Dropbox Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Dropbox users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Dropbox, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Dropbox users affected:
Dropbox is a file hosting service operated by American company Dropbox, Inc., headquartered in San Francisco, California, that offers cloud storage, file synchronization, personal cloud, and client software.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Bournemouth, England | 1 |
| Paramaribo, Paramaribo | 1 |
| Bogotá, Bogota D.C. | 1 |
| Auxerre, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté | 1 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 1 |
| Madrid, Madrid | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Dropbox Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Erlendur (@erlendur) reported@DropboxSupport Web is fine (Firefox on Mac); for me it is your app on iPhone that is broken - no photos upload to Camera Uploads. Error is "some photos couldn't be uploaded". I retry and it is the same.
-
QuixoticMoose (@QuixoticMoose) reportedBricks & Minifigs LEGO Drama: Unredacted Police Footage Raises Serious Questions About Cop-Business Ties Hey everyone, it's been a wild ride since my last piece on the Bricks and Minifigs mess. What started as a story about a family trying to sell their massive Star Wars LEGO collection has turned into something much uglier. With the unredacted bodycam and dashcam footage from American Fork Police now out there, we are seeing a side of this that looks a lot like police getting way too cozy with the business they were supposed to investigate fairly. The Footage Drop That Blew It Open Just recently, someone got hold of a big batch of unredacted videos from the American Fork PD. It was apparently an accidental public Dropbox link, but once it was out, it spread fast. These are the full versions of the interactions that were shown in heavily edited form before. And man, they paint a pretty concerning picture. In the clips, you see Bricks and Minifigs people like store owner Joshua Johnson and CEO Ammon McNeff talking to officers. They throw out some heavy claims against Reckless Ben. Things like extortion, death threats, collusion with the Mansells, and even making up documents. The police seem to eat it up without much pushback right there on camera. It feels like they are taking the company's word as solid fact. Signs of Too Close for Comfort One part that stands out is when an officer mentions personal connections. He talks about being friends with the Airbnb host where Reckless Ben and his crew were staying before that swatting mess. The officer even sounds like he is bragging about it on bodycam. That kind of casual chat makes you wonder if private relationships played into how aggressively they went after Ben. There is also talk between American Fork officers and other departments, including LAPD. It looks like McNeff and his team were pushing multiple police forces to go after Reckless Ben. The footage shows officers coordinating in ways that feel more like helping a business protect itself than handling a neutral investigation. The arrest of Reckless Ben gets shown in more detail too. What some saw as a traffic stop turns into a long vehicle search over supposed drugs that never seemed to pan out. Critics are calling the whole thing disproportionate, like the police were there to send a message rather than enforce clear laws. The earlier redacted videos hid a lot of this flow, but now we can see it all. The Community Reaction and the Mormon Angle LEGO fans and true crime watchers online have been tearing this apart. Threads on Reddit and YouTube breakdowns are full of people saying it looks like the department acted as private security for Bricks and Minifigs. Some point to the shared LDS Church ties between officers, Johnson, McNeff, and others as a possible reason for the protective vibe. I am not saying it is a full conspiracy, but the optics are not great in a tight knit place like American Fork. Public trust in the police handling here has taken a real hit. The department put out statements defending their actions as responses to stalking complaints at Johnson's home. They say redactions were about protecting victims. But the full unredacted stuff has many questioning if that was the whole truth. Where Does This Leave the Mansells? Remember, at the heart of it all is still that elderly collector and his son who lost track of most of their $200,000 collection during the franchise handover. Bricks and Minifigs maintains they only inherited a tiny bit of inventory and that the original deal was not properly done. Lawsuits are moving forward, but the missing sets and money have not been explained to the Mansells' satisfaction. Reckless Ben's videos brought massive attention to their situation, including a GoFundMe that has helped with legal costs. His style is aggressive, sure, but the new footage makes it look like the pushback from the other side involved more than just legal channels. This scandal shows how fast a hobby dispute can drag in law enforcement and how important real transparency is. If police really did favor one business over a fair process, that is a big problem no matter what side you are on. The LEGO community thrives on trust and good deals. Right now, a lot of us are watching closely to see if the courts sort out the missing bricks and whether anyone holds the police accountable for how they handled this. It is not over yet, but these videos have definitely shifted the conversation. What do you think? Drop your takes below.
-
lonesome cowgirl lex (@besosprincessa) reportedWho is down to add to their Dropbox link? 👀👀👀 shoot me a message with your budget and want you wanna see!!
-
Abhishek Singh (@0xlelouch_) reportedA good system design interview question for a Senior/Staff Backend Engineer is: Design Dropbox. At first, Dropbox looks like a simple file upload and download system. User uploads a file, we store it, and later they can access it from another device. But the real complexity is not uploading one file. The real complexity is sync, conflict resolution, versioning, permissions, large file handling, offline changes, metadata consistency, deduplication, and making the system feel instant across laptops, phones, and web. I would start by breaking the system into two major parts: file content and file metadata. File content means the actual bytes of the file. Metadata means file name, folder path, owner, size, checksum, version, permissions, timestamps, and deleted/restored state. These two should not be stored together. File bytes should go to blob/object storage, while metadata should go to a database that supports fast lookups and strong correctness. For upload, the client should not send a large file as one big request. A 2GB video should not restart from zero because the Wi-Fi dropped at 95%. So we should split files into chunks, calculate checksum for each chunk, and upload chunks independently. Once all chunks are uploaded, the server creates a file version that points to those chunks. This gives us resumable uploads, retry safety, and better network usage. A very important optimization is deduplication. If 10,000 users upload the same popular PDF, we do not want to store 10,000 copies of the same bytes. We can hash file chunks and store only unique chunks. Metadata will point to the chunk list. This saves huge storage cost, but we must be careful with privacy and security. Dedup should happen in a controlled way, not leak whether another user already has a specific file. The metadata service becomes the source of truth. Every change like upload, rename, move, delete, restore, or share should create a new metadata version. This is important because Dropbox is not just storage, it is a timeline of changes. If the user deletes a file by mistake, we should be able to restore it. If two devices make changes offline, we should know exactly what changed and when. Sync is the heart of the system. Each client should maintain a local sync token. Whenever something changes, the server writes it into a change log. The client can ask, “give me all changes after token X.” This is much better than scanning every folder again and again. For near real-time sync, clients can use long polling, WebSockets, or push notifications to know when new changes are available. Conflict handling is where naive systems fail. Imagine a user edits the same file on laptop while offline, and also edits it from mobile. When both devices come online, which version wins? For normal files, the safest approach is to keep both versions and create a conflict copy. For collaborative documents, we need deeper merging logic, but for a Dropbox-like file system, versioning plus conflict copies is usually good enough. Permissions should be checked before every sensitive operation. Sharing a folder is not just adding one row in a table. If a folder has thousands of files, permission inheritance becomes tricky. We should model ownership, viewer/editor access, shared links, link expiry, team policies, and audit logs. Permission changes should be strongly consistent because users must trust that removing access actually removes access. Downloads should first go through metadata and permission checks. After that, the system can return a short-lived signed URL from blob storage or CDN. Public/shared files can be cached more aggressively. Private files need careful access control. Performance is important, but leaking private files for speed is not acceptable.
-
MacroWire (@MacroWire_US) reportedDropbox CEO Drew Houston steps down after 19 yrs, becomes executive chairman.
-
Auritrack - AI-powered expense tracker (@auritrack) reportedHow $9.99 a month for “just one app” became the most profitable business model of the last decade. The math behind subscription creep Adobe had a very huge effect on Photoshop boxed sales in 2013, same software, now $20.99 a month forever. Revenue went from $4.4 billion to over $21 billion in ten years. The product didn’t change, the billing did. Companies Learned Something Brutal: - People fight a $200 charge - People ignore a $9.99 one So they sliced everything into $9.99s. Spotify, Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, Max, Apple TV+, Peacock, Paramount+, Audible, Kindle Unlimited, NYT, WSJ, Substacks, Notion, Dropbox, iCloud, Google One. Add a gym membership and a meal kit and you’re at $400 a month before rent. The Trick: every individual service feels reasonable, the bundle feels invisible, banks don’t surface the total and apps don’t show what else you’re paying but you have to add it up yourself. Most people are off by 60% when asked to guess their monthly subscription spend. Banks reviewed this in 2024, off by $130 a month on average. The fix isn’t dramatic. Pull last month’s statement, highlight every recurring charge, cancel three. Most people save $80+ a month with that one exercise. Auritrack does this automatically, every recurring charge gets a tag, the forgotten ones get flagged. Follow for more money stories.
-
Adi K. (@AdeelKh14332183) reportedDon’t pay for Notion, use Obsidian Don’t pay for Slack, use Discord Don’t pay for Zoom, use Google Meet Don’t pay for Jira, use Linear Don’t pay for Salesforce, use HubSpot CRM Don’t pay for QuickBooks, use Wave Don’t pay for DocuSign, use Dropbox Sign Don’t pay for Calendly, use Cal Don’t pay for Intercom, use Crisp Don’t pay for Webflow, use Carrd Don’t pay for Airtable, use NocoDB Don’t pay for 1Password, use Bitwarden Most startups don’t have a revenue problem. They have a software subscription problem. You don’t need a $30k tech stack to build a great company. You just need smarter tools. That’s an easy $15,000+/year saved.
-
Detroit Media Magazine (@detroitmediamag) reported@DropboxSupport I don't know who's running this page but you need to fix the glitch that is going on with your latest update. My Dropbox app worked just fine up until your latest update which was about three or four days ago. Maybe even two days ago. I heavily rely on your services and I need access to my account ASAP. There is nothing but a black screen when I open up my Dropbox app hopefully somebody can get back to me with this problem and hopefully one of your technicians gets to work on your end.
-
Ryan McKeen (@ryanmckeen) reportedLawyers, your biggest barrier to AI isn't AI. It's that your data lives in 6 places. Dropbox. Drive. Email. Hard drive. A spreadsheet only one person can find. Fix that first.
-
_brettam (@_brettam) reported@jjacky I don't see the problem. Everyone who has a Facebook probably doesn't care much about privacy anyway. And if not Facebook, most have DropBox, OneDrive, or ICloud. They all have access to the photos you upload.
-
Adeyinka Prime™ (@adefilaadeyinka) reported@aarondfrancis @Shpigford Exactly - when sharing solves a problem for the person sharing, it doesn't feel like marketing. Dropbox nailed this because storing files alone was less useful than storing them with others. The product itself created the reason to invite.
-
🎀MONA MANIC🧸 (@mona_maniccc) reportedMy new Dropbox link is out 1 terabyte dm if you are down 💞
-
Néstor Planes (@NestorPlanes) reportedBen Thompson about The Consumer Market: "This reality about the consumer market is a lesson that Silicon Valley has to re-learn every decade or so. Consider Dropbox, whose founder, Drew Houston, is in the process of stepping down. Dropbox was a category-defining product that had a viral hook — if someone signed up with your referral code, you got more storage — and grew extremely fast amongst consumers; the company then spent too long trying to actually build a business in the consumer space, before finally realizing that the only way to make money with what was ultimately a productivity product was by selling to enterprise. The reason is obvious when you think about it: enterprises are paying for their employees’ time, so of course they are willing to pay for tools that make those employees more productive; consumers, on the other hand, are mostly looking to waste time, which is why attention-harvesting advertising is the only software business model that works at scale for consumer services. The fact that Silicon Valley forgets this is downstream from Silicon Valley being a bubble; normal people aren’t looking for agents to buy them tickets to a concert. Still, the bubble was strong enough to convince OpenAI to make the exact same mistake Dropbox did: the company somehow convinced itself that it could make enough money selling subscriptions to consumers; Anthropic, meanwhile, realized that it was enterprises who were willing to pay for AI’s massive productivity benefits, even as OpenAI failed to capitalize on their consumer market penetration by refusing to build an advertising product. This is a long-winded way of saying that I don’t think that Apple’s agentic shortcomings are a big deal, at least for now. Agents help you do work and be more productive, and consumers don’t want to work or care about being productive. What they do want to do is watch short-form video, and an iPhone is simply much better at that than any other device ever will be; in that context, Siri being good enough is enough, and it appears that Apple crossed that bar."
-
2Do (@2DoApp) reported@PhilipLeworthy The Android app is going to unfortunately remain on CalDAV + Dropbox sync for now. I'll be updating it to fix a few issues as well as Tablet related compatibility issues but not major features planned. It remains functional the way it is albeit with a few limitations.
-
𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓃𝒸ℯ𝓈𝓈 𝓵𝓾𝔁💗👑 (@payprncslux) reportedgot a new phone & laptop now I can’t login to my dropbox because I don’t have my old devices .. fml