Disney+ Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  MillArts (@MillArts1) reported 3 minutes ago

  @RBReich Funny how nobody cared about Disney and Microsoft buying everything. But this is a problem.

• 
  Pereira made AnkalASS **** his pants,crumble, quit (@JoJo98476713) reported 4 minutes ago

  @jhd2002 @cnnbrk Stfu u have no problem with Disney literally being one and destroying all are beloved IP’s u POS

• 
  Charles LaRocca (@LaRoccaism) reported 5 minutes ago

  Damn Disney, you are always letting ppl down. “We are so advanced we are so advanced…” we can’t even handle tv (technical issues) they have no excuse. And at minimum the paying subscribers deserve an answer.

• 
  Sub Pop Culture 🇺🇸🐿️ (@WriterMcG) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Jason34420 You are the salty bastard who smiles big, steals from young ones, laughs all the way to the bank. Wash, rinse, repeat. The genre you work in is easy peasy — there’s a big audience for premise alone. You just dress it up, ad spend against the low budget, take the biggest cut and simply ROB young people who are smitten with fame and being spokespersons for your glittering douchebaggery. Somewhere in the vast world of AI is a young Walt Disney and that individual, wherever they are, is going to be wise and reject the invite, take all the cake. You will still have a nice house and an assistant to fold your laundry and fetch you coffee. The comedy is that you pretend a resume hit matters. That’s not what you buy — you buy the audience someone else gained and the house they built and then you flip it, like all Hollywood players do, and guess what — nobody really needs you anymore. They just need to comprehend how useless you really are. Marketing department be damned.

• 
  Erik Schrader (@Ace_of_Schrades) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Cavinumab In KH2 we did almost nothing but deal with Pete and him causing problems with the Disney villain. In 3, every member of the Organization was doing/manipulating something.

• 
  Connor Collins (@collinconnors) reported 18 minutes ago

  The performance of the @themandalorian & Grogu doesn't reflect the quality of the movie, but the expectation that it's better to wait until it hits @DisneyPlus than pay all that extra money & deal w/ the hassle of going to the theater. Even an abbreviated S4 would've been better.

• 
  CrimsonLight73 (@NuclearTheology) reported 20 minutes ago

  While the “hostess at Applebees” joke is funny, the reality is that how Abrams set up Rey in Force Awakens only further highlights just how badly Disney bungled the sequel trilogy. JJ did a great job setting her up as a scrappy scavenger who could hold her own in a brawl in a rough environment. Nothing really unbelievable there. However, even those good in a scrap wouldn’t be able to suddenly take on a highly skilled magic samurai or a contingent of elite guardsman. “Last Jedi’s” throne room scene only works because of sloppy editing (see the clip below) and expecting the viewer to forget that Rey’s only had force powers less than a week and no formal training whatsoever. That’s not even going into the other major issues with the scene as OP pointed out - Disney wanted a cool Rey/Kylo Ren team up fight with no thought put into the fight or world building other than “make it look exciting.” Sequel fans hate the “Mary Sue” accusation but Disney didn’t help the situation by having an untrained scavenger take on elite warriors and move mountains at will #starwars #lastjedi

• 
  . (@anipalpy) reported 21 minutes ago

  @gandalf_reed @StarWarsDaily_ Doesn’t matter what you think it is, it’s still lore, there’s canon books and comics all backing it up, and palpatine even talks about some of the abilities in the prequels. I’ve liked some of the stuff Disney has done, but majority of it is canon breaking with awful stories

• 
  Movie Wiz 🇳🇿 (@_thebestfrom) reported 22 minutes ago

  Fun fact #143: Disney first began developing an animated film about the world of video game characters in the 1980s. At that time the project was called "High Score" and in the 1990s was titled "Joe Jump." In the 2000s, when the movie was finally pushed forward, the first two months of story development focused on Fix-It Felix Jr. as the main character.

• 
  Professor Milo Beasley (@MiloBeasleyShow) reported 22 minutes ago

  Omgggggg!!! The back up singers in this music video are actually Sci Fi Diner servers!!! (They are even wearing their name tags) Gotta love WCW at Disney’s MGM Studios! Makes me wonder if that house was on the Disney backlot as well.

• 
  Mr. X(bt⚡) (@bitloins) reported 24 minutes ago

  @alexand57671519 @BrianFaughnan The prequels weren't great but they're not terrible either. + they expanded the world building and had cool fights. Not comparable with the disney trilogy unless you have 2 digit IQ.

• 
  Joni (@LuckyFindsJoni) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BrucioMcCulloch You would work with pedos at disney

• 
  Gospel Barbie ✨ (@heart_stefanie) reported 31 minutes ago

  Not suitable for work feels like Disney 😭definitely not for me. 6/10

• 
  Donald J. Gorbachev (@donaldgorbachev) reported 32 minutes ago

  @FoilingMothra @georgegalloway Now the part that will annoy everyone: he still gets the nomination. Not because he's good — because the shelf is empty. Walk the warehouse. Vance is unsellable: a Peter Thiel candidate with Palantir on the label and the evangelical Disney World account attached to this administration getting heavier every month, no mechanism for getting lighter. You cannot move a Thiel product at retail, and the buyers feel it even when they can't say it. That lane expires on its own. There's nobody else in the building, and nominations, like everything in retail, eventually go to the last inventory in the warehouse. A body in a lane. And the general doesn't require a forecast, because it's already on tape. The Newsom–DeSantis debate happened years ago, and anyone who watched it knows: Newsom slapped him around the stage for the duration, and the clip that matters is the border one — Newsom reminding the room which of the two men actually governs a border state. If immigration is still the issue, and it will be, that clip runs on a loop from Labor Day to November. You don't predict this matchup. You stream it. Pencil Newsom in — and if the VP slot actually goes to Candace, switch to ink and put the pen away. The century's pattern says the same thing from the other direction. Walk the tickets: the century opens with an evangelical-picked ticket. Then a freshman senator. Then a landlord pretending to be a reality-TV host slash casino owner. And 2020 already showed what the electorate does after a run of fresh faces — it reached for the oldest, most familiar object in the store. The country is not in condition to gamble on podcasters and talk-show hosts, and it knows it. The next pick is a big-state governor on a serious ticket, because the condition of the patient writes the prescription — and there are about two states that qualify, and one of their governors is already on the tape, winning. Which leaves the only move the kitchen actually cares about. "Can govern," in this condition, means one thing: FDR. Whoever wins will have to govern like one, voluntarily or otherwise, because the arithmetic permits nothing else — and governing like an FDR in 2029 means one job before all the others: **** all over the landlords and the car dealers. Big tech follows; big tech is downstream and always was. The main thing is the rent roll, the dealerships, the towers, the parcels — the catalog. Whichever party figures that out first owns the next twenty years, and neither has filed. The platform's sitting on a card with a sports broadcaster's name on it. Day 104. Day 44. Still closed. He took a government back from a landlord and never noticed; the debate already happened and the country just hasn't watched it yet. Some preview. ذكية، كاملة. هوشمند، کامل. 落地

• 
  Alexander 'Lex' Williams (@squidlord) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Critical_Scribe The lack of boldness in innovation speaks to something worse than just stagnation. It says that creators, or at least the moneymen and studios, don't have any faith in their own ability to create something new, and instead just want to spend their time retooling something old, which would be okay if they showed any expression of love for what it was they're retooling. But they don't. Inevitably, they want to change what already exists. They want to make it something other than the thing that was actually popular. How is that inevitably going to turn out? Nobody cares that what we grew up with is no longer new. Nobody. Nobody gives a **** that the 1812 Overture is "dated." Nobody really cares that there are a dozen takes on Dracula, each going in a different direction and emphasizing different elements and with different levels of quality. What people care about is that the thing that they loved and which apparently is worth enough to bother sinking more money into is treated by the "remakers" as something that's broken elementally and needs to be fixed. If it needed to be fixed, it wouldn't already be popular. Note that when I say fixed here, I don't just mean updating graphics and interfaces to functional sensibilities. I mean literally changing the narrative of the piece. You know, the thing that made it worth buying in the first place. That's horrific. Nobody wants that, except for the people who didn't like it in the first place. For the best example of this, it's not surprising that Disney provides multiple. Look at what Remake Rot does to the retellings of original animated series in live action. *Moana* is a pretty good example, but *Lilo & Stitch* is a better one. Worse, less emotive acting on top of a complete inversion of the moral message of the original, which everybody liked. The remake trend in media has become corrosive rather than enhance. The idea is to destroy the original and not to elevate the original. That is something much worse than the fear of something not being new. That's a recognition that there are some things that should be left alone because the people who are trying to do something better with it are incapable and incompetent.