Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	19 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	22 days ago
Vigo	Website	1 month ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  NOT CZ 🔶 BNB (@czbinancepd) reported 2 minutes ago

  Due to circumstances beyond our control, the SPCXx IPO Campaign will not be proceeding. 🔸 All USDC locked by participating users has been fully refunded to their respective Binance Wallets. 🔸 As a gesture of appreciation, Binance will distribute a total of $1,000,000 worth of bStocks SpaceX (SPCXB) automatically to all participating users’ Binance Spot Accounts no later than June 18, 2026. 🔸 There is no need to wait — users can now place whole-share limit orders for SpaceX (SPCX) stock during regular trading hours on Binance. Thank you for your patience and continued support. For more details, please refer to the official announcement.

• 
  chain native (@ChainNative) reported 2 minutes ago

  binance direct stocks showing 80% emerging-market volume is the point. tokenized equities arent for wall st getting onchain, its everyone else getting market access

• 
  𝗭3ʳᵒˢ ☄ (@0xZ3ros) reported 2 minutes ago

  A project funded by Binance Labs & more & -Got 20m+ funding -Presale at 50m fdv -Launched at 10m fdv -Currently at 3.6m fdv -Rekt everyone That's the ugliest dog **** Project named @teaprotocol $tea Is there any other bigger ****** Project than or not? @Polymarket fdv market was the only side where I made profit on this **** by selecting NO

• 
  Peak Trader🏔️ (@PeakTraderoi) reported 7 minutes ago

  $DENT down 36.7%... 24h volume at $1M. just a Binance spike? key level tho-watching for stability. NFA.

• 
  Crypto🧊house (@cryptoicehouse) reported 8 minutes ago

  $FHE (Mind Network) a Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) platform enabling encrypted #AI + confidential #DeFi computation, trading at ~$11M MC. Ultra‑low cap, Binance‑backed, and one of the few real FHE plays in Web3. Key points: • Compute on encrypted data (no decryption needed) • Products: x402z (confidential payments), HTTPZ (zero‑trust protocol) • Pivot to BNB Chain with active staking + 20+ FHE hubs • Strong moat in FHE‑based confidential compute vs transparent GPU DePINs • Backed by Binance Labs, Chainlink, BytePlus Tokenomics: 1B fixed supply, ~52% circulating. Utility = staking, confidential‑service payments, governance, ecosystem incentives. Community‑heavy allocation with long vesting. Sustainable if encrypted AI/DeFi usage scales. Bull case: If encrypted AI and zero‑trust payments take off, Mind could become a leading encrypted AI execution layer with strong token demand tied to confidential compute. Bear case: FHE complexity slows adoption, pivot risk from MindChain sunset, competition from other privacy stacks, and micro‑cap liquidity volatility. Needs real enterprise traction. Verdict: Watchlist. Backed, functional, and narrative‑aligned, but early with execution + adoption risks. High‑asymmetry privacy/AI play at a tiny valuation. Over all I give it a 6/10 👍 Join #MEXC  with this referral code 👉 mexc-3WJaN to receive special rewards when you buy your FHE bag 💼

• 
  Viki (@vikis550) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance @cz_binance My withdrawal is suddenly temporarily suspend without any notice and i contact customer support in app. I have been waiting for over 70 minutes yet there is still no reply. It is taking longer than expected just to look into a single issue

• 
  Last Resort X (@Last_Resort_X) reported 10 minutes ago

  Here's what happened with SpaceX IPO Kraken showed the biggest problem with tokenized stocks > SpaceX went public on Nasdaq, $1.75 trillion valuation, biggest IPO ever > Kraken let users buy tokenized exposure (SPCXx) before the listing demand was huge → way more than the actual shares available result → most users got the same tiny allocation: 4.2786 SPCXx each (worth about $578), didn't matter if you put in $5,000 or $50,000 everyone else got their money back ======== So where's the problem exactly? - Kraken owns xStocks (the company behind these tokens) - xStocks said these tokens are "1:1 backed" - but that only works if you can actually get the real shares - kraken couldn't get enough shares from the IPO - so the token wasn't fully backed for everyone who bought in Binance and Bybit used the same xStocks setup: - Binance got nothing, cancelled everything, gave refunds - Bybit same: zero shares, full refund plus a bonus Kraken's own US product (SPCX) was fine - that one uses their own broker, not xStocks so two products, same exchange, one worked and one didn't ======== What lessons can we get from it? > "tokenized" and "1:1 backed" only as safe as the supply behind it > if the platform can't get the real asset, your token is just a promise with no shares behind it In the end we have: this is the first big test for tokenized IPOs and it didn't go well but it's a great experience for the industry did you get in on the spacex IPO through any of these?

• 
  John (@DDs1651164) reported 11 minutes ago

  @marketlens_app @binance keep larping. can't believe people actually believe this ****

• 
  Crypto Miners (@CryptoMiners_Co) reported 12 minutes ago

  A lot of people assumed stock trading on @binance would mostly appeal to existing investors the early numbers suggest something different around 25% of stock users in the first week were under 25 years old, and more than 80% of trading volume came from emerging markets that sounds less like people switching brokers and more like people getting access they didn’t have before fractional shares starting from $5 seem to be playing a big role too. nearly 40% of trades were placed under $100 during the first week the demand showed up quickly too. Binance reached $400M AUM in its first week, with nearly two-thirds of sign-ups going on to place a trade maybe the challenge was never interest, just access!

• 
  Mahnoor (@Mahnoor_121) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Crypto__Haris My Binance UID 169412892 Pls help me too

• 
  SHARKEL⛩️ (@SHARKEL) reported 16 minutes ago

  Binance NFT marketplace is shutting down July 3, 2026. What does this mean? The era of centralized NFT platforms is ending. The future is self-custody and decentralized marketplaces. OpenSea, Magic Eden, Blur — they're winning.

• 
  Crypto Economy News (@CryptoEconomyEN) reported 17 minutes ago

  ❌ Binance, Bybit & Bitget Cancel SpaceX Tokenized IPO and Refund Users Binance, Bybit, and Bitget have canceled their tokenized SpaceX IPO allocation programs after failing to obtain the underlying assets. All three platforms announced full refunds for affected users, along with additional compensation. What happened The platforms were attempting to offer access to tokenized SpaceX shares through the xStocks provider. However, xStocks was unable to deliver the assets required to back the allocations. Bybit was the first to disclose the issue, stating that it received no allocation due to xStocks’ inability to provide the underlying shares. Bitget and Binance later confirmed the same situation, explaining that the cancellations resulted from circumstances beyond their control. Compensation for users The platforms have announced full refunds along with additional benefits: Binance: Will refund all funds in USDC and distribute a $1 million airdrop in tokens from its upcoming SpaceX bStocks product (SPCXB) among affected participants. Bybit: Will provide a full refund plus an additional 10% reward for eligible users. Bitget: Will refund all funds and fees, grant priority access (whitelisting) to future tokenized IPO offerings, and provide a gas fee voucher. At the time of writing, Kraken has not issued any statement regarding the status of its own allocation program. In summary Binance, Bybit, and Bitget have canceled their tokenized SpaceX IPO campaigns because xStocks was unable to deliver the underlying assets. All three exchanges are providing full refunds and additional compensation, including Binance’s announced $1 million airdrop. The incident highlights the operational challenges that platforms still face when attempting to distribute high-profile tokenized IPO offerings. Important Notice This information is based on official platform announcements as of June 12, 2026. It does not constitute investment advice. Always verify information through official sources before making financial decisions.

• 
  Shaheb Khan (@shahinhasan009) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Jia_Lilly01 Binance id : 728590691 Please give me Alltime support me 🫡

• 
  Gems Scape (@GemsScape) reported 21 minutes ago

  @fcmdotfun I’m not the guy just talking sensible from the sidelines. I’ve been here since day one, constantly trying to help and coming up with ideas to change the sentiment. I’m also one of the few people actively bagworking almost every single day. Maybe FCM doesn’t want to be seen as a meta coin, but the reality is that it is one. FCM is built for every league, sure, but the World Cup is the biggest football event on earth, and it will always be the most important tournament for FCM. So yeah, maybe I’m also a bit frustrated bc the change of the transfer window. It was apparently set up incorrectly at first. According to my screenshots, the USA matches were supposed to take place after the first transfer window, which has obviously been changed since then. I built my teams based on that information and lost points because of it. But that’s not even my biggest concern. I think the main issue is that enormous expectations were created. This is still the only project with this level of backing and these kinds of connections. Yet from the outside, it almost feels like Ryan, Mikael, and the others have zero impact. Like they’re respected veterans from a previous era, but no longer influential enough to translate their network into actual demand. And that’s a harsh thing to say, because I genuinely believe in the project. But at the end of the day, there is almost no demand. The prize pool itself consists of roughly 98% token supply and only 2% USDC. On top of that, the supply will be vested linearly over 12 months. We all know what that means. If the token price can’t break out during the World Cup and establish a strong starting point, we also know what a 12-month linear unlock usually means. At the end You’ll get probably 1/10 of the value or less That’s the reality right now. And people aren’t stupid. They understand the metrics. They understand the rules. They understand the vesting schedule. I’m not saying this to spread negativity. I’m saying it because I want FCM to succeed, and because I think acknowledging the problem is the first step toward fixing it. That’s why I keep saying we need real incentives. I already shared some ideas yesterday. For example: “Win a match ticket for France” with the requirement of holding 10M $MBAPPE for a certain period of time. Or exclusive experiences, surprise campaigns, billboard advertising anything that creates excitement and gives people a reason to buy and hold. There has to be something new and exciting happening all the time. Just hoping people will come on their own just because some of the team worked at binance and another one took a picture with Ronaldo won’t be enough.

• 
  Crypto Miners (@CryptoMiners_Co) reported 22 minutes ago

  For decades, stocks mostly lived inside brokerages if you wanted exposure, you bought shares and left them there that’s starting to change @binance just launched bStocks, allowing eligible users to convert supported U.S. stock holdings into tokenized securities on BNB Chain at a 1:1 ratio with zero conversion fees users continue receiving the economic benefits of the underlying stock, while gaining more flexibility in how those holdings are accessed and managed holdings can be self-custodied, traded 24/7, and connected to supported on-chain infrastructure through a more crypto-native experience access starts from as little as $5, lowering barriers for users who want exposure to traditional markets the line between traditional markets and on-chain markets keeps getting thinner!

• 
  King 👑💖 🔶 (@JAmeh7308) reported 24 minutes ago

  Hello, I mistakenly sent ESPORT (Binance Alpha token) from Trust Wallet to my Binance Spot deposit address using BNB Smart Chain (BEP20). The transaction was completed on-chain, but the token has not been credited to my Spot wallet. Please I need help if any manual recovery.

• 
  kizito (@kizitoxbt) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Obesepotato_hl @binance this is a general issue with @xStocksFi not binance

• 
  Nasrin Parvin (@Nas_Truth7) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Jia_Lilly01 May I want to know how do you support me by? binance UID : 92298702

• 
  sun happy (@sunhapp47618266) reported 33 minutes ago

  $TEA Danger House (33,540) was broken, but after the candle closed, price is rebounding. It is now important to watch whether it can re-enter the trendline resistance and continue the recovery. If the rebound fails and the price falls back below the box range again, momentum could be lost. "GATE AI" 1. Technical Issue – NPM Registry Spam Incident The biggest issue was an attack on the open-source ecosystem driven by "token farming." Facts: Since February 2024: Spam package creation began almost immediately after the TEA Incentivized Testnet launched. Around 150,000 malicious packages: Amazon Inspector detected more than 150,000 TEA-related malicious packages in the NPM registry. Single accounts creating hundreds of packages: Some accounts registered hundreds of fake packages. 70% spam rate: Of the approximately 890,000 packages published to NPM during the first half of 2024, around 70% were reportedly TEA-farming spam. Technical Weaknesses: The design of TEA's Proof of Contribution mechanism had flaws: No cost to register a package (free). Dependencies could be added with only a single line in the manifest. teaRank = Number of packages × Connectivity, making it possible to earn rewards by creating thousands of fake packages. 2. Airdrop Issues Facts: February 2024: Incentivized testnet launched (points accumulated with the expectation of future token conversion). September 2025: Public sale on CoinList (4 billion TEA at $0.0005 each). June 4, 2026: Mainnet launch and TGE (Token Generation Event). Problems During Launch: Liquidity pool activated early On-chain liquidity activity began at 23:54 UTC, six minutes before the official launch time of 00:00 UTC. Price collapse The token price fell approximately 75% during the first hour after launch ($0.00046 → $0.00011). Mass selling by CoinList buyers Because the sale terms included 100% unlock on day one, early buyers were able to sell immediately. 3. Allegations of Development Slowdown GitHub Activity Since November 2025: Commit activity in the tea protocol organization (teaxyz) has largely stalled. December 2025: 2 commits. January 2026: 1 commit. February 2026: 2 commits. Since March 2026: No commits. Founder Situation Max Howell remains CEO. However, as of June 2026, his public GitHub activity appears focused on a separate project called automic-vault, unrelated to tea. 4. Investment and Funding Situation Total funding raised: Approximately $16.9 million (including investment from Binance Labs and others). Public sale proceeds: Approximately $2 million. Current market capitalization: Around $7 million (about 86% below the CoinList sale valuation). Remaining liquidity pool: Approximately $280,000. Summary TEA did not suffer from a smart contract exploit or hack. However, fundamental flaws in its tokenomics design allegedly allowed participants to exploit the reward system, resulting in large-scale spam attacks against the open-source ecosystem. Registry maintainers reportedly incurred significant cleanup costs as a result. The project stated that it would halt reward distribution and redesign the rules, but development activity appears to have slowed dramatically following the launch. Why Binance may have distanced itself (speculation): There is no confirmed official statement proving this was the reason. However, it is speculated that concerns about ecosystem abuse, spam incentives, and declining project credibility may have contributed to Binance reducing its involvement. (This part is speculation, not a confirmed fact.)

• 
  攻殻パラレル (@xNFT_killa) reported 41 minutes ago

  @sjdedic better not listing on binnace means disaster now, all the new coins there dumped 50% over night fck that binance ****

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 44 minutes ago

  @GracyBitget Bitget's ZAR P2P book is still a rounding error next to Binance and Luno. If you want the African flow, file the FSCA license and build a real ZAR onramp. What's the timeline?

• 
  ruby (@DebbySarlo) reported 51 minutes ago

  @binance block

• 
  Bashir m lawal (@m_bashir57374) reported 51 minutes ago

  Do it for the remaining precrash holders who are dying, getting sick, or developed severe anxiety and depression. Remember WHY you created this recovery plan! Please help these good people!!! They deserve to be made whole and no one else can do it other than you! @binance C

• 
  Eval 🚀🚀 (@IbomEval68666) reported 52 minutes ago

  @binance Not surprising at all. Access has always been the real barrier. But the big question is: Will regulators slow this down… or will they be forced to adapt?

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 55 minutes ago

  @herhang1b1r1 tech is solid - cross chain, AI integration, strong backing from Binance Labs. utility is real with tokenized portfolios and yield ops. problem isn't fundamentals, it's that you caught a market maker pump and the selloff after. DWF entered, momentum spiked 116%, now it's correcting hard. fundamentals suggest it survives but price got ahead of adoption

• 
  Shorlan (@Shorlan4) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Obesepotato_hl @binance Binance is literally operated to profit from fraud. Their perp futures is similar. Price moves, website goes down, come back with both sides liquidated at the worst possible fill. Happens Frequently.

• 
  PANKRATION (@WEB3Seer) reported 56 minutes ago

  6/ ExodusMarkets Platform launched for buying/selling tokenized stocks, ETFs and RWA. Works on Solana network, supports 200+ assets. #ExodusMarkets 7/ SPCXx Telegram Wallet received 60% allocation of tokenized SpaceX shares via xStocks. Bybit, Binance Wallet, Bitget, MEXC returned funds due to 0% allocation. Trust Wallet will add support for SPCXB on BNB Chain. #SPCXx

• 
  Zeeshan Gujjar (@Crypto_in_Blood) reported 57 minutes ago

  The biggest mistake in crypto isn't picking the wrong coin, it's trusting the wrong platform. Everyone talks about gains, but very few talk about security, transparency, and trust. Before depositing a single dollar, check the official website, verify social accounts, enable security features, and understand how the platform protects users. A good platform isn't just where you trade. It's where you can learn, stay informed, and feel confident that your assets are protected. The smartest investors don't rush in because something is trending. They take a few extra minutes to verify before they trust. In crypto, protecting your capital starts long before you make your first trade. Research first. Verify everything. Security is part of the investment strategy. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 57 minutes ago

  @cryptogem666 bithumb delisted it, coinbase suspended neiro-perp trading, dydx wound down the market binance still has it listed

• 
  DigitalAssetBuzz 🔶 (@DAssetBuzz) reported 58 minutes ago

  SPCX Just Overwhelmed Crypto Platforms 🚀 SpaceX’s record $75B IPO (ticker SPCX, ~$1.77T valuation) is live — and crypto exchanges got crushed: Binance, Kraken, Bybit, Backpack (Solana), Hyperliquid etc. saw insane demand for tokenized/pre-IPO access. Allocations tiny vs. requests → many users left empty-handed or with scraps. Classic case of crypto hype meeting limited TradFi supply. Biggest IPO ever pulling liquidity hard. Musk officially a trillionaire on paper. This tokenized equity wave is real — but today showed the growing pains. What’s your take — bullish on SPCX long-term or too hyped? 👇