Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Buffering (33%)
• Crashing (20%)
• Playback Issues (7%)
• Video Quality (3%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Saint Paul	Sign in	8 hours ago
London	Sign in	1 day ago
Malvern	Crashing	1 day ago
London	Sign in	1 day ago
Aubagne	Sign in	2 days ago
Paris	Playback Issues	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  exakic (@exakic) reported 5 minutes ago

  Also shadowplay doesnt work when you have certain websites open (streaming services like prime video and disney+) so if theres one without that issue that would be great

• 
  Everlena Oliver (@missnotyou) reported 10 minutes ago

  It didn't help that @Disney Corp didn't give it any decent promotion.

• 
  TOBEY (@OluwatobiD83481) reported 11 minutes ago

  @SajinShrijith I think those online hates only for work DC and Disney movies lol

• 
  Rekter (@Rekter) reported 13 minutes ago

  $SPY At ~$748, within a 52-week range of $482 to $762. The jobs print I said would decide everything landed Thursday morning, and it came in soft: employers added just 57,000 jobs in June, roughly half the 113,000 to 115,000 expected, breaking a three-month hot streak. And the market loved it. The S&P 500 gained 1.8% in the holiday-shortened four-day week (markets closed Friday for Independence Day), finishing near 7,486. The Dow surged 539 points Thursday (+1.03%) to a fresh all-time record close of 52,844, up 2% on the week, with Apple up 4.8%, McDonald’s up 4.07%, and Disney up 3.84% leading. The details of the report were Goldilocks, not recession: unemployment actually ticked DOWN to 4.2% from 4.3%, wage growth held at 3.5% year-over-year, right in line, and while April and May were revised lower by a combined 74,000 jobs, 2026 monthly job gains still average about 92,000 versus just 9,700 in 2025. The read across Wall Street was uniform: slower hiring pulls the rate hike off the table without signaling a breaking economy. The week also closed the books on Q2, the best quarter for U.S. indexes since 2020. New Fed Chair Warsh, speaking at the ECB’s Sintra forum, told investors to look to the data rather than the Fed for the rate path, and the data just bought him room to wait. Oil kept collapsing, with WTI near $67, down nearly 20% in two weeks and back to levels last seen the first trading day after the war began. The jobs report was the binary and it broke bullish: soft enough to kill the hike, firm enough to avoid a growth scare. Dow at a record 52,844. Best quarter since 2020 in the books. Oil doing the Fed’s inflation work for free. The Goldilocks window is open. The question is how long 57K stays “cooling” before it becomes “stalling.”

• 
  Jim Star The Adventurer (@jimthestar9) reported 14 minutes ago

  @ABCNetwork @catchycomedyfun On Monday Sep, 14, 2026 Jim Star's Disney Channel will flip to Ch. 6.3 and Jim Star's This TV will flip to Ch. 6.4 due to an ERROR we found in the last earlier post on July 4, 2026 before the ERROR was fixed today on July 5, 2026

• 
  Cradle to the Graverobber 🔞 (@calicunny) reported 16 minutes ago

  @inkfycreates A major issue with this is because people are treating a character made by a single person to things like Disney (design by committee) when there's a huge difference. Ripping off a single artist because they're "rich" (not even that true) is not the same as ripping off a company.

• 
  Dynamic-Gaming-Twinz (@TwinzDynamic) reported 17 minutes ago

  @NPellettiere @ColonelFalcon Yes indeed. Perhaps it's due to licencing issues with Disney or other companies 🤔

• 
  TREK (@trek_official) reported 20 minutes ago

  What if the biggest entertainment empire on Earth had to perform emergency surgery on itself... and the operating table was its own future? 1. THE BLEEDING By mid-2022, Disney+ had 137 million subscribers. Wall Street cheered. Inside Disney's Burbank headquarters, CFO Christine McCarthy was looking at a different number: a streaming operating loss projected at nearly $4 billion for the fiscal year. The strategy, inherited from the Chapek era and its 'subscribers at all costs' mantra, was bleeding the company dry. Every new season of The Mandalorian, every Marvel series, was a colossal expense disguised as a win. The game was about to change. 2. THE SURGEON RETURNS October 2022. Bob Iger is back. His first memo isn't about content; it's about 'significant cost reduction.' The narrative shifts overnight from 'growth' to 'sustainability.' The Wall Street cheers for raw subscriber counts turn to skeptical questions about path-to-profit. Iger doesn't just refocus the ship; he starts throwing cargo overboard. Hundreds of shows are removed from the platform, not for quality, but for tax write-downs. The message is brutal and clear: we are no longer in the library business. We are in the profitable content business. 3. THE PRICE OF ADULTING Then came the part nobody wanted, but everyone had to pay for. In late 2022 and again in 2024, Disney hiked subscription prices. Aggressively. It wasn't a modest adjustment; it was a test of loyalty. The company was betting that families who had woven Disney+ into their digital living rooms—after subscribing for $6.99—would stomach $13.99. The bet wasn't on new shows. It was on inertia, on brand love, on the fact that cancelling feels like taking a toy from a child. And it worked. Revenue per user began climbing, even as some price-sensitive subscribers walked away. 4. THE AD-FUELED TRADE-OFF But Disney couldn't just take money from loyalists. They needed new, less price-sensitive revenue. Enter the ad-supported tier. This wasn't just another option; it was the linchpin of the new model. It allowed Disney to effectively segment the market: those who pay with their money, and those who pay with their attention. This dual engine—higher subscription fees AND ad revenue—created the financial oxygen needed to stop the bleeding. By the end of Fiscal 2025, the streaming segment, encompassing Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+, had clawed its way toward profitability. The surgery was working. 5. THE QUIET CONTENT REVOLUTION Here's what the balance sheets don't scream: the content strategy quietly mutated. The flood of mid-budget Marvel and Star Wars series wasn't just reduced; it was replaced with fewer, higher-stakes events. The model shifted from 'always something new' to 'must-see when it arrives.' Simultaneously, the focus turned to franchise extensions that could feed both streaming and parks—the true profit multiplier. Every decision was run through a new filter: does this justify its cost and drive deeper engagement across our ecosystem? 6. THE LESSON THEY LEARNED (AND WALL STREET DIDN'T) The genius of Disney's pivot was accepting a painful short-term narrative to win a long-term war. For two years, headlines screamed 'Disney+ Loses Subscribers!' as the company intentionally shed unprofitable users and raised prices. They traded the vanity metric for the vital one. Fiscal 2025 became their 'financial repair' year. They didn't just cut costs; they rebuilt the unit economics of streaming from the ground up, proving that in the attention economy, the company that can price for value—monetarily and emotionally—wins. So, was it a costly pivot? Billions in losses and two years of brutal headlines say yes. But ask a different question: what was the cost of not pivoting? Disney didn't just save its streaming business. It potentially defined the playbook for the entire industry: growth is a lie told in quarterly earnings calls; profit is the truth told in decades. The mouse didn't just learn to dance in the dark—it learned to light its own fire. source @trek_official

• 
  el azotador del maldito moro (@elazotedelmoro) reported 21 minutes ago

  @GreenCheetah99 The djs are always the worst at Disney special events

• 
  matdryhurst (@matdryhurst) reported 22 minutes ago

  @neilturkewitz Yes but do you agree that the animation behind that, and much of your language, is that ai on the whole is dehumanizing and should go away - which conflicts with the actions of the companies filing legal action who are negotiating to own a piece of the ai companies (not cutting their artists into those deals) If consent is the only question, and means 99% of artists still have no meaningful income from universal, Disney and/or tech companies owning the interaction, that will not help pretty much all of the people angry in my mentions about this

• 
  🇧🇪 Lee_beaux 🇧🇪 (@lee_beaux) reported 23 minutes ago

  @xinpe__ People are not getting it. Maybe it's cos I'm not watching & can see through tweets but they are underestimating how much Black support he has. They feel he's targeted(Disney tweet didn't help) & aunties love that he's good looking. Threads is KC city. They also promo'd Corbin

• 
  Ian (@dipsmarquez_99) reported 26 minutes ago

  This disney plus F1 feed always has issues

• 
  timbre (@hemlockthistle) reported 27 minutes ago

  @PayeRyan @katok_exe generic and palatable form— along with their layoffs and moves for open adoption of ai— mean that audiences are naturally suspicious as to whether things like chatgpt are being used even if art-genai isn’t. Because Disney plays it so safe, their work resembles the ai that was

• 
  LordTerminal (@Lordofthesuplex) reported 27 minutes ago

  Wait they actually gave this show continuity? We're getting a follow up to the underground episode where all of the forgotten Disney IPs ended up? Then wouldn't it make more sense for Star to get Billy Dilley's help instead? #Chibiverse

• 
  Jack’s Raging Optimism (@RNiecestro) reported 30 minutes ago

  @BrerOswald Anyone who has stayed in a Disney World resort over past 10 years knew Josh was a terrible choice. This is going exactly how I thought it would.

• 
  Bob Denver's Very Distant Son (@schwloperbk) reported 32 minutes ago

  @feltwelt78 There's nothing inherently wrong with gag relief characters, only problem is that Disney didn't know how to make them funny. They got Gilbert Gottfried, a guy who's normally hilarious for Aladdin and gave him such an unbearable part as that parrot

• 
  CJ Morton 🇺🇸🇵🇭🇯🇵 (@awe5omeCJ) reported 34 minutes ago

  @RadicalCinema @wiseguy_ocb @razzle1337 Not even close even the worst of the original Saban era and the worst of the Disney era seasons are better than Super MegaDisappointment

• 
  🖤 JustStayin (@JStayin) reported 37 minutes ago

  @hewitson10 No rules were broken? (Then Farage has set a historic precedent and must be punished to set an example) Jenrick clearly thinks we're playing a giant game of Mornington Crescent under Westferry Planning Scandal; "White Faces"; Defection document; Disney mural rules?

• 
  Lord Stark Potter (@LordStarkPotter) reported 45 minutes ago

  @SepzenoOfficial Captain America 4 Lowest reviews Also its the worst of the 4 Bigger box office flop due to larger budget then supergirl and the rest no matter what lies Disney , Media and their fans peddle in. SideNote: all are not great films.

• 
  bianca ✨👑 (@rapunzelariels) reported 47 minutes ago

  i really miss being excited about disney animation. i feel nothing but sadness and anger towards them now. their upcoming movie hexed looks absolutely terrible and expect frozen 3 will be as well. i miss the disney i grew up with as a kid, the one that told great stories...

• 
  Gojiro7 (@GojirosArtDojo) reported 48 minutes ago

  @RiseFallNickBck That's not how genetics work, Disney!! XD

• 
  Douglas (@DouglasnTexas) reported 48 minutes ago

  @ChrisLynnHedges Chris a violent revolution is not required. We can peacefully take over capitalism in a fashion that steals nothing and earnds everything. Corporations are powerful tools for concentrating capital and influence. How that power is used—or shared—ultimately rests with those who create and govern them. There is no moral or practical reason why any billionaire should be forced to surrender wealth they risked everything to build and distribute it to people who contributed nothing to earning it. No one has a right to claim what they did not earn. Every adult citizen in the United States already possesses the fundamental right to risk their own money, start a company, and keep the rewards they generate. Citizens also have the right to pool their resources—month after month—to form and fund corporations together. The transformative moment comes when ordinary people realize they can do exactly that on a massive scale. They can band together to create companies that serve real societal needs, contribute as little as five dollars a month, and gain ownership in enterprises producing valuable intellectual property and profits. Think about Netflix. Millions of us already pay every month for unlimited access to movies and shows. We fund the machine like clockwork—but we own nothing. The exciting truth is: we *can* own it. We already subscribe to Netflix, Disney, Spotify, and countless others. Why not redirect that same recurring commitment into corporations we collectively own? With millions of citizens participating, even modest contributions of five dollars per month could generate enormous capital—while limiting each individual’s risk to almost nothing. This is in everyone’s self-interest. And that is not a flaw to be ashamed of—it is a powerful human reality we should harness. People reliably act in their own interest first. Rather than treating self-interest as a problem to suppress, we should design systems that turn it into a driving force for widespread prosperity. It is entirely possible to build corporations that serve both the individual owner’s financial return *and* broader societal value. When millions of citizens own and back such companies, capitalism will have reached its next evolution. Capitalism works for the masses every bit as effectively as it works for billionaires—when the masses become owners, not just consumers.

• 
  Patrick (@PBBMGB) reported 49 minutes ago

  @DisBeforeAfter That is the issue. Disney invited other non resort guests to visit the resorts for lunch & dinner. Sadly, Disney didn’t manage it properly. I remember being an off property guests going to the luau at Poly. We were young and it made us want to stay at Poly and we have!

• 
  Mr. Pendington (@MrPendington) reported 50 minutes ago

  Thinking a little further about the Disney face projection issue; why doesn't Disney consider making a semi projected face? Have a thin layer on top that's see through and have that be the projected layer with a practical face underneath.

• 
  Douglas (@DouglasnTexas) reported 50 minutes ago

  @MarcoFoster_ Here is the argument that makes sense. Corporations are powerful tools for concentrating capital and influence. How that power is used—or shared—ultimately rests with those who create and govern them. There is no moral or practical reason why any billionaire should be forced to surrender wealth they risked everything to build and distribute it to people who contributed nothing to earning it. No one has a right to claim what they did not earn. Every adult citizen in the United States already possesses the fundamental right to risk their own money, start a company, and keep the rewards they generate. Citizens also have the right to pool their resources—month after month—to form and fund corporations together. The transformative moment comes when ordinary people realize they can do exactly that on a massive scale. They can band together to create companies that serve real societal needs, contribute as little as five dollars a month, and gain ownership in enterprises producing valuable intellectual property and profits. Think about Netflix. Millions of us already pay every month for unlimited access to movies and shows. We fund the machine like clockwork—but we own nothing. The exciting truth is: we *can* own it. We already subscribe to Netflix, Disney, Spotify, and countless others. Why not redirect that same recurring commitment into corporations we collectively own? With millions of citizens participating, even modest contributions of five dollars per month could generate enormous capital—while limiting each individual’s risk to almost nothing. This is in everyone’s self-interest. And that is not a flaw to be ashamed of—it is a powerful human reality we should harness. People reliably act in their own interest first. Rather than treating self-interest as a problem to suppress, we should design systems that turn it into a driving force for widespread prosperity. It is entirely possible to build corporations that serve both the individual owner’s financial return *and* broader societal value. When millions of citizens own and back such companies, capitalism will have reached its next evolution. Capitalism works for the masses every bit as effectively as it works for billionaires—when the masses become owners, not just consumers.

• 
  Andrew (@Andrew_a174) reported 51 minutes ago

  @newyorkgrooovee God Disney is awful.

• 
  Unborn Lives Matter (@David_A_Dennis) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Sir_Charlsss Plant City, Florida?!?! I have been there doing work for the company I worked for. Dart Container. Dart paid to send my family to Disney World back in the 1990’s and rented me a Camaro to commute (else I wouldn’t go!)! Prayers going up.

• 
  cloudchaser (@ohjcmw) reported 55 minutes ago

  "he'll probably make it work" lakas maka-disney princess .. gkjhkhlkkfk na para bang "once upon a time, in a far away kingdom......"

• 
  Gunpowder Artificer in Training (@Anubis_F0X) reported 57 minutes ago

  @AlluPatronia @LordTankArt Viv could have something if she focused on the characters and stopped being so unbelievably edgy. The backdrop of Heaven and hell lends itself to some very interesting drama's and problems (See Darksiders). Her problem is it's dark Disney with none of the moral strengths

• 
  LiCHtsLiCH (@Barbaneth) reported 58 minutes ago

  @hell_line0 Nobody should be allowed to vote. Nobody is actually thinking about policy. It is literally filling out paperwork for a credit card. You vote to get paid, that's it. It's the same decision making process you use in buying stuff. Whats the lowest price. Honestly, all we have to do to make you look like clowns is make clown outfits cheap. That's why everything, no matter the style, fabric, or country of origin all cost the same. That's it, that is all there is to humanity at this point. How to google your homework, and how to buy cheap stuff, and who is Disney enough to make you feel like the good guy. Sorry, humans as a non-animal would take me saying this, and be like, "well that makes me sound like a brainless animal". However, 90% of human readers haven't made it this far, and half of that 10% knows they arn't animals and completely agrees with me. The other 5% are half wondering if I've got like a "so whats gonna happen to them" clause. Honestly I don't know, it's really troublesome to be in thi situation where nobody has any desire to even try and better themselves. Even I'm stuck in a bit of a loop when it comes to doing things. I probably should just stop thinking about it and do what I enjoy, keep my wits about me, and come up with creative ways to help people accept they are in fact, just animals. Ya know, food, dolls, tools. I still wish they were more, but at this point I'm doing more of what they can do than they are for them. I guess that means I need them a little more than data centers, but at some point, I need them to manage them. Dunno, like I said creative.