Ubisoft Connect status: server issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
Ubisoft Connect is a digital distribution, digital rights management, multiplayer and communications service developed by Ubisoft to provide an experience similar to the achievements/trophies offered by various other game companies. The service is provided across various platforms (PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, etc).
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Ubisoft Connect reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Ubisoft Connect. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Ubisoft Connect users through our website.
- Sign in (70%)
- Online Play (14%)
- Glitches (10%)
- Matchmaking (2%)
- Game Crash (2%)
- Hacking / Cheating (0%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Ubisoft Connect outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Brussels
|
Glitches | 1 day ago |
 Grenoble
|
Online Play | 1 day ago |
|
Orléans
|
Online Play | 5 days ago |
|
Orléans
|
Sign in | 5 days ago |
 Chatham
|
Sign in | 6 days ago |
|
Paris
|
Matchmaking | 7 days ago |
Full Outage Map
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Ubisoft Connect Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
MREVILA55 (@MREVILA55) reportedThe problem is Ubisoft.
-
MarketQuestJas (@MarketQuestJas) reported📌 EXACT SOURCES & COVERAGE: PlayStation Network Status Monitor & Service Outage Resolution Logs (June 18, 2026) Capcom Europe Corporate Communications Broadcast (@CapcomEurope - Issued June 2026) Ubisoft Developer Network - Title Update 1.1.11 & Black Tides Patch Notes Strefa Inwestorów / PAP Biznes - Bloober Team S.A. SAW: Genesis Alpha Registry & 11 bit Asset Ratings (June 18, 2026) Reuters Legal / Bloomberg Enterprise - Microsoft Shareholder Class-Action Litigation Index (Filed June 2026) TechPowerUp Silicon Core Inventory Database (July 2026 Hardware Update Manifests)
-
Meta (@zTxMeta) reported@mossy_max Unless they want to join Ubisoft in class action lawsuit any% speedrun, highly ******* doubt shits getting disabled game wide permanently. At absolute best if its a broken crucible thing, turned off in crucible only and so on.
-
BomboDiez (@bombodiez10) reported@TheDivisionGame I quit playing because it was so toxic... the PvP meta was toxic, the TTK was broken, and it was/is frustrating for new or returning players. In fact, I even stopped playing it on my phone... it's not fun, it's just frustrating @Ubisoft @TencentGames 🐒
-
ragegun (@_ragegun) reported@lmkifiwin All in service of Ubisoft, which is already hemorrhaging money and likely won't be around that much longer anyway.
-
DoYou K Now The Brokeboi Insider (@wllmlew) reported@JusticeSolid @PoniesTearsHQ @JeremyBrouwer why is it people like to bring up "well they removed COD and it's still more expensive" do you guys forget there were other things added that caused the price to increase to $30 that are still available. $3 increase for an added $20 value Fortnite Crew - $12/month standalone Ubisoft Classics- $8/month standalone. not to mention adding more day ones to the service
-
Gareth Walker (@Revision_124c41) reported@Grummz AAA needs to re-evaluate how it's spending its money. Not throwing money at the problem. A lot of the time what they are spending on is way out of scope of what is expected for AAA. I mean hear is the definition of AAA: "AAA is an informal industry classification for high-budget, high-profile video games developed by large studios and distributed by major publishers." It just means a bit more to get that extra sheen that a AA can't quiet reach. Let's be fair here AA while improved a lot over the years isn't able to reach certain plateaus. Expedition 33 had its fair share of issues that I wouldn't have encountered in a AAA game. Might have featured a bit more content as a AAA game. AAA doesn't mean, it has to be open world or have live services. That's just Self Destructive Game Development that exists in the same venn diagram bubble as chasing industry trends instead of setting them. While niether of those two things are inherently evil in the industry, they are a problem when that is all gamers have to play. Variety is the spice of life and 30 failing live services would make anyone turn their nose up at the selection. Then blowing those budgets on ideologies instead of just crafting believable worlds, is art trying to force life to imitate it, instead of the other way around. That's a sure fire way to set your wallet on fire (literally) instead of your points of sale (figuratively) with customers demanding your product. This idea of AA vs AAA is ridiculous, it has nothing to do with either category. It boils down to those with extra blowing corporate money on bullshit schemes instead of doing as they are meant to function. Not enough money to build engine tech. Ubisoft has had 3 long running engines at its disposal that it could have easily challenged Unreal Engine by distributing to other vendors, but they don't have enough confidence in their games to release the tech and license it. A competing model would have been nice. Same applies to Fox Engine, Decima, Crystal Tools, Luminous Engine, RE Engine, and countless others. That could have helped pay for development as well as lead to development standards improving significantly. Better tools, better games. Competitive engine tool suites, competitive improvements in that space. Meanwhile we have morons like Yves Guilmote talking about the AAAA game and driving his publishing company and development studios into the ground while trying to influence culture instead of letting culture influence his product. Xbox is toast so long as they don't come to grips with these problems. Switching to UE5 from slipstream(?) probably one of the dumber things they've done. Glad Activision didn't pull the same **** with the CoD engine and finally unified their tech. say what you will about BLOPS7, the game has become infinitely more stable than entries in the franchise from 5 years ago and has started to allow them to really start dialing up features and bring back old ones that weren't easily ported between two separate engines. What about Id Tech? They have this bad *** engine used for doom, what is even happening there. Miss use of resources.
-
Survivor (@survivor966) reported@assassinscreed Fix download speeds on ubisoft connect
-
Throwaway9001 (@GoonItForward) reported@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @eurogamer uplay is a subscription service
-
Slayer (@Slayerdps) reported@Pirat_Nation The game was long af. Nothing the incel troglodytes says matters. The actual issue was ubisoft bloat.
-
Jonah 🎮 (@TheACMJS) reported@BelizaireKenny I want to be clear it is NOT a "great" game nor is it a "good" AC game. Playing as a black protagonist wasn't ever an issue and you know it. The issue stems from a split narrative and constant back peddling from Ubisoft themselves over historical accuracy and stolen/AI art/assets
-
Alta_AF (@Alta_AF1979) reportedAs many bad things as I might have to say about Ubisoft, they are still supporting The Division 2 Long term support for live service games seems to be hard for people to figure out, SONY
-
Jebus (@Dat_Jebus) reported@LegacyKillaHD Its pretty funny, Ubisoft probably felt forced to take this course of action to protect its dwindling income. Problem is, people knowing about it is going to hurt them a looooot more.
-
ØØøØØ (@wyaendless) reported@Joshinken1 @Dexerto Where was this energy when you were accepting the terms of service? You are demanding that Ubisoft be held accountable for a bad TOS, but you get out of jail for free for accepting said TOS? Okay.
-
ItzNuyxz (@matthewspigner6) reported@Ubisoft @Rainbow6Game I just deranked because of a cheater are we gonna do something about that problem or we gonna keep ******* up the game
-
GameBoost (@GameBoostCom) reportedNew Far Cry and Ghost Recon games could be in serious trouble. - According to a report cited by TheGamer, both Ubisoft's next Ghost Recon game and Far Cry 7 are facing serious development issues. - Ubisoft's new Ghost Recon project has reportedly missed several internal milestones - Developers are said to be "bracing for impact" as management changes and restructuring efforts take place - Far Cry 7's development has allegedly been described as "abysmal" by Insider Gaming's Tom Henderson - Unrealistic deadlines and production difficulties are reportedly affecting both projects - The problems come during a period of broader turmoil at Ubisoft, which has been undergoing layoffs, studio closures, and company-wide restructuring - Despite the setbacks, neither game has been canceled, and development is continuing
-
keworrk (@keworrk) reported@JariSpectre That's true, the game had a huge potential but people didn't wanted to give XDefiant the time he needed to fix everything and ubisoft choosed to give up without really trying like always. I just wish we could do something to revive XDefiant, the game deserve better.
-
MakattackTDFAM (@TDFAMwithMak) reported@Grummz There is an easy fix, don't buy anything live service, and never buy anything Ubisoft puts out.
-
TheDezembro (@TheDezembro) reported@Lazzy102 @Sevvy_707 For you, maybe. But really they were both awful games in their franchises. Watered down core aspects in comparison to previous entries, had notably worse writing, and Shadows toyed with live-service elements that made it the worst experience out of the 4 RPG AC games. But anyway that wasn't even the point here. Point here was that they were games with lots of online impressions that underperformed. Veilguard, devastatingly so. Shadows is hard to tell because we didn't get any numbers besides "activations" lol which counted the people using an 18 dollar subscription service where the game was playable. But given the absolute financial shitshow that Ubisoft was in last year (& still is now) it clearly didn't do well either.
-
Walkabo (@soaplexi) reportedis this tweet funded by ubisoft and live service investors
-
Immaneed Bout tree fiddy (@BouTreeFidy) reported@Pirat_Nation Of course it's facing development problems. I'll tell you right now despite my love for Ghost recon I'll take my computer out back and beat it with a mallet before I reinstall Ubisoft launcher on there.
-
Achilles, not really it is Charles, unfortunately (@CHARLESLOVESTV6) reported@TheRealZephryss Ah its ubisoft, but ok, not the same, though, if it was uncharted 5 hell yeah. Or tlou3, also I heard a rumour saying naughty dogs woke trash space game is delayed indefinitely trouble at the former top dog of playstation. Also no more pc releases of ps singleplayer games.
-
Just Harry (@hahayeahmate) reportedRanked 3.0 matchmaking is genuinely awful. It should not be the case you have 1 decent win and then the next 3 you are unfairly matched against people who clearly should have been placed much much higher than they are! Same bs from 2.0 repackaged, fix up! @Ubisoft @Rainbow6Game
-
A Good Shepherd (@AgentSIMMONS_AL) reported@Npweezy215 @oliver_drk Ubisoft Plus was on the service before they hiked the price. I think most gamers paying for GAME Pass would prefer having Call of Duty over a trial for sports.
-
PepThird💀 (@PepThird) reported@PaulTassi Hate ubisoft all you want but they always maintain their live service games (except xdefiant that game is very odd indeed)
-
Oyasumi Bastet (@OyasumiBastet) reported@OmniStef94 Like, what happened to the outrage over GAAS, stupid amount of DLC, Always online required, and login to third party services. Why does MS get a pass where PS, and many other publishers dont, like ubisoft has a launcher, why is that an issue if Xbox live isnt?
-
WARLORD12 (@WARLORD1216424) reported@popuniversee Because Ubisoft was probably trying to turn the Prince of persia remaster into live service. Why would it take 3 or 4 years to do a remaster ? All you had to do was copy & paste, so obviously you were trying to show horn in a bunch of stuff & it ended up being in vain.
-
fearthecow (@Fearthecow93) reported@TheNCSmaster The issue is its what the average buyer wants. One of the heads at ubisoft said the reason they have these giant open world games is because its what people actually buy.
-
Danuki the Tanuki たぬき Vtuber Vチューバー (@DanukiTheTanuki) reported@Pirat_Nation The EU commission is corrupted. Was expected for them to take bribes and arrangements with the CEOs. It's why companies like Ubisoft must crash down economically, it's how you strike them down
-
BazzieMazzie (@LazzieMan2626) reported@piecaruso97 @partialmean8 ???? you would need to bribe 27 people who were with them and most likely it would have been blown whistles and gotten them into trouble ubisoft doesnt have money to give and risk it to be caught