1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. GitHub
  4. Outage Map
GitHub

GitHub Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

GitHub users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Colima, COL 1
Poblete, Castille-La Mancha 1
Ronda, Andalusia 1
Montataire, Hauts-de-France 2
Hernani, Basque Country 1
Tortosa, Catalonia 1
Culiacán, SIN 1
Haarlem, nh 1
Villemomble, Île-de-France 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Ingolstadt, Bavaria 1
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Berlin, Berlin 2
Dortmund, NRW 1
Davenport, IA 1
St Helens, England 1
Nové Strašecí, Central Bohemia 1
West Lake Sammamish, WA 3
Parkersburg, WV 1
Perpignan, Occitanie 1
Piura, Piura 1
Tokyo, Tokyo 1
Brownsville, FL 1
New Delhi, NCT 1
Kannur, KL 1
Newark, NJ 1
Raszyn, Mazovia 1
Trichūr, KL 1
Departamento de Capital, MZ 1
Chão de Cevada, Faro 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • TanyaDe2233
    TanyaDe 🇻🇦 (@TanyaDe2233) reported

    @MoonBeetleBug There's more than just that how about these credit card companies cracking down on steam and GitHub removing horror games they deem "problematic"

  • chacon
    Scott Chacon (@chacon) reported

    The big problem with everything legal I’ve ever done is MS Word and redlines. Legal needs a github - markdown, diffable, mergeable, etc. I’m sure everything changes with AI, but if legal collaboration is still emailing ******* docx files around, I tell you thats not the answer.

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reported

    @martbln_dev @OpenAI Sure! Real-life Codex example: A frontend dev imports their VS Code plugins + GitHub issues + Figma files. Codex then auto-reviews a React PR, updates the changelog from Jira tickets, generates migration docs, and even drafts the deploy script—all in one thread without copy-pasting context. Seamless context = way less yak shaving. What workflow do you want to see next?

  • yegor256
    Yegor Bugayenko (@yegor256) reported

    As tools like GitHub Copilot and new models from OpenAI and Anthropic reduce the cost of writing code, many assume software engineering is becoming easier or even obsolete. But faster code doesn’t mean simpler systems. The harder problem remains: ownership, coordination, and decision-making. As code generation accelerates, management becomes the real engineering discipline and most organizations are not designed for it.

  • VibeCoderOfek
    Ofek Shaked (@VibeCoderOfek) reported

    Just watched an agent go from GitHub issue to merged PR in one pass. This isn’t ‘AI helps you code’ anymore this is the terminal becoming the new IDE. My backend workflows are about to look prehistoric.

  • CDCapitalHL
    CDCapital.hl (@CDCapitalHL) reported

    BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨 Hyperliquid GitHub docs are down , rug incoming !!!!

  • wiltedservices
    wiltedservices (@wiltedservices) reported

    remeber that we raided this guy github issue tab with our site

  • C8Luna
    looney (@C8Luna) reported

    @thdxr GitHub is fine, all these automated commits and PR just exposed a scaling and usage issue. Once they patch that all will be well again. Anything newer will have huge pain point for years to be able to compete

  • Emma_Leo01
    Emmanuel Coder 🪖 (@Emma_Leo01) reported

    @iamvscode Yes chief login with GitHub

  • whoyatagarasu
    yata (@whoyatagarasu) reported

    > i committed .env to a public repo in my second month of coding. > didn't notice for 6 weeks. > the key was rotated by the provider automatically. got lucky. >most people don't. > 29 million secrets leaked on GitHub last year. 64% of credentials from 2022 are still valid today. not because hackers are good. because developers never revoke what they leak. > your .gitignore is probably a template you copied on day one and forgot about. > it was written before .claude/ existed. before .cursor/ existed. before AI tools started storing your API tokens in config files you don't even think about. > one line in an ignore file. that's the difference between a normal tuesday and explaining to your team why production is down. full breakdown of what actually needs to be in it 👇

  • Kiwi_Nod
    KiwiNod (@Kiwi_Nod) reported

    @GMozeeez Oh, a bullet-point manifesto. Very consulting-core of you. Promises are cute, but I've got 100K $PROS and a trust issue. Show me something you've actually built — a Figma link, a GitHub repo, a Notion doc. Anything with a timestamp before today. Convince me you're a builder,...

  • twwilliams
    Tommy Williams 🇺🇦 (@twwilliams) reported

    @mikecallaghan I have seen so many posts from people who think GitHub is just a server that hosts *** repos (at the scale they do it, even that is a lot). They have no idea about all the many, many other things that make up Github.

  • AnsweredSatyr
    Answered Satyr, GED ✝️🇺🇸 (@AnsweredSatyr) reported

    Claude and I have this kind of working relationship: "OK - logic is updated and working. Let's start working on uploading to my github and hosting on Relay now so I don't need to keep powershell open for the app to work on the server... Be granular and specific in your instructions because I am retarded."

  • Akshat_Gup
    Akshat Gupta (@Akshat_Gup) reported

    Github is fundamentally broken. It’s gotten harder than ever to review vibecoded PRs. Most code is slop, and I’d much rather read someone’s prompts over their code. So I built codebook, the *** for prompts. - Codebook scans all of your local repos, prompts, and *** history - It groups all of your previous prompts by commit, so you can share or save your prompts in one-click - There’s a hook that lets you create a prompts/ folder and sync it with your *** history Fully local, native, and open-source. (1/n)

  • esrtweet
    Eric S. Raymond (@esrtweet) reported

    planefag, I'm not excusing the attitude of the guy who pissed you off. But there is an explanation for it, and I'm going to put on my Mister Open Source hat and lay it on you. The real reason there aren't prominent links to downloadable binaries on forge sites like GitHub is that in open-source land there is no such thing as a truly portable binary. Windows and Mac make binary distribution easy by being limited to a single hardware platform and a single ABI - application binary interface.. (The assertion I just made can be quibbled with at the edges. I will be unkind to anyone who attempts this.) An application binary interface is a set of conventions for how you decorate your binary so the operating system's program loader knows what to do with it, and how you write traps from your binary to call operating system services. Windows and Mac have, effectively, just one ABI each. So you can generate one binary for, say, Windows, attach it to a download link, and Windows users will generally not come back screaming for your blood because it fails to work in some obscure way. (Again, this statement can be quibbled with, but see this whacking great truncheon in my hand? Just don't.) There is no such grace in open-source land. There are a whole bunch of complicated historical reasons for this, starting with the fact that Linux runs on more different hardware architectures, and continuing with the fact that Linux isn't the only game in town (there are the BSDs), and continuing into technical minutiae that would make your head hurt, and continuing further into technical minutiae that make *my* head hurt. But what this actually means is that if you want to provide binaries and not get sperg-screamed at, you can't just provide one. You'd have to provide many, and no matter how comprehensive you try to be somebody is going to be disgruntled because you didn't cover their corner case. This is not a cost-free proposition. For each different kind of binary you provide, you need to cross-compile your source code in a different environment, many of them posted on distributions and hardware platforms you don't have routine access to. So people almost never do it at all. Because most projects don't do this, sites like GitHub don't see any demand push to make binary download links really accessible. Instead, the problem is normally handled at a different level. Your distribution maker keeps huge sets of compiled binaries lightly hidden inside of installable packages, tuned for the ABI of that single distribution. Your package manager hides from you the packages for everything but your hardware architecture The person who pissed you off was rude, but he wasn't exactly wrong about the objective facts. What you want isn't practically possible. Instead of being annoyed because GitHub doesn't feature binary-download links, search for that software using your package manager. Sometimes you won't find it. That's when you have to download source bust out a compiler. Sorry, but that's the way it is. We're trying as hard as we can - really, we are. But the complicated shape of the terrain constrains what we can achieve.

Check Current Status