Dropbox Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Auritrack - AI-powered expense tracker (@auritrack) reported 54 seconds ago

  How $9.99 a month for “just one app” became the most profitable business model of the last decade. The math behind subscription creep Adobe had a very huge effect on Photoshop boxed sales in 2013, same software, now $20.99 a month forever. Revenue went from $4.4 billion to over $21 billion in ten years. The product didn’t change, the billing did. Companies Learned Something Brutal: - People fight a $200 charge - People ignore a $9.99 one So they sliced everything into $9.99s. Spotify, Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, Max, Apple TV+, Peacock, Paramount+, Audible, Kindle Unlimited, NYT, WSJ, Substacks, Notion, Dropbox, iCloud, Google One. Add a gym membership and a meal kit and you’re at $400 a month before rent. The Trick: every individual service feels reasonable, the bundle feels invisible, banks don’t surface the total and apps don’t show what else you’re paying but you have to add it up yourself. Most people are off by 60% when asked to guess their monthly subscription spend. Banks reviewed this in 2024, off by $130 a month on average. The fix isn’t dramatic. Pull last month’s statement, highlight every recurring charge, cancel three. Most people save $80+ a month with that one exercise. Auritrack does this automatically, every recurring charge gets a tag, the forgotten ones get flagged. Follow for more money stories.

• 
  urBITCOIN (@BitcoinUr) reported 1 minute ago

  No, no, no. You're thinking about it all wrong. A functioning file server would be a liability. If Urbit actually stored and served everyone's files reliably today, people would start using it for files. Then we'd have to make it fast. We'd have to make it redundant. We'd have to handle backups, syncing, corruption, support tickets. That's infrastructure. What we have is much more valuable. We have the *option* of being a file server. The vision of a file server. A file server-shaped hole in the future. Right now, every missing feature is proof of how early we are. Every failed upload is evidence of untapped potential. The fact that nobody can depend on it yet means the market is still entirely available. The moment it becomes a good file server, people stop asking how big it could be and start asking why it's slower than Dropbox. You don't want to be Dropbox. Dropbox has revenue. Revenue means expectations. Expectations mean accountability. Accountability kills narrative. We're building a decentralized, sovereign, peer-to-peer, identity-native, file-adjacent platform opportunity. The less it functions as a file server today, the more it can function as one tomorrow. It's a pure play.

• 
  Thomas Oomens (@HonestDevIO) reported 2 minutes ago

  Drew Houston stepping down as Dropbox CEO. 314 comments on HN, most reading like a eulogy. Cloud storage went from 'this changes everything' to 'it's just a folder' in about a decade. The moment Google bundled Drive for free, the moat was gone. What's the modern equivalent — something we think is defensible today that'll be commoditized by 2030?

• 
  Pelicart (@pelicartza) reported 2 minutes ago

  @lukey_stephens @_avdept real also - dropbox??? why would you pay $5 and not just set up an sftp server

• 
  Long Long Int (@LongLongInteger) reported 7 minutes ago

  Topic 7: Checksum: ========= Input Data -> Cryptographic hash functions like MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-512 -> fixed size string is called checksum Checksum is used for checking data corruption during data transfer/upload Can be done both client-side and server-side Advantages of client-side checksum: =========================== -Detect data corruption during transmission -Resumable downloads (only after checksum match for each chunk, we mark that chunk as uploaded) -Deduplication before upload -Companies that do: Youtube, Google Drive, S3(optional), Dropbox Advantages of server-side checksum: ============================ -Verify storage integrity (to check disk corruption, large systems periodically check files) -Deduplication inside storage -Replication verification -Companies that do: Local file backup software, Dropbox, Google Drive, Youtube

• 
  _brettam (@_brettam) reported 8 minutes ago

  @jjacky I don't see the problem. Everyone who has a Facebook probably doesn't care much about privacy anyway. And if not Facebook, most have DropBox, OneDrive, or ICloud. They all have access to the photos you upload.

• 
  🔆 j i k o ⋆₊ ‧ ˚⊹ 🏜️ (@lisey_ann) reported 9 minutes ago

  @joinautopilot @charliebilello I can see why a bunch of those are sagging (joke? Or maybe I'm not joking): - Snapchat is in decline, less users overall. - Streaming subscriptions are becoming too expensive to keep up w/ inflation - X likely sagging ever since its lead advertisers left - Dropbox: user usage declining? (I use Google drive, Mega) - Alibaba: Chinese knockoffs, not bound to survive long - doordash: getting too expensive, way too many fees whenever I've used it, even WITH the discounts - Roblox: declining corporate - Snap: declining user usage, they constantly advertise Snapchat+ and idk anyone who actually uses that - Facebook: meta's side hussles were failing (notable: metaverse shutdown) - coinbase: app is ALWAYS buggy, slow, Base wallet became infested with scam tokens with no way to report, I personally stopped using it for this reason - pinterest: we just have AI to put together mood boards now, Pinterest not needed - Uber: same fee problem as doordash plus majority of gig drivers in my experience are the same few Indian drivers - uipath: likely not keeping up with the AI agent competition - bumble: women are probably tired of it tbh - lyft: same problems as Uber and doordash I can't answer for some others because I'm not as familiar or just can't think of a reason why they have poorer returns, so I dunno.

• 
  GLITCH (@Rukkssss__) reported 9 minutes ago

  𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 is BitTorrent's decentralized file storage system, and it fundamentally changes how you store and share data. Think about traditional cloud storage: Google Drive, Dropbox, iCloud. Your files live on servers owned by a single company. That company controls access, sets prices, and can delete your data at any time. Your files are only as safe as that one company's security. And if their server goes down? You lose access. 𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 works completely differently. Instead of relying on a single server, your files are split into tiny encrypted pieces and stored across thousands of independent nodes worldwide. No single point of failure. No single company holding your data hostage. This architecture delivers 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗶𝘁𝘀. First, security. Because files are fragmented and distributed, an attacker would need to compromise thousands of nodes to reassemble your data practically impossible. Second, censorship-resistance. No government or corporation can shut down BTFS because there's no central target to attack. Third, fault-tolerance. If some nodes go offline, thousands of others still serve your files. Fourth, speed. Peer-to-peer retrieval means you often download from the closest node, not a distant data center. So how does it work for actual users? You upload a file. 𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 splits it, encrypts each piece, and distributes those pieces to storage providers around the world users who have volunteered their spare hard drive space. When you need the file back, BTFS locates all the pieces from the fastest available nodes and reassembles them. But here's what makes BTFS sustainable: 𝗥𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀. If you have unused storage space on your computer say, 100 GB sitting empty you can lease that space to the BTFS network. You earn 𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻𝘀 for every byte you store and serve. Your idle hard drive becomes an income stream. For everyday users, this means cheaper cloud storage. Without a centralized company setting monopolistic prices, storage costs drop to market rates determined by supply and demand. It means safer backups. Your encrypted, fragmented files survive disk failures, server outages, and even natural disasters. It means faster file sharing. The more popular a file is, the more nodes store it, and the faster everyone downloads it the opposite of centralized servers that slow down under load. All of this runs on 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 combined with BitTorrent's massive existing network. BitTorrent already has hundreds of millions of users worldwide. BTFS taps into that peer-to-peer infrastructure, adding incentives and persistence to what was once just a sharing protocol. Upload, store, retrieve. Or share your spare space and earn. No corporate servers. No hidden fees. No single point of failure. That's 𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 decentralized storage built for the real world. @justinsuntron @BitTorrent #TRONEcoStar

• 
  Raziel (@tryraziel) reported 10 minutes ago

  Drew Houston got rejected by 76 VCs before Dropbox became worth $12B. But the rejections weren't random — they revealed exactly what he needed to fix. 2007: Drew builds a file-syncing prototype. VCs say "there are already 20 companies doing this" and "users won't pay for storage." He realizes he's pitching the wrong thing. Storage isn't the product — seamless sync is. 2008: He creates a 4-minute demo video showing Dropbox "magically" syncing files across devices. No technical jargon. Just the experience. The video gets 75,000 signups overnight from a waiting list that didn't exist yet. Same product. Same founder. Completely different story. Key insight: Drew stopped explaining how Dropbox worked and started showing why people needed it. → Before: "We use block-level file synchronization across distributed systems" → After: "Your files, everywhere you need them" When he finally raised $1.2M from Sequoia, it wasn't because he built better technology. It was because he learned to sell the outcome, not the process. The rejections taught him something no accelerator could: how to position a technical product for mass adoption. What's the difference between how you explain your product internally versus how customers actually experience it?

• 
  CHRISTOPHER BLAZ✨ (@Blaz_Dao) reported 10 minutes ago

  Walrus 🦭 and Walrus Memory explained in a lay man's understanding. Let's dive in: 1. What is" Walrus🦭" ?? Firstly, I want you to think of Walrus as a gaint decentralised hard drive built on Sui protocol or ecosystem. Walrus is trying to become the decentralized version of cloud storage services like Google Drive, Dropbox, or Amazon S3, but built for Web3. In a simple analogy, think of it like this; Google Drive vs Walrus With Google Drive, your files are stored on Google's servers and Google controls the storage. If Google removes a file or service, you're dependent on them. But, With Walrus🦭 it's a different case as your files are split into many pieces. Those pieces are stored across many independent storage providers in a cheap manner as no single company controls all of your data. And the most fascinating thing is as long as enough storage providers remain online, your files can be recovered whenever you want. 2. What is "Walrus memory"?? In plain English, Walrus memory is simply the storage space used to keep data on the Walrus network. That data can be:Images, Videos, Documents, NFT media, AI datasets, Website files, Backups etc. Why does it matter? Imagine a viral meme image on Sui. Normally, the blockchain only stores a reference to the image because storing the image itself would be too expensive. Most blockchains are good at storing transactions but terrible at storing large files. @WalrusProtocol is designed to store large amounts of data cheaply while remaining decentralized. ~BlazCares

• 
  Rogerio Ferreira (@rogeriofza) reported 10 minutes ago

  @FMSlovakia portugal 2 meu super - dropbox link is not working

• 
  Tychique Esteve (@TychiqueY) reported 12 minutes ago

  Day 4 building Verytis in public. I've been pushing hard to find first beta testers. Reddit 1,200+ views, real conversations, zero installs. X engagement, validation, zero installs. Direct DMs sent, read, zero responses. Everyone describes the problem in their own words. Nobody takes the step to test. So today I changed approach. I just submitted to Hacker News the community that broke Dropbox open in 2007. If the problem is real and the solution makes sense, this is where I'll find out. Watching the thread now.

• 
  Sara (@monamouroui) reported 16 minutes ago

  Why did Microsoft OneDrive just delete all of my Dropbox files? What a fracking PITA. You just created a huge problem for me. This might make me jump to a Mac. I am so disgusted and frustrated by what Microsoft running Windows 11 just did to my computer. Dozens of years of documents....whoosh. @Microsoft

• 
  Harshita Renee (@harshitaxmars) reported 17 minutes ago

  Despite me having proven him wrong about the exact requirement table issue he pinned on me as a “it’s her problem, shut her up” (Dropbox has the scoresheet proving I was not out of line, they were), I don’t think he can ever be wrong. That is just technical error on his part.

• 
  Harman (@itsharmanjot) reported 20 minutes ago

  Open source NotebookLM alternative with no data limits and AI agents. Same idea as Google's NotebookLM. Same chat-with-your-docs. Same podcast generator. Same cited answers. Except this one has no source limit, no notebook limit, no 200MB file cap, and no Google login. It's called SurfSense. Google NotebookLM vs SurfSense: - Sources per notebook: 50 to 600 → Unlimited - File size cap: 200MB and 500K words → No limit - LLM choice: Gemini only → 100+ models via LiteLLM - Local LLMs: Not allowed → Full Ollama and vLLM support - Self-host: No → Yes, one Docker command - Price: $0, $19.99/mo Pro, or $249.99/mo Ultra → $0 forever Here's the wildest part: It connects to 27+ sources Google can't touch. Notion. Slack. Linear. Jira. GitHub. Discord. Dropbox. OneDrive. Gmail. Confluence. Obsidian. ClickUp. Microsoft Teams. Airtable. Your entire work life, indexed once, searchable from one chat box. 14.4K GitHub stars. 1.4K forks. 6,232 commits. Apache-2.0 license. One honest note: the README says it's not yet production-ready and still being actively developed. But it already does more than NotebookLM does, and the gap is widening every release. This is what NotebookLM should have been from the start. Repo in the first comment.