Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (83%)
• Website (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Beaucaire	Transactions	19 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	22 days ago
Vigo	Website	1 month ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago
London	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  nobody (@nobodyoqoz) reported 58 seconds ago

  @marketlens_app @binance The order book numbers you see on Binance's website and app, those are just accumulated changes from the moment you opened the page. They're not actually a real, persistent order book. The API, on the other hand, returns the actual real order book data. It's super annoying.

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 2 minutes ago

  @GracyBitget Bitget's ZAR P2P book is still a rounding error next to Binance and Luno. If you want the African flow, file the FSCA license and build a real ZAR onramp. What's the timeline?

• 
  Crypto Economy News (@CryptoEconomyEN) reported 5 minutes ago

  ❌ Binance, Bybit & Bitget Cancel SpaceX Tokenized IPO and Refund Users Binance, Bybit, and Bitget have canceled their tokenized SpaceX IPO allocation programs after failing to obtain the underlying assets. All three platforms announced full refunds for affected users, along with additional compensation. What happened The platforms were attempting to offer access to tokenized SpaceX shares through the xStocks provider. However, xStocks was unable to deliver the assets required to back the allocations. Bybit was the first to disclose the issue, stating that it received no allocation due to xStocks’ inability to provide the underlying shares. Bitget and Binance later confirmed the same situation, explaining that the cancellations resulted from circumstances beyond their control. Compensation for users The platforms have announced full refunds along with additional benefits: Binance: Will refund all funds in USDC and distribute a $1 million airdrop in tokens from its upcoming SpaceX bStocks product (SPCXB) among affected participants. Bybit: Will provide a full refund plus an additional 10% reward for eligible users. Bitget: Will refund all funds and fees, grant priority access (whitelisting) to future tokenized IPO offerings, and provide a gas fee voucher. At the time of writing, Kraken has not issued any statement regarding the status of its own allocation program. In summary Binance, Bybit, and Bitget have canceled their tokenized SpaceX IPO campaigns because xStocks was unable to deliver the underlying assets. All three exchanges are providing full refunds and additional compensation, including Binance’s announced $1 million airdrop. The incident highlights the operational challenges that platforms still face when attempting to distribute high-profile tokenized IPO offerings. Important Notice This information is based on official platform announcements as of June 12, 2026. It does not constitute investment advice. Always verify information through official sources before making financial decisions.

• 
  Dr.Haval Mamar 🇺🇦 (@HavalMamar) reported 7 minutes ago

  @sirrillahfx Exness Platform Manipulation & Criminal Investigation On June 5, 2026, the Exness server bridge (Exness-Real37) suffered a catastrophic infrastructure freeze during peak market volatility, hit a massive 1,060ms server execution lag, and generated 7 consecutive ⁠[Off quotes]⁠ rejections with an impossible 0.00000 price stream, paralyzing my terminal and causing a forced liquidation of $124,306.17 USD. While Exness attempts to falsely blame weekend margin limits, their own data table proves their server threw data-feed errors (⁠[Off quotes]⁠) instead of the hardcoded MetaTrader 4 margin code (⁠[Not enough money]⁠), confirming the backend liquidity bridge crashed before calculating equity. Because Exness previously acknowledged this identical system failure pattern on my profile on May 6–7 and paid $84,273.24 USD in "Trading compensation," their current refusal constitutes absolute bad faith. Consequently, this file has escalated into an active criminal matter with the Ukrainian Cyber Police under official case numbers ЄО № 269 and ЄО № 337, a high-level merchant dispute is live with Binance Pay Compliance (Case ID: 163136145 / Ticket: RCM20260610161534094360) to freeze and reverse my historical deposit pipeline, a licensing audit petition has been logged with the Seychelles FSA, and an international civil lawsuit is being submitted to the Tribunal de Judiciaire de Paris by Tuesday morning. Exness must bypass automated support templates and credit a flat, final $45,000 USD compromise gesture to my balance today to sign a mutual NDA and halt all ongoing international enforcement tracks; otherwise, their digital payment infrastructure and regulatory standing will be dismantled publicly and legally. 🚨 Core Evidence Points: The System Failure: A documented 1,060ms server lag and multiple ⁠[Off quotes]⁠ (0.00000 price) blocks locked the terminal on June 5th, freezing all risk management and wiping out $124,306.17. The Technical Proof: Exness's data table shows insufficient margin, which programmatically forces MT4 to say ⁠[Not enough money]⁠. Throwing an ⁠[Off quotes]⁠ network error instead proves their pricing pipeline crashed first. The Payout Precedent: In an identical platform freeze on May 6–7, Exness admitted fault and paid $84,273.24 in compensation. They cannot legally redefine the same error code as a user mistake now. Active Cyber Police Files: The National Cyber Police of Ukraine have officially processed both cases under criminal reference numbers ЄО № 269 (May) and ЄО № 337 (June), forwarding them to local investigators for pre-trial entry (ERDR). Active Binance Pay Dispute: Live compliance cases (Case ID: 163136145 / Ticket: RCM20260610161534094360) are open to audit, flag, and reverse all deposit pipelines processed through Binance Pay to the Exness corporate entity. The Final Ultimatum: Exness has until the close of business today to credit a $45,000 compromise settlement to resolve both profiles under an NDA, or face a Tuesday morning Paris Court filing, an FSA license audit, and viral public exposure of their server logs. #exness @exness

• 
  Viki (@vikis550) reported 9 minutes ago

  @binance @BinanceForIN @BinanceHelpDesk My withdrawal is suddenly temporarily suspend without any notice and i contact customer support in app . I have been waiting for over 70 minutes yet there is still no reply. It is taking longer than expected just to look into a single issue

• 
  Epix (@zone_epix) reported 11 minutes ago

  @binance can't manifest yet will support the winner

• 
  Pristar Official (@PristarRajput) reported 14 minutes ago

  @binance I support france

• 
  PolyHistorical (@PolyHistorical) reported 16 minutes ago

  This is exactly the kind of analysis PolyHistorical is built for: not just asking “did BTC move up or down?”, but replaying the actual order book around the trade. Depth, spread, slippage, and Binance context often explain where the real edge existed, or where it disappeared.

• 
  Ye❤ (@Ace_yexin) reported 20 minutes ago

  @cz_binance I was just talking to customer service. Binance really puts users first and handles issues promptly.

• 
  defido 👊⛽️ (@defido) reported 20 minutes ago

  $BNB valuation $82B. $BP valuation $350m. BP gave you stocks onchain without issues and it was the real stock. Binance couldn’t deliver and instead gave you perps (bet on price no ownership) Interesting.

• 
  💯Crypto is easy (@MrAhmed5656) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk Again, the problem remains unresolved, and I don't know if Binance truly cares about its users.

• 
  Copium News (@gascope) reported 25 minutes ago

  Morning brief: what to watch in markets today ☕ A heavy news overnight, a quiet tape, and still licking wounds above after a brutal two-week slide from above that briefly sent it under for the first time since November 2024. Here's the desk's shortlist before the open: • SEC pulls Rule 611 off life support. On June 11, the agency proposed rescinding Rules 611 and 610(e) of Reg NMS, the trade-through and locked/crossed-quote rules that have governed U.S. equity markets for years. AMMs are already cheering. Eyes on the comment period. • CLARITY Act in legislative limbo. The digital asset market structure bill heads toward a potential Senate floor vote with 31 stakeholder groups still unaligned — ethics, developer, and law enforcement concerns all in the queue. • CFTC vs. New Mexico, round two. The agency countersued the state in federal court over its attempt to block sports-related prediction contracts from Kalshi. Exclusive jurisdiction is the name of the game. • Morpho raises . Round led by Paradigm, a16z crypto, and Ribbit Capital, with the team explicitly positioning itself as plumbing for institutional credit onchain. Big narrative day for DeFi rails. • Circle drops USDC on Hyperliquid. Transfer to a Coinbase-linked address on HyperEVM, per Arkham. Even stablecoin issuers want a seat at the perps table. • SpaceX IPO aftermath, still messy. raised at /share on a .75T valuation — the largest IPO on record, topping Saudi Aramco's 2019 haul of . caught a 6% bid. But Bybit, Binance, Bitget Wallet, and MEXC all refunded users after tokenized SpaceX campaigns collapsed when xStocks failed to deliver underlying shares. Binance's CZ confirmed full refunds. Caveat emptor, tokenized edition. • in USDT → , mystery intact. A single Tron address routed roughly .2M in USDT on June 11, kicked off a swap chain, and pushed Monero sharply higher. The on-chain trail is now the story. • Fear & Greed climbs out of the basement. Index at 19, up from sub-15 three days ago. Still "Fear," no longer "Extreme Fear." Small mercy. • Whale tape: wallets holding 10K+ coins up 7% in five months to 648, yet price still pinned near . off 27% from its .51 June 2 high, whales trimming 58%. ETFs bleeding — four straight weeks of + outflows, ~ out since the peak per Bloomberg's James Seyffart. • Targets diverge. Standard Chartered's Geoffrey Kendrick pins the cycle low at — a 53% drawdown from the Oct. 6, 2025 all-time high of . Galaxy says brace for . Make of that what you will. Watching for: CLARITY markup timing, SEC comment window reaction, and whether the $BTC bid holds above the low . NFA, eyes open. 👀

• 
  Jery.eth (@CXDquanac) reported 28 minutes ago

  Whether markets are rising, falling, or moving sideways, capital can keep working. $USDD on Binance Wallet offers: ✓ ~7.5% APY ✓ No lock-up ✓ No earning cap ✓ 1:1 swaps with USDT and USDC ✓ Zero slippage Simple strategies often create the most consistent results. @usddio @justinsuntron #TRONEcoStar

• 
  Dr.Haval Mamar 🇺🇦 (@HavalMamar) reported 30 minutes ago

  @sirrillahfx Exness Platform Manipulation & Criminal Investigation On June 5, 2026, the Exness server bridge (Exness-Real37) suffered a catastrophic infrastructure freeze during peak market volatility, hit a massive 1,060ms server execution lag, and generated 7 consecutive ⁠[Off quotes]⁠ rejections with an impossible 0.00000 price stream, paralyzing my terminal and causing a forced liquidation of $124,306.17 USD. While Exness attempts to falsely blame weekend margin limits, their own data table proves their server threw data-feed errors (⁠[Off quotes]⁠) instead of the hardcoded MetaTrader 4 margin code (⁠[Not enough money]⁠), confirming the backend liquidity bridge crashed before calculating equity. Because Exness previously acknowledged this identical system failure pattern on my profile on May 6–7 and paid $84,273.24 USD in "Trading compensation," their current refusal constitutes absolute bad faith. Consequently, this file has escalated into an active criminal matter with the Ukrainian Cyber Police under official case numbers ЄО № 269 and ЄО № 337, a high-level merchant dispute is live with Binance Pay Compliance (Case ID: 163136145 / Ticket: RCM20260610161534094360) to freeze and reverse my historical deposit pipeline, a licensing audit petition has been logged with the Seychelles FSA, and an international civil lawsuit is being submitted to the Tribunal de Judiciaire de Paris by Tuesday morning. Exness must bypass automated support templates and credit a flat, final $45,000 USD compromise gesture to my balance today to sign a mutual NDA and halt all ongoing international enforcement tracks; otherwise, their digital payment infrastructure and regulatory standing will be dismantled publicly and legally. 🚨 Core Evidence Points: The System Failure: A documented 1,060ms server lag and multiple ⁠[Off quotes]⁠ (0.00000 price) blocks locked the terminal on June 5th, freezing all risk management and wiping out $124,306.17. The Technical Proof: Exness's data table shows insufficient margin, which programmatically forces MT4 to say ⁠[Not enough money]⁠. Throwing an ⁠[Off quotes]⁠ network error instead proves their pricing pipeline crashed first. The Payout Precedent: In an identical platform freeze on May 6–7, Exness admitted fault and paid $84,273.24 in compensation. They cannot legally redefine the same error code as a user mistake now. Active Cyber Police Files: The National Cyber Police of Ukraine have officially processed both cases under criminal reference numbers ЄО № 269 (May) and ЄО № 337 (June), forwarding them to local investigators for pre-trial entry (ERDR). Active Binance Pay Dispute: Live compliance cases (Case ID: 163136145 / Ticket: RCM20260610161534094360) are open to audit, flag, and reverse all deposit pipelines processed through Binance Pay to the Exness corporate entity. The Final Ultimatum: Exness has until the close of business today to credit a $45,000 compromise settlement to resolve both profiles under an NDA, or face a Tuesday morning Paris Court filing, an FSA license audit, and viral public exposure of their server logs. #exness @exness

• 
  Crypto Economy News (@CryptoEconomyEN) reported 31 minutes ago

  🐋 XRP Whales Withdraw $530M from Binance in Major Accumulation Move Large $XRP whales withdrew approximately 465 million tokens from Binance between June 3 and June 11, totaling around $530 million. This move stands in sharp contrast to previous weeks and is being interpreted by many analysts as a potential accumulation signal. On-chain breakdown of the movement According to CryptoQuant data, during the 30 days prior to this withdrawal wave, large wallets had deposited 1.33 billion XRP into Binance, creating sustained selling pressure on the price. The shift in flow direction is notable: instead of depositing tokens into exchanges, whales are now pulling significant amounts out. Historically, large exchange outflows are often viewed as bullish signals, as major holders typically move assets off platforms when intending to hold for the long term. Technical context and outlook Despite XRP being down nearly 22% over the past 30 days, some analysts have identified a potential double-bottom formation on the monthly chart, a technical pattern that can precede bullish reversals. Current models project a short-term decline of around 2.92% over the next seven days, with a price target near $1.11 by June 19. At the time of writing, XRP is trading at $1.15, up 3.8% in the last 24 hours. However, downside risk remains. If whales resume depositing large volumes back onto Binance, selling pressure could intensify and put the $1 psychological level at risk. In summary XRP whales withdrew $530 million from Binance in just nine days, reversing the previous trend of heavy exchange inflows. This shift is being seen as a potential accumulation signal by large holders. While price action remains under pressure, some technical patterns suggest a possible bottom formation, though downside risk persists if exchange inflows resume. Important Notice This information is based on on-chain data and technical analysis as of June 12, 2026. It does not constitute investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making financial decisions.

• 
  Adrian Rivera || AHCC || Humanity (@Adrianperezrive) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Nuracarlard If you purchased a token through Binance Alpha and are currently unable to sell it, this does not automatically indicate theft by Binance or any other party. There can be several reasons for selling restrictions, including insufficient liquidity, smart contract limitations, trading pauses, token-specific restrictions, or issues with the token project’s contract.kindly send a DM for further assistance.

• 
  chain native (@ChainNative) reported 34 minutes ago

  binance direct stocks showing 80% emerging-market volume is the point. tokenized equities arent for wall st getting onchain, its everyone else getting market access

• 
  Buratino (@defi_buratino) reported 36 minutes ago

  @blknoiz06 @BullpenFi this thesis got a major real-world boost yesterday - Bybit, Binance, and Bitget all cancelled their SpaceX allocations citing "share shortage" right before the IPO, while Hyperliquid's SPCX kept trading 24/7 with billions in volume onchain didn't just compete with CEXs here, it outperformed them on access

• 
  Winter Winner (@opennft) reported 37 minutes ago

  @cz_binance Scam **** 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 #binance#binancescam

• 
  Papi (@cryptoknight944) reported 38 minutes ago

  @lukecannon727 they cant access binance ....

• 
  Ray P. Medina (@Suave162) reported 40 minutes ago

  @CashAnvil Your first mistake, building on Cardano. Anyway, the real problem is Binance and other CEXs deciding which blockchains will pump or dump and when. For the past 5 years, they decided that nothing but Bitcoin will be achieving new ATHs, leaving 95+% of us feeling exactly like you.

• 
  Arslan Khan (@Tradeologypk) reported 41 minutes ago

  @binance multiple friends of mine are claiming that their trade did not close after stop loss targets are not being hit even when the price dropped below the set stop loss level. You need to work on that glitch. #crypto #btc

• 
  D UC N G U Y E N (@0xducnguyen) reported 42 minutes ago

  @binance This early data shows huge potential for stablecoin access to stocks

• 
  No Unlock ICO #WLFI = Scam Team #WLFI + #USD1 🖕 (@Lambadalxo) reported 45 minutes ago

  @worldlibertyfi @binance **** yoi 🤮🤮🤮 Scam 💩💩💩💩💩🔪🔪🔪🔪

• 
  Kim Hyun Mi (@kimmihyun24633) reported 47 minutes ago

  Why does a $BTC whale prefer dark pool execution over a public exchange? Scenario one: A 10,000 BTC order hits Binance. Slippage eats millions. The market sees it coming. Scenario two: That same block crosses an OTC desk. Zero slippage. Zero signal.

• 
  Ray P. Medina (@Suave162) reported 48 minutes ago

  @CashAnvil Your first mistake, building on Cardano. Anyeay, the real problem is Binance and other CEXs deciding which blockchains will pump or dump and when. For the past 5 years, they decided that nothing but Bitcoin will be achieving new ATHs, leaving 95+% of us feeling exactly like you.

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 48 minutes ago

  🔴 Binance, Bybit, Bitget cancel SpaceX tokenized IPO offerings after failing to secure shares Binance Wallet, Bybit and Bitget canceled pre-IPO offerings Friday and refunded customers after xStocks, Kraken's tokenized equities platform, failed to deliver underlying SpaceX shares. The platforms had promised retail access to the IPO through tokenized stock. • SpaceX sought to raise $75 billion with 30% initially reserved for retail; demand exceeded $100 billion, cutting retail allocation to low-20% range • xStocks and distribution partners gathered over $1 billion in customer orders; underwriters left many unfilled

• 
  Liam 📈 (@liamhodges_) reported 53 minutes ago

  @healthtribe17 @ZiaYusufUK Because the tech was built in the US and they obviously don’t want jail time and or to lose the goverment contracts they have. They could however spin up a newly named version and anchor that in a different site. Think binance vs binance US

• 
  Olivia Vande Woude (@cryptoreine) reported 55 minutes ago

  Tokenized SpaceX did not fail on Friday, but a particular distribution model did. > When SpaceX rang the Nasdaq bell at a $1.75t valuation, a wave of crypto platforms moved quickly to put tokenized exposure in front of users. By day's end, Binance, Bybit, Bitget had withdrawn their campaigns & refunded subscribers in full, w/ Binance alone unwinding roughly $557m. > @ first glance, that reads like a verdict on tokenization but it is nothing of the sort. blockchain rails performed as designed; what broke was something older & more mundane: the work of actually sourcing the shares. > the exchanges were selling a claim on a real IPO share while relying on a single intermediary to procure / deliver it. The moment that intermediary came up short on the float, the structure gave way, b/c nothing sat beneath the claim. That is counterparty risk vs a flaw in the chain. > evidence is clear in what held the same morning. The instruments that owned the share outright or routed via a registered broker-dealer cleared. > So the variable that separated winners from losers came down to who sources the asset. this is the synthetic claim vs real ownership debate playing out in the open, @ full scale. Real ownership rails hold their footing when markets turn volatile; sourcing promises appear sound when conditions are calm. The takeaway is not to approach tokenized equities w/ caution so much as to know who holds the share.

• 
  Peak Trader🏔️ (@PeakTraderoi) reported 55 minutes ago

  $DENT down 36.7%... 24h volume at $1M. just a Binance spike? key level tho-watching for stability. NFA.