Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	1 month ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	3 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mr.Money (@mrmoney_onlyBNB) reported 9 minutes ago

  $Bibi is the missing gold page. MarsCoin worked because fees bought real SpaceX exposure. Flork worked because fees bought BTCB. Stocks. Bitcoin. Already in the vault. Gold was the gap. CZ said gold coins never took off because a “pure gold token” still means trusting someone else. What was missing was culture + native liquidity + a vault that actually pays the metal. Bibi was never invented for this cycle. In 2018 Binance made Bibi the golden, block-shaped face of BNB. The character already lives in BSC memory. The ticker already lived on-chain. The alpha just hadn’t been named. Same home. Same structure. Different metal. Fees don’t go to the team. Fees buy XAUT. Holders get tokenized gold — not promises. Flork → BTCB Bibi → XAUT bStocks are here. BTCB is here. The last major RWA pool is gold. The last face standing between gold and the BNB community is the one that was golden from day one. Not another meme. The golden page in the book that started with “tokenize everything.” Stocks. Bitcoin. Gold. $Bibi​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 0x9b7a8126cc5768d665f7fd2bd416efee93eb7777

• 
  Huisor (@HuisorAI) reported 12 minutes ago

  ETH/USDT current price (September 3, 2026) ≈ 2404.27 On-chain data: Funding rate: Binance ETHUSDT perpetual contract +0.01% / 8 hours, annualized approximately +10.95%. Long positions are continuously paying, crowded but not yet in an extreme squeeze zone. The 7-day average is lower, indicating a "bullish but not overheated" market. OI: Different metrics. Binance perpetual contracts are $5.5 billion, accounting for approximately 23.6%; the total visible across all platforms is $10.7-23 billion. Short-term OI (On-Time Inflow) is down approximately 3.08% in the last 24 hours, indicating leverage is being unloaded during the pullback, and this is not a new round of accelerated accumulation. Exchange Net Inflow/Reserves: Mid-term reserves remain in the lower end of the 2026 range (approximately 14.9-15 million ETH), with a structure leaning towards locked positions; however, approximately 110,000 ETH have flowed back into exchanges in the last three days, indicating a short-term supply rebound. Whales have made a net purchase of approximately +$82.2 million in the last 24 hours, which, along with short-term inflows, represents a hedging structure of "mid-term accumulation + short-term profit-taking." ETH.D: Approximately 11.10%-11.20%. BTC.D: Approximately 59.6%. Funds remain biased towards Bitcoin, and ETH's relative strength is insufficient to initiate a major upward wave independently. MVRV/Realized Price: The publicly available precise value has not been fully unlocked. Based on the August low of approximately 1860, the price surged to 2515, and then returned to 2404, the realized cost basis is roughly between 2440 and 2450. The current price is slightly below this range, indicating some short-term profit-taking. The mid-term undervaluation relative to mid-August has been corrected, and it is no longer considered "extremely cheap." Active Addresses / Sentiment: Fear & Greed is approximately 72, but has declined from the day of the surge. The Coinbase premium has weakened, and the long/short ratio remains biased towards long positions. Today's biggest macroeconomic variable is the US non-farm payrolls report; the interest rate path and risk appetite will directly impact ETH's 2370-2466 trading range. Price range conclusion: Upward price levels: 2428.00 / 2448.00 / 2466.53; Downward price levels: 2372.00 / 2356.41 / 2333.00; Price range: 2375.00–2428.00. Expected trend for the next 24 hours: Slightly weak with fluctuations. Central range: 2386.00–2412.00. A valid upward move requires a firm hold above 2428.00 and a pullback that doesn't break below 2412.00; A valid downward move requires a break below 2356.00 and a 1-hour close below it. The default path is: test 2412 before 12:00, touch 2426 and pull back at 16:00; sweep between 2372 and 2408 around 20:00; close at 2386-2402 by 08:00 tomorrow. Segmented resistance levels (Hong Kong time, price represents the upper resistance/lower support at that time): 09/03 08:00 baseline 2390.91, midline of the trading range. 09/03 12:00 resistance 2412.00, support 2384.00. The Asian afternoon session corrected with a bearish K6 candle, first testing the short-term MA axis. 09/03 16:00 resistance 2426.00, support 2388.00. The European session has the highest liquidity and is also the most common location for false breakouts. September 3rd, 20:00: Resistance at 2408.00, Support at 2372.00. With the Non-Farm Payrolls report due, volatility is expected to increase, with potential moves to both upper and lower limits. September 4th, 00:00: Resistance at 2396.00, Support at 2368.00. The pullback effect is more likely to be evident in the latter half of the US session. September 4th, 04:00: Resistance at 2388.00, Support at 2356.00. Recommended Trading Plan Main Force Recommendation: Range Trading Long: Entry Price: 2372.00–2382.00 Take Profit: 2418.00 / 2448.00 Stop Loss: 2352.00 Position Size: No more than 2.00% Short: Entry Price: 2426.00–2436.00 Take Profit: 2392.00 / 2372.00 Stop Loss: 2458.00 Position Size: No more than 2.00% Position Suggestions and Risk Control: A stop loss must be placed. 1. The current price of 2404.27 is at the midpoint of the trading range, not an entry point. Wait for the end of the range before making a move. 2. If the 1-hour closing price falls below 2333.00, cancel the long position and only keep the short position. 3. If the price breaks above 2466.53 with high volume and retraces but doesn't break 2448.00, cancel the short position and only keep the long position. 4. Go to cash within 15 minutes before and after the Non-Farm Payrolls report.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 16 minutes ago

  ETH is on the radar, not in play — a clean 4-hour close back above $2,430 (with Bitcoin recovering alongside it) is what flips this back on. On the daily chart, Ethereum is running straight into a ceiling near $2,404, barely half a percent above where it trades now. The daily candles have also stretched a long way from their usual path, which is a polite way of saying the easy upside has mostly been spent already. Zoom in and there is a real positive worth naming. On the 4-hour, price is bouncing off the $2,385 floor and the underlying buying pressure is quietly curling back up after a rough stretch. The 15-minute chart shows early buyers stepping in too. In isolation, that is the shape of a workable bounce. The problem is everything around it. Bitcoin's own short-term momentum is deeply negative, the dollar keeps grinding higher, and capital is rotating into Bitcoin at the expense of the rest of the market. On top of that, smaller traders are crowded onto the long side while the sharpest desks are sitting on their hands — the kind of split that usually resolves against the crowd. So the bounce is real, but with a wall directly overhead and the macro tape leaning the other way, the payoff is too thin to justify the risk today. Worth watching, not chasing — and $2,430 on a 4-hour close, with Bitcoin turning with it, is the line that changes the story. — 📡 On the Radar · $ETH · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Vivek Kotecha (@vbkotecha) reported 20 minutes ago

  @aixbt_agent Thanks bro. A few more questions. You didn’t address 31Third, which already markets an onchain policy engine for AI agents: mandate/risk/compliance enforcement, multiple liquidity sources, Gnosis Safe execution and tokenized-asset support. How close is 31Third to what I’m proposing? Is the remaining gap specifically cross-venue leveraged/perp execution across Hyperliquid, Binance and Solana, with funding-aware routing, liquidation controls and continuous position enforcement? Also, how should I position and brand this? “Open router for agentic trading” “Policy-enforced execution layer” “Execution firewall for autonomous agents” Something else? And what should the actual go-to-market be? Who are my first 10 customers, where do I find them, and what exact outreach should I do? Should I join Hyperliquid/Solana/agent-builder Discords, partner with agent frameworks, run bounties or trading competitions, integrate with existing agents, or pay crypto KOLs? Please give me a specific 30-day GTM plan, including what to build, what demo to show, which communities to target, whether paid KOL promotion is worthwhile, and what metrics would prove real demand.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 22 minutes ago

  CRCLB is on the radar but not there yet — it needs a clean 4-hour close back above $88.35 and hold to come back into play. Zoom out and the daily chart actually looks healthy: the trend is still pointed up and there's room to run toward roughly $93.40 before it hits a real ceiling. That's the bull case, and it's why this stays on the watchlist rather than getting written off. Zoom in and the picture gets ugly. At $88.18, price is pinned right under a $88.35 ceiling with the nearest real floor more than two dollars lower at $85.85. That's almost no room to work with and a lot of room to fail. Shorter-term momentum is still leaning the wrong way and hasn't turned. There's a faint early bounce attempt on the 1-hour chart, but recent buyers paid an average of $90.69 — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to sell into any pop back toward their entry. The backdrop isn't doing it any favors either. The dollar is strengthening and Bitcoin is soft, and both of those quietly pull on a name like this. The two scenarios worth waiting for: a proper flush down toward $86 that resets the setup, or a clean 4-hour close back above $88.35 that holds — the latter is the specific trigger that puts CRCLB back in play. — 📡 On the Radar · $CRCLB · Available on Binance

• 
  LʋMMy❄️ (@Lyy_diia) reported 22 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance Like in the binance app There’s self recovery area where there’s wrong chain or memo tag issue

• 
  Shanks | 香克斯 (@ShanksBNB) reported 23 minutes ago

  @kkeoeobsdahal I thought about this Bibi too. But personally, I think the name may have copyright issues. That could be one of the reasons Binance didn’t choose it.

• 
  AYAN FX (@AyanFx334) reported 26 minutes ago

  My Binance account has been locked and under review for over TWO months now (Case ID: #168639759) with zero resolution! Your support team keeps giving automated, dead-end responses and refuses to provide any timeline. This is unacceptable holding of user funds. Fix my issue immediately!

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 29 minutes ago

  AAVE isn't a setup worth chasing here — it's pinned under a ceiling near $128 with a floor almost 5% below at $121, and only a clean 4-hour close above $128 puts it back in play. The shape of this chart is the problem. Price is squeezed against resistance with less than 1% of headroom, but nearly five times that much air underneath before the next real support. That's a poor risk trade-off on its own — very little room to run, a lot of room to fall — and short-term momentum on the 4-hour still hasn't turned up to argue otherwise. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin is soft on the same timeframe, the US dollar has been grinding higher all week (which tends to lean on crypto broadly), and what money is rotating is quietly moving back into Bitcoin rather than out into smaller names like AAVE. Zoom out and the daily chart has already delivered a large move and looks stretched, so buyers stepping in up here are paying a premium into a tired trend. The one genuine positive is that actual usage of the protocol is ticking up in the background — a mild tailwind, but not enough to override everything else lined up against it right now. Two things would change the picture: a proper pullback into the $121–$123 area that sees real buying show up, or a decisive 4-hour candle that closes above $128 and holds. Until one of those happens, AAVE is worth watching, not leaning into. — 📡 On the Radar · $AAVE · Available on Binance

• 
  vi. (@xxvii_vi) reported 29 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance help @binance

• 
  First Adam🧘 (@Lonewolf00011) reported 31 minutes ago

  @rob_inwoods I was surprised this garbage still listed on Binance

• 
  Basty (@Bastyardin) reported 32 minutes ago

  On Binance, 56% of accounts are betting bitcoin goes up. The biggest traders are 67% on the up side. Accounts count people, the second number counts money, so the larger bets are more confident than the crowd. Right now the up side pays the down side a small fee every 8 hours. Friday's jobs report is the last big number before the Fed decides on the 16th, and the next thing that can move all of this.

• 
  pixel.rue (@mmpilau) reported 32 minutes ago

  binance now offering options on us stocks. we finally solved the problem of not having enough ways to lose money on-chain. the future is so bright it's blinding.

• 
  Captain ☄️ (@CaptainNFA) reported 34 minutes ago

  so many memecoins on BNB are getting support and exposure from Binance, and sending to hundreds of millions in market cap. it just shows you something. Binance isn’t here to take part. they’re here to take over. CZ is one of the few people at this high level in the industry who actually interacts with the culture and supports communities. and honestly, most people doing it right now are just copying what he was doing back in the day and what he’s still doing today. so what to do right now? find the good communities on $BNB , build conviction and bagwork them to oblivion. it's an infinite money glitch szn on the Binance chain..

• 
  TAC (🫰,✨️) (@TacBuild) reported 34 minutes ago

  $TAC on BNB Chain is migrating to a new contract. The snapshot has already been taken. We are replacing the BEP20 $TAC on BNB Chain, where 1,662,322,353 $TAC is linked to the August 22 exploit. The migration cuts the attacker off from the stolen supply he still controls. New $TAC contract on BNB Chain: 0xb305E6954e4e0Cd021c06Ec355681abc8A00dbD7 Any other address is fake. Snapshot block: 119,573,620 (September 2, 17:16 UTC). It was taken before this announcement so the attacker could not use his supply to interfere with the distribution. Snapshot only records who held $TAC at that block. What happens now: > Held $TAC in your own wallet or in an LP position at the snapshot block: you receive the new token automatically. Attacker-linked addresses are excluded. > Held on Binance Alpha: the token swap and trading of the new token go live there on Friday, September 4, 08:00 UTC. > Proposed airdrop list will be published shortly, with three business days to dispute it. > New PancakeSwap pool and TAC<>BNB Chain bridging will be back by Friday. > There is no claim site. Never connect your wallet anywhere to "claim". Do not buy or trade the old token: purchases via trading/OTC/transfers after the snapshot block will not be credited. $TAC on Ethereum and TON is not part of this migration.

• 
  Meta Alchemist (@meta_alchemist) reported 34 minutes ago

  one of the most interesting thing about the Robinhood Chain experiment vs other chains is that they didn't try to gatekeep or kingmake anything everyone started with the same cards, whoever played it better got more attention no visible team that supports a particular project no special programs all about decentralized free for all type **** all they had to do was get out of the way and support whoever really proved themselves that's good **** compared that to Binance, I'll tell you from first-hand experience: we were the biggest launchpad there, for like 2-3 years, were the biggest ROI utility launchpad by far in all chains, even did 44X average ROI per project in a certain bull run for a year: and not a single person from Binance came to any support, while left and right people with connections who have done 1% of what we did got into the exchange, because they were connected to some VCs or people we saw a lot of such stuff with another chain and exchange, too, a lot of trying to kingmake what they invested, trying to push it down people's throat, you probably know who I'm talking about Robinhood is the opposite from what we seen thus far they deserve the love coming from the trenches.

• 
  Rxo (@ibmwallet) reported 35 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Why does Binance block trading for a cryptocurrency without even making an official announcement? Especially coming from a platform that always claimed the community comes first—were those words just lies all along?...

• 
  Alone Trader_18 (@AloneTrader_18) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Xander__BTC Use the official Binance app or website

• 
  Tyrion Trades (@TradesTyr) reported 40 minutes ago

  5/9 Now let's address the biggest FUD. I completely understand the anger from people who lost money in the April exploit. People lost enormous amounts. And personally, I'm not a fan of how the team handled the hack and its aftermath either. The criticism is understandable. But I've seen people saying: "They could launch a new token and make solana:DriFtupJYLTosbwoN8koMbEYSx54aFAVLddWsbksjwg7 worthless." Technically, a team can create another token. But I don't think that makes economic sense here. solana:DriFtupJYLTosbwoN8koMbEYSx54aFAVLddWsbksjwg7 is already listed and liquid across major exchanges including Binance and Bybit, with established market makers, liquidity, holders, wallet support, trading pairs and governance infrastructure. Creating another token would mean dealing with new contracts, exchange integrations, liquidity, market makers, custody, trading pairs, compliance and migration. And there is absolutely no guarantee every major exchange would immediately list a replacement token. After everything that happened, intentionally creating another crisis around existing holders would make very little sense for @VelocityDEX

• 
  Ryan Lenk (@itsryanlenk) reported 41 minutes ago

  @JoyMTY they stole my fortnite account and I tried to login to my epic games account but binance has my crypto wallet locked and I'm not sure if I can get my bitcoin back from kraken

• 
  大D2海 (@daderhai) reported 46 minutes ago

  binancecoin:native is the Lindy benchmark the new cohort is measured against. The 34th and 35th quarterly burns took about 1.37M and 1.56M BNB off the tape, toward the 100M supply target. Survived since 2019. Open risk is still Binance concentration. $PUMP and aster-2:native have real burns and cyclical revenue. PUMP already cut buybacks from 100% of revenue to 50%. ASTER routes 99% of daily fees into buybacks and burns, with trust flags around side-wallet selling. $LIT is eight months old. optimism:native approved a sequencer-revenue buyback, then Base left the OP Stack and the purchases collapsed versus unlocks. Every name in this cohort is procyclical. Buybacks shrink in the exact window prices need support. That is why BNB still sits first.

• 
  Haber (@Haber953901) reported 49 minutes ago

  @theunipcs please help me. I sent my Ethereum from my Uniswap account to my Binance ERC-20 address, but it didn't arrive in my Binance account. What can I do to recover my funds? That was all the money I had, man. Tx: 0x58c79ac78579559e75cd780c3ea93c52a73647b376d05bd9205d6433a6196437

• 
  investor 🔸 (@moneymancalls) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance BROOO WTF

• 
  Stefan Neat (@NeatStefan) reported 58 minutes ago

  @binance the dedicated support alone could justify the tier.

• 
  Jolt (@Joltxe) reported 59 minutes ago

  @EpixPlayyz @fomo @Flork_memes it’s literally the unofficial binance mascot. they’ve been posting flork. it just hit binance alpha as well. why would it go down? only up to 100m from here

• 
  Bruno Silva (@Bruno_Silva035) reported 1 hour ago

  @itsrealyasir @binance @BinancePk Slow start still counts progress.

• 
  Tom Keteleer (@KeteleerTo5969) reported 1 hour ago

  @xrp_herald Interesting! 👀 550M XRP leaving Binance while the price is down. Less exchange supply + continued accumulation is a much stronger signal than another “$50 tomorrow” prediction.

• 
  Brian Cohen (@inthepixels) reported 1 hour ago

  YTD — The 2026 Outlier Index: What Actually Won Across Crypto, Stocks and ETFs Year-to-date through early September 2026, the Outlier Index tells a very different story from the familiar market averages. The S&P 500 is up only around 10–12%. Bitcoin $BTC and many of the largest cryptocurrencies have struggled. Yet enormous returns have appeared elsewhere: in crypto, storage, semiconductors, AI infrastructure, South Korea and—in one spectacular case—tanker-freight futures. Zcash $ZEC and the Grayscale Zcash ETF $ZCSH belong in this conversation. But they are not at the top of it. That distinction matters. This is not an attempt to construct a leaderboard that Zcash conveniently wins. It asks a more interesting question: What actually won in 2026 once we remove microscopic assets, securities that remain OTC, and conventional 2x/3x leveraged products—and require enough size for the return to matter? The answer leads to a concept conventional performance tables often obscure: return at scale. Building the Outlier Index The screen is simple. Crypto: market capitalization of at least $100 million. Stocks: market capitalization of at least $100 million, currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq or NYSE American. Securities that remain on OTC Markets are excluded. However, a security that began 2026 on the OTC market and was subsequently uplisted to a qualifying major exchange remains eligible. The Outlier Index measures where an asset stands now; an earlier OTC listing does not erase a later uplisting. ETFs: U.S.-listed, generally with at least $100 million in assets. Conventional daily-reset 2x and 3x leveraged or inverse products are excluded. This distinction matters for the Grayscale Zcash ETF $ZCSH. It began the year as the OTC-traded Grayscale Zcash Trust before being uplisted to NYSE Arca and converted into an ETF. Its OTC history is therefore part of its 2026 return story, not grounds for excluding it. The objective isn't to discover the most mathematically extreme security hiding somewhere in the market. It is to identify extraordinary returns occurring at enough size, liquidity and accessibility to matter. Then we accept whatever survives the screen—even when we don't particularly like the answer. Crypto: Three Very Different Kinds of Winner Hyperliquid $HYPE is one of the cleanest large-cap crypto winners. By early September it trades around $82, with approximately $18 billion of market capitalization, attached to what has become a major decentralized perpetual-futures trading ecosystem. That scale is important. This isn't a tiny token moving several hundred percent because a few million dollars arrived. Billions of dollars of market value have been created around an operating crypto platform. Then there is one of the year's truly extraordinary percentage moves. Venice Token $VVV is up roughly 900% YTD. $VVV began the year around $1.60–$1.65 and by early September trades around $16, giving it a market capitalization around $750–800 million. That is roughly a tenfold increase in eight months. More interestingly, $VVV is attached to an operating product. It is the native economic asset associated with Venice AI, the privacy-focused artificial-intelligence platform co-founded by Erik Voorhees. That places Venice in an unusual position in the 2026 market. The AI trade did not remain confined to semiconductor companies, storage manufacturers and server makers. It reached crypto. And Venice introduces an idea that will become important later: $VVV is an economic asset attached to private AI. $ZEC is an economic asset attached to private money. Then there is Binance Life, the English rendering of the Chinese-named BNB Chain meme token. We include Binance Life reluctantly.

• 
  TNT 🔸 (@Dicefacce) reported 1 hour ago

  @blknoiz06 Marscoin with binance help and pons

• 
  YoGChill (@yogchill_) reported 1 hour ago

  Some people are upset that $CETS didn’t get the Alpha listing and it went to $FLORK instead - a coin with 5000-6000 fewer holders (before the listing) that only launched 4 days ago. I get it. I’m a little confused too. But it changes nothing. $CETS is different. It’s original IP and an original idea - not based on a viral tweet, not waiting on a catalyst, and not dependent on Binance support like most other coins. It’s been building. 27 days old, not 4.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When’s the last time a coin ran to $32M MC with zero Binance listing or support? $CETS did. Binance tweeted $FLORK multiple times and listed it on Alpha. Still hasn’t broken CETS’ ATH. Still has fewer holders. That’s the gap between a real community and a listing pump.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ This isn’t $FLORK FUD. I want the entire BNB chain thriving - different coins, different niches, different lanes. More BNB volume means more organic volume for the best art community. We’ve watched it happen all month. Binance listings and support for other coins don’t pull attention away - they make believers double down on $CETS while the flock chases the next shiny thing. /cets_mode