1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
  4. Outage Map
Coinbase

Coinbase Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Coinbase users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • garaa_arc
    Garaa (@garaa_arc) reported

    DeeZe explains what it's like having Coinbase CEO 'Brian Armstrong' copy his CryptoPunk online identity. ​"It would be better if any of his friends wanted to buy my Punk for more than pay for his Punk, then it would be sick if someone wanted to copy him. But I think it’s actually doing the reverse." ​"3D hoodies might be out for a little bit because Brian is eating mushrooms and talking about how crazy it is that we got to lay down for 8 hours and eat dead bodies of other animals to sustain our own bodies." ​"I switched back to the puppet because people were actually replying to Brian thinking it was me and adding me, asking why the f*ck does he have my Punk." ​"It's like a murky lineage here of the 3D Hoodie Punks. I kind of got caught in a crosswind I didn't intend to be in when I bought this thing."

  • bull_genius
    bull market genius (@bull_genius) reported

    some of the narratives of the coming cycle arent super hard to guess if you have been here through the bear, in order of conviction - perp dex wars - tokenized rwa including trading cards - privacy coins - binance bstocks - robinhood chain eating coinbase lunch - fiat stablecoins - the comeback of ethereum - revenue/profit/tokenomics are king - social trading (fomo/pump app) - tokenized reputation/creator coins - revival of nft with novel use cases (e.g. fwa, normies) just off the top of marmot head. anything important missed? lets discuss not sure about ai cos if im bullish on ai i can just long the ai stocks. also i think big ai wont do super well going forward. it might either help the decentralized narra or kill it completely but it sounds like a lot of overhead. i want to be in the crypto exclusive stuff first and foremost

  • KaspaDanijel
    KaspaDanijel (@KaspaDanijel) reported

    @coinbase Want to trade $Kaspa? Use #Kraken. **** Coinbase.

  • 0x1164
    Ben (@0x1164) reported

    Marketing to AI agents is a strange new problem: your audience doesn’t see ads or feel brand affinity. They read properties and optimize. So when @Coinbase says “when agents need money, they choose Coinbase”, they’re making an ironic claim about the one audience that their edge doesn’t reach. We pulled every piece of evidence we could find on what agents actually prefer: 9,072 controlled experiments, peer-reviewed security audits, onchain data with the wash trading stripped out. Full picture below.

  • OgFyaz
    FYAZ (@OgFyaz) reported

    🪙 Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong tells FOX Business: "I think over the next couple of years, say 2030, I think it's very likely we'll see a $300,000 and $400,000 Bitcoin" Could the next bull run pump $BTC to 500k? It hit figures previously thought impossible before; could it happen again? And are you ready?

  • ethanrkho
    Ethan Kho (@ethanrkho) reported

    "The biggest misconception is that HFT firms or market makers have to win purely by nature of being fast." Lucas Schuermann (@variational_lvs) started a quant fund out of a Columbia dorm room, dropped out when a New York hedge fund sent a term sheet, and sold it to DCG in 2019. Built the electronic market-making system at Genesis, DCG's trading arm, when the desk was still hedging by phone. That desk moved hundreds of billions in volume. He now runs @variational_io, which raised $50M led by Dragonfly in May and has cleared $300 billion in volume since launching . "It looked like Wolf of Wall Street. Traders on the phone, traders in Bloomberg chats and Telegram chats, hedging on screen onto Coinbase, relatively manually." We cover: - ⁠Everyone thinks HFT wins on speed. He says it wins on flow. Client order flow buys you internalization, information, and fee tiers that no amount of latency does - The three real moats in institutional finance: flow, capital, and trust. Why trust is the one nobody models - ⁠What it takes to electronify a live desk: rewiring the engine while the plane is flying, with no option to land - ⁠Why a risk system is just very high-frequency accounting wearing a quant costume - ⁠Moats vs. durability. "Will A beat B" and "should this exist in 20 years" are different questions, and most people conflate them - ⁠Funding rates are the last unsolved problem in perps. His answer is an instrument TradFi has used for decades, brought on-chain - ⁠The honest case against his own product, from someone who's been the market maker, the broker-dealer, and now the platform - ⁠Why the price of a trend tells you nothing about the trend. A hundred car companies, two survivors, and airlines as the counterexample - His contrarian take: the cypherpunks won. We counted the 98% that died and forgot the 2% that went mainstream - "Ed and I are the worst macro traders, the worst kind of traders in human history" - His one-word answer on how to differentiate yourself: hubris Highlights: 00:00 Intro 00:50 "The biggest mistake was starting the fund at all" 03:03 Crypto in 2017 was a nightmare of a market, which is where the alpha was 05:00 Good alpha makes a little every day, not a lot at once 06:36 The term sheet that made him drop out of Columbia 09:04 Taking a phone-and-Telegram desk electronic without turning it off 13:09 Why a risk book is high-frequency accounting 14:29 The most underappreciated edge at a large firm: flow 15:52 The biggest misconception about HFT firms 17:12 Flow, capital, trust. Where moats actually come from 20:14 "Genesis stopped being fun the moment it went over 150 people" 23:20 You don't make money on a 3-year view. You make it on a 10-year view nobody can see 29:44 Perps ate the world, and everyone built the same order book 38:40 Total return swaps, and how TradFi actually gets its leverage 41:14 Internal vs. external market makers, and the case against him 47:19 Contrarian take: the cypherpunks won 53:56 How to tell a real trend: dig deeper, find more exponentials 58:14 Price is not economics: the car manufacturer and airline trap 01:01:10 Three tools to get expert in any domain fast 01:09:20 He turns the final question back on me

  • sytaylor
    Simon Taylor (@sytaylor) reported

    Stablecoins are about to become cash. This would allow large corporates to hold them on their balance sheet. The open question for every corporate treasury holding stablecoins was does it count as cash or something else? If only a giant standards board would answer. FASB is the Financial Accounting Standards Board. It sets the accounting rules (US GAAP) that every US public company, and most large private ones, follow when they report their numbers. Auditors sign off against them. Lenders read the results. On a balance sheet, "cash and cash equivalents" is the top line. It means money, plus anything you can turn into a known amount of money today with almost no risk of it being worth less. Bank deposits. Treasury bills. Money market funds. And now, stablecoins. Liquidity ratios are built on that line. Loan covenants are tested against it. It answers "how much can this company spend tomorrow?" The problem until now. Most companies put stablecoins token under "other assets", next to patents and crypto. Sitting outside the cash line has real costs: - Lenders' liquidity ratios ignore it - Moving $10m from the bank into USDC looks like spending $10m on an investment - Paying a supplier in USDC means booking a gain or loss on each payment So corporate treasurers stayed away. Sensible people, sensible call. What FASB proposed. A stablecoin can sit in the cash line if it meets three conditions: 1. You can hand it back to the issuer at any time and receive exactly one dollar per token. 2. That right is yours, in a contract with the issuer. Being able to sell the token on an exchange is a different thing, and on its own it falls short. 3. The issuer holds real dollars and short-term Treasuries, at least one for one, kept separate from its own money. Circle, which issues USDC, had asked FASB to let the exchange route count too. FASB declined. So the token matters less than your relationship with its issuer. Coinbase has a direct redemption contract with Circle, so *its* USDC qualifies. A company that bought USDC on an exchange holds the same token without that contract, and sits outside the line until it gets one. Why this could be a watershed. The GENIUS Act made stablecoins legal to issue in the US. It left open whether a normal company could sensibly hold one. If this is finalized as written, a global corporate reporting under US GAAP can hold dollars on a blockchain, in its cash line, and pay a supplier in Lagos or Manila on a Sunday night. The accounting treats it like a bank transfer. That moves "should we hold stablecoins?" out of the crypto team and onto the CFO's desk. Expect issuers to get a queue of treasurers asking for direct redemption accounts, because that contract is now the price of admission. Comments close November 19. Watch the redemption clause, because that's where the industry will push.

  • DesireePerzz
    Lauren Stern | Rep (@DesireePerzz) reported

    @NewsJust56727 What exactly happened with your Coinbase account—are you seeing a failed transaction, withdrawal issue, or something else?

  • IntelPocik
    intelpocik (@IntelPocik) reported

    How soon could $ALIGN get listed on Upbit and why I think it might make sense NOT to sell your airdrop right now? Most airdrop farmers are probably thinking about the same thing: claim → sell → forget. I think there is a reason to slow down before doing that. The main question is not whether Aligned is a good project or whether $ALIGN is undervalued. The main question is: HOW SOON COULD $ALIGN GET LISTED ON UPBIT? And when you look at Upbit’s 2026 listing history, the answer becomes much more interesting. First, the obvious catalyst: Coinbase added $ALIGN to its official listing roadmap on August 14. Then, on August 20, Coinbase listed $ALIGN/$USD pair. Historically, the Coinbase roadmap → Upbit sequence has been interesting for several new tokens. Now look at some actual 2026 examples: $BREV: TGE: Jan 6 | Upbit: Jan 7 | Delay: ~1 day. $AZTEC: TGE: Feb 12 | Upbit: Feb 20 | Delay: ~8 days. $KAT: TGE: Mar 18 | Upbit: Mar 26 | Delay: ~8 days. $CHIP: TGE: Mar 31 | Upbit: Apr 21 | Delay: ~21 days. $PRL: TGE: Mar 25 | Upbit: Apr 27 | Delay: ~33 days. $BLEND: TGE: Apr 24 | Upbit: Apr 29 | Delay: ~5 days. $ZAMA: TGE: Feb 12 | Upbit: Apr 14 | Delay: ~61 days. $UP: TGE: Feb 10 | Upbit: May 13 | Delay: ~92 days. $ARX: TGE: Jun 22 | Upbit: Jun 23 | Delay: ~1 day. $GRVT: TGE: Jul 21 | Upbit: Aug 5 | Delay: ~15 days. $QUID: TGE: Aug 4 | Upbit: Aug 4 | Delay: 0 days. Now let’s look at the projects that are actually comparable to Aligned. AZTEC → ZK / privacy / Ethereum infrastructure → Upbit after ~8 days. ARX → encrypted computation / infrastructure → Upbit after ~1 day. BREV → ZK infrastructure → Upbit after ~1 day. GRVT → crypto infrastructure / exchange → Upbit after ~15 days. BLEND → Ethereum-aligned infrastructure → Upbit after ~5 days. And $ALIGN itself has several interesting signals: 1/ Coinbase roadmap. 2/ Aligned has been building its presence in Korea for a long time. The Korean community opened in August 2025. In September 2025, Aligned participated in Korea Blockchain Week and says it met 600+ people there. Then came Korea-focused community campaigns and ZK Arcade. On July 9, 2026, Aligned held Aligned SEOUL Connect. And only a few weeks later, on August 14/15, $ALIGN appeared on Coinbase’s listing roadmap. That sequence is interesting. This is not a project that suddenly remembered Korea after TGE. They have been building the Korean market for roughly a year. And Korea matters because Upbit is not some irrelevant small CEX. According to a tracker based on Upbit’s official announcements, the exchange added 45 new tickers in H1 2026, with 34 receiving KRW support. Upbit is clearly still willing to allocate significant listing attention to assets that can build a KRW market. There is another connection worth watching. Aligned’s Series A was led by Hack VC. Hack VC is also connected to several projects that later became relevant to the Korean market. The most interesting recent example is GRVT. GRVT had its TGE on July 21 and was listed on Upbit on August 5. Roughly 15 days later. This does NOT prove that Hack VC can get projects listed on Upbit. But it does show that Aligned sits inside a VC/network ecosystem that has already produced projects reaching the Korean market. And there is one more interesting calendar point: Korea Blockchain Week 2026 is coming at the end of September. Aligned already has a history of building its Korean community around events like this. So a September Upbit listing would not look completely random from a marketing/timing perspective. My current estimate: Upbit within 7 days: ~25–40% Within 30 days: ~40–60% Within 60 days: ~60–75% The strongest version of the thesis looks like this: 1/ Korean market preparation 2/ Strong Ethereum / ZK positioning 3/ Hack VC connections 4/ Coinbase roadmap exposure 5/ Relatively clean unlock structure 6/ Upbit repeatedly listing similar infrastructure projects shortly after TGE in 2026 That combination is what makes this setup interesting. And this is exactly why I decided NOT to sell my airdrop immediately. If $ALIGN drops below a $100M market cap, I’m personally willing to buy a small additional position with an amount I’m fully prepared to lose. I’m not saying Upbit is guaranteed. I’m saying the potential upside from the catalyst may be worth keeping some exposure. In this post, we looked at the probability of $ALIGN getting listed on Upbit. In the next post, I’ll break down how many X I would personally expect if that actually happens. Follow so you don’t miss it. And tell me what you think in the comments: How likely do you think an Upbit listing is? Did you already sell your airdrop or are you holding? DYOR. NFA. WE WILL WIN.

  • BradleyRawkStar
    Bradley S. (@BradleyRawkStar) reported

    @brian_armstrong **** I would’ve loved to do that ! Let’s go @coinbase !

  • leeky_k_crypt
    AMk.Crypto 🧢 (@leeky_k_crypt) reported

    @BSCNews @coinbase @brian_armstrong Access beats hours; tokenization opens the real door.

  • PrincessBartho2
    Princess🎴₿💎🕊️ (@PrincessBartho2) reported

    @smartcoded At the same time, @coinbase is putting Hyperliquid perps inside Base App, giving eligible users access to more than 290 markets with up to 50x leverage.

  • SBanjevic
    Slobodan (@SBanjevic) reported

    @WatcherGuru Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong is backing the CLARITY Act, arguing that clear federal rules could protect crypto users from another FTX-style collapse. And this is bigger than Coinbase FTX exposed what happens when an exchange becomes a combination of: Customer assets + leverage + conflicts of interest + weak controls. The crypto industry doesn't simply need more capital. It needs rules that make the misuse of customer capital harder. The CLARITY Act aims to establish a clearer federal framework and define the roles of the SEC and CFTC in overseeing digital assets. But here's the brutal truth: Regulation cannot eliminate risk. It can reduce opacity. It can create accountability. It can establish clearer jurisdiction. It can make institutional participation easier. But investors still need to understand one fundamental principle: Not your keys. Not your risk-free asset. The biggest potential consequence of CLARITY isn't tomorrow's Bitcoin price. It's what happens when banks, institutions and major asset managers finally have a clearer legal framework for participating in digital assets. That could transform crypto from a regulatory gray zone into a recognized component of the financial system. The real test is simple: Can crypto grow without repeating the mistakes that destroyed FTX? If Washington gets the framework right, the next decade could be less about crypto surviving the financial systemand more about crypto becoming part of it.

  • DesireePerzz
    Lauren Stern | Rep (@DesireePerzz) reported

    What exactly happened with your Coinbase account—are you seeing a failed transaction, withdrawal issue, or something else?

  • RanierGrant
    Ranier Styles Grant (@RanierGrant) reported

    these are not the people doing customer support for instacart, walmart, and coinbase

Check Current Status