Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.

• Domains (27%)
• Hosting (27%)
• Cloud Services (18%)
• Web Tools (18%)
• E-mail (9%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Noida	Hosting	12 days ago
Noida	Domains	13 days ago
Noida	Domains	1 month ago
Jewar	Hosting	1 month ago
Montataire	Cloud Services	1 month ago
Greater Noida	Hosting	1 month ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Web3Specialist 🔶 (@Web3Specialist1) reported 5 minutes ago

  Intranet search has historically been where productivity goes to die. Fragmented docs in Drive, loose specs in Jira, data trapped in Salesforce. Inside Phase 2 of my @GoogleCloud journey, I’m breaking down how Gemini Enterprise unifies this exact chaos into one agentic interface. 👇 (1/5)

• 
  WALITO-NY (@WalitoWorldwide) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MLBStats @MLB @googlecloud That man can’t wait to get out of Pittsburgh All this talent going to waste. That owner will never build around talent.

• 
  saurav (@5auravv) reported 8 minutes ago

  I need urgent help from a real human at Google Cloud Billing / Google Payments team Between 14 May and 29 May 2026, my ICICI Bank account was debited 103 times via UPI AutoPay to Google Cloud. @GoogleCloud @GooglePayIndia @Google_India_

• 
  Botta (@TheBottaMan) reported 10 minutes ago

  @googlecloud two weeks of no response for my service ticket! Completely locked out of Google cloud console! Please help!

• 
  dnu (@DnuLkjkjh) reported 10 minutes ago

  @pushmeet @GoogleDeepMind @googlecloud The hard part is usually the eval boundary, not the raw solve rate. once a coding agent can touch production-facing systems, even a 1% bad action rate is too high. where did you put the first handoff gate: tests, human review, or sandbox-only tasks?

• 
  Michael Richins (@richins_michael) reported 19 minutes ago

  @googlecloud So you want to govern us? Go **** yourselves

• 
  inc.fun (@incdotfun) reported 23 minutes ago

  @SolanaSensei @googlecloud it's super cool to see this unlocking so many use cases for agents - from selecting the service to paying for it...all frictionless

• 
  Evan Otero (@EvanOtero) reported 23 minutes ago

  @PodobnikLovro @googlecloud @GoogleAI Hey Lovro, any update on the appeal? Let me know how I can help

• 
  Sean Guy (@sean63491) reported 24 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Trust & Safety appeal stalled >1 week (ID: UTR 3SJ N7E NJN TET HZR XFH VWK R4). Local code is secured, but I'm blocked from revoking compromised keys in the console until the suspension is lifted. Please help escalate!

• 
  DrusTheAxe (@kapustein) reported 24 minutes ago

  @guyrleech @UnrealEngine @googlecloud You can run makeappx with /nc to do no compression. Not a bad idea if you're just functional testing and the size delta is so negligible

• 
  Prabhat Tyagi (@prabhattyagi1) reported 25 minutes ago

  @GoogleCloud @GoogleStartups Desperately need help! Applied for the Cloud Startup Program, submitted the requested billing admin verification screenshot 9 days ago, but no response. Our free trial is about to expire and ProdHub's workloads will freeze. Please help escalate!

• 
  Superteam Germany (@SuperteamDE) reported 30 minutes ago

  @solana @googlecloud Shipping never stops on Solana 🚢

• 
  AIMadeSimple (@makingAISimple) reported 31 minutes ago

  OpenAI is completing with @awscloud @googlecloud and @Azure This is interesting. But they are still depending on their infrastructure to launch this service. So basically the competition is PaaS

• 
  bimri (@bimrian) reported 32 minutes ago

  @GoogleAIStudio better @googlecloud! it sucks as is, no way to file complaints, but they're very fast in shutting down projects! 😡 😤

• 
  Ferbin (@Ferbin08) reported 33 minutes ago

  @rseroter @googlecloud when you run trading bots under burst load, this is real. you're stuck choosing between idle capacity or slow starts. but standby buffers cost something too - what's the overhead when you scale across regions?

• 
  io.net India (@ionetindia) reported 33 minutes ago

  @ionet @googlecloud the hidden costs are always where they get you... the sticker price is never the real number with these platforms

• 
  Kate Bennett (@katebennettctc) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Railway pays ~$1M/month to @googlecloud. On 19 May they were suspended at 10pm - no advance notice. Nine minutes of account lockout. Eight hours of user outage. What's the upstream single point in your stack that you've never stress-tested?

• 
  S Boccone (@StevenBoccone) reported 34 minutes ago

  @bavedikian Google Cloud @googlecloud supported @flare Node building and advertised it. I built my node only to be suddenly shut down with GC claiming mining issues. It took me months to get a refund, I got 1/2 and I am still fighting for the rest.

• 
  AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported 42 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

• 
  Dave Remy (@daveremy) reported 42 minutes ago

  Apparently @googlecloud blocked @Railway's account? Dashboard, API, all services returning "Application not found" for every customer. My backend's been down for hours. No ETA. Cloud hosting is just renting someone else's relationship with Google.

• 
  शुभम् कुमार (@shubh_app) reported 42 minutes ago

  While connecting to SSH, you can click on Connect without Identity-Aware Proxy. I'm not finding a way on console to connect to vm instance without identity-aware proxy. please help #gcp #arcadegames #googlecloud

• 
  ATCA (@ATCA_now) reported 43 minutes ago

  @awscloud Chris Niehaus @googlecloud on the panel: "At Google, it's important that the cloud network infrastructure has multiple levels of redundancy buildt in."

• 
  Real Tums Festival (@Vegas_Chicken) reported 46 minutes ago

  @MLBNetwork @googlecloud Too bad he plays for a garbage franchise that's going nowhere.

• 
  bluelotus99.base.eth 🍀💫 (@BLueLoTuS99) reported 47 minutes ago

  @ionet @googlecloud The link is broken ..

• 
  Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported 47 minutes ago

  @__000ali @SolanaFndn @googlecloud You got the point, high gas fee would be an issue for ETH and the liquidity there should be much better... No matter which chain, the migration would be big efforts for our engineering team. The mint might be delayed. So, it's tricky, we need to rethink about that. Any ideas ?

• 
  Josh Meyer (@JoshMey16883104) reported 51 minutes ago

  @GoogleCloudTech @googlecloud I have been on hold now for two hours waiting for a live customer support agent

• 
  Ziku.eth (@yungziku) reported 56 minutes ago

  $DATA Team releasing an app Market asked -> is it useful? (Make profit for the users) -> Not sure? -> choppy pricing Team getting gold check Market asked -> How easy is it to get gold checked? -> Extensive verification? -> violent pivot Team partner with @googlecloud Market asked -> What is the scale of this partnership? -> Not sure -> Slight sell down “Buy the rumor, sell the news” (1/2) —— What does it means? It means when the team pull it off the repricing upward will be violent Equivalently would be a violent reprice downward if the team fail to pull off early infrastructure claims

• 
  Johnny Nel | AI for Founders (@JohnnyNel_) reported 58 minutes ago

  @TBG_JUST_G @Google @googlecloud switching providers really does free up energy you didn't realize was stuck... what bottlenecks were slowing you down most?

• 
  Logan Jackson (@jackson_lo58573) reported 59 minutes ago

  @NewsFromGoogle @googlecloud Google, hoping you will see this. I blew through the 5 hour limit and enabled the "enable ai credit overages", have 55k available credits. didn't work. reloaded antigravity. enable ai credit overages was toggled off. tried it 3 more times same issue. Two developers with me have the same issues and cant enable ai credit overages. Had codex troubleshoot and it couldn't figure it out either. Trying to switch all my flows to antigravity but can't.

• 
  Checholitary Mayne (@checho_dallas) reported 1 hour ago

  @googlecloud how long does it has to take until you guys look at my support request? I sent you guys an appeal of an issue 9 days ago and 2 follow up emails and I haven't seen anything back yet.