Disney+ status: streaming issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Disney+ reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Disney+ users through our website.

• Buffering (42%)
• Crashing (23%)
• Sign in (20%)
• Playback Issues (10%)
• Video Quality (5%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Disney+ outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Crashing	2 days ago
London	Sign in	2 days ago
Montrond-les-Bains	Buffering	2 days ago
Falkirk	Buffering	2 days ago
Blackwood	Crashing	2 days ago
Nottingham	Buffering	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Disney+ Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Alexander 'Lex' Williams (@squidlord) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Critical_Scribe The lack of boldness in innovation speaks to something worse than just stagnation. It says that creators, or at least the moneymen and studios, don't have any faith in their own ability to create something new, and instead just want to spend their time retooling something old, which would be okay if they showed any expression of love for what it was they're retooling. But they don't. Inevitably, they want to change what already exists. They want to make it something other than the thing that was actually popular. How is that inevitably going to turn out? Nobody cares that what we grew up with is no longer new. Nobody. Nobody gives a **** that the 1812 Overture is "dated." Nobody really cares that there are a dozen takes on Dracula, each going in a different direction and emphasizing different elements and with different levels of quality. What people care about is that the thing that they loved and which apparently is worth enough to bother sinking more money into is treated by the "remakers" as something that's broken elementally and needs to be fixed. If it needed to be fixed, it wouldn't already be popular. Note that when I say fixed here, I don't just mean updating graphics and interfaces to functional sensibilities. I mean literally changing the narrative of the piece. You know, the thing that made it worth buying in the first place. That's horrific. Nobody wants that, except for the people who didn't like it in the first place. For the best example of this, it's not surprising that Disney provides multiple. Look at what Remake Rot does to the retellings of original animated series in live action. *Moana* is a pretty good example, but *Lilo & Stitch* is a better one. Worse, less emotive acting on top of a complete inversion of the moral message of the original, which everybody liked. The remake trend in media has become corrosive rather than enhance. The idea is to destroy the original and not to elevate the original. That is something much worse than the fear of something not being new. That's a recognition that there are some things that should be left alone because the people who are trying to do something better with it are incapable and incompetent.

• 
  BlossomOnyx (@BlossomOnyx223) reported 6 minutes ago

  Keyword is "officially" Given the channels they go through, it has already been leaked (Thanks indie company for going through the same companies as disney to outsource work)

• 
  Scott (Human) - 𐌃𐌏ᖇ𐌉乙乙𐌃𐌕 (@Dorizzdt) reported 8 minutes ago

  **** this, I'm going out today to spend $3k on a media setup. I'm going back to just pirating TV/Movies. It's not because I am not willing to pay, its I am tired of paying subscription services and having everything so fragmented and being Nickel and Dimed by the services. When we worked on HD Streaming in the 2000's we set the foundation up for the industry to make video possible more easier. Even back then convincing Hollywood / TV Networks to abandon physical media for streaming was a huge undertaking in itself. They just were ******* in contracts with the creators of content and couldn't find a way to make online work. Fast forward 20 years later and this is the **** we end up with. It literally is just easier to pirate than its to keep doing this. atm I pay for: HBO Max Stan FoxTel Primewire Paramount Netflix Disney+ BritTv (i forgot to cancel the trial fml) AppleTV+ Its about $160 a month AUD I can't find half the **** i want to watch and the stuff that I want to watch is full of ads, or you have to then pay extra ontop. I'm out. stfu ... I'ma use AI to setup a complete end to end media experience.

• 
  90milesmiles (@90milesmiles) reported 9 minutes ago

  @NickChaps96 @LiamFromOrlando They should have kept it a little longer to help promote the movie on Disney+ and DVD.

• 
  Sub Pop Culture 🇺🇸🐿️ (@WriterMcG) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Jason34420 You are the salty bastard who smiles big, steals from young ones, laughs all the way to the bank. Wash, rinse, repeat. The genre you work in is easy peasy — there’s a big audience for premise alone. You just dress it up, ad spend against the low budget, take the biggest cut and simply ROB young people who are smitten with fame and being spokespersons for your glittering douchebaggery. Somewhere in the vast world of AI is a young Walt Disney and that individual, wherever they are, is going to be wise and reject the invite, take all the cake. You will still have a nice house and an assistant to fold your laundry and fetch you coffee. The comedy is that you pretend a resume hit matters. That’s not what you buy — you buy the audience someone else gained and the house they built and then you flip it, like all Hollywood players do, and guess what — nobody really needs you anymore. They just need to comprehend how useless you really are. Marketing department be damned.

• 
  J. L. Stein Massage Therapy (@JLSteinMT79) reported 10 minutes ago

  @PalmerLuckey I have the solution, you as an inventor should appreciate this solution as you have most to gain. First part of how I want the patent office to change is no more protections , as long as the invention was of USA origin then you as a citizen of USA have free reign to use it however you want. Because every good idea is based off of a different idea might have been a better one might have been a worse one but everything is built off of the past to pretend things work otherwise is a limitation that our nation can't survive . Especially when countries like China will steal any IP and reverse engineer it. Instead the @uspto will function more like the scoreboard on an arcade game simply showing who came up with what first giving bragging rights so that the public will know who's valuable to work with and who's contributed to our society . But no more what countries like Disney or Paramount or Raytheon or Lockheed Martin be able to stifle culture and scientific progress for the sake of controlling an IP that the public likely contributed to with either their tax dollars or their own personal efforts. Think how much better things would be if we had the ability to fix all of the operating systems manufacturing would be Unleashed especially with the Advent of 3D printing

• 
  Bryan Ng (@boomerrbryan) reported 12 minutes ago

  You do not have a writing problem. You have a process problem. Most creators sit down to write a YouTube script and immediately get stuck because they have no framework for how the output actually gets built. They blame writer's block. The real issue is they skipped 4 specific layers. Layer 1. Research source. Where do you actually research? Claude. Subscribr. Perplexity. Reddit. Pick the source and commit. Bouncing between 5 platforms every time you research a video kills consistency. Layer 2. Medium. Are you typing the ideas, writing them by hand, or voice dictating them? Each one activates a different part of the brain. The ideas you get from typing are not the ideas you get from speaking. Pick the medium that fits the stage. Layer 3. Environment. Where do you do this work? Walt Disney famously had 3 separate rooms. One for dreaming. One for brainstorming. One for editing. Different rooms produced different output. Most creators do all 3 from the same desk and wonder why their ideas all sound the same. Layer 4. Outlining and editing framework. The actual structure you apply to turn raw ideas into a finished script. Most creators skip 3 of the 4 layers and call it "writer's block." The pros codify all 4 and ship consistently. Pick the layers. Codify the process. Stop calling it inspiration.

• 
  Logan Evans (@Le28708) reported 16 minutes ago

  @rTron1z @Xgamer3607 Yea unfortunately tho Alex had a decent amount of issues while working with Disney on the show but it’s an easy cash grab if they do end up doing a collab

• 
  HICOOKin the Horse 🐎 meat 🍖 (@HI_Darius) reported 17 minutes ago

  @TizzyEnt He looks like if the worst parts of Hitler & Walt Disney were fused together

• 
  𝐊𝐂 💫 (@KandorianCandor) reported 20 minutes ago

  @StarbuckasFRO7 @DiscussingFilm Are you too stupid to realize that Disney having bought Fox now makes this more of a problem? Do the world a favor, don't procreate.

• 
  Chandler Desrochers (@SunnylandProds) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Vell_3rd The inherent problem is that this looks identical to the exact kind of low-effort YouTube kids content farm slop that parents putting Disney Junior on are likely trying to avoid.

• 
  Lee Stetson🇺🇸⚓#🟦 (@flankspeed_) reported 22 minutes ago

  @ArclightPNW @GarrettKeller11 @DEADLINE Because there has to be a legal basis. Not just because you are big mad that you don't like the CEO. Pretty much every expert has said there is no legal basis and the deal will close using Fox/Disney as the most relevant example. Broadcast isn't even an issue and SVOD still has ample competition.

• 
  KikReask (@ChrisJAIK22) reported 26 minutes ago

  @predator467 Ehhh it has technically happened in the EU. It happened to Boba Fett's wife and there was an attempted assault scene in an issue of Empire. Still in my opinion it shouldn't be anywhere near this franchise, EU or Disney. Yeah yeah Jabba the Hutt but we never saw that or implied it

• 
  Peaches Yancy (@KomplexSanity) reported 31 minutes ago

  @mrjrich_27 @toluogunjobi23 no we actually don’t. that’s the problem instead just using your brain and imagination you need Disney to write a story for you so you can blindly follow it then be mad if you don’t like something about it. just learn to enjoy things in that moment.

• 
  kunk (@gunk4188) reported 33 minutes ago

  Yes, that's the problem. Gilroy doesn't like Star Wars and doesn't want to make Star Wars. But his output isn't good enough to stand on its own two feet, so he has to parasitize a better artist's work, facilitated by the Disney cultural **** factory.

• 
  Cakecow (@Patrick_jane32) reported 39 minutes ago

  @MJediB03 Honestly they cant decide what they want vader to be in Disney cannon, hes either horror movie villain unstoppable and op or a broken warrior miles away from his prime that loses (or is close) every single duel he is in due to internal conflict.

• 
  Cody (@CrapCody) reported 41 minutes ago

  Officially never ripping Disney Lorcana again. 75 total packs of cards across multiple skus and stores with 0 Iconics, 0 enchanteds and only 5 epics. Possibly the worst pull rates of any TCG ever.

• 
  Jack (@JPrentice_8) reported 46 minutes ago

  @kingrobbstark5 @fcbtray All I saw was a load of dirt dug up.eta face it, you wouldn't give a toss about Wrexham without Disney. Worst kind of fan in the English game

• 
  Dark Meld Depot-SW (@Catlover10000S) reported 47 minutes ago

  You just expose that arent truly nothing but a **** eater with a comment like that. I used to enjoy it all. Back when it was actually star wars. You know, before disney bought it and ruined everything? There's a discernible line of quality that if you choose not to acknowledge, exposes you as a shill. Your follower count won't help you here.

• 
  Low Crab (@TheLowCrab) reported 48 minutes ago

  @ClownWorld Same thing happened to us at Disney World. They had cut across like 8 line loops and ended up popping up in front of me and my family. I was like, Naw fam, I can't help what y'all been doing, but there is 0 percent chance y'all are cutting any more here. Somehow no fight. 🙏💯

• 
  yohannbiimu (@yohannbiimu1) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Auburn84 @SirBylHolte I'm a bit of an animation buff, but I have a poor opinion of the Disney version. Much of the animation was reused, essentially traced from past shorts and features. I have no problem with the storytelling, apart from some very silly moments, but they cut corners on the animation.

• 
  𝟏𝟑𝐭𝐡 𝐕𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐥 🗝 (@ligero_miguel) reported 51 minutes ago

  Square needs to show a new Disney world in the next trailer, just to stop these unnecessary controversies. As for the KHUx characters, we don’t fully know their roles yet. If they are properly introduced and the new story remains self-contained, there shouldn’t be any issues.

• 
  Mackay Bell (@mackaybell) reported 52 minutes ago

  This is a very good thread explaining the difficulties staff TV writers are facing these days, and I sympathize with the terrible situation she and other established staff writers are in. However, this has been coming like a freight train toward Hollywood for many decades, and it is not just the fault of "tech bros" and billionaires outside the industry. The studios, the networks, and the unions ignored the issue for many, many years, even when anyone could see the writing on the wall. I knew writers screaming about this to the WGA long ago. The union had grown very comfortable with network pay rates and residual structures and did not prepare for a streaming future. Meanwhile, the studios and networks, while they put out some really great shows, also produced a ton of junk assuming they had a captive audience. No one forced people to buy cable to search for alternatives to the three or four networks. Much of the programming was simply boring. A comfortable economic model was built around stuff that was often marginal, a system that, for example, expected people to watch half a year of reruns rather than new programming. When cable came around, people were willing to pay extra to find alternatives. So did the studios and networks rush to make better product? No. Did they rush to create new networks with fresh content? Mostly not. They simply figured out ways to reposition their existing pipelines onto cable and demand that people pay for what they could already watch on network television. (With some exceptions like HBO and MTV, which were initially wildly successful.) Gradually the quality of cable offerings (five Disney channels, for instance) went down and down as prices went up. They created a model where people had to pay for channels (like CNN and sports) they did not want. When Netflix came around, the studios were not forced to sell their old shows to it. But they rushed to do so. Meanwhile, cable had become as hated as three-network TV, and people rushed to cord-cut. When the studios finally decided to jump into streaming themselves, they expected a quick payoff and generally handled it badly. Now they are embracing YouTube, hoping for a return to the cable model where people subscribe to multiple services, many of which they watch only occasionally. Meanwhile, network TV hasn't improved even to the extent of better competing against four hour talking head podcasts, and seems to have settled on an inevitable decline of new versions of Law and Order, recycled medical/law/cop procedurals and ultra woke late night hosts complaining about half the country. Along the way, the studios also tossed aside very lucrative opportunities like selling series on VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray to hardcore fans. They figured they would make more money with less work by dumping all those titles on Netflix, YouTube, and their own streaming services. It is not surprising that the people who made all these bad decisions are not going to take care of the writers who work for them. So, yeah, the comfortable middle-class writer-for-hire jobs are dying quickly. And there does not look like anything is coming to replace them. Hoping for a return probably will not help. A new model is emerging, and that is "create your own thing." It will not help all writers, and the competition will be more brutal than fighting for a more secure staffing job. But there will be a bigger payoff for a much smaller group of writers, because they will be able to own their own work and control their own destinies. I am not saying that will always be better, but it seems the only good path forward. As for all the new writers thinking about trying to break into Hollywood, be aware of the current realities. If you're just starting out, you might want to think about "creating your own" thing first.

• 
  Movie Wiz 🇳🇿 (@_thebestfrom) reported 53 minutes ago

  Fun fact #143: Disney first began developing an animated film about the world of video game characters in the 1980s. At that time the project was called "High Score" and in the 1990s was titled "Joe Jump." In the 2000s, when the movie was finally pushed forward, the first two months of story development focused on Fix-It Felix Jr. as the main character.

• 
  Sus Sanguifer (@SusSanguifer) reported 54 minutes ago

  @h4ilhorse Disney has a 100 year monopoly due to little girls media, so the moment they got a little boys IP, they started to feminize it in the worst way possible

• 
  Hanna ❤️‍🔥 (@zillenialblkgal) reported 55 minutes ago

  breaking this down for the creatives in the back: in 2019 disney swallowed fox. today the DOJ cleared paramount to swallow warner bros with ZERO conditions. we're now down to 4 major studios. fewer buyers for your work, fewer jobs, less leverage to negotiate. this isn't 'storytelling.' it's consolidation.

• 
  Kuotw (@Kuotw268803) reported 60 minutes ago

  @BAD_LITTLE_B0Y Mind you, doesn’t even look low quality or bad. God forbid Disney shows something that isn’t ****** copy and paste cgi

• 
  Mεitnerium🔜AC, Megaplex (@__Meitnerium__) reported 1 hour ago

  @pineyyote Mateen didn't target Pulse because of homophobia. Opportunity allowed because he scouted for clubs/bars and noticed it had minimal security to thwart or slow down his attack when his original plot to target Disney Springs wouldn't work due to large police and security presence.

• 
  Anthony AC Chacon (@rowingcoachac) reported 1 hour ago

  @AmazonMGMStudio I wanted to let you know that I’ve canceled my Prime membership, just as I previously did with Disney+, Netflix, and Paramount+. The reason is simple: you keep canceling the good sci-fi shows I enjoy, or you rework them into something dumbed-down and preachy. I’m looking for well-written, intelligent science fiction from creators (@BaronDestructo) who actually respect the audience and the genre. Unfortunately, that’s no longer what any of the major streamers deliver. At this point, I’d rather watch free 25-year-old reruns of Stargate on Pluto TV than give you another dollar to fund low-quality, poorly written content. Bring back Stargate the way the people want.

• 
  KyleSolmonson (@KyleSolmonson) reported 1 hour ago

  @horrormuseum Tokyo Disney has a hotel for over 300 a night, same with Disney World's AoA, so that's a moot point. Parking's not really an issue if you stay onsite and use transportations. Food and park tix are cheaper at TDL, but compare flight costs, you're still spending more getting to tdl