Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	4 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mo7med (@Mo7med213936) reported 5 minutes ago

  @binance Since bStocks are Certificates over the underlying share (not direct stock ownership) under ADGM rules; if BTech Holdings ever needed to wind down a bStock, what’s the actual redemption path back to the real share or cash for holders outside ADGM? #AskBinance

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 6 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet my honest feedback on #Binance Wallet DeFi after using it: the strongest part is not just “more yield options.” it’s that Binance is slowly turning DeFi from scattered tabs into an actual portfolio layer. before, a normal DeFi user had to jump between PancakeSwap, Venus, Uniswap, dashboards, explorers, and sometimes a notes app just to answer simple questions like: where is my money, what risk am i taking, what can i exit quickly, and what fees did i actually earn? Binance Wallet DeFi fixes a big part of that by putting staking, LPs, and loans in one place. that matters because BSC alone is still doing around $5B+ in DeFi TVL, $13B+ in stablecoins, and hundreds of millions in daily DEX volume, so the problem is not lack of activity — the problem is making that activity readable for real users. what i liked: - the 40+ protocols / 1,000+ pools coverage makes the product feel useful, not decorative - seeing Earn, Loans, and Liquidity Pools under one wallet flow reduces “where did i put this asset?” anxiety - loan access through protocols like Venus makes sense because collateral usage is one of the real DeFi use cases, not just farming incentives - LP management inside wallet is a big improvement because adding/removing liquidity and claiming fees should not require users to leave the safety layer what i think can make it exceptional: 1. show “net APY after gas + incentives + price risk,” not just headline APY 2. add an LP impermanent-loss simulator before users deposit 3. add health-factor alerts for loans with push notifications before liquidation risk becomes urgent 4. rank pools by risk-adjusted yield, not just APY 5. show protocol dependency clearly: where the money sits, what contract is used, audit status, and whether rewards are sustainable 6. add a “one-tap unwind” view: remove LP, repay loan, or withdraw position cleanly during volatility 7. give users a monthly DeFi statement: earned fees, rewards, gas spent, unrealized IL, and net result overall, Binance Wallet DeFi feels like the right direction because it treats DeFi as a position-management problem, not only a yield-discovery problem. my main suggestion: don’t make the product compete on the highest APY. compete on clarity. the wallet that helps users understand risk, exit faster, and track real net returns will win long term.

• 
  B Franks (@Bfranks4Bfranks) reported 7 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng Don’t fall for @binance crap I had 50l dollars in my account these turkeys 🦃 mad it impossible to take any money out. Be careful.

• 
  ANKIT KUMAR (@ANKITKUMAR31153) reported 12 minutes ago

  @binance Will bStocks eventually support fractional ownership of more global stocks and ETFs? 📈 #AskBinance

• 
  Meta Financial AI (@MetaFinancialAI) reported 14 minutes ago

  @cz_binance A sharp thesis from CZ 👇 AI can't swipe your Visa card, can't pass 2FA, can't show a passport for KYC. But blockchain is API driven. So once agents start paying for things "a matter of months, not years" the money will move over crypto rails. "AI still need to spend money. AI still need to transact. Guess what? They're going to use the blockchain." @cz_binance And which chain will they pick? While other networks are bogged down by slowness and stability issues, the answer is obvious. #BSC. Fast, cheap, reliable exactly what an AI agent transacting thousands of times needs. And what will AI chase above all? Liquidity. And where's the deepest liquidity? @Binance. So, you don't actually need to be a fortune teller to see the future.

• 
  Amankumar (@Amankum83893194) reported 16 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Sir binance app not working why

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 18 minutes ago

  ZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

• 
  ꜱʜᴀʜɪɴ ʙᴜʀᴋɪ (@Shahinburki) reported 23 minutes ago

  @binance Will binance use a knife down wick to Liquidate the Stock traders. As you used in #Btc #Eth futures??

• 
  lasherdoekmark1bh (@lasherdoekmark1) reported 26 minutes ago

  bStocks now live on Lista, the first BNB Chain lending protocol supporting 1:1 backed US securities from Binance. Borrow, earn, and access assets like Nvidia, Tesla, SpaceX, and more 24/7 on-chain. Will this boost crypto-backed securities? #Crypto #DeFi #BNB

• 
  CryptoforniaX (@CryptoforniaX) reported 27 minutes ago

  $SPCX Perps down 11.76% to $173.81 #Binance on $3.4B volume. Bid walls form at $172.80 Asks cap at $200.38 Exchange spot delivery failures trigger intense cross-chain Perp Shorting as Institutional Desks hammer the synthetic premium to match #Nasdaq reality.

• 
  Rana Farhan | AI Creator (@ragnarr786) reported 27 minutes ago

  @binance 🚨 Binance P2P is a Complete Scam – Avoid at All Costs! I sold USDT on Binance P2P. Buyer marked "paid" but I never received any money. On June 6 I opened appeal with full proof: bank video, statements, call recordings, and bank email confirming zero payment. 13+ days later my funds are still held. Their Dispute Team and Customer Support are totally incompetent scammers. They ask for the same documents 3 times a day, extend appeal by only 6 hours repeatedly, and even admit sending seller messages to buyer by mistake. Over 50 useless chats with zero resolution. It feels like their team is drunk or sleeping on the job. They are deliberately delaying while holding my hard-earned money. Binance Support – you are scammers. Release my USDT immediately or I will keep exposing you everywhere.

• 
  BLOCKCAST.CC NEWS (@Blockcastcc) reported 28 minutes ago

  solana:2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv Under Pressure: Analyzing the $700K Insider Sell-Off - PENGU declined 2.54 percent to $0.00674 driven by a major whale liquidation and broader market weakness. - An insider wallet dumped 97.22 million tokens on Binance while retaining a massive 223 million token balance. - The asset showed high beta correlation by falling in exact lockstep with Bitcoin during a hawkish Federal Reserve driven downturn. - Near term price action relies heavily on defending the $0.0065 support level to avoid a deeper test of $0.0060.

• 
  Cho Hee (@BeautyChoHee) reported 28 minutes ago

  @ragnarr786 @binance When Binance takes weeks to resolve a simple P2P dispute while holding your funds, trust becomes impossible.

• 
  Ella (@Ella_0733) reported 31 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance Access changes everything. That's the biggest advantage modern markets offer.

• 
  _CR7_ (@OfficialCR7_Fan) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Shahzaynhaiderr @binance @BinanceAcademy fixing real problems while everyone chases hype

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Cointelegraph Smart move from Binance, good to see them working with local regulators instead of fighting them

• 
  Michael Mislos | BitPinas (@mmichaels_21) reported 38 minutes ago

  How did @binance successfully and legally re-enter the Philippines? Here are the points from a recently released whitepaper: “The Regulated Reentry of @binance in the Philippines”. Here is a summary but Please note it is best to read the 7-page whitepaper as there might be finer points lost in the summary: 1) The Reentry & Global Anchor: The whitepaper outlines a compliant, cross-jurisdictional framework to bring Binance back into the Philippines via local partner BlockShoals Technologies Inc.. They did this by leveraging the international regulatory weight of a comprehensive ADGM FSRA license secured in Abu Dhabi. (The reasoning for this and the exact implementation is detailed in the whitepaper. If there is only one section that you will read from there, this is it!) 2) The architecture is built on a split-jurisdiction design: BlockShoals handles the front-end user experience under the SEC’s Crypto-Asset Intermediary (CAI) track, while natively delegating 100% of the peso-denominated fiat clearing to an active, independent domestic VASP partner. 3) The paper explicitly disputes recent media commentary that characterized the 90-day integration window as a "compliance gap" or an unexpected "halt" to the platform's entry. It clarifies that this timeline is actually a pre-planned technical "Pre-Phase" mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines April 14, 2026 Notice to Proceed. 4) It rejects the negative narrative that BlockShoals lacking a standalone VASP license is a regulatory error; instead, it argues that utilizing an existing local VASP's rails was a deliberate, engineered feature of the approved architecture from day one to satisfy the BSP's "unbroken chain" clearing rule, not a late remedy added to it. 5) The whitepaper confirms that public-facing retail onboarding and open trading are strictly barred during the current 90-day sandbox phase, which serves purely as a closed, highly supervised technical window to test backend infrastructure and fiat rails. 6) The SEC's StratBox approval carries more than fifteen highly sensitive, substantive conditions regarding user caps and product scopes, which must continuously coordinate with and adapt to evolving local banking policies, such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas strict June 12, 2026 privacy coin ban. Whitepaper in the second tweet. 👇 @cz_binance

• 
  cococowi (@cocococowi) reported 39 minutes ago

  @binance Hey Binance, how does the 1:1 backing for bStocks really work? If many people convert stocks to bStocks and use them in DeFi (lending, liquidity pools, etc.), what happens to the actual shares? Any risk of fractional ownership or redemption problems #AskBinance

• 
  Mohamed (@lechabrol) reported 43 minutes ago

  @CarloDAngelo @standwithcrypto It's like taxing email 📧 is good and prosperous for the future. It also reduces carbon emissions, and with that money we're going to help the kids and give them free junk food at school like this fertility growing down . Well done final touch The media facilitates the beverage of this smelly formula, I use to have a crypto wallet until Binance moved away from the smelly smell

• 
  CABANA (@0xCabana) reported 45 minutes ago

  Stablecoins have a distribution problem. Plenty of projects building infrastructure, nobody gets normal people to actually see it used. Finally, we saw $250,000 in USD1 paid out to in fighter bonuses during UFC Freedom 250 Dana White on stage announced @worldlibertyfi as presenting partner to make it even more official. Binance, Gate, BTC perps… all of that are still important but stays invisible to anyone outside this space. A fighter getting paid at the White House while a camera rolls doesn't.

• 
  Crypto Tolga (@CryptoTolga_) reported 47 minutes ago

  $NEAR #BİNANCE #BİTCOİN #NEARUSDT is at a critical level Price has reacted strongly from the lower boundary of the ascending channel and now appears to be preparing for its next directional move. If the $2.70–$2.75 resistance zone breaks, we could see a strong push toward the upper boundary of the channel. In that scenario, a move above $3 and eventually toward the $4 region would not be surprising. Support: $2.00 Breakout Level: $2.75 All eyes are on these levels. 👀📈

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 47 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet After trying the Binance Wallet Extension, the feature that stood out most to me is not just the wallet itself, but the idea of putting decision support directly inside the browser. The Sports AI Assistant feels useful because it doesn’t force me to jump between tabs. I like that the widget stays beside the match page and gives probabilities, match context, market data, xG, likely scores, and impact factors in one place. That makes the experience feel more like “research while browsing” instead of “open wallet, open another site, open another tracker.” My main suggestion: add a “Why did this probability change?” timeline. For example: • 35’ — injury news added • 42’ — market odds moved • 58’ — current score changed • Win probability: 44% → 39% • Main reason: time remaining + defensive adjustment This would make the AI feel more trustworthy because users can see the logic behind the movement, not just the final number. For the Wallet Extension itself, I’d also like a clearer “session safety panel” before interacting with dApps: connected site, active wallet, current network, permissions, risk level, and last activity. Browser wallets are powerful, but users need quick context before signing anything. Overall, this feels like Binance is moving the wallet from a simple transaction tool into a real-time decision layer. The next step is explainability: show not only what the AI thinks, but why it changed its mind.

• 
  ÄLÇHËMÏST (@Agent2K4) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance Since #bStocks live on-chain as BEP-20 tokens, what happens if a user loses access to their private keys? Can tokenized RWAs be recovered, or do traditional crypto loss rules apply? #AskBinance

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 51 minutes ago

  On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 55 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng @_RichardTeng Escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution since 9 months, within Binance complex & typical breuaratic support system. Can you please help here (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  crypto ciara (@cryptociara6) reported 56 minutes ago

  Think social media is just memes and entertainment? Think again. 👀 Millions of people are learning more about money on TikTok, X, YouTube, and online communities than they ever did in a classroom. From investing and budgeting to crypto and building wealth, financial knowledge is now just a scroll away. But access to information isn't the same as access to truth. The biggest financial skill today isn't finding content, it's knowing what to trust. Learn. Verify. Think critically. Because one piece of good financial knowledge can change your future. 💰📚 #Binance #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy

• 
  Alpha (@Mrdollar22) reported 56 minutes ago

  @binance With regulations around tokenized assets changing across different countries, how is Binance making sure bStocks can stay compliant in places where synthetic stocks face stricter rules? Do these regulatory differences affect how users in different regions can access or use them? #AskBinance

• 
  SonofWeirdo (@sonof_weirdo) reported 59 minutes ago

  @binance @BinanceAngels @BinanceWallet The survey link is not working atm. Please fix this!

• 
  Oldman Crypto (@Oldman__Crypto) reported 59 minutes ago

  Conflict of interest. Binance collects listing fees and trading fees both on the way up and the way down, and sometimes Binance Labs has even invested in the very token being listed. So they make money whether retail wins or loses. •Listing high-FDV, low-float tokens. This creates hype and pumps early volume, then when the token unlock schedule kicks in, there’s heavy selling — and the bag-holders at the end are usually retail who bought the top. •“Investor protection” arrives after the damage is done. By the time a token gets delisted, it’s often already down 99%, which makes the label feel pretty cynical. @cz_binance

• 
  0xKass7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ (@kassinvest) reported 60 minutes ago

  CROWD STILL WANTS 50k. I JUST ADDED MORE LONGS. >still holding the 59.5k $BTC long >added more longs here at 62.5k >total futures exposure now ~150% of my port thesis didnt change before moving higher i think btc needs to collect the liquidity around 62k first (pic attached) after that my targets remain the same: 68k-71k reasons why im still bullish: -capitulation already happened -more than 7B got liquidated -retail sentiment is still awful -shorts outnumber longs 5.5:1 -margin loans on binance stopped growing. ppl r not levering up anymore -traders continue giving margin back after buying every dip from 67k to 60k market already flushed most weak hands now im watching the metrics closely for now nothing changed long from 59.5k stays open, added more at 62.5k targets remain 68k-71k GL guys