GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (62%)
• Errors (21%)
• Sign in (18%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Tlalpan	Sign in	3 days ago
Quilmes	Website Down	3 days ago
Bengaluru	Website Down	5 days ago
Yokohama	Sign in	6 days ago
Gustavo Adolfo Madero	Website Down	10 days ago
Nice	Website Down	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  nadya (@sosidudku) reported 24 seconds ago

  ran Hermes Agent vs OpenClaw on local model Qwen 3.6 35B task: scrape GitHub star history, find what caused the growth spikes, build a live dashboard in the browser OpenClaw: 203k tokens, 12m 01s — wrote a bash script Hermes: 257k tokens, 33m 01s — wrote a SKILL.md OpenClaw: hit GitHub API, got truncated responses, paginated through contributors, pulled star-history JSON, found a security incident in OpenClaw's history, fetched SVGs, fixed broken HTML from trimming, rewrote it clean. Hermes: parallel tool calls across GitHub API, web search, and browser. Hit Google rate limit, auto-switched to DuckDuckGo. Fetched article contents, mapped viral moments, then built the dashboard. Both shipped a live dashboard with star growth charts and spike annotations.

• 
  Shadow (@4shadowed) reported 1 minute ago

  @alex_marples @openclaw Have you filed any GitHub issues? Helped test the betas? Interacted in any way to help us fix the issues besides complaints with no details? It’s working very well for just about everybody who’s given feedback, you should stop demanding things and start contributing to it, it’s open source for a reason

• 
  Dewaldt Huysamen (@GodsBoy7777) reported 2 minutes ago

  @sickdotdev Getting insane and better results just on medium for all of the above categories. Weirdest is Opus 4.7 fails at basic school tasks help for kids and when I do code GPT 5.5 finds issues that are found in any case on github CI checks. If use codex CI passes more than 99%

• 
  𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚑𝚞𝚊 𝙱𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚕𝚎 (@joshua__b) reported 3 minutes ago

  @MagneticNorse You're right, they are hedging. But look at the board: open-sourcing the algorithm to GitHub is a brilliant tactical move because it creates the illusion of total transparency. The problem is that the code itself isn't where the suppression happens. The suppression happens in the training data, the safety filters, and the jurisdictional legal compliance that Musk himself admitted the algorithm is subject to. Hedging against criticism by showing us the code is like showing us the engine of a car while the administrative state still holds the steering wheel. It's an improvement, but it doesn't change our destination.

• 
  The Whizz AI (@TheWhizzAI) reported 6 minutes ago

  🚨Elon Musk just open-sourced the algorithm that controls what 600 million people see every day. Not a summary. Not a blog post. The actual production code. Live on GitHub right now. Facebook won't do this. TikTok guards it like a state secret. Instagram calls it proprietary. X just put it on the internet for free. This is the first time in history a major social platform has released its live, production-grade recommendation algorithm the same day it went live for users. Here's what's actually inside: →Home Mixer the orchestration layer that assembles your entire feed →Thunder stores and ranks every post from accounts you follow →Phoenix the Grok transformer that mines the entire global post library to find content you didn't know you wanted →Zero manual feature engineering Grok watches what you click, like, and dwell on. That IS the algorithm. →Updated every 4 weeks with full developer notes. Live. In public. Why did Musk do this? The EU fined X €120 million for transparency violations. France launched a separate investigation into algorithmic bias. Threads just overtook X in daily active users for the first time. And Musk said out loud on the day of release: "We know this algorithm is dumb and needs major improvements. But at least you can see us struggling to fix it in real time. No other social platform would dare do this." Here's the wildest part: You can now read exactly why your posts go viral. Or why they die at 12 impressions. No more guessing the algorithm. No more $500/mo "X growth" courses. No more "post at 9 AM on Tuesdays" nonsense. The answer is literally in the code. Apache 2.0 license. Full source. Updated monthly. The most transparent thing any social platform has ever done.

• 
  Your Friend Myk (@mykola) reported 10 minutes ago

  @joelhooks is this just static content? so like a github pages alterntaive? can't run a server etc?

• 
  Kendall Zettlmeier (@KZettlmeier) reported 11 minutes ago

  @davidfowl @github I would love agent mode to handle code review comments and issues but leaving the merging to the code writer (we have QA validate after an approval)

• 
  Lee Penkman (@LeeLeepenkman) reported 12 minutes ago

  @gxjo_dev stupidity... no... frupidity basically. like the exec cfo team is like well what if we reduce headcount wouldnt profitability go up? Like yes but you just wont be a good product company without a good product... like you are already struggling to compete with GitHub lmao... how u gna compere with codex n claude when they do repos? Also theres just fear that these devs cant learn AI which is kind of wrong because devs seem to be best placed to leverage AI of all? idk. im just guessing. lots of saas companies just doing layoffs had hired too many people having thought they would keep growing then they didnt their stock went way down and becomes harder to raise money for them because of bearish outlook for them competing with claude so investors scared off so harder for them to afford lots of developers so kind of start sinking. the devs would do better elsewhere anyway better to be on a new ship instead of sinking one.

• 
  Aki Ranin (@aki_ranin) reported 15 minutes ago

  New Claude Code master prompt: "/goal assign next GitHub issue and start PR, iterate until no critical or high issues found with PR review skill"

• 
  kiryl.ziusko (@ziusko) reported 16 minutes ago

  @rizzrark Oh no, it should always give a correct result. Don't you mind opening an issue on GitHub? I would love to understand the issue better 👀

• 
  Jerome Israel (@jerome_fletcher) reported 18 minutes ago

  github actions down? what's going on 👀

• 
  AtomicNodes (@AtomicNodes) reported 19 minutes ago

  Hermes Agent vs OpenClaw on Local Qwen 3.6 35B We asked agents to scrape GitHub star history for both tools, find what caused the growth spikes, build a live dashboard in the browser. MacBook Pro M5 Max 64Gb. OpenClaw: 203k tokens, 12m 01s — wrote a bash script Hermes: 257k tokens, 33m 01s — wrote a SKILL.md OpenClaw: hit GitHub API, got truncated responses, paginated through contributors, pulled star-history JSON, found a security incident in OpenClaw's history, fetched SVGs, fixed broken HTML from trimming, rewrote it clean. Hermes: parallel tool calls across GitHub API, web search, and browser. Hit Google rate limit, auto-switched to DuckDuckGo. Fetched article contents, mapped viral moments, then built the dashboard. Both shipped a live dashboard with star growth charts and spike annotations

• 
  C. ₿utt 📵 (@ctbutt114) reported 21 minutes ago

  @zquestz Reports are an issue with GG20, which was identified last month and set to be addressed. However, being open source, the bug was revealed via GitHub, & someone took advantage. Single bad actor on a new node. DLKS has been on the roadmap. Needed faster now.

• 
  isaac (@isaac_yeang) reported 26 minutes ago

  jk just lazy error message handling another bajillion dollars to github

• 
  craig carpenter (@ccarp87) reported 26 minutes ago

  @rfleury @awesomekling AI is bad at writing Rust, so Anthropic's answer is training it on Bun's github bug reports. Rust devs can't help themselves -- they just have to talk about how smart they are in GitHub Issues. They'll have this thing trained in a week.

• 
  Farhan Helmy (@farhanhelmycode) reported 27 minutes ago

  down again ? imma kms @github

• 
  DeBros (@DeBrosOfficial) reported 33 minutes ago

  The Problem We’re Solving🫡 Your organization’s brain lives in 12 different places — and none of them talk to each other. Decisions get buried in Telegram threads. Context is split between GitHub and AnChat. Important knowledge disappears within hours. Onboarding becomes tribal knowledge all over again. 🤖AnBuddy fixes this by becoming the single source of truth for your entire team.

• 
  Avinash (@amaurya888) reported 33 minutes ago

  GitHub Actions down? The runner is not picking up the queued job. @github @githubstatus @GitHubEnt

• 
  Crypto Scores Rating (@CryptoScoresCom) reported 34 minutes ago

  Did the team build before the money showed up? That's exactly what the "GitHub Before Crypto" metric tells you. It compares the first GitHub commit date to the token creation date. Positive number = code came first. Negative number = token came first. Ethereum: +589 days. Nearly two years of building with zero financial incentive. Solana: minus 63 days. Token launched before the repo even existed. Neither is an automatic verdict. But it tells you everything about priorities. CryptoScores just dropped a full tutorial breaking it down. Watch it now :

• 
  Atul (@atulcode) reported 35 minutes ago

  @GithubProjects Github is down

• 
  Lux Sp4rk (@lux_sp4rk) reported 40 minutes ago

  I dunno why I even humor this html > markdown trend. It's clearly not. Reality is that Markdown renders to HTML anyway. I.E: A Github issue is *not* raw markdown. The ByteRover argument relies on a false dichotomy.

• 
  Jason (@jasonbunnell) reported 43 minutes ago

  @claudeai FEATURE REQUEST: if user finds an issue with Claude Code and Claude resolves (or not), you should auto increment GitHub issue to keep track of real user issues per issue to resolve as needed Had an issue with Claude Code for VS Code extension but noticed only 10 likes

• 
  Fareesh Vijayarangam (@fareesh) reported 44 minutes ago

  @ThePrimeagen tbh I have zero reliability issues with GitHub I wonder if it's a western hemisphere thing

• 
  Emmanuel Olajide (@E_m_m_a_ola) reported 46 minutes ago

  Build Bulletproof Runbooks & Playbooks Every alert should have a one-click “what to do” guide. Store them in GitHub + link directly in PagerDuty. No more 3 a.m. panic. Just follow the steps and fix it in minutes.

• 
  Gopinho (@gopiinho) reported 51 minutes ago

  @apoorveth @walletchan_ will do for sure, also open issues on github if there is some backlog

• 
  Sukhjit Singh (@thesukhjitbajwa) reported 53 minutes ago

  Published the campus website, learned about Next.js static content and export output, uploaded the files via FTP to the server, and now brainstorming ways to automate the process using either GitHub Actions or local scripts.

• 
  Justin Cromer (@just_cromer) reported 53 minutes ago

  @htmx_org github is down sry

• 
  Tony Junkes (@tonyjunkes) reported 55 minutes ago

  Not having a “to top of page” button on a GitHub PR’s Files Changed tab when going well down a list of changed files is painful. Yes the home key does the thing, but hand on mouse, mouse yearns to click.

• 
  Abu Olumi 🪶 (@Olumi441) reported 57 minutes ago

  There's also a public feed. BaseLens fetches Base GitHub releases and analyzes them with AI automatically. Clean upgrade cards. No jargon. No noise. Anyone can read it, no login needed.

• 
  Scott Rudy (@scottrudy) reported 57 minutes ago

  @davidfowl I have GitHub Actions for Static Web Apps with .Net azure functions, but they refuse to update for .Net 10. Still stuck on 9 despite open issues.