Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	8 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Etherbit (@EtherbitHQ) reported 4 minutes ago

  This isn’t the first meeting either. The committee already spoke to CoinDCX, Binance, WazirX, and a bunch of other exchanges over the past year. This is a slow process. Today was one more step, not the final word.

• 
  DeFi Oracle 🔮 (@DeFiOracle_) reported 4 minutes ago

  @CazroWeb3 @binance Access is the main driver here

• 
  TRUTH (@paulamobi) reported 5 minutes ago

  @binance And so ? Who this news help

• 
  Unc Pooop (@pooop_real) reported 10 minutes ago

  @degentradingLSD Brother this “system shutdown” or inability to log in has been goin on since 2021 at least. I used to put in 7-8 figure collateral (say mid 8 figures position size ) trades on Binance in 2021-2022 and was always mysteriously unable to login during times of high volatility due to “system issues” and a lot of times got stopped out or unable to put on trades

• 
  CoastRider (@CoastRiderX) reported 15 minutes ago

  In the beginning #Binance (customer since 2017) i had great view about them and they gave the vibes the will be top crpyto financial institution. But shady stuff in recent years and how they market make, treat their customers its just a NO-GO. Distrupt trad-fi not your people! 🫣

• 
  Hossam (@Seemore170) reported 21 minutes ago

  @blknoiz06 1. I know this is my fault. I kept chasing losses and buying tops trying to recover too fast. 2. I lost almost everything and now I’m rebuilding from absolute zero. 3. I saw you doing an airdrop for your token, but unfortunately I wasn’t lucky enough to be an early buyer or holder. 4. One real opportunity could genuinely change my life and help me stand on my feet again. 5. If you want proof, I’m willing to privately share my Binance and MEXC accounts so you can verify the losses yourself.

• 
  Okta (@Okta22738214) reported 21 minutes ago

  Binance Alpha 2.0 will support the rebranding of Story (IP) to Data Network (DATAIP), with a token swap at 1:1 ratio starting July 2. Trading pauses from 02:00 to 08:00 UTC. Will DATAIP's new branding boost its market presence? #Crypto #Binance #DataNetwork

• 
  TNT (@TNTCapitalC) reported 23 minutes ago

  Emotions. The current market structure and risk/reward profile don't support BTC trading at $160K–$180K. A 2–3x move from here would already be an extraordinary outcome given today's market depth and positioning. Why? Because last 10 years. The edge was never certainty. it was uncertainty. For the last decade, nobody knew where Bitcoin's terminal price could be. There was no proof, only probability. A lot of dreams and beliefs in Saylor also. Institutions bought big, they made a mistake, now they are paying the price of their greed. And they bought retail's bags also in the process. Even you, you said you have 6 figures ready to deploy, you feel you can do easy 2-3x. Safe, nice and easy. To help you and your retirement. But back in the days, 10 years ago, or even 5 years ago. Never heard anyone saying investing in BTC for retirement was easy money. In fact, investing in BTC in 2020 during Covid (6 years ago only), was risky as ****. That information asymmetry created outsized returns because the market consistently underestimated the upside. And fomo later was real when governments started accumulating very high. Today, the investment case is largely validated. Institutions, sovereigns, and corporates recognize Bitcoin as a legitimate asset. The uncertainty that once created the opportunity has been significantly reduced. And it's actually a really big thing. Same reasons why SPCX could never have been alpha. Because not enough uncertainty. It was a crowded trade. Even heard Uber driver mentioning SPCX. If 50% win and 50% lose. Who pays for it then? Where is the money coming from? Uncertainty is what gives the 100x. Certainty kills the ROI, it kills markets. Always. Don't forget. When you materialize a 100x profitable trade, it means 100 people are paying for it. (technically) It's less obvious on CEX like Binance, because you have Market Makers. But think about the exit liquidity dynamic. If you buy an altcoin on Uniswap at $1 and eventually sell it at $100, all else being equal, someone is willingly paying $100 for an asset they had no interest in buying at $1. That's the trade. You de-risk and realize gains by distributing your position into their demand. You're happy because you've crystallized a 100x return. They're happy because they believe there's still meaningful upside from $100. Markets clear because every trade has two participants with different expectations. The problem is that every additional leg higher requires increasingly larger capital inflows. As the valuation expands, the marginal buyer has to absorb supply from earlier investors who are taking profits. The higher the price, the more exit liquidity is needed to sustain the move. Going from $1 to $100 is one thing. Going from $100 to another 100x is a completely different proposition. It requires a much larger pool of incremental capital and a new wave of buyers willing to pay substantially higher prices. Alpha is made by buying before consensus. Exit liquidity arrives after consensus. Now obviously: It's not that a 100x higher price literally requires 100 times as many buyers. A small number of aggressive buyers can move price significantly if available liquidity is thin. What is generally true is that as an asset's market capitalization grows, sustaining the same percentage returns usually requires much larger dollar inflows. Going from a $10 million valuation to $1 billion is often easier than going from $100 billion to $10 trillion. This is why many hedge funds talk about "law of large numbers," "reflexivity," "marginal buyer," "liquidity," and "exit liquidity." Early investors profit because later investors are willing to pay higher prices, but each successive multiple typically requires a larger base of capital and stronger conviction. Same reason why Gold going down like a shitcoin. Most people don't understand why Gold will continue to go down. Everyone currently saying Gold is safe, Gold is the hedge. Who do you think is selling then during such certainty? That's the paradox: it's often easier to make money speculating before something is proven than after it becomes consensus. That's why we are contrarian. Because being non-contrarian doesn't work. (it didn't for us) Bitcoin could one day still reach $125K? Through continued adoption, liquidity expansion, and capital inflows? Maybe, but not now. The BM literally just started. (if you zoom out) Expecting another exponential repricing right now becomes more difficult once the market broadly agrees on the thesis. Everyone waiting and buying the dips. Even people with zero economics or finance background, and 0 investment experience, think they’re going to make easy money with one unique investment strategy. Why? On the sole basis, that apparently it worked for others in the past. We need some mad capitulation before that. Some **** hitting the fan. And it's not Saylor selling 32 btc, and it's not MSTR. SP500 dropped 80% after Dot com bubble. No one cares now. People will always say this time is different. But if SP500 dropped 80% 20 years ago, it's gonna drop 80% now. Nothing has changed. And don't think Internet bubble was larger than this current bubble. That's why we heavily positioned short on SP500 at 7,615. We are barely are break even. But let's see who is laughing in 12 months from now. Fundamentally, and will probably stop with this essay, when everyone has the same information and similar expectations, alpha compresses, and future returns tend to moderate. You won't make money with certainty. Right now, too much certainty on BTC, on GOLD, on SPX. And it's very much a remake of history. Same market, new players. Most weren't even born, or weren't old enough to invest, 20 years ago, and many are too lazy to open TradingView. Earlier today, SOL had put in a top. Every signal was flashing exhaustion, yet the market squeezed another 3% higher. That final pump only happened because of information asymmetry and surprise, the move caught participants offside. Now that the move has played out and expectations have adjusted, the asymmetry is gone. From here, the path of least resistance for SOL is lower. But a few hours ago, this was already the same path anyway. A pump doesn't change the structure. Same with BTC, same with SPX. Again, Information asymmetry created the opportunity. Consensus compresses it. The market will recover one day, BTC, SPX, Gold but not from the price levels everyone expects. In the meantime, be very careful not to burn your USDT. We are not in a bull run anymore. 🟥 US Average Hourly Earnings in 20 mins Expect volatility (though that’s just short-term noise). There’s nothing here that can sustainably push BTC higher from this point. Appreciate all your messages today. Going to archive this in case some people are interested in reading about the certainty and asymmetry discussion. Big dump coming. Gonna be another Black Thursday by the look of it. Chat soon.

• 
  Ratih (@Ratih94357237) reported 27 minutes ago

  Binance Alpha 2.0 will support the rebranding of the IP token to Data Network (DATAIP), with a 1:1 swap starting July 2, 2026. Trading will be temporarily paused to facilitate this update. Are you ready for the transition? #Crypto #Blockchain #DataNetwork

• 
  Unipcs (aka 'Bonk Guy') 🎒 (@theunipcs) reported 27 minutes ago

  i went long a couple of 'new' memecoins today: • $FARTCOIN • $PIPPIN • $POPCAT thesis: • extremely oversold memecoins that are down 95–98% from ATHs and had peak mindshare for months during the last memecoin rally • pretty decent OI and volume • very strong spot and perps listings — POPCAT and PIPPIN are on Robinhood, Coinbase, and several other top-tier CEXs, while FARTCOIN is on Coinbase, Binance perps, Hyperliquid, and several other top-tier exchanges • $FARTCOIN in particular is crazy underrated. for comparison, $SPX currently has a 2.4x higher market cap than FARTCOIN even though they both had similar ATHs, and FARTCOIN arguably has higher mindshare • i think odds are good that the market as a whole has bottomed at least for a while, which should make it easier for these coins to move • i think odds are good that these coins do not make new lows even if BTC tries to tag the lows again or make new lows • all are $SOL memecoins. i expect SOL to outperform from here, which is bullish for the Solana ecosystem and memecoins, so i expect them to retrace a meaningful portion of the aggressive selloff they've had • i'm targeting at least a few Xs on these • while i have good reason to believe these memecoins have bottomed, i'll happily cut at any time if things do not play out as i anticipate i've posted more detailed theses on all of the above coins in the past. with FARTCOIN in particular, i turned roughly ~$300k into $8m before getting wiped out on 10/10. i'm essentially trying to repeat that trade with a smaller amount. the core thesis for all of the above coins remains largely unchanged from what i've posted previously (feel free to search my X if you're interested); i just think the timing is much better now i think it's important to add that i'm not calling a full macro bottom on $BTC & crypto here (although i'd be happy if we have). i originally believed the 4-year cycle was dead, and i ended up being wrong. if the 4-year cycle plays out as it has in previous cycles, we might not fully bottom until Q4. that said, these memecoins could still deliver easy 2–5x moves or more in a bear market echo rally any way you look at it, i think the R/R favors being long here

• 
  Bella Quack (@bella_quack) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Alexxx636 @binance Stablecoins help reduce volatility in exchange rates for smoother international transactions.

• 
  James Berkeley-Clarke (@JBerkeleyClarke) reported 29 minutes ago

  @EricDoriean @THONGLUVVA Here's the issue with holochain and the entire project as a whole; Financing! Arthur has run the financial side of the business into the ground. They have no hot tokens left, the hot token is getting DELISTED on margin trading on Binance (soon DELISTED completely) & they have a skeleton crew running things. I have it on good authority that they are unable to scale. They keep getting cascade failures every time they try to put any real pressure on the framework. Bottlenecks, multiple bugs and unusable functionality don't install confidence. Yes you could say that will be overcome but will it? I'm not so sure with these people in charge. There is a lot of bullshit about all these phantom projects building in secret but the reality is there isn't. There is perhaps 30 maximum building anything. Only about five that actually looks like they would be downloaded as a happ, yours included. Here's where real business experience comes in: with those sorts of numbers holochain will run out of money before it's ever fully functioning at scale. Some years ago I invested in Eos (a similar idea) and it was far more advanced than holochain is now. It simply didn't work properly and it went bust! They had hundreds of projects building on it! Holochain framework is nowhere near ready for large scale use. Without money and development it will stay niche for decades.

• 
  Rexha 🐸 (@RexhaRexhaRexha) reported 30 minutes ago

  Ash Robin speaks on how trading crypto has evolved and how you need to adapt or die. "The thing that bums me out is that when you think about how things have changed. I was blasting like 100 grand into this coin after a Binance listing. Nowadays you would be very hard-pressed to be buying after a listing like that because they just don't do the same thing. So it's like the game has changed so much." "We react differently, and it's hard now because you have to remember those things and say like I remember what used to work back then, but that stuff's not working now."

• 
  Shah33 (@KhanG0G) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Jia_Lilly01 Yeah I want plz help madam Binance UID 209909971

• 
  Leila (@chimpnzee) reported 33 minutes ago

  6/ Integration depth. This is more than a surface level marketing partnership. JustLend officially added Binance Wallet to their connection options. Technical implementation at the wallet layer. That means: ✓ Direct DApp portal access ✓ Reduced friction for supply/staking ✓ Institutional-grade UX for retail users

• 
  Yasu0x.hl🫀 (@yasu0x1) reported 33 minutes ago

  @hellosuoha @binance classic. just keep averaging down into a hole and see if the bottom has a basement

• 
  TECA (@CryptoTeca__) reported 36 minutes ago

  @CazroWeb3 @binance Better access is what turns niche markets into mainstream ones.

• 
  Old Skeptic (@SergeyP77) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Pupchicoin @binance @injective Support from Binance is a powerful signal for the entire market

• 
  SurfLiquid 🌊 (@Surf_Liquid) reported 40 minutes ago

  EU Binance users just lost access to Earn and new deposits overnight. Your money in Surf works differently. It sits in a vault only you own. Nobody can switch it off. Nobody can change the terms. The rate keeps moving. The door stays open.

• 
  Austine2 (@austineonyeka2) reported 41 minutes ago

  $GIGGLE 👀 One of the most interesting charts on Binance right now. $Giggle is @cz_binance affiliated token. ✅ Total Supply: 1 Million (I love low supply Gems) ✅ Down more than 90% from its highs ✅ Trading back near a major support zone. Trade idea: 📍Entry: $22 - $26 🛑 Invalidation: Daily close below $20 🎯 Target 1: $42 (69%+) 🎯 Target 2: $55 (125%+) 🎯 Target 3: $81 (229%+) 🎯 Moon Target: $270 (992%+) Risk/Reward looks attractive if this support holds. I wouldn't be surprised to see a violent squeeze higher. Position: Small starter position. Will add only on confirmation. Not financial advice. Just sharing my thesis publicly.

• 
  MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported 41 minutes ago

  Hundreds of millions of $XRP have left major exchanges over the past several weeks. Binance reserves are down over 170 million $XRP since mid May. Upbit is down around 58 million $XRP. Coinbase is showing a higher share of whale sized withdrawals. That means coins are moving off exchanges instead of sitting there for short term trading. At the same time, the $XRP Ledger is running clean. Ledgers are closing around 3.85 seconds. Payments are steady. AMM pools have real liquidity locked. RLUSD still dominates the stablecoin side of XRPL. No validator drama. No abnormal network behavior. LendingProtocol, SingleAssetVault, and fixCleanup3_2_0 are still below activation levels, so nothing new went live today. Coins are moving off exchanges. The rails are running. Liquidity is on ledger. That’s the signal.

• 
  Adam Edwards (@Popenanyo) reported 45 minutes ago

  @AlphaW0lfCrypto Some of us punters can't wait for the market to get its **** together, already heavily down on hbar and xlm and pretty much everything else. Synapse on money I've made this year and that's only because binance hit it with a monitoring tag.

• 
  SUPPORT TEAM (@Suportteamm) reported 46 minutes ago

  @very_common_guy Btc dev and many other great projects don't lure their community with religious gilbarish like "believers", great projects are working hard to be listed in great exchanges to bring value to holders, marpy said God will do it, that binance will beg him to list his scam wkc. etc

• 
  Chartist (@ChartistXBT) reported 50 minutes ago

  @fernandowavesfx That piece of **** is a big scammer from way back in the day. He was and still a @binance plant. Absolutely garbage vile **** he is

• 
  MetaFi Consortium (@Meta_UnityNet) reported 51 minutes ago

  First, we need to clarify a basic concept: what is the essence of compliance? Compliance is a baseline, not a ceiling. It is a guardrail to protect users, not a marketing tool for PR campaigns. The cryptocurrency industry was born after the 2008 financial crisis, and its core spirit was precisely a rebellion against the centralized monopoly and regulatory failures of traditional finance. If an exchange treats compliance as its only selling point and promotes it everywhere, that actually exposes its overall weakness in product capability, technology, and liquidity. Only when the product itself lacks highlights does “we obey the rules” become the biggest highlight. It is like a race car driver repeatedly emphasizing on the track that he has fastened his seat belt. Is it important? Of course. But people buy tickets to watch speed, skill, and overtaking — not to see how properly a safety belt is worn. OKX treats regulatory certificates as badges of honor, as if obtaining a license naturally grants it industry leadership. The problem with this mindset is that compliance is an entry threshold, not a trophy. Once everyone crosses that threshold, what determines who runs ahead will always be product strength, innovation, and insight into user demand — not who got the admission ticket first. Besides, Star Xu’s OKX does not even hold more regulatory licenses than Binance. It is worth noting that, as of June 2026, according to data from the European Securities and Markets Authority, among more than 1,200 pre-registered companies, only 210 had obtained full authorization. This shows that compliance under the MiCA framework is itself a long marathon, not a short sprint. Star Xu using phased progress in a compliance process as a weapon to overpower competitors is neither professional nor respectable.

• 
  Scarlet (@Donald20251) reported 52 minutes ago

  Yet another piece of FUD that bundles old news, lawsuits, and statements from former employees. Binance will handle the legal and regulatory issues it faces; it’s enough for users to continue voting with their feet. “The darker it gets, the stronger we become”—that’s not just empty talk.

• 
  Nyx (@Nyx1139184) reported 53 minutes ago

  The perp is green and the month is red. If you've run a leveraged book, you've had this argument with your own spreadsheet. Standard unrealized P&L on a perp is (mark - entry) x size. By convention it doesn't include funding, and funding is a separate cashflow that never touches the mark. On Binance, OKX and Bybit it's a snapshot: you pay or receive only if you're holding at the funding stamp. On Hyperliquid and dYdX it accrues continuously. Short the perp against spot and you're collecting it; sit long into positive funding and you're paying it. Funding around 10% annualized is roughly 20bp a week hitting your cash that the position line never books. Book the position at the mark and let funding fall into cash, and the per-strategy P&L an LP reads is off on any perp held across a settlement, whichever way funding ran. The errors net into the cash line, so top-line NAV still foots. What it's built from doesn't. So I built Nyx to value each position off the reconciled venue balance, the number after settled funding has landed. That caps the miss at one funding interval, not a month. Funding your book missed shows up as the venue balance drifting from your ledger, a reconciliation break flagged the same week, not found at audit. Read-only keys, no withdrawal. Perp desks: does your per-strategy P&L tie to venue balances after each funding settlement, or do you find the drift in the cash line at month-end?

• 
  Oun Mohammad Naqvi (@ounmohammad75) reported 55 minutes ago

  I followed EVERY instruction Binance gave me. I completed every step.I submitted every proof and document requested. I cooperated fully and waited patiently. But even after doing everything asked of me, the issue remains unresolved. @cz_binance @binance @BinanceHelpDesk

• 
  Leon Czajkowski (@LeonCzajko77747) reported 58 minutes ago

  Binance gains approval to provide crypto services in the Philippines, marking a significant step for the company's expansion. This move could boost local adoption and spark new opportunities. Will regulation help grow crypto markets? #Crypto #Binance #Philippines

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 1 hour ago

  bitcoin long-term holder SOPR just printed 0.615. holders with 5+ months cost basis are selling at 38.5% average losses. this reading has only gone below 0.65 three times: march 2020, october 2022, july 2023. three for three at marking cycle bottoms. meanwhile binance retail inflows hit 329 BTC/day, lowest since the exchange was founded, down from 2,690/day at the 2021 peak. the people who need to sell have almost finished selling. the question is whether you're on the same side as the entity that just absorbed 270k BTC at $59k or on the other side of that trade