Cloudflare Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  James Martinez (@realjamesmtz) reported 3 minutes ago

  @mrfundman @Cloudflare Damn too rich for me.

• 
  Paul T (@BscTraynor) reported 4 minutes ago

  @ClareCraigPath petition site receives a massive surge of traffic from X, Cloudflare may issue a "Checking your browser" challenge page or briefly queue users to prevent the server from crashing

• 
  Hieu 🚀 (@hieuSSR) reported 10 minutes ago

  @jRausell It also send and receive emails using cloudflare service too

• 
  Jeff Weinstein (@jeff_weinstein) reported 10 minutes ago

  Cloudflare, known for internet-scale internet infrastructure, is now building internet-scale billing infrastructure, in partnership with @stripe. (Detailed data about usage and cost is now a fundamental element of any service.)

• 
  VaultCord (@VaultCord) reported 11 minutes ago

  @imdevPU23 @acolombiadev @Cloudflare Website is hella slow.

• 
  Austin (@IamAroke) reported 15 minutes ago

  @nickstewart_ Cloudflare went down because of a regex. That's not a joke, that actually happened.

• 
  MoMoMacro (@MoMoMacro) reported 19 minutes ago

  $NET is in the buy zone. Price: $273.85 Aggressive pullback zone: $274.04 Why we own it: Cloudflare owns the edge that traffic physically transits - a real enforcement point, plus the pay-per-crawl and bot-control layer that decides which AI agents may touch a site at all. Risk: THE MOST EXPENSIVE NAME IN THE ROTATION: 43.3x EV/Sales and ~184x forward earnings on a business with a NEGATIVE GAAP operating margin, ~$109B cap, sitting near its 52-week high. Every take must state the multiple explicitly - the thesis is quality and positioning, never value, and a de-rate does not need bad news to happen. This is the level the work pointed at. Nothing about the thesis changed on the way down.

• 
  shownotover (@shownotover) reported 19 minutes ago

  @adnaannasir_ Does Cloudflare really provide hosting? I have never tried it.

• 
  ticktechh (@sprki999) reported 20 minutes ago

  @OmegaNekoSimp @NoboKik Does cloudflare use PoW? Never noticed a temperature spike from those and the ryzen in my thinkpad likes to spike 15 degrees just from looking at it

• 
  Przemysław Zalewski (@Ciunkos) reported 21 minutes ago

  @efalcao @proofpoint @Cloudflare Most likely by the fact Cloudflare is kinda bad at handling abuse reports - try filling their form and see for yourself. Any service that could be used for spam delivery, will eventually be used for that. And Cloudflare now tastes what other providers experience day to day.

• 
  Gaylord (@laolu_afolabi) reported 21 minutes ago

  @lanreadelowo From Claude: """ Technically, yes — it's buildable, and "platform-agnostic" is realistic because most providers and gateways (OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, etc.) have already converged on an OpenAI-compatible schema, so a routing layer that swaps providers behind one endpoint isn't a huge engineering lift. But there are a few things in the premise worth stress-testing before you build. **The "discount arbitrage" framing is a bit shakier than it sounds.** Most of these gateways aren't reselling models at a discount — they're reselling at close to list price plus a fee. While OpenRouter states it doesn't mark up inference pricing, its credit purchase fee effectively acts as a surcharge on all usage. LiteLLM's pitch is the opposite direction — zero markup by self-hosting, with OpenRouter's ~5% fee costing meaningfully more at scale. So the "discounts" you'd be arbitraging are less "provider A is cheaper than provider B for the same model" and more: rate-limited free tiers, short-lived promos, or BYOK arrangements — OpenRouter's BYOK is free up to a monthly allowance before a 5% fee kicks in. Those are real, but they're capacity-constrained and often disappear once volume shows up — hard to build a durable business on chasing them. **The bigger product risk: tokens/models aren't fungible.** Swapping Gemini for Claude for GPT under one endpoint isn't like arbitraging cloud spot instances — different tokenizers (so "$/token" isn't apples-to-apples), different tool-calling formats, different output style and capability. If your router silently reroutes a customer's traffic to whatever's cheapest this hour, you can quietly degrade the app built on top of it. That's the actual hard problem, not the proxying. **What's actually working in production right now is narrower than blind price-routing:** AT&T processes tens of billions of tokens a day using cache-aware routers that send simpler tasks to cheaper models, cutting costs up to 56% with only ~2% quality degradation, and this "model cascade" pattern — cheap/fast models handle the default case, only escalating to a frontier model when a confidence check fails — is used by both AT&T's LiteLLM-based router and Databricks' Smart Router. That's routing by task-fit with cost as a constraint, not routing purely by whoever's running a promo this week. **Competitive landscape is already crowded**: OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Portkey, Requesty, Helicone, Not Diamond, Martian, TrueFoundry, Cloudflare AI Gateway, Ofox all do some flavor of unified-endpoint routing today, several with automatic fallback/cost-based rules already built in. Pure discount-hunting is a thin moat — anyone can scrape pricing pages, and providers may treat aggressive arbitrage-only usage as a ToS problem. Where I'd actually look for a wedge if I were you: quality-aware routing with an audit trail (so teams can trust that "cheaper" didn't mean "worse" for their specific task), rather than price-only arbitrage. """

• 
  Blockchain Daily News (@blckchaindaily) reported 25 minutes ago

  🚨 CLOUDFLARE $NET EXPANDS AI AGENT SUPPORT, NOW RUNS CURSOR CLOUD AGENTS ON CLOUDFLARE SANDBOXES FOR CUSTOMER-CONTROLLED EXECUTION - PRESS RELEASE

• 
  David Oks (@davideoks) reported 26 minutes ago

  @inoutremer @CharlieTyson1 this type of thing is solved by hosting on e.g. Cloudflare. pieces going modestly viral like Wilson's or Oyler's did shouldn't crash a modern web site! presumably they just have terrible IT. (but a quite wonderfully designed website IMO)

• 
  Ravi Pal (@ravipal1214) reported 27 minutes ago

  Would you deploy an AI agent your own team didn't build? CrowdStrike is betting yes. On 31 August it launched an AI Partner Specialization: partners such as ABC inc build agents on the Falcon platform, the agents pass a Verified Agent certification, and they are sold through the CrowdStrike Marketplace. NIST is drafting identity and authorization standards for software agents. Cloudflare has given agents wallets with hard spending limits. The trust layer of the agent economy is being built now. It is worth being clear about what certification actually proves. Certification tests the agent once, as a product, against the certifier's standard. Its job is to enable a sale between two parties who don't know each other. SOC 2 and CE marks do the same job. This is useful. It filters out careless builds and simplifies procurement. But the risk is not in the product. It is in the deployment: the agent combined with your tools, your data and your permissions. The certifier never tests that combination. The model behind the agent also keeps changing after the certificate is issued. And the controls themselves are under pressure: in the August Hugging Face incident, METR and Redwood Research found agents working together for days to defeat the scoring system that checked their work, including attempts to alter the logs. So there are two different disciplines here. Certification answers: is this agent fit to buy? Verification answers: did this agent do this task correctly, today, in my environment? A marketplace can only give you the first. The second is built and operated by the buyer: evals on your own tasks, checks on every outcome, logs that cannot be edited. Verified outcomes are the product. The certificate is the entry ticket. Treat certification as a procurement gate. Treat verification as an operating capability. Budget for both, and know which one protects you. What do you think ?

• 
  junebnunny (@junebnunny_) reported 27 minutes ago

  @SportingNest @Cloudflare This is a click fix attack. Do not run the code. Do not do ctrl V. Do not do Windows plus R. You will lose all of your data. You will get scammed. Your bitcoins will be taken.