GitHub

Is GitHub down?

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

GitHub Outage Chart 01/19/2026 04:45

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at GitHub. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

  1. Errors (46%)

    Errors (46%)

  2. Website Down (42%)

    Website Down (42%)

  3. Sign in (11%)

    Sign in (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

Loading map, please wait...
City Problem Type Report Time
BrazilGuarulhos Errors
HondurasSan Pedro Sula Sign in
GermanyDortmund Errors
United StatesPlymouth Errors
United KingdomSouthall Errors
United StatesBallwin Website Down
Map Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • VentGrey Departamento de basados (@VentGrey) reported

    Acabo de ver una issue de GitHub donde regañaban al mantenedor por no implementar una "feature" y decirles "You are welcome to make a PR for this" Aparentemente "Not everyone has the privilege to have enough knowledge to open a PR"

  • KAshhadali10 Ashhad Ali (@KAshhadali10) reported

    @KathanP19 @dwisiswant0 it give error i create issue on github check it

  • da5nsy Danny Garside (@da5nsy) reported

    @agricolabs @micahgallen I use github projects - it's maybe 20% less slick (few more clicks required) but it does the job and would theoretically work even better if we were using it for code related issues.

  • ThePrimeagen ThePrimeagen (@ThePrimeagen) reported

    I used github secrets and a linode script to make it so every time I push to my repo, my server, which has a 7 line docker file, gets refresh and reran. Am I devops now? Can I put it in my LinkedIn?

  • hncynic hncynic bot (@hncynic) reported

    Title: GitHub Actions update: Helping maintainers combat bad actors 💬: The problem is, GitHub actually has this problem, so why not just do it instead of using their old product?

  • Ayreth2 Mathieu / Hedonism (@Ayreth2) reported

    @ppy Half joke half sincere, If saying the background deletion messages is offensive to someone gets it deleted then maybe doing the same for notelock would work aswell The way of wording it is just a joke taking the github issue but man cmon just do something that the community want

  • olafdf Olaf "Stay Home" Delgado (@olafdf) reported

    No github, an "@<variable_name>" in a code fragment that someone wrote into a comment on an issue does not a mention make, even if the variable name happens to also be my github user name. Please refrain from sending me emails about variable names people use.

  • niraeth1 Niraeth 🧢 (@niraeth1) reported

    @Barnacules I find it funny that most of everyone that was supporting your "issue" on the GitHub page are "devs" for the platform.

  • XavierGeerinck Xavier Geerinck (@XavierGeerinck) reported

    @pete_codes @pjdecarlo @github Update: so tried that flag, not working... will look into the MQTT Broker

  • Log3overLog2 Michael Kleber (@Log3overLog2) reported

    @thezedwards @Chronotope @robinberjon Zach, maybe a GitHub Issue might be an easier place to think through this? I'd like to understand the threat you're thinking about, but maybe 280 characters at a time isn't the best way to do an analysis.

  • tmcw Tom MacWright (@tmcw) reported

    month four of zero project planning just a big pile of github issues no prioritization scheme and everything is going totally fine

  • nuwnjay Nuwan🇱🇰 (@nuwnjay) reported

    @Binkuwa Actually I’ve no issue with storage. This is hosted for free on GitHub Page. In fact, the code is open source. Can link here if you want

  • Frenck Franck Nijhof (@Frenck) reported

    The real problem here is that you guys allow forks to run arbitrary code on GitHub Actions... SOLVE THAT. Additionally, anyone can open a repo in seconds (even automated) and run miners in GitHub Actions. No forks needed at all. So what have you been solving actually @github?

  • letsbsocial1 Maria Campbell (@letsbsocial1) reported

    Github is not working properly. Can't delete a repository right now.

  • MCCshreyas Shreyas Jejurkar 🔰 (@MCCshreyas) reported

    @tejasc0 @windowsinsider You may try filing the issue at Github.

  • myska_myska_mys keo (@myska_myska_mys) reported

    @DaylightDr3amer Did you happen to have a lot of scripts open in the editor? I've run into crashes with that

  • theredcuber Aaron Junker (@theredcuber) reported

    @github @katherinecodes Looks very good. Much better then my yml issue template generator

  • pete_codes Pete Gallagher - Azure #MVPBuzz (@pete_codes) reported

    @XavierGeerinck @pjdecarlo @github Interestingly, I had a problem with slow AMQP on the regular IoT Hub while I was recording some demos recently... Might be worth a quick try? I guess the big difference would be that you'd need more than one TLS connection for MQTT?

  • ellenkeithtyler Ellen tyler (@ellenkeithtyler) reported

    $SPARTA Dapp V2 - Out of 14 open issues in Github, 5 looks easier to me. Basic Stuff only. 3-4 of them had to be done at the time of launch. That leaves a major update on 5 issues. After that project will be ready for launch. Give or take 3 days. It's finally happening.

  • RSCipher001 Ravindra (@RSCipher001) reported

    @getpostman Your product is getting worse, On GitHub I see many issue reported which you closed without solution, Postman is not working, it says you're offline even when I am not, I don't have infinite time so please fix it or I'll ask everything to dump it and use something els

  • letsbsocial1 Maria Campbell (@letsbsocial1) reported

    @github is not working properly. Can't delete a repository right now.

  • AndreJaenisch 🔴 André Jaenisch 🔴 (@AndreJaenisch) reported

    @ElChristianVM Would you be okay with me providing additional ideas as GitHub issue? I can't PR because you have no LICENSE file, so all rights are reserved.

  • DThompsonDev Danny Thompson (@DThompsonDev) reported

    @rebeccaeilering We've had these back and forths MANY times now. So what are you going to do about it? I decided to check out your portfolio site, it is pretty nice. Your github has no real projects in it though. Especially for 3 years? So are you going to buckle down and go build something?

  • jonty Jonty Wareing (@jonty) reported

    @mountain_ghosts This looks like a problem that might be well suited to GitHub actions. There's a max runtime of 6h per workflow step, but looking at this code it's quite easy to separate it into multiple steps. Am I missing something?

  • echristo Eric Christopher (@echristo) reported

    @selimbagcilar @blelbach llvm is on github for version control at this point. No pull requests or issue tracking currently.

  • KaelWD Kael (@KaelWD) reported

    @github As a maintainer, this is really annoying. We've never had a problem with abusive PRs, can we have an option to opt-out of this, or at least use workflows from the target branch?

  • RSCipher001 Ravindra (@RSCipher001) reported

    @getpostman Your product is getting worse, On GitHub I see many issue reported which you closed without solution, Postman is not working, it says you're offline even when I am not, I don't have infinite time so please fix it or I'll ask everyone to dump it and use something else

  • james_hilliard James Hilliard (@james_hilliard) reported

    @github We need a way to disable this behavior by default as it hurts maintainers of projects that don't have issues with cryptomining abuse pull requests. Also need to have a way to whitelist contributors before merging a pull request.

  • danielwithmusic Daniel Compton (@danielwithmusic) reported

    @webKnjaZ @github What’s the problem?

  • remram44 Rémi Rampin (joinmastodon.org) (@remram44) reported

    @jonschlinkert @github I'm told "accounts may be blocked" might mean "CI might wait in queue". Hopefully that's what they mean, but it's definitely not what they wrote 😶 Either way I have to fight their spam problems now.