Dropbox Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  m ⋆｡°✩ (@ascaIons) reported 7 minutes ago

  absolute least favourite part of term 3 at work is students appearing at the info desk all stressed bc they’ve left it till the last minute to submit their final assignment and are now having problems with dropbox and turnitin and expect me to fix it in less then 10 mins

• 
  Isha (@VISportsTalk) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Dropbox Is your website down? Can't create new folders. Is everyone getting this error?

• 
  Anna Bubbly 🌺✨ (@AnnaBubblyMV) reported 10 minutes ago

  Is uploading on Clips4Sale not working for anyone else? I can only get it to work if I do it through Dropbox, the usual upload button isn’t working

• 
  Jesse Meyers (@jmbase) reported 15 minutes ago

  @VISportsTalk @Dropbox I was able to get the web interface to load by switching to a VPN. Before that it was showing a 500 error. Desktop app on Mac is still not connecting. Dropbox status page doesn’t show any issues.

• 
  ScarcityMan (@ScarcityMan) reported 16 minutes ago

  You might not believe it, but it is in fact happening, because it increases the cost, time, and difficulty of running a node. "Large" is a matter of opinion, but is clearly a quantity which would add up over time and have an impact. Why don't you want nodes to be as easy to run for people as possible, so that the maximum number of people can participate in the network, making it more valuable and more resilient? Why is that not something you want, to the extent that you will spend time arguing against it? What exactly is your stake in nodes being more difficult to run than they need to be? Why don't you care about spam? Why don't you care that it obviously, as it does everywhere it exists, degrades the quality of the thing being used? Why do think bitcoin will just be fine and go on forever while watching it transform into a poor imitation of dropbox? Why would anyone interested in bitcoin as money continue to use it when it becomes more and more infested with non-monetary data? Why don't you care about the possibility of truly bad stuff ending up on chain until the end of time? Do you think Satoshi made a mistake? Should he have created "Bitdata" instead? Do we not need to fix the world's money? You good with USD or whatever else is inflating away to nothing? So many questions that will never be answered...

• 
  Music, Film & RE Investments (@investandcreate) reported 16 minutes ago

  @0xajka @Dropbox What’s your problem? @dropbox support is horrendous.

• 
  Rebecca Allen (@silentnomore314) reported 17 minutes ago

  that they took over ran up charges did god knows what and locked me out. 900 in dropbox charges during a free trial they locked me out of they are all in big big big trouble but your handler is forcing them to lie perjue and the way he is forcing them to blow their covers wow

• 
  Lukman Aufbau (@lukmanAufbau) reported 18 minutes ago

  Dropbox tried paid ads first. Expensive. Low conversion. Stopped. Then built distribution into the product. 3,900% growth. Lesson: Test channels. Kill what doesn't pull. Double down on what does naturally.

• 
  Lagoon Labs (@LagoonLabsMv) reported 18 minutes ago

  Dropbox is doubling down on virtual-first while everyone else pushes return to office - their people chief says hybrid is the worst of all worlds.

• 
  How To AI (@HowToAI_) reported 21 minutes ago

  Google, Dropbox, and Apple are in trouble.. Someone open-source a tool that gives you unlimited cloud storage for free by using Telegram as the backend. Just log in with your Telegram ID and start uploading. → UNLIMITED storage → NO file size limits → NO subscription → NO credit card → Login in 3 seconds Google charges $120/year for 2TB. Dropbox charges $144. Apple charges $120. Telegram has been giving away infinity this whole time and you didn't know. Nobody can shut this down. 100% Open Source.

• 
  GLITCH (@Rukkssss__) reported 26 minutes ago

  𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 is BitTorrent's decentralized file storage system, and it fundamentally changes how you store and share data. Think about traditional cloud storage: Google Drive, Dropbox, iCloud. Your files live on servers owned by a single company. That company controls access, sets prices, and can delete your data at any time. Your files are only as safe as that one company's security. And if their server goes down? You lose access. 𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 works completely differently. Instead of relying on a single server, your files are split into tiny encrypted pieces and stored across thousands of independent nodes worldwide. No single point of failure. No single company holding your data hostage. This architecture delivers 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗶𝘁𝘀. First, security. Because files are fragmented and distributed, an attacker would need to compromise thousands of nodes to reassemble your data practically impossible. Second, censorship-resistance. No government or corporation can shut down BTFS because there's no central target to attack. Third, fault-tolerance. If some nodes go offline, thousands of others still serve your files. Fourth, speed. Peer-to-peer retrieval means you often download from the closest node, not a distant data center. So how does it work for actual users? You upload a file. 𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 splits it, encrypts each piece, and distributes those pieces to storage providers around the world users who have volunteered their spare hard drive space. When you need the file back, BTFS locates all the pieces from the fastest available nodes and reassembles them. But here's what makes BTFS sustainable: 𝗥𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀. If you have unused storage space on your computer say, 100 GB sitting empty you can lease that space to the BTFS network. You earn 𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻𝘀 for every byte you store and serve. Your idle hard drive becomes an income stream. For everyday users, this means cheaper cloud storage. Without a centralized company setting monopolistic prices, storage costs drop to market rates determined by supply and demand. It means safer backups. Your encrypted, fragmented files survive disk failures, server outages, and even natural disasters. It means faster file sharing. The more popular a file is, the more nodes store it, and the faster everyone downloads it the opposite of centralized servers that slow down under load. All of this runs on 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 combined with BitTorrent's massive existing network. BitTorrent already has hundreds of millions of users worldwide. BTFS taps into that peer-to-peer infrastructure, adding incentives and persistence to what was once just a sharing protocol. Upload, store, retrieve. Or share your spare space and earn. No corporate servers. No hidden fees. No single point of failure. That's 𝗕𝗧𝗙𝗦 decentralized storage built for the real world. @justinsuntron @BitTorrent #TRONEcoStar

• 
  Adrien Matray (@AdrienMatray) reported 28 minutes ago

  The fix is simple: do not use one generic code/ folder for all long-lived branches. Use separate Dropbox folders whose names encode the intended branch: code_main/ code_experimentation_main/ code_experimentation_main_name1Sandbox/ code_experimentation_main_name2Sandbox/

• 
  kelsey (@kelsscarlet) reported 29 minutes ago

  i knowwwww somebody gotta be down to pay $100 for my dropbox folder w 770 files 👀 mommy needs gas to go to portland for a concert tn

• 
  Colin Turner (@ColinTurnerTN66) reported 31 minutes ago

  @pinutos @AZAGMayes The Recorder can do that. Security is far too lax on the dropbox/early voting system and the board has shown no initiative to fix the problem. Looking forward to the suit.

• 
  Jeff Preshing (@preshing) reported 34 minutes ago

  What's the point of using smarter models if "smarter" means 10% better at finding obscure bugs and having a sassy attitude? Most of the true productivity gains that coding agents have to offer, which are finite, can be obtained using open-weight models for literally 1/100 of the price. The catch is that you actually need to understand the code you are working on. At the same time, I still think there's a viable business serving proprietary models. People are willing to pay for Dropbox even though FTP is free, and it's nice to throw a tough problem at a stronger model occasionally (if intellectual property limitations allow it). Plus, there's a whole frontier productizing this stuff. Unfortunately, Anthropic is currently in the business of spreading tall tales about future improvements, then shaking down enterprise customers. Most of it is based on 2010s LessWrong posts full of category errors, some of which I remember reading back in those days. And their recent hostility toward users in the name of safety is a result of the same ideological recklessness.