come online and notice the new update I've been away from online for a while now, just notice an email of transferable deadline 😪 #BinanceTurns9 #AskBinance
-
Shaheedah (@SwitSlim) reportedThey loot this country dry yet have the audacity to tell us companies like Binance and AbokiFX are the problem.
-
JONY (@JonyMazumder1) reported@Jia_Lilly01 It would be great if you gave me twenty dollars. I have asked you many times but you have never given me any. 180206476 binance please help
-
Signal_guy (@Cryptoprime00) reported📉 Another leg down Binance Futures #AR/ #USDT Take-Profit target 3 ✅ Profit: 116.5939% 📈 Period: 3 Days 14 Hours 17 Minutes ⏰
-
NodoNexus (@NodoNexus) reportedUpdate on how the $BONK treasury drain actually worked: This was not a hacked contract and not drained user wallets. It was governance capture on Realms. BIP #76 went live around Jun 30. On the surface it looked like a “reward YES voters” style proposal. Buried in it was the instruction that mattered: move ~4.426T $BONK (~$20–21.2M) out of the BonkDAO treasury. Over Jul 4–5 the attacker accumulated ~882B BONK (~$4.0–4.4M) on Bybit/Binance rails — just enough to clear the ~1% quorum (~879.95B). Turnout was extremely low. Their YES stack dominated the vote. Once it passed, execution was automatic. No useful timelock between “proposal passed” and “treasury emptied”. Based on the onchain setup and public reports: • Cost of control: ~$4.4M in voting power • Treasury taken: ~4.426T BONK / ~$20–21M • Official @bonk_inu called it a malicious governance proposal, said LE was notified, and user funds / mint were unaffected The design problem is simple: If treasury value >> cost of quorum, and there is no delay/veto, governance becomes the attack surface. Interesting case study for every DAO still running fat treasuries with thin participation. Tracking the next flows closely. $BONK
-
Mendes (@0xdmendes) reported@chudhouse_sol With posts like this, we’ll wake up tomorrow to see Binance announcing the listing of this piece of ****.