Gmail Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dean Hunt (@deanhunt) reported 5 minutes ago

  @poteto @billykyle Anything that solves the issues with loading sites. Gmail works well, but a significant amount of sites and services have it detected as a bot and won’t work. MCP integration to X feels like low hanging fruit too :)

• 
  Neil Lau (@Neil__Lau) reported 8 minutes ago

  @bot the UI is great and it seems it can handle tasks. But in reality it is having trouble to do simple task like attaching a pdf and send via Gmail. And when it fails it just drops the task.

• 
  DigitalAssetBuzz 🔶 (@DAssetBuzz) reported 8 minutes ago

  The Pricing Page Says Everything. Except the Number. Everyone covered the Grok Bot expansion: Pro+ and Plus tiers, free trials, access for all. Yet most observers missed the real story. This isn't an access announcement. It is a case study in selling a percentage of a secret. The Numbers Behind the Hype • $60/month Pro+ — five checkmarks on the page, zero quantities • 48% of the weekly pool gone in under a day — a Pro+ user, day one • 14 hours — how long a $300 Heavy user's week lasted cleaning up Gmail • ~30 distinct users reporting 1–2 day burnouts in the first week • 1 documented spend cap: "There is no Grok Bot-specific spend cap yet" A weekly allowance with no published size is not a plan—it is a percentage of a secret. Three Takeaways from the Fine Print 1. "Usage Included" Is Doing All the Work Every subscription on earth sells a quantity. This page sells a vibe. Users only ever see a percent of an unstated pool, and they're publicly begging @cursor_ai and @xai for the number. When your customers reverse-engineer your pricing with spreadsheets—one measured ~247M tokens for the whole weekly pool—opacity isn't a bug in the pricing page. It is the pricing page. 2. You Pay for What the Filter Deletes Failed generations count. Server errors count. One user lost half a week to errors that returned nothing. Another went to sleep at 2% and woke at 100% with no clients open. In what other industry do you pay full price for the meal the kitchen refused to serve—then get told an audit view is "coming"? 3. The Funnel Got Wider. The Pool Did Not. Today's expansion added Pro+, Plus, and every Teams plan. What it didn't add: quota, spend controls, or a number on the page. Two subscriptions still don't stack—you get the max of two pools, never the sum. Widening the funnel into an opaque pool isn't growth. It's a queue for the same complaint. The Founder's Dilemma: The Number or the Vibe Every usage-based founder faces this fork: publish the allowance and let value do the selling, or hide the denominator and let the meter do the surprising. The winning pitch: "Here's exactly what a week of my usage buys." The losing pitch: "Weekly usage included. Amount: nowhere." If your pricing page needs an FAQ that says "not yet" on spend caps, you didn't ship a plan. You shipped a meter without a denominator—and that's not a limit, it's a mood. So—what's a subscription worth when the customer can't know what they bought? If you found this breakdown useful, follow for more insights on the shifting AI subscription landscape.

• 
  AshutoshShrivastava (@ai_for_success) reported 8 minutes ago

  @canjapan1 You don't need when you install tir ask for authentication and you can just login using Gmail which has AI subscription. May be litte bit of research can help.. Also Gemini CLI is not available any more you can only use Antigravity CLI if that what you meant.

• 
  Paul Walsh (@Paul__Walsh) reported 9 minutes ago

  I’ve just spent hours responding to an avalanche of comments about the ChatGPT plugin for Apple Messages. Here are the main ones: 💬 "Anyone can screenshot your messages" Yes. They can also print them and fax them to the FBI. People using end to end encryption accept the risk that another participant can deliberately betray their trust. They don’t expect that person to give third party software ongoing access to read, search and analyse their private conversations. 💬 "I opted in, so it’s not a problem" You opted in. Everyone you communicate with didn’t. 💬 "The encryption still works, so you’re wrong" Yes, the cryptography still works. My concern is third party access to the readable content before or after decryption. 💬 "The recipient could always share your messages" Yes. The recipient could betray your trust. That doesn’t justify automating third party access to your private conversations. 💬 "Any Mac app with Full Disk Access could already do this" Yes. Apple specifically warns that Full Disk Access can expose Messages. OpenAI has now productised that capability for ordinary people who aren't aware of the potential implications, at scale. I don't think Apple saw this coming. 💬 "This is no different from giving AI access to email, SMS, Slack or Teams" It is. Those services don’t provide the same end to end encryption model as iMessage. Think Signal, not SMS. This Proton, not Gmail. The screenshot one is my favourite. I’ll either update my original article with an FAQ or write a dedicated follow up. Thankfully, these comments represent less than 2% of the responses I’ve received here. I haven’t even looked at LinkedIn yet. My concern with this implementation is scale. One person can enable it on their Mac and expose accessible conversations involving potentially hundreds of people who never enabled ChatGPT, never agreed to the access and aren’t notified. Depending on their Apple and iCloud configuration, that can include historical conversations, participant identifiers, contact information and attachments. Proton summarised my argument well after reading the article. I recommend reading their post first, then clicking through to mine for the full analysis. My Substack is free. I’m building a community around corporate surveillance, government overreach, privacy and personal digital safety. I’m interested in what the technology can do, what information it can access, who else can be affected and what happens when that capability is deployed at scale.

• 
  Jeremy Thee Bizard (@TheeBizard) reported 11 minutes ago

  @CordCuttersNews Can you fix your website from opening straight to log in to my Gmail

• 
  hot choccie and trashcan enjoyer (@agr35t) reported 16 minutes ago

  @bluemail rejected just like gmail autentification on linux that redirects to nothing and thus never completes, fix this mess

• 
  Nigel Scott (@LibSubversive) reported 18 minutes ago

  @CliveWismayer I recently received a virtual "gift card" from an old friend. When I clicked on it I was asked to input my Gmail account login details in order to see it. I declined.

• 
  Saurabh yadav (@Saurabh05152) reported 18 minutes ago

  Upsssc pet registration form not fill because gmail otp not received please upsssc person solve this problem #upsssc

• 
  Foxy Audit (@foxyaudit) reported 19 minutes ago

  Fair callout, most of what we've posted has centered one company's AI product. Not because it's uniquely the problem. Dec 2025: a flaw called GeminiJack let attackers leak Gmail, Calendar, and Docs data through Gemini, zero clicks needed.

• 
  Ven Venkata | Email Marketing (@0Venkata) reported 20 minutes ago

  A list with 500 genuinely engaged subscribers will outperform a list with 5,000 loosely relevant ones on every metric that connects to revenue. Not because 500 is a better number. Because engagement quality determines inbox placement, and inbox placement determines whether the email gets seen, and whether the email gets seen determines whether any of the other decisions matter. The 5,000-subscriber list with 40% disengagement is sending to 2,000 people who are either not opening or not clicking, dragging the aggregate engagement signal down for every send. Gmail sees this. The inbox placement for the whole list reflects the behaviour of the disengaged portion. The 500-subscriber list where 80% click regularly sends a strong positive signal on every send. Inbox placement stays high. The engaged subscribers reinforce the reputation that makes the next send land well. The number that matters is not total subscribers. It's the percentage of total subscribers who are genuinely engaged, and whether that percentage is growing or declining as the list grows. If the list is growing and the engagement percentage is declining, the growth channel is importing dilution, not subscribers.

• 
  denas (@denasklncs) reported 21 minutes ago

  your esp handles delivery. not deliverability. delivery means it handed the message over and the receiving server took it. that is the end of their job. whether anyone tells you what happened next depends entirely on which provider it was. yahoo sends complaints back per message. dkim based enrolment, arf reports, the most timely signal available anywhere. microsoft sends them too, through jmrp. they rebuilt that platform recently, so if you enrolled years ago you may have quietly stopped receiving anything. gmail sends nothing per message. postmaster gives you an aggregate rate and that is all. apple sends nothing at all. no feedback loop, no dashboard, no rate. their postmaster page tells you to suppress inactive subscribers instead. so for the two providers carrying most consumer ecommerce, you are working blind. and your esp cannot report a number nobody ever sent it.

• 
  Ashit Adhikari (@me_no_buddha) reported 21 minutes ago

  @bigulchugh Looks like a google meet call with gmail server in the id. 💯 Percent scam.

• 
  Sam Pullara (@sampullara) reported 26 minutes ago

  @pitdesi i honestly don't get it. if it is a abuse problem. go after the abusers and close the holes that make it possible. ultimately google was able to do this with gmail for example. early on internally abused, later almost impossible.

• 
  David (@davidthepurple) reported 27 minutes ago

  Dear @gmail please respond to my postmaster feedback request. You're blocking 100% of my emails to addresses hosted by Gmail, and I can't determine why, or a way to fix it.