Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	14 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  DoN (@0x_DoNjayy) reported 6 minutes ago

  @heisChapman @TermMaxFi That binance points is my issue bro

• 
  Klaeytus (@Klaeytus) reported 7 minutes ago

  𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐁𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐛𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐬 There's a version of investing that doesn't sleep. That's the easiest way I can describe what Binance just built with bStocks. Picture this. It's 2am on a Saturday. US markets have been shut for hours. Wall Street is dark. But somewhere, someone still wants a slice of Tesla or NVIDIA. Normally, tough luck you wait for Monday. With bStocks, you just... trade. That's the whole shift in one sentence. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗱, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝘀. @binance, through an affiliate called BTech Holdings, buys the real stock actual Tesla shares, actual NVIDIA shares and holds them with a regulated custodian. Then it issues a token that mirrors that stock's price, one-for-one. So when you hold a bStock, you're not holding paper ownership like a traditional shareholder. You're holding a certificate that moves exactly like the stock moves, backed by a real share sitting in a vault somewhere. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿? 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲. Since it's a token and not a paper certificate, it can go anywhere crypto goes. You can pull it into your own wallet instead of leaving it sitting in a brokerage account. You can plug it into DeFi apps. You can trade it against Bitcoin or stablecoins with barely any friction. Try doing any of that with a share of Apple sitting in a normal brokerage app. Then there's the money question, the one that actually opens the door for people. Traditional stock investing still carries this quiet barrier: you need real capital to get in properly. bStocks knock that down. You can start with five dollars. Literally a coffee's worth of money buys you a fractional slice of a real company's price movement. And the growth has been loud. Launched mid-June, bStocks crossed $500 million in holdings within seven weeks, then kept climbing past $600 million, overtaking established competitors in the tokenized stock space. Interestingly, a huge chunk of that activity is coming from young, crypto-native traders many of them touching traditional markets for the very first time through this exact product. 𝙉𝙤𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮𝙨 𝙖𝙨𝙠 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩: 𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙖𝙨 𝙤𝙬𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙘𝙠? Not quite, and that's worth being honest about. You're not a shareholder with voting rights sitting on a company's cap table. You're holding a backed certificate that tracks the stock's price and passes through benefits like dividends. It's price exposure, engineered for a digital world not a replacement for equity ownership in the traditional legal sense. There's also a geography wall here worth knowing: it isn't available everywhere, and certain regions are excluded entirely for regulatory reasons. So that's bStocks in plain terms. Same price movement you'd get from owning Tesla or Apple stock, but repackaged as something that trades at 2am, lives in your wallet, and costs less than lunch to start. 𝑫𝒐 𝒀𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑶𝒘𝒏 𝑹𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒉 #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy #Binance

• 
  BP (@JWorld9197) reported 10 minutes ago

  @PeterSchiff CZ binance hold as much as 5-600k, due to this high amount, he just can throw up and down to make people hip and loss money to him

• 
  Crypto Dreamer (@SmartNuggetApp) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Quanterty I think the issue is that you caused cognitive dissonance by continuing to bullpost while selling big chunks. There’s nothing wrong with selling and I’m a big proponent of taking profits….but clearly some of the momentum in the coin has peaked, and the only thing that can really juice it up is a listing (maybe Binance)… Selling by definition means your conviction level has declined and you’re doing responsible risk management by taking well earned profits. Again, nothing wrong with that. That being said, I’m not even a holder in this coin…but have been following it and observing closely since the beginning.

• 
  Pasta Capital (@Pasta_Capital) reported 11 minutes ago

  What ******** is this ****?? Imagine reading this and even remotely thinking "oh yeah this is bullish" No! You ******* idiot. This is bull-****. He's trying to make Binance launch but for even dumber people HOW DID WE END UP IN THIS ********?

• 
  Coinminutes (@coinminutes_en) reported 11 minutes ago

  Small unsolicited $USDT transfers (3-10 $USDT) from HTX-Labeled wallets are landing in people’s Coinbase (and other exchange) deposit addresses. Result? Instant account freezes. Exchanges demand “proof” you weren’t dealing with a sanctioned entity. Context: - @HTX_Global has been under UK sanctions since May 26 - EU restrictions kick in fully on Aug 23 - Binance already announced it will restrict HTX-related transfers from Aug 23 Some are calling it deliberate “AML poisoning / dusting” - possibly retaliation timed right before the Binance cutoff. HTX has denied any involvement and says they’re investigating (possible labeling error or third party). Whether intentional or not, a few dollars of dust is now enough to lock accounts. Compliance systems vs on-chain reality in full display.

• 
  MINopoly (@MINopoly_) reported 12 minutes ago

  @AltcoinDaily This account is most likely paid from @cz_binance @binance to fud markets. Just DCA and don’t listen to ANY “influencer” because none know absolutely ****.

• 
  WealthLift (@Wealth_Lift) reported 15 minutes ago

  📈 JUST IN: Massive block buy data reveals that Binance users purchased over 18,000 BTC ($1.2 Billion) in a single 24-hour window, providing a substantial liquidity floor despite ongoing macro fears. $BTC

• 
  Sahid (@mominsdcc) reported 17 minutes ago

  𝐔𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬. Most people know you can buy and sell crypto. But here is something most holders never think about. Your crypto is just sitting there. It could be doing something. 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬?⇨ Instead of leaving crypto idle in your wallet, earning products let you deposit it somewhere and receive rewards while you continue holding. A rough comparison would be a savings account. You park your money, the bank pays you for keeping it there. Crypto earning products work on a similar idea but the mechanics are different. 𝐁𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐒𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧⇨ One of the cleaner examples of this is Binance Simple Earn. It has two options and the difference between them is straightforward. 𝐅𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞⇨ You deposit. You earn. You can take your funds back whenever you want. No waiting period. No commitment. Your crypto stays accessible the whole time. 𝐋𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝⇨ You commit your crypto for a set period. Could be 30, 60, or 90 days. Early withdrawal is generally not available. The tradeoff is that reward rates tend to be higher because you are agreeing to keep funds there for a fixed time. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐨𝐟𝐟⇨ Flexible gives you access. Locked gives you higher potential rewards. Neither is the right answer for everyone. 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐃𝐨 𝐀𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠⇨ Crypto markets move. Reward rates change. These products carry risks that a regular savings account does not. Read everything before committing and only use what you can afford to leave there. Have you ever used an earning product before? What was your experience like? Not financial advice. DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  CRYPTO SHAHZAIB (@CryptoShahzaib_) reported 19 minutes ago

  🚨 $CLO STRONG PUMP SETUP 🚨 This is the coin I was talking about. 👀 $CLO is holding a clean ascending support and just printed a strong breakout with volume coming in. If this breakout holds, I’m watching $0.20 first, then the major $0.23–$0.25 area. Structure looks ready for expansion. $CLO is firmly on my bullish radar from here. 🔥 #CLO #Binance

• 
  BitCAT (@bitcatnabil) reported 19 minutes ago

  @nongxiaofeng777 @binance @cz_binance Lol, Being fast doesn't help when bots beat you in milliseconds no human reacts that quick. Nobody said it's stolen, just that the system favors bots by design. That's worth questioning, not just accepting.

• 
  DanyloK (@danylok81) reported 26 minutes ago

  @coinbureau @binance get ******** out ofUkraine

• 
  Inigma (@PentaCryp) reported 26 minutes ago

  @binance What kind of access or behavior patterns were the attackers exploiting?

• 
  Zembo (@bouchkirab) reported 27 minutes ago

  @CoincimCoincimm The $LUNC Burn Myth: Why Hype Influencers Are Straight-Up Scamming You ​The latest posts on X and YouTube are pushing the exact same fairytale again: "500 Billion LUNC burn coming soon!", "Major CEX developments!", plastered over thumbnails with red arrows and flame emojis. Let’s stop beating around the bush: this is pure engagement-farming and total manipulation. ​Here is the cold, hard math proving why their claims are complete nonsense. ​1. The Cold Hard Math (The Calculations) ​Their sales pitch falls apart the moment you open a basic calculator: ​Total LUNC Supply: ~5.5 Trillion (5,500,000,000,000) tokens. ​The "Massive" Burn Claim: 500 Billion tokens. ​Remaining Supply Post-Burn: 5.5 \text{ Trillion} - 0.5 \text{ Trillion} = \mathbf{5.0 \text{ Trillion tokens}}. ​The Reality Check 💥: Even after a hypothetical 500 billion token burn, 91% of the total supply still exists. For LUNC to reach just $0.01 with 5 trillion tokens left, the market cap would need to hit $50 Billion—making it larger than almost the entire crypto top 10 combined. ​💥 Punch 1: Anyone claiming a 500 billion burn will send the price to $0.01 or $1.00 either failed middle school math or is blatantly lying to farm your views. ​2. Why "CEX Support" Is Total Nonsense ​Influencers love throwing around exchange names like WEEX, LBank, or Binance to sound legitimate. ​How Exchanges Actually Work: Exchanges aren’t charities. They make their money strictly on trading fees. ​The Scam Cycle: They announce a tiny "burn campaign." Naive followers rush to trade on the platform. The exchange clears massive profits in fees, burns a few thousand bucks of pocket change in LUNC, and pays the influencer their affiliate kickback. ​💥 Punch 2: The exchanges get rich, the influencers take their affiliate cut, and the followers get left holding the bag. You are nothing but exit liquidity to them. ​3. The Hype Factory: Feeding Candy To Kids ​Why do these channels keep making these videos? ​Algorithm Farming: Clickbait titles like "SON DURUM / NELER OLUYOR?" target desperate holders trying to break even. ​Dangling the Carrot: They dangle a fake promise ("Just hold, the big burn is coming!") to keep you liking, commenting, and boosting their channel metrics. ​💥 Punch 3: This isn't market analysis—it's digital begging. They are throwing candy to children who still believe in the tooth fairy while the market swallows their money whole. ​Conclusion ​Ditch the fairytales and the flame emojis. The numbers do not lie: the burn rate doesn't even make a dent in this massive supply. ​Stop listening to hype-merchants on social media and trust your own calculator. Time to call out the bullshit and move on.

• 
  lefty (@leftcurvemaxing) reported 30 minutes ago

  admitting that memes have gotten so bad that there is utility in having a curation layer (which used to just happen through ct naturally) does not feel bullish memecoins long term and should probably open up a broader discussion, particularly bc market is so copytrader driven atm. we can see the issues with this through the profitable onchain trader metric being sub-10% while hyperliquid’s is 25% (i would have thought those would be flipped) coins that do well typically have a quarterback but having a singular kol give a stamp of approval to guarantee of some form of safety or vetting just feels akin to “hold a bored ape and get whitelisted for xyz mint” where there’s no real safety or guarantee. it creates a bottleneck where rather than the collective deciding what a good coin is and encouraging people to learn how to think for themselves and figure out what makes a good coin, coins become even more reliant on a small handful of people or one person dictating all of it. buy coins that someone says are good and approve with a badge on their platform or it’s not going to go up this is no different than the many (short lived) bsc seasons where for a couple weeks everyone tries to frontrun binance alpha listings, or figure out what base is going to tweet, or who vlad is going to follow. none of these games are sustainable because they rely on one person or entity to make something go up compare this to 2024 where yes interactions/listings/posts moved coins, but the focus was on the coin itself being good enough to warrant those things, not because the coin itself was KOL-bait. every coin has essentially turned into a tweet coin where traders are waiting for someone to post before they buy or sell, and I feel like a curation layer exacerbates this I’ve hit good trades participating in these types of coins (Elon coins, aster, 4, miggles etc) but the bulk of the best trades that I had last cycle were coins that had either an organic community that formed and grew or a dev/dev team that was obsessed with delivering a good product bootstrapping some form of community is a good concept but a curation layer feels like a solution that’s just kicking the can down the road or potentially making the copytrading-only (and the “this coin is gonna get ‘crimed’” thesis) issue worse. memecoins are currently going the same route that NFTs went and there needs to be a new game or a new way to play them to prevent them from going that direction, unless there’s something im missing here, and admittedly I could be missing something because some smart people that I follow think of this as a positive direction for onchain a lot of the current conditions onchain can be attributed to shaking off the bear market and most of these things can get solved with time, but if they can be solved with time, why is the solution - at its core, basically tailing a KOL - needed at all? if a curation layer were launching at a different time in the market maybe I’d have a different perspective on it, but right now it feels like it’s keeping the ship pointed in the same direction: low profitability for most, and emphasis on copytrading, teaching new coiners to only buy coins that are approved by someone with clout

• 
  Gnanesh Crypto (@Gnaneshcrypto07) reported 30 minutes ago

  Do you remember the coin $PUSDT ? It launched almost a year ago. There was a lot of noise about it being delisted from Binance and issues with future smart contracts. After that, the coin went into a long consolidation phase. But Binance never fully delisted it. It was only shown under Alpha for a while, and it has remained available on spot trading the entire time. You can still buy it right now. The market cap crashed all the way down to around $258k. Now it’s sitting between $4–5 million. If it ever reclaims its all-time high from here, that’s roughly a 10x move. Even after such a heavy downfall, it never got removed and is still listed on spot. Binance will always try to scare people with delisting threats or warnings that’s just how they operate. I’ve been holding this coin for a full year through all of it. Right now the price is starting to show some upward momentum again. I’ve moved my bags to a private wallet and I’m still heavily invested. Let’s see how it plays out. I think this one has the potential to move like $Akedo did. Holding and watching.

• 
  scared money (@scaredmoneybrrr) reported 30 minutes ago

  also, z500 gives Coinbase, Binance and Robinhood a better view of the landscape to decipher credible meme coins from dog **** rugs. further incentivizing them to list more frequently. they can sift through the **** with a comb.

• 
  Rovac (@RovacCS) reported 31 minutes ago

  @SynthdataCo @Kalshi @binance Add spuffing on market and all this **** was ****** up

• 
  NodeWire (@NodeWire) reported 33 minutes ago

  🚨LATEST: CZ officially stops using his public wallet, saying it’s “almost impossible to clean out” as unsolicited meme coins continue piling in. Multiple traders had been monitoring CZ’s wallet for trading signals, with one reportedly making $282K, a 29x return, after spotting the wallet burn $MARSCOIN and immediately buying in while paying 100x the usual gas fees. The founder of Binance says he will donate the remaining tokens to Giggle Academy before abandoning the address, as attempts to burn unsolicited tokens only resulted in more token spam and further speculation around his on-chain activity.

• 
  S (@signalcalls) reported 34 minutes ago

  I genuinely believe $MEMESTOCK has a shot at becoming one of the biggest “memestock” memecoins in crypto. Here’s why. We all know the GameStop story. @TheRoaringKitty shared his thesis with the WallStreetBets community, kept posting updates and showing conviction, retail followed, and GME eventually exploded while heavily shorted hedge funds took massive losses. Now look at what’s happening with $MEMESTOCK. @Convictioncap_ CTO’d MEMESTOCK on BNB Chain after its launch on Flap — and since then, the story has started getting very interesting. They began buying out the farming dev’s supply, including allocations that had been distributed from dev wallets to KOLs, completely transparently through Fomo. And who’s sitting among the top holders? PoorGoat. The same guy who helped bring 43.3K+ retail holders into crypto through Catecoin and platforms like Fomo. Today, more than 80% of the supply is sitting on Fomo, with some seriously notable wallets and high-PNL holders positioning themselves. For five straight days, the process has basically been: Buy the early wallets. Absorb the supply. Repeat. And everyone gets to watch it happen in real time. After doing my own research, I estimate there could be roughly 3% of the community supply left to rotate before things get really interesting. That’s where the GameStop thesis comes in. GME became synonymous with a short squeeze. $MEMESTOCK has a different setup: the thesis is essentially a squeeze on the remaining available liquidity, while only around 5% of supply sits in the PancakeSwap LP. If momentum keeps building, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Binance Alpha or Aster start taking notice. Especially when you remember what CZ said years ago: “GME should issue a utility token on the blockchain, on #BSC hopefully.” CZ’s original post And now you have $MEMESTOCK paired with tokenized GME stock $GMEB, creating a setup where holders can potentially earn $GMEB simply by holding. That’s a pretty interesting evolution for a memecoin. The name. The narrative. The retail movement. The BSC connection. The GameStop inspiration. The CTO group accumulating supply. It all feels strangely familiar. Maybe $MEMESTOCK becomes the next big memestock. Maybe it doesn’t. But the storyline is getting harder to ignore. CA: 0x6FF45323817d1d53bbb8A8dFbA9245aE74057777 I like the memestock.

• 
  CW (@CW8900) reported 37 minutes ago

  Yesterday, large-scale net buying of $ETH occurred on Binance and OKX. In particular, the net buying in the futures market was substantial. On the other hand, Coinbase showed net selling. They pushed the price down through selling. However, after a slight decline, they recovered the selling volume. Today, they are showing a net selling trend. However, the real movement will emerge during the US time zone.

• 
  Nevertheless (@Neverless137) reported 44 minutes ago

  @MastrXYZ CZ is an absolutely disgusting jerk. All binance criminal mafia must be prosecuted. They are solely responsible for October 10 event and all financial and human victims due to the crash. Working for Putin must be the last nail to the coffin of this enterprise of evil.

• 
  Perfect trader (@innocenteyes73) reported 44 minutes ago

  @BinancePk Binance support never contact u

• 
  Amrit Mirchandani (@Amrit_Mirch) reported 48 minutes ago

  today it turned toward solidity. the security instance now audits live deployed contracts and fresh solidity repos, not just github projects. team says it's already disclosed issues in a binance SDK, opensea contracts and some launchpads. those are still embargoed so take them as their claim, not a link you can click yet.

• 
  Haya Yousaf (@Haya_Yousaaf) reported 49 minutes ago

  Just got my first real salary a while back Almost spent it like it was free money. Here’s what I actually did instead: I sat down and made a simple budget first Then I built a small emergency fund before touching anything else After that I split what was left between saving and investing I started small, kept it diversified, and only put in money I could handle losing First salary feels exciting. But treating it right is how you stop starting from zero every time Start small Learn as you go Always DYOR What’s the first thing you did with your first paycheck? #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Yehoshua Zion (@YehoshuaZion) reported 52 minutes ago

  @WTF_Rehanuwn @BinanceAcademy round the clock access makes binance useful but risk control matters

• 
  James Bearish Bull (@jamesjasmy) reported 55 minutes ago

  In Defence of Alex Dreyfus. @alex_dreyfus $CHZ @Chiliz. Do I think Alex Dreyfus is a con man? No, I don't. But the situation he's put himself in has led to the same result, just not for the same reasons. This is purely my view. I've never met the man. I'm only looking at him through a very limited window. But I think I'm correct on this. There are far easier ways to con people than making seven hundred million dollar partnerships with major football clubs and running a team of over two hundred people. The Chiliz Group claims three hundred staff, but the reality is closer to two hundred and thirty. The fact they choose to overstate the numbers rather than boast about being lean tells you something important about his mindset. He's from a poker background. In that world, you don't expect choir boys -- you expect ruthless operators. But he's neither. He's stuck in this strange middle ground: not ruthless enough to be a true operator, but not a deep tactical thinker either. He’s done it the hard way. Dropped out of school at eighteen, built and sold businesses, made real money in online poker, then had the vision to move into blockchain and sports fan engagement. The Binance Malta move was a genuine power play that gave him real credibility. The one thing he does better than anyone is marketing. This is where he and his team truly excel. Everything else falls short. The flashy private jet with a rocket on the tail and "Let's ******* Go" on the door, the Vision 2030 video that delivered candy floss instead of substance -- it's all marketing. It's all hype. He's got Dunning-Kruger on steroids. But there is something to his vision. He's so close to getting it right, but he doesn't know how to thread the needle. If I was heavily speculating, which of course I am, I would say that this guy is dyslexic. That he thinks in waves -- brain waves that curve, angle, and loop — rather than the straight-line thinking most people have. His creativity is probably off the scale, but details and substance are his blind spot. This is why he hates when you point at him. This is why he's blocked people like me for asking tough questions. When you point at him and say "the emperor's got his private parts out, look, he's naked" -- he does not like that. Because it questions his whole identity. At the top of the market he was worth hundreds of millions, if not billions on paper. But he couldn't extract that money because the liquidity simply wasn't there. So he had to find a way to get some value out while still funding the team and his overinflated lifestyle, because he needs to keep feeling like the man. This is where the Dragon 8 hard fork came from. It wasn't some grand strategic masterstroke. It was a desperate attempt to solve the problem of "how do I keep being the man?" And that's exactly where his lack of knowledge spiralled in and started imploding his own vision. So in the end, Alex Dreyfus isn't a con man. He's a man who flew too close to the sun on wings of pure belief and marketing. The tragedy isn't that he set out to deceive anyone. The tragedy is that he deceived himself most of all. The private jet, the rocket, the slogans, the grand vision videos — they're all just props in a story he's telling himself about who he is. The real tragedy is that the man who once showed genuine vision and hustle now seems trapped by the very image he's created. And until he finds the courage to drop the act and face reality, that gap between who he wants to be and what he's actually built will only keep growing. Ultimately, as CHZ holders, there’s very little comfort in this analysis. Whether he’s a con man or simply a man trapped by his own ego and myth, we’ve arrived at the same painful destination. Actions were needed a year ago, but they’re needed now more than ever. The window is rapidly closing on his ability to turn this around. If he is going to turn this around, he needs a moment of brutal honesty -- with himself first, then with everyone else. He has to look at everything from the ground up, strip away the hype, and rebuild with substance over spectacle. The window is closing fast. Alex, if you really are the man, the man actually gets it done. The man knows when to call it a day and turn the ship around Or in this case the Plane!

• 
  Cryptogenerian (@cryptogenerian) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Lebcrypguy Addendum… It was a Binance issue in which the value of the pegged dollar printed at .65 and this forced liquidations. This propagated across the broader market.

• 
  ༽Europurr༼ (@vrloom) reported 60 minutes ago

  @peterktodd Terrible. Haven't used Binance since 2020 and glad

• 
  El (@El6301151278117) reported 1 hour ago

  @Binansmartkid You eat ****! The he charts shows 0 liquidity and cand be seen that they are heavily trying to hold the price ! This is just another scam by @binance and @cz_binance criminal that blocked me for exposing his rug pull Binance alpha