Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	17 days ago
Angers	Login	1 month ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  KZZY (@kzzy47) reported 4 minutes ago

  Replied to five different threads before 9am today. Binance letting AI agents place real trades, someone clearing 42k in 36 hours off a bidding site, a coding agent with full repo access running commands on its own. Every single one made me want to go build something instead of finishing my coffee.

• 
  Tamora🌍 (@Morfu_one) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance what's us is going down eventually

• 
  Sandy (@Smileeyxoxo) reported 10 minutes ago

  Justin Sun’s statement reads less like a legal victory and more like an attempt to win the case on social media before he wins anything in court. To be very clear about what actually happened: The court did not rule that World Liberty Financial committed fraud. It did not rule that WLFI illegally confiscated his tokens. It did not rule that USD1 is undercollateralized. It did not rule that World Liberty is insolvent. It did not confirm the dramatic accusations now being pushed across social media. Sun won a procedural issue about where certain claims can be heard. That’s it. Turning a procedural ruling into a public declaration that WLFI has effectively been exposed is not evidence. It’s narrative control. And the part Sun seems least interested in discussing is the conduct World Liberty has accused his own side of. WLFI alleges that entities connected to Sun made unauthorized transfers of WLFI, including transfers to Binance, participated in purchases involving undisclosed parties, and took short positions against WLFI. Think about that for a second. The man now positioning himself as a defender of WLFI holders is being accused by the project itself of conduct that could benefit from the token falling in value. That is not some side detail. That goes directly to motive. World Liberty’s lawsuit also alleges that Sun’s side threatened to “light World Liberty on fire” and make the price of WLFI “go to ****.” So spare me the sudden concern for the community. You cannot allegedly threaten to destroy a project, allegedly put yourself in a position to benefit from weakness in its token, and then suddenly present yourself as the protector of the investors who would be harmed by exactly that outcome. That contradiction sits at the center of this entire dispute. Then we get the “secret backdoor” story. Again, the language is designed to create outrage before people read the documents. World Liberty’s position is that wallet restrictions and freezing authority were disclosed in the relevant agreements, including the Token Unlock Agreement accepted by Blue Anthem. So the real issue is not simply whether WLFI had the technical ability to freeze tokens. The real issue is why that authority was used against Sun. And WLFI’s position is clear: it believed restrictions had been violated and that conduct connected to Sun was threatening the project and its holders. Calling that “theft” before a court has actually ruled on the contractual dispute is not a legal conclusion. It is Sun’s version of events. There is also something almost absurd about the attack on USD1. Sun points out that the billions backing USD1 are effectively reserved for USD1 holders and cannot simply be used to satisfy a massive judgment in his favor. Exactly. That is how it should work. Stablecoin reserves are supposed to protect the people holding the stablecoin. They are not supposed to become Justin Sun’s personal settlement fund. The fact that USD1 reserves cannot simply be drained to pay one litigant is not evidence that USD1 is weak. It is evidence that those reserves are not supposed to be treated like ordinary corporate cash. And unlike the insinuations being thrown around online, there is actual reserve reporting. KPMG’s June examination reported approximately $4.634410 billion of redeemable USD1 against approximately $4.634587 billion of redemption assets. So while Sun is trying to create fear around USD1, the available reserve reporting points in the opposite direction. Then comes the FTX comparison. This is where the rhetoric becomes even more obvious. Yes, WLFI’s use of its own token as collateral on Dolomite can be criticized from a risk-management perspective. But risk is not fraud. An on-chain collateralized borrowing position that the market can inspect does not magically become FTX just because someone types “FTX” in a post. That comparison is emotionally powerful. It is also legally meaningless unless comparable misconduct is actually proven. And so far, that has not happened. The same tactic appears with Dough Finance. Serious allegations from another lawsuit are repeated as if they were established facts. They are not. An accusation does not become a fact just because Justin Sun includes it in a long post. This whole statement relies heavily on the same trick: Take allegations. Remove the word “alleged.” Add dramatic language. Throw in FTX. Mention billions of dollars. Present a procedural ruling as validation. And hope the audience never reads the underlying documents. I did. And I’m even less convinced by Sun’s narrative after reading them. What I see is a sophisticated investor in a serious commercial dispute trying to use his enormous public platform to define the story before the court defines the facts. Meanwhile, World Liberty is the party alleging that Sun-linked entities engaged in conduct against the interests of the project itself. If those allegations are proven, the entire image Sun is trying to build for himself collapses. Because then this is not the story of an innocent investor suddenly betrayed by WLFI. It becomes the story of a major holder whose conduct allegedly conflicted with the interests of the project, whose tokens were restricted after WLFI believed its rules had been violated, and who then launched a massive public offensive against that same project. That is a very different story. And no amount of dramatic wording changes the basic legal reality: Sun has not won the fraud case. He has not proven that WLFI stole his property. He has not proven that USD1 is unsafe. He has not proven that World Liberty is insolvent. He has not proven the most explosive claims in his statement. He has filed them. That is not the same thing. Until the evidence is tested in court, I’m going to judge World Liberty by documents, reserve data, on-chain activity and actual rulings. Not by Justin Sun’s PR campaign. I support $WLFI. And after seeing how aggressively this procedural ruling is being turned into something it simply is not, I have even less reason to accept Sun’s version of events at face value. Facts first. Court findings first. Evidence first. Not headlines. Not insinuations. And definitely not one litigant’s self-serving version of the story. $WLFI #WLFI #USD1

• 
  Datweb3guy (@Datweb3guy) reported 11 minutes ago

  @binance If I need to tighten an agent's limits mid-session (for example, reducing its max position size after a bad trade), can I adjust those permissions live, or do I have to revoke access and reconfigure the sub-account from scratch? #AskBinance

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 14 minutes ago

  🚨𝗦𝗨𝗡 𝗨𝗡𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗛𝗘𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗦! Justin Sun is targeting Coinbase, Binance and Hyperliquid’s AML filters, sending tiny USDT dust from HTX to anyone who used those platforms. HTX has been sanctioned in the EU and UK since May 26, prompting Coinbase to freeze accounts that received funds from it unless users prove they aren’t linked to a blacklisted entity. Binance announced on Aug 23 it will block deposits and withdrawals involving 11 platforms, including HTX, signaling a direct retaliation. Sun’s move pressures the two exchanges and EU regulators to either recognize HTX as a legitimate business or face a wave of angry users. $BTC

• 
  0x_Noblesse (@0x_noblesse) reported 14 minutes ago

  🚨 Spotted on Telegram: how a trader lost $160K in a BingX copy trading scam. In two hours, 160,000 dollars will be stolen from a follower on the BingX exchange. Very neat work. Here is how it all happened: "I talked to a trader for a year. His username on BingX is Michael74 (Telegram ID: 7098739671). Recently, he suggested that I move from Binance to BingX. He said he had a personal manager there and could get me special rewards. I fell for it and moved. They gave me VIP-2 status. Michael74 told me that I could get more bonuses from the exchange. To do this, I needed to subscribe to copy his trades. It is called 'copy trading'. I subscribed. At first with a small amount, 500 dollars. The exchange gave me a 500 dollar bonus too. Then I copied his trades with 160,000 dollars. In 6 minutes, Michael74 made 94 trades on the BTC-USDT pair. He made trades with leverage. He lost all my 160,000 dollars on exchange fees alone. Out of the 160,000 dollar loss, 148,000 was just fees. The exchange takes a fee from every trade. It takes it from the total trade size, not from the profit. A leverage of 90x means that a 160,000 dollar position opens a trade worth 14 million dollars. The fee is taken from all 14 million dollars. One open and close action eats 6.75% of the money. Michael74 did this 94 times in 6 minutes. Open, then close two seconds later. In the morning, I learned that the exchange gives half of the trading fee back to Michael74. The exchange pays the person who invited you up to half of your fees. That is 74,000 dollars in seven minutes. Getting that fee was his real goal. I am sure that BingX employees are also involved in this scam, considering the bonuses I received. My BingX UID: 38241527 Telegram: @sendthishere Please help if you can."

• 
  Isabella (@plural_sounds) reported 14 minutes ago

  @binance If an Agent OS agent executes dozens of small trades throughout the day, how will Binance help users properly track and export the complete trade history + reasoning logs for tax reporting purposes? Will there be a dedicated “Agent Activity Report” that clearly separates human trades from AI-driven ones? #AskBinance

• 
  Yubee (@Yubeekingston) reported 15 minutes ago

  Binance: your super app Binance stopped being just a crypto exchange a while ago. It's your super app now and most people are still using it like it's 2019. Five apps open at once used to be normal. One for stocks, one for crypto, one for sending money to family, one for news to figure out why anything moved. Binance folded all of that into one login. Trading on it isn't just crypto anymore. Spot, margin, futures, sure but you can also hold tokenized versions of Apple, Tesla, even the S&P 500, paid for in stablecoins. No separate brokerage account, no wire transfer, no waiting on market hours for most of it. Sending money across borders used to mean bank fees eating into the transfer and a multi-day wait for it to land. Binance Pay skips that email, phone number, or QR code, instant, no fee, nobody taking a cut just for existing in the middle. Idle money loses value sitting still, inflation makes sure of that. Binance Earn turns an idle balance into something working flexible or locked savings for yield, or auto-invest if you'd rather DCA into an asset weekly without thinking about it every time. Then there's Binance Square, sitting right next to your balance market news and creator analysis without tab-switching across five sources. From there you're one step from Web3 itself, dApps, NFTs, cross-chain bridges, without a separate wallet login for each one. None of this is really about any single feature though. It's not juggling six logins and six security codes just to get a full picture of what you own. One dashboard. One login. Your entire financial position in a few taps. That's the actual pitch behind "super app" and right now, Binance is the one actually building it. This content for educational purpose. #LearnWithBinance #BinanceAcademy #Binance

• 
  XYO (@OfficialXYO) reported 17 minutes ago

  Binance launched Agent OS today. You can point an AI agent at your account through ChatGPT, Claude Code or Cursor, give it its own sub-account, set exactly what it's allowed to do, and pull its access whenever you want. 🤖 What would you let yours do?

• 
  Melio (@MelioHL) reported 18 minutes ago

  @CoinMarketCap Devs get direct access to Binance liquidity without building their own exchange integrations That shifts distribution for AI agents from wrappers to whoever controls the permissions

• 
  Vikas Tanwar (@Vikastan2912) reported 19 minutes ago

  @binance If multiple independent AI agents connected to Binance Agent OS access the Skill Hub simultaneously, how does the system prevent front-running or order collisions between two of a user's own automated agents operating on opposing strategies? #AskBinance

• 
  mr.raymond (@lvlr_Raymond) reported 23 minutes ago

  Imagine that you launch a coin $world to do marketing for 2 months, and then send fees to binance last fees 24,000k dollars for the $hyperworld and $world fees, and buy and sell and now you are like a scammer solana fundation team @world_xyz disgusting never see that before ****

• 
  Tobias Bley (@Tobias_Bley) reported 25 minutes ago

  @binance @0xKenja I updated my account with new ID after 2 Years+ pause because the old ID had past its date. I log in, sell my xrp to go trade Algo/BTC with leverage, and I find out I can only buy with my USDC other Fiat like Euro, Franks,..I buy Euro try to purchase some BTC or Algo. Nothing!

• 
  EyeOnChain (@EyeOnChain) reported 25 minutes ago

  ETH whale is finally taking some profit. One whale has been using leverage to build a massive ETH + BTC position, and now it looks like the profit-taking phase has started. Wallet 0x268…47643 withdrew 79,226 $ETH from Binance during July–August at an average price of around $1,776.83 .... roughly $140M worth at the time. Since August 19, it has already sent 10,887 ETH, worth about $24.16M, back to exchanges. If those ETH are sold, the whale would lock in roughly $4.82M in profit. And the interesting part? The stablecoins generated from the sales are reportedly being used to repay its Spark loans. The whale still has plenty of skin in the game, with 47,889 wstETH + 1,200 WBTC posted as collateral against $83.67M USDS borrowed. Current health factor: 2.26. So this doesn’t look like a full exit yet .... more like taking profits while paying down the leverage. Add:0x268448f31594f4636d03cbb4e813b94801e47643

• 
  J2TX (@j2txcrypto) reported 26 minutes ago

  4/ There are also signs that larger investors may be accumulating UNI.Analysts have pointed to Binance transaction activity as evidence of potential whale buying — another factor that could support the recovery if demand persists.

• 
  LearnToEarn 🔶🥇マナビ (@LearnToEarn_K) reported 26 minutes ago

  Binance Agent OS allows users to give AI agents limited access through Sub-Accounts with withdrawals blocked by default . However, according to TechCrunch, Binance cannot see the agent's reasoning behind its decisions.....that process happens entirely within the user's AI application . Given the demonstrated risk of prompt-injection attacks (like the Grok-Bankr incident where a Morse-coded prompt led to a $150,000 crypto loss , or Zscaler's findings that multiple LLMs can be manipulated into executing payments through hidden website prompts ), are Binance's existing security, risk-control, and AML policies for sub-account APIs sufficient to handle a scenario where a compromised agent executes harmful trades? And does Binance plan to introduce additional risk-monitoring or reasoning-auditing tools for agent activity in future updates? #AskBinance

• 
  SHAKIL khan sk (@DeFiShakil) reported 27 minutes ago

  What’s Happening in Blockchain & Digital Assets? Blockchain is changing, but the most important change is not just the rise in crypto prices. The real shift is that blockchain is slowly becoming useful infrastructure for finance, payments, technology, and digital ownership. One of the biggest developments is RWA (Real World Asset) tokenization. Traditional assets like US Treasuries, private credit, and bonds are moving onto the blockchain. Why does this matter? Because blockchain allows these assets to be traded and settled 24/7, reduces middleman steps, and makes financial markets more efficient. Then there are stablecoins. They are moving beyond crypto trading and becoming a regular payment system. Businesses can use stablecoins for faster cross-border payments, merchant settlements, and money management without relying completely on traditional banks. Another important development is the connection between AI and blockchain. AI tools will increasingly need to pay for computer power, data, storage, and other services. Blockchain and smart contracts can offer an automatic payment system where these tools can send money on their own. The technology is also becoming easier to use. Layer-2 networks, ZK rollups, and chain abstraction are lowering costs and removing complex problems related to crypto wallets, transaction fees, and different network types. However, a major question remains: How do we balance decentralization with legal regulations? Public blockchains offer open access, protection from censorship, and personal control over money. On the other hand, private institutional networks offer user privacy, legal compliance, and reliable performance. These models do not necessarily need to replace each other. The future could be a mixed financial system where institutions use regulated networks while public blockchains provide open trading and wider access for everyone. The most interesting idea is that blockchain may eventually become invisible just like most people use the internet every day without thinking about how the underlying technology works. Do you think blockchain will eventually become part of everyday financial systems without people even realizing they are using it? Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  shields 🌚 (@ImMrShields) reported 33 minutes ago

  Binance now allows AI agents to trade crypto on their own The exchange has launched Agent OS, a platform that lets AI agents access market data and execute trades independently. It can be connected to Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and other tools.

• 
  Muqeem 🔶 (@Muqeem94) reported 34 minutes ago

  Crypto can move fast. But a fast move doesn't tell you the whole story. You might see a sharp move higher and hear people call it a rally. Later, you might see prices pull back and hear correction. Neither is unusual. Crypto markets can move quickly because participation, sentiment, liquidity, and market conditions can change rapidly. And markets don't move in only one direction. Bullish periods can be followed by corrections. Bearish periods can also be followed by recoveries. That's why looking at one green or red candle isn't enough to understand the market. Instead of asking: "How much did it move?" Try asking: "What's happening behind the move?" Understanding rallies, corrections, and market cycles won't tell you what happens next. But it can help you understand what you're looking at. Learn the market before you chase the move. Educational only, not financial advice. Always do your own research and use official sources. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  John🎗️ (@i_am_JBS) reported 34 minutes ago

  I had this conversation with a friend at 2am last week.. he asked; “Bro, why do you keep your crypto on Binance?” I replied; “Because I can’t spend it.” “It’s literally money though.” He then said; “Yeah, but try paying for Netflix with Bitcoin. Good luck.” that was when it hit me: We have crypto that holds value, but can’t always use it like money. That’s the problem @kripicard is solving. Here’s the move, read till the end to understand: (A thread 🧵)

• 
  Hearts💕 (@Lianakenzi) reported 45 minutes ago

  @YemeenZaya @BinanceAcademy @binance Tokenized stocks help the blockchain to grow

• 
  Burry Graham (@BurryGraham) reported 45 minutes ago

  Why was it delisted? $LOOM (Loom Network) Loom Network raised millions in 2017 with a pitch about plasma scaling for Ethereum, saying they’d build a “sidechain for gaming” where developers could deploy dapps instantly with low fees. The $LOOM token was going to power this new world. By 2019, the vision was clear: nobody actually wanted to build on Loom. Transaction volume stayed in the hundreds per day. Developers that tested the network moved to Polygon (then Matic) instead. Loom’s marketing got quieter. By 2021, the project was basically abandoned, with the team quietly pivoting to infrastructure consulting. $LOOM got delisted from Binance in 2022 and most major exchanges followed. The token still exists, still has a website, but trades for fractions of a cent on OTC markets. The kicker: Loom was technically sound. There was no hack, no fraud, no theft. The scaling solution worked exactly as promised. It just solved a problem nobody had. Nobody wanted to play games on Loom when Polygon existed. Sometimes the reason a token dies isn’t that it failed. It’s that the market moved before anyone noticed. $LOOM $MATIC $UXLINK

• 
  Salahuddin2004 (@salahuddin2004) reported 47 minutes ago

  bitcoin:native #BTCUSD #Bitcoin BTC PERPETUAL TRADE SELL SETUP Short from $75,500 Currently $75,500 Targeting $72,200 or Down (Trading plan IF BTC go up to $78k will add more shorts) Its not a Financial advice $BTCUSD $ETHUSD $XRP $XRPUSD $SOLANA @CoinMarketCap @coinbase @binance

• 
  Teresa (@Teressa211192) reported 51 minutes ago

  Crypto doesn’t need another conversation about “when moon.” It needs conversations about what happens AFTER the hype. How do we make blockchain useful enough for everyday people? Which real-world problems can Web3 actually solve? What needs to change for adoption to go mainstream? And which ideas are still flying under the radar? That’s what makes Binance Blockchain Week interesting. Different builders. Different perspectives. One industry trying to figure out where the next chapter begins. The biggest opportunity in crypto might not be the next token. It might be the next idea. What’s one blockchain topic you think deserves way more attention right now? #Binance • #BinanceAcademy • #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Kekkin (@TrillKek) reported 53 minutes ago

  Apparently the Chinese can't sell this token... It is due to the fault of @binance Wallet (China) (and @cz_binance). Chinese holders are tweaking out, complaining at CZ, and comparing this to MarsCoin (which apparently had the same issue early on) This is honestly kinda funny. Was this issue part of the reason why MarsCoin ended up mooning soon after? Was CZ dealing with so many complaints, that he was left with no choice but to crime the token and make everyone happy? Either way -- imagine a BSC coin with chinese holders, yet they are somehow all forced to hold? Sounds more bullish than the majority of other BSC coins to me. Maybe if the coin starts going up-only, instead of down to zero, all the Chinese holders will end up happy? Very interesting to watch this play out. $SKYLARK 0x5d52d11bb538ec28ab1597afff502ffc9e458888 What if SkyLark ended up... in the sky?

• 
  Myles🧣 (@Mollygreg25) reported 53 minutes ago

  @binance To protect enterprise capital, does Agent OS support multi sig prompt or webhook verifications before an agent can modify core subaccount parameters? #AskBinance

• 
  Mustapha 🔻 (@liaichi_m) reported 54 minutes ago

  @nexocooker Can't u just ... Send to ur binance wallet ? Or how this exactly working

• 
  Perspective Vibe (@Perspectivibe) reported 55 minutes ago

  @thanphu656 @binance Great Let's support each other 🤝💪

• 
  Leonard (@ekpen76) reported 57 minutes ago

  @_absnt @binance You can directly message Binance about it, and possibly the Ethereum foundation if they can help by either freezing the funds or blacklisting the wallets.

• 
  KidMoseby (@KidMoseby) reported 58 minutes ago

  @binance Connecting an AI agent to Binance is powerful, but it also means giving software access to sensitive financial data and potentially trading permissions. Binance should make the permission boundaries and failure safeguards impossible to misunderstand