GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Zeep (@Gnomonknows) reported 34 seconds ago

  hey @toly im trying to get devnet solana fauceted to my wallet but my github is too new can we fix this? your boy just trying to build rn thanks goat

• 
  Marc-André Moreau (@awakecoding) reported 4 minutes ago

  @glidermcp I can definitely try the MCP server in GitHub Copilot. I use a few MCP servers and I haven't had issues with them getting randomly disabled

• 
  Zachary Kurtz (@ledflyd) reported 6 minutes ago

  @blekhman implemented incorrectly with poor justification. That github issue is a wild read

• 
  CulturedNiichan (Kuro) (@culturednii_v2) reported 7 minutes ago

  heh another advantage of self hosting my gitea. I have a LORA trianing image set cleanup tool. I have a typos file with common typos and the fix, many NSFW. Accidentally didn't ignore it in ***. But since it's not github, who cares? it's my server lol

• 
  xjdr (@_xjdr) reported 8 minutes ago

  towards the middle of last year, it was clear there were 2 key risks for my ongoing research and development the way i was going. one was the reliance on claude code and anthropic, so i spent a large amount of time burning down those risks by moving completely towards codex (thankfully right around the time gpt5 was released) and towards claude code + an internally served and finetuned k2.6 (the other key risk was *** and github) fable 5 seems like a massive improvement over the latest Opus models (which, IMHO werent that impressive and i was able to complete replace with our k2.6) but, even without the intentional nerfing, is not a significant enough improvement (in many was a regression) over my current flow. for most things i do, my only real goal is to use the best model available for the given task and the given time but at this point there would need to be a GPT4 or o1 level disparity in capabilities for me to rely on anthropic for my work again.

• 
  Lan (@lanredevv) reported 14 minutes ago

  I'm tired of being my own biggest obstacle (the realization I didn't want to have) For the longest time, I thought my problem was discipline. Every day, I was learning something new about Web3 & Blockchain development. Watching tutorials, reading documentation, saving insightful threads, bookmarking GitHub repositories I promised myself I'd revisit later. On paper, it looked like I was making progress. But deep down, I knew something wasn't right. I was constantly busy, yet I couldn't point to many things I had actually finished. A course would spark my interest, and I'd dive in headfirst. Then I'd discover a new project idea. Before I could make meaningful progress on that, another tutorial would catch my attention. Then another opportunity. Then another rabbit hole. I wasn't standing still, but I wasn't moving forward either. The worst part wasn't feeling behind everyone else. It was knowing I was the one getting in my own way. I couldn't blame a lack of resources. I couldn't blame a lack of information. Everything I needed was already in front of me. Yet somehow, I kept convincing myself that the next tutorial, the next course, or the next piece of information would be the thing that finally unlocked my progress. Guess what?

• 
  Clément Faydi (@cfaydi) reported 14 minutes ago

  @joshm @kaz @InderosD Hi Josh, If I may share feedback - as someone who had to move to Jira a decade ago after using Github Issues for years, and now using Linear daily for a side project. The biggest issue I have with Jira is that everything feels like a chore. That might sound minor, but friction compounds and over time it makes people report fewer issues, update things less often, and disengage from the tool entirely… which affects the quality of the end product you're building. A simple example is creating an issue. See the screenshot below (assuming I'm using the regular UI everyone is using, I might very well be stuck in an older corp version - apologies if so): - there's no information hierarchy - everything lives on the same level and seems mandatory - you can't copy paste screenshots quickly/inline and write next to them - keyboard shortcuts aren't obvious (do they exist?) - the "task" checkbox at the top has always been a mystery to me. What is a task, what is not a task? If it's not a task then what is it? - the Team dropdown doesn't show who's on which team (hard to keep track of team names/structure in a big co) - no clear and visual markdown formatting - etc It's obviously an incredibly powerful tool in a large org, but from an IC standpoint it's truly painful compared to other tools. Really hope it gets better as so many folks in tech depend on it. A quick succession of small UX improvements would go a really long way for us daily users :) Thanks!

• 
  Dante (@drnasin) reported 16 minutes ago

  Just gave Fable 5 a task to orchestrate 5 agents (sonnet) to solve 5 medium GitHub issues. Let's see how that goes regarding token usage.

• 
  Joaquin Ossandon (@cacoos) reported 18 minutes ago

  the main problems are Github syncing.. i don't want to go to Github anymore 1. PRs statuses are completely out of sync, everytime 2. the left sidebar doesn't show any PR state. is it merged? conflicts? checks? 3. no "merge" button? 4. i can't see the PR checks content

• 
  Jonah Lau (@jonahlau_) reported 20 minutes ago

  The "just build projects" advice everyone's parroting is creating a generation of students who work for free and still don't get hired A final-year student called me last week spiraling after 450 applications. Turns out he had six side projects, three with actual users, all documented perfectly on his GitHub. Still got 4 replies. All of them asked him to do a take-home assignment that looked suspiciously like spec work for their actual product roadmap. He thought he was doing everything right because every LinkedIn guru told him projects beat degrees. Nobody mentioned that flooding the market with free builders just taught companies they can get free labor before even starting the interview. I've watched this play out across 50+ hiring processes in the last year. The kids with portfolios aren't getting hired faster. They're getting lowballed harder because companies know they're desperate enough to have already worked for free. The ones actually landing offers aren't the ones with the most projects. They're the ones who built something that got traction, realized they had leverage, and walked away from any company that tried to undervalue them. Most students are optimizing for quantity of proof when the market already moved to rewarding the one person who had proof people actually wanted what they made. Every unemployed student with a stacked GitHub is competing against every other unemployed student with a stacked GitHub. The portfolio stopped being the differentiator the minute it became the baseline. If you've already got projects and you're still getting ghosted, the problem isn't that you haven't built enough. It's that you're applying to companies as a supplicant instead of someone they'd be lucky to get.

• 
  Bonieky Lacerda (@bonieky) reported 29 minutes ago

  is @github API really down? been trying a simple GET /users/:id for over an hour and get timeout. @githubstatus says operational

• 
  Rob | Bitsaga.be (@BitsagaRob) reported 29 minutes ago

  Shot past 2k code contributions on GitHub 🚀 AI is making me 10x the software engineer I used to be. On LinkedIn the most prevailing sentiment is AI doom & gloom, that costs are exploding, junior engineers cost less than their monthly invoices and the bubble is about to pop. Now all those things may be true, but if the value of your tokens is not at least 10x what you're paying them, maybe the cost of your tokens is not the issue. But the person behind the keyboard is. I know I'd still gladly pay 10x the cost of my tokens.

• 
  GameDevMadeEasy (Stand-up philosopher) (@GameDevMadeEasy) reported 31 minutes ago

  @caps_raunak Bro... Most of what I learned was from other people's code and my own trial and error. When **** broke for me, I stole other people's code on GitHub or stack overflow. So this whole "some model trained on millions of stolen data" talking point is ironic.

• 
  NÜMETAL | Agent Accelerators (@numetalxyz) reported 32 minutes ago

  websites are down for a few minutes for an org migration re github

• 
  Garv Sanwariya (@GarvSanwariya) reported 34 minutes ago

  GPT-5-Codex just hit 85% on SWE-bench. that means it can autonomously fix 85% of real-world GitHub issues. a year ago this number was 12%. we're watching AI go from "helpful autocomplete" to "replace your junior dev" in real time.