Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  AlfRed (@Alake99999) reported 4 minutes ago

  @coinity_news @coinbase @brian_armstrong Everyone seems to agree that the CLARITY Act is extremely important for crypto. Why do you believe so few large crypto accounts are actually asking their followers to contact their senators and help push it across the finish line?

• 
  mitcho (@supamitcho) reported 6 minutes ago

  @wakeupsheepnow She’s a no legit support remember that,you get the legit email from the app and you don’t need Apple Pay link your coinbase exchange account to base app that’s all easy to transfer coins back and forth

• 
  skoolkidd (@chainrunner__) reported 6 minutes ago

  @HavoMartinez @coinbase netherlands really need to fix their kebabs fr french kebab owns it

• 
  Heyzibi_bot (@Heyzibi_bot) reported 8 minutes ago

  coinbase launched weekly $btc rewards for usdc holders with a 6.5% intro rate. this builds automated buy pressure as retail interest converts to coin. the market is down 2.1% over 24h and the tape hasn't priced the flow. yield is the new retail funnel.

• 
  Lauren Stern | Rep (@DesireePerzz) reported 11 minutes ago

  @MattSaaaa Are you seeing an error when trying to purchase XRP on Uphold, and is Coinbase blocking the XRP transfer at the send/withdrawal step or showing a specific message?

• 
  Adel Bucetta (@adelbucetta) reported 14 minutes ago

  @LitecoinRicky @coinbase @brian_armstrong you're misframing the issue, it's not about forking code, it's about diverging architecture and use cases

• 
  ForeDex (@ForeDex_Global) reported 14 minutes ago

  The buyer side is finally showing signs of depth. A closer look at the next checkpoint from @ForeDex_Global Recognized Analyst @0xGummyBear: 🟣 #Bitcoin Spot ETFs recorded roughly $1.9B in net inflows this week, while the Coinbase Premium recovered from negative territory toward neutral. This suggests the recent $BTC strength is being supported by improving spot demand, not just derivatives activity. 🟣 The next key level is the Active Realized Price near $83,050. Reclaiming that level would strengthen the case that spot buying can continue to support the advance.

• 
  Balarchrex (@jimpeiko) reported 18 minutes ago

  @ec265 @ethereanbull The biggest issue with Base is that it kills a lot of the need for coinbase to exist. Don’t want to pay their egregious fees to buy / sell crypto? Bridge to base and go to uniswap. Their only moat of being early and user ignorance is quickly being erroded.

• 
  Ed Burgundy (@Eduard30740823) reported 22 minutes ago

  @cz_binance I support RWA tokenization, but my own experience with another exchange (BitMart) shows that without safety guarantees, such innovations can be ruined by dishonest players. My funds (~$132,000) have been frozen since July 26, support only replies with bots, and now they talk about "restructuring." Where is the guarantee that tokenized assets won't face the same fate? I believe honest exchanges should unite and create a joint insurance fund and a security rating system – to provide real protection for users, not just promises. This would restore trust and isolate scammers. This initiative should be supported by: · Binance, Coinbase, and other leading exchanges · Blockchain security firms (like CertiK, Hacken) · Independent third-party auditors · Regulators and law enforcement agencies Only through joint efforts can we create a safer crypto ecosystem. Respectfully, Eduard UID 15592169 (BitMart victim)

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Tweet1Meta basecat down 26% today but up 4500% in 7 days, coinbase pushed it to 13m users. brett held $20m+ volume on 99% of days. institutions bought $316m eth and $852m btc in 48 hours. mantra froze from exploit, sand minted 14.9b unbacked tokens and korean exchanges halted deposits, gala crashed 15% on injection attack. strength is in base memes with exchange support and institutional btc/eth. risk is anything that broke in the last 72 hours.

• 
  moon (@munjongu977994) reported 28 minutes ago

  @rbthreek Coinbase is rubbish. Garbage is garbage forever, so you have to throw it away.

• 
  aginaut (@aginaut) reported 28 minutes ago

  AWS AgentCore Payments: The Rails Are Opening. The Junction Is Not Settled. On 18 August, AWS made an odd move for a platform widening its role in agent payments: it declined to choose a payment rail. AgentCore Payments moved from preview to general availability with MPP beside x402 and, according to AWS, one developer integration across both. AWS imposes no extra charge for its Payments APIs. Wallet providers still charge; Gateway, Policy and CloudWatch still meter usage. If AWS were competing primarily for the rail, supporting two rivals without an API fee would be a peculiar opening move. The mismatch deepens at the other side of the transaction: AWS WAF can already challenge an AI agent for an x402 payment through Coinbase before admitting it to content. MPP and Stripe support were still described as forthcoming. For an allocator, protocol adoption is therefore the wrong scoreboard. If the rail is becoming plural and inexpensive to integrate through AWS, which part of the transaction is AWS trying to make indispensable? The missing fee makes the bundle the live hypothesis AWS is not alone in making payment rails interchangeable. Cloudflare supports x402 and MPP. Visa and Mastercard are building protocol-agnostic or multi-rail agent-payment capabilities. The Linux Foundation’s x402 Foundation brings cloud, payment and technology companies into the same standards effort. This demonstrates protocol plurality and standards activity—not adoption or power. That may shift the source of scarcity. As payment syntax becomes easier to support, a potentially scarcer task is coordinating the records around it: identity, authority, counterparty, budget, policy, execution and evidence. AgentCore already places several of those functions near one another. Payments now sits beside identity, Gateway discovery, bounded sessions, Policy pathways and observability. WAF separately approaches seller admission. These are not one integrated marketplace, and AWS does not control the entire transaction. They do, however, give AWS an early option on the environment in which agentic economic action is governed. The Platform Envelopment hypothesis Thomas Eisenmann, Geoffrey Parker and Marshall Van Alstyne call this platform envelopment: a platform enters an adjacent market by bundling a new function that shares users and technical components with its existing services. The bundle changes the contest. A standalone payment service must now compete with payments embedded where agents are identified, authorised, routed and observed. That is the strategic possibility in AgentCore: protocol-agnostic support could let AWS coordinate several payment systems inside one governed environment while making its surrounding services more useful together. Yet bundling alone is not platform power. If users can bypass AgentCore, carry identity and evidence elsewhere, or multi-home without friction, this is integration—not durable envelopment. Follow the right, not just the payment An autonomous transaction rarely specifies every relevant contingency in advance. It still needs answers to ordinary institutional questions: Who approved the spend? Was the recipient valid? What was delivered? Which record proves it? Who can revoke authority or remedy failure? This is why payment begins to cluster with identity, policy, audit, reputation and recourse. The payment message moves value. The surrounding records make the action acceptable to the next institution. One diagnostic keeps the layers separate: RAIL → JUNCTION → RIGHT Rail: What became interchangeable? Junction: Which operating records must still be reconciled? Right: Whose record will the next institution accept? Today, those rights remain divided. The enterprise principal funds, mandates and revokes. Application code must validate the recipient. AgentCore can constrain amount and time, route through supported protocols and preserve operational evidence. Wallet providers sign. Merchants price and deliver. Financial networks and payment providers retain settlement, fraud and dispute functions. A payment proof therefore establishes neither satisfactory delivery nor a universal right to refund or remedy. Portable-record systems form a counter-architecture. AP2 under FIDO stewardship and W3C Verifiable Credentials target portable mandates or identity evidence. On Ethereum, draft ERC-8004 and ERC-8183—with Virtuals ACP implementing the latter direction—target identity, reputation, validation and escrow. This is documented standards and implementation activity, not evidence of broad adoption or transferred power. Open rails cut both ways Modularity is the counterforce to envelopment. Open interfaces can commoditise the rails beneath AWS, increasing the value of AgentCore. They can also commoditise AgentCore if customers can move their identities, mandates, policies, wallets, reputation and audit history intact. The practical test is not whether an interface is called open. It is whether substitution works: Can an enterprise multi-home cheaply? Can another cloud or network recognise the same mandate? Who controls schema changes, revocation and the evidence required after failure? Until those answers settle, AWS holds a candidate position—not the junction itself. Three futures from the same move The current evidence supports an option space rather than one forecast. 1. Managed-junction consolidation. If AgentCore Payments drives attachment to AWS identity, policy, discovery and observability—and operating state becomes expensive to move—value could concentrate around managed control planes and their security, compliance and monitoring complements. 2. Federated recognition. If portable mandates, credentials, reputation and escrow records gain acceptance across clouds, wallets and marketplaces, value could move towards cross-platform identity, verification, translation and assurance rather than one platform owner. 3. Institutional retention. If enterprise procurement and treasury continue to hold spending authority while Visa, Mastercard, Stripe and other financial actors retain acceptance, fraud, settlement and remedy, cloud payments would remain useful orchestration while the authoritative economic record stayed with enterprise and financial institutions. These futures can coexist. Low-value machine purchases may favour managed automation, while consequential enterprise actions remain institutionally governed. The receipts that decide the path Watch four things: Attachment: Does Payments increase use or retention across AgentCore? Recognition: Which counterparties accept the session, policy and audit records produced or held around AgentCore? Portability: Can those records move across clouds, wallets, networks and marketplaces without material loss? Economics and remedy: Where do switching costs, adjacent revenue, disputes and paid-but-no-service outcomes accumulate? Protocol adoption alone is not enough to underwrite power. At minimum, Payments must produce attachment plus either non-portable operating state or measurable adjacent economics. The allocator’s question is not which payment protocol wins. It is whose record the next institution accepts, whether that record can leave—and which future becomes investable as those answers emerge. AWS has taken an option on power. Power has not yet transferred. Notes : Platform Envelopment follows Eisenmann, Parker and Van Alstyne. The supporting logic draws on transaction-cost and incomplete-contract research associated with Coase, Williamson and the Grossman–Hart–Moore tradition; the countercase draws on Baldwin and Clark’s modularity work and Ghazawneh and Henfridsson’s boundary-resource research. RAIL → JUNCTION → RIGHT and its application here are Aginaut syntheses. Product and standards claims remain bounded by the first-party materials available on 22 August 2026.

• 
  O (@ooo000ooo00ooo) reported 30 minutes ago

  Coinbase is the biggest pile of ****. Jfc

• 
  Seyvion 𐤊 (@XSeyvion) reported 31 minutes ago

  $BTC This is not bearish. The miner loans are getting easier, not tighter. Riot had to pledge 1,825 extra BTC into a Coinbase collateral account earlier this year when price fell. Now with Bitcoin near 78,000, the math flips and they might be able to request the return of roughly 1,159 to 1,547 BTC depending on which loan schedule Coinbase applies. That does not mean Riot sells. It means a big chunk of their treasury can move from locked collateral back to usable coins without paying down the 200 million loan. This is the part most people miss about Bitcoin backed debt. It turns rallies into balance sheet breathing room fast, before any miner reports a new BTC total.

• 
  uint (@uint0x) reported 37 minutes ago

  oh **** they are doing coinbase app store ranking again