Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.

• Sign in (60%)
• Online Play (21%)
• Glitches (15%)
• Matchmaking (4%)
• Game Crash (1%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Dieppe	Online Play	2 days ago
Villefranche-sur-Saône	Sign in	3 days ago
Ciudad Jardín	Glitches	3 days ago
Montréal	Sign in	4 days ago
Haguenau	Sign in	4 days ago
Val-d'Or	Sign in	5 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  snottiestermine 🇳🇱 (@snottiestermine) reported 5 minutes ago

  @GhostRecon Can you please fix ghost recon future soldiers you can't start the campaign says can't connect with Ubisoft server

• 
  YourFavouritePixel (@YFPixel) reported 6 minutes ago

  @EdwardSwardt @TheRealZephryss the problem here is that Ubisoft finished the Juno Arc in the UPRISING Comics, which is WHY the franchise declined They have no outliner

• 
  Austin Bell (@Sh0wYaH0wda) reported 8 minutes ago

  Updating it first like especially like apps like Ubisoft or Steam or the Game Pass app or Xbox app whatever have you when there’s way more features and stuff on it then just the games or like Xbox my rewards were reset for the daily login to the PC app because of (3)

• 
  OCD Gamer (@OCDGamerNZ) reported 8 minutes ago

  Hey @Ubisoft. See.. you have this game called Wildlands... I went to play it with friends today and the update broke co op entirely... It really put a damper on my stream 👍 Can you fix it. A friend paid full price just to join and now you've kind of put out that spark and it's a shame. Thanks #starshiptroopers Extermination for being an indie game that actually works online. Fix #wildlands #ghostrecon

• 
  The Raven (@RavenMentore) reported 11 minutes ago

  Calling long-time Assassin’s Creed fans “gatekeepers” because they want Assassin’s Creed to retain the identity that made them fans in the first place completely misses the point. A franchise evolving is not the same thing as a franchise being able to become *anything* simply because the Assassin’s Creed logo is on the box. Fans asking for social stealth, parkour, grounded historical storytelling, Assassins vs Templars, meaningful modern-day lore and the design philosophy that defined the classic games aren't trying to stop other people having fun. They're asking Ubisoft not to abandon the qualities that made Assassin’s Creed distinctive. And dismissing criticism as a “hate crusade” or “Twitter engagement farming” isn't an argument. People are allowed to dislike the direction of a franchise they have supported for years. There is also an obvious difference between mythology existing within Assassin’s Creed lore through the Isu and turning mythology into an excuse for increasingly fantastical RPG content. The older games managed science fiction, historical fiction and mystery without forgetting what kind of series they were. Want the RPG games? Fine. Enjoy them. Want mythology? Fine. But stop pretending that people asking **Assassin’s Creed to actually feel like Assassin’s Creed** are somehow the problem. Criticism isn't gatekeeping.

• 
  The Raven (@RavenMentore) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Sainte_XIII I actually think there's a lot here I agree with, particularly the point that some of the problems people associate with modern AC didn't suddenly appear with Origins. The older games absolutely had contradictions between the **fantasy of being an Assassin** and what the gameplay allowed. Ezio could dress incredibly conspicuously, walk around covered in weapons and eventually slaughter groups of guards with very little difficulty. Brotherhood's counter-kill chains especially pushed combat toward a power fantasy rather than making open combat something an Assassin genuinely wanted to avoid. Where I'd differ slightly is that I don't think Assassin's Creed necessarily needs to become a conventional hardcore stealth game like Styx. AC1's original idea of stealth was actually quite distinctive because it wasn't primarily about hiding in darkness — it was about **hiding in plain sight**. Social blending, scholars, crowds, benches, rooftops, manipulating suspicion, gathering information and choosing the right moment to strike were what separated AC from other stealth games. I'd rather Ubisoft take that philosophy much further. And that's partly why I don't want a simple return to the “golden age” either. Those games had flaws worth fixing. Imagine an AC where clothing affects detection, conspicuous weapons attract attention, social stealth is systemic rather than contextual, guards remember suspicious behaviour, combat against large groups is genuinely dangerous, and escaping after an assassination matters as much as reaching the target. Then following the Creed wouldn't merely be something characters discuss in cutscenes — **the mechanics would encourage you to behave like an Assassin.** So I think you're right that the seeds were there early. Where I'm more optimistic is that I don't see those flaws as proof the original concept failed. I see them as ideas Assassin's Creed **never fully developed to their potential.**

• 
  y (@yigitaky590) reported 16 minutes ago

  @UbisoftSupport After this connection problem, my account was hacked and I can no longer access it. Please help, it's been days! @UbisoftSupport @Ubisoft

• 
  Nope (@JanVac91) reported 18 minutes ago

  @GTAVInewz It's not an issue. Ubisoft created so many massive empty open world that shows how dimension doesn't matter if the world is empty. Also do you want to spend 10 minutes in PLANE to reach the opposite edge of the map?

• 
  NBDY (@NBDY2k) reported 19 minutes ago

  @YtfhR6 @Ubisoft the anticheat isnt the issue tbh its **** like always lol they somehow just ****** the rollback system

• 
  Gaim Ready (@GaimReady) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Iron_Will07 @NerdyAttorney88 Yes, but if you have a disc you still have access. It's like an antique, things with age go up in price because it becomes priceless. Especially if the game is delisted. Like, a long time ago you could buy fine china for pennies, but now it's extremely expensive because they don't make it anymore and it's considered and antique. From your logic, you'd have a problem with that price as a bar to entry, without considering the priceless nature of the artifact. It's not complicated. You can't do anything about the pricing with a game this old. Digital Games aren't going to lower the price, especially when you are using an older delisted game as an example. And that access is not guaranteed. People lost access to the crew when Ubisoft took it offline and people paid for that game. So it's not outside the realm of possibility when you allow Sony or Xbox to retain a monopoly over their store. It will not go in your favor, and it hasn't before.

• 
  thed.vawaifu (@KevinGame2013) reported 31 minutes ago

  @SamSpade2501 @SuperSisi And soon koei techmo will end up as Ubisoft and continue making bad decisions and release flop after flop but at least they don't release in a buggy broken and unfinished state like ubisoft and EA

• 
  The Hidden One (@TheHiddenOneAC) reported 33 minutes ago

  I came across this old Ubisoft video about Studio Alice, and it explains so much as to why writing quality and standards have completely declined from back then to now. So basically, Ubisoft back in the day during their prime era created an entire internal group to improve the quality of their writing. Writers would bring in their scripts to get another set of eyes on them, and then have problems pointed out, and actually be challenged when something wasn't working. Corey May in this video talks about how important it was for writers to have somewhere to go for HONEST feedback. He talks about when he was writing games himself, there were times where he had nobody to turn to for help or guidance. Nobody to look at his work and tell him what they thought. Studio Alice was partly his attempt to give the writers the support system he wished he had. He says writers would come to him and basically say, "I need your help. I would love it if I could show you my work and you could tell me what you think of it." What is said at 4:57 literally describes the current state of Ubisoft writing quality. Lowkey, she kinda foreshadowed today's Ubisoft. I find this so funny because watching this video after my tweet about the Ubisoft writer seemingly being oblivious to how much worse the new Black Flag Resynced writing feels compared to the old really puts things into perspective.

• 
  Zephryss⛩️ (@TheRealZephryss) reported 33 minutes ago

  Assassin’s Creed needs the right balance for every type of AC game. Both classic AC and RPG AC games are important for the future of the franchise as there is now a huge fanbase on both sides. But there hasn’t been a pure new Assassins vs. Templars game in the last 10 years since 2016. Mirage was actually good and had that classic Assassin’s Creed feeling but it was too short. Black Flag Resynced is a remake, not a new original game. In the last 10 years we’ve had 4 big RPG games, 1 remake and 1 short classic AC game. This is the imbalance I’m talking about. Now if Ubisoft makes only classic AC games for the next 10 years, I’ll be angry too. The same issue applies here. I also agree that Origins was the perfect RPG game with a good story. But starting with Odyssey, things changed a lot, with bad writing, bad cutscenes, bad stories, bad dialogue, and bad quests becoming a recurring problem. Ubisoft got used to it and didn't care about it as the sales numbers are good. But it became a big problem at a later stage. That's why we’re still getting complaints about the writing and cutscenes. Ubisoft has forgotten the origins of the franchise and changed its direction from one path to another for money and sales numbers. Yes changes are needed and evolution is important but you can’t completely forget the core Assassin’s Creed pillars. If we had gotten 3 big AC RPG games and 3 new classic AC games in the last 10 years, there probably wouldn’t be this level of division and controversy. I’m not gatekeeping anything. I’ve supported both AC RPG fans and classic AC fans from day one on this platform. I started making content with AC Shadows and I have more than 500 hours of playtime in it. I also have over 1000 hours in Odyssey and Valhalla, which is more than my combined playtime from AC1 to Syndicate. Everyone knows I’ve made more content about the AC RPG games than the classic games. But I’m an AC creator. I just want the best for this franchise and I want to see both sides of the fanbase happy and together because of Ubisoft’s future decisions. At the end of the day, it’s all about the fans, what they want to play, and what they enjoy. No one can stop you from enjoying a game. If I’ve unknowingly hurt anyone’s feelings with my previous posts, I’m sorry.

• 
  Kai Cabero (@kai_cabero) reported 37 minutes ago

  65-70% of every founder, BD lead, and sales director I speak to says the same thing "We hired an agency. Spent months explaining our product. They nodded, took notes, and came back with leads who still didn't understand what we do." And in deep tech, AI, robotics, and SaaS this problem is terminal Because your buyers are technical Your product is complex And most salespeople can't speak the language well enough to get a $50M infrastructure company to take a meeting seriously So I built a process that removes that barrier completely I call it Strategy Map Selling Traditional sales: unclear expectations, 5 calls, endless back and forth, implementation feels slow, you're seen as a salesman Strategy Map Selling: prospects see clear deliverables upfront, two steps only - triage and onboarding, implementation feels immediate, you're positioned as a problem solver That's it No 12-step sequence No 6-month nurture campaign No hoping the prospect remembers who you are after call number 4 Triage confirms fit Strategy map shows the path Onboarding starts the clock Enterprise sales cycles that used to take 3-12 months compress to weeks Not because of a clever script but because clarity and structure move faster than persuasion every single time I've had conversations with C-suites at Fox, Samsung, Ubisoft, Avalanche & Lenovo None of those conversations happened because someone was a great salesman They happened because the infrastructure was right, the message resonated, and the process removed all the friction between interest and signed contract That's the whole game Comment the word "Strategy" and i'll send over a video showing how this system works

• 
  𝓑𝓲𝓰 𝓑𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓴𝓼 (@INDOLENTRAZOR) reported 37 minutes ago

  @kaz_maniandevil Also what’s up with Rayman being in stuff now, the whole franchise seemingly ******* DIED and like after the Mario + Rabbids dlc he started being exponentially more relevant I wonder if Ubisoft had like any sort of rights issue or if they just genuinely fully forgot 😭😭

• 
  Patrick PJ Realmuto $BUBBLE 🫧🫧🫧🫧🫧 (@JammedDoor) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Rainbow6Game Fix the ******* game. Change the rating to PG13. No blood, no limbs. If I remember they cursed Ubisoft... Soft *** **** apparently.

• 
  Topher Morris (@Goldenfoxx) reported 39 minutes ago

  @RavenMentore @K__Med If the problem was bias alone, we wouldn't have been having this conversation, culturally, for TWELVE YEARS now. The problem, much like influencers who have relationships with Ubisoft, is that Kotaku, IGN, etc's biases are bought and paid for.

• 
  oscar martinez (@ockmartinez) reported 40 minutes ago

  @white_raven_1 @GhostRecon Are you guys playing on steam , i have had no issues on the ubisoft app , thats weird i see a lot of people having issues with this game

• 
  Bloxycolah (@Bloxr6) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft can we just nerf the ******* tcsg already? Its been broken for nearly 2 years now. It just flew under the radar because everyone still had acog 75 damage is ludicrous, especially with how little recoil there actually is for it.

• 
  Tom Mohrmann (@Gamer311363) reported 45 minutes ago

  @yuhMaxine @Nocturnal2002 So many People don’t get what happend to XDefiant. The Game had Problems in Terms of Motivation to Grind, Gunplay, TTK, Netcode and ultimately Ubisoft had a Financial Crisis and XDefiant Wasnt Going to be a Profit for at least 2 more years. Thats what killed XDefiant, Not SBMM

• 
  ezdev (@ezjpzy) reported 47 minutes ago

  @GameStalgiaX Ubisoft account login

• 
  Mostly Positive Reviews (@mpr_reviews) reported 47 minutes ago

  @HaanSoloD1 @AthienoR6 This has nothing to do with degradation issues. It started happening to all Ubisoft games after a windows update / microcode update. Avatar wouldnt even open, sane with SW Outlaws. Those got fixed, but the older games take forever to load in. Disabling e-cores and HT also fixes it. It's a Ubisoft launcher bug, not an Intel issue.

• 
  Jack🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 (@purchase_jack) reported 48 minutes ago

  @UbisoftFR @GhostRecon any plans to fix some of the bugs that have been introduced through the latest 60fps patch, for ghost recon wildlands?

• 
  Richard Loveridge (@selnor1983) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Colteastwood Think the issue is the hype around Marvel Insomniac games isnt there anymore. I have the same feeling about Wolverine as I do about a new Ubisoft game. Just have veryittle interest in Spiderman 3 with a Wolverine skin. Insomniac should forgrt Marvel and make something OG.

• 
  StoneRose (@StoneRose95) reported 54 minutes ago

  @UbisoftSupport @Ubisoft fix the bug in Wildlands my headgear keeps getting removed from my characters and teammates.

• 
  goose (@strongestgoose) reported 56 minutes ago

  @WoodysGamertag @UbisoftSupport Ubisoft is a easily the worst gaming company. I pray for their demise. “Be comfortable not owning games you’ve purchased” *** be comfortable me not buying your slop you French ***** Hope ur friend gets his issue resolved

• 
  Erik Wedin (@Aktivarum) reported 58 minutes ago

  @GhostRecon Update: It seems they DID fix it... Its a 25 GB large update which I think Ubisoft dropped yesterday. I am able to play Wildlands now on my Intel Core Ultra 7

• 
  Indignation (@Rufter91) reported 59 minutes ago

  @UbisoftSupport Hello, my ubisoft connect account has just been suspended because of, apparently, too many failed login attempts, even though I didnt attempt to login. Now I am unable to play a game that I own on steam. Any way you can help me please?

• 
  Yizus 🇻🇪 (@YizusOh) reported 60 minutes ago

  @Ubisoft Yeah, so when are they going to fix the accessory bug in Wildlands where equipping a helmet switches it to night-vision goggles?

• 
  Jared Brock (@jaredjbrock) reported 1 hour ago

  @RunaBytes It’s not that Marathon killed Destiny 2 directly. But it’s the choices that have occurred that is primarily what people are upset about - a lot of people just simplify it and blame Marathon. Bungie had multiple projects in development, spreading their studio thin. Bungie directly removed important personnel from Destiny to put them on Marathon, negatively impacting a noticeable amount of stuff with Destiny, such as PVP support and investment. Bungie consistently had art problems, particularly noteworthy with Marathon. Marathon didn’t come out at its intended time, which would have been prior to ARC Raiders. ARC beating them to the punch did a severe amount of damage to what Marathon could have brought in. Before all that, Bungie decided to build a major size studio in a high-cost area. And COVID occurred, rendering that investment very poor. Bad leadership calls led to Bungie dropping several expansions from Destiny 2, not only angering people that paid for that content, but also with the unintended side effect of making the new player experience completely awful, therefore heavily discouraging bringing in new players. Which is what you need for a live-service game — new players. On top of all of that, the cycle of dropping so much cool content just to remove it after the year was over was abysmal. Had a Monument of Triumph style Portal existed before that that old content could be recycled into, even if seasonally rotating out, it would do wonders for ensuring the game always felt like it had new content. Bungie also started and promised a new Nine saga. The first major entry being cool story wise but pretty bland and awful gameplay wise. The second being a Star Wars-esque expansion in terms of lore and gameplay, which isn’t for everyone. The story was building to somewhere cool, and it was just completely dropped — even with a significant amount of content already complete and near ready to ship. What angers players the most is that the story was not left in at least a good enough state. It was just up and wrapped up quickly with lingering plot threads in case they wanted to continue, which they show no plans of doing. All that to say, while it’s not directly Marathon’s fault, it is simultaneously easy to see where the investment into Marathon and not Destiny led to Destiny falling into the abyss it is. The fact that Destiny won’t continue, and yet you see a studio like Ubisoft doubling down and creating The Division 3 is just asinine. Destiny 2 was never designed to be an infinite game. That’s a decision that must be made from the start, as it is going to always be a place of catch up if you make that decision later. All we wanted was them to invest in Destiny 3 so that they could develop and realize that intent that they tried but failed to do with Destiny 2.