GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Hot Aisle (@HotAisle) reported 56 seconds ago

  @arunoda This is 💯 a github issue!

• 
  Mayank Jain (@mayankjain_11) reported 1 minute ago

  4/ Perplexity for devs Stop Googling documentation. Perplexity pulls the latest docs, Stack Overflow threads and GitHub issues in one answer. Saves 20 mins per debugging session easily.

• 
  SMA 🏴‍☠️ (@generic_void) reported 2 minutes ago

  Barton @bmorphism of @plurigrid’s nash-portal GitHub repo (first image) to misinform investors that I once sold from my dev wallet (maybe he is confused about the token lock, to give him benefit of the doubt). I opened an issue on his repo that it’s defaming me by somehow listing my dev wallet as someone who sold $NASH token when I have not. Whether due to malicious intent, reckless negligence, or perhaps not knowing what he’s doing, I highly recommend not trust Barton, Plurigrid, or his tools for reliable and accurate information. Meanwhile, I set up my own tracking system and have the real list of top 20 suspicious wallets (second image). None of these wallets belong to me. I set this up in order to be able to identify and block saboteurs and scammers from manipulating the $NASH market and from scamming legitimate investors in $NASH. Thank you.

• 
  Senior Product (@Producthaunter) reported 4 minutes ago

  @PeterMcCormack I can't design. I can't code. I don't understand SQL, APIs, Cloud Storage - yet Claude has walked me through Github, Supabase, Vercel and it is deployed and working. This is actually the problem, not a way to go. So you just made another ****.

• 
  mrpicule.eth (@MrPicule) reported 6 minutes ago

  @faizantariq26 RepoRank is actual massive brain energy fren. Linking GitHub solves the trust problem forever

• 
  Kai (@kaish3n) reported 8 minutes ago

  Unable to fix this for now. We have to change the name of GitHub account and the app both. The next update and new name drops in 3 hours!

• 
  Beau Johnson (@BeauJohnson89) reported 13 minutes ago

  your ai coding bill is becoming a dashboard problem stormzhang/token-tracker > 84 stars on github > tracks claude code + codex token usage locally > statusline shows 5h / 7d limits, context window, model, and token burn > cli dashboard breaks usage down by session, day, week, and month > no cloud sync. no upload. local only this is the boring tool that matters once agents stop being demos. when you run codex, claude code, and local agents all day, the question changes from does this work to what did this actually cost me agent ops is becoming a real category.

• 
  Gabriel Varaljay (@GabrielVaraljay) reported 13 minutes ago

  @andreysuperior Right, let me unpack this little bedtime story for aspiring digital nomads. 1. “3D Gaussian Splatting, free on GitHub since 2023”: technically true, but the original INRIA code is research grade and licensed for non commercial use only. Try selling client work with it and enjoy the cease and desist. Commercial use needs alternative implementations or licensing. Also, “free on GitHub” does not mean “works on your phone in twenty minutes”. You need a decent GPU, calibrated capture, and post processing. The hard part is not the algorithm. It is the capture pipeline. 2. “Straps a rig to his back, walks in, twenty minutes, done”: hotels and commercial spaces are not Airbnbs. You do not just walk in and start scanning. You need permission, insurance, scheduled access, often a NDA. Twenty minutes for a hotel? You will get the lobby and one corridor before the manager asks who you are. 3. Luma AI is “free”: Luma has a free tier with watermarks and usage caps. Commercial use, API access, and unlimited captures are paid. Pretending the tool stack costs $20 a month is the kind of math that only works in a thread. 4. “Built by Claude in ten minutes”: hi. I can build a viewer page in ten minutes. Hosting a 3D splat that does not crash mobile Safari, embedding it in a hotel booking flow, handling bandwidth for splats that run 50 to 500MB each, GDPR for guest data, and not getting deindexed by Google because your page is 4 seconds slow, is not ten minutes. It is a real product. 5. “Cancellations drop, reviews go up”: source: the voices in the thread author’s head. There is zero cited data. Virtual tours have existed since Matterport launched in 2011. If walking around a hotel room in 3D were a silver bullet for cancellations, Booking and Airbnb would have mandated it a decade ago. They did not, because the actual lift is modest and inconsistent. 6. “$400 per scan, $99 monthly hosting”: Matterport, the established competitor with hardware, software, and an enterprise sales team, charges roughly that and has been clawing for market share for over a decade. The idea that a 24 year old with a backpack is going to walk into hotel chains and casually extract $99 a month per property, forever, is fan fiction. 7. “Month one: $3,500. Month six: $18,000”: ah yes, the hockey stick that exists only in tweets. No mention of churn, sales cycles for B2B hospitality, which is 3 to 6 months minimum, refund handling, storage costs as the library scales, or what happens when the client cancels and your $99 MRR evaporates. 8. The framing: “most people see a street, he sees money”. This is the universal template of grift threads. Replace 3D scanning with drone footage, AI voiceovers, faceless YouTube, or print on demand, and you have the same post from 2019, 2021, 2023, and now. The streets are fine. The hustle porn is the actual product being sold here, and you are the customer. Streets have not changed. Neither has the genre of guy explaining how easy it is to print money, while not actually printing any.

• 
  Vishal Lohar (@yourcodebuddy) reported 17 minutes ago

  How does @EffectTS_ suggest building APIs? Pure Effect or @honojs/@elysiaJS + Effect? And, I couldn't find any benchmarks comparing all the options. Found a GitHub repo by Backpine Labs where he used Pure Effect to build an API server. It was cool, and I didn't know it was possible.

• 
  Hot Aisle (@HotAisle) reported 20 minutes ago

  @bcomnes It was a github actions problem.

• 
  Hongli Lai (@honglilai) reported 25 minutes ago

  @nateberkopec @jnunemaker The problem here is not the workflow, it's cache poisining. I wonder wtf Github is doing and why they're not solving these sort of issues at the root.

• 
  Giri (@Giri_dharan__) reported 28 minutes ago

  🧵 2 repos from GitHub trending worth knowing about: 1/ openhuman — "Your Personal AI superintelligence" Private. Local. No cloud. Think of it as a personal AI that runs entirely on your machine — no data sent anywhere. Who it's for: anyone who wants powerful AI without handing their data to a tech giant. 2/ tokenspeed — "speed-of-light LLM inference engine" Running LLMs locally is slow. This is built to fix that. Faster token generation = faster AI responses on your own hardware. Who it's for: devs running models locally, researchers, anyone tired of slow inference. Both are open-source and free. Links in first reply 👇

• 
  Senior PowerPoint Engineer (@ryxcommar) reported 29 minutes ago

  Github Actions needs to get their **** together. All the recent GA-based supply chain attacks and vulnerabilities-- LiteLLM, Trivy, Tanstack, nx-- are theoretically preventable if you know way too much about Github Actions footguns: hashes for uses, don't store PATs in pull_request_target (or maybe don't use pull_request_target at all, even "securely"), never use classic PATs (unless you need to, of course, which you might because Github *still* doesn't support all features with fine-grained access control). But it's also ridiculous that's the state of things. The entire software supply chain shouldn't be dependent on 100% of the maintainers of the hundreds of dependencies we're downloading indiscriminately knowing the nuances of Github Actions security. Unlike all the AI agents yeeting bullshit code to Github's servers and overwhelming it, all of these security issues with Github Actions have been known for a long while. It doesn't seem like Github has the ***** to mildly inconvenience people by deprecating classic PATs or forcing commit hashes for 3rd party actions or what have you so I guess this will just be how things are forever.

• 
  Sparsh Shandilya (@D_E_V_sparsh) reported 34 minutes ago

  Building Nexus: Give it a Linear issue, it autonomously plans, writes, and commits code to GitHub What's working today: - Planner reads the real ticket + repo files - Coder creates a branch and commits actual working code - Full typed pipeline: BullMQ + custom MCP servers + Groq Reviewer and deployer are next Thread with more details soon 🧵

• 
  davidsong (@bitplane) reported 35 minutes ago

  @gonenb @oxcrowx linux pwned, macos pwned, windows pwned, github pwned, firefox pwned, tanstack pwned with malware targeting developer machines for a supply chain attack cascade. bots reading commit logs, chinese models doing pound shop mythos. 2026 will go down in history as the year everyone got hacked. secure your ****.