Robinhood Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Robinhood Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  B🅰️nshee (@DeNebulord) reported 1 minute ago

  . @RobinhoodApp prediction markets suck I placed an order to buy $20 on Argentina when they were down 2 nil and it only filled 15 contracts @ $0.17 out of the 111 requested. No notification saying my order wasn’t filled, nothing. Later found out in my order history page that it was only partially filled So let me get this straight @RobinhoodApp You will fill a $2.55 trade and not tell the user that the vast majority of their order was unfilled? To find out later after the odds have flipped that my bet was never filled? I would have rather had nothing filled with such a small amount and gotten another chance to place the order at a higher price I really should be entitled to compensation here bc the way your order system works is completely flawed Only made $12 but would’ve made $120

• 
  Zera (@zera_chielo) reported 1 minute ago

  @wennyxz @RobinhoodApp Sorry for that Wenny Stupid dev ngl, hope CTO will revive it

• 
  cat world 🌏 (@BatamGowes) reported 3 minutes ago

  Too many honeypot on @RobinhoodApp chain, and too many rugg on @solana What is your solution?

• 
  TheStockBro (@TheStockBro) reported 7 minutes ago

  @TheSalonDon @RobinhoodApp @vladtenev can you please fix this?

• 
  Jesus (@CCrypto1001) reported 8 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp @RobinhoodComms @vladtenev Robinhood is ALWAYS INCOMPETENT AND INEFFICIENT, with the technical problems they created.

• 
  Ty (@pensonmgmt) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Matt_Hougan It’s awful - they close accounts without any explanation. @RobinhoodApp is not reliable or trusted

• 
  Ethreums 👑 (@HVnS42442600) reported 9 minutes ago

  @rosetina_degen9 @RobinhoodApp @RobinhoodCrypto But what about security concerns with Robinhood Chain, an L2 on Arbitrum, being a new blockchain solution?

• 
  CryptoJoe (@Jo3Dang3r) reported 9 minutes ago

  @n0commas @RobinhoodApp Also, the Uniswap cross chain swap won't trigger a Metamask popup confirm, and says an unknown error has occurred.

• 
  MrFrog (@MisterWera12) reported 10 minutes ago

  please support Chain @RobinhoodApp @clanker_world

• 
  vik ⚡️ (@vscorrpio) reported 14 minutes ago

  found an interesting honeypot ($RIALTO) on @RobinhoodApp today. i aped it myself, got drained, felt pretty stupid, so i figured i’d reverse it. turns out it was a pretty clean allowance bypass, and you don’t see those every day. CA: 0xefd3db0271aa579b8f9f1e4ab91a9d17fea1faa9 attacker helper: 0x5e3c1C6F90d35499C40A5f5769822AF2a631d702 attacker: 0x281FF81dF0Eca1F3F7Ba2A48499c7A83D216a2A8 both contracts were unverified, so most of the reversing was done with a mix of decompilers, AI, and manual analysis. normally an ERC20 works like this: - alice owns tokens. - alice calls approve(bob, 100). - the contract stores that allowance. - bob can now call transferFrom(alice, someoneElse, 100). without that approval, transferFrom should revert. that’s basically the entire security model behind ERC20 allowances. on $RIALTO, transferFrom has another branch. before it checks the allowance, it loads a value from a hidden mapping in storage slot 0 using msg.sender as the key. if that value is non-zero, the allowance check is skipped completely. roughly: if (hidden[msg.sender] != 0) { // skip allowance check } else { require(allowance[from][msg.sender] >= amount); } the attacker helper contract had hidden[attacker] = 0x64. that single storage value effectively made it a privileged spender. it could call transferFrom(holder, attacker, amount) against any holder without ever receiving an approval from that holder. i also suspect this has a decent chance of slipping past a lot of automated bytecode scanners. most quick scanners look for obvious blacklist logic, owner mints, tax changes, or suspicious selectors. this one hides inside an otherwise normal-looking transferFrom implementation. they were also actively market making the token. volume looked organic, there were real-looking sells, larger buys getting sold into, then the chart recovered again. the price action looked surprisingly legitimate even though the whole thing was all fake. since @RobinhoodApp is only on day 2, stuff like this was bound to show up sooner or later. security tooling and risk scoring on new chains usually takes time to catch up, so don’t blindly trust green checkmarks on terminals like @BasedBot which btw great job for working so well on day0 when nobody else was around stay safe out there.

• 
  Blank_00__ (🪶) (@Blank_00___) reported 16 minutes ago

  @The_Pitch_Man @RobinhoodApp @vladtenev support us 🪶

• 
  okan (@okanruhi) reported 17 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp My account has been under “unusual activity” review for days. Called support — got nowhere, no real answers, no timeline beyond a vague date. I have a trade to execute Monday and no way to reach anyone who can actually help. This is unacceptable. #Robinhood #CustomerService

• 
  Kundan Sharma || Collably Network (@kundanAi8) reported 18 minutes ago

  @robidyapp @RobinhoodApp Every new ecosystem needs builders with real utility. Curious to see what problem Robidy is aiming to solve first.

• 
  JohnnyBravo (@JonBras0824) reported 19 minutes ago

  @liorsela @RobinhoodApp I'm stupid I didn't knew every purchase I had to stake i buy everyday

• 
  devameer 🇵🇹 (@devameer0) reported 25 minutes ago

  @0xmani @RobinhoodApp Wtf rubbinhood ?