Cogeco outages and service status in Kawartha Lakes, Ontario
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- Cogeco generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Kawartha Lakes, including 0 direct reports.
Cogeco offers cable television, internet and home phone service. Cogeco service homes and businesses in multiple areas, mainly in Ontario and Quebec.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Kawartha Lakes, Ontario
The chart below shows the number of Cogeco reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Kawartha Lakes, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Cogeco. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Cogeco Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
zubic (@zubic_eth) reportedHey @cogeco π¨π¦ You are by far the worst internet provider out there. Iβve had no internet or cable for over 24 hours now, and your service has become completely unreliable time and time again. After this, Iβll be switching to @Starlink. Thanks for making the decision easy π
-
Klink VonSchultznbundy (@JGooballs) reported@Oakvillejaysfan Some companies have garbage customer service but not Cogeco.
-
JerryP (@yarop) reported@KellySuzanne9 @corpcapture @cogeco Internet down in parts of Canada, too. Was this planned in advance? Is this some kind of testing of people's reactions? As WEF predicted large internet outages. Is very unlikely that all internet companies have problem exactly the same time. People be aware!!
-
Lexi (@Lexi58746074319) reported@passepruneau @cogeco One of the worst handling of a crisis from a PR/customer service standpoint Iβve seen in a long time.
-
zoro liker | caught up on one peas (@faggotzoro) reportedthought artfight was being crazy slow again but turns out cogeco **** the bed across ontario
-
Barsky (@Barsky420) reported@justin_sens @Johnny_Tins @SteveOnSens Virgin and Cogeco respectively but have spent numerous unfortunate years with both Rogers and Bell as my phone service provider
-
π―JT.π― (@JimmyT2022) reported@cogeco Donβt go here we have an outage at out place after being connected 24 hours ago bad fibre line. Fix yaaaaa right wait two weeks and they may have soemone out to fix IT. STAY AWAY
-
MrsB (@mrsburnside2011) reported@cogeco itβs really hard to stay a customer when your services are going down every month. Yet again, your website says a fibre line was cut in my neighbourhood and the ETA for repair is over eight hours away.This is ridiculous. It happens too often for it to be an accident.
-
π¨π¦ Make It Home YGK (@MIHomeYGK) reportedMassive Cogeco outage affecting internet connections and retail POS services, also causing collateral slowdown of other data services as large numbers of customers attempt to temporarily switch to personal cellphone hotspots.
-
Kini Surrco | Dividend data (@kinisurrco) reported@CDInewsletter Really appreciate the thoughtful reply and coming from you, it carries weight. I ran both Quebecor and Cogeco through the algorithm just now. And I am happy to see that your instincts mostly checkout :) : $QBR-B: π’ OPTIMAL | Quality 85, Opportunity 80. P/FFO 8.7x, ND/EBITDA 2.9x, 11.8% dividend CAGR. The model loves this one - Quality 85 is significantly higher than BCE (57) or Telus (58). The 2.2% yield is light, but total shareholder yield is 3.79% with buybacks. $CCA: π CAUTION | Quality 45, Opportunity 70. Yield 6.38%, P/FFO 1.5x. The $2.2B impairment on the U.S. segment (Breezeline) is flagged as a permanent structural problem, not temporary. The algorithm sees the value but doesn't trust the moat. The BCE management trust point is well taken. "The dividend is safe" β 42% cut a year later is exactly the kind of credibility gap no quantitative model captures. I should probably add some version of this. Thanks again π¨π¦