Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (43%)
• Website (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	2 days ago
Angers	Login	26 days ago
Itu	Website	1 month ago
Seattle	Website	1 month ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Kish (@kish_t_A) reported 0 seconds ago

  This shift also reshaped competition between exchanges. Binance led overall June trading volume, while MEXC held the second largest monthly market share from January through May before the surge in US stock trading changed the rankings which gave access to other exchanges like OKX. This simply shows that even the leading exchanges are becoming increasingly tied to product offerings rather than simply being a crypto exchange.

• 
  Boss🐰 (@IrfanIrfan2024) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance I am very disappointed that my case is not being given as much priority by Binance's support team. What I mean is that if you have created customer support, your job is to help the user and if they have an issue, solve it, not tell the user not to.@BinanceHelpDesk

• 
  Hồng Khoa 🪐 (@Xmoney_VN) reported 3 minutes ago

  Yeah, this one’s interesting. Coin Bureau just flagged the fresh Bloomberg report: Binance-linked entities (Nest Trading and a couple others) have filed suit in Hong Kong against RedotPay’s three co-founders, seeking $472.8 million. They’re claiming the firm systematically steered more than 470,000 Binance users over to RedotPay’s stablecoin cards. The core of the allegation is that roughly $304 million moved through those cards via direct Binance Pay top-ups before the partnership channel got cut in April. They’re valuing each diverted customer at about $925 in lifetime value, which is how they arrive at that big number. From where I sit, this feels less like a simple contract dispute and more like the inevitable collision that happens when a big exchange and a fast-growing payments player share the same user base a little too closely. RedotPay is pushing back hard, saying the claims are unfounded and they’ll defend themselves vigorously. Whether the $473 million figure holds up in court is another question, but the scale of the alleged diversion is hard to ignore.

• 
  ArxionLabs (@Arxionlabs) reported 4 minutes ago

  The case for tokenized stocks is that they trade 24/7. Across 33 tokenized US stock and ETF pairs on Binance, $983M changed hands last week. Only 40% of it inside the 09:30-16:00 session. That is not the market moving offshore. Pre-market and after-hours take another 29%. What is left - genuinely untradeable, overnight and weekends - is 30% of the volume spread over 52% of the clock. Per half hour: $184k in the session, $94k in extended hours, $52k when the share cannot be traded anywhere. The largest 30-minute moves fall in the same order: 45% / 32% / 23%. The wrapper is 24/7. The trading is not. It thins out in exactly the order you would expect from something still taking its cue from New York. $NVDA does 31% of its tokenized volume in untradeable hours. $TSLA 26%. The tokenized Nasdaq-100 does 65%. Caveats worth having: the venue is eight weeks old, and three names are 77% of the volume. Dropping the largest moves the number up, not down. Binance 30m klines, 29 Jul-5 Aug, basket named on the chart.

• 
  MaXeeno 〽️ (@Ma_Xeeno) reported 5 minutes ago

  @FavManCity @yeet Haaaa I dun **** up I go deposit from binance

• 
  Adil.g (@Adil_G__) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Abrlien @cz_binance @heyibinance Absolutely love this idea 🔥 A monthly community vote with real Binance Alpha support would be a game-changer for BNB memecoins. 🌟💛

• 
  Luka Ivicevic (@lukaivicev) reported 6 minutes ago

  3 examples of unfair distribution: @Plasma who had an insane TGE. While their bank account product isn't necessarily differentiated, they had a massive following + famous investors. @Aster_DEX launched at the height of 100 perp dex's launching, they killed it (and will continue doing well) because CZ/Binance is behind it @EtherFi had billions in TVL before launching a neobank. They had the customer base already baked in.

• 
  unfolded. (@cryptounfolded) reported 8 minutes ago

  Binance affiliates sued RedotPay founders in Hong Kong, alleging a fraudulent scheme diverted hundreds of thousands of users to a competing product, breaching a 2025 agreement and causing $470M in losses. Follows Binance Pay's April termination of RedotPay support. Highlights partnership and compliance risks for crypto payments firms; no immediate market reaction reported.

• 
  Owen Scott (@Owen_Scott8) reported 9 minutes ago

  The most interesting thing about Binance bStocks is not just “stocks on Binance.” It is the bigger idea behind it: What happens when traditional assets start becoming digital, tokenized, and available in new market structures? Traditional stocks are built around brokers, market hours, settlement cycles, and regional access rules. Tokenized stocks use blockchain technology to represent exposure in a digital format. That does not make them magic. That does not remove risk. And it does not mean everyone can access them. Binance bStocks are only available to eligible users in supported regions, and product features can vary by jurisdiction. This is why the first step is not trading. The first step is understanding what you are actually using. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Mustaphadanyaro101@g (@mustaphadanyar1) reported 16 minutes ago

  @tzafar35 @binance Honestly speaking no date no time just may God help us

• 
  Rananjay Singh (@TodayCryptoRj) reported 17 minutes ago

  🚨 BINANCE TAKES REDOTPAY TO COURT Binance affiliates are seeking nearly $473M from RedotPay’s founders, alleging the Hong Kong stablecoin payments firm diverted 470,000+ Binance users. The filing also claims around $304M flowed through RedotPay cards funded via Binance Pay before the channel was shut down. RedotPay says it will vigorously defend the claims. #Binance #RedotPay #Crypto

• 
  Leonardo (@LeonardoLUNC) reported 18 minutes ago

  @stablefeng I think that is a fair explanation of your position, and I agree with more of it than you might expect. You are right that supply matters, and I am not arguing that burns should be abandoned. My disagreement is about the method. A burn mechanism only works if there is enough activity to feed it. Demand creates volume, volume creates fees, and fees can create burns. If the tax reduces the activity generating those burns, the supply policy begins working against itself. I also agree that lowering the tax did not automatically produce successful dApps. But that does not prove higher friction is harmless. A lower tax cannot create good products by itself; it simply gives those products a better environment in which to compete. Developers still have to build something people want. Where I disagree most is waiting until a successful product can prove the tax is the “primary” obstacle. By then, the damage may already have been done. New products begin with limited users and liquidity. Market makers, arbitrage bots and active traders are often their first participants, and also the most sensitive to repeated costs. A product does not need to fail solely because of the tax for the tax to materially weaken its chances. Binance is a useful example. It initially resisted applying the 1.2% burn tax to every off-chain trade because it believed doing so would drive trading elsewhere and make the policy ineffective. Instead, Binance kept trading costs competitive and voluntarily burned a share of the fees generated by LUNC trading. It later specifically requested that transfers between its own wallets be whitelisted from the on-chain tax, even warning that it could reconsider its burn contribution if the necessary changes were not made. That distinction matters. Binance supports reducing supply, but it has also consistently protected the activity that generates the revenue used for those burns. Its model is: attract volume first, earn fees from that volume, then burn part of the revenue, not repeatedly tax the underlying activity and assume volume will remain unchanged. On your final point, I completely agree. People who build nothing, oppose every proposal, and automatically call every developer a scammer are not helping the chain. Criticism should be evidence-based, and builders should be judged by their code, delivery and conduct. I also appreciate your comments about Ceramic. I believe his success would benefit the entire ecosystem. My concern about the tax is not opposition to burns; it is that we should not make it harder for the very products capable of generating meaningful, sustainable burns to succeed.

• 
  MatrixLiquidity.eth (@SeekeerHodl) reported 19 minutes ago

  @binance 24/7 access to trade stocks I can’t afford at least the insomnia is finally useful

• 
  Greenpeace.BNB.probablynothing.LUNC (@Greenpeace06_09) reported 22 minutes ago

  @babi_terakhir Tell me my scam since I'm a fraud? Did I create a **** coin? No. Did I take from the community pool? No. Juris does both. Juris also helped create very **** coin on the chain and takes 40 percent profit. How do I know? He tried to get me to push peas token. Juris is also the reason why we have lost over $14,000,000.00 in burned Lunc fees because of the proposal they pushed to mint binance burned coins. Binance continues to punish this community because of juris? How does binance punish the community because of me? I'll wait and let you think. Don't hurt yourself thinking.

• 
  СryptoTotem (@CryptoTotem) reported 23 minutes ago

  Binance Files $473M Lawsuit Against RedotPay Over User Diversion The Conflict: @binance -affiliated companies sued @RedotPay and its co-founders in Hong Kong court, claiming breach of partnership and unauthorized user diversion. Damages sought: $472.8 million. What Happened: The partnership (since Nov 2023) was supposed to be mutually beneficial — RedotPay gains Binance users; Binance expands payment network reach. But Binance claims RedotPay allowed users to top up RedotPay cards using Binance Pay funds, violating agreement terms and diverting 470,000+ users away from Binance Card. The Math: - Users diverted: 470,000+ - Claimed user lifetime value: $925 per customer - Total damages: $472.8 million - Funds attracted via Binance Pay: ~$304 million RedotPay's Defense: The platform categorically denies the allegations and vows to defend itself in court. Operations remain unaffected. Context: A separate lawsuit was filed in Singapore with a hearing scheduled for August 7. RedotPay is reportedly preparing for IPO (potential valuation: $4B) and seeking new funding round.

• 
  Eric (@ericvuca88) reported 32 minutes ago

  @jason_chen998 ******* scam coin.**** binance. @binance

• 
  HaMy🔸 (@hamybinance) reported 33 minutes ago

  @binance The market clock is changing. 24/7 access is becoming the new normal

• 
  J ɐ Nc (@JaNc___) reported 33 minutes ago

  @binance Hopefully @SECGov govt agencies will crack down on these bad exchange players. Starting with October 10!

• 
  ZEKRIPTO (@zekripto) reported 42 minutes ago

  @eth_cedric What about $aob ? If you believe in BSC season, you should to support All on Binance slogan’s meme :)

• 
  Gabe (@gabe_onchain) reported 43 minutes ago

  Heyyy @BinanceHelpDesk can someone please help me resolve this? > May 29 2021, sent 739.455515 USDC to my Binance deposit address > Used xDai chain by mistake, wasn't a network you supported (should've checked) > Support said: "we do not have access to an unsupported chain" > Asked for the private key to recover it myself, refused > xDai chain rebranded to Gnosis Chain in Dec 2021, same infrastructure, same chain ID > Talked to support again this week. New answer: "the @gnosis_ network specifically continues to not be supported, only the GNO token itself, via the ETH network" > Asked for the pk/json again, same reason as before > Still waiting on an answer > 739.455515 USDC, same addy, since 21' > 5 years now, in limbo

• 
  SeanLuncMoon (@seanyboy8369) reported 43 minutes ago

  @VegasMorph @binance Vegas. Need to do something with the USTC in the CP. Get it being used as it's been sat there for ages. The community agrees the 1.5% but I think the OP needs special attention. I think holders + rewards + moving USTC will help the MM2 efforts. Just my 2 cents.

• 
  Media Debug (@mediadebug) reported 46 minutes ago

  @binance Act as a Web3 Risk Officer. Build a $BTC report across 5 areas: 1. Supply & Halving dynamics 2. On-chain liquidity & ETF flows 3. Technicals (support/resistance 200-day EMA, RSI/MACD) 4. Scenario Matrix (Bear/Base/Bull targets) 5. Safety Score (1-10) & exit triggers #BuildWithYou

• 
  Memes (@Memes370037) reported 52 minutes ago

  $HFT, one of the tokens being delisted from Binance tomorrow, keeps climbing. After dropping to $0.006 post-delist news it's now at $0.03, a 5x in a short time. Sell orders are stacking up at $0.04 on the whale order book. It'll likely return to $0.006 levels by end of day but finding the exact top is nearly impossible. I'm focused on $VANRY and $VIC since Binance is among the top holders. The manipulative pump like what $HFT did hasn't happened yet.

• 
  Inksmith & Rogers Tattoo Studio (@inksmithrogers) reported 52 minutes ago

  @GT_Protocol What other Binance settings usually cause issues

• 
  FunwithHashir (@Fun_with_Hashir) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance This is actually huge. Being able to move stocks over for free and manage everything in one account changes the game. Any word on mobile support next?

• 
  Legrand Rico 🐊 (@crico41) reported 55 minutes ago

  @LeonVoss @binance I like this perspective. The interesting part isn’t replacing traditional markets it’s expanding how people can access them.

• 
  Money Bunny (@MoneyCrptBunny) reported 55 minutes ago

  @MadMagicSOL Just ask Binance support directly, they explain every step clearly

• 
  BSCN (@BSCNews) reported 56 minutes ago

  Binance Sues RedotPay Founders... Bloomberg reports that @Binance affiliates have filed a $472.8M damages suit in Hong Kong against the co-founders of @RedotPay. The complaint alleges a massive breach of a 2025 agreement, claiming the founders fraudulently diverted more than 470,000 users from Binance's payment ecosystem into their own proprietary stablecoin card network. The exchange seeks to recover lost revenue after RedotPay allegedly used its Binance Pay integration to siphon retail volume into a private card service rather than expanding the joint network.

• 
  Cryptoland (@canalcryptoland) reported 56 minutes ago

  @ice_blockchain What disappoints me amidst all this chaos is knowing that, for years, people like @Bitcoinhabebe had access to insider information—such as the progress of the Binance listing—information that should NEVER have been disclosed to anyone outside the team.

• 
  ArxionLabs (@Arxionlabs) reported 59 minutes ago

  @WallStreetXHQ The dump is the easy half. Within a day all six had printed a close back above their pre-notice price - all six. Two days on they've separated completely: $HFT +119%, $VIC +11%, VANRY flat, PYR/PIVX/ACX down 4-13%. Same notice, same minute, six outcomes. Looks like the drop was mechanical and everything after wasn't. Binance 1h closes, baseline = last close before 03:00 UTC on 3 Aug.