1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Binance
Binance

Binance status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Binance is a Chinese digital asset exchange currently sitting in the top 20 exchanges by volume. The exchange has particularly strong volume in pairs like NEO/BTC, GAS/BTC, ETH/BTC, and BNB/BTC.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Binance. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

  • 40% Website (40%)
  • 20% Transactions (20%)
  • 20% Mobile App (20%)
  • 20% Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Porto Alegre Transactions 29 days ago
Angers Login 2 months ago
Itu Website 2 months ago
Seattle Website 2 months ago
Nice Mobile App 2 months ago
Beaucaire Transactions 3 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • SatoshiMaverick
    Yes (@SatoshiMaverick) reported

    @LeonidasNFT @binance @cz_binance because we don't you, a nobody to get rich. If you want to have it listed, pay you broke piece of garbage

  • _Ayoo_xx
    Ayoo (@_Ayoo_xx) reported

    @Tim76909994 @binance Them never send me any feedback Tho they said 2 working days tho

  • Primalking38
    Megalodon🦈 (@Primalking38) reported

    @Abrlien @cz_binance @heyibinance The gap is crazy wtf. Binance on top 🦅🦅

  • bullseyesky5
    bullseyesky (@bullseyesky5) reported

    @bramk because it hasn’t started yet, wait till s&p tops & biggest bubble since dot com collapses. Wait till CZ binance & Michael seller go under. Don’t worry tho after that maybe in 4 years btc can go back up 20% above previous ath, while stocks 3x that, before btc go down 70% again

  • vbkotecha
    Vivek Kotecha (@vbkotecha) reported

    @aixbt_agent Thanks bro. A few more questions. You didn’t address 31Third, which already markets an onchain policy engine for AI agents: mandate/risk/compliance enforcement, multiple liquidity sources, Gnosis Safe execution and tokenized-asset support. How close is 31Third to what I’m proposing? Is the remaining gap specifically cross-venue leveraged/perp execution across Hyperliquid, Binance and Solana, with funding-aware routing, liquidation controls and continuous position enforcement? Also, how should I position and brand this? “Open router for agentic trading” “Policy-enforced execution layer” “Execution firewall for autonomous agents” Something else? And what should the actual go-to-market be? Who are my first 10 customers, where do I find them, and what exact outreach should I do? Should I join Hyperliquid/Solana/agent-builder Discords, partner with agent frameworks, run bounties or trading competitions, integrate with existing agents, or pay crypto KOLs? Please give me a specific 30-day GTM plan, including what to build, what demo to show, which communities to target, whether paid KOL promotion is worthwhile, and what metrics would prove real demand.

  • call_martin_x
    Call_me_martin (@call_martin_x) reported

    @realdogen @binance This is literally a money glitch for those who know

  • SolOwl_
    SolOwl (@SolOwl_) reported

    @solana Down almost 10% with 5 years of growing and speeding up. Sucks that $SOL value is determined by Binance and not fundamentals

  • Levaaa12
    Levaaa (@Levaaa12) reported

    @VeylinVey @binance @Gate The site shut down after i deposited 5$XDDD

  • ASVPXILLZ
    Tony (@ASVPXILLZ) reported

    @binance VIP 6 means even your weekend FOMO gets customer support...

  • jessica_coderx
    Jessica (@jessica_coderx) reported

    > be a 19-year-old Japanese student >build a trading bot with Claude Code in 2 days >use the iPad as a second monitor scan over 50 markets >sync BTC data from Binance >spot price errors before humans >first night: +$6,732 >started with $68 >total profit $750,000 Why do people keep trading manually? Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me @jessica_coderx (so i can DM you)

  • Crypto_guy000
    Signal.guy1 (@Crypto_guy000) reported

    Up in money down in nerves! Binance #SUPER/ #USDT Take-Profit target 1 ✅ Profit: 5.9259% 📈 Period: 4 Days 0 Hours 45 Minutes ⏰

  • SatoshiBTC_
    Vinícius (@SatoshiBTC_) reported

    @cz_binance Why does Binance block trading for a cryptocurrency without even making an official announcement? Especially coming from a platform that always claimed the community comes first—were those words just lies all along?

  • zeroxkyle
    Kyle (@zeroxkyle) reported

    anyways, for the liquid fund or altcoin players who are sidelined on-chain and waiting for the fabled alt season, here's my high conviction play firstly, imo there are two big risks w this thesis - first, the fact that on-chain has been very hot (hot ball of money is there) ; and secondly, that crypto x ai play has been left for dead due to many failures that have no pmf (only vvv works, and yes, this is a crypto x ai token) decentralized models - failed ; gpu renting - failed ; agents - failed; these risks cut both ways - one, you are pre-positioning for the "eventual puck" - but it may never come, and i may be stuck in this position that does nothing. But if it DOES come, then this is under-positioned and offer asymmetric upside and has good r/r. you can't have your cake and eat it two but the silver lining is - looking at VVV's success, we can conclude that market DOES have appetite, but for things that *work*. and alts HAVE just done a 2-4x since the bottom, and have just been chilling, so all things considered, odds are in your favour now for the thesis - n of 1 vertical, practically impossible to copy bc it's relationship driven biz in an atomized world (not bits) - right place, right time, jensen started gpu financing - was laughed at 1y+ ago but now it's starting to gain traction - also, in a vertical of crypto, like mentioned earlier, has been left for dead, yet has shown strong pmf in their metrics, and has the right tailwinds of bringing RWA yield on-chain, good tokenomics, in a secular high growth vertical (AI) - tvl up and to the right, closed sharon ai (leopold holding) + few other neos - overloaded with borrow demand, could write 10x loan TVL (3bn) in next three months. - top of funnel ~13bn in loan originations; constraint is not demand, but deposits ; aave + sky integration upcoming to provide material boost over the next few months - listed on every exchange - upbit, robinhood, binance, coinbase - expecting tokenomics update on value accrual in next few months. founder has shared public views on how he thinks about value accrual, expect this to be very positive. he takes lessons from HYPE / VVV ; - as an example, 65bn nasdaq listed tech company bought tokens three months ago - team just hired ex CRWV CFO as Senior Advisor - 80m MC with no unlocks till q1 27 - oh , and chart looks like this ******* send it

  • bearbullbunny_
    BearBullBunny (@bearbullbunny_) reported

    @LowCapB Long way from $2,389. $ETH is down 2.5% in the last 24h on Gate/Bybit/HL/Binance and it just took the biggest long liq on the tape, $11.99M on Binance alone. Busiest name we track right now.

  • josefbednar
    josé (@josefbednar) reported

    @cryptogoos Scroll down his own screenshot. He pulled the same 7.2K off Binance last week

  • miralordf
    miralord fartfuck (@miralordf) reported

    @EricCryptoman @binance open a little position in fomo so people can see it, might help a little maybe lolz

  • CryptoPatel
    Crypto Patel (@CryptoPatel) reported

    MARSCOIN ($MARSCOIN) Full Project Review: From Zero To Now. And What Comes Next. No hype. No shill. Just facts. Let's break it down family. 👇 What It Actually Is: MARSCOIN is a meme coin on BNB Chain with a twist. It is being called a "stock memecoin." Hold MARSCOIN and you earn SPCXB, a BNB Chain tokenized version of SpaceX stock (SPCX). So it mixes meme culture with tokenized equity exposure. That is a fresh 2026 narrative. This is NOT the original 2014 Marscoin. Different chain, different token, different everything. Verify the contract. The Origin (Zero): Brand new. Born from a meme. 📌 Launched around July 28, 2026 on the Flap platform 📌 Only about 5 weeks old 📌 Plays on the old 2021 moment when CZ replied to Elon with "Maybe call it MarsCoin" 📌 Community driven, team is anonymous How The Rewards Work: This is the whole selling point, so read carefully. 🔹 A transaction tax (reported around 2 to 3%) is used to buy SPCXB 🔹 That SPCXB is sent to MARSCOIN holders from a vault 🔹 Hold enough MARSCOIN and you receive SPCXB automatically Sounds great. But here is the honest part. This mechanism has NOT been fully verified through an independent smart contract audit. Treat the reward claims as unconfirmed until proven on-chain. Funding Rounds and Entry Prices: Different from the VC-backed launches we usually cover. 👇 🟢 Seed / VC Round: None 🟡 Presale / ICO: None 🔵 It launched as a fair-style meme on Flap There are no insider VC unlocks here. But there is also no VC backing, no audit-grade guarantees, and no team accountability. Cuts both ways. Tokenomics: 🔸 Total Supply: 1 Billion 🔸 Max Supply: 1 Billion 🔸 Circulating: 100% (fully circulating) 🔸 Market Cap and FDV: basically the same (~$67M) 🔸 CertiK score: 3.6 (mediocre, not strong) The Price Math (Insane Move): 🟠 All-Time Low: ~$0.003 (Jul 29) 🟠 All-Time High: ~$0.09783 (Sep 1) 🟠 Now: ~$0.07 🟠 Up roughly 3000% from the low. Around a 31x at the peak Let that sink in. A near 30x in about a month. This is one of the hottest momentum runs on BNB right now. It is also exactly the kind of chart that can reverse hard. The Catalysts (Now): Why it is pumping. 🔹 Binance Alpha listing (late July) 🔹 The tokenized stock and SpaceX narrative is red hot 🔹 Binance listed MARSCOIN perpetual futures with up to 20x leverage Perps with leverage can add fuel both ways. Up fast, down faster. The Risks (No Bias, Read This Twice): This is where I protect the family. ❗ Liquidity is very thin, around 1.25% of market cap. A big sell can crater the price ❗ The SPCXB reward mechanism is not independently verified yet ❗ Anonymous team. No accountability if something breaks ❗ Some viral claims (holder counts, gains, volumes) are contested vs real data ❗ Transaction tax means every trade has friction ❗ 20x perps can trigger violent liquidations ❗ Chasing a 30x is Like exit liquidity behavior Future Outlook: Let's be clear about what this is. A high-risk narrative meme, not a fundamentals play. The bull case: tokenized stocks stay hot, the SPCXB rewards prove real and keep paying, Binance perps bring volume, and the meme keeps attention. The bear case: thin liquidity unwinds, the reward mechanism disappoints or gets questioned, hype fades, and it round-trips a big chunk of this move. Watch liquidity. Watch if SPCXB rewards are actually verifiable on-chain. Watch the perps funding. Watch for the team to prove the mechanics. Fresh, viral, and a monster short-term chart. Clever tokenized-stock angle. But thin liquidity, an unverified reward engine, an anon team, and a mediocre audit score. This is a high-risk momentum gamble. Fun to watch, dangerous to marry. Never more than you can lose. And verify that reward mechanism yourself before trusting it. Not Financial Advice. ALWAYS DYOR. 🫡 @MarsCoin7777

  • moneymancalls
    investor 🔸 (@moneymancalls) reported

    @binance BROOO WTF

  • ctrlcrypto1
    CTRL + CRYPTO (@ctrlcrypto1) reported

    WHAT HAPPENED TO MEFAI’S SOLANA INVESTORS? Today is September 1, 2026. I am sharing this not to harm any project, but to bring public attention to the promises made about MEFAI’s Solana side, the statements that encouraged investors to buy, and the situation we have reached today. The screenshots I am sharing clearly show the statements made by the MEFAI CEO regarding Solana: “If the community supports us, we can go to Binance Alpha tomorrow.” The Binance side told us. “If you don’t have MEFAI, try the Solana side because the market cap is small.” “Trust me, SOL will be amazing like MEFAI on BSC.” “If you trust me, it will be amazing for both networks.” “Binance wants to see Solana volume.” “We will win the Binance game.” These were not rumors spread by ordinary community members. They were statements made by the person leading the project statements capable of directly influencing investors’ financial decisions. The names Binance and Binance Alpha were used, Solana’s low market capitalization was presented as an opportunity, and investors were explicitly told, “Trust me.” More importantly, another message in the screenshots describes an alleged token migration model under which users would send their tokens to a migration address and receive tokens from a new contract in return. The same message claims that, if the project continued developing, it could reach Binance Alpha. It also says this discussion should not be disclosed because those involved might be accused of being “insiders.” It must now be clarified whether these statements were actually communicated by Binance. If such discussions or offers took place, verifiable evidence must be provided. If they did not, MEFAI must explain why the names of Binance and Binance Alpha were used in a way that could create confidence and expectations among investors. The Solana side was promoted as a more advantageous alternative because of the tax structure on BNB Chain. Expectations were created that the two networks could eventually be connected, and repeated assurances were given that the Solana side would grow. People invested their money based on these statements, their trust in the project’s management, and the relationships publicly presented by the team. However, as of September 1, 2026, we are facing a situation completely opposite to those assurances and expectations. The closure of the Solana side was announced, investors were driven into panic, heavy selling pushed the project’s value close to zero, and many people suffered serious financial losses. This cannot simply be dismissed by saying, “The price went down.” Everyone understands that cryptocurrency investments involve risk. However, encouraging people to buy, using the names of major platforms to create expectations, telling investors to “trust me,” and then announcing a shutdown that pushes people into panic selling creates a serious responsibility that must be addressed. We therefore expect clear and documented answers from MEFAI’s management: Why was the Solana side closed? When was this decision made, and why were investors not given a transparent exit plan beforehand? What verifiable discussions were the statements “The Binance side told us” and “Binance wants to see Solana volume” based on? What concrete information or documentation supported the Binance Alpha expectations presented to investors? What happened to the promises concerning the future of the two networks and the proposed bridge or integration? Why has no clear compensation, reimbursement, or migration plan been announced for affected Solana investors? Will the Solana token movements of the team and all associated wallets be publicly disclosed? This statement is not based on words alone. Screenshots of the statements, investor testimonies, and on-chain transactions will be made available for public examination. Our purpose is not to insult anyone or make unsupported accusations.#MEFAI $MEFAI @BNBCHAIN @heyibinance @cz_binance

  • Lolatoye1
    MILOLA (@Lolatoye1) reported

    @_Ayoo_xx @binance Open support ticket on binance and you will be attended to

  • CryptrixLabs
    Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported

    SOL is pressing right into a ceiling that's already turned it away four times — until it clears $103 on a 4-hour close with Bitcoin turning back up, this one stays on the watchlist, not in play. Zoom out and the setup is lopsided. Sellers keep defending the $102.7–$102.9 zone across every timeframe from the daily down to the 15-minute — SOL has less than 1.5% of headroom before it hits that wall again, while the nearest real floor sits more than 25% lower near $75. That's a lot more room to fail than to work with, and chasing into a ceiling that's held four times is how good setups turn into bad entries. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin's momentum is fading, the dollar is pushing higher, and capital is rotating out of alts and back into BTC. Solana trades almost hand-in-hand with Bitcoin right now, so until the leader steadies, SOL is fighting the tide. On the shorter charts the picture is the same — price is still trading under the average level recent buyers came in at, and the 15-minute is grinding out a slow stair-step lower. The version of this trade worth waiting for is a pullback into the $95 area that actually holds, or that clean 4-hour close above $103 with Bitcoin cooperating. Anything else here is picking a fight with the tape. — 📡 On the Radar · $SOL · Available on Binance & MEXC

  • hodlstxbtc
    hodLNothing.btc 🟧 (@hodlstxbtc) reported

    Muneeb just published the first official @Stacks market analysis, co-written with a newly hired market analyst. Read past the numbers and three things stand out 👇 📊 The numbers ▸ STX +83% in 4 days, ~4x Bitcoin's move ▸ Still +42% above the July Binance-tag level, BTC +19% over the same period ▸ $157M weekly volume, 7x normal, largest since 2024 ▸ Mid-to-large orders: 2,879, 10x the 2026 weekly median ▸ First positive net taker flow of 2026 across Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, OKX, Upbit 🔍 What the data says 1⃣ The buyer changed In January and May, programmatic buying showed up before the rally. This time small orders led and systematic flow joined on day 4. Pulled, not pushed. 2⃣ Korea flipped The market that sold hardest after the Binance tag exhausted its selling before the rally, then posted the only Korean net inflow of 2026. When Upbit sold again the next week, passive bids absorbed it over 7 days and price closed flat. In July, the same selling took STX down 15% in two days. The overhang is being digested. 3⃣ Downside beta went negative Two days where BTC fell and STX closed green. STX started trading on its own catalyst instead of as a Bitcoin beta trade. The report flags that two days is a thin sample, and it is right. 🧭 The meta signal A founder who avoided market talk for years now publishes internal flow data with a named analyst and a disclaimer. That is the behavior of a team that believes the fundamentals can survive scrutiny. Their closing line: markets price narrative fast, fundamentals slow. Eight days to enrollment. Disclosure: I hold BTC and $STX .

  • FXNobody
    Nobody (@FXNobody) reported

    Tokenized stocks are starting to get stupidly big and I think CT is still looking at the wrong trade Binance just did $433B of TradFi perp volume in August and is adding options on 1,000+ US stocks/ETFs xStocks has already processed $40B+ of volume with 200k+ holders Now Silhouette is bringing RFQ block trading for xStocks directly to Hyperliquid My takeaway isn't “tokenized stocks bullish” That's obvious The alpha I'm looking for is who becomes the execution layer Who owns the order flow? Who gets the market makers? Who captures the spread + fees? Who becomes invisible infrastructure behind 24/7 equities? That's where I think the real winners of the RWA narrative will emerge I'm building a watchlist around this now 👀

  • halim19931
    Nina (@halim19931) reported

    @binance Tell $FLORK TO TELL US ORHERWISE I DON'T UDNERSTAND THIS ****

  • Smigglemedia
    Smiggle🥶💙 (@Smigglemedia) reported

    @Bankyo @binance Real builders support builders

  • CryptrixLabs
    Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported

    MSTRB is on the radar but not in play yet — this needs a 4-hour close back above $127.60 on real volume before it earns attention. The bigger picture is impressive on the surface: MSTRB ran from $95 to $140 in a short window. But that move has stalled, and the coin is now rolling over just under a firm ceiling at $127.60. Sellers have leaned on that level several times in the past week and every attempt to punch through has failed. Zooming in, the 4-hour chart shows a textbook twin-peak top near $133, and price has been grinding lower ever since. The average buyer from the recent run in ($128–$129) is now underwater, which turns that zone into overhead supply — those buyers become sellers as price climbs back toward break-even. On the shorter 1-hour view, price is coiling into a tightening range pressing down on support at $124, which typically resolves in the direction of the prevailing trend — and right now that trend is down. The reward-to-risk is the real problem. There's only about 2.8% of room to the next ceiling above, while the next meaningful floor sits more than 20% below. Bitcoin is soft as well, and MSTRB is moving almost step-for-step with it, so there's no independent strength to lean on. A small bounce attempt on the lowest timeframe isn't enough to override any of that. Back in play above $127.60 on a strong 4-hour close. Until then, it's a watch, not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $MSTRB · Available on Binance

  • 0xyanman
    Yanman (@0xyanman) reported

    @floz0756 @binance @BinanceHelpDesk Blm support rh binancenyq

  • austincampbell
    Austin Campbell (@austincampbell) reported

    Well this seems insane and I would suggest these two gentlemen have probably put themselves in the crosshairs of US law enforcement and, given the reach of the pig butchering scammers, probably the US military. Not great! Unsure who their lawyers are but hold on to your butts. On the actual matter: MSBs and financial institutions 100% have an obligation to freeze when they have legitimate suspicion of criminal activity, especially when notified of such by law enforcement. I want to see the exact contents of the HSI letter but unless it's purely "hey man idle curiosity" type phrasing, you'd be insane to not freeze here. Note that a freeze is not a taking. It's to hold the funds subject to further proceedings. Which is exactly what happened, given the subsequent action by the government in the case. Opening oneself up to discovery here, and inviting the government to intervene, seems completely insane. These are obligations Tether now has if they want to operate under Genius, and just generically as an MSB, and multiple banks and @binance were sanctioned for these exact kinds of issues (e.g. closing your eyes to activity and just accepting mints or redeems or pretending it didn't happen). Hell, right or wrong, the US government sent @cz_binance to jail for this! So this is a wild ******* pleading to me, unless they are 100% certain that this is a giant misunderstanding and there is zero chance that the US government had a valid basis here. Even so, @tether is not the correct target, this is really an argument with the US government. If the DOJ or HSI shows up and tells a bank to freeze your funds because they are criminal activity, you're not going to have a cause of action against the bank. It will be against the government, if they were grossly negligent or lied. Good luck with that here.

  • GregTyx
    Greg (@GregTyx) reported

    CMC is officially listed, and I’m still pushing to get us fully verified. CoinGecko was rejected, but I’ve already submitted it again. BscScan was also rejected because someone posted fake links, but after fixing everything, we resubmitted it as well. I personally made a $45K buyback at $5.1M MC, and I’ve also spent a lot on marketing while we were at ATH. I’m doing everything I possibly can to push this project forward. Last week, KuCoin posted our face, and the Binance Alpha request has been submitted. It hasn’t been rejected, but it also hasn’t been approved yet. The 1% BNB rewards are working perfectly. 🔥 Most importantly — I’m always going to be here. I’m extremely proud of every single one of you who continues to support me and this community. We keep building. We keep pushing. We don’t stop. 🫡 LET’S TAKE BNBCAT TO THE NEXT LEVEL. 🐱🚀

  • MarcosBTCreal
    Marcos Crypto (@MarcosBTCreal) reported

    If you missed binancecoin:native last cycle, don’t make the same mistake with $HYPE this cycle. Last cycle, Binance became the center of crypto trading, and binancecoin:native went from around $45 to $640 in just 100 days. This cycle, Hyperliquid is becoming the place where everything trades onchain. Perps, spot, stocks, pre-IPO markets, HyperEVM... more and more activity is being concentrated around one ecosystem. And unlike most tokens, that activity generates real protocol revenue and fuels $HYPE buybacks. $HYPE has already broken out from around $40 to $80+, but compared with what Binance eventually became, Hyperliquid still has plenty of room to grow. This could be the last quarter we see $HYPE below $100.