GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Evan Robertson (@evanbrobertson) reported 33 seconds ago

  Having 2 agents go back in forth in @github issues both using my account and it looks like I have schizophrenia

• 
  Ozan Dikilitaş, M.D. (@dikilitas_ozan) reported 53 seconds ago

  @7uomoki Is there a GitHub link for this? The one on preprint is not working for me. Great work!!!

• 
  Claire (@BOBO11036) reported 4 minutes ago

  @predzoru Any github project worth its salt usually has a readme directing you to the releases tab but tech literacy is so astronomically down that doesn't even click with some

• 
  EntLaiser (@EntLaiser) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ssr_tourist I’ve never had a problem with downloading stuff from GitHub but I always forget how I do it. Like, I can’t remember there being a big “download” button, but if it’s On GitHub it ends up on my PC one way or the other. And then I’ve also uploaded projects to share with myself too!

• 
  Ching-Yuen Huang (@Michael_Huang_W) reported 8 minutes ago

  Unintentionally created a duplicate Pro account due to @cursor_ai's GitHub/Google login architecture, which auto-renewed for 6 months with 0% usage. Since I am already an active paying user on my primary research account, billing support flatly refused to even transfer store credits. Any chance @ArVID220u can help a dev out?

• 
  Harley Lewis Foote (@harleyfoote_) reported 8 minutes ago

  @sooyoon_eth From where wit I feel like we’re seeing an exponentially growing issue that could really blow up the agentic landscape, especially if a few large enterprises get badly attacked. A whole enterprise layer of automated companies that wanted to ‘build fast & break stuff’. Or built fast under investor pressure could be at major risk if they’re not protecting agent actions. Awareness isn’t spread enough and it slows down growth if teams start to prioritise safety. Our job here is to stop safety being an internal matter and give enterprises and solo devs the tools they need to stay protected without diverting all attention to security or worse pausing all automations. Opportunity is huge here. Few teams doing this to a standard that is 1. Trust worthy 2. Honest 3. Transparent. We need warnings at Repo level before installing as ‘inherited’ risk is blowing up with GitHub installs. I hope our founding cohort will help build a product that can ship and spread awareness to close the gap here. Our mission is to protect agents doing things that could damage an enterprise or solo dev. Our product works on our repo/its fixed real attack surfaces. Now we scale it out to others. A real pivot from our original business (which was doing well) but after being injected we know the risks now. We can’t turn away from it.

• 
  Joshua Levy (@ojoshe) reported 11 minutes ago

  @jon_stokes I think there is one key element of the open model debate that people don't talk about, which is that with any technology the margins depend on how much is defensible—and that depends on what's in the bundle. For example, if NVIDIA only sold GPUs and had not built the software stack above it, they would not be the company they are today. But their software stack defends their hardware monopoly. Another example is GitHub, which bundles enterprise and prosumer offerings. Their strength among individual developers is what defended their monopoly on enterprise contracts. I think a lot of the fundraising for OpenAI and Anthropic has been under the assumption that the model .is. the bundle. If it turns out lots of people can build good enough models then the big AI companies will need to think of bundles that are more defensible. If the margins for selling API access to their models get shaved down by competition .and. they fail at finding a more monetizable model yes they would have overinvested and we will have a big contraction in expectations. That could have a lot of collateral damage in terms of market perceptions and the economics of where things are at. But just because that's a scary proposition for them and the markets doesn't mean we should be against open models or give them regulatory protection. That's an entirely different argument. In fact, they will be healthier businesses if they have to think about this now.

• 
  connor (@konar_dev) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Krocodile01 @thsottiaux It’s an issue with dwm in windows, there’s been open issues for it on GitHub for months

• 
  Will Mexi (@WillMexi) reported 13 minutes ago

  @NBA__trey @SOLsesame I can say for the record, I was not involved with any of these bad actors plans or execution of it, and i actually found that code they put in, I helped with frontend improvements, and was the person who set the GitHub protection in place that enabled us to find what they are doing. Also for the record I never bought ANY tokens, and I never intended to bundle or snipe, or had conversations with those devs about it. My upside was purely if the platform went well, and directly when we found out we closed the platform and deleted the access of the bad actors, which resulted in the situation we’re in now, this was to protect further issues from these devs.

• 
  Manoj (@HeartofManoj) reported 16 minutes ago

  One backup is never enough. If you run a website, keep a copy somewhere outside your hosting account. Free options: • Google Drive • Dropbox • OneDrive • GitHub (for code) • Local external drive Your backup is useless if it's stored on the same server that crashes. Happens more often than you'd think. #WordPress #WebHosting #Backup

• 
  Cennes100 (@Cennes100) reported 18 minutes ago

  EVERYONE PAYING FOR AI VIDEO TOOLS IS ABOUT TO FEEL SILLY. Most people see a slick paid tool like Higgs Field and assume that's just the price of entry. Locked behind a subscription, no way around it. That's the problem. People keep paying monthly for models they don't own, on servers they don't control. The mechanism: a guy named Anil Macha rebuilt the Higgs Field cinema studio and dropped it on GitHub, free and open source. Same idea, same workflow, zero paywall. The detail most people miss: this isn't a cloud wrapper charging per generation. It runs on open source models on your own computer. No subscription, no credits counting down. That changes what's possible: 1. Run cinema-style AI video locally, whenever you want 2. Iterate endlessly without burning credits 3. Tweak the pipeline instead of trusting a black box This isn't just "a free alternative dropped." It's proof the moat these tools lean on was never that deep. Most people use tools like Higgs Field because they think power has to be rented. This setup uses the same power and just... owns it. Follow: @Cennes100

• 
  Juan (@juanroberto82) reported 18 minutes ago

  @galluzzo_julian Hi Julian, I recently followed you in the July AI Web Design Sprint, and I have a question with regards to Ship Studio. As I finished building the initial figma site into Ship Studio when I try to push the site live I noticed I don't have access to both the "Push to Github to enable Vercel" button or "Create a GitHub repository first", both those buttons are inactive. I went ahead and asked Claude to help but I am not following what the the solution requires. When I go the main Ship Studio "homepage" I see both Github and Vercel are disconnected and even I do sign in to both successfully, I still see the same result. Can I please get some help in getting both services working in Ship Studio? I hope this makes sense. Thank you for your time. Juan Sierra

• 
  David Buckell (@DavidBuckell) reported 24 minutes ago

  @AzureSupport FYI when creating a Java 25 function app with Github continuous deployment the initial build fails with "The template is not valid. .github/workflows/main_java-function-app.yml (Line: 30, Col: 15): Unexpected value 'java-version: 25 '." The following fix is required

• 
  Lars H. (@circuitoftmrw) reported 24 minutes ago

  small milestone: my first resolved GitHub issue AND first star, both on the same repo old K2200 wasn’t supported for object detection in Frigate anymore, rebuilt onnxruntime with Maxwell support back in, and shipped the fix feels good watching an old GPU do real work again.

• 
  Abhishek Anand Tiwari (@MAbhishekAnand) reported 26 minutes ago

  You can build and launch a real startup: Here's the entire stack: Claude — coding ($20/mo) Supabase — backend (Free) Vercel — deploying (Free) GitHub — version control (Free) Clerk — auth (Free) Stripe — payments (2.9%/transaction) Resend — emails (Free) Cloudflare — DNS (Free) PostHog — analytics (Free) Sentry — error tracking (Free) Upstash — Redis (Free) Pinecone — vector DB (Free) Namecheap — domain ($12/yr) No agency. No dev team. No excuses left. Total Cost: 👇