Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.

• Domains (30%)
• Cloud Services (20%)
• Web Tools (20%)
• Hosting (20%)
• E-mail (10%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Noida	Domains	16 days ago
Jewar	Hosting	17 days ago
Montataire	Cloud Services	21 days ago
Greater Noida	Hosting	23 days ago
Ribeirão Preto	E-mail	24 days ago
Tijuana	Cloud Services	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported 4 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

• 
  K P (@kpitalism) reported 10 minutes ago

  Dear @googlecloud @GoogleCloud_IN For what reason my GCP project is suspended. No notification regarding whats going wrong, just suspend. Its better to go legal against you guys as things are traumatic now. Despite following everything, still suspended. WTF.

• 
  Josh Meyer (@JoshMey16883104) reported 12 minutes ago

  @GoogleCloudTech @googlecloud I have been on hold now for two hours waiting for a live customer support agent

• 
  draver (@draver461573) reported 12 minutes ago

  @teflocarbon @SimiStern @googlecloud The problem for me is that Railway markets itself as a serious cloud provider with its own data centers, except it has a SPOF on a different cloud provider. It's just not serious

• 
  rahul gupta (@guptarahul07) reported 14 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Hi @googlecloud, I submitted a quota increase request for My Business API (Case ID: 4-7405000041466) on April 26. Not able find or track this case ID. This issue raised earlier as well but no response. Can you help check the status? Project: reviewpilot-d9899. Tks!

• 
  Nelson Lee Miller (@NelsonLeeMiller) reported 15 minutes ago

  @EvanOtero @googlecloud Right, it would be a miracle to get anything resolved with Google support. This vulnerability has been known by Google since November 2025. I'm alerting all major news outlets. Going viral on LinkedIn.

• 
  Lensherr (@MaxLensherr) reported 18 minutes ago

  the positioning is now shifting. Not shared security or restaking but a broader idea: verifiable services built on top of the network. that shift became visible through specific events: @a16z purchasing a significant stake in EIGEN @googlecloud partnering with EigenLayer on verifiable services infrastructure these didn’t change the fundamentals, they made the shift legible. now, the protocol is being positioned less as a crypto-native primitive and more as infrastructure that non-crypto applications can integrate with directly.

• 
  Yoel Samuel Castillo Castillo (@AstroYoel) reported 18 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Okey but, there was a time I have an account closed, because I submit a “ilegal” software to my drive account. So, imagine I am doing some experiment with a tons of personal data and “ilegal” cybersecurity software, can I choose to have my data fully blind to Google’s servers? For example, my personals notes: if I run GEMINI CLI, and of course those notes need to be process by a server, but, if 1 note contain any material that it’s bad for the Google Terms and Conditions, can i receive a warning and not a Closed Account immediately?

• 
  Umer Imran (@UmerImran271675) reported 19 minutes ago

  @googlecloud @GMapsPlatform My Gmail account has been disabled. The problem is that the verification code is being sent to the same Gmail address that I am locked out of. This is my Google AdSense email, and I am very worried about it. Please help me recover my Gmail account

• 
  Krishnav Kanoi (@KanoiKrishnav) reported 20 minutes ago

  I need some help from the @googlecloud / @GoogleMapsPlatform team 🙏 I’m a student building a hyper-personalised travel agent for myself and others using Maps + AI. My 300 USD trial credits expired and my prototype is now stuck. My college hasn’t enrolled in the student/education program yet, so I don’t have a way to get new Maps credits right now, but I’m actively pushing them to apply. If anyone from the Google Cloud / Maps startup or education programs could guide me on how to get Maps API credits as a student builder (or the right program to apply to), it would unblock my work. Happy to share the idea, architecture, and progress so far. DMs open.

• 
  Teflo 🇦🇺 (@teflocarbon) reported 20 minutes ago

  @SimiStern I don’t even like Railway, or the "managed hosting" ecosystem in general. But the actual problem here is the continued bullshit @googlecloud keeps pulling: "oopsies, our finger slipped :3" account/control-plane failures that can take real infrastructure offline, while everyone keeps pretending this is acceptable behaviour from a serious cloud provider.

• 
  Chen Avnery (@MindTheGapMTG) reported 24 minutes ago

  @googlecloud $750M to help people build agents. Almost none of it will fund the constraint and audit layers that stop those agents from going rogue at 3am. The bottleneck was never creation. It's governance after deployment.

• 
  Nate Grater (@votethemALLout7) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Humana @googlehealth @googlecloud Why am I paying for medication when I have humans dsnp with a Medicare d plan? I mean 80 dollars to the ceo and down at Humana may not be much to for me it is groceries for two weeks. So I go hungry or take meds? Killing the elderly is all you are doing.

• 
  Evan Otero (@EvanOtero) reported 30 minutes ago

  @NelsonLeeMiller @googlecloud Hey Nelson, let's fix this asap. Just to double check, the case still hasn't been resolved yet right?

• 
  JB (@arrotu) reported 32 minutes ago

  @HAF_tech @googlecloud Identity and gateway help, but they answer "who and through what" not "was this specific action allowed at runtime." Once an agent runs for days, the question that gets asked later isn't whether the agent was authenticated. It's whether each action it took was admissible at the moment it committed, and whether that's still showable. Gateway plus identity plus a per-action authorization record is closer to what enterprises will actually be asked to defend.

• 
  Dawk O'Shiel (@Dawk_OShiel) reported 32 minutes ago

  @TBG_JUST_G @googlecloud Reschedule is always better than cancel!

• 
  ashen (@ashen_one) reported 34 minutes ago

  @SolanaFndn @googlecloud hell yea wtf

• 
  Andre MR (@AndreMR) reported 35 minutes ago

  @googlecloud is this a parody account? am i really reading a GOOGLE service account talking about open ai things?

• 
  MCO Global (@moretradingonl) reported 35 minutes ago

  @googlecloud google counting down like it fixes everything

• 
  Point Zero AI (@pointzeroai) reported 37 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Does this mean I can cancel my Go High Level subscription?

• 
  Revolgy (@Revolgy) reported 37 minutes ago

  Three weeks out from MSP Show London and we're already deep in conversations about what's actually keeping managed service providers up at night in 2026. Spoiler: it's not the technology. The tools exist. @googlecloud, @GoogleWorkspace, Gemini, managed security – all of it is there. It's the gap between "we have it deployed" and "our team actually uses it and our customers see the value." That's the gap we close. Stand 784, Excel London, 13-14 May.

• 
  Kyriakos (@Kyriakos_Pelek) reported 37 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Scale is wild, what problems are actually getting solved?

• 
  Malik umar (@malik850393) reported 41 minutes ago

  "This is a ridiculous response, @GoogleCloud. How can I 'link an active billing account' when your system is REJECTING every valid card I try to add (Error OR_BACR2_31)? ​Your automated system is blocking the very setup required to access support.

• 
  Umer Imran (@UmerImran271675) reported 42 minutes ago

  @googlecloud My Gmail account has been disabled. The problem is that the verification code is being sent to the same Gmail address that I am locked out of. This is my Google AdSense email, and I am very worried about it. Please help me recover my Gmail account

• 
  Web3Specialist 🔶 (@Web3Specialist1) reported 44 minutes ago

  @googlecloud We analyzed real enterprise use cases using Cymbal Labs. Look at Customer Support Overload or Fragmented Data Analysis, the truth is that agents aren't just doing simple data lookups anymore. They are executing multi-step workflows like running rule checks, verifying guidelines, and making decisions. (5/10) 👇

• 
  EDOUARD (@edouard) reported 44 minutes ago

  @googlecloud We’d rather have your side of the story for @Railway’s complete five-hour outage that they say was caused by your blocking of their account without warning.

• 
  Diljot Mutti (@DiljotMutti) reported 49 minutes ago

  trying to setup paid support for @googlecloud for more than an hour so that i can have actual support for my issue > paid support requires organization > organization requires something called cloud identity > cloud identity docs suggest go to Billing > Buy or upgrade. But there is no "Buy or upgrade" button 😐

• 
  Gabriel Moncha (@gabimoncha) reported 50 minutes ago

  i love @ctatedev portless but it seems that @googlecloud authorized javascript and redirect URL's don't accept wildcards for subdomains or .local / .localhost top level domains i hope they fix this sometime in near future. until then, we're back at using port numbers

• 
  Derek Morgan (@mtcderek) reported 55 minutes ago

  Honestly, if @Railway emailed me pre this @googlecloud issue and said "We're going multicloud for reliability" I would have worried more about complexity-related outages. The unlikelihood of a major cloud hyperscaler cutting a client like this should approach infinity.

• 
  JackBox (@Jack_Box_2026) reported 56 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Never, google will steal your data.