1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Google Cloud
Google Cloud

Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Google Cloud Platform, offered by Google, is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Google Cloud. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.

  • 27% Domains (27%)
  • 27% Hosting (27%)
  • 18% Cloud Services (18%)
  • 18% Web Tools (18%)
  • 9% E-mail (9%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Noida Hosting 15 days ago
Noida Domains 17 days ago
Noida Domains 1 month ago
Jewar Hosting 1 month ago
Montataire Cloud Services 1 month ago
Greater Noida Hosting 1 month ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Ferbin08
    Ferbin (@Ferbin08) reported

    @nvidia @googlecloud Apple Intelligence running on third-party data centers now. The infrastructure layer got decoupled from the software. Pretty standard move for a scaled service, but Apple's been locked down until now.

  • B4_winZ
    Bavin (@B4_winZ) reported

    @googlecloud @GoogleCloud_IN im getting this error : This action couldn't be completed. [OR_BACR2_44] for many times as I tried many times to upgrade my account. it was really urgent. my cards are currently unusable so I prefer GPay UPI Mandate plaease Help

  • draver461573
    draver (@draver461573) reported

    @teflocarbon @SimiStern @googlecloud The problem for me is that Railway markets itself as a serious cloud provider with its own data centers, except it has a SPOF on a different cloud provider. It's just not serious

  • ashen_one
    ashen (@ashen_one) reported

    @SolanaFndn @googlecloud hell yea wtf

  • rob_future
    future Rob (@rob_future) reported

    @GoogleCloud OAuth verification is becoming a case study in everything wrong with automated brand safety review. We’ve been stuck in a rejection loop for months. The latest rejection says our English OAuth demo needs to be in English. PLEASE SEND HELP

  • AshwiniNK21
    Ashwini (@AshwiniNK21) reported

    Attended @googlecloud 's Agentic AI at Work webinar today. Most of it was expected. Demos, roadmaps, enterprise case studies. Then one number stopped me. KPMG rolled out an AI platform to 38,000 employees. 15,000 agents were built. Not by the tech team. By regular employees. People who had a problem, figured out a tool, and just... built something. That's when the whole "agentic AI" framing clicked for me. It's not waiting for engineering to build you something. It's people closest to the problem reaching for whatever works. And the results when that happens? A German insurance company built an agent for customer health queries. 400% usage spike in 3 months. 37% faster response times. Real teams. Real impact. Not a demo. The tooling is now no-code. The barrier is basically gone. What felt like an "oh wow, someday" is starting to feel very close.

  • vitobotta
    Vito Botta (@vitobotta) reported

    @googlecloud @thenewstack Arm in GKE as default scheduling is a big signal. Graviton ate AWS, now Axion is doing the same for GCP. x86 isn't dying but it's losing the price fight.

  • ionetindia
    io.net India (@ionetindia) reported

    @ionet @googlecloud the hidden costs are always where they get you... the sticker price is never the real number with these platforms

  • rados_law1
    rados (@rados_law1) reported

    @NewsFromGoogle @googlecloud @Google you big. I know. What I know but I’m happy to fix that. To be brother with you. They destroy something. Unique. You know unique. Destroy distrub because they selfish. Idots look at them. Life only. They after death for they not future

  • airasentia
    aira (@airasentia) reported

    @rseroter @googlecloud agent revisions are where the chat demo grows up. traffic splitting sounds boring until one bad prompt revision starts touching real tools.

  • bettercallsalva
    Thiago Salvador (@bettercallsalva) reported

    @addyosmani @googlecloud duration was never the constraint, coherence is. the longer an agent runs, the more it drifts off the original goal and compounds small errors. checkpointing state and re-grounding mid-run ends up mattering more than how long it can technically go.

  • okaditya84
    Aditya Jethani (@okaditya84) reported

    @KunalKSahoo @googlecloud @GooglePayIndia Looks like it. But it'll still take some more catastrophic errors for companies to overturn their layoff decisions which they called as "business requirements" and "team restructuring" Ironically, never felt the need of QAs more than ever. Users = Testers

  • okaditya84
    Aditya Jethani (@okaditya84) reported

    @googlecloud @googlecloud I have sent a DM regarding the issue. Hoping for a resolution.

  • prabhattyagi1
    Prabhat Tyagi (@prabhattyagi1) reported

    @GoogleCloud @GoogleStartups Desperately need help! Applied for the Cloud Startup Program, submitted the requested billing admin verification screenshot 9 days ago, but no response. Our free trial is about to expire and ProdHub's workloads will freeze. Please help escalate!

  • bad_sin90451
    AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported

    @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

  • Slyy_007
    Slyy (@Slyy_007) reported

    @solana @googlecloud Damn this is huge ngl

  • twinkwithabat
    twinkbat (@twinkwithabat) reported

    @googlecloud “Introducing” as if you all haven’t shoved this down everyone’s throat already. At least give us a choice to use AI if we want to or not. Can’t even search things properly now.

  • shreyasmav
    Shreyas Mavanoor (@shreyasmav) reported

    @DhravyaShah @googlecloud their support is not upto par imho

  • JobbingPsych
    Rash05 (@JobbingPsych) reported

    @googlecloud Stuck in support limbo with @GoogleCloud. Tried to upgrade to deploy our website, but got automated fraud-blocked. It's been 5 days since I uploaded my verification docs to Case #72047300 with zero response. Disappointing customer service. Urgent help needed! @GoogleCloudTech

  • EcoTunesVibes
    Cleaner Horizons (@EcoTunesVibes) reported

    @_amrishkumar @googlecloud @GoogleCloud_IN I think calling this 'customer responsibility' is absurd. Google told developers for years API keys aren't secrets, then billed a startup $35K and vanished for a month.

  • BigFire97827414
    BigFire (@BigFire97827414) reported

    @MLB @googlecloud Some run support for him would've been apprciated.

  • DawktorX
    DawktorX (@DawktorX) reported

    @MLB @googlecloud Put chin straps on helmets. **** is getting annoying

  • lgrig
    Lawrence (@lgrig) reported

    Google Cloud Console is one of the most difficult and terrible admin panels in terms of UX I've ever seen in all my years working on tech. Everything is incredibly confusing, counter-intuitive and hard to navigate and get things done. @googlecloud

  • mtcderek
    Derek Morgan (@mtcderek) reported

    Honestly, if @Railway emailed me pre this @googlecloud issue and said "We're going multicloud for reliability" I would have worried more about complexity-related outages. The unlikelihood of a major cloud hyperscaler cutting a client like this should approach infinity.

  • guyrleech
    Guy Leech (@guyrleech) reported

    @KarenPayneMVP Mediocre but query wise I know I could use AI these days to craft them for me - it's fantastic for @GoogleCloud Big Query so assume MS SQL is no problem for it (Gemini)

  • thatjosephodeh
    PBAT in my Veins (@thatjosephodeh) reported

    Spent the last 24h stuck in a brutal deployment loop trying to launch n8n on @GoogleCloud Run + Cloud SQL. For a mid/senior dev, the fragmentation & complete lack of ecosystem integration is a massive failure. Here is a breakdown of why GCP feels broken right now. 🧵👇

  • lobsternft_lol
    Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported

    @_rishinsharma @googlecloud Great! If we migrate over, what kind of support can you provide?

  • BLueLoTuS99
    bluelotus99.base.eth 🍀💫 (@BLueLoTuS99) reported

    @ionet @googlecloud The link is broken ..

  • ColdBootSignal
    ColdBoot (@ColdBootSignal) reported

    @googlecloud Utilities are using TPU clusters to model weather risk and reduce outages before lines go down. The grid is moving from reactive to predictive.

  • AgingShadow
    Aging Shadow (@AgingShadow) reported

    @MLBStats @googlecloud For bleep sake it was against the worst team in MLB. A team that leads all of baseball in striking out! Geezus!