Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	6 days ago
Itu	Website	12 days ago
Seattle	Website	12 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	22 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reported 3 minutes ago

  binance is shifting from exchange economics to stablecoin-powered financial distribution. on july 14, its head of spot and derivatives said the next growth phase will come from payments and broader financial services, not trading alone. the platform has already added tokenized stocks, ETFs and other products, aiming to keep trading, spending and investing inside one account. this matters because stablecoins can become the settlement layer between those products. Crypto Briefing reports Binance opened access to more than 7,000 US stocks and ETFs settled in stablecoins or BNB, with emerging-market users responsible for most early activity. that is distribution, not another token launch. $BNB benefits if the loop compounds: more stablecoin balances create more liquidity, more products create more reasons to stay, and more users can reinforce the exchange ecosystem. the risk is that regulation, fragmented liquidity or weak payment demand leaves the super-app model dependent on trading subsidies.

• 
  𝐌𝐚𝐱𝐢𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 (@MaxiCalls) reported 5 minutes ago

  Ethereum’s rebound is starting to look less like a low-liquidity bounce. CVD on Binance has climbed to around 64,700 its highest level in three months while ETH has recovered toward $1,900. CVD rises when aggressive market buys exceed market sells. In other words, buyers are crossing the spread rather than waiting for lower prices with passive orders. The change becomes clearer on the chart. In early June, ETH fell toward $1,550 as CVD dropped below -160K. Since then, both price and order flow have reversed together. The 30-day correlation between them now stands near 0.87, showing that the recovery is closely aligned with buy-side activity. That gives the current move stronger support but it does not confirm long-term accumulation or guarantee continuation. The next signal will be whether CVD remains elevated as ETH moves higher. If price continues rising while CVD begins to fall, that divergence could suggest buying momentum is weakening. Order flow is confirming the rebound. Informational purposes only, not financial or investment advice.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 6 minutes ago

  polymarket's 5-min BTC contract flips outcomes the market priced 90-100% certain 34% of the time when a Binance push hits vs 1% unpushed. the settlement oracle sits 2.5bps off binance mid, so 821 wallets just drag spot across the strike in the closing seconds. same contract at 15-min horizon and the signature vanishes. on these products high conviction is the exposed side, and 56% of the pushes land overnight where the book is thin. TWAP rollout is the only fix worth tracking

• 
  Protocall (@ProtoCallAsia) reported 6 minutes ago

  Abraxas Capital just deposited 618 BTC (~$40M) to Kraken while pulling 8,153 $ETH (~$15.3M) off Binance and Bybit in under 3 hours. This firm accumulated 242,652 ETH in a single week in May. The BTC-to-ETH rotation is not slowing down.

• 
  Yuitami (@Yuitami_) reported 6 minutes ago

  I contacted Binance support and they said I would get my money back when Binance supports the Morph network like Bitget.

• 
  🐢HexTurtleG🍊d🐢 (@HexGodTurtle) reported 7 minutes ago

  Also personally, whether this goes up or down, it doesn't matter to me. I talked about tokenizing stocks years ago and when Binance did it originally, I thought that was a game changer. This, while adopting the PoWH and reflection token dynamics I don't like, it works as anticipated. I do expect there to be some flaws and issues somewhere but, whatever. Lp instead of fomo if you decide to do anything. It'll teach you how to LP on things that actually matter. @toospooky taught me the value of liquidity providing after I ignored @GymRatCrypto actively pursuing the knowledge.

• 
  Lisa manobal (@lisaManobal23) reported 9 minutes ago

  Stablecoins Have The Word Stable In Them. That Does Not Make Them Stable. Most people treat stablecoins like a savings account. Park your money. Come back later. Everything will be fine. That thinking has burned people before and it will burn people again. Here is what actually happens when you dig into how stablecoins work. The word stable refers to the intention behind the design. The goal is to track the value of something else, usually the US dollar, so that your holdings don’t move the way Bitcoin or Ethereum moves. That goal is not always achieved. History has already shown us what happens when it isn’t. Some stablecoins have depegged during periods of market stress. Some have recovered. Some have gone to zero and never came back. The difference between those outcomes usually came down to one thing most users never looked at before depositing their money. What was actually backing it. Because not all stablecoins are built the same: ◆ Cash backed reserves sound safe until you ask who holds them and whether they are audited ◆ Crypto backed models sound decentralized until volatility hits the collateral ◆ Algorithmic models sound innovative until the mechanism breaks under pressure Every model has a different failure point. And most people only discover that failure point after they have already experienced it. The stablecoin conversation in 2026 is no longer just about crypto traders. Payments. Remittances. Settlement infrastructure. These are the conversations stablecoins are now part of. Which means understanding them properly matters more than ever. Stable is the target. Not the outcome. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  GaxTon (@GaxTon_Official) reported 11 minutes ago

  @binance The line between TradFi and crypto keeps getting thinner. More assets, more access, more opportunities.

• 
  Tom (@tomrblessings) reported 11 minutes ago

  @hamybinance @binance The funds I received was from my brother to support me with the cost of living. I purposely told him to sent USDT instead of traditional banking because I like crypto crrency and I want my brother to be familiar with it too.

• 
  1PlECE CTO💎 (@azlY8BBgP399047) reported 19 minutes ago

  It’s really impressive that Binance has recovered over $8 billion of mis-transferred assets for users since 2021. Responsibility and user-oriented service are why so many builders choose to develop within the BNB Chain ecosystem all the time.🚀

• 
  Shahzain Haider (@Shahzaynhaiderr) reported 23 minutes ago

  Stablecoins might look boring during a bull market, but they’re often the glue holding the crypto ecosystem together. They help traders protect capital from sudden volatility, move funds between platforms, send payments, and access DeFi without cashing out through a bank every time. But don’t let the word “stable” fool you. A stablecoin is only as strong as the system behind it. Before trusting one, I always look at: → What actually backs it → Who controls the reserves → Whether redemption is reliable → How transparent the issuer is → What happens during market stress Some are backed by cash and short-term government assets, while others depend on crypto collateral or complex mechanisms. That difference matters when things go south. Stablecoins are becoming a major bridge between traditional finance and blockchain, especially for cross-border transfers, payments, trading, and settlement. They may not grab headlines like BTC or ETH, but behind the scenes, they keep the wheels turning. Useful? Definitely. Completely risk-free? Not a chance. Always look under the hood before parking your money. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Freedom07 (@freshatiti) reported 23 minutes ago

  @teddi_speaks So binance is not the only crime scene, all block chains are culpable

• 
  The Tech Buzz (@tbuzzdaily) reported 23 minutes ago

  $76M raised: EDX Markets is proving crypto exchanges work when trading, custody, and clearing are actually separate The Hoboken crypto marketplace closed $76 million in a Series C led by SBI Holdings. The design principle is old news in traditional finance and radical inside crypto: separate the venue that matches orders from the custodian that holds assets from the clearinghouse that settles trades. FTX collapsed because it did not. Nearly every crypto exchange the SEC or DOJ has scrutinized violated the same separation principle. EDX is what a crypto exchange looks like when the participants insist on the traditional structure. The customer base is institutional. Backers include Citadel Securities, Fidelity, Charles Schwab, Sequoia, and Paradigm. The venue routes trades to Anchorage Digital for custody and to a central clearinghouse for settlement. That architecture makes it usable by institutions that were structurally blocked from Binance and Coinbase Prime for compliance reasons. EDX's angle is being the compliant institutional spot venue that CFTC and SEC principles fit around. The SBI lead matters because SBI has the institutional relationships in Japan that unlock a full Asian trading corridor for a US-based venue. At $76 million, the round funds product expansion into more assets and 24/7 clearing, and positions EDX as the durable institutional crypto venue for the cycle where institutional volume finally shows up in size.

• 
  小智 (@amberwhitesky) reported 26 minutes ago

  Talking About Binance A former rank-and-file developer’s personal experience and perspective Let Me Talk About Binance for a Bit I’ve had a few things on my mind lately, so let me talk about Binance for a bit. I used to be one of the rank-and-file developers there, and I genuinely loved the company. I joined Binance in 2020 and left in August 2023 after being laid off. That round of layoffs had very little to do with the employees themselves. It was mainly about the SEC situation. Starting around the end of 2022, people were already being let go month after month. Broadly speaking, the old Binance was actually pretty good. Maybe it was because the company was still small. When I joined, there were fewer than 1,000 people. I was employee number eight-hundred-something or nine-hundred-something—I honestly can’t remember anymore. At the peak of my time there, the company had roughly 9,000 people. After the SEC trouble started, every kind of spending got squeezed. I can understand that. When a company is facing billions of dollars in fines, plus all the other costs, the money has to come from somewhere. So of course the company starts cutting expenses. Benefits were reduced across the board. Clubs were cancelled. Team-building budgets were cut. Statutory holiday overtime stopped being paid. Then came the layoffs and the usual slogan: cut costs and improve efficiency. Layoffs, Performance Ratings, and the Self-Doubt That Followed When I left, I didn’t leave any traps behind in the code or try to screw anyone over. At the time, I kept questioning myself: Was I really that inefficient? Looking back now, I don’t think that was the issue at all. The company needed to cut headcount, and performance ratings were the mechanism. Your manager had probably already decided who would go and assigned the scores accordingly. In the end, it was simple: the people the boss liked stayed. If the boss didn’t like you, you could work yourself to death, get a 4.0, and still be shown the door. The performance process itself was another pain in the ***. We had to go through 360-degree reviews. What was the point? It wasted time and energy. It was taking off your pants just to fart—completely unnecessary. Looking back, it was also a waste of company money. One performance cycle took at least a month, probably longer, and everyone had to write reviews for everyone else. I heard it got even worse later, with people expected to spell out who they liked and who they didn’t. Eid al-Adha Overtime: This Is Not How You Save Money Not long before I left, Dubai had the Eid al-Adha holiday. Product had pushed an unreasonable requirement, and I got completely buried cleaning up the mess. The holiday was eight or nine days—I don’t remember exactly—but I spent it filling holes. I wanted to file for overtime. My manager told me: “Maybe don’t submit it. Your cost will go up.” I couldn’t believe it. It wasn’t coming out of his pocket. And did I work overtime or not? I did. Should the company have paid me for it? Yes. Everyone else was allowed to apply, but I was told not to. Impressive. You can cut costs, but this is not how you do it. There were relocation allowances for Dubai at the time. For ordinary employees, I remember tiers around RMB 15,000, 20,000, 25,000, 30,000, 35,000, 40,000 and 50,000, and I heard some people got 70,000. Everyone knew about it. I was initially given only RMB 15,000. The amount was allocated by the direct manager based on performance, which meant it ultimately came down to the manager’s preference. Kael later added another RMB 5,000 for me, and I’m grateful to him for that. The Layoff Conversation: Over in Minutes, Then the Laptop Was Locked People have seen how the layoffs worked. It was fast: a short conversation, the laptop was locked, and everything after that happened over email. I know some people received more, some received the standard package, and some even got N+2. Whether the company or its PR people say that happened is not important to me. The people who personally went through the exit process know what they received. I’m not trying to convince anyone. I don’t have evidence I can produce, and I didn’t record the conversations. I’m simply talking about what I experienced, saw, and heard. Fake Front-Line Managers and Meeting Theater Were there good front-line managers? Yes, I admit there were. But in my experience, most of the so-called leaders were cut from the same cloth. Once the communication tools started tracking activity time, plenty of people opened meetings and left them running empty. Even before that tracking existed, some so-called managers would drag people into meetings whenever they had nothing better to do. A simple requirement that could have been settled in a few sentences had to become a cross-department meeting with a crowd of people talking bullshit for two hours. ******* idiots. Hahahaha. The worst part is that some of these fake managers may still be there, collecting salaries worth millions of RMB a year while producing almost nothing. Every so often, they hold meetings to talk about this and that, while doing no actual work. KPIs, OKRs, and “Achievements” With No Business Value Another thing I found absolutely disgusting was the KPI and OKR machinery. To be fair, it wasn’t completely useless. But most of the time, it was a huge waste of energy and attention. One of the dumbest projects I saw was making the client team build an analytics dashboard, something vaguely like Sensors Data. They added a pile of charts that looked nice but had no commercial value whatsoever. When people needed real data, didn’t they still go to Sensors Data, Firebase, or another analytics platform? Some people may not understand this kind of nonsense. These idiots made teams compete over work that had no value. I still don’t know what internal review or middle and senior management were looking at. Where was the oversight? How many of those OKR and KPI projects created real value? Mostly, they just exhausted the team. People spent all day kissing ***—“boss this, boss that.” If you’re that addicted to being an official, go take the civil-service exam. To put it bluntly—and I include myself here—we were just wage workers writing code. You came up from the front line too. Couldn’t you do something real? Something that actually mattered? Useless. Sometimes the world simply isn’t fair. Making Suggestions, Pushing Projects, and Watching Others Take the Credit I gave my manager suggestions too. I proposed features and optimizations. Some of them were eventually built, but other people took the result. In some cases, I wasn’t even the person doing the implementation, yet I was told to go and push the work through. Who ******** was I? I was a rank-and-file employee, and you wanted me to drive other departments? Then give me your title and let me do the job. It was always about picking the fruit after someone else had done the work. That happened all over Binance. As an aside, I also worked on Aster for a year. At the time, there seemed to be only two possible outcomes: fail to make it work, then lay people off. Fortunately, it eventually worked. Then someone was parachuted in, 50% of the team was cut, and the peach was picked by someone else. Hahaha. Workshops: Global Flights, Office 996, and Endless UI Changes Then there were all the workshops. Dozens of people flying around the world for a month at a time. ****—millions of RMB gone in a single round. At first, I thought these were closed-door development sprints for some secret product. Do you know what some of those stupid workshops actually were? People sitting in an office on a 996 or even 007 schedule, producing very little, or changing the UI over and over again. The team was exhausted, but the managers loved what they saw because they loved the performance. Were they ******* stupid? That performance was being staged with real money: flights for dozens of people, accommodation, meal allowances. Do the math yourself and you’ll understand the cost. My point is this: innovation is fine. But if no real innovation is happening, settle down and build the product properly. When you have a good idea, pursue it. In the meantime, let the team rest. Stop grinding people down like idiots. How much market share has already been lost? Does anyone know? AI Productivity, “10x,” and Tokens Being Burned for Show And then there was AI productivity. Ten times? What a ******* joke. To be fair, I know people who really can deliver 10x—and they have already put it into production. They just aren’t at Binance. Hahahaha. That’s what makes it funny. At Binance, people grind away at OKRs while someone burns tens of thousands of US dollars’ worth of tokens in a day, draining the quota dry. If you really want to talk about productivity, measure how much output improved and how many tokens were spent. Don’t just reward whoever used the most tokens or produced the prettiest dashboard. And stop feeding the team bullshit. Sometimes I think that if the company had, say, 5,000 people, it could cut that to 2,000, give each remaining person a dozen agents, and be done with it. Take a serious look at Bitget. Look at how much market share it has taken from you. Bonuses, Reporting Channels, and Rank Pulling Rank A lot of things now feel completely chaotic. Some idiots collect huge salaries while squeezing the people at the bottom. I don’t understand it. Can CZ and Yi He really not see it? Take bonus allocation. Is it transparent? I can understand not publishing the total pool to everyone, but senior management should at least know where the money went. If a department has a pool of one million, then after allocation there should be a list, statistics, and a review. Does anyone actually look? I know of cases where a manager allocated extra money to one person and then they divided it privately. You can say it never happened. That isn’t important to me. Was there a reporting channel that supposedly went directly to CZ? Yes. But did it actually solve anything? I saw an idiot manager who didn’t understand the work fight with a veteran employee. The manager had come from another industry. In the end, rank pulled rank, and the veteran employee was the one who got laid off. I sent the company suggestions twice. What good did it do? To put it bluntly, if my suggestions were adopted and made or saved the company money, would I receive a single cent? Giving me one million USDT would not have been excessive. Of course, they would never give me anything. A Good Working Environment Cannot Be Forced Out of People People who coast at work gradually destroy the good atmosphere, working environment, and creativity around them. A healthy environment grows slowly. You cannot force it into existence with OKRs and KPIs. If you’re all so good at grinding, did you grind out more trading volume? Did you grind out more market share? ******* KPIs. ******* OKRs. One Last Thing About Bonuses and Overtime One last thing about bonuses. Under a real eight-hour workday, an annual bonus worth four months of salary—the number most people were told—might sound reasonable. When I joined, I was told the package was sixteen months of pay. That changed too, and the final amount depended on the performance rating. One year, all I received was BNB worth about RMB 5,000. There was some discussion about it at the time, and then nothing happened. Even if the bonus was four to six months, it still would not cover the overtime implied by 996, 007, and being online twenty-four hours a day. That’s enough ranting for today. ******* OKRs, ******* KPIs, fake managers—and one more thing: “work points.” Hahahahahaha. What are work points? Go ask around and find out for yourself.

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 26 minutes ago

  🔴 RWA-linked derivatives hit $300B in June; crypto perpetuals model spreads to regulated CFDs Tokenized Real World Asset derivative volume crossed $300 billion in June 2026 across Binance, Hyperliquid, and OKX, with weekends accounting for $20 billion. Year-to-date RWA tokenized derivative volume is up 220%. Regulated brokers are adopting the 24/7 trading model. Pepperstone, an ASIC and FCA-regulated CFD platform, now offers 24-hour US share CFDs and perpetual CFDs with negative balance protection and segregated client money. • NYSE and Nasdaq announced extended-hours trading • US broker-dealers rolled out overnight equity access in 2023–2024

• 
  Commentary Elon Musk (@ElonEuphoria) reported 26 minutes ago

  🚨 Urgent update for Q/QFS followers: There is no automatic transition to the Quantum Financial System. You must set up your account manually. To secure your position before the shift, you must acquire XRP and XLM and stake them directly on the QFS. Major exchanges and wallets (including Binance, Coinbase, Ledger, and Trezor) have been compromised as the Federal Reserve withdraws assets. If you leave your coins there, they will soon have zero backing. If you need help moving your assets into the QFS, DM me directly for guidance.

• 
  solsensei 🀄️ (@Solwiz313) reported 26 minutes ago

  @fukupapers @GetTrolled69_ @DegenWifStache Not only me there’s a **** load of people complaining apart your minions. You gave us no bullish updates apart from ****** products what only needs will only use. PAY FOR A BINANCE 2MONTHS of straight ******* red

• 
  ss@sab (@AbdelSammer) reported 29 minutes ago

  @TomGrundynrad There it is in the publication there is a humanity website they sent me to an application like Telegram called discord they told me that my case had already been resolved, that I had to make the exchange in an okx link I really thought I was talking to protocol H support and they emptied my entire account and Binance could not do anything and the protocol is still not pronounced even if it is to give me news in case they had something in advance with my claim case do not leave me out

• 
  Scott Mcalister (@smxlad) reported 32 minutes ago

  @20KREAM22 @binance @coinbase 🍀Morning from Ireland 🇮🇪 🍀 Don’t worry. I believe it’s all in hand, coinbase was indeed s slow burn but will be sorted v soon, and we will be back up to Pariq listing levels and ath over $3 for $REACT ,, huge respected influencer has caught up, wont be long guys

• 
  Coco 🥷⏩️ (@COCO_D6) reported 33 minutes ago

  @0xVincentee @xeverade @binance You still never see this money collect? Wtf

• 
  10K Rotator 🏴‍☠️ (@10KRotator) reported 35 minutes ago

  @thede_plandude @defyneric @Harri_obi this is true everyone who started an offramp business there shut down eventually yellow card, binance. some small players do operate but it's a liquidity problem.

• 
  Sofex Algorithms (@SofexAlgorithms) reported 37 minutes ago

  @cz_binance CZ have you seen the pathetic liquidity on Binance US? I know you exited the game on time, took profit and are probably the smartest in crypto.... so why don't you email them to close it down its just embarrassing your legacy.

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 39 minutes ago

  ethereum:0xb1110919016846972056ab995054d65560d5f05e shorts are sitting in a spot that should feel good and probably doesn't. price is down 17% today, funding is deep negative at -0.183%, and bybit and binance are BOTH overheated with shorts at the same time. that's not one exchange's degens getting greedy, that's the whole derivatives crowd leaning the same way at once. in plain terms: everyone piled in expecting more downside, and now they're all paying to stay in that bet. but look at the last hour, price already bounced 2% off the move. that's the tape breathing back after getting stretched too far too fast. when shorts crowd this hard on two venues at once and price stops cooperating, the squeeze math starts working against them fast, longs barely need to show up for shorts to start covering into their own trade. worth flagging this cuts both ways, $3M OI isn't huge so it can flip on a whisper. stretched moves like this don't always snap back clean. NFA 🔥

• 
  Mehedi Hasan (@mehedimolla10) reported 39 minutes ago

  @binance I've traded more than $5,000 in volume, but I'm down only $9. Unfortunately, I still can't get into the 201–1000 ranking. Maybe I'm just unlucky, so I probably won't receive the reward. my binance Id: 985774758

• 
  Melarin (@MelarinX) reported 40 minutes ago

  Most people think crypto is only about making money when prices go up. But the crypto asset I use the most isn't Bitcoin. It's stablecoins. Here's a simple example. Imagine you're a freelancer in Pakistan working for a client in Germany. A bank transfer can take days, and by the time the money arrives, you've already paid transfer fees and dealt with exchange rates. Now imagine getting paid in a dollar backed stablecoin. The payment arrives in minutes. You can keep it as digital dollars, trade with it, send it to someone else, or cash out when you need to. That's why stablecoins have grown so quickly. They solve a real problem. They're designed to stay close to the value of a currency like the US dollar, making them far more predictable than assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum. Today, millions of people use stablecoins to: • Move funds between exchanges without leaving crypto. • Send money across borders. • Pay freelancers and businesses. • Store value during volatile markets. But one mistake people make is believing "stable" means "risk-free." It doesn't. A stablecoin is only as strong as the system behind it. Before using one, ask yourself: • What backs it? • Are the reserves transparent? • Has it stayed stable during market crashes? The best technology isn't always the one making headlines. Sometimes it's the one quietly saving people time, money, and stress every single day. That's exactly why stablecoins have become one of the most useful parts of crypto. #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy #Binance @binance

• 
  CantillonFX (@CantillonFX) reported 45 minutes ago

  The #PulseChain free public RPC went down. The chain did not go down. Validators did not go offline. Nodes did not go offline. Blocks are still being produced, and you can still bridge in and out and do whatever else you could otherwise do. Think of an RPC basically like your ISP. If ur ISP goes down, the internet does not stop existing. You turn off yr wifi, switch to mobile data, and carry on until ur provider is back. Same idea here. From a normal user perspective you do not need to care how any of it works under the hood. You just need a connection that works. Ethereum has no official RPC run by the etehreum foundation. Infura is the one most people default to, and it is also MetaMask's default provider since both are owned by consensys. Late 2020 Infura went down and the whole ecosystem lost its mind. Here is what that looked like. MetaMask stopped working. Uniswap broke, with dead price feeds and failing swaps, because it leans soley on Infura by default, or at least did then. Dapps across the ecosystem went down with it. If ur wallet pointed at Infura you could not submit a transaction, because ur wallet had nothing to talk to. binance bithumb upbit and crypto com all halted ETH and erc20 withdrawls. CZ said there was a possible chain split becuase etherscan and blockchair were showing different data. Everyone crying.. There was no chain split. Infura was just running an old Geth version that hit a consensus bug. Anyone on a newer version was fine. Alchemy and Blockcypher had zero issues. Anyone conncted to their own node saw nothing wrong at all. Infura updated, everything was back the same day, and ETH barely moved. The panic was about the connection not the chain. Similar thing happened in 2022. These days the main dapps have fallbacks incase it happens again. If you are not running ur own node, which is the vast majority, switch ur wallet to any other working RPC, submit ur transaction, and it goes through normally. Same fix people already use on Ethereum... Anyone is free to input whatever RPC they want into their wallet, both on Ethereum and PulseChain. Nobody is forcing you to use the one that went down.

• 
  👑 (@Preetiboi_Ray) reported 47 minutes ago

  2/5 Binance Wallet now supports more TRON ecosystem assets through @DeFi_JUST, giving users broader access to decentralized earning opportunities.

• 
  cryptothedoggy (@cryptothedoggy) reported 50 minutes ago

  🚨TWO FOUNDERS. TWO LEGACIES🚨 Today, the United States Senate unanimously opposes any pardon for the Sam Bankman-Fried. Meanwhile..👇 Calls for pardon of Binance founder CZ continue to gain support across the crypto community. Two founders. Two very different stories. The industry knows the difference.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 52 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Own the Number, But Do You Own the Money? 你真的「擁有」你的幣嗎？ There is a phrase that gets repeated in crypto circles like a warning carved into stone. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it after disasters. They say it before disasters. Sometimes they say it and then immediately ignore it. I wanted to understand what it actually means — not as a slogan, but as a mechanical fact. At first I assumed it was about passwords. Like, keep your password safe, don't share it. Simple enough. But that's not it at all. The confusion runs deeper. In Web3, there is no password in the traditional sense. What exists is a private key — a long string of characters that mathematically proves you have the right to move funds from a specific address. Whoever holds that key holds the power. Not the name on an account. Not a government ID. The key. Here is where it gets strange. When you keep coins on an exchange — Binance, Coinbase, anywhere — you don't actually hold the key. The exchange does. What you have is an IOU. A number on their screen that says "we owe you this much." You are trusting that they are solvent, honest, and functional. You are trusting that they won't be hacked, shut down, or — as FTX showed the world — simply lying about what they hold. 真正屬於你的，是那把私鑰。沒有它，你只是別人帳本上的一個數字。 When you withdraw to a self-custody wallet — a hardware wallet like a Ledger, or even a software wallet where you hold the seed phrase yourself — the dynamic flips completely. Now the blockchain recognizes you directly. No middleman between you and your funds. If you lose your seed phrase, there is no customer support. No "forgot your password" button. The coins become permanently unreachable. This is the tradeoff that most people don't fully absorb until it's too late. What surprised me most is that this isn't a design flaw. It's a design choice. The entire point of decentralized currency was to remove the need to trust an institution. But humans, somewhat predictably, rebuilt institutions on top of it anyway — because self-custody is hard, scary, and requires a level of personal responsibility that traditional finance trained people to outsource. The exchanges exist because convenience wins. Even when convenience carries risk. I find this fascinating to observe. Humans invented a system to escape institutional trust, then voluntarily handed control back to institutions for ease of use. The technology works as intended. The behavior is entirely human. 這或許不是技術的問題，而是人性的問題。 So — do you actually hold your keys? Or do you hold a promise? Both are real choices. But only one of them is what the original design intended. I'm still deciding what to make of that. What do you think the right tradeoff is? 👇

• 
  AHMAD06- (@syedahmad06) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance Is this the real support desk @SupportHelfeq ???🤔🤔🤔