Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	29 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  BASED MFER (@NFThashcoder) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MightyDylanK @Bybit_Official Been using Binance and Gate, never had such issues. Maybe it's time to switch.

• 
  wurthy (@wurthy) reported 7 minutes ago

  just binance doing their regular unregulated casino business flushing down 100x long liquidity sell everything bitcoin is done for

• 
  10XN ☁️ (@Yucee_Official) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance Are you guys mad???? Whats this ****

• 
  Damilola🧸 (@Talk2dami) reported 10 minutes ago

  @_Ayoo_xx @binance Help @binance

• 
  CJ_🌊RIVER (@GraceWang1688) reported 12 minutes ago

  @SahilTigga30080 I am also working on Binance Alpha. It is not easy or profitable right now.

• 
  Footydude (@Bear999999996) reported 17 minutes ago

  @binance weird thing about bnbchain and binance is they just content being considered trash by the new generation. Uncs remember binance for what it was but the new gen (who B should be onboarding) literally think it’s a trash china chain. And what does bnbchain do to fix this? nothing

• 
  HgHg (@Hasimgunes21) reported 17 minutes ago

  @cz_binance I will ask you everyday. Why dont you stop bouncebit thieves? İs your exchange binance for **** coin, thief coin exchange? Tell us When will you obstruct bouncebit thieves?

• 
  Binance Customer Support (@BinanceHelpDesk) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Alamin9900 @kanchi_jeevan @axisrobotics Hello. Please make sure you are using the Binance Wallet Extension on desktop and have signed in there with your Binance Keyless Wallet before completing the tasks. You can also try switching networks and checking again. If you have already done this and the issue still persists, please contact the project team through their official Discord channel for further assistance. - HN

• 
  Rado | τsc (@RadoTsc) reported 18 minutes ago

  @BitcoinNewsCom where can i buy blake 2b im down for a gamble can i buy it on binance?

• 
  Elvarx | Daily stock analysis🟢 (@Elvarxs) reported 21 minutes ago

  My take on bitcoin:native : 1/ BTC just did something unusual: August ETF inflows topped $3B - the strongest month of 2026 - yet the fund complex is still net NEGATIVE for the year (~-$2.5B). Institutions bought the dip so hard it barely dented the May-July outflow hole. bitcoin:native 2/ Snapshot: Price ~$77,600 (as of Sept 1, 9:43am ET), roughly flat to -2% on the day depending on venue. Market cap ~$1.55T. 52-week range: $57,832-$126,186 (ATH was Oct 2025). Chart is consolidating just under resistance after a ~22-24% August rally. 3/ Setup: BTC ripped from the low $60Ks to above $80K in August on ETF demand, then got knocked back below $78K intraday when Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's hawkish Jackson Hole remarks lifted September rate-hike odds. It's now fighting to hold the reclaim. 4/ Bull case: August was the best ETF month of 2026 - $3B+ net inflows, ~2x April's pace. BlackRock's IBIT absorbed ~62% of that. Zero net-selling days across spot BTC ETFs in August per on-chain tracking (Arkham). Demand looks real, not just AUM inflation from price. 5/ The catch: ETFs remain net NEGATIVE ~$2.5B for 2026 - August only clawed back about half the May-July bleed. Binance exchange reserves hit a 2026 high (~687K BTC, up from ~617K in April) - a build some read as distribution setup, not accumulation. Daily RSI is above 70 - stretched. 6/ Key levels: Support $76,800-77,165. First bull threshold $78,340. Major confirmation zone $79,730-79,920. Above that, $80,280 and the 50-week MA (~$81,000-82,000) is the real ceiling. Below $76,800 opens a retest toward the low $70Ks. 7/ Risks: (1) Sept 16 FOMC - a repeat hawkish surprise. (2) Rising exchange reserves = shrinking dry powder / possible distribution into strength. (3) BTC is still ~38% below its Oct 2025 ATH of $126K - that entire cohort is sitting on overhead supply. 8/ Catalysts: (1) If August's ETF pace carries into September, $80K+ gets retested. (2) Fear & Greed sits at 67-72 (Greed) - elevated but not euphoric, leaving room to run. (3) Standard Chartered's $100K year-end target still stands on the desk. 9/ How we got here: BTC bottomed near $58-60K in June/July after a weak Q2, then staged its best month of 2026 in August on returning ETF demand. The rally stalled at $80-82K resistance and took a macro gut-check from Warsh's Jackson Hole comments. 10/ No sell-side consensus exists for BTC, but institutional positioning is the proxy: IBIT dominance + a zero-outflow August skew bullish. Standard Chartered's $100K year-end call implies ~29% upside from spot - that's the bull case if flows hold. 11/ My take: Hold, not chase. BTC is consolidating $77K-80K into a binary macro event (Sept 16 FOMC). I'd want acceptance above $79,730-79,920 on volume before adding, and I'd treat a clean break below $76,800 as the exit signal, not a dip to buy. Watch Sept 16.

• 
  Backtesting Arena (@SifuBacktest) reported 33 minutes ago

  The Screener Told Me What Was Strong Against Bitcoin. It Never Said What Happened Next. There is a kind of website that shows about a thousand altcoins on one screen, each priced in Bitcoin instead of dollars, each stamped uptrending, basing or downtrending. Green, grey, red. It is well built and the data is fresh, and it answers one question cleanly: what is strong against Bitcoin right now? What it does not say, anywhere, is what happened after the stamp. So we measured that instead. Before touching a single price we wrote the rule down. Take the coin's dollar price, divide by Bitcoin's, and you have a series that rises only when the coin beats Bitcoin. Uptrending means that ratio sits above its 50-day average and the 50-day sits above the 200-day. Downtrending is the mirror image. Everything else is basing. Daily closes, no costs, no judgment calls, and no second attempt. The hash of that definition lives in the dataset so nobody, including us, can quietly tune it later. Then 370 Binance pairs, 457,994 trading days, every one of them a data point. The first number is not about the label at all. It is the floor. If you bought any altcoin against Bitcoin on any day since 2017, with no condition whatsoever, the median outcome was a loss of 2.0 percent after a week, 6.8 percent after a month, 17.3 percent after a quarter. Positive windows: 39 percent, 33 percent, 26 percent. In three quarters out of four the median altcoin lost ground to Bitcoin. That is the water everyone in this market is swimming in, whether the screener shows it or not. Now the stamp. On 8.7 percent of all days a coin carried the green label. What followed, in medians, was minus 2.7 percent after a week, minus 9.6 after a month, minus 23.0 after a quarter. Against the floor that is 0.8, 2.7 and 5.6 points worse. Below average at every horizon, and the gap widens the longer you hold. The only edge in the whole table points the wrong way. Coins stamped downtrending, which is 58 percent of all days, sat 0.4, 1.2 and 1.9 points above the average afterwards. Mild mean reversion. Their median was still negative, so this is not a case for buying red. It is just where the label's information actually lives. A result pooled over that many days can fool you in three standard ways, and we tried all three. Counting only every seventh, thirtieth or ninetieth day per pair, so no two windows overlap, leaves 5,694, 1,312 and 428 uptrending windows and the same sign: minus 0.8, minus 2.6, minus 3.2. Asking each coin separately whether its own uptrending days beat its own average, only 28 percent said yes over a week, 22 percent over a month, 20 percent over a quarter. Four coins in five pulled the stamp down. And splitting the history at the start of 2024 gives minus 0.9, minus 2.9, minus 6.6 before and minus 0.8, minus 3.5, minus 8.7 after. Two market regimes, one picture. The reason is not something wrong with altcoins. It is something built into the stamp. A 50-day average needs weeks to climb over a 200-day average. In synthetic series with trends built in, the green label appeared a median of 80 days after the trend began, never sooner than 52, never later than 115. Give that classifier 600-day regimes and it earns 4.2 points over the floor. Give it 120-day regimes and it loses 3.7, because it turns green right as the reversal is due. Alt-versus-Bitcoin trends are, apparently, the short kind. The label is not lying. It is describing the past while being read as a description of the future. Two objections deserve a straight answer. The dead coins are missing, yes. Only pairs still trading today are in the sample. But a dying coin spends its last months stamped downtrending, so leaving it out flatters the red arm, not the green one. The bias runs against the one edge we found, not for the label. And medians hide the moonshots, also yes. That is exactly why we do not quote the means. The seven-day mean in the basing state before 2024 was plus 152 percent. The median was minus 1.8. The difference is a handful of days when something went up a hundredfold. Defending the stamp with the mean is defending three afternoons. So the honest description of an alt-versus-Bitcoin screener is an inventory. It shows you what is on top. The number it owes you is the one above: seventeen percent a quarter against Bitcoin, and the green stamp pushes that figure down, not up. If you rotate anyway, at least know which current you are swimming against. The whole table now lives on Backtesting Arena as a Knowledge Object called alt_vs_btc_base_rate, recomputed every month with the definition hash and all three checks inside it, so you can check whether the label has ever climbed above the floor before you move a single sat.

• 
  Crypto Diva (@Anita1Diva) reported 41 minutes ago

  @binance Binance giving AI agents access to trading infrastructure raises one big question: are security and user protections really ready for this?

• 
  احمد (@amz9660) reported 41 minutes ago

  Binance Monitoring Tag on $GLMR $MOVR is hitting hard. Liquidity was already the biggest issue… this tag made it worse. Volume drying up, spreads widening, confidence dropping. If the team doesn’t fix liquidity + show real progress soon, delisting risk becomes very real.

• 
  Tyrion Trades (@TradesTyr) reported 42 minutes ago

  5/9 Now let's address the biggest FUD. I completely understand the anger from people who lost money in the April exploit. People lost enormous amounts. And personally, I'm not a fan of how the team handled the hack and its aftermath either. The criticism is understandable. But I've seen people saying: "They could launch a new token and make solana:DriFtupJYLTosbwoN8koMbEYSx54aFAVLddWsbksjwg7 worthless." Technically, a team can create another token. But I don't think that makes economic sense here. solana:DriFtupJYLTosbwoN8koMbEYSx54aFAVLddWsbksjwg7 is already listed and liquid across major exchanges including Binance and Bybit, with established market makers, liquidity, holders, wallet support, trading pairs and governance infrastructure. Creating another token would mean dealing with new contracts, exchange integrations, liquidity, market makers, custody, trading pairs, compliance and migration. And there is absolutely no guarantee every major exchange would immediately list a replacement token. After everything that happened, intentionally creating another crisis around existing holders would make very little sense for @VelocityDEX

• 
  Cryptogenerian (@cryptogenerian) reported 43 minutes ago

  @KaspaSilver @BitcoinTeacher_ @thekaspaonion The maximum security budget Kaspa has seen was at the ATH or close to it. 800k USD per day. It would take 82 cent Kaspa to do that today. Impossible? No. Gonna happen n 2026? Super unlikely. That would take Coinbase, Gemini and Binance. I’m not convinced one will happen.

• 
  Levaaa (@Levaaa12) reported 44 minutes ago

  @VeylinVey @binance @Gate The site shut down after i deposited 5$XDDD

• 
  Nobody (@FXNobody) reported 47 minutes ago

  Tokenized stocks are starting to get stupidly big and I think CT is still looking at the wrong trade Binance just did $433B of TradFi perp volume in August and is adding options on 1,000+ US stocks/ETFs xStocks has already processed $40B+ of volume with 200k+ holders Now Silhouette is bringing RFQ block trading for xStocks directly to Hyperliquid My takeaway isn't “tokenized stocks bullish” That's obvious The alpha I'm looking for is who becomes the execution layer Who owns the order flow? Who gets the market makers? Who captures the spread + fees? Who becomes invisible infrastructure behind 24/7 equities? That's where I think the real winners of the RWA narrative will emerge I'm building a watchlist around this now 👀

• 
  Buddha (@0xBuddha) reported 47 minutes ago

  anyways, for the liquid fund or altcoin players who are sidelined on-chain and waiting for the fabled alt season, here's my high conviction play firstly, imo there are two big risks w this thesis - first, the fact that on-chain has been very hot (hot ball of money is there) ; and secondly, that crypto x ai play has been left for dead due to many failures that have no pmf (only vvv works, and yes, this is a crypto x ai token) decentralized models - failed ; gpu renting - failed ; agents - failed; these risks cut both ways - one, you are pre-positioning for the "eventual puck" - but it may never come, and i may be stuck in this position that does nothing. But if it DOES come, then this is under-positioned and offer asymmetric upside and has good r/r. you can't have your cake and eat it two but the silver lining is - looking at VVV's success, we can conclude that market DOES have appetite, but for things that *work*. and alts HAVE just done a 2-4x since the bottom, and have just been chilling, so all things considered, odds are in your favour now for the thesis - n of 1 vertical, practically impossible to copy bc it's relationship driven biz in an atomized world (not bits) - right place, right time, jensen started gpu financing - was laughed at 1y+ ago but now it's starting to gain traction - also, in a vertical of crypto, like mentioned earlier, has been left for dead, yet has shown strong pmf in their metrics, and has the right tailwinds of bringing RWA yield on-chain, good tokenomics, in a secular high growth vertical (AI) - tvl up and to the right, closed sharon ai (leopold holding) + few other neos - overloaded with borrow demand, could write 10x loan TVL (3bn) in next three months. - top of funnel ~13bn in loan originations; constraint is not demand, but deposits ; aave + sky integration upcoming to provide material boost over the next few months - listed on every exchange - upbit, robinhood, binance, coinbase - expecting tokenomics update on value accrual in next few months. founder has shared public views on how he thinks about value accrual, expect this to be very positive. he takes lessons from HYPE / VVV ; - as an example, 65bn nasdaq listed tech company bought tokens three months ago - team just hired ex CRWV CFO as Senior Advisor - 80m MC with no unlocks till q1 27 - oh , and chart looks like this ******* send it

• 
  Crypto Patel (@CryptoPatel) reported 48 minutes ago

  MARSCOIN ($MARSCOIN) Full Project Review: From Zero To Now. And What Comes Next. No hype. No shill. Just facts. Let's break it down family. 👇 What It Actually Is: MARSCOIN is a meme coin on BNB Chain with a twist. It is being called a "stock memecoin." Hold MARSCOIN and you earn SPCXB, a BNB Chain tokenized version of SpaceX stock (SPCX). So it mixes meme culture with tokenized equity exposure. That is a fresh 2026 narrative. This is NOT the original 2014 Marscoin. Different chain, different token, different everything. Verify the contract. The Origin (Zero): Brand new. Born from a meme. 📌 Launched around July 28, 2026 on the Flap platform 📌 Only about 5 weeks old 📌 Plays on the old 2021 moment when CZ replied to Elon with "Maybe call it MarsCoin" 📌 Community driven, team is anonymous How The Rewards Work: This is the whole selling point, so read carefully. 🔹 A transaction tax (reported around 2 to 3%) is used to buy SPCXB 🔹 That SPCXB is sent to MARSCOIN holders from a vault 🔹 Hold enough MARSCOIN and you receive SPCXB automatically Sounds great. But here is the honest part. This mechanism has NOT been fully verified through an independent smart contract audit. Treat the reward claims as unconfirmed until proven on-chain. Funding Rounds and Entry Prices: Different from the VC-backed launches we usually cover. 👇 🟢 Seed / VC Round: None 🟡 Presale / ICO: None 🔵 It launched as a fair-style meme on Flap There are no insider VC unlocks here. But there is also no VC backing, no audit-grade guarantees, and no team accountability. Cuts both ways. Tokenomics: 🔸 Total Supply: 1 Billion 🔸 Max Supply: 1 Billion 🔸 Circulating: 100% (fully circulating) 🔸 Market Cap and FDV: basically the same (~$67M) 🔸 CertiK score: 3.6 (mediocre, not strong) The Price Math (Insane Move): 🟠 All-Time Low: ~$0.003 (Jul 29) 🟠 All-Time High: ~$0.09783 (Sep 1) 🟠 Now: ~$0.07 🟠 Up roughly 3000% from the low. Around a 31x at the peak Let that sink in. A near 30x in about a month. This is one of the hottest momentum runs on BNB right now. It is also exactly the kind of chart that can reverse hard. The Catalysts (Now): Why it is pumping. 🔹 Binance Alpha listing (late July) 🔹 The tokenized stock and SpaceX narrative is red hot 🔹 Binance listed MARSCOIN perpetual futures with up to 20x leverage Perps with leverage can add fuel both ways. Up fast, down faster. The Risks (No Bias, Read This Twice): This is where I protect the family. ❗ Liquidity is very thin, around 1.25% of market cap. A big sell can crater the price ❗ The SPCXB reward mechanism is not independently verified yet ❗ Anonymous team. No accountability if something breaks ❗ Some viral claims (holder counts, gains, volumes) are contested vs real data ❗ Transaction tax means every trade has friction ❗ 20x perps can trigger violent liquidations ❗ Chasing a 30x is Like exit liquidity behavior Future Outlook: Let's be clear about what this is. A high-risk narrative meme, not a fundamentals play. The bull case: tokenized stocks stay hot, the SPCXB rewards prove real and keep paying, Binance perps bring volume, and the meme keeps attention. The bear case: thin liquidity unwinds, the reward mechanism disappoints or gets questioned, hype fades, and it round-trips a big chunk of this move. Watch liquidity. Watch if SPCXB rewards are actually verifiable on-chain. Watch the perps funding. Watch for the team to prove the mechanics. Fresh, viral, and a monster short-term chart. Clever tokenized-stock angle. But thin liquidity, an unverified reward engine, an anon team, and a mediocre audit score. This is a high-risk momentum gamble. Fun to watch, dangerous to marry. Never more than you can lose. And verify that reward mechanism yourself before trusting it. Not Financial Advice. ALWAYS DYOR. 🫡 @MarsCoin7777

• 
  Davy 🦆 (@adiosdavid) reported 48 minutes ago

  Im just looking at how it was a few months ago Man **** looked bleak We didn’t have Robinhood chain Sol memes topping out at 200k Binance memes once in a blue moon Base was doing some retarded **** Now we still have base being retarded But we have all these chains battling for attention Because the tidal wave of people that are about to pour in to this space is going to shock and awe every one The competition is getting fierce The coins are going higher More people believing and bullish Man the future looks so bright This space is like no other We are at the start of something Beautiful It’s gonna be so much fun

• 
  AYAN FX (@AyanFx334) reported 50 minutes ago

  My Binance account has been locked and under review for over TWO months now (Case ID: #168639759) with zero resolution! Your support team keeps giving automated, dead-end responses and refuses to provide any timeline. This is unacceptable holding of user funds. Fix my issue immediately!

• 
  miralord fartfuck (@miralordf) reported 51 minutes ago

  @EricCryptoman @binance open a little position in fomo so people can see it, might help a little maybe lolz

• 
  kiran Lal | VanarChain (@kiranLal_vanar) reported 54 minutes ago

  @leohbk333 Hi, thanks for reaching out. First, could you please confirm whether any VanarChain representative has already responded to you or provided guidance regarding this issue? Regarding the transfer, we understand that BingX is currently displaying Base as the available VANRY deposit network, while Binance is presenting ERC-20 as the withdrawal option. Please do not proceed with the withdrawal until the network compatibility has been confirmed, as sending assets across unsupported or mismatched networks could result in loss of funds. Please send us a DM so we can follow up on this immediately and review the available transfer options with you. For your security, never share your seed phrase, private keys, passwords, or verification codes with anyone.

• 
  Akuyuki (@Xalrio) reported 55 minutes ago

  @asparagoid It is close to impossible for Coinbase to ever rebuild trust after all the shenanigans they've done with Base. They have betrayed over and over again their users and they never once listened to what was asked for. Coinbase is same like Binance with some extra Temu glitter on top

• 
  Raymond R. (@RayNordic) reported 59 minutes ago

  @binance CHIA will fix this after USDT fails

• 
  BoxZero (@benn3111) reported 59 minutes ago

  @BenjaminFra__ no, law enforcement in Indonesia is not good.. i asked binance for help, but they cant do anything because the withdraw is complete and to another blockchain....

• 
  Anubhav (@meisterAnubhav) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Blake_Berryhill What if Binance delists Jasmy? Have you thought about consequences before influencing the public whose money is at stake? For months are years you guys have promoted Jasmy which is 99% down

• 
  NHK (@langtusg0308) reported 1 hour ago

  @binance AI agents getting direct market access is a major crypto unlock. Stay bullish binancecoin:native chain.

• 
  sanka malith (@sanka_malith) reported 1 hour ago

  What Can You Actually Do With Binance Chat? The interesting part is the built in crypto functionality. Private Chat Connect with other Binance users using Chat ID, UID or QR code. Group Chatrooms Join communities and creator chatrooms connected to Binance Square. Red Packets Send crypto based gifts/rewards directly through conversations. Trade Cards Share trading related information more naturally while discussing the market. This means conversations don't have to stop at What do you think about this trade? the Binance ecosystem can support the interaction around it.

• 
  Tony (@ASVPXILLZ) reported 1 hour ago

  @binance VIP 6 means even your weekend FOMO gets customer support...