Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.

• Sign in (70%)
• Online Play (14%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Matchmaking (2%)
• Game Crash (2%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Brussels	Glitches	3 days ago
Grenoble	Online Play	4 days ago
Orléans	Online Play	7 days ago
Orléans	Sign in	7 days ago
Chatham	Sign in	8 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  SomalianGamer (@sharmake25) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Stormzy010 @HazzadorGamin Only Xbox has a limited potential of reach to monetize so they should either try one last time or go full 3rd party platform and stop the console so that they can put their GP service on PS and Nintendo similar to EA and Ubisoft.

• 
  Pirat_Nation 🔴 (@Pirat_Nation) reported 7 minutes ago

  According to a new report from Insider Gaming the next Ghost Recon game, codenamed Project OVR, is facing development problems. The report says the game recently failed to reach internal alpha goals, leading to management changes. Sources also claim developers have been dealing with unrealistic deadlines Rumors inside Ubisoft suggest that if things do not improve, the project could be rebooted or canceled in favor of a different game.

• 
  LazyGamer (@LazyTechGamer) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Bilboswaggends4 To be fair other publishers do it as well including Ubisoft and EA so that’s not the problem. Like I said for awhile now they should have had option to pay for GP for year as cheaper price then monthly cost like everyone else. It mean they will have a much more users long term

• 
  The Rascals Lounge Podcast (@RascalsLounge) reported 11 minutes ago

  @R6esports @R6esports @Ubisoft Please fix Unranked. It's so unbalanced that it's becoming unbearable to play. Mixing Copper and Bronze players with Plats, Diamonds, and Champs doesn't make Unranked fun. No map bans either? what are you guys thinking? Just make Unranked the same as Ranked, but without the rank gains or losses. Simple.

• 
  SirD 🇺🇸 (@Sir_Dammed) reported 11 minutes ago

  @emceekhan So what's the point of creating a product at all, if not to earn money? Why are people putting in 5+ years creating single player games, if the goal is not a return on their time and cost investment? If investors are just handing them funds to merely exist, idk, sounds like that's not a sustainable business model and that if consumers aren't purchasing their products, they're going to have a problem. Ubisoft crashed/burned. BioWare is crashing/burning. They're not the only ones, and they both monetized their products through live service.

• 
  mcSHMUPS (@pewdypew) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation The problem is ubisoft owns the franchise

• 
  LazyThinker | Nemesis ✦ Apechain🦴🦍| | ETHGas ⛽ (@LazySinker) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Gh0stsNFT Big deal? This is so elementary Projects nowadays doing more than this Hey @Ubisoft is @XFunkeda one of your people? Nothing but trouble in web3. ****

• 
  Air_Rick_Charm_Ella (@irRickCharmElla) reported 18 minutes ago

  @heelvsbabyface @Ashikenshinyu What makes this especially funny is that everybody told them it wasn't going to "resonate", they had a full 6 years or whatever, to fix it, and they still got caught with their pants down. Ubisoft deserves everything that's happening to them. They earned it.

• 
  MakattackTDFAM (@TDFAMwithMak) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Grummz There is an easy fix, don't buy anything live service, and never buy anything Ubisoft puts out.

• 
  Gareth Walker (@Revision_124c41) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Grummz AAA needs to re-evaluate how it's spending its money. Not throwing money at the problem. A lot of the time what they are spending on is way out of scope of what is expected for AAA. I mean hear is the definition of AAA: "AAA is an informal industry classification for high-budget, high-profile video games developed by large studios and distributed by major publishers." It just means a bit more to get that extra sheen that a AA can't quiet reach. Let's be fair here AA while improved a lot over the years isn't able to reach certain plateaus. Expedition 33 had its fair share of issues that I wouldn't have encountered in a AAA game. Might have featured a bit more content as a AAA game. AAA doesn't mean, it has to be open world or have live services. That's just Self Destructive Game Development that exists in the same venn diagram bubble as chasing industry trends instead of setting them. While niether of those two things are inherently evil in the industry, they are a problem when that is all gamers have to play. Variety is the spice of life and 30 failing live services would make anyone turn their nose up at the selection. Then blowing those budgets on ideologies instead of just crafting believable worlds, is art trying to force life to imitate it, instead of the other way around. That's a sure fire way to set your wallet on fire (literally) instead of your points of sale (figuratively) with customers demanding your product. This idea of AA vs AAA is ridiculous, it has nothing to do with either category. It boils down to those with extra blowing corporate money on bullshit schemes instead of doing as they are meant to function. Not enough money to build engine tech. Ubisoft has had 3 long running engines at its disposal that it could have easily challenged Unreal Engine by distributing to other vendors, but they don't have enough confidence in their games to release the tech and license it. A competing model would have been nice. Same applies to Fox Engine, Decima, Crystal Tools, Luminous Engine, RE Engine, and countless others. That could have helped pay for development as well as lead to development standards improving significantly. Better tools, better games. Competitive engine tool suites, competitive improvements in that space. Meanwhile we have morons like Yves Guilmote talking about the AAAA game and driving his publishing company and development studios into the ground while trying to influence culture instead of letting culture influence his product. Xbox is toast so long as they don't come to grips with these problems. Switching to UE5 from slipstream(?) probably one of the dumber things they've done. Glad Activision didn't pull the same **** with the CoD engine and finally unified their tech. say what you will about BLOPS7, the game has become infinitely more stable than entries in the franchise from 5 years ago and has started to allow them to really start dialing up features and bring back old ones that weren't easily ported between two separate engines. What about Id Tech? They have this bad *** engine used for doom, what is even happening there. Miss use of resources.

• 
  Bluesheep (@bluesheep100) reported 19 minutes ago

  @weirdphil @Pirat_Nation Basically, Ubisoft and epic are mad that Valve's price parity enforcement prevents them from using pricing to coerce gamers to use other storefronts that provide a worse service. Reminder that the Epic store launched without a ******* cart.

• 
  Spoil-t (@Cynickal_Bane) reported 19 minutes ago

  @RealKingiman @trending_tony That's not the issue. People want the game to be playable after the publisher pulls the plug. We don't want what Ubisoft did to the Crew where they legit took the game away from people.

• 
  SPΞCTΞR (@SpecterGr1d) reported 22 minutes ago

  @JezCorden As much as I am against some of the stuff they do, they don't need to. Microsoft is a software company, a very dominant one at that. THAT IS THEIR LANE. Microsoft literally could rival steam if they focused on that aspect. They could find a way to flip gamepass into a service that Sony may agree to like they did with ubisoft classics, Microsoft we don't want your new games day one, but if you archive your older titles into a tier that benefits our plus customers, hey why not? To me that gives Microsoft leverage. There is obviously interest in their products from the reaction of Eday and the sales of FH5. They just need to find a way.

• 
  Shadow Stone (@LSXGOD812) reported 22 minutes ago

  Live service games are the biggest scam in gaming history. Companies like Ubisoft and EA killed single player experiences so they could milk you with battle passes and $70+ seasons forever. Games like The Division or Anthem showed us the future: empty promises, server shutdowns, and dead player bases. Bring back complete games on release no always online bs man.

• 
  entwinedspace7 (@entwinedsp71971) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Vara_Dark Not surprised, what did they expect telling their customers not to buy their games. They acted as if they had some infinite money glitch unlocked. Funny thing is Expedition 33 could've been a ubisoft game.

• 
  Timmy Trooner (@lgbtarefreaks) reported 25 minutes ago

  @TheCrewGame as always with ubisoft it's players, not sales. Myriads of people try games with their ****** subscription service and never play them again after.

• 
  cloudy ☁️ (@Cloudy_R6) reported 28 minutes ago

  please Ubisoft wake tf up n fix your game - DMRs out - Shields nerf to the ground - nerf thorn 1.5x or LMG Meta was so much better

• 
  Walkabo (@soaplexi) reported 30 minutes ago

  is this tweet funded by ubisoft and live service investors

• 
  ItzNuyxz (@matthewspigner6) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft FIX ******* SIEGE TS IS CRAZY THIS MATCHMAKING IS *** AND THE ******* **** WHERE IM FACING ******* CHAMPS AND CHEATERS AS A PEAK GOLD 1 ON PC LIKE ******* KYS IF YOU AINT GONNA DO ANYTHING

• 
  Jonah, King of Whales (@TheSponchMaster) reported 41 minutes ago

  @IGN Literally every gamer: "SCREW LIVE SERVICE AND WE'RE SICK OF AC RPG AND WE WANT MORE HISTORICAL AUTHENTICITY!" Ubisoft: "Why aren't gamers buying our Historically Bankrupt Live-Service Assassin's Creed RPG?"

• 
  Jakub (@vthj_) reported 42 minutes ago

  ubisoft fix your ******* game please, 100fps is unplayable

• 
  BazzieMazzie (@LazzieMan2626) reported 42 minutes ago

  @piecaruso97 @partialmean8 ???? you would need to bribe 27 people who were with them and most likely it would have been blown whistles and gotten them into trouble ubisoft doesnt have money to give and risk it to be caught

• 
  PepThird💀 (@PepThird) reported 42 minutes ago

  @PaulTassi Hate ubisoft all you want but they always maintain their live service games (except xdefiant that game is very odd indeed)

• 
  Rino🚀 (@RinoTheBouncer) reported 47 minutes ago

  @OzzinaArcane The industry-wide problem is that games aren’t being made fun. They are prioritizing design choices that are totally different from what 90s and 00s games did. Bloated games, not fun mechanics, emphasis on “retaining players”, everything feeling like a chore, uninspired characters, storytelling, even cutscenes are boring. Everything looks visually stunning, yes, but lacking any soul or direction. I played Resident Evil remakes and Requiem like 5-8 times each, and yet I jump from one main quest to another ignoring side stuff in most Sony, Ubisoft, Bethesda games. Why? Because I feel bored, I feel like I’m doing a job not playing a game for fun. Imagine just how uninteresting something’s gotta be when repeating something else that you already played 4 times prior, sometimes even a remake, is more fun than something you’re playing for the first time…

• 
  howie2 (@Jackhowerton2) reported 48 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft @UbisoftSupport @Rainbow6Game - this is ridiculous. Every single delta pack I have opened has been a duplicate. What is the point?!? I just want the MP7 black ice and every purple rarity I get is a duplicate. FIX IT

• 
  DoYou K Now The Brokeboi Insider (@wllmlew) reported 51 minutes ago

  @JusticeSolid @PoniesTearsHQ @JeremyBrouwer why is it people like to bring up "well they removed COD and it's still more expensive" do you guys forget there were other things added that caused the price to increase to $30 that are still available. $3 increase for an added $20 value Fortnite Crew - $12/month standalone Ubisoft Classics- $8/month standalone. not to mention adding more day ones to the service

• 
  John GameFix (@John_GAMEFIX) reported 56 minutes ago

  @ForeignG59 @UbisoftSupport @Ubisoft What's the issue?

• 
  Slayer (@Slayerdps) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation The game was long af. Nothing the incel troglodytes says matters. The actual issue was ubisoft bloat.

• 
  RoboticsDave (@DavidLo05086582) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Sora_1303 @jondelarroz Alexios. That one of the reasons people preferred kassandra. She was actually only supposed to be the main lead but Ubisoft thought people would have an issue with just her. This was way before they started pushing females in a lot of games

• 
  Hank Scorpio (@Eldowzo1) reported 58 minutes ago

  @KeemaMr Apple Arcade, EA play and Ubisoft + (which also gives DLC I am sure ) no one has problems with these services even though they give games day one in there respective services