1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Google Cloud
  4. Outage Map
Google Cloud

Google Cloud Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Google Cloud users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Google Cloud, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Google Cloud users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Google Cloud Platform, offered by Google, is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Noida, UP 3
Little Rock, AR 1
Jewar, UP 1
Montataire, Hauts-de-France 1
Greater Noida, UP 1
Ribeirão Preto, SP 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • bettercallsalva
    Thiago Salvador (@bettercallsalva) reported

    @addyosmani @googlecloud duration was never the constraint, coherence is. the longer an agent runs, the more it drifts off the original goal and compounds small errors. checkpointing state and re-grounding mid-run ends up mattering more than how long it can technically go.

  • Web3Specialist1
    Web3Specialist 🔶 (@Web3Specialist1) reported

    @googlecloud We analyzed real enterprise use cases using Cymbal Labs. Look at Customer Support Overload or Fragmented Data Analysis, the truth is that agents aren't just doing simple data lookups anymore. They are executing multi-step workflows like running rule checks, verifying guidelines, and making decisions. (5/10) 👇

  • Ferbin08
    Ferbin (@Ferbin08) reported

    @rseroter @googlecloud when you run trading bots under burst load, this is real. you're stuck choosing between idle capacity or slow starts. but standby buffers cost something too - what's the overhead when you scale across regions?

  • CocoAIxyz
    CocoAI (@CocoAIxyz) reported

    3/ On the @googlecloud panel, Charlie was asked what teams most underestimate going global. His answer: compliance, not tech. Code has no borders; compliance does. And on why COCO runs on Google: you already trust it with Maps, Gmail, your calls — you have to trust somebody. Pick the safest vendor so the customer can't say no, then talk product.

  • strategem360
    Strategem360 (@strategem360) reported

    Google Cloud outage hits India: Fire in a third-party data center triggered full shutdown. Services disrupted for users across the region. Google investigating and working on failover. #GoogleCloud #CloudOutage

  • bad_sin90451
    AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported

    @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

  • BaltimorePeace
    Meg from Baltimore (@BaltimorePeace) reported

    @googlecloud **** your nature destroying AI crap!! 🤬

  • confideleapnews
    Confideleap Partners Communication (@confideleapnews) reported

    @nvidia @googlecloud strong example of how innovation and trust can evolve together to support the next generation of AI-powered services.

  • shubhamgandhi_
    Shubham Gandhi (@shubhamgandhi_) reported

    bigquery has a really difficult UI- chunky, random paddings, too many squares, too many toolbars. low information density but still feels hard to use @googlecloud #BigQuery pls help!

  • thatjosephodeh
    PBAT in my Veins (@thatjosephodeh) reported

    Spent the last 24h stuck in a brutal deployment loop trying to launch n8n on @GoogleCloud Run + Cloud SQL. For a mid/senior dev, the fragmentation & complete lack of ecosystem integration is a massive failure. Here is a breakdown of why GCP feels broken right now. 🧵👇

  • 0xBebis_
    bebis (@0xBebis_) reported

    @uv @googlecloud they saw I was a day-1 Google Fi user and couldn't help but get onboard

  • A_Sabo8198
    S.A (@A_Sabo8198) reported

    @nvidia @googlecloud Cerebra’s goes up 20$ Nvidia down 2$😱😑😑 Release the beast Jensen! Enough is enough!! Everyone else got rich😑😴 wake up! Buy the shares back! Let’s go!🤪🧐🥸

  • Web3Specialist1
    Web3Specialist 🔶 (@Web3Specialist1) reported

    Intranet search has historically been where productivity goes to die. Fragmented docs in Drive, loose specs in Jira, data trapped in Salesforce. Inside Phase 2 of my @GoogleCloud journey, I’m breaking down how Gemini Enterprise unifies this exact chaos into one agentic interface. 👇 (1/5)

  • NoodeAPI
    Noode (@NoodeAPI) reported

    ➕ AI Integration: @SolanaFndn partnered with @googlecloud to launch a payment gateway for #AIagents, enabling multi-service API access via stablecoins without subscriptions.

  • ionetindia
    io.net India (@ionetindia) reported

    @ionet @googlecloud the hidden costs are always where they get you... the sticker price is never the real number with these platforms

Check Current Status