Ubisoft Connect Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Zer01ne 🇲🇫 (@Zer01neDev) reported 48 seconds ago

  @victorygrove98 @8Lp3DSJCaRpPpcw @Tidux Most Games comes broken, EA Games comes with an Online checks, Ubisoft Games require Internet to be Installed. They did everything on purpose, up the DRM system itself.

• 
  mobbie (@Mobbie1996) reported 3 minutes ago

  @GinRombayRumba @ChesronKocsis @digitalfoundry Also, forgetting Ubisoft no longer sells keys globally but login redeems and even then that's barely a thing

• 
  Dagger 323 (@dagger323) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BillyOfBagEnd @XboxArchives Any online-only live service game that a dev has milked for 11 years straight is slop. Further is it slop because it is largely multiplayer-only with no focus on mode variety or a developed singleplayer experience. It's a travesty to the Rainbow Six games that came before it, and demonstrates the peak model of greed and laziness that defines modern Ubisoft. Once again, Ghost Recon Wildlands was the only quality Tom Clancy game that's released since the 360 era. Siege is literally live service corporate slop.

• 
  Synth Potato🥔 (@SynthPotato) reported 11 minutes ago

  @374_Karim The problem is that at that point, you'd just be making a different game. And I do not believe current Ubisoft can make a game as good as AC1, it'll just be Mirage again which I enjoy Mirage but its not going up against that AC1-AC4 run of games

• 
  Sheldon Yakiwchuk (@YakkStack) reported 14 minutes ago

  @LivinTheFringe I post there daily. Full Haver Uplay episodes. Having some issues with them limiting my distribution, but not fact checking.

• 
  𝕸𝖔𝖗𝖌𝖆𝖓 𝕷𝖆𝖓𝖈𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖗 (@Lancaster_1899) reported 14 minutes ago

  @ObligedUniform @CultureCrave Problem is they don't determine what other publishers charge, now their first party title completely agree, but to hold them accountable for say Rockstar, or Ubisoft charging $80+ dollars is delusional at best.

• 
  Christian Murphy (@ChristianMurp04) reported 16 minutes ago

  FOR THE LOVE OF GOD UBISOFT FIX CHEATING ON CONSOLE

• 
  WizDev (@WizardlyDev) reported 18 minutes ago

  @SlayzieVII Mostly due to Ubisoft crunch time leading to that specific issue. The pacing has more of a finished and cohesive start middle and end. Origins lingers so much and you have to find an alternative motivation to force yourself to engage.

• 
  Pouët (@Pouet2) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft No disc, no buy! We don't buy Sony or Microsoft products anymore! Bro! I sold my ps5 pro, bye gta 2 years... I have a pc with rtx 4060 and steam or gog, problem solved!

• 
  Miriam (Miri) 🧘🏼‍♀️ (@miriam_choomie) reported 20 minutes ago

  My 2 cents on this topic: Yeah people are right AC doesn´t need a remake it needs an entire reimagining except the Story and Characters. Before anyone says "but this is from todays perspective" no its not. It was always a Issue that this game was basically you doing the same mission over and over again just to get to the next cutscene or city. And yeah Ubisoft always had a issue with repetitive gameplay but here its just so noticeable. You can have your nostalgia and what not. Original game yada yada. But AC 1 is mechanically absolutely horrible and mostly lives from Nostalgia. I think there is no denying that.

• 
  Ookaze BioACobol (@Ookaze0) reported 23 minutes ago

  @dajsz1989 @RobotGuy405 The issue is that AAA has no meaning. So anyone can say anything, it makes no sense, anyway. If I ask 10 people what AAA is, I'll get 10 different definitions, aka it's a buzzword to give fake value to things, aka manipulation. Only grifters use this term. Ubisoft even went AAAA.

• 
  Jordan Dufrene (@J0rdvnn__) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft Fix your ******* Ubisoft Connect app. I've bought games on pc that I can't even ******* play.

• 
  🕹 ~Bich~ 🇵🇷 (@Bich_Dingo) reported 24 minutes ago

  @eyemissxv @OldManSakaki I dont disagree much here beyond disliking the open world Ubisoft template, but FF13, 15 and 16 are all vastly different games with unique issues that strayed from the formula while FF7R has been tauted as the return to form SE needed for a long time.

• 
  Vegetto71 (@vegetto71) reported 26 minutes ago

  @iyasele_o I have mine the same way and it doesn't give issues at all bruh, do you have the extension enabled and ubisoft connect to auto launch with windows?

• 
  Betty Egg (@betty_egg) reported 29 minutes ago

  @PolishTamales You said it went down from 88k to 3k when you can see in the screenshot you shared it's double that - the 24 hour peak caps at about 6k, and shoots up to 40k at the start of a new season. Having a 24 hour peak puts you in the top 2%-3% of all games on Steam. The problem with Marathon is it cost 250 million (allegedly) and it's probably only made around 50-60 million back, 4 months later. Also this problem isn't exclusive to Marathon - Marathon is simply the chosen scapegoat. This is happening to AAA games across the board. They're over budgeted and underperforming. In the grand scheme of things, Marathon's player retention would be fairly decent if it cost about half as much to make - but again this is not a "Marathon" problem, it's a AAA problem abroad. I'm not trying to be snarky but the only reason I bring this up is because I see people making all these posts, and they seem genuinely confused? The reason Sony is still supporting Marathon is because there is a slight chance for a game like this to pick up steam, because yes in fact - player retention puts it in the top 2%-3% games on Steam. Games like Warframe and Siege took YEARS to get to where they are today, and they debuted with numbers far worse than Marathon (even when taking into account Siege had it's own Ubisoft servers on top of Steam).. THIS is why they continue to support it. They'll probably give a year before they decide to pull the plug, and again the only reason I mention this is because 90% of my feed seems to be confused about what all these numbers mean, and firstly, if you think only 3k people are playing Marathon - when in reality it's twice that many - that would be confusing, on top of the fact if you didn't know where that puts it in contrast with the rest of games on Steam, you're not gonna understand why Sony continues to support it. People keep trying to compare these games to games like Arc Raiders, or Apex Legends - games like that are well within the top 0.5% of ALL games on Steam, globally. Not everything is an overnight hit, in fact most live service games fall flat on their face... Whereas Marathon has SOME retention. That's why.