GitHub

GitHub Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

GitHub users affected:

Less
More

github Hero Image

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Map Check Current Status

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Elkridge, MD 1
Berkeley, CA 1
Warsaw, Województwo Mazowieckie 1
Turbaco, Departamento de Bolívar 1
João Monlevade, MG 1
Rio Grande da Serra, SP 1
Detroit, MI 1
Cotia, SP 1
Wichita, KS 1
Ketsch, Baden-Württemberg Region 1
Vilanova i la Geltrú, Catalunya 1

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • lmcdo_ Luke (@lmcdo_) reported

    @kurtsh The problem is that it's doing so in a way where the code's licensing is lost. It also should be able to generate an attribution list. GitHub at its core is about tracking that info, after all!

  • xKushagra Kushagra Pathak (@xKushagra) reported

    @alexjc @donavon @hirokonishimura It's much wider problem of people leaking credentials on the internet then just blaming Copilot. Same is possible with GitHub search, Google BigQuery GitHub dataset too. GitHub can't ever efficiently filter these leaked creds since there is no one type of API key or password 1/2

  • KardOnIce 👻🎃 Status Quo 🎃👻 (@KardOnIce) reported

    I get that Github, through there terms of service, likely has the right to develop a model based on code published to the site: that's not the issue.

  • nappy_techie Zoracon (@nappy_techie) reported

    I know a lot of new contributors are told to go to open source projects to submit a fix or new feature to show initiative outside of your job. But please know PR to Opensource != guaranteed GitHub contributor credit

  • Aaronontheweb Aaron Stannard (@Aaronontheweb) reported

    @EricRichards22 @gigafelon I mean, it's bad that repository owners do this - but you'd think given Github's spate of tools they've released for detecting and alerting repository owners to this problem they'd have used that same technology to filter the data that went into CoPilot's model first

  • Louis_CAD Louis CAD (@Louis_CAD) reported

    @BladeCoder That's not an issue, GitHub can pre-install software on their runners, they already do it, Gradle 7.1 is there for example (though that doesn't make it much faster to start its daemon and actually do what it was asked to do 🙄)

  • edoardottt2 edoardottt👹 (@edoardottt2) reported

    @MrrFawadkhann @golang @github Okok, I think I got it. The output already creates 4 different files for this. I don't know If I have time these days, I'm preparing for an exam. If you want you can open an issue (under 'feature') and discuss about this :) let me know👍🏼

  • saumyadadoo Saumya Dadoo (@saumyadadoo) reported

    @github you have taken down the app but issued no statement when your platform has been used to intimidate and discriminate against a protected category? These images were sourced and shared on @Twitter. Do you have no responsibility towards marginalised users? 2/n

  • jwildeboer 😷 Jan Wildeboer (@jwildeboer) reported

    My problem with @github #copilot: how can I opt-out of using my source code as input for their „AI“ and why isn’t it opt-in?

  • DJGummikuh DJGummikuh (@DJGummikuh) reported

    @foosel "Regurgitated full blocks of code" sounds like Stack Overflow gone GitHub tbf, and nobody bats an eye there. I believe the main issue people take with this is the fact that #GithubCopilot is a paid service, trained with data that sees no compensation for that

  • kjelljorner Kjell Jorner (@kjelljorner) reported

    @rasbt Notebooks can be cleaned for publication to mitigate most issues. I actually find that notebooks are preferable when reviewing papers as they display on GitHub with all their content such as figures in the right place. Reviewing code in plain .py files is often a nightmare.

  • sibinmohan Sibin (@sibinmohan) reported

    @madeforbrettLEE Looks like GitHub took it down. How to get the perpetrators to justice is a whole different problem. Hopefully they can be traced via their Github account info. But who will prosecute?

  • DrSadiya_ Dr Sadiya (@DrSadiya_) reported

    @Ambreenzaidi What's this nonsense! He is the one who emailed to GitHub and took down the account. Instead of thanking him you're calling him out?

  • flaviocopes flavio (@flaviocopes) reported

    Just not sure how to implement that. Maybe a blank GitHub repo, new issue = new request. Since we all use GitHub anyway?

  • KardOnIce 👻🎃 Status Quo 🎃👻 (@KardOnIce) reported

    There's so many issues with Github Copilot, and both the central idea and the marketing around it are wildly irresponsible.

Map Check Current Status