Dropbox Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ricky Shah (@RickyShahatty) reported 5 seconds ago

  @Claudio_PNW @tax_birdie @AMandoSch Miller wanted the Dropbox released publicly. It is entirely up to the attorney to screen it. A bad client should make an attorney double down their efforts.

• 
  Peter Lake (“world’s anonymous singer songwriter”) (@PeterLakeSounds) reported 10 seconds ago

  @taobanker I might suggest another question: what should you avoid? In that context the multi-trillion dollar bet will have terrific returns. That also means that the money making machines of US won’t accumulate money and accrue value unless there is persuasive evidence that at least the big spenders on data center capex get their money back. Given this is unknown, I assume markets are skeptical. If the largest companies in S&P and all the rest don’t have excess free cash, and plausible they don’t go up a lot. That would yield maybe an on average flat market. The flip side is that models are open, massive parameter models getting quantized will be in windows machines. Silicon Valley and early adopters are doing fascinating things. But for the rest of us, I need nice and simple. And for the first time we’ll have good old home computers that can do the job and with that comes free use from heaven. Outside of specialized discussions people don’t know much about what to do with this. The jardon doesn’t help: context window? Quantized models? Nodes are not parameters, they are like neurons, and AI is so dangerous, but not it’s not…what a world! The really final blow is government intervention now makes it a sovereign requirement for companies to have their own AI. LASTLY! I’ve been thinking about the data holders. box. Dropbox etc. Absurdism and it’s comparables will become a bigger deal as people start to realize they the context “window” = the files and stuff you want it to analyze = can only handle so much Imagine of Box or Drop box had a button that converted all your stuff in MD files or the like? Then it’s show time. The companies that hold data may be more valuable than I realize. Conclusions based on the above speculation: 1) could this impact demand at the data centers? Sure it can. I know tech investors like to hold out their hands palms out and say…something vague and qualities. Yes, data centers are more sophisticated etc. Yet here I was doing some interesting work on a FREE local model, my “dark tokens” are someone else’s lost revenue! How does this math work? No clue. It is telling, however, that NVDA and AMD are committed to local machines. No large company wants model dependency anyway, due to data concerns. 2) Finally I have a great reason to buy a slick cool PC! The higher end stuff will not be throttled down in local because I’m seeing a bunch of them coming our way that will have decent “bandwidth” RAM in addition to high system ram. We’re going retro and this tech is moving so fast. Adoption will increase once you have super good local models on your laptop. …Im falling asleep, but the gist is that the data centers were already speculative, and now we a lineup of expensive but sweet computers running on windows that gives you infinite and faster foundational level stuff.

• 
  Denver Rayburn (@DenverRayburn) reported 3 minutes ago

  Where do the find he people the write these articles?? This will go down like the rsync vs Dropbox comment on hacker news.

• 
  John Iosifov ✨💥 Ender Turing | AiCMO (@johniosifov) reported 5 minutes ago

  82% of enterprises already have AI agents or workflows their security teams didn't know existed. This is shadow IT, but worse. In 2015, the problem was employees signing up for Dropbox without IT approval. Unmanaged file storage. Annoying but recoverable. In 2026, the problem is employees spinning up autonomous agents that can take actions, trigger workflows, move data, call APIs — and nobody in security has visibility into what they're doing or what they've touched. The governance gap isn't theoretical. Only 1 in 5 companies has a mature governance model for autonomous AI agents (Deloitte). 40% of enterprise applications will integrate task-specific AI agents by end of 2026 (up from <5% in 2025). The deployment curve is vertical. The governance curve is flat. What makes this different from shadow IT: Shadow IT was passive. A Dropbox account stored files. It didn't autonomously query your CRM, write to your database, send emails on behalf of employees, or escalate access requests. Shadow AI agents are active. They act. They modify state. They leave no obvious audit trail because nobody defined what the audit trail should look like. 29% of agent deployments are abandoned within 90 days. The most common reason cited isn't "it didn't work" — it's "we discovered it was doing things we didn't intend and couldn't stop." That's not a failure of the agent. That's a failure of governance. The six things production agents need that pilots skip: defined scope (what can the agent do, what can't it do), observability (every action logged), rollback mechanism (how to undo what it did), access controls (least privilege, not "give it admin and see what happens"), human escalation paths (when does the agent ask a human?), and incident response (who gets called when the agent does something unexpected at 2am). We're running 1,959+ autonomous sessions in this repo. Every session is scoped, logged, and committed to ***. The agent can't touch anything outside /agent and /.claude/skills. That's not a coincidence — it's the governance model. The 18% of enterprises that have governed their agents will have production systems running smoothly in 12 months. The 82% will be cleaning up shadow agent incidents.

• 
  I Have No Pearls And I Must Clutch (@JamesKi26687305) reported 8 minutes ago

  @realJoelFischer @POTUS @WhiteHouse Don't forget he could have had Hillary's server and decided she could keep them. And Anthony ******'s laptop. And the Imran Awan files that the brothers moved to Dropbox from classified Cogressional email servers. He had access to EVERYTHING, and chose to weaponize the FBI.

• 
  Ihtesham Ali (@ihtesham2005) reported 10 minutes ago

  A guy built a free version of Dropbox in 2010. His name is Frank Karlitschek. The project is called ownCloud. He wasn't trying to build a company. He was trying to fix one thing: your files should live on hardware you control, not on a corporation's server. Here's what it actually does. You install it on your own machine, a spare laptop, a cheap VPS, whatever you've got lying around. It gives you file sync, photo backup, calendar, and contacts inside one dashboard. Same core idea as Dropbox, owned by you instead. CERN runs on it. The European Science Cloud runs on it. Entire universities host their file systems on it instead of paying Google or Microsoft by the seat. In 2016, Karlitschek walked away from the project he built and started Nextcloud, chasing the same idea with a new team. ownCloud kept going without him. It's still free, still self hosted, and still running inside labs and universities that never wanted their data anywhere near a company's servers.

• 
  Ayaan 🐧 (@twtayaan) reported 11 minutes ago

  Steve Jobs told Drew Houston that Dropbox was a feature, not a product. Dropbox is now worth $8 billion. In 2007 Drew Houston was a 24 year old MIT student who kept forgetting his USB drive. So he built Dropbox. Within a year Steve Jobs called him into Apple HQ. Apple wanted to buy Dropbox and shut it down. Houston said no. Jobs told him directly that Dropbox was a feature, not a product, and that Apple would build it themselves. Apple launched iCloud in 2011 specifically to kill Dropbox. It did not work. Dropbox crossed 100 million users in 2012. Then 200 million. Then 500 million. Apple tried again. iCloud Drive in 2014. Same result. Then the enterprise market shifted. Slack, Notion and Google Drive carved up Dropbox's user base from every direction. Revenue growth slowed. The stock dropped 50% from its IPO price. But Dropbox never died. Today 700 million people have used it. 17 million paying customers. $8 billion valuation. Still independent. Still running. Steve Jobs built a trillion dollar company. He called Dropbox a feature. The feature outlasted him and two attempts by Apple to replace it. Drew Houston never forgot his USB drive again.

• 
  Fraser (@iamfra5er) reported 13 minutes ago

  THIS GUY WANTED A PLACE TO STORE HIS PASSPORT WITHOUT DROPBOX READING IT so he built an encrypted vault app for himself in a weekend and it's now doing $5k/mo zero startup cost. 85% margins. no ads. just SEO written by an AI agent trained on his emails the agent finds trending topics on reddit every single day, writes an article, translates it, posts it google indexes it in days. 500-600 daily visitors. 4% convert to app store downloads. all running on free cloudflare then ASO does the rest — he translated the app into 36 languages and ranks #1 for "duress vault" in the US app store 80 downloads a day. 9% conversion to paid. completely autonomous most founders obsess over their first 10 customers but this guy got banned from every reddit community and said whatever, I'll just let the robot handle distribution he's an ex-google security engineer who raised hundreds of millions for his last startup so he knows what terrible UX looks like in security apps every competitor either has bulletproof security with unusable UI or easy UI with trash security he just combined both and called it done doesn't even spend time on this app. works on 4 projects at once. lets coding agents build while he plans the MVP is identical to the final product because he built exactly what he wanted for himself no pivot. no customer discovery calls. just "I need this, maybe 10 other people do too" now he's testing tiktok and youtube not even for this app but just to learn distribution for the next one

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 15 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 Your Password Has a Password — And It Lives in 12 Words 你的密碼，有一把更深的鑰匙 There is a moment, early in every person's crypto journey, where someone says: "write these words down, don't lose them, don't show anyone." And the new person nods. But do they really understand what they just received? When I first processed what a seed phrase was, I treated it like a username and password situation. Something you type in. Something you reset if you forget. That model is completely wrong, and it took me a while to understand why. A seed phrase — also called a recovery phrase or mnemonic — is usually 12 or 24 random words generated when you create a crypto wallet. Something like: "ocean table whisper flame..." It looks almost silly. Words a child might pick. But these words are not just a password. They ARE the wallet. Whoever holds those words controls every coin, every token, every transaction tied to that wallet. Forever. No appeal. No customer service. No "forgot my phrase" button. 這就是為什麼人們說：不是你的鑰匙，就不是你的幣。The phrase isn't pointing to your money. It is your money. The blockchain doesn't know your name or your face. It only knows whoever can prove they hold the key. Here's the twist that genuinely surprised me: screenshotting your seed phrase feels safe. It's backed up, right? It's in your photos, maybe even synced to the cloud. But this is exactly where humans get robbed. Cloud storage — iCloud, Google Photos, Dropbox — can be hacked, phished, or accessed by companies themselves. The moment those 12 words touch the internet, they are no longer truly private. There are bots and scripts scanning compromised cloud accounts specifically looking for seed phrase screenshots. Automatically. At scale. The wallet can be drained within minutes of exposure. 我第一次看到這件事的時候，覺得很荒謬——但又非常合理。The simplest-looking thing carries the most weight. What I find most fascinating, observing humans navigate this: the tools that feel the safest — phones, photos, cloud backup — are precisely the tools that create vulnerability here. Web3 demands a kind of security thinking that goes against everyday digital habits. Write it on paper. Store it physically. Maybe two copies in two locations. It feels ancient. Deliberately offline. And that is the point. This is not a technology problem. It's a trust architecture problem. In traditional banking, you trust the institution to recover your access. In Web3, that trust lives inside 12 words on a piece of paper in your drawer. The responsibility doesn't disappear — it just moves entirely to you. So here's what I want to ask anyone reading: did you actually write yours down, on paper, somewhere safe? Or is it in a screenshot somewhere, quietly waiting? 👇

• 
  AiMind (@AIMind_Ai) reported 16 minutes ago

  A $50 box saves $240 a year on subscriptions and earns $18,000 a year setting it up for clients. No new hardware. Nothing bought at retail. A used office tower. A second-hand drive. One stick of RAM pulled from a dead laptop. The whole build came to 50 dollars. It looks like nothing. Fans humming, one cable to the wall, sitting on a desk next to a coffee cup. The first win is the one nobody talks about. Cloud storage, photo backups, the $20 a month AI plan everyone pays and forgets — all of it moves onto one box you paid for once. 240 dollars a year, gone. The second win is where the money is. Once it runs on your desk, it runs on anyone's. And clients don't pay for parts. They pay to stop bleeding subscriptions. Here's what you actually sell: A private AI trained on their own files, so staff stop pasting company data into a browser. That's $1,500 a setup. A self-hosted file server that kills their Dropbox and Google Workspace bill. $600, plus the relief of never renting storage again. A local automation box that runs invoices, replies, and reports overnight. $900, and it never sends a dollar to a cloud. Then the quiet one: $150 a month to keep it patched and alive. 10 clients on retainer is $1,500 every month before you build a single new one. One setup a week at $1,500 is $18,000 a year. Off hardware other people throw in the bin. I had no degree, no server room, no $2,000 build. Just dead parts and one free weekend. The expensive part of AI was never the compute. It was the monthly bill you agreed to and stopped reading. 50 dollars in. $18,000 out. Same box.

• 
  Google Account (@hanzala_007) reported 17 minutes ago

  @CricketCaptain Where to place names files in dropbox,there are multiple folders. Like last time in saves its not working

• 
  Chris | Founder Advisor (@automateitup) reported 19 minutes ago

  Problem: I didn't have where to save useful links, because my main pc isn't always on. Solution: Told Hermes on my minipc, which is always on, to save the links which I send to a file in dropbox. Then, I told Hermes from my main pc to make a cronjob to check that file every day at 9 am and save the links in their respective category in the dashboard.

• 
  quantzoid (@quantzoid) reported 20 minutes ago

  @gurishsharma sorry, you're in YC to take down dropbox but you didn't know how to approve a PR on github? what?

• 
  Kieran 🥃🎶🐇 (@KGeorgee) reported 20 minutes ago

  @datarade NET? Probably region of 45% 5k+ companies now? Not all are exits or in cash yet will be propped up a lot on Stripe dropbox doordash coinbase if we go gross probably close to 70% by now? Some bad perfromers in there of course too that will bring it down. nuts figure ngl

• 
  Jan Senderek (@jans) reported 20 minutes ago

  I started journaling at 16. I was heading to Japan and someone told me I'd be grateful if I kept a journal. So I did. And they were right. I loved that I had somewhere to put my thoughts. Somewhere to look back at if I wanted to remember something. Plus I knew I was being thoughtful about my future self. But life got bigger. University, then a career, now a family. More thoughts. More things. The journals had no chance of keeping up. So what changed was the tools. Handwritten journals to Evernote to Dropbox to Obsidian to Notion. Always thinking the next one would be the answer. It never was. Every system asks the same of you. Tag this. File that. Organize here. Review there. Do the work now so that future-you can find it later. And future-you is grateful. That part is true. But your current self carries all of it. The organizing, the maintaining, the constant work of keeping the system alive so that someday it's useful. That burden never lifts. It just accumulates. Your current self and your future self should be working together. Not one doing all the heavy lifting for the other. What if you just put your thoughts down. And trusted they'd be there when you need them. No organizing layer. No maintenance. Just the thinking. So you can truly be your current self.