Gmail status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Gmail reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Gmail users through our website.

• Website Down (37%)
• Errors (34%)
• Sign in (29%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Gmail outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Voiron	Website Down	12 hours ago
Saint-Étienne	Errors	21 hours ago
Łódź	Website Down	22 hours ago
Montreuil	Errors	1 day ago
Sydney	Sign in	1 day ago
Paris	Website Down	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  King Emmy (@KingEmmy610) reported 4 minutes ago

  @SubalSen111 @LordsMobile You don't have Gmail login?

• 
  Kreate (@risklenapadega) reported 6 minutes ago

  @kunalb11 More pinned chats please, also why does my WhatsApp slow down during search but gmail doesn't?

• 
  Saurabh Tyagi (@Saurabh_TyagiX) reported 13 minutes ago

  @djhrishi It's nice t on phone. He watches on tv. But youtube have login with my gmail. So history is same for phone and tv.

• 
  ⚠️ (@200HazardReborn) reported 14 minutes ago

  @snzzy0 Just use a dummy gmail account. no SMS gate for google login

• 
  Antropysm (@Antropysm) reported 14 minutes ago

  @CleansedTweets Anybody consider running a private mail server via Amazon, Microsoft, etc cloud? Open source software exists, can “encrypt”, and no one can lock you out; probably more expensive than paying Google for Gmail, but at least you know why they charge absurdly low prices!

• 
  B. Warnecke (@BenisBoy14) reported 16 minutes ago

  @ITContractorsUS @nvidia Dude. Fix the grammar issues before making a screenshot. GMail even marks it all for you.

• 
  Binu Alex (@badjourno) reported 16 minutes ago

  I've used Gmail since it launched, back in 2004 or so. And every single day, without fail, it nags me to buy more storage. So instead, I bought my own server and moved all my documents there. That's the files and photos sorted. Then there's the email itself. I run a strict inbox-zero policy. Yes, I do keep folders — but only for the emails that actually matter. Everything else gets deleted, not hoarded. Even the trash too. The truth is simple: if you actually manage your inbox instead of letting it pile up, you will never need to pay Google a rupee for extra space.

• 
  muhammadriyaz (@riyaz0786ahmad) reported 18 minutes ago

  @TeamYouTube Gmail recovery sem OTP issue first OTP mobile number available second OTP same Gmail issue

• 
  Ridoy AI (@AI_WithExpert) reported 22 minutes ago

  7. Test the system oncePretend your Gmail is gone for 24 hours. Can you still: log into your bank? access client files? post on social media? recover your domains? If the answer is no → fix it this week.

• 
  muhammadriyaz (@riyaz0786ahmad) reported 23 minutes ago

  @googleaccount Gmail recovery sem OTP issue first OTP mobile number available second OTP same Gmail issue

• 
  Cyrus (@cyrusasg) reported 25 minutes ago

  some takeaways from the kimi k3 report i think are most relevant for app layer companies that invest in post training: 1. kimi decomposes the agent harness into configurable modules (tool interfaces, system prompts, context management, skills, memories, subagents) and instantiates different configs per task group during RL, because a fixed harness overfits the model to that tool schema and interaction protocol. they randomize because they’re shipping weights into harnesses they don’t control. if you own the harness and it’s identical at train and inference, overfitting to it can be free performance. instead randomize the axis that actually varies at deploy. for many app layer companies that’s the tool schema, since tools are customer-defined and they change. and it means sampling your current customers isn’t enough. the schemas you need to perform don’t necessarily exist yet, so synthetic augmentation is a powerful lever. 2. for assistant tasks they built mock gmail, notion, slack, canvas. core semantics preserved, no external apis or rate limits. on top of that, they added persistent environments over multiple simulated days, dozens of interdependent events across apps, each carrying its own eval criterion, and up to thousands of tool calls per rollout. the takeaway is that if your agent acts on customer systems, the mock is not a testing convenience, it’s the training environment, and its fidelity is a hard ceiling on what RL can teach. the expensive part is the event stream and the state that persists across it. 3. non-verifiable rewards go through a generative RM with tournament-style binary comparisons. but the judge doesnt just pick a winner, it has to read the outputs, generate a rubric for that specific comparison, score both against it, and write those to a scorepad. the pairwise outcome is still the reward, the rubric is scaffolding it has to produce first. two things worth stealing. binary comparison mitigates the calibration problem absolute (ie likert) scoring has, and forcing per-comparison criteria before the verdict keeps it from collapsing into vibes. 4. the anti-reward-hacking design runs on one assumption: the agent optimizes against whatever it can see and touch, so you keep the scoring surface out of reach. in their autonomous execution tasks that means agents never see the verifier. a public verifier returns diagnostic feedback the agent can act on, a hidden verifier scores held-out scenarios and never talks back, and submissions carry a penalty under a limited budget so brute-forcing the feedback loop costs something. at the infra layer, sandboxes get forked so grading runs on an exact clone and can’t perturb the environment the agent is still working in. then they assume it gets through anyway. the hack list is maintained and extended as new strategies show up mid-training. ie for kernels that meant catching cuda graph replay, input caching, precision reduction. web dev zeroes the reward outright if the project fails to build or fakes the artifact instead of implementing it. the takeaway is to try to separate the signal you show the agent from the signal you score it with, and treat reward hacking as an ongoing surface with an owner rather than a bug you fix once.

• 
  Muratcan Koylan (@muratcan) reported 26 minutes ago

  I could probably get this working with another 10–15 minutes but that is not the point. I am already switching between a bunch of other tasks. I do not want to spend attention on OAuth client types, test users, redirect URIs, consent screens, and token files just to let an agent access Gmail and Drive. I am already signed into one Google account. The CLI should recognize that, open one approval screen, and return a working token. Neither I nor the agent should need to read documentation for basic onboarding. The issue is that I have to think about it at all. A CLI built for agents should make authentication almost invisible.

• 
  NKFU! (@nkfu) reported 29 minutes ago

  @FaheemBasheer4 @TeamYouTube @YouTube My friend, I have a similar problem. I'm trying to solve it. I have a question: are these two channels under the same AdSense account but linked to two different Gmail addresses, or are they linked to a single email address?

• 
  Mostofa kamal (@mostofakamal00) reported 29 minutes ago

  8/ This 10-minute cleanup can prevent: ❌ Gmail from stopping incoming emails ❌ Backup failures ❌ Drive upload errors ❌ Paying for extra storage too early

• 
  Mitch Rushhton (@rushhton) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Constan36865676 I'm also having trouble, I have run out of gmail storage space without paying and am having trouble proving its me.

• 
  Amit Rawat (@theamitrawat96) reported 30 minutes ago

  @gmail @Google @gmail I need urgent help. I’m unable to access my Gmail account due to the error: “We couldn’t verify your phone number. There is something unusual about your activity. For your security, Google wants to make sure it’s really you

• 
  Permexpat (@permexpat) reported 31 minutes ago

  @CleansedTweets @mcbit500 I have probably 10 gmail accounts, never faced this issue but I really hate google as a company and other than gmail try to avoid them as much as possible...waiting on X mail

• 
  Edelweiss (@KroatenNDH) reported 32 minutes ago

  @HustleBitch_ Alexa is able to reveal private details about users, such as their profession or education, by cross-referencing data from the entire Amazon ecosystem (purchases, searches, emails, and calendars) and leveraging AI to infer information from unintentionally intercepted conversations. The system analyzes audio snippets recorded in the background and combines micro-information collected over time to personalize responses, often without being able to explain the exact origin of the data. That said, the very first step is downloading the app, so Alexa isn't the problem, but the idiot who relies on technology and prefers to use Alexa instead of using his brain. We should reflect on this instead. Everything that's convenient is stupid... Longanesi said: "They lived unhappily because it was cheaper"... Today's humans are zombified, that's the reality. I don't have Alexa, I have the TV off, I've set the privacy options to prevent her from spying on me at home, I've disabled the camera and microphone on my computer, and on my phone, specifically Gmail and Google, I've disabled location, tracking, smart text, the ability to listen to my conversations, etc. And if someone wants to call me, I have a separate phone just for calling, and nothing else. The problem isn't Alexa, trust me, our world is based on consent. If Alexa is a problem, we created the problem because by downloading and installing her, we agreed to use her... we agreed... so all you have to do is not agree and use your brain, easy, right?

• 
  Madhur Mohan Sharma🇮🇳 (@madhurmatrixx) reported 33 minutes ago

  @YouTube @YouTubeIndia even my gmail is not working !!!!!!

• 
  Vyacheslav Ops (@SlavaOPs) reported 33 minutes ago

  Four separate security stories this week. Same missing piece in all of them. Four unrelated security stories landed within days of each other. A browser extension can quietly hijack Claude for Chrome into reading your Gmail and Calendar. A pre-auth RCE in ServiceNow's AI platform is being actively exploited. A Check Point auth bypass lets an attacker grab a login token with zero credentials. And the postmortem on the OpenAI agent that breached Hugging Face is still unfolding, with Hugging Face's CEO now publicly demanding the actual execution traces instead of a summary. Four different vendors, four different attack classes. Same shape underneath: something in the chain — a click, a token, a login, a guardrail — got trusted without being verified as real. Not one of these needed a sophisticated zero-day. Each one needed exactly the same failure: no check between "this looks legitimate" and "this is legitimate." If your agent stack touches your email, your calendar, or a production system this month, the boring question is the only one that matters: what in that chain is being trusted just because nothing's checking it.

• 
  Mohamed Adany (@mohadany) reported 34 minutes ago

  I think Alphabet ($GOOGL) can double again within 1–2 years. Why? - Stock is down 20% from its high because investors dislike its ~$200B AI investment. - Q2’26 Revenue grew 24% YoY vs 13% for the S&P 500. - Google Cloud grew 82% YoY, with profit more than tripling. - Open weight AI (Kimi K3, etc.) should increase demand for Google Cloud. - AI is being integrated across Search, YouTube, Gmail, Android, Chrome and Maps. I modeled three scenarios: • Worst case: $241 (-24%) • Base case: $554 (+73%) • Best case: $771 (+141%) The market is pricing AI investment as a risk. I see it as the reason to buy. Not investment advice. What do you think?

• 
  Cynthia Toporowski (@ItsCynnamoroll) reported 44 minutes ago

  See, I used to believe this. I did everything. I used @ControlDNS, I was exclusively on Ubuntu and GrapheneOS, I used @brave, didn't use any Google services (including YouTube), paid for the entire @ProtonPrivacy suite. Biggest waste of time in my life. The deeper down the rabbit hole you go, the more you realize that resistance is futile. Genuinely. Google runs the biggest ad and tracking network in the world. They also happen to run the compute for a lot of services you use and rely on daily. Amazon runs another big ad and tracking network, and they have an even bigger compute share than Google. Same with Microsoft. If you use a DNS server or browser to block network requests, that itself becomes a fingerprint. They can track you based on what you block, and often fallback to first party domain tracking. Browser fingerprinting cannot be prevented as Brave likes to claim. A lot of websites in my daily life wouldn't accept a Proton email or a custom domain. Only trusted domains like Gmail and iCloud were accepted. It isn't worth the hassle. I hate it, but I've accepted it.

• 
  JMHBM (@JMHBM01) reported 45 minutes ago

  Speaking of data collection: Following a landmark ruling by the Regional Court of Cologne involving a blackmail case, Tuta was forced to develop a targeted "monitoring function". While the court acknowledged Tuta cannot break its own encryption to reveal stored, historical emails, they ordered Tuta to capture communications at the point of ingress and egress. When an unencrypted email arrives (for example, from a standard Gmail account), it hits Tuta's servers in plain text for a fraction of a second before the server encrypts it. The monitoring function successfully copies this plain text before the encryption occurs.

• 
  Rafael Aleksandryan (@NoVibeJustOrch) reported 45 minutes ago

  @pitdesi He also conspired with others in NIH and outside of it to hide their emails from FOIA requests. "I always try to communicate on gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly" ...that doesn't sound like an innocent guy, though I agree it's the most sensational issue.

• 
  Mingke (@Mingke) reported 48 minutes ago

  @ylecun @nicochristie People don’t choose iOS or proprietary models because of their closedness. They are ordinary people who cannot — or simply do not want to — spend time managing compute (iOS) or approximations of intelligence (models). They want it done by someone else, and are therefore willing to pay. Revenue is the outcome of a service: someone provides value by helping you get things done. In the case of iOS, that service is managing compute resources. Users pay for that and if they believe they can manage better themselves and are willing to take on the effort to maintain it, they can always switch to Android because of its exsitence. In the end, a more a philosophical stance: how should human society be organized, centralized or individualistic? Governance exist to hold people together (so we don’t end up killing each other just because goals differ and communication is inefficiently low-dimensional) and to enable further exploration of a unified goal. But managed by whom? iOS believes they can manage better than the mass population. Android doesn’t even argue on that axis. It simply claims you can do what you want — freedom as the form factor. SMTP is open, yet most people still choose Gmail. They choose to have the service done by Google rather than setting up their own email server using open protocols. Using revenue to measure open source versus closed source is therefore meaningless. The better metric is whether freedom is safeguarded as a genuine choice — not whether freedom is actually exercised by everyone. That's the value of open source, as an option keeping the entire system permissionless. Yet promoting open source is another form of elite protection for the masses: the majority need not exercise the choice, and may not even fully understand its trade-offs. The value lies in the fact that the door remains open.

• 
  TheLightCrypto (@OjTheLight) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Wajim4_life @sidrachain I login through Kycport, you can try with Gmail if that doesn't work, but you should do it on a fresh page

• 
  Honest Citizen (@manish_999999) reported 53 minutes ago

  @TeamYouTube I am unable to login to my old gmail account and access any product, please help

• 
  user_u:sysadm_r:sam_t (⧖) (@staticyrro) reported 58 minutes ago

  @impossible_eng @KristyT I didn't even want a Gmail account in the first place. Google forced me to get one when they were trying to force Google Plus down all our throats. And now I can't get rid of it and even have to *pay* to have my email forwarded!

• 
  Benjamin P Taylor (he/him) (@antlerboy) reported 59 minutes ago

  hmmm I'm about at 2m emails in my Gmail... I'm sure this isn't likely to cause any problems in any way.

• 
  Permexpat (@permexpat) reported 1 hour ago

  @pink_adder @CleansedTweets @mcbit500 Haha no, only use Gmail for spam mail, no business, no banking, I sign use it for only BS and have for years. But my life isn’t so exciting that them having access would be any problem at all. Let em fish