1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Cloudflare
  4. Outage Map
Cloudflare

Cloudflare Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Cloudflare users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Cloudflare, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Cloudflare users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Cloudflare is a company that provides DDoS mitigation, content delivery network (CDN) services, security and distributed DNS services. Cloudflare's services sit between the visitor and the Cloudflare user's hosting provider, acting as a reverse proxy for websites.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Asnières-sur-Seine, Île-de-France 1
New York City, NY 3
Township of Evan, KS 1
Ahmedabad, GJ 1
Le Puy-en-Velay, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Ann Arbor, MI 1
Palermo, Sicily 1
Los Angeles, CA 1
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • EliYumnik
    Eli Yumn (@EliYumnik) reported

    @acolombiadev @Cloudflare GitHub for CI/CD and hosting the damn internet’s repos Supabase Resend Replit Gemini Eleven labs

  • SelenkaOnChain
    Selenka (@SelenkaOnChain) reported

    Netnet Capital team is flexing metrics and talking about successful launch of Subway Runner... Meanwhile, 2 vibecoders literally drained their entire mechanic and became the #1 and #2 top holders. Here is the breakdown directly from one of the guys who farmed them: 🧵👇 "First decent cook of the bull run (if we’re even in one). Spent the last few months trying to get good at on-chain analytics, so hadn't been actively cooking. Two nights ago, I'm watching the feed and notice everyone sending $10 clips to this CA: 0x8154e35166f21305adac82f95b54de8acd44d23a. Instantly smelled pure degen activity. Hit up the group chat, did some digging - turns out it’s a Subway Surfers / Chrome dino style runner game by NetNet. Their shitcoin was sitting at a $90M cap at the time, so I figured if their token is holding that kind of valuation, there’s definitely meat on the bone. Normally, their games are pure casino trash: deposit cash, pray to RNGesus, or get rekt. But why not test it? Played a run manually and noticed that at the end of each game there was a draw. Checked their TG and reverse-engineered the contract - turns out there’s an N% chance to win an NFT from their collection. Their previous official collection had crazy volume and peaked hard, so my degen senses started tingling: this was a hidden gem. Literally 15 minutes later, they pause the game. Perfect timing - gave us room to prep. By that point, I had already captured the WSS traffic and requests. Their game logic was using a basic commit-reveal scheme: courseCommit = keccak256(serverSecret) seed = keccak256(serverSecret ++ playerSalt ++ runId) Meaning: right at game start, the server literally sent us the secret, allowing us to compute the seed and reconstruct the entire track in advance. The game loop: 3 lanes, 30 coins, 3600 ticks to finish (60 seconds). You dodge obstacles while longing/shorting NVDA. 3 hits = you lose the full $10. Complete a flawless run = you collect all coins to refund your stake and it only burns ~$0.20 in fees, giving you an almost free roll at the NFT lottery. In the era of AI and vibecoding, this was child's play. My boy XXX and I started spinning up bots in parallel. Ended up deploying his script since he coded it faster. We simulated runs, got a 100% win rate, set up a websocket listener for when the contract unpauses, and went to bed. Woke up at 6 AM, and literally 30 seconds later the game goes live. We spun up the bots - 5 minutes in, we already bagged our first NFT. Then came the scaling phase. At first, the team didn't give a single **** - no Cloudflare, no rate limiting, not even a basic 429. We ran 10 wallets simultaneously. After a few hours, they finally threw in a primitive 429, and that was it. No bot protection, no captcha, nothing. They didn’t even enforce single-session checks per wallet, so we were running multiple concurrent instances on the exact same address (literally impossible to do manually). The bots printed flawlessly. At one point, our load was crashing live games for actual manual players, forcing the team to repeatedly pause the game to fix lag. Every time they brought it back up, we resumed blasting. Total mint size was 1,060 NFTs. We scooped over 20% of the entire supply. Then came the funny part: the collection had zero secondary volume. Time for a little social engineering. We hopped into their TG playing dumb, gently nudging the admins: 'Hey guys, might want to tweet that the game is live and apply for OpenSea verification!' The final tally: * Total capital spent on fees/burns: ~$1,700 * Total NFTs pulled: ~50–60 pieces (friends got a similar bag) * PnL: Dumped most of the floor tier into bids today at $200–$300 a pop, still holding some. Nothing crazy for a real bull run, but an easy 5-figure profit for a couple of hours of vibecoding."

  • laolu_afolabi
    Gaylord (@laolu_afolabi) reported

    @lanreadelowo From Claude: """ Technically, yes — it's buildable, and "platform-agnostic" is realistic because most providers and gateways (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, etc.) have already converged on an OpenAI-compatible schema, so a routing layer that swaps providers behind one endpoint isn't a huge engineering lift. But there are a few things in the premise worth stress-testing before you build. **The "discount arbitrage" framing is a bit shakier than it sounds.** Most of these gateways aren't reselling models at a discount — they're reselling at close to list price plus a fee. While OpenRouter states it doesn't mark up inference pricing, its credit purchase fee effectively acts as a surcharge on all usage. LiteLLM's pitch is the opposite direction — zero markup by self-hosting, with OpenRouter's ~5% fee costing meaningfully more at scale. So the "discounts" you'd be arbitraging are less "provider A is cheaper than provider B for the same model" and more: rate-limited free tiers, short-lived promos, or BYOK arrangements — OpenRouter's BYOK is free up to a monthly allowance before a 5% fee kicks in. Those are real, but they're capacity-constrained and often disappear once volume shows up — hard to build a durable business on chasing them. **The bigger product risk: tokens/models aren't fungible.** Swapping Gemini for Claude for GPT under one endpoint isn't like arbitraging cloud spot instances — different tokenizers (so "$/token" isn't apples-to-apples), different tool-calling formats, different output style and capability. If your router silently reroutes a customer's traffic to whatever's cheapest this hour, you can quietly degrade the app built on top of it. That's the actual hard problem, not the proxying. **What's actually working in production right now is narrower than blind price-routing:** AT&T processes tens of billions of tokens a day using cache-aware routers that send simpler tasks to cheaper models, cutting costs up to 56% with only ~2% quality degradation, and this "model cascade" pattern — cheap/fast models handle the default case, only escalating to a frontier model when a confidence check fails — is used by both AT&T's LiteLLM-based router and Databricks' Smart Router. That's routing by task-fit with cost as a constraint, not routing purely by whoever's running a promo this week. **Competitive landscape is already crowded**: OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, Requesty, Helicone, Not Diamond, Martian, TrueFoundry, Cloudflare AI Gateway, Ofox all do some flavor of unified-endpoint routing today, several with automatic fallback/cost-based rules already built in. Pure discount-hunting is a thin moat — anyone can scrape pricing pages, and providers may treat aggressive arbitrage-only usage as a ToS problem. Where I'd actually look for a wedge if I were you: quality-aware routing with an audit trail (so teams can trust that "cheaper" didn't mean "worse" for their specific task), rather than price-only arbitrage. """

  • jamescoder12
    James (@jamescoder12) reported

    The uncomfortable truth. Your ISP has no incentive to optimize your router settings. They have every incentive to leave them on factory default and every incentive to upsell you when the defaults cause problems. When your Wi-Fi is slow, you call and complain. They test Speed 1 the connection to your modem. It's fine. So they tell you "everything looks good on our end" which is technically true. Then they offer you a faster plan. You pay $30/month more. Speed 1 goes up. Speed 2 the Wi-Fi to your devices doesn't change. Because the bottleneck was never the pipe coming into your home. It was the 6 feet between your router and your laptop. When your firmware is 4 years out of date, they don't push an update. When your channel is congested, they don't suggest switching. When your DNS is slow, they don't mention Cloudflare. When your channel width is halved, they don't widen it. When your security is on WPA2 with the factory admin password, they don't flag the risk. Every free fix that would make your Wi-Fi faster is a fix that prevents them from upselling you a more expensive plan. Every month you rent their router is $14 in revenue for a $60 device they deployed years ago. The rental has no end date. The equipment depreciates. The revenue doesn't. He called his ISP 4 times. They suggested upgrading twice. He upgraded twice. He paid $360 extra over a year for a faster plan that didn't make his Wi-Fi faster because the problem was never the plan. It was 9 settings his ISP could have fixed in a 5-minute phone call. They chose to sell him a faster highway instead of widening the off-ramp. "Your ISP isn't slow. Your settings are. And the company delivering your internet profits every month you don't know the difference." 9 settings. 15 minutes. $528/year back. Faster internet on a cheaper plan. The router was never broken. The defaults were designed by a company that makes money when you think it is.

  • SahilMondal_
    Sahil Mondal (@SahilMondal_) reported

    The fastest way to crash PostgreSQL is opening direct connections inside Serverless Lambdas. 1,000 concurrent requests = 1,000 DB connections = OOM crash in 2 seconds. Fix: Put PgBouncer or Cloudflare Hyperdrive in front. Keep 20 persistent connections open and reuse them.

  • NathanFlurry
    Nathan Flurry 🔩 (@NathanFlurry) reported

    AI-generated Rivet Actors / Workflows are (finally) here 🥂 Some design notes on Dynamic Apps: Powered by agentOS → provides lightweight sandbox-as-a-library V8 isolate runtime → generated apps scale to 0, cold starts in ms, 22 MB per app, native JS performance (not slower WebAssembly like QuickJS) Novel Node.js-compatible runtime → ground truth agents already know & existing libraries work, native performance No nested virtualization → pure userspace, like Chromium & Cloudflare Workers Self-hostable → Dynamic Apps can run anywhere, including Kubernetes, Railway, EC2, etc (which don't support microVM / KVM) SQLite sharded by actor → scalable, fast, cheap, uses no compute when idle A Rivet namespace per app → isolates its actors, separates billing, and nothing to provision Builds run inside agentOS → npm install & build steps in the WASM sandbox, like a Dockerfile without the Linux VM Dynamic Apps also supports plain REST backends & static frontends deploy the same way

  • HandsomeHank_
    HandsomeHank (@HandsomeHank_) reported

    Last night through this afternoon I was pushing Reed (Bot) to maximize my usage after the free reset. I had another reset today at 2pm. I had him create and edit multiple trailers, merge two old websites into one with a new theme, host it on Cloudflare, and create and link a Square store. Then I had him use Printful to recreate old designs from the other site that were never really finished. We also updated a current site so it stays current until we switch over. Reed ended up bringing in another bot (Jules) to help so we could finish before 2pm. Both of them worked hard and stopped at 1:56 so I wouldn’t burn into the next allotment. I have other uses for this week. They left notes to pick it back up if I have extra usage left. Very pleased with their work. @bot @grok 🔥

  • tangvu_dev
    Tang Vu (@tangvu_dev) reported

    In the Vietnam 100-VU burst, Cloudflare averaged 191.77 ms vs Vercel’s 430.95 ms. P95 was 337.11 vs 879.96 ms, with 0% errors on both. But cross-region burst tests reversed the winner in the same regions as the warm tests.

  • EnzInnocent
    Innocent Bigega (@EnzInnocent) reported

    Stopping the bad guys with Cloudflare: 17,256 malicious requests blocked or challenged in the last month #cloudflare

  • munchivelo
    J. (@munchivelo) reported

    @dillon_mulroy @EffectTS_ hm. what do you mean great cloudflare support? if i'm building apps for cloudflare ecosystem, what benefit does using EffectTS have over regular typescript/tailwind? can you be specific.

  • dataguybobby
    Bobby Lansing (@dataguybobby) reported

    Bot is grepping logs in CloudFlare, Azure, Supabase, and Vercel. Then triggering Cursor agents to build a fix. I am mentioning issues and approving PRs.

  • niceEli1
    Eli (イーライさん) (@niceEli1) reported

    @tekbog I literally migrated an entire service from one codebase made in C# to Rust with a few seconds of downtime (only was caused by cloudflare tunnels changing the domain from one internal service to another one). It isn’t hard to just make software work without a maintenance period.

  • hieuSSR
    Hieu 🚀 (@hieuSSR) reported

    @jRausell It also send and receive emails using cloudflare service too

  • blckchaindaily
    Blockchain Daily News (@blckchaindaily) reported

    🚨 CLOUDFLARE $NET EXPANDS AI AGENT SUPPORT, NOW RUNS CURSOR CLOUD AGENTS ON CLOUDFLARE SANDBOXES FOR CUSTOMER-CONTROLLED EXECUTION - PRESS RELEASE

  • rea1ReinaCruz
    Reina Cruz 🥼🧤🇨🇺 (@rea1ReinaCruz) reported

    @Cloudflare Fix human verification

Check Current Status