Office 365 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Office 365 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Tony Redmond (@12Knocksinna) reported 7 minutes ago

  @GrittyBluDragon @Office365 All I can say is that I have used sensitivity labels for five or so years. They work unless something is broken. You could join the AIP network on Yammer (run by Microsoft) and ask the engineers direct.

• 
  Simon Holman (@SimonHolman) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Outlook I know you want everyone paying for Office365, but do you really need to make configuring IMAP accounts so difficult. Just give the option to specify the servers without just assuming them. I shouldn't have to go into Control Panel to fix it!

• 
  Jonas (@wisplite) reported 10 minutes ago

  @korewadiego My biggest problems are that the UI is awful compared to Office 365, and it seems incapable of opening an existing docx without completely nuking the formatting.

• 
  Daniel (@dan325) reported 13 minutes ago

  @nonlinear_james @atalocke I’m using it to manage my work office 365 email right now without any issue. Not IMAP, either. It has native exchange capabilities. Also, WTF is wrong with IMAP? Evolution’s biggest advantage is it doesn’t tether me to a proprietary OS. No copilot BS on my computer!

• 
  Bɛrima Yaw Poku 🧠👁️👂🏾 (@barimayawpoku) reported 15 minutes ago

  @elliot_solution Ah, na government communications and emails koraa are running on office365 na documents. They don’t even have on-premise exchange communication server managed in house for data control and security seff. Tweaaa

• 
  Steve Turner (@SteveoReno3362) reported 19 minutes ago

  @DeborahKurata @Office365 I had similar problems with MS 365 security..... finally had to give up and start new acoounts and just trust the old stuff (account) was inaccessible😟

• 
  If you must know, its for my Schnauzer (@SJM0911) reported 20 minutes ago

  looks like @Office365 Outlook servers are down anyone else having trouble?

• 
  Shane (@Shane_L) reported 21 minutes ago

  @adahstwt Just deployed a small app for one of my company’s franchisees to use. Deployed on Azure because we use Office 365 and I could rely on existing MS accounts for auth. Never again… terrible experience. Azure is so disjointed…

• 
  Mani Mehr (@MehrvarzMani) reported 21 minutes ago

  7 clicks on average just to read an email? Office 365 needs a serious UX overhaul. Terrible customer service. No chat available someone call you from India next day. #office365

• 
  chris (@xH4ngEm) reported 22 minutes ago

  There's a question I get asked constantly by investors building individual accounts: how much of a single name is too much? Been sitting with this in the context of the Revere Gro and Rair exposure framework circulating around $MSFT positions. The model tries to map concentration risk across growth-rate sensitivity and rate-cycle sensitivity - not a bad starting structure. But I think it locates the problem slightly wrong. For a long-horizon value investor, risk management is not primarily about volatility. It's about permanent capital impairment. Those are genuinely different things, and conflating them leads to genuinely different mistakes. MSFT at current prices trades around 32-33x forward earnings. P/B north of 13. EV/EBITDA in the high 20s depending on the quarter. Not cheap multiples by historical standards - even for a business generating the FCF that Microsoft does. And the FCF is real: Azure margin expansion, Office 365 recurring, Activision slowly integrating. The capital allocation story holds up - disciplined buybacks, a growing dividend, R&D spend that's actually productive rather than defensive. ROIC consistently above cost of capital. The moat is not in question. But here's the thing about exposure management in individual accounts specifically: when you hold a concentrated position in a company priced for near-perfection, your margin of safety becomes structural rather than mathematical. You can't just point at the balance sheet and call it hedged. The Rair framing - rate-adjusted intrinsic return - is useful because it forces the right question: if the 10-year rises another 100bps from here, does this company's intrinsic value hold? For MSFT, probably yes. The business doesn't need cheap debt to function. It generates cash in almost any macro environment. The moat doesn't erode with rates. But position sizing is where individual investors chronically underperform. Institutions manage downside scenarios as a daily operational function. Individual investors size based on conviction - and conviction is not risk management. Conviction is the justification for taking risk. Risk management is the system of rules that governs how much risk you actually accept. Practical framework, after holding through multiple cycles: - If you can articulate the bear case (multiple compression, Azure growth deceleration, AI capex overhang not yet reflected in FCF) and still sleep at night at 10-12% allocation, that's probably the rational ceiling for a concentrated individual book. - If a 20% drawdown in this one name would materially alter your financial situation, you've crossed from investing into speculating on management quality and multiple expansion. The Revere Gro side of the concept is really just another way of saying: don't let a great company become a great risk by virtue of how much of your book it occupies. The business quality and the position size are separate questions that individual investors routinely collapse into one. Balance sheet analysis matters. FCF trajectory matters. They're inputs into a position-sizing decision - not substitutes for one. That distinction is the actual heart of risk management in individual accounts, and most frameworks bury it. Long MSFT. Have been for years. Never let it exceed 12% of the book regardless of how strongly I believe in the thesis. That ceiling is a feature.

• 
  Karl (@karlprosser) reported 24 minutes ago

  @asaio87 SaaS isn’t dead , but certain SaaS products that aren’t complex and that don’t have risk associated with them will be , and the rest will be open for disruption, especially on price. Not unlike when I automated the backend network/server/os/app layer of office 365 for Microsoft a decade plus ago , allowing them to reduce the per seat cost like 50% or something crazy.

• 
  Sciumo (@SciumoInc) reported 27 minutes ago

  @DeepValue47 On Azure. 👎🏻 If they force their Office dominance they’ll likely force @PalantirTech into the office document space. Office 365 web word support is terrible and everyone knows it. If Palantir integrates Team equivalent capability, the war will be on.

• 
  Security Weekly Podcast Network (@SecWeekly) reported 28 minutes ago

  Passwords get stolen. MFA prompts get approved. Rob Allen explains why some organizations are now locking SaaS apps like Office 365, GitHub, and Salesforce to specific trusted IP paths instead of exposing login access to the entire internet. Even if an attacker has credentials, they still can’t connect unless traffic comes from the approved location. Is location-based access control becoming the next layer after MFA? #Cybersecurity #SaaS #IdentitySecurity

• 
  brugs (@Lightningkey17) reported 30 minutes ago

  @MicrosoftHelps my account corrupted when setting up i need a fix its saying it doesnt exist but it took a payment for office 365

• 
  Kelsey. (@Kferr90) reported 31 minutes ago

  Cool so @Outlook @Office365 is still down. Not like I need it in order to do work or anything. Is anyone else having an issue opening the apps on their browser?