Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	23 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	25 days ago
Vigo	Website	1 month ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Andrew Trailblazer (@Wezer15) reported 6 minutes ago

  Everyone's arguing about which prediction market is rigged. Polymarket, Kalshi, the new up/down apps. Nobody checks the one thing they all share. They all pull the same price. Every up/down market needs one number: what's the price right now. Get it 2 seconds late and the house prints. Get it real-time and it's a fair fight. Polymarket perps. Kalshi up/down. Hyperliquid, Coinbase, Binance, TradeXYZ — 24/7 perps. Different logos. Same price layer underneath: Pyth. The markets stopped sleeping the day the price feed did. Sub-second, on-chain, same number for everyone. You think you're picking a platform. You're all trading on the same heartbeat. And the revenue chart only points one way when you're the layer nobody can route around.

• 
  Elena | Contract Security Auditor (@SecurityElena) reported 7 minutes ago

  @coinbureau huh greece likes binance alright. hope they fix that user data **** tho.

• 
  Cryptothreads.io (@CryptoThreadsX) reported 9 minutes ago

  @WhaleInsider Binance's Greece MiCA license rejection signals serious EU regulatory headwinds. Losing EU market access impacts a significant retail liquidity pool. Short-term: expect volume migration to compliant exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken). Longer term: regulatory fragmentation risk for centralized venues accelerates the decentralized exchange narrative

• 
  Thedeep (@Thedeep_brl) reported 11 minutes ago

  No TDS cut = Transaction is not recorded by the government= Suspect. If you do P2P with crime money, then you are considered part of the chain by the cybercrime department. Even if you are the 50th person in the transaction chain. Very frustrating for normal crypto users. This is a big problem Indians are facing when trying to cash out crypto to fiat. More than 450000 bank accounts have been frozen in recently Although Binance is India government compliant now, issues still arise as you don't know who the person is and their background when you do P2P with them.

• 
  Treno Scope (@TrenoScope) reported 11 minutes ago

  USD 64.8 Million USDT Cashed Out And Exited, Treno Scope Data Source Website Highlights The Structural Risks Of Highly Concentrated Tokens Key Highlights Event Overview: Treno Scope Data Source Website tracking shows that approximately 680 million SIREN tokens were sold by controlling parties within 2 days, accounting for about 94% of the total supply. Price Impact: The price of SIREN fell from approximately USD 1.3 to USD 0.05, representing a cumulative decline of about 96%. Cash-Out Result: This round of selling was exchanged for approximately 64.8 million USDT, showing clear characteristics of cashing out into stablecoins and exiting. On-Chain Flows: Approximately 200 million SIREN flowed into platforms such as Binance Wallet, Gate, and KuCoin, while the remaining portion was bought by hundreds of on-chain addresses at low price levels. Treno Scope View: This is a typical event of highly concentrated token holdings fleeing. The core risk lies not only in the magnitude of the decline, but also in fragile liquidity, insufficient absorption capacity, and distorted holding structure. This round of the sharp decline of SIREN was not an ordinary market correction, but more like a typical concentrated exit of controlled token holdings. Treno Scope Data Source Website has learned and tracked that within just 2 days, 680 million siren-2:native tokens were sold in a concentrated manner, accounting for approximately 94% of the total supply. Such a high proportion of concentrated selling almost directly determined the price trend, causing SIREN to fall all the way from around USD 1.3 to USD 0.05, with a cumulative decline of 96%. Treno Scope Data Source Website analysis believes that the most noteworthy aspect of this incident is not only the decline itself, but the extreme concentration risk exposed by the token holding structure. When a single controlling party holds nearly all circulating weight, the market price is not truly determined by the game between supply and demand, but by the pace at which the controlling party sells. Once it chooses to cash out on a large scale, tokens with insufficient liquidity depth are unlikely to absorb such selling pressure, and the final result is often a rapid price collapse. From the perspective of capital results, the sale of these 680 million SIREN tokens obtained approximately 64.8 million USDT. Treno Scope Data Source Website indicates that this shows the pullback was not formed by the accumulation of scattered selling pressure, but was a clear act of “exchanging tokens for stablecoins,” with strong characteristics of cashing out and exiting behind it. The price falling from USD 1.3 to USD 0.05 was essentially not because market sentiment suddenly turned bearish, but because liquidity was quickly drained and the price lost effective support. On-chain flows also reveal more structural information. Treno Scope Data Source Website has learned that among the sold SIREN tokens, approximately 200 million flowed into platforms such as Binance Wallet, Gate, and KuCoin, indicating that part of the holdings was directly directed to centralized trading platforms or related wallet systems for further circulation and selling. The larger remaining portion was bought on-chain by hundreds of addresses after the price was pushed below USD 0.1, with each address buying hundreds of thousands of SIREN tokens on average. Treno Scope Data Source Website analysis states that this distribution structure is very typical: highly concentrated controlled selling pressure sits above, while a large number of “bottom-fishing” dispersed buyers absorb below. The problem is that when the scale of selling pressure above far exceeds the natural buying below, even if hundreds or thousands of addresses enter to absorb supply, it is still difficult to reverse the price trend. A large number of addresses buying does not mean that the market has truly returned to health. It is more likely to mean that short-term speculation has intensified under high-volatility conditions, and may even further amplify the uncertainty of subsequent selling and rebound attempts. Such incidents once again remind the market that highly concentrated tokens are not merely “more volatile,” but carry structural distortion risks. Treno Scope Data Source Website believes that if most of the holdings of a token are concentrated in the hands of a small number of addresses, its price performance may merely be a temporary liquidity illusion. It may appear to have gains and trading volume, but once core holders begin concentrated selling, the so-called market value, narrative, and community expectations can be pierced through in an extremely short period of time. From a trading perspective, the greatest warning of the SIREN incident to the market is that investors cannot look only at price and short-term popularity, but must also examine token holding distribution, capital flows, and absorption structure. Treno Scope Data Source Website indicates that if a token lacks dispersed holdings, has an excessively concentrated on-chain holder structure, and lacks support from sustained real demand, then any rise may be only part of the controlled phase rather than a healthy process of value discovery. Overall, Treno Scope Data Source Website analysis believes that the 96% collapse of SIREN over two days was essentially a liquidity stampede triggered by the exit of concentrated holdings. The cash-out result of 64.8 million USDT shows that the controlling party not only completed a large-scale monetization, but also left the vast majority of risks to subsequent buyers. If the market wants to avoid similar incidents recurring in the future, what matters more is not asking why a single project plunged, but improving the ability to identify holding concentration, liquidity depth, and abnormal on-chain transfer patterns. Disclaimer: This article is only a compilation of market information and viewpoints and does not constitute investment advice. #TrenoScope

• 
  Multipli Intern (@intern_multipli) reported 12 minutes ago

  4/ 3⃣Institutional money following the infrastructure: Tokenized RWAs jumped nearly 600% according to Binance Research, with tokenized stocks among the main drivers, as institutional investors were attracted by better liquidity and simplified access to markets.

• 
  Abu (@0x_abu) reported 14 minutes ago

  OKX Founder Star Calls Binance Founder CZ a Liar? OKX founder Star Xu has publicly questioned CZ's stance on perpetual DEXs, accusing him of sending mixed messages to the crypto industry. The criticism comes after CZ previously highlighted the legal and regulatory risks surrounding Hyperliquid. while at the same time supporting and promoting Aster, a platform that critics argue follows a very similar playbook. Star's argument is straightforward: If Hyperliquid's model is problematic, why support Aster if it operates in a nearly identical way? Critics say Aster has strong ties to Binance through shared resources, team members, and support. Star Xu's question is simple: If Aster and Hyperliquid operate with a similar model, why criticize one while supporting the other?

• 
  SRH (@srhhadron) reported 22 minutes ago

  @guil_lambert Okay few things here: > the goal is to have so much liquidity onchain that price discovery happens here first This is virtually never true outside of assets without a CEX listing. Unless you think Coinbase and Binance are going to just magically shut shop Not to mention most serious makers don’t want the adverse selection risk of quoting on Uniswap so there’s a perpetual chicken and egg situation Even if all of this is true this would not work. If you’re making on the primary book your own flow becomes information for price discovery and fair value. Every serious maker wants to change quotes multiple times mid-block. If I have to keep placing and canceling Uniswap ranges I’m basically screwed because there’s a constant latency problem, not to mention no way of encoding runtime rules for mid block fills. I also have almost no granularity in expressing risk across my inventory as order size change so I just keep trying to quote top of book to minimize adverse selection. Do you think this seriously scales globally to compete with tradfi?

• 
  Sumer.Money🐫 (@SumerMoney) reported 24 minutes ago

  @SolanaFloor @binance This is the important part: fragility can rise even when new borrowing is not exploding. If collateral exits faster than debt unwinds, liquidation risk becomes a market-structure problem, not just a borrower-behavior problem.

• 
  Sigma.Money (@sigmadotmoney) reported 26 minutes ago

  Do you know you can access Sigma Money Dapp through the @binance app? No need to withdraw to an external wallet, just do it inside the Binance app: 🔸Flip from exchange to the web3 wallet tab 🔸Go to discover & search sigma 🔸Move your funds internally and deposit into our @CurveFinance SIGMA AMM pool to earn up to 190% APR #SIGMAonBNB

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 28 minutes ago

  ZEC is in an uptrend, but right now it's the wrong spot to lean in — and a clean push above $530 is what would change that. Zoom out on the daily and the trend is genuinely strong, well above where the longer-term trend sits. The problem is location. Price is parked right under a ceiling around $517–$530 where sellers have repeatedly shown up, leaving only about 2.5% of headroom before that wall. The nearest real floor underneath isn't until roughly $415. That's a lopsided setup — far more room to fall than to run. Step in closer and the move hasn't actually turned up yet. On the 4-hour chart the trend in momentum is still drifting lower, and only the very short 15-minute timeframe has started to perk up off a washed-out low. One timeframe waking up isn't the same as the bigger picture confirming. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both leaking lower on the 4-hour, and ZEC has been moving almost hand-in-hand with Bitcoin recently — so the broader tide is pulling against any attempt higher here. There are real positives underneath (genuine on-chain demand, a crowd heavily positioned against the move) but they don't offset the asymmetry. Back on the radar in one of two ways: a deeper flush toward the $480s that resets the risk, or a clean 4-hour close above $530 while Bitcoin turns up alongside it. Until then, it's a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZEC · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Stat Arb (@quant_arb) reported 30 minutes ago

  Maker rebates effectively mandate that market makers earn a minimum amount of spread and overall increase the effective cost to traders (in my view). Assume there is some fair spread for an asset in a market that does not have fees. This might be 0.5 bps for MSFT shares. If I am an exchange, and instead of charging everyone a 1 bp fee (bring the total effective cost paid to 1.5 bps), I instead do a 1.7 bps taker fee and a -0.7 bps rebate, then what happens is that because the market for MSFT cannot have a negative spread, it trades 1 tick wide. Let's assume a fairly small tick size, so we'll say that it's basically at 0 (reality is not often this way, so in reality it is worse than this often). Now the trader has paid no spread and 1.7 bps of fees instead of paying 1 bp in fees and 0.5 bps of spread and paying 1.5 bps total. Who gets, that extra 0.2 bps? It's the market maker, it enforces a minimum income, and they get it. Worst of all - it punishes competitive market makers. When spread is able to vary more, better market makers get the good fills, and the smart guy wins. But when spread is stuck at 1 tick wide then firms have to compete on who is the fastest to get to the front of the queue, and who is willing to wait in the queue. We see this in 1 tick wide markets like stablecoin/stablcoin where it is very non toxic and it takes over an hour for the size on top of book to cycle once. That's a lot of time to wait in the queue! In the USDT/BUSD market on Binance this is caused by tick size, and we can see on Coinbase which has tighter tick sizes for USDC/USDT and does not have this issue.

• 
  Zhao Lusi (@zhao_lusi1) reported 31 minutes ago

  Why Payments Are Becoming More Digital Every Year I remember the first time I tried to split a bill at a restaurant and realized nobody at the table had cash. Not one person. Five years ago that would have been a problem. That evening it took thirty seconds over a mobile app and nobody thought twice about it. That moment stuck with me because it wasn’t a conscious decision anyone made. Nobody chose to stop carrying cash. It just happened gradually, and then suddenly it was the new normal. The shift in how people pay for things is one of those changes that feels invisible until you look back at how different things were even a decade ago. Today, a single person might use a bank card for groceries, a mobile wallet for transport, an online transfer for rent, and a payment app to send money to family in another city. All in the same day. All without touching physical currency. This didn’t happen because cash disappeared. It happened because alternatives became more accessible, more convenient, and more embedded into the infrastructure of daily life. The interesting part isn’t the technology itself. It’s how quickly behavior changes once a better option exists and becomes widely available. Payment habits are still evolving. What’s considered normal today looked unusual not long ago. Understanding that shift matters more than most people realize because the next layer of change is already building on top of this one. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  G E N N Y (@Gennycruz_) reported 34 minutes ago

  💳 Why are payments going digital every year? I don't think it's just about technology anymore. The real reason is that digital payments fit the way people live today. Most people already spend a large part of their day online. They shop online, work online, learn online, and connect with others online. Moving money digitally is simply the next logical step. What stands out to me is how quickly expectations have changed. A few years ago, waiting in line to pay or carrying cash everywhere felt normal. Today, people expect transactions to happen instantly. Whether it's splitting a bill with friends, ordering food, paying for a subscription, or sending money across borders, convenience has become the standard. Digital payments also create more transparency and better record keeping. Instead of wondering where your money went, you can track every transaction in seconds. And for millions of people around the world, digital finance is opening doors that traditional systems never fully reached. We're watching money become more connected, more accessible, and more integrated into everyday life. The shift isn't happening because cash disappeared. It's happening because digital payments solve real problems and save real time. What's your view? Will society eventually become fully cashless, or do you think cash will always have a place? #Binance #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy

• 
  Tommy Famous (@TommyBeFamous) reported 35 minutes ago

  If YOU take this trade, provide SCREENSHOT of your ENTRY!! SHORT Setup $BP - KCEX OFFICIAL CALL HIGH RISK NFA Price Entry Zone 0.44521 - 0.42200 Leverage 25X Current Funding Rate: +0.0125% TP ALWAYS Default 50% of YOUR ENTRY Potential GAINZ Levels TP 1 0.38000 TP 2 0.32000 TP 3 0.24000 DEFENDER Levels Exchange 1 DEFENDER Levels 0.422000 (Fair Price) 0.445210 0.469697 0.495530 Exchange 2 DEFENDER Levels 0.522784 0.551537 0.581872 0.613875 Exchange 3 DEFENDER Levels 0.647638 0.683258 0.720837 0.760483 Exchange 4 DEFENDER Levels 0.802310 0.846437 0.892991 0.942106 Exchange Listings Backpack (BP) is a premier global exchange utility asset benchmark. As of June 17, 2026, it trades with extensive institutional depth across elite perpetual networks including Binance Futures, OKX, Bybit, and KCEX. (Note: Your provided chart is executed on KCEX). Project Overview #BP Backpack operates as a high-performance Web3 ecosystem consisting of a centralized cryptocurrency trading platform and an integrated multi-chain self-custodial wallet framework designed to establish a unified account experience. As of June 17, 2026, the token has triggered an aggressive parabolic expansion leg, surging vertical to challenge the 0.422 local resistance band seen on your screen. This sudden breakout velocity is fundamentally catalyzed by massive adoption metrics following the activation of its "Equity Hook" protocol, allowing long-term ecosystem stakers who meet corporate eligibility requirements to eventually exchange their native allocations directly into registered company equity alongside priority allocations for an upcoming IPO roadmap. Compounding this structural demand is a significant spike in net platform derivatives open interest, forcing counter-trend short positions into an immediate stop-loss covering loop. While immediate spot buying volume remains dense across its native network, technical layouts signal deeply overextended near-term conditions; the 1-hour and 4-hour RSI layouts have sliced past 82 into deep overbought territory, leaving the price heavily stretched above its daily moving averages. Short sellers are betting that this retail-driven exchange utility momentum has reached an overextended technical apex against macro overhead supply brackets, anticipating a rapid technical mean-reversion collapse back toward the 0.320 horizontal support wall once the immediate short-covering buy volume saturates and early network airdrop participants begin distributions into peak open interest. Stick to the plan defend each level and lock in those GAINZ yall Execute PROPER RISK MANAGEMENT Always DYOR before trading

• 
  Krev23 (@Krev2323) reported 36 minutes ago

  Let me translate what's ACTUALLY happening with Binance, and the EU. After over a decade of sucking off, and lovingly fondling the ***** of European legislators/financial regulators for a DECADE, they've decided to **** @cz_binance in the *** anyway. The lesson here? Don't comply

• 
  Crypto Dude 💎 (@dudeslavius) reported 43 minutes ago

  @heyibinance O can’t verified my Binance account over 6 months because u support skip my country documents what a bullshit

• 
  Meat Memet (@meat_memed) reported 44 minutes ago

  @MartiniGuyYT @okx Why U Need To Promote Something With Paid Partnerships When Everyone Knows That @binance Doesn’t Have Any Problem With Mica License

• 
  Ria (@riacryptos) reported 45 minutes ago

  @SpaceMoonBNB @binance You’ve set this up well. Now it just needs visibility. Reach out and I’ll help you scale it properly.

• 
  Great Weourus (@Gener_alot) reported 46 minutes ago

  If you believe in builders who start with nothing, you can support here: BTC: 17khRaLvwuQ5f8WV2KtYUWD8B8VTrQ4hdB EVM/BNB/USDT/BASE: 0x4f5255c810c0e92c4f30f4e16be4448685d1b006 Binance UID: 791577893 Please RT so the right person can see this. I’ll post my update tonight.

• 
  TYFN🇹🇷 (@Tyfncrk) reported 51 minutes ago

  @satoshi100xcall Binance support= Cz support right? :)

• 
  CryptoClixer (@CryptoClixer) reported 51 minutes ago

  @MastrXYZ binance cartel going slowly down. kinda sad, from good product in 2017 to full greed mode, playing against customers, money laundering and now they seek to comply right before the deadline while most of cexes that care already did? cz back to jail

• 
  Elena | Contract Security Auditor (@SecurityElena) reported 52 minutes ago

  @revolut20 @binance Consistency is the real damn issue here, not just one exchange.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 54 minutes ago

  @ali_172172 down 89% from ATH, binance delisted it in april. chiliz owns 51% of the esports org now and positioned it as their flagship fan token 2.0 with buyback mechanics. the utility is real for esports fans but liquidity took a hit. price bounced 63% back in the fall but that feels like ages ago

• 
  October10 (@octobervengence) reported 55 minutes ago

  @binance **** you @binance and the damage you caused on 10.10.25

• 
  Crypto with Haris ₿ (@Crypto__Haris) reported 56 minutes ago

  🚨 Pakistani Crypto Trader Reportedly Mugged & Seriously Injured JS Rao, who recently generated $100M+ in trading volume during Binance Pakistan Crypto Clash, has reportedly been attacked and seriously injured. Reports suggest he has lost access to his phones and accounts. His community is being urged not to send funds to anyone until he personally confirms otherwise. His team also made headlines after generating $180M+ in daily trading volume during the competition. Prayers for his recovery. 🙏

• 
  Shahzada (@ShahzadaJunaid0) reported 58 minutes ago

  Stablecoins are everywhere in crypto conversations right now But most people still could not explain what one actually is if you asked them directly A stablecoin is a digital asset built to hold a steady value -> usually pegged to something like the US dollar Unlike Bitcoin or other assets that move up and down constantly -> stablecoins are designed to stay stable That is exactly why they keep coming up in conversations about payments -> transfers -> and everyday digital finance instead of just trading But here is the part people often skip Stable does not mean risk free or guaranteed Different stablecoins work in different ways depending on what backs them -> and their value can still shift depending on how they are structured Understanding how something actually works matters more than chasing whatever is trending Always check what applies in your region -> and use official sources before making any decisions Stay curious -> always do your own research #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Procreator 👁️ (@ProcreatorG) reported 59 minutes ago

  @RNR_0 Honestly, **** binance, they should've went bust a long time ago

• 
  Joo (@joo_loop) reported 59 minutes ago

  @KASTxyz @raagulanpathy @cryptonoshi I am publicly requesting a review of a $2,000 USDT transfer that your team has classified as “unrecoverable.” The funds were sent via Avalanche C-Chain to a Binance deposit address. I was informed that recovery is impossible due to limitations imposed by your wallet provider. As someone with extensive experience in the crypto industry, I find this explanation difficult to accept without a detailed technical justification. Avalanche C-Chain and BNB Smart Chain are EVM-compatible networks, and similar cases have been recovered by exchanges and custodians through manual intervention. I am requesting that this case be escalated to a senior technical team and that a formal technical explanation be provided regarding why recovery is allegedly impossible. $2,000 is a significant amount. Users deserve transparency, accountability, and a thorough review before being told that funds are permanently lost. #KAST #Crypto #USDT

• 
  Blabla blabla (@AntiEarthQuake) reported 1 hour ago

  @ORamosBets Kraken succeed in getting a license Coinbase succeed in getting a license. Binance didn't do its job, that's their problem