Ubisoft Connect Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  keworrk (@keworrk) reported 6 minutes ago

  @JariSpectre That's true, the game had a huge potential but people didn't wanted to give XDefiant the time he needed to fix everything and ubisoft choosed to give up without really trying like always. I just wish we could do something to revive XDefiant, the game deserve better.

• 
  JT, Game feedback (@T22Jarrod) reported 7 minutes ago

  Ubisoft has the biggest commitment issues!

• 
  Dead Hardware (@deadhardware) reported 9 minutes ago

  @devildog2984 @TheCartelDel @TheMattEffect_ Ubisoft needed it to do those numbers because they have 19,000 employees for some dumbass reason. They need every game to be the biggest hit ever because they won't fix their cost base.

• 
  BazzieMazzie (@LazzieMan2626) reported 10 minutes ago

  @piecaruso97 @partialmean8 ???? you would need to bribe 27 people who were with them and most likely it would have been blown whistles and gotten them into trouble ubisoft doesnt have money to give and risk it to be caught

• 
  MahagonyWell (@MahagonyWell) reported 12 minutes ago

  @quanzBAYBAY And the little ******** casuals are the problem, they don't complain, they don't have standards, they will support whatever dogshit vomit all big companies feed them. Just like 2k games, or Ubisoft, or EA. They'll support companies no matter what flavour of **** they are fed.

• 
  EvrythingWillBeOk (@EvrythingO) reported 14 minutes ago

  @UndineImpera @Pirat_Nation Actually it did, Ubisoft problems lies elsewhere they had 20k employees even more at the peak and stupid centralized system for making games woke dei Paris headquarters, good thing they fired them, I have high hopes for their future games

• 
  Aether 🗡️ (@AetherScore22) reported 14 minutes ago

  @SynthPotato Damn camera cut rm double murders, what's the problem with ubisoft? Nobody likes it and everyone asks to take it out on their discord

• 
  A Good Shepherd (@AgentSIMMONS_AL) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Npweezy215 @oliver_drk Ubisoft Plus was on the service before they hiked the price. I think most gamers paying for GAME Pass would prefer having Call of Duty over a trial for sports.

• 
  (MaDness) (@MaD1n3ss) reported 19 minutes ago

  @J19_Gaming89 I dont think the side content was the problem. Most of it wasn't great butnit was how if felt like an ubisoft game. Crimson desert has alot of fluff but not only is it optional but you have to seek it out its not cluttering your experience.

• 
  Achilles, not really it is Charles, unfortunately (@CHARLESLOVESTV6) reported 21 minutes ago

  @TheRealZephryss Ah its ubisoft, but ok, not the same, though, if it was uncharted 5 hell yeah. Or tlou3, also I heard a rumour saying naughty dogs woke trash space game is delayed indefinitely trouble at the former top dog of playstation. Also no more pc releases of ps singleplayer games.

• 
  RasKovitch (@DoGputi) reported 24 minutes ago

  @TheHiddenOneAC @xj0nathan dude its just skill issues , like i dont understand why everything it has to be ubisoft fault its getting boring

• 
  LazyGamer (@LazyTechGamer) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Bilboswaggends4 To be fair other publishers do it as well including Ubisoft and EA so that’s not the problem. Like I said for awhile now they should have had option to pay for GP for year as cheaper price then monthly cost like everyone else. It mean they will have a much more users long term

• 
  Jonah 🎮 (@TheACMJS) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BelizaireKenny I want to be clear it is NOT a "great" game nor is it a "good" AC game. Playing as a black protagonist wasn't ever an issue and you know it. The issue stems from a split narrative and constant back peddling from Ubisoft themselves over historical accuracy and stolen/AI art/assets

• 
  RubenVsTheWorld (@RubenDyb1) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft @UbisoftSupport You have now successfully locked me out of being able to access the offline games I've bought and paid for. I'm not even able to write a support ticket to tell you how retarded your company is. Your joke of a game launcher: "An error occurred while trying to send your request. Please try again later." Website: "You're blocked from logging in due to repeated failed attempts. Please come back later." Your support site: "Please log in to your account to open a support case." When the Ubisoft ticker reaches its final destination of $0 I hope you will be able to understand that it is because you are all retarded.

• 
  Gareth Walker (@Revision_124c41) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Grummz AAA needs to re-evaluate how it's spending its money. Not throwing money at the problem. A lot of the time what they are spending on is way out of scope of what is expected for AAA. I mean hear is the definition of AAA: "AAA is an informal industry classification for high-budget, high-profile video games developed by large studios and distributed by major publishers." It just means a bit more to get that extra sheen that a AA can't quiet reach. Let's be fair here AA while improved a lot over the years isn't able to reach certain plateaus. Expedition 33 had its fair share of issues that I wouldn't have encountered in a AAA game. Might have featured a bit more content as a AAA game. AAA doesn't mean, it has to be open world or have live services. That's just Self Destructive Game Development that exists in the same venn diagram bubble as chasing industry trends instead of setting them. While niether of those two things are inherently evil in the industry, they are a problem when that is all gamers have to play. Variety is the spice of life and 30 failing live services would make anyone turn their nose up at the selection. Then blowing those budgets on ideologies instead of just crafting believable worlds, is art trying to force life to imitate it, instead of the other way around. That's a sure fire way to set your wallet on fire (literally) instead of your points of sale (figuratively) with customers demanding your product. This idea of AA vs AAA is ridiculous, it has nothing to do with either category. It boils down to those with extra blowing corporate money on bullshit schemes instead of doing as they are meant to function. Not enough money to build engine tech. Ubisoft has had 3 long running engines at its disposal that it could have easily challenged Unreal Engine by distributing to other vendors, but they don't have enough confidence in their games to release the tech and license it. A competing model would have been nice. Same applies to Fox Engine, Decima, Crystal Tools, Luminous Engine, RE Engine, and countless others. That could have helped pay for development as well as lead to development standards improving significantly. Better tools, better games. Competitive engine tool suites, competitive improvements in that space. Meanwhile we have morons like Yves Guilmote talking about the AAAA game and driving his publishing company and development studios into the ground while trying to influence culture instead of letting culture influence his product. Xbox is toast so long as they don't come to grips with these problems. Switching to UE5 from slipstream(?) probably one of the dumber things they've done. Glad Activision didn't pull the same **** with the CoD engine and finally unified their tech. say what you will about BLOPS7, the game has become infinitely more stable than entries in the franchise from 5 years ago and has started to allow them to really start dialing up features and bring back old ones that weren't easily ported between two separate engines. What about Id Tech? They have this bad *** engine used for doom, what is even happening there. Miss use of resources.