Ubisoft Connect Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  anna_world (@WorldAnnia47936) reported 1 minute ago

  @seralorneauthor I remember there was a problem at Ubisoft with a character whose costume was a different color than what was shown in the trailer, or the actor portraying the character was injured and the new character's clothes didn't fit properly, something like that... If you're referring to problems adding or removing characters... there was a game, I think it was by a Japanese company (I don't remember the name), where the character was supposed to be featured because she was very popular in the game and had her own DLC added. However, there were technical issues with the display screen, which necessitated expanding the display area to include the event screens... I didn't understand what you meant by spread boyond the booth! Could you explain further?

• 
  Abel The Strong by The Good Lords Mighty Grace (@shydout) reported 2 minutes ago

  @UbisoftSupport **** you ubisoft support , you guys think youre smart , not fixing your game , making us go to ubisoft support for help and when we try to ask about the conection issues you decline me from opening a case and redirect me to basic answers that do not solve the prob

• 
  Kaiserhawk (@Kaiserhawk) reported 6 minutes ago

  The R6 Tactics game looks pretty cool. Not cool enough to fix my 2FA issues on uplay, but still.

• 
  Jacob Marsh (@JohnMar39804972) reported 11 minutes ago

  @TheGameVerse They ruined wildlands. I uzed to play all thr time. But the new update tuin it. Now if you go to any menu all characters head gear changes to a mono nv. Its unplayable. Change clothes you have to fix all 4 members head gear. You cant even play it. Ubisoft today will ruin it.

• 
  Jonathan Craig (@uGVengence) reported 11 minutes ago

  I am having issues updating information on my ubisoft account. I have made a support case and yall did get back to me. Now I need to update yall with additional information but your website is failing to load the case. @UbisoftSupport

• 
  XÆN 🌹 (@XinDead) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Ilysomuch1000 @mrdaddyvondoom @itisscripted Yeah, it might not. But then why did people lose The Crew if Ubisoft hasn’t closed? Not owning your media is an issue that will only milk us as renters.

• 
  Chong Wingkong (@ChongWingk71066) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Lionel706666029 @KindredBlade Calling Western AAA studios "communist" is economically illiterate. EA, Ubisoft, and Activision don't answer to public collectives; they answer to Wall Street institutional investors, EBITDA targets, and quarterly shareholder calls. Corporate PR trend-chasing isn't "communism"—it’s risk-averse late-stage capitalism designed to protect market cap. ​Beyond the category error, lumping an entire hemisphere together is pure fallacy. Treating mega-corps the same as studios like Larian, CDPR, Warhorse, or thousands of standalone indies ignores the teams actually delivering deep mechanics, zero DRM, and consumer-first releases. ​Regional tribalism ruins consumer standards. A game isn't good because of where it was coded, and giving any developer a blank check just because they aren't "Western AAA" is how you end up accepting predatory monetization, broken optimization, and live-service bloat under a different flag. ​Judge the software on frametimes, physics, mechanical depth, and fair pricing—not culture-war buzzwords.

• 
  YellowJacketKaraguchi🔜CEO (@MateoKaraguchi) reported 15 minutes ago

  It’s happened with Microsoft, Sony, Ubisoft, Riot. The problem is that dev cycles are taking longer for playtime/feature bloat & only want you to ONLY play their game. To quote a fav creator: “I want shorter games with worse graphics, with employees paid more to work less.”

• 
  Advant (@NotAdvant) reported 15 minutes ago

  MW4 aint bad... if you can handle input delay worse than an office mouse on a windows 7 pc. Fix your ******* inputs Activision, Ubisoft is doing better than you.

• 
  Mars (@Marsormr_) reported 17 minutes ago

  @itsbesttohopoff EA Nintendo Ubisoft Sony Microsoft Rockstar is only the latest shitheel. I could go on and on. Quit being a disingenuous ****** by pretending not to understand the issue.

• 
  Asami DCD (@StarBreakersTW) reported 20 minutes ago

  @PinchofDoom @tacokitan @SpikeChunsoft_e Ubisoft with the shutdown of The Crew, which had a physical release of a live service game, resulted in discs not working anymore. By playing any game, we’re bound to EULAs. Though it is more a legal scare than anything, by those can they make US destroy. There’s more…

• 
  The Derpiest of Derps (@SlyWolf5) reported 21 minutes ago

  Ubisoft asked for a video of the "Glitch". Which is simply they sold a bundle, that showed an item, now they are trying to charge for the item again because it apparently wasn't in the bundle (Even though it was shown) So I sent them the most sarcastic *** recording I could.

• 
  Based Kazuya (@SaneGamer) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BeskInfinity The slow mo crash reminds me of Burnout and I love it. Wish they would remove the Ubisoft style awareness indicators @RockstarGames

• 
  Songanta (@HaileSelasie13) reported 21 minutes ago

  There’s a version of the digital future that I don’t think people take seriously enough because nothing about it looks dystopian while it is being built. It mostly looks convenient. Games download instantly. Software follows you between devices. Your photos live in the cloud. Cars get new functions through updates. Accounts remember everything you purchased years ago. All of that is genuinely useful, but somewhere along the way, ownership started changing meaning. A lot of digital products no longer really end at the moment of purchase. They continue depending on authentication servers, publisher accounts, DRM, cloud infrastructure and databases that sit completely outside your control. That sounds like a technical distinction until one of those dependencies disappears. Ubisoft already showed what this looks like with The Crew. People had paid for the game, but once the servers were shut down the purchase itself wasn’t enough to keep the product alive. California now literally requires companies to be clearer when the “Buy” button is actually selling a license rather than permanent ownership. Europe has had to debate whether publishers should be allowed to make purchased games completely unusable after support ends. None of these stories are particularly dramatic on their own, but together they point in a strange direction. We’re building a world where ownership increasingly depends on somebody else continuing to recognize it. And cybersecurity makes that arrangement even more interesting. Take a company like Rockstar. Whatever anyone thinks about the recent GTA VI situation, this is one of the most valuable entertainment projects on earth, controlled by a giant publisher with serious security infrastructure and an enormous financial incentive to keep unreleased material private. Yet even companies operating at that level still suffer breaches, leaks and internal security failures. That doesn’t mean someone is going to break into Steam tomorrow and erase everyone’s library. Large platforms have backups, audit trails and redundancy precisely because they understand that risk. What bothers me more is the architecture underneath it. The same centralized system that makes it possible to restore your entire library after buying a new PC is also the system capable of deciding whether that library exists for you at all. Usually that power is useful. Sometimes it is necessary. But once enough of our lives depend on these systems, the distinction between owning something and being continuously authorized to use it starts getting blurry. And gaming is probably just the easiest early example because we notice immediately when a game disappears. It gets more uncomfortable when the same logic moves into cars, appliances, professional software, personal archives and devices whose physical hardware we actually paid for. The darker version of this future probably won’t arrive through some cinematic cyberattack where everything switches off at midnight. It would be much less obvious. A feature here becomes account bound. Another product requires permanent authentication. An old service closes. Something stops receiving updates. A company changes its terms. A platform decides a ten year old product is no longer worth maintaining. Twenty years later everyone is still surrounded by things they technically purchased, but fewer of those things can function without permission from infrastructure they do not control. Maybe regulation stops that trajectory. Maybe consumers eventually start demanding offline fallbacks and stronger ownership rights. Maybe companies themselves realize that permanent access is a selling point. Nothing about the direction is inevitable. But I do think we should be paying attention while the meaning of “buy” is still being rewritten, because once an entire economy is built around conditional access, changing it afterward will be much harder. At what point does a product stop being something you own and become something you are merely allowed to keep using?

• 
  𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕨 🔰 (@Only1Digginz) reported 21 minutes ago

  @3denFPS The horrific launch of the first season and the netcode issues really tied a lead weight around that game's ankles. Really enjoyed it but Ubisoft just didn't have the patience to fix the problems. They wanted an instant hit in the live service space which is never reality.