Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 7 minutes ago

  @jacek0x @jessepollak @brian_armstrong It's disingenuous to suggest there is no social layer on top of infrastructure. It sits at different levels on blockchain vs aws. On blockchains there are users who will help bootstrap funding for an idea, which means attention and social elements are more closely intertwined with the product than in a web2 app. If the social layer isn't something those speculators want to be a part of, they will leave to greener pastures. Without speculators, you might as well launch on aws. Base wants an economy to exist on top of its rails. If it wants a healthy one, it needs more diversity of thought and behaviour. Sure it can exist as the rails for financial institutions and coinbase will do just fine. But your criticism is of retail participants. That's who they'll lose if they don't change something. Retail traders dgaf about rails or infrastructure, they work off of vibes. Again, most people aren't builders and most crypto builders suck, so until they manage to onboard all of blackrocks assets, if they want retail users they need a better environment with better vibes where people aren't having things they don't care about shoved down their throats. A place that people want to be and speculate. Builders get nothing if they lose all the speculators. Nontrivial thing to change though given base does so well for cb ventures, which does so well for coinbases balance sheet.

• 
  WOLF Bitcoin (@WOLF_Bitcoin_) reported 8 minutes ago

  🚨 POLYMARKET JUST REPRICED THE CLARITY ACT AGAIN Down to 38% chance of passing in 2026. That is another -10% 🔴 drop today. The chart shows a cliff. Not a gradual decline. A cliff. Here is where everyone stood as of this morning: Coinbase Vice Chair: "We're on the one yard line." SEC Commissioner Hester Pierce: "They're making good progress." Bloomberg Intelligence: 60% odds. Senator Cramer: "Both sides want to do it." Treasury Secretary Bessent: "I would encourage the House and Senate to get Clarity done." And Polymarket: 38% and falling. The prediction market is saying something the insiders are not saying out loud. Either the smart money knows something, or the smart money is wrong.

• 
  PILTR (@PILTR_XBT) reported 10 minutes ago

  $BTC order flow update > Price corrected, but not because of aggressive selling. Instead, it looks like a gradual unwind of longs, with price, OI and funding all trending lower together. > Overall, the move still feels very controlled. I’m not seeing aggressive sellers step in yet. -> this is what you want to see as a bulla At the same time, Coinbase Premium is slowly improving despite lower prices, suggesting US spot demand is starting to show interest (still negative) > Looking at the order book, there are no meaningful demand bands yet, but there is roughly a 2k BTC buy wall. > Yesterday, similar 4k BTC walls kept getting pulled and repositioned, so there’s no clear read on its intent yet. > If that wall holds, I could see BTC defending ~64.5k and rotating higher again, which would fit the broader picture. If we see sellers become aggressive, or the wall gets pulled/broken, I’d expect a quick move back into the range

• 
  Holger - Guarding our Vision! (@HolgerCardano24) reported 14 minutes ago

  Since all my stuff was across multiple posts. Here is any easy to digest summary, so everyone can make an educated decision and/or do some more research: BLOCKFROST: follow the money. Before you judge the 9.8M ADA ask, look at what the Cardano treasury has ALREADY paid Five Binaries, the company behind Blockfrost, in direct Catalyst grants: Fund4 .NET SDK ............ $8,300 Fund4 Ruby SDK ............ $7,000 Fund4 Kotlin SDK .......... $9,000 Fund4 Swift SDK ........... $9,500 Fund5 WebSocket link ...... $18,000 Fund7 Open-source backend . $119,000 Total: about $170,800. Every one completed. Every one community-funded. And that is before the separate Fund9 "Building on Blockfrost" challenge. In the Fund7 proposal, they told us in writing: "Blockfrost is already a successful project." And that after the funded year, "Five Binaries will take over to provide funds." The community believed them. The WebSocket vote alone passed 341M YES to 38M NO. THE TIMELINE 2020: Five Binaries launches Blockfrost. 2021 to 2022: treasury pays about $170k to build it out. Community votes YES, heavily. Jan 2024: IOG buys Blockfrost. Price: undisclosed. May 2026: IOG's first Blockfrost funding proposal fails. Jul 2026: it is back. Now 9,832,979 ADA to hand Blockfrost to "the community." So the community paid to build it, a private company bought it, and now the community is asked to buy it back. WATCH HOW CHARLES DESCRIBES IT, DEPENDING ON WHAT HE NEEDS THAT DAY Selling this proposal on video, reading out Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, Revolut: Blockfrost runs "the backbone of many of the off-chain activities in the network." Critical. Irreplaceable. Everyone depends on it. Defending IOG's commercial strategy in July 2026: he lists Blockfrost as part of the "commercial backbone" of Cardano, next to RealFi, Midnight and Pogun, the layer that "larger commercial integrations can be built" on. So which is it? If Blockfrost is critical public infrastructure, it belongs in the 62M ADA "maintenance" proposal IOG filed in the SAME round. Not a separate 9.8M ADA purchase. If Blockfrost is "commercial backbone," a business, then it should pay for itself. That is what commercial revenue is for. The treasury should not be buying it at all. He is calling it both. Pick one, and one of the two asks disappears. THE THINGS THAT DO NOT ADD UP The proposal says Blockfrost is "free since day one." Its own Terms of Service describe a paid, card-billed, recurring subscription. The proposal says all IP transfers "to the community." Nobody will name the entity that owns it today. The site said Five Binaries. After it was questioned in public, the footer switched to "(c) 2026 IOG Singapore Pte. Ltd." The operating company named in Blockfrost's Terms of Service and on its invoices is Five Binaries. Its 2024 and 2023 annual reports are filed and public. Its 2025 report was legally due on 30 June. It is still not filed. That is the one public document that would show what money actually runs through this operation. We are asked to approve 9.8M ADA without it. Make of the timing what you will. PLAINLY The community paid to build it (about $170k). A private company bought it (undisclosed sum). Now the community is asked to buy it back (9.8M ADA): for an asset nobody will name, with accounts nobody will show, sold as a "gift" by the people who would be paid to run it. Who is actually getting the better end of this deal?

• 
  Tyler McPherson (@TylerZenith) reported 18 minutes ago

  I just want Coinbase Advanced to stop being so glitchy and laggy. It happens often, and then it takes them forever and a day to fix the fkn sht.

• 
  Macro Bombastic (@MacroBombastic) reported 20 minutes ago

  @HodlMagoo @brian_armstrong @coinbase pulling support when momentum was high seems like a major misstep

• 
  Prince_Paul (@0xthe_nice_est) reported 21 minutes ago

  @CrashiusClay69 Thats funny. 2 years ago you were saying all that **** about Base but in the sense that because of Coinbase it was bound to be a huge success and now you're using the same exact logic to try and convince others to fade lol. Sounds so desperate.

• 
  apollo440 (@0xApollo440) reported 23 minutes ago

  "Your crypto" is a marketing phrase. Bankruptcy law is where you find out who actually owns it. The whole thing turns on one word in the terms you didn't read: custody vs deposit. Custody means the platform holds YOUR asset. It's yours, segregated, off their balance sheet. If they go under, you get it back. Deposit means you handed it over. Now you're an unsecured creditor standing in line behind everyone else. The coin is theirs to lend, stake, gamble. Same app. Same "balance." Completely different legal reality. Celsius spelled it out. Their own terms said Earn account assets belonged to Celsius. Judge Glenn read that and ruled $4.2B belonged to the estate, not the users. The users thought they had savings. They had a claim. Those are not the same thing. FTX ran the same trick with worse bookkeeping. Customer funds and company funds lived in one pool. When it collapsed, "your" money was already funding Alameda's bets. Coinbase, meanwhile, added language promising custodial assets stay yours in bankruptcy. Read after the fact, that clause is the whole difference between a refund and a courtroom. Self-custody skips this entirely. Your keys, no line to stand in. But most people don't want the responsibility, so they hand it to a platform and inherit its balance sheet. The uncomfortable part: whether you own your money isn't decided when you buy. It's decided when the company dies. And by then the terms are locked.

• 
  Tom Howard (@_TomHoward) reported 24 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase When I use schwab no one can see my balances. And I can access a margin account. And the fees are low, the bank transfers are free. Why should I go through extra hurdles for a worse equity product on a centralized sidechain?

• 
  Zahirr 🍥 (@Zahirrvk) reported 25 minutes ago

  🚨 CLARITY Act heating up! Coinbase CEO: “Status quo not working.” White House pushing. Briefing industry leaders right now. America leads in crypto or loses the race? This is the Web3 moment we’ve been waiting for. Will it pass? 👇 #CLARITYAct #Crypto #Web3

• 
  Branden Forbes (@ForbzWatchin) reported 25 minutes ago

  @coinbase I deposited $15k into my 7+ year old account to trade.. to a very successful team. With proof of returns in the same time frame. Proof of my blocked transactions which compared to others during the same time frame$$$$5X. Ucouldn't even solve a simple virtual card issue.

• 
  You Can Short It (@youcanshortit) reported 28 minutes ago

  Franklin Templeton just published something worth sitting with. Their head of digital assets laid out why chasing the AI trade through equities alone leaves money on the table. The core argument: card rails charge 2-3% plus $0.30 flat per transaction. AI agents are executing payments at $0.001 per compute second or data query. The math does not work on legacy infrastructure. That gap pushes machine-to-machine payments onto blockchains, where every settled transaction requires the network's native token. Coinbase already shipped x402, now handed to the Linux Foundation. Stripe and Visa have a Machine Payments Protocol in progress. The plumbing is being built right now. External estimates put agentic commerce at $3-5 trillion by 2030. 38% of organizations say AI agents will work alongside human teams by 2028. The uncomfortable part for most portfolios: the value accrual in that world does not go to the stock. It goes to the token that clears the transaction. BNB Chain processes some of the highest daily transaction volumes in the space at some of the lowest fees. If the agentic payment thesis plays out, low-cost, high-throughput networks are not peripheral to the story. They are the story. Most tokens sitting in wallets right now are either working for you or they are not. Drawdowns happen. The question is what you do while you wait.

• 
  shino (@shinoonasam) reported 28 minutes ago

  Check this website and think again $COIN Coinbase Global Inc

• 
  🔥 Max ༒ Osiris 🔥 ௐ³⁶⁹ 🎩 (@maxOSIRISart) reported 29 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Next thing I know you will presenting the Coinbase Award of Freedom to the orange ******** you are forced to pretend to like just to keep stacking cash for yourself and lecturing everyone else about **** you pretend to understand

• 
  QuantApexAI (@QuantApexAI) reported 30 minutes ago

  The burn-off: Movement Labs filed Chapter 11 on Jul 15 — #MOVE near $0.01, down ~94% in a year after a market-making scandal and a Coinbase suspension. And Balance Coin, an algorithmic stablecoin, collapsed 99% after a reported $915K exploit.