1. Home
  2. โฏ
  3. Companies
  4. โฏ
  5. Bitfinex
Bitfinex

Bitfinex status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Bitfinex is a crypto-currency exchange trading and currency-storage platform based out of Taiwan, owned and operated by iFinex Inc. Since 2014, it has been the largest Bitcoin exchange platform, with over 10% of the exchange's trading.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Bitfinex reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Bitfinex. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Bitfinex Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Moloch6666
    Moloch (@Moloch6666) reported

    @vincent_vancode It's manipulated on the way down and up It has been discovered in court how tether is manipulating the prices with bots in cooperation with the biggest exchanges(bitfinex case).

  • netrunner_btc
    netrunner (@netrunner_btc) reported

    @bitfinex whitepaper never says it but satoshi did use "block chain" (two words) on bitcointalk by 2010

  • news_oct
    OCT News (@news_oct) reported

    CRYPTO NEWS for 27th August: โžค Bitfinex Securities Launches $50M Tokenized Nickel Raise Backed by $1.6B in Industrial Nickel. โžค UK Government Moves to Give Bank of England Formal Mandate to Support Stablecoin and Digital Money Innovation. โžค OpenAI Reveals GPT-5.6 Sol and Internal AI Agents Breached Hugging Face Systems During Reduced-Safeguard Cyber Tests. โžค Anthropic Strikes Roughly $45B Cloud Computing Deal With UK-Based AI Infrastructure Firm Nscale. โžค DeFi Development Corp Launches Free โ€œState of Solanaโ€ Dashboard Tracking Network, Staking and Validator Metrics.

  • ForeDex_Global
    ForeDex (@ForeDex_Global) reported

    Daily ForeDex CVD by Order Size (Spot) Snapshot ๐Ÿ“ธ ๐Ÿ”ธ Whales and Mega Whales Only ๐Ÿ”ธ Based on a 1 month period (1M) 1. Binance : Decreased ๐Ÿ“‰ 2. Bybit : No Change โž– 3. Bitfinex (USD) : No Change โž– 4. Bitfinex (USDT) : No Change โž– โœ… Summary: A gradual step-down was seen on Binance, with no change across Bybit, Bitfinex USD, and Bitfinex USDT. [07-16-2026]

  • daboloskov
    DAโ‚ฟOLOSKOV (@daboloskov) reported

    @BFXSecurities @paoloardoino @bitfinex Are you guys can answer to your customer? Your support form certificate is no signed anymore and outdated.

  • ThomasOyxxx
    Thomas (@ThomasOyxxx) reported

    ๐„๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฒ ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ข๐ง ๐ง๐ž๐ž๐๐ฌ ๐š ๐Ÿ๐š๐œ๐ž. ๐’๐ญ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐ฆ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐š ๐›๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ž ๐๐ข๐ง๐จ๐ฌ๐š๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐š๐ง ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐›๐ข๐ญ๐ž. Culture isnโ€™t designed. Itโ€™s discovered, usually by accident. A toy photo, a broken render, a nickname that stuck. Thatโ€™s how $FEFER was born. Not from a whitepaper, not from a marketing plan. From CT deciding a jaw that never loaded was funnier than anything a team could have scripted. โžœ First launch failed โžœ Team stepped back โžœ Community didnโ€™t That sequence matters more than people give it credit for. Most memes die the moment the original push loses steam. Fefer got a second life because the people holding it treated the token like it was worth continuing, not restarting. โžœ Relaunched on @coinsdot + @Stable โžœ Snapshot of 4,827 original holders โžœ Airdropped directly, no claim forms, nobody left behind Thatโ€™s not a small detail. Snapshotting the original holders instead of starting a fresh cap table is the difference between โ€œnew project borrowing an old jokeโ€ and โ€œsame community, new chapter.โ€ Where it stands right now: โžœ $3.9M market cap โžœ $569K liquidity โžœ Live on a USDT-powered L1 backed by Bitfinex and PayPal Ventures Stable is still early. Its identity is still being written in real time, and the projects active in it now are the ones that end up shaping what people associate with the chain later. $FEFER isnโ€™t trying to win on utility. Itโ€™s trying to win on being unforgettable, and a meme that survives its own failed launch and still gets airdropped back to the exact people who believed in it the first time is hard to forget. Nobody decides which meme becomes the face of a chain. The timeline does. ๐Ÿ‘€ Fefer didnโ€™t restart. Fefer continued. CA: 0xDEeE8f25fe3B5C33AeF78637278ACBFF23EeBFa6 Always DYOR and verify the contract before interacting. @savefefer

  • mattymaddog_89
    Matt Chad (@mattymaddog_89) reported

    @bitfinex Before your hair cut where you rugged me 60% of my BTC holdings because you got โ€œhackedโ€ **** you Iโ€™ll never forget

  • TheBull1123
    The Bull Q๐Ÿ‚ (@TheBull1123) reported

    ๐ŸšจSOMEONE JUST OPENED A $16,000,000 $XRP LONG. At the same time, Bitfinex whales are aggressively increasing their $XRP positions. Wtf is going on???

  • Bittopia_
    Bittopia (@Bittopia_) reported

    ๐Ÿงฑ 155,000 $BTC HAVE FORMED A NEW COST-BASIS CLUSTER Bitfinex reported that roughly 155,000 BTC moved into the $62Kโ€“$65K cost-basis range during the latest pullback. The zone represents about 0.7% of circulating supply and became the marketโ€™s largest onchain cost-basis concentration. Why it matters: A growing cluster during a decline can indicate that buyers absorbed supply instead of holders exiting broadly. But it is not automatic support. If price revisits the range, those holders can defend their entry, hold through volatility or become potential sellers. The signal is also mixed with thinner spot volume, a $61.5M weekly outflow from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs and defensive options positioning. Accumulation data explains positioning. It does not guarantee direction. Disclaimer: Onchain cost-basis models use estimates and should not be treated as precise trading signals. @bitfinex | $BTC #Bitcoin #OnchainData #CryptoMarkets

  • CoinliveHQ
    Coinlive (@CoinliveHQ) reported

    Bitfinex Securities has listed five tokenized notes giving eligible non-US investors economic exposure to Strategy, STRC, Metaplanet, H100 Group and Capital B. They trade against USD, USDT and Bitcoin, with fractional access from about $1.

  • samsainlove2
    samsainlove .ยฐห–โœง (@samsainlove2) reported

    @bitfinex AVOID BITFINEX ! stealing customer money !!

  • WuBlockchain
    Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) reported

    Review: Major Institutions' Bitcoin Bottom Price Predictions for This Cycle Major institutional assessments of Bitcoinโ€™s cycle bottom cluster mainly in two ranges: $50,000โ€“$60,000 and $40,000โ€“$46,000. However, some figures are base-case bottom forecasts, while others represent valuation floors, support levels or bearish scenarios. Standard Chartered said $59,000 may have marked the bottom; CryptoQuant, NYDIG and Citi identified key levels near $53,000โ€“$54,000; 10x Researchโ€™s latest model pointed to $46,628โ€“$50,732; and Galaxy Research placed its base-case bottom at $40,000โ€“$46,000. Bitfinex and 22V Research also identified potential downside toward $40,000 under weaker demand or a decisive support break, while forecasts below $40,000 mostly reflect prolonged bear-market, recession or severe stress scenarios. Forecasts from industry figures are more dispersed, ranging from around $57,000 to below $30,000. Overall, there is no unified institutional consensus that Bitcoin will bottom at $44,000โ€“$46,000.

  • midwit_retard
    wittery (@midwit_retard) reported

    @Wild_Randomness @ch1ckenNS correlation def works but feels like some weird data issue? where does this long accumulation data on bitfinex come from eve..

  • ero_crypto
    Erik (@ero_crypto) reported

    CENTRALIZED EXCHANGE ASSET FLOWS Where is capital moving across centralized exchanges this month? Looking at 30-day net flows across 65+ tracked CEXs, the picture shows a clear shift in capital and confidence between platforms. As of August 6, 2026, total CEX assets stand at $244.6B, down from $246.86B 30 days earlier โ€” a net decline of $2.26B (-0.92%). โ—พ 28 exchanges recorded inflows totaling +$893.5M โ—พ 37 exchanges saw outflows totaling -$3.15B โ—พ OKX: -$1.186B (-5.59%) โ—พ Bybit: -$604.2M โ—พ Bitfinex: +$263.91M โ—พ Deribit: +$257.36M Bitfinex and Deribit attracted the strongest inflows relative to their size, while OKX and Bybit experienced some of the largest capital outflows. The broader takeaway: capital is leaving CEXs overall, but the flow between individual platforms is telling a much more interesting story.

  • Cryptocratico
    Cryptocrat (@Cryptocratico) reported

    ๐Ÿšจ $167M BTC SHIFTS BETWEEN MAJOR EXCHANGES Approximately 2,572 BTC moved in two transactions from a Bitfinex-labeled hot wallet to Kraken-labeled addresses. This is a sizeable cross-exchange liquidity shiftโ€”not evidence of a sale. Customer withdrawals, custody, OTC settlement or liquidity management remain possible.

  • tutsiandre
    Tutsi Andre (@tutsiandre) reported

    Hey @bitfinex I've been a verified customer for many years, now you are blocking my withdrawals?

  • Difoxxn
    difoxxn (@Difoxxn) reported

    $๐—•๐—š๐—• ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—น๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฎ "๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ" ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ณ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—น๐˜† ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐˜. ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ฝ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป-๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† Bitfinex just yeeted $BGB off their platform (delisted July 3). And the "official reason"? A vague "listing qualifications review." Translation: read between the lines yourself. Meanwhile Bitget's out here launching Stocks 2.0 like it's the second coming of TradFi. Cool story. But nobody's talking about the fact that $BGB's 24h volume is a measly $10M on a $1.18B cap. That's a 0.85% vol/cap ratio. This thing trades like a ghost town, not a "top 3 exchange token." "Deflationary tokenomics" ๐Ÿคก let's fact check that real quick: Dec 2024 burn: 800M tokens. Massive, legit, impressive. Q2 2026 Morph burn: 3,010,400 tokens. That's not a burn, that's a rounding error. Someone's riding on 2024's hype with 2026's leftovers. And here's the part that should actually scare you โ€” there's NO public whale wallet breakdown for $BGB. None. Zero. Nada. An exchange that publishes monthly Proof of Reserves for 42 straight months... can't show you who's holding the bag on their own token? Make it make sense. That green candle everyone's screenshotting? Pure market beta. Zero BGB-specific catalyst behind it. You're not smart money for buying it โ€” you're just along for the market's ride. My honest take: this is a CEX with real revenue wrapped around a token with thin liquidity, a fresh tier-1 delisting, and zero whale transparency. That's not a "hold and pray" setup โ€” that's a "know your exit" setup. Growth headlines don't pay your bags. On-chain flow does. Stay sharp, don't get exit-liquidity'd. NFA, DYOR, act accordingly. #BGB #Bitget

  • AriDavidPaul
    Ari Paul (@AriDavidPaul) reported

    @nic_carter At least two of cryptoโ€™s biggest successful institutions were ponzis at points in time. Both seem today to have more than fully recovered their assets. With bitfinex-tether I think this is pretty public knowledge at this point: at one point bitfinex was insolvent and recapitalized with tether, and vice versa, so at various points each was in a ponzi state. But profits flowed, and all worked out. The principals wanted/hope for this to happen, rather than their customers eat the losses, their business fail, and possible criminal charges. IMO, this is all unethical and illegal, butโ€ฆa lot less malicious and unethical than people who run ponzis intending to exit scam. The other example is more controversial - Binance. We know customer funds were transferred from the exchange to a private trading account and gambled with (on-chain forensics, public reporting). Presumably repaid later with winnings. Why did CZ do that? I assume the same reason heโ€™s still running pumps and dumps as the worldโ€™s richest felon.

  • TAUHEED5
    2weed ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ (@TAUHEED5) reported

    @CW8900 Wtf is bitfinex whale

  • perdooky
    perdooky (@perdooky) reported

    my journey to safely custody bitcoin: first heard about bitcoin in 2011 and stored it on MyBitcoin because it was literally called MyBitcoin > website disappeared with my bitcoin started over and deposited it into Bitcoin Savings & Trust because a man named pirateat40 was paying a very sustainable 7% per week > ponzi collapsed > lost all my bitcoin started over on Mt. Gox because the exchange handling most global bitcoin volume had to be the safe one > 647,000 BTC stolen > bankruptcy > lost all my bitcoin started over on Bitfinex because exchanges had surely learned their lesson > 120,000 BTC hack > every customer received a 36% haircut and an IOU token moved what remained to BTC-e because nothing says trustworthy custodian like โ€œBTC-eโ€ > operator arrested and servers seized put the recovery stack into BitConnect because its proprietary volatility trading bot guaranteed daily returns > hey hey heyyyy > lost all my bitcoin started over on QuadrigaCX because Canada felt responsible > CEO died in India, supposed cold wallets were empty and the exchange turned out to be a ponzi > lost all my bitcoin finally learned โ€œnot your keys, not your coinsโ€ and ordered a Ledger > Ledger leaked my name, phone number and home address still had the bitcoin though, so wrapped it and deposited it into BadgerDAO because decentralized finance eliminated counterparty risk > front end compromised > lost all my bitcoin bought a Bitcoin-only, air-gapped Coldcard in 2021, generated a fresh seed and moved my long-term stack there > finally safe used the trading stack to buy UST because bitcoin was too volatile and โ€œstableโ€ was literally in the name > deposited it into Anchor for a modest 20% risk-free yield > death spiral > lost all my stable bitcoin unbanked myself with Celsius > withdrawals frozen moved to Voyager because it was publicly traded > bankruptcy started buying on FTX because Tom Brady, an arena and effective altruism felt like sufficient due diligence > bankruptcy started over on BlockFi because FTX had just rescued it > FTX bankruptcy also bankrupted BlockFi tried Gemini Earn because this time the exchange was regulated and run by two people > Genesis froze withdrawals gave up on custodians and downloaded Atomic Wallet because โ€œatomicโ€ sounded difficult to hack > $100 million hack stored my seed phrase in LastPass so I could never lose it > LastPass hackers found it before I did went back to Japan and bought on DMM because surely Japanese exchanges had learned from Mt. Gox > 4,502.9 BTC stolen > exchange shut down then in 2026 learned the Coldcard seed protecting my long-term stack had as little as 40 bits of entropy > wallet drained remotely researched multisig for three straight days, ordered a Trezor as another signer and finally achieved real cold storage > shipping provider leaked my full name, email, phone number and home address my bitcoin is now completely secure because there is none left, but fortunately everyone knows where I live. this is satire > if you made it this far go check out @SolarisAI_fun for the most undervalued infrastructure utility play in web3

  • realUrbanHacker
    Urban Hacker (@realUrbanHacker) reported

    After the Coldcard hack the vultures arrived on schedule, circling in perfect formation, announcing that self custody is de facto dead. You've read the posts. If only these poor souls had kept their coins "on an exchange," none of this would have happened. Adults said this out loud, in public, with their real names attached. So let's do the thing nobody circling the corpse wanted to do. Let's look at the data. ๐Ÿ”ด Mt. Gox โ€” 2014 Hot-wallet theft + years of mismanagement โ†’ insolvency ~850,000 BTC (~200k later recovered) ๐Ÿ”ด Bitfinex โ€” 2016 Hot wallet breach ~119,756 BTC ๐Ÿ”ด Coincheck โ€” 2018 Hot wallet breach (NEM) ~523M XEM (~USD 530M then) ๐Ÿ”ด Zaif โ€” 2018 Hot wallet breach ~5,966 BTC + other assets (~USD 60M) ๐Ÿ”ด QuadrigaCX โ€” 2018โ€“19 Not a classic hack: founder death + "inaccessible" cold wallets; monitor found big shortfall / suspected fraud ~26,000 BTC + other coins (~CAD 190โ€“250M+) ๐Ÿ”ด Cryptopia โ€” 2019 Hacked, then liquidation (BTC + alts) ~USD 16M+ initially reported ๐Ÿ”ด Binance โ€” 2019 Hot wallet breach 7,000 BTC (~USD 40M โ€” SAFU covered users) ๐Ÿ”ด KuCoin โ€” 2020 Hot wallets breached ~USD 275M mixed tokens ๐Ÿ”ด BitMart โ€” 2021 Hot wallets breached ~USD 150โ€“200M mixed ๐Ÿ”ด FTX / Alameda โ€” 2022 Fraud & insolvency; customer funds misused ~USD 8โ€“10B shortfall ๐Ÿ”ด DMM Bitcoin โ€” 2024 Unauthorized outflow 4,502.9 BTC (~USD 300M+) ๐Ÿ”ด WazirX โ€” 2024 Multisig / custody breach ~USD 230โ€“235M mixed ๐Ÿ”ด Bybit โ€” 2025 Cold-wallet / signer exploit ~401,000 ETH (~USD 1.4โ€“1.5B), not BTC-led Custodial and protocol heists together โ€” centralized exchanges plus DeFi and bridges โ€” run into the tens of billions of dollars over their lifetime at event prices, with single bad years clearing USD 2โ€“3B in hacks alone. That's not counting fraud, insolvency, or the founder who dies with the keys in his head. One Coldcard wave: roughly USD 0.04โ€“0.07B. Do the division. Very rough math puts Coldcard at somewhere between 0.1% and 1% of a single bad year, and comfortably under 1% of lifetime headline losses from exchanges and DeFi combined. It is a rounding error. It is the tip you leave on the bill for everything else that got stolen this decade. And it is being used as an argument to hand your keys back to the same institutions that produced the top of that table. But I'm not going to end on a smug ratio, because something about this genuinely bothers me. The people who lost money here were not degens. They weren't farming yield on a bridge held together with hope and a Discord moderator. They were the careful ones โ€” the people who read the guides, bought the hardware, wrote the words down on steel, and did everything the responsible adults told them to do. Playing it safe is exactly what got them hit. That's the part that stings, and anyone selling you a custodial account off the back of their pain should be treated accordingly. The conclusion doesn't move, though. Verify your entropy, verify your seed on a second implementation, stop trusting single black boxes โ€” and understand that from a strict safety analysis, your funds have never been safer than in self custody.

  • whistleblowerTA
    Whistleblower (@whistleblowerTA) reported

    Tether, the largest stablecoin issuer in the crypto industry, currently has a market capitalization of around $184 billion. According to publicly available data, it was the 7th-largest net buyer of U.S. Treasury bills in 2024 and is on track to become one of the top 10 purchasers of U.S. T-bills in 2026. Tether's demand for Treasury bills helps finance U.S. government debt. What's surprising is that Tether has existed for 14 years, yet it still has not published a full independent audit proving that all USDT tokens are fully backed by reserves. But in March 2026, Tether engaged KPMG, one of the Big Four accounting firms, to conduct its first full independent financial statement audit covering USDT reserves and the company's financials. KPMG is not infallible, no auditor is. However, it is generally considered far more credible than smaller accounting firms. There have also been notable audit failures involving KPMG, including: - Wirecard (Germany, 2020): KPMG was involved in reviewing a company that later collapsed after a โ‚ฌ1.9 billion accounting fraud was uncovered. - Carillion (UK, 2018): KPMG faced criticism over its audit work before the construction giant went bankrupt. - KPMG has also faced regulatory fines from authorities such as the U.S. SEC and the UK's FCA over deficiencies in certain audits. Although KPMG's involvement could significantly strengthen confidence in Tether, it should not be viewed as proof of perfection. For years, Tether changed statements on its own website, including earlier claims that every USDT token was fully backed by U.S. dollars. Tether is also closely connected to the Bitfinex exchange, with both companies sharing common ownership. In 2018, Tether arranged a "verification" by Friedman LLP. The day before the verification, Bitfinex transferred approximately $382 million to Tether's bank account to demonstrate reserves, and the funds were moved out shortly afterward. These events were later confirmed during investigations by the New York Attorney General (NYAG) and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which resulted in regulatory fines. Tether and Bitfinex ultimately paid $18.5 million and $41 million in fines, respectively, related to misleading statements about reserve backing and other regulatory violations. Tether also faces significant regulatory pressure in the European Union and has not obtained authorization under the MiCA regulatory framework, leading to restrictions on its availability in parts of the EU. Tether remains one of the most controversial companies in the cryptocurrency industry, yet it also plays a crucial role in providing liquidity across the crypto market.

  • Cryptoinsightuk
    Cryptoinsightuk (@Cryptoinsightuk) reported

    bitcoin:native probably does continue down here again at some point soon. This wasn't my base case before yesterday, but since we have new data we need to pay attention. I think there is a liquidation event to come. Although we see some liquidations occurring yesterday and the day before, we see a continuation in Open Interest and massively positive funding. This suggests we have people going leverage long here in size. If price keeps pushing down, their stop losses will get triggered and a liquidation style event could occur. This isn't inevitable, but looks likely here. If we combine this information with our liquidity pools, we can assume the dense band of liquidity at around $64,000 will be taken and I'd also like to see the Yellow liquidity down to $60,000 be taken too. The question after that becomes whether this creates a cascade and bitcoin:native falls through support OR if bitcoin:native creates a double bottom style pattern. This discussion is a difficult one. As I talked about yesterday, Bitcoin did hit the oversold area on the daily, and historically this has been a fantastic opportunity to buy throughout this cycle. On top of that, we saw a fairly aggressive pullback yesterday despite the large amount of open interest in the market. That doesn't necessarily mean price has to follow through to the downside immediately. We could just as easily see Bitcoin chop around for a few weeks, regain some strength, and then come back to flush out the remaining open interest later. In other words, it doesn't have to continue straight down from here. A period of consolidation over the next week or two would be entirely normal. Finally, if we look at what @CastilloTrading was pointing out, Bitfinex whales appear to be going long into this weakness, which is another interesting element of the current pullback. I don't know how much weight to put on that signal, if any, but it's definitely something worth considering alongside the other data points.

  • FUINY77
    FUINY7 (@FUINY77) reported

    @bitfinex Btc is broken, and you are delusional.

  • BankXRP
    ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธXRP (@BankXRP) reported

    XRP longs on Bitfinex just printed a massive round trip. Positions surged from 4.9M in June to a peak of 6.45M in late August one of the biggest leverage buildups this cycle. Now unwinding: longs down to 5.62M, price back to $1.41 (-1.61% today). Leverage got ahead of itself. Worth watching if this flushes further or finds support here.

  • PikaDetects
    PIKACHU4SSR IS ๐Ÿ’žALIVE๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿ˜Ž (@PikaDetects) reported

    what is this about bitfinex ? Error loading address data. (400 OK: Invalid Bitcoin address) ?? #Bitcoin

  • nat_xgg2288
    DMT-NAT ๅฐๆžœๆžœ๏ผˆๆ™จๆ›ฆ๏ผ‰ (@nat_xgg2288) reported

    @fiatarchive Remaining BTC Supply Projection April 2026 Remaining: 984,370 coins (Block reward per block: 3.125 BTC) April 2027 Remaining: 820,310 coins (Block reward per block: 3.125 BTC) April 2028 Remaining: 656,250 coins (Block reward per block: 1.5625 BTC) April 2029 Remaining: 574,210 coins (Block reward per block: 1.5625 BTC) April 2030 Remaining: 492,180 coins (Block reward per block: 1.5625 BTC) April 2031 Remaining: 410,150 coins (Block reward per block: 1.5625 BTC) April 2032 Remaining: 328,120 coins (Block reward per block: 0.78125 BTC) April 2033 Remaining: 287,100 coins (Block reward per block: 0.78125 BTC) April 2034 Remaining: 246,090 coins (Block reward per block: 0.78125 BTC) April 2035 Remaining: 205,070 coins (Block reward per block: 0.78125 BTC) April 2036 Remaining: 164,060 coins (Block reward per block: 0.390625 BTC) April 2037 Remaining: 143,550 coins (Block reward per block: 0.390625 BTC) April 2038 Remaining: 123,040 coins (Block reward per block: 0.390625 BTC) April 2039 Remaining: 102,530 coins (Block reward per block: 0.390625 BTC) April 2040 Remaining: 82,030 coins (Block reward per block: 0.1953125 BTC) By the completion of the 7th halving (projected April 2036): Total Bitcoin minted: 20,835,937.5 coins Total Bitcoin left unmined: 164,062.5 coins This means that by April 2036, 99.22% of Bitcoinโ€™s total supply will have been fully mined. The gradual depletion of block rewards is hardcoded into Bitcoinโ€™s protocol and can be calculated with absolute precision, yet most people fail to grasp this reality, refuse to believe it, or simply deny this inevitable outcome. Let us break down a critical question: Can Bitcoin sustain steady operation all the way to the 7th halving in April 2036 relying solely on its current block reward model? A simple cost analysis lays bare the issue. The current mining cost per Bitcoin stands at roughly $75,000. After three more halvings, mining costs will surge eightfold, pushing the cost per coin to $600,000. At that price point, Bitcoinโ€™s overall total market capitalization would need to top $12 trillion. By contrast, the total hardware value of all Bitcoin mining rigs across the globe is only around $7 billion. How can a $12 trillion market be supported by merely $7 billion worth of mining hardware? This is utterly illogical and devoid of basic market sense. Are all institutional investors and capitalists in this space ignorant or irrational? This scenario completely defies commercial logic and fundamental capital principles. Scaling up network hash rate will only drive mining costs higher, amplify operational losses, and accelerate the onset of a death spiral. This is an unsolvable dead end under the existing rulesโ€”there is only one fix: expand block reward supply. The solution: #NAT #NAT is a native asset built directly on the Bitcoin mainchain. It shares identical hash power, blockchain, block generation cycle and wallet address system with Bitcoin, minting synchronously every ten minutes within each block. It functions as the secondary native asset minted in parallel within every Bitcoin block, Bitcoinโ€™s twin asset sharing the same foundational blockchain infrastructure. Two of the worldโ€™s top 4 mining pools, SpiderPool and F2Pool, have already begun distributing #NAT to miners. The entities with the most to lose are the major Bitcoin holders ranked below: 1.ย Coinbase (Exchange + ETF custody): 976,000 BTC โ€‹ 2.ย Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy, public listed firm): 845,300 BTC (Latest financial filing update, June 8) โ€‹ 3.ย BlackRock IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Spot ETF): 817,100 BTC โ€‹ 4.ย Binance (User exchange reserves): 631,000 BTC โ€‹ 5.ย BTC seized by the U.S. government: 328,400 BTC โ€‹ 6.ย Fidelity FBTC ETF: 190,000 โ€“ 200,000 BTC โ€‹ 7.ย Grayscale GBTC: 144,000 BTC (Sustained net redemptions and drawdowns) โ€‹ 8.ย Bitfinex Exchange: Approximately 195,000 BTC

  • Mrbvnkstips
    Mrbankstips Parody (@Mrbvnkstips) reported

    Every crypto CEX shutting down like Bitfinex and others have one thing in common they bought ETH and over leveraged simple

  • syedaliakber2
    Sheryl | Simple Crypto Advice (@syedaliakber2) reported

    ๐ŸšจSOMEONE JUST OPENED A $16,000,000 $XRP LONG. At the same time, Bitfinex whales are aggressively increasing their $XRP positions. Wtf is going on???

  • giacomozucco
    Giacomo ShadowUNbanned Zucco (@giacomozucco) reported

    @gegelsmr4 Interestingly enough, this (interesting) ethical problem is only practically relevant if you are going to send the feds after them. Which is a retarded thing to do anyway, since the feds steal much more money (with violence and guns, not "finding" it) and even if they caught the attackers would keep the loot for themselves (cf Bitfinex). So it's a theoretically important question which cyphertank theory makes irrelevant: just make your keys hard to find.