Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (43%)
• Transactions (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	20 days ago
Itu	Website	26 days ago
Seattle	Website	26 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) reported 12 seconds ago

  JUST IN: Binance founder CZ- “I support all meme coins. I might even buy (or sell) one or two in the next few weeks to test a few new things. May the best memes win!” CZ clarified he had no involvement in the recent sale of meme tokens sent to him or binance, explaining that Giggle Academy routinely converts most donated tokens into BNB at month-end to fund its free education initiative, rather than burning them.

• 
  Super Degen 💎 (@SuperDegen) reported 2 minutes ago

  @BinanceResearch Binance Research dropping the Half-Year 2026 On-Chain Markets report breaking down H1 trends

• 
  JTC (@JTCdev) reported 7 minutes ago

  This is a big deal. Binance (US) with a DCM license means regulated, mainstream access to prediction markets at serious scale. Polymarket built the culture. Kalshi got the regulatory stamp first. Now the biggest name in crypto retail is coming for the space.

• 
  kioto (@0xkioto) reported 8 minutes ago

  Back from vacation with another play Honestly this isn’t an underdog play and it’s talked widely on the TL but I think people don't realize the narrative behind $MARSCOIN Marscoin was discussed by elon musk and cz in a tweet in 2021. CZ suggested to launch this coin and elon agreed. CZ said he will list it if it has some utility. CZ is the 17th richest person on earth. Today he quoted a tweet saying he will be buying some memes over the next weeks. The second quote was to an account named "Mars 🟧". 4 hours before Marscoin was listed on binance alpha. Nothing of this is a coincidence. We have seen CZ publicly buy three coins. (afaik) aster (7B ath) tst (500M ath) mubarak (220M ath) CZ is well aware of Vlads actions. Softshilling memes, following projects etc. He saw how well it worked but realized that rh cooled down because no coins were listed yet. Thats his chance to regain momentum for his chain. He can list Marscoin and people will learn to dream again. Marscoin is also paired with SPCX which makes it a RWA pair. Binance is pivoting to RWAs recently and wants them to take off. There is even a dedicated page to "Stock memes" that marscoin leads. The coin does exactly that and revives meme culture on their chain at the same time. Thats another incentive for them to list it / buy it / talk about it.

• 
  Backtesting Arena (@SifuBacktest) reported 8 minutes ago

  𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀, 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗪𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘂𝘁𝗲 — 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝘆𝗰𝗸𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝗦𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 In the first article we showed that the Wyckoff Spring runs against the documented order-flow research. Carol Osler's work indicates that price accelerates after crossing stop-loss clusters rather than reversing — and the Spring lives in exactly that zone. This article is the pre-registration. The rules for our test, published before we have calculated a single number. Including a control group that exposed a gap in our own method. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 We read three public Wyckoff scripts for TradingView, all under the Mozilla Public License. One detects the entire schematic with a state machine across all five phases. One marks Springs only. One does something else entirely, which we come back to. The difference is instructive, and it is not about the authors' care. PHASES ARE STATES, NOT EVENTS. The larger script carries a variable travelling from Phase A to Phase E, driven by roughly twenty hard-coded thresholds. The state depends on the whole path price took to get there. It never resets and it never expires. So you cannot say "there were 47 Phase C events, and on average this followed." There are no 47 events. There is a state that was entered at some point and gets overwritten by something else at another. A Spring is a timestamp. Timestamps can be counted, set against what happened next, and compared to a baseline. Testability is a property of scope, not of diligence. All three scripts are competently written. Only some ask a question that can have an answer. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 If you code a rule, look at the result, then adjust the parameters, you will always end up finding something. Not through dishonesty — it happens on its own. You try a different pivot length because the first one "didn't look right". You nudge the volume threshold. Five passes later you have a rule that works on exactly this data and nothing else. The only mechanical protection is writing the rules down beforehand and publishing them. After that they cannot be changed quietly. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲 • PIVOT — a bar whose low is below the six bars before it and no higher than the six after. Which means it confirms six bars late. That is deliberate: it was not known earlier, so it may not be used earlier • VALID LEVEL — a confirmed pivot low that was also the low of its trailing twenty bars. That puts it at the bottom edge of a range rather than somewhere in the middle • SPRING — price trades below a valid level but closes above it. The low must also be the lowest of the trailing twenty bars, and the level must not have been broken more than three times before. Each level fires at most once • ENTRY — at the close of the bar the Spring occurs on. Not at the low. The low was not tradeable at the moment of the decision • MEASURED — price movement over 5, 10 and 20 bars afterward, net of 0.1% costs per side. No optimised exit, no stop, or the study answers a different question • BENCHMARK — the unconditional forward return over the same horizons, same window, same universe • UNIVERSE — Bitcoin plus the nine most-traded USDT pairs on Binance, ranked by December 2019 volume, not by today's survivors: BTC, ETH, MATIC, BNB, TRX, XRP, EOS, LTC, BCH, VET. That MATIC ranked third then and VET tenth is the point — today's list would differ The benchmark is the single most important item on the list. A positive return after a Spring says nothing until you know what the market did anyway over the same stretch. And the 2020-dated universe is the reason the number will not just be a survivorship artefact. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁 𝗢𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗿 Here is the property that matters. Our rule only fires once the close has ALREADY RECLAIMED support. It therefore does not predict the reversal — it selects precisely those cases where the cascade failed to run. So the question is no longer "does price reverse after a break". It becomes: does the subset where the cascade did not run behave differently afterward than the market as a whole? Narrower, sharper, answerable. Without Osler's paper we would not have framed it this way. 𝗩𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 The teaching is not unanimous here. A Spring is read one way as absorption by large buyers — which implies high volume. And another way as evidence that no supply remains — which implies low. Both readings are common. So we measure three ways: no volume condition, high volume, low volume. If both extremes give the same answer, volume is not doing the work and the price pattern carries it alone. Both of the first two scripts test only for high volume. Neither notes that this was a choice. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 The third script defines the Spring like this: RSI rises above 30. That is all. No price level, no support, no trading range, no break with recovery, no volume. An oscillator crossing with a Wyckoff label on it. And it would test perfectly well. You could run it through the same machine — sample gate, benchmark, multiple-testing correction, look-ahead check — and get a clean number. For a question that has nothing to do with Wyckoff. Which exposes a gap we had not named. Everything else we check concerns the RELIABILITY of a result: is the number reproducible, is future information leaking in, does it hold against the right comparison. None of those checks asks WHETHER THE THING MEASURED IS THE THING ON THE LABEL. A backtest can be methodologically flawless and still measure the wrong thing. That is not an edge case. It is probably the more common failure — because it leaves no trace in the metrics. 𝗦𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗯𝗼 𝗴𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 The RSI crossing becomes a control group. Same horizons, same baseline, same costs, same gates. The placebo measures plain reversion from oversold. Our Spring additionally measures a price-level structure — the break and recovery of a confirmed support. Whatever the Wyckoff definition contributes on its own is exactly the gap between the two. 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁 Fixed in advance, because otherwise any configuration can be narrated into a finding afterward. • Spring works, placebo does not — the price-level structure contributes something • Both work, similar size — the Spring mostly measures oversold reversion, and the label is decoration • Both work, placebo clearly smaller — both effects are real and the structure adds on top • Neither works — neither rule shows anything on this data • Only the placebo works — the simpler rule beats the more elaborate one That last row is the outcome we would least enjoy. It is on the list for exactly that reason. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 • Under one standard error of difference — no detectable effect, regardless of sign • Under 30 events per variant — anecdote, reported as one • Fewer than 12 distinct months — one observation, not forty • Twelve combinations tested — corrected for multiple testing via the deflated Sharpe ratio • Prefix test — the series is computed twice, once on truncated data, and overlapping values must match exactly 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 We publish the result whatever it is. Effect found, no effect, or too few Springs to say anything. All three accepted in advance, all three reported the same way. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 A backtest whose rules were written after the first look at the numbers looks exactly like one whose rules came first. Same chart, same metrics, same confidence. The difference is the order — and the order does not appear anywhere in the output. So it appears here instead. Beforehand, with a date on it. The result follows. Study the Past — Improve your Future.

• 
  Alastar (@AlastarTrades) reported 11 minutes ago

  $BANK update On July 28, after the squeeze, I wrote that supply had moved onto hot wallets and there was more of it than at any point that week. Price is down 78% since then. Everything swept into cold storage during the accumulation phase is now back out: Bitget pulled 38M BANK from cold in four batches Gate pulled 18.348M, the same inventory it swept in yesterday Both hot wallets are now depositing straight into Binance Deposits into Binance have not slowed. Last 4h candle closed down 32.7%. BANK, AKE and US run through the same deposit addresses. The full sequence is now on record. #bank #bankusdt

• 
  Bittopia (@Bittopia_) reported 15 minutes ago

  @fveswvojk066829 @binance Coverage really is the key. Hopefully more merchants will support it over time.

• 
  Gemtoast (@gemtoast) reported 24 minutes ago

  USD1 showing up in Binance markets for tokenized equities is bigger than it looks this isn't just another place to park stables between trades once USD1 starts settling markets outside crypto-native assets, it starts becoming actual market infrastructure 24/7 access and leverage are cool but the settlement layer underneath is the part i'm watching

• 
  Cripto_signal.03 (@Criptoprime0) reported 24 minutes ago

  Profit or ****? Binance Futures #ATA/ $USDT Take-Profit target 1 ✅ Profit: 39.801% 📈 Period: 5 Hours 42 Minutes ⏰

• 
  ꧁༒AnGeL༒꧂ (@Ruslan357642) reported 24 minutes ago

  @binance What’s the news on Mica? I don’t want you to die; you post so much, yet you stay silent about the most important thing. Please reach out to someone for help, or give us an update on what is happening with Mica.

• 
  Usman | Web3 Builder🔸 (@BuildWithUsman) reported 25 minutes ago

  @ZoomexOfficial 🫡 My first crypto exchange was Binance. It earned my trust because it was easy to use, secure, and had everything I needed in one place. I used it for almost everything. Unfortunately, I stopped using it regularly after the P2P service was disabled in Nigeria. #zoomexsalute

• 
  Mutua.base.eth (@Mutuabrian_M) reported 26 minutes ago

  What this means for crypto users. If you hold USDT, USDC or any other stablecoin on a Kenyan licensed platform, the platform won't be allowed to issue interest on your holdings. If this stretches to offshore CEXs like Binance, OKX and the rest, features like Binance Earn will also be slashed for stablecoins. This has nothing to do with consumer protection. It’s all about protecting the local banks. They can't believe someone else is giving 5-8% APR on USDT when interests on their saving accounts are topping at 3%. On the brighter side, this does not touch on decentralized DeFi protocols like AAVE and Compound.

• 
  Slem 🍚 ⛓ (@slem1337) reported 27 minutes ago

  I USED TO THINK POLYMARKET LATENCY ARBITRAGE LOOKED LIKE FREE MONEY Binance moves first. Polymarket reacts a little later. A bot sees the move, buys the mispriced outcome and collects the difference. Simple, right? A new public research release has now tested that idea across 727 million synchronized Polymarket and Binance rows. The researchers matched 2.94 million cross-venue events across 54 Polymarket trading days and found that Polymarket quotes reacted to large Binance moves after a median 347 milliseconds. On paper, that sounds like a huge edge for a trading bot. In practice, it was not. A walk-forward model using 43 different microstructure features still failed to outperform the probability already embedded in Polymarket’s own order book. After the researchers added estimated fees and slippage, the strategy lost money. And this is where building trading bots becomes much more complicated than simply finding a signal. The bot still needs to detect the move, calculate the trade, submit the order, enter the queue and actually get filled before the market reprices. Even when Binance clearly moves first, most of the theoretical edge can disappear during execution. The lag is real. The obvious arbitrage is not. But that does not mean the dataset is useless. It probably means the more interesting opportunity is not predicting whether Bitcoin moves up or down. It may be identifying moments when Polymarket fails to reprice cleanly: • Liquidity disappears after a large Binance move • Spreads suddenly expand • Thin books create temporary dislocations • Prices get stuck near $0.01 or $0.99 • Market makers become overexposed on one side Most Polymarket latency bots are probably not competing over who sees the Binance move first anymore. They are competing over who can execute without giving the entire edge back through spread, slippage and queue position. Seeing the opportunity is easy. Actually getting paid for it is the hard part.

• 
  Maker | Perps & Ownership szn (@Nevergreen911) reported 28 minutes ago

  TL;DR: People who actually brought volume and metrics to GRVT for 3+ years will have to wait up to 6 hours before they can access their tokens. Meanwhile, Binance Alpha users get free $GRVT with no lockups, no vesting, and immediate liquidity. Yeah... another "high-tech, next-gen, top-tier" perp DEX choosing to screw over the community that got them here.

• 
  Mutua.base.eth (@Mutuabrian_M) reported 28 minutes ago

  What this means for crypto users. If you hold USDT, USDC or any other stablecoin on a Kenyan licensed platform, the platform won't be allowed to issue interest on your holdings. If this stretches to offshore CEXs like Binance, OKX and the rest, features like Binance Earn are will also be slashed for stablecoins. This has nothing to do with consumer protection. It’s all about protecting the local banks. They can't believe someone else is giving 5-8% APR on. USDT yet their savings accounts are topping at 3%. On the brighter side, this does not touch on decentralized DeFi protocols like AAVE and Compound.

• 
  seano ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ (@teethrichards) reported 30 minutes ago

  @cz_binance I was locked out of Binance for like 5 years. Forced HODL as a Service isn't something I signed up for, but it's probably better than some strategies in the long run.

• 
  Duaa **** Ghaza (@mc0kz) reported 31 minutes ago

  I hope that anyone who cares about my situation will donate to me via Binance wallet. I need the money to support my family. TFJwF3kK8fLtEqn4bQDoTbKTAzCDUuGk3J

• 
  Divine Arc (@divinexyz777) reported 32 minutes ago

  This stocks pair meme popularized by @longdotxyz but @vladtenev not support it Now binance take the hype , thats why we really need supportive dev VLADD PLSS CHECK LONGGGGGGG

• 
  Natalia (@Nataliaaly149) reported 34 minutes ago

  You bought crypto. Now what? Most people think the crypto journey is only about watching charts, finding entries, and waiting for the right time to sell. But holding an asset is also a decision. This is where crypto earning products come into the conversation. Instead of keeping your assets completely inactive, some products allow eligible users to explore ways to potentially earn rewards on supported crypto assets. One example is Binance Simple Earn. It offers different product types depending on what users are looking for: 🔹 Flexible Products For users who want more access to their assets and prefer not to commit for a fixed period. 🔹 Locked Products For users who are comfortable committing assets for a specific duration based on the product terms. But earning products are not just about chasing higher numbers. Before participating, users should understand: • Supported assets and availability can vary • Reward rates may change • Terms, risks, and eligibility requirements matter Crypto is not only about buying and selling. Understanding the tools available and knowing how they work is an important part of becoming a smarter participant in the ecosystem. Learn first. Explore responsibly. Make informed decisions. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Soumitra (@0xSenpie) reported 37 minutes ago

  you thought the $GRVT TGE couldn’t get any worse? it can! no checker on launch day 3-6 hours just to withdraw your own tokens while binance alpha users already dumped lol vesting games + rule changes mid-farm + still this garbage UX waiting half a day to move airdrop tokens in 2026 is actually insane honestly one of the worst TGEs I’ve seen in a long time @grvt_io really cooked themselves with this one if you are a perp dex looking to do a TGE, please learn from this

• 
  MIRZA (@mirza_sarmin) reported 40 minutes ago

  $GRVT tge is finally here — july 30. the day a lot of people have been waiting for. here's everything happening today. the big picture: · tge today, july 30. airdrop claims open at 21:00 (utc+8). · total airdrop pool: 280m grvt (28% of 1b supply). · season 1: 100m. season 2: 180m. all vested over 12 months. · if you registered before july 17, your first batch is auto-distributed. later registrations need to claim manually within 30 days per batch. listings: · binance alpha — confirmed, likely 1-2 hours before other cex. · bybit & kucoin — spot trading for grvt/usdt goes live at 14:00 utc. · coinbase — added to roadmap. deposit addresses are available, but deposits won't activate until the project unlocks transfers. · mexc — pre-market trading already live. last executed price around $0.41. pricing & valuation: · pre-market price on mexc: ~$0.41. implied fdv: ~$410m. · polymarket traders are betting on whether fdv crosses $500m the day after listing. · current spot price: ~$0.065. market cap: ~$65m. (note: price is still settling across venues) token transfer times: · deposits from ethereum network: ~20 minutes. · withdrawals (bridging out): minimum 3 hours, up to 6 hours. due to zksync protocol's minimum settlement delay. · expected to improve over time. what grvt actually is: it's a self-custodial on-chain wealth platform built on zksync's elastic chain. combines perpetual futures, spot trading, yield products, and tokenized assets in one account. you earn yield on deposits while using them as trading collateral. positions itself as a hybrid — cex-like ux with dex self-custody. utility of $grvt: · reduced trading fees · higher margin efficiency · priority access to treasury investments · governance · yield and payment rights my take: tge day is always chaotic. prices will swing. listings will roll out in waves. if you have an allocation, check your claim window. if you're trading, watch the spreads — pre-market doesn't always match spot. grvt is a legit project with real backing — $33m raised, backed by delphi ventures and hack vc. but tge day is about execution, not narratives. @grvt_io dyor!

• 
  Alpha (@nmalpha052) reported 46 minutes ago

  Most People Use Crypto for One Reason. They're Missing the Rest. Ask someone why they own crypto and you'll usually hear the same answer: "I'm waiting for the price to go up." But digital assets can serve more than one purpose. For eligible users, crypto earning products provide an opportunity to receive rewards on supported assets under specific product terms, rather than leaving them inactive. A well-known example is Binance Simple Earn, which offers two different approaches. 🟡 Flexible Products are built for users who want access to their supported assets while remaining eligible for rewards according to the product conditions. 🔒 Locked Products are designed for those who don't mind committing supported assets for a set duration, with reward structures that may differ. Neither approach is a one-size-fits-all solution. The right choice depends on your objectives, preferred level of access, and the terms of each product. Before getting started, it's worth checking which assets are supported in your region, along with eligibility requirements, reward rates, redemption rules, and availability. The more you understand the tools available in crypto, the better equipped you'll be to navigate the ecosystem. Educational content only. Not financial advice. Always do your own research and refer to official sources. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Binance Customer Support (@BinanceHelpDesk) reported 47 minutes ago

  @f_diamo @binance Hi there! We are aware of a fake announcement circulating online claiming that Binance is shutting down its operations. This information is false and does not originate from Binance. The platform remains fully operational. Don't believe the FUD, please rely only on Binance's official communication channels for accurate and trusted updates. ˆLP

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 53 minutes ago

  ALLO isn't ready yet — the trend is still pointing down and buyers need to reclaim about $0.319 on the hourly with real volume before this is worth leaning into. Zoom out and the daily chart tells the story: ALLO has been bleeding lower for weeks and is trading well under its average price of the last month. The next real ceiling overhead sits up near $0.36, and if sellers press harder there's no meaningful floor until $0.15. That's a lot of empty air in both directions, and right now gravity is winning. On the 4-hour chart the shorter-term average price is still sitting below the longer-term one — a simple way of saying recent buyers are underwater. Momentum hasn't actually turned up either, and every attempt to push into the $0.32–$0.35 zone has been sold. On the 4-hour and 1-hour charts there's also a subtle warning sign: price is making slightly lower highs while momentum makes slightly higher ones. That pattern usually resolves as the downtrend simply continuing after a brief pause, not as a real reversal. The 15-minute chart did bounce off a low, but volume behind it is thin and price is still trapped under the levels that would signal a genuine shift. There is some coiled-spring potential here — most traders are positioned against the coin and the range has tightened up, which can fuel a sharp squeeze — but that's kindling, not a fire. Trend and structure still point down. The line in the sand is clear: a clean hourly close back above roughly $0.319 with strong volume flips the read and puts ALLO back on the table. Until then, this one stays on the watchlist, not in the basket. — 📡 On the Radar · $ALLO · Available on Binance

• 
  Annihilator (@KhushalGabhane) reported 54 minutes ago

  @ZetoshiX Sometimes even if you know the clue. Universe don't want you to get what you need. Code for people but not for ones in EU. Know the direction but don't have a way to follow that. :( can't use the code in EU, as they have took down the binance app here

• 
  Unchained (@imoffchain) reported 54 minutes ago

  STEADY LADS WORKING ON BINANCE LISTING RN JUST A FEW MORE THINGS TO FILL OUT

• 
  CoinGape (@CoinGapeMedia) reported 56 minutes ago

  🚨 BINANCE IS BACK? After months of restrictions, millions of users can once again access the world’s largest crypto #exchange. Here’s what changed—and what it means for @Binance users. 🎥 Watch the full video below 👇

• 
  MendezNFTsr (@MendezNFTsr) reported 56 minutes ago

  @binance @AFKBNB black and yellow always look like a construction site warning to me this actually makes it work

• 
  ALPHA (@CKRcrypto) reported 57 minutes ago

  @czbinanceprd follow you with great interest. It is amazing that you are the founder of an exchange like Binance and that it provides services accessible in every corner of the world today. You are one of the first names that come to mind when people think of a "Bull" market in the crypto space. Recently, we have been having a hard time making sense of your comments and posts, and understanding what is happening behind the scenes. There are armed conflicts all over the world, and wars never end. If the rally is going to happen at a time when nobody knows or expects it, is this even possible in such an environment? Assets are just flooding the market with supply. Even projects with actual use cases fail to inspire confidence. I think we have all understood the importance of digital currency by now. But it feels like a gambling system where transactions are untraceable, and no one can claim any legal rights. I want to believe that this is not the case. I suspect that every post you make is a FOMO call and that you only care about yourself. You are a billionaire; when prices drop, you can make stronger purchases. But as altcoin investors with only $1,000 in hand, we cannot do that. Do whatever needs to be done. And I invite you to support the EIGEN coin. You are a powerhouse, and you should reflect this strength.

• 
  Tara (@Tipwotip) reported 58 minutes ago

  The prediction market trend is not slowing down Now Binance US wants to enter into it They planning to apply for a CFTC license next month If approved Binance will join: > Kalshi > Polymarket US > Gemini > Coinbase > Robinhood What do you think when this trend will end?