Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	7 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	1 month ago
Seattle	Website	1 month ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  leextstyle (@leext34) reported 3 minutes ago

  I think 90% of “crypto narratives” are completely useless and why you can be exit liquidity. And the more I look at token performance after listings, the harder it is to disagree. We have thousands of projects with: > billions in FDV > massive Twitter communities > KOLs shilling them > “revolutionary” technology > points programs > airdrops > huge exchange listings And then something very predictable happens. The hype disappears. The liquidity dries up. Unlocks start hitting the market. And the token slowly bleeds for months. According to CoinGecko's research across 12 major centralized exchanges, only around 32% of newly listed tokens were still above their listing price after 30 days. After a year, on most exchanges, less than 10% remained above their initial listing price. Read that again. If you bought a random new token at listing and simply held it for a year, the odds were heavily against you. And this is where I think the problem with crypto narratives becomes obvious. A lot of projects don't actually need to create long-term value. They only need to create enough demand at launch. Give users points. Promise an airdrop. Build a massive community. Get listed on a major exchange. Get a few big accounts talking about it. Create the illusion that everyone is early. Then the token launches. And suddenly thousands of people who received tokens for free have a very good reason to sell them. CoinGecko looked at the 50 biggest airdrops and found that 23 of them reached their peak price within the first two weeks after the airdrop. That's almost half. The market often gets the maximum attention right when the maximum amount of free supply enters people's wallets. And this creates a weird situation: The community thinks: “The airdrop created millions of users.” But sometimes what it actually created was: millions of potential sellers. That's not necessarily the same thing as product-market fit. And I'm not saying every altcoin is useless. There are absolutely projects creating real products, real revenue, real users and real infrastructure. But that's exactly the point. You shouldn't assume a token has value just because the project has a narrative. A good product not good token. A lot of users not token demand. A huge community not long-term holders. A massive FDV not a valuable network. And an airdrop not adoption. The biggest mistake retail makes is confusing attention with value. A token can have 500K followers. Millions of impressions. A $2B FDV. And still have almost no reason for someone to hold it six months later. That's why I think the next cycle won't be about finding the project with the coolest narrative. It will be about finding the projects where real demand exists after the incentives disappear. Because when the airdrop is over… when the points are gone… when the KOLs move to the next narrative… when the unlocks start… what is left? That's the question I'd ask before buying any altcoin. Not: “Who is backing it?” Not: “Is Binance going to list it?” Not: “Is CT bullish?” But: “Why would someone still want to own this token in 2 years?” If the answer is unclear… maybe the token was never the product. Maybe you were the exit liquidity.

• 
  Ex Nihilio (@SamuraiFlare) reported 4 minutes ago

  The issue with $ansem shills they work mostly work for low caps just based on dynamics. But any other shill attached to futures is free money for exchanges. They love liquidating Leverage junkies and that's who he attracts. $Hype and binance will have a field day

• 
  boshdolski (@boshdolski) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance Working hard in the kitchen i wish i could know about it

• 
  max 🐂🀄️ (@mostluckiestmax) reported 10 minutes ago

  [the real reason binance is delaying the $MARSCOIN listing] “they are getting ready to do a massive push on this new feature, which is depositing and withdrawing real us stocks” everyone is asking why cz hasn't listed marscoin yet @rasmr_eth breaks down the strategic delay, and it has nothing to do with the token itself binance is preparing a massive infrastructure upgrade. here is the actual game plan: > binance is rolling out a feature to deposit and withdraw real us stocks > they are intentionally holding back on the marscoin listing until this integration is fully rolled out. > they want the us stock feature fully ready exactly when marscoin starts its massive push. they aren't ignoring the market, they are preparing a dual catalyst launch to maximize attention and utility

• 
  Dr Crypto (@DrCrypto__X) reported 10 minutes ago

  An Open Message to Major Crypto Exchanges: #Binance , #bitget and Everyone Leading This Industry Bitget has announced nearly $40 million in compensation for users affected by abnormal price movements that resulted in massive liquidations. First, this deserves recognition. Admitting that something went wrong, taking responsibility, and compensating affected users is a strong step, and Bitget deserves respect for doing it. But this also raises a much bigger question: Did this happen out of nowhere? And why are we seeing situations like this repeatedly across crypto markets? This is not about Bitget alone. We have seen tokens on multiple major exchanges experience extreme and sometimes difficult-to-explain price movements, followed by millions of dollars in liquidations within a very short period of time. Of course, leverage carries risk. Traders who choose high leverage must accept responsibility for that risk. But trader responsibility should not eliminate exchange responsibility. When relatively illiquid markets are combined with high leverage, concentrated positions, aggressive liquidation mechanisms, and sudden abnormal price movements, we create an environment where enormous amounts of user capital can disappear within minutes. This is where I believe the largest exchanges need to lead. Bitget, Binance, and every major platform have access to market data and infrastructure far beyond what an ordinary retail trader can see. You can monitor liquidity depth, open interest, position concentration, abnormal order flow, liquidation clusters, volatility and potential manipulation in real time. So perhaps the industry needs to move beyond simply asking: “Why did traders use so much leverage?” And start asking: “Why was this level of leverage available in a market with this level of liquidity and potential manipulation in the first place?” Maybe the solution requires dynamic leverage limits based on liquidity. Maybe exchanges need stronger safeguards when abnormal price behavior is detected. Maybe listing standards, market-maker activity, liquidation mechanisms and position concentration need greater transparency and oversight. Or perhaps the industry needs entirely new mechanisms. I don’t claim to have the perfect solution. But the largest exchanges have the data, technology, expertise and resources to find one. Compensation after an incident is admirable. Preventing the next incident would be even more important. Crypto has lost more than capital over the past few years. It has lost liquidity, participants, and most importantly, trust. If we genuinely want this industry to grow again, protecting market integrity cannot remain secondary to increasing trading volume. So this is a sincere request to Bitget, Binance, and every exchange helping shape the future of crypto: Please work together and find a solution. Make manipulation harder. Make leverage smarter. Make abnormal market conditions safer. And give people a reason to trust crypto markets again. The industry doesn’t only need more users. It needs users who believe the market is worth staying in. Let’s make crypto great again.

• 
  mandaC🇱🇨 (@Mamacastang28) reported 12 minutes ago

  @binance Working

• 
  Rock1988 (@cmaDxB) reported 13 minutes ago

  @WatcherGuru Crypto went from shitcoin to deepshit coin. Nobody want Binance deepshitcoin anymore , they made last round money from deepshit coin creator as listing fee as much possible... Nobody anymore have to smell it to find its **** , it's visible from far away that is deepshit...

• 
  John Anderson (@JohnAnders66671) reported 13 minutes ago

  @RausGeorge @MoonbeamNetwork are you slow its confidential they cant just blast all the info while in negotiations with Binance you sound like amateur that would piss Binance off & posssibly escalate delisting they are waiting to respond until resolving the issue obviously. Merging the tokens is a dumb idea

• 
  PEPE 🔮 (@pepearaucano) reported 14 minutes ago

  Binance drops a monitoring tag on $GLMR and they go: “We’re talking to Binance to fix it.” Sure, same energy as when they drained the liquidity and said “just migrate, trust us.” Zombie project with an AI agents rebrand. Congrats, scammers with a pitch deck. @zachxbt

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 17 minutes ago

  🚨𝗚𝗟𝗢𝗕𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗧 𝗩𝗢𝗟𝗨𝗠𝗘 𝗣𝗟𝗨𝗠𝗠𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝟮𝟭.𝟳% 𝗜𝗡 𝗝𝗨𝗟𝗬! Spot trading across 14 leading exchanges fell to $429.0 billion in July, down from $547.9 billion in June. Every exchange saw a dip. Binance led with $196.5 billion (45.8% of total), followed by OKX ($41.6 billion) and Bybit ($36.3 billion), together making up 64% of activity. Uniswap ($UNI) had the mildest drop at 9.8%, while Bitfinex slumped 59.7%, Coinbase 26.4% and Bybit 24.5%.

• 
  DeadxDaze (@send_hbar) reported 18 minutes ago

  @aroogle Bro in like 2022 or 23 tje volume on binance was under a mil usdt. We need that dead type **** again. These paper hand mfs need to sell first

• 
  Caszet07 (@caszet0736767) reported 22 minutes ago

  As the deadline approached in 2026, Binance was still working through its European licensing strategy. On June 24, 2026, Binance withdrew its application for a MiCA licence in Greece and indicated that it would pursue authorisation through another European jurisdiction.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 23 minutes ago

  @CanGavro vana down 97% from december ath at $35, now $0.86 evm l1 for user-owned data pools that feed ai training. binance ran a trading tournament for it 20 days ago

• 
  iamlequanghuong🪬 (@iamlequanghuong) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Mayacrypt @binance wtf is this?

• 
  🌊🌊🌎🌊 marius schwarz (@Crypto_Argo) reported 26 minutes ago

  @TerraHaberTr I am certain: CZ and Binance are working hard behind the scenes to rectify the financial damage! They are still holding their $LUNC! Binance, too, suffered significant losses from the crash.

• 
  The Announcer🐧 (@TheAnnouncerUK) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Ayzacoder This is not real. There is no verified 19-year-old (American or otherwise) who built a Claude Code trading bot in 2 days that turned $68 into $750,000.This exact claim (or near-identical versions swapping “American”/“Japanese,” the same $68 start, $6,732 first-night profit, $750k total, iPad second monitor, “50 markets,” Binance BTC data, arbitrage on price errors, etc.) has been circulating for months as recycled engagement-bait. Multiple independent checks, including prior analyses of the accompanying dashboard videos, show:No name, no identity, no GitHub, no wallet addresses, no on-chain records, no trade history, and no credible proof of any kind. The video is a sped-up simulated trading interface (often labeled or clearly stylized as simulated / unrealistic PnL curves), not live verified results. Accounts post the story, then demand “Comment ‘Fable’ + Like + Repost + Follow” so they can “DM the complete setup.” This is classic engagement farming. The DMs (if any arrive) are typically empty, a generic prompt, an upsell, a phishing attempt for API keys/exchange credentials, or worse.

• 
  0xSuji_Web3 (@its_me_sj_offl) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Crypto__Haris UID binance - 373819096 following 2 months brother please help me 😭

• 
  Tulips (@alkhadji) reported 34 minutes ago

  🚨$XRP Momentum Is Starting to Show Its Hand!🚨 Another week kicking off, and we're starting to see momentum come through. IMO, XRP is STILL working its way toward the $0.87 macro support on Coinbase. The expected pauses along the way are EXACTLY what we want to see! First is $1.00. That's a major psychological level AND Binance's macro .786 retracement (hasn't been tested in that market), so continued reaction/consolidation here makes complete sense... It gives the RSI time to cool off and selling pressure weaken. From there, I'm watching for momentum to build into a stronger break, potentially around midweek...? #xrpcrypto #xrpupdate #cryptocurrencies

• 
  Cosmos (@fcoursedk) reported 36 minutes ago

  Any help how I can import my DeFi wallet to binance

• 
  MoneyLord (@MoneyLord) reported 37 minutes ago

  You really think $MARSCOIN tops at 60m? binance alpha, direct binance mention first time in history on @binancezh mentions CA, binance competition Its a skill issue if you sold early 1B+ nothing less for this one

• 
  Claudio 𐤊 ✈ (@monrad24) reported 37 minutes ago

  @InvestwithDoc @binance Most of us did. Last time we checked, they asked for 3% of the supply, which is crazy for a fair launched project. They had no problem listing KAS on futures though.

• 
  SureTrades (@Gboodaman) reported 38 minutes ago

  $AXTI just doubled in a week. The bigger question now is: can liquidity handle the volatility? $AXTI surged from around $50 to $88.58 after a major earnings beat, putting the compound-semiconductor supplier at the center of the AI optical-interconnect trade. The numbers explain the move: Q2 revenue: $47.60M, vs. $34.10M expected Q2 EPS: $0.19, vs. $0.07 expected Q3 revenue guidance: $66M, vs. $38.80M expected Market cap: roughly $5.8B The bigger story is InP. AXTI supplies indium phosphide substrates used in the lasers behind 800G and 1.6T optical modules. With more than $100M in hard orders and capacity approaching saturation, the company sits upstream of a critical AI infrastructure bottleneck. But when a stock moves this quickly, liquidity becomes part of the trade thesis. Large orders can move thin books, creating slippage and making entry or exit prices very different from what traders expected. That's why order-book depth matters especially for larger positions. Recent liquidity data shows @bitget 's rToken and Stock Perps offering deeper liquidity for names including AXTI, SPCX, SNDK and AMD than competing venues such as Binance, OKX, Bybit and Hyperliquid. That gives traders more flexibility to express a view without automatically shrinking position size just to manage market impact. For AXTI, I'd be watching whether price can hold the breakout structure after such an aggressive repricing. Strong fundamentals can support a trend, but chasing a vertical move without confirmation is a different trade entirely. Trade the AI infrastructure trend but respect the liquidity behind the price. #AXTI #AI #StockMarket

• 
  Virgill (@Virgill007) reported 38 minutes ago

  It has been several hours since i filled your formulary to send My bigo payment to My binance wallet and still no money i need help what is going on! My withdrawal reference is ***-317928-PYT @TripleAHQ

• 
  Max Wynn (@imamaxwynner) reported 39 minutes ago

  @BOBBNBCHAIN Wow now bob isnt shelved! i cant believe this is actually a binance deployer wtf

• 
  Samuel desmond (@iamDchapter) reported 40 minutes ago

  @binance Was still in school, not working then, don't know about Bitcoin.

• 
  SAYED (@SayedVision) reported 43 minutes ago

  @binance Strong recovery from support could make $BB interesting again

• 
  Financier.news (@FINANCIERNEWS) reported 45 minutes ago

  $XRP Hits YTD Low at $1, Down 60% From January Peak XRP slid over 3% to $1 on Bitstamp Tuesday, its weakest level since November 2024, with market cap dropping to $62.8B from $65B. The token has fallen nearly 60% since its Jan. 6 peak of $2.40. Analyst Vincent Van Code warns thin Binance books are the trigger: 24-hour volume collapsed to $68M from $1B, with just $4M in sell orders enough to push XRP to $0.95 and liquidate crowded longs. #CryptoExchanges #Markets

• 
  Stupifff (@Stupifff) reported 51 minutes ago

  2017 ICOs were NOT like the fabled alt szn brother We would read a 1 page white paper with an address at the bottom and you would send 1Eth and pray. It would be some retarded *** use case like a coin to pay for Hotel stays, or a coin designed to be sent on mobile to third world countries (Telcoin), coins used for home sharing networks (Bee Token), Decentralized P2P Video coin (Theta), Korean Ethereum (ICX) It sounds stupid now but back then this **** was ground breaking technology and we would throw money at it. Stay with me now. To transact online, you would need to go to MyEtherWallet and paste in your private key (actually) or plug in your ledger, manually set gas, there was no dApp connections, everything was manual. No Rabby or Phantom. We would follow Ian Balina's lists like the ******' bible, any ICO he shilled would instantly get 10x over subscribed. Bro was the original shitcoin KOL. It was so wild west and there was so much opportunity that we would see Binance Coin at $2 and think it was a waste of time because why should an exchange need a token? Most of your ICOs would rug and you would never get your tokens or your Eth back. Others would send you the tokens and they'll be worth almost nothing. But, if you just held (or forget about that ledger for a few years, in my case) sometimes you come back a surprise like Half a bitcoin in that stupid hotel coin, or a couple of bitcoin worth of Theta or Telcoin in 2021 So no, we weren't trading against plumbers. We were cowboys in the wild west and there was no sheriff in town.

• 
  0xLenx (@0xLenx) reported 55 minutes ago

  2/ In June alone, the five major won exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, Gopax) sent 2.76 trillion won in stablecoins offshore and got 2.20 trillion back, a net outflow of about $367M in a single month. Where's it going? Offshore platforms like Binance and Bybit, which offer leveraged products and even contracts tied to Korean stocks that domestic exchanges are legally barred from providing under the Specific Financial Information Act. The Bank of Korea keeps insisting any won stablecoin has to be bank-led, which is prudent, but also slow. So the question is whether the won stablecoin arrives fast enough to actually pull that flow back, or if by the time it launches, an entire generation of Korean traders has already built their habits around offshore rails instead.

• 
  CyreneAI (@CyreneAI) reported 59 minutes ago

  Crypto has Trillions in assets but still doesn't have a financial data standard. That's a pretty insane infrastructure gap. @KryptosConnect is building the layer to fix it. One API connecting 5,500+ sources across blockchains, exchanges and wallets. - $300M+ tracked daily - 120,000+ connected accounts - Official tax infrastructure partner to @binance UK, @Phemex_official, and Bitstamp by Robinhood. The goal: one clean financial data layer for the entire digital asset economy. 🎦Launch Stream at 12:30 PM UTC and goes live on CyreneAI at 1:30 PM UTC