Signal Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Signal users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Signal, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Signal users affected:
Signal is a cross-platform encrypted messaging service. It uses the Internet to send one-to-one and group messages, which can include files, voice notes, images and videos. It can also be used to make one-to-one and group voice and video calls.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Berlin, Land Berlin | 4 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 3 |
| Quito, Provincia de Pichincha | 3 |
| Hamburg, HH | 2 |
| Atlanta, GA | 2 |
| Zürich, ZH | 2 |
| Jewar, UP | 2 |
| Zetel, Lower Saxony | 1 |
| Munich, Bavaria | 1 |
| Springe, Lower Saxony | 1 |
| Vijayawada, AP | 1 |
| Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
| Cagliari, Sardegna | 1 |
| Rockford, IL | 1 |
| Wolnzach, Bavaria | 1 |
| Kolkata, WB | 1 |
| Bilāspur, CT | 1 |
| Essen, NRW | 1 |
| Gżira, Il-Gżira | 1 |
| Halifax, England | 1 |
| Schaan, Schaan | 1 |
| Portland, OR | 1 |
| Landsberg am Lech, Bavaria | 1 |
| Revere, MA | 1 |
| Crowley, TX | 1 |
| Lima, Provincia de Lima | 1 |
| Kirkland, WA | 1 |
| Gävle, Gävleborgs län | 1 |
| Westerstede, Lower Saxony | 1 |
| Bremen, Bremen | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Signal Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
k3rnlp4n1c
(@k3rnlp4n1c) reported
@signalapp Terrible decision.
-
🇺🇦 Bertrand B.
(@B_Boutillier) reported
@AnonyPla @interchu @signalapp I implore too ! This is the best idea to kill the app ... it was a really useful function to promote the application to people not aware of privacy problems. They'll go back to WhatsApp and co. ...
-
Eric Schultz
(@wwahammy) reported
@olmaverick @signalapp I'm sympathetic to that too. But, I don't remember anything changing in that area for a long time. So is this an intractable problem? I'm skeptical it is.
-
☠spooky scary skelemav☠
(@olmaverick) reported
@wwahammy @signalapp In point of fact I have never used signal for SMS, in the early days of the standalone app the UI was really terrible, and I avoided it for anything but secure messages. It kept getting better but by then I really like the idea that I had a secure box and an insecure box.
-
CorporateRiot
(@ExecutiveRiot) reported
@signalapp So bummed as this was my default messaging app for all. Likely not going to play the messaging app juggling game though, so thanks for the years of service Signal.
-
Michael
(@mghare) reported
@signalapp Your making a terrible decision. This is going to make what is already a difficult sell ever harder.
-
Khen
(@khenmain) reported
@signalapp This is probably a bad move. Having SMS and Signal conversations in one app makes it so much simpler for new users to switch. I guess this move will help improve the security of people using Signal, but this change will likely cause significant inconveniences.
-
Håkan Save Hansson 🇸🇪🇺🇦
(@savehansson) reported
@signalapp Terrible decision. Many (most?) Signal users on Android, incl their families/parents, will now have to leave Signal and use plain SMS app instead 😟 You're de facto forcing people to use LESS secure/private messaging.
-
JC
(@jdcguy) reported
@signalapp removing SMS support from Signal for Android is a terrible idea, yes I read the blog post, yes I understand the arguments. I convinced many people less technically versed to install it because it served as their default SMS app. You will lose many users over this
-
Nate Bartram
(@TNONate) reported
@TheChaumin @signalapp She also said they'll still require a phone number to fight spam, they just won't make it the username. I dunno, maybe I'm just overreacting cause I'm upset but I'm feeling frustrated and let down. Feels like Signal is going downhill and not listening to their users.
-
Michael
(@mghare) reported
@signalapp You're making a terrible decision. This is going to make what is already a difficult sell ever harder.
-
J. Ryne Danielson
(@jrynedanielson) reported
@signalapp This is a terrible idea. I may stop using it because of the change. At the very least, it will be much less useful to me.
-
Calderia Mezzaluna
(@CalMezzaluna) reported
@signalapp As many have already said, this is a terrible decision on so many levels. I've been an advocate and a donor for quite some time, but this decion seems ill-advised and runs counter to the privacy advocacy Signal claims to represent.
-
MetropleX
(@Metr0pl3x) reported
@signalapp Have to say while I understand and appreciate the motive, pragmatically as others have said it's a terrible move for adoption. I've managed to move OAPs onto Signal thanks to SMS integration. I have also appreciated the backup/restore of SMS as well as securing SMS OTP codes.
-
Nananikinas
(@nananikinas) reported
@signalapp I’m soo for this if it also means removing the phone number requirement for using the service. Cause privacy right?