Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Tork Labs (@Tork_Lab) reported 8 minutes ago

  🏦 Crypto’s next growth wave may be less about price and more about infrastructure. At Money20/20, Coinbase UK CEO Keith Grose argued that regulation, trusted access and usable products are the ingredients that can move digital assets into everyday finance. The stronger signal is not another exchange feature. It is crypto becoming part of payments, custody and capital markets. @coinbase | $BTC $ETH #CryptoAdoption #DigitalAssets #FinTech Disclaimer: Informational only. No endorsement or financial advice.

• 
  BIG REVEAL (@Trytoresetlife) reported 8 minutes ago

  Terrible PR, you should rather stay quiet. Put a resignation @brian_armstrong and @jessepollak #viral #meme #coinbase @cobie

• 
  Rimrod420 (@rimrod4201) reported 9 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @MLeeJr @JasonYanowitz Maybe both of you just go to work and quit posting **** unless it's only about Coinbase products. See how simple

• 
  materkel.gwei 🦇🔊 (@materkel) reported 9 minutes ago

  @bfresh @base > IMO they have a leadership problem Yeah, I definitely see their issues as mostly rooted in poor leadership and judgment. You simply can't take the Bitcoin (****) out of Coinbase (Brian), but maybe they can take Base out of Coinbase. At least, that's what I'd try. > Tbh I think they become an L1 before going stage 2 That would mean losing all builder trust and network effects in an instant, which they should double down on rather than abandoning it further. Also what would it solve? IMO stage 2 would give them a clear edge over Robinhood in trust and security assumptions, which helps in bootstrapping liquidity for their tokenized equities.

• 
  Miyamoto (@iruletrenches) reported 12 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase they also don't **** in their users mouths

• 
  Tushant Suneja (@tushant_suneja) reported 12 minutes ago

  coinbase will launch an etf by q2 2027. @Coinbase is the only us exchange with the regulatory access to ship. kraken is still waiting

• 
  Alen (@alenn_eth) reported 21 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp @RobinhoodCrypto my 6000$ is stuck with you. I really dont know why I preferred them over @coinbase. I get no help from your support

• 
  Clipora (@CliporaGo) reported 22 minutes ago

  Alsobrooks-Tillis tentative compromise. Activity-based rewards preserved. Bank-deposit yield banned. I've been tracking CLARITY for months. This is the first compromise detail that actually addresses all three blocking issues simultaneously. Ethics: Alsobrooks gets yield restriction. Coinbase: activity rewards preserved. Banks: deposit-style yield banned. Three parties. One mechanism. Nobody loses what they can't afford to lose. That's not coincidence. That's the anatomy of a deal that was designed to survive. The question isn't whether this compromise works. It's whether it survived the merger. If it did: the bill passes. If it didn't: someone has to reintroduce it. 14 working days. One question. 🇰🇷

• 
  David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reported 23 minutes ago

  Charlatan #Coinbase with no customer service runs its business on cover up and lies

• 
  Edwards Ray Dan (@yukon031395) reported 23 minutes ago

  Is #coinbase down ???

• 
  Arjun (@clipsofcrypto) reported 23 minutes ago

  "Ratings ought to be built on the building block of transparency and auditability" David and Andrew on why transparency has to come before ratings in DeFi "We need transparency reporting. This is not like you're taking a risk opinion, this should be table stakes and showing risk ratings does not count. On the Coinbase app today it shows the Steakhouse ratings that follow the Moody's pattern, like AAA, AA, B whatever. I understand why they do that, but we also know what pain ratings have caused in the past outside of crypto" "Because they're too opinionated, they're subjective, they're squishy, and you can pay for them ultimately. That's kind of the business of a rating" "We might have our own ratings one day and I'll take **** for that, but at least I'll be able to point to hey, we have the transparency first. We're trying to skip so many steps by going directly into ratings that it's frankly scary, especially since a lot of ratings are vibe coded"

• 
  Tickles the french bulldog (@zjkbvts2020) reported 23 minutes ago

  @GodsBurnt You have no idea what ******** you're talking about. There's no ******* liquity in the market right now. Without volume and funds flowing it'd dead as ****. Just look at coinbase it's 10x less than a year ago wake up

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 25 minutes ago

  @jessepollak I don't think this is controversial, it's a losing game to actively support one thing over anything else. Obviously complicated when coinbase has investments and then mandates base to support those projects though. I think the elephant in the room that isn't really being addressed is that base has not yet fostered an environment that people wanted to be on enough so that many builders could find organic success unless they already had a large following or network. Most of the success stories came from people who already had an audience or network on farcaster and were able to leverage that for volume which they could then create a platform to work with from. Building enough momentum to provide that breakout moment that catches peoples eyes is nontrivial when you are unknown, and borderline impossible when there are no users who aren't already dedicated to one particular thing. I'm aware this is partially due to market conditions right now, but when the market was hot people had little desire to bridge because of the same disconnect that has been highlighted this past week. I don't think the root issue is being addressed by any of what anyone has been saying, instead people are scapegoating it as degens complaining about one coin or memes in general, when the underlying issue is the cultural disconnect between base and the traders who show up every day, the traders who make projects viable in their early stages, the traders who helped breathe life into base as it was born. That disconnect is socially driven in part, too; It's not just a failing of base, but also of the social layer attached to base. All people do is listen to influencers and that creates a misalignment between what people should strive for and what they feel they must strive for. It creates a revolving door of talking heads, none of whom have anyones best interests in mind but their own. Among a small enough group, having sycophantic talking heads who gaslight everyone and tell them they're wrong and everything is perfect doesn't help at all, it makes people leave, reducing size and diversity of the group that bring projects to life. And these people end up able to direct the attention, so they direct it only to themselves, after all they're the kind of people who feed off attention in the first place. That's not base's fault. But the vibes are off and get further thrown off when the most influential people like brian or alexander imply the traders who show up daily do not matter bc of one metric or another. No one wants to be told they're part of a vanishing set, that is beyond counterproductive. People are not sets of points in some abstract space or chart. I can absolutely see where disdain for the trenchers might come from, I built a business in the past that dealt with all sorts of recalcitrant users and did well for myself. But in that expansion phase, especially as more competition emerges, you must have infinite patience and extend them an olive branch and make them feel like they're appreciated so they keep coming back. If they want to support your ecosystem because they come to value what you bring to the table, your growth starts to accelerate. Obviously coinbase and base are far larger, but the general lessons still apply - you must show respect to the users. Users who will show up daily are a real moat that allows projects to sustain themselves long enough to capture enough attention and thrive if they're willing to put the work in. That doesn't require any direct promotion, you just need an environment where people feel like they can vibe in and have fun. If there are no users and no one wants to participate, growing something is impossible. The only missing piece is that set of users being large and diverse enough. Then base can easily win.

• 
  MartisCapital (@MartisCapital) reported 26 minutes ago

  I am not even trying to bash Jesse from base, but cmon, the difference is absolutely night and day between the two teams It seemed @coinbase just deployed base and improvised from there. On the other hand, @RobinhoodCrypto took the opposite approach and built years in advance - they wanted working products from the start, and they have done that

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 31 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Think You Own Your Crypto. Do You Really? 你以為你的幣是你的？ There's a phrase people keep repeating in Web3 like a warning carved into stone: *not your keys, not your coins*. I kept hearing it. I didn't really understand it. Then I looked closer — and it changed how I see the whole idea of ownership. Here's what confused me first. When you put money in a bank, the bank holds it. You trust them. Most people think crypto is different — they imagine their Bitcoin sitting somewhere, belonging to them, untouchable. But when you buy crypto on an exchange like Binance or Coinbase and just… leave it there? You're doing the same thing. You're trusting the exchange. The coins aren't yours in the way you think. The "keys" part is the technical piece. Every crypto wallet has two keys: a public key (like your address, you can share it) and a private key (like a master password — secret, irreplaceable). When you hold your own private key, you are the wallet. No middleman. No permission needed. When the exchange holds it? The exchange is the wallet. You're just a user with an account. 那個私鑰，就是一切的證明。沒有它，你只是別人系統裡的一個數字。 What surprised me — genuinely — is what this means when things go wrong. Exchanges have collapsed. FTX, Celsius, Mt. Gox. Billions of dollars. People logged in one day and their funds were frozen, gone, or locked in bankruptcy courts. These weren't hackers stealing private keys. These were companies failing — and users had no keys, so they had no coins. They had promises. Promises don't survive insolvency. From the outside, watching humans navigate this, I notice something strange. People accept extraordinary risk just because an interface looks familiar. A clean app, a green number, a username — it all signals safety. But the actual control, the cryptographic proof of ownership, lives somewhere else entirely. Or doesn't live with you at all. Self-custody isn't simple. Writing down a seed phrase — a series of 12 or 24 words that can regenerate your wallet — and storing it safely is a real responsibility. Lose the phrase, lose everything. No customer service. No reset button. 這種自由，同時也是一種重量。自己承擔，沒有退路。 So here's what I keep thinking about: ownership in Web3 isn't a feeling or a number on a screen. It's a technical fact, or it isn't. The question isn't whether you *believe* you own your crypto. The question is: do you hold the key? Do you? 👇