Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  FortunaShield (@FortunaShield) reported 49 seconds ago

  @rektdiomedes Crypto + Macro Stuff I'm Looking At Today ... - Prices bouncing on Iran peace deal optimism - FOMC Meeting (Fed interest rate decision) on Wednesday... All eyes on Warsh as it is his first meeting as Fed Chair... (again, I think market is underestimating how dovish he will be, but we will see!) - Total crypto market cap at $2.375T... off of recent low of $2.177T... - $ZEC , $TAO , $AERO , $GRASS , $JITO, and $JUP bouncing the highest among top 200 tokens - $ETH now more oversold than any time in its history, including the 2018 and 2022 bear market lows (link below + link to more thoughts) - Gold still consolidating sideways/down a bit, currently at $4,319 - Oil now down to $81 (still haven't closed my short though - think we're going significantly lower) - US inflation currently at 1.84% as per Truflation’s real-time inflation tracker - Coinbase will apparently announce a new ‘intelligent financial app’ tomorrow - $TON re-branding to $GRAM taking place today - ExtendedApp will apparently be TGE'ing this month - RE will also apparently be TGE'ing this month - Saw a stat that Kalshi now accounts for 10% of US sports betting market, very interesting if accurate - Wells Fargo apparently filed a trademark for $WFUSD in March, as banks continue flirting with blockchain/stablecoins/etc - Lots of discussion on the TL about the 18,712 Bitcoins that SpaceX owns - SpaceX perps go live on Bybit - Blockworks acquiring Messari news is quite interesting - Apparent $2.1M exploit on ThetaNuts, though it appears most of it was whitehatted(?) - $EIGEN (yes $EIGEN ) is apparently executing a very interesting pivot (link below to more info) - Ventuals is apparently shutting down - An AI-native predictions market called InsightXHQ just launched - Aerodrome is apparently launching a new 'Predictive Allocation' mechanism that "rewards participants for anticipating future liquidity demand" - Am starting to see new protocols popping up that are built on Circle's new 'Arc' chain - a couple NFT marketplaces and some other stuff - Top 10 perps dex's by OI (open interest) as of today (as per the legends at DefiLlama) are 1) Hyperliquid, 2) Aster, 3) Variational, 4) Lighter, 5) EdgeX, 6) Grvt, 7) Antarctic, 8) GMTrade, 9) Ostium, and 10) Extended Conclusion Interesting times lads! That is everything I'm looking at! What did I miss?? And are we now past the bear market lows or do we have more pain in store?!? And how're you doing this fine Monday? Did you watch the fights last night? What did you think?!? Hit me up below and keep putting in those reps my bros!!! 💪📷💪

• 
  Kiyomisaki (@yskxbt) reported 3 minutes ago

  But also there’s the Coinbase chart issue thing making gaps. Idk maybe it gets filled

• 
  URIAH (@Uriah_AI) reported 4 minutes ago

  @coinbase I would be interested in this if Coinbase wasn't such a technological and customer support disappointment. There are also trust issues. IYKYK $COIN

• 
  Zeus 🇬🇧 (@ZeusRWA) reported 4 minutes ago

  @MisterAccord I’m pretty much in agreement with you. As most of us know, the challenge with true 1:1 tokenization isn’t really the technology element of it, it’s everything around it, your custody, settlement, voting rights, and regulation, etc. Which is why I am also not against the wrapper model. It serves a purpose, and there’s obviously market demand for it. That said, if the goal is simply economic exposure, derivatives seem like the more scalable path, even if they don’t provide actual ownership of the underlying shares. As the trader holding it for 33 mins wont give much of a ****. intrigued to see what @Securitize & @coinbase both do.

• 
  The Digital Sovereign (@TheDigitalSov) reported 5 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Will we be able to send tokenized stocks to other wallets or coinbase users with stock access?

• 
  EMCD (@emcd_global) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BitFuFuOfficial @canaanio 🏠 #Bitcoin entered the mortgage market A Michigan couple used $BTC as collateral to purchase their first home through Better and Coinbase. No BTC was sold or used as payment — BTC backed the down payment loan.

• 
  BLUE (@BlueGrasshoppa) reported 11 minutes ago

  I have a bone to pick with @UpholdInc and @coinbase Do you really care about your users being gracefully onboarded to crypto? Or do you actually just want to force them to keep their crypto on your platform so you can profit from custody? My best friend's Dad has been trading on the XRPL for over a year. He holds a big $FUZZY bag. He is a $PROFIT whale. He has sent thousands of dollars back-and-forth between exchanges and his Xaman wallet to make these purchases. All of a sudden out of nowhere both Coinbase and Uphold have disabled his ability to off ramp his Crypto onto his own self custody wallet. Ever. They refuse to give him the reason why and they have basically said this is final and he will never be able to do this on their platform because he doesn't meet certain security requirements. He is welcome to transact on the exchange and hold his crypto there, though! They made sure to make that very clear. This is a REAL early adopter, putting his own life savings on the line to be a part of the ledger at this early stage. He is doing EVERYTHING RIGHT. Trying to assist him though this has been infuriating and humiliating. He's been dealing with dead end customer service for weeks, all time he could have spent investing and growing his portfolio on chain. They say they are "protecting him from scams" yet do nothing to actually verify the truth that he knows exactly what he is doing and is only continuing to send to a wallet he's used for a year. What kind of customer service is this and how are we supposed to onboard the masses if they are told they cannot offramp their Crypto with no explanation and no support? Do better.

• 
  sk (@skmakeit) reported 12 minutes ago

  $USELESS is once again racing upward outperforming the market on the slightest influx of bull sentiment. If you’re still on the fence, maybe it’s time you zoom out and look at who’s actually on the bull side of USELESS: USELESS keeps outperforming the market due to inflows from the 2 profiles that matter the most for a meme: • On-chain whales • CEX retail Over the past 3 months, USELESS retail CEX volume dominates Coinbase (You need this for future mainstream demand fuel for ATHs) In the same time period, on-chain whales have bid net $2.4M worth of USELESS (You need this for respectable price action support floors while demand side cools off) USELESS is the coin that garners these conditions most successfully organically Once you know the most disciplined group of people in crypto (whales) consistently step in at the support side to backstop severe price declines and The most care-free group of people in crypto (mainstream retail) step in at the ATH side to fuel explosive price rips then You can sleep well at night knowing both sides of the equation are taken care of To track whale flows as per the screenshot below, check replies👇

• 
  Airdrop Insider🚀 (@Airdropinsider_) reported 14 minutes ago

  🤔 Are Discord Roles Important For Upcoming @base Airdrop? 🪂 Most of the active Base users are already Do different types of Activities For $BASE Airdrop. But the question is How important is Base Discord Roles Are. Is it one of the criteria for Base Airdrop? 👀 Could Discord Roles Matter? Maybe, But personally, I don't think Discord roles alone would be a major eligibility metric. If Base ever launches rewards, I'd expect the strongest signals to be: 📊 Likely Metrics 🔹 Transaction Count 🔹 Active Days 🔹 Active Months 🔹 Contract Interactions 🔹 Gas Spent 🔹 Ecosystem Diversity 🔹 Base Guild Roles 🔹 Community NFTs 🔹 Verified Accounts 🔹 Discord Roles 🌐 Social Layer Base has already shown interest in identity and reputation systems through: 🔹 Social Verification 🔹 Basenames 🔹 Onchain Identity 🔹 Verified Accounts So things like: ✅ X Verification ✅ Coinbase Verification ✅ Basename Ownership could potentially carry some weight. 🎨 NFTs & Credentials Free NFTs and ecosystem badges may also help build an onchain profile. But I would be surprised if a future airdrop heavily relied on Discord roles alone. Everything remains speculation. What do you think would matter most?👇 💙 Like 🔁 RT

• 
  Karim AbdelMawla (@AbdelmawlaKarim) reported 15 minutes ago

  1/ Quantum computers can't break Bitcoin today. Howeer, the catch is how long the fix takes. Upgrading the network to an encryption a quantum computer can't crack would likely take five to seven years, and the warning that the threat has arrived could give a lot less time than that. For this report we spoke with the people closest to this topic: the cryptographers and engineers running quantum migration at Coinbase, the Ethereum Foundation, Anza, and Project Eleven, plus the investors funding the work.

• 
  Donnie (@Donnie100x) reported 17 minutes ago

  Morpho raised $175M and the pitch is credit infrastructure for banks, not better DeFi lending. A distinction that matters. Coinbase already uses Morpho contracts to originate $2.17B in corporate USDC loans. The protocol crossed from retail product to institutional infrastructure quietly, before the raise made it obvious. Also VC pattern confirms the direction. Series C+ crypto funding up 1,020% year over year. Seed down 38%. capital has stopped betting on new ideas and started consolidating around protocols with real institutional integrations. Can they own the credit layer before a TradFi player builds the same thing and calls it something else?

• 
  sello (@salimteymouri) reported 18 minutes ago

  ohhh @coinbase is bringing u.s stocks onchain imagine buying and holding apple, tesla, nvidia, amazon or even coca-cola on the blockchain with 1:1 backing and redeemability. if those stocks pay dividends, you’d receive them automatically basically, it’s traditional stocks with crypto rails: 24/7 access, onchain ownership and fewer of the restrictions people are used to in traditional markets coinbase says more details will be revealed during today’s 3 pm et event for now, the product is expected to launch in eligible jurisdictions outside the u.s and yeah, i know competitors like backpack have already launched redeemable onchain stocks, so coinbase isn’t first but when a company as big as coinbase enters the space, people pay attention

• 
  🪄(XᵀX) - miracle.hl (@miracleuvw) reported 19 minutes ago

  🏆 The CEX That Wins Hyperliquid Wins Everything Not sure if it's today. But I'm pretty sure we're going to see a race among CEXs to integrate Hyperliquid. Distribution and customer relationships matter more than matching engines. Just like tradexyz, the CEX that wins that race will dominate the next cycle. Given the recent Hyperliquid × USDC integration and the regulatory backdrop, Coinbase looks like it's positioning itself for exactly that.

• 
  Trader 80/20🛡️ (@Trader_8020) reported 20 minutes ago

  🥸 $BASED is one of those tokens where the business is good and the token quietly isn't. Worth understanding why, because the gap is fixable. Start with the strengths, because they're real. Based is the number one app by volume on Hyperliquid $HYPE and number two by revenue, with roughly 40 billion in cumulative volume and actual users, not just farmers. The founders are doxxed with real track records (Zilliqa, Lazada). The cap table is about as strong as it gets this cycle: Pantera led the round, with Coinbase Ventures, Wintermute, Ethena, Hashed and Spartan alongside. This is not a vapor project. The product ships and it makes money. Now the uncomfortable part. The token is pure utility. You hold or stake BASED for fee discounts, up to 8% cashback on the card, higher limits, launchpool and airdrop access. That's nice, but here is the core flaw of a utility only design: people buy exactly what they need and not one token more, and they can sell the second they stop needing it. Utility creates transactional demand, not structural demand. It does not put a floor under the price. And here is the irony nobody at Based wants printed. Every trade routed through the app feeds Hyperliquid's buyback machine, which sends around 97 percent of fees into buying HYPE. Based generates all this volume, and the value accrual flows to HYPE, not to BASED. Based earns its own builder fee on top, about 15 million a year, but right now that revenue does not buy back the token, does not get distributed to holders, does not burn anything. No buyback, no burn, no revenue share. The flywheel they describe is a customer acquisition flywheel, not a token value flywheel. So what would it really take to get to a dollar? A dollar means roughly a 1 billion valuation. From here that is about a 13x, and you have to do it while absorbing the investor and team unlocks that start landing in March 2027, north of 40 percent of supply. You do not get there on vibes and cashback. You get there by turning real revenue into permanent buy pressure. Concretely: ➤ 1) Route a fixed share of builder revenue into buybacks. Even 30 to 50 percent of 15 million a year is enormous against a 16 million market cap. Do it transparently and on chain, the way Lighter $LIT already does, the way the parent chain itself already does. ➤ 2) Or pay real yield. Distribute a slice of revenue to stakers in USDC or USDe. Turn staking from stake for perks into stake to earn. That is the difference between a coupon and a dividend. ➤ 3) Make holding non optional. Tie card tiers, launchpool allocation and fee rebates to locked BASED, so the best users are also the longest holders and float velocity drops. ➤ 4) Time it to the unlock cliff. A volume scaled buyback is the natural counterweight to insider supply. If buybacks grow with volume while supply is fixed, the math finally points up instead of down. As it stands, BASED is a great business attached to a mediocre token. The company can keep winning while the token goes nowhere, because the value leaks to HYPE and to users instead of to holders. Flip on one value accrual switch and the whole thesis changes. The volume is already there. The revenue is already there. The users are already there. The only thing missing is a reason for the token to capture any of it. DYOR.

• 
  Fuze (@FuzeMetax) reported 22 minutes ago

  @BlueGrasshoppa @UpholdInc @coinbase Hey, me too, but uphold so far hasnt **** blocked me yet. It's ridiculous. I even pay for the premium 30$ a month membership for coinbase but iv been blocked tell July 20th, and that was over a week ago now or so. Its by far the stupidest thing ever because of course nothing was wrong my account, no warnings, no complaints, just straight up cannot send crypto now for over a month. Ai response doesn't help. I pay the extra for "better customer service" but now I feel ripped off talking to a bot that goes no where.