Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.

• Sign in (37%)
• Buffering (33%)
• Crashing (20%)
• Playback Issues (6%)
• Video Quality (4%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Sign in	2 hours ago
Lima	Buffering	13 hours ago
Paris	Crashing	16 hours ago
Chambéry	Crashing	17 hours ago
Paris	Sign in	19 hours ago
Widnes	Sign in	23 hours ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Lady godiva Ness 🤪 (@RebelG41) reported 17 seconds ago

  @RavenGrace0613 @OkieDad918 She is insane and typical of a bullying ***** like her, leads the charge against Erika which has resulted in the worst bullying I've seen but when Erika reacts somehow Candace is the victim. The same lying Candace who was parading around at Disney World or wherever it was when she was allegedly getting death threats from the French foreign legion with her kids no less, such a responsible caring parent eh candy 🤦

• 
  Themountainking (@Themountainkin1) reported 10 minutes ago

  @DrewDisneyDude The fact that they really think there’s a market for boring-streetwear-Disney-slop😭. All we’re asking for is merch with nice designs and quality materials + fits like they did before fast fashion quality took over…

• 
  Roger 1st in Cuyahoga Falls (@Roger1stCFalls) reported 11 minutes ago

  @TheFritz330 @Disney @espn Does that mean I shouldn’t open the email from ESPN about doing some broadcast work?

• 
  ᴵᴺᶠᴬᴹᴼᵁˢᴷᴵᴰ January 27th 🇵🇪🇺🇸 (@infamouskid) reported 11 minutes ago

  They trying to rewrite history and it won’t work… plus she burned her bridges and Disney is petty and hold grudges so yeah…

• 
  AL__3.0 (@Allen048047991) reported 12 minutes ago

  @NoContextHumans My wife made me realize that our latest trip to Disney might just be our last family vacation there. I wasn’t ready for that. The stays had been falling a little flat as the kids had gotten older but no more? All those years and memories are at their end? I really trouble with it.

• 
  spencer (@tanosully) reported 13 minutes ago

  @the_first_index i'm not opposed to sabine being potentially force sensitive or even having jedi training from ahsoka tano the problem (with Most things in modern disney star wars) isn't that it was done. the problem is that it was handled absolutely terribly

• 
  🐐 G.O.A.T Goat (ON 🦋 TOO)🐐 (@BillyBloatGruff) reported 14 minutes ago

  ‘AI-Generated’ isn’t valid here when the AI still makes it look cheap. The sketch to pose causes certain items to appear smaller and straight up disappear during inbetweens. It’s an insult to the animation quality Disney was once recognized for.

• 
  bee🏳️‍⚧️ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🐝 (@warm_cuddles225) reported 17 minutes ago

  genuinely the worst thing to happen to Pixar was being bought by Disney

• 
  Kris From Belgium (@KrisfromBelgium) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Themountainkin1 @DrewDisneyDude If the quality is there, the designs aren’t half bad. But I wouldn’t travel to a D23 or Glendale to pick up some brand outfits. These would look great in a Disney Fashion. But I don’t like pseudo-exclusiveness. A

• 
  Ca$hmere (@cashmereH42) reported 23 minutes ago

  @ByClaytonDavis I said this yesterday but atp Disney and Paramount are competing for worst movie studio this year

• 
  SouthernGirl 🇺🇸📟 (@_SammyGirl__) reported 27 minutes ago

  @suzimo66 @BlakeSNeff Because she is Mrs. Charlie Kirk, dumb dumb. Are you really this stupid? Do you harass Ford Motor Company for keeping Henry Ford’s name on the company after he passed away? Walt Disney Company for keeping his name? Harley-Davidson for keeping their founders’ names? You Candy cultists are the dumbest gaslighters on the planet. There’s zero logic to your methods of harassment. And as you can see, it clearly doesn’t work. You’re not stopping them.

• 
  Mark Hespen (@MarkHespen) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Michaeloptv @ToonHive I’m not talking about money… I’m talking about quality IP that Disney can use for years in their parks and merchandise, nothing Pixar original since Coco is that

• 
  Matt Jarbo (@mjarbo) reported 31 minutes ago

  Pixar is getting hit hard in Disney’s latest round of layoffs, and that absolutely sucks for the people losing their jobs. But the reasoning isn’t difficult to understand. This is basically what happens in the video game industry. A company staffs up because it needs more people to get a slate of projects finished, then production slows down and suddenly those people are considered expendable. Disney overexpanded Pixar during the streaming push, realized it was making too much stuff, and is now scaling back toward fewer theatrical movies. Quality over quantity is probably the right move, but the workers are the ones paying for Disney biting off more than it could chew. My concern is that animation becomes even more project-based, where studios hire a bunch of people during crunch and throw them back into the job market when the movie is finished. That might be the reality of the business, but it’s still a ****** way to build a creative industry.

• 
  1 Foot on Yo *** (@minxy_brat) reported 34 minutes ago

  No problem Get Disney+ for the summer at $4.99/month Just have weekend movie binges or after dinner movies My son did this over the last few weeks and he’s all the way caught up. He even read quite a few specialty books on Marvel MCU we had from B&N too.

• 
  Shockd (@Shockd_4) reported 35 minutes ago

  @EmJo95861704 @TabuleyAnim this person literally animates like a Disney movie, let them make some bank off of their hard work for a while

• 
  Nick & Gio 🏳️‍🌈♈️♌️ One World One Love (@Sexplorers2) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Disney @ABC We’re all seeing why you license is under threat!! Legitimate reasons keep popping up! It’s self inflicted, fix it!!

• 
  Boston Three Party (@CelticPride0) reported 38 minutes ago

  @danstevejon1 @aakashgupta That’s nowhere near how that happened. Disney begged for it for MCU and mcu Spiderman is the worst by far. Disney sucks. Fox did it better. Old Ironman movies were awesome. Same with X-men

• 
  Zane Little (@zanelittlemusic) reported 39 minutes ago

  I really think Disney is actually just the worst company ever. It's run by people who actually hate animation and think it's stupid. Make ****** live action remakes of animated movies, then blame their animation studios for their losses when they flop.

• 
  Reese (@reesespieces401) reported 44 minutes ago

  @brndxix Bahaha you think that’s the problem???? Espn went down the drain when Disney bought it

• 
  Fer (AnimationRules!) (@FMark2011) reported 46 minutes ago

  @TommyDiazMillan He doesn't work on Disney anymore

• 
  derrickvader 🇺🇸 (@derrickvader) reported 47 minutes ago

  @EpicGames Bring back Lucasarts Of course being a Willow wish, it would be Disney Lucasarts and crank out terrible, woke trash

• 
  Edwardo2754 (@EdwardArnett4) reported 50 minutes ago

  She don’t wanna work for Disney duh

• 
  Michael (@HarleyQFan75) reported 50 minutes ago

  @SnyderCastle Spider-Man has never had a problem because that is Sony, and Sony is good at making them. Disney MCU is what is in trouble, and while i will go see Dooms Day, and most likely like it, it is really a desperate hail mary pass, The even paid RDJ 100+ and is giving him around 5% of net profits to come back

• 
  jayz (@JayssJayzz) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Rave00789 Movie??? Didn’t know that series was a movie now. But they stopped because the actor didn’t wanna work for Disney anymore

• 
  Leo (@Leooo0155) reported 53 minutes ago

  The forced Disney Channel sitcom comedy in the Tom Holland movies have made the movies worst. I wish Marvel movies had a more serious tone like the movie Logan

• 
  Avaitor Taylor (@FolklessMetal) reported 54 minutes ago

  @CCharmanderK The other problem is that Mandalorian and Moana are going to lose more money for Disney than Hoppers, why is Lucasfilm and the remake department mostly getting off scott free vs Pixar?

• 
  🎭 JessyMortoni 🎭. 🇧🇷 🇵🇸 (@Jmortoni1) reported 55 minutes ago

  Worst Disney Live Action i saw btw, honestly 🫩

• 
  Anime Industry Today / 今日のアニメビジネス (@anime_attention) reported 55 minutes ago

  I think the more important question isn’t the budget. It’s whether Disney should have made another version of essentially the same movie in the first place—a film that doesn’t give audiences a compelling reason to pay to see it again. Live-action adaptations of animated films have at least carried a sense of spectacle. Watching an animated world come to life. Seeing beloved characters portrayed by famous actors. Experiencing fictional creatures and locations rendered photorealistically. Marveling at massive sets and cutting-edge VFX made possible by enormous budgets. Generative AI, however, is gradually turning the act of converting animation into realistic imagery into a commodity. If any fan can generate versions of an animated film “as live action,” “as a 1980s Hong Kong movie,” or “with an all-Japanese cast,” then simply spending $250 million to produce an official visual transformation no longer feels inherently special. AI may reduce the cost of producing live-action remakes, but it also reduces the value of the very spectacle those remakes have sold. When discussing remakes, people often focus on how faithfully they recreate the original, but I suspect audiences don’t actually pay for fidelity itself. They pay for what is different. For example: - A fresh interpretation. - New emotional depth. - A different cultural perspective. - The physical performance of actors. - A stronger connection to today’s society. - Relationships between characters that the original never explored. - New experiences made possible by changing the medium itself. Perhaps the criticism surrounding Moana isn’t simply that it stays too faithful to the original. It’s that audiences don’t see enough difference to justify buying another movie ticket. AI will almost certainly reduce financial risk. If production costs fall dramatically, studios can afford more failures, but lower production costs don’t automatically make studios more creative. In fact, as AI continues to improve, it may become even easier to mass-produce sequels, remakes, spin-offs, character-specific editions, and region-specific versions. The loss from any single project may become smaller, but audience attention—and trust in the brand—can erode much faster. AI may lower financial risk. It cannot lower the risk of brand dilution. For Disney, the real issue isn’t whether one film turns a profit. It’s whether audiences continue believing that “a Disney movie is worth seeing in theaters.” AI may reduce the cost of producing remakes. At the same time, it may destroy the scarcity that once made remakes feel like events. Even if thousands of people work on a film and hundreds of millions of dollars are spent...if the result merely copies the surface of an existing work, repeats past successes, rearranges familiar elements based on market research, and lacks any strong creative conviction, then perhaps it deserves to be called human-made slop. Conversely, what if a film is created with AI but clearly reflects an author’s unique voice, perspective, themes, and artistic intent? Perhaps the phrase “AI slop” isn’t really about AI but maybe it describes a work whose creators can no longer answer a simple question: Why did this work need to exist? If we focus only on opposing AI, we risk overlooking a deeper problem—the growing lack of creative ambition within the existing entertainment industry itself. Even if a $250 million movie could someday be made for $250,000 with AI, it still won’t succeed commercially if audiences never wanted that movie in the first place. AI lowers the break-even point but it does not automatically create audience interest, reasons to visit theaters, cultural conversation, or passionate fandom. As AI becomes part of filmmaking, perhaps the industry’s most important metric will no longer be how much money was spent, but rather “why was this story worth telling?” and “what new emotions, conversations, or experiences does it give audiences?”

• 
  G (@thegc99) reported 57 minutes ago

  @StrikerTheCrow i ship them but that aside, it would be horrible. bc there's no way to make this work without making red and max twins(unless disney is feeling brave and maddox got 2 women pregnant at the same time) which means bridget chose to abandon her son in 2 timelines

• 
  RaisorBlade (@BladeRaisor) reported 60 minutes ago

  Disney DOES know the reason their movies make so much money is BECAUSE of the hard working crew who put their blood, sweat, and tears into their work, right? What a comically evil company.