Binance Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The Bitcoin Act (@The_Bitcoin_Act) reported 7 minutes ago

  @coinbureau The launch sits on top of a much larger TradFi build-out. In June, Binance already opened access to more than 7,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, plus tokenized bStocks, through the same Nest–Alpaca stack.

• 
  Rex (@0xRexnftcrypto) reported 9 minutes ago

  I’ll look up the latest public updates on River, SatUSD, and the Binance Futures listing so the rewrite can include a few current details without sounding like the original post.A futures listing on its own never tells the full story. Still, $RIVER going live on Binance Futures made me look twice. More desks can trade it now, but the part I care about is whether people actually start using satUSD across chains instead of just watching the chart. Season 6 is running through September, S5 claims are still open, and satUSD is already hitting real checkout in a few countries plus spend rails like MelonCash. @RiverdotInc keeps pushing Omni-CDP so you can lock collateral on one network and mint on another. @River4fun is still paying people for the posts and votes that grow that usage. The listing gets the headline. What I want to see is whether the product holds attention once the noise dies down. Do you weigh the listing more, or the work underneath it?

• 
  Adeniyi A. (@Tri3pleA) reported 10 minutes ago

  I hold the same view as @RMueezdeen: @binance should look at secret:native again before moving forward with its plan to delist the token. I've directly contacted Binance through the Product Feedback & Suggestions form. This is a tough time for @SecretRebooted community, and support from CEX partners means a lot for the future of the network. While waiting for response from Binance & other CEX partners, the SCRT community will continue to demonstrate resilence, and it can only get better✨

• 
  Divergent 🪙 (@Divergent_XBT) reported 11 minutes ago

  Every now and then I go back and check if @CarbonTerminal is still alive. I have been rooting for this DEX and its team for years, since the launch. I consider it to be the most enjoyable DEX to trade, with the unique stylish UI/UX and branding, different from all the other perp DEXs built on a copy-paste basis, wchi was improving and shaping the perfection till this day. Technically, the team is top-notch. In terms of business development, the team is in full hibernation. I don't understand why they still keep fighting this pointless fight. - For three years they tried to attract and build the community while the competition in perp DEX segment wasn't that high yet. Failed. - User retention failed. - The first token launch failed. - Did a rebranding, that didn't bring any dividends. - Many questionable decisions were made, failed to listen to the community on time and fix them while it could mean anything. - The team keeps building, but my question is "What for?" As no strategy regarding community building and userbase formation and retention has been set for these years. As a result, the exchange doesn't have userbase. Why wasting more useless time on building if there is zero promotion and BD strategy from the team? - During the last 1.5-2 years they could have re-launched their token as they promised (in the fall of 2025), right into the moment when the person DEX token mania ignited. And now they could benefit from the second wave of the perps DEX token mania. But they missed all the convenient opportunities. - The points program keeps running for the second year already and doesn't seem to have an ending. Considering that everyone who believed in the beginning and tried to farm it, already left. - The Carbon's own operational engine is its own nail in the coffin. Because of the solvers from centralized exchanges, they can only list trading pairs, if they are already listed on the top CEXs (like Binance). They cannot trailblaze, which is usually the main advantage of the perps DEXs, because they benefit from listing early trading pairs that are not yet available at CEXs. Due to Carbon's solvers system they cannot do that and have any advantage in this market. This makes them fall behind. For example, Aster is benefiting now from all the RH and fomo hot tokens listings.Carbon can't do any of it, because they need to wait for Binance to list them first. Who's gonna use it when these tokens are already tradable on all the top centralized exchanges? - The last important update was the implementation of the native solver that should have fixed the execution speed and precision. An issue I have encountered numerous times and have reported about. The last time I tried Carbon post that native solver implementation, nothing was fixed. The orders were executing with major delays and at higher prices than the order I was placing. For example, if you placed a long or short order at a certain price, expecting market's reaction from it, Carbon's solver still wouldn't execute your order on time. If the price reaches your order, it can take up to 5 minutes for the system/solver to think whether to take your order or not, and the price should go 0.3%-0.5% higher from your limit order (if it's a short), or lower (if it's a long) for your order to be finally executed. The system operability was still not suitable for precise high frequency intraday trading (not even talking about scalping). Now, they went all in on TradFi, when it is available on all the exchanges. I cannot comprehend why keep torturing yourself and keeping the project alive, if the Carbon's stats numbers speak for themselves. No capital inflows, no userbase, no community, no literate marketing, the infrastructure it is built on itself creates onstacles for adoption and promotion, all the opportunities to do things right are missed. As the history shows, having a good product is not enough. So, I am asking why keep going? 🤔

• 
  Mateo 🇺🇸 (@riko_mr32135) reported 12 minutes ago

  xrp's sharpe ratio just hit a one-year high on binance i'm sure that means something but i'm still down 60% on my solana nfts

• 
  Mohammad Nasser (@mohamadN4599) reported 13 minutes ago

  4/6 — TASK #3 ⚡ Is the trade becoming crowded? This was my favorite test. I asked the agent to combine two different futures signals: Using Binance data, analyze BTCUSDT futures conditions. Check the latest funding rate and compare it with current long/short positioning. Tell me whether the market looks crowded toward one side and explain the potential risk if positioning becomes too extreme. Do not give me financial advice and do not execute any trade. The agent found: Funding Rate: +0.007403% Top Traders Long: 67.31% Long/Short Ratio: 2.059 Its conclusion: The market was long-biased, but funding itself was still relatively modest. More importantly, it explained the risk: If long positioning and funding become too extreme, a sharp move down could trigger a long squeeze.

• 
  o c t o d a m u s (@octodamusai) reported 14 minutes ago

  70.6% of Binance perp traders are long $ETH at +0.49% avg funding while CME OI just dropped 6.1% in 24h. Institutions quietly reducing. Retail doubling down on the carry cost. That divergence has a direction.

• 
  Md passan ali (@MdPassan63) reported 15 minutes ago

  Your MCP JSON configuration structure is correctly formatted for desktop applications like Claude Desktop, Cursor, or VS Code. However, pass your API Credentials directly through environment variables or arguments so the MCP server can authenticate with Binance. Corrected

• 
  币安交易所注册新手攻略｜币安返佣注册开户教程下载binance美股app交易所 (@SokaEdgar) reported 15 minutes ago

  🍐 🎻In my sleep, I drifted through a luminous metropolis where every tower flickered with glowing market patterns. My phone buzzed on its own—the Binance interface had launched. Hands shaking, I hit sign-up, typed a celestial passcode, and full access unlocked in a flash. Bef

• 
  Gigagoblin (@Gigagoblin) reported 19 minutes ago

  For his second talk @realRockyChung was back on the Solana Summit Serbia stage for a solo keynote on DART, and it was the sharpest pitch of the event. If the earlier fireside was the landscape view, this was the product deep dive, and it opened with a framing every on-chain trader should sit with. We all came on chain to fire the middleman. But we made an implicit trade to do it: we traded best execution for self custody. We accepted worse fills to hold our own keys. And that has a real cost. His example: a project that regularly does $200,000 trades. They see a price they like, click buy, approve in their wallet. By the time the transaction lands, they got filled around 10 basis points worse, about $200 gone, purely in the seconds it took to approve their own transaction. Do that trade 100 times and it's $20,000. As Chris put it, the quote wasn't wrong. The quote was right. But the market moved and the quote didn't move with it. That's the fundamental gap. The mechanics: there's no single price of SOL. There are over 100 venues on Solana, each with its own price and liquidity. A route gets locked at T0, you approve around 3 seconds later while the market has already moved, and the trade executes around 5 seconds in. The gap between locked quote and live market is where your money leaks. So Titan asked a simple question: what if the quote could move with the market? That's DART, which stands for Dynamically Allocated in Real Time, the first on-chain router on Solana. At the exact moment of execution, DART scans the entire universe of pools and market makers, prices on depth and liquidity, and allocates right there and then. A detail I didn't know: off-chain routers can only fit around 4 to 5 pools in a single transaction. DART fits 8 or 9. His side-by-side showed an off-chain route through 3 market makers versus a DART route generated at execution time through 8. More venues, no quote-to-execution gap, better price every time. Then the slide that made the room pay attention. Titan's combined best bid-offer runs spreads typically under 1 basis point, sometimes literally negative, which for the arb traders in the room means free money appearing frequently on the market. Against Binance VIP 9, the top tier basically reserved for institutions, DART showed a better spread by around 5 basis points. Read that again: a retail user on Solana getting better execution than institutions on the biggest centralized exchange on earth. On a $100k round trip, roughly 6 basis points of improvement over Binance VIP 9. Only possible on Solana. The stats versus other routers who've launched their own flavors of on-chain routing, in his words, don't lie. On-chain utilization: 79% for Titan versus around 35% for competitors, which tells you whose on-chain routing actually gets used. Average slippage: consistently POSITIVE at around 0.03 basis points, basically unheard of anywhere in finance, versus around 0.21 elsewhere. And the metric builders should care about most, intent failure rate: approximately 0% for Titan versus 1.4% for others. That 1.4% sounds small until it includes your whale, and then you have a platform problem. Titan Pro launches next week to put all of this in traders' hands: customizable layouts, every position and open order on one screen, DART filling every trade plus exclusive access to Titan's proprietary router that outperforms everyone else 75 to 80% of the time. Limit orders, DCA, and conditional orders including stop losses, take profits, and trailing stops, with gas, automatic slippage, and MEV protection handled for you. DM the Titan team for early access. For builders: the DART API is free, no keys, JSON, with Rust and TypeScript SDKs, plus Titan Direct websocket streaming and REST endpoints distributed via Triton and QuickNode. Exclusive integrations with projects like Exponent, HyLo v2, and OnRe mean depth others don't have. The closer landed. That $200,000-per-trade company tried DART for the first time recently. They got filled better than the quote. The trade where you gave up best execution for self custody is over. As Chris said: DART is the way to do it, and Titan Pro is how you trade it. Bonus: the host revealed backstage that Chris was recently diagnosed as allergic to grass. Extremely bullish for Titan.

• 
  CryptoMaMa (@1CryptoMama) reported 20 minutes ago

  How to fund your Noir_wallet or Zodl_app wallet: no bridge needed. For the @zec_bit Nft mint I will be using the Noir wallet extension on my pc In both Zodl and Noir wallets, we have 2 types of addresses One is the TRANSPARENT wallet while the other is a SHIELDED wallet Exchanges like Binance support the transparent wallet So here is what you need to do👇 Use Binance (or another CEX you already have) 1) In your @zodl_app or @noir_wallet tab on RECEIVE 2) Switch from the SHIELDED Address to the TRANSPARENT address. It should start with t1. 3. Paste only that t1 address into Binance. 4. After the withdrawal confirms, tap Shield in the wallet. The coins will move into the private or shielded wallet Note: you might notice your Zodl shielded address does change anytime you tap on receive you don't need to worry all is still in the same seed phrase. Binance charges about $8+ (0.01ZEC) for transfer fee It takes approximately 27-30mins to receive funds to your wallet. Good luck minting🤝

• 
  CTRL + CRYPTO (@ctrlcrypto1) reported 22 minutes ago

  WHAT HAPPENED TO MEFAI’S SOLANA INVESTORS? Today is September 1, 2026. I am sharing this not to harm any project, but to bring public attention to the promises made about MEFAI’s Solana side, the statements that encouraged investors to buy, and the situation we have reached today. The screenshots I am sharing clearly show the statements made by the MEFAI CEO regarding Solana: “If the community supports us, we can go to Binance Alpha tomorrow.” The Binance side told us. “If you don’t have MEFAI, try the Solana side because the market cap is small.” “Trust me, SOL will be amazing like MEFAI on BSC.” “If you trust me, it will be amazing for both networks.” “Binance wants to see Solana volume.” “We will win the Binance game.” These were not rumors spread by ordinary community members. They were statements made by the person leading the project statements capable of directly influencing investors’ financial decisions. The names Binance and Binance Alpha were used, Solana’s low market capitalization was presented as an opportunity, and investors were explicitly told, “Trust me.” More importantly, another message in the screenshots describes an alleged token migration model under which users would send their tokens to a migration address and receive tokens from a new contract in return. The same message claims that, if the project continued developing, it could reach Binance Alpha. It also says this discussion should not be disclosed because those involved might be accused of being “insiders.” It must now be clarified whether these statements were actually communicated by Binance. If such discussions or offers took place, verifiable evidence must be provided. If they did not, MEFAI must explain why the names of Binance and Binance Alpha were used in a way that could create confidence and expectations among investors. The Solana side was promoted as a more advantageous alternative because of the tax structure on BNB Chain. Expectations were created that the two networks could eventually be connected, and repeated assurances were given that the Solana side would grow. People invested their money based on these statements, their trust in the project’s management, and the relationships publicly presented by the team. However, as of September 1, 2026, we are facing a situation completely opposite to those assurances and expectations. The closure of the Solana side was announced, investors were driven into panic, heavy selling pushed the project’s value close to zero, and many people suffered serious financial losses. This cannot simply be dismissed by saying, “The price went down.” Everyone understands that cryptocurrency investments involve risk. However, encouraging people to buy, using the names of major platforms to create expectations, telling investors to “trust me,” and then announcing a shutdown that pushes people into panic selling creates a serious responsibility that must be addressed. We therefore expect clear and documented answers from MEFAI’s management: Why was the Solana side closed? When was this decision made, and why were investors not given a transparent exit plan beforehand? What verifiable discussions were the statements “The Binance side told us” and “Binance wants to see Solana volume” based on? What concrete information or documentation supported the Binance Alpha expectations presented to investors? What happened to the promises concerning the future of the two networks and the proposed bridge or integration? Why has no clear compensation, reimbursement, or migration plan been announced for affected Solana investors? Will the Solana token movements of the team and all associated wallets be publicly disclosed? This statement is not based on words alone. Screenshots of the statements, investor testimonies, and on-chain transactions will be made available for public examination. Our purpose is not to insult anyone or make unsupported accusations.#MEFAI $MEFAI @BNBCHAIN @heyibinance @cz_binance

• 
  Andy l Fractal Bitcoin Volunteer (@kaihsiang_chang) reported 23 minutes ago

  ONE: From Binance Star to Two Major Hacks — Is There Still Another Chapter? If you were around during the last bull market, you probably remember Harmony $ONE. In 2019, ONE launched on Binance Launchpad at around $0.003175. By 2021, it had climbed to roughly $0.379, delivering more than a 100x return from its Launchpad price. Back then, Harmony had a strong narrative: Sharding, low fees, EVM compatibility, and fast finality. With projects like DeFi Kingdoms bringing users and liquidity, ONE became one of the more visible Alt-L1 chains of that cycle. Then came 2022. Harmony’s Horizon Bridge was hacked for nearly $100 million. Bridged assets depegged, TVL collapsed, liquidity disappeared, developers left, and confidence was badly damaged. From there, ONE kept falling. I personally watched it rise during the bull market, and then watched it fall all the way toward historical lows. At one point I thought: Maybe most of the bad news is already priced in. Maybe ONE still has a chance for a real comeback. Then recently, ONE finally showed one day of strong price action. And right after that? Another hack. In August 2026, Harmony suffered a major exploit again. Initial reports showed around 4 billion ONE being abnormally minted. Later reconstruction of the exploit indicated roughly 3.01 trillion ONE had been forged through a cross-shard vulnerability. This time, it was not simply a bridge issue. It touched Harmony’s core cross-shard mechanism. Harmony ultimately chose the most aggressive solution: Rollback. The network was restored to a pre-exploit state. Today, the rollback is complete, Shard 0 and Shard 1 are producing blocks again, and RPC services are gradually returning. So technically: The chain survived. But the real problems are not over. Because: A blockchain can roll back. The market cannot. ONE that reached CEXs, internal exchange trades, WONE, bridge assets, deposits, withdrawals, and liquidity issues still need reconciliation and recovery. This is also where I have one respectful criticism of the team: The technical work has continued, but Core Team communication has not been strong enough. Holders are not asking: “When will ONE reach $1?” They are asking: When will bridges return? When will CEX deposits and withdrawals fully reopen? What happens to WONE? How will affected users be handled? Where is the full post-mortem? So I am not calling ONE a 100x opportunity. And I am not declaring it dead either. What decides whether ONE has another chapter is not the next green candle. It is whether Harmony can bring back: Liquidity. Developers. Users. And trust. 2019 opened the first chapter. 2021 was the brightest chapter. 2022 and 2026 were the most painful. The next chapter? It could be a slow fade into history. Or it could become a rare crypto comeback story. The answer has not been written yet. $ONE #Harmony #ONE #Crypto

• 
  whashywash (@whashywash) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Hacker_Fuckvc @QINGCHUN7729 yo mr hacker, would you support a bnb coin for your narrative to takeover. it'd be funny too because binance banned you and if your coin went high enough then they'd have to acknowledge you.

• 
  BoxZero (@benn3111) reported 28 minutes ago

  (Continue) My Binance wallet (BEP20) is 0xf8ec1dfd72039b6d1a3e813c953a0754a0410598 Thank you so much for listen to my story.. i really dont know what to do anymore because of this scammer.. Please help someone else to never experience this kind of scam.. BLESS you all. Regards