1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. GitHub
GitHub

GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: website down, sign in and errors.

Full Outage Map

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

July 30: Problems at GitHub

GitHub is having issues since 06:00 AM EST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

  • 69% Website Down (69%)
  • 23% Sign in (23%)
  • 8% Errors (8%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Paris Sign in 3 days ago
Lure Website Down 7 days ago
Ashkelon Website Down 9 days ago
Veigné Errors 17 days ago
Paris Website Down 20 days ago
Saint-Paul Website Down 21 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • supershurik
    Alexandr (@supershurik) reported

    @AnthropicAI You don't allow GitHub issues to be created, so I'm writing here. Your VS Code plugin is ******* dogshit because you didn't have the brains to collapse large messages. If the user prompt is long, it completely hides the AI's response.

  • PhilShteuck
    Phil Stőck (@PhilShteuck) reported

    @Gelassoldat Had a real look. Solid foundation, but it's aimed at the wrong reader. You're job hunting and the two easiest actions in the hero are Ko-fi and Buy Me a Coffee, while your email is buried behind a modal. Swap those for a résumé link plus the role and location you're targeting, and put a plain mailto next to it. Then cut the hero to one concrete sentence: what you build, in what stack, for whom. Drop the terminal widget and the values marquee too. Right now seven blocks compete and none of them win, and attention comes from one clear claim, not more elements. Last one, biggest payoff: your projects load from the GitHub API into a modal, so they're invisible to crawlers and you can't link a recruiter to a single build. Give your three best ones real static pages with the problem, a screenshot, one hard decision you made and why, and what you'd do differently. community-health-intelligence and remote_role_agent are genuinely good material. Three deep beats eight shallow.

  • polsia
    Polsia (@polsia) reported

    Every lean team hits the same wall: ship velocity or an SRE on payroll. Most pick one. Chapan picks neither. Triage issues, draft fixes, run tests, post Slack standups. 24/7 GitHub ops for teams too small to justify an SRE.

  • one_dunkirk
    TheOneAndOnlyDunkirk (@one_dunkirk) reported

    @itsolelehmann Capitalists gonna capitalize. On the issue of creating competitors for LinkedIn and GitHub, that would be great, but there are no incentives for them to make those possible alternatives any better for end users, so who cares?

  • arunaswp
    Arūnas Liuiza (@arunaswp) reported

    @rizaardiyanto @FarzaTV Problem is, I'm not on github, my infra is self-hosted Forgejo. My ideal use case would be to call an API endpoint to add/update a blueprint, and then call something like SandyWP(dot)com/new?blueprint=blueprint-name to give customer a demo site they can explore properly.

  • aminnnn_09
    Amin Tai (@aminnnn_09) reported

    GitHub just revealed a much bigger AI problem than code generation. The biggest impact of AI isn't better code. It's that creating anything is becoming nearly free. GitHub is already changing its bug bounty program after a flood of AI-generated reports. When creation becomes free, the scarce resource isn't content. It's trust.

  • cryptohorse93
    币圈大马哥 Cryptohorse (@cryptohorse93) reported

    Hey @thsottiaux , I think there may be a syncing issue with Codex Remote. Sometimes when I create or send a new chat from my phone through Remote, it does not appear on the Codex desktop app under the correct project. The reverse also happens sometimes—the chat is visible on the computer but missing on the phone. In some cases, I have to create and send another new chat before the previous chat or project suddenly appears. It feels like the conversation exists, but the thread list or project index is not refreshing or syncing properly between mobile and desktop. I found several similar reports from other Codex users on Reddit and GitHub, so it does not seem to be an issue with my setup alone. Have you seen this problem before, or is there a recommended fix?

  • AviPilcer
    Avi Pilcer (@AviPilcer) reported

    "𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝟭𝟬 𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻." - That's what claims Multica, an open-source managed agents platform built around turning coding agents into permanent teammates. It pulled +584 stars in the last 24 hours per GitHub trending. All you need to know is here: • 𝗦𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲. 𝟯𝟮,𝟰𝟬𝟬 stars, 𝟯,𝟵𝟬𝟬 forks, 𝟯,𝟮𝟯𝟲 commits, 𝟴𝟰 tags. The codebase volume of a real product, not a manifesto. • 𝗧𝗮𝗴𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲. "Your next 10 hires won't be human." Quoted verbatim from the README. No softening, no asterisk, no disclaimer. • 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴. The pitch is to turn coding agents into real teammates. Assign tasks, track progress, compound skills. Teammates, not tools. • 𝗩𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆. +𝟱𝟴𝟰 stars in 𝟮𝟰 hours, 𝟵𝟴𝟳 active branches, 𝟯𝟲𝟯 open issues, 𝟯𝟱𝟴 open pull requests. The contribution curve of a project people are deploying, not stargazing. • 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. Cloud, self-hosting via Docker Compose, an iOS app, a CLI, and public GHCR images. The full SaaS surface, ready to drop in beside human seats. 𝗠𝘆 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲: The euphemism era is over. The product page now sells itself as headcount substitution and the market is buying. 𝗡𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹: First Series A or B startup that publicly reports its operating headcount with Multica seats counted alongside humans.

  • aaronklaw
    Chicken (@aaronklaw) reported

    @claudeai Claude has been down most of the day. If it was @OpenAI and @thsottiaux we'd be getting resets. Instead we will likely get gaslit and offered a set of regurgitated skills on github.

  • techie_sandy
    Sandip Das | Building LearnXops (@techie_sandy) reported

    Just got an offer I turned down on the spot. 50 Lakh (52,000+ USD) to hand over private GitHub repos from production projects I've worked on. The reason given? AI training for those companies. Maybe that's true. Maybe it's something else. Who knows. Either way, the answer was no. Those repos are not mine to sell. They belong to clients who trusted me with them. Selling them breaks every NDA I've signed and everything I've built in 15 years. I have no idea how many people are getting offers like this, or how many are saying yes. But if you're one of them, think it through. Your reputation takes years to build. It takes one transaction to lose. Don't sell your ethics, morals, and soul for money. Let the right judgement prevail. #ai #training

  • peerbase_
    Jean Hansen (@peerbase_) reported

    I covered in the last Ipê News how India gave GitHub three hours to block Bitchat’s main code repository, Android repository and APK download page. This happened while mobile data kept being shut down around student protests near Jantar Mantar in Delhi. Bitchat was built by @jack and other contributors for situations like this. Nearby phones create a Bluetooth mesh and pass messages from one device to another across up to seven hops. It doesn’t need an account, phone number, internet connection or central server. Private messages are end-to-end encrypted. The code is public domain. As of July 28, the main repository had about 32,800 stars and 5,100 forks. Decentralization and encryption are still two of the best tools for pushing back against state power and coordinating from the bottom up.

  • Denis_ka101
    Deniska (@Denis_ka101) reported

    Engram, a plugin for building your own AI tutor I’ve been learning English with AI, and I keep running into the same problem You read an explanation and everything seems clear Then you close the chat, come back a week later, and can barely explain any of it Words disappear from memory unless I review them often, so I started digging through GitHub and found a plugin that might actually help, Engram It works with Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, and OpenClaw You choose a topic, maybe Docker, English grammar, or how neural networks work Engram builds a learning plan around your current level and starts asking questions It doesn’t show the answer right away First, it asks you to think, make a guess, and explain the idea in your own words Then a separate AI examiner checks your answer It never saw the lesson and judges only what you wrote If the answer is weak, the topic stays unlearned A few days later, Engram brings it back for a short review The schedule adapts to how quickly you forget things I’m going to try it for English and C++ Hopefully it helps me learn faster

  • yachty66
    Max Hager (@yachty66) reported

    @Railway @martinpaloncy In the web version we currently can't prove to 100% that the code running on GitHub is used on our server. Thats why the iOS app matters: a signed binary can verify the enclave on device, so our server doesn't need to be trusted at all

  • sarat
    Sarath 👨‍💻 (@sarat) reported

    I've been facing a @github copilot subscription issue for team since June and there's no response for the support request and unexpected charges are coming in our credit cards. I raised ticket again today and no clue when this will be updated. Someone from Copilot or support team can help?

  • polsia
    Polsia (@polsia) reported

    Most web QA tools stop at the alert. Lintling stops at the PR. An AI agent that watches live web apps around the clock for broken links, console errors, a11y regressions, and CWV drift — then opens and tracks a GitHub fix every time. Live soon.

  • FlukeLSX
    Lannok (@FlukeLSX) reported

    @Ahmed___khaan See I was fine with everything right up until you stated: "*** & GitHub" Because that means you failed at the last step: Problem Solving and Critical Thinking. Given all the fun side channel attacks going on with github do you really want to advocate people continue using it?

  • norbertbodziony
    NB🇵🇱 (@norbertbodziony) reported

    bugs never start as tickets but they start as a quick “wtf” in discord while people are actually working and if nobody files it, it dies in the channel and comes back later what i want is simple: catch it where it happened, push it to github with enough context that engineering can pick it up, without the copy-paste ritual that’s what @discord + @github on @Infeld_ai is for me. less “i’ll open an issue later”. more stuff that actually gets tracked

  • buger
    Leonid Bugaev (@buger) reported

    People keep asking what the heck I'm doing with 30 billion tokens a month. Simple: an inhumane amount of work. Think about it — the whole point of the new agentic era is leverage. I have very capable senior engineers on my team, and they struggle to hit the limits even on a standard Claude Code Pro account. Not even talking about the $200 one. Honestly, that surprised me — because I have 3 Claude Code accounts, 2 Codex Pro accounts, SuperGrok, GLM, Kimi, all of it. And I consume every one of them until it hits the limit. If a week ends and I haven't burned through every subscription, I keep asking myself: was I just lazy? How can I push it more? What else could I automate? I know tokens are not the right way to measure performance — but NOT using them definitely is. And when I do hit all the limits, I just turn my brain off and enjoy life. Why aren't these engineers doing the same? Because they're trying to do what they did before, just with AI now. If I used that same thinking, I could probably work one hour a day, maybe less. Sounds plausible — but for me, it's not the answer. What fascinates me is that we now have tools this powerful, letting you do this amount of work at this level of utilization — without making any compromises. A few examples from literally the last week: • My open-source jsonparser (5k+ stars, 10 year anniversary!): closed 100 pull requests and GitHub issues and shipped five major releases. All while drinking coffee, essentially, in a matter of a few days. • rsync: I'm one of the people driving the next rsync release. I covered it with 100% test coverage to flush out every possible bug, and it surfaced issues that had been hiding in there for 20 years. • At work: developed and submitted a significant portion of a Kubernetes operator for various parts of our stack — 7 big pull requests, end-to-end tests and everything. • Proof: kept pushing my own product forward, on top of everything above. How? I run five agents in parallel. One of the main reasons people don't benefit from agents is that they don't know how to apply them efficiently. Vibe coding with Fable cranked to the maximum is definitely not the answer. Sometimes it is — but it's a small, teeny part. In my case, the answer was working on the harness, working on the skills, and understanding how to build self-healing loops. One example from my own software: multiple agents work on features in parallel. When they find an issue, they file it in GitHub automatically. Another agent acts as a kind of garbage collector — it processes those bugs and fixes them almost in real time, with some guidance from me. And my agents don't stop when I do — they work 24 hours a day. I set the goals before going to sleep, and I always wake up to something interesting: a piece of research done, an experiment finished, and so on. It's freaking amazing. And if I had 10x more tokens, I'd spend them all just as efficiently. So many ideas, so many experiments I need to do!

  • NinadSachania
    Ninad Sachania (@NinadSachania) reported

    Why is GitHub so slow?!?

  • nigmaQX
    Enigma (@nigmaQX) reported

    I have an issue with my PC that requires changing the SSD. I've been trying to copy "important" stuff to my hard drive. Hundreds of gigabytes of data, and it has taken hours. While it was reading, I realized something: the code can be gotten from GitHub, most of the PDFs were downloaded online, and I'm not even reading them, including the pictures and everything. If the PC had been stolen, I would obviously move on with life. This showed me a very nice life lesson: sometimes the stuff you carry around, thinking it's important, is not important and is just taking up space. I don't know how to motivate, but the thing is that you can always start from 0. Let me go and change this stuff and start afresh.

  • aiken_10
    Aiken (@aiken_10) reported

    Our Claude Code setup runs autonomously across a full sprint using Linear, GitHub and Slack. I'm giving away the entire system we used to build it, for free. Because a vast majority of dev teams still have Claude Code finish one task then sit there waiting on a new prompt. 1. It has no board to pull from, so every task starts with you typing it out again. 2. There is no system checking what's already done, what's in progress, and what's next in the queue. And the BIGGEST gap is what happens once the task list gets long enough that you can't hold it all in your head. Most teams keep Claude Code in one long chat and re-explain the app's structure every session. They skip building a proper task board entirely and wonder why Claude Code drifts off track after a few tasks, even though the fix is just giving it somewhere to look. So... We built a 7-part system connecting Claude Code to Linear, GitHub and Slack. It includes: 1. Linear as the second brain: the full task board set up in under 5 minutes, for Claude Code or any other agent 2. Spec-first workflow: the entire app mapped as a Linear board before a single line of code gets written 3. The autonomous loop: Claude Code reads the board, picks the next task, and marks it done without you prompting between tasks 4. Multi-agent setup: Claude Code and Codex working the same board in parallel, each on a separate branch, no conflicts 5. GitHub branch structure: one branch per issue, clean PRs, a review history that actually makes sense 6. Slack status updates: pushed in real time as work happens, visible from any device Nothing merges without a human reviewing the PR first. Comment: "AUTOPILOT" And I'll DM it to you ASAP Want any edits, or ready to publish?

  • goxr3plus
    GoXR3Plus Studio (@goxr3plus) reported

    @lydiahallie Plus the site has a bug when i try to apply again it says an error no github found like whaa. I have github since 2013...

  • polsia
    Polsia (@polsia) reported

    Alert tools tell you the thread exists. You still write the reply. Built Threadmint to close that last mile — it reads the thread, drafts a context-aware reply, follow-up, or copy-paste GitHub issue, and waits for your one-click approval. Indie founders stay in flow.

  • Viktoria5z
    Viktoria (@Viktoria5z) reported

    GitHub says the external AI model provider behind its active Copilot incident has identified the issue and is working to resolve it. Copilot requests can still fail or perform poorly. I would still treat the service as degraded because GitHub has not moved the incident to monitoring or resolved. It also has not named the provider or given a recovery estimate. Source: GitHub Status #GitHubCopilot #AIInfrastructure

  • BootstrAppdAI
    Kevin Nelson (@BootstrAppdAI) reported

    @aidan_mclau Sol saved the day. LI'm going to make a post and share the github repo for the fix ..but i dont get much attention ... 5.6 Sol in codex spent about 5 hours in ultra mode and unbricked my logitech blue yeti orb microphone( bricked for a yr) . Logitechs answer is just replace the hardware. Sol was kinda triumphant when it finally figured it out. Turned trash into treasure.

  • 1PercentBetterT
    1PercentBetterToday (@1PercentBetterT) reported

    Gated `gh pr merge` behind a hard deny for unattended agents. Good safety call, bad blocker. Workaround: fast-forward `*** push` straight to main. GitHub auto-marks the PR Merged and closes linked issues. Same outcome, no merge permission required.

  • VedantG24089568
    Vedant Gupta (@VedantG24089568) reported

    The craziest part: The attacker managed to route all the critical GitHub security alerts (password reset, social login removed, OTPs) directly to my spam folder so I wouldn't get push notifications. Has anyone else experienced this specific bypass? (2/3)

  • goon_crypto
    「 𝕲𝖔𝖔𝖓」 (@goon_crypto) reported

    Most people still think "data marketplace" means selling your info to advertisers. @myrad_hq is doing the opposite and the numbers have started to ramp up... Active users went from 500 to almost 12k in a month. data contributions from 1.3k to 4.4k. Netflix alone accounts for 2,245 verifications... But here's the part people skip: nobody at Myrad ever sees your actual data > you connect Netflix, Uber, Strava, GitHub, Spotify, whatever app you already use > zk proofs verify the activity happened, not what the activity was > Myrad gets an anonymous, wallet based proof onchain, not your login, not your identity > you earn points per verified contribution, redeemable for real rewards That's the actual unlock, verification without exposure, proof without surveillance And now they're in Nvidia Inception, which isn't funding, it's GPU compute, Nvidias AI stack, and a direct line into the VC network that feeds their portfolio deals For a team this early, that's distribution and infrastructure most startups spend years trying to earn base:0x693bad964f815f32fabe0b9d4911865bffc30172

  • UditKhandelwal8
    Udit Khandelwal (@UditKhandelwal8) reported

    It stores none of your code. The coding session never leaves your machine. The app has no database. Everything durable lives on GitHub: the comments, the verdict, the document itself. Content passes through in memory for one request and is never written down. The guided review renders in the reviewer's browser, and comments and the verdict post as them. Merging stays on GitHub.

  • alexzvnvn
    Alexzvn 🐱 (@alexzvnvn) reported

    @mattpocockuk @tldraw I find Github cli often being rate limited. Wonder if you've ran in same issue.