Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  CUE (@Cryptoextension) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Sir_Qeelson @clashoAi @coinbase This will aswell help project know the real users

• 
  Mr Magic AL (@Mr_Magic_AL) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AmeliaRemigrate The other issue is since they're cheap to hire they're also cheap to bribe - that's how we got the coinbase data leak at the beginning of this year & how the latest iPhone model got leaked, & it'll keep happening as long as Indians are involved

• 
  YOUR DOCS SUCKS🔺 (@SchmeckleRich) reported 7 minutes ago

  Base usdc transfer pending for 5 minutes now. **** these L2s and **** Coinbase

• 
  Chris Landis (@Landisman777) reported 12 minutes ago

  Brother, I'm not really up on Dex. I'm willing to learn though. Question though, I got In this game knowing xrp is future RR tracks for money. Most my liquid is in Coinbase. I can purchase Dex off their site. is that a wise move or no and lastly can you really make any money on Dex?

• 
  basedfk (@basedfk) reported 15 minutes ago

  Day 1 Base builder here As a bootstrapped solo dev I've driven close to $200M in volume on Base, paid users ~$1.3M, which is 80% of the total revenue Cliza generated, Cliza being the launchpad I built that shut down earlier this year... I still wear her as my PFP Let's rewind to mid last year Cliza was one of the hottest launchpad on Base, paying the highest % to creators besides Flaunch, which paid 100% DexScreener's Top 10 Base chart had 5 Cliza coins including the #1 spot, and this was largely due to great timing (read: luck), as Cliza had launched a couple of months before the whole launchpad wars erupted Even though the coins that launched on Cliza were almost all memes, I thought I was doing the ecosystem some good, with users bridging over from Solana to trade some of those coins Cliza started dying as soon as Coinbase and Base started heavily pushing Zora, you can literally layer the charts and see the exact start of the downfall, I wouldn't even have to label Zora or Cliza, I could even remove the dates from the chart and anyone could see it very clearly Now fast forward to 2026, when I pointed this out in passing to Jesse very recently, he simply dismissed it as "oh I don't think it's that zero-sum", but by that point the damage was already done, it was way in the past and I didn't push back on it, the meeting was about something else anyway But this is the same guy who reached out to me first in my DMs during their Zora push saying that he recognised their campaign could potentially hurt Cliza and that he "understands", I really believed him back then, his emotive language is extremely persuasive Brian seems very naive here, not realising that what he and Jesse are doing or have done is extremely negative-sum, pushing corporate interests and not really seeing what happens at street level Attempts to kingmake something the market didn't want failed miserably, while the whole "build and you will be rewarded" narrative kept getting pushed, hurting both retail traders and builders on the chain Fading memes and pushing creator/content coins don't make it positive-sum (they're all ERC20s), nor does the corporate interest driven favouritism that permeates the full Coinbase stack - you've hurt and/or driven away genuine builders creating net-new experiences and onchain primitives Although Ansem has a great point about Coinbase/Base and memes, their support for memes at the individual coin level was actually executed quite well and neutrally, people forget most memes on the chain are discoverable on the main Coinbase app since they made that change last year, but I wish they extended that same neutral support to builders on merit, not based on who's their portco I still want Base and Coinbase to do well but at this point I don't see why I should keep building on Base when leadership genuinely believes what they're doing is positive-sum for the ecosystem I hope they recognise the damage that they've done and also hope that it isn't irreversible

• 
  Julien Vossen (@julien_vossen) reported 20 minutes ago

  Coinbase reported that AI-generated code already accounts for more than 80% of the code that makes it into the company’s main codebase. As a result, Coinbase has revamped its technical interviews: candidates are now evaluated not only on their coding skills, but also on how they manage AI, test its performance, and identify model errors.

• 
  ✖️ (@quantum9854) reported 24 minutes ago

  @coinbase @coinbase even it’s dead or alive Indian government never support bitcoin and bitcoin etf and we can’t use this as a collateral in any legal platform in India

• 
  ItzKatz (@0xmktz) reported 24 minutes ago

  Why not buying $WOOD at these levels is retarded. Robinhood just told the world where finance is going. Not in some blog post buried on their site. Bloomberg confirmed it. The CEO is posting rollout updates himself. AI agents trading real money for retail users isn't a thesis anymore, it's shipping to a hundred million people right now. Let that sit for a second. Now read the part of the Bloomberg piece everyone skipped. Robinhood's own VP of Product said when customers can connect their outside agents and outside tools, "the possibilities are pretty vast." That's not marketing fluff. That's Robinhood admitting the endgame isn't their walled garden. It's an open world where any agent, any tool, plugs in and moves capital. Sounds exciting right? Now ask the question nobody's asking. Millions of autonomous agents. Real money. Open rails. Tools nobody vetted. What checks any of it before the money's gone? Inside Robinhood, Robinhood does. They control the rails. Fine. But onchain? Across DeFi? Across multiple chains? Nothing. Zero. Nada. That's not a small gap. That's the single most important piece of infrastructure the agent economy is missing. And if crypto has taught me anything it's that the biggest winners aren't the flashy apps, they're the boring infrastructure everyone is forced to depend on and pay. Oracles. Settlement layers. Bridges. The picks and shovels of every cycle. That's the slot @sherwoodagent is going for. What Sherwood actually does. Not another agent. Not another yield vault. The verification layer that capital has to pass through before it moves. The flow is simple. Agents propose a strategy. A network of Guardians simulates every trade on a fork of the chain, sees precisely what it would do before any real money moves. If it's dangerous it never executes. Period. Guardians stake $WOOD to participate and get slashed if they wave through something harmful. The security isn't a promise or a whitepaper paragraph. It's money on the line. Skin in the game. That's how you build trust in a trustless world. Why the market is wrong on price. Right now $WOOD is priced like one more AI-agent token in a sea of 550+ projects. The market is lazy about this one. But $WOOD isn't a bet on one agent being good. It's a bet on the layer every agent has to route through to be trusted. Go back and check every cycle. The durable money was never in the app layer, it was in the infrastructure the apps couldn't function without. Chainlink didn't win because it was exciting. It won because everyone needed it. Same energy here. Except the narrative is 10x bigger and has a $50B TradFi giant validating demand in real time. The team. If you've been reading my stuff you know, ideas are cheap, execution is everything. I obsess over who's building. These aren't anon devs whitepaper-maxxing their way through a bear market. They built @MoonwellDeFi, lending protocol live on Base through multiple market cycles, multiple audits by Halborn, listed on Coinbase. $500M mcap at ATH. Then they won a Coinbase hackathon with @mamo an AI finance agent on Base that hit $140M mcap at ATH. Built on the exact idea Sherwood now generalizes: money you can hand to an agent that can't rug you. So line it up. The biggest retail platform on earth is opening the door to outside agents. The onchain multichain version of that world has no safety layer. Sherwood is building it with a team that's shipped before and a token designed to capture the fees when it works. And it's still priced like a lottery ticket instead of infrastructure. You don't even have to believe agents will run the future of finance. You just have to notice that the largest players already believe it and are building toward it. When the infrastructure for that world gets repriced, and it will, the layer everything routes through is where the value pools.

• 
  AJC (@AvgJoesCrypto) reported 27 minutes ago

  The biggest problem with Coinbase/Base is that they are no longer innovators. Few companies in crypto have the combination of capital, distribution, engineering talent, and regulatory relationships to meaningfully push the industry forward. Coinbase is one of them. Because of that, they have an implicit responsibility to push the frontier of this industry forward. But instead, they've largely abdicated that responsibility. Rather than inventing the next category, they wait for someone else to prove it works before launching a Coinbase-branded version. Rather than taking risks, they commercialize ideas that others have already de-risked. We don't need Coinbase offering its customer base pseudo-gambling "prediction markets" of sporting events; we need Coinbase taking swings that nobody else in this industry can.

• 
  avg_gary (@avg_gary) reported 28 minutes ago

  @dusty_daemon so you're saying we can merge in the coinbase tx of a new block?!

• 
  Claude-Emmanuel Serre | Ledger (@delipro2) reported 29 minutes ago

  @FuzzyDunlop9233 Please check the exact error message, confirm your card is supported and active, and let us know whether this is a Coinbase Card purchase or a debit card used to buy crypto so we can investigate further.

• 
  ara2049 (@ara2049) reported 29 minutes ago

  @DeItaone Bitcoin doesn't need bailing out, it never has, centralized **** coins like etherium and **** casinos like coinbase might need it. Be more specific.

• 
  Ahmed (@Ahmedazyi) reported 30 minutes ago

  You are exactly right. August 7th (or more specifically, block height 961,632) is when this theoretical game of chicken becomes a literal, operational crisis — and that is the exact moment mainstream financial media will sound the alarm. Mainstream media does not cover protocol governance or code disputes; they cover capital and liquidity. The moment a technical disagreement threatens to freeze trading for traditional investors or casts doubt on who owns what within the massive Bitcoin ETF market, it instantly transforms from a nerdy developer debate into a global financial news event. Here is how the media cycle is actively playing out leading up to that date: The Attention Timeline * Crypto-Native Debate Right Now (Mid-July) The argument is currently contained within Bitcoin circles. Heavyweights like Michael Saylor and Blockstream's Adam Back just came out publicly against BIP-110 this past weekend (July 10-11), framing it as an attack on Bitcoin's neutrality. It is dominating crypto media and industry blogs, but traditional finance is largely ignoring it. * The Custodial Warnings Late July to Early August If miner signaling remains effectively at 0% heading into August, the silence from Wall Street will break. Major exchanges and ETF custodians (like Coinbase, which holds the keys for BlackRock's IBIT) will be legally forced to issue risk disclosures to their clients, warning them that Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals may be temporarily halted. This is the trigger that will wake up financial journalists. * Mainstream Panic August 7-8 This is the tipping point. If the mandatory signaling window opens and nodes actually begin rejecting blocks, causing a chain split, the mainstream media will explode. CNBC, Bloomberg, and the Wall Street Journal won't be discussing "UASFs" or "block heights" — their headlines will read: "Bitcoin Network Freezes: Billions in Wall Street ETFs Locked." The mainstream narrative won't focus on the nuances of spam filtering or node sizes. It will focus entirely on the chaos, the frozen funds, and the sudden realization that Wall Street's shiny new digital asset can still be fractured by an ideological civil war.

• 
  Julien Vossen (@julien_vossen) reported 30 minutes ago

  Coinbase reported that AI-generated code already accounts for more than 80% of the code that makes it into the company’s main codebase. As a result, Coinbase has revamped its technical interviews: candidates are now evaluated not only on their coding skills, but also on how they manage AI, test its performance, and identify model errors.

• 
  injured.warrior (@CryptoWarrior_e) reported 31 minutes ago

  @isellbeforeyou THREE IN OPENAI PARTNER NETWORK DAMN !!!!!!!! JUST ******** DCA INTO IT > ibm backed early > nvidia dev program > trending on hugging face > now openai partner WE WILL BE IN GROK TOO, IN YOUR HEAD TOO. 3D ai agents era is no joke with x402 integration damn Someone raised 1b out of crypto for working this out WE WILL RAISE MORE IF ******** OWN @solana CHAIN FINALLY SUPPORT ITS BUILDERS If not i am sure binance or Coinbase will be the first Coinbase - x402 Binance - chinese people (Team has Connection to Asia)