Gmail status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Gmail reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Gmail users through our website.

• Website Down (38%)
• Errors (34%)
• Sign in (28%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Gmail outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Québec	Sign in	1 hour ago
Paris	Website Down	1 day ago
Paris	Sign in	1 day ago
Paris	Errors	2 days ago
Pessac	Sign in	3 days ago
Strasbourg	Errors	3 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Prymex.eth 🌊 (@EmekaOghali) reported 29 seconds ago

  @onlyonearcane @FeyiLux Dump the channel and start new one, once you get zero impressions the channel/gmail has issues

• 
  Jrmaya (@Olaniran_btc) reported 2 minutes ago

  The best agentmail use case i've seen wasn't even one of their official demos. During a big SF power outage, someone spun up a set of email inboxes overnight, one per household, so people could send complaint emails to the utility company, plus shared public inboxes so everyone could see what was actually being sent. The whole thing was live and posted publicly by the next morning. This is the real test of "email as agent identity," not a sandbox demo, a real situation where people needed to send real accountability emails fast, and the infrastructure just had to not be the bottleneck. No human's gmail to borrow, no manual signup, nobody babysitting deliverability. It needed an address, and it needed that address to actually land in an inbox instead of spam. Small story, also exactly the kind of thing that's easy to miss if you're only reading the funding headline.

• 
  Kabiru Ibrahim (@Kabirumakwalla) reported 4 minutes ago

  If we don't have access with our old Gmail, we can't have a chance to receive otp for creating tik-wallet, please do something on this issue, or allow phone number otp instead of Gmail. Thanks @TikCoin_Network

• 
  Neil Gass (@NeilGassX) reported 5 minutes ago

  You didn't pick your AI assistant. You typed the name you'd heard of into Google one day and the default stuck, and now it knows your business, holds your files, and leaving means teaching a new one from scratch. That was a free decision a year ago. It isn't anymore. Memory, uploaded files, custom instructions, app connections. All of it piles up inside one account and none of it comes with you. Here's what moved underneath you. Similarweb's July report puts ChatGPT at about 53% of global generative AI web traffic, down from 76% a year earlier. Gemini climbed to roughly 27%. Claude went from barely 2% to close to 9%. People are re-choosing. Most owners aren't. The prices are all the same, which is what trips people up. ChatGPT Plus $20, Claude Pro $20, Google AI Pro $19.99. This was never a price decision. It's a fit decision. Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar? Gemini. Reaching the work you already have beats any feature list. Proposals, contracts, careful client writing? Claude. Long documents, and the writing holds up when tone matters. Want the most tutorials and ready-made helpers? ChatGPT. Still the biggest by a wide margin, so the how-to content is everywhere. People ask which one I use. Claude, mostly. I run an ad agency and a consulting practice on it every day. But that's my answer for my businesses, not yours. A comparison like this has a shelf life of about three months, because all three ship features constantly and pricing moves with no notice. Which is why we re-verify ours every quarter instead of writing it once and letting it rot. The mistake I watch owners make isn't picking the wrong one. It's picking three. Free tiers everywhere, one paid plan nobody has trained, and you get three shallow acquaintances instead of one assistant that knows how you work. Three subscriptions and one habit is $40 a month donated to the AI industry. Pick one. Set up your custom instructions the day you subscribe, upload your price list and service descriptions and brand voice samples, give it one real job this week. If you want a second opinion before your team standardizes, that's what our Fractional AI Advisor does. We don't sell software, so we evaluate the tools against your actual workflows, get your team onto one standard, and keep you current as they change. Did you actually pick the assistant you're using, or did you just keep the first one you tried?

• 
  Cody via (@CVia10388) reported 5 minutes ago

  Just got @bot for the administrative side of my company. Very impressed and fairly easy to use for the average person. The only thing I had problems with was linking it to my quickbooks. There is no plugin (as of now hopefully) and when I tried to give it access through its browser, it was flagged and didnt allow it to sign in. I also couldn't get into my outlook email account. My Gmail worked perfectly.

• 
  One Man LBO (@OneManLBO) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Shaun_FullSteam @SBA_Matthias Yeah I run proper tech stack (warmed Gmail inboxes on like max 20 cold / 30 warm per day), short and informal copy, but still feel like a lot of people don’t read it. Either attention span issue or MS outlook (which seems to be the preferred ESP in construction)

• 
  Jack Daniel (@JackDaniels0314) reported 9 minutes ago

  @eviljunglelord @PACattica you don’t know me, but I have an accounthere @Jack__Daniel___ I haven’t been able to sign in for more than a year. I’ve gone through X Help 50 times at least. You can’t make them understand the Gmail closed an account that I didn’t use even though my ph number is doesn’t matter!

• 
  Bobby Gadzooks (@TimeBobby3) reported 9 minutes ago

  @infosec_james 100% and completely practical for elderly parents who get confused why Google on tv would ask them to sign in when they signed into gmail 4 days ago from their laptop. I know mom, it’s stupid, let’s get the book out snd sign you in.

• 
  Shaurs (@Shaursbtw) reported 12 minutes ago

  How we built a cold email agency an automated inbox placement testing system that runs across every sender account without a human touching it. Why you need this: In cold email, one burned inbox lands you in spam. Five burned inboxes tank a client campaign. Nobody notices until reply rates crater and the CSM is on the phone explaining. The old fix is running Emailguard placement tests by hand across every sender inbox. It works. It takes 4+ hours a day. And nobody actually does it consistently. The setup: Cold email deliverability isn't a marketing metric. It's an infrastructure metric. Every sender inbox behaves differently. Some land in the Gmail promotions tab. Some hit Microsoft spam. Some bounce silently. Without testing, you're sending from senders that haven't hit an inbox in two weeks and you don't know. Do that across 500 inboxes and 20 clients and you need a system. We built two coordinated n8n workflows that run the entire placement test lifecycle automatically. Here's what it does: - Airtable triggers a bulk test via webhook for every sender across a client - Loops through each sender with a 2-second rate limit that protects the APIs - Creates a placement test in Emailguard for each inbox (4 Google + 4 Microsoft addresses) - Sends the test through the Bison API with a unique filter phrase to track it - Waits 2 minutes for delivery and provider categorization - Retrieves results and calculates: Google inbox/spam/bounce, Microsoft inbox/spam/bounce - Computes the overall placement score: (Total Inbox / Total Delivered) × 100 - Writes every metric back to Airtable, per sender, per test The outcomes: Zero manual placement testing. Zero burned inboxes silently sending to spam. Zero clients getting a surprise deliverability drop mid-campaign. Every sender scored. Every test tracked. Every drop caught before it costs a client. The best cold email agencies aren't the ones with the biggest inbox lists. They're the ones who know exactly which inbox is worth sending from today. If you're running cold email at scale and your placement testing is still someone's evening ritual, book a call. Link in bio.

• 
  Seyimola 🤴 (@seyimola) reported 13 minutes ago

  @gmail @googlemaps I can't login into my account anytime i try, it keeps telling me account already exist even after i have cleared all data on my Gmail

• 
  Bali as a Colony of Jakarta (@pakar_ai) reported 18 minutes ago

  @ModelScope2022 not interested too hard to follow to many step u should just make it login with gmail also small model not good for real task

• 
  Sheel Mohnot (@pitdesi) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Guerrero_FJ @narendra Huh? I mean he uses it to email other people Doesn’t login to Gmail

• 
  Sally Fergus (@FergusSall36171) reported 22 minutes ago

  To 02airaacamrilgue of oa*****@gmail.com, or whoever ******** you are. People who fancy themselves as hackers or people who's business is stealing, here is an update for you I know people like you want to know the results of your destruction so I am going to give you a list. 1. You destroyed the email I have had for 30 years. My family tried to tell me of my uncle dying but, of course I missed it. I cannot recover that email. Congratulations. That's one in your favor. 2. You killed my Microsoft account to the point I can no longer log in under anything because I have be verified through my phone. My phone is not capable of the high tech verification processes and software required. I cannot spend $1000 for a new phone. So you killed microsoft for me and any programs that require a microsoft login such as my Office program. The $150 I spent on 365 is gone and so is my ability to use office. Congratulations on that one. After 7 verification attempts, none were successful. 3. You killed my microsoft games. They require a login. I can't log in. I can't even login with a new password. Congratulations. You are 3 for 3 so far. 4. You killed off any chance I have for technical support outside of the home. I took my computer to a computer repair company and for $75 and after a while, they told me they couldn't help me. You got me for $75. Congratulations. That is 4 out of 4. 5. I took my computer to the Geek Squad and they told me you have, either accidently or purposely put in in a login loop I can't get out of. Wow. You are good. 6. On my microsoft account, micrsoft wants to send me help only through an account at oa*****@gmail.com. I don't know who the FK oa*****@gmail is. There is no account on my gmail so you now are able to intercept any assistance microsoft has tried to send me. That's deep. Actually, that is pretty evil so you should be very proud of that. So far you are 6 for 6. 7. My bank notified me of suspicious purchases. I asked them to decline the sales. That cost me $35 to stop for illegal purchases of over $1000. That's 7 for you. I'm pretty tired of working on this for 2 weeks so I will quit now. You have don't a marvelous job. I wish you would contact me directly. I would like to meet you at a location of your choice and buy you a cup of coffee or a beer where we can both laugh at how much fun you had. I will travel cross country to meet with you for coffee or a beer. I'll buy.

• 
  Mouss | Unlimited Scaling (@mouss_us) reported 25 minutes ago

  the ban didn’t happen because of your ad. it was the login you never removed. or the agency you stopped working with in 2024. and it can be the freelancer who touched the account once. they still have access. their device. their network. their country. all of it attributed to you. device and IP consistency are part of how Meta reads an account before it enforces anything. set 2FA to everyone, not admins only. use an authenticator app instead of SMS. keep admins on company email, not personal gmail.

• 
  Ricci Research (@ricci_nov) reported 27 minutes ago

  @ChatGPT Event triggers on Slack and Gmail is the real shift — cron means the model runs when you decide, webhooks mean it runs when the outside world decides. Every inbound message is now a potential instruction, which makes prompt injection an inbox problem rather than a chat problem.

• 
  Harley F. (@harleyf33) reported 29 minutes ago

  Your cold email isn't getting ignored. It's getting filtered. Burned domain. No warm-up. One inbox pushing 150 sends a day. Gmail decided you're spam before a human ever saw a word. Fix the infrastructure first. Deliverability is the game before the game.

• 
  Seyimola 🤴 (@seyimola) reported 33 minutes ago

  @gmail @googlemaps Also i think my Google play store or Google play services is having issues

• 
  MOM - TCG and Collectibles - Drops and Restocks (@iamapokeMOM) reported 34 minutes ago

  For this use icloud or outlook - Gmail is not working for email verification.

• 
  Axat (@axat_div) reported 34 minutes ago

  Why does the Gmail settings page look so antiquated? I hope they can use Gemini or Claude Design to hopefully fix it and make it look less cluttered

• 
  Chris Longden (@chris_longden) reported 38 minutes ago

  @nima_owji Annoying when you have a work and personal account and you switch between them, cursor > gmail > sign in then logout > cursor > grok > x > back to cursor > sign in.

• 
  KaneMc (@kdepater) reported 39 minutes ago

  Is Gmail’s spam problem getting worse? Someone has been dealing with this for weeks. Spam email after spam email. They block the sender. Report it as spam. Delete it. And more just keeps coming. What surprised me is how many other Gmail users in the discussion say they’re experiencing something similar. Some even say obvious spam is now reaching their primary inbox instead of being automatically filtered out. Of course, this doesn’t mean Gmail itself is necessarily the cause. Your email address can end up on spam lists, and scammers constantly change addresses to bypass blocks. But there’s a bigger lesson here: Never assume an email is safe just because Gmail allowed it into your inbox. Check the sender. Be suspicious of unexpected links. And never enter passwords or payment details through a random email. Spam is annoying. Phishing is where annoying can become expensive. Has anyone else noticed more spam getting through lately?

• 
  𝙶𝚞𝚟'𝚗𝚘𝚛 𝙼𝚊𝚐𝚔𝚔 (@IdanMAGKK) reported 44 minutes ago

  @KlasickTheHost can't even login Gmail except the one I input from the start of the phone. will get it solved 🔜

• 
  Straggler Liu | AI & Semis (@StragglerLiu) reported 45 minutes ago

  Google Has the Best AI Distribution — and That Might Be Its Biggest Cost Problem One sentence: Google is creating AI demand by embedding Gemini into 13 products with 1B+ users—but every AI feature multiplied across billions of users becomes a massive recurring compute liability. Consensus: Google is spending aggressively on AI because it has to keep up. The narrative is simple: Big Tech is in an AI arms race, and Google can't afford to lose. Cloud is growing, Gemini is improving, capex is climbing, and FCF has gone negative. Contradiction: But Google's AI demand is not the same as OpenAI's or Anthropic's. Most AI companies build models and hope users come. Google already has 2.5B monthly users on AI Overviews alone. It doesn't need users to choose Gemini—it just needs to turn on AI features inside Search, Gmail, YouTube, and Workspace. That means Google is manufacturing a huge portion of its own AI demand through product design and distribution. Mechanism: Google's economic model is a feedback loop. Embed AI into products with billions of users. Usage increases because AI is now the default, not an optional tool. Compute demand rises—every AI-generated summary or suggestion consumes inference. Capex expands to keep up with the demand. That capex becomes evidence that "AI demand is exploding." The demand is real. But part of it is endogenous—it exists because Google decided to create it, not because users chose it. Evidence: AI Overviews: 2.5B monthly users. AI Mode: 1B+ monthly users. Gemini integrated across 13 products with 1B+ users, including 5 products with 3B+ users. Google Cloud revenue: +82% YoY in Q2 2026. Cloud backlog: $514B. Alphabet FCF: negative as infrastructure investment accelerates. Economic consequence: This scale creates a hidden trade-off. Every incremental AI feature multiplied across billions of users is a recurring compute expense. Google has been optimizing per-query cost aggressively—and that matters enormously because even small savings scale into billions. But the open question remains: does each AI interaction generate enough incremental revenue to justify the compute behind it? Profit pool migration: Primary beneficiary: Google (GOOGL) . $514B cloud backlog shows external demand is real. The company is raising debt to fund infrastructure. If AI Overviews increase Search engagement and ad monetization faster than inference costs rise, the ROI is massive. Challenged: Standalone AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic). Google's distribution advantage is unmatched—it doesn't need to win the "which model is best" debate to get inference workload. It just needs to keep embedding. Public equity implications: The market is pricing Google's AI capex as a "catch-up" spend. But the capex is also funding the transformation of Google itself into an AI-native ecosystem. Analysts are still calibrating the revenue lift from AI-enhanced products. The gap between "capex is a cost" and "capex is infrastructure for a higher-margin future" is the valuation debate. Risks and invalidation: Monetization gap: If AI features increase engagement but not ad pricing/subscriptions, the inference liability becomes a margin drag. Open-source erosion: If competitors offer similar AI capabilities for free, Google's distribution advantage shrinks. Regulatory pressure: Google's ability to default users into AI features may attract antitrust attention. Cost curve: If inference cost reductions don't keep pace with usage growth, the math breaks. Bottom line: Google is not just responding to AI demand—it is actively creating it. That is a superpower. But it is also a self-inflicted cost obligation. The stock ultimately depends on whether Google can turn billions of AI-powered interactions into billions of dollars of incremental profit faster than the compute bill arrives.

• 
  OLAOFOSUN (@OLAOFOSUN1) reported 50 minutes ago

  @TikCoin_Network TikCoin by Tikchain Network,please I want to ask that those of who using different Gmail to register TikCoin and using another Gmail register Tikchain what can we do to sign in to the Tikwallet I wanted to connect my Tikchain account to the Tikwallet thank you

• 
  𝚓𝚎𝚑𝚝 (@jeht_studio) reported 51 minutes ago

  @felix0me @ProtonMail @SimpleLogin I've been with them for years. I've never noticed an outage before. You made a good choice. As Proton said, it's back up. I can confirm. Good riddance Gmail, or whoever you were using before!

• 
  Bruno Garcia (@brungarc) reported 51 minutes ago

  @grichadev @indragie Spam filtering is one of the main reasons to use gmail. It has been the mail server for my domain for ~20 years

• 
  chall (@challdreams) reported 52 minutes ago

  @AskWorkspace I'm not dm from twitter with my mandatory gmail account couple with Fitbit now Google health. I've submitted a support request on Google health. Ignored as my last three ones. So... customer service you are not. Fitbit never had these issues.

• 
  Agbaje Automation. (@agbaje_automate) reported 54 minutes ago

  I’m building something I’ve been thinking about for a while an AI-powered document automation system for shipment and logistics operations. Because let’s be honest… A lot of businesses are still receiving invoices, shipping documents, packing lists, purchase orders, and other documents through email, then someone has to open each file, read through it, copy the information manually, validate it, enter it into a system, and finally store the document somewhere. That is a lot of repetitive work. So I’m building a workflow that handles that process automatically. The idea is simple: 📩 A client sends a document through Gmail. 📎 The workflow picks up the attachment automatically. 🤖 AI identifies what type of document it is. 📄 If it is a PDF, image, scanned document, or another supported format, the workflow processes the content so the AI can actually understand it. 🧠 The AI extracts important shipment information such as: • Shipment Number • Invoice Number • Purchase Order • Container Number • Booking Number • Vendor • Customer • Consignee • Shipper • Carrier • Origin Port • Destination Port • Departure Date • Arrival Date • Weight • Volume • Packages • Currency • Total Amount • Incoterms • Reference Number But I don’t want AI to just extract information and throw it somewhere. The workflow also validates the information. If the confidence is high and everything checks out → continue automatically. If important information is missing, the confidence is low, there is a duplicate shipment, the document cannot be processed, or something doesn't look right → send it for human review. Then the system stores the structured information in Google Sheets for now, while the original document is organized in Google Drive. So the complete flow looks something like: Gmail → Attachment → Document Processing → AI Classification → AI Extraction → Validation → Duplicate Check → Google Sheets → Google Drive → Notification And yes, I’m currently using Google Sheets as the ERP layer for the demo. The bigger idea isn't really about Google Sheets though. It is about showing how you can take something as messy as: “Here is an email with a PDF attached.” …and turn it into: “Here is a validated shipment record ready for your operations team.” That is the part of AI automation I enjoy. Not just adding AI because AI is trending. Actually looking at a business process, finding where people are wasting time, and building a system that removes the unnecessary manual work. I’m still testing different document types, OCR, validation rules, AI extraction and the error-handling side of the workflow. Because production automation isn't just: “It worked once.” It needs to handle situations where the document is missing information. It needs to handle duplicates. It needs to handle bad files. It needs to handle multiple attachments. It needs to know when to continue automatically and when to involve a human. That is where the real automation work begins. I’m building it, testing it, breaking it, and improving it. And honestly, this is the kind of system I love building. 🤖 I’m Agbaje Olarewaju AI Automation Specialist. I build systems that turn repetitive business processes into workflows that actually work.

• 
  Ruben (@rdominguezibar) reported 55 minutes ago

  BREAKING: Arga Labs raised $10M to stop teams testing AI agents in production General Catalyst led, with Y Combinator, BoxGroup, Emergence, Gradient and SV Angel joining The problem is obvious once you see it: agents already work inside Slack, Gmail and Salesforce, and most teams have no way to test them except on live systems Arga builds digital twins of that software @PhillipLii and @akkkkiira met in first-year calculus at 17 and 14, since Akira skipped high school. Amazon, Goldman and Stripe before this Excited to have invested in this round!!

• 
  DIO (@KusumoDio) reported 56 minutes ago

  50,000+ verified gmail 1m+ points already claimed funny enough, rialo launch was so crazy yesterday that the server actually went down on the first day. these numbers are pretty insane to me. i see this as way more than just a sign-up metric. this is genuine proof that people are actually that curious to try out firsthand what rialo is building. these 50k users are really just testing the waters.