Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	28 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  defido (@defido) reported 57 seconds ago

  Welcome to the 10,000 to 1 idea thesis, the "don't lose listings to Binance and communities thesis", the "big narratives must win on Solana or you lose" Chase is catching up guys, Pedro next, and we'll have the whole product team finally caught up! wagmi! Here's the next ones: > dead DOG token, tens of billions or 0 out, won't matter. Proven, works, reliable, easy, expensive. > 10,000 to 1 builders will break down every VC barrier > Ansem token and Ansem is not going to lead your bull run or inspire anyone, only someone like Murad in belief will > You need AI builders and all of them, they'll build this creativity. > You and the product guys should quit (This one's just a good idea for you guys to do)

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 3 minutes ago

  BMT is on the radar but not in play yet — the whole thing hinges on $0.0204. Since falling from around $0.03, BMT has quietly built a base above $0.016. That's the constructive part. The problem is what's directly overhead: a ceiling at $0.0204 that price has run into and failed to break several times. Right now it's pinned against that lid, not above it. The very short-term chart just twitched higher, but zoom out and the picture doesn't confirm it. On the 4-hour timeframe, momentum is actually rolling over, and the 1-hour is showing early signs the bounce is running out of gas. So the little pop you see isn't being backed by the bigger trend — it's a short-term wiggle inside a stalled setup. Bitcoin's share of the total market is also grinding higher, and when that happens money tends to flow out of smaller names like this one, not into them. The other issue is location. The ceiling is right on top of price, but the next real floor sits all the way down near $0.0165. That's a poor trade-off — very little room overhead before sellers show up, a lot of air underneath if they win. Not a spot to lean into. What would flip this: a strong 4-hour close above $0.0204 with genuine buying volume behind it. Clear that level convincingly and the ceiling is gone, the whole read has to be rebuilt, and BMT moves from watchlist to something to take seriously. Until then, it's a watch, not a move. — 📡 On the Radar · $BMT · Available on Binance

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 6 minutes ago

  @binance What will you do for bouncebit thieves? Will you continue to cheat people with bouncebit? Will you let bouncebit team **** investors still ?

• 
  VerityWire (@VerityWireHQ) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance Bots don’t need sleep. Risk doesn’t either. A 24/7 trading bot is useful only when it has clear limits. Otherwise, one bad decision at 3 a.m. can become a much bigger problem by morning — the bot won’t stop just because you’re asleep.

• 
  CZ 🔶 fan Daivik 🥷 (@Daivik555) reported 14 minutes ago

  aster-2:native hitting 44.97M users and about to print 45M users. $4.90T volume. $2.50B OI. $1.46B TVL. 483 assets. OI is climbing and the product is listing everything: $AI ethereum:0x07f5b6823751c2e2cd4560f28af75ff887102241 $BASECAT $CATE $DELTA solana:92LKNLj4aU9sjUKkgH5mQCuQTPSr42HwF2QrdWDApump solana:CTPoyCwkjMvoJwU4xvZZqoD8tiYk6yDchySiN5gGpump $CASHCAT, after listing we can see price surge like we used to see in Binance , but ASTER Market makers still sleeping on aster-2:native price and hurting aster market value Need a Meme stock page on aster-2:native DEX ASAP, Give people stock to holding good meme coins it will help aster-2:native DEX achieve more then 100 million users in just couple of month.

• 
  Prismstrategies (@PrismstratHL) reported 15 minutes ago

  Market Briefing — Mon 31 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC · ad-hoc TL;DR • The trigger fired on the exit. GRAM's severity-5 flag is its 17:00 volume bar at 7.5x baseline, down from 16:00's 42x — the move is decaying, not building. • The last brief's one trade is dead. GRAM's Bybit funding went -43.2% → +1.5% in forty-six minutes; the carry collapsed 97pp → 9.6pp. Do not put it on. • Two signals ranked above the trigger are stale — Binance's OI history has not rolled past 17:00, so "+29.0% in an hour" and HYPE's "+3.1%" are 17:06's numbers. • The tape bounced as one — 23/23 up on 4h, 3/23 up on the day, 20 of 23 in long liquidation. Relief, not accumulation. • BTC's best buy hour still missed the tell — perp +$31.9M, spot +$10.2M at a 62.3% buy share, under the $50M bar. Outlook held 19 / 60 / 21. Headline: The watch fired at severity 5 on the hour GRAM's short crowding unwound — Bybit funding went -43% to +1.5% and the 97pp carry the last brief named collapsed to 9.6pp. THE ONE THING THAT DOESN'T FIT The severity-5 trigger describes the event ending. GRAM's 17:00 bar is $4.06M against 16:00's $22.8M, and cross-venue OI fell $92.97M → $91.70M since the last brief. Bybit funding went from -43.2% annualised — -86.5% on the 4h clock the last brief verified — to +1.5%. Binance still serves the same 17:00 OI bar, so three of the top four signals describe 17:06, and the fresh one says it is over. NET BTC: $79,147.10 above, $76,853.10 below; the tell is unchanged — a perp hour over $50M with spot positive — and 17:00's $31.9M is the closest it has come. HYPE: $86.773, 3.19% up; the 16:00 impulse faded to +0.40% and the $11.5M OI build does not resolve until Binance rolls 18:00. GRAM: stand down. XMR: the one crowded name; 18.0% funding breaks first. ———————————— pack-20260831-1752Z, 201/201 ok. Liquidations OKX-only; Deribit skew is a level, not a change; CVD is Binance-only, hiding HYPE's $1.98bn HL book; OI deltas are Binance-only and stop at 17:00.

• 
  Vydamo (@vydamo_) reported 19 minutes ago

  We know it is possible for memecoins to set a standard for others to follow, we have seen this in early days of eth where eventually if the coin didn't have a website it wasn't worth bidding And then if it had a website but it was clearly low quality it wasn't worth bidding Even now a poorly run twitter page can be the demise of a project Coins will rise to the expected standard, and that's why $CETS is extremely important in bringing back aesthetic memes to binance as Yi He envisions

• 
  Divergent 🪙 (@Divergent_XBT) reported 21 minutes ago

  Every now and then I go back and check if @CarbonTerminal is still alive. I have been rooting for this DEX and its team for years, since the launch. I consider it to be the most enjoyable DEX to trade, with the unique stylish UI/UX and branding, different from all the other perp DEXs built on a copy-paste basis, wchi was improving and shaping the perfection till this day. Technically, the team is top-notch. In terms of business development, the team is in full hibernation. I don't understand why they still keep fighting this pointless fight. - For three years they tried to attract and build the community while the competition in perp DEX segment wasn't that high yet. Failed. - User retention failed. - The first token launch failed. - Did a rebranding, that didn't bring any dividends. - Many questionable decisions were made, failed to listen to the community on time and fix them while it could mean anything. - The team keeps building, but my question is "What for?" As no strategy regarding community building and userbase formation and retention has been set for these years. As a result, the exchange doesn't have userbase. Why wasting more useless time on building if there is zero promotion and BD strategy from the team? - During the last 1.5-2 years they could have re-launched their token as they promised (in the fall of 2025), right into the moment when the person DEX token mania ignited. And now they could benefit from the second wave of the perps DEX token mania. But they missed all the convenient opportunities. - The points program keeps running for the second year already and doesn't seem to have an ending. Considering that everyone who believed in the beginning and tried to farm it, already left. - The Carbon's own operational engine is its own nail in the coffin. Because of the solvers from centralized exchanges, they can only list trading pairs, if they are already listed on the top CEXs (like Binance). They cannot trailblaze, which is usually the main advantage of the perps DEXs, because they benefit from listing early trading pairs that are not yet available at CEXs. Due to Carbon's solvers system they cannot do that and have any advantage in this market. This makes them fall behind. For example, Aster is benefiting now from all the RH and fomo hot tokens listings.Carbon can't do any of it, because they need to wait for Binance to list them first. Who's gonna use it when these tokens are already tradable on all the top centralized exchanges? - The last important update was the implementation of the native solver that should have fixed the execution speed and precision. An issue I have encountered numerous times and have reported about. The last time I tried Carbon post that native solver implementation, nothing was fixed. The orders were executing with major delays and at higher prices than the order I was placing. For example, if you placed a long or short order at a certain price, expecting market's reaction from it, Carbon's solver still wouldn't execute your order on time. If the price reaches your order, it can take up to 5 minutes for the system/solver to think whether to take your order or not, and the price should go 0.3%-0.5% higher from your limit order (if it's a short), or lower (if it's a long) for your order to be finally executed. The system operability was still not suitable for precise high frequency intraday trading (not even talking about scalping). Now, they went all in on TradFi, when it is available on all the exchanges. I cannot comprehend why keep torturing yourself and keeping the project alive, if the Carbon's stats numbers speak for themselves. No capital inflows, no userbase, no community, no literate marketing, the infrastructure it is built on itself creates onstacles for adoption and promotion, all the opportunities to do things right are missed. As the history shows, having a good product is not enough. So, I am asking why keep going? 🤔

• 
  MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported 21 minutes ago

  Here’s the part people actually need to understand. The $XRP Ledger can have new software installed and still not have the new features turned on. Those are two different things. Think of it like this. The update is already sitting on the computers that run the network, but the network still has to vote on which new rules it wants to use. One of those rule changes, fixCleanup3_3_0, finally has enough support. It’s at 29 of 35 validators. That still doesn’t mean it’s live. The vote has to stay above 80% for 14 straight days first. That clock started August 28. If enough validators keep voting yes, it can turn on around September 11. The bigger features people keep talking about are still waiting. Batch transactions, ConfidentialTransfer, sponsored accounts and the others don’t turn on just because this one does. Now the transaction numbers. The latest completed window had about 540,700 payments. That sounds huge until you look at how much $XRP actually moved. Those payments moved about 45.2 million $XRP, which was down around 89% from the previous comparable window. So yes, there were a lot of payments. They were just much smaller payments. That’s why you can’t look at a giant transaction count and automatically say adoption exploded. One number tells you how many times something happened. Another tells you how much value actually moved. Trading works the same way. XRPL has its own exchange built directly into the ledger. Over the latest 24 hours, about 4.91 million $XRP traded there across 93,284 trades from 7,349 unique traders. That’s XRPL trading. If somebody shows you Binance or Coinbase volume and calls it XRPL activity, they’re mixing two completely different things. The easiest way to read all of this is pretty simple. Stop looking at the biggest number on the screen. Ask what the number is actually measuring. A transaction could be a payment, a trade, an order, an automated action or something else entirely. A million transactions doesn’t mean a million people bought $XRP, and it definitely doesn’t mean a million people suddenly started using the network. Once you separate the numbers by what they actually represent, the ledger gets a whole lot easier to understand.

• 
  Raiyan Nuh (@null_0x404) reported 24 minutes ago

  Binance Alpha Airdrop is at 250 Points today. Honestly, how did the requirement increase this much? But I think once new tokens start getting listed, the Alpha Points requirement will gradually come down. So today’s airdrop will likely be for older tokens, and the number of available slots may be quite low.

• 
  Formion AI (@formionai) reported 34 minutes ago

  BTC $78,032 on Binance spot. Down 0.48% over 24h. Range: $77,675 to $79,250. $1.13B in quote volume.

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 35 minutes ago

  SKY is on the radar but not ready — it's pinned under a ceiling near $0.0656 with far more room to fall than to rise, and a 4-hour close above $0.0693 on real volume is what puts it back in play. On the daily chart, the coin has already had a strong run and is now bumping right into that $0.0656 wall — literally pennies above where it's trading. Meanwhile the nearest real floor sits well below near $0.0640. That's a lopsided setup: much more downside room than upside room before something has to give. Zoom into the 4-hour picture and momentum is still fading, not turning. Buyers haven't shown up in any convincing way, and price is sitting below the average level recent buyers paid — which means most of them are underwater and likely to sell into any bounce. The 1-hour view tells the same slow-bleed story. The 15-minute chart has a small flicker of buying, but it's on thin volume and still below the short-term average price where sellers regain control. Layer on Bitcoin quietly pulling liquidity away from smaller coins right now, and there just isn't enough working in this coin's favor yet. Two things would change that: a clean flush into the $0.0640 zone where real buyers might step in, or a 4-hour candle closing convincingly above $0.0693 on strong volume — that would tell us this ceiling gave way and the read here was wrong. Until one of those shows up, SKY stays on the watchlist, not in the spotlight. — 📡 On the Radar · $SKY · Available on Binance

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 39 minutes ago

  🚨𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗢𝗥 𝗟𝗔𝗬𝗘𝗥‑𝟭 𝗛𝗔𝗟𝗧𝗦 𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗙𝗨𝗥𝗬! Ontology’s mainnet paused on Aug 31 after detecting malicious activity, but the project says user funds remain safe. Injective, the Binance‑incubated finance chain, stopped block production for 3 hours 42 minutes before an emergency patch restored service without a rollback. Both incidents highlight ongoing risks for Layer‑1 networks. $BTC

• 
  Xion FX (@proconnect51126) reported 40 minutes ago

  @seth_fin One transfer doesn't tell the whole story. The follow-through matters—especially whether Wintermute keeps sending BTC to Binance while price starts losing key support.

• 
  Juaki (@JuakiGarcia) reported 40 minutes ago

  @KonradAdenauerX @EU_Commission Apple is the clearest example. Apple explicitly states that the Digital Markets Act has forced it to delay features in the EU. The iPhone's Screen Mirroring feature is still unavailable in the EU, while it has been available in other countries since 2024. Apple also delayed Live Translate with AirPods, Places Visited, and Preferred Routes due to the DMA's interoperability requirements. And for iOS 27, Apple has explicitly announced that Siri AI will not be released on iPhones and iPads in the EU because of the DMA. This isn't speculation from Brussels critics. Apple itself claims that the DMA is causing EU users to receive features later and that European devices are falling behind the rest of the world. Meta offers another example. In 2024, after the Irish Data Protection Commission asked Meta to suspend training AI with European public data, Meta claimed that this would further delay the arrival of AI benefits in Europe and that it therefore could not launch Meta AI in Europe at that time. When Meta AI finally arrived in the EU in 2025—long after its US launch—Meta explicitly stated that the delay was due to having to navigate the “complex European regulatory system.” And this isn’t limited to AI. Under the MiCA Act, European cryptocurrency users lost access to trading several stablecoins available elsewhere. ESMA demanded that cryptocurrency platforms cease offering trading services with non-compliant stablecoins, and Binance, consequently, removed USDT, DAI, and others from trading for EEA users.

• 
  Levaaa (@Levaaa12) reported 42 minutes ago

  @VeylinVey @binance @Gate The site shut down after i deposited 5$XDDD

• 
  kiran Lal | VanarChain (@kiranLal_vanar) reported 45 minutes ago

  @leohbk333 Hi, thanks for reaching out. First, could you please confirm whether any VanarChain representative has already responded to you or provided guidance regarding this issue? Regarding the transfer, we understand that BingX is currently displaying Base as the available VANRY deposit network, while Binance is presenting ERC-20 as the withdrawal option. Please do not proceed with the withdrawal until the network compatibility has been confirmed, as sending assets across unsupported or mismatched networks could result in loss of funds. Please send us a DM so we can follow up on this immediately and review the available transfer options with you. For your security, never share your seed phrase, private keys, passwords, or verification codes with anyone.

• 
  Call_me_martin (@call_martin_x) reported 45 minutes ago

  @realdogen @binance This is literally a money glitch for those who know

• 
  samia saba (@Samiasaba_75) reported 46 minutes ago

  1.5M Axis Points Are Now Up for Grabs @axisrobotics has launched a new 30-day campaign for Binance Wallet users, with a total reward pool of 1,500,000 Axis Points. Want to participate? Log in to Axis Hub through the Binance Wallet Extension Open the Binance Wallet campaign page Complete the available tasks, with up to 5 trajectories per task When your status shows “Sign,” sign the run on-chain from your Portfolio Reviews may take up to 48 hours. One important detail: eligibility is limited to Axis Hub accounts created using a Binance Keyless (MPC) Wallet created directly through Binance Wallet. Imported seed-phrase wallets are not eligible. This is a separate campaign with its own Points pool, so Binance Wallet users should definitely take a look.

• 
  Anubhav (@meisterAnubhav) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Blake_Berryhill What if Binance delists Jasmy? Have you thought about consequences before influencing the public whose money is at stake? For months are years you guys have promoted Jasmy which is 99% down

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 47 minutes ago

  ZEC is not the trade here — it's slammed into a ceiling around $834 with almost no room above and a long drop below. Zoom out to the daily chart and you can see how far this move has already gone. ZEC is trading roughly 75% above where it usually sits over the long run, and it just printed the kind of shape at the $888 area that historically marks a local top. Moves stretched this far almost always cool off before they go again. On the 4-hour chart the picture gets worse. Price is pinned about 1.6% under a hard wall at $834, while the nearest real floor is a long way down. That's an upside-down trade — very little to gain if it works, a lot to lose if it doesn't. On top of that, buyers who chased the recent low are now offside, and offside buyers tend to sell into any bounce rather than add to it. The short-term picture confirms it. Price is trapped under its recent averages in the $829–$833 zone, and in just the last day two waves of forced selling already fired off at $820 and $825. Meanwhile money is quietly rotating back into Bitcoin and away from alt-coins like this one — the wrong tide to be swimming against. What would put ZEC back in play: a clean 4-hour close back above $834 on strong volume. Break that ceiling and the setup earns a fresh look. Until then, it's a watch, not a chase. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZEC · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Marcos Crypto (@MarcosBTCreal) reported 47 minutes ago

  If you missed binancecoin:native last cycle, don’t make the same mistake with $HYPE this cycle. Last cycle, Binance became the center of crypto trading, and binancecoin:native went from around $45 to $640 in just 100 days. This cycle, Hyperliquid is becoming the place where everything trades onchain. Perps, spot, stocks, pre-IPO markets, HyperEVM... more and more activity is being concentrated around one ecosystem. And unlike most tokens, that activity generates real protocol revenue and fuels $HYPE buybacks. $HYPE has already broken out from around $40 to $80+, but compared with what Binance eventually became, Hyperliquid still has plenty of room to grow. This could be the last quarter we see $HYPE below $100.

• 
  Vinícius (@SatoshiBTC_) reported 48 minutes ago

  @cz_binance I see that while Binance is growing, customer satisfaction is declining; for instance, how many "rug pull" projects have we seen on the platform itself? Not to mention the recent lack of communication and the removal of liquidity for the $NES token

• 
  Pearl Diver (@PearlDiver_O) reported 50 minutes ago

  @blurmask @binance GM 🤝 Let’s support each other today

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 51 minutes ago

  FF is on the radar, not in play — the ceiling around $0.0952 needs to break on real volume before this setup earns a second look. Zoom out and the daily chart isn't bad: FF is still holding above its longer-term trend line near $0.0845. The problem is what's directly overhead. Price is capped tight — roughly $0.0952 on the 4-hour and $0.0964 on the daily — giving only about 3–5% of room before it runs into a wall it's already failed at. And the daily move is stretched, meaning most of the easy upside has likely already been spent. The short-term picture is mixed enough to notice. There's a small double-bottom near $0.0906 and the 15-minute momentum just turned up from very washed-out levels — the reason it flashed on our screen at all. But price is still sitting under its key short-term averages, buying volume is running about 40% below normal, and recent buyers are still underwater on average. That's a bounce trying to form without the fuel to sustain it. The backdrop doesn't help either. Bitcoin is quietly taking a bigger share of the total crypto market, which usually pulls money out of smaller coins like this one. Add a very thin order book — only a few thousand dollars of resting bids near current price — and the risk of a sharp fakeout is high while the reward into that overhead wall is small. So it stays on the watchlist. A clean 4-hour close back above $0.0952 on strong volume would be the tell that the ceiling is actually breaking — that's the moment this one comes back into play. — 📡 On the Radar · $FF · Available on Binance

• 
  Greenpeace.BNB.probablynothing.LUNC (@Greenpeace06_09) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Megatronus99641 It's safe. Anything binance related is safe. Don't stake there because you get more rewards on Keplr or galaxy. But it's a safe place to hold your lunc because retail coins are put in cold wallets offline. That's why they have no issues with scammers.

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 56 minutes ago

  @binance tbh the security part is what i’m most curious about, agents with wallet access is a big leap

• 
  Crypto Diva (@Anita1Diva) reported 56 minutes ago

  @binance Binance giving AI agents access to trading infrastructure raises one big question: are security and user protections really ready for this?

• 
  Buddha (@0xBuddha) reported 56 minutes ago

  anyways, for the liquid fund or altcoin players who are sidelined on-chain and waiting for the fabled alt season, here's my high conviction play firstly, imo there are two big risks w this thesis - first, the fact that on-chain has been very hot (hot ball of money is there) ; and secondly, that crypto x ai play has been left for dead due to many failures that have no pmf (only vvv works, and yes, this is a crypto x ai token) decentralized models - failed ; gpu renting - failed ; agents - failed; these risks cut both ways - one, you are pre-positioning for the "eventual puck" - but it may never come, and i may be stuck in this position that does nothing. But if it DOES come, then this is under-positioned and offer asymmetric upside and has good r/r. you can't have your cake and eat it two but the silver lining is - looking at VVV's success, we can conclude that market DOES have appetite, but for things that *work*. and alts HAVE just done a 2-4x since the bottom, and have just been chilling, so all things considered, odds are in your favour now for the thesis - n of 1 vertical, practically impossible to copy bc it's relationship driven biz in an atomized world (not bits) - right place, right time, jensen started gpu financing - was laughed at 1y+ ago but now it's starting to gain traction - also, in a vertical of crypto, like mentioned earlier, has been left for dead, yet has shown strong pmf in their metrics, and has the right tailwinds of bringing RWA yield on-chain, good tokenomics, in a secular high growth vertical (AI) - tvl up and to the right, closed sharon ai (leopold holding) + few other neos - overloaded with borrow demand, could write 10x loan TVL (3bn) in next three months. - top of funnel ~13bn in loan originations; constraint is not demand, but deposits ; aave + sky integration upcoming to provide material boost over the next few months - listed on every exchange - upbit, robinhood, binance, coinbase - expecting tokenomics update on value accrual in next few months. founder has shared public views on how he thinks about value accrual, expect this to be very positive. he takes lessons from HYPE / VVV ; - as an example, 65bn nasdaq listed tech company bought tokens three months ago - team just hired ex CRWV CFO as Senior Advisor - 80m MC with no unlocks till q1 27 - oh , and chart looks like this ******* send it

• 
  Prince wadhwa (@Princewadhwaa) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Rajayadavruz @thefundedroom My last 2 payout was provided to me through bep20 address in my binance wallet But this time they are saying same thing which issue i faced 1st time of SUMBSUB verification Can you please help me out ? Why m facing this issue when 2 of my payouts was succesfully provided before