Disney+ Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ThatOneWidowmaker (@MaZu_iceTea) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Avi_Jey @JuiceHead33 @Shpeshal_Nick I told you how double standards work. According to your logic Disney is double standards bc why do they not cover Netflix stuff and vise versa...dumb ****

• 
  Sean Speer (@Sean_Speer) reported 6 minutes ago

  Pressing pause on C-11 isn't enough This week, the Carney government directed the CRTC to pause its plan to impose new fees on foreign streaming services such as Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime. The stated rationale was affordability. At a time when Canadians are struggling with the cost of living, policymakers don’t want regulatory decisions that could contribute to higher prices. The decision may be welcome. But it exposes a deeper problem at the heart of Canada’s cultural policy. The original rationale for the Online Streaming Act was straightforward. Traditional broadcasters have long been subject to Canadian-content quotas, expenditure requirements, and other regulatory obligations. Streaming services were not. The legislation was intended to address this perceived asymmetry by bringing online platforms into the same regulatory system. Yet the government’s latest intervention effectively acknowledges that imposing those obligations on streaming services carries real costs for consumers. That leaves policymakers in an awkward position. If these requirements are too burdensome to apply to streaming services, extending them cannot be the solution to the asymmetry problem. But neither does subsidizing traditional broadcasters or providing temporary exemptions. Those measures merely preserve a regulatory imbalance while shifting its costs elsewhere. The deeper question is whether the asymmetry itself has been misunderstood. For decades, Canadian cultural policy has been built on the assumption that governments should play an active role in shaping the relationship between creators and audiences. Regulators determine expenditure requirements, define what qualifies as Canadian content, establish quotas, and influence what gets produced and promoted. The debate over streaming has largely accepted this premise. The disagreement has been about who should be regulated and how much. But perhaps the better answer is less regulation rather than more. As long as traditional broadcasters remain subject to government-directed content requirements, they’ll continue to operate at a disadvantage relative to competitors that are better able to respond to consumer preferences and changing market conditions. Extending those rules to new technologies doesn’t solve the problem. It simply spreads it. The digital age has dramatically reduced the barriers between creators and audiences. Canadian writers, filmmakers, musicians, podcasters, and digital creators can now reach global markets in ways that were unimaginable when the country’s broadcasting regime was first constructed. Rather than attempting to preserve a regulatory model designed for an era of spectrum scarcity, policymakers should embrace a simpler principle: let creators create and let audiences decide. That means repealing the Online Streaming Act. It also means revisiting the broader network of Canadian-content quotas and regulatory mandates that continue to govern traditional broadcasters. The government’s pause may have been motivated by affordability concerns. But it unintentionally points toward a larger truth. The problem isn’t that Canada’s cultural regulations apply to too few firms. It is that they continue to exist at all.

• 
  casey armstrong (@asbelcas) reported 8 minutes ago

  I ran a half marathon at Disney world in Florida and the number one sensory issue I did not account for ahead of time was the SMELL of tens of thousands of sweaty humans. It was outdoors but, there was no escaping THAT smell. So, part of my assumption is based off this.

• 
  djmark (@mehblehdontcare) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Ghost5410126211 @detroitotaku @Clint_Davey1 There was nothing wrong with the actual DIRECTING of Star Wars. The story was the issue with the Star Wars sequels and most of that came down to Disney not having a plan for it all ahead of time. But that's on Disney more than Abrams, especially in the case of the third movie.

• 
  riri 🔞 (@smileydjo) reported 11 minutes ago

  @l1ber1angirl 6 weeks at disney is crazyyyy work. he wanted her to know what she was missing 😭😭

• 
  B³ (@BensonBunnyBoy) reported 12 minutes ago

  @HortonHearALock Gay baseball, bullshit music Save this slop for Disney and Broadway Once again I have no problem with kids enjoying this. It’s 29 year old childless incels that need to touch grass

• 
  🍒🍑 (@peachpicked) reported 14 minutes ago

  help i have got post Disney depression so badly i cannot believe i have to go home and just live a normal life now?????????

• 
  Eric Sisson (@ESisson7) reported 14 minutes ago

  ESPN and Disney have the worst possible app experience I’ve ever experienced. @JTCOUGARS20 cancelled our YouTubeTV. Trying to watch college baseball on the ESPN app and it won’t even take me anywhere to give them money to do it. I’ve tried through Disney+ and everything

• 
  Skippy (@SkippyyTM) reported 15 minutes ago

  @cwebbonline You had no problem when it looked like Disney.

• 
  Musical1inNM (@Musical1inNm) reported 17 minutes ago

  Go work at Disney world.

• 
  Richard Hoffman (@chelidon23) reported 18 minutes ago

  @brenda_murban @GicAriana Sorry, friend, even Disney tells better fairy tales. Work on it.

• 
  Rainn Old Man Thoughts 🔞🇨🇦⛈️☄️ (@RainningDeath) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Innsmouth_Eye Oh the "Super Hell" story sounds terrible I agree I don't see it as de-beautifying, thinking a warrior mom living in ancient times with no make-up in the middle of the woods that just woke up in super hell is going to look like a Disney Princess just because the actress is hot

• 
  Eric Smith (@EricSmi11284735) reported 21 minutes ago

  @themancalorians That Disney star wars tv shows except acolyte are not terrible just average worth watching

• 
  🇺🇸★𝗞𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗡★🇺🇸 (@kristin_m1983) reported 22 minutes ago

  @JebraFaushay I am a bridesmaid in a wedding AT Disney. I want to cry. It’s such an inconvenience and-Disney. That’s the worst part. Why not Aruba? Destination weddings are rude imo. This is gonna cost WAY too much and it is the last place I want to go.

• 
  Dark Meld Depot-SW (@Catlover10000S) reported 22 minutes ago

  See how you are using less than 1 percent of 1 percent of the EU novels for a basis to defend Disney's consistent failure. And in proper turn you have failed. Go change your profile pic as everyone who reads this will know you are not worthy to hold Revan's jockstrap. Failed at representing the EU and failed at defending Disney. The EU is a massive body of work with decades of consistent storytelling, character depth, and earned consequences. Cherry-picking one obscure novel or moment to say "see, Disney is fine" ignores the overwhelming majority that proves the quality drop. You can't defend the new canon on its own merits so you hide behind tiny fragments of the EU while attacking the rest. That's not representing the EU—that's weaponizing scraps to cope. Real fans defend the whole thing because the whole thing was better. You failed both sides of the argument. Change the pic. The L is permanent.