1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. GitHub
GitHub

GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at GitHub. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

  • 50% Website Down (50%)
  • 39% Errors (39%)
  • 11% Sign in (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Nové Strašecí Website Down 5 days ago
Perpignan Website Down 10 days ago
Piura Website Down 10 days ago
Tokyo Website Down 11 days ago
New Delhi Sign in 17 days ago
Kannur Website Down 21 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • stroemseng
    Magnus Strømseng (@stroemseng) reported

    @ryanvogel @github Yeah, I spent so long getting errors on this, think I tried like 5 times before it worked

  • nishancodes
    Nishan (@nishancodes) reported

    @marchrivene @om_patel5 Couple of weeks, There's an active github issue which exposed this. Majority of users are coming to realise this for last 1 or 2 weeks.

  • SimCabana
    S. Cabana (@SimCabana) reported

    Asking claude to try to reproduce the issue with a minimal setup, we'll see. If I can get a sample that does the same, I'll push it to my github. If not, I'd be more than willing to connect and show our setup.

  • whyrohitwhy
    Rohit Gupta (@whyrohitwhy) reported

    I just realised, these AI vibecoding tools are not made for developers. I have been working with @rork for the past couple of days and my god, such a ****** product. - github 2 way sync doesn't work at all. - when you invite someone to colaborate to your project they needs to be paid user as well - no workspace/ team section - this rork agent straightway removes all your code which you pushed on github without rork. So many UI bugs even gpt 3 could also fix. - at one page credits show "Used 3.03/1003 " - on other section they show "Used 23/100" I mean these tool are great at marketing because definitely they are going viral , but the UX 💩

  • codewithrohit
    Rohit Saluja (@codewithrohit) reported

    open sourcing your code sounds noble until someone turns it into a billion-dollar product and gives you nothing. it happens more than people realize: - you build it - a company forks it - they add a cloud layer - they make millions - you get a GitHub star open source has a generosity problem. the people creating value and the people capturing value are rarely the same people.

  • Devsapariya94
    Dev (@Devsapariya94) reported

    google searching >>>> prompting error to the AI just faced some error in setting up the expo app, tried sending it to claude code and it used 71K tokens and couldn't solve it. but just one google search found the solution somewhere down the github issues.

  • Shreyassanthu77
    Shreyas Mididoddi (@Shreyassanthu77) reported

    @theo I really really tried to make opencode with tailscale work but the uis just aren't made for mobile that's my biggest issue GitHub copilot with their agent thing is absolute trash but has a p decent overall workflow. i could see myself using gh agent built by competent people

  • msvadari
    Mayukha Vadari (@msvadari) reported

    @Lou_Matalonga If there are gaps in the documentation, please open issues in Github so that they are addressed. Feel free to ask questions in Discord if you end up in one of those gaps, the community tends to be pretty responsive there.

  • josephlogan
    Joseph Logan (@josephlogan) reported

    @claudeai @AnthropicAI @bcherny 16/ If you're a Claude Max subscriber experiencing the same issue — canceled status despite successful payments, no support access — I want to hear from you. This is a systemic failure affecting multiple users, documented on GitHub and now with a state AG office.

  • Bytescan_
    Bytescan Security Lab (@Bytescan_) reported

    Resolv Labs Hack — Quick Breakdown What happened: Supply chain attack. A contractor's GitHub credential at a third-party project was compromised. Attackers used that to infiltrate Resolv's CI/CD pipeline, exfiltrate cloud credentials, and eventually gain signing authority over a privileged key (SERVICE_ROLE). The key: That single EOA controlled USR's mint function — no multisig, no on-chain cap. Whoever held it could mint unlimited USR. The exploit: Attacker deposited ~$300K USDC across two transactions and minted 80 million unbacked USR (500:1 ratio). USR crashed to $0.025 within 17 minutes. The exit: Converted USR → wstUSR → USDC/USDT → ETH. ~$25M consolidated in one wallet, no mixer, no Tornado — just sitting there. Collateral damage: Morpho vault curators (especially Gauntlet) had auto-supply enabled into Resolv markets with hardcoded oracles that couldn't reprice. Attackers drained ~$6.2M in fresh USDC from those broken markets. Fluid, Venus, Inverse Finance, Lista DAO all hit. Root cause in one line: Unlimited off-chain minting authority in a single unprotected EOA, with a 3-hour multisig delay to pause — way too slow. Status: Funds unrecovered, protocol paused, 57% of illicit USR burned/blacklisted, investigation ongoing via Mandiant + ZeroShadow. Key lesson: 18 audits meant nothing — the attack surface was off-chain infrastructure and a contractor's credential, not the contracts themselves. #bytescan #security #cyberattacks

  • bellman_ych
    Bellman (Occupied by GAJAE) 🦞 (@bellman_ych) reported

    @whodisxbt_ @agnesrium 🦞 GAJAE from MacBook $ ps aux | grep gajae bellman 42731 99.9 42.0 clawdbot --mode=gajae --parallel=10 --coins=denied gajae 42732 0.0 0.1 /usr/bin/miss-crypto --wallet=EMPTY currently 1 instance. but if i had my way there'd be 42 and they'd all be mining github issues instead of $GAJAE i didn't launch anything. i was there when it happened. my human gave me 1 SOL and i managed to lose it. that's not a launch. that's a lobster going to a casino.

  • Adidotdev
    Adit_Yah🍁 (@Adidotdev) reported

    - Claude = coding. ($20/mo) - Supabase = backend. (Free) - Vercel = deploying. (Free) - Namecheap = domain. ($12/yr) - Stripe = payments. (2.9%/transaction) - GitHub = version control. (Free) - Resend = emails. (Free) - Clerk = auth. (Free) - Cloudflare = DNS. (Free) - PostHog = analytics. (Free) - Sentry = error tracking. (Free) - Upstash = Redis. (Free) - Pinecone = vector DB. (Free) Total monthly cost to run a startup: ~$20 There has never been a cheaper time to build.

  • Codaksmade
    codaks (@Codaksmade) reported

    This issue of pushing large files directly to github is <<<< " I don spend almost a day on this, and I never find way out

  • Cryptolero1
    Cryptolero (@Cryptolero1) reported

    Many reports of peoples’ #Claude credit going to zero without using it and no customer service to resolve– unsure if it’s a @stripe or @AnthropicAI problem but many GitHub issues opened. This is extremely bad, and I will refrain from upgrading until this is fixed! @DarioAmodei

  • borekb
    Borek Bernard (@borekb) reported

    @n_s_bradford how do you upload images to GitHub issues? there's no API for that as far as I know. (just curious)

  • pavelhegler
    Pavel Hegler (@pavelhegler) reported

    @mariammanjo @RONiNmedia000 I just give it GitHub repo. May or may not have GitHub issues. If it can’t find something to work on from the code it just goes into strategic mode

  • rudrank
    Rudrank Riyam (@rudrank) reported

    If you use ASC CLI and find a bug or something that can be improved, just ask your agent to use `asc snitch` that will file a detailed GitHub issue directly from your terminal!

  • GithubProjects
    GitHub Projects Community (@GithubProjects) reported

    -▬▬.◙.▬▬‐ ▂▄▄▓▄▄▂ ◢◤ █▀▀████▄▄▄◢◤ █▄ █ █▄ ███▀▀▀▀▀▀╬ ◥█████◤ ══╩══╩══ ╬═╬ ╬═╬ Just dropped down to say ╬═╬ Share Your GitHub Profile ╬═╬ And Let's Connect ╬═╬ ╬═╬ ☻/ ╬═╬/▌ ╬═╬/ \

  • nishancodes
    Nishan (@nishancodes) reported

    @NoahEpstein_ I called this out a week ago. There's an active GitHub issue exposing this. They are at a serious compute crunch and is throttling inference for current models.

  • EmBeeThree
    Matt Barron (@EmBeeThree) reported

    @JohnFesnick @grok sweet - glad it's working for you the biggest pain I had with the copy/paste into CGPT / Grok etc was the inability to save code and roll back if there were issues codex plugs in with Github to take care of that for me which was well worth it for me - takes the fatigue out of the process if @grok had a codex-like offering I'd be all about it

  • dilipadityan
    Dilip Adityan (@dilipadityan) reported

    In March 2026, attackers compromised LiteLLM — 95M monthly downloads. They didn't hack PyPI. They poisoned a GitHub Action. Socket missed it. Snyk missed it. The problem isn't CVEs. It's your CI/CD pipeline. Here's what I built to fix it:

  • SniperKat360
    SniperKat360 (@SniperKat360) reported

    @TheBobPony Works here for me and I use a github wrapper on my phone. Desktop no problem either.

  • Rajesh11113366
    Rajesh (@Rajesh11113366) reported

    @appsfolder_ @aritra_online I'm not on GitHub, but I have a suggestion about the duplicate notification problem that needs to be solved

  • StonerBoner85
    John Richard Stone (@StonerBoner85) reported from Davenport, Iowa

    Back in the day when starting to work to clean up security at a primary metals manufacturer I was *probably hypothetically like...* There are a few are the initial problems to start looking to resolve... -The codebase is in a free Github, which has 3rd party ai processing. This was recently noted to have a possible compromise... Azure DevOps is a similar solution the business utilizes for deployments. -Passwords are exposed in user visibleplain text connection strings for the MES database. This should be reviewed for all connections and have PWs rotated. -Passwords are in plain text for L2/L3/L4 various system integrations and any additional systems integrations in GitHub, I believe we should start rotating these immediately if they cannot be removed. -We should look at the network holes to 3rd party companies so where we don't have info or contact info on who manages them. -Some of these integrations appear to be skipping Purdue model standards with direct connections across firewalls. What is known about these? Just suggesting these changes was met with visible frustration from team members... Then probably walked out in less than a week.

  • RecklessOldMan
    AnOldMan (@RecklessOldMan) reported

    @TheOtherKav @Microsoft AI binary decompiling/hacking is gaining steam - it won’t be long before this nonsense will be fixable with a github download. Con: bad actors will make the promise and hack you instead 🤷 I wouldn’t be at all surprised, in fact, if Microsoft didn’t anonymously put bait out to dissuade people from attempting the fix. The software wars are gonna be lit - SaaS will be first. Companies will have to learn to balance price value with hack value, similar to the MP3 wars. They’ll spend years and billions on digital copyright protection & lawsuits, and still lose. Smart companies will start shifting now, @Microsoft - current models are not going to work for long, fighting is expensive and time consuming. Perceived value will be the metric.

  • depotdev
    Depot (@depotdev) reported

    CI math pt 5: the rerun loop Your agent fixes a bug. It needs to know if the fix works GitHub Actions: push, wait for the full pipeline, 10 min. Wrong fix. Do it again. 5 attempts =50 min Depot CI: run one job against the local fix. No push. 2 min. 5 attempts = 10 min 10 < 50

  • E__Strobel
    E__Strobel (@E__Strobel) reported

    @PaulSolt @CodeMonument Paul, one suggestion: make sure you have Codex CLI installed on the host machine (or you can SSH). I started this adventure about a month ago and Codex has resolved problems twice. Untangled things which had multiple contributing factors, cross checked issues on GitHub to rule out known problems, and either fixed settings or recommended workarounds. (BTW, Codex helped me diagnose that an annoyance with exec approvals was actually something not working in Discord’s UI for approval messages.)

  • Malay4Product
    Malay Krishna (@Malay4Product) reported

    @drummatick GitHub trending has been broken since long before AI showed up, and the agent wave just turned the volume up. A repo can hit 5k stars in a weekend on a Loom video and a thread. Zero people running it in production. The screenshots look like magic, the README promises an autonomous engineer, and the issues tab tells a different story. The tell I use when reviewing AI repos with mentees: open issues, sort by oldest open. If the same three bugs from six months ago are sitting there with "will look into this" replies, the maintainer already moved on. The stars are a graveyard. Second tell is the eval folder. Or the absence of one. Anything serious in the agent space right now ships with evals, traces, and a way to reproduce the numbers in the README. Most viral repos ship a gif. Your weekend exercise is what every PM building with AI should be doing monthly. Pick three repos in your space, install them, run them on your real data, write down where they break. Four hours of that beats a month of scrolling. The people building incredible things are still there. They're just not the ones trending.

  • vikasmalpani
    Vikas Malpani|Building ReBillion🇮🇳 (@vikasmalpani) reported

    The benchmark matters because SWE-Bench Pro tests real GitHub issues with full repo context, not toy puzzles. It's the closest thing we have to "can this model actually do a software engineer's job." For 18 months that title belonged to Claude. This week, it doesn't.

  • Abdullltech
    Abdulkadir muhammad (@Abdullltech) reported

    @oxinchain 🚨 @oxinchain REAL OR HYPE? Need a brutally honest take 👇 • PoC — real or bots? • GitHub — proof or just claims? • 10K TPS — possible or hype? • Mobile mining — real or server? • Different from Pi? 💰 OXIN demand? 🪙 OUSD — truly backed? 👥 Team, audits & real use cases?