Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Robert Albert (@Robert_Xrpl) reported 54 seconds ago

  JUST IN: Federal Reserve, IRS, SEC, Social Security, All Bonds: Birth Certificate, Social Security Card, Diploma's, Advanced Degrees, Professional Designations, Marriages, Divorces, Fidelity, Brokerage Accounts: Margin Interest, Loaned Shares for brokerage shorting, Crypto Platforms/Exchanges, ie., Uphold, Binance, Coinbase and All the others that used our XRP or XLM to "stake" and made "Billions" for staking out our XRP. John Deaton did nothing for XRP holders and would never respond to me "EVER" about this issue.

• 
  Wildhoney78.eth🍯🍯🍯 (@wildhoney78bc) reported 4 minutes ago

  @vangoyaa Not really. Its been over a month since launch and they still haven’t fixed the wallet connect issue, specifically for legacy coinbase wallets that require seed phrases instead of emails. You (Adam) tell me I can claim rewards but I wallet can’t connect to claim said rewards (fees)

• 
  Jimmy Mukler (@Jimmy_Mukler) reported 4 minutes ago

  Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, and Coinbase just backed a stablecoin designed to cut Circle and Tether out of the economics. 140 companies forming a consortium around Open USD. The model: whoever distributes the coin keeps the yield. Not the issuer. That's the exact reason banks never pushed USDC hard. Adopting it meant handing the float to a competitor. This flips that structure. Distribution becomes the moat, not issuance. Governing 140 members is a different problem entirely. Some are calling this a Tether killer. I'd rather watch whether they can ship a governance model before calling it anything.

• 
  ItaloIrlandese - non mi rompere le scatole! (@alfah0lic) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ColmALombard @martypartymusic @Revolut **** that ****. kraken only. revolut & coinbase will suspend your account the minute you try to cash out anything over 5k. cashed out 170k via kraken with 0 problems

• 
  Greensmoke Studios 💚 🐒 (@Greensmokegroup) reported 7 minutes ago

  @fayzez_com @github How did y'all find this before the airdrop? That's how I heard about it is it was listed on coinbase and I seen it was down to like three or four dollars so I started buying in after the coinbase listing and it went down some obviously I didn't by the top but how do you how did y'all hear about it before then was that on GitHub?

• 
  venussystems (@manteo_websites) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Steph_iscrypto THIS IS NOT GOOD NEWS! Figures (as of the end of June 2026): Authorized providers (CASPs with MiCA licenses): approx. 244 (according to the ESMA register and reports). Many of these are based in Germany (approx. 57), France, and the Netherlands. Major platforms such as Coinbase, Kraken, OKX, Bybit, Bitpanda, and Revolut are included. Pre-MiCA (national licenses/VASPs): Estimates suggest there were between 1,200 and approximately 3,000 registered crypto firms in the EU/EEA. This means: Around 80% or more of the existing providers (numbering in the hundreds to over 2,000) have had to—or still must—cease or severely curtail their EU operations. Many have withdrawn, merged with others, or relocated to countries outside the EU. Probably only the one where the communist EU has access to the owners' coins in a worst-case scenario.

• 
  Gami Capital (@Gami_Capital) reported 13 minutes ago

  Is Circle Actually in Trouble? Our Read on the OUSD Launch On June 30th, while Jeremy Allaire was on stage at Goldman Sachs' Digital Assets conference in London talking about "the future of money," Open Standard announced the launch of OUSD, a dollar stablecoin backed by 149 partners. Two days later, Circle's stock ($CRCL) dropped 18% in a single session, now down roughly 76% from its June 2025 high. Does that mean Circle is done for? Here's our read, in six points, including Jeremy Allaire's direct response. 1. Circle's paradox: usage is up, margins are collapsing USDC has never been doing better: roughly $77 billion in circulation, up nearly 20% since the IPO. The problem is that Circle's revenue has only grown 5.5% over the same period, and net margin has collapsed over three quarters, falling from 29% to 8%. The explanation fits in one line: roughly 94% of Circle's revenue comes from interest earned on reserves (mostly T-bills). The market isn't pricing USDC usage, it's pricing Circle's ability to monetize that usage. And that ability is eroding: growing revenue-sharing with distributors (Coinbase chief among them), Binance suspending services in Europe over a missing MiCA license (after Circle had paid for USDC's distribution on the platform), and removal from several Russell Growth indexes in late June. The timing of OUSD couldn't be worse. 2. OUSD: the issuer model, redistributed to the ecosystem Open Standard has assembled a rare lineup: Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, BNY Mellon, Google, Stripe and Shopify on the TradFi side; Coinbase, Aave, Bybit, OKX, Plasma and Tempo on the crypto side. Neither Circle, Tether, nor Paxos are part of it. The pitch is simple and direct: zero minting and redemption fees, with nearly all reserve yield passed back to the partners who adopt and use the stablecoin. In other words, OUSD is attacking the exact revenue line that keeps legacy issuers alive. 3. What Circle still has going for it Circle's regulatory moat is still the one that cannot be beaten, for now: the first global issuer to reach full MiCA compliance back in July 2024, conditional OCC approval for a national trust bank charter in the US, money transmitter licenses across 46 US states. That's years of groundwork a consortium doesn't replicate with a press release. On the integrations side, USDC remains the settlement asset for BlackRock's tokenized BUIDL fund, was just added to BNY Mellon's digital custody platform (itself an OUSD partner...), and stays the default collateral on regulated US and European trading venues. Circle remains the go-to for institutions wanting a regulated dollar backed by nearly a decade of audit history. But a shrinking moat is still a shrinking moat. 4. Jeremy Allaire's response: network effects as the real defense Facing a wave of questions from his investor community, Circle's CEO published a detailed rebuttal that's worth taking seriously rather than dismissing as crisis PR. His core thesis: stablecoin networks are platform businesses built on network effects, established over long periods, that tend toward winner-take-most market structures. He lays out three layers he says protect USDC: - Application-layer network effects: every developer integration strengthens the network, which in turn attracts more integrations. Circle has been building this ecosystem for nearly a decade, with infrastructure like CCTP and Gateway extending interoperability to new chains, including permissioned L2s and government-built networks. - Liquidity network effects: Allaire claims USDC sits in the top 3 most liquid digital assets in the world, alongside BTC and USDT, with the next closest dollar stablecoins roughly 10x smaller in liquidity, often concentrated in a single exchange's promotional books. - Regulatory and banking integration: the states USDC is currently the only major global stablecoin available across all of Europe and Japan, backed by nearly a decade of investment in global banking, treasury and liquidity management. He backs this with a striking data point: in Q1 2026, according to Artemis, USDC handled nearly $30 trillion in on-chain transactions, 80% of all dollar stablecoin transaction volume, versus 20% for USDT, and under 0.5% combined for everyone else, OUSD included at this stage. On the substance of OUSD's pitch, Allaire pushes back point by point: - On free minting and redemption: he notes the entire payments industry runs on small basis-point fees, and that unlimited free redemptions tend to collide with market realities, something Circle says it already addresses through contractual mechanisms rather than a blanket fee exemption. - On passing all revenue back to partners: Circle says it already shares the majority of its revenue with distribution partners, while retaining enough to keep investing in infrastructure. Giving everything away, he argues, is a recipe for structural underinvestment and a platform that stays limited in scope. -On consortium governance: the sharpest point in the piece. Allaire repeats, almost verbatim, a line he'd already made publicly: that large groups of large companies coordinate poorly, have misaligned incentives, and tend to starve their own consortium out of self-interest. He states Circle itself tried this model in USDC's early days and ran into the same problems. He closes by reaffirming that the Coinbase partnership remains as strong as ever, that several OUSD founding members remain major USDC partners, and that Circle continues expanding its own ecosystem (Arc, CPN, StableFX, Agent Stack) by working with dozens of other stablecoin issuers, his way of signaling Circle doesn't feel threatened in its role as infrastructure. 5. Why OUSD hasn't won anything yet Recent history for consortium-backed stablecoins argues for caution, and echoes Allaire's own point. USDG (Paxos, with Kraken, Robinhood, and Galaxy among its backers) is plateauing around $3 billion. PYUSD (PayPal) took two and a half years to approach $4 billion, then shrank by a third from its peak. A big announcement doesn't make an adoption curve. Three questions remain open: governance across a 149-member consortium, historically slow and prone to misaligned incentives; the viability of a model with no fees and no retained yield; and, above all, the end user, since the yield flows to partners, not holders. Why hold OUSD rather than USDC or USDT? The answer will hinge on incentives, and on that front, we're watching Plasma and Tempo (Stripe's chain) closely as the two most likely launch rails. 6. Tether, watching calmly from the sidelines With over $180 billion in USDT circulating, Tether dominates territory OUSD isn't primarily targeting: Tron, P2P payments and remittances in emerging markets, trading collateral in Asia. The threat is real for Circle; at this stage, far less so for Tether. Our takeaway The real story here isn't "Circle vs. OUSD," it's the structural compression of issuance margins. Allaire's response, however well-argued, doesn't refute that point so much as reframe it: his thesis is that network effects and liquidity matter more than distributed yield, and that Circle can afford to share revenue as long as it stays the default rail. That's a defensible position, but it still has to prove itself against a consortium that, for the first time, aligns distributors and infrastructure rather than pitting them against each other. Reserve yield, the economic core of stablecoins, is being redistributed. The question is no longer whether, but to whom: distributors, chains, partners, or end users. For allocators, that's arguably good news: more competition among issuers means more value captured by whoever brings the liquidity and the usage. At Gami Capital, where we run on-chain USDC strategies day to day, we'll be watching liquidity migrations and the opportunities this new landscape creates closely. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

• 
  skinky (afk) (@goatdsalmon) reported 13 minutes ago

  @GokuYoppy @blknoiz06 just watch, once it breaks 0.2 a lot of people will have that "oh **** @blknoiz06 is really gonna do this ****" moment and you'll see capital sidelined since WIF Coinbase listing hit the order books. People lack the ability to look ahead into the future. Not me.

• 
  Charles B (@charlesbatens) reported 16 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodCrypto @RobinhoodApp why is $CFG still not listed? Major global exchanges have already moved. Coinbase ✅ Binance ✅ Kraken ✅ Upbit ✅ Bithumb ✅ @Centrifuge is building serious RWA infrastructure with names like Apollo, Janus Henderson, New York Life Investment Management and Coinbase/Base involved. Robinhood users deserve access to real RWA infrastructure too. Time to add $CFG.

• 
  strv17 🕸 (@storv17) reported 21 minutes ago

  @coinbase, your mobile app really sucks ! Slow, not loading, not useful at all.

• 
  Tiago (@0x_tiago) reported 21 minutes ago

  Last month, Ethena launched its first earn product for USDe on Coinbase. Now, USDe will be available on the Robinhood App • Coinbase has 100M+ users and ~9M monthly active users • Robinhood has 27M+ users and ~11M monthly active users Two giant crypto/fintech companies onboarding USDe as collateral for earn products should tell you the direction Ethena is going... Stablecoins need distribution to win, and Ethena is working towards making USDe the most widely adopted collateral for yield products.

• 
  Robert Albert (@Robert_Xrpl) reported 23 minutes ago

  SEC & COINBASE: Remember just after coming onto Twitter the LORD had me posting about the "CLAW-BACKS" namely all the nefarious and illegal purchases of XRP not supervised by Platforms such as Binance, Coinbase and others. It was illegal to purchase XRP using VPN's to mask being a US Citizen, or selling other digital assets to then acquire XRP. That is what the SEC is doing w/ Coinbase. The SEC had to take down Binance and other foreign platforms acting as exchanges to get the customer information on those that used funds from there to then buy XRP in Coinbase. CB's Armstrong knew their KYC and Compliance Department SCREWED UP -- BIG TIME. Now the weeping and gnashing of teeth, the LORD had me post about is HAPPENING. #sec

• 
  2ALPHAFOXTROT🇺🇸 (@RoadtoDamascus7) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @circle I guess Competition is good, but Coinbase is shady, even tgiugh coinbase uses USDC...(Alot). I am just not a Fan of Coinbases Practices. Esp their 3rd Party Scammer Customer service. I will never use coinbase again.

• 
  Harvey Reginald Financial (@Crypto1Harvey) reported 26 minutes ago

  @flippifi WRONG again, #Litecoin $LTC bagholder. You're LYING or terribly misinformed. According to Coinbase: "Litecoin reached its record high of $420.00 on December 11, 2017, marking a -90% change from its present value". It hasn't $420 since, making it the REAL ATH. Now YOU know YOUR facts, sit down and shut ******** up. Memecoin or not, I don't think you realize how manipulated LTC actually is. So the net result is still the same. Maybe you just deliberately ignore this or pretend it doesn't exist.

• 
  Ricardo (@Ric_RTP) reported 28 minutes ago

  140 of the biggest financial firms on Earth just teamed up to assassinate ONE company. The same company they helped BUILD for 7 years. BlackRock, Coinbase, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BNY Mellon, and Google all showed up to sign the kill order: Yesterday, a consortium of over 140 financial firms launched a new stablecoin called Open USD. The target: Circle Internet Group, the $17 billion company behind USDC. Circle stock crashed 17.5% in a single trading session and closed near $62. It is now down more than 40% in 30 days from its May high of $138. But this is NOT a story about a competitor showing up... This is about a company getting assassinated by the exact partners it depended on to survive. Here is how deep the betrayal goes: Coinbase and Circle co-founded USDC together in 2018. They built the stablecoin as partners through the Centre Consortium. In 2024 alone, Circle paid Coinbase $908 million as a distribution fee for hosting USDC on the Coinbase platform. That revenue-sharing agreement expires in August 2026. Six weeks before that renewal, Coinbase publicly signed onto a project designed to make USDC obsolete. BlackRock literally manages Circle's reserves. The world's largest asset manager has been sitting on the $73.6 billion in US Treasuries backing USDC but joined a consortium built to redirect that interest income to other partners instead of Circle. BNY Mellon is Circle's custody bank. Same playbook here. Custody by day, competitor by night. And Open USD is launching natively on Base, which is Coinbase's own blockchain. Coinbase is literally constructing the rails to replace USDC on the chain Coinbase owns. And what makes it worse: 99% of Circle's 2024 revenue came from interest earned on those Treasury reserves. That is the entire business model. Take user dollars, park them in short-term T-bills, keep the yield. Open USD's pitch to the market is a single sentence: Partners keep the yield instead of Circle. Zero minting fees or redemption fees. Almost all the interest income flows back to the 140 companies distributing the coin. Every "partner" that gave Circle its network effect just realized they had been paying Circle to do something they could do themselves. The interim CEO of Open Standard is Zach Abrams, the co-founder of Bridge, the stablecoin infrastructure firm Stripe acquired for $1.1 billion in 2024. Stripe's stablecoin acquisition is now running the coordinated hit against Circle as well. Circle's own CEO Jeremy Allaire went on the record calling USDC "the most trusted, widely adopted stablecoin globally" and welcoming the competition. That is the polite corporate translation for "our largest revenue-sharing partner just publicly announced they no longer need us." Citi projects the stablecoin market will hit $4 trillion by 2030. 140 companies looked at that number, looked at how much of it Circle was keeping, and coordinated to take it. The exchanges that gave USDC liquidity, the banks that gave USDC legitimacy, the card networks that gave USDC distribution, and the asset managers that gave USDC credibility... Every one of them spent years inside the walls before yesterday's public execution. The most successful crypto IPO of 2025 just got dismantled by the SAME names that built it. What do you think?