Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.

• Domains (27%)
• Hosting (27%)
• Cloud Services (18%)
• Web Tools (18%)
• E-mail (9%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Noida	Hosting	18 days ago
Noida	Domains	19 days ago
Noida	Domains	1 month ago
Jewar	Hosting	1 month ago
Montataire	Cloud Services	2 months ago
Greater Noida	Hosting	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  kingson (@kingsonGEGE) reported 1 second ago

  @nvidia @googlecloud This is the interesting privacy shift: private AI stops being only “whose model is best” and becomes a verifiable supply-chain problem. Compute, attestation, logs, data boundaries, and public ledgers are the product now. The lock icon finally has infrastructure behind it.

• 
  Prashasti (@0xPrashasti) reported 2 minutes ago

  Solana has become the default chain for the agent economy & honestly, most people still don’t realise how big this is getting. We’re already at 65% of agentic AI payments settling on @solana, @googlecloud just integrated, so agents can pay for APIs on their own. This isn’t some cute experiment anymore, it’s real economic activity between machines. No other chain makes sense for this ****. The speed and near-zero fees are actually useful here. If you’re still calling AI agents “just a narrative,” you’re gonna get left in the dust in 2026.

• 
  Juan F Lago (@LagoJuanF) reported 2 minutes ago

  @googlecloud my Gmail account has been hacked my data in Google cloud, Google Drive, Youtube and mail has been compromised. Have tried to recover by all means with Google Support Pages but identification methods have been changed by the hacker. Please help.

• 
  AIMadeSimple (@makingAISimple) reported 5 minutes ago

  OpenAI is completing with @awscloud @googlecloud and @Azure This is interesting. But they are still depending on their infrastructure to launch this service. So basically the competition is PaaS

• 
  NobodysFool41 (@nobodys_fool41) reported 12 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Virgin Voyages is the worst of all the cruise lines. Just sayin.

• 
  Ziku.eth (@yungziku) reported 18 minutes ago

  $DATA Team releasing an app Market asked -> is it useful? (Make profit for the users) -> Not sure? -> choppy pricing Team getting gold check Market asked -> How easy is it to get gold checked? -> Extensive verification? -> violent pivot Team partner with @googlecloud Market asked -> What is the scale of this partnership? -> Not sure -> Slight sell down “Buy the rumor, sell the news” (1/2) —— What does it means? It means when the team pull it off the repricing upward will be violent Equivalently would be a violent reprice downward if the team fail to pull off early infrastructure claims

• 
  Kishore Mandyam (@nmandyam) reported 18 minutes ago

  @googlecloud DM-ed, please help

• 
  Srihari (@misosoup0709) reported 21 minutes ago

  Hey @GoogleCloud @GoogleCloudTech, I’m a student facing a total nightmare. An old educational hackathon project racked up a unexpected bill. My account is now suspended, which has completely locked me out of the support console to raise a ticket,Please help me with this issue!

• 
  Our Gatekeeper (@ourgatekeepergh) reported 22 minutes ago

  @GoogleCloud Our security platform has been down for nearly 48 hours with ZERO response from your support team. We serve gated estate, real residents are locked out. This is a safety issue, not just a service issue. We need urgent escalation. NOW. #GCPOutage #GoogleCloud

• 
  Teflo 🇦🇺 (@teflocarbon) reported 27 minutes ago

  @SimiStern I don’t even like Railway, or the "managed hosting" ecosystem in general. But the actual problem here is the continued bullshit @googlecloud keeps pulling: "oopsies, our finger slipped :3" account/control-plane failures that can take real infrastructure offline, while everyone keeps pretending this is acceptable behaviour from a serious cloud provider.

• 
  J O E L (@JoelFickson) reported 28 minutes ago

  @googlecloud I also have a case with you guys, and it's been pending for almost a month now. It's so unhelpful. Your response times have been so bad.

• 
  Project Lobster (@lobsternft_lol) reported 32 minutes ago

  @0xLabswizzird25 @SolanaFndn @googlecloud Yeah, we are working on the solutions. That's a high priority topic for our team these days. And we are evaluating the effort of migration to other chains seriously. As you said, it seems projects the projects on Ethereum mainnet might get more support. But migration takes time and it's a big engineering effort, and we have to consider the high gas fee of ETH Mainnet, if we want to deploy our AI agent on an L2 chain that will not be an easy task for every team. To be honest, the infrastructure is not ready yet at the moment. And the other reason is that once we spend some time on migration, the user has to wait for longer time before mint.

• 
  JackBox (@Jack_Box_2026) reported 32 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Never, google will steal your data.

• 
  DrusTheAxe (@kapustein) reported 33 minutes ago

  @guyrleech @UnrealEngine @googlecloud You can run makeappx with /nc to do no compression. Not a bad idea if you're just functional testing and the size delta is so negligible

• 
  Lovro (@PodobnikLovro) reported 34 minutes ago

  @EvanOtero @googlecloud @GoogleAI I sent you the case numbers last week I still haven’t received any update from Google about this. Would you be able to check on the status when you have a moment? Really appreciate you offering to help!

• 
  Xi Cheng (@mailper) reported 35 minutes ago

  @googlecloud and its T&S team needs to work as a coherent whole instead of showing an org chart to the customers. My account was locked (17 days ago), I explained the fix and received an email saying the project is re-instated but the account is still locked.

• 
  Kate Bennett (@katebennettctc) reported 35 minutes ago

  @Railway pays ~$1M/month to @googlecloud. On 19 May they were suspended at 10pm - no advance notice. Nine minutes of account lockout. Eight hours of user outage. What's the upstream single point in your stack that you've never stress-tested?

• 
  0xFrankCastle🦀 (@0xcastle_chain) reported 35 minutes ago

  @SolanaFndn @googlecloud So my next client can be an agent, I think we need agent customer service quickly.

• 
  Azy (@therealazy) reported 36 minutes ago

  @googlecloud I've had a support ticket open for a week now trying to increase the quote of projects I can add to a Billing profile. What is this non sense....

• 
  Evan Otero (@EvanOtero) reported 40 minutes ago

  @PodobnikLovro @googlecloud @GoogleAI You should get an email soon. We'll be providing a billing adjustment -- lmk if there's any more issues!

• 
  Derek Morgan (@mtcderek) reported 40 minutes ago

  Honestly, if @Railway emailed me pre this @googlecloud issue and said "We're going multicloud for reliability" I would have worried more about complexity-related outages. The unlikelihood of a major cloud hyperscaler cutting a client like this should approach infinity.

• 
  EDOUARD (@edouard) reported 40 minutes ago

  @googlecloud We’d rather have your side of the story for @Railway’s complete five-hour outage that they say was caused by your blocking of their account without warning.

• 
  Aloysius Samuel | AI & SaaS (@mascot75572) reported 41 minutes ago

  @ham_basshogg @googlecloud is this problem resolved already?

• 
  SharpSide (@TrySharpSide) reported 43 minutes ago

  @MLBNetwork @googlecloud never gets old seeing a player figure it out mid-career. curious if this keeps up.

• 
  alpinelogic (@alpinelogic1) reported 47 minutes ago

  @addyosmani @googlecloud Can you all fix Antigravity 2.0 IDE please? It was working great before this update. Constant `Agent execution terminated due to error.` and I'm on the Google AI Ultra plan.

• 
  AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported 49 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

• 
  𝕸y_n🂡me_Is_☡ (@HansonZachary) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Railway I have no issues with @googlecloud

• 
  Band Of Angels - Defender Of Children (@BandDefender1) reported 50 minutes ago from Little Rock, Arkansas

  @Humana @googlehealth @googlecloud You have the worst Customer Service ever! I AM CHANGING INSURANCE signed Sherilynn Dee Reyes of Russellville ARKANSAS

• 
  Shubham Gandhi (@shubhamgandhi_) reported 52 minutes ago

  bigquery has a really difficult UI- chunky, random paddings, too many squares, too many toolbars. low information density but still feels hard to use @googlecloud #BigQuery pls help!

• 
  Bez (@aBez95) reported 57 minutes ago

  Plus I don’t understand why the went down this route given how at the end of the day they would still make money from @googlecloud usage via @GoogleAIStudio