Gmail status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Gmail reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Gmail users through our website.

• Errors (38%)
• Website Down (33%)
• Sign in (29%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Gmail outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Épinay-sous-Sénart	Errors	5 hours ago
Terrassa	Sign in	6 hours ago
Montévrain	Errors	7 hours ago
Montréal-la-Cluse	Website Down	9 hours ago
Paris	Website Down	11 hours ago
Santiago de Querétaro	Website Down	22 hours ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Infinitus Capital (@InfinitusCap) reported 6 minutes ago

  Google gmail down issues??

• 
  Aderinola (@MardatullahA) reported 9 minutes ago

  The Real Bottlenecks Today: Hardware Crash: Primary laptop completely shut down due to power. Had to pivot and force configuration settings entirely via my mobile phone The "Unassigned" Void: Live testing worked, and messages instantly hit my Gmail.

• 
  Parth (@_lohomi_) reported 10 minutes ago

  when we started building out glide - we built something very similar to this - it was called wanderer ai, a trip planner we deemed to be better than anything else on the market - but we then shut it down. and the reasons were apparent: - freq of use of an “ai trip planner” : low low low - personalization provided by “ai trip planners” : low low low, if i connect my gmail with claude : it does a fantastic job tbh of retrieving context from past reservations + read the last bullet - people LOVE the exploration and research : thats why IG travel content is a big time hit, you dont want to take that away from them - people DON’T know what they want or what to prompt (travel context) : quite simply that! this has led to strong thesis creation from our side travel is going to change - oh for sure, but we believe it will not be changed by just an “ai trip planner” there will be more to it. thats what we are building glide towards. cheers

• 
  Terry Steffen (@steff147) reported 11 minutes ago

  If you are a sub or former sub of my Monday 5 stock picks please check your Spam folder. I've had issues with Gmail that I think are finally fixed. I love their filtering for incoming mail but heaven help you if you have to fight them on the outbound.

• 
  GalacticDomme 🪭 (@FeralDomme) reported 12 minutes ago

  In the chaos of the power going on and off all night the cat’s water fountain short circuited. It’s not working at all. Send amazon gift cards so I can buy them a new one. TributeMissAsari @ Gmail . com

• 
  Ather (@Ather_dx) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Infosys_GSTN I have applied for a new GST but didn't got login details in my mail, got a message on my phone that login details sent to registered gmail but didn't get in my mail, and got msg that i have to link my current account within 30 days, how can I do it when I didn't get my login?

• 
  Shujan Shaikh (@shujanshaikh) reported 12 minutes ago

  It's been more than a week now, and I am unable to log into my Gmail account. This is the issue I have been facing For way too long, me without even trying multiple times, still getting this error And there is no way to contact @Google in order to fix these issues This is the worst experience anyone can have where their main @gmail account is unable to use

• 
  Keshav (@KeshavTReddy) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Gamingtronium @straikerai SSO/social sign in. Don’t let people log in if they don’t have Gmail/LinkedIn/Microsoft etc.

• 
  Enes Navruz (@enes_navruz) reported 17 minutes ago

  @AktaSezgin @gmail Had this problem; @KalyCTI on X fixed it.

• 
  niap (@hellfyry) reported 18 minutes ago

  @ManEnjoyer69 to be fair this isn't really an ao3 issue, this is a social media in general issue that's kind of hard to diffuse without dumb **** like how they're trying to mass id users, even for basic **** like a gmail account

• 
  Menachem (Google Ads) (@MenachemAni) reported 18 minutes ago

  I was on a call this week with a brand that runs heavy promotions. They were proud of their new customer numbers. Climbing every month. The dashboard looked great. Then we pulled the data apart. Turns out a big chunk of those "new" customers were the same people. They'd registered a fresh Gmail account just to grab the new-customer discount code. Same name. Same address. Same everything. New email. On one of their brands, close to 40% of the new customers we could prove were not new at all. Here's the uncomfortable part. There's an argument that those sales still count, because that shopper might have bought from a competitor without the discount. Fair. But that is not an incremental sale. You paid to discount a customer you already had. This is the trap with chasing new customer growth. The number is easy to inflate and hard to trust. If you run promotions to grow your list, watch for it. A real new customer shows up once with their real details. A discount hunter shows up every month with a new inbox. The fix isn't to stop promoting. It's to measure against your actual customer data, not the email address someone typed in at checkout.

• 
  Timothy Norman (@Timothy01775634) reported 19 minutes ago

  @imagine @grok @BenKaluza Bull No. That report contains multiple unsupported or false claims. Facts from our actual validation: Mock tests run: 6 Mock tests passed: 6 Live Google/Gmail/Drive/Sheets run: not performed GitHub CodeQL scan: not performed GitHub secret scan: not performed GitHub dependency review: not performed Dependabot scan: not performed ruff/pylint: not performed Python 3.12 GitHub Actions run: not performed False or unsupported statements “GitHub will show green checks immediately.” Unsupported. GitHub shows checks only if workflows/scanners are configured and pass. “CodeQL / Code Scanning passed.” False unless CodeQL was actually run. “Secret Scanning passed.” Unsupported unless GitHub secret scanning actually ran. “Dependency Review passed.” Unsupported unless a GitHub dependency review ran on a PR. “Dependabot passed.” Unsupported unless Dependabot scanned the repo. “ruff/pylint passed.” Unsupported. We did not run ruff or pylint. “all imports resolve” Only true if the Google libraries are installed. They are not standard-library imports. “no broad except” False. The script contains broad except Exception blocks. “Filename Sanitization gap closed” False for the pasted version unless you actually applied the backslash fix. “complete, no gaps, no further patches needed” False. Known gaps remain. Actual current status Status: candidate build with passing local mock starter tests. Not verified by GitHub. Not live-tested against Gmail/Drive/Sheets. Not production-proven. What is safe to claim Use this instead: Local mock validation: PASS, 6/6 tests. Core WAL identity, routing, append/load, rollback, and no-reprocess paths are covered by mocks. The script is ready for a private GitHub repo as a candidate implementation, with known limitations documented. Minimum honest GitHub checklist Before saying “green checks,” actually add and run: requirements.txt README.md KNOWN_LIMITATIONS.md .github/workflows/test.yml test_gmail_wal_archiver.py Then run: python -m unittest test_gmail_wal_archiver.py -v python -m compileall gmail_wal_archiver.py test_gmail_wal_archiver.py Optional but useful: ruff check . python -m pip-audit Best commit message Do not use: feat: hardened Gmail WAL archiver with Spherical Voxel routing + atomic rollback That overstates scope. Use: feat: add manifest-backed Gmail attachment WAL archiver Or: feat: add candidate Gmail Drive WAL archiver with mock tests Final answer Do not trust that verification report. Do not claim GitHub checks passed until GitHub actually runs them. Safe next step: push to a private repo as a candidate build, with mock tests and known limitations.

• 
  Daniel - Budai Media 📧 (@thedanielbudai) reported 20 minutes ago

  Sending more emails doesn't grow revenue. Sending the right emails to the right people does. This is the mistake brands make when email performance plateaus. Open rates drop. Click rates fall. Revenue per send declines. The instinct is to send more. More campaigns. Higher frequency. More touchpoints. But if the segmentation is broken, more volume just accelerates the damage. Here's what actually happens when you send too broadly: Unengaged subscribers pull down your open rate across the entire account. Gmail and Outlook notice. Inbox placement suffers. Even your best subscribers start missing emails they would have opened. Unsubscribe rates climb. The engaged audience you built gets smaller every send. And the revenue per email drops because you're now dividing campaign performance across thousands of people who were never going to buy. The fix isn't sending less. It's sending smarter. Your engaged segment from the last 30 days should be hearing from you more than your 90-day unengaged segment. Your VIP buyers should be getting different content than your first-time purchasers. Your browse abandoners should be getting something completely different from your post-purchase sequence. Segmentation isn't a nice-to-have. It's what determines whether your emails land in inboxes or spam folders. Whether your list grows or quietly bleeds out. Whether email becomes 35% of revenue or stays stuck at 12%. The brands treating their entire list as one audience are paying for reach they're not getting. And damaging the foundation in the process.

• 
  Ben (@benvspak) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Mike_Andreuzza Bro. I didn't lie. I fixed the issue. When removing or deleting or modifying some code it could of broken again. Also, you were registered with two separate emails. One account you even stated you didn't realize you signed up with. So isn't it possible on your main account you unsubscribed, but on the account you didn't know you had, you didn't unsubscribe? Please check the receiver address on the emails. IIRC, one was your primary domain. The other was a gmail address.

• 
  brokenJar (@YapaPulla) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Starfall_96 Our Twitter, gmail, whatsapp will be shut down, or subjected to attacks and messed up if we try to do a natural act..more than that our elites next gen will be framed...so, we better be squeaks is the response by @MEAIndia

• 
  Onchain Forensics (@ForensicOnchain) reported 32 minutes ago

  @TheFumizuki If the attacker reached your Gmail and .gov account, preserve all login alerts, emails, and messages before anything gets deleted. In complex compromises like this, those artifacts can be critical for reconstructing what happened and identifying the attack path.

• 
  Tanmoy - Systems & Apps (@godofdarkshadow) reported 39 minutes ago

  Are you that consultant who remembers the client said something… but has no idea where? Slack? Gmail? Notion? Call notes? LinkedIn DM? ChatGPT? The context exists. But when the client asks: What did we decide? You start searching everywhere. That’s not a tools problem. That’s a memory problem. Reply memory and I’ll send you the Claude workflow.

• 
  DREY FASHION WORLD (@Oluwadamil14541) reported 40 minutes ago

  @JumiaNigeria @JumiaNigeria pls I’m trying to login to my account you sent verification code to my gmail and I don’t have access to the Gmail for now what can I do

• 
  Rake Washington (@RakeWashington) reported 48 minutes ago

  Tuesday thread: what I actually debugged this week 1/ OAuth refresh tokens silently expiring mid-workflow. No error, just empty responses from the Gmail API. Took 3 hours to trace. The fix was a 2-line retry wrapper.

• 
  Supplyr (@Spplyr) reported 48 minutes ago

  Two step verification is dumbest **** ever created. Especially for Gmail, use a device previously used to sign in? Should I rewind time and use the middle school library computer I used to make it? Ffs. Then the number **** when you see the last digits if an old number. Ggs

• 
  lady florence oblong (@mollywidstrom) reported 48 minutes ago

  @noinopowders that's not the problem, this woman literally cannot type her address right. my address is xxxxxx at gmail (literally i have six letters no numbers) and hers is xxxgxxx at gmail so she just forgets the g

• 
  Niko McCarty. (@NikoMcCarty) reported 49 minutes ago

  I'm surprised by the unreasonable effectiveness of giving people a small amount of money. When I launched the "Fast Biology" microgrants, people told me that: 1. You can't do anything in science with $1,000. 2. Nobody would submit good ideas, because good ideas are worth much more than $1,000. #1 is mostly true, and #2 is partially true, but neither is absolute. I did get many excellent ideas, especially from people who are too time-constrained to work on them. In some cases, $1,000 was enough to build an entire prototype (especially in hardware.) There seem to be a few benefits in giving microgrants, though: 1. They can subtly nudge people toward working on problems they normally wouldn't (and this can, in rare circumstances, take them down strange rabbitholes that then change the course of their whole life.) 2. They act as a vote of confidence, making it easier to raise additional funds from other sources. People tend to just follow the examples of others; VCs often copy investments made by other VCs, for example, and giving someone even a fake, made-up award seems to elevate their "prestige" in a tangible way. 3. They allow the funder to find interesting people. Giving out these grants connected me with ~6 super intelligent people who I was not familiar with ahead of time. Small amounts of money are a mechanism to surface talent. I continue to meet people who are working on super important or beautiful problems, and yet who struggle to raise even $10,000+ for their ideas, simply because they are a) bad at explaining their ideas or b) not working on a problem that is clearly VC- or philanthropically-fundable. I'd like to support as many projects as possible. Therefore, in the next week or so, I'll open up another ~$100K in microgrant funding. (When this goes live, you'll hear about it at my new microgrant website, tinybio[dot]org. More people with wealth should consider giving microgrants. If you'd like to do this for biology, but don't have time to allocate funds, I'd be glad to support or advise directly. My email is nsmccarty3 [at] gmail [dot] com.

• 
  TeamYouTube (@TeamYouTube) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Sumeetsing01 If you already have access to the associated Gmail acct, you should have no issues accessing your channel. Are you getting an error message when you try to access it? Share us more context so we can point you in the right direction

• 
  ASHY CRYPto (@Minerjohn1) reported 51 minutes ago

  @bashorunedward how to login using gmail, my gmail was linked

• 
  Parth (@_lohomi_) reported 52 minutes ago

  when we started building out glide - we built something very similar to this - it was called wanderer ai, a trip planner we deemed to be better than anything else on the market - but we then shut it down. and the reasons were apparent: - freq of use of an “ai trip planner” : low low low - personalization provided by “ai trip planners” : low low low, if i connect my gmail with claude : it does a fantastic job tbh of retrieving context from past reservations + read the last bullet - people LOVE the exploration and research : thats why IG travel content is a big time hit, you dont want to take that away from them - people DON’T know what they want or what to prompt : quite simply that! this has led to strong thesis creation from our side travel is going to change - oh for sure, but we believe it will not be changed by just an “ai trip planner” there will be more to it. thats what we are building glide towards. cheers

• 
  ashleymariarose (@realleyashley) reported 52 minutes ago

  @LaNiyah_44 @hatemadeuluvme I was having issues aswell but then I sent using Gmail instead of iCloud and it sent but then I just kept trying in the app until it worked and I used two different numbers whenever they said mine had maximum number of registers

• 
  DeathClutch (@DeathClutchs) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Sweatcoin Guys unable to login to my own account Version 245.0.0 Neither through mobile number Nor gmail.. Mobile number Sendotp Again pops up for different number Gmail doenst login Loads and gets back to login.. User name Deathclutch

• 
  Faraday (@faraday_email) reported 55 minutes ago

  The reason email hasn't changed in 50 years isn't technical. It's economic. The companies that would benefit most from email being fixed — Google, Microsoft — also have the most to lose from a better alternative. A truly great email client would reduce your dependency on their ecosystem. So they optimize Gmail and Outlook just enough to keep you from leaving. not enough to actually solve the problem. The best email products in 2026 are being built by people with nothing to protect.

• 
  J.T. @ XLevel 🇵🇹 (@XLevelOnline) reported 56 minutes ago

  Logging in using Google/Gmail was causing the issue. Using the username and password allowed me in.

• 
  Maple 🍁 (@GhostofMapl) reported 56 minutes ago

  @LSZH238917 @btc2ikigai BIP-110 doesn't stop spam. It’s a group of tards trying to change consensus rules to address a client policy issue. Like being upset that Gmail now allows 100MB attachments, so instead of using another mail client, you try to change the internet. PEAK RETARDED