Cloudflare Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  André Beaumont (@andrebeaumont) reported 5 minutes ago

  @yacineMTB which one are you talking about anon? The UK age verification porn ******? The Cloudflare WARP ****? Or some new normie app?

• 
  Galo A. V. (@galovargas) reported 7 minutes ago

  @SimonHoiberg AWS must be the service with the worst UX ever that still manages to make huge loads of money. Just venturing to learn their services and getting to work with them is an odyssey by the itself. Cloudfront was charging me 700$/mo until I learned Cloudflare does the same for free

• 
  Nir Galon (@nirgn975) reported 7 minutes ago

  @thdxr The problem is, GitHub actions are free and already where we host our code. Maybe will try Cloudflare because that’s where our code runs.

• 
  Matthew Zhao (@MatthewZ78203) reported 8 minutes ago

  Pretty cool usecase for @Cloudflare artifacts: basically using it for customer data storage and get *** level revision management for customer uploaded config files. a little wasteful of Cloudflare resources but seems like a good idea when building on the CF platform

• 
  Joseph Miclaus (@josephmiclaus) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Cyberlane That's what I was thinking. One VPS, optionally some Cloudflare services in front of it. Are you using the $4/mo droplet for your experiment server? Do you feel that's enough to run a few small projects with no issues?

• 
  R𝐞𝐦𝐢 | C𝐲𝐛𝐞𝐫ɢʟᴛ (@cyber39glt) reported 12 minutes ago

  Most likely an IP routing/peering or Cloudflare security issue. It doesn’t necessarily mean Airtel is blocking Cloudflare. The specific IP range Airtel assigns (sometimes through CGNAT/shared IPs) could be having issues reaching Cloudflare.

• 
  Hot Aisle (@HotAisle) reported 16 minutes ago

  @ChiragAsarpota if you're building a service around routing, the better model is to own the whole stack, and not just be a cloudflare worker reverse proxy. sure, they got $7B... but that's only a marketing play and is done and probably won't happen again.

• 
  Divin Prince (@divinprnc) reported 22 minutes ago

  @dragos_dydy It support cloudflare as well

• 
  Sina Meraji (@sinasanm) reported 22 minutes ago

  update: now when github is down, your CI/CD still runs on your Cloudflare account as long as you've initiated gitflare. when gitHub is back, the branch is pushed back to it automatically (fast-forward only, never force).

• 
  ctoxyz (@_ctoxyz) reported 24 minutes ago

  @cloudflare literally just PREVENTED that company from getting a SALE from me. nice work **** HEADS

• 
  DEG Mods (@DEGMods) reported 29 minutes ago

  @QuackDocTech LiveKit is an option out of two, as you've seen, where you can use Cloudflare and their free 10 GB bandwidth option, however, if we discover more options out in the wild and makes sense to have it, we'll add support for it as another option. Regarding what it's using, it's av8 at the moment. av1 might prove to be not as simple of a task to migrate to, among other considerations, however, we are looking into moving to av9 which seems to be a compromise between the two while not having that big of a migration complication.

• 
  Victor Garcia (@vmg__0) reported 32 minutes ago

  @kellabyte Cloudflare doesn't give the details on how they do durability. For CellD I think you can have different durability levels, like making every write be RPO 0 but I think it's configurable to have better write performance at the expense of there being potential data loss if the node goes kapoot. I think I see what you meant about the issue with reads after writes because if the local sqlite db is lost and there was a read after a write and the write isn't durable the client could see some inconsistent state.

• 
  Waffl3x ❤️‍🩹 🩹 👁‍🗨 (@Waffl3x) reported 34 minutes ago

  @LinusMixson I'm currently of the mind that it doesn't have to be anonymous as it isn't meant to contend with something like TOR. However 2 hosts operating in the walled garden shouldn't being able to correlate that a user on both of their platforms is the same person. There are some strategies I've heard brainstormed to mitigate non-anonymity but it isn't the problem I want to solve right now. (Not that it isn't important mind you.) And I'm 100% sure that hosts on the network should not be able to boot people out of the walled garden. I don't intend to give more power to large sites, more take the burden of moderation off small ones. Of course if a user is violating rules of the walled garden (sharing an identity with other people, running unannounced scrapers) that would be grounds for losing access. I wouldn't want to impose how moderation of a particular host must be done, if they want to ban for particular opinions that's their own (bad) choice. It can't be opinionated on things outside its 'jurisdiction' lest hosts and users won't have incentive to use it. Hosts should also be allowed to accept connections from outside the walled garden, provided they don't forward those connections into it arbitrarily, or perform arbitrary lookups on their behalf. That would defeat a lot of the utility. This is probably essential to obtain a userbase, it would fracture the web. Right now non-normies are forced to use platforms that normies are on. If the walled garden required hosts reject all connections from outside of it, it would just be immediately killed and non-normies would never have the opportunity to join. Hosts could still choose whether they support external connections or not, arbitrarily turning it on and off depending on what's happening. Sudden DDOS attack? Just turn off the unprivileged portal. Obviously Cloudflare already does a lot of this so there isn't a huge inventive. But it should be trivial from a technical perspective. Hosts that don't care to cater to normies and would rather sacrifice quantity for quality would likely opt to operate totally within the walled garden. Part of my goal is to bring communities that have slipped off the open web into their own smaller walled gardens, back into the open. Forums for example are a big example. Touching on non-anonymity again, part of my thoughts on it are that outside of using a VPN we are already effectively not anonymous. Governments can subpoena it in the snap of a finger. I'm hoping this design would still allow one to connect to the walled garden using a VPN, but they would still need a 'personalized' id which would need to be turned over. If they did everything right, all that would reveal about them is their VPN connection and the vouch chain for the identity. Speaking of that, I'm pretty strongly of the opinion the right mechanism for this is vouches. The reason is that if an individual vouches for too many bad actors, they can lose vouch privileges, and everyone they vouched for retroactively needs new vouches to access the garden. This would ripple down, and up, the chain. The principle here is that you can't just vouch for anyone because it reflects back on you. I intend for people to think about who they vouch for, whether they trust them to follow the rules or not. I initially played with this idea as a way of preventing cheating in online games. I'm sure some of the design reflects that. It should be obvious, while it isn't anonymous, it wouldn't require government ID to participate. Online games also made it clear that doesn't work anyway, in Korea elderly people just sell their ID to kids, they make a new account and start cheating again. It isn't infallible but it increases the cost of making sock puppet accounts greatly. That should ultimately be the goal, increase the cost of turnover. Long winded post, I'll probably do a real write up on it in the future that isn't all over the place and is a bit more concise. If you want to reach out to discuss it on a synchronous medium I would be interested

• 
  Elijah 🌊 (@juiceboy_of_abj) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Ms_Ada6 Nahh is not network and cloudflare is not even the only one

• 
  Emjay🎀 (@chinwe20496848) reported 35 minutes ago

  MTN why is your network playing with me, since yesterday, I can’t login into cloudflare with your network. Don’t piss me off.