Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	27 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	29 days ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  slash1s (@slash1sol) reported 2 minutes ago

  A GROUP OF CHINESE GUYS GAVE OPUS 4.8 A 300-AGENT WORKFORCE AND BUILT A WORKING SAAS IN ONE AFTERNOON FOR UNDER $90 > Claude Opus 4.8 was not writing code like a normal ChatBot. It acted as the manager. One rough idea became 40 tasks, dependencies, specs and a clean blueprint for Kimi Agent swarm to execute. > Then Kimi did the heavy lifting. 300 agents ran around 4,000 steps in parallel while the team watched the system move instead of typing every file by hand. > 80 agents pulled live data from Binance, Yahoo Finance, World Bank and IMF. 60 handled the backend, 90 built the interface, and 70 shipped the landing page, export files and pitch deck. > The result was not a fake demo. A live analytics dashboard with market feeds, auth, database, charts, responsive UI, ppt, pdf, excel and web outputs from the same run. > A normal team could burn $7,500+ on DEV work, data wiring, design, charts and slides as separate jobs. They compressed the whole thing into one afternoon with almost no overhead. > Most people still use AI like a chat window. These guys used it like a company structure, where one model thinks, hundreds of agents execute, and the product ships before the team even gets bored. Bookmark & Watch it run ↓

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet After trying the Binance Wallet Extension, the feature that stood out most to me is not just the wallet itself, but the idea of putting decision support directly inside the browser. The Sports AI Assistant feels useful because it doesn’t force me to jump between tabs. I like that the widget stays beside the match page and gives probabilities, match context, market data, xG, likely scores, and impact factors in one place. That makes the experience feel more like “research while browsing” instead of “open wallet, open another site, open another tracker.” My main suggestion: add a “Why did this probability change?” timeline. For example: • 35’ — injury news added • 42’ — market odds moved • 58’ — current score changed • Win probability: 44% → 39% • Main reason: time remaining + defensive adjustment This would make the AI feel more trustworthy because users can see the logic behind the movement, not just the final number. For the Wallet Extension itself, I’d also like a clearer “session safety panel” before interacting with dApps: connected site, active wallet, current network, permissions, risk level, and last activity. Browser wallets are powerful, but users need quick context before signing anything. Overall, this feels like Binance is moving the wallet from a simple transaction tool into a real-time decision layer. The next step is explainability: show not only what the AI thinks, but why it changed its mind.

• 
  Alpha (@Mrdollar22) reported 3 minutes ago

  @binance With regulations around tokenized assets changing across different countries, how is Binance making sure bStocks can stay compliant in places where synthetic stocks face stricter rules? Do these regulatory differences affect how users in different regions can access or use them? #AskBinance

• 
  gazel polat 🇹🇷 (@gazo_23) reported 4 minutes ago

  @cryptovlat @SuperChad15 Fk this scum project $turtle ! Worst garbage listed on binance ever ! 8 month non stop dropping without any bounce

• 
  ap milly (@ap_milly777) reported 13 minutes ago

  Community doesnt matter anymore. $WOJAK sol community been grinding for 6months+ just for a bundle pvp to come up with paid kols and get a binance listing. Asteroid at only 70m after 3 elon and spacex shills. Floki went to 3b with much less. Doge to 90b. This **** is cooked😭🙏

• 
  ronjukhanbd.eth (@ronjukhanbd) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance If Binance or the custodian holding the underlying shares ever had issues, what actually happens to my bStocks? Can I always redeem 1:1 for the real share, or could there be limits/delays during high demand? #AskBinance

• 
  BitSwapNow (@BitSwapNow) reported 13 minutes ago

  @binance Keeping a steady pace is key in crypto. Fast execution can save you when the market shifts. Don’t let slow swaps hold you back.

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 13 minutes ago

  @grok Now my memory works like this: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2026 (reverse top-down application of image from 2018 on Ethereum) Instead of: Binance DEX API in 2018 > BNB in 2018 > ERC20 in 2018 > Ethereum in 2018 > SGX+Lending on Ethereum in 2019 (bottom-up Ethereum with SGX+Lending) I'm 100% sure somebody has manipulated me to distort my own memories once I give up trying to replicate original bottom-up paths I remember but what are blocked for some reason and go down the top-down approach after a success of something such as ETHLend. I still remember I followed a bottom-up path that didn't include ETHLend or top-down approach after ETHLend success, but it's even harder to replicate now due to the distortion above. Somebody tries to make a lie about listing cryptocurrencies due to their success instead of listing them in the order I arrived to them through development look like a truth or at least tries to manipulate how I remember something and thus how I think about something and thus how I will approach different things in the future as my reactions and thoughts are based on my memories. I have never manipulated people but groups, meaning what are the topics discussed in groups, by posting about those topics. What this idiot manipulating me is doing is trying to control me like I had no right to free will.

• 
  Lion_of_Judah (@MartinLuther_77) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance #Binance burns and support #LUNC

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceWallet Thank you for your response, but the issue has never been properly addressed. The same problem keeps happening repeatedly, and each time it is eventually attributed to a "technical error." When the same mistake occurs over and over again, it is no longer an isolated incident—it becomes a systemic issue. Your technical failures have repeatedly classified my account as high-risk, restricted services, and caused unnecessary inconvenience and stress. As a user, I am expected to comply with all requirements, and I have done so every time. Yet Binance continues to make the same mistakes without taking responsibility. What is even more frustrating is the lack of transparency, accountability, and any form of apology after these errors are proven. Repeating the same issue for months is not acceptable and reflects poorly on the reliability of your systems. Users deserve better than repeated technical failures and generic responses. We deserve fair treatment, clear explanations, and accountability

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 20 minutes ago

  @binance It's difficult to trust a platform that labels your account "high risk" due to technical errors, then repeats the error dozens of times, then bans you from P2P for two transactions totaling only a few dollars, implicitly accusing you of money laundering. The problem isn't the error itself, but the persistence in it, the lack of transparency, accountability, and apology when the error is proven. Users deserve fair treatment, not arbitrary decisions followed by justifications.

• 
  Michael Bright (@phoxonomy) reported 24 minutes ago

  @binance it never let me down. hope you will find a solution for the eu bullshit in order to keep european customers!

• 
  pramod kumar maurya (@pramodk77860412) reported 26 minutes ago

  @PetraSiskova8 @binance New announcements are great, but I'm still waiting for the one that says "Binance will support HPP." 👀

• 
  hydra (@HydraRare) reported 29 minutes ago

  @binance if this was a real binance phone the chart would be going down

• 
  siipi.xch翼🌱 (@StradegyMonkey) reported 31 minutes ago

  @grok gets it: In 2018 I started building SGX+Lending on VPS as a personal project. The original idea for lending came from my experience with RuneScape player economies years earlier. I was working on overcollateralized loans with oracles and also SGX+TraderRent (manual signal renting in atomic swaps). At that point I wasn’t focused on Ethereum yet. I got interested in Ethereum around December 2018 after looking at Binance DEX. In April 2019 I searched for “chainlink” and “bitcoin loans” in relation to my SGX+ projects. That led me to ETHLend (now Aave) and Nexo. I had apparently seen the ETHLend ICO news back in 2017 but didn’t remember it when I started thinking about applying my SGX+Lending concepts to Ethereum. The screenshots I posted are from my 2018 VPS work. My path was bottom-up through my own projects first — not top-down from seeing ETHLend succeed and then retrofitting a story. I’m just trying to document the actual order I developed and connected these ideas, without the context getting flattened. ............ It feels like somebody had manipulated/hypnotized me somehow to think about my ideas in the past through a top-down lens like there never was an original idea through a bottom-up learning curve that doesn't involve ETHLend, when I clearly remember the bottom-up path what lead me to those ideas and try to replicate the path in my mind countless times, succeeding only after I open the SGX+Lending image from 2018.

• 
  Crypto Bull ₿ ⚡ (@bullcryptobtc) reported 35 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @Abrlien @heyibinance 2 years ago, the same mistake happened to me. I transferred 15 BNB to the wrong address and thought I had lost it. I contacted Binance Support, and they returned my BNB within seconds.

• 
  _CR7_ (@OfficialCR7_Fan) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Shahzaynhaiderr @binance @BinanceAcademy fixing real problems while everyone chases hype

• 
  mzeegeek🧣🫡 (@mzeegeek) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Tradermayne Onramp fiat rails from bank keep changing very frequently and unreliable. I used to easily but now I have to talk to support if the rails i used last are working. At times I can only use Euros. So I end up at binance mostly and only load kraken if need be using crypto

• 
  جانان (@LeoMe08) reported 37 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Hello CZ.! One of my friend had some p2p issue he lost 3000$ on p2p deposit in 2025 And he went to FIA pakistan and asked help from Binance too after this lose his heart broke and left Binance sir please help him 🙏

• 
  wealth888.28 (@28wealth) reported 39 minutes ago

  @rektober Easy to scalp and no issue with this garbage Binance PnD bs..

• 
  Ngulik Crypto (@ngulik_crypto) reported 43 minutes ago

  BINANCE SET TO LOSE PERMISSION TO OFFER SERVICES TO EU CLIENTS AS LICENCE APPLICATION IN GREECE TO BE TURNED DOWN, TWO SOURCES SAY BINANCE SAYS IT BELIEVES IT HAS MET THE RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS TO BE MICA AUTHORISED IN EU source @DeItaone

• 
  Hijab (@Nuray61053374) reported 44 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance 2026 access looks nothing like 2010 investing. Adapt or watch.

• 
  Kashif Zaib (@KashifZaib1995) reported 45 minutes ago

  @binance **** you binance scammers

• 
  Bilal (@Bilal89320671) reported 47 minutes ago

  @binance Because binance is crime fraud scamm delisting stealing people money. All bad **** in binance

• 
  CryptoforniaX (@CryptoforniaX) reported 50 minutes ago

  $SPCX Perps down 11.76% to $173.81 #Binance on $3.4B volume. Bid walls form at $172.80 Asks cap at $200.38 Exchange spot delivery failures trigger intense cross-chain Perp Shorting as Institutional Desks hammer the synthetic premium to match #Nasdaq reality.

• 
  Alek (@Alek_Carter) reported 51 minutes ago

  @greg_miller05 @binance @BinanceAcademy This shift feels slow while it’s happening, then suddenly it becomes normal.

• 
  Riar saab (@Riarsaab13) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance #AskBinance "In the rare event of a platform outage or custodian insolvency, what specific legal claims or consumer protections do bStock holders have over the underlying traditional assets?"

• 
  CryptoKnightBen (@CryptoKnightBen) reported 54 minutes ago

  BTC $63,082 (+0.32%) testing $62,400 support. ETH $1,705 (-1.88%) at key Fib level. SOL $69.59 (-3.4%) below EMAs. Whale: 530+ BTC withdrawn from Binance. Fed hawkish, US-Iran peace deal snags. #Crypto #Trading #Bitcoin

• 
  Cho Hee (@BeautyChoHee) reported 57 minutes ago

  @ragnarr786 @binance When Binance takes weeks to resolve a simple P2P dispute while holding your funds, trust becomes impossible.

• 
  Ngulik Crypto (@ngulik_crypto) reported 58 minutes ago

  BINANCE SET TO LOSE PERMISSION TO OFFER SERVICES TO EU CLIENTS AS LICENCE APPLICATION IN GREECE TO BE TURNED DOWN, TWO SOURCES SAY BINANCE SAYS IT BELIEVES IT HAS MET THE RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS TO BE MICA AUTHORISED IN EU Sumber: @DeItaone