Dropbox Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rish Agarwal (@rish404) reported 14 seconds ago

  Imagine you have a team covering an event. Boots on the ground. What's the best way to get footage from all of them in a single library Dropbox? Google Drive? Physical hard drives? All of them either don't support it, requires an account for every person or just physically slow and limited Here's how @cutsio is solving that

• 
  Santiago Bustelo (@sbustelo) reported 4 minutes ago

  @DropboxSupport More details? “I am really sorry for any inconvenience this is causing. We'll update you shortly on this issue.    In the meantime, please let me know if you have any further questions.   Best regards,  Jesse | Advanced Support” That’s the “support” I’m getting. FULL REFUND NOW

• 
  Nick Bennett (@NickB2005) reported 9 minutes ago

  a company hired me in march to "fix marketing." their words. when i asked what had been done so far, the CEO sent me a dropbox link. inside was a 94-slide strategy deck from the fractional CMO they'd had for five months. beautifully designed, with color-coded ICP segments, a channel prioritization matrix, buyer journey maps with little arrows, TAM analysis, and messaging frameworks. 94 slides. i opened their HubSpot. zero new campaigns launched in those five months. the email sequences were the same ones from 2023. the blog hadn't been touched since january. their one webinar was a repurposed sales deck with no promotion plan. i asked the CEO how much they'd paid for the strategy work. $60K. five months at $12K/month for someone who built slides and attended standups. here's what i did in my first 30 days: rewrote the homepage messaging based on five customer interviews i ran myself. launched a 4-email nurture sequence targeting their top 50 accounts. set up a webinar with a customer willing to tell their story. built the UTM structure so we could actually track what was working. killed three tools they were paying for but nobody logged into. by day 45, the sales team had qualified meetings from inbound for the first time in two quarters. not because i had some brilliant strategy the previous person missed. honestly, the deck was solid. someone just needed to execute it. the problem is the market is flooded with people who call themselves fractional CMOs because the title sounds senior. they show up, do discovery, build a deck, present it to the leadership team, and then just consult. they attend meetings and give opinions but nobody is actually running the campaigns or in HubSpot building workflows or writing the emails or briefing the designer or pulling the performance data on friday to figure out what to change on monday. most early stage companies don't need a strategist. they need someone who can think and ship in the same week. someone who will build the system, run it, measure it, and iterate without needing a team underneath them to do the work. that's the gig i run. and every time i walk into a company that had a "fractional CMO" before me, i find the same thing: a great deck collecting dust and a team that still doesn't know what to do on monday morning.

• 
  Mark Hadfield (@Mhadfield) reported 10 minutes ago

  @butshaunn A lot of VCs get very excited about one thing, like a groundbreaking new company that has massive traction. They spend the next six months looking for the next best thing, which in their mind looks a lot like the last thing that went crazy. This is how you get silly comments like "can you replicate an exchange server into Dropbox?" Dropbox was the last thing that went crazy. And so now everything needs to get replicated into it.

• 
  Weird Darkness®️ (@WeirdDarkness) reported 10 minutes ago

  Dear @Google and @YouTube... My account has been hacked, and not only have I lost my Gmail, YouTube, etc., but I've also lost access to my Dropbox that has my full life in it, health records that I used Google to login to, etc. I signed up for Google Account Protection, but it did not protect me. Somehow, even after setting up brand new 2-factor authentication just a few weeks ago, they hacked in, changed EVERYTHING, and now my life, career, and health are at a standstill. I desperately need somebody to contact me. All options I've tried to regain access to my account have failed because everything has been disconnected.

• 
  Startup Archive (@StartupArchive_) reported 10 minutes ago

  Drew Houston on the growth hacks Dropbox used to acquire millions of users Dropbox founder Drew Houston reflects the distribution challenge most startups face in the early days: “You can buy all the AdWords in the world but if nobody’s searching for what you’re making, you have a problem.” Drew eventually landed on a two-step solution to solve Dropbox’s cold start problem. Step 1: make a product that people really love to use. “Good engineering and good design are part of it, but one of the ways I think about it is maximizing the probability that your customer ends up with a solved problem. That’s why Craigslist — which was started in the 1990s and doesn’t appear to have been updated since the 1990s — is by far the most successful business of its kind. You show up at Craigslist and you leave with your concert tickets or your casual encounter or whatever you’re looking for. Even though the design isn’t that great and it isn’t that hard of an engineering problem, it was unbelievably successful . . . [Distribution] starts with a great product and all of the marketing or tricks in the world won’t help you push a rock uphill.” Step 2: give people tools to spread the word “Two things drove the vast majority of our signups today. The first was we created this incentive-referral program where if I tell you about Dropbox you get some extra storage and I get some extra storage, which gave us this kind of currency to work with and people were just doing it for its own sake. People weren’t even using the extra space. They were just referring their friends because they got points. We’d now call it a gamification mechanic, even though I’m not sure that word was even around back then.” Drew continues: “The other thing we did was create this idea of shared folders where if I’m working on a shared project at work or if I want to share photos with my family, then all these new users are brought into the fold just by using the product . . . Now there’s whole body of art and science on how to do that, how consumer internet companies grow, and how viral growth works, but these things were instrumental to how we got started.” Source: @ECorner (Jun 2012)

• 
  pharmabro (@pharmabro0782) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Ronalfa @draparente @liambai21 a “rock engineer” at Dropbox is an engineer, an RA doesn’t have the degree (undergrad/ masters at best). Now this is different at large pharma where RAs can stay for much, much longer time with structured career development (slow but existent).

• 
  Shawna Canon (@ShawnaCanon) reported 13 minutes ago

  @smolzoey I had a similar problem with Dropbox. I had it syncing my desktop because I keep a lot of stuff there. I deleted Dropbox because I don't use it. I basically bricked my computer because my desktop no longer existed.

• 
  jss (@jsensarma) reported 13 minutes ago

  @pHequals7 They are usually slow but come around. Their customers are not going anywhere. (Google Drive took years, maybe a decade to show up, after Dropbox)

• 
  Vladic (@Vladic_ETH) reported 19 minutes ago

  OPENAI SHIPPED GPT-5.6 AND CHATGPT WORK. THE REAL WEAPON IS PRICE, NOT IQ. OpenAI shipped two things today. One of them is a costume change. GPT-5.6 landed as three models. ChatGPT Work is a new agent on top. The feeds say "new agent does your work." The real launch is the price sheet. Sol, the flagship, costs $5 per million input tokens and $30 output. That's not flagship pricing. That's what you paid for a mid-tier model a year ago. The gate half the feeds skipped Context first. Two weeks ago the US government cut GPT-5.6 access down to a small group of vetted partners over national security. The gate held about 12 days. Restrictions lifted July 8, public release July 9. Same day SpaceXAI shipped Grok 4.5. The frontier now ships when the government clears it, not when the model is ready. Anthropic went through the exact same thing with Fable and Mythos in June. A pattern, not a one-off. Three models, price as the weapon GPT-5.6 is three models, not one. Sol is the flagship. Terra is the everyday workhorse. Luna is cheap and fast. Price per million tokens, in/out: Sol $5/$30, Terra $2.50/$15, Luna $1/$6. Terra matches GPT-5.5 quality at half the cost. Luna is the cheapest entry in the line. Altman told CNBC Sol is 54% more token-efficient on agentic coding. That's the message. Not "smarter." "Cheaper for the same result." And ultra: a mode inside Sol that spins up multiple agents in parallel and hands subtasks to submodels. The market counts token bills, not benchmarks. Enterprise thinks spend first now. OpenAI heard it and made price the argument. Today's real launch is unit economics, not intelligence. "Sol beats Fable 5, Luna beats Opus 4.8 at two-thirds the cost" are OpenAI's own benchmarks. Until independent runs, treat them as marketing. ChatGPT Work is Codex in a suit Now the "new agent." ChatGPT Work runs on Codex and GPT-5.6. It moves across your apps and files, stays on a project for hours, breaks it into steps, finishes on its own. Output: docs, sheets, slides, web apps. Inside sits a Unified Plugins Directory: Google Drive, Slack, Teams, Gmail, Outlook, Salesforce, GitHub, Canva, Dropbox, more. Call one with "@" or let the agent pick the source. Sounds familiar. This is OpenAI's second run at plugins. The first was 2023 and it flopped. Brockman admitted the models weren't ready back then. Honest read: hard to tell what's actually new. Scheduled Tasks, Computer Use, connectors already lived in ChatGPT and Codex. Long tasks and data sources worked before too. The real move isn't features. It's consolidation: on desktop, OpenAI is merging Codex and ChatGPT into one super app and putting Codex in front of people who don't code. The Anthropic mirror Here's the tell. This is the exact play Anthropic ran with Claude Code -> Cowork. Take a dev agent, strip the "for coders" label, hand it to knowledge workers. Cowork just hit web and mobile, timed to get ahead of this. Two labs, one bet: whoever owns the desktop app that touches your files and apps owns the knowledge-work layer. Chat is the storefront. The desktop is the land grab. What a practitioner does with it One: rebuild pipelines around price tiers. Route bulk work to Luna and Terra. Keep Sol and ultra for the 10% that needs the ceiling. Economics is a routing problem now, not a single-model choice. Two: the real unlock is the desktop with local file access, not the web. Free tier gets ChatGPT Work on desktop right away. Web and mobile roll by tier: Pro, Enterprise, Edu first, Plus and Business next. Three: billing is usage-based and shares one pool with Codex, ChatGPT for Excel, and Workspace Agents. Count tokens before, not after. A complex task burns quota quietly. Security: OpenAI touts Auto-Review, where senior models check important actions before they run, and claims it blocked 100% of protected-data extraction attempts in red-teaming. 100% in a lab is zero confirmations in ****. Test it yourself. Sober read The model war moved from IQ to unit economics. The product war moved from chat to the desktop that holds your files. Testers are already posting "best model I've touched." Maybe. That's day-one sentiment, not fact. The real scoreboard isn't a benchmark. It's the "AI spend" line in an enterprise budget. That's a market you can actually read. The window is the next couple weeks, before prices settle and everyone re-routes spend. Rebuild your routing around three models now and you enter the quarter with a smaller bill for the same work. Everyone else reads the thread and changes nothing.

• 
  Lindsey Gaetani (@lindseygaetani) reported 20 minutes ago

  This piece of information is much more important than many realize. Cosgrove & Kate Peter got very lucky with my "countersuit" against Cosgrove, et al, in that they were able to use that as a convenient excuse to not continue with the wiretap & WI charge against @DoctorTurtleboy involving myself. But the truth of the matter is that Pam 'The Scam' Friedman (my "advocate" aka handler assigned by corrupt Brian Tully) informed me weeks before they had any knowledge of my countersuit that Cosgrove was having some "difficulties". She informed me that they could not locate the wiretap evidence that was shown to the grand jury when I testified. She even asked ME if I had a copy that I could provide to them. Evidence submitted before a grand jury is suppose to be saved and cataloged, so explain to me how exactly it goes "missing." Well, I can help you. See there were two videos. The original video in which I was recorded from a pocket. And the edited video that is spliced to make it appear as though I agreed to being recorded (the infamous "I know, I know" response). Kate Peter claimed that the original video was given to her by a woman who Aidan had sent it to. Big problem with this, the woman "didn't want to be involved", so her name was never mentioned during any police report or part of the grand jury, let alone did she testify to authenticate the videos. Instead, Tully had Kate save the original video to a Dropbox folder and email it directly to him, to make it appear as though it came from her and that this was the original chain of custody. Big no-no. As time went on, Kate's name began to take center stage, along with her shady involvement and criminal behavior. The secrets of her helping Mello were exposed so they had no choice but to see that these charges were squashed as to not contaminate the rest of the charges against Aidan. So what did they do? They had Kate delete the Dropbox file, and the evidence it contained. Kate Peter tampered with evidence in a felony trial. They must have took a big sigh of relief when I sued Cosgrove because it gave them a very easy out and they were able to wipe their hands clean as if none of this ever happened. Except it did. And Kate Peter still inserted herself into the other charges. For this reason alone, Aidan's charges should be dismissed.

• 
  yera. (@1stplaceee__) reported 23 minutes ago

  You down for my nasty FaceTime and Dropbox video HMU📨📥💦🍑

• 
  Jan Senderek (@jans) reported 23 minutes ago

  I started journaling at 16. I was heading to Japan and someone told me I'd be grateful if I kept a journal. So I did. And they were right. I loved that I had somewhere to put my thoughts. Somewhere to look back at if I wanted to remember something. Plus I knew I was being thoughtful about my future self. But life got bigger. University, then a career, now a family. More thoughts. More things. The journals had no chance of keeping up. So what changed was the tools. Handwritten journals to Evernote to Dropbox to Obsidian to Notion. Always thinking the next one would be the answer. It never was. Every system asks the same of you. Tag this. File that. Organize here. Review there. Do the work now so that future-you can find it later. And future-you is grateful. That part is true. But your current self carries all of it. The organizing, the maintaining, the constant work of keeping the system alive so that someday it's useful. That burden never lifts. It just accumulates. Your current self and your future self should be working together. Not one doing all the heavy lifting for the other. What if you just put your thoughts down. And trusted they'd be there when you need them. No organizing layer. No maintenance. Just the thinking. So you can truly be your current self.

• 
  Jack (@jackcoder0) reported 24 minutes ago

  1. Kill the Login Items the apps launching before you even sit down. Every time you log in, your Mac quietly launches 10-25 apps in the background. Spotify. Slack. Zoom. Google Drive. Dropbox. Creative Cloud. OneDrive. Each one consumes CPU and memory before you've opened a single window. System Settings → General → Login Items & Extensions. Review the list. Remove everything you don't need the instant you log in. You can always open them manually when you actually need them. His Mac had 19 login items. He needed 3. He removed 16. Boot time dropped from 2 minutes to 18 seconds. The first few minutes of every session — that sluggish, unresponsive window where nothing works gone.

• 
  ScarcityMan (@ScarcityMan) reported 28 minutes ago

  You might not believe it, but it is in fact happening, because it increases the cost, time, and difficulty of running a node. "Large" is a matter of opinion, but is clearly a quantity which would add up over time and have an impact. Why don't you want nodes to be as easy to run for people as possible, so that the maximum number of people can participate in the network, making it more valuable and more resilient? Why is that not something you want, to the extent that you will spend time arguing against it? What exactly is your stake in nodes being more difficult to run than they need to be? Why don't you care about spam? Why don't you care that it obviously, as it does everywhere it exists, degrades the quality of the thing being used? Why do think bitcoin will just be fine and go on forever while watching it transform into a poor imitation of dropbox? Why would anyone interested in bitcoin as money continue to use it when it becomes more and more infested with non-monetary data? Why don't you care about the possibility of truly bad stuff ending up on chain until the end of time? Do you think Satoshi made a mistake? Should he have created "Bitdata" instead? Do we not need to fix the world's money? You good with USD or whatever else is inflating away to nothing? So many questions that will never be answered...