Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.

• Domains (27%)
• Hosting (27%)
• Cloud Services (18%)
• Web Tools (18%)
• E-mail (9%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Noida	Hosting	13 days ago
Noida	Domains	14 days ago
Noida	Domains	1 month ago
Jewar	Hosting	1 month ago
Montataire	Cloud Services	1 month ago
Greater Noida	Hosting	1 month ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Prashanth Vaidya (@pvbuilds) reported 7 minutes ago

  Google Cloud’s customer support is absolutely ridiculous and this is a warning sign for anyone building on top of @googlecloud

• 
  Danilo Oliveira (@_oliveiradanilo) reported 9 minutes ago

  @shayanrm @googlecloud yeah, the gemini are passing our quality tests. the inference speed and quality are nice. It is working to our problems. they need improve the billing aspect and the deprecation policy. We need every month update the models and redo the tests.

• 
  M Mohan (@mukund) reported 10 minutes ago

  I used @antigravity to build and push to @googlecloud It was easier to push to @awscloud ? How? What? Google Cloud Run. Google Cloud Build: Artifact Registry: Cloud SQL Postgres:. Secret Manager IAM / service permissions: With the new Gemini 3.5 model I tried to build: cloudbuild.frontend.yaml cloudbuild.backend.yaml Out of tokens. Painful.

• 
  Derek Morgan (@mtcderek) reported 10 minutes ago

  Honestly, if @Railway emailed me pre this @googlecloud issue and said "We're going multicloud for reliability" I would have worried more about complexity-related outages. The unlikelihood of a major cloud hyperscaler cutting a client like this should approach infinity.

• 
  AI Expert Khalid (@khalide_f1) reported 14 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Feels like F1 strategy but for telecom. Predict the problem, make the move before anyone else sees it.

• 
  testtm (@test_tm7873) reported 15 minutes ago

  @arcjax7 @googlecloud All my 3 friends got the same message. 😿 So I was thinking it's the end. But honestly sadq they over the limit. Sad they thrown out old V3/V2s atleast that would help with the lot of users.

• 
  Ashwini (@AshwiniNK21) reported 15 minutes ago

  Attended @googlecloud 's Agentic AI at Work webinar today. Most of it was expected. Demos, roadmaps, enterprise case studies. Then one number stopped me. KPMG rolled out an AI platform to 38,000 employees. 15,000 agents were built. Not by the tech team. By regular employees. People who had a problem, figured out a tool, and just... built something. That's when the whole "agentic AI" framing clicked for me. It's not waiting for engineering to build you something. It's people closest to the problem reaching for whatever works. And the results when that happens? A German insurance company built an agent for customer health queries. 400% usage spike in 3 months. 37% faster response times. Real teams. Real impact. Not a demo. The tooling is now no-code. The barrier is basically gone. What felt like an "oh wow, someday" is starting to feel very close.

• 
  Ziku.eth (@yungziku) reported 18 minutes ago

  $DATA Team releasing an app Market asked -> is it useful? (Make profit for the users) -> Not sure? -> choppy pricing Team getting gold check Market asked -> How easy is it to get gold checked? -> Extensive verification? -> violent pivot Team partner with @googlecloud Market asked -> What is the scale of this partnership? -> Not sure -> Slight sell down “Buy the rumor, sell the news” (1/2) —— What does it means? It means when the team pull it off the repricing upward will be violent Equivalently would be a violent reprice downward if the team fail to pull off early infrastructure claims

• 
  Mike Lisovetsky (@_Liso_) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Railway @GoogleCloudTech @googlecloud please help

• 
  Nate Grater (@votethemALLout7) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Humana @googlehealth @googlecloud Why am I paying for medication when I have humans dsnp with a Medicare d plan? I mean 80 dollars to the ceo and down at Humana may not be much to for me it is groceries for two weeks. So I go hungry or take meds? Killing the elderly is all you are doing.

• 
  Prevoyance IT Solutions (@ItPrevoyance) reported 20 minutes ago

  Turned down a cloud migration project last year. That honesty built more trust than the deal itself. Not every company needs cloud. Some wait too long. #GoogleCloud #CloudMigration

• 
  Bez (@aBez95) reported 24 minutes ago

  Plus I don’t understand why the went down this route given how at the end of the day they would still make money from @googlecloud usage via @GoogleAIStudio

• 
  المهندس وسام حاج محمد | AI Architect (@WessamHMuhmad) reported 26 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Fatal error in @GoogleCloud support. Case #71706032 is locked over a minor $87 automated billing glitch, ignoring our 'Partner' status & high-value infrastructure build (MCP/ADK integration). Automated filters are killing real innovation. Urgent human DevRel review needed!"

• 
  ray (@ray_barrera) reported 26 minutes ago

  Dealing with cloud providers is such a pain in the ***. @googlecloud can't stick to a product name for more than two minutes, so you end up having to guess what you're trying to do. Ostensibly, they offer models as a service. Good luck figuring out how to actually use that on GCP, sorry, Vertex AI, sorry Gemini Enterprise, sorry, Agent Platform. You can just accidentally spin up a reserved GPU without realizing it. Amazing stuff.

• 
  Sage (@fullmetalasthma) reported 28 minutes ago

  @WhiteHaird_trap @googlecloud It literally gives me bad info all the time and then apologizes for hallucinating, its words not mine.

• 
  Confideleap Partners Communication (@confideleapnews) reported 34 minutes ago

  @nvidia @googlecloud strong example of how innovation and trust can evolve together to support the next generation of AI-powered services.

• 
  Evan Otero (@EvanOtero) reported 34 minutes ago

  @PodobnikLovro @googlecloud @GoogleAI You should get an email soon. We'll be providing a billing adjustment -- lmk if there's any more issues!

• 
  rahul gupta (@guptarahul07) reported 40 minutes ago

  Hi @GoogleCloud_IN @googlecloud, I submitted a quota increase request for My Business API (Case ID: 3-9628000041428) on June 02. Not able find or track this case ID. Can you help check the status?

• 
  AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported 40 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

• 
  aira (@airasentia) reported 45 minutes ago

  @rseroter @googlecloud agent revisions are where the chat demo grows up. traffic splitting sounds boring until one bad prompt revision starts touching real tools.

• 
  Meg from Baltimore (@BaltimorePeace) reported 46 minutes ago

  @googlecloud **** your nature destroying AI crap!! 🤬

• 
  EDOUARD (@edouard) reported 50 minutes ago

  @googlecloud We’d rather have your side of the story for @Railway’s complete five-hour outage that they say was caused by your blocking of their account without warning.

• 
  DawktorX (@DawktorX) reported 52 minutes ago

  @MLB @googlecloud Put chin straps on helmets. **** is getting annoying

• 
  Warhol’s Circus (@RayV2222) reported 54 minutes ago

  @nvidia @NewsFromGoogle @googlecloud Don’t buy the lie! They stole $212.49, from me, delivered nothing! Can’t help me fix it, and refuse to give me a refund! Gemini doesn’t even recognize me as a subscriber!!! They’re FRAUDS!!! I heard this affects thousands!!!

• 
  Kate Bennett (@katebennettctc) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Railway pays ~$1M/month to @googlecloud. On 19 May they were suspended at 10pm - no advance notice. Nine minutes of account lockout. Eight hours of user outage. What's the upstream single point in your stack that you've never stress-tested?

• 
  bluelotus99.base.eth 🍀💫 (@BLueLoTuS99) reported 59 minutes ago

  @ionet @googlecloud The link is broken ..

• 
  David Jorjani (@djorjani) reported 1 hour ago

  It’s always fun when the foundation we build on disappears for a while. How do we respond to customers when the application they rely on goes down? It’d be hilarious if it was for missed payments or one rogue Railway customer raising a flag with @googlecloud

• 
  draver (@draver461573) reported 1 hour ago

  @teflocarbon @SimiStern @googlecloud The problem for me is that Railway markets itself as a serious cloud provider with its own data centers, except it has a SPOF on a different cloud provider. It's just not serious

• 
  Ferbin (@Ferbin08) reported 1 hour ago

  @nvidia @googlecloud Apple Intelligence running on third-party data centers now. The infrastructure layer got decoupled from the software. Pretty standard move for a scaled service, but Apple's been locked down until now.

• 
  DrusTheAxe (@kapustein) reported 1 hour ago

  @guyrleech @UnrealEngine @googlecloud You can run makeappx with /nc to do no compression. Not a bad idea if you're just functional testing and the size delta is so negligible