1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. GitHub
GitHub

GitHub down? Current status and problems

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Full Outage Map

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at GitHub. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

  • 50% Website Down (50%)
  • 39% Errors (39%)
  • 11% Sign in (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Nové Strašecí Website Down 2 days ago
Perpignan Website Down 7 days ago
Piura Website Down 7 days ago
Tokyo Website Down 8 days ago
New Delhi Sign in 15 days ago
Kannur Website Down 18 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • simeonGriggs
    simeonGriggs (@simeonGriggs) reported

    Just spent an hour debugging something until I came across the answer. The answer I wrote a month ago on a GitHub Issue describing a fix to that problem.

  • codingedgar
    Edgar Rodríguez (@codingedgar) reported

    I need to stop posting github issues at 2am, all my copy&paste are fd up. Is my clipboard drunk at 2 am consistently? …or am I

  • jmhodges
    Jeff Hodges (@jmhodges) reported

    @ljharb @github They should have fixed the complaints instead of making it opt-out. I could imagine they didn't think they had the resources and community support at the time. All the problems discussed in there are solvable

  • rckenned
    Ryan Kennedy (@rckenned) reported

    @jmhodges @github right, but the transitive dependency thing means it only takes one broken link in the chain to create issues

  • statsgeekclare
    Clare Griffiths - out of office until 27 December (@statsgeekclare) reported

    @Letxuga007 @Pouriaaa @ChrisBeeley I closed an issue in GitHub.

  • The_Mystery_One
    Retired Kevin w/ Da Pack (@The_Mystery_One) reported

    I can’t work on anything from github and its slowing everything down

  • sluongng
    Son Luong (@sluongng) reported

    @paulienuh My suggestion is try to funnel all support requests/engagements through 1 portal: Github issues / discussion or Discourse. There you can measure traffics as a signal.

  • ThreatMonIT
    ThreatMonIT (@ThreatMonIT) reported

    Given how ubiquitous this library is, the impact of the exploit (full server control), and how easy it is to exploit, the impact of this vulnerability is quite severe. We're calling it "Log4Shell" for short. POC posted on GitHub. This has been published as CVE-2021-44228 .

  • mikesir87
    Michael Irwin (@mikesir87) reported

    @github Gah! Was too slow this time. Will have to watch for them to come back!

  • jmhodges
    Jeff Hodges (@jmhodges) reported

    @rckenned @github (Er, to join some dots, those libraries would hopefully be doing releases on security problems like this. But if we don't trust that, dependabot and equiv should step in, I mean)

  • jennifershehane
    Jennifer Shehane (@jennifershehane) reported from Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City

    Why don’t @github ‘issues/123’ links reroute to ‘pull/123’ links anymore? Is this intended? Because it’s broken a lot of links where we were assuming this rerouting.

  • kironroydev
    RayOfLight (@kironroydev) reported

    @palashv2 Note: GitHub disabled ‘back to top’ (in-page navigation). I am working on problem.

  • borud
    borud (@borud) reported

    Now that people have calmed down and gotten over their disappointment with Github Copilot, could we perhaps put down the crackpipe for a minute and put more smarts into language servers? For really useful things like better error messages and suggested mitigations on code errors?

  • _tkoriginal
    Tauqueer Khan | tauq.sol (@_tkoriginal) reported

    @TomGeshury @therealchaseeb @armaniferrante Do you mean locally? By going through Solana github issues I found that when running the validator locally, BPF-JIT doesn't support ARM. So running solana-test-validator --no-bpf-jit lets you deploy locally

  • ppy
    Dean Herbert (@ppy) reported

    @Spaceman_Atlas it's unfortunate github don't give the tools we need to fix this. if we switched back to issues 100%, we could use the new templates they offer to force users to include certain details.. but they can still bypass it intentionally via url or accidtanlly via not-logged-in bug

  • Dave_Canada
    David (@Dave_Canada) reported

    @githubstatus Hey, is there a potential issue with GitHub actions and self hosted nodes? We're seeing failures across multiple projects: "The self-hosted runner: xxx lost communication with the server. Verify the machine is running and has a healthy network connection."

  • MattWelke3
    Matt Welke (@MattWelke3) reported

    @shipilev @yazicivo Would a private fork help with this? I remember the GitHub researchers mentioning this. They said that one way to fix it would be to fork the repo, collaborate on the fix in the fork, then do a PR from the fork to upstream when it's done.

  • philarcher1
    Phil Archer (@philarcher1) reported

    A quick public apology to @valexiev1 for not yet responding to all the GitHub issues that have tagged me. I know, I know, sorry...

  • jmhodges
    Jeff Hodges (@jmhodges) reported

    @ljharb @github Yeah, thats the kind of stuff that folks making opt-in systems end up with, and working to make them opt-out is great pressure to fix it

  • Yagizdoo
    Yılmaz Yağız Dokumacı (@Yagizdoo) reported

    Day[3] I looked at Shared Preferences today. I made 2 samples. I couldn't move on to another topic because I was dealing with a lot of mistakes. If I can fix the error in the 2nd example I made, I will post it on github. I'll share it here. #100DaysOfCode

  • thenawazkhan
    nawaz khan (@thenawazkhan) reported

    Can we make human rights open-source on Github and bug fix all the open issues? Let’s keep updating the versions, folks! #OpenSource #HumanRights #HumanRightsDay2021

  • forewarnedyou
    Dallin Warne (@forewarnedyou) reported

    I don't have a pcap of exploit attempts, so please test and open an issue in Github

  • domster
    Dom Barnes (@domster) reported

    @xjki @agiletortoise @RebeccaSlatkin Can you even find stackoverflow through all the search results of sites that just scraped every page? See also GitHub issues.

  • z80dev
    z80.eth 🦇🔊 | z80.sol (@z80dev) reported

    what's the best place to publish a technical tutorial? don't want to go through the trouble of setting up my own domain rn github?

  • MattWelke3
    Matt Welke (@MattWelke3) reported

    @shipilev @yazicivo I've been trying to understand why this is so different than other CVEs I've seen. I worked on a CVE where GitHub's researchers were in contact with me privately as they let me choose a schedule to fix a vulnerability they detected in an open source library I maintained.

  • alexellisuk
    Alex Ellis (@alexellisuk) reported

    @PierreDeWulf Yes but on GitHub sponsors instead. Try not to let it get you down.

  • jmeowmeow
    Jeff Miller (@jmeowmeow) reported

    @ln1draw I dropped journaling when I noticed I was circling around the same issues. I've been coming back in little ways "reflect on the day" (GitHub's Good Day) and "anticipate the day" (Lysa Tula Penrose's card draw prompts).

  • snyff
    Louis Nyffenegger (@snyff) reported

    @jasonbcox0 The exploit was available 6 hours before this lab. The course actually provides less details that there are publicly available on GitHub. It provides a test environment for people to understand the issue and setup everything to be able to then make sure they properly patched.

  • sentientsixp
    sentient 6 (@sentientsixp) reported

    @scottlinux @kawikacheco I thought the GitHub only tracked Nt Mini issues?

  • Joe_Stead
    Joe (@Joe_Stead) reported

    @TomasJansson @github Yeah, that's an option, but when I've got a broken environment (which I did manually like an idiot) and want to rereun an automatic deploy to fix it, it's really annoying to go through the full workflow just this once.