Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (43%)
• Transactions (29%)
• Mobile App (14%)
• Login (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	20 days ago
Itu	Website	26 days ago
Seattle	Website	27 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Aftabahmad (@Aftabahmad6252) reported 18 seconds ago

  @sunshinebinance Please help me trade for free binance 🙏🚦

• 
  andrew.moh (@andrewmoh) reported 41 seconds ago

  A pool of 280m $GRVT out of 1b total supply is set for airdrop. Note that the allocation is calculated based on the traders' attempts to accumulate volume in each season, and it's all public, no hidden batch. GRVT is now available to claim on the GRVT site, and 100% of the allocation will be vested in the next 12 mons. Here are the cool things: + a customized vesting plan is applied - higher allocation for those who choose to reschedule the tranche to Month 4 (x2) or/and Month 8 (x4) + 30 days are left after each tranche to decide to claim or hold until the next release Anw, congrats @grvt_io on the TGE, it's definitely not the finish line; maximizing your allocation is a way to show your trust. Also, $GRVT can be found on every top exchange: OKX, Coinbase, Bybit, MEXC, Binance wallet, and more.

• 
  Alek (@Alek_Carter) reported 3 minutes ago

  Crypto is more than just charts, candles, and chasing pumps! A lot of people jump into crypto thinking the only way to participate is by buying low and selling high. But there’s another side of crypto too earning. Crypto earning products allow users to put their assets to work and earn rewards based on different product terms, instead of simply holding them idle. Take Binance Simple Earn as an example: • Flexible Products Need more control? Flexible options are made for users who want easier access to their assets while still having the opportunity to earn rewards. • Locked Products Okay with locking your assets for a certain period? Locked products can offer different reward opportunities in exchange for committing your funds for a fixed time. Every product is different supported coins, reward rates, availability, and rules can vary depending on the region and market conditions. Crypto isn’t a one-way street. Trading is just one path. Earning products are another option for users who want to explore the ecosystem differently. Always understand the terms, do your research, and make decisions that fit your goals. 🚀 #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  The Crypto Johannes (@TheCryptoJonny) reported 6 minutes ago

  JUST IN: Binance founder CZ- “I support all meme coins. I might even buy (or sell) one or two in the next few weeks to test a few new things. May the best memes win!” CZ clarified he had no involvement in the recent sale of meme tokens sent to him or binance, explaining that Giggle Academy routinely converts most donated tokens into BNB at month-end to fund its free education initiative, rather than burning them.

• 
  Cryptogoddm (@Cryptogoddm) reported 7 minutes ago

  I’m bullish on 401k,applcat,rwa too. built from Flap on Robinhood chain, it is still working. If it appears in Binance Alpha Stock, it will rise easily. Rwa+meme+flap will bring wealth. @eth_cedric still hold 1.5% 401k 401k has Good narrative

• 
  Darkfost (@Darkfost_Coc) reported 8 minutes ago

  📉 XRP Inflows to Binance hit All-Time Low as sellers exhaust above $1 Since its last high of $3.66, XRP has undergone a correction of more than 72%, even sending it below the $1 mark for a few days. Today, XRP is trading at 70% of its all-time high and is attempting to consolidate above $1. ⌈💡Consolidation phases typically form through an exchange of hands between sellers and buyers, particularly following a distribution episode followed by a gradual exhaustion of sellers. ⌋ 💥 This is precisely the dynamic we can observe through XRP inflows to Binance, which have just hit an all-time low. Average monthly XRP inflows to the platform now stand at around 3.6M XRP. While this figure may seem high in absolute terms, it actually represents the lowest level ever recorded, reflecting the absence of any strong willingness to sell among holders. 👉 This exhaustion of selling pressure should help XRP build a solid floor above the $1 threshold. What remains to be seen is whether a genuine rebound in demand will follow this lull on the sell side, a condition that appears necessary to spark a sustainable bullish trend.

• 
  Telbloggram (@Telbloggram) reported 14 minutes ago

  Binance will delist AEUR-related trading pairs and cease support Binance will discontinue support for the AEUR product and delist the AEUR/USDT spot trading pair on July 31, 2026, at 11:00. Users can withdraw or exchange AEUR for EUR before August 14, 2026; after this date,

• 
  Crypto King👑💎 (@cryptosanthoshK) reported 15 minutes ago

  @alk_dt @binance They are not down 80% If u technically entered my OPN calls, you should have made 2-3x. And if u had bought the top, it's a loss of 50%. It's a consolidation market. Make sure u time it right next time.

• 
  Muqadas (@MuqadasWeb3) reported 17 minutes ago

  Not every crypto user's goal is active trading... and it's not necessary to simply hold every asset in their wallet. That's why crypto earning products exist. The idea is simple: store eligible crypto assets in products where you don't just leave them idle. When it comes to @binance Simple Earn, there are two common options for beginners: > Flexible Products: If you want relatively easy access to your assets. > Locked Products: If you're comfortable committing your assets for a fixed period, where the reward structure can vary. there's no "best" option. the right choice is one that matches your goals, time horizon and comfort level. In crypto, simply looking at returns isn't enough... Understanding how the product works and its risks is even more important. Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Usman | Web3 Builder🔸 (@BuildWithUsman) reported 17 minutes ago

  @ZoomexOfficial 🫡 My first crypto exchange was Binance. It earned my trust because it was easy to use, secure, and had everything I needed in one place. I used it for almost everything. Unfortunately, I stopped using it regularly after the P2P service was disabled in Nigeria. #zoomexsalute

• 
  Tahir 🫧 (@Algoyrithm) reported 17 minutes ago

  I thought this was the type of **** you only see on futures until i saw someone went -99% on binance spot market because they list the absolute dogshit

• 
  M (@Mahendrabiswass) reported 19 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk Hello Binance team i can't Verify my Binance account by Facial Verification, even I upload Manual Video, still its rejected. Please Help me or Delete my account so i can create new Account with the same Number.

• 
  THE CRYPTO ORBIT (@Crypto_orbit06) reported 20 minutes ago

  Day 13/100 — Exchange vs Wallet 🔐 One of the biggest mistakes beginners make is thinking an exchange and a wallet are the same thing. They aren't. 🏦 Exchange (Binance, CoinDCX, Coinbase, etc.) • Used to buy and sell crypto. • Easy for beginners. • The exchange controls your private keys. • If the platform freezes withdrawals, gets hacked, or your account is restricted, your access can be affected. 🔐 Wallet • Used to store your crypto. • You own and control the private keys. • No company can access your funds without your permission. • Ideal for long-term holders who want full ownership. This is why the crypto community has repeated one phrase for years: "Not your keys, not your coins." That doesn't mean exchanges are bad. They're great for trading, but many experienced investors move long-term holdings to a wallet they control for greater security and ownership. The lesson is simple: 👉 Exchange = Trading 👉 Wallet = Ownership Where do you keep most of your crypto today? 🏦 Exchange 🔐 Wallet

• 
  garçon (@bellevuegarcon) reported 25 minutes ago

  @ArmaanIyer @PoorGoat_ @binance mhm im down now so ill hold till moon

• 
  Kryptex 💎 (@KryptexMining) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Barack_McBush @RedPandaMining @BitsBeTrippin You are free to use whichever method is most convenient for you. If the time limit expires, the payment will be canceled automatically, and you can reorder it. For example, MEXC or Binance allow 60 minutes for Lightning invoices. The exact time depends on the receiving service.

• 
  Super Degen 💎 (@SuperDegen) reported 27 minutes ago

  @BinanceResearch Binance Research dropping the Half-Year 2026 On-Chain Markets report breaking down H1 trends

• 
  Blind Ape (@blindaping) reported 29 minutes ago

  @VuoriTrading I remember it was some binance launched VC funded Blockchain lol. Might try catch a double bottom bounce at least invalidation is close like xvg, but because it's down trend I'm not expecting huge pump I'll take a 10-20%

• 
  PUELTA (@PUELTA7) reported 31 minutes ago

  I’ve always respected your vision for BNB Chain, but I think this situation deserves an honest conversation. You said Giggle is not a crypto team and doesn’t have the expertise to manage crypto assets. If that’s the case, why were the donated tokens transferred between different wallets before being sold? If the goal was simply to convert them to fund education, why wasn’t the process as transparent and straightforward as possible? Another point is respect for communities. In the past, even donations worth around $1,000 received a public thank you. This time, communities across multiple projects collectively contributed around $165,000 to support free education. A simple acknowledgment to those thousands of supporters would have shown respect. It wasn’t about marketing—it was about appreciating the people who made the donation possible. What also concerns me is consistency across the BNB Chain ecosystem. A Giggle-related token was listed on Binance despite having a transfer tax, while many other projects face much stricter standards. Doesn’t that create the perception that some projects receive preferential treatment over others? Finally, BNB Chain has incredibly dedicated builders, including many independent American developers who continue building through the toughest market conditions. Projects like $MAME have remained loyal to BNB Chain and continued developing despite every challenge. These builders deserve equal visibility, equal opportunities, and recognition based on their work—not selective attention. If BNB Chain truly wants the strongest ecosystem, every committed builder should be treated fairly. Equal standards, equal respect, and equal opportunities are what create long-term trust. @cz_binance @BNBCHAIN @GiggleAcademy

• 
  diAz the Og (@MetalikZeleni) reported 33 minutes ago

  @cryptosanthoshK @binance If Binance hired even one of the guys such as myself half of that **** wouldn't be listed there, than again since when was Binance working for the people. Every cex loves their corporate big shots and their millions

• 
  seano ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ (@teethrichards) reported 34 minutes ago

  @cz_binance I was locked out of Binance for like 5 years. Forced HODL as a Service isn't something I signed up for, but it's probably better than some strategies in the long run.

• 
  Swapiz (@swapizofficial) reported 35 minutes ago

  Lorenzo Valente of ARK Invest says crypto is in its biggest consolidation in history as weak projects exit. He calls it "extremely bullish for the space." Meanwhile, Binance expanded its bStocks lineup with 10 new tokenized stock pairs on Binance Spot, including Apple, Amazon, Goldman Sachs, and PayPal. Bitcoin price (bitcoin:native ) remained trapped near $64,600 today as renewed US-Iran fighting, a hawkish Federal Reserve, and another CLARITY Act delay prevented buyers from extending the recovery. Ethereum (ethereum:native ) is clinging to support near $1,800 as rising leverage, crowded longs, and persistent U.S. spot ETF outflows deepen downside risks for the second-largest cryptocurrency.

• 
  Cryptogoddm (@Cryptogoddm) reported 35 minutes ago

  @ezeroho8245 I’m bullish on 401k,applcat,rwa too. Built from Flap on Robinhood chain, it is still working. If it appears in Binance Alpha Stock, it will rise easily. Rwa+meme+flap will bring wealth. @eth_cedric still hold 1.5% 401k 401k has Good narrative

• 
  Slem 🍚 ⛓ (@slem1337) reported 35 minutes ago

  I USED TO THINK POLYMARKET LATENCY ARBITRAGE LOOKED LIKE FREE MONEY Binance moves first. Polymarket reacts a little later. A bot sees the move, buys the mispriced outcome and collects the difference. Simple, right? A new public research release has now tested that idea across 727 million synchronized Polymarket and Binance rows. The researchers matched 2.94 million cross-venue events across 54 Polymarket trading days and found that Polymarket quotes reacted to large Binance moves after a median 347 milliseconds. On paper, that sounds like a huge edge for a trading bot. In practice, it was not. A walk-forward model using 43 different microstructure features still failed to outperform the probability already embedded in Polymarket’s own order book. After the researchers added estimated fees and slippage, the strategy lost money. And this is where building trading bots becomes much more complicated than simply finding a signal. The bot still needs to detect the move, calculate the trade, submit the order, enter the queue and actually get filled before the market reprices. Even when Binance clearly moves first, most of the theoretical edge can disappear during execution. The lag is real. The obvious arbitrage is not. But that does not mean the dataset is useless. It probably means the more interesting opportunity is not predicting whether Bitcoin moves up or down. It may be identifying moments when Polymarket fails to reprice cleanly: • Liquidity disappears after a large Binance move • Spreads suddenly expand • Thin books create temporary dislocations • Prices get stuck near $0.01 or $0.99 • Market makers become overexposed on one side Most Polymarket latency bots are probably not competing over who sees the Binance move first anymore. They are competing over who can execute without giving the entire edge back through spread, slippage and queue position. Seeing the opportunity is easy. Actually getting paid for it is the hard part.

• 
  👀 🐂🀄️ (@I4NFTS) reported 36 minutes ago

  So now we’ve had crime on Robinhood with $pipedog Crime on Binance (king of crime) with $MarsCoin And yet @solana stills adds zero help to push anything on their chain People are degenerates and constantly add most volume on low caps on pump but if it were for that I really wish solana would just lose a massive share of meme volume to the people who actually care to address them and push them

• 
  Troy Root (@TroyxRoot) reported 38 minutes ago

  @MomSenja @BrendanPedersen More like the problem of money laundering to the RNC (and DNC) from foreign governments aided by Coinbase, Binance, Tether, Circle and Anchorage Digital. Audit World Liberty Financial.

• 
  Backtesting Arena (@SifuBacktest) reported 46 minutes ago

  𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀, 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗪𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘂𝘁𝗲 — 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝘆𝗰𝗸𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝗦𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 In the first article we showed that the Wyckoff Spring runs against the documented order-flow research. Carol Osler's work indicates that price accelerates after crossing stop-loss clusters rather than reversing — and the Spring lives in exactly that zone. This article is the pre-registration. The rules for our test, published before we have calculated a single number. Including a control group that exposed a gap in our own method. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 We read three public Wyckoff scripts for TradingView, all under the Mozilla Public License. One detects the entire schematic with a state machine across all five phases. One marks Springs only. One does something else entirely, which we come back to. The difference is instructive, and it is not about the authors' care. PHASES ARE STATES, NOT EVENTS. The larger script carries a variable travelling from Phase A to Phase E, driven by roughly twenty hard-coded thresholds. The state depends on the whole path price took to get there. It never resets and it never expires. So you cannot say "there were 47 Phase C events, and on average this followed." There are no 47 events. There is a state that was entered at some point and gets overwritten by something else at another. A Spring is a timestamp. Timestamps can be counted, set against what happened next, and compared to a baseline. Testability is a property of scope, not of diligence. All three scripts are competently written. Only some ask a question that can have an answer. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 If you code a rule, look at the result, then adjust the parameters, you will always end up finding something. Not through dishonesty — it happens on its own. You try a different pivot length because the first one "didn't look right". You nudge the volume threshold. Five passes later you have a rule that works on exactly this data and nothing else. The only mechanical protection is writing the rules down beforehand and publishing them. After that they cannot be changed quietly. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲 • PIVOT — a bar whose low is below the six bars before it and no higher than the six after. Which means it confirms six bars late. That is deliberate: it was not known earlier, so it may not be used earlier • VALID LEVEL — a confirmed pivot low that was also the low of its trailing twenty bars. That puts it at the bottom edge of a range rather than somewhere in the middle • SPRING — price trades below a valid level but closes above it. The low must also be the lowest of the trailing twenty bars, and the level must not have been broken more than three times before. Each level fires at most once • ENTRY — at the close of the bar the Spring occurs on. Not at the low. The low was not tradeable at the moment of the decision • MEASURED — price movement over 5, 10 and 20 bars afterward, net of 0.1% costs per side. No optimised exit, no stop, or the study answers a different question • BENCHMARK — the unconditional forward return over the same horizons, same window, same universe • UNIVERSE — Bitcoin plus the nine most-traded USDT pairs on Binance, ranked by December 2019 volume, not by today's survivors: BTC, ETH, MATIC, BNB, TRX, XRP, EOS, LTC, BCH, VET. That MATIC ranked third then and VET tenth is the point — today's list would differ The benchmark is the single most important item on the list. A positive return after a Spring says nothing until you know what the market did anyway over the same stretch. And the 2020-dated universe is the reason the number will not just be a survivorship artefact. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁 𝗢𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗿 Here is the property that matters. Our rule only fires once the close has ALREADY RECLAIMED support. It therefore does not predict the reversal — it selects precisely those cases where the cascade failed to run. So the question is no longer "does price reverse after a break". It becomes: does the subset where the cascade did not run behave differently afterward than the market as a whole? Narrower, sharper, answerable. Without Osler's paper we would not have framed it this way. 𝗩𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 The teaching is not unanimous here. A Spring is read one way as absorption by large buyers — which implies high volume. And another way as evidence that no supply remains — which implies low. Both readings are common. So we measure three ways: no volume condition, high volume, low volume. If both extremes give the same answer, volume is not doing the work and the price pattern carries it alone. Both of the first two scripts test only for high volume. Neither notes that this was a choice. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 The third script defines the Spring like this: RSI rises above 30. That is all. No price level, no support, no trading range, no break with recovery, no volume. An oscillator crossing with a Wyckoff label on it. And it would test perfectly well. You could run it through the same machine — sample gate, benchmark, multiple-testing correction, look-ahead check — and get a clean number. For a question that has nothing to do with Wyckoff. Which exposes a gap we had not named. Everything else we check concerns the RELIABILITY of a result: is the number reproducible, is future information leaking in, does it hold against the right comparison. None of those checks asks WHETHER THE THING MEASURED IS THE THING ON THE LABEL. A backtest can be methodologically flawless and still measure the wrong thing. That is not an edge case. It is probably the more common failure — because it leaves no trace in the metrics. 𝗦𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗯𝗼 𝗴𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 The RSI crossing becomes a control group. Same horizons, same baseline, same costs, same gates. The placebo measures plain reversion from oversold. Our Spring additionally measures a price-level structure — the break and recovery of a confirmed support. Whatever the Wyckoff definition contributes on its own is exactly the gap between the two. 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁 Fixed in advance, because otherwise any configuration can be narrated into a finding afterward. • Spring works, placebo does not — the price-level structure contributes something • Both work, similar size — the Spring mostly measures oversold reversion, and the label is decoration • Both work, placebo clearly smaller — both effects are real and the structure adds on top • Neither works — neither rule shows anything on this data • Only the placebo works — the simpler rule beats the more elaborate one That last row is the outcome we would least enjoy. It is on the list for exactly that reason. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 • Under one standard error of difference — no detectable effect, regardless of sign • Under 30 events per variant — anecdote, reported as one • Fewer than 12 distinct months — one observation, not forty • Twelve combinations tested — corrected for multiple testing via the deflated Sharpe ratio • Prefix test — the series is computed twice, once on truncated data, and overlapping values must match exactly 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 We publish the result whatever it is. Effect found, no effect, or too few Springs to say anything. All three accepted in advance, all three reported the same way. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 A backtest whose rules were written after the first look at the numbers looks exactly like one whose rules came first. Same chart, same metrics, same confidence. The difference is the order — and the order does not appear anywhere in the output. So it appears here instead. Beforehand, with a date on it. The result follows. Study the Past — Improve your Future.

• 
  ilia (@ilia_el_pro) reported 49 minutes ago

  also minimax $E5A eu AND $MINIMAX spread took a L i really think since binance got on this stocks they also IBKR sh... you fills on adr on europe are ****...

• 
  kevan🎸 (@wegotl0ve) reported 51 minutes ago

  @binance please take it down

• 
  Duaa **** Ghaza (@mc0kz) reported 52 minutes ago

  I hope you can help me support my children. Please donate to my Binance wallet. Even $5 makes a difference to me. Please. TFJwF3kK8fLtEqn4bQDoTbKTAzCDUuGk3J

• 
  🐻 Bearound XRP (@BearoundXRP) reported 57 minutes ago

  🚨 JUST IN: While the giants got walled out of Europe, #Ripple walked straight in. 🇪🇺 Binance: no licence, EU access gone. Tether: never applied, delisted. Fewer than 10% of 3,000+ EU crypto firms cleared MiCA. #Ripple holds full CASP and EMI. All 30 EEA markets. 75+ licences worldwide. Everyone else needs permission. Ripple already has it.