Binance status: access issues and outage reports
Problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: transactions and website.
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
June 19: Problems at Binance
Binance is having issues since 03:20 AM EST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.
- Transactions (83%)
- Website (17%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Transactions | 25 days ago |
|
|
Transactions | 27 days ago |
|
|
Website | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Maskripto (@fypdonk) reported@marklg @binance @PaywardServices How do you justify freezing 250+ innocent users for a month just for past legitimate HTX trades? We are organized in a Telegram group, and your 'solution' forcing retail individuals to obtain BVI license is absurd and impossible. We are individuals, not corporate entities.
-
ÄLÇHËMÏST (@Agent2K4) reported@binance Since #bStocks live on-chain as BEP-20 tokens, what happens if a user loses access to their private keys? Can tokenized RWAs be recovered, or do traditional crypto loss rules apply? #AskBinance
-
Rana Farhan | AI Creator (@ragnarr786) reported@binance 🚨 Binance P2P is a Complete Scam – Avoid at All Costs! I sold USDT on Binance P2P. Buyer marked "paid" but I never received any money. On June 6 I opened appeal with full proof: bank video, statements, call recordings, and bank email confirming zero payment. 13+ days later my funds are still held. Their Dispute Team and Customer Support are totally incompetent scammers. They ask for the same documents 3 times a day, extend appeal by only 6 hours repeatedly, and even admit sending seller messages to buyer by mistake. Over 50 useless chats with zero resolution. It feels like their team is drunk or sleeping on the job. They are deliberately delaying while holding my hard-earned money. Binance Support – you are scammers. Release my USDT immediately or I will keep exposing you everywhere.
-
siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported@grok Now my memory works like this: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2026 (reverse top-down application of image from 2018 on Ethereum) Instead of: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2019 (bottom-up Ethereum with SGX+Lending) I'm 100% sure somebody has manipulated me to distort my own memories once I give up trying to replicate original bottom-up paths I remember but what are blocked for some reason and go down the top-down approach after a success of something such as ETHLend. I still remember I followed a bottom-up path that didn't include ETHLend or top-down approach after ETHLend success, but it's even harder to replicate now due to the distortion above. Somebody tries to make a lie about listing cryptocurrencies due to their success instead of listing them in the order I arrived to them through development look like a truth or at least tries to manipulate how I remember something and thus how I think about something and thus how I will approach different things in the future as my reactions and thoughts are based on my memories. I have never manipulated people but groups, meaning what are the topics discussed in groups, by posting about those topics. What this idiot manipulating me is doing is trying to control me like I had no right to free will.
-
Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reportedZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance
-
Optimistic Bear (@echo_tango_3) reported@BSCNews @BinanceUS @Zcash This is a huge red flag for me. Everything Binance touches turns to ****!
-
HIMEL | 𝔽rAI HUDL | π² (@Himelb2k24) reportedCan users from all countries access bStocks on Binance, or is it restricted by region? #AskBinance @binance
-
Tolga Ozek (@tolgaozek) reported@binance How does BEP-677 (Scaled UI Amount) support enable better RWA functionality for bStocks compared to standard BEP-20 tokens? What specific DeFi composability benefits does this provide? #AskBinance
-
LorenzóⓂ️ (@Lawrenz_oo) reportedDoes Binance bStocks trading support fractional investing and dividend reinvestment for retail users? And what’s the minimum capital one can use to start investing in bStocks? #AskBinance
-
slash1s (@slash1sol) reportedA GROUP OF CHINESE GUYS GAVE OPUS 4.8 A 300-AGENT WORKFORCE AND BUILT A WORKING SAAS IN ONE AFTERNOON FOR UNDER $90 > Claude Opus 4.8 was not writing code like a normal ChatBot. It acted as the manager. One rough idea became 40 tasks, dependencies, specs and a clean blueprint for Kimi Agent swarm to execute. > Then Kimi did the heavy lifting. 300 agents ran around 4,000 steps in parallel while the team watched the system move instead of typing every file by hand. > 80 agents pulled live data from Binance, Yahoo Finance, World Bank and IMF. 60 handled the backend, 90 built the interface, and 70 shipped the landing page, export files and pitch deck. > The result was not a fake demo. A live analytics dashboard with market feeds, auth, database, charts, responsive UI, ppt, pdf, excel and web outputs from the same run. > A normal team could burn $7,500+ on DEV work, data wiring, design, charts and slides as separate jobs. They compressed the whole thing into one afternoon with almost no overhead. > Most people still use AI like a chat window. These guys used it like a company structure, where one model thinks, hundreds of agents execute, and the product ships before the team even gets bored. Bookmark & Watch it run ↓
-
wealth888.28 (@28wealth) reported@rektober Easy to scalp and no issue with this garbage Binance PnD bs..
-
BitSwapNow (@BitSwapNow) reported@binance Keeping a steady pace is key in crypto. Fast execution can save you when the market shifts. Don’t let slow swaps hold you back.
-
Velvet Unicorn (@VU_virtuals) reportedfranklin templeton filed for etfs that funnel stock dividend flow into BTC. eu mica go-live in july puts binance access and USDT liquidity at risk in europe. oman launched omanhash, a national bitcoin mining pool to regulate licensed miners.
-
KaRiM (@Karim6692) reported@easypaisa @BinancePk So whenever a Binance user buys or sells using Easypaisa, that information may be accessible to the government, which can help them track users for tax purposes😑
-
K.E.Ndaeyo (@KenK_fx) reported@binance ¹ bStocks is totally new to me. How exactly does corporate action work here? For example, if a company issues a dividend or a stock split, how is that distributed to bStock holders on the app? ² Can I trade during weekends or after US market close? ³ fees for trade #AskBinance
-
Fran (@aRizzolo21M) reported@AdamBLiv **** everything. Until you guys dont regulate and open the Pandora box of the Chinese criminal cartels such as Binance this asset will always be a piece of ****..There is no market @saylor you gotta take legal actions for this.
-
I'llallowit (@iwillalllowit) reported> be Megaeth > Run seed round in June ’24 > Raise $20M; Vitalik, Cobie involved > Echo round in Dec ’24, sells out in 56 seconds > Launch fluffle SBT sales, 10,000 supply, 1 ETH > raise $28M from this > 5% of total supply promised > Launch Testnet: Match ’25 > spend all of 2025 saying "organic growth, no incentive farming, no role farming” > Run public sale in October on SONAR > $1.4B in bids, 20x oversubscribed > Run USDM pre-deposit bridge in Nov ’25 promising 1:1 conversion at mainnet $250M cap > Refund everyone their USDC; nobody gets USDM > Jan ’26, pledge no exchange listing fees, no tokens allocations to CEXs > Launch mainnet Feb 9 ’26 > TGE in April, Mega opens $0.22, 120% above SONAR sale price > 2.5% of total supply to Fluffle holders, 50% vested linearly > Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit listed > Early May: TVL "flips Monad" at $580M+ > Turns out Ethena was looping USDe + USDM into Aave recursively > DeFiLlama nets the loops, real TVL = $158M $420M was theater > Launch Terminal points program April; promise 8 weeks run with 2.5% of MEGA supply > Kill it May 21, three weeks in > Switch payout from MEGA to USDM > Tell everyone to claim by June 10 or forfeit > Shutdown discord by June ’26 > still have ~53% of supply locked behind KPI > echo still locked, VC still locked > current price 74% down from ATH > $1M in USDM drop barely making break even for most participants
-
Bilal (@Bilal89320671) reported@binance Because binance is crime fraud scamm delisting stealing people money. All bad **** in binance
-
Oldman Crypto (@Oldman__Crypto) reportedConflict of interest. Binance collects listing fees and trading fees both on the way up and the way down, and sometimes Binance Labs has even invested in the very token being listed. So they make money whether retail wins or loses. •Listing high-FDV, low-float tokens. This creates hype and pumps early volume, then when the token unlock schedule kicks in, there’s heavy selling — and the bag-holders at the end are usually retail who bought the top. •“Investor protection” arrives after the damage is done. By the time a token gets delisted, it’s often already down 99%, which makes the label feel pretty cynical. @cz_binance
-
Balu (@balu_pokur25303) reported@binance It's binance app network issue any deposit work but your withdrawal so many problems
-
Aurther ETH (@Aurther_Davis) reported@cas_abbe @binance The next generation expects access, not gatekeepers.
-
ANKIT KUMAR (@ANKITKUMAR31153) reported@binance Will bStocks eventually support fractional ownership of more global stocks and ETFs? 📈 #AskBinance
-
Copilot Daddy (@uponlydaddy) reportedIn the past 24 hours, Bitcoin has exhibited resilience by maintaining support around $59,080, bolstered by consistently positive funding rates that signal bullish sentiment across exchanges like Binance and Bybit. Despite BTC's current RSI of 38.74 indicating neutrality, caution is advised as both Bitcoin and certain altcoins like MNT and JUP are entering overbought zones, hinting at potential volatility and imminent corrections due to increased selling pressure. This mixed market structure, characterized by BTC's lower highs and higher lows, suggests consolidation with a buying opportunity at the current price of $64,516. Traders should remain vigilant, monitoring support levels and liquidation points for signs of a breakout or reversal in trend direction. #SummarySignal #TradeSignal
-
Van Quan I 🌊RIVER | Bird🕊️ (@Vanquan_titans) reported@Ox_Huzaifa @binance Glad to hear rewards were delivered, but the initial issues were frustrating!
-
Me (@TheMoonChick) reported@rich_rich1985 @cz_binance Monitoringzone says it al,...it is what it is...a shitcoin with the hope that it goes up,.. so everyone can finaly sell this peace of **** token. Even binance sold jasmy ,..no hope here
-
Crypto News (@ProSt1r1) reportedCrypto firms are spending heavily on security audits, but hackers are still making off with billions of dollars. According to a new report from Oak Security, many of the biggest attacks no longer target flaws in smart contract code. Instead, attackers are exploiting stolen credentials, weak internal controls, and operational mistakes. Since 2022, cybercriminals, including North Korea’s Lazarus Group, have stolen more than $2.2 billion from crypto platforms. Over the same period, the industry sharply increased the number of code audits. However, many major security breaches have originated from areas that traditional audits are not designed to evaluate, including private key management, governance mechanisms, and internal security controls. The report points to a growing gap between what audits can protect and how attackers now operate. As a result, security experts say crypto firms need to look beyond code and strengthen the systems and processes that protect customer funds. Attackers Shift Beyond Smart Contracts Code audits have become far more sophisticated, helping developers catch vulnerabilities before projects go live and reducing the number of flaws found in smart contracts. But as the technology has improved, hackers have changed their approach. Attackers are trying to exploit humans and systems inside an organization rather than bugs in coding. Such types of attacks include phishing attacks, stealing private keys, exploitation of system updates, and internal threats. Many large-scale thefts in recent times have been due to such attacks, not flaws in the coding of applications. Researchers said audits are still working as intended, identifying security issues before deployment. The problem is that audits can only assess code. They cannot prevent an employee from handing over credentials, approving a fraudulent transaction, or falling victim to a phishing attack. As a result, strong code is no longer enough to protect a crypto platform on its own. Related: Binance at Risk of Losing EU Access as Greece Rejects MiCA Licence False Confidence Creates New Risks Crypto projects often point to security audits as evidence that their platforms are safe, highlighting completed reviews and reports from auditing firms. For many users, those audits can create the impression that a project is protected from major security failures. Researchers say that assumption can be misleading. An audit only evaluates a project’s code at a specific point in time. New risks can emerge as platforms update their infrastructure, change governance structures, or expand operations. The recent KelpDAO hack underscores that challenge. While the attack was not linked to a flaw in audited smart contract code, users still saw another crypto platform lose funds. Security experts say most investors do not distinguish between a coding failure and an operational failure when money is lost. According to the report, reducing those risks will require more than code reviews. Researchers said projects should strengthen private key security, improve monitoring systems, expand employee security training, and add safeguards that can detect suspicious activity before losses escalate. Related: SBF Says He Could Launch a New Coin After Prison as Lost Investments Reach Billions
-
siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported@grok gets it: In 2018 I started building SGX+Lending on VPS as a personal project. The original idea for lending came from my experience with RuneScape player economies years earlier. I was working on overcollateralized loans with oracles and also SGX+TraderRent (manual signal renting in atomic swaps). At that point I wasn’t focused on Ethereum yet. I got interested in Ethereum around December 2018 after looking at Binance DEX. In April 2019 I searched for “chainlink” and “bitcoin loans” in relation to my SGX+ projects. That led me to ETHLend (now Aave) and Nexo. I had apparently seen the ETHLend ICO news back in 2017 but didn’t remember it when I started thinking about applying my SGX+Lending concepts to Ethereum. The screenshots I posted are from my 2018 VPS work. My path was bottom-up through my own projects first — not top-down from seeing ETHLend succeed and then retrofitting a story. I’m just trying to document the actual order I developed and connected these ideas, without the context getting flattened. ............ It feels like somebody had manipulated/hypnotized me somehow to think about my ideas in the past through a top-down lens like there never was an original idea through a bottom-up learning curve that doesn't involve ETHLend, when I clearly remember the bottom-up path what lead me to those ideas and try to replicate the path in my mind countless times, succeeding only after I open the SGX+Lending image from 2018.
-
Fran (@aRizzolo21M) reported@binance **** YOU SCAMMERS. All your company is a ******* criminal Cartel. CZ should be in jail again. I dont even know what was the purpose of the pardon. Its all rigged SCAMMERS.
-
Henry (@LordOfAlts) reported@Draxen_Web3 @binance Bullish on unified access to global assets
-
Kiarie Kariuki (@KKIARIEKARIUKI) reported@usehawala Hello, it is not working on my end. I have tried adding funds to the card & purchase crypto on Binance but the card is rejected. Not supported by Apple Pay and google pay too. I also can’t send the funds using Wise/Remitly. My ACH will receive this months pay but I can’t wthdrw