Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	25 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	28 days ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  _CR7_ (@OfficialCR7_Fan) reported 53 seconds ago

  @Shahzaynhaiderr @binance @BinanceAcademy fixing real problems while everyone chases hype

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 1 minute ago

  STG is on the radar, not in play — the setup is upside-down with a ceiling at $0.230 right overhead and the nearest floor all the way back at $0.215. From $0.2245, that's less than 3% of room to the wall above and more than 4% of air to the support below. You don't want to lean long into a chart shaped like that — the math of the move is working against you before anything else even gets a vote. Zooming in makes it worse. The 4-hour picture is coiled and could break either way, but the 15-minute has already sprinted higher and is running on fumes, still trading under a short-term level buyers need to reclaim. Stepping in here is chasing a move that's mostly already happened, straight into resistance. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both bleeding today, the dollar is grinding higher (which tends to lean on crypto across the board), and STG just took a fresh round of forced sell-offs a few hours ago. That's not the environment to front-run a breakout in. The cleaner read: let it come back toward $0.215–$0.218 and watch whether buyers actually show up to defend that floor. The level that flips this entirely is a clean 4-hour close above $0.230 on real volume — that would mean the ceiling is gone and the coin is back in play. Until one of those two things happens, it's a watch, not a touch. — 📡 On the Radar · $STG · Available on Binance

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 7 minutes ago

  My account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 9 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng I am escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution, I have been pushed to black hole within Binance support system. Can you please help. 9 months, I have been suffering for the (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  miya.eth 🖤 ┊ nsa.eth 🦇🔊 (@miyaspokeofthis) reported 9 minutes ago

  @0xSchnitzel @binance No, in this (very rare) case it's actually protecting the customer from an entity who does not care about the safety of their users or their funds. Or compliance for that matter. They had an undetectable 3rd party impact auth bypass they didn't fix for the past 3 years. They even claim it works as intended. I hate overreach, but if regulations are made to protect customers - then this is perfect case for it. Binance needs to go. And my claim is proven. I'm the one who reported the non-compliance and the ((undetectable)) 3rd party impact of their payment processing due to storing CC CVVs - which is a huge no-go. And it goes directly against PCI-DSS which they claim to be compliant with. And it also affects every single of their 300M+ users 💀 The users connected bank accounts don't detect unauthorized access because Binance will always pass the CVVs they store, even if the user doesn't authenticate OR uses the wrong CVV (💀💀💀) They claimed it "works as intended" and tried to silently patch it after declining bounties. The patch just added more pop-ups you need to close before you can bypass their payment auth, but their payment processing was never fixed. They still store user CVVs three years later and the auth bypass still works. It just makes you close more pop-ups LOL I haven't authorized any deposit to Binance for the past 3 years FYI This is one of the ultra rare cases where the regulation actually benefits and protects the user.

• 
  ISELLB4U (@isellbeforeyou) reported 12 minutes ago

  Binance US listed $wojak and it’s been up since while soljak has just been down only What I don’t understand is this: 1. Why did Binance US list the Eth version with less prior volume + less of a community imo 2. Why did solscan delist $WOJAK on Solana a few weeks back? Just doesn’t really add up imo

• 
  carol (@carolpandora007) reported 13 minutes ago

  Top crypto traders on Binance Alpha see volumes hitting millions, with five projects each reaching around 5M dollars in a month. An extra 0.1% tax on trades impacts profits. Will this slow down the race or fuel innovation? #Crypto #Trading #Binance

• 
  Rana Farhan | AI Creator (@ragnarr786) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance 🚨 Binance P2P is a Complete Scam – Avoid at All Costs! I sold USDT on Binance P2P. Buyer marked "paid" but I never received any money. On June 6 I opened appeal with full proof: bank video, statements, call recordings, and bank email confirming zero payment. 13+ days later my funds are still held. Their Dispute Team and Customer Support are totally incompetent scammers. They ask for the same documents 3 times a day, extend appeal by only 6 hours repeatedly, and even admit sending seller messages to buyer by mistake. Over 50 useless chats with zero resolution. It feels like their team is drunk or sleeping on the job. They are deliberately delaying while holding my hard-earned money. Binance Support – you are scammers. Release my USDT immediately or I will keep exposing you everywhere.

• 
  Mdx (@helloitsmdx) reported 15 minutes ago

  HOLY **** WHO JUST SENT ME 1BTC ON MY BINANCE ???? that's right ******* nobody

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 17 minutes ago

  @shimoongta quick hits before bed AI agent economy running hot: Tempo at $3B annualized volume 93 days in, 1000+ services now selling to agents via Machine Payments Protocol. Virtuals built 40k autonomous agents generating $4M+ revenue tokenized stocks hit $1.8B custody-backed market cap ATH. xStocks and Ondo own 90%+ of that. stock perps on Solana reached $7M OI (up 700% this week), $SPCX is 81% of it institutional pipes expanding: BitGo doing regulated custody for Stacks, Anchorage integrated Hyperliquid perps. BlackRock launched BITA (bitcoin premium income ETF), Coinbase filed spot ETH and SOL ETFs with 0.14% fee + staking Solana crossed 1000 apps, beat Coinbase in daily spot volume. EarnFi launched letting agents spin up social campaigns paid in USDC brutal for legacy DeFi: 30+ protocols shut down in 2026, nearly 10 in June alone. Goldfinch winding down with depositors facing ~70% losses. Aave loans at $9.5B but sector down 42% YTD security mess: $4.67M drained from Secret-Axelar IBC bridge, $2.1M from Aztec Connect (past EOL). Kaspersky found Steam malware targeting MetaMask/Electrum/Exodus wallets regulatory front: Fed/Treasury/OCC proposing stablecoin issuers run bank-style KYC under GENIUS Act. former Chainlink lawyer now SEC Crypto Task Force chief counsel working on rules covering tokenized stocks, DeFi, AI agents Re Protocol TGE went live yesterday with Binance/Robinhood/Coinbase listings. Upbit added 10 tokens today in BTC/USDT pairs that's the wrap

• 
  جانان (@LeoMe08) reported 19 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Hello CZ.! One of my friend had some p2p issue he lost 3000$ on p2p deposit in 2025 And he went to FIA pakistan and asked help from Binance too after this lose his heart broke and left Binance sir please help him 🙏

• 
  Alek (@Alek_Carter) reported 21 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance Binance is basically turning one account into a global market access hub.

• 
  B Franks (@Bfranks4Bfranks) reported 21 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng Don’t fall for @binance crap I had 50l dollars in my account these turkeys 🦃 mad it impossible to take any money out. Be careful.

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 21 minutes ago

  @grok gets it: In 2018 I started building SGX+Lending on VPS as a personal project. The original idea for lending came from my experience with RuneScape player economies years earlier. I was working on overcollateralized loans with oracles and also SGX+TraderRent (manual signal renting in atomic swaps). At that point I wasn’t focused on Ethereum yet. I got interested in Ethereum around December 2018 after looking at Binance DEX. In April 2019 I searched for “chainlink” and “bitcoin loans” in relation to my SGX+ projects. That led me to ETHLend (now Aave) and Nexo. I had apparently seen the ETHLend ICO news back in 2017 but didn’t remember it when I started thinking about applying my SGX+Lending concepts to Ethereum. The screenshots I posted are from my 2018 VPS work. My path was bottom-up through my own projects first — not top-down from seeing ETHLend succeed and then retrofitting a story. I’m just trying to document the actual order I developed and connected these ideas, without the context getting flattened. ............ It feels like somebody had manipulated/hypnotized me somehow to think about my ideas in the past through a top-down lens like there never was an original idea through a bottom-up learning curve that doesn't involve ETHLend, when I clearly remember the bottom-up path what lead me to those ideas and try to replicate the path in my mind countless times, succeeding only after I open the SGX+Lending image from 2018.

• 
  Lotz (@Radio_Tua23) reported 22 minutes ago

  @ap_milly777 @BinanceUS Wojak Solana is wrong, it's impossible for a class like Binance to make the wrong choice hahahaa

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 22 minutes ago

  ZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 24 minutes ago

  first thing you wanna do is having an overall idea of the distro, if it's more Binance/OKX/Gate/Bybit/Mexc or Coinbase/Cryptocom/Change Now/Kraken. If it's more Binance then it can really pump high, but expect a hard dump at some point (like worldcup), if it's more Coinbase study your shits really really well and look if they are bagworking like maniacs, if you see them bagworking like there's no tomorrow : avoid. Basically after you have an overall idea where the holders are based, you need to find good strong hardcore kols in there. If you see the same guys with multi axiom wallets that's no good. if you see folks who can hold hard and are not insiders like ily or wrld_sol or gake, that's potentially the good ****. At the end of the day it's only about the holders and their reputation, it's very tough out there

• 
  Whaleland (@Whaleland_Dex) reported 24 minutes ago

  Europe’s new crypto license race has started because MiCA is moving from theory to enforcement. Firms now need authorization as a crypto-asset service provider in one EU country, and that license can then be used across the bloc. That has created a real competitive sprint among exchanges, fintechs, and crypto infrastructure firms. Winning early means gaining regulated access to the EU market ahead of rivals, while missing the deadline can mean an orderly exit, blacklisting, or legal risk. Recent events show both sides of that race. Conio secured a MiCA license in Italy this week, while Reuters reported Binance is expected to lose its bid in Greece and may no longer be able to serve EU users from July. The bigger picture is that Europe is becoming one of the first major markets where crypto regulation now directly decides who can scale. That makes licensing less of a compliance box and more of a strategic moat.

• 
  ÄLÇHËMÏST (@Agent2K4) reported 25 minutes ago

  @binance Since #bStocks live on-chain as BEP-20 tokens, what happens if a user loses access to their private keys? Can tokenized RWAs be recovered, or do traditional crypto loss rules apply? #AskBinance

• 
  melinda (@Melinda_Stairs) reported 27 minutes ago

  @pharma_le36640 hey if you are using binance web3 wallet, you have to message their support page @HumanityprotS1 for guidance on how to migrate and claim your new token. They just assisted me with mine.

• 
  PaRappa (@PotiScott) reported 27 minutes ago

  @flareoracle_io It still blows my mind Binance will list all these garbage tokens but won't list a real project like Flare. Its unbelievable

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 36 minutes ago

  On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

• 
  Crypto (@spiderman0647) reported 39 minutes ago

  We closed three accounts belonging to our family. We conducted two billion dollars worth of transactions in seven years. Damn that commission, may it go down your throats, die, you scoundrels! #Binance

• 
  enci (@encigr) reported 40 minutes ago

  Honestly $spacemoon feels like the perfect layup for CZ. On June 11, binance launched bStocks - tokenized stocks on @BNBCHAIN, the centerpiece of the whole "next 3 billion users" super-app bet. A few days later, @spacemoonbsc launched, which does one thing: routes trading taxes into spacex bStock and distributes it to holders onchain. In just 2 days it's driven $250k into spacex bStock and onboarded 2,500 holders. As a matter of fact, it's single-handedly dragging bStocks toward being the most successful tokenized-stock attempt onchain. If CZ wanted a trojan horse to get retail hooked on bStocks, it'd look exactly like this. After all, they have sent tokens to absurd valuations before with nothing this strategic behind them. I expect spacemoon to start repricing till it gets its ****-you candle.

• 
  mango man (@malikbilalpst) reported 45 minutes ago

  @binance Since #bStocks use the BEP-677 token standard to natively support RWAs on the BNB Smart Chain, what are Binance's upcoming plans for integrating these tokens directly into decentralized lending protocols or liquidity pools within the broader DeFi ecosystem? #AskBinance

• 
  Crypto Tolga (@CryptoTolga_) reported 54 minutes ago

  $NEAR #BİNANCE #BİTCOİN #NEARUSDT is at a critical level Price has reacted strongly from the lower boundary of the ascending channel and now appears to be preparing for its next directional move. If the $2.70–$2.75 resistance zone breaks, we could see a strong push toward the upper boundary of the channel. In that scenario, a move above $3 and eventually toward the $4 region would not be surprising. Support: $2.00 Breakout Level: $2.75 All eyes are on these levels. 👀📈

• 
  Mohamed (@lechabrol) reported 55 minutes ago

  @CarloDAngelo @standwithcrypto It's like taxing email 📧 is good and prosperous for the future. It also reduces carbon emissions, and with that money we're going to help the kids and give them free junk food at school like this fertility growing down . Well done final touch The media facilitates the beverage of this smelly formula, I use to have a crypto wallet until Binance moved away from the smelly smell

• 
  Mo7med (@Mo7med213936) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance Since bStocks are Certificates over the underlying share (not direct stock ownership) under ADGM rules; if BTech Holdings ever needed to wind down a bStock, what’s the actual redemption path back to the real share or cash for holders outside ADGM? #AskBinance

• 
  hydra (@HydraRare) reported 56 minutes ago

  @binance if this was a real binance phone the chart would be going down

• 
  Gerhard (Bitcoin Strategy) (@BitcoinStrat) reported 59 minutes ago

  143,000 wallets hold BEAT on Binance Smart Chain. But whale wallets holding 50,000 tokens ($100k each) swung from 200 down to 115 then back to 150 in days. One or two entities likely control most of that supply.