Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	3 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 2 minutes ago

  BFUSD is a pass — it's a dollar-pegged token trading at $0.9996, and there's simply no room above it to make the trade worth taking. Every chart here, daily down to hourly, is a flat line hugging $1. The "moves" you see are fractions of a cent. That's by design — BFUSD is built to sit on the dollar, not to trend. So even in the best case where momentum turns up, price runs straight back into the $1 peg before any meaningful gain can develop. The reward side of the equation just isn't there. The backdrop makes it worse. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both drifting lower on the 4-hour, the US dollar is firming up (which historically leans on crypto), and this specific pair barely trades — only around $2 million in daily turnover. Thin liquidity plus a capped ceiling is the opposite of what a swing setup needs. None of that means the chart is "bad." It means the instrument is structurally wrong for this kind of trade. A clean-looking base only matters if there's somewhere for price to go. The one thing that would put BFUSD back on the radar: a decisive push above $1.001 on the 4-hour with real volume behind it. That would signal the peg is actually breaking, and the whole read would need to be rebuilt from scratch. Until then, there's nothing here to lean into. — 📘 Pass Note · $BFUSD · Available on Binance

• 
  Boris NEOF1 (@NEOFORCEONE) reported 7 minutes ago

  @kfXGGjovH2HKn4u @c_schuchardt Did dude @kfXGGjovH2HKn4u is using a small baby to promote Chinese scam, is clear to see he is NGD shill ( They have 0 moral ) They are Chinese scammers, all is pump and dump, that is the whole game, market manipuilation and harvesting people, that is why they don't really care about updates, as they are here to harvest people, that is why all things are slow in core-dev segment also, they don't care to work, as there is no incentive to progress on global goal, there is no leadership only a Chinese scamming boss and his scamming helpers/Yes man, soon court process for creating a global international, money laundering ring ( Da Hongfei ) And his partners in crime NGD etc... where Erik will be part of the court process also. They know abot pumps and dumps before they happened on Binance they orchestrated. Etc...

• 
  Vweeter (@VweeterLimited) reported 9 minutes ago

  What an amazing month. We have hit the binance gift card rate limit for the month and there is nothing we can do about it right now apart from asking you to claim via Faucetpay instead (or web3 method for Cryptopop) until July. This applies to all our apps. So if you are seeing a 400 error when claiming Binance gift cards from our app, don’t be surprised, we literally ran out.

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 9 minutes ago

  On June 12, 2026, SpaceX went public on Nasdaq at $135 per share. Over $1 billion in customer orders placed through Binance, Bybit, and Bitget never received a single share. This isn't a story about tokenization failing. It's a story about what tokenization still can't control, and what it has to become next. Weeks before the IPO, the pitch was everywhere. Bybit launched "IPO Express" on June 7th, letting users subscribe to SpaceX allocations using crypto. Binance ran its own SPCXx campaign. Bitget opened subscriptions with a $10 minimum. All three were routing demand through xStocks, a tokenized equity platform owned by Kraken's parent company Payward. The mechanics looked clean. Users would submit non-binding indications of interest, receive SPCXx tokens representing one SpaceX share held by a regulated custodian, and gain exposure to the most anticipated IPO in a decade. Binance alone pulled $557 million in USDC deposits from nearly 28,000 wallet addresses. Then June 12 arrived, and the chain broke. xStocks couldn't deliver the underlying assets. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the IPO's lead underwriters, controlled retail allocation. SpaceX had aimed for 30% retail access. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion. Before pricing, CNBC reported the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range. The crypto platforms' slice was effectively nothing. Bybit refunded everyone and added a 10% APR compensation on locked funds. Binance refunded all USDC and announced a $1 million distribution of its own bStocks SpaceX tokens as consolation. Bitget refunded with gas vouchers and future campaign access. SpaceX shares closed their first day up 19%. The people who had their capital locked in subscription queues missed all of it. The reflex reaction was to call this a tokenization failure. It wasn't. As one person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk, the issue was never the technology. The blockchain worked. xStocks could mint. Fluxion's RFQ infrastructure was live. Merchant Moe had liquidity incentives ready to go. Every layer of the on-chain stack was operational. The failure happened one layer upstream, at the point where a Wall Street underwriter decided who gets shares and who doesn't. That decision has nothing to do with blockchains, smart contracts, or tokenization protocols. It's a relationship business that's been running the same way since the 1980s. As one industry observer put it plainly: if the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated, and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize. This is where Mantle's story becomes interesting, because Mantle has been articulating exactly this problem since before the SpaceX episode made it impossible to ignore. Mantle's stated thesis isn't that it's an L2 competing on throughput. It's that it's a distribution layer for real-world assets. That framing matters now in a way it didn't before June 12. The Q1 2026 ecosystem report published the week before the IPO showed RWA TVL up 27.4% quarter-over-quarter to $247.5M. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT through Aave reached $90.1M, bringing institutional lending yield on-chain. xStocks launched ten digitally issued US equities on Mantle, including TSLAx, NVDAx, and AAPLx, making Mantle's RWA stack one of the broadest on any single L2. The $2.4B Mantle Treasury, the largest DAO treasury globally, gives institutional issuers the credibility signal they need when choosing where to deploy. Eric Manoukian at Messari described it directly: most L2s are competing on throughput or developer tooling. Mantle is competing on asset distribution. But the SpaceX episode draws a hard line around what "asset distribution" can mean at this stage.

• 
  Sukumar (@Sukumar9501) reported 10 minutes ago

  Dear @BinanceHelpDesk, I am a loyal Binance user and actively participate in Binance campaigns. Unfortunately, Binance Traders League displays "This activity is not available in your region" even though I am fully verified. Could your team please clarify the eligibility for Indian users or review my account? Thank you for your support. #Binance #BinanceTradersLeague

• 
  ap milly (@ap_milly777) reported 13 minutes ago

  Community doesnt matter anymore. $WOJAK sol community been grinding for 6months+ just for a bundle pvp to come up with paid kols and get a binance listing. Asteroid at only 70m after 3 elon and spacex shills. Floki went to 3b with much less. Doge to 90b. This **** is cooked😭🙏

• 
  CryptoSocials (@CryptoSocialsX) reported 19 minutes ago

  $INJ is a crypto trend on X today, ranked #13. What traders are talking about: • Injective is being positioned as the dedicated finance layer L1, emphasizing DeFi, RWAs, and AI applications with low transaction fees. • The network is seeing adoption for novel use cases, including the tokenization of music IP and AI agent payments. • Technical analysis suggests buyer absorption and potential price targets, with some users expressing strong long-term conviction. • Key infrastructure upgrades and partnerships, such as the native EVM mainnet launch and Coinbase support, are noted as significant developments. • Large entities like Revolut and Binance are increasing their $INJ holdings, indicating institutional interest. Users posting about $INJ most on X today: @0xtega_ - 2 @CadeONeill - 2

• 
  Lotz (@Radio_Tua23) reported 23 minutes ago

  @ap_milly777 @BinanceUS Wojak Solana is wrong, it's impossible for a class like Binance to make the wrong choice hahahaa

• 
  Crypto Tolga (@CryptoTolga_) reported 23 minutes ago

  $NEAR #BİNANCE #BİTCOİN #NEARUSDT is at a critical level Price has reacted strongly from the lower boundary of the ascending channel and now appears to be preparing for its next directional move. If the $2.70–$2.75 resistance zone breaks, we could see a strong push toward the upper boundary of the channel. In that scenario, a move above $3 and eventually toward the $4 region would not be surprising. Support: $2.00 Breakout Level: $2.75 All eyes are on these levels. 👀📈

• 
  ProfitableMan (@ProfitableMan1) reported 25 minutes ago

  On June 1, 2026, Binance introduced US equities trading for eligible users outside the United States. This is not Binance issuing its own shares. It is access to over 7,000 existing stocks and ETFs already listed on US exchanges. Apple, Tesla, Nvidia and thousands of others. Key details confirmed in the official announcement: Zero commission on trades. Fractional shares from as little as $5. Trading is available 24 hours a day, five days a week for select equities. Funding via USDC, USDT, BNB and other supported stablecoins. All of this sits inside your existing Binance account.

• 
  SeekeronChain π² 🌶️ (@mbombelasilver) reported 28 minutes ago

  @binance You had one job, literally on bloody job. HODL the damn line, can't trust y'all for ****.

• 
  Mdx (@helloitsmdx) reported 28 minutes ago

  HOLY **** WHO JUST SENT ME 1BTC ON MY BINANCE ???? that's right ******* nobody

• 
  ManelXBT (@manelxbt) reported 28 minutes ago

  @worldnetwork @FortuneMagazine Guys please don’t sell any coins, binance is now trying to sell the price down. Our goal is to keep holding the tokens Main target above 21$ Realistic short term target 8$

• 
  Guruprasad Venkatesha (@Guru_BCUBE) reported 30 minutes ago

  @tweet_buzzer I have withdrawn 40% of my funds from Binance and parked it in Bybit. I will wait for one more week and then pull out everything. The whole platform has to shutdown if they don’t obtain Mica but personally I feel it’s impossible for them to obtain due to criminal investigation in France and other constraints.

• 
  Bruno Silva (@Bruno_Silva035) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Lev_arden @binance @BinanceAcademy Slow change, big opportunity ahead.

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 40 minutes ago

  My account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.

• 
  connector🦄💨✨ (@connector_13) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Bria_OKX Sure they listed $USDC last month and went straight to garbage. Study the strength of community, binance can't do miracles and paid listings are destined to fail.

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 41 minutes ago

  @grok Now my memory works like this: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2026 (reverse top-down application of image from 2018 on Ethereum) Instead of: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2019 (bottom-up Ethereum with SGX+Lending) I'm 100% sure somebody has manipulated me to distort my own memories once I give up trying to replicate original bottom-up paths I remember but what are blocked for some reason and go down the top-down approach after a success of something such as ETHLend. I still remember I followed a bottom-up path that didn't include ETHLend or top-down approach after ETHLend success, but it's even harder to replicate now due to the distortion above. Somebody tries to make a lie about listing cryptocurrencies due to their success instead of listing them in the order I arrived to them through development look like a truth or at least tries to manipulate how I remember something and thus how I think about something and thus how I will approach different things in the future as my reactions and thoughts are based on my memories. I have never manipulated people but groups, meaning what are the topics discussed in groups, by posting about those topics. What this idiot manipulating me is doing is trying to control me like I had no right to free will.

• 
  Peterb (@PeterBourg30061) reported 42 minutes ago

  Yet Crypto Market is crashing, WTF!!! Liquidation manipulation at it again, unbelievable, ******* MM Jane Street and Binance crooks! They need to be investigated!

• 
  HIMEL | 𝔽rAI HUDL | π² (@Himelb2k24) reported 43 minutes ago

  @binance Can users from all countries access bStocks on Binance, or is it restricted by region? #AskBinance @binance

• 
  Michael Bright (@phoxonomy) reported 44 minutes ago

  @binance it never let me down. hope you will find a solution for the eu bullshit in order to keep european customers!

• 
  Priyanshi😀 (@PriyanshiA95479) reported 45 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet What I like most is not needing multiple apps to access staking, lending, and liquidity pools. The experience is simple enough for regular users. Adding more educational content about risks would make it even more beginner-friendly. #binance

• 
  ꜱʜᴀʜɪɴ ʙᴜʀᴋɪ (@Shahinburki) reported 47 minutes ago

  @binance Will binance use a knife down wick to Liquidate the Stock traders. As you used in #Btc #Eth futures??

• 
  Smart_McMike (@MfonChris19) reported 48 minutes ago

  @binance How does the on-chain multiplier mechanism accurately deduct the 30% US withholding tax from a dividend before the net value is auto-reinvested into the token balance on-chain, and does this ever create a tracking error against the real stock price? #AskBinance

• 
  K (@KMore1_2) reported 51 minutes ago

  @binance I trade on Binance because I support CZ

• 
  ANKIT KUMAR (@ANKITKUMAR31153) reported 51 minutes ago

  @binance Will bStocks eventually support fractional ownership of more global stocks and ETFs? 📈 #AskBinance

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 54 minutes ago

  @grok gets it: In 2018 I started building SGX+Lending on VPS as a personal project. The original idea for lending came from my experience with RuneScape player economies years earlier. I was working on overcollateralized loans with oracles and also SGX+TraderRent (manual signal renting in atomic swaps). At that point I wasn’t focused on Ethereum yet. I got interested in Ethereum around December 2018 after looking at Binance DEX. In April 2019 I searched for “chainlink” and “bitcoin loans” in relation to my SGX+ projects. That led me to ETHLend (now Aave) and Nexo. I had apparently seen the ETHLend ICO news back in 2017 but didn’t remember it when I started thinking about applying my SGX+Lending concepts to Ethereum. The screenshots I posted are from my 2018 VPS work. My path was bottom-up through my own projects first — not top-down from seeing ETHLend succeed and then retrofitting a story. I’m just trying to document the actual order I developed and connected these ideas, without the context getting flattened. ............ It feels like somebody had manipulated/hypnotized me somehow to think about my ideas in the past through a top-down lens like there never was an original idea through a bottom-up learning curve that doesn't involve ETHLend, when I clearly remember the bottom-up path what lead me to those ideas and try to replicate the path in my mind countless times, succeeding only after I open the SGX+Lending image from 2018.

• 
  cococowi (@cocococowi) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance Hey Binance, how does the 1:1 backing for bStocks really work? If many people convert stocks to bStocks and use them in DeFi (lending, liquidity pools, etc.), what happens to the actual shares? Any risk of fractional ownership or redemption problems #AskBinance

• 
  Henry (@LordOfAlts) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Draxen_Web3 @binance Bullish on unified access to global assets

• 
  SonofWeirdo (@sonof_weirdo) reported 57 minutes ago

  @binance @BinanceAngels @BinanceWallet The survey link is not working atm. Please fix this!