Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Asymmetric Insight (@billheckler1) reported 2 minutes ago

  @EquityDiamonds A Bitcoin off-on-ramp set up would be an exchange in a Western country where you can safely buy and sell Bitcoin (as described in the white paper). Something like Orange Gateway of scale with public audited financial statements. So buyers and sellers can confidently convert BSV at scale. Calvin tried to do this with Coinsquare in Canada but ultimately failed. ***** One would imagine that if Satoshi had access to USD $65 billion he'd make sure that such an on/off ramp existed. If only to manage his own private liquidity. One of the reasons I never bought Core Coin in the early days is that I did not trust the early anonymous private exchanges that I investigated (Gox, Quadriga, and pre-IPO Coinbase) enough to send them a check up front. I would regard the establishment of a credible on-off ramp by a creidble party as a major BSV buy signal.

• 
  Shadat Official | Airdrop (@shadatofficial1) reported 2 minutes ago

  Interesting Detail Found in @Base Verify Docs Base Verify Could Change Airdrop Eligibility Base Verify demo shows how projects can verify real users using social identity signals One interesting example from the documentation: > X account verification > Coinbase One membership > X followers requirement (1000+ followers) > Instagram/TikTok activity checks For example, a project could set a rule like: > Verified X account > 1,000+ X followers Then only users matching those requirements can access certain features or claim rewards This doesn’t confirm any @BASE airdrop criteria yet But it shows Base is exploring ways to identify quality users instead of only looking at wallet transactions If future airdrops use reputation-based eligibility, having a strong onchain + social profile could become important Time to build your identity, not just your wallet history

• 
  TotalWorld (@TotalWorldApps) reported 2 minutes ago

  @CryptoTaxFixer fr the same issues plague all crypto on/r off ramps - ton isn't a silver bullet but it'll be easier to move value across than sending 1m from coinbase to citi.

• 
  Paul Rainwater (@PaulERainwater) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Maddere7 @TheBitcoinConf @coinbase It's just more of the same hype to try and keep this Ponzi propped up before it falls to 40,000 and further down.

• 
  Modularity (@ModularMax_E) reported 7 minutes ago

  @RyDawg42 3% reward on X debit is best I’ve seen since Coinbase had a 4% reward card for few years until it disappeared and the whole app went to ****. Pay your car payment and mortgage or rent with X debit to offset high interest rate and bypass fees associated with credit transactions

• 
  ZenRiot (@zenriot) reported 7 minutes ago

  Finally sold my $COIN I've been too lazy to worry about for a while. Been a @coinbase customer since 2014. This MAGA asswart is doing everything he can to tank your shares. GL if you still hold.

• 
  Matthew (@MatthewMadera) reported 8 minutes ago

  Is there a happy medium between @coinbase listing almost anything and @binance charging an arm and a leg? I miss when a listing actually meant something. That “oh ****, they just got listed on ___” feeling carried real weight because you knew it was earned.

• 
  Ben Hart (@BenHart_Freedom) reported 9 minutes ago

  LESSONS FROM THE COLDCARD FIASCO. I have been a Coldcard user for self-custodying my Bitcoin. Coldcard had a reputation for being the gold standard for securing one's Bitcoin if you are self-custodying your Bitcoin, not trusting a third party. Now I learn that, because of programming incompetence at Coldcard, the 24-word seed phrase generation (and therefore private key code) was not random, so private key codes are being cracked using brute force computing and wallets drained. Here, in summary, is what happened . . . Under normal conditions, a 24-word seed word list represents 256 bits of entropy. It's uncrackable. There are then more possibilities for private key codes than atoms in the known universe. Bitcoin's SHA-256 cryptography and hashing function was developed by the NSA to protect America's military communications systems. The problem is not with Bitcoin, it's with Coldcard. Coldcard's so-called Random Number Generator (RNG) was picking seed words from a much smaller pool of possible words than it was supposed to. I knew instinctively not to trust any so-called Random Number Generator. So the good news for me is I used the dice method for generating my own private keys -- which is completely randomized. So my funds appear to be safe. However, I still do not trust Coldcard. If they made a security error this basic, what other errors have they made? I am, temporarily, moving my funds off my own private keys back to Coinbase until I figure out another self-custody solution. The reality is self-custody is risky. So is third party custody. With third-party custody (such as with Coinbase) your funds are at risk from lawsuit, seizure by government, or theft. But with self-custody, you are the biggest risk. People lose their funds by making errors -- losing your seed phrase, forgetting the access code for your hardware wallet, software hacks on your hot wallet, and all kinds of attacks that I have not thought of. Also, if I die suddenly, it's unclear whether my wife Wanda would be able to access her funds even though she has clear written instructions stored in an offsite safe-deposit box on how to. It becomes a complex puzzle for her to figure out if one is not used to this technical environment and the protcols. So it's starting to appear to me that the risks of self-custody might be greater than just having a third-party custodian -- just have my Bitcoin in the form of the Blackrock ETF. But to me, this almost destroys the big point of Bitcoin -- which is not to have to trust third parties. "To be your own bank" . . . to be a "sovereign individual." This idea seems to have gone out the window with this Coldcard revelation, coming on the heels of the equally big fiasco at Trezor a couple years ago. Trezor was supposed to be the Gold Standard for secure self-custody, then Coldcard. It appears to me that no wallet is safe, software or hardware. We can move to multi-sig being required to access funds, add additional pass-phrases, and have multiple private keys (wallets). But this adds yet more layers of complexity to self-custody and becomes very unwieldy. You can then end up locking yourself out of your own Bitcoin by layering on too much security. Then there's no customer service you can call, no one you can sue to recover your Bitcoin. The point is, there are big trade-offs to self-custody, as there are for third-party custody. Both have their own risks, pitfalls, and drawbacks. As of now, I have no solution or recommendation to solve this dilema. @BTCsessions @MartyBent

• 
  Schadenfreude (@Schaden12162515) reported 12 minutes ago

  @statusquont @intangiblecoins Imagining you can recover stolen Bitcoin by showing a Coinbase receipt to the manager of the blockchain is peak comedy. Cryptography doesn’t care about your deposit history. If a hacker derives your weak seed, they own the key. There is no customer service desk to appeal to

• 
  Mit (@mitsingh29) reported 12 minutes ago

  @LovesBabyLux I am here and I am in touch with coinbase support but I wanted people to become aware whats going on in base wallets.

• 
  T9 (@GamesZeroNine) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BitcoinMagazine He should shut ******** up. Coinbase is part of the reason we're in this mess

• 
  Ineberiated.Bear 58k.Gang (@TamagoFluffy) reported 15 minutes ago

  @sneddenbrian1 @RoaringRagnar Your bitcoin is protected by a single account authentication system, and coinbase has a practically non-existent customer service

• 
  OASIS (@O4SI5) reported 17 minutes ago

  @brknbull That concern is justified. Nine million dollars reaching Coinbase is meaningful inventory, especially after the loss of trend support. If actual selling begins and buyers cannot absorb it, the $50 area becomes increasingly fragile. Holding that level would require visible spot demand, not token economics alone.

• 
  Opti (@opti_x) reported 18 minutes ago

  So now you gotta be careful with cold wallets. Literally at this point it’s safer to park your BTC on coinbase. Unless you wanna diversify across wallets which becomes a mess. WTF bro lol

• 
  CodeOlam ◽️ (@CodeOlam) reported 19 minutes ago

  4/10 REAL EXAMPLES IN 2026 👉 BlackRock (the biggest asset manager on Earth) already has a multi-billion-dollar tokenized Treasury fund called BUIDL. Institutions can hold U.S. government debt as a digital token and earn yield. 👉 Circle has USYC — another tokenized Treasury product that has grown past $3 billion. It can move on-chain and be used as collateral. 👉 DTCC (the company that holds almost every U.S. stock behind the scenes) started limited real production trades of tokenized stocks and Treasuries this month. Full service launches later this year. 👉 Coinbase is rolling out 1:1 backed tokenized U.S. stocks (starting for non-U.S. users) with dividends paid on-chain. These are not experiments anymore. Big institutions are live.