Disney+ Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Disney+ users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Disney+, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Disney+ users affected:
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Saint Paul, MN | 1 |
| London, England | 26 |
| Malvern, AR | 1 |
| Aubagne, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 2 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 64 |
| Saint-Julien, Brittany | 1 |
| Attleborough, England | 1 |
| San José Iturbide, GUA | 1 |
| Milwaukee, WI | 1 |
| Harlow, England | 2 |
| Sandillon, Centre | 3 |
| Saint-Michel-Chef-Chef, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Toul, ACAL | 2 |
| Medellín, Antioquia | 1 |
| Milton Keynes, England | 6 |
| Nîmes, Occitanie | 3 |
| Acton, MA | 1 |
| Blyth, England | 2 |
| City of London, England | 3 |
| Southwark, England | 5 |
| Nashville, TN | 2 |
| Ciudad Jardín, MEX | 2 |
| Great Malvern, England | 1 |
| Choisy-le-Roi, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Valence, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Villefranche-sur-Saône, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Omaha, NE | 2 |
| Ocala, FL | 1 |
| Renfrew, Scotland | 1 |
| Reading, England | 3 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Dezso Augusztin - Now and Then Galleria LLC (@DezAugusztin) reportedSo #ButterNews @ABC7NY finally came on at 611PM and not at 5P like the news was scheduled! This is a serious problem that must be resolved! Honestly, scheduling news and not honoring it cause $$$ matter to @disney and **** the viewers is what I'm seeing happening! Shutdown by 47?
-
Gojiro7 (@GojirosArtDojo) reported@RiseFallNickBck That's not how genetics work, Disney!! XD
-
Sid Prabhu (@sidprabhu) reportedCoca-Cola has a mark to market gain of about $4-5b on its debt against an equity market cap of $360b and ~$13B of earnings last year. Their debt is not close to their best product. It turns out most companies make money from selling products, not “shorting the currency”. Companies issue debt because debt financing is often cheaper, and debt holders accept lower returns because debt is generally less risky. They mention Disney 100 year bonds. I see two classes of Disney 100 year bonds, both issued in the 90s and both of which have outperformed the stock over the ~30 years since issuance. So much for the wisdom of “shorting the currency”.
-
Comrade Lil Red (@ComradeButt) reported@cltladybug @MatthewCappucci @StevenTDennis Courtney, You’ve responded to a weather alert for the DC area. A weatherman located in DC. The fireworks last night made air quality conditions poor enough warranting reporting the conditions. Disney is a private entity in *Florida*. There’s no double standard but your own :)
-
Ray Peast (@mail_makey) reported@bham_901 is ILM permanently in the clutches of disney, or could they work with paramount again? theres no bayformers without ILM.
-
TOBEY (@OluwatobiD83481) reported@SajinShrijith I think those online hates only for work DC and Disney movies lol
-
🅿️ascal (@zielke_pascal) reported@bestofstarwar Yes and No, the prequels work strongly with The Clone Wars and The Bad Batch including the Maul Series. Where it falls apart is the Sequels, but that's the issue of Disney. Can't really blame Dave Filoni and John Favreau.
-
Douglas (@DouglasnTexas) reportedCorporations are powerful tools for concentrating capital and influence. How that power is used—or shared—ultimately rests with those who create and govern them. There is no moral or practical reason why any billionaire should be forced to surrender wealth they risked everything to build and distribute it to people who contributed nothing to earning it. No one has a right to claim what they did not earn. Every adult citizen in the United States already possesses the fundamental right to risk their own money, start a company, and keep the rewards they generate. Citizens also have the right to pool their resources—month after month—to form and fund corporations together. The transformative moment comes when ordinary people realize they can do exactly that on a massive scale. They can band together to create companies that serve real societal needs, contribute as little as five dollars a month, and gain ownership in enterprises producing valuable intellectual property and profits. Think about Netflix. Millions of us already pay every month for unlimited access to movies and shows. We fund the machine like clockwork—but we own nothing. The exciting truth is: we *can* own it. We already subscribe to Netflix, Disney, Spotify, and countless others. Why not redirect that same recurring commitment into corporations we collectively own? With millions of citizens participating, even modest contributions of five dollars per month could generate enormous capital—while limiting each individual’s risk to almost nothing. This is in everyone’s self-interest. And that is not a flaw to be ashamed of—it is a powerful human reality we should harness. People reliably act in their own interest first. Rather than treating self-interest as a problem to suppress, we should design systems that turn it into a driving force for widespread prosperity. It is entirely possible to build corporations that serve both the individual owner’s financial return *and* broader societal value. When millions of citizens own and back such companies, capitalism will have reached its next evolution. Capitalism works for the masses every bit as effectively as it works for billionaires—when the masses become owners, not just consumers.
-
Alexsis 🏳️⚧️ (@Collectablebots) reported@TheDimmeh I feel like if you give Doctor Who to Apple TV the show would be in safe hands, unlike other streaming platforms like Disney+ or Netflix they rarely if ever cancel a show due to bad ratings and they value quality over quantity
-
endthewest (@bookdellector) reported@Kela_Mulenga I mean if sisi wanted to be the new art director for disney on some star wars movies I wouldn’t have a problem with him whatsoever…
-
Lucy 🏳️⚧️🍉 (@filmlovinglucy) reportedDisney tried something New, they took a Creative Gamble, and it didn't work. That's okay!! Walt always meant for the Parks to be Agents of Change!! I wish we could Discuss the Pros and Cons of a Seismic Change like this in a way that didn't immediately devolve into Conservatism.
-
3DAnimatorSpotlight (@3DAnimationSL) reportedNo, by my logic if Disney announced they were turning all of Star Wars into a tax write off and a bunch of people who claim to love George Lucas started celebrating the idea, even though "ALL" would include the OT/PT/TCW, aka Lucas's direct work being made legally unavailable
-
Top Tier (@LondonGreenwade) reportedAll that work fighting for my life trying to take their pics working at Disney on Ice and now they learn how to pose.
-
T'ny (@TnyWasUsedAgain) reported@chazfinder @BrerOswald They remove what people like, make it worse and slap a newer IP onto it. They don’t maintain their existing lineup unless it’s “good enough” not the “Disney Difference” level of care and quality. They don’t remove things people actively DON’T LIKE. They take forever with construction to the point most of the park would be work walls. And all while raising prices for everything at the parks.
-
Troy_OTC (@TexansCap) reportedDisney Plus working for yall? Not working on iPhone or iPad for us.