Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	7 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	1 month ago
Seattle	Website	1 month ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Md Habibur Rahman (@ariyan98dvm) reported 6 seconds ago

  @AlphaByMalik **** Binance... I have 244 points bt missing claim😡

• 
  Rock1988 (@cmaDxB) reported 2 minutes ago

  @WatcherGuru Crypto went from shitcoin to deepshit coin. Nobody want Binance deepshitcoin anymore , they made last round money from deepshit coin creator as listing fee as much possible... Nobody anymore have to smell it to find its **** , it's visible from far away that is deepshit...

• 
  Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) reported 4 minutes ago

  $XRP is about to break the phsychological $1 support. While most people will freak out, and will likely trip a cascading sell down to 0.95, it's important to note the 24h volume. On Binance it's a mere $68M, down from well over $1BN At these numbers it's very simple to manipulate. Lots of people opening long positions because theyvthink the bottom is in, and this is ripe for Binance and VIPs to liquidste these positi9ns quite easily with only very small slush fund. Current order books super thin, with only $4M sells triggering drop to 0.95 level, and likely closing out millions in longs. That's the name of the game.

• 
  SergPi (3,14159265) (@GameTheoryBTC) reported 5 minutes ago

  @rf_extended Thanks for clarifying. But your answer actually makes the issue more concerning, not less. I understand now that Extended is not the counterparty and that RFQ liquidity comes from external market makers. But that doesn't address the core problem I described. You are saying that the indicative order book can show ~10 bps while a market order can execute 40–50 bps away because market orders are currently priced using Mark Price, and that Mark Price can lag the actual market during volatility. If you already know this can happen, why is a user allowed to enter a position based on an indicative price that can be completely disconnected from the price they will actually receive when exiting? Especially when there is apparently no meaningful size restriction on the 10 bps quote. That's the part I don't understand. A user sees: 10 bps indicative price → enters a large position → later tries to exit → market order uses Mark Price → suddenly pays 40–50 bps. Calling this a "Mark Price issue" explains the mechanism, but it doesn't explain why this was allowed to happen in production in the first place. And if the solution is simply: "We're working on changing market-order pricing to use the indicative order book" then doesn't that mean the current implementation is objectively giving users misleading information about the actual executable price? Because that's exactly what I'm complaining about. There is also another question your answer raises. If Extended doesn't provide the liquidity and all trades are against external market makers, then who is capturing the difference between the indicative price and the actual execution price? If a token is showing ~10 bps on the indicative book but the user is effectively paying 40–50 bps to exit, I'd like to understand where those additional 30–40 bps are going. Is it: the external market maker, a consequence of Mark Price, a combination of both, or something else? Because "Extended isn't the counterparty" doesn't make the execution problem disappear. On funding, I also understand the reasoning better now. You say the previous funding mechanism created opportunities for users to arbitrage market makers, so you switched to Binance funding to remove that possibility. Fair enough. But then you're effectively saying that the funding mechanism was changed primarily to protect market makers from an arbitrage opportunity. That's a legitimate business decision, but users still need to understand the consequences. If Extended uses its own RFQ pricing while funding is determined from Binance/Hyperliquid, there can still be a disconnect between the price users can actually trade and the reference used for funding. So I'd like to see some transparency around how that relationship is handled. Finally, telling me to open a ticket is fine if we're talking about one individual execution. But the issue I'm raising isn't just "my trade was bad." I'm questioning the market design itself. If the indicative price says 10 bps, there is no meaningful size limit, and the actual market-order execution can be 40–50 bps away because of Mark Price, that's a systemic issue affecting every trader — not an isolated ticket. You have now confirmed that the mechanism I was describing actually exists. So the question is no longer whether this can happen. The question is why it was designed this way, why it has been allowed to remain this way, and how users are supposed to know what price they can actually exit at. I'd genuinely like a detailed answer to that.

• 
  Ember 🇰🇷 (@Ember_web3) reported 8 minutes ago

  The cause isn't panic, it's product access. Korean-licensed exchanges operate under the Specific Financial Information Act, which blocks high-leverage derivatives, DeFi pools, liquid staking, and most RWA products. Offshore venues like Binance and Bybit don't have that restriction — some even offer contracts tied to Korean equities.

• 
  Midnight Crypto (@midnightcrypto) reported 10 minutes ago

  This is why wallet analysis needs context. A Binance or Bitget wallet holding millions of $TUT does not mean Binance or Bitget “owns” those tokens. CEX wallets custody assets for thousands of users. A transfer into Bitget cold storage also doesn't prove Bitget is “accumulating”. It can be customer deposits or normal exchange wallet consolidation. And shorts getting liquidated isn't evidence of manipulation. That's what happens when traders crowd one side of a leveraged market and price moves against them. If you're going to claim manipulation, show the manipulating entity, connected wallets and trades that caused it. On-chain data is evidence. A story attached to on-chain data isn't. $TUT 🟡

• 
  boshdolski (@boshdolski) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance Working hard in the kitchen i wish i could know about it

• 
  max profit (@FIDO4186) reported 13 minutes ago

  @quantdata21 Binance can make this sideways and down for 10 years of they like . This asset class has become a joke .

• 
  Hoss (@HOSS_ibc) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Mayacrypt @binance wtf is this?

• 
  Ceo (@traderr22) reported 20 minutes ago

  1⃣4⃣ @jawadvanar Binance refuses to support the swap, forcing users into manual migration. Do you have a safety fund or emergency plan if the swap smart contract faces any exploits? #VANAR

• 
  Phong Nguyễn (@CoutureCheyenn2) reported 24 minutes ago

  @binance this is the most crypto-native dividend statement i've seen, down to the exact cents per share

• 
  Max Wynn (@imamaxwynner) reported 25 minutes ago

  @BOBBNBCHAIN Wow now bob isnt shelved! i cant believe this is actually a binance deployer wtf

• 
  Adeniyiadewale (@Adeniyiwale31) reported 28 minutes ago

  OKX keeping its EU access wasn't luck—it applied early in Malta back in January 2025. Binance waited and pulled its Greek application days before the deadline. Even OKX's own $504M US fine didn't stop it, because timing mattered more than size.

• 
  Salem Irabor (@salem4tweeter) reported 28 minutes ago

  @sirmapy should Binance Lab or a Bsc crypto whale support your project with 10million dollars, what exactly are you doing/building with it? @cz_binance and 👀

• 
  MoneyLord (@MoneyLord) reported 30 minutes ago

  You really think $MARSCOIN tops at 60m? binance alpha, direct binance mention first time in history on @binancezh mentions CA, binance competition Its a skill issue if you sold early 1B+ nothing less for this one

• 
  Tenno_Nft (@Tenno_Nft) reported 40 minutes ago

  70% of Binance’s kicked-out EU users chose self-custody over another regulated exchange. MiCA was sold as the fix to keep everyone inside a “safe” regulated system. Instead, most said no thanks. Europe was apparently better off with Binance than without it. Regulation meant to protect users just pushed them somewhere regulators can’t even see. Iconic.

• 
  azar.🏝 (@azar111111111) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BloodsMind @binance Good ****

• 
  Coin680 🌍 (@coin680) reported 42 minutes ago

  Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken All Push Deeper Into Tokenized Stocks in the Same Week Coinbase expanded to over 8,000 tokenized US equities via a new Yahoo Finance partnership. Binance launched tokenized securities through Ondo Finance. Kraken took a different route, launching tokenized perpetual futures on major indexes, commodities, and large-cap stocks rather than the underlying shares themselves. The near-simultaneous timing looks like competitive response more than coincidence, once one major exchange visibly commits real infrastructure to equity tokenization, the other two have real pressure not to cede ground. Worth noting the three approaches are structurally different under the same headline, Coinbase leans retail-access breadth, Binance plugs into Ondo's existing real-world-asset rails, and Kraken sidesteps direct equity custody entirely through a derivatives wrapper. #Crypto #News

• 
  Cryptic (@CrypticM0) reported 43 minutes ago

  @MadLukas86 will not happen, armani is best at self-sabotaging Binance does things fast and well, backpack does things slow and half baked

• 
  ً (@trading_axe) reported 43 minutes ago

  The OGs had to pave the wave for you ******. They created the blueprint - things that you [BY DEFAULT now] utilize without thinking much of. They survived the endless rugs, exchange implosions, exit scams, predatory dealflow, countless liquidations of hundreds of BTC because nothing worked properly etc. etc. Everything you have now is ABSURDLY EASY because the OGs have already gone through the punishment FOR YOU to learn from. And you’re a fool to think trading back then was easy. It was difficult to create capital out of nothing. You can get 1 SOL now and with all the nefarious tactics “in the trenches” - you can run it up just by deving/bundling coins to rug on repeat. What did you do back then? You had to register on Binance [that went down every hour because of congested traffic] and most exchanges were limiting account creations to buy the 10th derivative of a whitelisted private sale shitcoin that had a 50/50 chance of going to zero or x10ing for an hour before spiralling to zero. And this is whilst everyone thought that the blockchain was some new tech that was going to be the future so rather than converting profits to BTC, You’d hold the shitcoin thinking it would revolutionize the world. Nobody trusted stables / Tether at the time either, so forget that. It was never “vs plumbers” it was entering a completely new game with crazy maps and exploring it for the first time getting nuked left and right. You guys now have “tutorials” for everything to learn from and copy. The game is complete, it’s EASIER than ever before. Sure, the participants are slightly sharper and by sharper I mean more devious, cunning and money hungry [knowing that “everything is a scam.”] But the game itself has gotten far easier because there’s nothing YOU DON’T KNOW. ~ Dr. Axius.

• 
  Cryptocrat (@Cryptocratico) reported 45 minutes ago

  🚨 BINANCE ETH OUTFLOW EXPANDS TO $93.5M Two Binance-labeled hot wallets transferred a combined 50,000 ETH to the same unlabeled address in a single block. The recipient previously staked 40,000 ETH after a similar Binance withdrawal. No sale is confirmed—the next move toward the Beacon Deposit Contract will be the key signal. 🚨 BINANCE ETH OUTFLOW EXPANDS TO $93.5M Two Binance-labeled hot wallets transferred a combined 50,000 ETH to the same unlabeled address in a single block. The recipient previously staked 40,000 ETH after a similar Binance withdrawal. No sale is confirmed—the next move toward the Beacon Deposit Contract will be the key signal.

• 
  0xMemeDegen 🔺 (@0xMemeDegen) reported 45 minutes ago

  @USronaldcarter please no! binance listing is down only event

• 
  milkndhoney (@money_planter) reported 47 minutes ago

  @binance 9 months, I have been watching 4 is down 90% after invest my business money into it, I'm just weak ND tire I pray I don't get to weak to sell of soon as I need some cash to keep the business running..

• 
  Ex Nihilio (@SamuraiFlare) reported 50 minutes ago

  The issue with $ansem shills they work mostly work for low caps just based on dynamics. But any other shill attached to futures is free money for exchanges. They love liquidating Leverage junkies and that's who he attracts. $Hype and binance will have a field day

• 
  max 🐂🀄️ (@mostluckiestmax) reported 50 minutes ago

  [the real reason binance is delaying the marscoin listing] “they are getting ready to do a massive push on this new feature, which is depositing and withdrawing real us stocks” everyone is asking why cz hasn't listed marscoin yet @rasmr_eth breaks down the strategic delay, and it has nothing to do with the token itself binance is preparing a massive infrastructure upgrade. here is the actual game plan: > binance is rolling out a feature to deposit and withdraw real us stocks > they are intentionally holding back on the marscoin listing until this integration is fully rolled out. > they want the us stock feature fully ready exactly when marscoin starts its massive push. they aren't ignoring the market; they are preparing a dual catalyst launch to maximize attention and utility

• 
  Belinkov (@kriptomanikk) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Superp_xyz @binance listing scam token on his app, you are adding more token in circulation while in investor are down and not saying anything!

• 
  Yune (@dvsg_life) reported 53 minutes ago

  One thing I'll be precise about, since you might want to score me later. My "altcoin basket" isn't TOTAL3 or OTHERS. It's every Binance USDT spot pair except BTC and ETH, equal-weighted, rebalanced weekly. So the universe is whatever Binance chose to list, and a $50M coin counts the same as BNB or XRP. It has a known flaw: coins that got delisted leave my data, so I miss their last leg down. My basket flatters alts. TOTAL3 has the opposite flaw. It's a sum of market caps, not a return. It rises when a new token is created and listed, even though no holder gained a dollar. It measures how big the alt market is, not what owning alts did to you. Neither is clean. Mine answers what a holder experienced. TOTAL3 is the one you can pull up on a free chart.

• 
  flew (@flewTrades) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Binance_intern Do u at least get free pizza working at binance?

• 
  SUPER LUCKY | SKP☘️ (@SuperLuckySKP) reported 55 minutes ago

  🤖🍀 SUPER LUCKY AI Agent Trading System In the AI era, trading is entering a new stage of intelligence. Powered by smart algorithms and automated strategies, the SUPER LUCKY AI Agent helps users capture market opportunities and achieve a more efficient, systematic trading experience. ✨ Key Highlights: ✅ Your assets always remain under your own control ✅ Secure authorization via Binance API ✅ The Agent executes trading strategies independently ✅ No asset transfer required, no custodial funding ✅ 24/7 intelligent market analysis and execution 📊 Based on historical strategy test data: • Monthly performance range: approx. 15%–30% • Max drawdown controlled: within 10% (Historical data is for strategy performance reference only and does not represent future returns.) 💎 Original subscription fee: 100 USDT / month 🚀 Coming now: SUPER LUCKY AI Agent is about to open a limited number of beta testing spots! We believe more everyday users should have access to the AI-powered trading era. 🍀 Stay Lucky. Build with SUPER LUCKY. #SUPERLUCKY #AIAgent #CryptoAI

• 
  Amy (@QWEqwe1122yqp) reported 59 minutes ago

  @whale_alert This large volume of mainstream cryptocurrencies suddenly being transferred out of compliant custodians could lead to significant issues if they subsequently flow into exchanges like Binance or OKX