Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (43%)
• Transactions (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	22 days ago
Itu	Website	29 days ago
Seattle	Website	29 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 3 minutes ago

  The November 2023 U.S. resolution of Binance Holdings Ltd., Changpeng Zhao, and affiliates is the most detailed enforcement map yet for offshore crypto exchanges that touch U.S. users. The DOJ, CFTC, FinCEN, and OFAC package required Binance to plead guilty to conspiracy to violate the Bank Secrecy Act, operating an unlicensed money-services business, and sanctions breaches; Zhao pleaded guilty to a BSA violation; and the firm agreed to roughly $4.3 billion in penalties, a monitorship, and a new independent compliance committee. Legally, the case shows that U.S. jurisdiction follows the customer and the dollar, not the corporate flag. Because Binance matched U.S. persons, processed U.S. dollar flows, and maintained U.S.-facing infrastructure, BSA/AML duties attached regardless of where the entity was domiciled. The sanctions count is equally instructive: screening comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions under IEEPA/OFAC is not a box-ticking exercise, and VPN disclaimers do not displace liability under the Commodity Exchange Act for unregistered derivatives activity. For market participants, the takeaway is structural. Offshore exchanges must now treat U.S. nexus as a hard compliance trigger, not a marketing restriction. Real KYC, transaction monitoring, sanctions filtering, an independent monitor, and board-level compliance oversight are becoming baseline cost of market access rather than optional overhead. This is public enforcement analysis, not legal or investment advice. #DOJ #蓝V互关

• 
  Sarosh (@SaroshQ2022) reported 4 minutes ago

  3- $ONDO Data Update — August 1, 2026 Open Interest Is Coming Down Across the major exchanges, open interest is generally lower: • Binance: -2.8% • OKX: -5.6% • Bybit: -1.5% • Gate: -8.7% • Bitget: slightly lower • Hyperliquid: roughly -13.9% That is exactly what I would expect after a liquidity event. I would rather see this than price falling while open interest explodes higher. The market is deleveraging, not aggressively building another enormous speculative position underneath the decline. Funding Remains Controlled Funding is still sitting around the neutral area. And again, the direction matters. We came from negative funding earlier in the week, recovered toward neutral, and despite yesterday’s macro shock we have not gone back into some deeply negative funding environment. So there is stress, but I do not see panic building inside the derivatives market. Positioning Has Reset The long/short ratios are interesting: • Binance accounts: 1.35 • OKX accounts: 3.08 • Binance top traders by accounts: 1.52 • Binance top traders by positions: 2.14 Binance retail positioning has come down substantially from the roughly 1.9–2.0 area we were seeing earlier. I like that. We had been talking about ONDO being long-biased but not necessarily overcrowded. Yesterday’s flush cleaned some of that positioning out. The market took leverage off without destroying the larger recovery structure. Futures Flow Is Still Negative — But Improving Current futures net flow: • 1 hour: -$427,000 • 4 hours: +$18,000 • 8 hours: -$172,000 • 12 hours: -$2.36 million Now compare the important number. Yesterday, the 12-hour futures reading was approximately -$3.94 million. Today it is -$2.36 million. Still negative? Yes. But far less negative. And the four-hour reading has already moved slightly positive. That tells me futures pressure is beginning to ease after the macro shock rather than continuing to accelerate lower. Spot Is the Most Interesting Part Here is where the relative analysis becomes extremely important. Current spot net flow: • 1 hour: -$37,000 • 4 hours: -$102,000 • 8 hours: -$22,000 • 12 hours: +$131,000 Yesterday the 12-hour spot reading was approximately -$608,000. Today it is +$131,000. That is not merely “less negative.” It has flipped positive. And it happened after a broad liquidity shock that knocked virtually everything lower. That is probably the most constructive part of today’s internal data. Price got hit, longs were liquidated, open interest came down — yet the broader spot-flow reading improved from -$608,000 to +$131,000. That is exactly why we cannot just look at the red price candle and declare deterioration. What I’m Looking At Now Price is around $0.387, which puts us right back into the $0.385–$0.39 area we have been watching. What I want to see now is pretty straightforward: hold this area while the internal data continues repairing. Futures flow is already less negative. Four-hour futures flow has turned slightly positive. Spot flow has moved from deeply negative yesterday to positive over 12 hours. Open interest is being cleaned out. Funding remains controlled. That is a much healthier internal picture than the price alone would suggest.

• 
  J&R ≥_≤ (@JIR_KR) reported 5 minutes ago

  Everyone launching bStock-paired meme tokens on BNB, listen up. This is real alpha. Why do you think Binance Wallet hasn’t listed tokens that directly use the names of publicly traded companies? Think about it. Trademark risk. You have to be careful with the meme’s name, PFP, ticker, and overall branding so people don’t mistake it for an official token. Why? Because the moment a legal dispute happens, Binance Wallet could be exposed to liability. That’s why they simply can’t list those tokens. So, what about GOLD? Gold is a generic concept. It isn’t something one company owns, so you have far more freedom to create whatever kind of meme you want around it. And what is the natural counterpart to Mars? Venus. In East Asia, Venus is written as 金星, which literally means “Gold Star.” Gold is already embedded in the name itself. Got it? And in the West, the name Venus naturally brings Aphrodite to mind. Doesn’t Aphrodite somehow fit He Yi’s image perfectly too? Remember this: $VENUSCOIN CA: 0x44eed03629dca440bbb8678d9fc7b858995f7777 And if the Venus dev sees this, please get your act together. Build an X community or a website already, man!!

• 
  Interlink Network Viet Nam Community (@interlinklabsvn) reported 5 minutes ago

  Why Is Customer Support on DEXs Weaker Than on CEXs? People who are new to crypto are often used to the traditional customer service model: if something goes wrong, they call a hotline or contact a support agent. However, on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) such as Uniswap or PancakeSwap, the reality is very different—there is no hotline to call and no customer service department to file a complaint with. In contrast, centralized exchanges (CEXs) like Binance and Coinbase maintain dedicated customer support teams and professional communication channels. This difference stems from the fundamental operating structure of the two models. First, there is no central entity responsible for users. A CEX is a legally registered company subject to regulatory oversight, so it is expected to provide customer support. A DEX, by contrast, is essentially a collection of smart contracts combined with a web interface. Many DEX projects are governed by a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), meaning there is no "parent company" or official representative that can be held accountable. Second, your funds are your responsibility. CEXs are custodial platforms—they hold users' assets and can sometimes intervene or reverse transactions when errors occur. DEXs are non-custodial: users sign and authorize transactions directly on the blockchain. Because blockchain transactions are immutable, no one—not even the DEX development team—can reverse a transaction, whether it was sent to the wrong address or affected by a smart contract issue. Third, the revenue model is much leaner. CEXs generate income from multiple sources, including trading fees, lending services, listing fees, and more, allowing them to fund large operational and customer support teams. DEXs typically earn only a small percentage of trading fees, most of which is distributed back to liquidity providers. As a result, there is often little budget left to maintain a dedicated, professional customer service department. Fourth, official communication is often limited. Many DEX development teams are anonymous or relatively small and lack dedicated public relations departments. When incidents occur, updates may only be shared through a few personal posts on social media, which can be inconsistent and significantly slower than the formal announcements typically issued by centralized exchanges. This is a trade-off, not necessarily an operational flaw. A CEX offers users greater peace of mind because there is an organization that can be held accountable. In exchange, users must trust a third party to custody their assets. A DEX gives users complete control over their funds—but also full responsibility. If you make a mistake, there is usually no one who can recover your assets. Interestingly, some blockchain projects are attempting to narrow this gap by adding additional security and risk-protection layers at the infrastructure level. For example, according to information published by InterLink Network on its official social media channels in early 2026, the project stated that it is developing post-quantum cryptography (PQC) to help protect digital assets against long-term security risks posed by future quantum computers. Disclaimer:Cryptocurrency is not recognized as a legal means of payment in Vietnam. This article is intended solely for technical and educational purposes. It should not be interpreted as investment advice or an endorsement of any cryptocurrency project. Readers should conduct their own research, carefully assess the associated risks, and comply with all applicable laws and regulations before participating in any crypto platform. #Interlink #ITLG #ITL

• 
  RottiLunc (@LuncRotti) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattleForceLunc @terra_xplodify This is unfair❗ Binance had no obligation to burn $LUNC. The real value is not only the amount burned — it is four years of continued support, liquidity, visibility, and commitment to the #LunaClassic community. That deserves gratitude, not criticism. Thank you, #Binance. 🔥 #LUNC @cz_binance

• 
  Towqeer Gilkar (@towqeerdxb) reported 10 minutes ago

  Everyone's treating Coinbase's Q2 "record market share" like proof the bull market is back. They missed earnings estimates. Badly. Spot trading volume collapsed, volatility died, and that record market share means they own more of a shrinking pie. The growth areas - derivatives, stablecoins, tokenized RWAs - are lower-margin businesses where they're years behind Binance, OKX and Bybit. The US regulatory moat is real but it's protecting a drying pond. Coinbase optimized for compliance and spot dominance right as Bitcoin ETFs killed retail spot volume and everyone either rotated into offshore perps or just parked in USDC earning yield. This is what winning and losing at the same time looks like: you dominate market share in the old game, regulators love you, and the actual profit pools quietly migrate to products you're structurally too slow to build. Market share without margin expansion is just expensive customer acquisition. Tell me I'm wrong.

• 
  Ash (@ash232hn) reported 12 minutes ago

  Binance will do anything it can to avoid supporting that scam one, just to protect its reputation. ❌0x330990DaE53BCa4C5811C5362B44C33a47db7777 ru that ******* slow? OG and have high chance for alpha list is only ✅0x248918d672e5523f9d64c0f3d4511513d7397777

• 
  Okyuuuh (@okyuuuh) reported 13 minutes ago

  @cz_binance **** YOU China SCAMMER **** Binance 🖕🖕🖕

• 
  0xRetardio (@0xRetardio) reported 15 minutes ago

  Most Web3 projects don’t have an airdrop problem. They have a human verification problem. Base just introduced one of the most interesting approaches to solving Sybil attacks onchain. Imagine you’re launching an airdrop worth $1M with a simple goal: ➢ Reward 100,000 genuine users ➢ Each person gets their fair share. Pretty straightforward goal but there’s a risk of potential Sybil attack. For years, projects have tried solving this with wallet filters : ➢ Wallet age ➢ Transaction history ➢ Token balance ➢ Gas spent, etc However the problem doesn’t get fixed because those metrics used are easy to fake. A farmer can simply fund thousands of wallets today, leave them untouched for months, interact with a few protocols, and eventually every wallet appears “eligible.” While others rely on KYC, users have to upload IDs, onboarding becomes slower, conversion drops, and projects inherit compliance responsibilities. Neither approach truly answers the one question that matters: Is this one real human, or one person operating hundreds of wallets? That’s where Base Verify Onchain introduces a different approach. Here’s how it works. Imagine I own three wallets: ➢ Wallet A ➢ Wallet B ➢ Wallet C Even though they’re different wallets, they all belong to me. First, I verify ownership of an existing account, such as Coinbase or another supported platform. If I meet the protocol’s requirements, Base Verify generates a deterministic identity hash. Think of it like this: Wallet A → 0xABCD123… Later, I connect Wallet B but instead of generating a brand-new identity, it returns: Wallet B → 0xABCD123… Then I try Wallet C, Again: Wallet C → 0xABCD123… The smart contract immediately recognizes:“We’ve already seen this person.” The contract doesn’t know my: ➢ Name ➢ Email ➢ Binance/Coinbase account ➢ X username, etc Instead it only stores one anonymous identity hash. That hash can’t be reversed to reveal who I am, but it’s consistent enough for the contract to know it’s still the same real person. Also we can say: Maximum 1,000 tokens per wallet. Projects can now enforce: Maximum 1,000 tokens per real person. Creating another 500 wallets suddenly provides zero advantage. This same idea extends to: ➢ Fair token launches ➢ One-person-one-vote governance ➢ Loyalty programs based on trusted real-world signals ➢ DeFi incentives that reward genuine users instead of professional farmers Crypto has always struggled to balance three things: ➢ Privacy ➢ Decentralization ➢ Sybil resistance Improving one usually meant compromising another. If this approach proves reliable at scale, it could fundamentally change how Web3 distributes incentives, runs governance, and proves personhood.

• 
  Kampy83 (@cnd1983) reported 15 minutes ago

  @tranc3y @binance @BinanceWallet is it being walked down to flsuh weak hands before take off? watching.

• 
  Jay (@worthyadversary) reported 19 minutes ago

  @buttsniffer99 its probably over, nobody even tried to get this one right. @binance listed it on the stock-meme page and did all of nothing lol. This **** is tiring.

• 
  REF (@The_Ref_io) reported 19 minutes ago

  Iran-linked exchange sent Binance $676 million > The Block

• 
  0xJoseph (@_0xJoseph) reported 21 minutes ago

  2/ At the time, @cz_binance stated it was only a test/demo token, the private key for the creator address had been deleted, and neither @BNBCHAIN nor @binance held any meaningful bag. The token continued trading long after the video was taken down.

• 
  Matthew (@MatthewMadera) reported 23 minutes ago

  Is there a happy medium between @coinbase listing almost anything and @binance charging an arm and a leg? I miss when a listing actually meant something. That “oh ****, they just got listed on ___” feeling carried real weight because you knew it was earned.

• 
  theotterside (@Shawn0578226690) reported 24 minutes ago

  @vs_bull_lunc @binance Bull ****.

• 
  BUSH (@Bush200004) reported 24 minutes ago

  On March 18, 2024, Victor Cheruiyot Bett (also referred to as Victor Kibet), a 23-year-old Bachelor of Commerce graduate from JKUAT was playing pool at an entertainment joint in Juja, Kiambu County. Armed men claiming to be police officers, cornered him, forcibly dragged him outside, and bundled him into a waiting Subaru escorted by a double-cabin pick-up truck. The Subaru immediately sped off, closely trailed by a double-cabin pickup truck acting as a security detail for the abductors. The family filed a missing person report at the Juja Police Station (OB number 74/19/3/24). The Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) and local police confirmed that no official agency had processed or sanctioned his arrest. Victor Kibet, despite being a technically fresh, recent jobless graduate, Bett went viral and drew intense scrutiny online after flaunting a lifestyle of extreme luxury. Within a short period, he acquired four high-end luxury vehicles, including a brand-new Mercedes-Benz, a sleek Subaru, and a Mark X. Following his disappearance, intense investigative reporting and police intelligence linked him to sophisticated online fraud, digital extortion, and international cyber-heist syndicates operating out of Juja and Kasarani. It was widely speculated that his "arrest" was either a rogue police extraction or a hit by a rival syndicate after a massive payout went sour. He was allegedly working as a key local link for international fraudsters (including Chinese handlers) to drain bank accounts. The "arrest" of Victor Kibet on March 18, 2024, was not a formal law enforcement arrest, but a highly orchestrated kidnapping. Unconfirmed reports following his release suggested that his kidnappers forcefully extracted an estimated USD 600,000 (~Ksh 77 million) directly from his crypto wallet/Binance account. After a three-week multi-agency search and nationwide media frenzy, Kibet safely resurfaced in April 2024, placed a phone call to his father, Paul Mutai, confirming he was alive and well, though he remained highly secretive about his exact location, and the identities of his captors to protect his safety.

• 
  Raiyan Nuh (@null_0x404) reported 27 minutes ago

  Many countries are now becoming ineligible for Binance referrals. Honestly, I think this is a very good decision by Binance. There are many admins who refer users through their own links but don’t give anything back to those users. Some even delete their Binance accounts and create new ones just to earn referral commissions again. This should definitely help reduce referral abuse.

• 
  RJ📿 (@sabrgainz) reported 29 minutes ago

  A recommendation to the $jacket social team on binance don’t make the jacket a bsc meme, just make it a meme remove the bsc logo from the jacket remove the bsc logo from the banner Because I’m ngl that **** sucks one thing I like about Solana is those people know how to meme .

• 
  Cryptosurfer90 (@Cryptosurfer_90) reported 30 minutes ago

  @carlmoon I got hacked in @TrustWallet worst experience ever and I’ve used MetaMask, phantom, Binance, Bitso etc @TrustWallet is ****

• 
  CryptoGParty ⚫️💳 (@CryptoGParty) reported 31 minutes ago

  Because of things like that, I can say f***k CryptoCom , f*ck Cronos & $CRO. Cant even decide wtf they want, wtf they building, wtf community is there for, playing like they dont know what we talk about, investing millions to GameFi, zkEVM, NFTs, corporate memes etc, just to experiment with #CROfam and that team+insiders get rich using believers and investors as exit liquidity in all the CRO ecosystem. At one point all CROfam will be so f***ing happy to leave the ship and never touch $CRO again. Thanks to all that “amazing last 10years.” Even if we 1000x from here, we dont care, thats how far we come. And I remember… we were saying #CROfam remembers for Binance and CZ not listing CRO and fudding… you know what, YES, WE REMEMBER also what you did to us CROfam @cryptocom @CronosApp @CronosNetwork

• 
  gokumoria.base.eth (@tokidokiloverr) reported 32 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet It seems the Binance NFT Service is still active. Due date?

• 
  WOLF 🐺 🪶 (@OgBitcoin57914) reported 41 minutes ago

  @whysopepe Thats not similar lore don’t Talk ****. Tst Go up because Cz supportet it because it binance listed it you will never see that binance or Cz will support this Scammer don’t **** You’re followers FCKN IDIOT

• 
  Amy (@AmyHa1619) reported 43 minutes ago

  JUST IN: Binance founder CZ- “I support all meme coins. I might even buy (or sell) one or two in the next few weeks to test a few new things. May the best memes win!”

• 
  AB 🔶 (@Abrlien) reported 43 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @TrustWallet I’ve experienced this from the other side too. Binance support helped me recover funds after a transfer issue. No software is bug free The real difference is how the team takes responsibility and supports its users

• 
  SuitPotato (@XRPologist) reported 47 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Sounds like Binance is going down. Sorry to hear.

• 
  The Rollup (@therollupco) reported 47 minutes ago

  Steve Gregory unpacks the Binance US distribution and chain-agnostic strategy: "Distribution is everything. Binance US has 1.5 million funded accounts, over 7 million total accounts. Pretty good distribution chain leveraging the Binance US name." "Chain-agnostic listing posture. Binance Smart Chain runs on the platform, we don't control it. We'd list any L1, any sort of thing. Even Robinhood Chain if it came down to it. Just better for customers getting access to whatever they need." "RWAs getting bigger. Intending to get a broker-dealer to bring some of that here when SEC rules get clarified."

• 
  Rune (@RuneCrypto_) reported 48 minutes ago

  $220,000 in tokenized SP500 distributed through a memecoin on @BNBCHAIN here’s why i think stock memecoins are the next meta on BNB: @binance just launched bStocks: tokenized US equities, 1:1 backed, self-custodial, tradable 24/7 on BNB chain. zero maker fees until august. they’re going all in on this the problem is distribution. how do you get retail to hold tokenized stocks? the institutions have been trying to figure this out for years. the answer turned out to be memes? $SP69 has onboarded 6,000+ people into tokenized SP500 by just existing. 80% of all SPYb holders got there through this memecoin. $MARSCOIN distributed $950K in tokenized SpaceX at $40M mcap CZ said he’d buy a couple memecoins to try stuff. binance is pushing tokenized stocks harder than anything i’m in both, $SP69 & $MARSCOIN. the thesis is simple: memes are the distribution layer for binance’s stock infrastructure. the numbers already prove it. the mcaps hasn’t caught up yet

• 
  Strawhat Kyle🐂🀄️ (@FB_strawhatkyle) reported 51 minutes ago

  What? @binance meme stock lists a $gold ticker but after minutes they deleted? Wtf binance! **** your interns

• 
  ZLaw (@LawZ1125) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Puf_xx @apecoin @binance Apechain need to fix this problem

• 
  Soli (@SoliXBT) reported 55 minutes ago

  Crypto has started August with very low volume, and Binance data is no longer sufficient for analysis Most users are moving to decentralized exchanges. The reason for the bankruptcy of BitMEX and other CEXs has been the same issues. Lack of liquidity and users fleeing from KYC. The chart is not good at all.