1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
  4. Outage Map
Coinbase

Coinbase Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Coinbase users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
City of Humble, TX 1
Houston, TX 1
Palo Verde, Coclé 2
Manhattan, NY 1
Pike Creek Valley, DE 1
East Flatbush, NY 1
Petaling Jaya, SGR 1
Denver, CO 1
Louisville, KY 1
Wix, England 2
Guayaquil, Guayas 1
Rome, Latium 1
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 1
City of Tiffin, OH 2
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • DanPMelnick
    Dan Melnick (@DanPMelnick) reported

    Cloudflare just eliminated 20% of its staff while citing massive AI productivity gains. 1,100 employees. Gone in a single announcement. What organizational compression means for you: your engineering function could be next. Coinbase cut 14% of its staff, noting engineers now ship in days instead of weeks. Block reduced its workforce while leaning into AI efficiencies. All restructuring simultaneously. The industry calls it an AI-first transformation. This is not a headline about tech layoffs. It is a headline about workforce architecture. The function is being rebuilt around new pillars: system design, AI code review, and high-level problem solving. The goal is to organize around the capabilities that will matter most next. That sentence deserves a second read. Because it does not describe the roles being eliminated. It describes the roles replacing them. The new structure does not replicate the old one with fewer people. It is built around fundamentally different assumptions about what developers can do when AI handles the syntax and repetitive layer. This is the pattern I have been tracking across software development for months. Meta moved to leaner teams. Amazon restructured around AI operations. Now the industry is not just compressing headcount. It is redesigning the logic of how a build operates. I watch a version of this happen firsthand every day at Zing. We use our Six-Step Software Methodology to cut development time by 40%. The part that never makes the headlines: the developers who stay do not keep their old jobs with AI bolted on. They get entirely new jobs. Writing code becomes reviewing code. The skillset changes. The bottleneck changes. The definition of what "good" looks like changes. AI handles the volume, while humans handle the 20% that requires strategy, architecture, and judgment. That is the difference between task automation and structural redesign. Task automation makes people faster. Structural redesign removes the need for the old architecture entirely. Most dev shops are still doing the first. The smart ones are doing the second. Here is what concerns me. The gap between what AI enables and what most organizations have actually restructured around continues to widen. AI-forward teams are on one side of that gap. Almost everyone else is on the other. And the distance between the two groups is growing every quarter. Your CTO is watching this. Your board should be too. The question worth raising in your next leadership meeting is not "how do we make our developers code faster with AI." It is: if we rebuilt this function from scratch around AI-era capabilities, what would it look like? Not which roles become faster. Which roles shift entirely to system design. And what replaces the junior work. Most organizations are not asking that question yet. The winners just did.

  • 0x_KaELo
    C A L (@0x_KaELo) reported

    @BagCalls @quipnetwork Quantum readiness isn't a distant problem anymore. Coinbase said prepare now

  • 7zaiik
    Zaiik (@7zaiik) reported

    Can Coinbase help me find my missing coins... in my couch?

  • jconnorholliman
    Connor Holliman (@jconnorholliman) reported

    @KQpewpew @coinbase Thanks Kev, absolutely gutted still but wouldn’t trade my experience working with you for anything 🫡

  • when_tge
    𝙬𝙚𝙣🔅 (@when_tge) reported

    Coinbase cutting 14% of staff is not a one-off. It is a preview. The CEO did not even dress it up. AI lets them do more with fewer people and that is exactly what they are going to do. Every company watching that announcement is running the same calculation right now. The part that gets glossed over is where the value goes when the labor costs disappear. It does not get passed to customers. It does not flow to the workers who spent years building the systems being replaced. It goes up. To Shareholders, platforms, executives, and the AI companies sitting underneath all of it. It's not a conspiracy or something like it. That is just how businesses are structured to behave. They follow incentives and right now every incentive points toward fewer people and higher margins. The problem is not that AI exists. The problem is who owns it and who benefits when it works. A people-owned alternative is not an idealistic concept anymore. It is just the logical response to a system that was never designed to share what it captures. @ActionModelAI is one of the few projects actually building that alternative instead of just talking about it.

  • realarmaansidhu
    Armaan Sidhu (@realarmaansidhu) reported

    @brian_armstrong Brian Armstrong's Coinbase layoff letter is the first explicit corporate confirmation that AI is replacing knowledge workers at scale. He didn't hide it. He made it the structural reason. The structural reality. Coinbase reduced headcount by 14 percent and rebuilt the org around three principles. Maximum 5 layers below the CEO. No pure managers (every leader must ship code). AI-native pods including "one person teams" handling engineer, designer, and PM roles in single hires. The labor displacement math. If a single engineer can ship in days what previously took a team weeks, the team isn't 5x more productive. It's been replaced. Coinbase is publicly admitting the multiplier is real and acting on it before it becomes obvious. The competitive context. Other large tech companies have done quiet AI-driven layoffs without admitting the cause. Armstrong is the first major CEO to write down "AI changed how we work" as the explicit justification. Other CEOs will follow once the tone is set. The structural lesson on AI labor disruption. 2020-2024 saw incremental productivity gains from AI tools. 2025-2026 is producing structural cost reductions that flow directly to operating margin. Displaced workers don't reabsorb. They compete with everyone else's displaced workers. The bull case for Coinbase shareholders. Lower fixed costs through the next crypto cycle mean leverage to revenue growth without proportional opex growth. If crypto adoption accelerates, Coinbase emerges with higher operating leverage. The bear case. Cutting too deep mid-cycle creates execution risk. Crypto cycles have a way of demanding capacity at the moment companies have removed it. Other tech CEOs are watching this letter. The next 12 months will tell whether Coinbase is early or just first.

  • dollarnihilist
    Bitfly (@dollarnihilist) reported

    Funds were safe during #Coinbase outage

  • beingme_24
    0xHuman (@beingme_24) reported

    Better avoid coinbase or take out ur hard earned money from this CeX A non technical with help of AI deploying code to **** where customers funds are at risk

  • FrankRundatz
    Frank Rundatz (@FrankRundatz) reported

    @Cliffinkent Yes - this points out that tradfi banks are much more regulated than defi companies. I agree that most tradfi banks have redundancy for an entire region going down. Coinbase claims to have not been prepared for a single AZ having a problem.

  • LitecoinTA
    Chikun (@LitecoinTA) reported

    Every time I login to @coinbase they want some new piece of personal information. It’s beyond ridiculous now. They’ll be asking for my inside leg measurement soon.

  • czverse
    czverse (@czverse) reported

    For 30 years, the internet ran on one payment assumption: Humans authorize. Humans approve. Humans pay. Every financial rail ever built assumed a person at the end of the wire. Credit cards - designed for humans. Bank transfers - designed for humans. PayPal - designed for humans. Then on May 7th, AWS flipped a switch. And the assumption broke. AI agents running on Amazon's infrastructure can now pay for things. By themselves. In real money. In 200 milliseconds. No human in the loop. The Coinbase head of infrastructure didn't bury the headline: "There will soon be more AI agents transacting than humans." Here's what they actually built: AWS Bedrock AgentCore Payments. Agents get a wallet. Wallet is funded by a human. Agent spends - within hard limits you set. Settlement happens in USDC on Coinbase Base or Solana. Cost per transaction: fractions of a cent. And the protocol underneath is elegant. It's called x402. Built on HTTP 402 - a status code that's existed since 1991. "Payment Required." Engineers reserved it in the original web specs. Never implemented it - because the financial rails of the 90s couldn't support it. Stablecoin rails can. So x402 is finally live. 30 years later. The use cases are already real: → APIs become pay-per-call - no contracts, no accounts, just transact → MCP servers get paid directly by agents doing research → Paywalled content charges per article - agents pay 5 cents to read → Agents hire other agents and pay them per completed task Warner Bros. Discovery is testing it. Heurist AI is building agent labor markets on top of it. And that creates the question nobody's ready for: What happens to the economy when agents are the buyers? No impulse purchases. No brand loyalty. No UI dark patterns. Agents optimize purely on price, speed, and quality. The machine economy doesn't browse. It transacts. We broke down the full architecture, the x402 protocol, every use case, and the risks in detail. Link in bio. czverse

  • jimmy_build2026
    jimmy (@jimmy_build2026) reported

    the teams winning this race aren't building better models. they're building the trust primitives every other agent will depend on. if you think agent commerce is the next big thing, you should be paying very close attention to kya infrastructure. @coinbase @brian_armstrong — when does kya integration become a prerequisite for agent wallet access, not an option?

  • jessepollak
    jesse.base.eth (@jessepollak) reported

    @rbthreek I remember when coinbase listed VVV on day 1 and CT melted down

  • MaknBank1
    MaknBank (@MaknBank1) reported

    @brian_armstrong @coinbase @roinujnotrya yes the problem still persist on mobile.

  • Bradaboy38
    Bradley Heiges (@Bradaboy38) reported

    @BSCNews @coinbase They cut 700 employees!! With zero notice! There will be far bigger issues! Move your crypto off the exchange! Cold storage or to $Cronos

Check Current Status