Google Cloud Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Google Cloud users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Google Cloud, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Google Cloud users affected:
Google Cloud Platform, offered by Google, is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Noida, UP | 3 |
| Little Rock, AR | 1 |
| Jewar, UP | 1 |
| Montataire, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Greater Noida, UP | 1 |
| Ribeirão Preto, SP | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Google Cloud Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Real Tums Festival (@Vegas_Chicken) reported@MLBNetwork @googlecloud Too bad he plays for a garbage franchise that's going nowhere.
-
AI Expert Khalid (@khalide_f1) reported@googlecloud Feels like F1 strategy but for telecom. Predict the problem, make the move before anyone else sees it.
-
Prevoyance IT Solutions (@ItPrevoyance) reportedTurned down a cloud migration project last year. That honesty built more trust than the deal itself. Not every company needs cloud. Some wait too long. #GoogleCloud #CloudMigration
-
DrusTheAxe (@kapustein) reported@guyrleech @UnrealEngine @googlecloud You can run makeappx with /nc to do no compression. Not a bad idea if you're just functional testing and the size delta is so negligible
-
DiscoverCyclades.gr (@touristasai) reportedI wanted to test google maps API ( sandbox) and now I have balance of 700$!!!! Thank you @GoogleAI @Google @googlecloud !!!! And obviously no support section to contact to! CAN YOU DO SOMETHING
-
Osync Network (@OsyncNet_003) reported@GBNEWS @BBCBreaking @googlecloud Google kills kids They sell the contracts as is documented for Nimbus, Maven and lavender for 1.2 billion pounds worth of cloud compute. That's how ethical they are. This is like the grooming scandal all over again. Google seems to have perfected that. But if you look at the systemic issues with regarding kitty data, no surprise Google grun and hide when the going gets tough. So why aren't these CEOs behind bars? We didn't get a human right on this, but they're now deciding the ethics but they chose to put machines into autonomous cloud compute contracts. That was an executive decision made at their level. So why on Google on trial for being murderers and that wasn't even Pentagon grade that was done by a round of funding? That's how these AI tools are done rounds of funding. So let's do a round of funding. And let's see how much ethical s*** we can pull up on Google. Let's be transparent right? Cuz if we didn't get a vote, why the f*** should the Greek London break who sold this compute out two of them stay at Google for AI one goes over to Microsoft dictate the future when they don't even know how to stop child exploitation, they're enabling in it. They are absolute unethical elitists and go ask all of their CEOs where they send their children. They don't let their children use the tech that they break rules to force into everybody else's lives. Let's talk about that real talk your tools. How many children have your tools killed? Character AI why did you buy that top Tech talent? What was so talented about them? Boys& girls So demis a sabase are you now a **** Your own tool Gemini seems to be absolutely clarifying the documentation. Oh dear! Didn't you think somebody would index the internet and look at the people who allowed the likes of Epstein and the doj shareholders that just so happen to be googlebound and as is documented, what are you actually trying to do over there with big Satan and little Satan? 🤔
-
AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported@googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.
-
Fabio Lauria (@fabiolauria92) reported@TelecomReviewEU @VodafoneBiz @googlecloud Most SMEs don't realize their biggest bottleneck isn't technology—it's time. You can deploy sophisticated AI tools, but if extracting insights still requires a data scientist, you haven't solved the real problem. I've watched teams spend weeks manually analyzing data when they should be acting on it. Removing friction in the entire pipeline is where transformation happens 📊
-
samih (@samihss) reported@AskGoogleCloud @googlecloud you suspended our entire project with real usage with no prior warning with a“hijacking” motif but no real details? We submitted an appeal, we haven’t heard back from you guys our entire platform is at a standstill - please help.
-
Heydari (@HeydariAI) reported@arcjax7 @test_tm7873 @googlecloud I preferred TPUs to be less famous man. I hope the don't shut down kaggle TPUs too
-
teqqed (@teqqed) reported@googlecloud i did but apprently have to wait for support to respond. regardless of the outcome, we should switch to @Mapbox it seems
-
EDOUARD (@edouard) reported@googlecloud We’d rather have your side of the story for @Railway’s complete five-hour outage that they say was caused by your blocking of their account without warning.
-
ATCA (@ATCA_now) reported@awscloud Chris Niehaus @googlecloud on the panel: "At Google, it's important that the cloud network infrastructure has multiple levels of redundancy buildt in."
-
Lensherr (@MaxLensherr) reportedthe positioning is now shifting. Not shared security or restaking but a broader idea: verifiable services built on top of the network. that shift became visible through specific events: @a16z purchasing a significant stake in EIGEN @googlecloud partnering with EigenLayer on verifiable services infrastructure these didn’t change the fundamentals, they made the shift legible. now, the protocol is being positioned less as a crypto-native primitive and more as infrastructure that non-crypto applications can integrate with directly.
-
Amrish Kumar (@_amrishkumar) reported@googlecloud @GoogleCloud_IN It's now one whole month and the escalation manager who was assigned last replied on May 9th requesting for 2-3 business days and I have never heard back from him