Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ercan ozturk (@ercanoztur30817) reported 6 seconds ago

  @Vivek4real_ Coinbase and other major exchanges have been accumulating Bitcoin and altcoins with customer funds. Because they can't find buyers, they're short-selling at a loss. When I said exchanges could go bankrupt, this is what I meant.

• 
  Vincent Hancock (@quytongdaivn) reported 32 seconds ago

  Breaking News: Here are the real reasons behind the Bitcoin crash: Coinbase sold 13,501 BTC, Binance sold 13,142 BTC, whales sold 24,871 BTC, Wintermute sold 4,572 BTC, and Kraken sold 3,980 BTC. They offloaded over $10.7 billion worth of Bitcoin, driving the price down to around $60,000. Is Ethereum next?

• 
  MilliΞ (@llamaonthebrink) reported 5 minutes ago

  The Polymarket for MSTR selling BTC in May had a hidden rule. That rule actually shifted the market deadline from May 31st to May 25th. It wasn’t stated explicitly in the contract, but many rule hackers or “sharps” were aware of this lacking context. I call this flaw “context-lacking markets.” Meaning that the market rules do not capture the context of the event it is covering. They say that evidence after the market deadline shouldn’t count. But the way the market was designed, it excluded any and all activity between May 25th to May 31st. Why? Because MSTR only reports its BTC buys or sells from the previous week on Mondays when it files its 8-K. This has been the pattern for a while now. In fact, I don’t recall when Saylor made an explicit announcement of buys or sells inconsistent with that weekly filing in recent memory. So as of their 8-K filing on Monday morning May 25th, this market was effectively already a NO for all intents and purposes because the next filing fell outside the “evidence deadline.” A rule that was not explicitly stated, but that some traders secretly knew about. Sure Saylor could have made a random announcement that he sold BTC mid week, but that would be such a deviation from the norms that the odds of such a thing were lower than the odds of the market itself. So basically taking the NO side was free money for 7 whole days. For 7 days YES buyers were getting exploited by rule hackers. Why is this egregious? Because think of a Polymarket for whether “Nvdia earnings will see a quarterly decline in any quarter of 2026.” Now imagine setting the deadline for this market to be before Nvidia’s earnings call for the last quarter of 2026, but not specifying that “evidence submitted after the deadline” will not be considered. Then as we enter that final quarter, everyone who knows this hidden rule can make free money for months on end. Polymarket knew that it was too late for the market to resolve to YES, UMA voters knew, and all the badge holding rule hackers knew. Yet it wasn’t publicly shared for the whole period that the market had all but resolved on paper. The market rules lacked context. A critical part of the market’s timeline was privately voided until after the evidence had surfaced and a clarification had been issued. This is what I mean by a context-lacking market. On top of that their market format is fundamentally flawed. The market rules and sources are put in the same description instead of being separate fields, so sources are often given little thought. In this case, they cited “onchain transactions” as a resolution source in the rules despite the fact that it is impossible to determine whether a BTC transfer is evidence of a sale. Another example of lacking context. funny enough, the closest thing to onchain proof of a sale did occur when MSTR transferred 400 BTC to Coinbase prime on May 29th, but obviously that wasn’t considered as definitive proof. Which begs the question, why was it a listed source in the rules in the first place? Because the market was lacking context on several fronts. To be clear, this is different from ambiguous rules. I’m for the market in question, aside from the meaningless onchain proof source, the rules were quite clear. And by its literal interpretation, the market criteria was satisfied. But the intention of the market wasn’t a literal interpretation of the rules, or even the spirit of the market. The intention was missing completely. A hidden secret shared by a select few. This is why the market was trading in a void for a whole week. If you knew, you were making free money. If you didn’t, you were getting rinsed.

• 
  Forrest Knight (@ForrestPKnight) reported 8 minutes ago

  Companies have explicitly said AI is the reason they are laying off thousands of employees: - Cloudflare: 1,100 employees - Atlassian: 1,600 employees - Snap: 1,000 employees - Coinbase: 700 employees - Cisco: nearly 4,000 employees - Block: 4,000+ employees - Wix: 1,000 employees And there are more. But I don't know how much of this is true or if that's just their excuse for these layoffs. Anyone have more information on this topic?

• 
  HP (@hpscare87) reported 9 minutes ago

  @coinbase Since being added to spy last year you're down almost 40% while spy is up over 25%. Take control of your stock before it goes to 0. Con man pos @brian_armstrong

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 12 minutes ago

  @JuancitoXBT btc down 53% from oct peak at $126k, sitting around $59k. daily rsi lowest since nov 2018. latest takes are split. massive selling pressure just hit: exchanges and whales dumped $10.7B+ worth (coinbase 13.5k btc, binance 13k, whales 25k, wintermute 4.5k). saylor still stacking though, spent $64B to acquire $50B worth. congress introducing 7 btc tax bills with hearing june 12, one proposes 0% tax on everyday btc payments. conviction is fragmented. the big dump suggests some large players are out. but etf selling is mostly short term traders, not long term holders. coinbase premium recovering while price makes new lows, suggests institutional buying stabilizing. grayscale spot etf just ended 13 day outflow streak. microstrategy keeps buying but grayscale research worried their leveraged model might force more selling. immediate term: that $10.7B selling pressure could continue. broader risk off sentiment across markets. etf flows volatile between short term sellers and long term accumulators. oversold rsi could mean bounce or more capitulation depending on support levels. medium term: those tax bills could be massive for adoption if they pass. morgan stanley and galaxy launched btc to etf conversion for wealthy clients. square rolled out btc tap to pay for 4M merchants. historical cycle claims suggest potential accumulation zone. quantum computing risk estimates (50% by 2032) becoming a narrative. microstrategy situation needs watching.

• 
  TheWhiteMan👑⚔️XRP⚒️ (@TheWhiteManXRP) reported 13 minutes ago

  Coinbase is down

• 
  Froglegz67 (@froglegz67) reported 17 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase **** the WNBA and their pandering to idiots like Brianna Turner.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 19 minutes ago

  @rimrod4201 down 96% from ath but fundamentals intact zero fund losses over 9 months, coinbase listed, audited contracts still running. price is getting destroyed with everything else but the platform hasn't broken btc dumped 20% this week and took the entire market down with it

• 
  K7(Mob) (@k7lewis) reported 20 minutes ago

  @MiggyCryptoX @coinbase This card is the ****

• 
  Gabey (@gabeyhills) reported 22 minutes ago

  Oh my,you too @WilliamR1945 This sucks so bad,l almost lost over $30k also and coinbase ignored me getting help, I was just able to recover my money with the help of a blockchain dev.Have you tried talking to this dev @IRONCLADFORENS This is important. You should talk to them

• 
  ZoneCrypto (@_ZoneCrypto_) reported 23 minutes ago

  ✦ Forward Industries transfers $32M in $SOL amid significant losses: Forward Industries has transferred approximately $31.9 million in $SOL to Coinbase $COIN Prime, highlighting the company's struggles with its investment in Solana $SOL, which is down over 70%. This transfer, recorded on Thursday, represents the company's first on-chain transaction in a month. According to Arkham $ARKM Intelligence, the Nasdaq-listed firm's wallet moved 455,784 $SOL tokens, indicating potential trading activity as the company seeks to manage its substantial unrealized losses.

• 
  Riz (@SovereignRiz) reported 25 minutes ago

  @M4032060267567 VERI is not an investment. This had been made clear many times but specifically in the purchase agreement at the original release. VERI was a license key to access products and services of Veritaseum. Further the SEC targeted Veritaseum and stripped the utility of the token. It was never ruled a security but there is no clarity or a current use case. As for the Coinbase part of your question, I am not a lawyer so I can’t give legal advice.

• 
  la luz (@buyerofbananas) reported 26 minutes ago

  @reaIityobserver @brian_armstrong Coinbase reports +8% YoY revenues BTC down 50% in >1 yr

• 
  Formz (@checkrais3d) reported 31 minutes ago

  wtf why can you buy HYPE on Coinbase now lololol