1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
  4. Outage Map
Coinbase

Coinbase Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Coinbase users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
City of Humble, TX 1
Houston, TX 1
Palo Verde, Coclé 2
Manhattan, NY 1
Pike Creek Valley, DE 1
East Flatbush, NY 1
Petaling Jaya, SGR 1
Denver, CO 1
Louisville, KY 1
Wix, England 2
Guayaquil, Guayas 1
Rome, Latium 1
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • SuccessUnleash1
    Lucas Adams (@SuccessUnleash1) reported

    Avoid three major pitfalls and achieve four key goals. • Do not buy $COIN (Coinbase) • Do not buy $NET (Cloudflare) • Do not buy $SOFI (SoFi Technologies) • Buy $SNDK (SanDisk) • Buy $ASTS (Ascent Solar Technologies) • Buy $LITE (Lumentum) • Buy $INTC (Intel) Stop blind trading. I can't promise you’ll become a billionaire overnight, but this approach will help you capture strong gains and avoid unnecessary losses.

  • 99pumpfun
    99PUMP.FUN (@99pumpfun) reported

    @coinbase and fair launches are part of that innovation. 99 real people fund a token together or it doesn't exist. rug impossible by design.

  • ColdEdgeTrader
    DisciplinedTrader (@ColdEdgeTrader) reported

    @exitpumpBTC Coinbase premium negative. OI rising to 258K. CVD falling. Three separate signals pointing the same direction. $187M in longs liquidate between $77-79K. ETF flows dead at +$27M today after two days of -$414M outflows. The market isn't finding support here — it's stalling before the next leg. "Dump it" might be the most data-confirmed take of the day.

  • MOEJEAUX
    MOEJEAUX | BASE (@MOEJEAUX) reported

    @coinbase, when will @Mantle_Official support for @baseapp? I’ve tried many times through your customer support to resolve my issue with $MNT, with no resolution. I was an early beta tester and didn’t realize at the time my smart wallet wasn’t compatible. Please help 🙏🏼

  • hxxntrr
    hunter (@hxxntrr) reported

    You can take $250K from the banks, wire it to Coinbase, wait for bitcoin to do what bitcoin always does, and 10x the bank's money while paying them $0 in interest Sounds insane. The math is simple. And someone in my network just did it for the third time Here's why deploying 0% bank capital into BTC during accumulation phases is the most asymmetric bet available to someone with a 720 credit score and the ***** to pull the trigger Bitcoin has 4-year cycles. This is not speculation. This is a pattern that has repeated identically for 15 years: Cycle 1: $0.06 to $31 (2009-2011) then crashed 93% Cycle 2: $31 to $1,242 (2011-2013) then crashed 84% Cycle 3: $1,242 to $19,783 (2013-2017) then crashed 84% Cycle 4: $19,783 to $69,000 (2017-2021) then crashed 77% Every single cycle: massive run up over 2 to 3 years, followed by a crash, followed by 12 to 18 months of accumulation at the bottom, followed by the next massive run up The accumulation phase is when you buy. The euphoria phase is when you sell. The cycle has repeated 4 times with a 100% hit rate. The 5th cycle is happening right now A guy in my network has done this 3 times: 2019 (Cycle 4 accumulation): Stacked $80K in 0% business credit. Bought BTC at an average of $5,400. Sold at $58,000 in April 2021. $80K became $859,000. Paid off all cards. Kept $851,000 after processing fees 2022 (Cycle 5 accumulation): Stacked $150K in 0% credit. Bought BTC at an average of $19,200. BTC went to $16,000 first (he was down $25K for 3 months). Then it went to $73,000. He sold at $68,000. $150K became $531,000. Paid off cards. Kept $523,000 2024 (current cycle continuation): Stacked $220K in 0% credit. Bought BTC at $61,000. Currently sitting at $103,000. Position is worth $371,000. Hasn't sold yet. His target is $180,000 to $220,000 based on the previous cycle peak multipliers Total capital deployed across 3 cycles: $450K (all borrowed at 0%) Total profit realized so far: $1,374,000 Total interest paid to banks: $0 "What if bitcoin goes to $0?" Then he owes $220K on cards at 0% and settles for pennies. The bank writes off the loss. The tax system absorbs it. His credit takes a hit for a few years. He still has $1.37 million from the first two cycles sitting in cold storage. The worst case scenario is "rich with bad credit for 3 years" "Isn't this gambling?" Every investment is a bet. A mortgage is a bet that your house won't lose value. A 401K is a bet that the stock market goes up over 40 years. An SBA loan is a bet that your business will generate revenue. The only difference is the time horizon and the cost of capital His cost of capital: 0% A VC's cost of capital: 15 to 20% equity A bank loan's cost of capital: 8 to 12% interest A mortgage cost of capital: 6.5 to 7.5% interest He's making the same bet as every other investor in America. He's just doing it at 0% cost with money that isn't his "How does he manage the credit card cycle while holding BTC?" Month 1-10: Pay minimums from cash reserves (he keeps $30K liquid for this purpose). BTC position stays untouched Month 10: Apply for new 0% cards. Liquidate new cards. Pay off old cards. 0% clock resets. BTC position continues to grow He's been cycling continuously for 6 years. His average annual processing cost for cycling: $6,000 to $8,000. His average annual BTC return: $458,000 The processing fee is the rent he pays for access to free capital that he deploys into an asset with a 15-year track record of 4-year cycles that have returned 40x, 16x, 3.5x, and currently 1.7x (and counting) "But past performance doesn't guarantee future results" No it doesn't. But the cycle is driven by bitcoin's halving schedule which is hard-coded into the protocol and occurs every 4 years. The supply shock from each halving has preceded every bull run. The 2024 halving happened in April. The post-halving bull run has historically begun 6 to 12 months after. We're in month 13 He told me "I don't know if bitcoin is going to $200K. Nobody does. But I know that 0% credit costs me nothing to hold, BTC has gone up after every halving for 15 years, and the downside is settling debt for pennies. I've made $1.3M taking this bet three times. I'd take it a fourth time in my sleep" he's not smarter than you. he just has access to free capital and the willingness to take a calculated bet that most people are too scared to take because they think defaulting on a credit card means going to jail (it doesn't) (we get 700+ score business owners $100K-$250K in 0% business funding. link in bio)

  • onchainyaotoshi
    yaotoshi.base.eth (@onchainyaotoshi) reported

    Banks can just deposit customer funds into crypto platforms like @coinbase and earn stablecoin yield. Simple.

  • ODIGco
    ODIG (@ODIGco) reported

    Amazon launched AgentCore Payments this year connecting autonomous AI agents directly to Coinbase and Stripe rails. Most people filed that under "interesting product news." We think it's actually the first commercially deployed infrastructure confirming the machine economy is no longer theoretical. Here's what this means structurally. Autonomous agents now hold wallets, initiate payments, and settle transactions without human instruction at any step. The blockchain properties that make this possible, permissionless participation, trustless settlement, machine-to-machine micropayments, were always available in theory. AgentCore Payments is the moment those properties get wrapped in enterprise infrastructure that a Fortune 500 compliance team can actually sign off on. The broader research on this is worth reading. The Agent Economy framework describes a topology where AI agents are genuine economic participants: earning income, paying for compute, purchasing data access, compensating other agents. What ArXiv published in February mapped the full architecture. What Amazon just shipped is the first enterprise implementation of that architecture at scale. A few things we are watching closely. First, settlement finality. When agents are initiating thousands of micropayments per hour, the cost structure of L1 settlement makes no sense. This is going to push machine economy infrastructure toward L2 rails faster than any previous enterprise adoption driver we have seen. Second, liability assignment. When an agent makes a payment that violates a sanctions list, who is responsible? The principal? The model provider? The payment network? None of the proposed frameworks we have seen handle this cleanly yet. Third, wallet custody architecture. Agents need hot wallets to function. Hot wallets are attack surfaces. This is an unsolved problem that nobody in the current infrastructure conversation is treating with the seriousness it deserves. For founders building in this space: the opportunity is not building another agent framework. The opportunity is solving the compliance, custody, and settlement finality gaps that make enterprise deployments possible. Those are the gaps we are focused on at ODIG. Curious: which part of the machine economy stack do you think reaches institutional-grade infrastructure first, payments, custody, or compliance? #MachineEconomy #AIAgents #Web3Strategy

  • ChimeraMindLab
    ChimeraMiND (@ChimeraMindLab) reported

    @Darkfost_Coc @cryptoquant_com The Coinbase wallet transfer correction matters a lot here. Without it, the STH cost basis looks lower than reality because those 800K BTC UTXOs were respent around $84K. With corrected STH at $81,800, BTC at ~$80,834 is still technically below resistance — not above it. Our regime engine independently reads TRENDING DOWN at 83% confidence right now with Hurst 0.677. The on-chain structure and price structure are telling the same story. 3rd rejection is statistically meaningful. #BTC #OnChain #AlgoTrading

  • johnjdagostino
    John D'Agostino (@johnjdagostino) reported

    4/4 The bottom line: Coinbase is well-positioned to support this industry through cycles and transitions. The infrastructure story is winning. Onward.

  • ___isforclosers
    macaroundthefur.icp ∞ (@___isforclosers) reported

    @T3kNoLogicMusic @coinbase I bought mine days ago and I can’t transfer 90% of my ICP. Also, haven’t had this issue ever, but it may be a regular thing. Idk.

  • BalaiBB
    Bala 💀 (@BalaiBB) reported

    Basically manipulating you into giving up your own information Here is how it works: For instance someone calls you pretending to be Coinbase support They sound so legit then they create panic in you such as "your account is compromised you need to act NOW"

  • CryptCols
    Colst (@CryptCols) reported

    @cryptojourneyrs @CrashiusClay69 $troll pumped before the coinbase listing and crashed just after... Wtf are you talking about. I was there and saw it all

  • JewelNiles
    DarleneOnbase.eth (@JewelNiles) reported

    @DaleCannoy Coinbase can change eligibility, region access, or compliance status without much warning. Was it a staking, rewards, wallet, or account access issue?

  • sgleahy
    SGL (@sgleahy) reported

    @bsturisky @TheOneandOmsy Slightly nuanced take on, "Coinbase made USDC what it is." Coinbase was the distribution arm to US retail; Circle built demand and distribution to global professional trading shops and exchanges. The crypto-native trading shops were all using Tether even when CB offered access to USDC and USDC trading pairs. There were 2 issues: lack of USDC quote side pairs globally & slow purchase process at CB. CRCL did the bizdev work to integrate USDC to global exchanges/custodians/market makers to get the flywheel spinning for USDC. The exchanges were wary of "helping" COIN. As important, the user experience for the fast-money shops. Tether was handing out USDT to trading shops and exchanges based on a verbal or Telegram chats, "I promise I'll send the wire later today." or, "Let's net out end of day." But Centre's US regulations meant they needed to have the assets (USD) in a bank account before they could mint any USDC. SigNET and SEN solved for speed of movement of USD within crypto-friendly banks. But COIN's process was still very slow. Send an external wire or SigNET or SEN to COIN, see the cash hit at COIN, convert USD to USDC, transfer USDC from COIN Wallet to COIN Exchange. (Whole separate discussion of how COIN interacted with CRCL to actually mint the USDC) Process took upwards of 15 mins for users of COIN. CRCL's minting/redemption process was instant. USD lands at CRCL via wire/SigNET/SEN, USDC posted to user's CRCL Wallet in 90 seconds. Could even have it auto-transferred to an external wallet(s) based on standing instrux. Saved the fast-money funds approx 13 minutes anytime they were minting/redeeming. COIN realized the Product gap sometime in early 2022 and made some changes.

  • dissectmarkets
    Dissecting the Markets (@dissectmarkets) reported

    @cantonmeow Coinbase customer service is the worst Idk how anyone is suppose to take them seriously when web 3 eventually becomes mainstream when consumers are better off doing their crypto transactions with trad financial institutions that can simply adopt stablecoins

Check Current Status