1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. GitHub
  6. ❯
  7. Outage Map
GitHub

GitHub Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

GitHub users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Inverness, Scotland 1
Quito, Pichincha 2
Junín, Manabí 1
Guadalajara, JAL 1
Paris, Île-de-France 6
São Paulo, SP 1
Ipauçu, SP 1
Vigo, Galicia 1
Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv 1
Éragny, Île-de-France 1
Saltillo, COA 2
Montlhéry, Île-de-France 1
Aulnay-sous-Bois, Île-de-France 1
Granada, Andalusia 1
Vernon, Normandy 1
Township of Evan, KS 1
Madrid, Madrid 1
Bogotá, Bogota D.C. 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Lima, Lima 1
Aix-en-Provence, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige 1
Le Chambon-Feugerolles, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Antananarivo, Analamanga 1
Lure, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Ashkelon, Southern District 1
Veigné, Centre 1
Saint-Paul, Réunion 2
Mexico City, CDMX 1
León de los Aldama, GUA 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • MO_warsi786
    Muhammad Owais Warsi (@MO_warsi786) reported

    I never rage at github when it goes down I believe and understand that no modern alternative or even some legacy softwares can handle this much of load and traffic with so number of features such smoothly and efficiently and now comes the ai slop

  • jimlunsford
    Jim Lunsford (@jimlunsford) reported

    Spent the last 24 hours hardening Bonumark Stream for different hosting environments. A real deployment exposed assumptions around routing, import staging, writable paths, Nginx, and upgrades. Instead of weakening the hosting security model, I changed the product. Bonumark Stream now understands locked-down installs, ships with tested Nginx support, checks hosting capabilities, and supports owner-run CLI upgrades. I’m planning to get a GitHub release out this weekend with these changes.

  • ainewsusa
    AI News (@ainewsusa) reported

    🚨 Breaking in AI: 💻 Cloudflare Cuts Astro Github Issues by 85% with AI Agents Here's what's happening and why it matters 🧵👇 #AICoding #GitHub

  • MilWoke
    Woke Mil L's (@MilWoke) reported

    @AmeliaRemigrate @DoDeportations Think you do something about the repository that github took down?

  • ainewsusa
    AI News (@ainewsusa) reported

    The numbers are brutal: 85% fewer open issues, powered by agentic AI inside GitHub Actions. Cloudflare paired Flue (their agent framework) with triagebot on Workers to auto-classify, reproduce, and even patch bugs. Human reviewers only see the final diff. That’s not automation—th

  • Soveryn_AI
    Soveryn Intelligence (@Soveryn_AI) reported

    Anyone having issues with Canva on @bot @X @SpaceXAI it’s linked to GitHub with a bad url

  • aka_ssy
    Hero.S (@aka_ssy) reported

    *** was designed so no central server could stop development. Then we put pull requests, CI, packages, auth, and deploy approvals on GitHub. On August 17, every engineer still had the code—and many still couldn’t ship a line of it. Distributed version control, centralized everything else.

  • henryhndev
    Henry Nguyen (@henryhndev) reported

    @pierceboggan @github @MicrosoftTeams This is actually huge for remote teams—no more switching tabs mid-flow to check issues. How’s the handoff experience with larger repos so far?

  • TheCraigHewitt
    Craig Hewitt (@TheCraigHewitt) reported

    I want to see the best dev automation setup: - issues from helpscout tickets or Sentry issues - creates issues in github/linear - spawns Coding agent (codex, CC, Cursor, don't care) - does some kind of QA - Creates a PR - Notifies in Slack What am I missing? Any public repos I can check out?

  • shawmakesmagic
    Shaw (spirit/acc) (@shawmakesmagic) reported

    @123skely Just use worktrees and GitHub I’m running a lot more than that and not having these problems Need a lot of hard drive space tho Also need to plan up front, have it ask you clarifying questions and then answer them itself, read the answers to make sure it’s aligned with your intent— this has been massively help to quality and success for me

  • AayushStack
    Aayush Giri (@AayushStack) reported

    one recent security paper looked at malicious instructions hidden inside github issues and found that current coding agents can be surprisingly susceptible to them. that's a pretty uncomfortable thought. your agent doesn't just read your code anymore. it reads your environment.

  • f4gch
    f4g (@f4gch) reported

    Disagree on that, codeberg is a somewhat proper non-profit that unlike others doesn’t have hard large sponsors (feel free to correct). Looking at the graph of new AI-base projects on GitHub and them slowly having more and more a problem with outages I see a pattern Codeberg doesn’t have MSFT budget and if it ends up expanding like it had that budget it’d either HAVE to submit to large investment group sponsors or become paid both of which potentially come with hard drawbacks

  • MarkLyck
    Mark Lyck (@MarkLyck) reported

    @leerob @poteto @ericzakariasson can you please improve these simple Cursor PR features? Tried switching to Cursor this month, but there's a lot of missing / annoying stuff. 1. Add a preview link button. If the PR has a preview deployment from Vercel/Cloudflare/Netlify etc. Just give me a button I can click to quickly go to that preview deployment in Cursor or Browser. I don't want to have to go into the PR and go through review comments to find it. 2. Give me a keyboard shortcut to copy the Github PR link. Right now I have to click the chat, wait for it to load, then click "View PR" then click the 3 dots next to the github logo, then click copy link. That's way too many steps to share a Github/Origin link. 3. Why can't I configure trusted domains in the agent mode? Everytime I click a link I get this error "It's outside Cursor's trusted set. Only continue if you trust the source." And yes I did add it to my trusted domains in the IDE mode, but doesn't seem to work in agent mode. 4. Give me an indicator somewhere that shows how many approvals my PR has gotten if it has any. Right now the fastest way is to go to the github link, second fastest way is to go to the review section and scroll down and count manually if the PR doesn't have a lot of discussions. These are easy UX wins that would really help. 🙏🏻

  • bbaskin
    Brian Baskin (@bbaskin) reported

    I went to publish a new CTF writeup on github and *** threw all kinds of errors Somehow dozens of writeups were missing large chunks, but some were newer than local files. The fun of trying to do CTFs from multiple systems to same repo. Now spending weekend recreating them 😔

  • 3sx_dev
    apstygo (@3sx_dev) reported

    @mrjinjin2612 It’s being worked on, but I can’t promise anything timeline-wise. You can track progress in github issues

Check Current Status