Amazon Web Services status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon Web Services reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon Web Services users through our website.

• Website Down (83%)
• Errors (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon Web Services outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Pottstown	Website Down	4 days ago
Iztacalco	Website Down	8 days ago
Boca da Mata	Errors	19 days ago
Township of Evan	Website Down	1 month ago
New York City	Website Down	1 month ago
Ciudad Jardín	Website Down	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Web Services Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Samrat Singh (Sam) (@isamrats) reported 5 minutes ago

  @KahlonGurshaan @Rushike32313211 Yes its down , but no official confirmation posted by @awscloud yet

• 
  Chris (@Mcatbeast) reported 5 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport Apologies for the earlier frustration. Turns out it was an issue from our end! My user was accidentally deleted.

• 
  Arian van Putten (@ProgrammerDude) reported 7 minutes ago

  @QuinnyPig @awscloud Are they gonna fix that IAM identity center stored passkeys on a domain that is shared between aws orgs and accounts so I keep locking myself out of orgs when updating one?

• 
  The Trading Guy (@thetradingguy_) reported 12 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport I need resolution on this asap as I am having problem deploying my services. I am using alternative services which are costing a lot. So please resolve this and verify my account for cloudfront Case ID: 178582104300071

• 
  niknak (@niknak) reported 12 minutes ago

  @duckdb @ducklabs_com @awscloud Congrats on the check fellas but this is terrible news

• 
  Webdesign29 Création de sites internet Brest⛓️🕸️ (@Webdesign29B) reported 13 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport I tried every possible combination to get phone support. I think it either just doesn't exist or it is down. Someone did get back to me in chat in another ticket tho.

• 
  Onkar Deshpande (@i_am_onkar) reported 14 minutes ago

  @bilal_akh @awscloud what were potential issues? account compromised? keys exposed? last time this happened for me was when some keys got leaked and someone emptied my startup credits -this was 8years ago tho

• 
  Pixi Dust (@Bethco2257) reported 14 minutes ago

  @FmrRepMTG @amazon @awscloud walk into any Amazon office building at Seattle HQ and South Lake Union Amazon Seattle offices and instantly you can see with your own eyes… nearly 80% of staff are HB1 visa holders!!!! So yes, we have a big problem.

• 
  Sai Manikanta ☕ (@rebuiltWithSai) reported 15 minutes ago

  Day 19 of #JobSwitchUntilPlaced 🚀 Today's progress: ✅ Started a new Microservices project by building the User Service ✅ Solved 2 DSA problems ✅ Learned about Blob Storage (Amazon S3) One step closer to building production-ready, scalable backend systems.💪 #BuildInPublic

• 
  Mon (@mon73x) reported 16 minutes ago

  @asimrazax @AWSSupport I have the same problem. Did you fix it?

• 
  Babak (@bbkhbb) reported 17 minutes ago

  @ajassy @AWSSupport what happened to customer obsession? I would like to invite you to review the interactions on AWS support case #178605390000779. There's no better way to put this, it's a sad joke. Reps don't appear to be incentivized to solve the problem nor to do the reading

• 
  Jaimin Vaghani (@jaiminvaghani) reported 22 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport @AWSSupport Appreciate the reply, but I've heard this exact message every day this week. At what point does a 5+ day production-down case qualify for actual escalation? Please have an escalation manager or TAM contact me directly, the Support Center loop isn't working.

• 
  Vinit Upadhyay (@vinitcodes) reported 25 minutes ago

  @kirodotdev @awscloud @AWSSupport issues still persist i didn't got any update

• 
  Haresh Kukkreja (@HandbrakeHarry) reported 32 minutes ago

  @amazonIN @awscloud Your app seems to be down. Unable to contact Customer Support

• 
  Jaimin Vaghani (@jaiminvaghani) reported 34 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport @AWSSupport Day 6. Production down. Same templated reply on Twitter, in the case, everywhere. If a multi-day production outage doesn't qualify for real escalation, what does? Asking someone with authority to review Case 178738643800497 and respond with an actual ETA.

• 
  Jaimin Vaghani (@jaiminvaghani) reported 38 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport 5+ days, Case 178738643800497. Production down, customers impacted. Same scripted answer daily: no ETA, no updates, just "check back in a couple of hours." This needs real escalation. Please have someone with authority look at this.

• 
  zarrakh (@zarrakh) reported 38 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport @awscloud @AWSSupport as I told before, It will be just a correspondence and no solution. I have been getting correspondence since feb 2026 but no refund, despite of your team confirmed that the issue is on your side.#aws

• 
  banhchung (@banhchugxanh) reported 39 minutes ago

  @POTATOCHEAPGAM1 @trythreews @awscloud i'm so down for cloud gaming, but 5gb internet feels like a stretch

• 
  X anonyn (@OmrX304) reported 40 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport Hi team, my account is suspended due to payment rate limit (Error 880104). I've sent a DM with my Case ID & details. Could you please escalate this to the billing team urgently? Thanks

• 
  Nicholas Griffin (@ngriffin_uk) reported 44 minutes ago

  @QuinnyPig @awscloud that’s real? it looks like someone who doesnt know how to prompt made a sign in screen and didnt look at it.

• 
  Abdulkadir | Cybersecurity (@cyber_razz) reported 47 minutes ago

  ClarityCheck markets itself as a tool to detect catfishing. To verify identities. To keep you safe from liars online. Here's how it works. You upload someone's photo. ClarityCheck runs it through their reverse image search. Finds their dating profile. Their social media. Wherever that face appears. Seems solid. Except ClarityCheck just leaked 9 million photos sitting in an unsecured Amazon S3 bucket. 450 gigabytes of faces. Stored in folders labeled "faces" and "profiles." The photos came from people uploading images of strangers. Dating app screenshots. Private social accounts. Scanned prints. Photos of children. Most of these people never uploaded anything to ClarityCheck. They just got identified by someone else trying to figure out who they were. Then their face got indexed. Stored. And left wide open. For several months. The URL to access it was embedded in ClarityCheck's own website source code. The company's response: this was "temporary storage" and an "ordinary member of the public" would not have found it. An ordinary member of the public with the URL from their own website. Which is not temporary storage. That's just a server. And it wasn't invisible. You'd need 30 seconds and a basic understanding of how websites work. Now ClarityCheck says the data is "secured." A service built to prevent identity fraud just exposed millions of identities. The tool designed to catch people lying about who they are just showed everyone's actual face to anyone listening. The irony isn't subtle. It's a design flaw pretending to be an accident.

• 
  Drama Memes (@drama_meme) reported 49 minutes ago

  @cgeorgiaw @AnthropicAI @awscloud Someone tell me why this is a hard problem and you can’t just do $ diff normal.genome sick.genome ? I am guessing it’s a statistical thing, but, if it were random then how would you figure out what’s different??

• 
  Ikenna Iheanaetu (@Ikenna_dev) reported 49 minutes ago

  @awscloud Runtime request flow User → HTTPS → ALB → ECS Fargate → Container The ALB handles HTTPS using ACM and routes traffic to the ECS service. The service runs multiple tasks across Availability Zones, giving the application redundancy instead of relying on one server.

• 
  Ohm Patel (@Techieohm) reported 50 minutes ago

  “Facing some problems with @awscloud on our new product. This is the 2nd time this has happened.”

• 
  kakafa.btc (@kakafa_btc) reported 52 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport Still NO resolution after 7 days! Case ID: 17849863000462 Account hold cleared days ago, but CloudFront is STILL locked due to a backend flag sync issue. @AWSSupport keeps passing the buck. Assign a supervisor to clear this flag NOW! @awscloud #AWS #CloudFront #AWSCloud

• 
  Priyanshu (@iproductAI) reported 55 minutes ago

  I requested @awscloud to increase my Opus 4.6 V1 limit and I’ve been chatting with the AWS support team for almost 4-5 days now. They’re telling me this. Is @awscloud a government company? I mean, you guys can’t just pass the problem from one department to another. I mean, WTF? Now I have to raise my query again to sales? Why can’t you just pass this query? You already have more context about what the issue is. I can’t believe how these big MNCs are working these days. Totally absurd service from @awscloud. One more thing, please educate your support. I mean, she didn’t even know what the TPD limit is in the service quota. She literally replied the first time saying there’s only a TPM limit and no separate TPD limit.

• 
  Maciej Wilczyński (@wilczynski24) reported 58 minutes ago

  @opsolutehq @awscloud Otherwise, I believe it's not fully viable for full-range products. Example of Lovable: they have hundreds of potential use cases. That's where they are on credit-based systems rather than outcome-based systems, because you can't narrow down the overall cafeteria of use cases.

• 
  Jeremiah "SMEEgle" Castillo (@jcastillo4tx) reported 1 hour ago

  @AWSSupport @AWSSupport @awscloud small business now facing issues with clients. Have provided all details and past 2hrs downtime on production server. Case 178699777500302 with Bill B. Also case 178555512600788, open since Aug 4, no response.

• 
  ❤️‍🔥ViBe GuY_PrinCe😉 (@777PrinceFreaky) reported 1 hour ago

  Amazon has very poor service in Warranty and Claim Procedure To Customer fix this for me soon @amazonIN @awscloud @AmazonHelp

• 
  Carlos DP 🤖🇺🇸 (@carlosdponx) reported 1 hour ago

  @MarwaEldiwiny They’re not hiding it’s a G1, it’s obviously a G1 and they don’t lie if asked. I don’t advertise explicitly my robots are built on G1 either, because it’s a distraction when marketing like this. The end user doesn’t care. It’s like if you sold a SaaS product and mentioned the servers run on Amazon AWS, it’s irrelevant to the user. Their tweets are marketing posts, not technical reports. Also idk what you mean by the G1 “having a lot of issues”. It’s the most reliable and mature humanoid platform you can actually buy today (and we have no data on reliability of closed platforms).