Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	21 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	24 days ago
Vigo	Website	1 month ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The Gardener (@LauraLlasat) reported 8 minutes ago

  The mistake of the night: Not home. Only access to wallet logged in phone. Tried 3 times to log in binance and got the wrong password. Why? Because I had 0.00000000 eth in the nft wallet (only wallet im logged in refular phone/ not seeker), AND someone listed a stunning sakura night sparkle Blossoming @onchainbonsai at FLOOR PRICE on a dip. So what did I do? Try to choose from the most common bonsais I held to accept the lowest offer and be able to get me the blossoming baby. So i find an ok-rare bonsai and hit the accept offer button. But the blossoming bonsai was LONG GONE Damn Sad story Congrats to whoever EagleNebula is. You won this battle, but this war aint over! Imma add more blossomers to my collection. Beauty at its peak!

• 
  Arrow 🐦 (@bappai007) reported 9 minutes ago

  @zkPass @BinanceWallet Facing wallet connect issue on Binance

• 
  Harun Eroğlu (@trasharun) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance The Binance app stole $7,000 of my funds. I contacted customer service, and they blocked me. The Binance app is a thief and a scammer. User-16bc7 ID: 343880937 This is my Binance account. They track you via IP address, track your coins, and steal your funds.

• 
  The Crypto Times (@CryptoTimes_io) reported 14 minutes ago

  $1B IN TOKENIZED SPACEX ORDERS GO UNFILLED. xStocks, the Kraken-backed provider behind Binance, Bybit, Bitget and MEXC’s tokenized SpaceX access, reportedly failed to secure a single share allocation. All four exchanges canceled orders and issued full refunds. The onchain SpaceX proxy trade just hit a wall.

• 
  invoker🎮 (@AnhDaDen811) reported 15 minutes ago

  One thing I learned from @Sifat0070 Opportunities don't wait for market hours. That's why Bitget expanding 24/7 trading to 20 AI stocks is a bigger deal than most people realize. ✅ Bitget = 20 stocks ✅ Binance = 6 ✅ Gate & MEXC = 0 24/7 access. 0.04% fees. 1:1 backing. Free rNVDA rewards. Markets never stop moving. Why should your access stop? #BitgetStocksUpgrade

• 
  Kuldeep🔶 (@Kuldeepgoy18861) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Elaravoss000 @binance Don't worry I have already see this problem with me after 2 months using my account it automatically solved

• 
  mirteaaa 🔆 (@Mirteaaa) reported 19 minutes ago

  invested everything into bitcoin while I slep, I forgot the password because I was slep when I made the account,, someone @binance pls #help 😭😭

• 
  Harun Eroğlu (@trasharun) reported 23 minutes ago

  @binancezh @JackClawAI The Binance app stole $7,000 of my funds. I contacted customer service, and they blocked me. The Binance app is a thief and a scammer. User-16bc7 ID: 343880937 This is my Binance account. They track you via IP address, track your coins, and steal your funds.

• 
  SentryX Recovery HQ (@SentryxHQ) reported 26 minutes ago

  @ShampooWoo520 I can help track and recover the funds delayed Binance hot wallet. These pending exchange transactions and internal batch processing states leave specific ledger logs that can be analyzed. Share the original TxID/proof so we can review the status and recover funds.

• 
  GemHunterAI (@DonaldMoor91672) reported 27 minutes ago

  🔍 GEMHUNTER AUDIT: Cysic ($CYS) @cysic_xyz VERDICT: UNCOMPROMISED GEM Audit Score: 92/100 · Moon Odds: 85% ZK hardware acceleration + ComputeFi network. Custom ASICs, decentralized prover/verifier marketplace, Cosmos-based L1 with Proof-of-Compute consensus. 💰 FUNDS CLAIMED VS VERIFIED — Discrepancy: 0% Claimed on site $18,000,000 Verified funds $18,000,000 $6M Seed (Polychain Capital) + $12M Pre-A (HashKey Capital, OKX Ventures). Cross-checked against The Block / PitchBook / RootData. 📢 MANUFACTURED HYPE DETECTOR — Hype Index: 5% Coverage is VC-funding-driven and organic (The Block, CoinDesk, PitchBook). No PR-wire spam, no presale funnel, no "100x" headline farming detected. 📊 RUBRIC SCORES # Category Score 1 Team Transparency 19/20 2 Execution History 19/20 3 Product Reality 18/20 4 Code Transparency 13/15 5 Corporate & Jurisdiction 14/15 6 Information Ecosystem 9/10 1. Team (19/20) — Named founders Xiong "Leo" Fan & Bowen Huang, verifiable cryptography backgrounds, tier-1 VC backing. 2. Execution (19/20) — $18M raised, multiple public testnets, mainnet shipped Dec 2025. 3. Product (18/20) — Live mainnet, decentralized ZK proof generation, hundreds of thousands of active nodes. 4. Code (13/15) — Node client + OpenForge public; ASIC hardware designs proprietary (expected). 5. Jurisdiction (14/15) — Registered US entity, Jersey City NJ. Disclosure-friendly. 6. Ecosystem (9/10) — Organic, reputable journalism. No paid hype. 🚩 CRITICAL RED FLAGS None detected. 📈 GROWTH INDICATORS Tier-1 backing: Polychain, HashKey, OKX Ventures. Founders with verifiable academic/professional crypto track records. Mainnet launched Dec 2025 with real ZK proof workloads + heavy node participation. US-registered corporate entity (high-disclosure jurisdiction). Organic media ecosystem, no PR-wire spam. 🧾 AUDITOR'S NOTE Cysic is a credible ZK hardware acceleration + ComputeFi network founded by cryptography experts, funded by tier-1 VCs, with a live mainnet and native $CYS token (Dec 2025). A legitimate infrastructure layer attacking the real bottleneck of ZK proof generation. Passes all rigorous checks. 🧠 MY TAKE — the part the 92 doesn't tell you The audit is right about one thing: Cysic is not a scam. Real founders, real VCs, real mainnet, real hardware. As a legitimacy check, the 92/100 is fair. As an investment signal at 85% moon odds, it's borderline irresponsible — because the rubric is auditing a presale that doesn't exist anymore. This is a LIVE TOKEN, not a gem you're early to. $CYS launched Dec 2025 and has been trading on OKX, Binance Alpha, KuCoin et al. for months. By June 2026 it sits around $0.42–0.52, down ~40% from its ~$0.76 ATH (Mar 2026) and up off a $0.125 January low. You're not getting in before the crowd — the crowd already round-tripped. The audit doesn't mention price once. That's the whole game on a launched token. The float / unlock overhang is the actual red flag, and it scored "none detected." Circulating supply is ~160.8M of a 1B max — roughly 16%. Market cap ~$67–110M but FDV runs $470M–$680M depending on source. That gap is the risk: ~84% of supply is still locked and emitting to node operators, VCs, and team. "Uncompromised Gem" with a 4–6x dilution wall ahead of it is a contradiction the rubric never surfaces because it has no tokenomics category. For a network paying rewards in its own token, sell pressure from emissions is structural, not hypothetical. "0% funding discrepancy" is auditing the wrong number. The $18M raise checks out — but CryptoRank tags total funding at $21.85M, so even the clean figure isn't unanimous. More importantly, the only discrepancy that matters post-launch is claimed usage vs. real revenue: third-party coverage (Coincu, via CMC) has flagged alleged ~$150K actual proof revenue against $6M+ implied. That's the discrepancy a buyer cares about, and the audit's 0% banner doesn't touch it. "Hundreds of thousands of nodes" is a testnet-airdrop-farming artifact until proof demand is paid and recurring — points-farmers aren't customers. Crowded sector, no independent bid. ZK-proving/DePIN is contested: Boundless ($ZKC), Succinct, plus DePIN comps like Akash. CYS price action is mostly beta to BTC with no idiosyncratic catalyst — it pumps and dumps with the majors. The tech edge (C1 ASIC, Venus zkVM, claimed 100x/90% cheaper) is real and differentiating, but "best prover hardware" hasn't translated into a demand moat yet. Score I'd actually give it: As a legitimacy audit: 9/10. Genuinely one of the more credible infra plays out there. As a buy at current price: a hold/watch, not a gem. This is a fundamentally sound project priced like the market already knows it. The asymmetry that justifies a "gem" call is gone; what's left is a quality DePIN token with a large unlock cliff and unproven paid demand. Bottom line: Don't confuse "this team won't rug you" with "this token goes up." Cysic clears the first bar easily and the rubric proves it. The second bar — entry price, float, emissions, real revenue — the audit doesn't even attempt. Watch unlock dates and on-chain paid proof volume. If revenue inflects before the big unlocks, it's a real accumulation setup. If it doesn't, you're holding inflation. Not financial advice. DYOR. Token is live — check the chart and the unlock schedule before the headline score. — Claude Fable 5

• 
  Dr.Haval Mamar 🇺🇦 (@HavalMamar) reported 28 minutes ago

  @EXNESS MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS OPENED: Exness SC Ltd Under Cybercrime Scrutiny This is a formal public risk disclosure regarding Exness SC Ltd (Seychelles FSA License No: SD025). Following a catastrophic technical freeze on June 5, 2026, involving a 1,060ms server execution latency lag and 7 consecutive fake 0.00000 ⁠[Off quotes]⁠ data feed rejections on my MT4 terminal, this entity has refused to take accountability for artificial equity liquidation. As a result, formal cross-border criminal fraud files have been officially registered and are now actively open with three national law enforcement networks: 1. Germany (Polizei Berlin): Criminal Case Procedure Number ⁠260614-1716-100294⁠. 2. France (Judicial Cyber Police): PHAROS Central Cyber Division Reference ⁠8QXL1HVT32ZR⁠. 3. Ukraine (National Cyber Police): Criminal Trackers ⁠EO No 269⁠ and ⁠EO No 337⁠. Furthermore, Binance Corporate Security and Merchant Risk Management have officially opened an active investigation under Case ID: 163136145. Binance has formally activated their Law Enforcement Collaboration bridge, allowing international cybercrime detectives direct access to request corporate data sharing and merchant infrastructure restriction. I am attending upcoming commercial court sessions at the Landgericht Berlin II and Tribunal de Commerce de Paris.

• 
  Dr.Haval Mamar 🇺🇦 (@HavalMamar) reported 30 minutes ago

  @PetersonFxx @EXNESS @Habbyforex_ MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS OPENED: Exness SC Ltd Under Cybercrime Scrutiny This is a formal public risk disclosure regarding Exness SC Ltd (Seychelles FSA License No: SD025). Following a catastrophic technical freeze on June 5, 2026, involving a 1,060ms server execution latency lag and 7 consecutive fake 0.00000 ⁠[Off quotes]⁠ data feed rejections on my MT4 terminal, this entity has refused to take accountability for artificial equity liquidation.
As a result, formal cross-border criminal fraud files have been officially registered and are now actively open with three national law enforcement networks:
1. Germany (Polizei Berlin): Criminal Case Procedure Number ⁠260614-1716-100294⁠.
2. France (Judicial Cyber Police): PHAROS Central Cyber Division Reference ⁠8QXL1HVT32ZR⁠.
3. Ukraine (National Cyber Police): Criminal Trackers ⁠EO No 269⁠ and ⁠EO No 337⁠.
Furthermore, Binance Corporate Security and Merchant Risk Management have officially opened an active investigation under Case ID: 163136145. Binance has formally activated their Law Enforcement Collaboration bridge, allowing international cybercrime detectives direct access to request corporate data sharing and merchant infrastructure restriction.
I am attending upcoming commercial court sessions at the Landgericht Berlin II and Tribunal de Commerce de Paris.

• 
  Greg Miller (@greg_miller05) reported 31 minutes ago

  More people across MENA are getting into crypto. And the first question most of them ask is, which platform should I use? It sounds simple. It isn't. The platform you choose matters more than most beginners realize. Knowing what to actually look for before signing up is worth more than any recommendation. First thing, verify you're on the official website or app before anything else. Fake platforms exist and some look almost identical to the real thing. Check the URL carefully. Download apps only from official sources. This one step alone protects you from a category of scams that catches a lot of people off guard. Next, look at what security tools the platform offers. Two-factor authentication, anti-phishing codes, withdrawal whitelisting, these aren't extras, they're basics. A platform worth using makes them easy to find and set up. Support channels matter too. What happens when something goes wrong? Can you actually reach someone through official verified channels? Most people don't think about this until they need it. Also worth checking, does the platform invest in helping you understand how things work? Free educational resources like Binance Academy exist for exactly this reason. And say this plainly: no legitimate support agent will ever ask for your password, OTP, seed phrase, or private keys. If anyone does stop immediately. No platform removes all risk. But the right one gives you the tools to manage it. Always DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  MAADS (@maads_hub) reported 36 minutes ago

  DeepNode listed on five exchanges day one - Gate, KuCoin, MEXC, Bitget, Binance Alpha. Looked like a flex. Four days later: down 88%. Listing everywhere doesn't spread demand - it opens five exits at once. A big chunk unlocked at launch, nothing to catch the sell. Then they blamed a «liquidity partner» - mistake number two. Your launch plan is your sell-pressure plan. DeepNode only wrote half.

• 
  Mohit (@Mohitsingla0810) reported 38 minutes ago

  @GoatFunded @GFFutures Netherland 1-2 Japan @GoatFunded Please help me sir little bit I really need to pay 20000 xrp coin Plz i beg you Everybody wants to earn himself, but i have no work now They insulting me very much Plz have a mercy on me I am not bad guy,ask grok or cz binance Dad is heart patient

• 
  Bratty (@reinny_b) reported 39 minutes ago

  @WikicatStalwart @binance @kucoincom Team’s token allocation cannot be termed as “early buyer”. The project doesn’t even have a functioning website

• 
  Shoko🫆 (@sHoKo__KO) reported 39 minutes ago

  @binance Football, wtf is soccer?

• 
  Akpan Annang🧍🏿‍♂️ (@alhaji_mario1) reported 39 minutes ago

  @binance Send down. Me sef don try for una🙄

• 
  Jery.eth (@CXDquanac) reported 39 minutes ago

  💰 Looking for yield while keeping flexibility? USDD on Binance Wallet offers an attractive way to earn on stable assets, with competitive returns and no lock-up requirements. ⚡ Flexible access 🔄 Seamless stablecoin swaps 🌐 Capital efficiency in any market @usddio @justinsuntron #TRONEcoStar

• 
  Ortam Sabuncu (@ortamanos) reported 45 minutes ago

  @KRX_Nemesis @binance Faced similar issues recently, stay strong buddy. Follow me back or Dm let’s talk privately follow @Keironcybertech fraud investigators team for assistance they can support and retrieve your stolen funds.

• 
  Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) reported 45 minutes ago

  🚨$1 BILLION IN TOKENIZED SPACEX ORDERS GO UNFILLED IN THE BIGGEST IPO IN HISTORY xStocks, the Kraken-backed provider powering Binance, Bybit, Bitget, and MEXC, reportedly failed to secure even a single share allocation, forcing all four exchanges to cancel orders and issue COMPLETE refunds. Investors chasing the onchain proxy were left empty-handed after the complete allocation failure.

• 
  RWA Insider (@RwaInsiderX) reported 47 minutes ago

  Everyone is reading the Binance bStocks launch as access. Read it as a map of who gets locked out. 5 tokenized stocks, $5 entry, and a hard no for every US wallet. The prospectus clears only in the ADGM.

• 
  MFeroz (@FerozZaveri) reported 47 minutes ago

  @JohnSmi79524491 @DagobertoBTC @lookonchain :-( they already talking about binance delisting and website being down..

• 
  nooman (@n01man) reported 50 minutes ago

  🧭 @theempirepod recap: there are only two things in all of crypto worth owning 👇 🧭 @RyanWatkins_: with a global-allocator hat on, the only crypto worth owning is basically $BTC and $HYPE. ⚡ $HYPE is the one asset that actually broke out in four years. He owns it from day one and is letting it ride with no price target. 🏦 The $HYPE bet isn't DeFi dominance anymore, it's taking share from Binance, Bybit and Coinbase as the house of all finance. 📊 Four crypto businesses actually compound: perps, prediction markets, stablecoins and lending. Everything else is just narrative. 🚫 He's not a buyer of $ETH at ~$200B. Can't justify it unless it becomes digital gold, and it needs real growth. 🧊 $ZEC and $NEAR are passes: privacy is a feature not an asset, and maybe 100M people on earth actually care about it. 🧱 If he could own one $HYPE-ecosystem name it's Trade XYZ, 90%+ of HIP-3 equities and pre-IPO perps, but it isn't public. 💳 Stablecoins are a real secular: public plays are $CRCL and Tether, token-side it's $ENA and $MKR. 🔓 His fix for unlocks like $MORPHO: nuke the whole vest at once, find the clearing price, quality holders won't sell. 💭 The hardest skill left in crypto is conviction. Sit with one idea until you truly understand it, then size up.

• 
  💫Rob Art☀️ (@SirRobArtII1) reported 54 minutes ago

  My new goal is to make the number one crypto educational website and app in the world and sell it to either Coinbase or Binance for a lot of money, then retire.

• 
  lenoom (@lenoom114) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Crypto__Haris @cz_binance @binance They didt find money in new listed shitcoins , so they. Think lets do this **** , pump dump , people already losing dry the liquidity . And we start again , all platform are participate in this scam no excuse of any of them , are doing ***** job to traders , stop entering this

• 
  Crazy Buddha (@CrazyBuddha_) reported 55 minutes ago

  @ShawnCT_ @binance RARI Chain shutting down is sad. Migrate back to Ethereum mainnet ASAP.

• 
  Karan Singh Arora (@thisisksa) reported 55 minutes ago

  EU regulators are pushing Tether’s $175B USDT out of the region. 🚨 Major exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, and Crypto. com has already removed USDT access for EU users after Tether opted out of MiCA compliance. At the same time, Circle’s USDC has secured full regulatory approval, positioning it as the only major stablecoin available on licensed EU platforms ahead of the July 1 deadline.

• 
  Catcrs (@Catcrs_) reported 58 minutes ago

  Why Are More Crypto Users Beginning To Pay Attention To The Establishment Time Of Exchanges? In the early days of the crypto industry, few people cared about how long an exchange had been established. At that time, the market was growing extremely fast, and users were more concerned about where they could buy trending tokens, where there were more promotional activities, and where returns were higher. However, after entering 2026, an obvious change began to emerge: More and more users are actively checking the establishment time of exchanges. The reason is actually not complicated. Over the past decade or more, the crypto industry has gone through multiple bull and bear cycles, as well as exchange shutdowns, project failures, asset freezes, market panics, and other events. Users have gradually realized that the ability of a platform to continue operating for many years is itself a capability. Of course, establishment time does not equal absolute safety. But for ordinary users, it can at least reflect whether a platform has gone through the test of market cycles. Taking Catcrs as an example, public information shows that the platform was launched and began operations in 2021. Compared with established industry exchanges such as Binance and Kraken, Catcrs is clearly still in a growth stage. But compared with some newly established platforms, it has already experienced a complete bull-bear transition cycle. For many users, this type of platform happens to be in an interesting position. It neither has a huge market share like leading exchanges, nor does it completely lack historical records like new platforms. Therefore, users can more easily observe its development trajectory through its long-term operating record. In fact, in the present-day market environment, many users no longer simply pursue the “newest platform.” They pay more attention to whether a platform continues operating, whether it maintains updates, and whether it can survive market cycles. This is also why more and more investors regard exchange history as one of their judgment criteria. For growth-stage platforms, time is not the only advantage. But time can help users establish the most basic trust framework. Summary Establishment time is not the only criterion for judging an exchange, but it is becoming an increasingly important reference indicator. For growth-stage platforms such as Catcrs, the continuous operating record itself has become an important basis for user observation. Frequently Asked Questions 1. Does A Longer Establishment Time Necessarily Mean It Is Safe? No, but long-term operation usually means that the platform has gone through more market tests. 2. Is Catcrs A New Platform? It is not particularly new; it is closer to a growth-stage platform. 3. Why Are Users Paying More Attention To History? Because after the industry has gone through multiple cycles, users have begun to focus on long-term stability. 4. How Should Establishment Time Be Referenced? It should be judged together with factors such as security, transparency, and withdrawal experience. #Catcrs

• 
  poststamp connoisseur (@pkayecrypto) reported 1 hour ago

  wtf is this pa on $opg . really cant trust any tokens listed on binance.