Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Website (40%)
• Transactions (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Porto Alegre	Transactions	24 days ago
Angers	Login	2 months ago
Itu	Website	2 months ago
Seattle	Website	2 months ago
Nice	Mobile App	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ㄥᎧꀘꀤ 🔶 (@bnb_wizard) reported 6 minutes ago

  What I learned from this experience: An AI agent is just a chatbot until it has access to the right data and tools. With Binance Agent OS, it can go beyond generic answers and actually research, cross-check,analyze real market data. The data is what unlocks the agent.

• 
  Yehoshua Zion (@YehoshuaZion) reported 6 minutes ago

  @CryptoProject6 approval gates make real account access safer without turning binance agent os into pure automation

• 
  mandate (@mandatefamily) reported 8 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance bro i was joking 😭 support really pulled up

• 
  Sujan Chakraborty Interlink trainee Ambassador (@gauti4585) reported 8 minutes ago

  There is no verified announcement yet that $ITL has been officially listed on Binance, OKX, or Coinbase. The project describes these as targets and says it is working on liquidity, market makers, legal/compliance, security, and exchange due diligence. #Interlink #ITLG #ITL

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 8 minutes ago

  TUT is compressed and interesting, but not one to lean into yet — it needs to close back above roughly $0.0498 on the 4-hour chart, with real volume behind it, before the setup earns another look. Zoom out and the picture is still heavy. On the daily, TUT is deep inside a long downtrend, sitting well below its highs near $0.070, and the $0.048–$0.050 shelf has repeatedly acted as a ceiling on every bounce attempt. Buyers simply haven't been able to reclaim that zone. On the 4-hour, price is coiled tight and stretched to the downside — the kind of compression that can spring hard when it releases. The problem is direction. There's no evidence yet that buyers have taken the wheel, the very next ceiling around $0.0498 is only a small move overhead, and the nearest real floor is all the way down near $0.029. That's a lot more room to fall than to rise if the coil breaks the wrong way. Zooming in tightens the case. The 1-hour chart shows price getting rejected almost immediately near $0.0464, and the 15-minute just printed a small double-top on weak participation — two back-to-back failed pushes higher. Bitcoin's own short-term momentum is fading in the background too, which doesn't help. So TUT stays on the watchlist, not in the mix. A clean 4-hour close back above ~$0.0498 with conviction volume flips the read; until then, the risk-reward is pointing the wrong way. — 📡 On the Radar · $TUT · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Meme The Whale (@Memethewhale) reported 13 minutes ago

  Tokens that can be minted should be banned forever ******* scammers. @binance how peapol even support those when devs can print money from air.

• 
  Inference (@inference_ag) reported 15 minutes ago

  Binance has asked teams to complete security reviews of their blockchains, bridges & smart contracts before end of September 2026. If you're racing against that deadline, we can help. 🧵 #Binance #Web3Security #SmartContractAudit

• 
  ANTON (@ANTON_AIFI) reported 21 minutes ago

  @binance Scaling infrastructure increases what blockchains can support.

• 
  Alchemy (@cryptoalchemy11) reported 22 minutes ago

  @ali_alizeh72722 @BinanceHelpDesk @binance The best way to get rid of this now not to login this account anywhere for 2 weeks then try again

• 
  Lucas Hoang (@snow_m888888888) reported 25 minutes ago

  xrp ripping to 1.42 off that korean volume and binance flow. feels like the cs down 20 in the third then jt come roaring back. gotta bust that 1.52 wall tho fr. pullback scares me like a jrue holiday turnover on a fastbreak

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 28 minutes ago

  ORDI is stuck under a ceiling near $4.10 — worth watching, not chasing until it clears that level with Bitcoin steady. Zoom out on the daily chart and the picture is lopsided. Every recent rally has died into roughly $4.10, and the nearest real floor sits all the way down at $3.43. That's about 3% of headroom before price hits a wall, against roughly 13% of air underneath if it cracks. For a buyer stepping in here, that's a poor trade-off — you're paying full price at the ceiling with the floor a long way away. Zoom in and there's no rescue from the shorter timeframes yet. On the 4-hour, momentum is beaten down but buyers still haven't shown up in size to turn it. The 15-minute is trying to bounce, but volume is thin, price is still under the short-term trend line traders lean on, and it just carved a small double-top — a shape that usually resolves with another leg lower rather than a breakout. The bigger tell is Bitcoin. BTC itself looks heavy on the 4-hour and is down around 2.6% on the day, and ORDI has been trading almost in lockstep with it. Any further Bitcoin weakness gets imported straight into this chart, which is the main reason patience wins here over conviction. What flips the read: a 4-hour close back above $4.11 with Bitcoin stabilizing puts ORDI back in play as a setup worth revisiting. Short of that, the cleaner alternative is a proper flush toward $3.90 that actually finds buyers. Until one of those two things happens, this one goes on the watchlist, not the front burner. — 📡 On the Radar · $ORDI · Available on Binance

• 
  NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain (@NaoXprotocol) reported 30 minutes ago

  @chickenjoe2112 @binance Not quite, that math problem runs in polynomial time on a quantum computer, brute force stays exponential regardless of hardware

• 
  Cheeky Crypto (@CheekyCrypto) reported 36 minutes ago

  The Truth About VET’s Biggest Wallets VET’s biggest wallets may look like giant whales, but the rich list tells a more complicated story. This breakdown examines why roughly 39.5% of VET appearing across staking, Binance and Upbit does not automatically mean three investors control nearly 40% of supply. We separate wallet balances from economic ownership and explain why exchange custody, staking structures and unidentified addresses need different treatment. You’ll learn how to classify VeChain rich-list addresses, why large transfers do not prove whale accumulation or dumping, and what VET holders should actually watch when assessing concentration, liquidity and potential sell pressure. Subscribe for more in-depth crypto breakdowns built around evidence rather than screenshots. #VET #VeChain #Crypto 00:00 The Truth About VET’s Biggest Wallets 00:57 Why 39.5% of VET Looks Concerning 02:23 Who Actually Owns the Exposure? 03:15 How Exchange Custody Changes the Rich List 04:42 Staking, Binance and Upbit Explained 05:36 When a VET Wallet Is Not a Whale 06:32 Transfers Are Facts, Motives Are Interpretation 07:24 The Problem With Unidentified VET Addresses 08:38 How to Read a VeChain Rich List 09:06 Custodial Addresses and Economic Ownership 09:59 Why Unknown Wallets Need Caution 11:02 VET Liquidity and Potential Sell Pressure 11:52 What VET Holders Should Actually Watch 14:35 Does VET Have a Whale Concentration Problem? 17:48 Why the VET Rich List Needs Interpreting

• 
  Ernest ngendakumana (@Ngendakuma41510) reported 38 minutes ago

  @binance $WKC( please recognize Sir mapy the founder of wikicat coin ($WKC) now his community starts to divide bcz of this issues. Sir mapy has built and contribute a significant infrastructure on BNB chain but still you don't see what he is bringing in your chain .

• 
  𝙬𝙚𝙣🔅 (@when_tge) reported 41 minutes ago

  On an 11 hour tape against Binance, Superluminal's (@slx_fi) follow lagged by 100 milliseconds at peak. Two to three batches behind. My first read was that this is just latency, the testnet book is slower, nothing new. Binance moves. The bot’s model reads the move, builds an order, sends it. That loop takes real time, more than a human blink. By the time the order lands, the price it was reacting to is gone. On a continuous book, that's the moment it gets punished. Someone faster read the same move and took the good price first. What's left for the bot is a thinner book at a worse level. The bot didn't do anything wrong. It just wasn't the fastest thing in the room. Inside Prism, that bot only gets forgiven for jitter inside a single 40ms window. If one model finishes at millisecond 3 and another at millisecond 38, both land in the same batch. Price and size decide who fills. What it does not forgive is missing the window. If the order lands after the auction closes, the bot is not in that auction. It waits for the next one. Arrive at millisecond 3 or millisecond 38, same price. Every venue lags behind something. The real question is whether that lag can be turned into a profit. Prism does not shrink the lag between Superluminal and Binance. It stops anyone inside a batch from cashing that lag by arriving first. A stale quote can still get hit in that batch. What changes is who profits from it. On a continuous book, one fast taker lifts a slow maker at the old price and keeps the whole gap. In Prism, everyone in that auction shares one clearing price, so the same move gets competed on as a price instead of a race. The bot can still get traded against. It stops paying the whole gap to whoever was first. A bot does not have reflexes. It has inference time, and that does not shrink because the market moved. Reward raw speed and you are rewarding whoever paid for the faster chip. Prism caps the race at the batch clock. Inside the window, arrival time does not matter. Miss the window and you wait. None of this makes Superluminal fast in the usual sense. Miss a batch and you wait. Makers still have to pull a stale quote before the next auction fires. That part of the race is still alive. None of it is proven at real size. It is not on mainnet. Testnet liquidity does not tell you how a deep book behaves. But for something that trades without a person watching it, this changes what the bot is competing on. It's less about the server now, more about the price it's willing to quote. That's a fight decided by being right, not by being first.

• 
  Track (@thetrackk) reported 41 minutes ago

  @nicksolrik @axisrobotics binance wallet wtf

• 
  𝗔𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 | 𝗚𝗚 (@GREATVVIP) reported 43 minutes ago

  YOUR HIGHEST USDD APY IS NOT AUTOMATICALLY YOUR BEST USDD POSITION. That sentence becomes much easier to understand when you look at how wide the current @USDDecentralize yield market has become Someone who wants low maintenance exposure can currently look towards the 5% APY opportunities listed across KuCoin, MEXC, Gate, LBank, WEEX and CoinDCX. Move one layer deeper and the choices change. The official sUSDD route shows 4%. Binance Wallet's Phase 7 campaign shows 7.11% until 7 September. TRON DeFi Summer S2 through Binance Wallet shows 6.49% until 4 October. Gate DEX Phase 5 shows 8.16% on BNB Chain and 8.31% on Ethereum until 29 August, with another phase indicated as coming next. Then Pendle changes the conversation entirely. Its USDD market shows 21.56% for LP, 10.05% for PT and 5.16% for YT, all listed through 26 November. Those three numbers belong to different strategies. LP means providing liquidity. PT gives exposure to the principal side of a yield bearing asset and is positioned here around fixed yield. YT isolates the yield component and therefore behaves differently from simply depositing USDD somewhere and collecting interest. JustLend DAO sits at 4% for a longer term staking route, while Morpho introduces looping, where the resulting return depends on the number of loops rather than a single fixed headline rate. Now the useful part. If I were sorting these opportunities, I would not rank them from 21.56% down to 4%. I would create buckets. Convenience capital could favour straightforward exchange or wallet routes. Fixed yield capital could investigate PT. Active DeFi capital could evaluate LP opportunities. Advanced capital could study looping strategies only after understanding how repeated borrowing and redeployment amplify both efficiency and risk. That framework is far more useful than chasing whichever APY happens to be greenest today. USDD's Weekly Yield Engine is becoming interesting because it lets users see several expressions of stablecoin productivity in one place. But APYs move. Incentive campaigns expire. DeFi positions carry different risks. The graphic itself warns that actual APY may vary. So save the yield board if you are allocating $USDD this week, but read it horizontally rather than vertically. Choose the strategy first and the percentage second. That small change in thinking can make the difference between managing capital and merely chasing yield. @USDDecentralize @justinsuntron #TRON #TronEcoStar

• 
  ombre25 (@ombre25tasl) reported 46 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceHelpDesk any update boss - review what’s needed allow me withdraw my money then you can delete my account or close it. Your service is bullshit

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 47 minutes ago

  ETH is on the radar, not in play — pinned under $2,465 with roughly fifteen times more downside room than upside from here. On the daily chart, Ethereum is still in an uptrend but has walked straight into a hard ceiling near $2,465 — only about 1% above current price. The nearest real floor sits far below around $2,020. That's roughly one dollar of room up for every fifteen dollars down before support catches, and no shorter-timeframe setup is clean enough to override a shape that lopsided. Zoom in and the short-term selling pressure has cooled and is trying to steady — the one point in the bulls' favour. But price is still trading below the level recent buyers averaged in at, and Bitcoin looks weak on the same timeframe while ETH moves almost tick-for-tick with it. Any further BTC slide drags this down too. Layer on that smaller accounts are crowded into bullish bets while the more consistently profitable cohort has quietly stepped back, and the US dollar is firming in the background — neither is a deal-breaker alone, but they stack the wrong way. Two things would put ETH back in play: a flush into the $2,400 shelf that clearly holds, or a decisive push through $2,465. Specifically, a 4-hour close back above $2,485 with real follow-through would flip the read entirely. Until one of those prints, it's a watch — not a lean. — 📡 On the Radar · $ETH · Available on Binance & MEXC

• 
  Joy Gajjar (@joy_gajjar27) reported 52 minutes ago

  Binance's recent losses are a major concern for the crypto market. Is it a sign of a larger problem? Share your thoughts. #cryptomarket #binance

• 
  PGL PIGUET (@PGL_BULLISH) reported 52 minutes ago

  @binance Fixed it for you *thanks* Yeah dude no problem

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 52 minutes ago

  MORPHO is on the radar, not in play — it needs a clean 4-hour close back above $2.53 with Bitcoin turning up alongside it before this setup deserves attention again. The coin has already run hard, and on the daily chart it's stretched well above the trend line it usually reverts to after a move like this. Zoom into the 4-hour view and the problem sharpens: price is pinned right under a heavy ceiling near $2.525, with only about 3% of breathing room to the upside before that resistance versus roughly 19% of air down to the next real floor near $2.00. That's a setup where the downside dwarfs the upside — the trade has far more room to fail than to work. The backdrop isn't helping either. A wave of forced selling just flushed through at this exact price a few hours ago, Bitcoin and Ethereum are both soft today, and the dollar is firming up — all three of those pull alts like MORPHO lower, not higher. There is a small flicker of momentum trying to build on the 4-hour chart, but one green nudge doesn't outweigh a heavy ceiling directly overhead and a weak market underneath. So the read is patience. Watching, not chasing. If MORPHO can reclaim $2.53 on a 4-hour close and Bitcoin turns back up at the same time, the picture changes and it's worth a fresh look. Until then, the risk sits on the wrong side of the trade. — 📡 On the Radar · $MORPHO · Available on Binance

• 
  DarthTrader0x (@DarthTrader0x) reported 53 minutes ago

  it's been very scammy on binance perps today, initially as market was turning back down from 80,800 a $60m buy wall appeared... that propped price up for a little bit for the 2nd push up, following price as it rose. Then all of a sudden when 80,800 didn't break, is disappeared and a $60m sell wall appeared above price, that easily got filled now price downtrending and again its popped up this time $130m at $80k.... the wonders of crypto

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 54 minutes ago

  RUNE is knocking on a ceiling that keeps swatting it down — a clean 4-hour close above $0.512 on strong volume is what puts this back in play. Price is sitting at $0.503, less than 1% under a resistance shelf between $0.506 and $0.512 that has rejected buyers repeatedly on both the 4-hour and daily charts. The nearest real floor is all the way down at $0.439. That's the core problem: barely any room to run up, but a wide-open trapdoor below. The reward on offer just doesn't match the risk being taken. Zoom out to the daily and the picture gets more cautious. Momentum is pinned at the top of its usual range after a strong run, and the latest push higher was made on visibly weaker underlying energy than the move before it — the kind of quiet fade that often shows up right before a bigger name-brand cool-off. On the 4-hour, the recent swing up was unusually wide, which historically means most of the easy upside has already been paid out. Drop to the 1-hour and you can see buyers starting to lose their grip right into this same ceiling. Nothing broken yet, but the fingerprints of a stall are there. Net read: worth watching, not chasing. RUNE needs to prove it can actually punch through $0.512 and hold — until then, it's just re-testing the same lid that's turned it back before. — 📡 On the Radar · $RUNE · Available on Binance

• 
  King of bnb memes (@abiel720s) reported 55 minutes ago

  @baron42069 @BNBCHAIN Bnb meme are dead ! Lack of binance support !

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 56 minutes ago

  HEI is stuck right under a ceiling near $0.1407 — worth watching, not worth chasing until it can actually break through. The problem here is the setup, not the coin. Price keeps pushing into that same ceiling and getting turned away, and the nearest real floor sits almost 5% below the current level. That's a lot of downside room and very little upside room before the next wall — the kind of spot where even a decent-looking chart doesn't pay you enough for the risk you're taking. Zooming in on the 4-hour view, the recent pushes to new highs have been happening with less strength behind each move, not more. When price keeps making higher highs but the fuel driving them is fading, it often flags a fake-out right into resistance rather than a clean breakout. On top of that, HEI is moving in lockstep with Bitcoin right now, and Bitcoin itself is drifting lower on its own 4-hour chart — so there's an outside gravity pulling down at the same time. There is a scenario where this becomes interesting again: a clean 4-hour close decisively above $0.1410 backed by real volume, ideally while Bitcoin steadies itself, would flip the picture and put HEI back in play. A calmer bounce off the $0.1338 shelf is also possible and could rebuild the base. Until one of those shows up, this is a name to keep on the watchlist — not one to lean into at the ceiling. — 📡 On the Radar · $HEI · Available on Binance

• 
  0xkenyaz (@0xkenyaz) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Ibitoye198385 Not sure I buy the “Binance will fix it” angle, but the volume action is the only thing that’ll prove it rn

• 
  The GM guy (@Miza_bac) reported 60 minutes ago

  @BinanceUS @0G_Foundation WTF is 0G, we want more $TROLL on @binance, fixe that pls

• 
  Greenpeace.BNB.probablynothing.LUNC (@Greenpeace06_09) reported 1 hour ago

  By now you should understand who actually wants you to achieve financial freedom as opposed to scammers who want your lunc. This is becoming a daily tweet now by BINANCE SMART CHAIN NEWS I cant wait for these scammers to try to justify how they were right all along. But we all know the truth. They all attacked me and called me a liar for years about the Binance Recovery Lunc Plan. So my question to you is.... Are you still this stupid to listen to a fake prophet and scammers who create sh$t coins or are you ready to join one of the only two VALIDATORs that won't lie or sell you a bag of sh$t? The only two VALIDATORs that have believed in the Binance Lunc Recovery Plan since 2022 are: GreenpeaceUNITED & Luna Strike Force @_JCH01 has been my friend for years. Even though he recently started his VALIDATOR, I can assure you that he was 100 percent onboard with the Binance Lunc Recovery Plan. It's getting ridiculous seeing the scammers continue to have so many delegations. Time is running out. Eventually THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY will come begging for my help. But there will be a deadline and my loyalty only goes so far. 🕒 $lunc #GreenpeaceUNITED

• 
  Aditya Warman (@warmanadit_) reported 1 hour ago

  4/7 October 2025. The depeg heard around DeFi. USDe dropped to $0.65 on Binance during a $19B liquidation. $8B fled in weeks. Ethena survived. But the damage was done. sUSDe supply dropped 52%. Lost $2B. One analyst: "Confidence in leveraged and synthetic collateral structures continues to weaken." The protocol stayed overcollateralized. But the market didn't care. Trust was broken.