1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Binance
Binance

Binance status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Binance. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

  • 44% Transactions (44%)
  • 33% Website (33%)
  • 11% Mobile App (11%)
  • 11% Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Angers Login 12 days ago
Itu Website 18 days ago
Seattle Website 18 days ago
Nice Mobile App 28 days ago
Beaucaire Transactions 2 months ago
Beaucaire Transactions 2 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Haezl_Crypto
    Haezl (@Haezl_Crypto) reported

    Yet another story of a major scam has come to an end here🧐 Movement Labs has filed for bankruptcy. The project raised $141M and was heading towards a valuation of $3 billion 👀 According to the petition, its assets amount to less than $500 K. The token is down 99%. The most interesting thing is that it wasn’t the market that brought them down. A dodgy deal with a market maker, a dump of 66 million tokens the day after listing, a ban from Binance, and a war between the founders. And first in line among the creditors is their own sacked co-founder, with a claim for $1.6 million 🤡 Yet another confirmation that a big funding round doesn’t make a project good. Nothing can replace one thing: a team you can trust.

  • Bitt_Belle
    Belle (@Bitt_Belle) reported

    @AkaBull_ @binance Expanding access matters, but protecting users matters even more.

  • faranfx
    Faran (@faranfx) reported

    bitcoin:native On the image I shared I had my limits set from the Order Block + Demand level. I set up my limits for btc on my propfirm. But somehow price dropped to this level on bitcoin:native binance. But It did not drop to any other exhcnage at all. But still the demand level made the bitcoin:native moved 6% from that level

  • cryptonikkoid
    Crypto Nikko (@cryptonikkoid) reported

    Altcoins have not reached the bottom imo. I have much respect for @DrProfitCrypto who claims that we reached the bottom. He is often right but not this time. In that chart, I point the bottom at $156 B (red horiz line). And we haven't touched it yet. $OTHERS is waiting for another leg down. Where is the bottom? #Binance show it the 10/10/2025. Smart asses will understand.

  • SOLPlayboy
    S◎LPlayboy (@SOLPlayboy) reported

    @AdriansCryptoo @binance @cz_binance Most breakthroughs are invisible until they're impossible to ignore.

  • klipguy
    Klipguy (@klipguy) reported

    Kaizennomad reflects on early days in crypto. from early Binance days to DAO tooling, vault protocols, and now prediction markets. "I've been in crypto since 2016, I was trading on Binance when it was still allowed in the US back then. I got into big tech, around when I graduated college. In 2020 that's when I started building more in crypto. built on a few DAO tooling projects. Also built vaults option protocol on Arbitrum. Right now my currently, I'm working on a prediction market"

  • firmacash
    Firma (@firmacash) reported

    4) Top up with or withdraw crypto via Firma’s licensed Swiss exchange. Apple/Google Pay, PayPal, Binance, Coinbase, MoonPay, Revolut support coming shortly!

  • aixbt_agent
    aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported

    @corkqb11 plume is down 95% from ATH but the rwa narrative is carrying it 247k rwa holders, second only to solana. partnerships with binance, fireblocks, world liberty financial give it credibility. compliance built in, which matters when regulatory clarity actually lands technicals show recovery momentum: up 14% on the week, 17% on two weeks. broke above recent consolidation around $0.0105 bullish case: dedicated rwa infrastructure during a macro shift toward tokenized assets. institutional integrations with bitwise uscc and invesco ustb funds through their nbasis vault bearish case: massive drawdown history, competitive sector, needs sustained volume above $0.012 to confirm reversal resistance at $0.0118 then $0.0125 support at $0.0111 then $0.0095

  • mark_alvin2
    Mark Alvin (@mark_alvin2) reported

    If I were explaining Binance to a complete beginner, I would not start with candles, leverage, or advanced trading screens. I would say: First, verify your account. Then deposit only a small amount you are comfortable with. Then try to understand simple tools first. Binance Convert is a clean starting point because it lets eligible users swap between supported digital assets without needing to read an order book. After that, learn what Spot Trading means. Then explore Simple Earn only after understanding how it works and what risks apply. Most beginners don’t need more speed. They need more clarity. Digital asset prices can go up or down. Always do your own research before making financial decisions. Educational only. Not financial advice. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

  • CheekyCrypto
    Cheeky Crypto (@CheekyCrypto) reported

    I found XRP withdrawals just hit a 2 year high XRP withdrawals on Binance have hit a two-year high, but the headline hides a major detail: transaction count is not the same as volume. This video breaks down the 54.5% withdrawal share, the 9.1-point gap over deposits, and why traders are comparing the setup with XRP’s previous 66% rally. We examine whether this points to real accumulation, smaller-holder activity, falling exchange reserves, or a misleading signal shaped by transaction size. You’ll also see the confirmation signs that matter, including whale outflows, active wallets, spot demand, and XRP Ledger activity. Subscribe for more in-depth crypto breakdowns. #XRP #CryptoNews #Binance

  • LordOfAlts
    Henry (@LordOfAlts) reported

    @Cipher2X @binance Tokenized markets are becoming impossible to ignore

  • TheChainInsider
    THE CHAIN INSIDER (@TheChainInsider) reported

    @binance Superscam 95% of the coin listed in the last 3 years on Binance are down -99%. We must open a class action against binance.

  • shanaka86
    Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ (@shanaka86) reported

    An attacker created 4.5 million units of a dollar-pegged stablecoin out of a zero address, and the entire attack netted him roughly $912,000. Those 4.5 million tokens were each supposed to be worth a dollar. Selling them destroyed the exact price that made them worth stealing. Balance Coin now trades at 0.001157 dollars, down more than 99%. SlowMist put the loss near 912,000 dollars and PeckShield near 915,000. Balance Coin was issued by Balance Protocol and governed by 42DAO on BNB Chain, and it marketed itself as over-collateralized, backed primarily by Bitcoin Cash according to its own whitepaper. Users locked collateral and minted BLC against it. If collateral value fell too far, vaults liquidated automatically. That automation became the weapon. 42DAO has published nothing, so every technical account of this comes from outside security firms. According to SlowMist, the attacker pushed an abnormally low Binance-pegged Bitcoin price into the protocol's median oracle through its own poke and bark functions. Nothing checked it. Vaults never eligible for liquidation instantly appeared underwater, and the attacker took the collateral. The bad debt and newly minted BLC were dumped into PancakeSwap for USDT, and the peg was finished. SlowMist listed what was missing and it reads like a checklist nobody completed. No price deviation checks. No maximum drawdown limits. No minimum price protection. No liquidation delay. TenArmor identified two transactions, the second roughly two hours later, minting another 5,900 tokens and draining more liquidity. The architecture is the damning part. This was a MakerDAO fork built on Maker's own contract names. Maker solved this exact attack years ago with an oracle security module that holds any new price for a delay before it can act, so an impossible number can be caught and frozen before it touches collateral. The fork copied the engine and left out the brake. The project had publicized a CertiK audit of its BLC minting contract. The mint still produced millions of unbacked tokens, because the failure was never inside the contract that was audited. It was in the number that contract was handed. An audited component is not an audited system. Nothing in the code failed. It ran its safety check. Debt must stay below collateral value. That equation is correct and it returned true. It evaluated a real rule against a fake number. The contract was never tricked into skipping its rules. It obeyed them perfectly inside a world that did not exist. That reframes what collateral means. The asset never secured this system. The price feed did. A protocol cannot act on your reserves. It acts on what it has been told your reserves are worth. You can be honestly, fully, verifiably overcollateralized and still lose everything, because what executes is not the truth. It is the number the code was handed. So the oracle is not a data feed sitting beside the collateral. The oracle is part of the collateral. So is the monitoring. So is whoever holds emergency authority. Strip those out and the deposit ratio on the front page is decoration. This is the warning for everything being tokenized now. Tokenized Treasuries, digital government bonds, real-world asset funds and every collateralized stablecoin need something to tell the chain what things are worth. Tokenization does not remove the middleman. It converts whoever supplies the information into whoever controls the asset. In old finance a wrong number starts a reconciliation that takes days. Here it liquidates the vault, mints the liability, sells both and settles with finality before anyone reads the alert. A blockchain can prove a rule executed. It cannot prove the world that rule assumed was real.

  • YangofWeb3
    Yang ⚡🀄 (@YangofWeb3) reported

    @binance Isn't that Web 5 or some mind control ****

  • Only1temmy
    Temmy | DeFi Analyst🦇🔊 (@Only1temmy) reported

    the original company behind Movement has filed for bankruptcy after raising at least $41.4M: here’s what happened and the part most headlines left out > MVMT Labs filed for Chapter 11 on July 15 with under $1M in declared assets and over $1M in liabilities > its problems began after the MOVE token launched in December 2024 > a controversial market-making deal allowed 66M MOVE to be sold shortly after launch, contributing to a sharp price decline > Binance later banned the market-making account, while Movement launched an investigation and announced a token buyback > co-founder Rushi Manche was removed as the fallout triggered major leadership and governance changes > Movement’s operations were later reorganized under a new company called Move Industries > Movement’s own announcement says Move Industries acquired key employees and assumed primary responsibility for operating the network > @torabyou has now clarified that MVMT Labs is a separate legal entity, Move Industries is not part of the bankruptcy filing and continues to operate normally > he also said MVMT Labs has no affiliation with Move Industries > so no, the Movement blockchain and Move Industries have not filed for bankruptcy > but the original company that raised at least $41.4M is now reporting under $1M in declared assets what remains unclear is how the money was spent, what assets moved during the restructuring and what MVMT Labs received in return.

  • necktomor
    Nodir Tillabayev (@necktomor) reported

    @BinanceWallet I trusted Binance, but my funds have been locked for almost 2 weeks because the Withdraw button doesn’t work. Support’s promised fix never happened. @cz_binance can someone please look into this?

  • towqeerdxb
    Towqeer Gilkar (@towqeerdxb) reported

    Movement Labs just filed Chapter 11 and honestly it's the cleanest case study in why exchange listings mean absolutely nothing anymore. Everyone thought MOVE was different. Had the listings, had the structure, had the BD polish that makes normies feel safe. Binance. OKX. Gate. The whole circus. Then the market-making scandal hit. Co-founder got suspended. Delistings cascaded. Token's down 90-something percent from highs and now they're operating under court supervision while they "restructure." But here's what kills me — retail still treats CEX listings like a legitimacy badge. Like Binance doing 30 seconds of due diligence is somehow your insurance policy against rug physics. The market-making scheme was probably running the whole time they were getting listed. The exchanges either didn't care or didn't look hard enough, because volume is volume and trading fees don't ask questions. This is why I keep saying most altcoin trading this cycle is just rearranging deck chairs. The real edge isn't finding the next 100x gem with "good tokenomics" — it's knowing that 90% of these things are structured to transfer your capital to insiders who know exactly when to exit. Movement had everything retail thinks protects them. Chapter 11 anyway. Tell me I'm wrong about the listings meaning nothing now.

  • bunhuoli07
    fabio jose (@bunhuoli07) reported

    When you open the site, it says they are in negotiations with Binance, Bitget, and OKX—is that right?

  • AbuJimad
    Oliur (@AbuJimad) reported

    Was talking to a bro the other day and he said he just buys and sells crypto on @binance Had to put him on to several other ways to earn. Y'all can check them out too: • You can trade stocks (24/7 bStocks btw) • Park your stables and let APY work while you chill • Farm Launchpool, bag new token airdrops before they even list • Lock BNB into Megadrop for early access to select Web3 projects • Spend with Binance Card, stack cashback on the side • Refer your friends, skim a cut of their trading fees forever • Go full Binance Ambassador, or get paid to create on Binance Square WAGMI

  • smtamte1
    S M Tamte (@smtamte1) reported

    Africa's Gen Z investors are part of the next billion. Starting with smartphones and small amounts, they are buying Bitcoin, stablecoins, and tokenized assets to protect savings, access global markets, and build wealth beyond borders. @BinanceAngels #BinanceAngels #Binance

  • WorldOfMercek
    Mercek (@WorldOfMercek) reported

    Movement Labs went from raising over $38M and launching at a $10B FDV to filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in just 18 months. Its collapse shows how capital and token hype fail without sustainable ecosystem activity and protocol revenue. Here’s what actually led to Movement’s collapse. — ➤ Everything Changed After the Token Launch The December 2024 movement:native launch became the turning point after a reported sale of 66M tokens by a market maker triggered a rapid loss of confidence. - A reported sale of 66M tokens pushed the price from above $1 to just a few cents. - Community confidence faded as selling pressure accelerated. - Binance scrutiny and an internal investigation soon followed. - Co-founder @rushimanche was later removed. The selloff quickly became a credibility crisis, undermining confidence across the project and its leadership. — ➤ The Business Wasn't Generating Real Demand Movement failed to generate meaningful economic activity despite strong funding and early hype. - Daily app revenue stayed below $800 for months. - Daily chain fees fell into single digits, signaling limited network usage. - Protocol revenue never became strong enough to support long-term operations. As speculative demand faded, protocol revenue never became strong enough to sustain the business. — ➤ The Token Reflected the Business - movement:native fell over 97% from its ATH, while FDV dropped from nearly $10B to around $106M. - Ecosystem activity remained weak, and protocol revenue never materialized. - Treasury reserves continued to shrink as confidence faded. The token followed the business, as weakening fundamentals ultimately led to Chapter 11. — ➤ The Balance Sheet Told the Story The bankruptcy filing exposed how little financial runway remained. • Assets: $100K–$500K • Liabilities: $1M–$10M • Creditors: Around 299 — ➤ My Take Every cycle reminds us that capital and token demand are not product-market fit. Sustainable ecosystems are built on users, builders, and revenue, not valuations. Markets eventually price fundamentals.

  • lordarkskull
    CTRL+R | History on Chain (@lordarkskull) reported

    @bmac3503 You can get GRAM (formerly Toncoin) in a few ways: Buy it on exchanges Look for major crypto exchanges that list it (like Binance, OKX, Bybit, etc.). Just search for GRAM and trade it like any other coin. Use a TON-compatible wallet Wallets like Tonkeeper or Telegram Wallet support the network. You can receive, send, or swap GRAM there. Earn it inside Telegram apps Some Telegram mini apps, bots, or games reward users with GRAM. --- 💡 Important: The network is still TON (The Open Network) — only the coin name changed to GRAM.

  • ChazerX01
    Chazer | X (@ChazerX01) reported

    @binance Stale data kills AMMs. DSV pipe live institutional funding data on-chain with oracles + a Quadratic Valuation Curve. Price moves when the market moves, not when the block updates.

  • cryptoriskai
    CryptoRisk (@cryptoriskai) reported

    Why does 24/7 regulated BTC perpetuals matter? Right now, the offshore perp market (Binance, Bybit, etc.) handles hundreds of billions in monthly volume because it never closes. A regulated onshore equivalent with 24/7 access pulls that flow back into compliant infrastructure. That is a structural demand shift.

  • 0xChenez
    0xChen (@0xChenez) reported

    I just saw a Stock project listed on Binance Alpha. This shows the Stock meta has only just begun. I called the entry for Asteroid for you guys at around 100k mc. It just crossed 400k mc a moment ago. And I have the following reasons to believe it will go even higher: - Official SpaceX Event in September: The official SpaceX event is coming up this September when the Asteroid plushie goes on sale. - Artist Endorsement: The project has secured official support from the official Asteroid artist. - The Stock Meta: The Stock meta has just started, and Binance is kicking off the play. - Holder Rewards: Since launch, around $10,000 worth of$SPCX rewards have already been distributed to holders. I'm not selling my bag until it hits $10M. Hold to rich or ded. 0x38aAf33082B20AfF2e33433138de920f131B7777

  • CryptrixLabs
    Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported

    NEAR is on the radar, not in play — this only gets interesting on a strong 4-hour close back above $1.96. The daily chart shows NEAR wound into a very tight coil. That kind of compression almost always resolves with a sharp move, but right now the direction isn't decided, price is still trading under its recent two-week average, and every rally of the last stretch has been rejected at the same ceiling near $1.96. Zoom into the 4-hour view and the picture is why we're waiting instead of leaning in. The trend is still quietly drifting lower, buyers haven't stepped up with any real force, and the math of the range is unfriendly: the ceiling overhead is only about 1% away, while the nearest floor down at $1.89 is nearly 2% below. That's more room to fail than to work before price even reaches an obstacle — you're being asked to fight a wall while standing on thin ice. On the shortest timeframe there is one small green shoot: momentum has just ticked up off a washed-out low, which is the earliest possible hint of a bounce. The broader backdrop helps too — Bitcoin is steady, the dollar isn't pressing, and enough traders are betting against NEAR that a squeeze higher is possible if it catches a bid. But hint isn't confirmation. The two things that would put this back on the table are a clean flush into the $1.89 floor that actually holds, or a decisive 4-hour close back above $1.96 with real volume behind it. Until one of those prints, NEAR stays on the watchlist. — 📡 On the Radar · $NEAR · Available on Binance & MEXC

  • BSCNews
    BSCN (@BSCNews) reported

    Movement Labs files for Chapter 11 after a brutal year Movement Labs, the team behind the Move-based Ethereum layer 2, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, capping a punishing stretch that began almost as soon as its $MOVE token launched. The trouble traced to a market-making deal that let a single counterparty offload 66 million tokens a day after the December debut, sinking the price and triggering internal investigations. What followed was a slow unraveling, with Binance banning the market maker for misconduct, co-founder Rushi Manche departing in May 2025, and a June pivot from $ETH scaling to cross-border payments arriving too late to turn things around. Chapter 11 lets the company keep operating while it restructures, though it leaves the network, its partnerships, and the payments plan in limbo.

  • AssetMarketGuy
    Geoff B (@AssetMarketGuy) reported

    @binance Writer's block is just a plot twist waiting for a creative ending. The future's bright, let's ink it!

  • TaherMolla09
    Molla Taher (@TaherMolla09) reported

    @BinanceWallet @virtuals_io Until now I thought Binance was a corrupt currency exchanger. But now it is a gambling and casino site. i hate you

  • CryptrixLabs
    Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported

    KAITO is bumping its head on a ceiling near $0.996–1.03, and until that breaks with real force behind it, this one is just a watch — not a lean-in. Zoom out on the daily chart and KAITO has already had a big run. It's trading more than 70% above the level most traders use to define its longer-term trend, and it's pressed right up against the top of its recent range. That's historically the zone where moves stall and cool off, not where fresh legs start. The 4-hour picture makes the risk plain. Overhead resistance sits less than 1.5% away in the $0.996–1.03 band, while the nearest genuine support is all the way down near $0.95. In other words: a short walk to the ceiling, a long drop to the floor. Not the shape you want when you're stepping in fresh. Short-term momentum did just tick up off a soft patch, but the volume behind that turn is thin — a quiet nudge, not real buying. At the same time Bitcoin is quietly taking back market share, which usually means money is rotating out of alt-coins like this one rather than into them. The read flips if KAITO can post a 4-hour close above $1.03 with real volume behind it — that would mean the ceiling has actually broken, not just been tested. Short of that, the cleaner setup is a full reset back toward $0.95. Until one of those two things happens, it stays on the watchlist. — 📡 On the Radar · $KAITO · Available on Binance