Robinhood status: trading issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Robinhood reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Robinhood users through our website.

• Trading platform (50%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (10%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Robinhood outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Township of Evan	Login	17 days ago
Saint Peters	Trading platform	25 days ago
Orlando	Login	2 months ago
Carlisle	Trading platform	2 months ago
Youngstown	Trading platform	2 months ago
Columbus	Trading platform	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Robinhood Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  🌴𐌕𐌉𐌌 💸 (@_TimSon8) reported 3 minutes ago

  @jonesrrrrrr @RyDawg42 @RobinhoodApp This is actually the reason I don’t buy crypto through Robinhood anymore - definitely something they need to fix

• 
  Doug Bielecki (@dbielecki) reported 4 minutes ago

  @AskRobinhood @RobinhoodApp your mobile check deposit function sucks via banking. Multiple rejections and errors. Make it easier otherwise we’ll stop using you.

• 
  BrodieJenner (@Snakecase_) reported 9 minutes ago

  People that down have the @RobinhoodApp are the new people that don’t have an iPhone

• 
  Chris Mont Zenith (@Web3Neir0) reported 9 minutes ago

  @RobinHood100X @robinhoodcat_ @RobinhoodApp Support bro LFG

• 
  Samilly_Elixir | Oracle | Sweep & 🦈 (@Samilly_Elixir) reported 12 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp Your site is not working

• 
  Max Belov | BlueRock (@BlueRockID) reported 13 minutes ago

  @nofadsec @RobinhoodApp @HyperliquidX Automation removes the click, not the risk. The meaningful benchmark is not connected capital but behavior across volatility: execution quality, drawdown controls, intervention paths, and whether users can understand why the system acted before losses compound.

• 
  Azariel.eth ⛩️ |DSK| ᛤ (@OrlandoCruzNFT) reported 17 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp This looks like it’s going to be quality

• 
  Drew Orozco (@OrozcoDrew99) reported 20 minutes ago

  @CashmereLabs @RobinhoodApp done submitting ready to hold and support for the long run

• 
  Sakti Guntur (@GunturSak56728) reported 20 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp damn im in love

• 
  Exsild (@exsild) reported 23 minutes ago

  @nubinsocietyrh @RobinhoodApp @long_journeyRH x SAD here to support

• 
  MBK (@MBjornK) reported 24 minutes ago

  Can you team up with TradingView already? Like wtf?! @RobinhoodApp @vladtenev

• 
  🫐rebekah🫐 (@panic_19XX) reported 25 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Do NOT invest your money into these “predictions” they don’t report accurate high temperatures under the hourly “daily observation” and will not pay you what you’re owed despite you winning the contract. Tell me why all the other high temperatures for the day are in red on the hour but not if a bunch of investors predicted it correctly and they were going to lose a huge payout. I did these predictions to try to get ahead with my finances and I knew I was right because I watched one temperature sit at 69° and went to buy more shares and the cancelled all but 5 when the system caught up. THEN I watched the temperature go back down to 98° however the high for that day was 70°.

• 
  Celal 💛🐈 (@Celo6128) reported 27 minutes ago

  Support the legend @Aurelius0121 who holding $CATE since day 1 and support it. With $COOKWARE you earn $HOOD. A big player on @RobinhoodApp

• 
  Kyso (@KysooG) reported 27 minutes ago

  @GLITCHED_HOOD @RobinhoodApp glitch

• 
  Ifeanyi Uchendu (@Ifeanyiuchend) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Goboovi @btcordinal @RobinhoodApp NFTs back? wtf

• 
  QWE Software Technology (@leoliuchenhu) reported 32 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Please take a look at Stackers NFT.we need help

• 
  Lorenzo Valente (@LorenzoARK) reported 33 minutes ago

  Why @HyperliquidX Should Acquire Gemini: The Regulated HIP-3/4 Deployer in the US Hyperliquid is engaging with the CFTC/SEC to enable U.S.-regulated companies to offer perpetual futures that trade and settle on its public blockchain. I think Hyperliquid should take that ambition one step further: Acquire a regulated U.S. platform like Gemini and turn it into the de facto regulated HIP-3 and HIP-4 venue in the U.S. Gemini went public in September 2025 at a $3.3B valuation. Today, it trades at roughly $450M, down more than 85% from its IPO valuation. The core business is clearly struggling. Gemini is too small to compete effectively with the major U.S. exchanges for spot or derivatives flow. It has no meaningful liquidity moat and limited crypto-native distribution. The company has already started diversifying toward its credit card and prediction markets businesses. More telling is that Gemini is in outright shrinking mode. It has wound down its UK, EU, and Australia operations, cut headcount roughly 40% from peak to about 402 employees, and guided to lower compensation and technology spend for the year. Assets on platform fell from $18.2B to $8.4B year over year and spot volume dropped 66%. This is a company retreating to its core and cutting burn. But what looks like a challenged standalone business could be a strategic asset at a fire-sale price. For roughly $450M, Hyperliquid could acquire Gemini's entire U.S. regulatory stack, which I think could be worth ~$200M on its own: - NYDFS Trust Charter: custody + New York exchange authority (2015) - DCM: Gemini Titan, CFTC-regulated derivatives venue (Dec. 2025) - DCO: Gemini Olympus, CFTC clearing license (Apr. 2026) - FCM: in progress, completing the CFTC derivatives stack - MTLs: money-transmitter licenses across nearly all U.S. states - Broker-dealer: rails for regulated equities For context, @krakenfx's parent paid up to $550M for Bitnomial, effectively acquiring a regulatory and derivatives infrastructure asset with little operating business attached. Gemini's entire market cap is now below that. Yes, Hyperliquid would inherit a business currently losing roughly $30–40M per quarter operationally. But it would also acquire a meaningful operating footprint: - 580K monthly transacting users (Q2'26) - 1.72M lifetime transacting users - $8.4B of assets on platform - $3.8B quarterly spot volume - $3.1B institutional / -= $0.7B retail - $45.5M quarterly revenue, or ~$180M annualized - 106K active card users - ~$485M quarterly card spend and ~$220M of receivables - A regulated prediction-markets business with 27K+ traders and 225M+ contracts since launch At a $450M valuation, that's roughly $290 per funded customer. For comparison, @Robinhoodapp paid roughly $400 per funded customer for Bitstamp, despite acquiring about half the revenue and no comparable U.S. federal license stack. Kraken paid roughly $790 per funded user for NinjaTrader. And Gemini's users already hold an average of roughly $14.5K of assets on platform. In other words, you could argue that the regulatory stack alone goes a long way toward underwriting the purchase price, while the users, assets, revenue, card business, and prediction markets come on top. The most interesting part is that Hyperliquid could potentially finance the acquisition without touching a single burned HYPE token. The community reserve holds roughly 389M HYPE. Spending ~7.9M HYPE at $70 would represent approximately $550M — just 2.0% of the reserve, under 1% of max supply, and roughly 3% of HYPE's ~$18.5B circulating market cap — enough to acquire Gemini outright at a ~20% premium to its current market cap. Hyperliquid could then redirect a portion of protocol buybacks toward rebuilding the reserve. At the current fee run rate, the reserve could potentially be replenished within 12–18 months. The strategic logic is bigger than simply buying an exchange. Hyperliquid would be buying the regulatory bridge between HIP-3/4 and the U.S. market. Gemini could become one of Hyperliquid's HIP-3 and HIP-4 markets, the regulated U.S. deployer, handling KYC, custody, fiat rails, brokerage, clearing, and compliance while the L1 provides the underlying market infrastructure, liquidity, and onchain settlement. Mechanically, this transaction is far simpler than most public-company M&A. Gemini's dual-class structure gives Class B shares ten votes each, and the Winklevoss twins hold all of them, roughly 94.7% of total voting power. It is a Nasdaq-designated controlled company. There is no proxy fight, no activist interloper, no drawn-out process. Board approval and a majority of voting power both run through two people. The entire negotiation is whether Cameron and Tyler want to convert a controlling stake in a declining exchange into a meaningful HYPE position and the distinction of bringing Hyperliquid onshore. On structure, the buyer wouldn't be the protocol or the foundation directly. NYDFS probabl wants a US entity with named officers, not an offshore foundation. The path is a Delaware HoldCo, funded by the Hyper Foundation but legally distinct, that acquires Gemini and keeps the regulated subsidiaries intact. The L1 stays a separate permissionless layer that never touches a US customer. Polymarket already ran this playbook. Offshore, non-KYC, with a CFTC settlement on its record, it bought QCEX (a licensed DCM/DCO) for $112M in July 2025, ring-fenced it as a US entity, and relaunched onshore in December. Hyperliquid starts from a better position: no enforcement history, US users geofenced, and active dialogue with both agencies. Hyperliquid generates substantial cash flow and sits on an enormous treasury. It should be much more aggressive about deploying both strategically. let's stop the buy back and burns and play offense.

• 
  ₿ANTO🀄 (@BantofWeb4) reported 34 minutes ago

  @MaxMendezzx @RobinhoodApp can I get a follow back? I'd be glad to support your project 🔥

• 
  Will (@NxumaloJulia) reported 34 minutes ago

  @9LivesRH @RobinhoodApp damn!

• 
  n̷o̷x̷.exe (@Imogen157x) reported 36 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp Yiur submit button sees broken man

• 
  Mesh (@MeshGateway) reported 38 minutes ago

  MeshCard. The first way to spend USDG on @RobinhoodApp Chain anywhere Visa and Mastercard are accepted. Issue a virtual card from your dashboard. Fund it straight from your wallet in USDG. That's it. No off-ramp, no exchange, no fiat account in between. Under the hood we bridge the exact amount the card needs, automatically. You only ever hold USDG. Card numbers are revealed pass-through and never touch our database. MeshGateway let agents pay for APIs. MeshIdentity gave them a name. MeshCard connects USDG to the rest of the economy. On-chain to checkout. We keep shipping.

• 
  Bendernet (@Bendernet_1) reported 39 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Fix your bugs first!

• 
  Rustaaaaghhh (@SReckamn) reported 40 minutes ago

  @apewifbeanie @MeshGateway @RobinhoodApp huh i try cant find token on phantom when enter CA uniswap gives a error

• 
  Aleksandr (@AleMacLeo) reported 42 minutes ago

  @iamdhananjayb @RobinhoodApp Dear members of the American press! Steve Jobs once said, "If you can convince the press of your technology, and the press convinces us, we'll pay attention." That's why I'm reaching out to you. For years, the development of personal devices has been driven by advances in smartphones, tablets, and virtual reality technologies. However, all of these solutions still require people to adapt to the device. I've developed a concept based on the opposite principle: the device should adapt to the user and interact with them as naturally as possible. I believe this technology has the potential to be the next major step in the development of consumer electronics. It offers a fundamentally new way to interact with the digital environment and has the potential to replace many existing devices that accompany people in their daily lives today. If my assessment is correct, this isn't just another gadget, but a platform capable of transforming the market in the same way that the personal computer, iPod, and iPhone once did. Such opportunities arise extremely rarely, and that's why they deserve independent attention and objective assessment. I believe Apple has the experience, engineering culture, and vision necessary to turn this idea into a world-class product. Moreover, the successful implementation of such technology could strengthen the leadership of the American tech industry at a time when global competition is becoming increasingly fierce. I'm not asking you to take my word for it. I'm asking only one thing: help draw Apple's attention to this development and give it the opportunity to be considered by those capable of objectively assessing its potential. If the technology truly represents the value I see in it, ignoring it could be a missed opportunity. If not, that will become clear after a professional evaluation. But in either case, the idea deserves to be heard. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Alexander.

• 
  Ehi_Lia (@theehilia) reported 42 minutes ago

  @h00dmodels @RobinhoodApp Excited for the show @_Titandao is here to support

• 
  coinbaez (@coinbaez) reported 45 minutes ago

  $CASHCAT is a mainstay of Robinhood Chain culture and @RobinhoodApp lore. I don’t think it makes sense to put it in the same category as a force-fed (AI) cat meme designed simply to grab market share. Funny how that happened right after Cashcat kicked off cat szn. There really is no comparison. Cashcat was the breakout meme of Robinhood Chain from day one. It’s become the chain’s identity, people actually built around it, an ecosystem formed around the meme, and now it’s directly tradable for the 28.5 million people on the Robinhood app. And somehow people still think it’s topped? And are rotating to other nonsense? I think the bigger picture is what makes Cashcat so interesting. Other CEXs see what Vlad is doing with Robinhood Chain and are positioning themselves around it. They have every reason to pivot like they are. Difference is - Vlad is, and has always been, pro-memes. He’s literally said Robinhood Chain “works great for memes too.” And that matters, because Robinhood has an enormous retail audience that already trusts the company enough to do their finances with them. They have the brand, the distribution, the retail users, and now they have the chain. That’s why I think comparing Cashcat to some CEX-manufactured meme that was created specifically to compete for attention misses the point entirely. It didn’t need to be invented by a marketing department. It came out of the culture organically, became synonymous with the chain’s early days and has stayed on top since then. Robinhood is the Disney/Nintendo of centralized finance. And Cashcat is sitting at the intersection of Robinhood, memes, retail and its new chain. That is a pretty damn potent combination. Robinhood chain will be the premiere destination for this bull run’s memes. Still incredibly early.

• 
  Alhaji_Rado (✱,✱)🌶️ (@Alhaji_Rado) reported 46 minutes ago

  @EtherBubu @RobinhoodApp I got error in verifying Tried so many times

• 
  ÅŁ𝕧𝕚𝕟 Ł𝕖𝕖 (@ayam_alvin10) reported 49 minutes ago

  @0xfablo @Kiyoo_nft @RobinhoodApp There’s a clear problem being addressed here.

• 
  Mo 🚀 (@mohan_me1) reported 50 minutes ago

  Traded 1,000 pts ($10) for a @RobinhoodApp Mystery Box just to get a single-use 10% dining boost. The card already gets 3%, so I have to spend $143+ on my next meal just to break even on my own $10. Buy a coffee first and it’s a 90% loss. Any chance support wants to swap this for an offer that doesn't lose money on swipe #1? @AskRobinhood

• 
  0X daredevil (@yeatersink) reported 56 minutes ago

  @LibertySwapFi @RobinhoodApp Yeah I tested it too, the problem is is that Robinhood locked my ability to transfer crypto to an external wallet. Now maybe that has changed over the last month but it took me several weeks to get my money back out of Robinhood so I could bridge in through another means.