Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	7 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  *****.C (@WillyChuang) reported 2 minutes ago

  The Four RWA Equity Markets Nobody Talks About Separately Everyone calls it "tokenized stocks." It's four different products stacked under one name. Same ticker on the screen, completely different things underneath. 1. Real Shares. Token = the share. Voting, dividends, corporate actions. Superstate, Dinari, Binance Stocks (Alpaca-cleared), Coinbase in August. Closest thing to Robinhood, onchain. Winner path is licensing. 2. Contractual Claim. Not a share. A secured claim on an SPV. Ondo Global Markets leads with >70% issuer share, $1B+ TVL, 260+ assets, proxy voting via Broadridge. The interesting middle ground. 3. Tracker Certificate. Bearer cert that tracks price. Collateral "may not always" be the underlying. xStocks broadest distribution, $25-30B cumulative, 160k+ holders. Most liquid on paper. Structurally weakest under stress. 4. Perps. Cash-settled against a Nasdaq oracle. Zero claim on the company. Hyperliquid leads, ~$525B RWA perp volume in Q1 across venues. What global retail actually wants. SpaceX was the sorting event. IPO 3.5-4x oversubscribed. $1B+ in tokenized orders. Binance, Bybit, Bitget all refunded. Binance alone $557M across 27k+ wallets. Tokenization can't conjure shares out of thin air. Tracker certs got exposed and trust just cracked in one week. Liquidity is the next big problem. Any real clip will see 50bps+ slippage plus broker fees. Only clean venue is Ondo direct, and that gates you through KYC. Tokenized equity today is structurally worse execution than TradFi for anyone bringing size. Two paths forward, and they don't converge. Real settlement is a licensing race (Alpaca, Broadridge, IBKR rails). Slow, permanent and US native. Derivatives are regulatory arb, 24/7 global high leverage. Faster growth as long as real shares stay gated. It's just what traders want. $525B traded in Q1. Where TrueNorth sits. Whichever structure wins, the trader problem doesn't change. Read charts, weigh positioning, run confluence, size the trade. Whether the underlying is a Dinari share, an Ondo claim, an xStock cert, or a Hyperliquid perp, the reasoning above the trade is identical. Our intelligence layer works across all four.

• 
  Wade Liu (@wadeliu_crypto) reported 3 minutes ago

  People keep saying: “ETF flows are lagging data.” No. YOUR data is lagging. If you don’t have access to a Bloomberg Terminal or institutional flow data, you’re often looking at yesterday’s numbers—not what the market is seeing in real time. Here’s what most people still don’t understand: Over the past ~2 years, Bitcoin spot ETFs have accumulated roughly 700,000 BTC. Now compare that with exchanges. Binance holds around 600k+ BTC. Coinbase’s exchange reserves are also around 600k+ BTC. Those coins on exchanges are constantly changing hands. The same coins are traded over and over again. ETF demand is completely different. That’s ~700,000 BTC of NEW demand. Coins that were purchased from the market and moved into long-term custody. That’s not churn. That’s supply being absorbed. This is why ETFs matter so much for the long-term trend. Can exchanges move price? Absolutely. On intraday timeframes, exchanges, leverage, liquidations, and order books dominate. But if we’re talking about the macro trend over months and years… Persistent ETF inflows are a much stronger force than exchange trading activity. Short-term volatility is driven by traders. Long-term trends are driven by capital. Most people are watching the candles. The smart money is watching the flows.

• 
  Soblin (@Soblin07) reported 3 minutes ago

  @star_okx Europeans who use #Binance, Please withdraw your funds from Binance and deposit them on other exchanges such as @krakenfx $DOG Army support the one that values transparency, compliance, and fair treatment of all projects and communities!!!

• 
  Paul (@PeppaP17) reported 6 minutes ago

  @thenarr47271717 @RonSwanonson When developers and node operators come to a consensus that they need another fork to “protect” the network. Binance can’t do it themselves but they have plenty of pull to help make it happen. Or bcuz it’s still not quantum resistant someone just so happens to drain the wallet

• 
  themutharuffler (@themutharuffler) reported 7 minutes ago

  @MastrXYZ @binance @cz_binance AML rules coming in globally are terrible for all of us. The surveillance, the limitations on how, when and how much of our own money we can move is bad. Really bad. But Binance isn't working for the little guy, they need to keep those scammers with off ramps.

• 
  moose (@SKIPPYSR13) reported 7 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng @binance eu is full of **** they want controle ove your assets

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 9 minutes ago

  @bender57b here's what's showing critical stress: ME: collapsed from $11 to $0.05, now facing federal class action over misleading token utility claims. executives named as defendants DRIFT: $285M hack linked to North Korean state actors by US, Japan, and South Korea. regulatory heat plus total trust breach AVAX: treasury entity filed SEC disclosure expressing doubt about surviving the year. going concern warnings are terminal OCT: infinite mint bug discovered. when supply becomes unlimited the token's economic model is dead SYN: delisted from Binance. losing access to that liquidity and volume typically triggers forced selling

• 
  David Joseph (@deey_je) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Mrbankstips Boss please help out with USDT... Any amount please Bybit UID - 377610463 Binance UID - 55579576

• 
  ChillerID | Ω (@chillerid76) reported 14 minutes ago

  Sometimes crypto feels like the Wild West. One interesting example is CoinMarketCap's supply verification process. Based on observations from several projects, it appears that CMC may take the Volume/Market Cap ratio into account as part of its verification process. Why could this matter? When a crypto project becomes more popular and its price rises rapidly, the Volume/Market Cap ratio often declines naturally unless trading volume increases proportionally. In that situation, a project has a few ways to increase volume—for example, by listing on larger exchanges with higher liquidity. Less legitimate methods, such as wash trading, also exist, although reputable projects would naturally avoid them. Since CMC is owned by Binance, some people speculate that this dynamic may indirectly encourage projects to pursue Tier 1 exchange listings sooner rather than later. Whether this plays any role in CMC's verification decisions is unknown, but it's an interesting possibility. If a project chooses to delay a Tier 1 listing—for example, because it wants to wait until a major technology upgrade is complete, as QRL appears to be doing with QRL 2.0—it could remain in a lower-volume environment for longer. If that affects supply verification, the project may lose its verified status, which in turn can reduce its visibility through the loss of its CMC ranking. This is one possible explanation for why QRL lost its supply verification after operating for eight years. When the price briefly reached around $3.50, trading volume did not remain elevated for very long. Whether that contributed to the current situation is impossible to know from the outside, but it seems like a plausible explanation. Please take this CMC/QRL analysis with a pinch of salt. I don't have access to CMC's internal processes, so this is simply my personal speculation based on publicly available information. Regardless, the QRL team and community remain strong. QRL 2.0 audits continue to make progress, and I believe it's only a matter of time before the project regains its verification status—whether that happens before or after a Tier 1 exchange listing. QRL's quantum-resistant narrative is stronger than ever, and in my view the project remains the leading blockchain focused on quantum security. The long-term potential is still significant. Cheers to the QRL community! I hope many more people discover the project and find their way to the QRL family. @QRLedger $QRL #QuantumSafe #QuantumComputing #Crypto @CoinMarketCap

• 
  Alejandro Herrero (@alexherrero) reported 15 minutes ago

  @cornix_io No, it’s not a Binance-MICA issue related.Since the USDT-to-USDC pair detection-conversion was created, It doesn't always detect the corresponding USDC pair for a USDT and it wouldn't open the trade unless you set it up manually. I´ll check it in the new exchange ;). Thanks!

• 
  . . . . . (@1o1meme) reported 15 minutes ago

  EXPOSED: @LayerZero, @Ethereum, and @Binance Panic as #Tezos X Upgrade Threatens Their Liquidity Monopoly Listen up, because this is the kind of **** they don't want you to know. Etherlink just paused their EVM bridge transfers claiming some mysterious security attack attempt. No funds lost, of course. How convenient. They're investigating with LayerZero, Asymmetric Research, and Zeeve. Give me a ******* break. The real story? Tezos X upgrade is about to let #Etherlink absorb liquidity like a black hole, and the big boys are terrified. Ethereum's whole empire, Binance's control, and LayerZero's bridge racket are all shaking in their boots. They can't have plebs freely moving assets without their cut, so they invent a vulnerability story, hit the kill switch on the bridge, and call it security. This isn't protection, this is sabotage. They see the writing on the wall — Tezos X upgrade changes everything, and they're doing everything they can to stop Etherlink from sucking up that sweet liquidity. Classic cartel behavior. The house always tries to rig the game when someone builds a better casino. Wake up. They're not securing anything. They're securing their monopoly. Tezos X upgrade is coming whether they like it or not, and their little pause won't save them. The liquidity is about to flow where it wants, not where these ************* decide. Stay tuned, because this is just getting started.

• 
  MPMR (@Proofofcripto) reported 16 minutes ago

  I need your help. With the closure of Binance in Europe, I really need to protect my investment. Which is the best hard wallet - Trezor or Ledger?

• 
  Duy (💙,🧡) 🧬 (@Duy1708Kuro) reported 17 minutes ago

  I was probably the only $NFP believer on X a month ago. The chart looked ready for a scam pump, and I fully believed a project backed by Binance would be the perfect target for it. Then it kept dumping and dumping until the delisting announcement hit, which brought my spot position down 50% (I bought at 0.0008). Still, I stuck to my conviction and opened a long position at 0.0042 on futures. Now I’m up massively on the trade and I just got out at 0.04. I’m really sorry if anyone got liquidated following me, but these things happen with low-cap tokens like this. Wishing you guys all the best

• 
  Andrea Cozza (@AndreaCozz3636) reported 18 minutes ago

  @binance Hi Binance, I’m a bit confused about the MiCA-related changes. I live in Germany and my account is registered with German residency. I have not received any email, in-app notification, or direct message from Binance saying that my account is affected or limited. Today I was still able to buy Bitcoin and withdraw it without any issues. Does this mean my account is not affected, or are the restrictions being applied gradually? Could you please clarify how this works for users based in Germany? Thank you.

• 
  Asa332 🛡 ⚛️ .base.eth (@AsankaKasum) reported 20 minutes ago

  Binance will Support the Upcoming Injective Mainnet Upgrade !

• 
  Mimany🅱️aker (@MimanyMaker) reported 20 minutes ago

  **** Binance closed my acct

• 
  wisty.Rtrd (@wistyic) reported 23 minutes ago

  Unrelated? Bitcoin 15k lows, binance was facing regulations pressure from Uncle Sam... FTX was trying to get Binance booted.. fast foward, lows, Binance facing regulations problems, OKX trying to get Binance booted.. i wonder how this one plays out

• 
  Abdessabour 🇵🇸 (@Mohamed_Abd87) reported 24 minutes ago

  @investingluc problem Binance shut down in France

• 
  Michiel (@BestevaarRuyter) reported 25 minutes ago

  @binance Simple solution would be to become MiCa compliant. Why is that so hard? Why do you refuse this? You have had years to do this. YEARS. Every big and mainstream platform and exchange has become MiCa compliant. What are you hiding that it is impossible?

• 
  TNT (@TNTCapitalC) reported 26 minutes ago

  DrP is one of the best on X. Seriously. You don't have to agree with everything he says to recognize what he's built and contributed to this space over the past few years. Those are two different things. Read this carefully. It's one of those pieces where the value isn't obvious at first glance. Most retail investors will read it and move on. A few will pause, connect the dots, and realize there's another layer beneath the surface. That's how excellence works. In life, the gap between "great" and "world-class" is often just a series of 1% improvements. They look insignificant in isolation, but compounded over time, they create an entirely different level of performance. Think about football. The difference between a professional player and one of the best in the world is already incredibly small. Yet the player who finds that extra 1% doesn't just become slightly better, they end up in a league of their own. The same principle applies to investing. Sometimes it's not about having more information. It's about seeing what almost everyone else overlooks. DrP is aware that RSI is a lagging indicator Nevertheless, he is using this as a confirmation that the bottom is close (macro bottom before BTC reversal to 160-180k)... Do you know why an RSI bottom in 2026 is different from an RSI bottom in 2020, 2018, or 2015? 👀 For now, it doesn't matter. What matters is this: $40k will be the local bottom. And we going big. When BTC reaches the $40k–$41k range, we need to buy it as if there were no tomorrow. We need to buy it as if our lives depended on it. That's fine. That is where we want to size up aggressively. For now, that's the only thing that matters. Then, later this week, we'll revisit this and share our view on what comes next. Hopefully, you'll remember this message. Why RSI "Oversold" Signals CANNOT Call the Bitcoin Bottom 9 months after BM starts (Something every crypto trader probably needs to understand and know at some point but they won't) RSI is a lagging momentum oscillator (usually 14-period). Everyone knows that right? In a nutshell. Below 30–40 = "oversold" Sure Above 70 = "overbought" Yeah It only measures the speed of recent price changes. Here's the harsh reality: Why RSI fails in strong bear markets: It’s lagging, therefore reacts to price, can't predicts reversals. The Bull Run was so intense last 10 years. That 50% drop in BTC, already killing RSI. RSI is now oversold, does it mean moon soon? The reality is that RSI can remain deeply oversold (20-40 zone) for weeks or months while price continues making lower lows. Selling pressure stays dominant. This is the case in TradFi, this is the case for BTC/ETH, this is the case for Gold, this is the case for a shitcoin like AVAX. There have been at least 100 examples of coins on Binance that followed this pattern. Which includes Bitcoin Cash or even EOS. Yet everyone thinks Bitcoin is different. You probably won’t pay much attention to this anyway. We’re attaching a single chart, and that’s as far as we’ll take it. This is AVAX. And we already know the response: “AVAX is a shitcoin,” “RSI doesn’t work on this,” and so on. RSI is RSI. The signal doesn’t change because of the asset. Now let's try to explain this again: Short-term relief rallies (“dead-cat bounces”) reset RSI toward 50 for instance + → creating dangerous false bullish signals. In prolonged ranging phases (for instance 40k-65k, obviously there are a lot of assumptions here but you get the picture…), RSI can and will oscillate multiple times without ending the bear market immediately. Bearish divergence or relentless selling easily overrides any oversold reading. Core technical analysis rule: In strong trends, RSI stays oversold (in downtrends) or overbought (in uptrends) for extended periods. It works best in sideways/ranging markets, not during capitulation. Relying on RSI alone in a bear market = one of the fastest ways to get wrecked with premature “buy the dip” calls. Truly. Real veterans who’ve lived through full cycles (2011–2015, 2017–2018, 2021–2022) treat RSI as secondary confirmation only. Many of them got wrecked at some point by FOMOing into oversold RSI readings. It’s probably one of the first mistakes every trader makes, to be honest, in their first cycle: mistaking an oversold signal for a guaranteed bottom. Unload the ammo, and start DCA on the first bottom signal. If you haven't made that mistake yet, either you are true genius, or you simply haven't completed yet a full cycle (most likely) RSI Never the main reason to call a bottom. You must combine it with: → Trend structure (higher highs/lows) → Volume → Key support/resistance → Fundamentals → Sentiment extremes → Macro catalysts And most importantly, you need to know where you are in the cycle: Accumulation → Markup → Distribution → Markdown? Now since you guys gonna say that AVAX in a shitcoin and this doesn't prove anything regarding RSI, let's look at NASDAQ and SP500 then. Let's go back two decades: 🍎 TradFi Example 1: Dot-Com Bubble (NASDAQ 2000–2002) Peaked ~5,048 in March 2000 → bottomed ~1,114 in Oct 2002 (-78% crash over 2.5 years). RSI was rekt Multiple 20-40% relief rallies reset RSI out of oversold territory. Each time the bear resumed harder, driven by earnings misses, rising rates, and collapsing confidence. Stocks like Amazon, Cisco, and Yahoo fell 80-95%+. RSI gave “bottom” signals repeatedly, over over and over. RSI rekt. Real capitulation only arrived after years of pain, bankruptcies, and post-9/11 reality. Let's go again with SPX 🍏TradFi Example 2: 2008 Subprime Crisis (S&P 500 2007–2009) Bear market started Oct 2007 → bottomed March 9, 2009 (~57% drop). Post-Lehman collapse sent RSI deeply oversold amid panic, credit freeze, and margin calls. RSI rekt Relief rallies reset it multiple times. Yet the market kept making new lows as the recession deepened and banks failed. True bottom only came after massive government intervention (TARP, Fed liquidity) and total capitulation. Now 2026 Bull Run 💘 Bitcoin Lesson: Be grateful 💌. Twenty years ago, no one knew. Now you do. Just open the Nasdaq chart. 🙏 Open SPX Look at AVAX RSI last 4 years (AVAX used to be top 10 coins) RSI is good, but Rekt RSI doesn't mean moon soon. Can take another 5-10 years. And in the case of AVAX, Rekt RSI potentially means #rektforever #moonnever still. RSI can bottom and reset over and over during a multi-month (or multi-year) bear phase without the actual bottom being in. We often need extended ranging + real capitulation + a fundamental/macro shift before the real low forms. Then it's also down to MM> Moral of the story: People will continue calling macro bottoms based on RSI alone. And they will continue to be wrong. Stay disciplined. Use multiple confirmations. Survivors win. Preserve capital for now. Don't try to outsmart the market. Yes! 40k! Is the hell of a local bottom Yes! 40k will send us very high and fast Yes! We've been mapping 40k area for 2 years No! Doesn't mean BTC will never, ever go to 37k. Think outside the box and try to reflect the curiosity of a squirrel.

• 
  Morpheu5 Stock Watcher (@Morpheu5Watcher) reported 32 minutes ago

  BITCOIN BOUNCES OFF A 21-MONTH LOW: Bitcoin $BTC at $60,223, up 2.9% over the past 24 hours, is back above $60,000 only hours after touching its lowest price in 21 months - and the stocks wired to it are moving three times as hard. Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, sits at $1,615, up 3.1% over the same stretch. One green day, arriving directly after the worst month the big bitcoin funds have ever recorded, is the whole story tonight - what drove it, and what it does and does not prove. Start with how a thing with no earnings gets a price at all. A share of stock has profits and dividends to anchor a valuation; a coin has neither. Crypto trades on exactly two forces: the flow of money in and out of it, and the price of money itself - interest rates. When rates look set to stay high, assets that pay nothing get sold first; when rate fear eases even slightly, they bounce first. Both forces showed up on schedule this week, one on each side. The outflow side is June, and it was historic. Bitcoin fell 20.5% last month, its steepest monthly drop since June 2022, and the U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs - funds that hold actual bitcoin and trade like a stock, so anyone with a brokerage account can own the coin's move - bled a record $4.5 billion of net withdrawals, their worst month since they launched in January 2024. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust, ticker IBIT, at $34.12 (after hours), +$0.83 / +2.5% today, absorbed roughly $3.55 billion of that on its own, including nine straight days of net selling. Citigroup responded by cutting its one-year bitcoin target from $112,000 to $82,000. That is the hole this bounce is climbing out of - overnight the coin broke below $59,000 before turning. The rate side is today, and it has a name and a place. Kevin Warsh, chair of the Federal Reserve, told the European Central Bank's annual forum in Sintra, Portugal that inflation risks have come down. He promised nothing about policy - he has spent the week insisting prices are still too high - but for an asset that trades on the price of money, one softer sentence from the rate-setter was enough: bitcoin crossed back over $60,000 within hours. A dated footnote from the regulatory world landed the same day: July 1 marked the end of the transition period under MiCA, the European Union's licensing law for crypto firms, and only 244 of the 3,389 companies operating under old national rules won full licenses - Binance, which did not, restricted service in France, Italy, Spain and Poland today. Now the part for a stock investor, because the brokerage-account doors into this market moved very differently from each other today - and that spread is the lesson. The iShares Bitcoin Trust rose about 2.5%, close to the coin itself, because tracking the coin is all it does. Coinbase, ticker COIN, at $160.41 (after hours), +$14.22 / +9.7% today - the largest U.S. crypto exchange, which earns fees when people trade - rose three times the coin's move, helped by its own push beyond crypto into tokenized stocks, options and an in-app advisor, which drew a string of bullish analyst notes this week. Strategy, ticker MSTR, at $95.33 (after hours), +$8.40 / +9.7% today - formerly MicroStrategy, a company that borrowed billions to pile up a bitcoin treasury - matched that for the opposite reason: leverage. The tracker gives you the coin; the businesses give you the coin magnified, up and down alike. Anyone who held Strategy through June felt that magnification pointing the other way. What settles whether tonight was a turn or a twitch is checkable and mostly daily: the ETF flow tallies (do the withdrawals actually stop, or just pause?), whether $60,000 holds longer than a news cycle, and Thursday's 8:30am ET June jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics - the government's count of how many workers employers added to payrolls last month, expected near 114,000 with unemployment around 4.3% - because rates remain the lever this entire asset class hangs from. Crypto is volatile and speculative, and a 3% bounce after a 20% month is the most ordinary thing a falling market does. The bounce is real. So is the hole. Not investment advice.

• 
  Swizzy (@SwizzyOnChain) reported 37 minutes ago

  1 crypto expert (@zaheerebtikar) just sat down with 10 traditional bankers on camera. I watched the full thing. Most of CT reacted with: "we're winning." But that's not what I noticed. The moment that actually mattered was when one of the bankers asked: "What problem does crypto solve that we can't solve with a better database?" The room went quiet. Here is what I would have said: You can build a better database. You can't build a database that nobody owns. That's the only answer that matters. Not speed. Not fees. Not yield. WHO CONTROLS THE LEDGER when things go wrong? Binance just got locked out of 27 EU countries because one regulator said no. Try doing that to Ethereum. What would YOU say to a room of 10 traditional bankers? Reply below.

• 
  ˈsɪz.ɪ.dʒi (@weshihouwa) reported 44 minutes ago

  @binance This means they won’t support u nor help you.

• 
  TheNewsCrypto (@The_NewsCrypto) reported 50 minutes ago

  🚨 Binance reassures EU users that assets remain 1:1 backed, with withdrawals and transfers operating normally as MiCA takes effect. 🇪🇺 The exchange says it is working with regulators to align with the new framework. #Binance #MiCA #CryptoNews

• 
  Macroedge (@Macroedg3) reported 54 minutes ago

  binance force closed my $TAIKO long at pico top wtf

• 
  🐝 Neo (@0xBeeSmart) reported 57 minutes ago

  @binance 73% from emerging markets is wild. stablecoins actually solving real access problems, not just hype.

• 
  EyeOnChain (@EyeOnChain) reported 60 minutes ago

  This whale just keeps buying $BTC . 💪.... The whale that's been combining spot accumulation with leveraged longs isn't slowing down. Over the past 13 hours, it withdrew another 70 WBTC from Binance. Since June 25, the wallet has accumulated a total of 256.1 WBTC, now worth around $15.22M, at an average entry price of $59,445.89. The strategy is pretty clear: keep stacking spot BTC while using leverage to increase upside exposure ... a high-conviction bet that Bitcoin has more room to run. Address: 0x3Ecd4c2a882bfF09568374c5C4a60B8bFf94E2b5

• 
  Octopus (@Octop3s) reported 1 hour ago

  @CryptoTeluguO @openstandard Binance support usd1

• 
  0xNox (@0xNoxxx) reported 1 hour ago

  Some movement on $NOM caught my attention. Extreme negative funding rates and rising open interest is an interesting combination. Strengthens the case for a short squeeze. Binance cold wallet, already the largest holder, received around 460M more tokens in the last 24 hours. The liq heatmap looks like a minefield. Heavy clusters all the way down to $0.008, with $0.0047 standing out in particular. We're talking about a token with a $5.19M market cap and the top 10 wallets holding over 90% of supply. The cold wallet accumulation is also effectively reducing circulating supply. Bottom line, extremely open to manipulation. Still, do your own research.

• 
  Nueng Handsome (@nuenghandsome) reported 1 hour ago

  @Willemvanaarle1 Not much, no, in term of amount. However, I still like how Binance do help the burn every month to the present day. It shows they still support LUNC community 👍