Disney+ Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Disney+ users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Disney+, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Disney+ users affected:
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Mexico City, CDMX | 2 |
| Township of Evan, KS | 12 |
| Béziers, Occitanie | 1 |
| Bogotá, Bogota D.C. | 9 |
| Medellín, Antioquia | 2 |
| Redditch, England | 2 |
| Le Chesne, ACAL | 1 |
| Tepic, NAY | 1 |
| Hermosillo, SON | 1 |
| Chula Vista, CA | 1 |
| Les Abymes, Guadeloupe | 2 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 66 |
| March, England | 1 |
| Strasbourg, ACAL | 7 |
| Sydney, NSW | 4 |
| Culiacán, SIN | 5 |
| Saint-Médard-en-Jalles, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 2 |
| Mazatlán, SIN | 3 |
| Villers-lès-Nancy, ACAL | 1 |
| La Roche-sur-Yon, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Grand Forks, ND | 1 |
| Pierre-Bénite, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Blumenau, SC | 1 |
| Toulon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 3 |
| Pau, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 2 |
| Belfort, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté | 1 |
| Derby, England | 3 |
| Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 10 |
| City of Westminster, England | 3 |
| Charlotte, NC | 2 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Bugged weirdo (@LoveBugArtsie) reported@mihailo____ @MegaMel1986 @COTM_2 No because that's why Disney keeps lowering the quality more and more, because yall keep eating up their garbage. What ******** are you doing on social media if you don't want to see people share their thoughts and opinions? ******* weirdo
-
Samantha Stark (@sydneyunigal) reported@_SimplyG @DiscussingFilm @joshuahorowitz Nah Adam Driver was full leaning into fandom debates, he loved being a part of them, and he loved the character. He’s likely just sore that the Star Wars script he worked on for three years got passed over. If that were me I wouldn’t be jumping to work for Disney again.
-
Kyle Eichenauer (@falconsfbref) reported@mchappell51 The problem is @espn is gonna pay @PatMcAfeeShow and then McAfee is a Disney employee and his show gets more censored. Pat should stay simulcaster and **** then censors.
-
🌸 (@_nayeee_) reportedUhhh let me login to Disney plus account 😒
-
Rique🍉 | KINGDOM HEARTS 4 IS REAL (@Rique08h) reported@WallyintheAlley "legal reasons" is Bullshit, the Act of datamining the game itself already breaks the Terms of Service. The Act of sharing Between friends ALSO breaks the Terms of Service. Disney Lawyers aren't the problem
-
Jordan Stapleton (@GTAJJ_) reported@StrangerWho934 @Zuby_Tech Business culture plays a significant part in this - both Nintendo and Sony come from creative backgrounds so they can apply skills to other areas to evolve and adapt. Nintendo reverted to their roots when making the Wii and Switch. Which of course came a price of missing out on industry leading software but had it's own niche that it created. The IPs they very well milk are so much in demand and they created that. As you pointed out, Sony used its creativity to combat Nintendo. Creating the CD-ROM put the PlayStation ahead of the tech race and even major franchises like Final Fantasy chose to stop developing on Nintendo as Sony allowed them to harness their creativity more. At this point I do want to point out that all these advantages have not removed anything from anyone that they already had. Each party has devised a method to make themselves better over another and ultimately the creators and consumers choose. You're very correct in that Elder Scrolls pushed to the Xbox and had a longer connection on there first. However, since then we have had it established for decades across the board. Had it be only on Xbox, there would not be anything to take away from other users. If we were to base todays exclusivity on association years ago, then GTA 6 should be exclusive to PlayStation by such logic. Microsoft/Xbox turned it down back in 1999 and Sony/PlayStation gave it a shot and thus GTA III came to the PS2. Resources are but that - there is very little risk when you bought existing established IP that has been tried and tested for decades. As for Spiderman, Microsoft/Xbox willingly chose to decline it before it was ever offered to PlayStation. Turning down an opportunity is wholly different to intentionally using money to create an opportunity to create leverage. Sony did not buy out Marvel or Disney to get Spiderman and to this day, Disney hold the licence. No entity is in control. All parties partake in timed exclusivity. STALKER 2, ARK 2, The Medium, The Ascent, High on Life, Splinter Cell Conviction, Dead Rising, Tomb Raider. Timed exclusivity is not control - all parties are still free in the market. Zenimax initially started with Xbox then went to PlayStation and now it bought back to Xbox. How does Zenimax choose in the future? The same with ABK. Market fluidity and freedom is key to keeping the pressure on both Sony and Microsoft to be the better platform. Buying out the market means it no longer needs to work for it. As you said, the games organically curated by Xbox aren't attractive enough to warrant a shift in the market. But buying out the existing market that we all have is dangerous and anti consumer and frankly the antithesis of the foundations - To Create. It's like being 4 - 0 down on a football match and then asking to foul and do handballs simply because you're so behind. It's tasteless to try to leverage existing entities that we all played for decades on. And that's not even talking about the intentional causing of job losses from these mergers. All because they can make their own great games. That 100 billion can make over 300 GTAVs. I honestly do not mind seeing Xbox ejected from the market after all the damage they did.
-
DuffJuice (@DuffJuice30) reportedPeep game: ESPN fired @Realrclark25 because when he spoke, he spoke up on social justice issues a little too much for a company that’s owned by Disney. They can only take so much of that kinda truth. This is why @stephenasmith straddles that line yet leans towards the right as much as he can because tap dancing will guarantee your paycheck at Disney—speaking as if you were Colin Kap does not.
-
VC Intern (@the_vc_intern) reported@DiscussingFilm @joshuahorowitz Bro does not wanna work for Disney ever again
-
Jeremy Johnson (@jeremyjohnson1) reportedDisney/ESPN finally fired Ryan Clark. He was one of the worst that’s ever been on tv. Now he’ll probably take his awful takes to Skip and whoever they are carting out over at Fox. 👋🏽
-
BlackRoomSec (@blackroomsec) reportedIf my life's work and career choice had anything to do with soothing egos or being nice about the stupidity I see which we need to fix, I would work at Disney. And, if Walt was alive, I'd tell him to get his act together too and stop throwing good money after bad.
-
TD (@TDDefense) reported@GregHeffleyOG Since Disney and feige gave too much control to writers that ****** up secret invasion, FF & Avengers vs X-men can’t and won’t work. Ok
-
🌧️ (@wstgoat7) reportedMy issues with it: - didn’t like majority of the acting performances - felt like the plot line was really stupid and boring - the entire time they were laughing at odysseus felt very Disney like - felt way too long and dragged out - the rinse and repeat of his crew dying felt very repetitive - too many big named actors / celbs which made me take the characters less serious - seeing a lot of these cool creatures and monsters just for them not to show up again or be explained - the entire witch plot line was ******* awful and pointless - telemachus plot line was very uninteresting - no humor - no emotional moments - probably my biggest critic which is Agamemnon being completely ******* useless and extremely disappointing he did absolutely nothing and died a very lame way Mind you this is while seeing it in 70mm can’t even imagine how much worse this would be while watching it anywhere else. It had great cinematography and music but that’s about it
-
BatKnight478 (@Dragozilla98) reportedI’m lmfao at this whole thing because none of hypocritical ********* said or did a damn thing when Disney was buying swallowing up the competition for years and now it becomes a big problem when someone else is doing it.
-
Fun Ahead 🇺🇸 (@heroesahead) reported@Figrin75 my biggest concern is that we're in Sequels Star Wars territory by the time Disney bought star wars the "big" story had already been told How are you going to tell me a better story than the Rise and Fall of Anakin Skywalker and they haven't figured that out How are marvel going to tell me a better story than the Infinity War Saga? Are we just in an era where what they're trying to do can't even be done, simply by the very nature of mythical storytelling you've already done all the stuff. introduced all the characters, had them go through all their individual arcs, go through hills and valleys, face the worst threat, pay a terrible price and by the skin of their teeth defeat a worthy villain what's the play here? do it again?
-
willow 🟥 (@wintersre9uiem) reported@UpToTASK Ultron was set up to return at the end of AoU (and nothing was done with it) And Kang WAS given setup through the Loki show, among other things. The problem is - not as many people watched the Loki show, because it was a disney+ exclusive show, and Quantumania was a (+)