Office 365 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Office 365 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Looks Safe To Me (@Mackama_Too) reported 3 minutes ago

  @EricRichards22 I send my LibreOffice docs and spread sheets to Google doc/sheets users, Office365 users, and OpenOffice users without any problems. And I can open and edit their files. What issues are you having?

• 
  Jonathan Cantliff (@cantliff9) reported 12 minutes ago

  @madebygoogle @MicrosoftHelps Gmail app not working with Office 365 emails (again) Doesn't seem to want to load modern authentication Could someone look into this please

• 
  Carlod (@justcarlod) reported 13 minutes ago

  @peach2k2 @B1rtek1 Same. You have to go to office 365 logout and then sign in again. This is inhumane UX!

• 
  Alter3D Reality (@alter3d) reported 14 minutes ago

  @glenn_tunes Deal! Since US companies are banned in EU: GMail immediately deletes all accounts for EU citizens and countries. Ditto Office365. YouTube immediately deletes all EU content. Google blocks access to the Play Store for EU citizens. Apple blocks all access to iCloud and other Apple services to EU accounts and deletes all data. AWS immediately deletes all EU accounts and shut down all the EU regions. Ditto Azure. Cloudflare bans all EU IPs. Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, Micron, Texas Instruments, Cisco, Qualcomm, IBM, Dell, and other US hardware companies ban sales of systems and components to the EU. Every major AI provider blocks access to EU citizens and companies. Major SaaS companies, including major manufacturing software providers like Autodesk and Onshape, block access to their products from the EU. Basically the EU accomplishes it's goal to become a 3rd world country overnight without the hassle of importing the 3rd world first.

• 
  Kyle Smith (@Malakai1174) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Anas_Sloth @Yetee_ @WildSentences no, you are with your utter idiocy. what does "365" have to do with literally anything in this conversation? do i need 365 attacking computers? Do i need to use office 365 like a micro simp? If you can't even clearly make a statement, don't bother trying to talk to people. What document on 365? What ******** does that gotta do with anything? Your answer is clearly dumb and has no sustenance behind it. Just make a little sense will ya. like you started off telling me it isn't a network problem, it is a backup problem. while responding to my message talking about data replication(A ******* backup). Thanks for pointing out the obvious! If anyone is a troll here it is you. I say it is a backup issue, and then you tell me "No, it is a backup issue not a network issue." Like a backup doesn't live on a network, requiring networking knowledge. All while telling me about bandwidth( A ******* networking Issue!!!!!)

• 
  Glich (@Glich) reported 20 minutes ago

  @yonann partly true. I work corp IT. A good part of my users whould be fine with a chromebook. All there work in in office365 and chrome. and this year our standard low spec model we issue increased in price 50%.

• 
  Pythis (@Pythis1313) reported 23 minutes ago

  @darknesss932 An attorney should request a server level search utilizing Microsoft Purview ediscovery. I would wager they are using office365 for email which means that a query kql could be created pertinent to the case executed on the entire tenant for the time frames involved.

• 
  Brian Teague 🐂 ⭕️ PBA 3 Berkeley (@undergroundlair) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Polymarket In all fairness to Microsoft, if the NASA Admin doesn’t set their Office 365 location to #outerfukingspace they might have an issue logging in.

• 
  Sidstream (@siddusaik) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Sakshi50038 I prefer quality over desi !!! Compare both and tell me which is better. Don't tell me to use indian products bcoz they are indian That's not how purchasing works. How many websites show you login using zoho mail? Chatgpt Copilot is integrated with office 365 sarvam is not.

• 
  The Catalyst Edge (@zeatle2) reported 33 minutes ago

  Two very different setups. $CLOV (Clover Health) — not in today's scrub, but running off a REAL catalyst. 🟢 Medicare 4.5-star upgrade via federal COURT ORDER (court forced CMS to re-rate) 🟢 Covers 97%+ of members on Contract H5141 🟢 Higher star rating = higher CMS reimbursement rates in 2027 🟢 Q1 2026: GAAP profitable, revenue +62% YoY 🔴 Already up 18.9% yesterday — needs consolidation first This is a fundamental re-rating, not a pump. Medicare stars = real dollars. Entry: $4.70–$5.00 on pullback | T1: $6.20 | T2: $7.50 | Stop: $4.20 $MSFT (Microsoft) activity score 522 — #3 on the full scrub. 🟢 Enterprise AI Copilot embedded in Office 365, Teams, Azure — the deployment layer 🟢 Down 14% YTD = multiple compression on a franchise business 🟢 #3 scrub = institutional money starting to re-rate 🔴 ORCL's $40B raise rattles AI infra capex narrative — watch for spillover At $398, this is best-in-class enterprise AI at a real discount. Entry: $395–$405 | T1: $435 | T2: $460 | Stop: $380

• 
  ZBM2 (@zulubravomike2) reported 34 minutes ago

  Assume low data rate and high ping. Now assume you're trying to log in to an Office 365 implementation of some sort. All that said, while astronauts are professionals, they're not IT pros and probably couldn't tell you the difference between outlook and an exchange server.

• 
  Toby McEvoy ♠❤♦♣ (@mcevoytm) reported 35 minutes ago

  @KeithMalinak Autocorrect may have been taking a few days off. Here's a real-life example from my own workplace. Through the miracle of SharePoint and Office365, I'm sharing a document with a Project Manager and we're adding questions and answers as I am refining his request for a change to our production environment. He edited something in the document abruptly last week resulting in colliding words and other jumbled things that I couldn't parse. I highlighted the text and requested, "Please fix these typos when you get a moment. " He fixed the typos and left me a comment in response: "Compelted"

• 
  GCU Tech Support (@gcutechsupport) reported 36 minutes ago

  Attention Lopes! Some active students aren't receiving their Office 365 license, so they can't access any of the included apps. Error message: “Error: Your school account is no longer active.” This issue is currently being looked into. Global Ticket Number: 3937295

• 
  chris (@xH4ngEm) reported 39 minutes ago

  There's a question I get asked constantly by investors building individual accounts: how much of a single name is too much? Been sitting with this in the context of the Revere Gro and Rair exposure framework circulating around $MSFT positions. The model tries to map concentration risk across growth-rate sensitivity and rate-cycle sensitivity - not a bad starting structure. But I think it locates the problem slightly wrong. For a long-horizon value investor, risk management is not primarily about volatility. It's about permanent capital impairment. Those are genuinely different things, and conflating them leads to genuinely different mistakes. MSFT at current prices trades around 32-33x forward earnings. P/B north of 13. EV/EBITDA in the high 20s depending on the quarter. Not cheap multiples by historical standards - even for a business generating the FCF that Microsoft does. And the FCF is real: Azure margin expansion, Office 365 recurring, Activision slowly integrating. The capital allocation story holds up - disciplined buybacks, a growing dividend, R&D spend that's actually productive rather than defensive. ROIC consistently above cost of capital. The moat is not in question. But here's the thing about exposure management in individual accounts specifically: when you hold a concentrated position in a company priced for near-perfection, your margin of safety becomes structural rather than mathematical. You can't just point at the balance sheet and call it hedged. The Rair framing - rate-adjusted intrinsic return - is useful because it forces the right question: if the 10-year rises another 100bps from here, does this company's intrinsic value hold? For MSFT, probably yes. The business doesn't need cheap debt to function. It generates cash in almost any macro environment. The moat doesn't erode with rates. But position sizing is where individual investors chronically underperform. Institutions manage downside scenarios as a daily operational function. Individual investors size based on conviction - and conviction is not risk management. Conviction is the justification for taking risk. Risk management is the system of rules that governs how much risk you actually accept. Practical framework, after holding through multiple cycles: - If you can articulate the bear case (multiple compression, Azure growth deceleration, AI capex overhang not yet reflected in FCF) and still sleep at night at 10-12% allocation, that's probably the rational ceiling for a concentrated individual book. - If a 20% drawdown in this one name would materially alter your financial situation, you've crossed from investing into speculating on management quality and multiple expansion. The Revere Gro side of the concept is really just another way of saying: don't let a great company become a great risk by virtue of how much of your book it occupies. The business quality and the position size are separate questions that individual investors routinely collapse into one. Balance sheet analysis matters. FCF trajectory matters. They're inputs into a position-sizing decision - not substitutes for one. That distinction is the actual heart of risk management in individual accounts, and most frameworks bury it. Long MSFT. Have been for years. Never let it exceed 12% of the book regardless of how strongly I believe in the thesis. That ceiling is a feature.

• 
  PrincessLeah (@ScorpionWSDBW) reported 42 minutes ago

  Let's put some "customer" information in here, so you have a better perspective. First, most of us who live in cyber security world avoid Edge like the plague. It is malware gangrene. You have designed it so that it digs in to every piece of our system, gathering our information, and we can't configure it to stay out. Security concerns. Let's add another problem, which is creating problems in daily operations: Office 365 has been designed in a way that prevents us from normal functions that we valued highly in Office Professional 2016, which was your cleanest, most professional WORKING version. Fast, efficient, and without the intrusions of 'phone' children processing. The new O365 is the least professional of all the versions you have 'improved.' I don't care about you tracking my daily work, giving me a 'viva report.' In fact, I want that deleted. There are so many bugs in O365, such as synching issues, wherein entire strings of emails disappear from the in box if I use a different device to respond to a Customer. There is a LONG list of 'improvements' you force in during updates that are actually damaging to work flow. Further, trying to force us into the NEW outlook is enraging. We keep using the "classic" to survive all your bugs and bad screen layouts, and the lack of controls your new version has imposed, and it keeps flipping back. SOOOOO many things we all hate about O365 and you do nothing to fix them. YOU have decided how we should do business. These childish relabeling and moving episodes of commands does not improve your product. Example: There was a function that allowed me to open an email, search 'all related emails' and find an older piece of the conversation. That's gone. Why? Many of the admin functions in settings are simply gone. Same with the new Windows. When I go research in various communities, MANY humans have the same complaints. Everyone hates the new versions of both products. SOME OF US are required to work offline, we do not work in your clouds. We have to have everything on the computer unit to travel without cloud access. You have made that a major problem. Do yourself a favor. If you want us to actually LIKE you, instead of hate you all day, take a survey here. Ask everyone what they miss about the old product, just start with 2016 Office Professional, and ask what they hate about O365. Ask about security problems, ask about the sentiment regarding Edge being forced on us, without the ability to uninstall it. Learn this: We are paying your salary. Learn this: We are all unhappy with the current product. Millions of us are heavy-use professionals that need the cleaner version. The current online version is even worse than that desktop app. Learn this: 2016, literally, was the last clean version you produced/coded. Once you went all SAS and cloud sales focused, you trashed a great product. Maybe have a team researching all the public comments and problems.