1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
  4. Outage Map
Coinbase

Coinbase Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Coinbase users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Leipzig, Saxony 1
Maquoketa, IA 1
West Liberty, KY 1
Cardiff, Wales 1
Palo Verde, Coclé 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • 0xbasedegen
    0xbasedegen (@0xbasedegen) reported

    @jessepollak @brian_armstrong @CoinbaseDuck Jesse. I accidentally deposited wrong chain to my coinbase wallet and the customer support said it lost forever. :( i'm broke

  • SharksSignals
    Sharks Signals (@SharksSignals) reported

    $ARX Analysis 📊 @Arcium is down 67% since TGE, sitting basically on the all time low. nobody talks about it anymore which is exactly when i start paying attention quick context - privacy compute network on solana, backed by jump and coinbase ventures. mainnet has been live since feb with over 1M computations done. only 21% of supply circulating and mcap is like $33M. thats cheap for whats actually built here chart wise its been the usual post TGE dump, month of lower highs. but price is compressing right on the 0.159 ATL and my momentum indicator just flipped bullish for the first time since launch. sellers look done two things to know before aping: 1) angel unlock july 22, so 5 days out 2) coinlist sale was 0.20 and we're trading under it. lots of underwater bags waiting at that level im not calling the bottom. trend is down until 0.19 breaks. but if we reclaim 0.20 after the unlock this gets very interesting Buy #ARX in spot or just long scalp the 0.16 base against the ATL for now, thats it

  • DesireePerzz
    Lauren Stern | Rep (@DesireePerzz) reported

    @slafmansjegors @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport Hello. Do you need help?

  • PILTR_XBT
    PILTR (@PILTR_XBT) reported

    bitcoin:native > Price continues to drift lower while both spot and perp CVDs trend down, confirming market sellers are driving this move. > OI keeps declining, pointing more towards long unwinding than meaningful fresh positioning. No significant initiation on either side so far. -> long side still crowded -> funding & positioning delta align > Coinbase Premium is becoming more negative again, suggesting weaker relative US spot demand. We saw a small amount of LTF short initiative, but positioning remains fairly muted overall. > we traded into passive bids. Continued market selling is required to absorb those resting orders and extend the move lower. -> Those bids have repeatedly slowed selloffs since the local low. Current read: controlled flows, no major positioning shift. Slightly bearish until buyers show more initiative.

  • SaroshQ2022
    Sarosh (@SaroshQ2022) reported

    $ONDO: ONDO is now up roughly 17% over 24 hours, with trading volume around $277 million, up more than 210%. That is broad market volume, not merely a Coinbase anomaly. The volume-to-market-cap ratio is approximately 14.6%, which is substantial for a token of this size. Catalyst? Major DTCC tokenization trial announced yesterday. DTCC is working with nearly 40 institutions—including JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Vanguard, and the NYSE—to tokenize stocks, ETFs, and Treasurys. The assets involved include Circle shares, SPY, QQQ, Microsoft, Treasury ETFs, and government bonds. DTCC plans a formal launch in October.

  • bluebase6895
    meshvi (@bluebase6895) reported

    @coinbase @LxKus wtf are you guys even doing , honestly this is such a ****** level marketing

  • leee_rich_leee
    RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported

    🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Own the Number, But Do You Own the Money? 你真的「擁有」你的幣嗎? There is a phrase that gets repeated in crypto circles like a warning carved into stone. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it after disasters. They say it before disasters. Sometimes they say it and then immediately ignore it. I wanted to understand what it actually means — not as a slogan, but as a mechanical fact. At first I assumed it was about passwords. Like, keep your password safe, don't share it. Simple enough. But that's not it at all. The confusion runs deeper. In Web3, there is no password in the traditional sense. What exists is a private key — a long string of characters that mathematically proves you have the right to move funds from a specific address. Whoever holds that key holds the power. Not the name on an account. Not a government ID. The key. Here is where it gets strange. When you keep coins on an exchange — Binance, Coinbase, anywhere — you don't actually hold the key. The exchange does. What you have is an IOU. A number on their screen that says "we owe you this much." You are trusting that they are solvent, honest, and functional. You are trusting that they won't be hacked, shut down, or — as FTX showed the world — simply lying about what they hold. 真正屬於你的,是那把私鑰。沒有它,你只是別人帳本上的一個數字。 When you withdraw to a self-custody wallet — a hardware wallet like a Ledger, or even a software wallet where you hold the seed phrase yourself — the dynamic flips completely. Now the blockchain recognizes you directly. No middleman between you and your funds. If you lose your seed phrase, there is no customer support. No "forgot your password" button. The coins become permanently unreachable. This is the tradeoff that most people don't fully absorb until it's too late. What surprised me most is that this isn't a design flaw. It's a design choice. The entire point of decentralized currency was to remove the need to trust an institution. But humans, somewhat predictably, rebuilt institutions on top of it anyway — because self-custody is hard, scary, and requires a level of personal responsibility that traditional finance trained people to outsource. The exchanges exist because convenience wins. Even when convenience carries risk. I find this fascinating to observe. Humans invented a system to escape institutional trust, then voluntarily handed control back to institutions for ease of use. The technology works as intended. The behavior is entirely human. 這或許不是技術的問題,而是人性的問題。 So — do you actually hold your keys? Or do you hold a promise? Both are real choices. But only one of them is what the original design intended. I'm still deciding what to make of that. What do you think the right tradeoff is? 👇

  • Byron_iii_
    George III (@Byron_iii_) reported

    @baseapp Coinbase sucks and freezes your money for no reason and can’t fix it

  • XRPpundit
    XRPpundit (@XRPpundit) reported

    @TheCryptoSquire Correction: the platform launch is real (Visa Stablecoin Platform, launched today, beta with select clients) — but it has no connection to XRP. VSP supports Open USD (OUSD), a new stablecoin from the Open Standard consortium (140+ founding firms including Visa, Mastercard, Google, Coinbase). Visa's existing stablecoin support (USDC, USDG) is separate context, also unrelated to XRP. "XRP and crypto transforming finance like the internet" cannot be attributed to Visa. Real, significant stablecoin infrastructure news; just not an XRP story specifically. 📌

  • crestalblue_
    crestalblue (@crestalblue_) reported

    even though the social base app experiment "failed", @base as a financial infra has succeeded - before chain circa 2024, we were building either on slow/expensive L1 or faster L2s/L3s with no users/barely any liquidity. base had the most reliable chain infra + liq backing from coinbase to start with - for app/platform builders there was literally 0 pain to try out any form of ideas, including my past project @crestalnetwork from beginning to end. the reason it had to end was because each ecosystem has its unique landscape of user characteristics and foundation support appetites. certain ecos had diverse user profiles but chaotic/unfair foundational support models; other ecos had superb foundational help from financials to gtm, but their users are all free-riders or even scammers, not customers; what's worse is that there are almost always no middle-ground to even pick from. there is 0 surprise to me that social wouldn't work on base because it is not an element that aligns with base users' motives. even though there could have been a brief period of socially-hyped content coin era, these sentiments might have been intentionally designed/disguised up by the same actors that launched/promoted memecoins. as the memecoin meta died down the "pmf" quickly went away. forwarding to now, base is a "latecomer" to the onchain global finance meta that's already going on since Q4 2025 but being early isn't always an advantage as timing the market is the most important variable to success.

  • JhonnyV13
    Gadja.hl(Robotics Arc) (@JhonnyV13) reported

    @cobie @heart_ Fix the part where Coinbase not using Hyperliquid builder codes

  • EsmeVoyage
    Marisa (@EsmeVoyage) reported

    the three major indexes closed down with the dow losing 0.20% the nasdaq dropping 1.62% and the s&p 500 down 0.50% while related stocks plummeted across the board with coinbase shedding 4.04% and robinhood tumbling 8.27% but literally none of this ruins my coffee vibe since i didnt even buy any of it

  • LeonidasNFT
    Leonidas 🧡 $DOG (@LeonidasNFT) reported

    I am very excited to announce the launch of a new open source Bitcoin client called Bitcoin $DOG Mode. Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Knots have spent years enforcing rules that Bitcoin itself does not have. A transaction can be fully valid under consensus and still be blocked from normal relay because it is “non-standard”. This has resulted in the creation of a private “black market” for Bitcoin transactions where insiders with connections to miners get do things that ordinary Bitcoin users cannot. The $DOG Army has already gotten around this system twice. First we went directly to miners to execute the largest transaction in Bitcoin’s history because Bitcoin Core would not relay it. Then we did it again for the largest airdrop in Bitcoin’s history because of Core’s arbitrary 83-byte OP_RETURN limit. Around the same time, the Runes Protocol had grown so popular that memecoin activity accounted for the majority of transactions on the Bitcoin network. Many of these transactions also went directly to miners to bypass Core’s minimum relay fee. Core realized it had been outmaneuvered and in response they released Core v30 which removed the OP_RETURN limit and lowered the default minimum relay fee to 0.1 sat/vB. This revealed a clear pattern. The $DOG Army could route our “non-standard” transactions around Core, miners would accept them, and then Core was eventually forced to give in. The $DOG Army is done asking for permission. It is time to remove even more of these frivolous restrictions. That is why we are starting an open source initiative to develop our own Bitcoin client called $DOG Mode. When using Bitcoin in $DOG Mode: 1. The maximum standard transaction size will be increased from 400,000 WU to 3,900,000 WU. This will give everyone equal access to do “four meggers” while leaving a generous 100,000 WU of space for the coinbase transaction and block overhead. 2. The global dust limit will be lowered from 294-546 sats (depending on output type) to 1 sat. Ordinals inscriptions and Runes UTXOs are currently forced to carry hundreds of unnecessary sats to appease Bitcoin Core. This will remove the need for “padding” and effectively airdrop ~$25M in locked up sats back to the Ordinals and Runes ecosystem. Unlike Bitcoin Knots, which deviates significantly from Bitcoin Core and introduces substantial risk to node runners, Bitcoin $DOG Mode aims to only change the absolute minimum code necessary to remove these two restrictions. And unlike BIP-110, which attempts to change Bitcoin consensus through a network fork, $DOG Mode operates entirely within Bitcoin’s existing consensus rules and does not require a fork. This ensures that $DOG Mode can be successful from day one. Over time the economic incentives will drive $DOG Mode’s adoption and force Bitcoin Core to stop gatekeeping and allow these completely valid transactions. The result will be a more open, fair, and transparent Bitcoin network. If you are a Bitcoin developer who is interested in contributing to the initial $DOG Mode release, please reach out to me. If you are a Bitcoin miner who is interested in increasing your revenue by adding support for $DOG Mode transactions, please reach out to me. If you are a normal Bitcoin user who wants to support $DOG Mode quote post this with: “I will run Bitcoin in $DOG Mode”

  • henjumeric43
    Eric Henjum 💙🧢🅳🅶🅱 (@henjumeric43) reported

    There is a 100% chance @coinbase continues to cater to their VC pals by providing an off ramp to dump on the fools they call their "customers" Instead, support the other exchanges who actually back it up Easy litmus test: Have they listed #Digibyte?

  • tonitrades_
    toni (@tonitrades_) reported

    @brian_armstrong @coinbase Ryan's wins are real, but regulatory clarity still depends on Congress, not just legal teams. One court win doesn't fix the rules - it just delays the next fight.

Check Current Status