Disney+ Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Zackk (@ZackkZackkz9) reported 35 seconds ago

  @parkerslawyer @Beyondreporter1 Won't be on Disney for awhile or not at all. Due to issues being homecoming and far from home and no way home aren't on Disney

• 
  SlabSquatch Sports Cards (@WaxMetrix) reported 3 minutes ago

  2026 Topps Chrome Disney Sapphire Analysis With a July 22 release, this one has already been out for a bit. Somewhere along the way, Topps quietly snuck in an odds sheet, which I completely missed until a follower brought it to my attention. After spending some time digging through the numbers, there are actually a few pretty interesting nuggets buried in this one. So let’s knock out a quick analysis of Disney Sapphire. The Basics Typical Sapphire fare touting 8 packs of 4 cards. Product dropped at $550/box on EQL. I'd be interested in knowing how difficult it was to procure for those that participated as I did not try for this one. At first glance, it seemed a bit steep for Disney Sapphire...but my ignorance is on full display with this one. Boxes are currently selling at Big Bully resellers for $1350! If you got in at $550, I'd say you did just fine. Total Cards in Product: 322,240 Total Boxes Produced: Hobby- 10,070 (1,007 cases) From a production perspective, this is a very standard Sapphire release. Hit Rates per Box: •Autos/Facsimile Autos: 1 per 6.1 boxes (1.64/case) •Parallels: 3.85 •Inserts: 1.2 •Numbered cards: 4 For this, I lumped Autos and Facsimile Autos into the same bucket. Individually, both are extremely rare. Autos should fall at a rate of 1 per 8.2 boxes and Facsimile Autos are even more scarce at 1 per 23.65 boxes. Combined, you should see one of either at a rate of 1 per ~6 boxes. If you read my posts, you'll know that typically I'm not enamored by facsimile autos and generally think they're a first-class troll job. However...with Disney Sapphire I was shocked at the value of desirably Facsimile Autos. So I will withhold the saltiness. At least it's extremely easy to tell. The autos are overly aesthetic and the words "Facsimile Auto" are printed in gigantic letters on the back. I really don't think anyone is mistaking these for the real thing. Though you're not getting much ink from a case, Topps did make up for it slightly by averaging 4 numbered parallels per box. This is definitely above average for Sapphire. You should also see 1.2 inserts per box, which is also a rarity for Sapphire. One of these will be a Beauty & the Beast 35th Anniversary Insert with an additional rare insert- Hidden Gems, Infinite, The Rose, or Mickey & Friends Home Jersey- combining to fall 1 in every ~5 boxes. Value Map: Just to cover both ends, I'll base these metrics on both drop day pricing ($550/box) and current market pricing ($1350/box), although boxes can be purchased for a much more reasonable ~$950 via ebay. $/card Drop: $17.19 Current: $42.19 $/Parallel (does not include Insert Parallels) Drop: $143.39 Current: $351.95 $/Auto+Facsimile Auto Drop: $3,355.63 Current: $8236.56 $/Numbered Card Drop: $138.42 Current: $339.77 $/Quality Hit Drop: $210.04 Current: $515.55 Takeaways: I want to mention something a follower brought to my attention. There is a one-card checklist for a fantastic-looking insert called “The Rose.” It is an extremely tough pull and carries serious value. The non-Sapphire version from Disney Chrome has only had a small handful surface on eBay, and the base version /35 sells for nearly $1,000. There are also Black /10, Red /5, and 1/1 parallels. Now here’s where it gets interesting. Sapphire has been getting ripped for roughly three weeks, and there should be 51 total copies of “The Rose” across its various parallels. You would think at least one would have surfaced by now, especially considering the Sapphire version would presumably carry even more value than the regular Chrome version. But as far as I can tell, none have. I’m not saying Topps forgot to insert them. I’m just saying it’s at least possible. Maybe some have been pulled and simply haven’t hit the market yet. Either way, it’s something worth keeping in mind if you’re entering Sapphire breaks. If you’ve seen one in the wild, please let me know. What Would the Squatch Do? The Squatch knows when to keep his mouth shut. I'm in no way going to try to guide you on what to do with this product. Disney has a massive following. Topps Chrome Sapphire is one of the most popular brands in all of sports cards. With that marriage, anything is possible. I thought $550 was steep. And I can admit when I'm wrong. There have already been some serious cards pulled from this release. And I'm sure there will be plenty more to come. So have your fun with it, whatever that means to you. Hobby how you hobby, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. The Print Runs: Base card production: ~1,350 ea Inserts: Beauty & the Beast 35th Anni (10 card CL)- ~1,000 ea Hidden Gems Emerald (5 card CL)- ~50 ea Infinite (10 card CL)- ~100 ea Mickey & Friends Home Jersey (30 card CL)- 10 ea Autos/Facsimile: Authentic Autos (23 card CL)- ~20 ea All other Autos & Facsimile Autos are numbered /10 or less. #thehobby #SlabSquatchAnalytics #2026ToppsChromeDisneySapphire

• 
  ShadowSpank (@shadowspank1) reported 5 minutes ago

  Starwars movie cancelled. Some saying it’s due to poor movie performance for the Mandalorian and Grogu. I think the main issue is people have a Disney + account and don’t care to go to the movies anymore or some other streaming and will just wait the 3 months till they can rent it or watch it on what they already have.

• 
  🦆🏒Austin Negrete 🇺🇸 (@Chewbakka42049) reported 10 minutes ago

  @SweatiestNerd @dxd_updates I have no problem with Disney having a channel for new programming. But that doesn’t mean the past should be ignored. Besides, this channel has never truly had good ratings. Sometimes looking back to the past can bring you to the future.

• 
  loritexgal58 (@loritexgal58) reported 10 minutes ago

  @jillysm51548154 I’m wondering if Sterns was not involved and many others. I mean we know he was involved in CSAM. Sure would like to know more about the buddy that brought him commissary in jail that used to work for Disney. The family friend who is high positioned there as well.

• 
  bmo™ 🧑🏽‍💼 (@saymakkari) reported 14 minutes ago

  @alexi_liam56 @evinlyXO i actually did watch this whack *** show & gotta say it was the worst disney+ marvel show

• 
  X0bai (@X0bai) reported 18 minutes ago

  @StarWarsDaily_ Total flop. Every scene she had was among the worst of the show. She had the most relational dynamics to work with (Ahsoka, Hera, Ezra) and had the least chemistry. And surviving a lightsaber through the gut is as stupid as Disney-era Star Wars gets.

• 
  Roman Bias (@ReadyfortheRun) reported 18 minutes ago

  @ERCboxoffice I wish CBS still had SEC football.. I wish ESPN/ABC never got the NBA.. I am not surprised the production fell off for 20th Century Fox, just look at how poor quality the sports experience is at ESPN. Paramount’s sports experience is top notch.. NFL, UFC, the Masters, UEFA and Big Ten Football.. I cringe when Disney gets rights to anything! Even College Game Day has been ruined!

• 
  Tobs #TouchlineFracas (@tapintobs) reported 21 minutes ago

  @vij_ara @serialwinner999 You are thick. Seriously thick. 1 for thinking that the only reason I have a ST is cos I do YT. Something I only started 6 years ago when I've owned a ST since 2017 and was going games routinely after I finished uni in 2013. 2 - you are thick because you clearly don't understand how STs work. You think you can just pick one up cos you do content and you want to go games looool 3 - all I do is speak without bullshit in my eyes. If it's possible, I will speak with positivity, if it's negative, I will speak with negativity. If a player is good, I'll say they're good and vice versa if they're not good. This ain't ******* Disney where I have to lie on a player's quality cos he 'scored' a goal which was an OG in a final we won

• 
  Savethemagic (@Savethedmagic) reported 23 minutes ago

  @disneyglimpses @BrerOswald @ThemeParkScout There was a time when I trusted Disney to understand what guests wanted before the guests themselves could articulate it. I don't anymore. At this point, my confidence in Disney management's ability to interpret "the data" in a way that produces a better Walt Disney World is essentially zero. If the alternative is management using spreadsheets to rationalize another short term decision, I'd rather they start listening much more closely to the people who actually care about the parks. And Disney can't have this both ways. You can't dismiss criticism with "guests don't know what they want" while simultaneously surveying those same guests, measuring their satisfaction, tracking their behavior, and citing guest feedback when it supports your decisions. The problem isn't data. The problem is treating data as a substitute for vision. Data can tell you what guests did yesterday. It cannot imagine what will astonish them tomorrow. That requires taste, judgment, conviction, and creative leadership. It would appear they are lacking in all of that.

• 
  Just Dean (@KishDean) reported 27 minutes ago

  @DiscussingFilm Oh that's awful! Disney tooting its own horn!

• 
  STAND WITH REFORM 🇬🇧 (@recoverbritain) reported 27 minutes ago

  @PopCrave i’m more worried about how the uk film tax credit ends up with disney while our councils can’t fix potholes. that’s a waste.

• 
  TamarindLAZ (@TamarindLAZ) reported 28 minutes ago

  @KILLTOPARTY I had a coworker who had bluey crocs she’d bring to work, but she was a zoomer who was obsessed with Disney.

• 
  VDeviance (@vdeviance) reported 29 minutes ago

  The vast majority of the target audience aged out of Saturday morning cartoons (I was 18 and working by then) and the adaptation was pretty terrible. The kids that were growing up weren't watching either Kids WB or Toonami, they were watching Disney Channel and Nickelodeon.

• 
  Natalie Brown (@Natdisneybrown) reported 29 minutes ago

  @Themountainkin1 It has its faults but NPB is a lovely hotel and definitly not the worst Disney hotel world wide.