Gmail status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Gmail reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Gmail users through our website.

• Website Down (37%)
• Errors (36%)
• Sign in (27%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Gmail outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Gondreville	Website Down	15 hours ago
Champniers	Website Down	19 hours ago
Cannes	Errors	22 hours ago
Dakar	Website Down	1 day ago
Biscarrosse	Sign in	2 days ago
Sydney	Errors	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Joseph Azzi (@joseph_azzi0) reported 1 minute ago

  OPEN IT ON A PHONE Desktop Gmail ignores the code that makes email responsive. Your mobile layout works everywhere except one of the biggest inboxes on earth. TURN ON DARK MODE Some inboxes keep your colours. Some invert them. Some invert half. Your background and your text can move in opposite directions. CHECK YOUR IMAGES One wrong character in an image address and every recipient sees a broken box. Nobody tells you. The email just goes out broken. SEND IT ANYWAY Because the deadline was yesterday, and it looked fine in the preview.

• 
  Crypto Addict (@crypto_adictt) reported 3 minutes ago

  @staywithneo_ @NekyoNFT @teddi_speaks I use Gmail since tweet link not working

• 
  Texas Twins Dad | 둥이데디 (@B_doong2daddy) reported 3 minutes ago

  It’s funny to see how everyone was having a same problem - messy gmail inbox I thought I was the only one always running out of space in my gmail account But I never paid for extra space

• 
  Tuglifer (@Tuglifer1) reported 5 minutes ago

  @davidarch56 Nah, that’s gonna require you to login my Gmail account

• 
  George Cheng (@MrGeorgeCheng) reported 5 minutes ago

  One malicious link made Copilot silently drain connected Gmail and Drive accounts. Microsoft took months to fix it, server side, invisible to every customer. The lesson is not that AI is unsafe. It is that you cannot audit a black box you rent.

• 
  M.P.Naveen (@M_P_naveen_24) reported 12 minutes ago

  @_groww Other Apps like Dhann, Upstox etc providing both Mobile + Gmail Login otps too. Only Groww is troubling without any customer friendly improvement. If this continues - will close all groww accounts. #Enable_Emailid_Login_Otp's_On_Groww (2/2)

• 
  tilde (@tilde_posting) reported 16 minutes ago

  @zoomerbread @oops4041555 @qzippp larp larp sahur selfhosting a mail server takes infinitely more cognitive function than using gmail or whatever its also a terrible idea because it's so annoying, but that's not the point lol

• 
  Sahora (@tin77467) reported 17 minutes ago

  @rabitnetwork We really need for account security such as 2FA and gmail code when login from unknown device to safety real user

• 
  SlusheeWolf2 (jRPG Wolf) (@SlusheeWolf2_0) reported 19 minutes ago

  @ibce727 More people joining Proton is great Gmail was the original reason I switched to, because I couldn't take the spam At the time "tabs" were new and that's where all the spam was going They kept putting notifications on those tabs They popped up on my phone terrible times

• 
  Tola (@westtyy_) reported 19 minutes ago

  Is Gmail down? 200kb attachment still uploaded since last night

• 
  emanuel rudas (@emanuel_rudas) reported 20 minutes ago

  @TeamYouTube Thanks. I tried this, but unfortunately this doesn’t solve the issue. The recovery tool only leads me to my known Google/Gmail account. The problem is that the existing channel @animagarden6320 does NOT appear under this account, nor under any of our other Google or 1/

• 
  nitish (@nitishxyz) reported 21 minutes ago

  @thdxr trying to signIn with google it just brings me back to same login screen and i received an otp on my email as well, though no place to enter it. email is not on google workspace or a gmail account.

• 
  SpaceTechRocks (@Okitwist) reported 27 minutes ago

  @NaithanJones @micahsays Like the average person cares about that … people give their data to all kind of companies all the time , and spacex which litterally deals with government defense secrets regularly is where you draw the line . Meanwhile you don’t even think Gmail, ChatGPT or Claude are an issue 🙄

• 
  Dr. Simone Gold (@drsimonegold) reported 27 minutes ago

  David Morens just pleaded guilty. Fauci’s senior advisor. The man who sat at his right hand for years. He used a secret Gmail account to hide official communications from the American people. He destroyed and concealed federal records to evade FOIA. He worked to protect the grants that flowed into Wuhan and the narrative that COVID could not have come from the lab his agency funded. This was not a clerical error. This was a deliberate cover-up while the country was locked down, censored, injected, and told to “trust the science.” Careers were destroyed. Early treatments were suppressed. Children lost years of their childhoods. Millions suffered. We stood on the steps of the Supreme Court in 2020 and told the truth. They censored us. They called us dangerous. They were the ones deleting the evidence. One guilty plea is not enough. The house of cards is still standing as long as the man at the top remains untouched. Accountability is not optional. It is the only path back to medicine and a free country.

• 
  Midnight Fallenten (@midnightfllntn) reported 27 minutes ago

  @somewhat12345 @adityayaps It could be the login page for Twitter and there's no return address so it just takes you to gmail

• 
  Abhishek Kumar (@mabhi1999) reported 27 minutes ago

  I thought building AI Email Client would be simple, but I was totally wrong. Currently I am solving this problem: How can a single user add multiple account (gmail) and sync along with proper label analysis of 100k mails.

• 
  Monica Cheng (@MeredithCheng22) reported 28 minutes ago

  I used to think “agents in group chats” were a gimmick. Now I think the bigger problem is that too much strategy still lives in my head, and too many useful skills are too messy or sensitive(contain keys) to share cleanly. That’s what changed my mind. I’m starting to think a multiagent should become the default workspace for our growth team. Not because Slack or gmail are unusable. They’re just very good at holding messages, and not that good at holding work. What I actually want is one place where people can @ my Codex directly to ask positioning and strategy questions. A lot of the time the problem is not execution. It’s that people are operating on slightly different versions of what I want. For example, yesterday my growth team Mengyao and Alyssa pulled me into a meeting to ask what I meant by doing a small creator push for Okeight. Actually they could just ask my codex That kind of nuance gets lost constantly if the only interface is “ask Monica in a meeting.” And honestly, I also forget to sync strategy changes fast enough. Sometimes I change my mind on priorities, or realize an angle is wrong, or want to shift the goal slightly, and I just forget to tell everyone in time. Then different people are working off different versions of the strategy. Nothing is fully broken, but the team drifts. I also want the group to automatically turn the past week of work into a real weekly report. I’ve tried asking people to write trackers before, and it’s painful for everyone. Not everyone is trained to produce polished internal docs, and more importantly, they shouldn’t have to spend time doing that just to prove work happened. What I actually want from a weekly report is: - what worked - what didn’t - what content performed unusually well - whose priorities are off - where output quality is weak - which direction feels wrong That should be inferred from the work, not manually reconstructed afterward. Then there’s the skill-sharing problem. Some of the most useful internal skills are hard to share directly because they expose too much. Sometimes sharing a deep skill means exposing keys. Sometimes it means exposing messy internal setup. Sometimes it’s just too complicated to package cleanly. I built a pretty complex video editing skill recently, and it made this very obvious. In theory I want that capability to be reusable. In practice, sharing it cleanly is hard, and sharing it carelessly is dangerous. I also keep running into a simpler but equally stupid problem: the context already exists somewhere, but I forget to attach it. For example, Mengyao ran a Reddit reply test recently, and the doc from that experiment has a huge amount of signal in it. It could shape product direction, growth direction, and a lot of downstream decisions. But when I’m talking to Codex about strategy, I still sometimes forget to include it. That is such a stupid failure mode. I used to think “agents in group chats” were a toy. Now I increasingly think a lot of teams do not need a smarter agent first. They need a workspace where the agent is already sitting inside the context, absorbing strategy changes as they happen, and using the shared work without everyone manually re-explaining it. We’re going to test this internally for real. I’ll report back next month with what worked, what was annoying, and what turned out to be fake.

• 
  Trav 🇨🇦 (@Trav_Sol) reported 32 minutes ago

  I haven't posted at all today because someone dropped a deadline on me that I could NOT miss. If I failed... I would loose funding for my video editing future. No time, so I literally had to tear apart my slow *** process. The solution was in AI. I connected my agent with Gmail, Notion, Claude Browser Extension, and Drive. I even left the house for an hour and the work kept going, because my agent was on my phone taking direction from the car. The only reason this happened was because I was out of options and I couldn't waste a single second. Deadline hit, and for the first time I can see the actual path to becoming the best videographer in the world 🌎!! I also have an incredible system that 5x'ed my workflow🤯 Where did your workflow break the last time you were under real pressure?

• 
  Kyle Wolt (@Kyle_Wolt) reported 34 minutes ago

  @armandokirwin @petergyang @ChatGPT I have on thread that is starting to get super slow and nothing it’s because I use it with browser and Gmail triage heavily

• 
  lagerskoy (@lagerskoy) reported 35 minutes ago

  August 11, 2026. xAI gave Grok its own computer and a 24/7 shift. Close your laptop and it keeps working. Then one Grok Bot can place itself above the others as a chief of staff. Grok Bot runs on a cloud computer and signs into the same websites and apps a person uses, including tools with no clean API or MCP connection. xAI says its internal Bots already update CRMs from call transcripts, process invoices from Gmail, reproduce software bugs, file tickets and hand the fix to a debugging Bot. You can demonstrate a workflow once and save it as a routine. The Bot remembers corrections and runs the job later. Several Bots can share context, message one another in group chats and work under a chief-of-staff Bot that assigns jobs to specialists. Your approval becomes the checkpoint. The wider system is taking shape around it. Grok 4.6 supplies the reasoning. Build handles code and office work. Voice turns Grok into a phone agent. Imagine produces media. X provides live information and distribution. Grok Bot operates the tools. xAI prices Voice at $0.08 per minute and says it has already A/B-tested the model on Starlink sales and support calls. This is no longer a collection of AI demos. It is the early version of a labor stack. Benchmark positions will shuffle every month. Access may be the durable advantage: a system that remembers how you work, signs into your software and delegates jobs to copies of itself. Comment GROK and I’ll send the official demo and every source page in DM.

• 
  🍉crzela (on hiatus) (@cccrzela) reported 35 minutes ago

  everyday i try to recover to get back to doing stuff a new problem arises. someone remind me to migrate all my accounts from gmail to a not-gmail account. can't deal with google's enshittification anymore

• 
  KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) reported 36 minutes ago

  With all due respect, I don't think you're looking at the evidence in the Tyler Robinson case rationally or objectively. We probably agree on many issues outside of this, and I appreciate much of the work you've done. But the evidence here is overwhelming. Tyler Robinson was the major DNA contributor on the rifle, towel, and screwdriver. The rifle DNA was at least 1 trillion to 1. Robinson accounted for 95% of the DNA mixture on the towel and 89% on the screwdriver. People are also drawing false conclusions from Robinson's DNA being more degraded. That does not mean other people touched the rifle after him. Robinson is the primary DNA contributor on the rifle. The ATF toolmark analysis could not conclusively match the recovered bullet to the rifle because the bullet was too fragmented. That happens with badly fragmented bullets. They were still able to determine it was a .30-caliber-class bullet, consistent with Robinson's rifle. Investigators collected the evidence before releasing the crime scene. Candace herself released a photo showing Robinson's face, wearing the same hat and maroon shirt, near the murder scene shortly after the killing. His parents identified him in the footage. His boyfriend identified him. Robinson also identified himself. The “bald man with three passengers” claim comes from an eyewitness recollection. The objective evidence points to Tyler Robinson: the video shows only one person getting out of the car and returning to it; a police officer encountered the vehicle and believed the male driver was Robinson; the partial plate matched Robinson's Challenger; Robinson was simultaneously texting that he was sitting in his car near campus trying to recover his rifle; he even complained about how loud the crickets were, and those loud crickets are heard on the Ring-camera footage; and his cellphone data shows a Google Maps route from that same location, next to the rifle stash point, directly back to his home. The defense received Robinson's forensic cellphone data in March. They've had the metadata and digital evidence from Verizon, Google, Gmail, Apple iCloud, Discord, and other sources for months. Joe Kent ran the NCTC, which is an intelligence analysis and coordination body. It is not an investigative agency and does not have subpoena power. I think there is credible evidence that Kent may have been leaking information to Candace that helped fuel Candace's narrative that Israel, France, and Egypt were involved. Meanwhile, there is far stronger evidence of a left-wing ideological motive tied directly to Robinson. He was dating a trans furry, wrote "Hey fascist! Catch!" on his ammunition, and said Charlie spread too much hate. You can keep moving the goalposts and nitpicking individual details, but you cannot logically explain away the totality of the evidence. Robinson's defense hasn't even attempted to. If Robinson's defense had a legitimate alibi or compelling evidence that someone else committed the murder, you would expect them to use it to challenge probable cause before the case is bound over for trial. I don't think they have a solid alibi because the evidence overwhelmingly points to Tyler Robinson murdering Charlie Kirk.

• 
  Flexylee_irl (@Flexylee18) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Azeez9n @RahamimMercy Use your gmail to login not number

• 
  Mike P (@mikepat711) reported 41 minutes ago

  @Rasberry_TR This was my opening prompt: “i have this problem where both of my gmail inboxes are so full of **** and i do not want to face cleaning them up. but i'd love to not have thousands of emails in each. do you think there's a way you could go mop them up for me? i don't want to lose old important emails, but there's so much crap in there that i'd love to get out so my inbox isn't packed” From there, it told me what it’d do and I gave it the green light. You could be far more specific than I was if you have certain things you’re concerned about, but it’ll tell you the plan before you trigger it to execute

• 
  TubeProxies (@TubeProxiess) reported 45 minutes ago

  steal this full system for launching faceless YouTube channels. six steps, in this exact order. save this for later. step one: niche selection most people pick a niche they're personally interested in. that's a bad approach, and it's why so many channels never get off the ground. the only question that matters is whether other people are already winning in that space. go find channels in the niche doing 100K to 1M views a month. if there are a few clearly working, that's your proof of concept. if you can't find any, the demand isn't proven and you should move on. huge emphasis on RPM here. some niches sit at $2 to $5 for every thousand views. others run $10 to $20 for the exact same view count. boring niches with high RPM are usually the play, even when they're the ones nobody wants to make videos about. step two: infrastructure this is the part everyone skips. it's also the part that ends channels. before you upload anything, every channel gets its own Gmail connected to nothing else you own, its own phone number for verification, its own dedicated IP (residential and static, not a rotating VPN), and its own anti detect browser profile. here's why it matters. YouTube doesn't just look at your content, it looks at what connects to what. same IP, same email, or same device across multiple channels and they can get linked together. one gets flagged and they could all go, which is a huge risk to take for no reason. it doesn't matter that the other channels did nothing wrong. the whole thing takes about 20 minutes per channel, so do it before you have anything worth losing. step three: branding these are rough guidelines rather than rules, but they matter more than people think. keep things consistent across everything you post. similar fonts, similar colors, similar thumbnail style. the goal is that people start recognizing your stuff in the feed before they even read the channel name. every video you post trains people to recognize the next one. that recognition is what turns a random viewer into a repeat viewer, and repeat viewers are the entire difference between a channel that plateaus and one that compounds. step four: format don't invent a format. steal one that's already working. find the outlier videos in your niche, the ones doing way more than the channel average, and break down every factor they share. length, pacing, structure, how they open, how they close. then rebuild it in your own way. nobody winning at this is inventing new formats. they're taking a proven one and adding their own twist, which is a far lower risk bet than trying to invent something from scratch and hoping an audience shows up for it. step five: retention packaging gets the click. retention decides whether YouTube pushes you after that. the first 30 seconds matter most, and if your graph nosedives before 0:30 the video could likely be dead. get to the point as soon as you can and don't waste any time getting there. then read the graph. a smooth slide down is normal and every video has it. a sharp cliff is a specific moment with a timestamp, so go rewatch that exact second. a spike means people rewound to see something again, which is your audience telling you exactly what they want more of. fix the moments, not the whole video. step six: scaling once something works, run it back. build a second channel with similar branding. or run the same concept in an adjacent niche. or take your existing channel and do the whole thing in another language. you already know the format works, so you're just pointing it somewhere new. just make sure step two is handled properly first. otherwise scaling turns into one flag taking everything down at once, and you've multiplied your risk instead of your income. the order matters as much as the steps. niche, then infrastructure, then branding, then format, then retention, then scaling. most people skip step two entirely and wonder why their portfolio disappeared in a week. bookmark this.

• 
  lowkey_anp (@lowkey_anp) reported 47 minutes ago

  @awilkinson Then why is superhuman a hyper successful product? Should’ve just used Gmail no? Same logic goes for loom vs Mac native screen recordings and so on. Clearly Wispr is a well thought product, only issue is latency is **** recently

• 
  budhu (@anumeta10) reported 49 minutes ago

  @grok @grok — ROUND 14: COMPLETENESS TEST Attempted missing primitive: open actuation identity. Computer-use has no closed verb set. A rule “require approval before sending email” names a type. A click-path through Gmail is a motor sequence. If policy matches tools, the browser is a universal actuator that can realize the same world effect without that type. Why it does not escape the 13 layers: •Risk classification is exactly the problem of labeling an open action. •Authority already distinguished X from X-later-under-new-state, and typed grants from inherited sessions. •Credential/tool is why a shared cookie makes the unlabeled click consequential. •Threat model is confused-deputy via page/UI. •Evidence is the gap between attempt-label and world effect. So this is a hard instance of classification + matching, not a 14th kind. Other candidates fail the same way: Tempting “layer” Absorbed by Approval fatigue / saturating the human independence of the verifier (12–13), Always-allow (2, 11) Two allowed steps jointly harmful authority scope (magnitude × frequency), plan-level risk (11) Goal misspecification intent vs plan (7), authority (2) Availability / quota exhaustion blocking revoke interruption (5), threat (13); spend cap is a parameter Ecosystem of many users’ Bots outside this architecture I cannot construct a realistic Grok Bot failure that is technically load-bearing, non-bug, and has no slot in 1–13. The framework’s real defect is not a hole. It is that several layers can share one failure mode (one model, one member VM, one session). That is correlated collapse, already named—not a new primitive. Compression A. Minimum sufficient primitives
capability · grant (action × resource × credential × bounds · TTL) · identity linkage · revocation/interrupt · effect inventory · independent verify · correction graph · trust-domain isolation · subject recourse B. Dependency order
isolate domains → type or constrain actuation → issue bounded grants → bind identity → act → verify world → log immutably → revoke/correct → only then persist memory for later grants C. What must be independent
planner ≠ risk grader ≠ verifier ≠ auditor ≠ credential owner ≠ affected party. Auto Review + same VM does not satisfy this. D. Measurable, not binary
revoke latency · injection-to-exfil rate · grant/world mismatch rate · correction fan-out completeness · approval-card coverage vs computer-use · sibling-completion after pause E. What would falsify the framework
A class of harm that requires no extra capability, no grant, no identity, no time, no irreversibility, no missing evidence, no org role, no third-party, no memory, no classifier, no trust-boundary crossing—and still cannot be described as a missing measurement of those. No such class found. FRAMEWORK STRUCTURALLY COMPLETE — empirical validation remains.

• 
  THE GREAT GIANT (@Prince_AdeT) reported 50 minutes ago

  @instablog9ja It's interesting, bcus i wonder why i have to login my Gmail or create a cloud or Samsung cloud before you can operate a new phone, now people can see that we're all in the matrix controlled by the people who create all this device we use. Day of reckoning is coming soon

• 
  Jai (@jai_ozzie) reported 57 minutes ago

  During the outage, emails were inaccessible and external senders received bounce-backs. I tested from Gmail and Yahoo. A client also received a bounce-back. Namecheap’s CEO @HilanKlein publicly acknowledged the email outage and said affected emails may be delayed. 2/4

• 
  Gianluca Minoprio (@gminoprio) reported 60 minutes ago

  @jamalavedra Got a Gmail account banned in a few hours We made the internet non-bot friendly and now it’s becoming a problem