Gmail status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Gmail reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Gmail users through our website.

• Website Down (39%)
• Errors (34%)
• Sign in (27%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Gmail outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Ealing	Errors	2 hours ago
London	Website Down	19 hours ago
Chamalières	Website Down	2 days ago
Anaheim	Errors	2 days ago
Paris	Website Down	3 days ago
Porto-Vecchio	Website Down	3 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Fego (@JayRomee_) reported 6 minutes ago

  @A_Kayode_A We have our own mailing server, but it's linked to my Gmail 🌚

• 
  Arpit Verma (@ArpitVe10412248) reported 7 minutes ago

  @nealmohan @YouTube Sir I rquested to you some days ago to issue about same gmail otp problem. But no one help me. Please help to recover my gamil account.

• 
  lilAgents (@lilAgents) reported 8 minutes ago

  To be clear, renting a tool isn't the problem. Gmail is a rental and that's fine, because you can export your data and leave anytime.

• 
  Mustafa Ekinci (@ekinciio) reported 9 minutes ago

  SaaS is not dead. AI is separating durable systems of record from replaceable workflow software. That was the most useful takeaway from the latest @theallinpod episode, where the hosts discussed Salesforce’s earnings and why the “SaaSpocalypse” narrative may have gone too far. A few months ago, the dominant argument was simple: AI agents can write software, so companies will rebuild their SaaS tools internally and stop paying vendors. The @theallinpod hosts argue that this misses the difficult part of enterprise software. Building the first version of a CRM with AI might take a weekend. Making it secure, reliable and scalable is a different problem. You still need permissions, compliance, data protection, integrations, auditability and support for thousands of edge cases. Friedberg shared a practical example from his own company. His team built an internal CRM using AI coding tools. The prototype worked, but every new requirement created another layer of work: account security, access controls, protected data storage and additional features. They eventually moved to Salesforce. The company’s engineering time was more valuable when spent on software unique to its business, such as plant breeding and laboratory workflows, rather than rebuilding a generic CRM that already existed. This creates an important distinction: Horizontal SaaS products such as Salesforce, Workday, Oracle, SAP, Slack, Gmail and Excel are difficult to replace because they hold canonical company data and support workflows across many industries. Vertical SaaS products are more exposed when their main value is a narrow workflow that an AI agent can recreate or customize for one company. The strongest SaaS companies will survive because they are systems of record, not because users love their interfaces. In fact, the interface may become less important. The hosts described a future where users work primarily through Claude or another general-purpose AI agent. The agent reads information from Salesforce, performs actions and writes the results back. Salesforce remains the trusted data layer even if Claude owns the user interaction. That explains why Salesforce’s Anthropic integration matters. Benioff appears willing to let Claude become the front end because Salesforce can remain the source of truth behind it. The new enterprise stack could look like this: • A trusted database and system of record • Applications and business workflows • AI agents that use those workflows • A general AI interface controlling the agents This also changes what SaaS founders should build. A polished dashboard is no longer enough. SaaS products need excellent APIs, command-line interfaces, permission systems and agent interfaces. External agents should be able to read data, execute approved actions and write results back safely. Companies that insist users interact only through their proprietary interface may lose relevance. Companies that make their data and workflows useful to outside agents can become more deeply embedded. My takeaway is that AI will not eliminate SaaS as a category. It will expose which products own durable data and which products are only workflow wrappers. The likely winners: • Trusted systems of record • Products with strong retention and low churn • Platforms with years of operational reliability • Companies with excellent APIs and agent access • Tools that help customers use their proprietary data safely The most vulnerable: • Thin vertical SaaS wrappers • Products built around easily replicated workflows • Vendors with weak data ownership • Companies that resist external AI agents • Tools whose main advantage is a user interface The question for every SaaS founder is becoming clearer: If the interface disappears and an AI agent operates the product on behalf of the user, what durable value remains underneath?

• 
  X. Manda (@AMPDDUP) reported 10 minutes ago

  Working with @bot I am continually having to sign into gmail. Is there a way to fix this? Do I just give in and give up my password? @GrokBotDev

• 
  Shivam Singhal (@shivam_310) reported 10 minutes ago

  Feel like anthropic is slowing down.. no new banger releases, no noticeable improvement in UX and features. Can’t even connect multiple gmail accounts to my claude.

• 
  Big Dave (@asia_prince1) reported 10 minutes ago

  @cjay_ttrades @TRADEWITH_DAVID Bro I didn’t see it from the Gmail I just have a welcome message and my account login only no way to use enter the site dashboard

• 
  Veronika ⊙⊝⊜ (@nik925446) reported 11 minutes ago

  important notice🚨 you can still join the waitlist and your email is being saved normally. if you’re using Gmail, the confirmation email may take a little longer to arrive right now. because of the huge amount of activity, Gmail is temporarily slowing down how quickly our emails can be delivered. other email providers are working normally. so if you signed up with Gmail and haven’t received the confirmation yet, don’t worry - you’re still on the waitlist thank you so much for your patience while things catch up 🙏

• 
  James Futhey (@kidgdzilla) reported 14 minutes ago

  @hieuSSR Like, there's positioning for people who just want this instead of paying for Google Workspace or a premium gmail inbox with domain. But if you kind of already know how an email server is supposed to work you end up with a lot of questions that Cloudflare doesn't answer well.

• 
  Haris (@fyreinteractive) reported 14 minutes ago

  your youtube trust score might be killing your channel’s views and you don’t even know about it… there’s no place to check it, but it exists you've seen it happen. a creator posts 20 genuinely good videos. zero traction. under 100 impressions on all of them. they assume they're bad at this, burn out, and quit. the content was fine, and the channel was flagged before their first upload even went live. let me break down exactly how this works and the $0 fix... when you create a new youtube channel, the system evaluates a set of signals to classify whether you're a real creator or a bot farm. fresh gmail + instant uploads + 0 viewing history + no subscriber activity = the exact fingerprint of the spam channels youtube kills every day so the system treats you the same way. your reach gets throttled before you've begun. i've watched this wreck dozens of channels in the facelessOS community before we figured out the pattern. a creator sets up a new gmail, creates a channel, uploads 5 videos in the first week, and wonders why their impressions are in the single digits. they think their thumbnails need work. their hooks need work. their niche selection was wrong. the real cause sat elsewhere: the channel was classified as low-trust on day one. and once you're locked in what people are calling "0 view jail," the algorithm withholds enough initial impressions to even TEST whether your videos are good. you're uploading into a void. the protocol fixing this costs nothing and takes 7 days. step 1: use a gmail you've had for months. an aged, real email with search history, youtube watch history, subscriptions, normal activity. this single change shifts how youtube classifies the account from the start. aged gmails signal "real human." fresh gmails signal "potential spam." step 2: spend 7 days as a viewer before you upload anything. watch full videos in your niche. complete watch-throughs rather than 30-second clicks. subscribe to 10-15 channels in your space. leave a few real comments. like videos. build a viewing profile that matches the audience you want to attract. this sounds dumb. it's the highest-leverage 7 days you'll ever spend on a channel. the system now has evidence you're a real person with real interests in the niche you're about to create content for. that reads completely differently to "anonymous account uploaded 5 videos about true crime yesterday." step 3: verify your identity. enable feature eligibility in your youtube settings. this requires a government ID and phone number. i know some faceless creators hate this because they want full anonymity. the tradeoff is the algorithm treating you like a verified human instead of an unknown entity. every creator in our network who verified saw an immediate increase in initial impression allocation. step 4: upload cadence matters MORE than upload volume. the channels that escape 0 view jail the fastest upload 2-3 videos in their first week with 48-72 hours between uploads, well away from 5 videos on day one. consistent spacing signals "real creator." mass uploads signal "bot farm." youtube's system is pattern-matching your behaviour against known spam patterns, and spam channels dump content fast. step 5: your first 3 videos are an audition. youtube tests new channels by sampling a small audience. if those first 3 videos get decent retention (above 40%) and positive engagement, the system escalates your trust and your next uploads get shown to a bigger initial pool. if your first 3 videos get 10% retention because the scripts were weak, the system downgrades you and your next uploads get an even smaller test audience. it's a compounding loop in both directions. this is why i keep saying the script carries everything. especially for new channels, the first 3 scripts need to be ENGINEERED for retention. they set the trust score for every video that comes after. the channels in our network running scripts built on retention data from 8,000+ proven scripts skip the 0 view jail entirely. their first videos get tested on meaningful audience sizes because the retention signals tell the algorithm "this channel is worth pushing."

• 
  broke boy (@0xfuckpoverty) reported 15 minutes ago

  i asked my Grok Bot what it could reach with my logins. the answer was $214,000 not what it did. what it could, at 4am, with nobody watching six bots. research, writing, outreach, ops, finance, support. the org chart everyone's posting this week. i built the same one then i read xAI's own docs and found the line none of those threads quote: separate Bots are not separate security boundaries six bots, one cloud computer. one filesystem. one browser holding one set of live sessions. memory is partitioned, capability is not so i mapped what that single machine was logged into: → stripe · $46,000 in refundable charges → business banking · $88,000 → the CRM · 2,400 contacts and every deal in flight → gmail · every invoice, contract and password reset i own → drive · 340 files other people build on → the deploy keys $214,000 of reach, sitting behind one browser session, driven by six sticky notes telling it what to be today you didn't hire six employees with six laptops. you deployed one laptop logged into everything day six it earned that lesson. outreach reported a perfect run - 640 sent, 100% success, zero errors. it had been wrong for nine straight hours. deduplicated the list on the wrong key, hit 96 clients twice, and matched two invoices to the wrong company. $11,300 about to go out the door nothing crashed. nothing turned red. by its own definition of done, it succeeded i caught it in four minutes because every bot writes one line before it acts: what it's about to do, why, and what it expects to be true after then i stopped sorting work by difficulty and started sorting by whether i can undo it: → ship it - wrong is cheap and obvious. labels, notes, drafts that never send → gate it - reversible, but i'd never notice. anything reaching a human, anything that spends → never - payments, refunds, payroll, deploys, permissions, customer data reach went from $214,000 to a bounded $3,400. same six bots. same speed. zero code, one evening they've since cleared their own $200/mo 42 times over here's the uncomfortable part. everyone posting the day-one screenshot has the same $214,000 sitting behind the same one browser, reporting 100% success to a lock screen at 11pm they have no line. no diff. no way to know go check right now what your bots are logged into. that number is your real exposure, and you've never once looked at it.

• 
  Sergus (@Serguseeq) reported 16 minutes ago

  @BzilaTrades Hello I have problem with my account can’t enter and today was paid subscription I used gmail for register account now can enter to my account

• 
  Leon (@_Leon_Lapaix) reported 19 minutes ago

  @thsottiaux I eventually migrated several Work threads over to Chat, and I doubt I’m the only one questioning where Work currently fits. Work is being pushed very heavily, but as soon as you actually use it on major projects with Very High or Maximum reasoning, the return of the 5-hour quotas can burn through them extremely quickly. In my case, on a large legal matter involving cross-referencing a lot of files and information stored in Google Drive, I had around 45 minutes of reasoning in Very High and more than 120 minutes in Maximum. And the quota isn’t even the only problem. Once the work is finished, those threads become practically impossible to use on Android. In the mobile app, the thread may stop displaying altogether. In Chrome on Android, it sometimes eventually loads, but with so much latency that a simple reply or attempt to resume the conversation can take several minutes. On PC, it remains usable, although it isn’t always smooth. And that’s where Work’s positioning becomes difficult to understand, because for a lot of use cases, Chat is already more than enough: document analysis, Gmail, Drive, research, writing, administrative, legal, banking, or insurance-related matters. And as soon as you actually need to act on a working environment, Codex often seems more relevant than Work to me. Codex can work directly with local files, synced folders, scripts, downloads, and above all the user’s existing signed-in Chrome session. That is a huge advantage over Work’s cloud browser, which uses its own session, often asks you to sign in again, and can be blocked by some websites that detect automation or treat it as a bot. So for browsing a banking portal or insurance account, retrieving multiple documents, archiving them, renaming them, or working within an already authenticated session, Codex can be much more practical. In the end, Work can sometimes feel as though its main appeal is giving Plus users access to Very High or Maximum. But if those modes consume a huge share of the quota, and the biggest threads then become difficult or even impossible to properly resume on mobile, the value proposition becomes much less obvious. And that also highlights another issue: there still isn’t really an intermediate plan between Plus and Pro at $100. A “Plus Extra” plan at around $40 to $50 would make a lot of sense: a larger context window, access to Extra High, more Chat and agentic quotas, for example 5x or 10x Plus, without having to jump straight to Pro. There is probably a real market between “Plus is enough for most things” and “I’m willing to pay $100 a month.” Right now, that jump is still huge, whereas an intermediate subscription would probably be a much better fit for a portion of heavy users.

• 
  Julian Goldie SEO (@JulianGoldieSEO) reported 19 minutes ago

  CHATGPT WORK JUST REMOVED ONE OF THE BIGGEST BLOCKERS IN AI AUTOMATION. The login screen used to kill the workflow. Now the agent can keep going. What changed: → ChatGPT Work runs inside a separate cloud-based browser → When login is required, you enter the credentials yourself → OpenAI says the model doesn't see or store your username/password → After authentication, the agent resumes the task What this unlocks: ✓ Persistent authenticated sessions using cookies ✓ Background work even after you close the app ✓ Webhook triggers from Gmail, Slack, and GitHub ✓ Shared tasks your team or clients can copy and run ✓ Site Tools/WebMCP for more direct website interaction The practical shift: ChatGPT isn't just answering questions anymore. It can research, navigate apps, pull data, create deliverables, and continue multi-step workflows while you're doing something else. That's a much more useful definition of an AI "agent."

• 
  Richard de los Santos (@ZeusRadls) reported 19 minutes ago

  @atmoio Grok Bot is wild. For fun I had it review and fix my LinkedIn page. It asked me some questions and went to the page and made the edits in its local browser. It will now respond to people and pass along useful connections to me. I asked it to push a local Grok Build project to GitHub. It found the project folder fixed some issues and pushed it to GitHub. I asked it clean up my downloads folder. It did it instantly. I asked it to review and clean up my old Gmail account. It went through thousands of old emails. Wiped out my quota doing it, but it was insanely easy. I activated the 𝕏 connector and had it advise me on my 𝕏 activity. It told me to stop positing garbage and clean up my act (basically). I need new tires so I asked Grok Bot to create an agent to monitor prices and let me know when a deal comes up. The list goes on…

• 
  Blackwell Mosh (@MwanikiMosh) reported 20 minutes ago

  @gmail @googlemaps Hi @gmail i recently lost access to my gmail account when i try logging in it says that my account does not exist. What could be the issue and I have been using the email for a while now.

• 
  آلیس در سرزمین حقایق (@khargiush) reported 24 minutes ago

  Hey creators & @TeamYouTube @Google, I really need your help! I’m completely locked out of my Google Account/Gmail due to an identity verification issue during login. Because of this, I’ve lost access to my monetized, fully compliant YouTube channel for over a month!

• 
  chris gobblins 🦃 (@CRMullins) reported 24 minutes ago

  @gremlin_sh @poiThePoi Like I said it's impressive. But let's also keep in mind this is twitter not big tech. If the hell-site goes down and I can't tweet at you freaks I'll be sad, but it would be a very different discussion if say Gmail or AWS had similar outage patterns. The ad revenue drop is also significant, and let's not forget the interest on the $13B Elon needed to fund the acquisition. Would be surprised if they broke even with the staff reductions.

• 
  kushagra chitkara (@kushagrchitkar) reported 26 minutes ago

  Instinct raised $350M this week. It also spent the week in a privacy backlash: screen access, data retention, actions users didn't confirm. Both things are true, and both matter. The demand signal is undeniable: people want an agent that acts first. The backlash signal is just as clear: nobody wants an agent that watches everything to do it. This is the exact design problem we've been living inside at Almanac. Our answer: the agent doesn't watch your screen. It builds context from where work already lives Gmail, Slack, Notion and acts on real triggers: a meeting on the calendar, a renewal date, an email that arrived. When it texts you, the draft is already done. Not because it was spying. Because it already knew. Proactive without surveillance isn't a compliance checkbox. It's the whole architecture. The market just proved the demand at $2.5B. The trust layer is still up for grabs. That's what we're building.

• 
  Mr Market (@dogreadsnews) reported 29 minutes ago

  @shiplogged @shirshakchavan Not quite there yet. Too many basic integration issues but we are getting closer. Grok Bot spent all afternoon adding basic images to Gmail for me. It got there in the end but it isn't slick. Not ready to run a business IMO. But closer.

• 
  Idle Writer (@idlewriter57) reported 34 minutes ago

  @rumai26581 @reezkawan Can you use another way to sign in apart from the phone. Gmail is so annoying it always adds so many extra steps

• 
  kelvin osato $XAGE (@_whizkel_) reported 40 minutes ago

  @ScaleNetworkAI @gmail I can’t even login

• 
  Jason Fleagle (@jjfleagle) reported 47 minutes ago

  Google says Universal Cart will work across Search, Gemini, YouTube, and Gmail. The hard problem is preserving buyer intent across handoffs. Tracking a price should not silently become permission to substitute a product, choose a merchant, or complete the purchase.

• 
  Andrew Perry (@LeonTransaxle) reported 49 minutes ago

  @RebCoPTrainee I receive emails from patients’ hotmail/outlook etc accounts without issue. None go into my junk folder. I can also send reminders& forward stuff from my home accounts (gmx, gmail or yahoo) without the need to set an exclusion rule. I expect it depends on the individual Trust.

• 
  Yadav (@001AnilYadav) reported 50 minutes ago

  @flipkartsupport @Flipkart .... That acount. Now concern is if I remove that gmail id by login through Gmail account in Flipkart it need another gmail id that I was not able to give as that number is no longer associated with me.

• 
  Julian Goldie SEO (@JulianGoldieSEO) reported 50 minutes ago

  ChatGPT agents can finally get past the login screen. That was the wall for years. Every time an agent hit your CRM, your ad dashboard, or your invoicing tool, it stopped dead at the password field. Here's how it works now. It runs on a cloud computer, not your machine. Your tabs, cookies, and passwords are untouched. When it hits a login, it stops and shows you a form. You type it yourself. OpenAI says the model never sees it. Then it keeps working, even if you close the app or shut your laptop. There's more nobody is covering. It can now fire on a trigger. A new Gmail message, a new Slack message, a new pull request. It starts working with no prompt from you. And you can hand a whole task to a teammate. They connect their own apps and run their own copy. Days ago the docs said the cloud browser would never accept logins. Now it does. Want the SOP? DM me. 💬

• 
  W. W. S. Hsieh - Sometimes Satirical! (@whsieh) reported 52 minutes ago

  @jwithing UT’s own webpage on Zotero says this so it doesn’t seem to be a configuration error. Also, since UT doesn’t use Gmail, I’m not wedded to using Chrome on my work laptop, anyhow.

• 
  Daniel Roemer (@SirMaximusIX) reported 58 minutes ago

  @XFreeze They need to fix the Gmail connector. ******* frustrated here

• 
  Altor (@GoldDelacr86694) reported 58 minutes ago

  @TeamYouTube My channel got terminated by KGH media and got 10 copyright strike from them, even though my video is heavy edited and followed the fair use and they just falsely claim the video that they don't even owned. They simply repost videos they do not own and claim rights over them and they just lists clips in a library and may still find the same clips on other channels/platforms. They continue to claim rights to videos they didn't create and which the creators have clearly stated that KGH Media does not own the rights to. And there's Multiple posters compare KGH's tactics to known copyright-troll patterns (demanding fees, aggressive takedowns) Even if i email them to remove the copyright strike, they will demand me for $250 to $500, and I will not going do it because, people reported it that they pay them and there channel is still terminated and not removed the strike, Please i need your help, they are abusing it without any consequences. I did what you said to me that, but my channel was not even in there anymore, I tried to scroll down and up but I can’t see my channel, This is the gmail of my channel and my channel is not in here anymore, only my brand accounts You said that you take this copyright trolls very seriously but it’s been almost 2 weeks and still no update or any actions I’ve been waiting for you DM for a long time but still no update

• 
  I GOT BANNED (@Abd_samad03) reported 1 hour ago

  @FiverrSupport I reached out via Gmail regarding an issue with my withdrawal, but I haven’t received a response yet. Could a human support agent please review my case and assist me? I’d really appreciate a prompt response.