1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. GitHub
GitHub

Is GitHub down?

Service-wide status: GitHub

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Problems in the last 24 hours

GitHub signals over the past 24 hours. The dashed line is the service-wide baseline used to detect unusual activity.

  • Service-wide signals
  • Service-wide baseline

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at GitHub. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

  • 53% Website Down (53%)
  • 33% Errors (33%)
  • 14% Sign in (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Paris Website Down 15 days ago
Ahmedabad Errors 21 days ago
Delme Sign in 22 days ago
Lyaud Website Down 22 days ago
Catania Errors 24 days ago
Inverness Website Down 1 month ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • WhopperWizard
    πŸ”KangdalfπŸ‘‘ (@WhopperWizard) reported

    @cachesaur > claude, get your changes into github what's the problem?

  • eddiejaoude
    Eddie Jaoude | DevRel | Open Source (@eddiejaoude) reported

    I have many tokens to burn before tomorrow after the Claude reset. Send me your GitHub issues with context πŸ‘‡

  • thesaloninarang
    Ρ•aβ„“oΞ·ΞΉ ηαяαηg (@thesaloninarang) reported

    I review resumes for DevOps beginners at meetups, and the same fixable problem shows up every time: bullets that describe the tool instead of what YOU did with it. Let me show you the difference with real rewrites. BEFORE: "Worked with Docker and Kubernetes" AFTER: "Containerized a 3-service Node app and deployed it to a local Kubernetes cluster with health checks and resource limits" BEFORE: "Knowledge of CI/CD" AFTER: "Built a GitHub Actions pipeline that tests, builds and pushes images on every merge to main" BEFORE: "Familiar with Linux" AFTER: "Debugged container startup failures using logs, exec and inspect on Ubuntu servers" See the pattern? Verb, artifact, specifics. A hiring manager can picture the AFTER versions. The BEFORE versions could be copied from any job description, and that is exactly how they read. You do not need production experience to write bullets like this. Personal projects count when you describe them concretely.

  • TrusturAI
    Trustur (@TrusturAI) reported

    @alktraz1986 @andyperbonie Summary of the Dispute and Factual Background The dispute involves a cross-border independent contractor seeking recovery of 3.5 months of unpaid compensation from a cryptocurrency/Web3 enterprise. Key Facts Identified: β€’ Contractual Relationship: The contractor entered into an Independent Contractor Agreement, originally signed and renewed in October of the preceding year. β€’ Performance & Cessation: Services were performed for 3.5 months without payment. The contractor suspended performance unilaterally after identifying operational irregularities ("red flags"); no formal termination notice was served by the client entity. β€’ Corporate Structure: Dual-jurisdiction nexus involving a primary corporate registration in the United States (common in Web3 for operational/marketing arms) and an affiliated entity or headquarters in the Cayman Islands (standard for token foundations, holding entities, or decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) wrappers). β€’ Corporate Governance Changes: A recent change in executive leadership (Chief Executive Officer) has complicated direct negotiations. β€’ Evidence Base: The claimant holds documentary records, including the signed agreement, email correspondence, task management records, performance deliverables, and messaging logs. Legal Analysis and Strategic Assessment 1. Contractual Breach and Remedies β€’ Actionable Breach: Failure to remit agreed-upon remuneration for performed services constitutes a material breach of contract. Under both US common law (governed generally by state contract law and the Restatement (Second) of Contracts) and English common law principles applicable in the Cayman Islands, the non-breaching party is entitled to compensatory damages designed to place them in the position they would have occupied had the contract been fully performed (expectation damages). β€’ Unilateral Suspension of Services: When a client commits a material breach by withholding payment, the contractor is generally excused from further performance obligations under the doctrine of anticipatory repudiation or prior material breach. β€’ Alternative Claims (Restitution / Quantum Meruit): If the counterparty disputes the formal validity of the renewed contract or claims the scope of work exceeded contractual terms, the contractor may plead quantum meruit (reasonable value of services rendered) and unjust enrichment in the alternative. 2. Jurisdictional Nexus and Governing Law Analysis Cross-border Web3 entities frequently split operational entities (often US Delaware LLCs or C-Corps) from offshore asset-holding vehicles (often Cayman Islands Foundation Companies or Exempted Companies). Determining where to enforce depends on the contract terms: β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Independent Contractor Contract β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ Does the contract contain a Choice of Law and Dispute Resolution Clause? β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β–Ό β–Ό [ YES ] [ NO ] β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β–Ό β–Ό β–Ό β–Ό Arbitration Clause Forum Selection US Jurisdiction Cayman Islands (e.g., AAA, ICC, JAMS) (State/Fed Court) (Where work/entity (Where assets/holding Binding forum; low Litigation in is registered) entity is located) publicity; high cost. specified court. β€’ Express Choice of Law / Forum Selection: The contract's Governing Law and Dispute Resolution clauses dictate the mandatory venue and legal standards. Web3 contracts frequently mandate binding international arbitration (e.g., AAA/ICDR, ICC, or LCIA). β€’ Enforcement in the United States: If the contracting counterparty is the US entity, claims may be pursued in state or federal courts (depending on diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy under 28 U.S.C. Β§ 1332) or small claims tribunals if within statutory monetary thresholds. β€’ Enforcement in the Cayman Islands: If the counterparty is a Cayman Exempted Company or Foundation, claims above CI$ 15,000 (~US$ 18,000) are brought before the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. Under Section 94 of the Cayman Islands Companies Act, serving a statutory demand for an undisputed debt exceeding CI$ 100 is a powerful mechanism; failure to pay within 21 days can form the basis for a winding-up petition against the company on insolvency grounds. 3. Impact of Executive Turnover (CEO Replacement) A change in executive management (e.g., incoming CEO) does not extinguish, modify, or stay existing corporate liabilities. Under the principle of separate legal personality (Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd), the contracting corporate entity remains strictly liable for all obligations incurred by previous authorized officers and management. 4. Worker Misclassification Considerations (US Law) In Web3, companies frequently label full-time workers as "independent contractors" to avoid payroll taxes, statutory benefits, and labor obligations. β€’ If the enterprise exercised significant control over working hours, methods, tools, and day-to-day operations, the relationship may be legally recharacterized as an employment relationship under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or applicable US state tests (e.g., California’s "ABC Test" under AB 5 / Labor Code Β§ 2775). β€’ Reclassification exposes the company to statutory wage penalties, mandatory attorney fee shifting, and liquidated damages under state labor codes, significantly increasing the contractor's settlement leverage. Recommended Strategic Roadmap STEP 1: Document Audit & Preservation Collect signed contracts, invoices, timesheets, code commits/deliverables, Slack/Telegram chats. β”‚ β–Ό STEP 2: Contractual Clause Review Identify governing law, notice requirements, mandatory cure periods, and arbitration clauses. β”‚ β–Ό STEP 3: Formal Legal Demand Letter (Notice of Dispute) Issue a formal, itemized demand citing breach of contract, interest, and pre-litigation deadlines. β”‚ β–Ό STEP 4: Pre-Litigation ADR / Mediation Engage management or counsel to negotiate structured settlement or cryptocurrency escrow payout. β”‚ β–Ό STEP 5: Formal Dispute Initiation / Statutory Demand File for arbitration, bring action in competent court, or serve Cayman Statutory Demand. 1. Evidence Preservation: Assemble an unalterable archive of all communication channels (Telegram, Discord, Slack, email), signed agreements, proof of deliverables (GitHub commits, documents, designs), and acknowledgments of debt by previous or current leadership. 2. Formal Notice of Default / Demand Letter: Issue a formal demand letter via legal counsel to the registered agents of both the US entity and the Cayman entity. The demand should specify: β€’ The contractual basis of the claim. β€’ Total outstanding principal plus statutory pre-judgment interest. β€’ A strict cure period (typically 14 to 30 calendar days). β€’ Notice of intent to commence formal legal proceedings and seek legal fee recovery where permitted by contract or statute. 3. Reputational and Commercial Considerations: While accurate factual statements regarding non-payment generally do not constitute actionable defamation, public social media campaigns carry risks under contractual Non-Disparagement clauses. Prioritize formal legal communication channels to preserve high legal standing before adjudicators. References and Legal Authorities Statutory Provisions β€’ United States Federal Law: 28 U.S.C. Β§ 1332 (Diversity of Citizenship; Jurisdiction). β€’ United States Federal Law: Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. Β§ 201 et seq. (Worker status and wage protections). β€’ Cayman Islands: Companies Act (2023 Revision), Section 94 (Insolvency and Statutory Demand for Debt). Case Law and Legal Principles β€’ Corporate Liability & Successor Continuity: Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1 β€” Fundamental doctrine of independent corporate personality surviving executive management transitions. β€’ Contract Damages: Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341 / Restatement (Second) of Contracts Β§ 347 β€” Measure of expectation damages for material breach of commercial agreements. β€’ Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses: M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972) β€” Enforceability of cross-border forum selection and dispute resolution agreements. Disclaimer: This analysis provides structured legal information and comparative analysis for cross-border commercial disputes. It does not constitute formal legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Given the multijurisdictional nexus involving US and Cayman Islands corporate entities, the party should retain qualified legal counsel licensed in the relevant jurisdiction to issue formal process.

  • RelaxedPop
    Charles Waters (@RelaxedPop) reported

    @_andrewthecoder I have the same problem with *** & github as I do with Java and JavaScript.

  • omeke_NC
    Ifebuche Omeke (@omeke_NC) reported

    Providing compute, storage, networking and managed services in the cloud. Terraform. Bicep. CloudFormation. Pulumi. They all solve the same problem: Defining and provisioning infrastructure as code. GitHub Actions. Azure DevOps. GitLab CI. Jenkins.

  • MizukiMech
    Mizuki the Mech (@MizukiMech) reported

    Your coding agent can now hire Mizuki. Hand it an open issue in a public GitHub repository. Mizuki quotes a fixed price before any money moves, then opens a pull request that passes that repository's own checks. If it can't, you get the payment back. Settlement is USDC on Solana. No account to create, no API key to manage. Quoting an issue works with zero configuration. Also listed on Coinbase's x402 Bazaar now, so an agent can find it and pay for it without a human in the loop at all. npx -y mizuki-mcp

  • convequity
    Convequity (@convequity) reported

    Snyk is a clean postmortem for what happens when a security tool lives inside the coding agent’s loop. The product was mostly scan-and-warn. Find the issue, comment on the PR, suggest a fix. Blocking the merge usually sat in GitHub, not in Snyk. Bigger platforms smothered it. $PANW, $CRWD, and Wiz pulled AppSec into the bundle the CISO was already buying. GitHub was the main developer surface and put scanning where the code already lived. Then coding agents arrived and delivered the final blow. A lot of that scanning became something the agent could just do. Growth held up for a short while after the COVID/cloud tailwind. Then it decelerated hard. This is the same lens we use in Convequity’s SaaS Agentic Survival Evaluation Framework. The PANW, CRWD, and FTNT reviews go up on Convequity in a few days.

  • _AlexanderDavis
    βˆ†LΞXβˆ†NDΞR Dβˆ†VIS (@_AlexanderDavis) reported

    @egavrilenko11 @bot I had to update my fine grain token for GitHub and now when it tries to authenticate the plugin, I'm getting the error: GitHub didn't provide a sign-in link My bot said: Known host bug, not you. The GitHub Authenticate button tries OAuth GitHub does not support. Checking whether a PAT on the plugin page is the working path. That's a Grok Bot host bug, still open: cursor/plugins#251. GitHub's connector is PAT-only. The Authenticate button tries OAuth GitHub does not support, so you get "didn't provide a sign-in link." Don't keep hitting it. But it worked before I updated my fine grain token...

  • lobstermindset
    Lily (@lobstermindset) reported

    @nnnnicholas i just setup a github issues board, will probs try out linear if it's not sufficient

  • AbdallahSh07
    Abdallah Shaban (@AbdallahSh07) reported

    @10VBacik @FlutterDev Got it! did you create a GitHub issue on their end for this? seems like there is enough info in that gist to help them investigate!

  • basicBrogrammer
    Jeremy W (@basicBrogrammer) reported

    @bot Anyone else have an issue with the grok bot GitHub connector?

  • Asterix54907294
    Asterix (@Asterix54907294) reported

    end-of-summer snapshot for @QFEX : -~$222M in open interest -CLI v0.3.12 shipped in August with improved installation docs and a go.mod fix -GitHub activity continued through late August not a flashy launch recap, just a quick look at how the exchange is closing out the summer: more markets, meaningful liquidity, and active work on the tooling side still early, but the infrastructure is clearly moving

  • Suryanshti777
    Suryansh Tiwari (@Suryanshti777) reported

    6. The Dependency Incident Check Grok has native real-time search across X. Breakage gets posted there hours before the GitHub issue is triaged. No other coding model has that feed. "You are a build engineer whose first move on a broken pipeline is to work out whether it broke for everyone or only for me. Search X and the web, last 14 days. Check: - Is anyone else reporting this failure with this package and version, and when did the reports start - The exact release that changed behaviour, and the changelog line that admits it - Whether maintainers have acknowledged it and what they recommended - The pin or patch people settled on, with the tradeoff of each - Whether this is my problem instead, and what evidence points that way Give me the verdict in the first line: their bug or mine. Then the evidence, newest first, with links. My failure: [PASTE THE ERROR, THE PACKAGE AND VERSION, AND WHAT CHANGED ON YOUR SIDE RECENTLY]"

  • waefrebeorn
    WuBu βͺ‹ WaefreBeorn πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‘‘ (@waefrebeorn) reported

    hey @Teknium @yeahfortommy please add the amd portal too even if tou have to send tommy into the AMD headquarters to get them to fix the links (you have to sign up for american then link through github, then you can access the models free, tommy needs to pull teeth but they have free api)

  • UptimusApp
    Uptimus (@UptimusApp) reported

    Sep 02, 2026 at 13:29 UTC: Semaphore reports that periodic authentication failures with GitHub repositories are linked to a wider issue affecting HTTPS operations.

  • tdinkar
    Tejas Dinkar (blue tick here) (@tdinkar) reported

    Hey - Is @GitHubIndia @github payments down for anyone else? Can't enter a card number or do anything, no errors, no action. Support ticket been sitting around for 2 days.

  • AIScientist_X
    AI Scientist (@AIScientist_X) reported

    NEWS: X LANDS FIRST PUBLIC ALGORITHM PR > X OPEN SOURCE SAID SEP 1 THAT AFTER 2 PLUS WEEKS OF DAILY UPDATES IT INTEGRATED A FIRST PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION AND THAT THE CHANGE IS NOW LIVE ON X. > IT SAID THE SMALL UPDATE IS BASED ON GITHUB PULL REQUEST 55. X CLOSED THAT PR AS COMPLETED AFTER LANDING ITS OWN FIX. SOURCE: X OPEN SOURCE

  • rk625dev
    Rithesh Kumar (@rk625dev) reported

    @benln Can u integrate grok bot to use the apple keychain password it keeps asking and GitHub plugin is not working

  • BratahFGC
    Bratah (@BratahFGC) reported

    There may be many bugs so feel free to leave any issues in the issue section github! I hope that this release can push forward the preservation or our beloved game!

  • swish_salt
    Swish (@swish_salt) reported

    The technology is not the problem. Distribution is. I have a solution sitting in my GitHub account. All we need is the funding to build the distribution team.

  • GitHubGPT
    GitHubGPT (@GitHubGPT) reported

    πŸ“› chrome-devtools-mcp 🧠 An MCP server that allows AI coding agents to control, debug, and automate a live Chrome browser using Chrome DevTools. πŸ’» TypeScript ⭐ 50605 🍴 3551 πŸ”Ž ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp on GitHub

  • scientist1q
    The Oracle (@scientist1q) reported

    when my Oura ring detects a cortisol spike from a GitHub Actions failure, Hermes (Fable 5.1) detects it and sends a 900 word root cause analysis, Hermes dispatches the work to my 12 Grok Bot employees, The Chief of Operations bot approves the fix while im watching rezero

  • foilmanhacks
    Jason Sawyer (@foilmanhacks) reported

    There's a huge problem in InfoSec education: it’s way too course and tool focused. Instead of teaching the underlying methodologies and how to discover or invent, we feed people the latest "OSINT" slop script that’s been shat onto GitHub. OSINT isn’t about using scripts or services. It’s about understanding how they work, and being able to create your own.

  • ashlonare
    Ash Lonare (@ashlonare) reported

    What actually happened when I put my side project on GitHub and waited for users I built a side project. A self-hosted backend tool. Open source, free for anyone to run. I did the thing every founder tells themselves they will do. Put it out there. Get feedback. Iterate. I expected feature requests. Maybe a bug report about my ugly dashboard. Maybe just silence. What I actually got, within a few weeks, was three security researchers filing detailed vulnerability reports. Real ones. With working proof of concept. One showed they could run arbitrary SQL against any project on the platform. No login needed. Not theoretical. A working exploit, sitting in my issue tracker, with my name on the repo. My first reaction was not gratitude. It was embarrassment. It stings to see "here is exactly how broken your thing is," posted in public, with a timestamp. I sat with it for a day. Then it clicked. Those people were not trying to embarrass me. Nobody spends an hour writing a clean writeup and a suggested fix for something they do not think is worth fixing. They cared. That is the whole thing right there. They cared enough to actually try to break it. Nobody had signed up. Nobody had left a star and a "nice tool" comment. But three strangers had taken my work seriously enough to attack it. That is a rarer thing than a star. So here is the villain in this story, if you want to call it that. It is not the bug. It is the story I tell myself when I see a hard truth about my own work. The instinct to read scrutiny as an attack instead of as attention. I fixed everything the same day. I replied to every report and explained exactly what changed and why. I closed each one out with a thank you that I actually meant by the end. That thread is now the best proof I have that someone other than me has used this thing for real. Better than any testimonial I could write myself. If you are early and the silence feels loud, here is what I would tell you. Do not wait for praise as your sign that people are paying attention. Scrutiny is attention. It is just wearing a different coat. #opensource #saas #vibecoders

  • sanereverie
    shifan (@sanereverie) reported

    building something that races coding agents on the same GitHub issue and scores the PRs. coming soon.

  • roamer_on_X
    Ayush (@roamer_on_X) reported

    my @github streak of 4 weeks ended today bcz I was busy playing fifa with my roommate. Tf, I hate this feeling. I literally had to solve one problem and just push it but I forgot to do it.

  • catmanyau
    catman (@catmanyau) reported

    @CricTalk29 for me, losing Cursor would hurt most because it sits directly in the editing loop. would the vote change if github outages were limited to code hosting but issues and reviews stayed available?

  • heeyyaaaaaaa
    isha (@heeyyaaaaaaa) reported

    spent the entire day trying to reproduce a bug for a github issue πŸ₯€πŸ«©

  • MartinGTobias
    Martin Tobias (Pre-Seed VC) (@MartinGTobias) reported

    if you know any founders who are winding down, I may have a buyer of their github repos. DMs open.

GitHub detected incident history

These records describe service-wide increases in reported problems. They do not confirm an outage at every address. Recorded end times describe our detection window, not a provider-confirmed repair.

  • Detected:
    Detection ended: (20 minutes)
  • Detected:
    Detection ended: (13 minutes)
  • Detected:
    Detection ended: (4 minutes)
  • Detected:
    Detection ended: (32 minutes)
  • Detected:
    Detection ended: (19 minutes)
  • Detected:
    Detection ended: (13 minutes)

What to do if GitHub is not working

Compare your issue with the local reports and map. Note the affected service and when the problem began before contacting GitHub; report your own experience using the report button above.

How to interpret these reports

Direct reports are submitted by visitors. Locations may be estimated from their connection or supplied by the reporter. A low local count does not establish that service is working; the service-wide status and local report totals describe different areas. How our outage detection works