Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  adrian defi (@0xadriandefi) reported 3 minutes ago

  "Which crypto platform should I use?" is the most common question I get asked by UK clients. It's also the wrong first question. The better one: what risk am I actually taking on by using this platform? @coinbase , @krakenfx and @Revolut can all be useful access points. They are not the same tool. Coinbase: simple on-ramp for beginners. UK-regulated, smooth interface, custody handled for you, which is also the catch. Kraken: more control for informed buyers and larger positions. Cleaner withdrawals, but the operational complexity bites people who never move past the beginner phase. Revolut: convenient for small amounts and existing app users. It was built as a bank that does crypto, not as a place you'd hold for years. The mistake is treating "easy access" as the same thing as "good structure." The platform is only the entry point. Before you pick one, the questions that actually decide whether the platform fits: 1. How long do I plan to hold? 2. How much will I deposit? 3. Will I move funds off the platform? 4. Do I need bank-style cash management? 5. Who else needs to access this if something happens to me? 6. Do I have a record of how I funded the deposit? 7. Have I talked to my tax adviser about reporting it? For small first steps, convenience can be fine. For serious capital, convenience is not a strategy. Crypto access is easy now. Crypto structure is still where most people make expensive mistakes.

• 
  zoinky 👴🏻 (@coinjunky) reported 4 minutes ago

  Volatility up? Coinbase down.

• 
  Kapil Dhiman (@iamkapildhiman) reported 6 minutes ago

  In April, six of the most credentialed cryptographers in the world - Aaronson at UT Austin, Boneh at Stanford, Drake at the Ethereum Foundation, Kannan at Eigen Labs, Lindell at Bar-Ilan, Malkhi at UC Santa Barbara - published a 51-page paper for the Coinbase Independent Advisory Board on Quantum Computing and Blockchain. They set out to assess what Q-Day means for $3 trillion of digital assets. They reached a question they could not answer. What do you do with the wallets whose owners cannot migrate? Around 6.9 million Bitcoin wallets sit at addresses with exposed public keys. Once a powerful enough quantum computer arrives, those wallets can be drained by anyone with that machine. The only defence is migration to a quantum-resistant address. Most holders will do this. Many will not. Some have lost their passwords. Some are dead. Some are Satoshi Nakamoto, whose roughly one million bitcoin have not moved since 2010 and almost certainly never will. The board frames the choice with brutal clarity. Option one: a flag day. A hard deadline. After this date, any wallet that has not migrated has its funds permanently destroyed by protocol. This solves the security problem. It also performs the most consequential property-rights violation in monetary history. Option two: do nothing. Leave the wallets exposed. Accept that a future quantum attacker will silently transfer 6.9 million wallets - including some of the most ideologically important coins in the network's history — to whoever owns the first cryptographically relevant machine. There is no third option. The cryptography forces the choice. Until recently, this dilemma was theoretical. That window has closed. - In 2019, breaking the cryptography that secures Bitcoin was estimated to require 20 million qubits. - By 2025, the estimate had dropped under 1 million. - By early 2026, after the Google Quantum AI / Ethereum Foundation / Stanford paper, the estimate is closer to 100,000. A 200-fold compression in seven years. The threshold for breaking the substrate of the entire digital asset ecosystem has fallen by two orders of magnitude in less than a single bonus cycle. The board's view is direct. The exact timeline is largely irrelevant - the question is what the network does before the day arrives. The first unauthorised movement of Satoshi's coins is the global signal that Q-Day has arrived. The most-watched wallet in the history of digital assets has been quietly drafted into service as an early warning system. Q-Day is not a future technical event. It is a present-tense governance problem with no good options. Re-foundation, not upgrade. The choice is not whether the next monetary system survives the quantum era. It is what kind of property right survives with it.

• 
  Pranav Maheshwari (@impranavm_) reported 7 minutes ago

  Robinhood in April grew 57% MoM while Crypto saw a 33% drop. Coinbase is doing silver price notifications while there alt volume business is down bad. Retail is out of the market. My instinct says that this is the bottom of the bear cycle. DYOR

• 
  Xav (@XavLiew) reported 8 minutes ago

  @mdudas @coinbase @circle Their customer support team already has strong synergy

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 13 minutes ago

  I'm sure there are few coinbase holders in that one but can't refresh so wtf

• 
  Vishnu (@pic_a_daily) reported 14 minutes ago

  @jsensarma Yes. Trust is a two way street and it is broken. Just heard that Oracle has revoked offers of students who are about to join next month. Last year Coinbase did same just week before. Due to their lucrative offer, people didn’t appear for other placements or MS ans lost other opps

• 
  adrian defi (@0xadriandefi) reported 17 minutes ago

  @coinbase and @circle just staked 500k $HYPE each on Hyperliquid. Tier-1 stablecoin issuers don't lock native tokens on a platform they expect to disappear. That's the ultimate confirmation for $HYPE from a competitor who has to admit that the decentralized rival isn't so easy to take down. Coinbase secured the rights to the USDH brand. USDC is now the official dollar on Hyperliquid. Spot markets ran on USDC. HIP-4 outcome markets ran on USDH. Users had to swap between the two. Friction in exactly the place liquidity should be invisible. HIP-4 volume was already lagging. Putting everything under one dollar fixes that. The brand swap is the surface. What matters is underneath: Circle and Coinbase each have to stake 500k $HYPE. 90% of post-cost revenue from stablecoins held on Hyperliquid flows back to the protocol. At current numbers, north of $150M per year. Two of the most regulated dollar issuers just plugged into Hyperliquid, locked native tokens to be there, and agreed to route the protocol a revenue stream most listed companies would envy. What this means: Hyperliquid is no longer "just a perp DEX." For a while, it's becoming a price discovery layer for anything tradeable, now with regulated dollar rails plugged in. Spot, perps, HIP-4 outcome markets, whatever comes next... Position update (unpopular opinion): I'm taking 20% of the $HYPE off the table here. The thesis hasn't weakened. If anything, it's stronger. But after a move like this, the cleanest position is the one that lets you think clearly. The other 80% stays on.

• 
  Adam Shannon (@adamdecaf) reported 19 minutes ago

  @chrishabig @tatumturnup Any address can theoretically be in the Coinbase for any block, given the right *****. These “hardest” blocks are those which could, in essence, be blocks in the far future when the difficulty is thousands or millions of times harder than it is now. They represent such improbable odds even for far future blocks.

• 
  Panche I. (@PIsajeski) reported 23 minutes ago

  @HadickM Seems like Base has identity crisis, first with Zora, creator coins, then agentic payments, now competing with Stripe, Visa ?!? I believe they are in really great position, having support of @coinbase , @brian_armstrong , access to USDC liquidity (which is crucial for cross border payments), and somehow still not finding its spot.

• 
  NN 🌸🐧 (@nn_blossoms) reported 25 minutes ago

  Even more rev & burn now that Coinbase/Circle are working with Hyperliquid. Hyperliquid.

• 
  AltOnChain (@AltOnChain) reported 27 minutes ago

  There will be a time when hyperliquid:native gets fudded back into the ground via immense regulatory scrutiny. It could get bad... and Jeff knows this hence his partnership with Coinbase (imo) they will help lobby for HL. Whenever that happens, no matter how low HYPE goes.. you BUY BUY BUY!

• 
  Sai Yeniganti (@saiyeniganti) reported 30 minutes ago

  Is anyone else facing issues with LinkedIn today? They announce layoffs and the site's glitching. Same story with Coinbase a week ago. Lessons in there.

• 
  CW (@CW8900) reported 32 minutes ago

  Yesterday's $BTC rise was led by Binance and OKX whales. In particular, Binance drove the rally with its strongest buying pressure in the last two months. On the other hand, Coinbase continued to exert downward pressure following the previous day. They attempted to drive down the price, but Binance whales did not allow it. Today, Binance and Coinbase remain in a neutral position. However, selling is occurring on OKX.

• 
  Leaving Tech (@leaving_tech) reported 32 minutes ago

  The People Manager career is OVER. The recent layoffs by Coinbase, Cloudfare, Block, Meta, etc, sent a clear message: pure manager roles are gone from the org chart. Their "AI Native" vision: everyone should be able to ship products, from idea to production. If you're an engineering manager or any kind of people manager in your company, you must to adapt quickly: 1) Stop doing just pure management functions 2) Use AI tools to build and deliver to production fast 3) Don't depend on others, demonstrate agency and do whatever it needs to be done, from design to infra, by yourself. You might not like it or disagree but this is the future, or better said the present, of management in this fast evolving tech industry.