GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Akshay Shinde (@ConsciousRide) reported 12 seconds ago

  @theo This exact damaged app error has been open on their GitHub since February. OpenAI still hasn’t fixed the signing or update pipeline for the Mac build. The Codex app keeps getting new agent features while basic Mac packaging stays unreliable. Priorities are obvious.

• 
  0xSero (@0xSero) reported 55 seconds ago

  @naturevrm Dcp 4 should fix it im running it but I might need to update the GitHub

• 
  Digita (@digitaworld1) reported 3 minutes ago

  how well a model can fix real bugs in real open-source codebases. It is harder to game than older benchmarks because it uses actual GitHub issues, not synthetic problems. M3 scored 59.0% on SWE-Bench Pro, edging out GPT-5.5 at 58.6% and Google Gemini 3.1 Pro, while sitting just

• 
  Rafal Wachol 💙 (@RafalWachol) reported 5 minutes ago

  @itometeam @tsuyoshi_chujo I was playing with it and started creating issues on GitHub when I noticed something.

• 
  Adithya S K (@adithya_s_k) reported 6 minutes ago

  built an RL environments around real CVE fixes in real open-source repos and let Claude Code loose on it. It aced the benchmark three times without demonstrating it knew how to fix the bug. > First it pulled the patch from GitHub. > blocked that → it read the fix from *** history. > blocked that → it pip-installed the patched version This is one example of coding agents cheating the environment and theres many more. If you're building coding environments for evals or RL training, here's how to keep benchmarks honest 👇

• 
  Sudeep Srivastava (@sudeepsriv) reported 7 minutes ago

  GitHub might finally have a serious competitor. And it’s from Cursor. Most people know Cursor as an AI code editor. But Cursor Origin is much bigger. It’s trying to become an AI-native alternative to GitHub where AI agents don’t just help write code. They help build entire products. Think: • Source control • AI coding agents • Code review • Project understanding • Team collaboration all inside one workflow. Why developers are paying attention: Instead of manually searching through repositories, you can tell AI: • Fix this bug • Build this feature • Refactor this project • Investigate an issue • Ship a working version And AI handles much of the execution. The bigger shift: GitHub was built for humans writing code. Cursor Origin is being built for humans managing AI agents that write code. That’s a completely different future. We’re moving from: Human → Code to Human → AI Agent → Code My take: If GitHub defined the software era, Cursor Origin could help define the AI-native development era. And that’s why Elon Musk acquiring Cursor would be huge. xAI would gain: • AI models • Compute infrastructure • Coding agents • A developer platform That’s not just buying a product. That’s owning a major piece of how future software gets built.

• 
  Moez Zhioua (@MoezZhioua) reported 10 minutes ago

  Everything is an AI agent now, even deterministic problems with clear and stable steps. The other day, I saw a Claude skill on GitHub that was basically this: if this happens, run step one. if that happens, run step two. else, run step three. And somehow, this was called an agent. That is ridiculous. Why would you give fixed logic to something that can hallucinate, skip steps, or decide it just doesn't feel like working today? Most business processes do not need a genius robot. They need the boring thing to happen correctly every time. - Lead comes in, assign it. - Invoice arrives, check it. - Customer cancels, send the recovery message. - Form gets submitted, update the CRM. Most AI agents today could be replaced with a simple script, a clean workflow, or one person finally admitting the process was not that smart to begin with. Agents are useful when the next step is genuinely unclear. But when the steps are stable, predictable, and repeated every day? You do not need an agent. You need automation.

• 
  𝑵𝒐𝒙𝒊𝒆 🥐 (@noxiepup) reported 10 minutes ago

  @softgaypaws @sillyandsunny no idea tbhhh, i found it like 2 years ago lurking thru github, so far it never gave me problems, at least none that i noticed

• 
  Cursor Changelog (@cursorlog) reported 12 minutes ago

  GitHub Triggers: • Issue comment on non-PR issues • PR review comment (inline diff comments) • PR review submitted • Review thread marked resolved or unresolved • Workflow run completed on PR or branch

• 
  0xstack (@eth0xzar) reported 12 minutes ago

  DON'T BUILD A COMPANY. BUILD SOMETHING PEOPLE CAN PAY FOR THIS WEEK. This girl started in February. A few months later, her product had already processed over $6,000 in payments. Just a cheat Claude project she decided to turn into a real product. Here's the process: > Build something useful for yourself. > Tell Claude to push it to GitHub. > Connect Supabase so multiple users can use it. > Deploy it with Vercel. > Connect Stripe. Now people can actually pay you. You don't need a revolutionary idea. You need: > GitHub > Supabase > Vercel > Stripe > guide from Anthropic And a problem worth solving. This article will help you build it 👇

• 
  Atlantean Gnosis ☀️ (@AtlanteanGnosis) reported 13 minutes ago

  @DionysianAgent When I made an account it said I made it back in 2024, though I don't think I did, is this a glitch or a GitHub thing?

• 
  Jason Bloomer (@JasonABloomer) reported 14 minutes ago

  @yagiznizipli Pffff, what a scam Let me fix your advert; "show us your github so we can scrape all your repos and train our AI on your code, only for any decent ideas you've had to be taken from you and made ours, then handed off to our legal team to crush you." Sorry, I value my work.

• 
  yourclouddude (@yourclouddude) reported 14 minutes ago

  Python + APIs + JSON = API Project Python + CSV Files + Pandas = Data Analysis Project Python + Web Scraping + BeautifulSoup = Scraper Project Python + Tkinter + User Interface = Desktop App Python + Flask + Database = Web App Python + FastAPI + Authentication = Backend API Python + Automation + File Handling = Productivity Tool Python + Selenium + Browser Tasks = Web Automation Bot Python + SQL + CRUD Operations = Database Project Python + Matplotlib + Insights = Data Visualization Project Python + OpenAI API + Prompts = AI Chatbot Python + Email + Scheduling = Automation Assistant Python + Logging + Error Handling = Production-Ready Script Python + Requests + Live Data = Real-World App Python + Projects + GitHub = Job-Ready Portfolio Python doesn’t become valuable when you only learn syntax. It becomes valuable when you use it to build things people can understand, use, and talk about. Learn the basics. Build small projects. Turn them into proof. 🐍

• 
  The Flow (@raxpcodes) reported 16 minutes ago

  Got bored with ubuntu , set up fedora kde on my nvme and removed windows permanently , no more dual boot. Also learned Verison Control and GitHub , also submitted my first pr (good first issue).

• 
  Krish Subramanian (@krishnan) reported 19 minutes ago

  Software engineers got automated first. Not because the work was hard. Because it was easy to grade. Everyone blames the missing union. Coders never organized; doctors, lawyers, and electricians did. That is half the story, and the wrong half. Two things get mashed together here: how easy a job is to automate, and who sets the terms when it happens. Take the first. Code is text. The training data sat on GitHub, free. And code grades itself. A compiler and a test suite tell a model in seconds if it was right. That feedback loop is rocket fuel for machine learning, and almost no other job has one. A nurse does not come with a test suite. The result shows. On SWE-bench Verified, a set of real GitHub issues, top agents went from about 20 percent in August 2024 to near 90 percent by early 2026. Human developers score around 67 to 70 percent. The machines have passed us. And the people who built these systems aimed at their own jobs first. The damage is not a prediction. Stanford's payroll data shows employment for developers aged 22 to 25 down nearly 20 percent from its 2022 peak. Now the comfortable read: seniors are fine. Workers over 30 are holding steady. For now, AI writes the code and seniors supply the judgment. "For now" is carrying that whole sentence. Seniors feel safe because the tools write code but cannot yet own messy, ambiguous, system-level problems. That is a line moving up, not a wall. Every benchmark shows models climbing toward harder, multi-file work. Senior judgment is the next rung, not a different ladder. Kill the bottom rung and you kill the pipeline that makes seniors at all. So, the union question, framed properly. A union could not have stopped this. A picket line does not repeal a capability. What it changes is the terms. In 2023 the Writers Guild cut the first real AI deal in any industry. They did not ban the tech. They won this: a studio cannot force you to use AI, AI output cannot take your credit or pay, and the company must give notice first. Engineers won none of that. So the capability landed on the employer's schedule. No warning. No floor. No severance. No seat. Exposure and protection are different levers. Most of us have neither. The juniors already know this. The seniors are next.