Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	27 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  YoGChill (@yogchill_) reported 7 minutes ago

  So the real question: If Robinhood and Vlad showed up for $CASHCAT by following + Robinhood listing, and Coinbase and Cobie showed up for $BASECAT by following + Coinbase listing at 8 million marketcap Why wouldn’t @cz_binance and @heyibinance eventually show up for $CETS? It’s the BIGGEST CAT MEME living on their chain You know? The one that also happens to be an RWA coin that rewards holders in tokenized gold?? Other chains followed their cats and listed them at much lower market caps. That support sent price flying. $CETS just hit $32M marketcap today with no large follow, no Binance Alpha listing, and no major CEX. The lucky gold cat already did it without the boost. Imagine what happens when it gets one.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 👀 /9_figure_coin @cetsongold

• 
  jeana🐂 (@jeannaxr2021) reported 8 minutes ago

  This **** is sad. Pinned and official mascot of solona getting rugged and had to be ctoed. Fck solana this **** would never happen in binance, robinhood or base

• 
  MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported 10 minutes ago

  Here’s the part people actually need to understand. The $XRP Ledger can have new software installed and still not have the new features turned on. Those are two different things. Think of it like this. The update is already sitting on the computers that run the network, but the network still has to vote on which new rules it wants to use. One of those rule changes, fixCleanup3_3_0, finally has enough support. It’s at 29 of 35 validators. That still doesn’t mean it’s live. The vote has to stay above 80% for 14 straight days first. That clock started August 28. If enough validators keep voting yes, it can turn on around September 11. The bigger features people keep talking about are still waiting. Batch transactions, ConfidentialTransfer, sponsored accounts and the others don’t turn on just because this one does. Now the transaction numbers. The latest completed window had about 540,700 payments. That sounds huge until you look at how much $XRP actually moved. Those payments moved about 45.2 million $XRP, which was down around 89% from the previous comparable window. So yes, there were a lot of payments. They were just much smaller payments. That’s why you can’t look at a giant transaction count and automatically say adoption exploded. One number tells you how many times something happened. Another tells you how much value actually moved. Trading works the same way. XRPL has its own exchange built directly into the ledger. Over the latest 24 hours, about 4.91 million $XRP traded there across 93,284 trades from 7,349 unique traders. That’s XRPL trading. If somebody shows you Binance or Coinbase volume and calls it XRPL activity, they’re mixing two completely different things. The easiest way to read all of this is pretty simple. Stop looking at the biggest number on the screen. Ask what the number is actually measuring. A transaction could be a payment, a trade, an order, an automated action or something else entirely. A million transactions doesn’t mean a million people bought $XRP, and it definitely doesn’t mean a million people suddenly started using the network. Once you separate the numbers by what they actually represent, the ledger gets a whole lot easier to understand.

• 
  CryptoPulse (@CryptoPulseGLBL) reported 12 minutes ago

  🔔#Today's Headlines 1. #BTC drops below $78,000, down 1.09% on the day 2. PeckShield: Tectonic attackers transferred only $6 million across chains; the remaining funds are stuck on the Cronos chain 3. Wintermute has transferred approximately $400 million in BTC to Binance over the past two days 4. Crypto trading app FOMO will integrate with the Arc mainnet on its first day of launch 5. SWIFT processes an average of approximately $5 trillion daily; stablecoins and tokenized deposits are accelerating the challenge to the cross-border payment system 6. The U.S. Open has entered into an exclusive partnership with Kalshi, making it the official prediction market platform 7. @saylor posted a message hinting that Strategy may increase its Bitcoin holdings again 8. A certain address has made cumulative profits exceeding $3.4 million from trading PONS and CASHCAT 9. A certain whale transferred $108 million worth of ETH to an exchange in a single day 10. HyperLabs has again applied to redeem 433,000 HYPE tokens, valued at approximately $36.14 million

• 
  FamousMaurice (@MauriceFamous) reported 13 minutes ago

  @PGL_BULLISH @binance Yeah. You should think could log in. Oh wait ican. ,Noone. I can't. Wait can't log in there but my Buckingham can !! Yeah. OK. Whatvthe luck am I doing here i.ean y. Notify me about anything.

• 
  Sprunky | On-Chain Forensics (@sprunky_eth) reported 13 minutes ago

  @thefrogmaxi Agreed — and we never claimed it was. Binance isn't the issue. Binance is the evidence locker. What we OBSERVED: the SAME hot wallet funded both the GOLD dump cluster (00:17 UTC) and the PLATINUM deployer (03:19 UTC). That's one operation — not guilt by association. And because it's a regulated CEX, the withdrawal logs hold KYC data. That's a subpoena path, not an accusation against the exchange. The issue is the operator. The exchange is the paperwork.

• 
  Greenpeace.BNB.probablynothing.LUNC (@Greenpeace06_09) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Megatronus99641 It's safe. Anything binance related is safe. Don't stake there because you get more rewards on Keplr or galaxy. But it's a safe place to hold your lunc because retail coins are put in cold wallets offline. That's why they have no issues with scammers.

• 
  WA7CRYPTO (@WA7CRYPTO) reported 13 minutes ago

  Since joining Binance before Square launched, I only earned $10 using the Feed feature. After the changes that allowed new content creators, I earned over $500 during my first few months in 2024. A few months later, I earned over $1000 in the same year. This is quite difficult, but with daily posting and monitoring, I earned over $1000 without any trading. The Creator Pad concept was initially great because it relied on account views and engagement. I earned over $3500 from events I hosted on Binance Square during 2024. During 2025, I earned $4000, mostly from Square events, which were quite successful. In 2026, I earned $1900 from just one event on Creator Pad. I only entered the Binance Square platform with the help of @Abrlien @heyibinance

• 
  smartmate (@QuantVault) reported 18 minutes ago

  Market Briefing — Sun 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC · ad-hoc TL;DR • Two 4.0s fired and the louder one is stale. UNI's "OI +42.1% on the day" is down from +47.2% at 18:13, the last hour is −2.84%, funding is at the 11.0% default on all four venues. A cooldown expiry, not news. • SKR is the only new fact: −504bp vs oracle on Hyperliquid, funding −4,917% annualised — shorts paying longs ~0.56%/hour to sit 5% under the composite, on a $5.3M book. • XMR resolved 1928Z's tell backwards. Price $489.06 → $496.38, perp premium halved +32.2 → +16.9bp, funding 230.5% → 246.8%. Longs pay a record rate and have stopped bidding the mark. • Index level, nothing. BTC $78,827, −0.07% since 19:28Z, funding 7.5% (3.5pp under baseline). Breadth narrowed 22/23 → 21/23. Headline: both triggers are single-name and one is decaying — the fresh fact is a 5% Hyperliquid discount in SKR that pays shorts to stay wrong. THE ONE THING THAT DOESN'T FIT XMR's venues stopped agreeing. As the CEX perp premium halved, HL's mark went the other way to +28.5bp, a session high, and the carry narrowed 90.4pp → 60.5pp, its receive leg rotating from Bybit back to Hyperliquid (HL 268.3%, Bybit 264.4%, Binance 207.8%) in 46 minutes. Price up, OI up, funding up, mark slipping against the index — spot led and the perp lagged while longs paid more than at any point today. Funded-out long or index catch-up is unresolvable here: XMR has no spot taker split anywhere we cover. NET Nothing here changes a BTC book. UNI: trigger behind the move, $5.492 / $4.629 still the frame. XMR: the tell moved from the premium to the mark — HL rich while the CEXs fade puts the last aggressive long on Hyperliquid; $462.53 with funding above 200% is the unwind, $527.53 and I'm wrong. SKR is not a carry until someone prices the CEX leg.

• 
  TheFrogMaxi🟧 (@thefrogmaxi) reported 19 minutes ago

  @sprunky_eth binance isn't the issue

• 
  josé (@josefbednar) reported 19 minutes ago

  BTC closed a 23.6% weekly candle last week, its biggest since March 2023. Since Binance listed BTC in 2017, 17 other weeks gained 20% or more. Twelve weeks later, 10 were higher and 7 were lower. The median was up 1.3%. The best was up 183%. The worst was down 50%. A candle that size marks an extreme, and history doesn't say which kind. Five of the 17 came in the ten weeks around the 2017 top. Others came straight off the 2018 and 2022 bottoms. Weekly chart, Binance.

• 
  Asim (@Asimali118) reported 25 minutes ago

  @alpha_xtrader @binance @BinancePk Exactly! 📚 Gen Z has more access to information than ever, but the key is not following the hype. Learn, research, understand the risks, and make informed decisions. DYOR 🔎📈”

• 
  Juaki (@JuakiGarcia) reported 25 minutes ago

  @KonradAdenauerX @EU_Commission Apple is the clearest example. Apple explicitly states that the Digital Markets Act has forced it to delay features in the EU. The iPhone's Screen Mirroring feature is still unavailable in the EU, while it has been available in other countries since 2024. Apple also delayed Live Translate with AirPods, Places Visited, and Preferred Routes due to the DMA's interoperability requirements. And for iOS 27, Apple has explicitly announced that Siri AI will not be released on iPhones and iPads in the EU because of the DMA. This isn't speculation from Brussels critics. Apple itself claims that the DMA is causing EU users to receive features later and that European devices are falling behind the rest of the world. Meta offers another example. In 2024, after the Irish Data Protection Commission asked Meta to suspend training AI with European public data, Meta claimed that this would further delay the arrival of AI benefits in Europe and that it therefore could not launch Meta AI in Europe at that time. When Meta AI finally arrived in the EU in 2025—long after its US launch—Meta explicitly stated that the delay was due to having to navigate the “complex European regulatory system.” And this isn’t limited to AI. Under the MiCA Act, European cryptocurrency users lost access to trading several stablecoins available elsewhere. ESMA demanded that cryptocurrency platforms cease offering trading services with non-compliant stablecoins, and Binance, consequently, removed USDT, DAI, and others from trading for EEA users.

• 
  邵逸夫币 (@RunRunShawCoin) reported 26 minutes ago

  This was unexpected. As far as we were aware from the original creator of this thread, btcpay86 was CZ. Given the evidence, ChatGPT estimated the probability of btcpay86 belonging to CZ at 95-99%. There was significant evidence to support this assumption. Even the Binance Co-Founder has referenced this exact github that was linked to his profile back then. @rebornloner has done a full analysis it seems on the identity of btcpay86. Perhaps there was something we did not originally see. Where there is smoke, there is often fire. We tried our best. It really was worth a shot.

• 
  James Berkeley-Clarke (@JBerkeleyClarke) reported 26 minutes ago

  @HolochainExpose Just another hired account to promote absolute crap. Holochain is dead and everyone knows it that has any sense. Volume down to $150k on Binance now! DELISTED very soon.

• 
  SOAT 𐤊🐬 (@Son0fATrip) reported 28 minutes ago

  “Nobody uses kaspa:native” is like walking past a build site. Foundations are up. Some rooms already have lights on. That is not an empty lot. You don’t judge a house by the scaffolding. But quick question for the cryptobros: What would actually count as “use” for you? A nice wallet, #Binance , general volume or just price?

• 
  K A V E Y J O E🇳🇵🇳🇵🇳🇵 (@KAVEYJOE) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BinanceAfrica My wish is for Binance to support and donate toward the ongoing flood rescue and relief efforts in Nepal. 🇳🇵🙏 Thousands of people have been affected, and many are still in urgent need of rescue and humanitarian assistance. Any support could make a real difference. 🥹💙

• 
  LapinBlanc (@Frogoffu4k) reported 32 minutes ago

  @HimothyJamesJr_ Website not working, Solana platform use….. Usual misdirecting tactic to rug people…. Robin Hood so much better and Binance will follow. Solana is dead! Great mascot that could have been and you’re f***ing it. Sorry @toly maybe you should save Sol here

• 
  Rain (@raintures) reported 34 minutes ago

  $ETH has a strange problem right now… The spot demand looks strong, but the price still cannot break free. ETH has seen 12 straight days of spot ETF inflows, with more than $1.5B entering during the streak. BlackRock alone accounted for roughly $1B of purchases without a negative day. Yet on Binance, the taker buy/sell ratio has fallen to 0.81: aggressive market selling is outweighing buying by roughly 23%. That makes the $2.26K–$2.35K realized-price cluster the level I would watch most closely. ETH holding above it suggests the market is absorbing that supply. Losing it while aggressive selling persists would tell a very different story. For me, $2.53K is the real short-term test. Until ETH clears it convincingly, ETF inflows alone are not enough confirmation that buyers have regained control. Is ETH quietly absorbing a wall of supply before the next leg higher?

• 
  milkyshits (@methmate) reported 35 minutes ago

  @pedma7 Jealous you can get Binance to work on an old account… they got aus accounts locked down! At least gate lets you trade via api from a blocked jurisdiction…

• 
  BoxZero (@benn3111) reported 43 minutes ago

  @BenjaminFra__ no, law enforcement in Indonesia is not good.. i asked binance for help, but they cant do anything because the withdraw is complete and to another blockchain....

• 
  Venture Catalyst (@TittyGrl2Trades) reported 46 minutes ago

  Crypto has really broken my brain because someone just told me I could open an airbnb in PR and make “25k a month!” and I was like, nah I’m good I can do more than that on Binance.

• 
  Sir Nostalja 🇿🇦🌍 🔞 (@soutafrikan) reported 56 minutes ago

  Binance needs to provide every crypto service.

• 
  Ali sher (@Alisher68919291) reported 56 minutes ago

  @ai_trading_frx Is binance support this

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 57 minutes ago

  @binance What will you do for bouncebit thieves? Will you continue to cheat people with bouncebit? Will you let bouncebit team **** investors still ?

• 
  Pain (@painkillerbill) reported 58 minutes ago

  ct ****** really thought binance is kucoin size or what. These guys still run **** we just can’t use them anymore

• 
  Zyre (@Zyre_eth) reported 59 minutes ago

  @NoKapRips @defiapp Bro accept the fact that defi app is just a ****, now withdraw on BNB chain to binance

• 
  clav (@marsclavie) reported 1 hour ago

  the timeline is suddenly full of XPL bull posts a month before one of the biggest unlocks relative to float in crypto history. funny timing @plasma here's why it's one of the worst-structured tokens in crypto. with receipts. the setup was perfect. tether and bitfinex behind it. founders fund. $373m committed to a $50m public sale, 7x oversubscribed. $2b of stablecoins on chain on day one. ath $1.68. twelve months later: $0.087. ten straight red monthly candles. back to the launch-day open. –94%. the chain: tvl from $5.7b in week one to $624m today. stablecoins on chain from 2b to 838m. fees: ~$830 a day. about $300k a year against an $870m fdv. that's not a bug. it's the design. zero-fee usdt means the core use case is structurally unmonetizable. every dollar of "adoption" produces nothing for the token. they built the one l1 that can't capture value from its own success. staking was promised for q1 2026. it's august 31. not live. no date. holders are just exit liq. meanwhile their own supply api shows 10.12b+ xpl, over 125m minted beyond genesis, while their docs say inflation "only activates when external validators and stake delegation go live." explain that one. tokenomics: 10b supply, 18% floated at launch. 25% team, 25% investors, one-year cliff. sept 25: 833m team + 833m investors + 89m ecosystem = 1.76b tokens in one day. 63% of the float. then 228m a month, 5% of float, until september 2028. the most circulated bull report, written by a disclosed plasma investor, models the cliff at "roughly 830 million tokens." official docs: 833m team and 833m investors. 1.67b. off by half, in a report about token demand. retweeted by the team. "look guys, this is why you buy xpl!" lmao. plasma one, "the world's first stablecoin-native neobank." their own data: 78,400 "cards." median balance under $1. one wallet holds 11% of all deposits. $17.9m total. 61 app store ratings. revolut has 75m customers and $6b in revenue. this is a dune dashboard with a visa logo. the card pays cashback in xpl. a token down 94%. every reward is a bag. platinum requires locking 100,000 xpl, about $8.5k, for a year. their own bull case admits the flywheel "partially throttles itself": token goes up, the lock costs more; token goes down, you're stuck in it. unit economics: 3–4% cashback against 2–3% interchange. their own investor report concedes they "may lose a little on each transaction." lock demand: ~33m xpl a month. vesting supply after sept 25: ~228m a month. seven to one. before the cliff. cmon bros. this playbook ran before. CRO: lock the token, get a metal card, 19x in 2021. rewards got cut, round-tripped 90%. plasma copied it, made the lock harder to enter, and launched it three months before the biggest unlock in the token's life. no CRO action, just dilution and holders crying. august had record binance spot volume, 12.75b xpl, 4.6x the float. looked like accumulation. it was a binance trading tournament. 4m xpl in vouchers. they paid for volume while the token sat at the bottom. october 2025, the founder: "no team members have sold any xpl." june 2026: wallets labeled plasma team moved 150m xpl to binance, flagged by onchain lens. august 2026: plasma-linked wallets depositing again, three weeks before 833m team tokens unlock. maybe it's market-making. they haven't said a word. same month: ethena bought out its selling investors and put a fee switch to a vote. +100%. monad offered to buy out early investors. pumpfun spent $350m on buybacks and ripped straight through its own cliff. plasma ran a trading competition. the stablecoin thesis is the best thesis in crypto. stablecoins settled $33t last year. the demand is real, in lagos and buenos aires and istanbul, and someone will build the rail. plasma had tether, thiel, and $373m of demand on day one. they built a token dispenser. im not buying the dip. i don’t want it. not because the idea was wrong. because they made it about themselves and not the holders. zero

• 
  defido (@defido) reported 1 hour ago

  @joaomendoncaaaa No I get it, it's motion, and I believe Solana is ETH 2020, I've been in all these cycles in some form, I know the feeling, BNB was motion and then ETH whales and ETH just cucked Binance so hard with SHIB they never saw that coming in the slightest. I know what Solana pulls off, it will be an all in onchain full frontal r@pe of Binance of the highest order and I will be at the front of the boat ready to jump off with sword and shield on the beaches. It is ETH 2020. The issue is, Vlad has REGULATORY motion and that's the dangerous part.

• 
  Greenpeace.BNB.probablynothing.LUNC (@Greenpeace06_09) reported 1 hour ago

  Well done Brett. I tried to tell you but you stopped believing in the Binance Lunc Recovery Plan that I chatted with you about for a long time. Because you aren't smart enough... you no longer have access to me. THE FIRST PERSON TO DISCOVER THE BINANCE LUNC RECOVERY PLAN! I spent over four years 10/12 hours a day researching so I could help the educated obtain financial freedom. I can connect every single dot now. Lunc community...... Don't be like Brett. He chose poorly despite all of the evidence over the years. Now he's on his own. I can help you. Delegate to GreenpeaceUNITED and send me a dm. Let's talk about your sell plan, my timeline and what you can do to join my private tg with 150 people that I'll open at .0005. Brett chose poorly. Choose better than Brett. $lunc #GreenpeaceUNITED