GitHub

Is GitHub down?

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

GitHub Outage Chart 02/27/2026 19:00

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at GitHub. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

  1. Website Down (57%)

    Website Down (57%)

  2. Errors (30%)

    Errors (30%)

  3. Sign in (13%)

    Sign in (13%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

Loading map, please wait...
City Problem Type Report Time
EcuadorGuayaquil Errors
United StatesIrvington Website Down
BrazilAraçagi Errors
EcuadorGuayaquil Errors
GermanySiegburg Errors
BrazilTeófilo Otoni Website Down
Map Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • donavon donavon "the {...❤️} guy" west (@donavon) reported

    @youyuxi @pomber @github We're talking about 2 different things here: A bug's Severity and its Priority. It may not be your Priority to fix a bug based on 💰, but that doesn't change its Severity (i.e. it's still a bug).

  • RickStrahl Rick Strahl (@RickStrahl) reported

    @noseratio @ericlaw Lots of problems with that. Bandwidth is one. Github hosting (which is how I get Choco and other package installers to validate) is another. Github won't serve these massive files. Currently package is small enough to be OK with updating by reinstall. w\ 100mb+ - not so much.

  • Thetacron Thetacron (@Thetacron) reported

    @CamThePerson Github links seem broken.

  • lotus_rules Raj Kamal (@lotus_rules) reported

    @pomber @github then all your bugs will be found in production, as those found by hobbyist won't make it to github issues

  • a_grebenyuk Alex Grebenyuk (@a_grebenyuk) reported

    @pomber @github I think it’s not a good idea because I absolutely want as many people as possible to use the projects and to point out issues in them.

  • dylanbarrell agile-accessibility (@dylanbarrell) reported

    We deployed a new axe beta server last night with the ability to sign up and sign in with Github and Google and broke our own sign up form 🤦 @dequesystems @dequelabs #fail #workingonit

  • WorkingCopyApp Working Copy (@WorkingCopyApp) reported

    @qqqzdl I think you would get a better error message from GitHub if this was about your data quota. 🤔

  • archiecoder Sébastien Lachance (@archiecoder) reported

    @dotMorten @github I had this issue today and earlier this week. It goes back to normal eventually, but it is intermittent. I ping @martinwoodward about it.

  • AndyC80550822 Andy Cunliffe (@AndyC80550822) reported

    @KAnderson_RS I'm not sure if it's quite what you're looking for but GitHub's Issues functionality is pretty capable for tracking multiple and sometimes interrelated tickets across multiple users

  • ToDiaspora LWFlouisa (@ToDiaspora) reported

    So for example, I store memories on github, in the form of mathematica, this would get downloaded into the chatbot. The chatbot would run this as it needs the information, then once closed gets rid of the downloaded mathematica. Thus the "essence of you" would be server data.

  • jfmengels Jeroen Engels (@jfmengels) reported

    @pomber @github I would actually like it if @github would give the option to limit view access to a repo only to sponsors. I'm not sure whether issues would be a good idea. Maybe.

  • ffFlammie Flammie Pirinen (@ffFlammie) reported

    things that I hate in modern programming languages with own package managers, eg rust: forced bundling of locked-in versions of libraries, a huge security problem that is self-inflicted and then "solved" by an army of bots scanning whole github for these locked in versions -_-;;;

  • CalumBoal Calum Boal (@CalumBoal) reported

    @belocal_0x Try googling the issue, or open a github issue

  • CoenJacobs Coen Jacobs (@CoenJacobs) reported

    @ScreenFeedFr Glad that works, but it feels a bit weird. If you can spare the time, could you document the issues you're having with the not prefixing of the files via the original PSR-0 autoloader in Mustache, in a GitHub issue, please? This should work just fine.

  • leandromatos Leandro Matos (@leandromatos) reported

    @Atinux @github I don't see any problems with that. Especially because dependencies with serious vulnerability problems sometimes appear, and this can cause numerous problems. 1/3

  • bangjelkoski Bojan Angjelkoski (@bangjelkoski) reported

    @Atinux @github Its getting annoying to get so much notifications and emails. The way to go would be to have weekly reminder (or eventually a PR) that you can bump dependencies and in rare cases (security issue) it can also notify you daily.

  • jamesdrandall James Randall (@jamesdrandall) reported

    Anyone seeing issues with @github Actions? Seem to be stuck in queued.

  • hawkinjs Josh Hawkins (@hawkinjs) reported

    @bebraw @pomber @github If I can’t see the issues or PRs without paying, I won’t use it, because open issues are part of how I pick between two otherwise similar projects

  • NinjaCo64233537 Ninja Cookie (@NinjaCo64233537) reported

    @drcongo Working fine on Github for me on Opera and Chrome. Do you have trouble only with Safari ?

  • asarturas Arturas Smorgun (@asarturas) reported

    @mpmlopes I have some terrible pending things in my to do list, so now occasionally I am successful at setting up enough stuff when I am productive in anticipation of procastination later. Like hosting website on github pages, so I do not need to rebuild myself. That said, my blog is dead.

  • DennyLindberg Denny Lindberg (@DennyLindberg) reported

    @rikarends What a massive pain... I checked the the obs-mac-virtualcam github page. There is an open issue with other users reporting that the virtual cam does not appear for them either in any other application. Seems reasonable the issue could be related to the OS version like you said?

  • denysdovhan Denys Dovhan 👨‍💻 (@denysdovhan) reported

    @pomber @github Nice idea, but keep I mind that GitHub Sponsors are available only in 30 countries, which is not even a quarter of the world. So roughly 3/4 of the developers would be able to neither sponsor you nor report an issue.

  • _WPScan_ WPScan - WordPress Security (@_WPScan_) reported

    @PProtonzz No, you deliberately spammed our Github repository issues. You have been blocked and banned.

  • denysdovhan Denys Dovhan 👨‍💻 (@denysdovhan) reported

    @pomber @github Nice idea, but keep I mind that GitHub Sponsors are available only in 30 countries, which is not even a quarter of the world. So roughly 3/4 of the developers would be able neither sponsor you, nor report an issue.

  • philpalmieri Phil Palmieri (@philpalmieri) reported

    @pomber @github interesting... why not just more fine-grained control over things without specific 'why' ... ie: source, issues, projects can all be public/private regardless of the repo settings, and role based issues? reviewer, non-ic, ic, etc

  • lotus_rules Raj Kamal (@lotus_rules) reported

    @pomber @github then all your issues will be created when people run into them in production, as everything else will not cross the paywall. i would not use such a project, let alone consider it "open source"

  • donavon donavon "the {...❤️} guy" west (@donavon) reported

    @youyuxi @pomber @github It's your right as an OSS maintainer to prioritize bugs (and you may decide paying customer's bugs should come first) but why would you not accept a valid issue? 🤷 And give sponsors a button to "sponsor" an issue they didn't create, making a non-paying user's bug a priority.

  • MetalMatze Matthias Loibl (@MetalMatze) reported

    @putadent @github @cortexmetrics Yes. We've been beta testing it with kube-prometheus. Converting issues to discussions is really helpful when starting out. Users are going to still open issues mostly.

  • abhas_rewcie RewCie 🚀🇮🇳 (@abhas_rewcie) reported

    @roshovani I use GitHub when needed. Most of the process are carried in the backend server. So I never needed to dig deeper into VCS... Tho I have *** installed too, but I never used it command line way either...

  • congralilso mot (@congralilso) reported

    @fatal_flux I kinda suspect search is broken intentionally and entirely for the reason to give a hard time for crawlers. Was trying to make a bot the other day and all crawlers had github issues about barely functioning anymore due to search