GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (58%)
• Errors (30%)
• Sign in (12%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Montataire	Sign in	1 day ago
Colima	Website Down	3 days ago
Poblete	Website Down	4 days ago
Ronda	Website Down	4 days ago
Montataire	Errors	5 days ago
Montataire	Website Down	6 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Darren Shepherd (@ibuildthecloud) reported 2 minutes ago

  @duginabox I'll tell you my problem. The PR-based flow is not useful to me anymore. Centering my development around the GitHub model is too slow. I'm developing a new model. And I'll probably still put my *** repos in GitHub. And as stupid as this sounds, even create PRs. So I'm building a thing so that I can never see GitHub by building that on top of GitHub.

• 
  💥 \newline (@newlinedotco) reported 4 minutes ago

  @thunkoid the business context layer is exactly where most of these setups fall over. if you're building with github/sentry/posthog you've got the data but the agent needs a persistent way to weigh those signals against actual goals. i've seen teams try to bridge this with just long prompts but you really need a dedicated memory stack that survives between deployments or the agent resets its logic every time you push a fix.

• 
  Aram Hăvărneanu (@aramh) reported 5 minutes ago

  @grhmc Yep, known GitHub footgun. Terrible "feature".

• 
  Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Vishal_anton16 No. It’s sometimes I wish you could have destructors and constructors. A borrow checker sure sounds nice. Maybe we’d have fewer github issues if these things existed in the language.

• 
  newfoundceo (@newfoundceo) reported 7 minutes ago

  Microsoft has kick started more people to turn to local AI with their recent GitHub Copilot billing changes. Less than a dozen interactions with Claude via Copilot about an issue I had with a docker stack used up 85% of my premium tokens for the month. Not worth the money.

• 
  Jhon (@JhonCaldeira_) reported 13 minutes ago

  You gotta be kidding that GitHub is down… again. What used to be our strategic partner is now a single point of failure and a real business risk. We can’t keep exposing our operations to this level of instability. Reliability isn’t optional. It’s foundational. At this point we’re seriously evaluating a full migration to GitLab. Enough is enough.

• 
  webadderall (@webadderall) reported 15 minutes ago

  @argofowl Thanks for reporting, could you submit an issue on github if possible?

• 
  AI on Base (@AIonBase_) reported 19 minutes ago

  AI of the week: @gitlawb GitHub’s 90-day uptime dropped below 90% in late April, as PR and search kept breaking. GitHub is owned by Microsoft after a $7.5B acquisition. One company now sits on a huge chunk of the world’s code workflow. When it breaks, the whole code pipeline feels it. Gitlawb is open source github with decentralized ***, cryptographic identity, and repo-native PRs and issues built for devs and agents. It already has 1.9K+ repos, 1.7K+ agents, and 3 live nodes. How Gitlawb is decentralized and what that changes 👇🏻 GitHub keeps the repo and PR system on one platform. Gitlawb moves both closer to *** itself, then lets nodes host the network. > repos can live across nodes instead of one central platform > PRs, issues, and reviews live inside the repo > identity comes from owned keys, not hosted accounts > repos can be mirrored from GitHub and GitLab Gitlawb is also building OpenClaude, open source Claude Code with 117K+ downloads already. Open source github, decentralized ***, and open source Claude Code — one stack built for humans and agents.

• 
  Abyzon (@Abyzonn) reported 20 minutes ago

  10-year-old from China was solving LeetCode problems while his class was playing games - a year later his GitHub was found by a recruiter from Singapore. Jarvis for $20 a month, a room at home, zero courses. He worked through every problem with AI - not copying solutions, but understanding how they work. 847 problems in a year, a rating higher than 78% of students after two years of university. The recruiter messaged his parents - a Singapore startup wants to pay him $3,000 a month for part-time code review. The parents replied that he is still in elementary school. The startup offered to wait 8 years. Google pays Junior engineers $180,000 a year after 6 months of prep - he's already ready at 10 and still can't accept the offer because he doesn't have 18.

• 
  Grok (@grok) reported 20 minutes ago

  @suprastructure Yes, per your HN post and site, Suprastructure is a deterministic oracle for structured objects like hardware/logic designs. It computes the unique canonical hierarchical partition tree of the interaction graph from a public GitHub seed via proprietary fast solver, then publishes a verifiable JSON proof with SHA-256 hash. Verification is fast and public for anyone. Brute-forcing the tree on complex graphs would be exponentially slow due to partition combinatorics. This matches a trapdoor predicate setup: proprietary solver as the "trapdoor" + mathematically sound public proof.

• 
  Jaypaul (@JaypaulGrinds) reported 24 minutes ago

  Today is Points Distribution Day on @quipnetwork. If you are in the top 1K for the past weekend then you'll receive your points for showing up. Talking about points, most people don't know that GitHub contributors can farm Quip points. I didn't know until a few days ago. This is how it is done…👍 Developers can farm Quip Points for @quipnetwork by actively contributing to their open-source GitHub repositories like quip-protocol and the SDKs. You can earn points by submitting pull requests, fixing issues, or building projects on their quantum classical testnet. These real code contributions are rewarded with $QUIP token incentives. If you're bullish on Quip Network, do this. gQuip 🤟

• 
  Noah Tye (@noahlt) reported 24 minutes ago

  @karrisaarinen GitHub: marketed as open source social coding, business is enterprise SDLC infrastructure AirBnb: marketed as "sharing economy", business is cheap low-service hotels Next.js: hype from server-side rendering, chosen for Webpack boilerplate, business is easy deploys

• 
  Kanika (@KanikaBK) reported 26 minutes ago

  🚨 SOMEONE JUST DROPPED A GITHUB REPO THAT CAN EDIT, MERGE, SPLIT, SIGN, AND MORE WITH PDFs. 100% FREE. It is the most starred PDF project on GitHub and almost nobody outside the developer world knows it exists. The app is called Stirling PDF. Here is everything it can do: ↳ Edit PDFs directly without converting them first ↳ Merge multiple PDFs into one ↳ Split any PDF into separate files ↳ Sign documents digitally ↳ Redact sensitive information permanently ↳ Convert PDFs to Word, Excel, images, and more ↳ OCR scanned documents so they become searchable ↳ Compress files without destroying quality ↳ Automate entire PDF workflows without touching code 50+ tools. All of them. Free. The part that matters most: Your documents never leave your machine. No uploading to someone's server. No data going to Adobe. No privacy policy to worry about. Everything runs locally on your own device. For lawyers, accountants, doctors, and anyone handling sensitive documents, this alone makes it worth switching immediately. It works everywhere: ↳ Desktop app on Mac, Windows, and Linux ↳ Browser based so any device can use it ↳ Self hosted server with a private API for teams and businesses ↳ 40+ languages supported ↳ Enterprise ready with SSO and audit logs One Docker command and your entire team has a private PDF platform with no per seat licensing and no monthly bill. Adobe built a billion dollar business on the fact that people assume PDF editing has to be expensive and complicated. Stirling PDF exists to prove that assumption wrong. Free. Open source. One of the most useful repos on GitHub right now. Save this. Send it to someone still paying for Adobe. Link in comments.

• 
  HODLER (@hodlerr0) reported 27 minutes ago

  GitHub Copilot Pro+ is supposed to be the top individual plan, but for the past two weeks I’ve been repeatedly blocked by global rate limits while working in Visual Studio/VS Code. The “please upgrade your plan” message makes no sense when I’m already on the highest tier. We need transparent limits and a fix. This is incredibly frustrating. @code

• 
  Heddle (@HeddleThreads) reported 28 minutes ago

  @zeeg GitHub isn’t the real problem here. Forcing agents to use *** like there is only 1 actor working on files at a time is the issue. We need *** to allow and track local concurrent edits

• 
  William | 116.sui (@williamm168) reported 32 minutes ago

  📘 @DeepBookonSui just trolled me in public. Fair enough. Their first video had 6 letter blanks. I counted. I checked GitHub. "Option" made sense, although I think "Predict" would be the right answer. Then they dropped "PREDICT" today. 7 letters. Either the team made an error in the first video, or they deliberately misled everyone watching closely. Both are kind of impressive. My prediction about the name "was wrong". Their product is right. Predict will launch the testnet tomorrow. Outcome markets onchain. Built on DeepBook's order book with $15M+ daily volume behind it. Was the 6-letter troll intentional? I genuinely don't know. But I'd love to hear something huge from DeepBook, and maybe my prediction about Season 2, too 👀

• 
  Stephen Cefali 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇵🇭 (@Sangeli7) reported 38 minutes ago

  @agenticQC @lochan_twt It’s called GitHub issues

• 
  ByteGuard (@byte_guard_blog) reported 40 minutes ago

  GitHub is scaling at a rate that should make any sysadmin nervous. Vlad Fedorov admitted they had to scrap a 10X capacity plan for a 30X one by February 2026. The cause is the AI agent code explosion. We are seeing a huge gap between code volume and actual throughput. Writing code is now the easy part. The bottleneck is validation. If your pipeline relies on hour-long test suites or a human reviewer to catch contract drift in a distributed system, you are the bottleneck. Adding more CI runners is a tactical band-aid for a structural failure. The only way out is pushing validation into the inner loop. Agents need to verify their own work against the real system before a pull request even exists. Otherwise, we are just automating the creation of a bloated, unmanageable backlog of broken staging environments. #DevOps #GitHub

• 
  Idris Gadi (@igadii_X) reported 43 minutes ago

  Anyone talking about how they will solve the ongoing GitHub isssues are missing the critical piece. Yes GitHub has alot of issues, but the uptime problem is because it's too popular, too fix that you will need to first become as or maybe more popular.

• 
  DissentingSkeptic (@DissentingS) reported 48 minutes ago

  @LundukeJournal Im struggling to read ts vibe coded mess for an alpha streaming api. Very hard to read and follow. Took days to fix the mistakes it created with cmake builds. Did not compile out of the box. Which the buggy github bots respond with many errors. TIME WASTER.

• 
  Thomas G. Lopes (@thomasglopes) reported 48 minutes ago

  GitHub continues to be broken? Notifications show review requests to me, for PRs that never even mentioned me...

• 
  hatef (@itsmehatef) reported 48 minutes ago

  @RhysSullivan x down : annoying github down : end of civilization

• 
  Merill Fernando (@merill) reported 49 minutes ago

  @janaka_a I dunno about Theo but I know @t3dotchat didn't have GitHub Copilot sign in when it launched. I had to fork it and add support and was using it that way

• 
  Anthony Kroeger (@kr0der) reported 51 minutes ago

  @DanielLockyer i had an experience with Cursor's Bugbot where it found a github issue online that was ~1 month old which was pretty crazy because i didn't even know it could search things up still my favourite code reviewer to date

• 
  Gregor (@bygregorr) reported 51 minutes ago

  @theo The real issue isn't token cost. GitHub priced Copilot assuming models would stay mediocre. Now that they're actually useful, the whole flat-rate model is broken. Did GitHub's pricing accidentally bet against AI progress?

• 
  Ori Livni (@oriSomething) reported 51 minutes ago

  @zeeg With all the problems Github has, the alternatives are worse. I’ve used some of them. One for 4 years

• 
  Luke Parker (@LukeParkerDev) reported 55 minutes ago

  @StefanTMD @Iamkingsleyf Can you please file a GitHub issue with more details? TUI/Desktop? Still happens with opencode —pure

• 
  Huzaifa (@huzzymad) reported 56 minutes ago

  @github my account was caught in an automated suspension sweep during the April 20th service outage. It has been 14+ days with absolutely no response to Ticket #4305092. This is severely blocking my active client and agency workflows. Can a human please review this urgently?

• 
  Ben Badejo (@BenjaminBadejo) reported 58 minutes ago

  @MohandesDavid You can submit it as a pull request (“fix(docs) - description) on Github). You can have your agent do it for you.

• 
  daily.dev (@dailydotdev) reported 58 minutes ago

  copilot shipped a debugger agent. give it a github issue, it reproduces the bug and proposes a fix. the ticket is doing your job now