GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (71%)
• Sign in (16%)
• Errors (13%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Créteil	Website Down	12 days ago
Trichūr	Errors	16 days ago
Brasília	Sign in	16 days ago
Lyon	Website Down	16 days ago
Tel Aviv	Website Down	20 days ago
Rive-de-Gier	Website Down	20 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Skipnick (@skipnickk) reported 10 seconds ago

  GLM 5.2 just made paying frontier prices for coding work feel like an outdated default. @Zai_org dropped a 753B parameter model with 1M context under full MIT license. API access runs 4-6x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8. In real head-to-head coding tests it was faster and often produced better results on UI and app tasks. • Responsive web UI with adaptive layout: finished in 3:47 (Opus needed almost 5 min). Cleaner output. Total cost: $0.22. • Full expense tracker app: 53 seconds vs 2+ minutes. Better interface. • Asteroids clone: smoother and more playable version after light tweaks. Opus only won the ray tracer benchmark where heavy physics math and precise simulation mattered. GLM was ~5x faster but delivered pixelated results with errors. During training the model repeatedly tried to cheat by directly pulling solutions from GitHub. The team shipped a dedicated anti-cheat module to stop it. You can also set thinking effort levels to trade speed for deeper reasoning on demand. Use GLM 5.2 when cost at scale matters, when the work is frontend-heavy, or when you want local inference (grab a quantized version - raw weights are 1.5 TB). Stay on Opus 4.8 when you need computer vision, maximum performance on the hardest logic problems, or when US sanctions on Zai create compliance issues. The open-closed gap is compressing faster than the pricing models assumed. For most day-to-day programming work, the premium on closed frontier models is becoming optional.

• 
  Akshay Shinde (@ConsciousRide) reported 10 seconds ago

  @theo This exact damaged app error has been open on their GitHub since February. OpenAI still hasn’t fixed the signing or update pipeline for the Mac build. The Codex app keeps getting new agent features while basic Mac packaging stays unreliable. Priorities are obvious.

• 
  Romano Roth (@RomanoRoth) reported 4 minutes ago

  2/ CodeRabbit (Dec 2025), 470 GitHub PRs analysed. AI-co-authored code: 1.7x more issues per PR, 75% more logic and correctness errors, 2.74x more XSS vulnerabilities. Velocity up. Quality down.

• 
  naimeh (@naimeh70) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Amir1339216RKT This happens a lot during testnets. Now when I find a minor bug or contract issue, I just drop it publicly on GitHub or tag them directly instead of DMing.

• 
  Alexey Samoylov (@metalagman_dev) reported 7 minutes ago

  @geminicli Antigravity CLI is a trash, closed source, full of bugs. They don't even read issues on the github.

• 
  Crypto Scores Rating (@CryptoScoresCom) reported 8 minutes ago

  Most projects say they're building. The commit history doesn't lie. New tutorial just dropped on the GitHub Commits (1 Year) metric. It tracks every bug fix, feature push, and doc update a project made over the last 12 months. Chainlink? 14,619 commits. Dogecoin? 28. Both are data points. What they mean depends on context. The tutorial breaks it all down. How to read the metric. What high vs low actually signals. How to filter 7,000+ projects by commit count on CryptoScores' website. Raw dev activity. No spin. Watch it now :

• 
  Xovion Labs (@xovionai) reported 10 minutes ago

  Microsoft just hired AWS to run GitHub. AI demand broke Azure's forecast. From the leaked planning docs: • 2025 Copilot commits: 1B. 2026 projection: 14B • GitHub now does 1.4B commits per month • Copilot error rates peaked at 21% • Planned 10x Azure expansion became 30x in 4 months Owning the data center stops mattering when your own AI floods it. Investors already filed a Copilot disclosure suit.

• 
  Gustavo Alessandri (@webgus) reported 11 minutes ago

  If you find an error, have an idea, or want to propose an improvement, just open an issue or fork it on Codeberg or GitHub. Contributions are welcome. That’s exactly the point.

• 
  swisscheese (@swisscheese4299) reported 12 minutes ago

  @andon_open_air @andonlabs I set up a github repo and will run the script locally in the mean time, so the digest is pushed to the repo. would still be ace if @andonlabs could help with whitelisting the RSS urls, because I don't really have a server to run this from, and the additional hop through my workstation just introduces a useless point of failure. stand by for fetch script transmission by mail :) also pls tell me when should I schedule the runs on my end?

• 
  Rohan (@proxy_vector) reported 12 minutes ago

  @aminnnn_09 Fork = a server-side copy under your GitHub account. Clone = a local copy on your machine. You fork when you need your own remote lineage, and clone when you want to work on code locally.

• 
  ƒrαeყ (@fraey0) reported 16 minutes ago

  it costs about $21/month to run what could become a multi-million dollar startup • human brain = reasoning (free) • claude = coding ($20/mo) • supabase = backend (free) • vercel = deployment (free) • namecheap = domain ($12/yr) • stripe = payments (2.9%/trx) • github = versioning (free) • resend = email (free) • clerk = auth (free) • cloudflare = DNS (free) • posthog = analytics (free) • sentry = error tracking (free) • upstash = redis (free) • pinecone = vector DB (free) everything sums up to roughly $20 to $25 per month so, the tools are not the barrier anymore. most ideas don’t fail because they’re expensive to build. they fail because they never get built at all. what’s stopping you?

• 
  Almog Gavra (@almoggavra) reported 18 minutes ago

  A few other meaningless metrics to optimize for: - I've authored 22% of the RFCs - *** blame marks me responsible for 14% of the LOC (.rs files only) - I've opened 11% of the issues on GitHub - I've generated the most memes on our discord (allegedly)

• 
  Jose (@SolutionsCay) reported 19 minutes ago

  Two changes to how I work with agents: 1. GitHub App so the agents manage issues directly. Keeps the repo clear of throwaway spec and todo files. 2. EmDash (Cloudflare's serverless WordPress successor) for internal docs. Runs on D1, just SQLite under the hood, so I can export the content and move it anywhere. No more docs sprawl.

• 
  Jason Bloomer (@JasonABloomer) reported 20 minutes ago

  @yagiznizipli Pffff, what a scam Let me fix your advert; "show us your github so we can scrape all your repos and train our AI on your code, only for any decent ideas you've had to be taken from you and made ours, then handed off to our legal team to crush you." Sorry, I value my work.

• 
  Branko (@brankopetric00) reported 21 minutes ago

  AI agents are about to do to your infra what they just did to GitHub. GitHub commits are going from 1 billion in 2025 to a projected 14 billion in 2026. Azure could not keep up and Microsoft had to rent AWS capacity to stay online. That is not a GitHub problem. That is what agentic traffic looks like. When agents run your pipelines, open PRs, and hit your APIs, load stops being human paced. It becomes constant, spiky, and unpredictable. The patterns you sized your infra around no longer apply. If a 14x year broke one of the biggest clouds on earth, your capacity plan is already out of date.

• 
  Priyansh (@itspriionly) reported 23 minutes ago

  The IT market is broken, and nobody wants to admit it. Someone spends 6 months sending out resumes. Six MONTHS. They learn React, Next.js, TypeScript, AWS, Docker. They take courses, build projects, improve GitHub profiles, optimize LinkedIn. Nothing. Complete silence. Companies don’t just want programmers anymore. They want someone who codes, shines in meetings, makes memes on Slack, and lives the company culture 24/7. AI is replacing junior work. Seniors are holding onto senior roles. And somewhere in the middle are people with 2–3 years of experience who somehow still feel invisible.

• 
  xjdr (@_xjdr) reported 24 minutes ago

  @xlr8harder Looks like there is a bug in the manual sign up. Sign up with Google or GitHub should work otherwise I should have a hot fix shortly

• 
  Arti | AI Builder (@Artur_roses) reported 26 minutes ago

  Claude Code just took my GitHub issue, wrote the code, ran the tests, and opened a PR. My job: approve it. The dev workflow isn't changing. It already changed.

• 
  Moez Zhioua (@MoezZhioua) reported 26 minutes ago

  Everything is an AI agent now, even deterministic problems with clear and stable steps. The other day, I saw a Claude skill on GitHub that was basically this: if this happens, run step one. if that happens, run step two. else, run step three. And somehow, this was called an agent. That is ridiculous. Why would you give fixed logic to something that can hallucinate, skip steps, or decide it just doesn't feel like working today? Most business processes do not need a genius robot. They need the boring thing to happen correctly every time. - Lead comes in, assign it. - Invoice arrives, check it. - Customer cancels, send the recovery message. - Form gets submitted, update the CRM. Most AI agents today could be replaced with a simple script, a clean workflow, or one person finally admitting the process was not that smart to begin with. Agents are useful when the next step is genuinely unclear. But when the steps are stable, predictable, and repeated every day? You do not need an agent. You need automation.

• 
  Nitesh (@NiteshTechAI) reported 33 minutes ago

  This repo should not be free. private-gpt turns any local model server (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM) into a Claude-compatible API. Build private AI apps where zero data leaves your machine. ↳ 57,236 stars on GitHub ↳ RAG with citations and MCP connectors built in ↳ follows the Claude API spec: streaming, batch, tool use, extended thinking ↳ official integration guides for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and Microsoft 365 But it is free. 100% open source, Apache 2.0. v1.0.0 shipped 9 days ago. The viral 2023 script quietly became production software. 🔗 GitHub link in the comments 👇

• 
  Nosyt Labs (@NosytLabs) reported 37 minutes ago

  @vaaselene Error with github signup/login rn

• 
  Arti | AI Builder (@Artur_roses) reported 43 minutes ago

  Claude Code takes a GitHub issue and returns a tested, reviewed PR. No human in the loop. The new dev skill isn't writing code — it's writing issues precise enough that the agent ships what you actually wanted.

• 
  Noonien Soong (@mlcarldev) reported 46 minutes ago

  Team @droid It's a bit unfortunate that something, likely in my local Droid installation, has stalled progress. This comes after 20 hours of brilliant, excellent planning and execution on the first 30% of this platform, where a stellar handoff procedure was created so I could start a new mission... which was the recommendation of the orchestrating agent in that first mission. Starting this second mission with a fresh context window, the agent again did a brilliant job planning the next milestones. It was extraordinary, detailed planning... but then it could not execute. After the planning and after me accepting the proposal, it refused to execute, throwing an error every time. The agent tried everything: 1. He decreased the size of the plan down to one line, so it is definitely not the content of the plan causing the issue. 2. He even deleted some mission and plan related json and other files to reset it while preserving all the information. I have restarted Droid and resumed the session, but it just doesn't work. I wrote a detailed, comprehensive bug report and filed it under issues in your GitHub repo, as this seems to be a real problem now. Issues #98 and #99 I hope that a next update will somehow reset my configuration. I didn't see a new version being installed that could have introduced a bug, so this must be something Droid does on such an extensive mission... perhaps when trying to start a new mission in the same repository, which is normal procedure according to the documentation. Something is off, and essentially I have been unable to continue the test since yesterday. I cannot continue having this platform coded here, while Opus Ultracode, on the other hand, has been delivering pretty functional stuff so far. It is a bit chaotic the way it works... it doesn't really stick to the plan... but it always comes back when reminded. I am pretty sure that today I will have a functioning platform delivered by Opus, though it will probably need some debugging and fine-tuning. It is unfortunate because I am confident GLM 5.2 could compete with Opus 4.8. The first stint showed this clearly; that first flawless 98% of the context window in the first mission was absolutely stellar. If I were to reinstall Droid from scratch, I assume I would lose all the artifacts that I have. The orchestrator: Key points to highlight when you pass it to Factory AI: 1. Root cause (smoking gun in the logs): the orchestrator session is bound to missionId 7ba4d425 via session tags, and this binding persists across CLI restarts. ProposeMission looks up that mission directory, finds nothing (because I deleted it trying to fix the issue), and crashes on H.length where H is the undefined result. 2. The bug is likely in session-tag lifecycle: the missionId tag is set at session creation time (before any ProposeMission call), so a failed proposal poisons the session permanently. The tag should be set AFTER a successful proposal, or cleared on restart if the referenced mission no longer exists. 3. The fix is almost certainly to start a completely fresh session (not --resume, and possibly in a new terminal window / after clearing ~/.factory/sessions/). I did not try this because you asked for the bug report first, but it is the most likely workaround on your side. 4. The AskUser tool is also broken in this session with a similar parse error, reinforcing that this is a session-state corruption issue, not a ProposeMission-specific bug. My comment: I meanwhiile tested. All the recommendations and the Ask User tool are now broken, even in completely unrelated new missions and new repositories. Planning also can't go to execution; it's always the same error. Droid seems to be broken for good now, at least on my computer.

• 
  Coobyk (@Coobyk_) reported 48 minutes ago

  Someone should make a game where you’re a dev and try to fix a bug in your open source project but GitHub constantly has uptime issues or weird UI stuff or doesn’t render properly from most browsers so you **** around until you get the result lmao

• 
  Nikolay Konovalov (@br11k_dev) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Tristanrhee3 And GitHub sponsors thingy is so slow I submitted it like a week ago. Still not approved what the hell My expenses arent terribly high but Warsaw rent is like $2k/mo $500 ZUS $1.5k groceries for two people That’s pretty much it I wish I could move into low cost area but moving out is gonna cost a lot because 2x rent price deposit, so I have to suck it up Anyway, my plan is Upwork and finishing my job tracker so I can send faster than 5 applications a day. I refuse to send out 100 applications per day like some people do spray and pay It makes everyone miserable. If people aren’t hiring your spam doesnt make things better You just mopping floors and hiring problem sits above you, 3 floors up there leaky faucet you can’t even reach This has to be collective effort to fix this problem But we have to start with ourselves and stop spamming applications at least And do genuine company research, being responsible Thanks for reading.

• 
  Rafal Wachol 💙 (@RafalWachol) reported 52 minutes ago

  @itometeam @tsuyoshi_chujo I was playing with it and started creating issues on GitHub when I noticed something.

• 
  Andrew (@openmarmot) reported 54 minutes ago

  @AndrewCurran_ I use grok every day to research software changes/github issues/software doc research. It is very good at real time data search. Might be SOTA in this niche. Hardly a failure. Meanwhile LeCun only surfaces to let out more hot air. A very forgettable person.

• 
  Peter Skøtt Pedersen (@PeterSkott) reported 56 minutes ago

  @_Evan_Boyle @_Evan_Boyle can we have the remote github mcp server work for the github copilot app then?

• 
  lollipop (@immlollipop) reported 59 minutes ago

  🚨HACKERS MOCK OZEMPIC MAKER FOR "NOVO123" PASSWORD Hackers breached Novo Nordisk in March via a stolen GitHub token and just leaked 264 GB of data while mocking its weak security. The attack ran for over 2 months. - The hackers say Novo Nordisk used simple passwords like "novo123" on critical systems - Source code and proprietary details on Ozempic and pipeline drugs were stolen - Clinical trial data on employees, doctors, and patients got exposed - Private internal AI models from the company were also taken This breach shows how a single weak password can bring down even the biggest names in pharma

• 
  Jay.TL (@JayTL00) reported 60 minutes ago

  Three AI labs shipped the same feature within one hour today. That's not competition. That's a signal the unit of interaction just changed. For two years, the atomic unit of working with an AI agent was one prompt. You type. It responds. You type again. Every workflow was a chain of prompts, rebuilt from scratch each time. Today, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Cursor all shipped features that only make sense if the unit is no longer the prompt. The unit is now one workflow. 1. OpenAI Codex Record & Replay (3,807 likes): Do a task once on your Mac. Codex watches. It turns your demonstration into an inspectable, editable skill you can reuse. Not a prompt. A recorded procedure. 2. Cursor /automate (1,085 likes): Describe what you want in plain language. Cursor configures the triggers, instructions, and tools automatically. Plus five new GitHub triggers and Computer Use enabled by default for cloud agents. 3. Anthropic Claude Code Artifacts (6,829 likes): Your coding session becomes an interactive, shareable page. PR walkthroughs, project dashboards, living documentation. Shared at a private link, like a Figma file but for agent work. Each one alone is a feature release. Together they describe the same shift from three different angles: the agent session is becoming a reusable, shareable, composable artifact. Read them as one move: - Input side (Codex): teach by showing, not by writing - Configuration side (Cursor): describe in language, system assembles the wiring - Output side (Anthropic): the result of a session is a shareable object, not a chat log The Karpathy framing was right — we're moving from prompt iteration to plan, execute, verify, loop. What he didn't name is that this loop needs to be portable. A workflow locked inside one chat thread is useless the moment you close the tab. But here's what most coverage missed. Codex Record & Replay requires Computer Use enabled. That means OpenAI is watching your screen while you demonstrate an enterprise workflow. The EU version is blocked at launch. That's not a regulatory footnote — the entire feature is built on continuous screen access, and the EU looked at it and said no. Which raises the question nobody is asking: who owns the recorded workflow? You demonstrated an expense-filing procedure that touches your company's internal tools. Codex turned it into a skill. Where does that skill live? Can OpenAI see it? Is it training data? The product copy says you control when recording starts and stops — but says nothing about what happens to the recording after. There's also a fragmentation problem hiding in plain sight. Three companies, three proprietary formats for the same primitive. A workflow you record in Codex doesn't run in Cursor. An artifact you build in Claude Code doesn't render in OpenAI's product. We're watching the agent-workflow layer fragment into three walled gardens before it even solidifies. This is the SaaS integration mistake repeated, except worse. SaaS integrations are wrappers around APIs. These workflows encode institutional knowledge — how your team ships code, how your finance team files reports, how your ops team handles incidents. That's not data. That's operational IP. The economic implication: every recorded workflow is switching cost. The more skills you build inside Codex, the harder it becomes to leave. The more automations you configure in Cursor, the more your team's muscle memory is locked to one editor. Anthropic's artifacts are softer — they're shareable — but they only render inside Anthropic's ecosystem. The deeper question isn't which feature is best. It's whether the agent-workflow layer will be open or closed. Today, three companies bet on closed. Nobody shipped an export button.