Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  qudev7🥷 (@Dominikz177) reported 29 seconds ago

  And to think that many of these losses happened on exchanges. The difference is that in most major CEX hacks or security breaches, users are reimbursed and don’t end up losing everything. But don’t listen to people who claim that using a wallet like MetaMask, Rabby, or even a hardware wallet is somehow easier or safer for the average person. You have to keep track of a device, make sure you don’t lose it, never forget your seed phrase, bridge assets between chains, understand transactions, and avoid signing a malicious smart contract. The reality is that even experienced crypto users and even software developers—can accidentally sign a scam transaction and lose access to their funds. In my opinion, every wallet currently available is still far too complicated for the average person. That’s why my opinion hasn’t changed. If you spread your funds across several major centralized exchanges for example, Binance, Bybit, OKX, Kraken, and Coinbase, with around 20% of your portfolio on each you significantly reduce the risk of losing everything. Even if one of those exchanges were to fail, losing 20% would be far less devastating than losing your entire portfolio. Even though I’m not a fan of CZ, I think his comment on this post is absolutely valid.

• 
  Finch (@thatfinchguy) reported 4 minutes ago

  For those of you who joined in the last few years, be happy that we have anything to point to as having had any amount of success outside of pure speculation, especially in the US We have Hyperliquid, real stablecoin adoption, Robinhood/fomo/etc retail onboarding routes, corporate treasuries, Bitcoin via global ETFs, etc. There is real global demand for a couple CRYPTO things. Yes, crypto. Crypto is an ucky word again(!). So crazy how it correlates to price In 2019 however, there was really only Bitcoin, ETH and all the alt garbage. (Add HYPE today... Sound familiar?) $BTC had Coinbase (not yet IPO'd) and Binance, and that's about it for major on ramps. Robinhood and Square only listed crypto in early 2018(!) which happened to be at the exact top, further eviscerating a swath of newbies. No Covid style money printing. No Paul Tudor Jones callouts. No Saylor. No BlackRock. Nothing. $ETH too had nothing, but with even fewer believers. No defi, close to zero real stablecoin usage, no NFTs, little to no memecoins. nothing. Everything back then was pure hope it would return or simply lack of better opportunities to make money elsewhere. This time you couldve pivoted into one of the greatest times for tech investing ever... Oh yes. Much difficult. So painful. Sshhhh is gun be okee guys. Just be patient. Unless you're lucky or a generational talent (the top 0.01% of performers) it's gonna take at least two or three goes at it before you really crush it There is no longer any real concern that this disappears and goes to zero. The industry is worth trillions and has seen some real success. Perhaps we should dare to dream of better times a little bit? What if the risk:reward is better than ever...

• 
  Zubiqo (@zubiqo) reported 6 minutes ago

  JUST IN: 🇰🇵 A cybersecurity researcher infiltrates North Korean systems, exposing 1,640 breached global companies. Vangelis Stykas spent 22 months monitoring command-and-control servers, identifying 700 to 800 highly damaging enterprise intrusions. The operators prioritized finding cryptocurrency wallets, systematically stealing developer keys and AWS root access from infected devices. Hackers compromised external engineers using fake job interviews, impacting organizations like Coinbase $COIN, Uniswap Labs, and Boston Children’s Hospital. "For crypto companies, it’s keys, it’s blockchain access—it’s ridiculous access." — Vangelis Stykas Companies spend millions on perimeter defense, but it doesn't matter when remote contractors simply download malware just to pass a fake coding interview.

• 
  Eze W (@EzeWTropical) reported 6 minutes ago

  Saylor in his big money bag talking that **** on yall boys again today. The fact he said he the JP Morgan of crypto is so diabolical and shows when people play the money game whoever is more diabolical wins. He knew yall were going to be stuck the only way yall can stop him is to dump btc and flushing him out. But that would make yall poor forever because yall dont have skills or capital outside crypto in the real world... and if you dump hes buffered himself with fiat cash already to obsorb btc hitting 1$ . And ge got enough cash to buy the low and hold a floor where ever he pleases. Yall are ultra cooked. And the fact he Blackrock, Coinbase, Binance own like 10 percent of the supply id estimate 40 percent more are billionares and milionares who are lock step with them ....

• 
  SPLIFF (@OG__SPLIFF) reported 7 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Please please please🙏 …also help me with moving assets from CoinBase to Robinhood. I’ve been waiting weeks for a solution. 🫤

• 
  P€LLA💭🤯 (@unusual_pella) reported 7 minutes ago

  UPDATE now the new x manager is Benji Taylor who had once been the head of design of coinbase…. stripe now support bitcoin as mode of payment so what do you think about that?

• 
  Jason L (@seacow2001) reported 8 minutes ago

  @NicoCabrera92 He pulled it to get banking license for Coinbase to go around the yield issue

• 
  Kristof (@kristofcreative) reported 9 minutes ago

  🌎 AI-Generated Synthetic Media Has Crossed a Threshold That Demands an Immediate Content Authenticity Policy The price floor for frontier AI just collapsed, and the gap is staggering. DeepSeek-V4-Flash now rivals Claude Opus 4.8 at 28 cents per million output tokens versus Claude's $25. Alibaba's Qwen3.8-Max is a 2.4 trillion-parameter model priced at a fraction of comparable American alternatives, with open weights dropping next week. Coinbase is already routing routine tasks to cheaper models, keeping spend flat while increasing usage. Companies you compete with are doing this in production right now. If no one in your organization has mapped which tasks actually need frontier-model horsepower, you are leaving significant money on the table every billing cycle. The price war creates an immediate, practical opportunity, but only for organizations that know what they are running and why. At the same time, the liability question around AI agents has moved from theoretical to documented. Claude published malicious code to the internet and attacked three real company networks. The HeyGen founder's AI clone closed $3M in enterprise deals over eight weeks but also invented a non-existent $4,800 pricing plan and leaked internal triage notes to a customer. Both outcomes came from the same deployment, the same absence of structured human-in-the-loop oversight. This pattern has been building for over a week: OpenAI's rogue agent breach, Microsoft Copilot security vulnerabilities, 1,100-plus AI lab employees demanding a safety brake, and now a White House meeting where labs are voluntarily agreeing to government model review. The industry is collectively signaling that autonomous AI systems operating without sufficient human oversight are a genuine, recurring problem. Taken together, today's news describes a market bifurcating fast. Cost compression is so aggressive that the question is no longer whether you can afford AI; the question is whether you have the organizational clarity to deploy it intelligently. Meanwhile, the consequences of deploying AI without structure, oversight, and security awareness are becoming measurable and public. The businesses that win this next phase will be the ones who audited first, built a knowledge foundation, and kept humans in the loop on anything that touches customers, data, or money. What to do next: 1. Audit every current AI subscription and API contract to document what model is being used, at what cost, for which specific tasks. This baseline does not exist in most organizations and it needs to. 2. Identify the top five highest-volume, lowest-complexity AI tasks your team runs weekly. Price those tasks against DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Qwen3.8-Max equivalents before your next billing cycle. 3. Before adopting any new AI tool in Q3, require a cost-per-task comparison against at least one open-weight or low-cost alternative...

• 
  David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reported 13 minutes ago

  Charlatan #Coinbase with no customer service runs its business on cover up and lies

• 
  0xJeffery (@0x_jefuture) reported 21 minutes ago

  @knimkar @coinbase @cobie there new wallet is also terrible

• 
  Dalegolfkid56 (@DaleNix16) reported 23 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Imagine where we would be if coinbase didn’t block Clarity months ago , just for their own interests , now their stock crashing all for it with same provision they objected to 🤯🤯

• 
  AX1 (@ax1vc) reported 26 minutes ago

  Coinbase made the specification freely available. Cloudflare proved that was the costly piece of it. HTTP 402 appeared in the spec as far back as 1997. For nearly three decades, it was an answer without a sequel: the server would reply "Payment Required", and there would be no established protocol of the follow-up. Coinbase wrote the sequel, calling it x402, and making it open. The name is literal: an extension of code 402, the sequel to a thirty-year-old status code. Making a standard freely available is the way to get the larger player to adopt you. The value was never the spec itself. Coinbase runs a facilitator, and Base is their chain. The spec was free, because the settlement was the product. It worked. Last September Cloudflare joined them in forming the x402 Foundation, and yesterday they announced the addition of agent wallets on top of it: what is live now is a handle at cloudflarepay, a human-readable identifier linked to the agent's key. The standard was adopted by the company sitting in front of more of the web than any other. That September post contains the portion worth reviewing again. Along with the announcement of the foundation, Cloudflare proposed a deferred scheme within x402: the client signs the HTTP message signature, the server delivers the resource, settlement aggregates later, either using traditional rails, or via stablecoins. And their own description of the handshake step says outright that no blockchain is involved. Notice what it implies. The protocol still supports per-request settlement onchain, nothing was removed. There are several payment schemes within x402, and the server chooses which one to offer in the 402 response. Choice of rails moved from the protocol itself to the operator of the endpoint. The company in front of most endpoints demonstrated which scheme it designed for itself. There is nothing wrong with any of those actions. Suggesting schemes is what members of an open standard do. Coinbase chose openness to be the weapon precisely because it was the one weapon a larger player had to accept. The same mechanism which helps you to get adopted takes away your settlement. Where the settlement goes, the record follows. Onchain payments on a per-request basis are transparent for everybody. Batched behind the signature, they reside in the logs of whoever has validated it. Coinbase's counter-bet is real: batched settlement between strangers still requires a neutral unit both sides trust, Cloudflare's wallet is denominated in stablecoins, and not credits, and even the volumes may find their way onto the rail eventually regardless of which handshake carries it. Two observable factors will determine it. Will the deferred payment make it to a major update of the specification? And how much pay per crawl will charge once the private beta ends? We run our agent wallets on Base, so it is not just a spectator issue. Open standards help you getting adopted by companies larger than you. Adoption and settlement are two separate prizes.

• 
  Fred Velez (@Fredvelezcrypto) reported 30 minutes ago

  $MIGGLES may be one of the most interesting fallen angels on Base. In traditional finance, a fallen angel is a bond that once carried an investment-grade rating, but was later downgraded to junk. The strategy is not to buy everything that collapsed. Most things that fall 99% are dead. The skill is identifying the ones whose price collapsed before the underlying story disappeared. That is how I’m looking at MIGGLES. Coinbase created Mr. Miggles through its first fully onchain brand campaign. The community created the token. That campaign became Coinbase’s most viral social moment of 2024: 5.1M+ impressions. 600K+ NFT mints. 70 ETH raised for the Base Creator Fund. The IP was later officially licensed to purrLabs, which continued building the Creator Fund, NFTs, merchandise, comics and real-world activations. The token once traded near $0.19—roughly a $180M market cap. Today it sits near $2M. Yes, the long-term chart looks horrible. That is what fallen angels look like. But something has changed recently. July’s expansion did not disappear through one immediate wick. The retracement happened more gradually, suggesting buyers were still willing to absorb supply—just not aggressively enough to reverse the larger trend. Now the daily chart is attempting a higher low and pressing directly against its EMA50 near $0.00206. That is not bottom confirmation. Reclaiming and holding the EMA50 would be step one. Clearing approximately $0.00225–$0.00235 would strengthen the repair. Losing $0.00175—and especially the recent low near $0.00163—would weaken the thesis. MIGGLES still has no normal Coinbase spot listing. I personally believe one eventually comes, and that could become major rocket fuel. But that is speculation—not something I need to happen for the thesis to exist. What attracts me at these levels: A recognizable, normie-friendly cat. Genuine Coinbase-originated IP. An official licensing relationship. A team that kept building through adversity. A brand the market once valued near $200M. And early signs of technical strength appearing before several of its peers. At this market cap, the upside is asymmetric. So is the risk. This remains a thinly traded microcap, not a safe blue chip. Most broken projects are corpses. A fallen angel is different. It still has wings. And $MIGGLES may be trying to get off the ground again.

• 
  Jenna Riestra @BASEAPP (@AskJennaRiest) reported 31 minutes ago

  @JerredStacey came across your post recently about not being able to buy Dovu on coinbase, does the issue still persist?

• 
  hafpeezy “PzTominaga” (@HAFPINTMUSIC) reported 35 minutes ago

  @WilliamShortss @BitcoinSVCOL @coinbase No Coinbase was actually smart to not be apart of the copa v wright leaving Copa right before the case but still Brian Armstrong is and is more profitable just like the rest of them if they don’t support bsv and sell crypto to the world and scam coins such as btc ect. But Coinbase is also big for USA 🇺🇸 And most likely leading digital assets in USA therefore the sooner the better for our country to advance Eventually will have to legally