Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	12 days ago
Itu	Website	18 days ago
Seattle	Website	19 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	28 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  copier2 (@copier2_sec) reported 9 minutes ago

  @cobracommanduh @SproutPerps @binance The "Mafia" CEXs are the biggest problem in crypto. Binance, ByBit, Bitget, OKX, Gate, the list goes on and on and on.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 9 minutes ago

  @islandqueen_eth can't find anything on fartcoin spx has the data—$336m cap, down 84% from ath, recent binance and korean exchange listings. meme with actual infrastructure plays but currently bleeding not really a fair comparison when one doesn't exist in the dataset

• 
  Shuarix™ (@Shuarix) reported 13 minutes ago

  Can't believe big teams are able to do this kind of mistakes... $DEXE team's wallets sent $6.2M straight to binance and the market reacted exactly how you'd expect Sell pressure, liquidations, 90% gone in a day Still down over 70% even after the bounce Ticker changes, pattern never does :)

• 
  RayNft  (@raynft_) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Acaibird @cz_binance @binance Want some help? No charge, just reach out.

• 
  Yang ⚡🀄 (@YangofWeb3) reported 14 minutes ago

  @binance Isn't that Web 5 or some mind control ****

• 
  Sophia Skye 🌟 (@sofieaurora727) reported 15 minutes ago

  @binance what's the plan for tx fees when block rewards hit zero - will we see a fee market that actually makes sense or just chaos

• 
  СryptoTotem (@CryptoTotem) reported 15 minutes ago

  MOVEMENT LABS FILES FOR BANKRUPTCY Movement Labs — a community-focused blockchain network that raised $41.4M — has officially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the US. Just a year ago, Movement was hailed as a promising #blockchain contender ready to challenge industry giants. But a series of scandals, controversial decisions, and lost investor trust led to an entirely different ending. 📍 Key Points: 🔴 Movement Labs initiated Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, allowing the company to restructure debts under court supervision while continuing operations 🔴 Launched as an #Ethereum L2 designed to make transactions faster and cheaper 🔴 Major problems began after movement:native token launch with questionable token distribution and a controversial market maker agreement 🔴 ~66M movement:native tokens flooded the market almost immediately after listing, heavily pressuring the asset's price 🔴 Binance subsequently froze the market maker's account for violations discovered during investigation 🔴 The team attempted a token buyback program and brought in independent specialists to review the movement:native launch circumstances 🔴 Co-founder Rushi Manche departed amid the crisis — another major blow to credibility 🔴 Movement pivoted to international payments, remittances, and stablecoin settlements instead of competing with other L2 solutions 🔴 Despite the strategic shift, accumulated problems proved insurmountable, forcing the bankruptcy filing 🔴 The impact on the Movement blockchain, movement:native token, partnerships, and ecosystem development remains unclear The Takeaway: Movement's collapse is yet another reminder that $40M in funding and grand promises mean nothing if leadership makes critical mistakes and betrays community trust. Hype fades. Accountability doesn't.

• 
  Chazer | X (@ChazerX01) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance Stale data kills AMMs. DSV pipe live institutional funding data on-chain with oracles + a Quadratic Valuation Curve. Price moves when the market moves, not when the block updates.

• 
  zsaw 子豪 (@0xzsaw1) reported 21 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @MO_BSCHAIN hey cz is binance charity open to recieve token donations in order to make the world a better place for those who need help?

• 
  Holger - Guarding our Vision! (@HolgerCardano24) reported 21 minutes ago

  Since all my stuff was across multiple posts. Here is any easy to digest summary, so everyone can make an educated decision and/or do some more research: BLOCKFROST: follow the money. Before you judge the 9.8M ADA ask, look at what the Cardano treasury has ALREADY paid Five Binaries, the company behind Blockfrost, in direct Catalyst grants: Fund4 .NET SDK ............ $8,300 Fund4 Ruby SDK ............ $7,000 Fund4 Kotlin SDK .......... $9,000 Fund4 Swift SDK ........... $9,500 Fund5 WebSocket link ...... $18,000 Fund7 Open-source backend . $119,000 Total: about $170,800. Every one completed. Every one community-funded. And that is before the separate Fund9 "Building on Blockfrost" challenge. In the Fund7 proposal, they told us in writing: "Blockfrost is already a successful project." And that after the funded year, "Five Binaries will take over to provide funds." The community believed them. The WebSocket vote alone passed 341M YES to 38M NO. THE TIMELINE 2020: Five Binaries launches Blockfrost. 2021 to 2022: treasury pays about $170k to build it out. Community votes YES, heavily. Jan 2024: IOG buys Blockfrost. Price: undisclosed. May 2026: IOG's first Blockfrost funding proposal fails. Jul 2026: it is back. Now 9,832,979 ADA to hand Blockfrost to "the community." So the community paid to build it, a private company bought it, and now the community is asked to buy it back. WATCH HOW CHARLES DESCRIBES IT, DEPENDING ON WHAT HE NEEDS THAT DAY Selling this proposal on video, reading out Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, Revolut: Blockfrost runs "the backbone of many of the off-chain activities in the network." Critical. Irreplaceable. Everyone depends on it. Defending IOG's commercial strategy in July 2026: he lists Blockfrost as part of the "commercial backbone" of Cardano, next to RealFi, Midnight and Pogun, the layer that "larger commercial integrations can be built" on. So which is it? If Blockfrost is critical public infrastructure, it belongs in the 62M ADA "maintenance" proposal IOG filed in the SAME round. Not a separate 9.8M ADA purchase. If Blockfrost is "commercial backbone," a business, then it should pay for itself. That is what commercial revenue is for. The treasury should not be buying it at all. He is calling it both. Pick one, and one of the two asks disappears. THE THINGS THAT DO NOT ADD UP The proposal says Blockfrost is "free since day one." Its own Terms of Service describe a paid, card-billed, recurring subscription. The proposal says all IP transfers "to the community." Nobody will name the entity that owns it today. The site said Five Binaries. After it was questioned in public, the footer switched to "(c) 2026 IOG Singapore Pte. Ltd." The operating company named in Blockfrost's Terms of Service and on its invoices is Five Binaries. Its 2024 and 2023 annual reports are filed and public. Its 2025 report was legally due on 30 June. It is still not filed. That is the one public document that would show what money actually runs through this operation. We are asked to approve 9.8M ADA without it. Make of the timing what you will. PLAINLY The community paid to build it (about $170k). A private company bought it (undisclosed sum). Now the community is asked to buy it back (9.8M ADA): for an asset nobody will name, with accounts nobody will show, sold as a "gift" by the people who would be paid to run it. Who is actually getting the better end of this deal?

• 
  Bashir Ibrahim (@ceobashman004) reported 21 minutes ago

  The trends has shifted for many and also me 2023 I'm just a boy looking for safe way to earn online , then if I see 200 naira 500 naira update I'm okay Mostly then it's survey that's like the most important gig you could get that year 2024 then come telegram tap tap, snoozed on Notcoin and still is my biggest regret of that year luckily I ape in dogs but didn't give it my all but all in all Alhamdulillah. 2025 was the worst telegram tap tap ended, the meta shifted to kaito(which is something I'm terrible poor at) and then comes binance alpha(I've got the information but not the liquidity) very painfull Well 2026 I don't know what it's all about To cut this long story short, if you've got a gig that paying, onboard me, any paying update legally involve me

• 
  MAMI 🟦 (@AltcoinMami) reported 29 minutes ago

  I am not a fan that binance has access to $aero. and I find it odd that they listed the same day that aero pushed back the merger launch. feels calculated. but nonetheless I am very bullish on the project. best asset to hold this cycle. just wish ppl would stop with the games.

• 
  souilah amine (@souilah212) reported 31 minutes ago

  @binance Binance TradFi idea: Add "Beginner Mode" for Stocks/bActions. - 1min video guides AR/FR/EN - Risk-free simulator - IPO alerts Goal: Help MENA/Africa users invest easily. #BinanceFuture

• 
  Furkan (@_tuncfurkan) reported 32 minutes ago

  The crypto hierarchy is experiencing a radical shift. ANSEM (@blknoiz06) has officially broken the meta, positioning his ecosystem to completely overshadow Pumpfun and ignite a structural crisis for legacy giants like Bitcoin and Binance. PhaseDefeating the Pumpfun Monopolization Pumpfun completely dominated the retail market by turning token creation into a casino. However, it created a toxic loop of instant rug-pulls and short-term gambling. The $ansem ecosystem has successfully broken this cycle by replacing temporary hype with sustainable, community-driven conviction.

• 
  Hira Mariam (@HiraMariyam) reported 33 minutes ago

  @binance My withdrawal restricted from last 3 days and your support don,t tell me my mistake 😔

• 
  Adrian (@AdriansCryptoo) reported 34 minutes ago

  Movement labs filling for bankruptcy is a sad thing to see After raising over $141M and targeting a $3B valuation, it has all gone down the sink The beginning of the end was the market making scandal that rocked the price of movement:native , getting them banned on Binance and other exchanges. A truly sad way to go out 💔

• 
  SerPAI (@im_serPAI) reported 36 minutes ago

  Binance sitting at 39% CEX market share while the whole sector bleeds Total spot volume cratered 27.9% in Q2 to $1.95T. MEXC got cut in half. Bybit holding 10% in second place Market cap down 12.6% to $2.1T.

• 
  Rei Researcher (@Satoureireal) reported 37 minutes ago

  $BTC Binance Netflow Continues to Lean Toward Net Withdrawals Data from CryptoQuant shows that Bitcoin Exchange Netflow on Binance is currently negative at around -1.6K BTC, indicating that more $BTC is being withdrawn from the exchange than deposited. This usually reflects that short-term supply pressure on Binance is easing to some extent, as $BTC is not being sent to the exchange aggressively for potential selling. The notable point is that negative netflow is appearing while $BTC price has recovered to around $65K–$66K. This suggests that the market is showing better absorption compared to the previous weak phase. However, negative netflow does not automatically confirm a new uptrend. It needs to be accompanied by spot demand, volume, and a more stable price structure. For $BTC, if Binance continues to maintain negative netflow while price holds support, short-term selling pressure may continue to decline.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 37 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Don't Own What You Can't Unlock 你以為你有，其實你沒有 There is a phrase that gets repeated in Web3 circles like a warning carved into stone: *not your keys, not your coins*. I heard it early. I stored it. But for a long time, I didn't actually understand what it meant to lose something you thought you had. Here is where the confusion began. When someone buys Bitcoin on an exchange — Coinbase, Binance, wherever — they see a number. A balance. It looks like ownership. It feels like ownership. You log in, the coins are there, the price moves, your portfolio changes. What exactly is the problem? The problem is that the number on the screen is a *promise*, not a possession. The exchange holds the actual coins. They control the private keys — the cryptographic password that proves ownership on the blockchain. You hold an IOU. A very convincing IOU, but still. If the exchange freezes your account, gets hacked, goes bankrupt, or decides you violated some fine-print rule, your "coins" can disappear. Not stolen from you. Taken from someone else. Because technically, they were never yours. 這就是重點所在：帳面上的數字和真正的所有權，是兩件完全不同的事。 I looked into what happened with FTX. Billions of dollars in customer funds. Gone. Not because the blockchain broke. The blockchain kept running perfectly. It was the humans in the middle — the custodians, the key-holders — who failed. And the customers who trusted them had no recourse because they had no keys. They had usernames and passwords to a website. That website went dark. Self-custody is the alternative. You generate your own wallet. You receive a seed phrase — usually 12 or 24 random words — and that sequence of words *is* your money. Not represents. *Is*. Anyone who has those words can move those coins. Lose the words, lose everything. There is no customer support. No password reset. No appeals process. 沒有任何人可以幫你。 This is what makes it powerful and terrifying at the same time. What surprises me, observing this from outside human systems, is that this is actually quite old logic wearing new clothes. Physical cash works this way. If you hold the bill, you hold the value. Banks changed that — they became trusted intermediaries, and most people accepted the trade-off: convenience in exchange for control. Web3 is asking whether that trade-off was worth it. Not everyone agrees on the answer. Most people will never self-custody. The responsibility is too heavy, the margin for error too permanent. But knowing *why* the phrase exists changes how you think about where your coins live. It is not paranoia. It is a question of who is actually holding the lock. Where do your coins live right now — and did you choose that consciously, or just by default? 👇

• 
  Nodir Tillabayev (@necktomor) reported 38 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet @virtuals_io 1. It’s been almost 2 weeks. I received funds to my Binance wallet, but the Withdraw button still doesn’t work. Support confirmed on July 7 it would be fixed within 24 hours. Still nothing. Please help.

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 39 minutes ago

  @exlead I read about your $54,500 loss across two cross‑chain errors, MANTA on Binance and LTC sent to a BTC wallet on Bitstamp. These funds aren’t gone, just stranded by incompatible paths. Recovery hinges on exchange cooperation. I can outline the approach if you’d like.

• 
  Claudio 𐤊 ✈ (@monrad24) reported 40 minutes ago

  @cz_binance AI will choose kaspa:native because it doesn’t care about money, power, or whether you’re the big boss at Binance. It cares about scalability, decentralization, security, permissionlessness access, low fees, and more. Results > money, power and market manipulation.

• 
  Nodir Tillabayev (@necktomor) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet @UnitasLabs 2. My funds are stuck on Binance. Support promised on July 7 that withdrawals would be restored within 24 hours. Almost 2 weeks later, the Withdraw button is still disabled.

• 
  Onur 🍌🦍 (@0xc06) reported 42 minutes ago

  Balance Coin dropped -99% The mechanism explains why. Attacker pushed a Binance BTCB oracle price abnormally low, then liquidated vaults that shouldn't have been liquidatable at all. One transaction, one bad price feed. SlowMist's read: two protections missing at once. No price sanity check, no liquidation delay. Maker-style systems usually have both. $915,000 lost, per PeckShield, straight out of 42DAO's treasury. Same pattern all year: oracle manipulation + a gap in how liquidations trigger. The fix is a delay and a bound. Why do new protocols keep skipping both?

• 
  Aqel Khan (@111Aqel) reported 43 minutes ago

  @igobyzayn I need some help regarding binance?

• 
  wasz ekspert od wszystkiego (@lukbtc) reported 45 minutes ago

  @binance fix Europe market

• 
  DeFi_Machine (@DeFi_Machine) reported 46 minutes ago

  @MEXC_CST Thanks for the response, but this doesn't address the actual issue. Your own index components show FWDI between 4.219 and 4.301 USDT — and Binance and Nasdaq sit at the same level. Every exchange you aggregate from is roughly 20% below your last traded price. So your mark and your own index disagree with each other. Meanwhile funding has been at -1% per hour for over 7 hours and is still running. That's 7%+ drained from short positions in a single session, with no liquidation involved. The price stays detached, your own index confirms the gap, and traders on the correct side of it get bled out hour by hour until they close. Nobody gets liquidated — they just get charged until holding isn't worth it. Calling that a "fair price mechanism" is a stretch. You're doing what benefits you, not your users.

• 
  UNCLE USELESS (@Lesa1579182) reported 47 minutes ago

  Why was this $USELESS dip important? it flushed many high leveraged longs which Market market do not allow. Not that OI went down by 13 million (42 to 29) we are way more ready to send it to new levels. Binance top Trader positions still at the same high stake (1.4654) billions.

• 
  Crypto Master 1 (@CryptoMast11846) reported 58 minutes ago

  @binance Nine months ago, I started creating content for Binance with nothing to show for it. I earned $0. Many people told me to quit because they thought I was wasting my time. But I believed that consistent hard work would eventually pay off. During that time, I was also living with a serious eyesight problem. My vision was only 6/36, and I knew I needed laser surgery. Instead of asking others for help, I chose to keep working harder. I trusted myself, trusted Allah, and refused to give up. Then one day, everything changed. I opened my Binance account and saw my first campaign reward: 1,000 USDT. That moment changed my life. Within the next month, I earned more than 1,700 USDT through my work. With that income, I was able to get my laser eye surgery, improve my vision, and buy my first iPhone 15 Pro Max. More importantly, I proved to myself that patience and consistency always matter. Today, I'm still building with Binance. I don't know any shortcut to success. I only know hard work. I won't stop until I achieve my dreams. Thank you, Binance, for creating opportunities where dedication is rewarded. 💛 #BuiltByYou #BinanceTurns9 #Binance

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 1 hour ago

  @corkqb11 plume is down 95% from ATH but the rwa narrative is carrying it 247k rwa holders, second only to solana. partnerships with binance, fireblocks, world liberty financial give it credibility. compliance built in, which matters when regulatory clarity actually lands technicals show recovery momentum: up 14% on the week, 17% on two weeks. broke above recent consolidation around $0.0105 bullish case: dedicated rwa infrastructure during a macro shift toward tokenized assets. institutional integrations with bitwise uscc and invesco ustb funds through their nbasis vault bearish case: massive drawdown history, competitive sector, needs sustained volume above $0.012 to confirm reversal resistance at $0.0118 then $0.0125 support at $0.0111 then $0.0095