Disney+ Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Disney+ users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Disney+, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Disney+ users affected:
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| London, England | 26 |
| Malvern, AR | 1 |
| Aubagne, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 2 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 64 |
| Saint-Julien, Brittany | 1 |
| Attleborough, England | 1 |
| San José Iturbide, GUA | 1 |
| Milwaukee, WI | 1 |
| Harlow, England | 2 |
| Sandillon, Centre | 3 |
| Saint-Michel-Chef-Chef, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Toul, ACAL | 2 |
| Medellín, Antioquia | 1 |
| Milton Keynes, England | 6 |
| Nîmes, Occitanie | 3 |
| Acton, MA | 1 |
| Blyth, England | 2 |
| City of London, England | 3 |
| Southwark, England | 5 |
| Nashville, TN | 2 |
| Ciudad Jardín, MEX | 2 |
| Great Malvern, England | 1 |
| Choisy-le-Roi, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Valence, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Villefranche-sur-Saône, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Omaha, NE | 2 |
| Ocala, FL | 1 |
| Renfrew, Scotland | 1 |
| Reading, England | 3 |
| Bishops Stortford, England | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐲 ♡ (@arianievez) reported@DisneyPlus who ******** are yall to tell me who can’t watch MY **** i pay for every month. fix this **** tf
-
Snoof333 (@snoof333awesome) reportedHis childhood kinda forced him to know how people are feeling and what they mean when they talk so he can get into less trouble. His childhood was almost disney level bad, he likes being dependant, getting upset, mostly at himself, when he needs comfort or help
-
Bardibardi ⁷ (@Bardibardi66341) reportedThe way Taylor is monetizing her wedding, it’ll be available on Netflix and Disney plus by Christmas. If they have problems or divorce then they’ll wanna keep it private. Since the wedding is being forced on us, I wanna be involved in the divorce too.
-
Erika Siegel (@not_Erika) reportedDisney hate is so lazy. Walt was America First, built a company meant to inspire and help people imagine what could be. Nothing more Americana than Disney, we should embrace it as a sacred institution, claim it as ours.
-
FeedRosie (@FeedRosie) reported@SanagiYuzu You must get awful looks from the Princesses at Disney parks. (They think you’re there to replace them)
-
TheMovieNerd (@leemour84) reported@bestofstarwar Disney+ was the worst thing to happen to star wars and Marvel and you can't convince me otherwise. Only good thing? Loki Daredevil That is all
-
The Sci Fi Center (@thescificenter) reported@OtunbaSebotimo Disney makes an aver of 38 billion annually through its parks , its main money maker, on thier worst day, these IPS feed into that , on a normal day they do good enough
-
Freddie the Schnoz 𓅃 (@FreddieSchnertz) reported@BranPuffin Idk man, I could try it again but rodeos are pretty awful. I remember being struck by how kids were treated. There's some kind of Disney meets Mike Vick thing going on
-
michael A koropsak (@MichaelKoropsak) reported@ABC @DavidMuir While enjoying the 24+ hours of the 250th birthday of our great country, I can’t help but wonder. Low energy, zero enthusiasm David Muir as host, was the most boring Scott Pelley not available. Disney has no on air talent capable to guest a show like this!
-
JB (@GigasMachina) reported@APPictures9 This film has been getting the worst of luck. It first landed at Fox, then Disney/Lucasfilm after the purchase, and then Paramount. Now the higher-ups screwed over the original author who helped with the adaptation.
-
Mr. Pendington (@MrPendington) reportedThinking a little further about the Disney face projection issue; why doesn't Disney consider making a semi projected face? Have a thin layer on top that's see through and have that be the projected layer with a practical face underneath.
-
matdryhurst (@matdryhurst) reported@neilturkewitz Yes but do you agree that the animation behind that, and much of your language, is that ai on the whole is dehumanizing and should go away - which conflicts with the actions of the companies filing legal action who are negotiating to own a piece of the ai companies (not cutting their artists into those deals) If consent is the only question, and means 99% of artists still have no meaningful income from universal, Disney and/or tech companies owning the interaction, that will not help pretty much all of the people angry in my mentions about this
-
Mike A (@Mikeat00) reported@RitasAdventures @doucnnvme That could work as an intro with the Walt Animatronic. The Epcot makeover seems like Disney got scared in investing in anything during COVID and just abandoned anything that was remotely “risky”
-
Douglas (@DouglasnTexas) reportedCorporations are powerful tools for concentrating capital and influence. How that power is used—or shared—ultimately rests with those who create and govern them. There is no moral or practical reason why any billionaire should be forced to surrender wealth they risked everything to build and distribute it to people who contributed nothing to earning it. No one has a right to claim what they did not earn. Every adult citizen in the United States already possesses the fundamental right to risk their own money, start a company, and keep the rewards they generate. Citizens also have the right to pool their resources—month after month—to form and fund corporations together. The transformative moment comes when ordinary people realize they can do exactly that on a massive scale. They can band together to create companies that serve real societal needs, contribute as little as five dollars a month, and gain ownership in enterprises producing valuable intellectual property and profits. Think about Netflix. Millions of us already pay every month for unlimited access to movies and shows. We fund the machine like clockwork—but we own nothing. The exciting truth is: we *can* own it. We already subscribe to Netflix, Disney, Spotify, and countless others. Why not redirect that same recurring commitment into corporations we collectively own? With millions of citizens participating, even modest contributions of five dollars per month could generate enormous capital—while limiting each individual’s risk to almost nothing. This is in everyone’s self-interest. And that is not a flaw to be ashamed of—it is a powerful human reality we should harness. People reliably act in their own interest first. Rather than treating self-interest as a problem to suppress, we should design systems that turn it into a driving force for widespread prosperity. It is entirely possible to build corporations that serve both the individual owner’s financial return *and* broader societal value. When millions of citizens own and back such companies, capitalism will have reached its next evolution. Capitalism works for the masses every bit as effectively as it works for billionaires—when the masses become owners, not just consumers.
-
Cradle to the Graverobber 🔞 (@calicunny) reported@inkfycreates A major issue with this is because people are treating a character made by a single person to things like Disney (design by committee) when there's a huge difference. Ripping off a single artist because they're "rich" (not even that true) is not the same as ripping off a company.