Ubisoft Connect Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jeremy Cartwright (@Epkon406) reported 3 minutes ago

  Why are you guys complaining when the game don't release until 2027? Its not even something ill be playing. but yea I agree with you all with Ubisoft being a big joke. I have a good majority of the PC catalog. And some of those games had horrible bugs that took years to fix! Some were game breaking.

• 
  𝓑𝓲𝓰 𝓑𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓴𝓼 (@INDOLENTRAZOR) reported 6 minutes ago

  @kaz_maniandevil Also what’s up with Rayman being in stuff now, the whole franchise seemingly ******* DIED and like after the Mario + Rabbids dlc he started being exponentially more relevant I wonder if Ubisoft had like any sort of rights issue or if they just genuinely fully forgot 😭😭

• 
  Cipher Of Being (@AlteredEndeavor) reported 7 minutes ago

  @MLGecko627 I don't think Sony first party games are the only ones that get attacked for this at all. Ubisoft has been getting hammered over its open world formula for years. Call of Duty gets criticized for being repetitive constantly. Sports games get criticized for yearly iterations, and I've even seen the exact criticism you're making here about seemingly everything becoming a Soulslike. I think what we see probably has a lot to do with the circles we're in and what the algorithms keep feeding us. I also don't think cinematic narrative driven action adventure games are inherently the problem. I enjoy plenty of them myself. My criticism is more about how much of Sony's major first party output has started to share a similar design philosophy, presentation, and structure. You can absolutely prefer that style of game, and I understand why someone would choose PlayStation specifically because Sony still invests heavily in it. Where I disagree is the idea that criticizing repetition means wanting these games to disappear or become Soulslikes. There's a huge amount of room for experimentation within cinematic action adventure games themselves. Different approaches to level design, storytelling, player agency, progression, combat, exploration, structure, and presentation could still produce the kind of narrative driven experiences you're talking about without abandoning the genre. I think this also connects to the larger problem with gaming discourse. Algorithms can make whatever criticism you're surrounded by feel universal. If you're heavily invested in PlayStation, you're probably going to see a disproportionate amount of PlayStation discourse. Someone heavily invested in Ubisoft, Xbox, Call of Duty, or Souls games is probably seeing an entirely different version of the supposedly "universal" gaming conversation. So I don't want Sony to stop making these games. I'd just like to see them take more chances within that space rather than feeling like the alternative has to be either the familiar Sony formula or turning everything into a Soulslike.

• 
  Typsy B34ST (@B34ST21) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft @UbisoftSupport FIX THE ISSUE WHERE CONSOLE PLAYERS (WHO PLAY WITH JUST CONTROLLER) GET STUCK IN THE PC POOL!!!! THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR ABOUT A MONTH NOW!! DO SOMETHING

• 
  Lugames47 (@LuanRodrigueslg) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft My copy of Ghost Recon Wildlands is showing an error after the latest update: dialogue repeats endlessly, regardless of the language. I’ve already uninstalled the game and cleared the cache, but the problem persists. @UbisoftBrasil @Ubisoft

• 
  Aherys (@aherys) reported 15 minutes ago

  @renlosmalik Thanks you, how ever what you said is absolutely not true. Triple AAA industry make money historical records everywhere (outside ubisoft). It's not an issue of "people do not buy". Studio shutdown just to please actionnary and because covid backslash. Job security is also very bad for indie because it's very hard place to be.

• 
  Songanta (@HaileSelasie13) reported 15 minutes ago

  There’s a version of the digital future that I don’t think people take seriously enough because nothing about it looks dystopian while it is being built. It mostly looks convenient. Games download instantly. Software follows you between devices. Your photos live in the cloud. Cars get new functions through updates. Accounts remember everything you purchased years ago. All of that is genuinely useful, but somewhere along the way, ownership started changing meaning. A lot of digital products no longer really end at the moment of purchase. They continue depending on authentication servers, publisher accounts, DRM, cloud infrastructure and databases that sit completely outside your control. That sounds like a technical distinction until one of those dependencies disappears. Ubisoft already showed what this looks like with The Crew. People had paid for the game, but once the servers were shut down the purchase itself wasn’t enough to keep the product alive. California now literally requires companies to be clearer when the “Buy” button is actually selling a license rather than permanent ownership. Europe has had to debate whether publishers should be allowed to make purchased games completely unusable after support ends. None of these stories are particularly dramatic on their own, but together they point in a strange direction. We’re building a world where ownership increasingly depends on somebody else continuing to recognize it. And cybersecurity makes that arrangement even more interesting. Take a company like Rockstar. Whatever anyone thinks about the recent GTA VI situation, this is one of the most valuable entertainment projects on earth, controlled by a giant publisher with serious security infrastructure and an enormous financial incentive to keep unreleased material private. Yet even companies operating at that level still suffer breaches, leaks and internal security failures. That doesn’t mean someone is going to break into Steam tomorrow and erase everyone’s library. Large platforms have backups, audit trails and redundancy precisely because they understand that risk. What bothers me more is the architecture underneath it. The same centralized system that makes it possible to restore your entire library after buying a new PC is also the system capable of deciding whether that library exists for you at all. Usually that power is useful. Sometimes it is necessary. But once enough of our lives depend on these systems, the distinction between owning something and being continuously authorized to use it starts getting blurry. And gaming is probably just the easiest early example because we notice immediately when a game disappears. It gets more uncomfortable when the same logic moves into cars, appliances, professional software, personal archives and devices whose physical hardware we actually paid for. The darker version of this future probably won’t arrive through some cinematic cyberattack where everything switches off at midnight. It would be much less obvious. A feature here becomes account bound. Another product requires permanent authentication. An old service closes. Something stops receiving updates. A company changes its terms. A platform decides a ten year old product is no longer worth maintaining. Twenty years later everyone is still surrounded by things they technically purchased, but fewer of those things can function without permission from infrastructure they do not control. Maybe regulation stops that trajectory. Maybe consumers eventually start demanding offline fallbacks and stronger ownership rights. Maybe companies themselves realize that permanent access is a selling point. Nothing about the direction is inevitable. But I do think we should be paying attention while the meaning of “buy” is still being rewritten, because once an entire economy is built around conditional access, changing it afterward will be much harder. At what point does a product stop being something you own and become something you are merely allowed to keep using?

• 
  madz (@LeBaNeSe_PrO) reported 23 minutes ago

  @UbisoftSupport Hi Ubisoft Support, I’m having a problem with Far Cry 5 online co-op/Arcade on PS5. I keep getting “The session you are trying to join is currently not available” — Error: Bookworm-9BF4CF37. I’ve tried everything on your website but same issue and im On PS5

• 
  ZerooSkil (@swoerd) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation Looks like they suddenly have the technology for female characters to look better Hey Ubisoft? @Ubisoft Yall next to fix your agenda pushing woke nonsense? Or whatsup here

• 
  DerUntergangGang (@UntergangGang) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Majewra **** having to login to third party game services. I shouldn’t have to login to Uplay to play The Settlers or Rockstar Game Launcher to play GTA IV.

• 
  Indignation (@Rufter91) reported 29 minutes ago

  @UbisoftSupport Hello, my ubisoft connect account has just been suspended because of, apparently, too many failed login attempts, even though I didnt attempt to login. Now I am unable to play a game that I own on steam. Any way you can help me please?

• 
  TGM_dryo (@dryo88) reported 30 minutes ago

  @3denFPS WE LET IT FLOP? I'll explain, THEY,Ubisoft, never gave Mark Rubin(Studio director) an actual FPS focused engine, they gave him the same engine as "The Division" they burned an entire year trying to patch engine issues due to that fact

• 
  Jack🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 (@purchase_jack) reported 33 minutes ago

  @UbisoftFR @GhostRecon any plans to fix some of the bugs that have been introduced through the latest 60fps patch, for ghost recon wildlands?

• 
  Tom Mohrmann (@Gamer311363) reported 33 minutes ago

  @xD4rkSoundx @KARNAGEclan XDefiant was unpolished and had netcode und Problems and was cut cause Ubisoft didnt have any money.

• 
  Xofur (@Xofurorcharlton) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft Fix siege bro that’s YOUR only good game