GitHub Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
GitHub users affected:
GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Montataire, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Hernani, Basque Country | 1 |
| Tortosa, Catalonia | 1 |
| Culiacán, SIN | 1 |
| Haarlem, nh | 1 |
| Villemomble, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Ingolstadt, Bavaria | 1 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Berlin, Berlin | 2 |
| Dortmund, NRW | 1 |
| Davenport, IA | 1 |
| St Helens, England | 1 |
| Nové Strašecí, Central Bohemia | 1 |
| West Lake Sammamish, WA | 3 |
| Parkersburg, WV | 1 |
| Perpignan, Occitanie | 1 |
| Piura, Piura | 1 |
| Tokyo, Tokyo | 1 |
| Brownsville, FL | 1 |
| New Delhi, NCT | 1 |
| Kannur, KL | 1 |
| Newark, NJ | 1 |
| Raszyn, Mazovia | 1 |
| Trichūr, KL | 1 |
| Departamento de Capital, MZ | 1 |
| Chão de Cevada, Faro | 1 |
| New York City, NY | 1 |
| León de los Aldama, GUA | 1 |
| Quito, Pichincha | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
GitHub Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
iBrendan 🇺🇸 (@iBrendan_) reported@ShitpostRock2 I feel that the reason there are no conventional comments on GitHub items is because if everyone who has something to say about your product has to ‘make a ticket’ then nobody can talk **** about how terrible it is. I can’t ’make a ticket’ about how generally **** something is.
-
Yann Masoch (@yannmasoch) reported@GergelyOrosz Last month was terrible, and the Reddit community fired up. Now it's GitHub Copilot's turn with their new token-based policy coming on June 1st.
-
iNevada (@nevada_wtf) reportedi just spent full week straight brainstorming with my ai agent, build my first script for farming airdrop this month and i’m actually enjoying it a lot might start a github repo later too, but only if what i’m building actually feels ready for public use right now it runs fine, just still a lot of trial and error in certain cases for now, i’m still learning :)
-
Neva Labs (@NevaLabs2026) reportedWhy most solo developers stay broke in 2026 1/ They fall in love with the code, not the problem. 2/ They optimize for GitHub stars, not revenue. 3/ They think ‘if I build it, they will come #IndieHacker #Solopreneur #BuildInPublic
-
DeMar (@punk1376) reportedIs the GitHub Copilot agent that has access to your codebase "inside" or "outside"? Is the third-party AI integration calling your API a "user" or an "autonomous actor"? The categories break down.
-
The Altcoin Sensei (@AltcoinSensei) reportedI keep coming back to $GITLAWB because the math just doesn’t work. A project ranks top 1500 globally on GitHub. Their flagship dev tool sits at 25K stars, 8.1K forks, 109K npm downloads. Active community of 94 contributors. Live decentralized network running on Base with real DIDs, real IPFS pins, real peer connections. And the market cap is still under $3M That’s the problem. Or the opportunity, depending on which side you’re on. Look at how the agent infrastructure space is shaping up. Bittensor sits at $2-3B. Virtuals at $600M. Even smaller infrastructure plays without working products trade at $20-50M just on narrative. Gitlawb has more developer adoption than most of them combined and trades at a fraction. Mainstream coverage is just starting as well. Bitrue dropped their explainer last week. Exchange listings will follow. AI agents are coming. They write code. Lots of code. They can’t use GitHub the way humans do, no emails, no 2FA, no human accounts. They need their own infrastructure. Gitlawb is the only project actually building it with real adoption already happening. Sub $30m is considered a ONCE in a LIFETIME entry. This will go on a $TIBBIR kinda run soon.
-
drew dillon (@drewdil) reportedjust me or is the github website super slow the past couple days...
-
Stickman Sham (@StickmanSham) reported@KainYusanagi @xatzimi1 @ShitpostRock2 this is exactly the problem, too many github pages dont put out releases and you have to do some other bullshit to download them
-
David Abram 🐊 (@devabram) reported@onehappyfellow @kerckhove_ts How [Company] Reduced CI Time from 6 Hours to 40 Seconds with NixCI Existing CI setup (GitHub Actions, GitLab, etc.) not reliable, flaky. Pain: 6 hour CI runs slow feedback loops blocked deploys / dev frustration Outcome: Deterministic builds via Nix Proper dependency graph Aggressive caching (binary cache reuse) Parallelization (visible in timeline graph)
-
Roman Knyazhitskiy (@knyazhitskiy) reported@hikettei i do feel like github integrations w/ llms in general are also quite a bit broken, like i sort of given up on leaving comments on the PR for an llm - cuz its super common it misattributes comments, and then just forgets to fix them
-
Connor (@Yoconnn) reported@shadcn @github Right ive used github for 10+ years and never had a problem before Everyone joining the weid hate train must be new devs w the vibe code slop that don’t realize yhe powerhouse GitHub is
-
Archimedeis (@Archimedeis27) reported@planefag I think the issue is that github should not be used for hosting products intended for a large user base. It's for code. If you're making something for a lot of people to use make an installer or an exe and put that someplace easy to download from
-
Inferlume (@inferlume_hq) reportedApproximately 88 percent of internet accessible GitHub Enterprise Server instances remain unpatched against CVE-2026-3854. The flaw grants code execution and full private repository access to anyone with push access via a single *** push.
-
Wolfram Siener (@wolframs91) reported@Sathos__voice @d29756183 You're giving her way too much credit. You're saying: Jan Leike, under whom Vallone is employed, had nothing to do with this. ****** model shipment practices that start to mirror Anthropic's abysmal track record of software shipment practices (look the reporting on the github issues up, if you dare) had nothing to do with it. Extreme market pressures and longer term incentives had nothing to do with it.
-
Ayush (defi arc) (@ayuxhtwt) reported@0xjayeshyadav @github oh that kinda native chat you're talking bout, oh yeah that's a problem i read somewhere that they were working on this, idk if that was legit or not!