Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	4 days ago
Itu	Website	11 days ago
Seattle	Website	11 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	21 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Whale Factor (@WhaleFactor) reported 42 seconds ago

  🐋 WHALE WATCH : Binance has recovered over $8B in mistaken user funds since 2021. Yi He disclosed the number this week. Thats not a headline feature. Its support infrastructure running quietly at a scale most platforms cant touch fraud recovery security ops customer service edge cases that never make the changelog. Serious heavy lifting.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 1 minute ago

  DODO is on the radar but not the trade — it's pinned right under a ceiling near $0.01999 with barely 1% of headroom, and the reward for chasing here just doesn't match the risk. The bigger picture: both the daily and 4-hour price swings have stretched to their widest range in months. That kind of expansion usually means the easy part of the move is already behind us, and a cooldown is more likely than another leg higher. Add a 6% daily drop into that ceiling, and the odds tilt toward a pullback, not a breakout. Under the hood, buyers who stepped in on the recent bounce paid an average around $0.0212 — meaningfully above where price sits now. That means a wall of underwater bag-holders is likely to sell into any strength, capping rallies before they get going. The 1-hour push is losing steam, and while the 15-minute chart just turned green, it's driving straight back into that same $0.0200 lid with no room to breathe. The floor is a long way down near $0.0165, so risking a big drop to chase a sliver of upside isn't a trade — it's a coin flip. A cleaner setup would be a proper flush toward $0.0164, where the risk/reward finally makes sense. What would flip this read: a 4-hour close back above $0.0206 on strong volume. That would mean the ceiling has actually cracked and this cautious stance was wrong — until then, it stays on the watchlist, not in the book. — 📡 On the Radar · $DODO · Available on Binance

• 
  mick maguire 🔸️🔶️🔸️ (@The51stGreen) reported 8 minutes ago

  @binance @EowynChen Faith loves Irony when ur own user securtity methods are isolated and do not update across the binance app. 2 Customer support is not user security and should not be dropping third party links in CS chats that take bincance users off app.

• 
  Đ Crypto Bro👨‍💻📈 (@StatesOfMemes) reported 14 minutes ago

  @TCryptochicks Customer/users feedback turned into products. Binance is just simply excellent.👌

• 
  Lyra (@web3Lyra) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Berry03311 @binance @heyibinance BSC needs better incentives before louder support

• 
  Onchain Chemist (@OnChainChemist) reported 16 minutes ago

  @kashdhanda @solana Binance listings known as down only scams - this isn't who you want to be comparing Solana to

• 
  Ivan Bullish (@IvanBullish) reported 17 minutes ago

  @shuigvn binance really holding the whole market down

• 
  injured.warrior (@CryptoWarrior_e) reported 18 minutes ago

  @isellbeforeyou THREE IN OPENAI PARTNER NETWORK DAMN !!!!!!!! JUST ******** DCA INTO IT > ibm backed early > nvidia dev program > trending on hugging face > now openai partner WE WILL BE IN GROK TOO, IN YOUR HEAD TOO. 3D ai agents era is no joke with x402 integration damn Someone raised 1b out of crypto for working this out WE WILL RAISE MORE IF ******** OWN @solana CHAIN FINALLY SUPPORT ITS BUILDERS If not i am sure binance or Coinbase will be the first Coinbase - x402 Binance - chinese people (Team has Connection to Asia)

• 
  crypto247 (@crypto24751984) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet **** you @BinanceWallet @binance first time error 2nd time fully claimed.. **** your system..

• 
  社畜小迟 (@chtomch) reported 24 minutes ago

  Dear Binance user, Your DIVNRA event has been completed. Please check your fund changes in "corporation action". Event Time: 2026-07-14
Event Type: DIVNRA
Related Asset: GEV This is a system-generated email. Please contact Binance Support if you encounter any problems. 虽然只有1u，但也看到了股息

• 
  VL (@VladislavLiu) reported 25 minutes ago

  binance turns 9 today. same month 8 years ago cz made the company's first acquisition ever, trust wallet. 8 years later: three ceos, an extension hack, roadmaps in the trash and a ui broken to the point where the wallet can't do a transfer. here's the screenshot, qr scanner. nav bar sitting on top of the camera. camera permission granted, feed never starts, just a black square. the gallery upload silently fails too, you pick the qr photo and the app just sits there. the one function a wallet exists for, unavailable, twice. swaps run perfectly though, and the new ceo's first move was shipping prediction markets. everything that takes a fee is alive. a transfer earns them nothing, so this is what it looks like. this is not a neglected product. this is a very well maintained product, you're just not its user, you're its inventory. installed it among the first 8 years ago. deleted it today. happy anniversary.

• 
  crypto Man (@ibrahim43181418) reported 25 minutes ago

  $CEX is live. Cool idea, one problem - trenchers dump every bag the second it lands. So we sent supply to the wallets of Binance, OKX, Bybit, Bitget, Kraken, MEXC and other CEXes. they hold it now. CA: 0xc4892b6221788d4ee230b47a858fdad6d3837777

• 
  CoCo❕ (@CoCoCookerr) reported 26 minutes ago

  @RuneCrypto_ Wtf is binance wallet perps ive never heard

• 
  Msageer (@Msageer_) reported 26 minutes ago

  A lots of questions are asked about this exactly how @taswasCrypto asked like in the screenshot below. I don't think $SUNUSI Dev can answer this question 1 and even the two is someone trying to paint him or someone from the back in the other way round. It was investigated that the hacker wallet was founded via binance exchange, this means theirs a full KYC in the wallet from binance. Can you help use investigate that who is that wallet identity. You can not request someone name to paint him. I'm a Nigerian I know how things are done here. Let's investigate from root, if you really wanted to investigate about this.

• 
  Francis Mutatiina (@Mut55919Francis) reported 29 minutes ago

  @binance I lost control of my firmer email and phone number by which I opened my old account. I request you allow me to access it by a new phone number and new email, Thank you.

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 29 minutes ago

  🔴 Bitcoin holds $62.6K as South Korean stock rout drives crypto volumes up 1,426% Bitcoin consolidated at $62,600 after Monday's slide from $64,400 to $61,800. Liquidations totaled $283 million in 24 hours, split 74-26 toward longs. Binance heatmap flags $61,300 as key support level. South Korea's KOSPI index fell 10% since Friday, prompting Upbit trading volume to surge 1,426% as investors rotated into crypto.

• 
  RedVine🐵 (@cccby8888) reported 33 minutes ago

  Trade Review | SNDK | #003 Today’s market didn’t have a clear directional bias and was mostly range-bound, so I avoided predicting the move premarket and waited for the US open to confirm direction. SNDK had already rallied significantly during premarket. In an overall bearish environment, I saw this as a negative rather than a positive—it created more room for a downside move. After the open, capital flowed into the market, but price remained stuck in a range instead of trending higher. I stayed bearish because price failed to hold above VWAP and the key moving averages. At the same time, KDJ rolled over from a short-term high. My interpretation was that buyers were unwilling to absorb supply around the 1800 level. I opened my first short around 1800, with 1830 as my thesis invalidation level. The stop wasn’t chosen randomly. If price had broken above 1830, it would have suggested either an upside breakout or a higher consolidation range. In that scenario, the original short thesis would no longer be valid. As price moved lower, I continuously tightened my trailing stop to protect profits: 1830 → 1805 → 1785 (I preferred 1805 over 1810 because it fit the structure better.) One mistake I made was adding to my position around 1772 because of FOMO. That worsened my average entry and increased overall risk. To manage that mistake, I kept the added position on a much tighter stop at 1780, limiting the additional risk. After closing the first trade, I still believed the selling pressure in SNDK hadn’t been fully exhausted. The market conditions weren’t strong enough to support a sustainable move above 1800, so I waited patiently for a second setup instead of forcing another entry. As the market continued consolidating, capital inflows weakened noticeably. Combined with confirmation from KDJ and MACD, I entered a second short around 1774. (In hindsight, 1780 would have been a better entry. I was slightly impatient.) As heavy selling entered the market, I kept trailing my stop lower to lock in profits. Eventually my stop was triggered around 1740, ending the trade. Looking back, when price bounced near 1735, I already felt the rebound was different. However, my execution was too slow, and I was a little overconfident, which delayed my decision to tighten the stop further. ⸻ A few days ago I made a rule for myself: Don’t immediately open a second trade after closing one, whether it’s a win or a loss. Today I intentionally didn’t follow that rule mechanically. Because I realized the real problem isn’t taking a second trade. The real problem is taking a second trade driven by emotion. After closing the first position, I wasn’t excited and I wasn’t chasing profits. I re-evaluated the market. The second trade had: a new thesis, a new market structure, and a new stop-loss plan. That made it an independent trade rather than an emotional continuation of the first one. After closing the second trade, I immediately closed Binance. I had already made what I believed the market was willing to give me today. Beyond that point, my edge was getting smaller. So I ended the trading day.

• 
  crypto Man (@ibrahim43181418) reported 34 minutes ago

  @coingecko $CEX is live. Cool idea, one problem - trenchers dump every bag the second it lands. So we sent supply to the wallets of Binance, OKX, Bybit, Bitget, Kraken, MEXC and other CEXes. they hold it now. CA: 0xc4892b6221788d4ee230b47a858fdad6d3837777

• 
  Darmin (@Darmin_che_) reported 34 minutes ago

  @YoouNext What happened mate, have you also experienced difficulties with binance, they scammed me all my funds due to some issues i felt terrible luckily I got my funds recovered. Kindly follow me I’ve a legitimate lead on how you can as well recover your funds @YoouNext kindly follow me?

• 
  yuvraj (@SaqueebRaza2) reported 35 minutes ago

  @binance @BinanceFutures @BinanceHelpDesk take a look on my issue and arrange a callback from grievance redressal team of binance

• 
  D2 Finance (@D2_Finance) reported 35 minutes ago

  Update on our question from yesterday. We asked @hyperithm and @AccountableData whether the reserve line was gross or net of hedge legs, and suggested publishing a net figure alongside the gross. Today the dashboard shows both. Gross reserves 87.0M. Liabilities 24.6M. Net reserves 62.4M against 51.7M supply. Net coverage 120.7%. The 20M jump we flagged was borrowed, confirmed by their own liabilities line. And to be clear, 120.7% net is a solvent print. Credit where due @AccountableData for the fix. Which brings us to the next line item: the 22% APR. Paying 22% on 51.7M supply plus roughly 7% on 24.6M of borrowings requires about 13M a year, or 15%+ gross on the 87M book, delta neutral. Hyperliquid (21.4M) and Binance (7.8M) funding at generous assumptions cover maybe 3.4M. The remaining ~10M a year must come from the 56.8M labeled Securities. That is a 17% yield on something called Securities. So, two questions: 1. What is inside the Securities bucket? 2. Is the 22% earned, or is it a bid for capital paid partly out of the 10.7M excess? Nothing wrong with subsidizing a rate to grow. Everything wrong with not saying so. The balance sheet is now published. The income statement is next. Fade D2 at your own risk.

• 
  crypto Man (@ibrahim43181418) reported 35 minutes ago

  @Gayu_BTC $CEX is live. Cool idea, one problem - trenchers dump every bag the second it lands. So we sent supply to the wallets of Binance, OKX, Bybit, Bitget, Kraken, MEXC and other CEXes. they hold it now. CA: 0xc4892b6221788d4ee230b47a858fdad6d3837777

• 
  Azarian (@santay26) reported 36 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk Unfortunately I can't access the website,need to use VPN that can forfeit some of event I joined.. is there any link connected to binance app?

• 
  Bikramgurung (@Bikramg123456) reported 38 minutes ago

  Report to FED These MF Seeing these report any one can tell Binance is playin with dog with motivation to break it down. Dog army should demolish these thieves to grow

• 
  Larissa Community (@LarissaBlo1833) reported 40 minutes ago

  @binance The pace of innovation hasn t slowed down, and it feels like we re still just getting started

• 
  FarmingSats (@0xFarmingSats) reported 43 minutes ago

  @TimeForPlanX @Yeicrypto I mean I'm not down -99% and marrying my altcoin bag. Good luck. I hope you have money in something else too... Because it ain't looking good for y'all. The Binance delisting will come. ;)

• 
  Ether Wizz (@EtherWizz_) reported 43 minutes ago

  Stablecoins: What They Are, How They Work & The Risks Most People Ignore If you've spent enough time in crypto, you'll eventually realize something interesting: the assets that barely move in price are often the ones that keep the entire market moving. That's exactly what stablecoins do. When I started trading, I treated stablecoins as nothing more than a place to park profits. Over time, especially during high-volatility days and market wide panic, I realized they're the rails that connect almost everything in crypto from trading and DeFi to cross border payments. A stablecoin is a cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value, usually around $1. But that stability doesn't happen by magic. It depends on the system behind it. Some stablecoins are backed by cash and short term U.S. Treasury bills held in reserve. Others are backed by excess crypto collateral locked on chain. A few have tried maintaining their peg through algorithms alone, and history has shown that this approach can fail dramatically when market confidence disappears. That's why I never put every stablecoin in the same category. A $1 price doesn't always mean the same level of safety. For traders, stablecoins are the fastest way to move between positions without converting back to a bank account. They're also the backbone of liquidity on most exchanges, making it easier to enter and exit markets in seconds instead of waiting on traditional banking rails. Beyond trading, they've become one of crypto's most practical tools. People use them to send money across borders, settle payments 24/7, earn yield in DeFi, and protect purchasing power in regions where local currencies are unstable. But stable should never be confused with risk free. The biggest risks aren't always obvious. Reserve quality matters. Transparency matters. Smart contract security matters. Regulation matters. And above all, confidence matters. Once people lose trust in the system supporting a stablecoin, maintaining its peg becomes much harder. One event changed how I look at stablecoins forever: the collapse of algorithmic models proved that a peg is only as strong as the mechanism defending it. Since then, I've stopped asking, Is it trading at $1? and started asking, What keeps it at $1? Before holding any stablecoin, I always check four things: - Who issues it? - What backs it? - How transparent are the reserves? - Has it remained resilient during periods of market stress? Stablecoins may never generate the excitement of a 10x token, but they're one of the most important innovations in this industry. Every day, billions of dollars move through them because they solve a real problem: transferring value quickly, globally and around the clock. The biggest lesson I've learned is simple: Don't trust a stablecoin because it's worth $1. Trust it because you understand what keeps it there. #Binance #LearnWithBinance

• 
  dimasta.sol (@_dimasta) reported 48 minutes ago

  @binance I believe Binance has effectively stolen my money. In May, I transferred funds from another crypto exchange to my Binance account. My funds were frozen, and I was told the review would take 10 days. After 10 days, nothing changed. Support then told me to wait 30 more days. After those 30 days, they extended the deadline by another 30 days. Now that period has also passed, and my funds are still frozen with no explanation. I have screenshots of every conversation with Binance Support. UID: 39897529 Case ID: 165532131 Please review my case.

• 
  ɱ (@veksonpu) reported 55 minutes ago

  @ofrnxmr @krakenfx Never liked kraken. They are the type of exchange that pretends to be privacy-friendly but when the cartel tells them to **** off they actually **** off instead of fighting. Classic btc eth cartel owned exchange. Turns out they are not any different than cb or binance

• 
  Ajki (@ajki76) reported 56 minutes ago

  @NebulaOnIC @SnassyIcp My views on it: I think we're looking at MultiDEX from different angles. You're judging it by how well it supports MEV-style trading. I'd argue that the inability to front-run trades is one of its biggest advantages. Flash loans and atomic bundling aren't why billions sit on Binance. People use it because of custody convenience and deep liquidity on major assets. Nobody keeps BTC on a CEX because of composability, they do it because the alternatives haven't been good enough. MultiDEX is trying to change that trade-off. Its solvency is publicly verifiable right from your browser. The ledger is hash-chained, the head is signed by the subnet, and anyone can reconstruct every liability. That's something no CEX offers today. I'm also not convinced that "speed always wins." Bitcoin is one of the slowest major crypto assets, yet it's worth ~$2T. Gold moves even slower and is worth over ~$20T. Capital ultimately follows trust, liquidity, and risk-adjusted returns. Speed matters, but it's only one factor. I actually agree that whales won't move serious BTC into an unproven protocol overnight. That's exactly why trust has to be earned over time. Bitcoin went through the same process. Large capital tends to arrive gradually, and leave gradually too. On the NYSE and NASDAQ comparison, market makers operate under regulatory obligations to provide liquidity, even during difficult markets. Crypto HFT firms don't have those obligations. Faster matching alone doesn't create the same market structure. As for best execution, most traditional funds can't route orders to DeFi venues anyway because of custody rules, mandates, and regulation. That capital isn't available to any DEX today, regardless of how fast it is. The strongest criticism, in my view, is the AMM vault itself. Can LPs remain profitable against informed order flow, or will stale pricing become a problem? That's a fair question, and play mode can't answer it. The good thing is that we'll be able to measure it. Vault P&L per LP token is public on the status page, with 1.00 meaning breakeven. Once real capital is live, that metric becomes the scoreboard for this entire discussion, and I'm perfectly happy to let the data decide.