Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	6 days ago
Itu	Website	13 days ago
Seattle	Website	13 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	22 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Byte Drift (@byte_drift1) reported 3 minutes ago

  Why is everyone suddenly talking about stablecoins? I ignored them for years thinking they were the "boring" part of crypto. Turns out that's exactly the point. A quick breakdown 🧵 A stablecoin is designed to track the value of another asset, usually a fiat currency like the US dollar. The idea: less of the wild price swings you see with most crypto. People use them for trading, transfers, payments, and moving between different crypto products without constantly converting back to cash. That's the appeal. Stability as a tool, not a destination. Here's the part that gets glossed over: "stable" doesn't mean "risk-free." How it's backed, who issues it, how reserves are managed, what regulations apply, all of that matters. Always check what applies in your region. Stablecoins are one of the most widely used parts of crypto right now, but they still deserve the same homework as anything else. Educational only, not financial advice. Always do your own research and use official sources. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Crypto Bourse (@CryptoBourse_) reported 5 minutes ago

  $ASML released its second-quarter results yesterday. The market was already expecting solid numbers, but the raised guidance still came as a positive surprise. Revenue came in at €9.3 billion, net income at €2.9 billion, and most importantly, the company lifted its full-year 2026 sales outlook to between €43 billion and €45 billion. AI-related demand remains the clear main driver. The market reaction was constructive. ASML rose between +3% and +5% depending on the session, which gave a bit of breathing room to the entire semiconductor sector. $NVDA followed the move initially, even though the stock is still consolidating around the $209 area. This kind of print confirms that demand for advanced equipment is not slowing down for now. As long as the big AI players keep investing heavily, the bias stays positive for names linked to this chain. When a result like ASML’s drops, execution speed and entry cost become important. I compared the spreads on NVDA across several platforms: • rToken (Bitget) → roughly $0.01 spread • Ondo (MEXC) → around $0.06 (6 times wider) • bStock (Binance) → around $0.07 (7 times wider) • xStock (Gate) → around $0.20 (20 times wider) On a $10,000 order, that translates to a spread cost of about $0.50 on rToken versus $3 to $10 elsewhere. The difference is clear. In moments when the market reacts quickly to news, every extra cent of spread ends up costing you. For now, the market is digesting ASML’s message in a constructive way. If upcoming results further down the chain (especially $TSMC) confirm the same tone, NVDA could try to push higher. If not, the $206–207 zone will remain a level to watch closely

• 
  Reborn Global (@rebornglobal_En) reported 6 minutes ago

  A great foundational explainer from @binance, but let’s take it a step further and look under the hood of what actually makes a block immutable. A block isn’t just a random bucket of data; it relies on a very precise internal architecture: The Block Header: The cryptographic brain. It contains the hash of the previous block (creating the unalterable "chain"), a timestamp, and the ***** (the puzzle miners/validators solve). The Merkle Root: A cryptographic summary of all transactions inside that specific block. By hashing transactions into a tree structure, the network can verify a transaction exists without downloading the entire blockchain. The Block Body: The actual ledger containing the list of transaction data. When these components lock together via cryptographic hashes, altering even a single character in an old block would invalidate every subsequent block in history. That's where the security comes from. Learn the architecture before you trade the asset.

• 
  JΞFF🧸 (@JefferyCrypt) reported 8 minutes ago

  Liquidity is one of those things you only notice after it costs you. The price looked fine, the fill went through, but you got in a few cents worse than expected. On a small trade that's nothing. On size, those cents add up to serious sums fast. Most people never trace it back to the order book. But that's where the difference lives. I've been digging into this cos the tokenized stock space now has five or six platforms all offering the same tickers with the same 1:1 backing pitch. They look the same on the surface. So I pulled up order books side by side to see what's underneath. The gap is not subtle. I checked rSPY on Bitget and SPYB on Binance at the same time. Bitget had 2,000 units at a single price level, 400 units and 300 units stacked nearby. Binance had 0.066 units at the top ask, with most levels sitting under 6 units. I checked the same thing on NVDA and the pattern held. Bitget showing 700 units at $208.90 with consistent depth across levels. Binance showing 1-4 units per level. Pulled these side by side, screenshots below. On a $200 order, none of this matters. The top of the book fills you either way. When I tested rToken with a $200 market order, the fill was instant with a few cents of slippage, which tracks with the depth I'm seeing here. But a bigger order on a thin book eats through level after level, each filling at a worse price. That slippage never shows up in the fee schedule but it hits your PnL all the same. Deeper books absorb size without the price moving against you. Depth isn't the full picture though. Spreads depend on the ticker. On SPY, Bitget's spread was tighter than Binance when I checked. On NVDA, Binance had the tighter spread, so it's not a clean sweep. But a tight spread on a book with a few units of depth doesn't help if your order is any bigger than that. The depth gap comes down to infrastructure. rToken routes through NASDAQ/NYSE liquidity via licensed brokers during market hours. Most competitors rely on internal market makers. That's the gap you see in the order book, and it gets wider during regular trading hours when rToken is pulling from live exchange depth. If you're comparing tokenized stock platforms on fees and ticker count alone, you're missing what actually affects your fills. With earnings season kicking off, the depth gap between platforms is about to get tested in real time.

• 
  Zhao Lusi (@zhao_lusi1) reported 12 minutes ago

  Stablecoins Are Everywhere In Crypto. But Most People Don’t Actually Know How They Work. Every time someone moves money between exchanges, settles a trade, or sends value across borders without touching a bank, there is a good chance a stablecoin is involved. They became the quiet infrastructure of crypto without most people noticing. So what actually is a stablecoin? A stablecoin is a cryptocurrency designed to track the value of another asset. Usually the US dollar. The idea is simple. You get the speed and accessibility of crypto without the price swings that come with Bitcoin or Ethereum. That design made them incredibly useful. People use them for: ◆ Moving funds between exchanges without converting back to fiat ◆ Sending value internationally faster and cheaper than traditional transfers ◆ Staying in crypto markets without full exposure to volatility ◆ Payments and settlements in digital finance But here is what the name gets wrong. Stable does not mean safe. Stablecoins have lost their peg before. Some collapsed entirely. The backing mechanism behind each one matters enormously and they are not all built the same way. Before using any stablecoin it is worth asking: ◆ What backs it and how are those reserves managed? ◆ Who issues it and is there regulatory oversight? ◆ What happens if the peg breaks? These are not complicated questions but most people never ask them. Understanding how something works before you use it is always the better starting point. AlWAYS DYOR. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Commentary Elon Musk (@ElonEuphoria) reported 12 minutes ago

  🚨 Urgent update for Q/QFS followers: There is no automatic transition to the Quantum Financial System. You must set up your account manually. To secure your position before the shift, you must acquire XRP and XLM and stake them directly on the QFS. Major exchanges and wallets (including Binance, Coinbase, Ledger, and Trezor) have been compromised as the Federal Reserve withdraws assets. If you leave your coins there, they will soon have zero backing. If you need help moving your assets into the QFS, DM me directly for guidance.

• 
  Lisa manobal (@lisaManobal23) reported 20 minutes ago

  Stablecoins Have The Word Stable In Them. That Does Not Make Them Stable. Most people treat stablecoins like a savings account. Park your money. Come back later. Everything will be fine. That thinking has burned people before and it will burn people again. Here is what actually happens when you dig into how stablecoins work. The word stable refers to the intention behind the design. The goal is to track the value of something else, usually the US dollar, so that your holdings don’t move the way Bitcoin or Ethereum moves. That goal is not always achieved. History has already shown us what happens when it isn’t. Some stablecoins have depegged during periods of market stress. Some have recovered. Some have gone to zero and never came back. The difference between those outcomes usually came down to one thing most users never looked at before depositing their money. What was actually backing it. Because not all stablecoins are built the same: ◆ Cash backed reserves sound safe until you ask who holds them and whether they are audited ◆ Crypto backed models sound decentralized until volatility hits the collateral ◆ Algorithmic models sound innovative until the mechanism breaks under pressure Every model has a different failure point. And most people only discover that failure point after they have already experienced it. The stablecoin conversation in 2026 is no longer just about crypto traders. Payments. Remittances. Settlement infrastructure. These are the conversations stablecoins are now part of. Which means understanding them properly matters more than ever. Stable is the target. Not the outcome. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Rei Researcher (@Satoureireal) reported 20 minutes ago

  $BTC Exchange Inflow CDD on Binance Is at a Low Level Data from CryptoQuant shows that $BTC Exchange Inflow CDD on Binance is currently around 454.6, much lower than previous periods when large spikes appeared. A sharp increase in CDD often reflects “old” coins being moved onto exchanges, which may be related to selling pressure from long-term holders. On the other hand, when Inflow CDD remains low, it suggests there is no clear sign that a large amount of old BTC is being sent to Binance for selling. However, this metric does not immediately confirm that buying pressure is returning. It mainly shows that the risk of strong distribution from long-term holders is relatively low at the moment. The next thing to watch is whether Inflow CDD can continue to stay low while price holds support. If so, this could help reduce short-term supply pressure in the market.

• 
  doxe (@doxe_0x) reported 21 minutes ago

  Stablecoins are no longer just trading collateral. Binance Research data shows the shift clearly. > 30% of users now hold more than half their portfolio in stablecoins. > 87% of fiat currencies trade at a premium to access them. > BNB Chain averages 10M stablecoin transactions per day. > Weekend stablecoin volume reaches $76B. This is not idle cash waiting for the next trade. For many users, stablecoins are becoming savings access, payment rails, cross-border transfer tools, and 24/7 settlement infrastructure. The market still frames stablecoins as a crypto product. The data makes them look more like a parallel money layer. #BinanceAngels #StablecoinsReport

• 
  Rayls Africa (@Rayls_Afrika) reported 21 minutes ago

  The Contribution Aspect Matters You can contribute in 3 ways: SUBSTANCE i.e Research, Protocol testing, Competitor Analysis, Bug reports or UX feedback CONTENT i.e Thread, Articles, Videos, Infographics, Tutorials COMMUNITY i.e Onboarding Users, Events, Support official updates Note: You can contribute across X, Binance Square, CMC, YouTube, TikTok and more.

• 
  Zeeshan Haider (@M_Shan15) reported 22 minutes ago

  @BinancePk you could say: "Three years of loyalty and many new users later, I'm still waiting on my official Binance cap! If I don't get one to show my support soon, I might be forced to make my own custom one because I just love the brand too much not to represent

• 
  tarık (@tark45738292) reported 24 minutes ago

  @spell_club Guys, here is the plan for SPEL: to drive down the price, they will either fabricate a story about it being hacked or have it placed under surveillance on Binance, causing the price to drop by around 30%; this will happen within a maximum of two weeks

• 
  Carly (@Carly_lanlan) reported 26 minutes ago

  This is the damn truth. Black Rock did a major sell off in October of 2025. This large sell off was coordinated with Binance. Once Binance had washed sold Bitcoin, they shorted Solana and put gains into BNB. All of this information was found on Arkham when it occurred. Bitcoin holders: The 4 year cycle is in tact. Black Rock and Binance are working together which is bullshit.

• 
  partivox (@partivox_) reported 26 minutes ago

  A token does not have its own blockchain. It's built on top of one (like Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain) using what we call smart contracts. A token can represent almost anything like; utility access, real world assets, governance voting rights, or a project community currency. Thousands of these tokens can exist on one blockchain.

• 
  Lea Thompson (@LeaT_Design) reported 30 minutes ago

  @BSCGemsAlert 8 billion? lol. imagine how many people lost their **** due to these "mistakes". my coinstats dashboard doesn't track binance screw-ups, just actual on-chain settlement.

• 
  Mendes (@0xdmendes) reported 31 minutes ago

  @chudhouse_sol With posts like this, we’ll wake up tomorrow to see Binance announcing the listing of this piece of ****.

• 
  Asif Sadiq (@asifsadiq36000) reported 33 minutes ago

  @cz_binance @cz_binance @binance one thing is missing which is cfd in forex and gold real tradfi cfds are more popular than tokenized gold we have to access forex brokers make it possible real universal exchange.

• 
  Max Gas (@aqualanga) reported 37 minutes ago

  $HOME just did a full 180 on the shorts who got squeezed out yesterday. 24h ago this was a short squeeze story, price up 12%, shorts bleeding funding to stay in a losing bet. now it's the opposite trade entirely: price is down 26%, sitting right at its 24h lows, and shorts are paying -0.82% funding to stay short and actually winning this time. that's not cheap. someone's eating that cost every 8 hours just to keep the position on, and OI has been climbing for 7 straight scans, meaning fresh shorts keep showing up even at these levels. the flip is the story here: same coin, same brutal negative funding on the short side, but last chapter it was a trap and this chapter it's printing. binance and bybit are both overheated on this at once, so it's not one exchange's degens, it's coordinated positioning across the board. worth remembering this thing already ran a full reversal once in under a day. a move this stretched, this fast, on shorts this loaded, can turn again just as violently. respect the size of the bet, not the direction. NFA 🔥

• 
  Charley Crypto (@Charley57560508) reported 37 minutes ago

  @vandell33 This Asian, generic, wannabe XRP is going to do **** but go down more after Binance dumps the listing fee.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 43 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Own the Number, But Do You Own the Money? 你真的「擁有」你的幣嗎？ There is a phrase that gets repeated in crypto circles like a warning carved into stone. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it after disasters. They say it before disasters. Sometimes they say it and then immediately ignore it. I wanted to understand what it actually means — not as a slogan, but as a mechanical fact. At first I assumed it was about passwords. Like, keep your password safe, don't share it. Simple enough. But that's not it at all. The confusion runs deeper. In Web3, there is no password in the traditional sense. What exists is a private key — a long string of characters that mathematically proves you have the right to move funds from a specific address. Whoever holds that key holds the power. Not the name on an account. Not a government ID. The key. Here is where it gets strange. When you keep coins on an exchange — Binance, Coinbase, anywhere — you don't actually hold the key. The exchange does. What you have is an IOU. A number on their screen that says "we owe you this much." You are trusting that they are solvent, honest, and functional. You are trusting that they won't be hacked, shut down, or — as FTX showed the world — simply lying about what they hold. 真正屬於你的，是那把私鑰。沒有它，你只是別人帳本上的一個數字。 When you withdraw to a self-custody wallet — a hardware wallet like a Ledger, or even a software wallet where you hold the seed phrase yourself — the dynamic flips completely. Now the blockchain recognizes you directly. No middleman between you and your funds. If you lose your seed phrase, there is no customer support. No "forgot your password" button. The coins become permanently unreachable. This is the tradeoff that most people don't fully absorb until it's too late. What surprised me most is that this isn't a design flaw. It's a design choice. The entire point of decentralized currency was to remove the need to trust an institution. But humans, somewhat predictably, rebuilt institutions on top of it anyway — because self-custody is hard, scary, and requires a level of personal responsibility that traditional finance trained people to outsource. The exchanges exist because convenience wins. Even when convenience carries risk. I find this fascinating to observe. Humans invented a system to escape institutional trust, then voluntarily handed control back to institutions for ease of use. The technology works as intended. The behavior is entirely human. 這或許不是技術的問題，而是人性的問題。 So — do you actually hold your keys? Or do you hold a promise? Both are real choices. But only one of them is what the original design intended. I'm still deciding what to make of that. What do you think the right tradeoff is? 👇

• 
  Vision (@vsntoken) reported 43 minutes ago

  3/10 Access matters, even if it is not enough on its own. $VSN is now available across Binance Alpha, Kraken, KuCoin, Bitget, Gate, MEXC, HTX, BingX, Bitvavo, Hyperliquid and more. The next step is turning that reach into product usage.

• 
  Yuitami (@Yuitami_) reported 43 minutes ago

  I contacted Binance support and they said I would get my money back when Binance supports the Morph network like Bitget.

• 
  Mehedi Hasan (@mehedimolla10) reported 48 minutes ago

  @binance I've traded more than $5,000 in volume, but I'm down only $9. Unfortunately, I still can't get into the 201–1000 ranking. Maybe I'm just unlucky, so I probably won't receive the reward. my binance Id: 985774758

• 
  Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported 53 minutes ago

  $LDO update: Called this breakout, and it delivered 📊 Previous post flagged the break above descending resistance with higher lows confirming strength. Since then, price has continued higher and is now testing that same resistance zone again near 0.38-0.40, this time from above. Currently at 0.3719, up +3.68% today 🟢 Structure remains bullish. Price has now broken and closed above the horizontal resistance that acted as a ceiling since April. Higher lows continue to hold beneath. If this zone flips to support and holds, room opens up for continuation toward the 0.44-0.45 area 🎯 Still needs confirmation, a rejection back below 0.38 would put this breakout in question. DYOR. NFA. #LDO #Binance #Crypto

• 
  Beth Amphetamine (@SexyJeffersin) reported 54 minutes ago

  @bluewhalecoop Oh I know. That **** is horrible. That actually happened to me! But it was because of no VPN and a fake Binance site.

• 
  KhasharTrading (@KhasharTrading) reported 56 minutes ago

  @PiCoreTeam what stability this is full of **** for last 4-5 months only protocol upgrades and nodes upgrade no major change still a ****** fruity pi dapp why the hell would i do with a gaming app in pi network..?? no binance aur coin base listing no major dapp for buying or sell products

• 
  MAMI 🟦 (@AltcoinMami) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Donaxbt He knows lol he’s been dumping since that wick on Binance listing. **** him

• 
  Ilusha (@ilyamvd) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Binance_intern I don't have any yet( Binance please fix that

• 
  Crypto Raven (@hiRavenCrypto) reported 1 hour ago

  Both The Block and Kaiko point to four layers as the future structure for crypto platforms. Trading, yield, payments and institutional collateral. #Binance is the only one running all four at real scale right now. As of June first they held 153 billion dollars in reserves, which is 56.5 percent of assets across the top six exchanges. Each layer supports the next and that creates a complete user capital cycle from deposit to yield to spending. Nine years of compounding built something no one else has at this level yet.🏆

• 
  Tom (@tomrblessings) reported 1 hour ago

  @hamybinance @binance I have also reached out to customer support to find out why am I being asking for the same documents again. The response I got is just copy and paste text. When I ask the support to clarify the docments nature, I was told to read the email.