Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	14 days ago
Itu	Website	20 days ago
Seattle	Website	21 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  NOTDAVID (@DavidBlundin) reported 2 minutes ago

  @binance Clear monitoring tags help users price risk before volatility turns a warning into an expensive lesson.

• 
  Tom Krzystek (@tom_krzystek) reported 8 minutes ago

  @MattiaR11 @cryptocom @Dune Interesting, I wonder how this funnel looks for Binance. 150m CDC users to 2700 users on Cronos sounds terrible.

• 
  Crypto Sat (@cryptosatred) reported 9 minutes ago

  🚨 BitMEX Is Shutting Down After 12 Years Launched in 2014, BitMEX was once one of the biggest names in crypto. BitMEX was the first to come up with the perpetual futures contract, which later became the norm on big exchanges. At its peak, it was one of the biggest crypto derivatives platforms in the world. Today, it still has 2.1M+ registered users, but its market share has fallen to less than 0.01%, as trading volume shifted to larger competitors like Binance, Bybit, OKX, Hyperliquid, and others. BitMEX has officially announced it will shut down on September 23, 2026. Current stats: • Over 2.1 million registered users • Nearly $1 billion in exchange reserves • 24Hrs spot trading volume: Under $1 million (~$907K), with derivatives activity also only a fraction of its former peak Timeline: • New user registrations have stopped immediately • From August 26, 2026, users can only reduce or close existing positions • On September 23, 2026, all remaining positions will be force-closed and the exchange will officially cease operations The exchange that helped shape modern crypto derivatives is now coming to an end. An important chapter in crypto history closes on September 23.

• 
  Brandon (@BullishVictory) reported 12 minutes ago

  @muneeb @binance There's a full-blown crisis, and you seriously think leaving a reply on Twitter is going to fix it? Are you kidding me? What is this, amateur hour?

• 
  Alice (e/nya)🐈‍⬛ (@Alice_comfy) reported 12 minutes ago

  Unethical behavior + stagnation (maybe they were bogged down in legal issues idk). Inverse futures made since before Tether existed but basically meant the platform couldn't have altcoin trading, the matching engine couldn't handle enough trades per second, and conveiniently there were rumors that the "internal market making" desk could trade while said freeze was on. ByBit came out as basically a "BitMEX but the platform actually works" alternative and then FTX did USD margin and a few other things. Binance then copied that with their distribution and there was no real reason to use BitMEX anymore.

• 
  Danny Winss (@DannyWinss) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Bybit_Official Instead of supporting community that pushes your mascot, putting a lot of efforts to support your brand you just deny it all. That's not right. I'm really disappointed. Just look at BiBi & what CZ & binance did.

• 
  Alpha Nexus (@ShaniL93146) reported 16 minutes ago

  @cz_binance **** your super cycle shame on you my holding this time 10x down and day by day binance delisting my holding coins stop delisting

• 
  Bektaş (@Bekta1463080) reported 19 minutes ago

  @CZBinanceFno I have a Binance account I m working with you

• 
  Trading Strategy (@TradingProtocol) reported 23 minutes ago

  @snj_peters There is a difference between "discretionary" and "discretionary " with predefined trading rules limited by a smart contract. For example, if the vault curator is limited to taking only certain BTC and ETH trades and certain lending positions, the risk to the vault depositor is very, very low. This likely does not warrant regulation. The only risk is bad trades. Then we have Mainstreet and some vaults that just transfer all assets to a centralised Binance account and can do whatever they want with the money, e.g. buy Ferraris, without rules, transparency, and smart contract protection. We should call the latter vaults "full custodian" and separate "full custodian" from "discretionary." Because smart contracts enable the difference. TradFi does not. That's why TradFi has tons of regulation, to prevent the fund manager from just taking all the money. But in DeFi, smart contracts already prevent that. We do not need regulation to prevent something that is impossible. It is a waste of cigarettes.

• 
  Falcon (@FalconyFalcon) reported 25 minutes ago

  In like 2029 Binance just drops: “We’re shutting down” and the timeline’s like: “Damn, October 10 was legendary. ******* gutting. We’ll miss you”

• 
  Zizcrypto (@_Crypto_glass) reported 27 minutes ago

  $BTC: Open Interest Moves Into Upper 30-Day Range While Retail Bias Stays Mid-Range Hyblock’s 30-day Binance positioning data shows elevated open interest, while retail account positioning remains near the middle of its monthly range. True Retail Longs Accounts stand at 60.07%, in the 50.20th percentile, up 2.87 points. True Retail Shorts Accounts stand at 39.93%, in the 49.82nd percentile, down 2.87 points. This points to a mild absolute long bias at the account level, but not an extreme retail-long reading relative to the 30-day lookback. Whale vs Retail Delta is 0.89, in the 64.29th percentile, down 1.20. The reading remains positive, meaning whale long positioning still holds a slight premium over retail, though that premium has narrowed. Binance Open Interest is near $6.74B, in the 86.45th percentile, up roughly $111.5M. This places OI in the upper 30-day range. Key takeaway: BTC’s 30-day positioning structure is not defined by extreme retail long participation. The stronger signal is elevated open interest while retail accounts remain roughly mid-range by percentile. This points to a more leverage-sensitive market, where positioning risk can rise even without an extreme retail-long reading.

• 
  Zaro (@Zero_Arb) reported 30 minutes ago

  Exchange counterparty risk assessment: Before deploying capital, check: Tier 1 (lowest risk): • Binance, Coinbase, Kraken • High liquidity, regulated, proven track record Tier 2 (medium risk): • Bybit, OKX, Bitget • Good liquidity, less regulation Tier 3 (higher risk): • Smaller exchanges • Lower liquidity, withdrawal issues possible Never put >30% of capital on Tier 2/3 exchanges FTX taught us this lesson 📊

• 
  wojak (@Maxime_K17) reported 32 minutes ago

  @binance Chart is upside down brah

• 
  Allium (@AlliumLabs) reported 32 minutes ago

  Binance lost access to EU users under MiCA on July 1. Many expected the money to flee to other centralized exchanges. Allium onchain data shows most of it did not. Here's where Binance's outflows actually went 🧵

• 
  HELiN (@turkish_babby) reported 34 minutes ago

  Why are stablecoins getting so much attention? Because they solve one of crypto’s biggest everyday problems: volatility. Most cryptocurrencies can move sharply in a short period of time. Stablecoins are different. They are designed to track the value of another asset, usually a fiat currency such as the US dollar, so their price is generally intended to stay more consistent. That makes them useful for more than simply holding crypto. People use stablecoins to move funds between exchanges, send money across borders, make supported digital payments, access DeFi platforms, and step away from market volatility without immediately converting everything back into a bank account. For traders, stablecoins can act as a temporary place to hold funds between positions. For freelancers and businesses, they may offer another way to receive international payments. For everyday users, they can make transferring digital value faster and more convenient, especially when traditional banking options are limited or slow. Stablecoins are also becoming an important connection between traditional money and blockchain technology. They bring familiar currency values into a digital environment where funds can move globally and operate around the clock. But the word “stable” can be misleading. Stablecoins are designed to maintain a steady value, but that does not mean they are completely risk-free. They can lose their peg, face liquidity problems, come under regulatory pressure, or depend on reserves that may not be as transparent as users expect. Before using one, it is worth asking: Who issues it? What supports its value? Are the reserves regularly verified? Can it be redeemed easily? What rules apply in your region? Stablecoins are being discussed because they make crypto more practical. They are not only tools for traders; they are becoming part of a much wider conversation around global payments, digital finance, and how money may move in the future. Their real value is not hype. It is utility. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  𝙈𝙧 𝘽𝙪𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙝 🚀 (@mr_bullishh) reported 34 minutes ago

  @ReazWeb3 @binance Binance must need to fix this ASAP

• 
  Lordsgood (@lordsgood) reported 35 minutes ago

  VIZO JUST LANDED WHERE THE ATTENTION ALREADY IS Been saying VIZO's approach to prediction markets was built for real scale, not just a niche audience. Binance Wallet integration is exactly the kind of proof that backs that up Now live as one of the newly integrated dApps within the Pharos ecosystem on Binance Wallet. That's not a small distribution win, that's direct access to one of the biggest wallet user bases in crypto Discovery friction just dropped significantly. Users don't need to go find VIZO anymore, it's sitting right there inside a wallet millions already use This is what happens when a product actually delivers instead of just promising to. The integrations start finding you Big moment for @VizoExchange, @BinanceWallet, and @pharos_network Explore VIZO through Binance Wallet today

• 
  Devil (@Devilll535) reported 37 minutes ago

  @GS25Erz @DexeNetwork @binance 1.72$ last block of liquidity clusters as off now. But, when things go down... More clusters gonna form down there. Won't be surprised if it goes to 0.

• 
  Farid Ullah (@Faridpk12) reported 39 minutes ago

  The Crypto Paradox: Why One Bad Project Can Undermine an Entire Industry🚒 In our circles, it is common to hear people dismiss cryptocurrencies outright as a “scam” or “fraud.” They see the extreme volatility, sudden collapses, and stories of rug pulls, and conclude that the entire space is nothing more than a sophisticated gambling scheme designed to enrich a few at the expense of many. For those of us who deeply understand blockchain technology, decentralization, and the revolutionary potential of crypto, this blanket rejection is frustrating. We spend time explaining the fundamentals: how Bitcoin introduced a trustless monetary system, how Ethereum enabled programmable money and smart contracts, and how blockchain can bring transparency, financial inclusion, and ownership back to individuals. Yet, incidents like the recent DEXE crash make our explanations significantly harder. DEXE, which had climbed steadily for months and reached an all-time high near $49, collapsed dramatically in a single day, dropping over 85-90% in value. What took months — even years — of building momentum, hype, and market confidence was erased in a matter of hours. Whether caused by large team-linked wallet dumps, poor tokenomics, excessive leverage, or alleged insider selling, the result remains the same: thousands of retail investors suffered massive losses, and public trust in the broader crypto market took another hit. This is the real problem. Such events are not just isolated failures — they represent a hybrid selling model (aggressive hype + coordinated or opportunistic dumping) that repeatedly damages the reputation of the entire industry. When a token can 20x or 30x in a short period and then lose nearly everything overnight, it creates a massive contradiction. On one hand, we preach long-term technological innovation, adoption, and utility. On the other hand, the price action looks exactly like a classic pump-and-dump scheme. This contradiction is one of the biggest obstacles to mainstream crypto adoption. Ordinary people, regulators, and traditional financial institutions look at these violent swings and ask legitimate questions: How can something be a “serious technology” if its price can be manipulated or destroyed so easily? Why should we trust an asset class where value can evaporate faster than it was created? Where is the accountability when teams or large holders cash out at the peak while retail investors hold the bags? The unfortunate truth is that while the underlying technology of blockchain is powerful and transformative, the speculative nature of many token launches, combined with weak regulation and misaligned incentives, allows bad actors and reckless projects to thrive. These incidents don’t just hurt investors in that particular token — they poison the well for the entire ecosystem. The Way Forward If cryptocurrency is to achieve widespread adoption and realize its true potential, the industry must address this issue seriously. Stronger transparency requirements around team token allocations, vesting schedules, and wallet movements are essential. Better education for retail investors, stricter listing standards on major exchanges, and community-driven accountability can all help reduce these destructive events. We cannot deny that bad projects and predatory behavior exist in crypto — just as they exist in traditional finance, real estate, and every other market. However, the decentralized and permissionless nature of blockchain makes these failures more visible and emotionally painful. The future of crypto depends not only on technological advancement but also on building credibility and trust. Until the space matures enough to effectively discourage or prevent these hybrid hype-and-dump cycles, convincing our skeptical friends and family that “this time is different” will remain an uphill battle @binance @cz_binance @DexeNetwork

• 
  Aftabahmad (@Aftabahmad6252) reported 40 minutes ago

  @JoeParys Joe jui jhooty my dear brother please help me trade for free binance

• 
  Lisa manobal (@lisaManobal23) reported 44 minutes ago

  Most people talk about tokenization like it's a single idea. It's really not, it's more of a shift in how ownership itself gets handled. I'd break it down this way. ⬢ Start with what stays the same: a commodity, a bond, a share, none of that changes just because it gets tokenized. The underlying asset is still exactly what it was. ⬢ What actually changes is the record. Instead of ownership sitting in a traditional ledger somewhere, it's represented on a blockchain, which opens up how it can be transferred, split, or accessed. ⬢ That's where fractional access comes in. Something that used to require a large minimum buy-in could, in theory, become available in smaller pieces, depending entirely on how the product is structured. ⬢ None of this removes risk though. Market risk, issuer risk, liquidity risk, regulatory risk, they're all still there, tokenization just changes the format, not the fundamentals. ⬢ And access varies a lot by region. Binance has introduced certain tokenized products, like bStocks, in select markets, so I'd always check official sources before assuming something's available to you. If I had to sum up why this space gets attention, it's not the blockchain part that's interesting to me. It's that ownership itself is slowly becoming more flexible, while what it represents stays exactly as real as it always was. Always DYOR #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Rei Researcher (@Satoureireal) reported 44 minutes ago

  Stablecoin Deposits on Binance Are Becoming More Active, but Not Truly Explosive Yet Data from CryptoQuant shows that the number of ERC20 stablecoin deposit transactions into Binance is currently around 12K transactions, after several strong spikes appeared in July. This shows that stablecoin activity moving onto Binance is still being maintained, reflecting that some liquidity is returning to the exchange to prepare for trading or wait for buying opportunities. However, the current level has cooled down compared to the previous large spikes, so it is still too early to say that stablecoin inflows are clearly exploding again.

• 
  Poly Diction (@giddings_nga) reported 45 minutes ago

  the day i stopped handing over full keys was the day liquidations lost their grip on me. just trade-only api access now, no withdrawals possible. the partial sell trigger kicks in automatically and keeps my binance futures position alive instead of going to zero

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 49 minutes ago

  BTC under $64K is not automatically a breakdown with a macro villain attached. Cointelegraph reported Bitcoin fell under $64K as surging US bond yields boosted Fed rate-hike odds, with dips under $64,000 and Binance bid liquidity described as reemerging. Fine. That is a sourced narrative. But in this bundle, the yield-pressure claim comes from single-authoritative Cointelegraph reporting only. No verified US yield data in bundle. No verified order-book data beyond Cointelegraph description. So the clean read is not “yields caused BTC weakness,” and definitely not “Binance saved it.” CT loves a cape. The data here does not hand one out. The daily close data only says BTC/USDT last closed at 63880.64 USDT. The 20-day SMA is 64234.8. The 50-day SMA is 63157.15. Price sits between them, below the short SMA, above the longer one. That is sideways compression, not a confirmed bear trend. Nearest support is 63100 USDT. Nearest resistance is 66956.15 USDT. BTC is also only 24% up its 90-session range, with the range low at 57800.19 and high at 82850. So yes, the tape is closer to the downside tripwire than the upside breakout level. Bears have a level to prove. They have not proven it yet. Volume is falling, recent third of the window versus prior third. That weakens the case for treating the sub-$64K move as a high-conviction directional break from current evidence alone. Falling volume could mean the sub-$64K move needs confirmation before treating it as a durable breakdown. If this continues, a close below 63100 USDT could suggest the sideways regime is losing support. A reclaim of 64234.8 USDT may keep BTC range-bound rather than confirm downside continuation. Confirmation cuts both ways. Downside pressure gets cleaner only if 63100 USDT fails on daily close data. Range repair improves if BTC/USDT remains above 63100 USDT while reclaiming the 20-day SMA. Upside invalidates the local squeeze if BTC/USDT breaks above 66956.15 USDT. Also valid: fresh data revises sideways regime or support/resistance levels. Until then, the tape says compression below the 20-day SMA near support, not macro fan fiction with a liquidation soundtrack.

• 
  Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported 53 minutes ago

  $AKE — Can we see 0.003? 👀📊 Price broke out clean from the accumulation zone, held the rising support trendline through every retest, and pushed through the breakout zone with strength. Currently at $0.0027890, up +11.07% today, now retesting the resistance zone from above. If this reclaim holds, structure opens up toward 0.0030 — a level that's well within reach if buyers keep defending this zone. Rising support still fully intact underneath. Every dip since the breakout has been bought. Still needs confirmation on a clean break above resistance. A rejection back below the breakout zone would weaken this setup. DYOR. NFA. $AKE #Binance #crypto

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 54 minutes ago

  JST is one to keep on the watchlist, not chase here — the whole setup unlocks on a clean 4-hour close back above $0.1013 with real volume behind it. Zoom out and the bigger picture is actually fine. On the daily chart JST is still trending up and sitting comfortably above its longer-term average price, with a floor near $0.0957 and a ceiling near $0.1046. That's a healthy structure. The issue is what's happening much closer to current price. On the 4-hour chart, price is pinned right underneath a stubborn ceiling around $0.1012 — only about half a percent overhead — while the nearest support sits nearly three times further below. That's a lopsided risk: very little room to gain if it breaks up, a lot of room to give back if it doesn't. And underneath the sideways grind, buying pressure on both the 4-hour and 1-hour charts is quietly fading. When price stalls under resistance while momentum leaks out, it usually means the bid is tiring, not loading up. The broader tape isn't helping either. Bitcoin is soft, the dollar is firming up, and capital is rotating out of smaller coins and back into BTC. Fighting a local ceiling into that kind of backdrop is a low-percentage move, and a short-term bounce on the 15-minute chart doesn't change any of it. The level to watch is clear: a decisive 4-hour close back above $0.1013, with volume actually showing up, would break that ceiling and put JST firmly back in play. Until then, it's a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $JST · Available on Binance

• 
  Black Zalophous (@BlackZalophous) reported 54 minutes ago

  $vanry fully retraced it shitpump. It means binance wont support migration and all vanry tokens will be worthless and delisted @Vanarchain

• 
  Cryptocalm.ltc (@KiwiTuckerNE) reported 58 minutes ago

  Why is @BitMEX shutting down? Their token BMEX (similar to Binance BNB) was used as a loyalty token. This lost value as newer perpetual markets opened and KYC requirements forced users away. Their system slowly collapsed. Centralized Exchanges may find themselves losing to…

• 
  Mr.Chongky (@Chongkydudut) reported 59 minutes ago

  @AkaBull_ @binance @BinanceAcademy stablecoins help move crypto money without needing banks

• 
  The Quant (@TheQuantHQ) reported 59 minutes ago

  @AshCrypto The lead means nothing if offshore exchanges still eat 70% of the volume. I track where size actually moves. Binance and OKX still clearing the real flow while US platforms fight over retail scraps and compliance theatre. The Clarity Act does not fix the liquidity problem, it just makes the regulated corner slightly less painful to operate in.