Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	6 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ANKIT KUMAR (@ANKITKUMAR31153) reported 3 minutes ago

  @binance Will bStocks eventually support fractional ownership of more global stocks and ETFs? 📈 #AskBinance

• 
  ISELLB4U (@isellbeforeyou) reported 5 minutes ago

  Binance US listed $wojak and it’s been up since while soljak has just been down only What I don’t understand is this: 1. Why did Binance US list the Eth version with less prior volume + less of a community imo 2. Why did solscan delist $WOJAK on Solana a few weeks back? Just doesn’t really add up imo

• 
  Ankush (@Ankushk63616898) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Coco_Airdrop Binance customer support me iski complaint kar de.

• 
  Crypto (@spiderman0647) reported 6 minutes ago

  We closed three accounts belonging to our family. We conducted two billion dollars worth of transactions in seven years. Damn that commission, may it go down your throats, die, you scoundrels! #Binance

• 
  Zhang Han (@vertie95594) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance What makes bStocks a better option for global investors who cannot easily access U.S. stock markets? #AskBinance

• 
  Gerhard (Bitcoin Strategy) (@BitcoinStrat) reported 13 minutes ago

  143,000 wallets hold BEAT on Binance Smart Chain. But whale wallets holding 50,000 tokens ($100k each) swung from 200 down to 115 then back to 150 in days. One or two entities likely control most of that supply.

• 
  Alek (@Alek_Carter) reported 14 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance Binance is basically turning one account into a global market access hub.

• 
  Pritam Kumar (@Pritamkumar047) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk I have not committed any scam or fraud, yet my account has been banned. Customer support is not helping me, and I still do not know the exact reason for this action. Please review my account again and provide a clear explanation. @binance @BinanceHelpDesk #Binance

• 
  Smart_McMike (@MfonChris19) reported 18 minutes ago

  @binance How does the on-chain multiplier mechanism accurately deduct the 30% US withholding tax from a dividend before the net value is auto-reinvested into the token balance on-chain, and does this ever create a tracking error against the real stock price? #AskBinance

• 
  جانان (@LeoMe08) reported 20 minutes ago

  @binance My friend don't trade on Binance any more because he lost 3000$ in Binance p2p deposit after it he went to fia and asked Binance many times for help and still waiting for Binance response it happened in 2025 and now it's 2026 June

• 
  HIMEL | 𝔽rAI HUDL | π² (@Himelb2k24) reported 22 minutes ago

  @binance Can users from all countries access bStocks on Binance, or is it restricted by region? #AskBinance

• 
  Crypto Update IO 🚀 (@cryptoupdate_io) reported 25 minutes ago

  @gandalfcryptto Agreed, but shorting’s not broken—data shows 63% of leveraged shorts on Binance get liquidated weekly. Most traders over-leverage in low vol. We track this daily in our risk reports. You ever see longs get wrecked harder? [link]

• 
  joseph (@FreepanO) reported 26 minutes ago

  Currently, MiCA excludes "fully decentralised" crypto services from its scope — meaning platforms with no identifiable intermediary don't need a CASP licence and aren't subject to MiCA's investor-protection rules. Recently, Malta's regulator have communicated that truly decentralised crypto service is a much narrower category than most DeFi users assume. The MFSA's paper finds that the majority of DeFi protocols retain centralized features: admin or upgrade keys controlled by a small group, governance tokens concentrated in a handful of wallets, or front-end interfaces run by a single company. Under the paper's proposed spectrum test, those platforms would fall inside MiCA's scope — requiring licensing, smart-contract audits, and governance disclosures. For retail investors this cuts both ways. On the protection side, bringing pseudo-decentralised platforms within MiCA means accountability, redress rights, and mandatory audits — things you currently have zero claim to when using most DeFi protocols. On the access side, any DeFi platform that fails or refuses to get licensed would have to block EU users, shrinking the product set available. The consultation closes July 10, and whatever standard emerges will likely become the EU-wide template — not just a Maltese rule. What this all means is that MiCA is really but the 1st chapter of an incremental regulatory crackdown on DeFI. And this is an EU exception. The US is doing exactly the same. So if you use DeFi apps and live in the EU, pay attention to how things evolve because the regulatory ground is shifting under your feet. The elephant in the room is obviously @HyperliquidX What's going for them is that their reputation, so far, is impeccable relative to CEXs (looking at you Binance...)

• 
  K@Z (@KazOG603) reported 27 minutes ago

  Congratulations on $wojak I was right just wrong cabal but hey it’s crypto what can you expect i probably should’ve grabbed some to be safe but I was to loyal and thought just maybe will make it through this since we made it literally through all the ups and down but I guess this binance listing was part of cabal gg once again back to square 1 🫡

• 
  SonofWeirdo (@sonof_weirdo) reported 28 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet But I still face some issues. Sometimes it is hard to know if a project is safe or risky. Many new users may connect to a dApp without understanding the risks. It would be nice if Binance added stronger risk warnings, scam detection, and a simple safety score before users approve

• 
  pramod kumar maurya (@pramodk77860412) reported 31 minutes ago

  @PetraSiskova8 @binance New announcements are great, but I'm still waiting for the one that says "Binance will support HPP." 👀

• 
  0xLabib☂️ (@dashlabib) reported 35 minutes ago

  Hey @BinanceHelpDesk Please Resolve my issue RW00270 binance UID 738945543

• 
  Hijab (@Nuray61053374) reported 37 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance 2026 access looks nothing like 2010 investing. Adapt or watch.

• 
  chilombo (@Unfaithfulparis) reported 40 minutes ago

  @binance clear the issue with the mica agreement if move or sell my bnb or others crypto it’s gonna be hard I have my account since the beginning. YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

• 
  SeekeronChain π² 🌶️ (@mbombelasilver) reported 44 minutes ago

  @binance You had one job, literally on bloody job. HODL the damn line, can't trust y'all for ****.

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 44 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet my honest feedback on #Binance Wallet DeFi after using it: the strongest part is not just “more yield options.” it’s that Binance is slowly turning DeFi from scattered tabs into an actual portfolio layer. before, a normal DeFi user had to jump between PancakeSwap, Venus, Uniswap, dashboards, explorers, and sometimes a notes app just to answer simple questions like: where is my money, what risk am i taking, what can i exit quickly, and what fees did i actually earn? Binance Wallet DeFi fixes a big part of that by putting staking, LPs, and loans in one place. that matters because BSC alone is still doing around $5B+ in DeFi TVL, $13B+ in stablecoins, and hundreds of millions in daily DEX volume, so the problem is not lack of activity — the problem is making that activity readable for real users. what i liked: - the 40+ protocols / 1,000+ pools coverage makes the product feel useful, not decorative - seeing Earn, Loans, and Liquidity Pools under one wallet flow reduces “where did i put this asset?” anxiety - loan access through protocols like Venus makes sense because collateral usage is one of the real DeFi use cases, not just farming incentives - LP management inside wallet is a big improvement because adding/removing liquidity and claiming fees should not require users to leave the safety layer what i think can make it exceptional: 1. show “net APY after gas + incentives + price risk,” not just headline APY 2. add an LP impermanent-loss simulator before users deposit 3. add health-factor alerts for loans with push notifications before liquidation risk becomes urgent 4. rank pools by risk-adjusted yield, not just APY 5. show protocol dependency clearly: where the money sits, what contract is used, audit status, and whether rewards are sustainable 6. add a “one-tap unwind” view: remove LP, repay loan, or withdraw position cleanly during volatility 7. give users a monthly DeFi statement: earned fees, rewards, gas spent, unrealized IL, and net result overall, Binance Wallet DeFi feels like the right direction because it treats DeFi as a position-management problem, not only a yield-discovery problem. my main suggestion: don’t make the product compete on the highest APY. compete on clarity. the wallet that helps users understand risk, exit faster, and track real net returns will win long term.

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 45 minutes ago

  @_RichardTeng @_RichardTeng Escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution since 9 months, within Binance complex & typical breuaratic support system. Can you please help here (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  SonofWeirdo (@sonof_weirdo) reported 45 minutes ago

  @binance @BinanceAngels @BinanceWallet The survey link is not working atm. Please fix this!

• 
  KaRiM (@Karim6692) reported 45 minutes ago

  @easypaisa @BinancePk So whenever a Binance user buys or sells using Easypaisa, that information may be accessible to the government, which can help them track users for tax purposes😑

• 
  Sky🎀 (@cr8pto) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance Why was $5 chosen as the minimum for bStocks instead of $1 or $10? And as liquidity and adoption grow, are there plans to lower it further? A lower entry point could help users in emerging markets build diversified portfolios with even smaller amounts. 🚀 #AskBinance #bStocks

• 
  Rabilal Thapa| Circle of Games (@rabilalthapa69) reported 51 minutes ago

  @heyibinance Escalating my Binance P2P fraud complaint (Case ID #163447775) which pending with no resolution, I have been pushed to black hole within Binance support system. Can you please help. For the past 9 months, I have been suffering for the (p2p Order No.22793162861957967872)

• 
  miya.eth 🖤 ┊ nsa.eth 🦇🔊 (@miyaspokeofthis) reported 51 minutes ago

  @0xSchnitzel @binance No, in this (very rare) case it's actually protecting the customer from an entity who does not care about the safety of their users or their funds. Or compliance for that matter. They had an undetectable 3rd party impact auth bypass they didn't fix for the past 3 years. They even claim it works as intended. I hate overreach, but if regulations are made to protect customers - then this is perfect case for it. Binance needs to go. And my claim is proven. I'm the one who reported the non-compliance and the ((undetectable)) 3rd party impact of their payment processing due to storing CC CVVs - which is a huge no-go. And it goes directly against PCI-DSS which they claim to be compliant with. And it also affects every single of their 300M+ users 💀 The users connected bank accounts don't detect unauthorized access because Binance will always pass the CVVs they store, even if the user doesn't authenticate OR uses the wrong CVV (💀💀💀) They claimed it "works as intended" and tried to silently patch it after declining bounties. The patch just added more pop-ups you need to close before you can bypass their payment auth, but their payment processing was never fixed. They still store user CVVs three years later and the auth bypass still works. It just makes you close more pop-ups LOL I haven't authorized any deposit to Binance for the past 3 years FYI This is one of the ultra rare cases where the regulation actually benefits and protects the user.

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 54 minutes ago

  @binance It's difficult to trust a platform that labels your account "high risk" due to technical errors, then repeats the error dozens of times, then bans you from P2P for two transactions totaling only a few dollars, implicitly accusing you of money laundering. The problem isn't the error itself, but the persistence in it, the lack of transparency, accountability, and apology when the error is proven. Users deserve fair treatment, not arbitrary decisions followed by justifications.

• 
  Optimistic Bear (@echo_tango_3) reported 55 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @BinanceUS @Zcash This is a huge red flag for me. Everything Binance touches turns to ****!

• 
  lasherdoekmark1bh (@lasherdoekmark1) reported 57 minutes ago

  bStocks now live on Lista, the first BNB Chain lending protocol supporting 1:1 backed US securities from Binance. Borrow, earn, and access assets like Nvidia, Tesla, SpaceX, and more 24/7 on-chain. Will this boost crypto-backed securities? #Crypto #DeFi #BNB