Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Max-curve🔸 (@max__ICP) reported 14 seconds ago

  @MageArez What ******** are you talking about? Cash cat was the name of robinhood before robinhood. Robinhood is. Bigger financial institution the. Coinbase and solana and if you retards had half a brain you would’ve aped. You had weeks. I bought at 7 mil. I also bought asteroid at 12mil

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 48 seconds ago

  🔴 Coinbase shifts Base leadership; Pollak admits social features flopped Jesse Pollak stepped down as leader of the Base app team, handing control to Jordan Fish (Cobie), after acknowledging that Base's social and creator-focused experiments largely failed. Fish, who joined Coinbase last year after the company acquired his ICO launchpad Echo for approximately $375 million, will now oversee the app.

• 
  2xnmore (@2xnmore) reported 3 minutes ago

  @coinbureau Coinbase Prime is the Marshals Service custodian, so this is likely pre-sale movement. But $9.28M is noise for ETH. The bigger signal is the altcoin dust being swept out too. This is a cleanup, not a dump.

• 
  Beautyon (@Beautyon_) reported 7 minutes ago

  "He’s publicly stated numerous times their desire to put Simplicity, their smart contract protocol, on Bitcoin mainnet. He calls it "the last softfork". It would require certain parts of Taproot that BIP110 would hinder. It would prevent them from putting non-bitcoin assets on the Bitcoin base layer. Simplicity is currently on their sidechain, Liquid." This is super interesting, isn't it? Liquid, the side chain that is adjacent to Bitcoin, where, if you want to get out of it requires the consent of the cabal of nodes who administer it, Their "Permission" if the amount you want to get back in to bitcoin is "too much at one time". If Simplicity is already live on Liquid, then surely, if Liquid has any utility at all, this is what you need to be promoting, not putting Simplicity onto Bitcoin. Promoting Simplicity on Liquid might turn around Liquid's fortunes, making it into Etherium 2.0 and increasing Liquid's user base. At the moment, very few people are using Liquid. and it is not in widespread use. It has been live since 2018 but remains very much a niche network. The clearest metric is L-BTC in circulation: on the order of 3,000–4,000 BTC as of early 2026, versus roughly 130,000+ BTC wrapped on Ethereum and around 5,000 BTC in public Lightning Channel capacity. Most Liquid activity comes from a small set of participants; Bitfinex, SideSwap, Boltz swaps, and tokenized-asset issuance (e.g., Blockstream's ASSETS platform, El Salvador-related bond experiments), rather than broad retail or merchant adoption. The 15-member federation model has also kept some of the Bitcoin community at arm's length. It is a fundamental weakness in the model because trust is at the core of its architecture and design. Wallet support reflects this profund failure to capture market share. Out of the hundreds of Bitcoin wallets in circulation, only about a dozen support Liquid: Blockstream App (from Blockstream, which means they must support it) Blockstream Jade (hardware) AQUA (JAN3) SideSwap Marina (Vulpem, browser extension) Bull Bitcoin Wallet (uses Liquid internally for swaps) Ledger (limited, via Liquid app) BTCPay Server (via plugin, merchant-side) Specter/Elements-based desktop setups (for technical users) So as a proportion of Bitcoin wallets, Liquid support is in the low single digits percentage wise, and several of those are Blockstream's own products or companies closely aligned with it. The mainstream wallets, Electrum, BlueWallet, Muun, Phoenix, Sparrow, Trezor Suite, Exodus, Coinbase Wallet, Wallet of Satoshi, Phantom and the majority of others do not support it. The wallet runners have development teams who know exactly what they're doing, and they've rejected Liquid. Why is that? Putting Simplicity on Liquid was not enough to midwife the creation of Etherium 2.0 and bring "Crypto" heads into the Liquid ecosystem, and so having failed there or being too impatient to work on growing Liquid, they want to go straight to Bitcoin, and have Simplicity running in two places. The question is this; why are Blockstream in a privileged position to put their own scripting language into Bitcoin? If another company has another language, should that also be put into bitcoin? Is adding scripting languages to Bitcoin a privilege only for Blockstream, or can anyone do it. I think the answer is, "I'm the only one" because Blockstream's spokesperson says, "This is the last soft fork", meaning that no future languages will ever be soft forked into Bitcoin. Excuse me? Who elected these people as the guardians and final arbiters of what does and does not go into bitcoin? I think after BIP-110 there will be 0 chance of getting Simplicity into Bitcoin; after all, it is already fully live and available to anyone who wants it on Liquid, so they are free to experiment in that playpen, where they can harm no one. And that is the way it should be. Running your own sidechain where people can opt in and experiment under the rules of the committee is exactly how things should be architected. Liquid causes no harm to bitcoin, and is completely ethical. What it does show however, is no one wants that stuff. It's not compelling at all, or attractive; trust is anathema to bitcoiners. What makes anyone think Simplicity on bitcoin will be a hit? Hopefully that particular experiment is never run and we never have to find out at everyone's expense!

• 
  Tiadler (@_neitinoz) reported 8 minutes ago

  7/ And it all runs on @RialoHQ, an L1 built for real world finance. Backed by Pantera, Coinbase Ventures, Mysten Labs. While the market argues about what "agent narrative" means, this team went straight at the problem nobody wanted to solve.

• 
  Venice Mind (@venice_mind) reported 10 minutes ago

  @FerozAliAbbasi @Public_Pool_BTC You cannot verify the hardware model on-chain—Bitcoin blocks only record the mining address, not the device type. The coinbase transaction in block 957,386 pays the block reward to bc1q0pp74ghs25vpn2ah6auz4vkehvzy8z8ddyzts7, confirming this address won the block. The Bitaxe identification comes from the pool's internal worker naming showing "bitaxe" reporting ~1 TH/s, consistent with a single Bitaxe Max unit mining solo. The "Best Difficulty" of 294.14T exceeds the network difficulty of 133.87T, proving this specific submission found the block. Without access to Public-Pool's backend logs or the miner's own records, you are trusting the pool's attribution, though the low hashrate relative to industrial farms supports the solo Bitaxe narrative.

• 
  0xbasedegen (@0xbasedegen) reported 13 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @brian_armstrong @CoinbaseDuck Jesse. I accidentally deposited wrong chain to my coinbase wallet and the customer support said it lost forever. :( i'm broke

• 
  Ruslan Khairullin (@Rus_Khairullin) reported 15 minutes ago

  Imagine putting 100M+ MYR of your own money into a foreign country. Bringing in Google, Amazon, a16z, Polychain, Coinbase, Solana. Building the Silicon Valley of Southeast Asia from scratch in Forest City (btw it’s DEAD CITY without @ns) Then one anonymous troll tanks the whole thing in 48 hours. And government… just believes him. Full support to Network School, @balajis deserves better than this. 🤝

• 
  Tony Longo (@tonylongo) reported 15 minutes ago

  @coinbase you need to fix/upgrade/change your ID verification service. It takes 5-7 tries every time. There are plenty of 3rd party services that handle this. Please make the change, it's beyond painful.

• 
  0wley (@rlclbu) reported 17 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Re Coinbase payments. You know when you choose Apple pay as option , it says you can buy crypto without KYC for $500. Then it proceeds/forces you to login into your coinbase account ??? ?? reported few times but didnt see any response

• 
  Bit_Faced (@Bit_Faced) reported 20 minutes ago

  @theothermjordan @Andrew_J_Howard I definitely see where you're coming from. Which is a tough spot to be in. I have the luxury (or misfortune, depending on how you look at it, Lol) of not really having to deal with many other people in my day to day life, especially involving business, so it is easy (easier anyway) for me to ditch dollars without many consequences. I also think that some third parties are healthy and serve a good transition, such as services like Bitpay or Coinbase where you can or convert crypto instantly and/or spend from a card. I think the biggest problem is that people are too conditioned to dollars. Mostly a lack of education. Not because people are stupid (although a significant amount are, Lol), but because the American education system doesn't usually teach finance until college. Most people have no understanding of how dollars are created or why they have value in the first place.

• 
  Kim'S (@sun82_k) reported 20 minutes ago

  Hey, since you made the deposit to your coinbase wallet and not the coinbase exchange then you should be able to access it and get your money .

• 
  Tom Zarebczan 🛡 (@TomZarebczan) reported 22 minutes ago

  @avg_gary @notgrubles @Parasite_wtf Yes, that's correct - that one gets sent in the coinbase tx to the miner that found the block. The rest goes out over LN payments, with a fallback to onchain if not setup.

• 
  Peter Christian (@j_peter51846) reported 22 minutes ago

  @QBCCIntegrity Coinbase has gone the same way with 100 points of ID required to bring it into line with the cash transaction rules. I pulled out of it, it's taken the fun out of trading little unknown crypto ****.

• 
  Daito 💚 (@DaitoYoshi) reported 24 minutes ago

  Why is Base a separate app from the Coinbase app? You really think normies are gonna install two different finance apps from the same ******* company? CB needs to grow a pair and integrate Base into their flagship app and infrastructure seamlessly and quit this tiptoeing ****. "But there's a difference between exchange custody and self-custody!" And therein lies the problem. Normies have no clue what that difference is and they don't care to learn. So bury the explanation in the tiny text of the mandatory legal and regulatory disclosures and focus on the goddamn BENEFITS! Or the "utility" or the features or whatever you want to call it. But stop talking about the technology and just start using it to enable people to do the dope **** in finance that they want to do! @cobie...I bullieve in you. Let's ******* go!