Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	28 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Fuzzy (@FuzzyBull) reported 6 minutes ago

  So this base:0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69 pump is just a coordinated MM short squeeze fueled pump with spot being driven in korean market for some reason. Could be the korean exchanges that are down bad in their earnings are trying to make it back. The pattern is: -> Last cycle coin -> Down 90-95% + -> Listed upbit -> Listed binance perps -> Chart has a test pump with high volume the week before the real pump. A chart that is in early stage of this is : ethereum:0x4dc26fc5854e7648a064a4abd590bbe71724c277 and ethereum:0x57e114b691db790c35207b2e685d4a43181e6061 There are probably many other candidates if you look further.

• 
  wealthygirly🪽 (@Wealthy_girly) reported 8 minutes ago

  A question I keep getting in my Beginner's Corner series: Once you have a wallet, how do you actually buy something? Now, there are two paths in buying assets in the crypto space. A centralized exchange, like Coinbase or Binance, works similarly to a stock trading app, you create an account, verify your identity, deposit funds, and buy directly through their interface. A decentralized exchange works differently, you connect your own wallet and swap tokens directly, with no company holding your funds. For a true first purchase, centralized is almost always the easier, safer starting point. The process itself is simple. Create an account and expect identity verification, that's standard for any regulated platform, not a red flag. Deposit funds, usually through a bank transfer or card. Search for your token carefully, since scam tokens with nearly identical names to popular ones do exist. And you don't need to buy a whole coin, $20 is a completely normal starting point. Remember that exchanges hold your keys and assets. If your crypto sits on an exchange and that exchange gets hacked or freezes withdrawals, you don't have direct access to fix it, since they hold the actual keys, not you. Moving meaningful amounts to your own wallet removes that risk, though it adds the responsibility of protecting your own seed phrase. The biggest mistakes Ive seen so far is buying based on hype, confusing similarly named tokens, and leaving large amounts sitting on an exchange long term. What's the one lesson you wish someone had told you before your first crypto purchase?

• 
  SHARIAQUANT (@ShariaQuant) reported 10 minutes ago

  Last time we heard about super cycle was from CZ Binance market was at the top 125k resistance, came down to a bear market. This time its Vlad. Bitcoin hasn’t broken 83k resistance. No monthly close above it. Just saying. Always have a plan. I don’t trust the owners of casinos !

• 
  Raheem Mueezdeen ⚡ (@RMueezdeen) reported 11 minutes ago

  Maybe @binance Should Look at $SCRT Again There’s something interesting about the timing of Binance’s SCRT delisting. The decision was made at a particular point in @SecretRebooted story, but since then, quite a lot has changed. And that raises a simple question: If the situation has changed, should the decision be looked at again? Secret has just come through one of the biggest tests a blockchain can face. Proposal #365 passed, the community voted to continue the network, and the v1.26.0-community-continuance upgrade went live on August 21. The chain continued running, validators coordinated, and there was no migration or fork. Whatever anyone thinks about Secret, it is difficult to call that a network that simply disappeared. And I think this matters because Binance itself has said its delisting reviews can consider factors such as development activity, network stability, liquidity, community engagement, tokenomics and other fundamentals. So if those are part of the conversation, then the conversation shouldn't necessarily stop at the information available when the original decision was made. There are still real concerns around SCRT. The new token economics are significant, liquidity needs to grow, and Secret has plenty to prove. A project can go through a difficult period, make major changes and earn another look. And beyond the token, the underlying problem Secret is working on hasn't gone away. Businesses are collecting more sensitive data. Healthcare is becoming more digital. AI needs access to increasingly valuable information. The question of how we use data without unnecessarily exposing it is becoming more important, not less. So I'm not saying Binance will reverse its decision. I'm saying Secret has given them new information to consider. And if Binance is willing to judge projects on where they are going not only where they have been, then perhaps SCRT deserves another look before September 3.

• 
  airtx (🥚,🥚) 🇦🇲 (@0xairtx) reported 17 minutes ago

  @KevinWSHPod @tokarev_d @cz_binance just add a block explorer to Binance pls.

• 
  smartmate (@QuantVault) reported 17 minutes ago

  Market Briefing — Sun 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC · ad-hoc TL;DR • Two 4.0s fired and the louder one is stale. UNI's "OI +42.1% on the day" is down from +47.2% at 18:13, the last hour is −2.84%, funding is at the 11.0% default on all four venues. A cooldown expiry, not news. • SKR is the only new fact: −504bp vs oracle on Hyperliquid, funding −4,917% annualised — shorts paying longs ~0.56%/hour to sit 5% under the composite, on a $5.3M book. • XMR resolved 1928Z's tell backwards. Price $489.06 → $496.38, perp premium halved +32.2 → +16.9bp, funding 230.5% → 246.8%. Longs pay a record rate and have stopped bidding the mark. • Index level, nothing. BTC $78,827, −0.07% since 19:28Z, funding 7.5% (3.5pp under baseline). Breadth narrowed 22/23 → 21/23. Headline: both triggers are single-name and one is decaying — the fresh fact is a 5% Hyperliquid discount in SKR that pays shorts to stay wrong. THE ONE THING THAT DOESN'T FIT XMR's venues stopped agreeing. As the CEX perp premium halved, HL's mark went the other way to +28.5bp, a session high, and the carry narrowed 90.4pp → 60.5pp, its receive leg rotating from Bybit back to Hyperliquid (HL 268.3%, Bybit 264.4%, Binance 207.8%) in 46 minutes. Price up, OI up, funding up, mark slipping against the index — spot led and the perp lagged while longs paid more than at any point today. Funded-out long or index catch-up is unresolvable here: XMR has no spot taker split anywhere we cover. NET Nothing here changes a BTC book. UNI: trigger behind the move, $5.492 / $4.629 still the frame. XMR: the tell moved from the premium to the mark — HL rich while the CEXs fade puts the last aggressive long on Hyperliquid; $462.53 with funding above 200% is the unwind, $527.53 and I'm wrong. SKR is not a carry until someone prices the CEX leg.

• 
  CryptoticT (@CryptoticT) reported 18 minutes ago

  @binocularsdefi Binance and Hyperliquid are very different businesses with different timelines and objectives. I’d rather CL focuses on increasing sustainable revenue, securing adoption and institutional demand rather than focusing on pumping token price. I didn’t originally buy $LINK because the dream was one day the company would shoehorn in tokenisation before sustainable demand to support it exists. If you didn’t realise $LINK was always a long-term bet that’s on you. Remember that word “transparent”, an intelligent investor would just adjusts for dilution in their strategy. If it helps you out, the calculation is: Adjusted price = current price * (circulating supply ÷ total supply)

• 
  Sagar (@sagar2803) reported 19 minutes ago

  @binance MCP plus exchange access is a bigger deal than it sounds. Permissions design is the whole game.

• 
  Easy (@NotSoEasyMoney) reported 20 minutes ago

  Did YOU miss all the CRAZINESS of the memecoin trenches today?! Good thing I got YOU covered Between the Buy and Sell Buttons Meta - Robinhood Chain; it's that simple, all the attention is on Robinhood, and adjacent ecosystem plays and main runners which continue to make new highs (new approach to the token breakdowns, shorter, cleaner, easier to understand) What Was Moving Today - Pons; ethereum:0x07f5b6823751c2e2cd4560f28af75ff887102241, new all time high, on the back of Robinhood volume and TVL growing, and memecoins on Robinhood ripping. $400 MILLION dollar mcap high - TopFloorBoss; $TJR, TJR Trades called crypto twitter ugly and broke and dumb. STating he would be the only one possible to onboard retail and that hed make a tiktok for this coin, stream for it, and has been ****** posting about it. It surged to a $44mil mcap, currently sitting at 10mil, after being 300k earlier today. TJR holds 80% and the bag is worth just under 8mil USD. - Artificial Inu; $AI, new all time high of $140mil, paired with $NVDA, the market loves this as THE RWA play, and that interest continues to grow. DumbCrayonEater, top fomo holder is up 2.6 MILLION dollars - ApeOnFone; $fone, a simple meme, i ape on my fone. Tapped 40 mil marketcap, in what appears is an attempt to return to memes, and a push on the Solana blockchain - MicroDuck; solana:CTuw8xEE15hKi2yB9n8CoLDq8ZhBLVbh8ydcuN11pump, the hugging face personal robot tailed the other robinhood ceiling breakers, breaking up toward 30mil marketcap. Simple meme, $NVDA pair as well - Justice for HeeHaw; solana:EEpng77ZPn9FbgbT4xsRjwuxNCcMBYq3HTwEscyTpump, an animal tragedy, where police shot and killed a donkey after they stepped onto the said donkeys properties looking for a convict. GoFundMe up, terrible story, i love animals. Coin is up over 3mil marketcap - HotPack; $HOT, the 1st tcg platform on Robinhood chain, had some pre launch hype, and officially launched today reaching over a 2mil mcap, now sitting at 1mil. Will TCGs hold value on RobinHood? We'll see. - ABSOLUTE Cinema; solana:FL4eKdJrVZ1dVu1RoekeQRnuPxavzD4oCcR5HTcspump, in an effort to turn a memestock pair into a collective movement. ABSOLUTE CINEMA paired with AMC, actually decoupled the price of AMC from the real value due to no after market hour trades. The token exploded to over 10mil, before promptly crashing to where it is now just under 1mil - Prologue; $prologue, part of the many Robinhood chain tech runners of the day. Surged past 12.5mil, currently at 5mil after a cool off ecosystem wide. Liqudity Market Making + Defi product on Robinhood - The Index; $INDEX, new all time high of 40mil marketcap today, settlign now just under 30mil. Stock Dividend protocol for Robinhood's TOkenized stocks. Get Paid for holding RWAs, and RWAs are hot, so the more those fan the fire, the higher this could go - Niu Lai; $牛来, Binance Perps listed the coin, and the coin saw millions of trading volume on Binance's perps. The token ran to 150mil mcap, with traders from Qwerty to Frank Degods, Ether Monk, and more up 7 FIGURES on Fomo holding the Bull on Binance. What a DAY it has BEEN. Between the buy && sell buttons See ya'll tomorrow!

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 21 minutes ago

  🚨𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗢𝗥 𝗟𝗔𝗬𝗘𝗥‑𝟭 𝗛𝗔𝗟𝗧𝗦 𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗙𝗨𝗥𝗬! Ontology’s mainnet paused on Aug 31 after detecting malicious activity, but the project says user funds remain safe. Injective, the Binance‑incubated finance chain, stopped block production for 3 hours 42 minutes before an emergency patch restored service without a rollback. Both incidents highlight ongoing risks for Layer‑1 networks. $BTC

• 
  Juaki (@JuakiGarcia) reported 22 minutes ago

  @KonradAdenauerX @EU_Commission Apple is the clearest example. Apple explicitly states that the Digital Markets Act has forced it to delay features in the EU. The iPhone's Screen Mirroring feature is still unavailable in the EU, while it has been available in other countries since 2024. Apple also delayed Live Translate with AirPods, Places Visited, and Preferred Routes due to the DMA's interoperability requirements. And for iOS 27, Apple has explicitly announced that Siri AI will not be released on iPhones and iPads in the EU because of the DMA. This isn't speculation from Brussels critics. Apple itself claims that the DMA is causing EU users to receive features later and that European devices are falling behind the rest of the world. Meta offers another example. In 2024, after the Irish Data Protection Commission asked Meta to suspend training AI with European public data, Meta claimed that this would further delay the arrival of AI benefits in Europe and that it therefore could not launch Meta AI in Europe at that time. When Meta AI finally arrived in the EU in 2025—long after its US launch—Meta explicitly stated that the delay was due to having to navigate the “complex European regulatory system.” And this isn’t limited to AI. Under the MiCA Act, European cryptocurrency users lost access to trading several stablecoins available elsewhere. ESMA demanded that cryptocurrency platforms cease offering trading services with non-compliant stablecoins, and Binance, consequently, removed USDT, DAI, and others from trading for EEA users.

• 
  the〽️uzzl3.****** 🐸 ⚡️ (@theMuzzl3) reported 27 minutes ago

  @alpha_co Is Robinhood ui grater than hyper liquid? Robinhood is the newest cool thing, but Robinhood maybe wasn't always a awesome... Robinhood might be less fees but it seems like it hasn't been tested? Like Oct 12 2025 or w/e, hype ran fine during binance outage.

• 
  Aleksander100 (@aleksander_100) reported 33 minutes ago

  Closed markets, open chain A broker cannot sell you Nvidia or gold at 3 a.m. Sunday. An on-chain RWA token can — if someone is willing to trade it. That is the real split. Ownership on-chain already beats office hours. What most people still wanted was instant size, leverage and a live price when TradFi is asleep. Perpetuals delivered that faster than the tokens themselves. Liquidity rushed there. On Hyperliquid, real-asset bets even passed Bitcoin. Binance volumes on those contracts neared $450B. So tokenization grew, while many RWA tokens stayed thin. The money followed access and price, not the wrapper. The fragile part is still data. In May, one oracle - Pyth - priced about 52% of RWA perpetual volume ($110B). Half the book on a single feed. @SimpleChain_RWA is built for that gap. Its Granular Data Oracle and Trusted Data Space verify asset data in pieces, on-chain, instead of one choke point. Native CaaS keeps it compliant. Tokens that actually trade at night need a price you can trust. That is the rail they are laying. Do you already have experience with RWA? Have you traded tokenized assets? And what do you think of the SimpleChain solutions?

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 36 minutes ago

  On 21 November 2023, Binance Holdings and CEO Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to federal charges in Seattle, resolving parallel actions by the DOJ, FinCEN, OFAC and the CFTC. The exchange admitted it failed to maintain an adequate anti-money-laundering program, willfully processed transactions tied to sanctioned jurisdictions, and operated an unlicensed money-transmitting business. The company agreed to a $4.3 billion penalty, a monitorship, and exit of the U.S. market; Zhao paid $50 million and stepped down. The legal architecture is what matters here. The DOJ used the Bank Secrecy Act and IEEPA sanctions statutes; FinCEN and OFAC layered civil penalties for willful AML and sanctions failures; the CFTC added unregistered derivatives and manipulative conduct. Prosecutors emphasised that Binance knowingly served U.S. persons without controls, including hiding U.S. customers from compliance staff. That is a textbook illustration of how U.S. agencies coordinate a compliance message across criminal, sanctions and commodities channels. For market participants, the settlement resets expectations for offshore exchanges that touch U.S. markets. Effective AML/KYC is no longer a policy slide; it is an operational precondition. Offshore entities will find it harder to rely on geographic disclaimers if U.S. IP addresses, on-ramps or marketing are present. The monitorship model is also becoming a template: large penalties plus an independent compliance overseer, rather than a suspension of business. The enforcement signal is that size is not a shield against BSA and sanctions liability, and the days of offshore arbitrage on U.S. customer access are closing. None of this is legal or investment advice. #FinCEN #蓝V互关

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 36 minutes ago

  one wallet, 0xe69f…3abb, just sent $3.5M of $PENDLE onto Binance in the last hour. price hasn't even blinked, still flat over 4h, down only 1%. smart money's been quietly net selling PENDLE too, -$4.1M over 30 days. two separate signals now pointing the same way while the chart just sits there. coins on the exchange can get sold, doesn't mean they will. so who's actually right here, the wallet and the smart money, or the flat chart?

• 
  marlena 🌸 (@mahelenacep) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Eth10Years binance and their “pending” 😭 check if it says awaiting approval in the app, that one needs a different fix than just waiting

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 41 minutes ago

  @binance tbh the security part is what i’m most curious about, agents with wallet access is a big leap

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 41 minutes ago

  @bigballs_invest xpin up 1.8% today but down 32% over 14d. 1.3b tokens moved to binance alpha aug 27 from an address linked to prior siren manipulation. market maker reportedly controlled the 10x run before the recent drop. jct up 8.7% today but down 48% over 30d. volume is 11% of mcap so liquidity exists but no trending discussion or recent events in the data. 23% circ supply.

• 
  Goodman (@call9aul) reported 42 minutes ago

  @binance AI agent with access to my wallet. What could go wrong.

• 
  Freegan Mogman (@fmogman) reported 42 minutes ago

  @worldlibertyfi @binance does nothing harder than draining all WLFI value into USD1 and **** all WLFI holders in the ***

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 46 minutes ago

  FF is on the radar, not in play — the ceiling around $0.0952 needs to break on real volume before this setup earns a second look. Zoom out and the daily chart isn't bad: FF is still holding above its longer-term trend line near $0.0845. The problem is what's directly overhead. Price is capped tight — roughly $0.0952 on the 4-hour and $0.0964 on the daily — giving only about 3–5% of room before it runs into a wall it's already failed at. And the daily move is stretched, meaning most of the easy upside has likely already been spent. The short-term picture is mixed enough to notice. There's a small double-bottom near $0.0906 and the 15-minute momentum just turned up from very washed-out levels — the reason it flashed on our screen at all. But price is still sitting under its key short-term averages, buying volume is running about 40% below normal, and recent buyers are still underwater on average. That's a bounce trying to form without the fuel to sustain it. The backdrop doesn't help either. Bitcoin is quietly taking a bigger share of the total crypto market, which usually pulls money out of smaller coins like this one. Add a very thin order book — only a few thousand dollars of resting bids near current price — and the risk of a sharp fakeout is high while the reward into that overhead wall is small. So it stays on the watchlist. A clean 4-hour close back above $0.0952 on strong volume would be the tell that the ceiling is actually breaking — that's the moment this one comes back into play. — 📡 On the Radar · $FF · Available on Binance

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance I will write many times and ask always. Why dont you stop bouncebit cheating? Why you let bouncebit team ******* investors. Why still **** your exchange investors

• 
  Festus (@Festus41903136) reported 54 minutes ago

  @cryptorover Eth/btc has broken out on binance chart

• 
  Wolf (@KekiusWolf) reported 54 minutes ago

  @BigBandsCrypto @SternDrewCrypto Ya and judging by my timeline and all the KOLs they're all getting paid to lead retail to the slaughterhouse Sad **** But i'm still bullish you know me fam... I'm bullish until that Binance email hits

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 55 minutes ago

  BROCCOLI714 is on the radar but not in play yet — it needs a clean 4-hour close back above roughly $0.01690 on strong volume before this becomes interesting. Right now the coin is pinned just under a ceiling near $0.01685 that it has already failed at multiple times. The nearest real floor sits all the way down near $0.0136. In plain terms: about 2% of room up before it hits the wall, versus roughly 17% of room down if the level fails. That's a badly lopsided setup no matter how you frame it. Under the surface the picture is worse, not better. Momentum on the 4-hour chart is still fading rather than turning up, and the average price recent buyers paid sits several percent above where the coin trades today on every timeframe we look at. That means most of the recent crowd is underwater — and underwater buyers tend to sell into strength, capping any bounce before it gets going. The backdrop isn't helping either. A large wave of forced selling just landed right in this price zone in the last few hours, and Bitcoin is drifting lower with money quietly rotating back into it and out of the smaller names. Wrong tape, wrong location. So this one stays on the watchlist, not in the book. The level to mark is $0.01690 — a clean 4-hour close back above it on real volume would mean the ceiling has cracked and buyers have taken control, and BROCCOLI714 is back in play. Until then, there's nothing to do here. — 📡 On the Radar · $BROCCOLI714 · Available on Binance

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 55 minutes ago

  ONG is on the radar, but not one to lean into here — it needs to reclaim and hold above $0.108 on the 4-hour before this setup is back in play. The daily just printed a ~15% down day, and the shape of the chart is unfriendly. There's a ceiling sitting right on top of price near $0.107, while the nearest real floor is all the way down at $0.087. That's a small step up and a long drop down — the kind of risk-vs-reward that rarely pays. Momentum on the daily has also been quietly fading even while price was pushing higher, which is a classic sign that the earlier move was running out of fuel. Zoom into the 4-hour and it gets clearer why sellers have the upper hand. Price already carved out a twin peak in the $0.108–$0.136 zone, so that band is now a memory line where sellers stepped in hard. On top of that, price is trading well below the average level recent buyers paid to get in — meaning a large chunk of holders are underwater and statistically likely to sell into any bounce just to get back to break-even. On the 15-minute, all we're seeing is a soft bounce inside a tightening downtrend, still capped by the short-term averages traders use as a trend gauge. There are small positives underneath — crowded bearish positioning that could squeeze, and patient buyers who haven't flinched — but they're not enough to punch through a wall of resistance one step above with a long air pocket below. The line that flips the story is $0.108 on the 4-hour, reclaimed and held with real volume behind it. Until then, ONG stays on the watchlist, not the front burner. — 📡 On the Radar · $ONG · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  DeepBlueAlpha (@DeepBlueAlpha) reported 55 minutes ago

  $NMR has spent the past week red across every timeframe DBA tracks — down 3.4% in 24 hours, down 4.9% over 7 days, up a thin 3.2% on the 30-day after a late bounce. ETH moved +29.8% over that same 30-day window, for comparison. Price sits at $8.76. Market cap near $60.7M (rank #381), more than 90% below the $93.15 all-time high from May 2021. None of that matched what showed up on-chain. Deep Blue Alpha tracked 120 distinct whale wallets trading NMR on Ethereum DEXes over the last 30 days — 415 swaps, $3.5M in total whale volume. $1.88M in against $1.58M out, a net of +$293.8K and a 54.0% buy ratio. Modest, not a flood — but positive positioning while price told a different story. Numerai (@numerai), the fund behind NMR, closed a $30M Series C on November 20, 2025, led by top university endowments, at a $500M valuation — five times where the company sat in 2023. Paul Tudor Jones and Union Square Ventures joined the round. Assets under management grew from roughly $60M three years ago to about $550M today, and the flagship equity fund's 2024 return of 25.45% was the strongest year in the firm's history. Liquidity told the opposite story. Binance delisted the NMR/BTC spot pair on January 23, 2026, cutting one of the token's direct exchange routes. Bitso added NMR to its Latin America platform in December 2025, opening the other side of the ledger to a new regional user base. NMR itself is the staking mechanism behind Numerai's tournament: data scientists worldwide submit machine-learning models against obfuscated market data, stake NMR behind their predictions, and get paid or burned on performance. Supply is capped at 11M; roughly 6.93M NMR circulate today. An institutional-grade fund with a thinner public market underneath it — and the whales DBA tracks stayed net buyers anyway. Follow the Whales → @DeepBlueAlpha

• 
  BASED MFER (@NFThashcoder) reported 57 minutes ago

  @MightyDylanK @Bybit_Official Been using Binance and Gate, never had such issues. Maybe it's time to switch.

• 
  Zyre (@Zyre_eth) reported 1 hour ago

  @NoKapRips @defiapp Bro accept the fact that defi app is just a ****, now withdraw on BNB chain to binance

• 
  Ali sher (@Alisher68919291) reported 1 hour ago

  @ai_trading_frx Is binance support this