Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports
Problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: sign in, buffering and crashing.
Disney+ is an American subscription video on-demand streaming service owned and operated by the Direct-to-Consumer & International division of The Walt Disney Company.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
July 4: Problems at Disney+
Disney+ is having issues since 08:40 AM EST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.
- Sign in (36%)
- Buffering (33%)
- Crashing (20%)
- Playback Issues (7%)
- Video Quality (3%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Sign in | 8 hours ago |
|
|
Playback Issues | 15 hours ago |
|
|
Playback Issues | 15 hours ago |
|
|
Sign in | 16 hours ago |
|
|
Sign in | 17 hours ago |
|
|
Playback Issues | 18 hours ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Disney+ Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
ShooterPlays (Shaun) (@ShooterPlaysTV) reported@PaulTassi i dont know , i think its more that both solo and the mandalorian & Grogu were just not stories fans connected with the big tell with be starfighter next year if that underperforms then i'll agree star wars and disney are in trouble
-
Gorefang (@TheHungerer) reportedProject Hail Mary Sucks Obv Spoilers Ahead So why does it suck and why didn't most reviewers realize it sucked? Both answers are bc the science is bad. Most ppl don't know **** about science @TheCriticalDri2, for instance, and are low brow enough to be entertained by a 2.5 hour buddy comedy reminiscent of a Disney Princess movie about two bumbling idiots that are suddenly competent when the script calls for it and obnoxious and stupid when it doesn't. So, what did they get wrong? Basically everything. One of the most egregious mistakes is not understanding how far Tau Ceti is or how long it would take to get there. Light travels at 186,000 miles per hour, thus a lightyear is how far light travels in a year. It's a massive distance. Tau Ceti is 12 lightyears away meaning if someone was traveling as fast as light, which some say is impossible, then it would take 12 years to arrive in the Tau Ceti system, making it over 70.54 TRILLION miles away. With current technology it would take humans about 200,000 years to get there. In the movie, it takes, presumably, about 12 years in Earth-time, but Grace only experiences 4 years passing each way due to time dilation, which is a bit far fetched (and not explained in the movie), esp if they're traveling at less than the speed of light. So going there and back takes 24 years from the perspective of Earth and 8 years from the perspective of Grace, which was a bit hard to swallow. Additionally, the movie seems to think the spaceship has to keep firing the engine to keep moving forward, burning fuel or it will come to a stop like a car, but that's not true. Space is a frictionless environment. Cars roll to stops when not being accelerated bc the wind resistance and friction caused by the wheels touching the ground due to Earth's gravitational influence is constantly slowing the vehicle, but there's no wind resistance or ground contact in space. When a rocket engine fires, the ship accelerates. When it stops firing the ship continues on at the same speed and direction until acted upon by another force. The movie also fails to understand orbital mechanics, there is a part when Grace is outside the ship in the upper atmosphere of the imaginary planet Adrien. If this was actually the case he would be killed by the heat generated by the ship's contact with the air in the upper atmosphere, but that didn't happen bc it wasn't convenient for the movie. Then when he's doing doing his in-atmosphere spacewalk he jumps back into the pilot chair and thrusts the ship out of the atmosphere and all is better bc now it's in orbit except that's not how orbit works at all. Simply leaving the atmosphere doesn't create a stable orbiting trajectory. The ship would just get pulled back down to the planet, but that didn't happen. When he finds life on the planet Adrien, how is that life supposed to make it back to Earth alive when it has nothing to eat on the way there? How is it these cells can consume Astrophage like an Ameoba, but the sun can't destroy them? These questions may have been answered in the book, but they were not at all addressed in the film. The science in the film is so bad that it's distracting to anyone with basic knowledge of such things so in the end all you're left with is two things: Ryan Gosling's bad acting, which is at its worst when he's pretending he's a caveman when he first wakes up from Cryosleep. It's one of the worst big-budget performances I've ever seen, and the buddy comedy between Grace and his new rock alien pal that he names Rocky bc he's such a brilliant man. The rest of the movie is Rocky and Grace chillin, having picnics and movie nights and being the best of pals and somewhere along the way the Earth probably gets saved, too, but who cares bc we have the Rocky/Grace friendship to be entertained by. **** the Earth. That's basically how the movie plays out. I wish it wasn't the case, but it is, so when I see so many ppl saying it was good, I really want to ask them. "Yeah? What was good about it?" I didn't see much of anything to praise. It's a scifi movie filled to the brim with bad science including the main premise. The Astrophage cells are water-based but are eating the sun? They are eating every sun in the local area of our galaxy and need a Venus-like planet to make a pitstop at before eating the sun suggesting every star system in the local galaxy, to include Tau Ceti has a Venus-like planet in it, which, obviously can't be the case. People say there was a book and it was better, idk about the book, I know about the movie and the movie combines two things I hate - bad science and childishness. There's more than a fair dollop of pointless bullshit, baby talk and dumb nonsense that's supposed to be endearing in a lovable idiot kind of way, but the problem for me is that I don't respect bad science in scifi films and I don't find adult children to be lovable idiots, just regular idiots. So for me, it was an awful movie. Unrelatable, forgettable, sloppy science on top of bad science on top of a unrealistic premise. Even if you accept all the bad science, why do they need Grace? He's a middle school science teacher that wrote a paper one time that said not all life in the universe is likely to be water-based. So what? None of it makes sense. I wasn't even going to write this review, but it seems like everyone is just talking about how great this movie is and it does not at all stand up to that hype esp if you're familiar at all with space or any aspect of science in general. 3/10.
-
FieryTwo (@FieryTwo) reportedPart of the problem with the new stuff is that Disney is publishing tons of stuff. All the time, so you're getting stuff and its quality is going to vary. I LIKE Ahsoka, its fine, but it doesn't stand up to the Likes of Andor.
-
Gorefang (@TheHungerer) reportedProject Hail Mary Sucks Obv Spoilers Ahead So why does it suck and why didn't most reviewers realize it sucked? Both answers are bc the science is bad. Most ppl don't know **** about science @TheCriticalDri2, for instance, and are low brow enough to be entertained by a 2.5 hour buddy comedy reminiscent of a Disney Princess movie about two bumbling idiots that are suddenly competent when the script calls for it and obnoxious and stupid when it doesn't. So, what did they get wrong? Basically everything. One of the most egregious mistakes is not understanding how far Tau Ceti is or how long it would take to get there. Light travels at 186,000 miles per hour, thus a lightyear is how far light travels in a year. It's a massive distance. Tau Ceti is 12 lightyears away meaning if someone was traveling as fast as light, which some say is impossible, then it would take 12 years to arrive in the Tau Ceti system, making it over 70.54 TRILLION miles away. With current technology it would take humans about 200,000 years to get there. In the movie, it takes, presumably, about 12 years, but Grace allegedly only experiences 4 years passing each way due to time dilation, which is a bit far fetched (and not explained in the movie), esp if they're traveling at less than the speed of light. So going there and back takes 24 years from the perspective of Earth and 8 years from the perspective of Grace. When he finds the life on the planet Adrien, how is that life supposed to make it back to Earth alive when it has nothing to eat on the way there? How is it these cells can consume Astrophage like an Ameoba, but the sun can't destroy them? These questions may have been answered in the book, but they were not at all addressed in the film. Additionally, the movie seems to think the spaceship has to keep firing the engine to keep moving forward, burning fuel or it will come to a stop like a car, but that's not true. Space is a frictionless environment. Cars roll to stops when not being accelerated bc the wind resistance and friction caused by the wheels touching the ground due to Earth's gravitational influence is constantly slowing the vehicle, but there's no wind resistance or ground contact in space. When a rocket engine fires, the ship accelerates. When it stops firing the ship continues on at the same speed and direction until acted upon by another force. The movie also fails to understand orbital mechanics, there is a part when Grace is outside the ship in the upper atmosphere of the imaginary planet Adrien. If this was actually the case he would be killed by the heat generated by the ship's contact with the air in the upper atmosphere, but that didn't happen bc it wasn't convenient for the movie. Then when he's doing doing his in-atmosphere spacewalk he jumps back into the pilot chair and thrusts the ship out of the atmosphere and all is better bc now it's in orbit except that's not how orbit works at all. Simply leaving the atmosphere doesn't create a stable orbiting trajectory. The ship would just get pulled back down to the planet, but that didn't happen. The science in the film is so bad that it's distracting to anyone with basic knowledge of such things so in the end all you're left with is two things: Ryan Gosling's bad acting, which is at its worst when he's pretending he's a caveman when he first wakes up from Cryosleep. It's one of the worst big-budget performances I've ever seen, and the buddy comedy between Grace and his new rock alien pal that he names Rocky bc he's such a brilliant man. The rest of the movie is Rocky and Grace chillin, having picnics and movie nights and being the best of pals and somewhere along the way the Earth probably gets saved, too, but who cares bc we have the Rocky/Grace friendship to be entertained by. **** the Earth. That's basically how the movie plays out. I wish it wasn't the case, but it is, so when I see so many ppl saying it was good, I really want to ask them. "Yeah? What was good about it?" I didn't see much of anything to praise. It's a scifi movie filled to the brim with bad science including the main premise. The Astrophage cells are water-based but are eating the sun? They are eating every sun in the local area of our galaxy and need a Venus-like planet to make a pitstop at before eating the sun suggesting every star system in the local galaxy, to include Tau Ceti has a Venus-like planet in it, which, obviously can't be the case. People say there was a book and it was better, idk about the book, I know about the movie and the movie combines two things I hate - bad science and childishness. There's more than a fair dollop of pointless bullshit, baby talk and dumb nonsense that's supposed to be endearing in a lovable idiot kind of way, but the problem for me is that I don't respect bad science in scifi films and I don't find adult children to be lovable idiots, just regular idiots. So for me, it was an awful movie. Unrelatable, forgettable, sloppy science on top of bad science on top of a unrealistic premise. Even if you accept all the bad science, why do they need Grace? He's a middle school science teacher that wrote a paper one time that said not all life in the universe is likely to be water-based. So what? None of it makes sense. I could literally talk forever about all the things that didn't make sense, but somehow all of those points just slipped past most people who have made a career out of reviewing movies like @TheCriticalDri2 who recommended this one and gave it a shining review despite all the obvious flaws. I suspect some of these ppl were paid for these reviews and others just don't know enough to question them and they like silly childish shows in the vein of the Mandolorian, bc in many ways that's what this was. I wasn't even going to write this review, but it seems like everyone is just talking about how great this movie is and it does not at all stand up to that hype esp if you're familiar at all with space or any aspect of science in general. 3/10.
-
Qwetzle (@Qwetzlecoatl) reported@SpiicyAtreides Ofc people will see the latest Nolan film. The issue is going to be after when his reputation is damaged and tries to make a new film that people will be cautious to watch. remember what happened with Disney? People kept watching after endgame until they realized its all garbage
-
Darin Bracy (@BasicBaptistGuy) reported@TravelbytheCoin @Lets_Talk_HC As to your question, What if, is a show on Disney+, there are no What If in theology. Either you accept God for who He is and submit to His will or you rebel against Him. You have clearly chosen rebellion. You want God to conform to what you want, you want Him to work for you.
-
Feliz Catus (@feliz_catus) reported@KashPrime My husband is a huge animal lover. He makes friends with any wild animal kind of like a Disney princess. I have to have this talk with him every few months just in case. You see a bat you don’t touch it! Him: but what if it needs help? Me: YOU SEE A BAT YOU DONT TOUCH IT!!!!
-
DeadeyeJediBob (@BobServo1) reportedCan someone please specify whether the, "robots," refered to in @DisneyPlus 's audio description track for X-Men97 s2 are Sentinels or run of the mill robots who work for Apocalypse. They sound like Sentinels. Another reason why I think AI wrote these S2 tracks.
-
Richard Hoffman (@chelidon23) reported@JFMCO1969 @OurShallowState @Sportandgrace Sorry, son. Disney still tells better fairytales. Work on it.
-
Donica Lewinsky 🇺🇸 (@TheDaddyBottom) reported@timaclaren @REDACTEDSpider Still hearsay and the article actually goes into it. They tried to tie his OnlyFans (that he already had) to his work on X-Men 97. Idk if I believe that part anymore because Marvel/Disney kept skirting around it and it seemed like it was just a way to get him out
-
🎆MC the Toonster🎆 (@MToonster24) reported@Snek_Snack Hold on, that’s irrational. Absolutely no one is trying to make bad films on purpose. Disney is not “choosing” to make bad movies. They do try to make good movies but they just didn’t work out; that’s different. What exactly is a good movie anyway.
-
char (@44lewdc) reported@spideysknight i said ppl are blind if they don’t see the whole ”for girls” issue with f1a’s representation! but yes, it’s linked to sponsors as well and i do think it’s an issue that they get a lot of “children girly pink sponsors” (hello kitty, disney, makeup brands) because (1/?)
-
ANLIK AKIŞ (@anlikaks) reportedPERFECT WOMAN Prompt Like a real photo. a cute brunette haired girl wearing a silk bikini. Sitting in a swing. City Park She is a cute woman The subject is expressing flirtation, with a coy smile and a tilted head. sitting with legs spread wide open Her age is 18 years old. she is wearing a micro bikini She has a lollipop body shape with a small frame and large bust. She has large, round breasts that sit wide apart with smooth curves and soft skin. She has youthful, bouncy buttocks with a firm surface and a lively, energetic appearance. negative anime, manga, disney, **** anime, manga, Disney, cartoon, low resolution, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry, artist name, anime, cartoon, rawing, illustration, boring, 3d render, long neck, out of frame, extra fingers mutation, deformed, canvas frame, high contrast:1.2, over saturated:1.2, glossy:1.1, bad lighting, deformed, text, bad lighting, deformed, text, worst quality, bad lighting, cropped, blurry, low-quality, deformed, text, poorly drawn, bad art, bad angle, boring, low-resolution, worst quality, bad composition, terrible lighting, bad anatomy, worst quality, bad lighting, cropped, blurry, low-quality, deformed, text, poorly drawn, bad art, bad angle, boring, low-resolution, worst quality, bad composition, terrible lighting, bad anatomy, worst quality, bad lighting, cropped, blurry, low-quality, deformed, text, poorly drawn, bad art, bad angle, boring, low-resolution, worst quality, bad composition, terrible lighting, bad anatomy, child, childlike, children, underage, <young child>, junior
-
Andre.official (@Tautvyd61444595) reported@starwars @DisneyPlus @hulu Hope the bumpy ride comes with better wifi, because my lightsaber can’t fix buffering.
-
Rodney Maxwell (@MaxwellRod46830) reported@JohnnyLCKai @stephenasmith @espn Certainly don't get it knowing Disney owned ESPN is owned and operated by white men so how does this anti white work when all the professional sports leagues is owned and operated by white men and women but they always seem to find a watch dog to tap dance
-
🍊Mr. Popo🍊 (@OG_MISTER_POPO) reported@heelvsbabyface @YouTube All the physical media people should all uninstall all their streaming services since digital is so evil and terrible uninstall netflix, hulu, disney+ amaazon prime, spotify, youtube all of it. I demand only physical only
-
bro wtf (@Yowtfcards) reportedDisney employees are worse that the ******* guests. Janet. I don’t give 2 flying ***** about you changing the location you work for the 12th time in the last 3 months. Stop calling it a life change on Facebook. You dumb ******* ****.
-
🌸Cherry🪫 (@cheriawishes) reported@machiroon_67 It doesn’t help he called me disney princess the other day and then the caption “ bye cherry” ….maybe he is gonna k*ll me oh my god😨
-
Disappointed Fred Gwynne (@NotFredGwynne) reported@WarsLover66976 @GeeksGamersCom Their films are upstream from those other revenue sources Film IP's drive their parks and streaming service If Disney films crash, the rest rolls up with it
-
Tom Varner (@tomvarner) reported@GeeksGamersCom So Disney thinks purchasing another company is going to fix their problems? I guess they learned NOTHING from the disaster Bob Iger brought them to.
-
Detective Spooky (@InverseNinjas) reportedDespite not being even in my Top 5 Worst Movies list (5. The Little Prince (Netflix), 4. Repo: The Genetic Opera, 3. Sucker Punch, 2. Monsters (Gareth Edwards), 1. A Wrinkle In Time) I'm pretty well known for my hot take that Moana is the worst Disney Princess flick by far. Eclipsing even its sequel and Pocahontas in its disastrous immensity. The fact that it made more money and is more beloved than the far far far far superior The Princess And The Frog keeps me up at night.
-
Parker (@ParkerWebHead26) reported@SAMTH33STALLION Because I know you support these characters and I love that. But I don’t like Fieges work or what Disney has done for Marvel being taken out of context. They have five times as more diversity in terms of character catalog in their universe compared to DC and other studios.
-
hilyah's kitchen is here!✨️🍳‼️ (@kKijoriing) reportedi think my dream is to work as a disney character at disneyland, :( like.. imagine seeing people cry because they finally met their childhood characters IT WAS SO?!??!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!!?😭
-
TruthWillWin (@EvilHatesTruth) reported@KeenanPeachy 🎯🎯 Disney does. But you can opt out. They don’t advertise it but tell them no picture or scan and it’s not a problem.
-
NICK 🟢🟣 (@FearlessRiOT) reported@KG_BLK23 My family seemed to have no issue with letting us watch any of the Friday movies as children. And with Charlie’s Angels, I think my family were just happy that I found another movie I liked that wasn’t animated or Disney.
-
KuriusC (@c_kurius) reported@Proudofthisland I wouldn't do it but if they are kept and dispatched humanely I don't see a huge problem. I'd get by without ever consuming meat but we aren't at a stage where we should ban it. Arguably animals should live a full life but it aint Disney.
-
Gorefang (@TheHungerer) reportedProject Hail Mary is streaming on Amazon. Spoiler Alert - It sucks. The general idea is that there are little alien dark cells that are killing every sun in the vicinity of our star system, the Solar System and this is an existential threat. For no good reason at all, the entire world needs the help of a douchebag middle school math teacher to solve the problem. No one else will do. It's a terrible movie from start to finish esp bc it's scifi that doesn't understand anything about science. These cells are made mostly of water, but can somehow travel en masse through space and eat the sun over a period of about 30 years without being destroyed by it. The math teacher becomes the only living person on the mission that survives the journey to a star 11.9 lightyears away, which is not 11.9 travel years away, it's 11.9 LIGHTYEARS which is such an incredible distance that he could not cross it in his lifetime, but somehow his ship can make that distance in just over 4 years, that's faster than light speed travel. Faster, even, than his communications back to Earth, which take approx 12 years to arrive. The movie thinks that the engine has to be firing for the ship to be moving and it will coast to a fairly abrupt stop if the accelerator isn't being held down, but this isn't a car. Cars stop when the accelerator isn't held down because Earth's gravity causes friction between the wheels of the car and the surface the car is traveling on. In space, no such friction exists so if you stop burning an engine, the craft will simply continue on at the same direction and speed unless acted on by another force. These kinds of simple mechanical errors are rife throughout the film, which at somepoint turns into a buddy comedy with a animate rock creature. I wish I was joking. This Math teacher and the rock are both intelligent scientists when the script calls for it and bumbling idiots in way over their heads when it doesn't. Gosling's acting, esp when he's pretending he can't remember how to speak properly after waking up from Cryosleep is some of the worst I've ever seen. I have no idea why people say this movie is good. It's not and to make matters worse, it's 2.5 hours long when it could have easily been 90 minutes. Terrible film. It's actually a little shocking to me that some idiot would make a scifi movie like this one without understanding the most basic things about space, space travel, orbital dynamics, gravity, or air pressure. If you don't understand any of that and you like cute little pet companions reminiscent of the animal companions each Disney Princess gets, then you might find something to enjoy in this film. If you don't like that or you understand even basic **** about space, you're going to see a lot of things that don't really make sense.
-
Orlando Basulto (@OrlandoBGood) reportedI mean it I’m standing right here next to the Boss of @Disney here in California is waiting to see you, Cece Basulto, you’re in biggest trouble, then I must be spoken and told to the Boss, Mickey Mouse, here at my sister Cece’s office filled with lots of family entertainment. Hey Mickey, will you help us do the dialogue against Cece please? I know that I worked at Disney Animation, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars, and National Geographic here in this streaming platform on @DisneyPlus? I think so. Can you all and Mr. Bob Iger, agree to finish the Abu Dhali’s Disneyland theme park and resort? I guess so!
-
Theodore (@TheoTheFurry_) reported@Joyous__Jasmine @owomoxcx We need to find the people who don't think it's weird before we start saying "not enough people think it's weird" because it does matter if it is being asked for. If no one is asking for this, and yet it's still showing up then it's a problem with Pixar / Disney. 🙃
-
Novio Tycooncell (@NovioNovia007) reported@videotech @mrpyo1 Wait you work for rockstar Well tell your boss that anything that connects to the Internet can be hacked He should not even make any move to legalize the non physical gaming experience cause what happened to Xbox Disney and iPhone will eventually destroy his ego