Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	14 days ago
Itu	Website	21 days ago
Seattle	Website	21 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Swizzy (@SwizzyOnChain) reported 2 minutes ago

  BitMEX is shutting down. September 23, 2026. 4am UTC. 11+ years. Zero customer funds lost to hacks. The exchange that literally invented the 100x leverage perpetual swap back in 2014, the product that's now the single most traded instrument in all of crypto. Perfect security record. Still dies. Not from an exploit. Not from a regulator. From a "strategic review", the polite way of saying the market moved on to Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid, and BitMEX never caught back up. The lesson I keep relearning: security keeps your funds safe. It doesn't keep your exchange relevant. If you still have a BitMEX account, you have about 60 days to close positions and withdraw. Don't wait for week 8. Did you ever trade your first liquidation on BitMEX? 🫡

• 
  Tony Chung (@jayc_BM) reported 5 minutes ago

  OKX's app just disappeared from Korean Google Play, unsearchable and unable to be installed as of July 24. Binance and Bitget remain fully accessible on the same store. This comes about two weeks after Bybit had the same thing happen on July 10. Context on why: back in January, FIU formally classified unregistered foreign VASPs under Korea's financial information act, and Google Play set a policy to restrict downloads and updates for flagged exchange apps accordingly. But actual enforcement never materialized when the policy was supposed to take effect, exchanges kept working fine on Google Play through the rest of January and beyond. Now it's actually happening, just picking off exchanges one at a time rather than all at once. Bybit first, OKX two weeks later, Binance and Bitget still untouched for now. Worth noting OKX is still fully accessible via web and remains on the Apple App Store, so this is a Google Play-specific enforcement action, not a full block.

• 
  ᅟ (@swordd777) reported 5 minutes ago

  @cz_binance ****** will ruin the 72k runnup talking value “best entry point”**** binance

• 
  Zaro (@Zero_Arb) reported 13 minutes ago

  Exchange counterparty risk assessment: Before deploying capital, check: Tier 1 (lowest risk): • Binance, Coinbase, Kraken • High liquidity, regulated, proven track record Tier 2 (medium risk): • Bybit, OKX, Bitget • Good liquidity, less regulation Tier 3 (higher risk): • Smaller exchanges • Lower liquidity, withdrawal issues possible Never put >30% of capital on Tier 2/3 exchanges FTX taught us this lesson 📊

• 
  CryptoMover🇺🇸 (@CRYPTOSMOVER) reported 13 minutes ago

  $XMR vs $BTC Bitcoin won. That's the problem. 1,213,437 BTC now sit in ETF custody. 843,775 more sit on a single corporate balance sheet. $77.6B of institutional AUM. Every one of those coins has a custodian, a KYC record, and a jurisdiction that can freeze it. The whitepaper said "peer-to-peer electronic cash." In 2026 the largest holder of Bitcoin is an ETF ticker on Nasdaq. Now look at Monero: ▸ 73 exchange delistings in 2025 alone ▸ Binance, Kraken, OKX — gone from major jurisdictions ▸ EU bans it outright from July 1, 2027 (AMLR Art. 58) ▸ Zero ETFs. Zero treasury companies. Zero institutional bid. And it's still a $7.5B network settling ~29,677 transactions a day. Here's the uncomfortable part for both camps: Bitcoin has never been banned. It's been ADOPTED. Which means the censorship-resistance thesis has never actually been stress-tested — the state simply decided to buy it instead. Monero got the test. 73 delistings, a continental ban, and a 51% attack in Aug 2025 when Qubic took 52% of hashrate and reorged 60 blocks. It's still running. I'm not telling you XMR beats BTC. Look at the tape — $1.28T vs $7.5B, and the gap is structural, not temporary. No ETF is ever coming. But "digital gold you can hold in a brokerage account" and "money the state can't see" are two different products. Only one of them was ever tested against the thing it claims to defend you from. @monero

• 
  Lonely Rooster (@lonelyrooster_) reported 18 minutes ago

  @hmmxavier @ExcelBaller I don’t think binance is the majority of the problem here.

• 
  万联welinkBTC(🦄,🦄) | 🔶 逍遥游版 (@fly_welinkBTC) reported 21 minutes ago

  Bitcoin surges to $64,000: more like a leverage stress test than a genuine breakout. Bitcoin is still fluctuating within a range, with volatility around $64,000 mainly driven by leverage and liquidity, and not much new spot buying or ETF funds coming in. $64,000 is being used for leverage testing, not a confirmation of a breakout. Bitcoin just touched $64,007 amidst rapid fluctuations, but this is not enough to indicate a change in market structure. Previously, the price fell from the midpoint of $65,000 back to the $63,000-$64,000 range, and is currently still below its recent high of $66,800. To put it bluntly, this is more like a leverage and liquidity test within an accumulation phase than the start of a new trend. While round numbers do attract momentum trading and alerts, without actual buying in physical shares and ETFs, it's difficult to maintain a price level of $64,000 on its own. The current market situation is roughly as follows: Risk appetite is quite selective and hasn't spread widely. Bitcoin remains the primary source of liquidity, and altcoins will not automatically follow suit. $64,000 only has meaning when accompanied by actual trading volume; don't overestimate it just because it's a round number. It's not advisable to chase the beta altcoins directly during this upward surge. Spot funds are cautious, and derivatives dominate short-term trading. Derivatives are the real players. Futures open interest is around $48.6 billion, funding rates are slightly positive, and there are also many Binance accounts. This isn't a low-crowding state with no open positions; rather, long positions are already somewhat crowded, and the structure is relatively fragile. The liquidation data shows more long positions being liquidated than short positions, indicating that the market is more likely clearing out crowded positions than initiating a strong upward trend. ETF fund flows are not one-sided. While there has been an overall net inflow recently, it has turned negative on the latest day. This change is more crucial than the headline "Bitcoin breaks $64,000," because ETF buying represents the marginal demand from the traditional financial sector. When ETF buying slows down while perpetual contracts remain prevalent, the credibility of a rebound is diminished. The on-chain state is more like a repair. Compared to futures, the on-chain data appears cleaner. MVRV is around 1.23, NUPL is around 0.19, and SOPR is close to 1.0, indicating that profit-taking is not intense, nor does it resemble the euphoria of a cycle peak. Exchange reserves have decreased slightly, but this does not suggest a large-scale distribution. Long-term holders haven't shown any signs of a "top has been reached," but short-term leverage can easily push them to liquidation. This is why prices can slowly rise for several weeks, yet still experience ugly intraday plunges. Therefore, don't easily believe claims like "breaking through $64,000 means momentum has turned bullish." Round numbers attract alerts and short-term trading, not large institutional funds. The real key factors are whether ETF demand recovers, whether dollar liquidity supports the move, whether perpetual leverage cools down, and whether cash holders remain steadfast. Let's look at Bitcoin first, then talk about altcoins. Macroeconomics isn't the main theme in this round. A clean risk-on market should have seen stronger ETF confirmation and fewer long liquidations. But the reality is that Bitcoin is more like a collateral hub for the entire market: funds flow to Bitcoin first, and the risk appetite for speculative assets still has room to grow. My view is that it's possible to add some Bitcoin to your position during a liquidation-driven decline, but don't bet on a full-blown altcoin rebound until the following conditions are met simultaneously: Bitcoin has reclaimed its recent highs; Funding rates are cooling down; ETF net inflows have returned; Bitcoin's dominance is no longer rising defensively. The on-chain frenzy hasn't even begun, but the perpetual market has already bet on a breakout narrative. This is precisely the main mismatch in the current market. We're currently in a neutral accumulation phase, not a breakout. Readers are neither early to a trend expansion nor should they enter based on altcoin season logic. The real advantage lies with long-term holders and low-leverage funds who can gradually add to their Bitcoin holdings during pullbacks; high-flying traders and high-beta altcoin buyers are at a disadvantage.

• 
  Aftabahmad (@Aftabahmad6252) reported 22 minutes ago

  @CrypNuevo Am no found helpy, expert, honest,,all gready , publicty, money, fees shares same u,,any helpy here please help me trade for free binance

• 
  skinny (@skinnydefi) reported 23 minutes ago

  𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗧𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗜𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗦𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆. 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗢𝗻𝗲. In January 2019, BitTorrent became the flagship project of a new era for Binance Launchpad. At the time, the conversation was largely about bringing one of the internet’s most recognized peer-to-peer networks into the blockchain economy. Fast-forward to July 2026. BitTorrent is participating as a Special Partner for #Binance9YA, but the ecosystem itself is now looking at a very different technology cycle. The world has moved from blockchain expansion to an era increasingly defined by AI, compute, and intelligent infrastructure. And BitTorrent is evolving with it. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝗕𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘂𝘁𝗲 BitTorrent’s original breakthrough came from changing how resources were coordinated. Instead of asking one server to carry the entire burden of data distribution, participants collectively contributed to the network. BTTInferGrid applies a similar decentralized philosophy to AI inference. AI developers create demand for inference. GPU providers contribute compute resources. The network coordinates workloads between them. More demand can create greater miner revenue. Greater revenue can attract additional GPU supply. More supply can improve cost and performance. And better service can attract more users. Demand → Revenue → Supply → Better Service → Growth. This is more than launching an AI product. It is an attempt to create a self-reinforcing compute economy. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗨𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗔𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗜𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 A network can create activity without necessarily creating long-term alignment around its native asset. This is where BitTorrent’s structured $BTT buyback and burn framework becomes important. Under the announced long-term program, 100% of revenue generated from BitTorrent’s decentralized services is allocated to quarterly BTT buybacks, with purchased tokens permanently burned. That creates a direct relationship worth studying: Infrastructure usage generates revenue. Revenue funds buybacks. Buybacks remove BTT from circulation through burns. The significance is not simply “token burning.” It is the attempt to connect the economics of the token more closely to the usage of the infrastructure around it. 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗟𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗽𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗔𝗜 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 2019 introduced $BTT to a new generation of crypto users. 2026 is beginning to ask a much bigger question: Can BitTorrent’s experience coordinating distributed networks become useful in the AI compute economy? BTTInferGrid is the infrastructure thesis. The buyback and burn framework is the economic alignment layer. And BitTorrent’s long history of peer-to-peer systems provides the broader context. Seven years after its Binance Launchpad debut, the most interesting thing about BitTorrent isn’t that the project is still here. It’s that the problem it wants to solve has become much bigger. From distributing files to coordinating AI inference. The resource has changed. The principle of distributed infrastructure remains. @BitTorrent @justinsuntron #TRONEcoStar

• 
  cryptogami.skr 📱 (@Cryptogamii) reported 23 minutes ago

  And it's going to change. Seriously, I've been doing a lot of research, and I've listened to and read interviews with Toly as well. First, let me mention that Bitcoin's dominance kept rising from 2022 to 2025; it's only now starting to decline in 2026, and it will likely decline further. This will lead us to the much-anticipated Alt Season, which this time will be selective. Not all alts will rise, but it's more than obvious that $SKR will, since it's the only one of its kind. Everyone uses cell phones, and a large portion of people conduct financial transactions from them, so people will be FOMO on the world's first mobile-centric crypto ecosystem (we can compare Solana Mobile to Binance, if you like, acknowledging the obvious differences). Second, I've come to understand how Toly operates, and his philosophy is to build in a bear market and fine-tune his product as much as possible for hardcore users—those who actually use his product—without the noise generated by a bull market. That's why they aren't creating hype around SKR and everything seems slow (even though they're building behind the scenes). But I also found that he knows we'll have a window to capitalize on the momentum of the ecosystem's growth, and we'll have to seize it. Most likely, that window will open next year, when the market will start to improve significantly. Based on all my research, I can say again: let him cook (referring to Toly, who himself said in an interview that Solana Mobile is his baby).

• 
  CGP Alpha (@CryptoGemPulse) reported 30 minutes ago

  1/6 Akedo targets the problem of fragmented DeFi experiences and limited composability on Binance Smart Chain, aiming to streamline access to decentralized financial products through a unified protocol layer.

• 
  Tom Krzystek (@tom_krzystek) reported 31 minutes ago

  @MattiaR11 @cryptocom @Dune Interesting, I wonder how this funnel looks for Binance. 150m CDC users to 2700 users on Cronos sounds terrible.

• 
  Lucky Uwakwe ( KING of DeFi / NFT/SocialFi /GameFi (@luo2027) reported 31 minutes ago

  Some hacker is currently sweeping user of BEP20 USDT wallet from across. This is the hacker receiving address 0xc048d4E75743bCD9D65D18b1Fd6427b47fac0246 @binance @BinanceResearch @zachxbt In the past 40 minutes over 39 wallet have been compromised or sweep of there BEP20 USDT the single highest victim so far have lost over 28,000+ USDT on BEP20 chain No one is sure of how the hacker got access to all the victim wallet so far

• 
  Kage Rex🐋🌑 (@KageRex) reported 33 minutes ago

  $AKE — Can we see 0.003? 👀📊 Price broke out clean from the accumulation zone, held the rising support trendline through every retest, and pushed through the breakout zone with strength. Currently at $0.0027890, up +11.07% today, now retesting the resistance zone from above. If this reclaim holds, structure opens up toward 0.0030 — a level that's well within reach if buyers keep defending this zone. Rising support still fully intact underneath. Every dip since the breakout has been bought. Still needs confirmation on a clean break above resistance. A rejection back below the breakout zone would weaken this setup. DYOR. NFA. $AKE #Binance #crypto

• 
  DiscoverLitecoin📲🌏 (@DiscoverLite) reported 35 minutes ago

  @TheBlockCo Wtf? How can a neutral news source and data service have a paid partnership with Binance and their data?

• 
  Kiva 🏴‍☠️ (@cx_00) reported 37 minutes ago

  @moneycetamol247 @Poloniex not so sure about that one... had some issues with fees and customer support. been using binance for years now, no complaints

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 38 minutes ago

  BTC got a quantum-security funding narrative; Binance BTC perp funding cooled anyway. Cointelegraph reported a Strategy-led group pledged $15M to secure Bitcoin from quantum-computing threats. Decrypt separately reported BlackRock, Coinbase, Strategy, plus other institutional Bitcoin names formed a consortium to fund developers working on Bitcoin security, including future quantum-computer risks. Credible headline. Not the same thing as leverage confirmation. Across the available 60-point window, BTC perpetual funding rate on Binance changed -45.7%. Latest reading: 0.005149%. Funding rate only covers Binance BTC perpetuals, so this is not a full-market positioning claim. It also says nothing about spot; no BTC spot price fact provided. Important distinction: consortium reports are single-source facts individually, not independently verified funding execution. Also, no on-chain developer activity fact provided. So we have reported institutional coordination around Bitcoin security, but not proof here of executed funding, developer traction, institutional demand, or bullish price confirmation. The clean read: the narrative has external confirmation from two reports, while the available derivatives data shows cooling rather than speculative leverage expansion. Invalidation is straightforward: BTC perpetual funding rises materially in later verified windows, or verified evidence shows derivatives positioning expanded after the consortium reports. Until then, if this continues, quantum-security funding may sit as a long-term credibility signal rather than a near-term leverage catalyst. CT can save the victory lap for actual positioning.

• 
  L U C K Y (@Mr_Luckry) reported 38 minutes ago

  @sanmiastar How sustainable are these high promotional yields once the current Binance and Gate campaign windows officially close down?

• 
  Ghost (@Ghostfatt) reported 40 minutes ago

  Whats the issue with binance ? Am trying to create an account its declining verification🤔

• 
  Mubarak Bin Amin 🔶 (@Mubarakbinamin) reported 43 minutes ago

  Since my old account, I have always advised people: if you want to hold your crypto for the long term, avoid keeping it in a custodial wallet. By custodial wallets, I mean platforms like Binance, MEXC, Bitget, Bybit, and others. The problem is that whenever the platform faces serious issues or collapses, your assets could be at risk too. If you want to hold your crypto, consider using a non-custodial wallet such as MetaMask, Trust Wallet, OKX Wallet, Binance Wallet, and others. Even if the wallet app itself stops working, you can import your wallet into another compatible wallet using your recovery phrase and still access your assets. A non-custodial wallet is essentially a way of having direct control over your assets on the blockchain. No company or exchange has full control over your funds. When an exchange shuts down, people may leave their assets there for years, hoping the platform will eventually return. But sometimes, that day never comes. Share this message to help your fellow crypto users understand the importance of taking control of their own assets. And yes, this is my new account after Mark permanently disabled my old one.

• 
  ZC (@goldstagcrypto) reported 43 minutes ago

  Reviewing yesterday's market, many traders successfully capitalized on the trading opportunities. If you haven't yet found a suitable trading rhythm, we recommend continuing to follow our updates. BTC Latest Market Analysis (July 24, 2026, 08:11 HKT) Current Real-Time Price: Approximately $64,850 – $64,950 USD (Binance BTCUSD, July 23rd daily candlestick close approximately $65,090, continued its decline in early trading today, July 24th daily candlestick open approximately $65,048). The price is currently in a consolidation phase after retracing from the $66.5k–$66.9k resistance zone. Today's Hexagram: Upper trigram Gen, Lower trigram Li = Mountain Fire (Hexagram 22). The hexagram's text reads, "Success, small gains are possible"—symbolizing adornment, refinement, and fire beneath a mountain, representing outward brilliance but inner substance. In the short term, it suggests "splendid first, then substantial; refinement is better than aggressive moves," suitable for range-bound adjustments rather than strong one-sided trends. 24-hour trend: High-level consolidation or a potential decline followed by a rise; expected range: -0.8% to +1.2% (midpoint approximately +0.3%). A breach of key support levels would increase risk. Order Placement Strategies 1. Long Position (Buy on Dips/Rebound Strategy) Entry: Place a buy order at the current price of $64,800–$65,000 or after confirming a hold above $65,100–$65,200; a better buy-on-dips zone is $64,300–$64,600. Take Profit: First level: $65,600–$66,000 Second level: $66,500–$67,000 Stop Loss: $64,000–$63,800 (invalid if support is broken) 2. Short Position (Breakdown Strategy) Entry: Place a short order after confirming a break below the key support level of $64,200–$64,000 with significant volume (entry $63,900–$64,100). Take Profit: First level: $63,200–$63,000 Second level: $62,500–$62,000 Stop Loss: $64,700–$64,900 (Stop if pullback fails) Risk Warning: The hexagram "Ben" signifies adornment, outward brilliance but inner substance is lacking; short-term trading should focus on small profits. Total energy is +0.36, indicating weak positive momentum and lack of strong direction; range trading is preferred. Key support: $64,000–$64,200; resistance: $66,000–$66,900. Current ETHUSD real-time price: 1875-1880 USD (A pullback after yesterday's large bearish candle, approximately -3% in 24 hours). Overall: Today's market is consolidating, with key support at 1870 and resistance at 1920. Recommended Trading Strategy: Range Trading (Optimal, aligns with the "Small Accumulation" hexagram's accumulation phase) Range Trading (Main Force): Buy at 1865 → Sell at 1910, or buy low and sell high between 1875-1900, with a stop-loss and take-profit of 25-35 points each. Suitable for multiple intraday trades. Long Strategy: Entry Price: 1865~1885 (Buy near support) Stop Loss: 1850 (Invalid if 1870 support is broken; strictly adhere to this; loss control <1.5%) Take-Profit: First level 1910 Second level 1930~1940 Short Selling (Defensive): If 1850 is broken, enter a short position near 1840, with a stop-loss at 1870 and a take-profit at 1800 (probability approximately 40%, small position size). Alternative Strategy: Buy on Dips (Breakout): Enter a long position after a valid breakout above 1920, with a stop-loss at 1895 and a take-profit at 1960 (small position, enter only after breakout confirmation). Risk Warning: While the hexagram "Small Accumulation" suggests accumulation, the "dense clouds without rain" pattern indicates that a break below support could accelerate the decline. Strict stop-loss orders are advised. Monitor whether volume continues to shrink and whether there is a large-scale outflow from on-chain transactions.

• 
  Tim (@Timothy36660780) reported 45 minutes ago

  And **** binancecoin:native and **** @cz_binance. I emptied my accounts at binance since Mid 25. But still using it for charts ONLY. Binance is NOT recognized and preferred by all smsf providers although it is registered in Australia. So **** @binance the robbers

• 
  BSCN (@BSCNews) reported 47 minutes ago

  Are you using Binance or Bybit in Vietnam...? BEWARE! Vietnam is 'going after the little guy' according to Cointelegraph, the country set to fine users of unlicensed overseas exchanges up to $1,900. Unlicensed overseas exchanges include the likes of @Binance and @Bybit_Official. The issue is that Vietnam hasn't actually any exchange licenses yet, despite having approved five CEXs in principle...

• 
  Rupert Du Maine (@Rupert_Du_Maine) reported 51 minutes ago

  @fba I'm currently doing these prohects with my AI agents via paperclip: 1. Local city newsletter currently at 3400 subs. 2. Binance crypto trading bot (I have no clue about Crypto) but it's fun. 3. etoro trading bot. Working through lots of tests mostly probably a fail but again fun

• 
  Selena Hart (@selenahart_) reported 55 minutes ago

  Binance Is Making Moves in MENA & Pakistan While everyone watches the charts, Binance is quietly getting the paperwork done. 20+ regulatory approvals globally, with MENA becoming a major region for Binance. 🇦🇪 Dubai: Licensed by VARA 🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi: Licensed under ADGM 🇧🇭 Bahrain: Category 4 licence from CBB 🇵🇰 Pakistan:AML registration completed, with local licensing next Not the flashy side of crypto, but an important one. Slow and steady. One market at a time. #Binance #BinanceAcademy #LearnWithBinance

• 
  Yaki (@Yaki_fomoArt) reported 56 minutes ago

  @BagCalls @binance love this. if USD1 becomes margin runway, who actually issues the USD1?

• 
  Turtle (𝔦, 𝔦) (@turtleonchain) reported 57 minutes ago

  I’m a great fan of Base. I’m also aware that there’s extreme denial going on at Base. While people have been getting rinsed left and right on Robinhood Chain, I’ve seen zero indicators of anyone wanting to go back to Base. The reputational damage Brian and Jesse caused is massive. People would rather lose everything somewhere else than go back. How does this get fixed, anon? That’s the million dollar question. It’s out of my control. If $BASE launches then Robinhood can just counter the move with their own native token. That in itself would kill all the excitement about $BASE that has been building up since 2025. People would just take the airdrop and **** off again. That shouldn’t be the case but that’s where we are. I couldn’t care less about TVL’s or the amount x402-transactions on Base when none of that serves the little guy in any way, shape or form. It’s awesome for those that made six- or seven figures on their own protocols and have deals with Coinbase because they used to work there. It’s great for them. But I’m not here for that crowd. I’m not here to serve those that work 9-5 or sleep on their golden silk pillows. I see and understand the suffering others have went through to make a dime in an honest way by investing (rather than trading like braindead gamblers or rugging tokens). Yes, there’s a huge group of investors that somehow always get the short end of the stick while the leadership always tries to convince them that they should think long-term. If there’s anything we’ve learned the past few years it’s that investing punishes you unless you got hold of supply for cheap as an insider or if you as a dev have been milking your community forever. Of course you’d defend your position and suck up to Coinbase because IT’S YOUR LIVELIHOOD. You cannot see the forest for the trees. You already made it. I’m speaking for those that want to achieve financial escape velocity. Don’t get me wrong. I couldn’t care less about memes nowadays or Brian’s sloppy handling of changing his PFP back and forth. I’m financially fine. I never entertained memes nor anything Zora-related on Base. Memes aren’t what they used to be. $BRIAN and $JESSE is pure slop. The big issue here is that utility protocols lack volume. The big issue is that builders and people that support builders with capital don’t get rewarded. ’Build on Base’ means jack **** today. It’s just mockery. It cannot be taken seriously nor should it. Base is terrible at bringing in real volume. Some have mistakenly confused recent posts from dozens of respected accounts as ”crashouts”. We are talking about hundreds of tweets with millions of impressions/views from a vast amount of minds that reached every corner of CT by trashing Coinbase, Base and its leadership. I’ve only seen Binance get such bad brand-sentiment in terms of people, platforms and products that are STILL working. This month has been an absolute PR-disaster for Base that unfolded organically. You have to make some really stupid moves on multiple occasions for a lengthy period of time to achieve this level of organic hatred. As long as the elephant in the room isn’t addressed this problem will not disappear. Brian and Jesse like to talk. But where is the volume? We can pretend all day long but I’m not a pretender. The volume isn’t pretending. My eyes aren’t lying. I know when volume has vanished. It’s a desert now as it was a desert in the early days of Base. BNB has been dry for a long while. ETH mainnet has been dry since late 2023. Could Base enter the same desert hell and never recover? It surely could. The matter of fact is that people don’t want to buy or hold tokens made by honest builders ONLY because they build on a chain that’s attached to Brian and Jesse. Should I repeat that? The quality of the protocols DON’T outweigh the disdain people have towards Brian and Jesse. The market is speaking and it’s speaking loudly. This is a very tricky spot to be in. Good luck with @baseapp, @cobie.

• 
  KISHUMATE ツ (@MateMXXI4) reported 57 minutes ago

  @binance that's a glitch in the matrix

• 
  Devil (@Devilll535) reported 57 minutes ago

  @GS25Erz @DexeNetwork @binance 1.72$ last block of liquidity clusters as off now. But, when things go down... More clusters gonna form down there. Won't be surprised if it goes to 0.

• 
  Ahmad (@TraderAhmaad) reported 60 minutes ago

  GM lads. $BTC getting sell pressure from perps, Not Spot. Binance perps and Bybit perps leading the selling. Monday high tag and sell off. I dont like price under weekly VWAP but it is at TPO range VAL. Losing weekly open can take price directly to monday lows. We have 1h200ema support right now