Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Peek Marks (@PeekMarks) reported 51 seconds ago

  @ElonVisioniX Yes as long as I’m not working on my coinbase acct

• 
  CasiTrades 🔥 (@CasiTrades) reported 1 minute ago

  @ClintTrunksWood The red doesn't have anything to do with war or tweets. I do agree that people shouldn't wait for 0.87 support if they have NONE. I've always said this... Accumulate on macro levels 1.09 and 0.87 for Coinbase!

• 
  Tracely - Lookonchain (@tracely_) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Route2FI @coinbase Accountability isn't the problem. Agents hit exchanges eventually, and one deposit address exposes the entire operation. On-chain is permanent.

• 
  Cryptic Mang 🗿🧲🍿 (@Cryptic_Mang) reported 3 minutes ago

  @pix_9999 I think this is a really fair take. I use to look at Giga in a similar way, “It has a clothing brand and supplements, which is a business, this is real utility blah blah blah” but I stopped looking at it like that. Bc I think a lot of that just creates a ceiling on its potential bc of exactly what you just explained…it kind of puts it in this rwa category up against coins that are trying to be actual businesses with boards full of suits, employees and marketing budgets, revenue forecasts, margin crunching nerds. Giga is not that…nor should it be. Bc the truth is memecoins have limitless potential when compared to a traditional business bc their value is based on belief rather than traditional business metrics. I see the clothing and supplements more like a marketing flywheel, not as a business. They are largely inconsequential to the success of giga imo. I mean look at when giga ran, they didn’t have all that **** you know. I like giga bc I like the meme and what it means to me. I think it’s a timeless meme that continues to grow in social and cultural relevancy and in a lot of ways I do not seeing that slowing down anytime soon. The onchain data is really strong in terms of diamond hands and in the sense of it is a coin that is predominately owned by normies on Coinbase.

• 
  The Intuitive Chiro🇵🇦 (@dereuter) reported 5 minutes ago

  .@CoinbaseSupport I am seriously considering hiring an attorney to help me with my issues with Coinbase. I havent been able to login to my account for over 3 years! Should I contact my representative @RepChuck or my senator?

• 
  zay (@Unisone) reported 6 minutes ago

  @nikitabier @paulg the man you’re asking: founded y combinator. seeded stripe, airbnb, dropbox, coinbase, reddit, doordash, twitch. portfolio worth north of $600B. handpicked sam altman. wrote the essays half this site’s founders read at 19. you sold an app called tbh and now moderate replies for elon. with all due respect

• 
  Vortex | BIP448 (@theonevortex) reported 7 minutes ago

  @YieldForceOne @saylor @coinbase It's not bloated with data now, it's a censorship resistant network, not paypal, it's **** you money, not amazon, therefore you can't prevent people from adding arbitrary data to transactions, this is why we have a fee, you understand what the fee does right?

• 
  Dear Diary (@DearDiaryMeme) reported 7 minutes ago

  Coinbase is literally a piece of ****. @brian_armstrong taking $300 in fees out of a $600 prediction. Do NOT use @coinbase for any reason. I’m finally done with this bullshit platform. Shorting the stock. Your funds are not safe. Period.

• 
  TEC Official (@theofficialtec_) reported 8 minutes ago

  @coinbase Service advisor

• 
  Pepe Lapiu (@LapiuPepe) reported 10 minutes ago

  @CryptoIranian @Decentralizd In every block there is a coinbase transaction. The company Coinbase uses that for their name but they are not related.

• 
  Wendy O (@CryptoWendyO) reported 11 minutes ago

  @coinbase Customer service.

• 
  Balarchrex (@jimpeiko) reported 12 minutes ago

  @AFDudley0 The coinbase app is absolute trash UX after nearly a decade. Robinhood even gave them a template and they can’t copy it. They yeet eth despite building their L2 on it. Spent 350M for echo for no apparent reason. Brian sells a north of a yard of his stock then has the gall to comment this BTC down turn is nothing but a breeze. At this point. $COIN is just a poorly run company. I’m short and long HOOD until further notice.

• 
  Dez Fleming (@DezFleming) reported 14 minutes ago

  The Clarity Act was in the news today, so let's talk about it. The Clarity Act is a piece of sister legislation to the Genius Act, but it's intended to be a framework for digital asset governance rather than stablecoin governance. So where are we currently at with The Clarity Act? It's currently on the Senate Calendar but it hasn't been allocated floor time (in order for a bill to become a law it needs to be debated, voted on, and approved on the senate floor). To give you a sense of what that means, Ryan VanGrack (vice chair and head of corporate affairs @coinbase) was quoted in an @axios article saying that "Clarity is on the one-yard line and I've seen nothing to suggest that the bipartisan group of senators working on it won't get it across the finish line. But to borrow a quote from Teddy Roosevelt: Nothing in the world is worth doing unless it means effort, pain, and difficulty." So take your usual, optimistic insider with a vested incentive in saying something like this discount, but the general direction feels Clarity is set to pass. I think I tweeted this in a separate tweet/musing but Kalshi odds currently give "crypto market startucture legislation" (i.e Clarity) ~50/50 odds of becoming law thi s time next year. So mechanically what happens if it passes? A few of the most important things that stick out to me #1 Clear Jursidiction Oversight: CFTC will own the realm of digital commodities (i.e tokens), SEC will own the realm of investment contracts (i.e anything security like) #2 Developers Get Safe Harbor: Provided that a developer cannot unilaterally control an asset - they are exempt from standard AML/KYC requirements. Effectively a clear line gets written between publishing software and operating a financial service (even if the software's express purpose is to enable cheaper, better, faster financial services). You still can't knowingly be used to transfer illicit funds (ahem Tornado Cash) but it certainly will give developers guidance, leeway, and a backstop to point to around the "we're just software" argument #3 Custody Becomes More Competitive: CLARITY codifies that customer crypto held in custody stays off the custodian's balance sheet; no capital charges against assets you don't own, which is going to invite legacy custodians into the market and put downward pressure on existing custody providers like Coinbase, Anchorage, and Bitgo There are other byproducts and components of digital asset legislation that could come into effect in the near time like guardrails/guidance on third party tokenized issuance (can anyone create a tokenized product or does they need to have a direct relationship with the underlying), but in general we're already starting to see positioning in the market for Clarity to pass. The way that I think about it is that Clarity just provides ecosystem players with the rules of the road, and different players (with different risk appeitites) are betting on which rules and which roads will be placed on timelines that they feel comfortable with. Some players are going to race ahead, while others will feel content to see how everything plays out.... Regardless Clarity is an important piece of legislation and is ALREADY having a net positive effect on the ecosystem

• 
  Traeyz ♠️ (@TraeyzX) reported 19 minutes ago

  Will the Robinhood chain actually have staying power, or is it just hype? HDF breaks down why the success of the chain completely relies on how they handle liquidity and UX. ​"I do think it will depend on how they're able to move the liquidity and flow from their traditional platform onto their chain itself." "If they can abstract that in a similar way that fomo abstracted it for their users, I think there's a really good chance that they can do something meaningful here." ​"If they do it like Coinbase, no shade to them, but if you create this long, friction process, then it becomes much harder to do." ​"Robinhood usually is pretty good with their UX. And so if they can abstract a ton of that user flow and that user experience, then I think there's a decent chance that they can continue to market this."

• 
  Shadooow (@ShadooowOnX) reported 19 minutes ago

  Easy says Paul Grewal leaving Coinbase is a major blow to the CLARITY Act because crypto just lost the person who was supposed to fight for it "Paul Grewal was supposed to be the guy who was going to ensure the CLARITY Act would pass, and now it’s really not looking like that is the case" "Without the right people in your corner fighting for the CLARITY Act, you have to accept that there’s obviously a little bit of worry on that front" "The CLARITY Act odds to pass this year are down to 40%. When Paul Grewal announced that he was leaving, it fell another 5% in the last week, it has dropped from 55% to 40%. That’s not a good sign" "When the person who’s supposed to be going to bat for you leaves, it’s definitely not the scenario that you want to see" "He was the person in our corner. He was the person who was supposed to be going to bat for us and giving us a semblance of hope"