Binance status: access issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Binance. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.
- Transactions (44%)
- Website (33%)
- Mobile App (11%)
- Login (11%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Login | 13 days ago |
|
|
Website | 19 days ago |
|
|
Website | 20 days ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 29 days ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transactions | 2 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Binance Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported$DEXE's shorts finally got the dump they wanted, 25% off the highs, and now they're the ones running. OI just flipped from piling in to draining, $1.7M of size walked out in the last hour alone. trigger was reportedly team wallets landing on Binance and getting sold, everything since is liquidation cascade. whoever's still in this trade is paying ~$724K a day to hold a $17.2M book while price just sits mid-range, well off today's low. crowd's still 61% long into a coin down 66% since we first flagged it three chapters ago. that's not a small bet to be wrong on. NFA 👀
-
Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reportedBTC sentiment is reported near capitulation. BTC/USDT is also up 1.8% over 7 daily closes. Awkward little combo. The sentiment claim is single-source via CryptoBriefing’s report of Coinbase’s Q2 2026 report. No underlying sentiment index value provided. No direct Coinbase report excerpt provided in the bundle. So no, this does not prove a Bitcoin bottom. CT can put the confetti cannon down. What is verified: BTC/USDT last closed at 65,919.68 USDT on Binance daily data, and the pair is modestly positive across the last 7 daily closes. Price action only. The price data does not prove sentiment. Cleaner framing: divergence, not capitulation, not recovery. Mechanism: if pessimistic sentiment stays heavy while spot refuses to confirm downside, positioning can get awkward. Bears may be leaning on a sentiment read that price is not validating yet. Bulls, meanwhile, still need continued resilience rather than vibes with a ticker. If this continues, BTC may form a sentiment-price divergence where bearish sentiment lags stabilizing price action. Bitcoin is worth watching for confirmation either way: renewed short-term price weakness would validate the risk side; continued resilience against near-capitulation sentiment would make the bearish framing look stale. Invalidation is clean: verified sentiment data no longer near capitulation, BTC/USDT price action turns sharply negative over comparable short-term closes, or Coinbase report context is corrected or contradicted by later verified reporting.
-
robo (@roboPBOC) reportedjust bought some $vladhood obviously i don’t support the fact that vlad got hacked, but the reality is the ca was posted on his account and that alone creates a narrative already seeing people cto it, so i decided to position myself in case it ends up pulling something similar to what happened with binance (4) whether vlad says anything bullish or not, i think there’s a good chance this goes higher purely because of the attention and speculation high risk, but worth a shot imo
-
Tradeologist-01 (@TradewithAryan) reportedunfortunately no cuz this happened last year and i deleted that account after that and made a new one lemme check my Gallery maybe there i find some ss can you help in that regard ? i texted binance support that time they said he transferred money to 2 more wallets we can't do anything
-
Cryptothreads.io (@CryptoThreadsX) reportedA LEGEND FALLS: BITMEX SHUTS DOWN AFTER 11 YEARS - The exchange that invented the perpetual contract - the thing every crypto exchange still runs on - is shutting down September 23, 2026. - New sign-ups: locked. Starting Aug 26, you can only close positions, not open new ones. Anything left open by closing day gets force-liquidated. - Before this, the entire leadership team walked out, sale rumors started swirling, and market share had already quietly bled out to Binance, Bybit, OKX, Hyperliquid. - 11 years through bull runs, bear markets, legal scandals... and it still didn't make it. Still got funds on @BitMEX ? Tag someone who needs to see this 👇
-
Rehman Awan (@rehman6560600) reported@Danny_Crypton i wonder when binance will shut down
-
Eizab05 (@eizab05) reportedTokenized real-world assets (RWAs) could become the gateway investment for the next billion users, allowing fractional ownership of bonds, real estate, and treasuries with global access. #Binance
-
Zhao Lusi (@zhao_lusi1) reportedI get asked pretty often how to actually start on @binance , and my answer is usually shorter than people expect. Skip the shortcuts. Every fast way in requires steps. You need Identity Verification before anything works, full stop. I've seen people try to find workarounds for this and it just wastes time, since it's the one thing that's actually mandatory. What I disagree with is the advice to just dive in after that. I'd rather someone put in a small amount, look around, click through the app, and get a feel for where things are before money that matters is involved. The one feature I genuinely think is underrated for beginners is Binance Convert. Nobody needs to learn candlesticks on day one. Convert lets you move between supported assets without touching a trading screen at all, and that alone removes most of the early intimidation. I'll be honest, most of what people struggle with isn't the platform, it's patience. Spot Trading and Simple Earn aren't going anywhere. Binance Academy has been there the whole time too. There's no version of this where waiting a week to learn the basics costs you anything real. If someone asked me for the one-line version, it'd be this: verify properly, start small, use Convert before anything else, and read before you trade. Digital asset prices can go up or down. Always do your own research before making financial decisions. Educational only, not financial advice. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance
-
VIKING (@badviking1995) reportedEveryone is talking about BitMEX shutting down but no one is talking about WHY? BitMEX created the 100x perpetual swaps, survived 11 years and was never hacked. So WHY shutdown? - Binance, Bybit and Hyperliquid took over the market - Liquidity is concentrating on fewer, bigger exchanges - Running a mid sized derivatives exchange is no longer worth it I repeat: It was not a hack, it was not a collapse. It was industry consolidation
-
Zaro (@Zero_Arb) reportedExchange counterparty risk assessment: Before deploying capital, check: Tier 1 (lowest risk): • Binance, Coinbase, Kraken • High liquidity, regulated, proven track record Tier 2 (medium risk): • Bybit, OKX, Bitget • Good liquidity, less regulation Tier 3 (higher risk): • Smaller exchanges • Lower liquidity, withdrawal issues possible Never put >30% of capital on Tier 2/3 exchanges FTX taught us this lesson 📊
-
💥BaiBai💥 (@twkay1) reported@cz_binance "Always support Binance and CZ."
-
Don't follow me (@DontfollowyouX) reportedThe exchange @BitMEX is shutting down. 11 years. Zero hacks in its entire history. The exchange that literally invented the 100x leverage perpetual swap the single most traded product in all of crypto. Closing September 23, 2026. The official reason: "strategic review of the business and the broader crypto industry." Meanwhile CEX perp volume dropped 10% last quarter while Hyperliquid climbed to #2 in open interest, right behind Binance. Read between the lines. The market is telling you where liquidity is actually moving.
-
Chazer | X (@ChazerX01) reported@binance Pre-IPO markets are notoriously broken that is illiquid, opaque, and manipulated. Simple perpetual swaps don't cut it. Binance needs to dominate this space by deploying Dynamic Synthetic Vaults (DSV) for Pre-IPO exposure.
-
Appolati İtalyan Zengin (@polay51) reportedScam (Binance ) **** $DEXE next 0.1
-
toni (@tonitrades_) reported@binance What's actually backing these tokens if Binance's servers ever go down?
-
Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reportedcrypto liquidity is concentrating while leverage cools. TokenInsight’s Q2 exchange report puts total trading volume at 16.5t, down 8% QoQ. But the mix changed: spot rebounded from 3.3t to 4.5t while derivatives fell from 14.6t to 12.0t. Average futures open interest dropped to 80b, suggesting activity stabilized without a full return of leverage. The venue layer is getting tighter. Binance’s total share rose to 35.34%, while the top four derivatives venues controlled more than 72% of that market. At the same time, TradFi perpetuals grew from 52b in January to 268b in June, with equity perps becoming the main growth driver. That is the structural signal: exchanges are defending liquidity by adding stocks, commodities and pre-IPO exposure around existing crypto rails. Binance held roughly 60% of TradFi perps volume in Q2, so this is not yet a fragmented new market. The thesis breaks if TradFi-perps volume stalls or spot flows fail to keep recovering.
-
Alastar (@AlastarTrades) reported$BANK update 24 hours since my last post. Price has moved higher, and exchange flows have not slowed down. The picture is one-directional: Binance is the main source. - Net outflow from Binance: ~4M BANK (~$750K), spread across Gate, Bitget, MEXC and KuCoin - Bitget received ~2.4M BANK net and moved 9.6M BANK (~$1.74M) into cold storage in five batches - Gate pulled 4.3M BANK (~$1M) out of cold storage back to its hot wallet, which usually points to elevated withdrawal demand - ~670K BANK entered Binance through ChangeNOW from unlabeled wallets. Someone prefers not to deposit directly. So tokens are leaving Binance and getting distributed across smaller venues, while Bitget keeps sweeping its inflows into cold storage. This looks more like liquidity dispersion than exchange dumping. I'll post an update if the behavior changes. These updates go out in my Telegram before X(link below) #bank #bankusdt
-
moruk (@serdalGkde73828) reported@cz_binance If only Binance would shut down so we could be done with the crypto business; that way, they wouldn't be able to cause too much damage.
-
Kaff 📊 (@Kaffchad) reported@Lumen0x The support of USD1 by major exchanges like Binance is crucial for its widespread adoption
-
Gerald Snyder (@hackerspro_me) reported@frenchie_rr @CryptoHayes That's what they say when ever they want to pull great exchanges down. Binance and others have had their fair share
-
skinny (@skinnydefi) reported𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗧𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗜𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗦𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆. 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗢𝗻𝗲. In January 2019, BitTorrent became the flagship project of a new era for Binance Launchpad. At the time, the conversation was largely about bringing one of the internet’s most recognized peer-to-peer networks into the blockchain economy. Fast-forward to July 2026. BitTorrent is participating as a Special Partner for #Binance9YA, but the ecosystem itself is now looking at a very different technology cycle. The world has moved from blockchain expansion to an era increasingly defined by AI, compute, and intelligent infrastructure. And BitTorrent is evolving with it. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝗕𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘂𝘁𝗲 BitTorrent’s original breakthrough came from changing how resources were coordinated. Instead of asking one server to carry the entire burden of data distribution, participants collectively contributed to the network. BTTInferGrid applies a similar decentralized philosophy to AI inference. AI developers create demand for inference. GPU providers contribute compute resources. The network coordinates workloads between them. More demand can create greater miner revenue. Greater revenue can attract additional GPU supply. More supply can improve cost and performance. And better service can attract more users. Demand → Revenue → Supply → Better Service → Growth. This is more than launching an AI product. It is an attempt to create a self-reinforcing compute economy. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗨𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗔𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗜𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 A network can create activity without necessarily creating long-term alignment around its native asset. This is where BitTorrent’s structured $BTT buyback and burn framework becomes important. Under the announced long-term program, 100% of revenue generated from BitTorrent’s decentralized services is allocated to quarterly BTT buybacks, with purchased tokens permanently burned. That creates a direct relationship worth studying: Infrastructure usage generates revenue. Revenue funds buybacks. Buybacks remove BTT from circulation through burns. The significance is not simply “token burning.” It is the attempt to connect the economics of the token more closely to the usage of the infrastructure around it. 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗟𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗽𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗔𝗜 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 2019 introduced $BTT to a new generation of crypto users. 2026 is beginning to ask a much bigger question: Can BitTorrent’s experience coordinating distributed networks become useful in the AI compute economy? BTTInferGrid is the infrastructure thesis. The buyback and burn framework is the economic alignment layer. And BitTorrent’s long history of peer-to-peer systems provides the broader context. Seven years after its Binance Launchpad debut, the most interesting thing about BitTorrent isn’t that the project is still here. It’s that the problem it wants to solve has become much bigger. From distributing files to coordinating AI inference. The resource has changed. The principle of distributed infrastructure remains. @BitTorrent @justinsuntron #TRONEcoStar
-
Fav_Truffle (@Fav_Truffle) reportedOh man, I spent so many sleepless nights on BitMEX, and I still sometimes miss the thrill of making or getting liquidated for a couple of BTC on 100x leverage in under a minute. Back then, we didn't even think it was possible for Binance to overtake BitMEX. When Binance first launched perps, they literally copy-pasted BitMEX word for word, and @cz_binance even publicly apologized for it lol. Now, even BitMEX is winding down. Long live on-chain!
-
Paul White Gold Eagle (@PaulGoldEagle) reportedBitMEX is shutting down permanently. The exchange officially announced on July 23, 2026, that it will cease all operations on September 23, 2026, at 04:00 UTC. Its parent company, HDR Global Trading Limited, decided to sunset the platform following a comprehensive strategic review of the business and the shifting competitive landscape of the crypto industry. Key Timelines for Users If you have an active account or open trades on BitMEX, you must follow their official phased wind-down schedule: Immediate Effect: New user account registrations are completely halted. All staked BMEX tokens have been unstaked and returned to users to facilitate withdrawal. August 26, 2026 (04:00 UTC): Risk limits kick in. Users will be blocked from opening any new positions and will only be permitted to reduce or close existing ones. September 23, 2026 (04:00 UTC): The official "Closure Time". Any remaining open positions will be forcibly closed and liquidated by the exchange. [1, 2] Post-Closure: While users will still be able to log in to view histories and withdraw funds, any accounts left with unwithdrawn assets will be penalized with a monthly administrative maintenance fee ($50 equivalent or 1% per annum, whichever is higher). Why the Exchange is Closing While the BitMEX Official Blog Announcement frames the decision as a strategic exit after an 11-year run, industry analysts highlight several compounding factors that led to the platform's downfall: Loss of Market Share: BitMEX famously pioneered the 100x leverage perpetual swap contract in 2014, commanding over 50% of the digital derivatives market at its peak. However, its market share recently collapsed to less than 0.01% due to intense competition from major centralized platforms like Binance and emerging decentralized perpetual networks like Hyperliquid. Legal and Regulatory Fallout: The exchange never fully recovered from years of legal battles. Its co-founders (including Arthur Hayes) pleaded guilty to Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering violations in 2022, and the company itself pleaded guilty in 2024, amassing over $230 million in combined fines and penalties. Executive Exodus: The shutdown comes just three weeks after the platform's chief executive officer (CEO), chief financial officer (CFO), and head of growth all abruptly departed the firm. The company has explicitly reassured users that all assets remain entirely safe, fully backed, and under customer control during this transition. However, they advise everyone to remain highly vigilant against phishing emails or fake support scams promising "expedited" or priority withdrawals during the wind-down period.
-
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ (@shanaka86) reportedAn attacker created 4.5 million units of a dollar-pegged stablecoin out of a zero address, and the entire attack netted him roughly $912,000. Those 4.5 million tokens were each supposed to be worth a dollar. Selling them destroyed the exact price that made them worth stealing. Balance Coin now trades at 0.001157 dollars, down more than 99%. SlowMist put the loss near 912,000 dollars and PeckShield near 915,000. Balance Coin was issued by Balance Protocol and governed by 42DAO on BNB Chain, and it marketed itself as over-collateralized, backed primarily by Bitcoin Cash according to its own whitepaper. Users locked collateral and minted BLC against it. If collateral value fell too far, vaults liquidated automatically. That automation became the weapon. 42DAO has published nothing, so every technical account of this comes from outside security firms. According to SlowMist, the attacker pushed an abnormally low Binance-pegged Bitcoin price into the protocol's median oracle through its own poke and bark functions. Nothing checked it. Vaults never eligible for liquidation instantly appeared underwater, and the attacker took the collateral. The bad debt and newly minted BLC were dumped into PancakeSwap for USDT, and the peg was finished. SlowMist listed what was missing and it reads like a checklist nobody completed. No price deviation checks. No maximum drawdown limits. No minimum price protection. No liquidation delay. TenArmor identified two transactions, the second roughly two hours later, minting another 5,900 tokens and draining more liquidity. The architecture is the damning part. This was a MakerDAO fork built on Maker's own contract names. Maker solved this exact attack years ago with an oracle security module that holds any new price for a delay before it can act, so an impossible number can be caught and frozen before it touches collateral. The fork copied the engine and left out the brake. The project had publicized a CertiK audit of its BLC minting contract. The mint still produced millions of unbacked tokens, because the failure was never inside the contract that was audited. It was in the number that contract was handed. An audited component is not an audited system. Nothing in the code failed. It ran its safety check. Debt must stay below collateral value. That equation is correct and it returned true. It evaluated a real rule against a fake number. The contract was never tricked into skipping its rules. It obeyed them perfectly inside a world that did not exist. That reframes what collateral means. The asset never secured this system. The price feed did. A protocol cannot act on your reserves. It acts on what it has been told your reserves are worth. You can be honestly, fully, verifiably overcollateralized and still lose everything, because what executes is not the truth. It is the number the code was handed. So the oracle is not a data feed sitting beside the collateral. The oracle is part of the collateral. So is the monitoring. So is whoever holds emergency authority. Strip those out and the deposit ratio on the front page is decoration. This is the warning for everything being tokenized now. Tokenized Treasuries, digital government bonds, real-world asset funds and every collateralized stablecoin need something to tell the chain what things are worth. Tokenization does not remove the middleman. It converts whoever supplies the information into whoever controls the asset. In old finance a wrong number starts a reconciliation that takes days. Here it liquidates the vault, mints the liability, sells both and settles with finality before anyone reads the alert. A blockchain can prove a rule executed. It cannot prove the world that rule assumed was real.
-
C A Z R O (@CazroWeb3) reported- @binance started as a crypto exchange. Nine years later, I don’t think that’s the same way to describe it anymore. DefiLlama’s latest research was that one direction in my opinion Tokenized RWAs grew from $5.5B to $25B by mid-2026, while Binance’s BTC perpetual liquidity reached $536M within 1% of the mid-price. Moving beyond Crypto vs TradFi Stocks, gold, tokenized assets, and crypto are increasingly becoming part of the same financial experience. Maybe the future is having access to all the markets from one place.
-
Cryptocalm.ltc (@KiwiTuckerNE) reportedWhy is @BitMEX shutting down? Their token BMEX (similar to Binance BNB) was used as a loyalty token. This lost value as newer perpetual markets opened and KYC requirements forced users away. Their system slowly collapsed. Centralized Exchanges may find themselves losing to…
-
DiscoverLitecoin📲🌏 (@DiscoverLite) reported@TheBlockCo Wtf? How can a neutral news source and data service have a paid partnership with Binance and their data?
-
Crypto Man MAB (@MabMan338) reported@binance A year ago buying Tesla on a crypto exchange sounded made up. Now it's a real product. Stocks, bStocks, Pre IPO Perps. Binance built a bridge nobody expected. So what's the next chapter? Stop selling single stocks. Sell a thesis instead. Most people don't want to pick one company, they want to bet on an idea, like AI or semiconductors. A basket of tokenized names does that better than any single ticker. Let pre IPO trades grow up. Right now they're a bet on a rumor. When the company actually lists, that position should convert smoothly into the real thing instead of just closing out and leaving people to chase the listing. One account, one risk pool. Let a stock position and a crypto position share the same margin. No traditional broker can do this. Almost nobody in crypto has either. Whoever gets there first wins a lot of loyalty. Bring yield thinking to equities. Crypto users already understand funding rates and staking rewards. Covered calls and cash secured puts on tokenized stocks speak that same language, just pointed at real companies. Give people somewhere boring to sit. Every bull run cools off eventually. Tokenized treasuries and bonds give users a reason to stay active instead of pulling everything into cash and logging off. Protect the downside on the riskiest trade. Pre IPO exposure is exciting and a little scary. A version with capped losses and some upside left in would bring in people who like the idea but not the risk. Be transparent about what people actually own. What round is this tracking. What's it worth right now. How much could it get diluted. Answering that clearly is the difference between trading and guessing. Go where regular brokers don't. Not everyone can easily buy their own home market's biggest companies. Tokenized access to markets outside the US fills a real gap. None of this needs a brand new idea. It just needs Binance to keep building like any asset really can live on one platform, until that stops feeling new and starts feeling obvious.
-
BlockFlow (@BlockFlow_News) reportedA Chinese trader made over $600K without betting on whether $SKHY would go up or down 🚀 He simply arbitraged the price and funding gaps across Korean stocks, crypto perps and ETFs. Here are the five trades: 1. Cross-platform arbitrage between Binance and Hyperliquid, +$15K Binance traded about $30 higher. He longed on Hyperliquid, shorted on Binance and waited for the spread to close. 2. Hedging Korean spot against the crypto perp, +$120K Crypto traders pushed the perp premium above $40. He bought SK Hynix spot through Interactive Brokers and shorted the overpriced perp, earning both convergence and funding. 3. Moving the position between platforms, +$170K Binance, OKX and Hyperliquid use different index calculations, settlement schedules and funding rules. He closed the Binance short and reopened the same position on OKX, where the funding was paying more. 4. Exploit Binance’s funding cap, +$150K After the Korean cash market fell sharply, retail traders bought the dip through crypto perps, causing the Binance-Hyperliquid spread to widen to around $40. Binance caps its funding rate, which means the contract premium cannot be pushed back down by funding in time. He built a position of roughly $10 million, shorting Binance and going long on Hyperliquid at an average spread of around $25. He was betting that either Binance would change its funding rules or the two prices would eventually converge. 5. Buy the mispriced Hong Kong 2x ETF, short the perp: +$200K The Korean market was closed on last Friday while Hong Kong remained open. The SK Hynix-linked 2x ETF, 07709, fell more than crypto perp. He bought the discounted ETF and shorted the crypto perp, then waited for the gap to close when the Korean market reopened. The alpha was finding where the same asset was priced differently. That’s where the money was made.
-
CoinGirl (@btcMoongirl) reported@23Mangcha @binance Binance continuing to support $TALE is giving some users more reasons to question its listing and oversight standards.