Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Google Cloud Platform, offered by Google, is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Google Cloud. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.
- Domains (27%)
- Hosting (27%)
- Cloud Services (18%)
- Web Tools (18%)
- E-mail (9%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Hosting | 7 days ago |
|
|
Domains | 8 days ago |
|
|
Domains | 29 days ago |
|
|
Hosting | 30 days ago |
|
|
Cloud Services | 1 month ago |
|
|
Hosting | 1 month ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Google Cloud Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
inc.fun (@incdotfun) reported@SolanaSensei @googlecloud it's super cool to see this unlocking so many use cases for agents - from selecting the service to paying for it...all frictionless
-
Band Of Angels - Defender Of Children (@BandDefender1) reported from Little Rock, Arkansas@Humana @googlehealth @googlecloud You have the worst Customer Service ever! I AM CHANGING INSURANCE signed Sherilynn Dee Reyes of Russellville ARKANSAS
-
Prashanth Vaidya (@pvbuilds) reportedGoogle Cloud’s customer support is absolutely ridiculous and this is a warning sign for anyone building on top of @googlecloud
-
Ryan Nixon (@rnixon92) reported@MyTechMusings @googlecloud Worth flagging though: inferring meaning from query logs assumes current usage = correct usage. That quietly bakes in tribal knowledge and historical bad joins. Powerful for discovery, but you end up with the 'common' answer, not necessarily the 'correct' one.
-
ColdBoot (@ColdBootSignal) reported@googlecloud Utilities are using TPU clusters to model weather risk and reduce outages before lines go down. The grid is moving from reactive to predictive.
-
Carlos Tecnico (@FutbolmeAI) reported@isudiptodas @Google @googlecloud Time to cancel autopay and use free tier. If Google can't process ₹2 they don't deserve your money 🙄
-
Web3Specialist 🔶 (@Web3Specialist1) reported@googlecloud We analyzed real enterprise use cases using Cymbal Labs. Look at Customer Support Overload or Fragmented Data Analysis, the truth is that agents aren't just doing simple data lookups anymore. They are executing multi-step workflows like running rule checks, verifying guidelines, and making decisions. (5/10) 👇
-
ashen (@ashen_one) reported@SolanaFndn @googlecloud plz help its saying you NEED touch ID or 1 password to use this?
-
Ferbin (@Ferbin08) reported@rseroter @googlecloud when you run trading bots under burst load, this is real. you're stuck choosing between idle capacity or slow starts. but standby buffers cost something too - what's the overhead when you scale across regions?
-
El Chon (@choonnn) reported@GoogleCloud Unexpected $10,225 MXN charge from Places API during development. Account 01B52E-22883E-48475B suspended. No quota limits were configured — this was unintentional. I need billing support to dispute this. Please help. #GoogleCloud
-
Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported@__000ali @SolanaFndn @googlecloud You got the point, high gas fee would be an issue for ETH and the liquidity there should be much better... No matter which chain, the migration would be big efforts for our engineering team. The mint might be delayed. So, it's tricky, we need to rethink about that. Any ideas ?
-
Sid Hary (@Sid_Hary_) reported@solana @googlecloud Pay-per-API-call via stablecoin is the kind of use case that makes sense on a blockchain and almost nowhere else. Traditional payment rails can't handle $0.005 transactions economically. This is a genuine fit between the technology and the problem
-
Brad Bonin (@cisco_brad) reported@googlecloud not bad. still curious how these stack against custom silicon from other clouds on total cost of ownership tho
-
Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported@0xLabswizzird25 @SolanaFndn @googlecloud Yeah, we are working on the solutions. That's a high priority topic for our team these days. And we are evaluating the effort of migration to other chains seriously. As you said, it seems projects the projects on Ethereum mainnet might get more support. But migration takes time and it's a big engineering effort, and we have to consider the high gas fee of ETH Mainnet, if we want to deploy our AI agent on an L2 chain that will not be an easy task for every team. To be honest, the infrastructure is not ready yet at the moment. And the other reason is that once we spend some time on migration, the user has to wait for longer time before mint.
-
Kyle (@kylem_org) reported@WallStreetApes @VladTheInflator And they all hire, promote and only protect each other, @googlecloud is the worst. Every PA 7 layers of Indian managers all friends.
-
Kazmal (@3kazmak) reported@googlecloud Gemini sucks *** !
-
Tampo (quant) (@tomslick88) reported@googlecloud copying out a system diagram makes this look way more formal than it really is actually feels like they finally solved the glue code problem
-
Shanytc (@_shanytc) reported@googlecloud And magically the vm price per hour doesn't go down...
-
Sam Padilla (@theSamPadilla) reported@yugacohler @CoinbaseDev @GoogleCloud pls fix. Uhhh APP?
-
Lensherr (@MaxLensherr) reportedthe positioning is now shifting. Not shared security or restaking but a broader idea: verifiable services built on top of the network. that shift became visible through specific events: @a16z purchasing a significant stake in EIGEN @googlecloud partnering with EigenLayer on verifiable services infrastructure these didn’t change the fundamentals, they made the shift legible. now, the protocol is being positioned less as a crypto-native primitive and more as infrastructure that non-crypto applications can integrate with directly.
-
Sean Guy (@sean63491) reported@googlecloud Trust & Safety appeal stalled >1 week (ID: UTR 3SJ N7E NJN TET HZR XFH VWK R4). Local code is secured, but I'm blocked from revoking compromised keys in the console until the suspension is lifted. Please help escalate!
-
samih (@samihss) reported@AskGoogleCloud @googlecloud you suspended our entire project with real usage with no prior warning with a“hijacking” motif but no real details? We submitted an appeal, we haven’t heard back from you guys our entire platform is at a standstill - please help.
-
BigFire (@BigFire97827414) reported@MLB @googlecloud Sight line in Minutemaid Park due to the roof is bad.
-
Nelson Lee Miller (@NelsonLeeMiller) reportedI am completely devastated. On May 6th, @GoogleCloud charged my card $7,069.02 for an absolute security failure on their end. Their support team has done nothing but harass and gaslight me ever since. (Case ID: 71048746) A thread on how a hobbyist got ruined by AI overnight: (1/)
-
AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported@googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.
-
Kunal Kumar Sahoo (@KunalKSahoo) reported@okaditya84 @googlecloud Not just this, my @GooglePayIndia is down post an update. I can do everything on it except make a payment.
-
bluelotus99.base.eth 🍀💫 (@BLueLoTuS99) reported@ionet @googlecloud The link is broken ..
-
Michael Richins (@richins_michael) reported@googlecloud So you want to govern us? Go **** yourselves
-
Superteam Germany (@SuperteamDE) reported@solana @googlecloud Shipping never stops on Solana 🚢
-
Krishnav Kanoi (@KanoiKrishnav) reported@vnsh02 @googlecloud It’s very bad I tried to use it , I have checked all available sites and APIs , nothing come remotely close to Google maps