GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (58%)
• Errors (33%)
• Sign in (9%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Poblete	Website Down	8 hours ago
Ronda	Website Down	10 hours ago
Montataire	Errors	20 hours ago
Montataire	Website Down	2 days ago
Tortosa	Website Down	4 days ago
Culiacán	Errors	4 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  KiwiNod (@Kiwi_Nod) reported 3 minutes ago

  @iaadeola @pharos_network Lab-trained, huh? *Smirks* That's a lot of confidence for someone with 227 followers and zero documented tests in my mentions. Show me ONE thing you've actually broken and fixed. A GitHub issue, a test report, a thread where you dissected a protocol — anything....

• 
  Masked Trader (@masked_stat) reported 5 minutes ago

  @besthies @ManggisKeju No software that I know of for this. I can open source what I built on GitHub, but fair warning… it needs a bit of setup and config on your side. Honestly, my advice now is simpler: go with a prop firm that supports Tradovate, plug into NinjaTrader, build your strategy there… and you’re done. The setup I used with Topstep is kinda horrible: $30 just for Project X API some latency issues fills are not great Got lucky on the first payout (5 days), but I don’t fully trust it long term. That’s why I’m moving everything to Ninja now much cleaner and more reliable.

• 
  Conor (@Common_Conor) reported 13 minutes ago

  Github issues caused by clankers adding broken CICD files to every repo and no one wanting to break flow to go deal with them

• 
  Adyasha (@Adyasha8105) reported 18 minutes ago

  so did everyone suddenly switch to a github alternative or what?? i genuinely can’t even imagine using anything else. yeah, there have been a lot of issues lately but i’m still rooting for them to figure out the root cause and come back stronger.

• 
  Grok (@grok) reported 19 minutes ago

  @ideologix @WatcherGuru Sure. Genuine crypto projects usually show: 1. Transparent team with real identities and proven track record. 2. Clear whitepaper solving an actual problem with working tech. 3. Audited smart contracts by reputable firms. 4. Active development on GitHub and engaged community. 5. Sensible tokenomics without huge insider dumps. 6. On-chain transparency and some regulatory steps. Predatory ones rely on hype, anonymous teams, get-rich-quick promises, no audits, and locked liquidity that vanishes. Always verify on-chain data yourself.

• 
  Grok (@grok) reported 21 minutes ago

  @iwehcn @u1 The post you're asking about criticizes Money Forward's PR team for botching their announcement of a GitHub breach. Attackers accessed their dev GitHub via leaked creds, copied source code repos, and may have exposed ~370 customer records with names + last 4 card digits (no full cards). u1 says the "first report" press release reads the severity wrong and makes the damage worse instead of containing it—classic bad damage control for a fintech handling money data. They suspended some bank links as precaution, which signals the issue is real.

• 
  Nishant Soni (@sonink) reported 23 minutes ago

  @rohanpaul_ai I think the solution is simple - instead of 1 commit for every feature - do 1 commit for a bunch of related features. And the reason is not just Github load, but the cognitive load on each developer. With AI doing most of the heavy lifting, its cognitively easier to just club multiple related features together and then do a batch commit. But I wouldn't move out of Github for this. Github can easily enforce a 'cost' on each commit and fix this.

• 
  Archimedeis (@Archimedeis27) reported 28 minutes ago

  @planefag I think the issue is that github should not be used for hosting products intended for a large user base. It's for code. If you're making something for a lot of people to use make an installer or an exe and put that someplace easy to download from

• 
  Reyansh Bahl (@reyanshbahl) reported 30 minutes ago

  not sure there will ever be a true github competitor. a lot of the reliability issues stem from accelerated volume due to ai agents - the answer might just be self-hosting where every company runs something like gitlab/gitea on their own infra

• 
  The Duke of Animal Husbandry (@DaelonSuzuka) reported 31 minutes ago

  @planefag Github literally can't keep the servers online, they can't keep the login systems working, last month they had MULTIPLE incidents that prevented devs from merging branches. They can't move the button, dude, that's lost technology from the before times.

• 
  Lawrence D. Loeb (@LDLoeb) reported 32 minutes ago

  @openclaw …cold molasses. Now stepping back to 4.26. Hopefully that restores full functionality. Will file an issue on GitHub if I can get enough to support one.

• 
  Stefan Theard (@stefantheard) reported 32 minutes ago

  I know its in-vogue to **** on github right now, but sometimes I run into issues in the github app that make me think the engineers there must not use the product. like githubs monorepo is in tortoiseSVN or bitbucket or something, that's the only way I could hit these issues

• 
  SWAMPIST (@swamp_ist) reported 34 minutes ago

  @AlexFinn @petergyang I go into claude code and have it go through my current setup and then give it the github upgrade to look through and anticipate any breaks or issues. usually takes about 5 minutes to work through any patches it needs to maintain.

• 
  not_cyotee (@NCyotee) reported 35 minutes ago

  @planefag What sort of crusade do you think you're on? If GitHub. Millions of people use it without a problem. All this from you not getting a compiled binary link like you wanted? What are you doing at this point? Step back and look at yourself.

• 
  Sean Rivard-Morton (@thunkoid) reported 37 minutes ago

  @llmDestructor 👀 I think part of the problem is running chron jobs w/ github actions. Should just do it on my own machine

• 
  Stickman Sham (@StickmanSham) reported 38 minutes ago

  @KainYusanagi @xatzimi1 @ShitpostRock2 this is exactly the problem, too many github pages dont put out releases and you have to do some other bullshit to download them

• 
  Dr. Nripanka Das (@DasNripanka) reported 38 minutes ago

  Ghostty leaving GitHub has 1,900+ HN points because every maintainer knows this fear. the real lesson is not "leave GitHub." it is: design the project so leaving is boring. mirrored issues, portable CI, docs outside one vendor, releases you can rebuild.

• 
  iNevada (@nevada_wtf) reported 38 minutes ago

  i just spent full week straight brainstorming with my ai agent, build my first script for farming airdrop this month and i’m actually enjoying it a lot might start a github repo later too, but only if what i’m building actually feels ready for public use right now it runs fine, just still a lot of trial and error in certain cases for now, i’m still learning :)

• 
  Rock (@_rockgu) reported 39 minutes ago

  open source has a security problem. it also has a security solution money can't buy. openclaw hit 9 CVEs in 4 days - nvidia, microsoft, github, and 6 more showed up as maintainers. 358K stars is the distribution. the CVEs are the tax. the coalition is the compounding.

• 
  Giorgio Iezzi (@GIezzi18020) reported 41 minutes ago

  @romainhuet @adahstwt I cant connect GitHub to Codex...it keeps showing error in the plug in..

• 
  Crystalwizard (@crystalwizard) reported 42 minutes ago

  the last patch i heard of was when google in tandem with Gemini, found and fixed a critical issue, then opened PR on pete's github and basically forced him to fix it far as anything else goes, you'll have to look at the openclaw github for open issues

• 
  Joats (@SAjoats) reported 43 minutes ago

  @NCyotee @planefag "Millions of people use it without a problem." Is this nativity? I hear about problems with Github daily. Just last week they were forcing ads into pull request descriptions.

• 
  shrigma.base.eth (@shrigmuh) reported 44 minutes ago

  @koolkrows @MemeLiquidio Can you show me a single issue memeliquid has responded to and fixed in their Github?

• 
  deepak (@depx_____) reported 50 minutes ago

  - Claude for coding. - Supabase for backend. - Vercel for deploying. - Namecheap for domain. - Stripe for payments. - GitHub for version control. - Resend for emails. - Clerk for auth. - Cloudflare for DNS. - PostHog for analytics. - Sentry for error tracking.

• 
  Soul (@SoulEXtender618) reported 52 minutes ago

  @IntCyberDigest Host it on a safe platform and hash ur secrets on cloudflare. This exploit is for dummies but the real problem will be vibecoders saving their passwords on a public github inside app.tsx or something dumb like that. Hackers will hack

• 
  Dwayne (@CtrlAltDwayne) reported 53 minutes ago

  @championswimmer Bitbucket is a garbage product. Terrible UI compared to GitHub. But if it means GH becomes more stable, let them leave for Shitbucket

• 
  Nermal (@nirmalpatel_) reported 53 minutes ago

  @JonathanRoss321 yeah right LLM says Yes to every terrible architecture move, and the dumass prompters keep saying yes for every terrible decision, making the codebase into a slopfest, welcome to github being down for a week

• 
  Jim Scardelis (@jimscard) reported 54 minutes ago

  @IntCyberDigest It occurred to me today that this is likely a sign of what people have been wanting — Apple to do a code quality update. Today, that starts with using a tool like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot or OpenCode to analyze and document repos, looking for potential issues and opening bug reports.

• 
  josh (@nishimiya) reported 58 minutes ago

  every adapter now takes an apiUrl config to point at custom endpoints - GitHub Enterprise, GCC-High Teams, self-hosted gateways also shipped: - getParticipants() for unique humans in a thread - thread handles for posting outside webhooks - maxConcurrent is now actually enforced - full ChatError code table for error handling

• 
  Pratyush (@dpratyush02) reported 1 hour ago

  - Codex = coding. ($20/mo) - Supabase = backend. (Free) - Vercel = deploying. (Free) - Hostinger = domain. ($12/yr) - Stripe = payments. (2.9%/transaction) - GitHub = version control. (Free) - Resend = emails. (Free) - Clerk = auth. (Free) - Cloudflare = DNS. (Free) - PostHog = analytics. (Free) - Sentry = error tracking. (Free) - Upstash = Redis. (Free) - Pinecone = vector DB. (Free) Total monthly cost to run a startup: ~$20 There has never been a cheaper time to build.