Disney+ Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Disney+ users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Disney+, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Disney+ users affected:
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Saint-Paul, Réunion | 1 |
| Auray, Brittany | 1 |
| Pont-Croix, Brittany | 1 |
| Seattle, WA | 1 |
| Birmingham, England | 2 |
| Skipton, England | 1 |
| Meylan, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Monterrey, NLE | 1 |
| Amiens, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Montigny-le-Bretonneux, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Melun, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Béziers, Occitanie | 2 |
| London, England | 8 |
| Ahome, SIN | 1 |
| Phoenix, AZ | 2 |
| Sydney, NSW | 4 |
| Ruislip, England | 1 |
| Hermosillo, SON | 2 |
| Lille, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Dewsbury, England | 1 |
| Woking, England | 1 |
| Chester, England | 1 |
| Albertville, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Roubaix, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Township of Evan, KS | 4 |
| City of London, England | 2 |
| Manchester, England | 3 |
| Mauves, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Ambarès-et-Lagrave, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Davenport, IA | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
GMitchell (@GMitchellDaily) reportedThe “Free Tier” Pitch: What Streaming Giants Aren’t Saying Disney has confirmed it is exploring a free, ad-supported version of Disney+. CEO Josh D’Amaro raised the idea during the company’s recent earnings call. The plan under consideration would offer limited free programming rather than the full Disney+ library, with the goal of drawing viewers, generating ad revenue, and converting some of them into paid subscribers. No launch date has been set. Paramount is weighing a comparable approach for Paramount+, described in reporting as a free “front porch” of selected content available without a subscription. Paramount already operates Pluto TV, giving it experience running free, ad-supported streaming at scale. Netflix has taken a more cautious stance. Co-CEO Greg Peters has said a free tier could work in certain markets but is not something Netflix plans to introduce soon, given its large paying base and growing advertising business. The company is instead focused on expanding its existing ad-supported subscription tier. The shift comes as free platforms including YouTube, Tubi and The Roku Channel draw a growing share of television viewing, while subscription prices keep climbing. One analysis found ad-free versions of eight major streaming services now total more than $137 a month combined. The next signal to watch is whether Disney formally launches a free tier and what programming it includes.
-
i drive a volt... (@eddiedi1) reported@galatians_4_6 The Disney era is awful. Each movie worse than the last. The TV shows are terrible outside of Andor. They have killed most popular franchise ever. Worthless at this point.
-
GianaGucci (@jojoslilmagic) reportedI'm so sad that my body type is a problem to so many big corporate companies like Disney. Especially curvy women are like only allowed to exist if they are grannies and then they are not allowed to have a loving partner. Ghibli shows us the same story too
-
FigmentJedi (@Figment_Jedi) reported@ToTheWinchWench @Sakonata04 @OdysseyJurassic This is why the current version is Figment clowning on Eric Idle for seven minutes, that version was like the worst rated Disney attraction of all time.
-
⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ (@blublairies) reportedI still think the trans issue is a psyop and children the collateral- and still annoyed nobody point blank fired at Elon how THE BIG BEAUTIFUL BALL ROOM is funded by Isaac Perlmutter who is so anti-gay (religiously and Israel coded) that he pushed his gay Disney employees to
-
⚡️PJocky⚡️ (@PJocky82) reported@Derrick_NOLA Disney tried it with moving their whole animation department to Florida and that didn’t work. You’re not going to get executives to move to Austin
-
yuri #U (@retrokika) reported@lov3isastate soulidified - rnb 90s and 2000s like nsync, boys ii men full circle boys - i get disney channel movie vibes in the bleachers mv but there's a cinematic quality to their newest visual release that i can't explain 3quency - tlc, destiny's child, maybe even danity kane
-
Cover3 (@Cover3_mx) reported@thejbratc Two things, just to help clear up the confusion. First, having a different opinion about a player is not “hate.” Calling every disagreement hate is lazy, childish, and boring. If you want to debate basketball, then actually engage with the argument. Second, how exactly has LeBron “passed” these players? Magic, Kobe, and Duncan all have five championships. 5 > 3.5. Steph has four championships, beat LeBron three times in the Finals, and did not need a Disney tournament to get one of them. 4 > 3.5. And Jordan is still sitting there at 6 > 3.5, with a perfect 6 and 0 Finals record and six Finals MVPs. That is a level of dominance LeBron’s team hopping career never reached. And if the entire “he passed them” argument is based on cumulative longevity stats, then be consistent. Longevity also puts LeBron at or near the top of several negative all time categories, including turnovers and missed shots. You cannot use longevity totals as definitive proof when they make him look good, then suddenly pretend those same totals do not matter when they make him look bad. Longevity is part of the argument. It is not the entire argument.
-
Rachelle (@LegendOfRachel_) reported@aidan7501 You can’t do rock and Disney knees at the same time it doesn’t work
-
Wayne CH (@WayneCH9) reported@sirdoom34 230 million for one of the worst shows I've seen. Crap writing, bad acting, it looked cheap. You Disney Star Wars shills are the reason it failed because you didn't watch it.
-
Ray (@MrInKryption) reported@YagamiFireSC I agree it's a multi-faceted issue, but the attributions to failure include KK, Feloni and Favreau. And it's like you say, they've hired a bunch of hacks. It's almost like Disney fostered a culture which they would call "toxic" anywhwere else.
-
Kajetan (@Idonthavetime90) reported@ToonHive @DEADLINE Disney cancells all black lead MCU projects, uses AI in their projects and grids Dhar Mann Genuinely wish Disney all the worst
-
Diana Villiers (@DianaVilliers1) reported@rapoportmike @joshstifter The biggest mistake they made was trying to jam. It was essentially the first three books into one movie. I guess the problem was that it was Pixar’s (yes I know it was technically Disney , but it was really a Pixar movie) first attempt at adapting a story from another medium rather than an original story
-
Unknown supspect (@USupspect) reported@lyl1vc @Marsspace17_ And you guys never left Sabrina alone since 2021, you prayed everyday she remains a Disney hasbeen and it didn’t work now you guys want to run smear bot campaigns hoping it takes her down for good. So Carpenters should be in her business more actually
-
Nightingale (@sunshineprotec) reported@Mantis_Mania @SSHdoesTweets2 “Whatever the final result is here, it's ultimately on the artist, not Disney/Marvel. Disney/Marvel won't publish with AI because you don't legally own anything made with AI, and contracts stipulate it must be "your wholly work".