Cloudflare Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Anthony Goonetilleke (@This_AnthonyG) reported 1 minute ago

  @dibiagioandrea @MTSlive It’s a good question technically, Cloudflare Radar measures HTTP HTTPS traffic so API calls would be included but most public websites don’t expose inbound REST endpoints so that portion is relatively small in the grand scheme of things The bulk of this “non-human” traffic is almost certainly LLM driven crawlers training foundation models, retrieval agents fetching live content, and RAG pipelines scraping HTML etc it will only increase There’s also a subtler demand side shift have you noticed when you search on Google today the AI summary answers your question directly from content it already scraped and synthesized the underlying site still gets the bot visit but never the human click or traffic this structural change is as important as the raw numbers. The bot to human ratio isn’t just rising because bots are doing more it’s rising because humans are doing less of the last mile themselves I think

• 
  Chad King (@dudewithtude88) reported 4 minutes ago

  @HoffmanTactical Website is down... Are you not using cloudflare?

• 
  Dimetros Birku (@dimetros) reported 8 minutes ago

  @SiteGround Why is this happening in the first place ? Not everyone has time to regularly reach out to support to fix this or that. I am convinced that the problem is not from @Cloudflare side. #webhosting #siteground #cloudflare

• 
  Luiseatscomics (@luiseatscomics) reported 9 minutes ago

  Why does everything use Cloudflare for verification now? Slows everything down. Are there that many security issues now?

• 
  Dave Lui ☀️🪝 (@madave_lui) reported 10 minutes ago

  @cosmostation888 @HugoPhilion Just based off what they say and who they're connected to. You have to dissect the facts from the noise, especially those who use "prophecy" as an investment criteria. But, if they succeed at building strong rails inside of ACH payments that directly connect to banks they could see a pretty great increase in price. I think they have a shot, but I could lose all my investment with them. They're currently in my mid-conviction tier. I do think they can do pretty alright, though, and maybe they'll even surprise us all. There's a lot of folks who are, in my opinion, overly optimistic with the dots they've connected. I'm a bit more balanced and tend to lean on what's actually been said/announced... For instance they call themselves a Ripple strategic partner. They also said Ripple invested in them. To date I can't find a single Ripple announcement that confirms that. What I did find is that Ripple granted them a lot of xrp to put on Stronghold'd exchange. At the time Xpring was solely focused only on expanding the xrp market, so that made sense. And also at the time, my understanding is that Stronghold removed the xlm/shx pair on that exchange and replaced it with xrp/shx. BUT, that exchange is dead now, the old URL resolves to their homepage. Further, they're not listed anywhere that I can find as a true Ripple investment; meaning Ripple gave them capital. There's no Form D filed with the SEC between Ripple and Stronghold (or Action Factory (Stronghold's founding company owned by Tammy)) and no official Ripple announcement. They're not even listed on the RippleX site where Ripple disclose's their investment portfolio. Does it mean that Ripple didn't invest? No, they could have in a more obscure way, but it could also mean that Stronghold is inflating the relationship and calling the xrp they received an investment/partnership... They could have been Ripple's partner in expanding xrp, but that deal could have been one-sided in Ripple's favor, and Stronghold only benefited from the exposure. Getting strong talking points is a valid growth strategy so who knows. The point is that without announcements from both sides (otherwise called "confirmation") or a paper trail that you can validate the claims yourself, you're leaving it to faith, and imaginations can run wild when you blindly believe what's claimed. Even still, Stronghold shows an impressive number of investors and advisors on their site. But again, that's coming from them. So what I have been able to track down is that Stronghold is based in SF, they have about 30+ people on LinkedIn who claim to work there full time (predominantly software engineers who live in New Zealand and a few other places), Stronghold is a Delaware entity (normal for privacy and taxes) that is owned by Action Factory, and their trademark is in fact registered and live. Action Factory and Stronghold both trace back to the same address in San Francisco. Both Action Factory and Stronghold's URL use identical CloudFlare name servers and that's a strong connection because those are unique to Cloudflare users. So the same person is managing both domains under one account. So at a minimum we know that Action Factory and Stronghold are the same entity both sitting at the same address at the time of inception. Doesn't mean they don't have a different corporate location now. There's no issue with that. Most recently they called their listing on Uphold as a partnership for institutions and tagged Uphold in the post. That's a brave move if not completely true, but those claims again have to be taken on faith. @UpholdMarkets (Uphold's marketing twitter account for their listings) did post about $shx, but they didn't mention institutions in that post. So we're back to faith there. I have never been able to confirm any of the investments or partnerships they claim outside of the now dead xrp moment with Ripple on their now dead trade[dot]stronghold[dot]co exchange. It's all Stronghold saying it, there's no confirmation from the other side. And the one everyone loves is the IBM trial in a closed loop environment. That was real, but it's long over now. Stronghold has moved away from Stronghold USD and their focus has shifted completely to leveraging other existing networks. IBM was a great name to tout for marketing, but the strength of that moment mattering has long passed for me. So my criteria won't let me over invest on what "might happen." I'd rather miss some upside than be completely wrong if they miss their shots or if they're "faking it until they make it" but never actually make it.

• 
  Neelakandan NC (@NeelakandanNC) reported 15 minutes ago

  A shocking 57.4% of all web activity came from AI agents and bots — automated software that cycles internet tasks on repeat — compared to just 42.7% being driven by humans, as of at least May, data from internet hosting service Cloudflare revealed. - it is time we build the internet for agents

• 
  teej dv 🔭 (@teej_dv) reported 15 minutes ago

  @just_cromer i'm still working on a lot of ideas of what the runtime will look like. i am really interested in actors because i think they are cool and then i can get rid of a bunch of shared memory parallelism problems without having to introduce all the modes oxcaml has. and it works nice for things like serverless deploy/multi-computer workfows/cloudflare workers/DOs, etc so i'm not sure yet. a lot to play with there right now

• 
  vaish (@wishee0) reported 16 minutes ago

  now, this is just the first half on how we're storing things. retrieval is up next. for querying, im gonna try with let's say, "cinema ticketing platform" - whatever ****** embedding model i use will just turn it into vector - ill throw @Cloudflare vectorize at the problem and it'll find nearby stored vectors - we get semantic contexts back - generator creates domain labels - reranker sorts them - resolver checks availability??? - profit?!?!?!??!! i think this is much cheaper than throwing an ai model at the solution or even a generic string matching solution cause keyword system only knows exact words with vectors, it can connect related ideas(?): cinema movie theater ticket sales events showtimes booking

• 
  Mason (@capten_masin) reported 19 minutes ago

  Anyone else getting constant 404 and API errors in @Cloudflare? Doesn't seem to be any issues on the status page

• 
  JR @ Tiny Startups (@tinystartupscom) reported 20 minutes ago

  @IricMidel I used to only buy with Godaddy but holy **** Cloudflare is so much cheaper

• 
  ThinkValue.co (@think_value) reported 20 minutes ago

  Effectively the line: ( in {"HTTP/1.0" "HTTP/1.1" "HTTP/0.9"} In my @Cloudflare rules config, caught much more bots than the other lines. I am not an expert, so it may also help people in a similar position to mine to know this as a good practice.

• 
  Dmytro Shevchenko 🇺🇦 (@dschewchenko) reported 21 minutes ago

  PreviewChecks got more scanner traffic than users today :) People already try /gcp-key.json and /firebase-adminsdk.json. Good news: Cloudflare Workers do not keep my secrets in public files. Bad news: they still keep trying.

• 
  BattleFlags (@Groks_Lament) reported 23 minutes ago

  @xai @Cloudflare Your egregious image gen cool down rates for paying customers are nothing short of Theft and Fraud.

• 
  Lord Waffleman (@LordWaffleman) reported 27 minutes ago

  @maietta @jpschroeder Yeah. That’s why think it’ll get worse. The massive amount of attacks, vulnerabilities we are seeing I think are driven by AI and … “another issue.” Cloudflare issues for the last couple years have set a few fires, so I can’t imagine it getting better.

• 
  Sahil Nawaz (@sahilyaps) reported 32 minutes ago

  ChatGPT can think. Claude can reason. Grok can search. None of them can buy a $5 API. That's the bottleneck. Everyone is obsessed with AI intelligence. Almost nobody is talking about AI payments. But that's where the next trillion-dollar market is forming. @awscloud just launched AgentCore Payments with @coinbase infrastructure. @Cloudflare and Coinbase are pushing x402. The entire premise is simple: (1) An AI agent discovers a service. (2) An AI agent pays for that service. (3) An AI agent consumes that service. No human in the loop. For 30 years, HTTP 402 ("Payment Required") was basically ignored. Now it's becoming the payment layer for machine-to-machine commerce. Most founders still think AI is a content tool. The biggest opportunity may actually be AI becoming an economic actor. Question: What happens when there are more agents spending money online than humans?