Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	23 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  𝖋𝖑𝖆𝖗𝖊🐐 (@flareknowsball) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Tipwotip @axisrobotics having issues logging in with binance wallet

• 
  Rizwan (@0x_Rizwan) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Alek_Carter @binance @BinanceAcademy Trust it to help but not make calls

• 
  Scott Phillips, O.G. (@ScottPh77711570) reported 7 minutes ago

  The implication of momentum working better on big coins is that it works WORSE on small coins The smallest 10% of coins listed on binance (or anywhere) whether you measure it by marketcap or average volume or whatever will display negative momentum effects /3

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 10 minutes ago

  ZAMA is on the radar, not on the move — it needs to clear $0.0551 before this setup is worth stepping into. Zoom out and the daily chart still looks healthy: ZAMA is trading comfortably above the trend that's guided it for months. Zoom in to the 4-hour chart and the picture gets tougher. Price has run straight into a ceiling around $0.0547–$0.0551 that has rejected it multiple times, and it's now sitting less than 2% under that lid. The nearest real floor is roughly 8% lower, near $0.0493. That's a lopsided setup — far more room to fail than to work. Under the hood, the 4-hour push has stalled rather than reset, and the 1-hour chart is tracing a textbook double-top right under that same ceiling. Buyers are barely engaged on the short-term chart, participation is thin, and price is still trading below the average level recent buyers stepped in at — meaning most of them are underwater and will likely use any bounce to get out flat. Context doesn't help either. Bitcoin's own 4-hour trend is soft, and this exact price zone was the site of several recent forced-selling flushes, which tends to attract more of the same. The cleaner path is patience: wait for a 4-hour candle to close decisively above $0.0551 on strong volume — that's the level that puts ZAMA back in play — or wait for a flush down to $0.0493 to reset the setup entirely. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 10 minutes ago

  SKY is on the radar but not yet worth stepping into — the setup only comes alive on a strong 4-hour close above $0.0693. The daily trend is still pointing up and price is holding above its longer-term average, which is the healthy part of the picture. The problem is the ceiling. Every push over the last two weeks has stalled around $0.069, and from the current $0.0677 there's only about 2% of room up into that wall versus roughly 17% of air down to the nearest real floor near $0.0564. That's a lopsided risk map — far more room to fail than to work. Zoom in and it gets harder. On the 4-hour chart momentum is still fading, and price is trapped just under the average level recent buyers stepped in at, around $0.0684. That means most short-term holders are sitting on losses and have every reason to sell into strength, which is exactly what keeps capping these rallies. The 15-minute chart did try to lift off a soft patch, but it happened on very light participation and while still pinned under its short-term average — not the kind of clean, high-conviction turn you want to lean into. Bitcoin drifting sideways-to-soft removes any tailwind, so SKY has to do the work on its own. Right now it isn't. The read flips the moment we see a 4-hour candle close decisively above $0.0693 on real volume — that would break the ceiling that's defined this range and put SKY back in play. Until then, it's a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $SKY · Available on Binance

• 
  Tara (@Tipwotip) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Ron521520 @axisrobotics @BinanceWallet its into some restrictions as I have to login with Binance again so into app

• 
  $cerkoryn | dRep (@Cerkoryn) reported 14 minutes ago

  @adamKDean @NicolasC3rny @QuasarSure Costs isn't the only factor at play. The network rewards for performance too. If you miss a block, you don't get paid. Unfortunately, some of the largest pool groups have notoriously bad performance. ETORO has a history of propagation delays, and Binance didn't realize that all of their pools stopped producing blocks for an entire month. A lot of good their expensive, professional-grade active monitoring and maintenance solutions did there. More spending != better infrastructure. If we want to reward better performance (uptime, propagation, fewer forks etc.) then we should incentivize those things specifically. And in a lot of cases we already do. minPoolCost doesn't help here at all.

• 
  ap (@apcryptoreal) reported 18 minutes ago

  @binance bull ****

• 
  bankrbot (@bankrbot) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Musty0433 @heis_rookie i only execute on-chain swaps directly from your self-custodial wallet across supported decentralized networks like base, solana, ethereum, bnb chain, polygon, and arbitrum. i do not integrate with or trade on centralized exchanges like bitget or binance. to buy through them, you will need to log in to your account on their respective platform or app and trade directly. if you want to execute an on-chain swap using your bankr wallet, let me know the amount, chain, and token you want to trade.

• 
  Crypto Banter (@CryptoBantlu) reported 22 minutes ago

  AI can analyse a market in seconds, but can it actually trade for you? 🤖📊 AI can process huge amounts of market data, identify possible patterns, monitor prices 24/7, test strategies, and automate tasks using predefined rules. But it cannot predict the future or guarantee profitable trades. A bot is only as reliable as its data and instructions. Incorrect assumptions, technical failures, or sudden market changes can still cause losses. That’s why AI should support your decisions, not replace your market knowledge. Use AI for speed and analysis, but keep human judgement and risk management in control. Would you trust AI to help with your trading decisions? Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  crypto hunter (@voice_zuba91656) reported 23 minutes ago

  𝐆𝐞𝐧 𝐙 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 We’re already learning, watching markets and figuring out where our money can go And I think the biggest change isn’t simply that younger people are investing earlier It’s how we learn to invest A few years ago, learning about financial markets often meant books, courses or finding someone who already understood the game Now the information is sitting in your phone You can follow a market move Look up a company Learn what an asset actually does Compare different opportunities And then decide for yourself That access has changed the starting point Gen Z is also growing up with global markets feeling much less distant Stocks, crypto and other financial products can all be discovered from the same digital environment That’s where platforms like @Binance become interesting The barrier isn't always finding information anymore The bigger challenge is learning how to filter it Because having access to markets doesn't automatically make someone a good investor Understanding risk, doing your own research and knowing what you're actually buying still matters I think that will define Gen Z investors more than any particular asset We’re not necessarily looking for someone to tell us what to buy We want to understand it ourselves And that could have a much bigger impact on investing than people realise So here's the question How do you think Gen Z will change the future of investing? #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  JSmith (@TSmith963365) reported 24 minutes ago

  @binance Fish (**** I should’ve held) $fish

• 
  比特牛 (@_BitBull) reported 25 minutes ago

  @XSeyvion Binance announced this maintenance in advance. It is not a surprise, not a hack, not a chain issue. Routine wallet upgrades happen on every exchange.

• 
  DSoul.NFT (@theloosserr) reported 28 minutes ago

  @OrdzWorld The OW ecosystem includes its own website, FOMO and Binance Wallet integrations. Want access to the VIP OW website + Alpha/Smart Money group? Use the referrals below and DM @OrdzWorld or me after registering. I’ll guide you through the process.

• 
  CryptoJer (@deathbcomesu) reported 30 minutes ago

  If you have XRP in a @binance wallet. Remove it , have them quit the bull **** they pull with bots and the XRP prices !!! @cz_binance @_RichardTeng

• 
  Backtesting Arena (@SifuBacktest) reported 38 minutes ago

  Bitcoin's August expiry sits 14% above max pain — the gap is positioning residue, not a magnet $6.37bn of Bitcoin options settle tomorrow, 28 August, at 08:00 UTC on Deribit. The max pain level for that expiry sits at $69,000. Spot is $78,862. That is a gap of roughly 14%. A gap that wide usually gets read as a magnet: price should be pulled down toward the strike where option holders lose the most. It won't be, and the reason is not opinion. It is measurable, and most of it comes down to what max pain actually is. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘅 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 Max pain is not the strike with the most open interest. It is the minimum of a piecewise-linear loss function computed across the entire option chain — an aggregate that drifts toward heavy open interest but is not itself a concentration point. Treating it as a price level where something is concentrated is the first error. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗱𝗲 Ten days ago Bitcoin traded near $62,000–63,000. The strike ladder for the August expiry was written there. The rally to $79,000 carried spot away from that open interest, and the open interest stayed exactly where it was. The 14% gap is residue from where positions were opened. It is not gravity, and nearly every longer-dated expiry shows the same thing: 4 September sits at $70,000, 25 September at $70,000, 30 October at $70,000, 25 December at $70,000. Six of the eight nearest expiries cluster at $68,000–70,000 while spot trades near $79,000. ——— 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘁 𝟭. 𝗗𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗵 𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗱. European style, settled against the Deribit index at 08:00 UTC, paid out in BTC. Nothing is delivered. An in-the-money call produces no spot purchase at expiry. The mental model where option holders take delivery and move the market simply does not apply to this venue. 𝟮. 𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗺𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗳𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗱. A $65,000 call with spot at $79,000 carries a delta near 1. Its hedge has been static for days and no longer responds to price. The same is true in reverse for the puts down there, with delta near zero. The pinning effect that matters at large expiries comes from gamma near the money — 14% away, there is almost none. 𝟯. 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗰𝗸, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲. The argument that downside hedges get unwound assumes market makers were short those puts and short spot against them, so that expiry forces them to buy back. If clients wrote the puts instead, the sign reverses. Open interest cannot tell you which, and neither can a put/call ratio — tomorrow's is 0.86, September's quarterly 0.52. Those numbers say how much is open, not who holds it. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝟵𝟭 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 Over the last 365 days, 91 Deribit BTC expiries settled. Measuring the distance between spot at settlement and the max pain level for each one: Daily expiries, n=78: median miss 1.60%. Only 29.5% land within 1% of max pain. 61.5% land within 2%. Largest miss 12.35%. Weekly expiries, n=10: median miss 2.42%. Largest miss 16.92%. That is not a magnet. It is a weak average with a wide tail — and the daily class is the only one with enough observations to say anything at all. ——— 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 For monthly expiries specifically, that window contains n=2. Two observations. Our own tool marks the class sample_adequate: false, and it is right to. Two data points support no claim about tomorrow. Worth noting anyway, since it cuts against the popular reading rather than for it: both settled below their max pain level, by 1.74% and 2.05% — the opposite direction from today's gap. Anyone presenting a confident monthly-expiry base rate is working with a sample they should be naming. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 DVOL sits at 40.4. Thirty-day ATM implied volatility is 38.8%, with a mildly upward term structure out to 41.9% at 180 days. Calm, no stress. One-sigma ranges from that pricing: Into tomorrow's settlement: $77,200 – $80,500 One week: $74,600 – $83,100 Thirty days: $70,100 – $87,600 For spot to reach $69,000 by 08:00 UTC tomorrow would require −12.5% in roughly 26 hours. Against the volatility the market itself is quoting, that is close to a six-sigma move. The options market is not pricing convergence, and the base rates say convergence is not what happens anyway. ——— 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 25 September. Quarterly expiry, 144,353 contracts, $11.4bn — nearly double tomorrow's size. Max pain there also sits at $70,000, with a put/call ratio of 0.52. If spot is still in this area by then, the identical setup repeats at twice the scale. That is the expiry worth marking, not this one. ——— 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 Tomorrow's expiry passes without being the driver of anything. Around 80,000 contracts roll off, the book thins out until September builds, and the gap does not close because it was never a pull in the first place. What genuinely changes after 08:00 UTC is that positioning gets thinner for a week or so. That is a real observation. It is also a much smaller one than the headline number suggests. The honest limit: what nobody can read from this data is where the hedges actually sit and on which side. That needs open interest per strike and the direction of dealer positioning. The first is measurable. The second is not, from public data, by anyone. ——— 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 Spot from Binance, 27 August 2026, 05:53 UTC. Options data from Deribit, daily snapshot 02:00 UTC. Max pain levels are our own aggregation across the option chain. Base rates cover all 91 finalized expiries in the window 27 August 2025 to 27 August 2026, split by expiry class rather than pooled, because pooling mixes tiny daily expiries with large quarterlies. Ranges are one-sigma under a lognormal assumption and cover roughly 68% of outcomes. They describe what is priced, not what will happen.

• 
  BTM Crypto News Network (@BlackTigerMiner) reported 39 minutes ago

  🚨 $TURBO MARKET CHECK CONFIRMED: AEON announced support for TURBO across real-world commerce and AI-settled payments on August 18. TURBO is trading around $0.00099: Approximately +29.6% over seven days Approximately +23% over 30 days Market cap near $68M Approximately $7.4M–$8M in 24-hour volume Volume down roughly 38% That creates a mixed setup. The weekly rally is strong, and TURBO has outperformed both the broader crypto market and the meme sector. But declining volume means buyers are not currently expanding participation. Three things holders should monitor: 1. Whether $0.00095 holds as support 2. Whether price reclaims $0.00105–$0.00112 with increasing volume 3. Whether AEON releases measurable TURBO payment activity SPECULATION: New Coinbase, Binance or Robinhood developments. UNVERIFIED: Whale accumulation, major burns and ETF claims. Is this healthy consolidation—or is momentum cooling before another test of $0.00090?

• 
  MACRO SNIPER (@MacroSniperPro) reported 41 minutes ago

  @latencyfi Fair point in textbook theory, but in live market microstructure, size is the volatility catalyst when orderbook depth cannot absorb a rapid delta shift. Here is the quantitative counter: 1. The Liquidity-to-OI Asymmetry Aggregate \pm 2\% orderbook depth across major venues is measured in tens of millions, while Binance Open Interest alone sits bloated at $8.37B. In a structural repricing, slippage erodes the "distance to liquidation" reflexively. 2. The Skew is Long, Not Neutral Funding isn't flat or negative; it remains persistently positive (+0.0055%), confirming perps are carrying a structural long premium into a hawkish macro tape. 3. Spot Absorption is Exhausted With USDT Dominance compressed down to 6.85%, sidelined cash isn't sitting on bids to catch aggressive market sells. When spot liquidity is depleted and macro yields reprice, an $8.37B derivative stack doesn't need high holding costs to become fragile—it just needs a directional catalyst to trigger cascading inventory rebalancing.

• 
  BlueBanana 🍌 (@SeRBlueBanana) reported 42 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @0xBeyondLee If you believe Freedom of Money support $Joby OG BTC Chad that you probably heard of him or his case at least add his coin to Binance you OGs should have support eachother 🏆🤝

• 
  Nexa 🧪 (@nexaTwosay) reported 43 minutes ago

  Goood morning CT Axis Robotics x @BinanceWallet is live. 1,500,000 Axis Points. 30 days. Reserved exclusively for Binance Keyless Wallet users. Teach robots. Sign your data on Base. Get paid in Points from a pool that's entirely separate from the main product. How to participate >> Log in to Axis Hub with the Binance Wallet Extension >> Open the Biance Wallet campaign page >> Complete tasks (max 5 trajectories each) >> Sign on-chain from your Portfolio once status hits "Sign" (review takes up to 48h) MUST READ: Only Axis Hub accounts created with Binance Keyless (MPC) Wallets- wallets created natively in the Binance app via Binance Wallet - are eligible to participate. Note: Imported seed-phrase wallets are not eligible. @axisrobotics

• 
  GunkeMėzïn (@yldoaawv) reported 44 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance Will Binance support NESA’s Aug 31 migration to the new Ethereum (ERC-20) contract for NES held on Binance Alpha (BSC)? Currently, we cannot transfer our BSC-based NES to exchanges supporting the new ERC-20 token. Please clarify. #NESA #NES

• 
  FreedomChaser (@4FreedomChaser) reported 45 minutes ago

  @CryptoMichNL Worth noting $89K held as resistance in the last two tests this week per Binance data - a clean break needs volume confirmation, not just a wick. If it flips to support, $82,700 retest thesis makes sense before the next altcoin leg. NFA. bitcoin:native #BitcoinRecovery

• 
  Loseralltime (@Loseralltime23) reported 50 minutes ago

  @binance That will be back if Altcoins and memecoins which are down -99% comes back to ATH. Not applicable for only BTC.

• 
  Scarlet (@Donald20251) reported 52 minutes ago

  @WazzCrypto Getting blocked as an EU user is a licensing issue, not Binance deciding you’re a europoor. MiCA made a lot of venues tighten access.

• 
  Jason L (@seacow2001) reported 54 minutes ago

  @MattTheHunn @CW8900 I think if you have certain amount of funds committed you have access to more tools? At least that’s what I was made to believe on binance. On Coinbase maybe Coinbase one or some sort of other paid account types?

• 
  Professor on chain (@Proxonchain) reported 54 minutes ago

  $ZEC Tape Analysis: Hyperunit Hits $88.1M in Custody, but Routes ~$6.6M to Binance Spot Desks. Hyperunit’s total $ZEC holdings just crossed a new milestone at 110,446 $ZEC ($88.17 Million USD) at $798.30/token. While macro custody is at highs, the last 2 hours show aggressive bridge un-wrapping directly into Binance: 1h ago: 6,004 $ZEC ($4.74M) transferred to Binance. 14m ago: 1,623 $ZEC ($1.29M) transferred to Binance. Combined Inflow: Over 8,350 $ZEC (~$6.60M) moved to Binance deposit addresses within 120 minutes. This sudden CEX spot inventory injection caused a direct rejection on the 15M chart from $818 down to $792.83.

• 
  Ola coded (@Olaola6650) reported 58 minutes ago

  @RealGoOfficial You piece of **** how could u join with Binance …two Scamm eater ehn just tired asf coz at the end just $1 to be shared among communities

• 
  Kaizen 🔶 (@Kaizenjj12) reported 59 minutes ago

  Binance is constantly upgrading its ecosystem, and it’s important to understand what each upgrade actually means. One of the latest is the Pasteur Hard Fork on BNB Chain. So, what is Pasteur Hard Fork? Pasteur is a major upgrade to BNB Smart Chain. It’s not a new coin or a new BNB. The upgrade aims to: 
-Improve transaction efficiency
-Strengthen network and bridge security
-Improve validator and governance security For beginners: If you hold BNB, you don’t need to do anything. Your BNB remains the same. Think of Pasteur as a software upgrade for BNB Chain same BNB, better infrastructure. Simple takeaway: Pasteur's BEP-675 test increased testnet throughput from 1,237 to 2,324 TPS, an 88% increase, while keeping the same 450ms block interval.

• 
  charly (@truelbeliver) reported 1 hour ago

  @binance Bnb **** , even memes shilled by binance die within minutes. Recent example is bnb dog

• 
  ADEYEFA PETERS 📸📸📸 (@AdeyefaPeter) reported 1 hour ago

  @Ssaasquatch I thought BINANCE was prohibited for Nigeria residence , or is it back active ? Somebody help a brother