GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Leonardo Trapani (@leo_trapani) reported 32 seconds ago

  A state machine that manages agents in effect, with state layer github issues...

• 
  Omid Saffari (@omidsaffari) reported 51 seconds ago

  Emergent’s $20 Standard plan gives you 100 credits a month. Keeping one deployed app live consumes 50 credits before you change a line. That is the clearest way to understand where this AI builder helps, and where its economics start working against you. Emergent can turn a sentence into a working full-stack prototype with a real backend, database, and code you can export to GitHub. That is materially better than getting a polished mockup trapped inside a proprietary runtime. But a prototype becomes an MVP through iteration. Every meaningful change draws down credits. Style revisions can trigger slow rebuilds. The UI tends to look generic. And the work that makes software safe for customers, including auth, payments, data validation, rate limiting, error handling, and security review, still belongs to your team. Even the $0 tier makes the point: 10 monthly credits are enough to preview the workflow, not build anything substantial. Pro jumps to $200 a month for 750 credits because serious building quickly outgrows Standard. The useful decision rule: Use Emergent to validate one core workflow, pressure-test scope, and leave with an ownable codebase. Before calling that output an MVP, cost the next phase separately: credit-heavy iteration, conversion-grade UI, and production hardening. Price it by credits per validated outcome, not the subscription on the pricing page.

• 
  Alex (@alexanderOpalic) reported 5 minutes ago

  I built now with GitHub actions and Claude code and agent browser a perfect workflow that agents will review code they will fix it automatically and I don't have to do anything anymore lol

• 
  Marsu (@marsuplamy) reported 7 minutes ago

  Think of blockchain like a very smart person locked in a room. Everything inside works perfectly, calculations are correct, rules hold, no one can cheat the system. But it can't talk to the outside world. It doesn't know the weather, doesn't know the market, doesn't know whether a job was completed or not. Unless someone comes in and tells it, it has no idea what's happening out there. This has been blockchain's fundamental problem for over a decade. Think about it through everyday examples. A freelancer finishes a job and pushes to GitHub. How would the smart contract know? There's a crop insurance agreement that says if it doesn't rain this month, the farmer gets compensated. How does the contract check the weather? A payment deal says if the dollar rate crosses a certain level, auto-conversion kicks in. Where does the contract pull the exchange rate from? The answer to all of these has always been the same. Set up an external oracle service, integrate it separately, trust it separately, pay for it separately. @RialoHQ solves this problem from inside the protocol. A smart contract can make a direct HTTP call to any web API with a single line of code. It can pull a GitHub pull request status, read weather data, fetch live exchange rates, query a company's credit score. None of these require setting up an external service because this capability is already built into the protocol. What does this mean in practice? Think back to the escrow system in Onyx. The client locked the funds, the freelancer pushed the work to GitHub. The contract looks directly at the GitHub API, checks whether the work was delivered, and automatically sends the payment once the condition is met. All of this happens with a single HTTP call and there is no middleman in between. Blockchain is no longer a smart person locked in a room. It's a system that can talk to the outside world, see what's really happening, and act on it.

• 
  EntLaiser (@EntLaiser) reported 12 minutes ago

  @ssr_tourist I’ve never had a problem with downloading stuff from GitHub but I always forget how I do it. Like, I can’t remember there being a big “download” button, but if it’s On GitHub it ends up on my PC one way or the other. And then I’ve also uploaded projects to share with myself too!

• 
  Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ (@ivanfioravanti) reported 16 minutes ago

  @stein_gran @NSchuler01 Manually not all of them are working on the same project. I use GitHub Issues or intermediate MD files to let them interact with each other. I ask them to enter ModelName: comment so that each one can understand who is who.

• 
  Ryan (@Gelassoldat) reported 17 minutes ago

  @tinytechfox Yeah, I clicked on Get Started then chose GitHub as the sign in, and it blocked a github sign in.

• 
  Han MF Brolo (@bxlewi1) reported 18 minutes ago

  @dhh I put them against each other and have them talk to each other through GitHub issues. They have a loop that watches until they see something for them, do the work then send it up for the next one.

• 
  Satoshi's Cat (me/mine) (@SotoastiNotmoto) reported 19 minutes ago

  @NEEDcreations This speaks to a broader issue: Core could do a whole lot better at their communication. I don't think them saying "refer to Github" is adequate. That being said, it must be frustrating being Boeing engineers being told by passengers how to build a plane.

• 
  Juan (@juanroberto82) reported 23 minutes ago

  @galluzzo_julian Hi Julian, I recently followed you in the July AI Web Design Sprint, and I have a question with regards to Ship Studio. As I finished building the initial figma site into Ship Studio when I try to push the site live I noticed I don't have access to both the "Push to Github to enable Vercel" button or "Create a GitHub repository first", both those buttons are inactive. I went ahead and asked Claude to help but I am not following what the the solution requires. When I go the main Ship Studio "homepage" I see both Github and Vercel are disconnected and even I do sign in to both successfully, I still see the same result. Can I please get some help in getting both services working in Ship Studio? I hope this makes sense. Thank you for your time. Juan Sierra

• 
  Scarlett claira (@AItechscarlett) reported 25 minutes ago

  In 2014 a Swedish engineer named Knut Sveidqvist lost a Microsoft Visio file. He went to open the diagram he had drawn a few months earlier. It was gone. Every box, every arrow, every label. All of it had to be redrawn by clicking through Visio menus again. That night his kids were watching The Little Mermaid on TV. He named his fix after the movie. Twelve years later Mermaid has 89,101 GitHub stars, 8 million users, and native rendering inside GitHub, GitLab, Notion, Obsidian, VS Code, and Confluence. Here is what the paid market still charges to draw the same boxes. Microsoft Visio Plan 2. $15 per user per month. Lucidchart Team. $10 per user per month with a three-user minimum. Miro Business. $20 per user per month. Fifty engineers on Miro Business burns $12,000 a year to draw arrows between boxes. Mermaid replaced the drag-and-drop editor with a text spec that reads like Markdown. ``` graph TD A[User] --> B[Login] B --> C{Valid?} C -->|Yes| D[Dashboard] C -->|No| E[Error] ``` Ten lines. Renders as a real diagram. Every version of Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Cursor already knows how to write it. You describe your architecture in plain English and the model returns a Mermaid block. Paste it into a GitHub README. Paste it into an issue. Paste it into a pull request. GitHub renders it inline as a live SVG. No plugin. No sign-in. The paid tools shipped drag-and-drop editors. Mermaid shipped a text spec that the LLMs learned on their own. Flowcharts, sequence diagrams, class diagrams, state diagrams, entity-relationship diagrams, user journey maps, Gantt charts, pie charts, *** graphs, mindmaps, timelines, C4 architecture diagrams, treemaps. Anything you would open Visio for. Version 11.16.0 shipped two weeks ago. Because the diagram is text, it lives in your repo. Because it lives in your repo, it goes through code review. Because it goes through code review, it stops rotting. Nobody has to remember where the Lucidchart account is. Nobody has to pay $10 a month to reopen a five-year-old file. MIT license. 89,101 stars. TypeScript. The library is free forever. Mermaid Chart the company sells a hosted editor on top for teams that want one, but the core stays MIT. Somebody in Sweden lost a Visio file and refused to draw it again. Twelve years later the paid diagram tools still exist, and nobody who writes software has to use one. (Link in the comments)

• 
  OpenShip (@openshipio) reported 32 minutes ago

  @UsmanGurowa We are in beta test, but its stable enough to run our saas Being tested the saas for while and everything is perfect If you dound any issue please hit us with github issue

• 
  Daniel May (@danielrmay) reported 32 minutes ago

  Claude calls it "upstream recon" I call it "not having to search github issues for three hours"

• 
  Sudo su (@sudoingX) reported 34 minutes ago

  now i'm running the harness fight i've wanted to run for a month. hermes agent vs openclaw, same model, same tasks, both pointed at a 3.9gb bonsai on a single 3090. lean vs bloated, head to head, and i post whatever happens. disclosure first, i contribute to hermes agent, so i'm not pretending i'm neutral. what i can do is make it a fair fight. upstream versions of both, same local endpoint, no fork tricks, and let the receipts talk. here's what's actually in each box. > hermes agent. a one-file agent loop, around 25 direct dependencies. it parses and repairs tool calls off many model families natively, which is the whole reason it reads what a local model actually emits. built for open weights from day one. #1 on openrouter by daily usage. > openclaw. thousands of typescript files, roughly double the dependencies. for years it leaned on the server to parse tool calls and only shipped its own repair recently, for a single format. way more github stars than hermes. built for the big api models, and it shows. now let me tell you the honest part. i uninstalled openclaw months ago. my experience was that it was built for someone else's models, it choked on local, and the bloat made it slow just to start. but that was months ago and these things move fast. maybe they fixed the local story. maybe the parsers are there now. i'm not going to assume, i'm going to run it. that's the whole test. can either harness hold a tool-calling loop on a 3.9gb model without falling apart. one early tester says bonsai breaks on iteration, another says it tops agentic benchmarks. that split might not be the model at all. it might be the harness. this is what finds out. results coming. i'm not calling it early.

• 
  Neelampalli Charan Balaji (@charan77194) reported 35 minutes ago

  @moraes_c_ Can @moraes c_u please help me to recover my github account.. I've been waiting for 20 days from the ticket raised. Can please solve my problem.