Ubisoft Connect Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Gareth Walker (@Revision_124c41) reported 8 minutes ago

  @noheroesleft @Jwave630 @Vara_Dark The misconception here is that the big publishers are the only ones publishing games. EA, Microsoft (which gobbled up two of the big publishers), Sony, Nintendo, Square Enix, Capcom, Namco, Ubisoft, Konami, Sega, Tencent, Take-Two. That's all the big ones right there. Beyond that there is a legion of smaller publishers and indies who self publish: Warner Brothers (some might consider them big simply because of hte parent company), CDPR, Epic Games, Devolver Digital, Focu, Paradox, Koch Media (which I imagine is one of your big 5), Aksys, Amazon Games (which is currently publishing tomb raider), Apple, Arc Sys Works, Cave, Gameloft, Gamefreak, Kepler Interactive (which they've been putting out some winners of late), Tecmo Koei, Natsume, NIS, Netflix, and Valve (this one will cause people to scratch their heads since they are a store front, but don't act as a publisher beyond their own games). The games industry is incredibly volatile. Just microsoft's acquisitions alone of Zenimax and ATVI upset that balance pretty hard, now you're seeing Kepler, devolover, and a few other small time publisher filling the void. (basically making the acquisitions beyond IP pretty pointless, bad buys imho). If you look deep enough the Chinese are a bigger problem than BlackRock and Vanguard. I'm not gonna lie here and say they aren't a problem. They are. However they spend most of their time trading these companies like baseball cards and even then have very little control over such a chaotic industry. It's when you get heads of development listening to dip shits like Sweet Baby Inc is when you start to see problems surface and brand integrity degrade.

• 
  KhoyaFraqg (@LeFraqg77) reported 8 minutes ago

  40 min in blue screen nice game fix this **** pls @Ubisoft @UbisoftSupport @Rainbow6Game

• 
  O4OUR (@O4OUR) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft You fix the Heroes 3 thing yet?

• 
  mip (@miptrix) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft you can fix every bug but when you shoot a window and the piece stays for 7 seconds nice

• 
  Ace (@acetomato1) reported 13 minutes ago

  @SajousGelumer @Ubisoft wildlands has offline functionality, breakpoint was built from the ground up as a live service game, that’s like saying let’s give Fortnite a offline mode, it’s very hard to do.

• 
  kam (@KamtanaR6) reported 16 minutes ago

  @fettR6S your new video about the bans is not completely accurate and I want to shine light before misinformation gets spread. In game messages may say cheating, the email however says the real reason for ban. In the past when Spoit was speedrunning bans, they have not started the bought account/alt account bans yet, and he was purely getting banned for CHEATING based on stats and fast rank ups. Last season with Ranked 3.0 was the first season we have seen where R6 decided to ban bought accounts, and all of the emails say breach of conduct despite in game saying banned for cheating. A huge problem with this, pros who log in from a teamhouse, a hotel, military that log in on base or abroad, every day people who just move houses or change internet providers, people who use VPN's or exitlag where the IPs will show different geolocations, will all be at risk of getting banned also. Now obviously this is not the main cause, R6 has a big scene for buying accounts even at the pro level. We even see pros sell accounts and we've seen pros scam account selling. The biggest cause would be the scene for buying accounts. Personally I dont think its right, I've bought numerous accounts myself so you can call me biased, but even unbiased Ubisoft has broken promises with the community and has made their "LIMITED TIME" skins available again and even at that has scalped ******** out of those items for a ridiculous price, and hardly has given any of that back to the community it seems. If we give so much money to this company why does it seem like they are always betraying us. Ubisoft had it on their websites for what seasonal skins and battle passes were, both were defined as limited available items, now they are back in store, even in alpha packs, it is betrayal. Soon we will see Chroma Streaks, possibly pro league skins, black ice bundles, all available again yet no sight of marketplace. We were branded a new secure boot for the game this season, and the panel team talked about DMA problems, yet in the new secure boot metrics, you dont even have to enable IOMMU which is literally what Valorant and Faceit are using TO DETECT DMA. Ubisoft surely isnt allocating money to staff manual bans. I know so they are still paying case workers out of New Dehli, Cairo, Cape Town, to handle cases and arent even doing proper investigations for account issues. It is a disgrace to give Ubisoft any benefit of the current dung ball they are rolling us all into as players.

• 
  Lee Helck (@LeeHelck) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Ricco_Wrld my issue isn't with the game, it's with the studio. they are one of the worst, second only to EA and Ubisoft. but go ahead, enjoy the game, i'm sure it will be fun. it doesn't effect me in the slightest.

• 
  OffWorld (@offworldreal) reported 17 minutes ago

  fix your ******* game @Ubisoft what do your devs do all day apart from play with their butts

• 
  NekoGwyndolin (@NekoGwyndolin) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Bayun_The_Cat @HighDrownedGodX @transcalamitas Dear lord dude, you're acting like FromSoft is about to fall off and become Ubisoft. They added some content to the new version of the game, but they didn't want to make that content exclusive to one console. They are selling it for $5 and it's a one time thing, there is no issue

• 
  Mike : MadHutch (@MadhutchMike) reported 19 minutes ago

  @RainbowzZz9 @entergamenexus @TheDivisionGame 60fps with alot of graphical issues my dude And cant hit 4k what are you arguing about. Its ubisoft man guess thats answer enough

• 
  The Gamer Dad (@TheGamerDad_GG) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Shpeshal_Nick BUT!!!! They do say licenses can change due to licensing issues in the future etc etc So, you would need the disc to play said game if a licensing changes. Example, Ubisoft puts their library available, but then decide to no longer support it in the future.

• 
  cltur (@R6Flush) reported 24 minutes ago

  @VarsityGamingTV Honestly I think everyone knows it HAS to be wrong, but Ubisoft being Ubisoft cannot claim they made a massive elo error so they won't speak on it or do anything about it.

• 
  PulpyGamesStudio (@KnightsF56749) reported 25 minutes ago

  @gladkyi_dmytro Yes, that's my problem with this ****. I want Steam to be an equal marketplace, I understand bigger companies have more $ to push marketing/more coverage, but this is an obvious playing favorites to clearly not make Ubisoft go through the same standards as solo devs for a launch.

• 
  Jon (@Jon_Coogan) reported 29 minutes ago

  @EaAuditor @Rainbow6Game @Ubisoft fix the controller settings back to how they were

• 
  Beeline Discovery (@GF_Australia) reported 31 minutes ago

  @axrxrxr100 @RockstarGames Your not the only one who thinks this. It's an OK game that may attract buyers at $50 if they could fix that frame rate. Rockstar didn't need to fire all their talent. They may as well have openly outsourced it to Ubisoft as a GTA V remaster with more gimmicks and less edge.