1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Dropbox
  4. Outage Map
Dropbox

Dropbox Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Dropbox users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Dropbox, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Dropbox users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Dropbox is a file hosting service operated by American company Dropbox, Inc., headquartered in San Francisco, California, that offers cloud storage, file synchronization, personal cloud, and client software.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Bournemouth, England 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • eternalwarnings
    bayleigh | HEARD BABYLON 💙 (@eternalwarnings) reported

    sorry it's boofed quality my Dropbox account was not working so I had to ss for the time being

  • AnnaBubblyMV
    Anna Bubbly 🌺✨ (@AnnaBubblyMV) reported

    Is uploading on Clips4Sale not working for anyone else? I can only get it to work if I do it through Dropbox, the usual upload button isn’t working

  • HospitalHell
    Hospital Hell (@HospitalHell) reported

    @SteveHiltonx The mostly mail-in/dropbox election system in California is painfully slow, but that doesn’t make it in any way fraudulent.

  • Lazy_Bari_Sax
    Eric S (@Lazy_Bari_Sax) reported

    @retrobike_c16 @themiasandrist Why doesn't the mobile version allow you to upload or download files, though? And why is it so damn slow to update? I'm thinking about changing back to Dropbox, despite it's many issues.

  • stucklikehoney
    𝔤𝔞𝔟𝔦 ♡ (@stucklikehoney) reported

    if I were to offer a lifetime dropbox, all of my content will go into it. I would add to it as I have new stuff. pictures and videos. pay one time. who would be down?

  • hanzala_007
    Google Account (@hanzala_007) reported

    @CricketCaptain Where to place names files in dropbox,there are multiple folders. Like last time in saves its not working

  • 0xlelouch_
    Abhishek Singh (@0xlelouch_) reported

    The interviewer asked me to design Dropbox file sync. I froze for a minute because I jumped into architecture before I nailed requirements. So I restarted with questions: single user or teams? offline edits? conflict handling? max file size? latency vs battery? Windows/Mac/Linux? end to end encryption? I scoped to: multi-device per user, near-real-time, offline support, conflict resolution, and basic sharing later. Then I wrote the core objects and APIs. Data model: User, Device, File, FileVersion (content hash, size, chunk list), Folder, Cursor/Checkpoint, and an Event log (append-only). APIs: UploadChunk, CommitFile(version, parentVersion), ListChanges(cursor), Download(version), Ack(cursor). Everything is idempotent with content hashes and request IDs. Architecture: client watches filesystem, batches changes, chunks large files, uploads to blob storage keyed by hash, then commits metadata to a strongly consistent store. Server writes an event per commit. Clients long-poll or use a push channel to get change events, then pull missing blobs. Scaling: hot path is metadata and change feed. Partition event logs by user/team, cache cursors, and keep blobs on cheap object storage with CDN for downloads. Dedup by hash saves real money when the same installer shows up on 500 laptops. Background compaction for old versions and tombstones. Tradeoffs I called out: strong consistency on metadata avoids weird conflicts but costs latency on cross-region; eventual consistency makes sync feel faster but harder to reason about. Chunk size trades memory and upload overhead vs retry cost. Conflict policy can be last-writer-wins (simple, lossy) or keep both versions (messy, safer). Failure cases: client crashes mid-upload so you need resumable multipart and garbage collection for orphaned chunks; network ***** so commits must be idempotent; clock skew so ordering cannot trust timestamps; two devices edit offline so you fork versions and surface a conflict file; duplicate events so cursor ack must tolerate replays; permissions changes during sync so downloads need auth checks at read time, not just at commit time

  • bigaiguy
    Spencer Baggins (@bigaiguy) reported

    SOMEONE BUILT A GITHUB REPO THAT TURNS TELEGRAM INTO UNLIMITED CLOUD STORAGE. 100% free. It is called UnlimCloud. Self-hosted-ish desktop app. Open source. Uses Telegram as the storage layer. You log in with your Telegram ID. Upload files. Download files. Organize folders. Manage pictures and videos in a gallery. That is it. No Google Drive upgrade screen. No Dropbox “you are out of space.” No iCloud begging for $2.99/month. No random startup holding your files hostage. Your Telegram. Your files. Your storage. Here is the full feature set: ↳ Uses Telegram as the backend storage layer ↳ Secure login with your Telegram account ↳ Upload, download, and organize files ↳ Folder-based file management ↳ Gallery for photos and videos ↳ Clean desktop app interface ↳ Built with Tauri ↳ Windows release available ↳ macOS and Linux coming soon ↳ MIT licensed ↳ Open source 885 GitHub stars. 125 forks already. Here is why this matters: For years, cloud storage companies trained everyone to rent space for their own files forever. Photos? Pay. Backups? Pay. Large folders? Pay. Team storage? Pay more. UnlimCloud is the opposite idea. Take an app people already use every day. Telegram. And turn it into a private cloud drive with a clean file manager on top. No storage subscription. No SaaS dashboard. No “pro” plan. Just a weird, useful, open-source hack that feels like it should not work this well. Built in HTML + Rust. MIT License. 100% Open Source.

  • ibesomeguy
    Some guy (@ibesomeguy) reported

    @Voxyz_ai Doesn't sound like a Codex problem, sounds like a Dropbox problem. Syncthing doesn't take your files offline, ever.

  • rish404
    Rish Agarwal (@rish404) reported

    Imagine you have a team covering an event. Boots on the ground. What's the best way to get footage from all of them in a single library Dropbox? Google Drive? Physical hard drives? All of them either don't support it, requires an account for every person or just physically slow and limited Here's how @cutsio is solving that

  • 2YOOandBoots
    Boots (@2YOOandBoots) reported

    @twicezulight @chuuize @tsun1verse Skajdkskak ***** is u seriously that slow? U sent me like 10 versions on Dropbox I had u do all the hard work

  • rndposer
    Random Poser (@rndposer) reported

    @iHerbMiddleEast Problem with iHerb is your delivery service to consumers. They’re a challenge to work with. I wouldnprefer if there is option to get my deliveries directly in a dropbox somewhere near and not go thru the 3rd party delivery service.

  • imbunniemai
    Bunnie Maiiii (@imbunniemai) reported

    @JohnRai21044566 Ill!!! since Fansly having problem I can not post throu phone atm. I’ll have to get all those files to Dropbox then post on Fansly. This set will be posted in 2 days 😭😭 sorryyyy baby Im bit busy but I’ll try post as soon as I cannnn

  • automateitup
    Chris | Founder Advisor (@automateitup) reported

    Problem: I didn't have where to save useful links, because my main pc isn't always on. Solution: Told Hermes on my minipc, which is always on, to save the links which I send to a file in dropbox. Then, I told Hermes from my main pc to make a cronjob to check that file every day at 9 am and save the links in their respective category in the dashboard.

  • BitcoinUr
    urBITCOIN (@BitcoinUr) reported

    No, no, no. You're thinking about it all wrong. A functioning file server would be a liability. If Urbit actually stored and served everyone's files reliably today, people would start using it for files. Then we'd have to make it fast. We'd have to make it redundant. We'd have to handle backups, syncing, corruption, support tickets. That's infrastructure. What we have is much more valuable. We have the *option* of being a file server. The vision of a file server. A file server-shaped hole in the future. Right now, every missing feature is proof of how early we are. Every failed upload is evidence of untapped potential. The fact that nobody can depend on it yet means the market is still entirely available. The moment it becomes a good file server, people stop asking how big it could be and start asking why it's slower than Dropbox. You don't want to be Dropbox. Dropbox has revenue. Revenue means expectations. Expectations mean accountability. Accountability kills narrative. We're building a decentralized, sovereign, peer-to-peer, identity-native, file-adjacent platform opportunity. The less it functions as a file server today, the more it can function as one tomorrow. It's a pure play.

Check Current Status