eBay status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of eBay reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by eBay users through our website.

• Website Down (61%)
• Sign in (24%)
• Errors (16%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent eBay outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Manchester	Website Down	9 hours ago
Regenstauf	Errors	14 hours ago
Manchester	Website Down	18 hours ago
Manchester	Website Down	23 hours ago
Manchester	Website Down	1 day ago
Wuppertal	Sign in	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

eBay Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Zair (@ZairTheSlayer) reported 6 minutes ago

  Some of the big updates that have happened so far. - Browser extension where you can see your bid pop up window for streamers that use Pumpfun to go live - Adding a Ebay like marketplace for people to sell their items freely without having to go live - Ebay takes 15 - 18 percent of your sales while Bidit only takes 4 percent that goes back into the coin - Points you can earn by just using the site to get an airdrop at the end of the month - Escrow safety net after a sale so you don't get scammed you need to verify your item got to you before a seller gets your money - New emotes added to chats - Now able to stream not just on Pumpfun but on Bidit itself - And now able to auction up NFTs on the marketplace. This is a slow cook in my opinion and can become someting massive in the crypto space not gonna lie. So many normies are in to TCG streams as seen on Whatnot and many people use Ebay every day to sell their items. Why not use a platform like this where sellers gain more money after selling while also being the flywheel for the community coin created. Dev is constantly shipping and I hope to see many people realize the potential this coin has ngl.

• 
  Necrobach (@NecroChronicle) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Grevious47 @Dexerto The issue is the nut jobs buying everything they can then dropping on Ebay for a 4x mark up.

• 
  Calum E. Douglas FRAeS (@CalumDouglas1) reported 8 minutes ago

  Bought the METCAL broken on eBay, it only needed the switch cleaned with contact cleaner 🙄

• 
  Ryan Dunner (@ryandunner) reported 10 minutes ago

  @GoatBeardzDD @jackAskingQs I rarely go long GME options, if I do its random lottos. How I like to accumulate is simply buying every week or month and then when we go through the volatile cycles, swaps or big news then I look to sell calls against my shares. Last time I did this was the ebay merger news and price ripped up. Sold some calls and waited.. stock falls back down and I use the premium to buy more shares. In my experience when I have every emotion in my body telling me to full send my account on $GME calls (like what I feel right now) - is exactly when I need to clear my head and step back. We are playing a game of emotions against the market makers and players on the other end of this trade. Currently I am looking into building some long calls here which for me would be Jan 2027 and beyond but still for me this would be with money that I look at as risk capital. I have a meaningful position in shares so if the calls go to 0 I dont care. Just me though not advice obviously. My sell button is broke for the stock. Warrants are interesting. Personally I sold all of mine because I am not sure whats going to happen. Another strategy I will put on is selling a put where I am happy owning the stock and then using premium for shares or to pay for a call (if I see fit).

• 
  Ire 🎮 taiali (@Tmrwleftoverss) reported 11 minutes ago

  @raychurro Tysmmm 🫶the fees are terrible omg a game that costs 27€ ended up at 60€ and I've seen even worse prices on ebay🥹🙏

• 
  Luis (@lcae83) reported 14 minutes ago

  @avaricexxx1010 @WRabbit741 That "DD" been wrong for years, it's irrelevant...and a big part of it is just delusional optimism Operation looks much better BTC and Ebay investments are in the red and will impact next ER Convert 1,4B debt atm, why? More dilution to come probably Stock will continue to go down

• 
  leo 🧸 (@griapples) reported 16 minutes ago

  grians having his headphone issue with his mouse from 2016 😭😭 hes got the make and model saved on ebay because he cant find anybody else selling it easily otherwise. only one person is selling it and he got skizz to buy it for him. hes making me cry.

• 
  Dark Light (@Dark_Light_SP) reported 19 minutes ago

  @eBay You need to fix the flat shipping price entry when it is originally set in a template I was told by your customer service on the phone that I could manually change specific items once they were in my drafts and that would not alter globally That info was incorrect

• 
  AurumWealth.Eth (@AurumWealthEth) reported 24 minutes ago

  @ebaygme_rh @GMEBAYonSOL That big candle up in the second screenshot was the day that GameStop sent. It’s unsolicited offer to eBay, and after it came back down, it came back down to a higher floor

• 
  Rugikk (@rugikkk) reported 25 minutes ago

  Elon Musk sat for his first television interview in 2007 with $37 million behind him and 2 companies that had shipped nothing. Wired Science, one camera, a host working from a script about a rich man's hobby. The money was 8 years old by then - Zip2 sold at 27, then the company eBay bought as PayPal. None of it shows. He sits in a cubicle at SpaceX with engineers on all sides. In at 9:30. Out at 8 PM. No fixed hours. The host asks whether he ever considered the beach and the beer and the sunset. Musk says that would be torture. The host laughs at him twice - once about his age, which Musk puts at 12, and once when he asks, on camera, whether we really went to the moon. Then the interview stops being about money. Musk says after college he picked 3 problems: the internet, space, and moving the economy off mined and burned hydrocarbons to solar electric. He gives 80% of his week to SpaceX and 2 to 3 days a month to Tesla. On the moon he is blunt - 1969 we walked on it, 3 decades later we can barely reach low Earth orbit. The moon is the Arctic. Barren, small, nowhere to put a civilization. "We saw that movie in the 60s. The remake's never as good." NASA, he points out, is not a rival. NASA is a customer. Falcon 9 lifts Dragon to the space station and brings it home, replacing the shuttle from 2011. Asked who is chasing him, he says nobody with a serious chance of catching. On Branson he does the math out loud: 9 units of energy to reach Mach 3, 625 to reach Mach 25, and all of it burns off again on reentry. Different league. He had already bought a ticket. The Tesla part is a business plan, not a car pitch. The Roadster runs 0 to 60 in under 4 seconds, beats every Porsche in production and every Ferrari but the Enzo, doubles the efficiency of a Prius, and 2007 production is nearly sold out. New technology enters at high price and low volume, so the sports car comes first. Model 2 is a $49,000 sedan. Model 3 lands near $30,000. None of it had been built. The host asks why you can't buy one yet. "We haven't made them yet." The tape is 19 years old. Nothing on it was a guess.

• 
  BEFORE THE POP (@beforethepop) reported 25 minutes ago

  Pikachu Stole Mario’s Grail Card Someone just paid US$33,999 for Pikachu wearing Mario’s clothes. This might be the best evidence yet that Mario’s actual rookie market is still early. The card is the 2016 Mario Pikachu #294. It is beautiful, instantly recognisable and already accepted as a modern grail. PSA has graded 2,210 copies at Gem Mint 10, yet buyers have repeatedly paid around US$30,000 for one. That is a serious population by the standards we normally hunt. Now compare it with the leading Mario rookie candidate. The Amada Donkey Kong Menko shows Donkey Kong, Pauline and Jumpman using the artwork from the original 1981 arcade cabinet. A CGC 7.5 sold through Goldin for US$12,810. Menko was a Japanese game where children tried to flip each other’s cards by smashing another card into them. Basically an industrial process for creating low-grade survivors. It is old, genuinely difficult to find in respectable condition and depicts Mario at the beginning of gaming history. The 2016 crossover has still sold for 2.7 times more. Plenty of people will see that and conclude Pokémon won. I see a Mario market that has barely started pricing its own history. Demand is clearly not the problem. Someone just paid nearly US$34,000 for a modern card because Pikachu is wearing a Mario costume. The Mario name, image and nostalgia already carry high-end money. The problem is that collectors still do not know which early Mario card to crown. The Donkey Kong Menko is widely treated as the 1981 rookie, although CGC recently changed new labels to “c.1985” because neither Nintendo nor Amada kept enough records to conclusively date it. The 1982 Topps Donkey Kong set contains “Jump Man at Work”, which Topps considers its first Mario card and gives American collectors a cleaner documented option. The 1982 Donkey Kong Jr Menko may be Mario’s first card after Jumpman was officially given the Mario name. There are multiple candidates, terrible records, tiny populations and no universally accepted checklist. Good. You do not get to be early after the hobby has agreed on the rookie, auction houses have called it a grail and every collector has saved the same eBay search. Before that happens, it looks exactly like this. The cards are difficult to identify. The dates are disputed. Listings are badly titled. Sales are infrequent. Collectors hesitate because there is no obvious answer telling them what to buy. That confusion is the discount. On our framework, early Mario clears the difficult tests. It has age, cultural importance, enormous global recognition, genuine scarcity, condition difficulty and an IP that mattered then and remains dominant now. It fails on clean canon and liquidity. Those are the two things a developing market can fix. Nobody can go back and manufacture more early Mario cards. The US$33,999 Mario Pikachu sale has already proven the ceiling exists. We are not waiting for collectors to care about Mario. They clearly do. We are waiting for that money to discover Mario’s actual early cards. The rookie market for the biggest gaming IP on Earth still hasn’t run. It is sitting right here, before the pop.

• 
  Moons Card Shop (@moonscardshop) reported 27 minutes ago

  @craig_vent94132 @Pittsburgh1Pete That is usually where it shows up first. Card money is the most discretionary money there is, so the hobby feels a squeeze months before anyone writes an article about it. Slow eBay is a leading indicator, not a Pokemon problem.

• 
  ToppsNowToday (@josephwmayjr) reported 28 minutes ago

  The Cards Are Rare. But Does @Topps Care? Joe May — Topps Now Today #Fanatics Let me warn you from the beginning: This is going to be a negative article. I do not enjoy writing negative articles about Topps NOW. I have spent the last decade collecting, promoting and defending this product. I own at least one copy of every MLB Topps NOW card. I have built a community around it. I want Topps NOW to succeed. That is precisely why I am writing this. Yesterday, I asked whether collectors care about genuinely rare Topps NOW cards. Today, I have a more uncomfortable question: Does Topps care about Topps NOW? The Joshua Báez Chase Joshua Báez just had the kind of MLB debut that Topps NOW was invented to capture: three home runs in his first Major League game. Card #555 commemorated that moment, and Topps added a relic chase consisting of redemption cards numbered to /10, /5 and 1/1. That means 16 collectors will eventually receive relic cards connected to this historic performance. Topps officially listed the three relic levels on the card’s product page. We chased them! But after speaking with some individuals in the know, my fear about the relic material was.....How do I put this? Well know I will not be changing yesterday’s article, It was pretty much spot on without me even needing to talk to anyone associated with Topps. So I will offer this advice: If you receive one of those 16 redemption cards, sell it before the finished card arrives. The redemption allows a buyer to imagine a spectacular piece of the base—a logo, a painted section, a corner or something else worthy of a 1/1, /5 or /10. Once the actual card arrives, that imagination will for sure disappear. Now I've been told that they will try to make the one of one better than it appears but they don't have to it's pretty much what you see is what you get. You may receive an ordinary, ***** piece from the top or even bottom of the base. Your 1/1 might distinguish itself primarily through foil and numbering while containing relic material that looks like it belongs in a card numbered to /99. Actually people will be pulling cards like this from flagship commemorating this exact day an exact event and it will be numbered to 99 and it will look better than your one-on-one. The redemption may honestly be more exciting than the finished card. And that's a sad state of affairs. Topps NOW Once Led the Way This was not always the situation. In 2016, Topps NOW produced event-specific base relics that were genuinely remarkable. These were not generic pieces of memorabilia pulled from storage and placed into cards having no connection to the pictured moment. The relic was part of the story. Perhaps the most iconic relic card from the early years of Topps NOW is the 2016 “Bryzzo” card. It commemorates the final out of the 2016 World Series: Kris Bryant fielding the ball and throwing it to Anthony Rizzo at first base, ending the Chicago Cubs’ 108-year championship drought. Topps created dual-autographed relic versions containing pieces of a base used during Game 7, and those pieces were MLB authenticated. Those relics received the good pieces—the jewel sections, logos, edges and other visually distinctive parts that made each card feel connected to that exact night. That is why the Bryzzo relic has become one of the defining cards of early Topps NOW. The card did not merely commemorate history. It contained a recognizable physical piece of that history. Now imagine that same moment happening today. Would the Topps NOW 1/1 receive the best section of the base? Would the /5 and /10 cards contain jewel or logo pieces worthy of the final out of a World Series? Or would Topps NOW collectors receive plain sections from the bottom while the premium pieces were saved for future pack-pulled products? I honestly feel sorry for collectors who hit some of these modern World Series relics. They may wait months for a redemption, expecting something worthy of the moment, only to receive an ordinary piece that looks nothing like a premium relic. That approach will damage the entire product line. Topps and Fanatics may generate additional revenue by saving the best pieces for Dynasty, Definitive, Transcendent and other future releases. But in doing so, they risk neglecting the product that captured the event when it actually happened. They are weakening one of the very features that helped make Topps NOW successful. Some of those 2016 cards contain tremendous logo, jewels and easily recognizable base pieces. They are distinctive, immediately recognizable and worthy of their numbering. Unfortunately, hindsight is undefeated. If Topps had known what those pieces might mean years later, perhaps it would have saved every great section of those bases for a premium 2016 commemorative product released during the tenth anniversary. Instead, Topps NOW collectors received them. Imagine that. The Bryzzo card demonstrated what Topps NOW could be. If that same card were produced under the apparent modern relic hierarchy, the pieces that made it iconic might never reach Topps NOW collectors at all. Fanatics may believe it is protecting the value of its future premium products. In reality, it may be destroying the value—and eventually the collector interest—of the product that made those pieces meaningful in the first place. My Wembanyama 1/1 I have already experienced this with my Victor Wembanyama Topps NOW 1/1 relic. I understood that a Wembanyama relic from Topps NOW might eventually be surpassed by a spectacular premium card from another product. That is business. What I did not expect was for my 1/1 to be visually outclassed by seemingly every /5 and /10 relic placed into other products. A 1/1 should represent the best available presentation—or at least something approaching it. It should not feel like the product received whatever material remained after every pack-pulled brand selected its pieces. That is the problem. The Unofficial Relic Hierarchy Topps does not publish an official chart ranking which products receive the best relic material. What collectors see, however, creates an obvious perceived hierarchy. Topps and Bowman currently support an enormous baseball portfolio: Flagship Series 1 and Series 2, Update, Bowman, Bowman Chrome, Bowman Draft, Topps Chrome, Chrome Sapphire, Logofractor, Finest, Heritage, Stadium Club, Brooklyn Collection, Dynamic Duals, Inception, Museum Collection, Pristine, Tribute, Tier One, Definitive, Dynasty and Transcendent—among others listed in Topps’ own current and recent checklist catalog. Topps’ official checklist page shows the breadth of that product lineup. Some are inexpensive. Others cost more than many collectors’ monthly mortgage payments. Yet when the impressive relic pieces are distributed, Topps NOW appears to sit beneath all of them. Topps NOW may have captured the event first. It may have sold the card while everyone was still talking about the performance. Its collectors may have financed the acquisition of the base through their purchases. But when that base is cut, the best sections appear destined for products with future revenue still attached to them. The Topps NOW sales clock has already expired. The money has already been collected. The card has not even been manufactured, but its revenue stream is finished. From a short-term business perspective, I understand the temptation. Why place the best piece into a product that can no longer generate another sale when it could become the centerpiece of a future premium release? I understand it. I just think it is shortsighted. Topps Is Teaching Collectors How to Value Its Product If Topps treats Topps NOW as the bottom of its own relic hierarchy, why should collectors treat it differently? Why should someone chase a Topps NOW 1/1 redemption when they can wait for the same base to appear in Dynasty, Definitive, Museum Collection, Tier One, Tribute or another pack-pulled release with a much more attractive piece? Why should collectors pay a premium during the 24-hour window? Why not wait, buy one base card from the cheapest eBay seller and return to chasing packs? Topps NOW created an entirely new category of collecting. It taught people to value immediacy, exact moments and verified print runs. It taught us that the first card commemorating an event could matter. But Topps cannot ask collectors to love this product more than Topps appears to love it. If the company continually reserves the best material for every other brand, it is effectively telling collectors that Topps NOW is inferior. Eventually, collectors will believe them. The Opportunity Topps Is Missing Imagine if the Joshua Báez 1/1 arrived before the season ended with a spectacular logo or jewel base piece. The winner would post it everywhere. Collectors would say, “Look at that card.” The next time Topps NOW offered a relic chase, more people would participate. More cards would sell. The photograph of that incredible 1/1 would continue advertising the product long after the original sales clock expired. That is how Topps NOW becomes stronger. It's how it became what it is today. A remarkable relic is not wasted on a completed sale. It is marketing for the next hundred sales. Instead, a disappointing relic teaches collectors not to chase the next one. That may save premium material for another product, but it slowly destroys one of the best features Topps NOW ever offered. My Advice Thankfully, Topps NOW autographs are different. I still believe those can be among the most significant cards in the entire hobby because they connect an autograph to a specific achievement almost immediately. Though even that's changing many autographs if not in other products already we'll forego a Topps Now autograph... Preferring to wait for flagship or some other more important brand. But I can no longer recommend chasing Topps NOW base relics with the same enthusiasm. They were once among the greatest things the product offered. Today, too many feel like a promise of something special followed by a routine piece of material surrounded by different-colored foil. The mockup may show an ordinary piece, so perhaps nobody can technically call it a bait and switch. But that does not make the finished card any less disappointing. So, if you receive that beautiful blue Joshua Báez redemption card, take a good look at it. Then consider taking it directly to eBay while collectors can still imagine what the relic might become. Because once the finished card arrives, the most valuable thing inside that redemption may have been the expectation. I do not want Topps NOW to fail. I want Fanatics and Topps executives to recognize that they are weakening a product that many of us genuinely love. Topps NOW does not need preferential treatment. It simply deserves relic pieces worthy of the moments it was created to preserve.

• 
  kurkosdr (@kurkosdr) reported 30 minutes ago

  @james_droog @lauriewired A similar thing almost happened to me on eBay when I bid on an okay-but-not-great vintage laptop with Nvidia 3D Vision: "set max bid to €600 so I won't have to monitor the auction", but someone matched me and (fortunately) outbid me! (they backed away after, but not my problem)

• 
  Bio Broly $Ski $Pengu (@The_Bio_Broly) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Aarameshi My buddy just had this exact thing happen with a GRADED CARD and ebay authenticity made him offer buyer a partial refund. He asked me if I had ever seen this issue before and I hadnt now Ive seen it twice in a week.

• 
  🐝The Honey Hive 🐝 (@TheHoneyHiveDC) reported 31 minutes ago

  OUTRAGE! Charles Spencer Wrote About His Own Sister Someone fetch the smelling salts. Apparently Charles Spencer has committed an unforgivable offense. He wrote a book about his sister, Diana. Yes, that Diana. And judging by some of the outrage, you would think he had broken into Althorp at midnight, dug up the family silver and sold it on eBay. I have no problem with it. Charles Spencer was Diana’s brother. He knew her before the tiaras, photographers, documentaries, biographies, podcasts and armies of strangers began explaining what Diana thought, felt, wanted and would supposedly think about absolutely everything happening in 2026. If anyone has standing to write “Diana, My Sister,” I’m going to suggest her actual brother qualifies. Naturally, the accusations have begun: He’s exploiting her! He’s making money from Diana! He should let her rest! Please. An entire industry has been making money from Diana for nearly thirty years. Biographers, broadcasters, documentary makers, royal commentators and people with YouTube channels have built small civilizations around discussing her. But suddenly her brother writes a book and everyone discovers ethical publishing. Also, Charles Spencer is an author. Authors write books. Publishers sell them. This is generally how publishing works, unless we have entered a brave new literary economy where authors distribute manuscripts outside Tesco in return for compliments and Nectar points. Will Spencer be biased? Of course. She was his sister. His memories are his memories. Other people may remember events differently. Readers can compare accounts, disagree with him and decide for themselves. It’s called reading. And at least Spencer isn’t claiming his wife is Diana 2.0. No announcements that she has inherited Diana’s humanitarian halo, fashion mantle, tragic destiny, public adoration and possibly her favorite handbag. He married a woman. He did not launch The People’s Princess: The Sequel. So perhaps everyone can put the pearls back around their necks. Nobody has to buy the book. Nobody has to agree with it. But Charles Spencer knew Diana when she was simply his sister, long before the rest of the world claimed ownership of her memory. That perspective is worth hearing. After decades of strangers explaining Diana to the Spencer family, I think we can survive one Spencer explaining Diana to us. It’s a book, people. Get over it.

• 
  Georgeous (@georgeousSOL) reported 32 minutes ago

  @mentioned Hotel Employee Discounts - places like Marriott have this search up ‘Marriott MMP’ and you’ll go down the rabbit hole, reddit can tell you who sells this (or ebay) oops I just saved you a DM!

• 
  ThiefofAlways (@AlwaysThiefof) reported 33 minutes ago

  @GiboAgain It's depressive but how did we did we get here? When these greedy *** companies (PS & key cards) want to exterminate physical media. If you disagree that's perfectly fine. Though enjoy next year when scalpers/ebay wholesalers pick up the broken pieces, increase everything.

• 
  Pumpkin Escobar 🌵🌄🇺🇸 (@PumpkinEscobar0) reported 34 minutes ago

  @studios2491 He could have gone up Toreys *** for anyone knows. **** this guy. El Pike is now El ****. All my #4 **** on eBay tomorrow. Seriously done with this ****** after the **** he pulled last year. Your house got broken into and you went to DR? F off. Get off my team.

• 
  brokeboycards (@brokeboycardz) reported 34 minutes ago

  @MK5Cards I’m wondering when they’re gonna open back up, it’s kind of a bummer. I’ve had issues getting distribution as well, I’m basically **** out of luck for getting anything retail value. I’ve gotta buy in bulk from other eBay distributors and see if I can manage to make money on it is basically how it’s going to work for the next year or so. Nobody will sell or distribute to anyone unless you have an actual store front. I can’t afford to buy a brick and mortar storefront right now, who can afford that kind of overhead lol.

• 
  Alice 🌊❤️‍🔥🌒 (@Alice82669242) reported 35 minutes ago

  @ThrillaRilla369 Toy R US perhaps closed down due to bad management? I noticed if a toy sold out on eBay the price would surge, and had seen toys r us followed as they raised their price to match eBay’s price on certain things 😮‍💨 kids toys at a toy store at Christmas time- to say the least. Bad times calls for desperate measure?

• 
  Fangs🖤| Pro Memoria (@FangsGhostV) reported 40 minutes ago

  @CopiaFanart That’s utterly horrible! Ebay is (at least in my experience years ago), really good with refunds for scams. Hopefully they take down the ad/scammer account as well.

• 
  angie (@euphoria_atr) reported 43 minutes ago

  @4Miathebrave If you are going to purchase physical copies, I suggest the nitro store! You can find the copy you want to purchase, give the link, title and price to a proxy or middleman who will purchase it, store it until you pay for shipping and then send it to you! Or, you could obtain a Japanese address for free with a packaging forwarding service, make a nitro store account yourself, pay yourself, and then have it forward to you with no middleman required! There is also j-list, based in America, that sells the offical english versions of the games! It’s all in eng, is easy to navigate, and is domestic for you, so no proxy required. eBay is full of resellers and scalpers who buy up all the stock, and resell it for higher prices. If you have issues with limited stock always being sold out, please do not support or buy from the scalpers and resellers on eBay, as that will just make the issue worse. Good luck!

• 
  mini menn (@quetalmny) reported 51 minutes ago

  @ChardoubleU I do! I love eBay! The problem is people can put a max bid so if I max bid 65 and the bid is at 14$ it’s going to utomatically outbid you to the next dollar. And u don’t know what others have their max bid at

• 
  A Floyd (@Mrshoujo) reported 52 minutes ago

  @gamestop Broken stuff which will end up on eBay "for parts" and then all the retro gaming channels on YouTube will buy it up and make videos repairing it all.

• 
  david payne (@garbage2010) reported 54 minutes ago

  @TrevRetro eBay and Amazon are terrible for that now. Search for Google pixel 10 phone case. Sponsored result. "iPhone 12 case"

• 
  Fatdad Dirk 🏴‍☠️ (@FatdadDirk) reported 54 minutes ago

  Q1’s $389.6M net income included a $268.4M unrealized gain on the eBay derivative position. GameStop’s adjusted net income was $179.3M. So if Q2 says: NET INCOME: $500 MILLION!!! I’m immediately scrolling down. Likewise, if GAAP net income looks disappointing because ->>

• 
  greg's mom (@gregsma42069) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Stonkfather2021 This is giving the feeling of when Blockbuster could have bought Netflix and decided not to and look how that panned out... Ebay turns down offer from gme only for Teddy to emerge and dominate and eBay falls in to a black hole.

• 
  DragoHeart57 (@ThtChronicleGuy) reported 57 minutes ago

  @HMKilla It's been a hot minute since I've seen it, but I have already remedied that problem. $16 on eBay, brand-new Blu-ray/DVD combo.

• 
  SaugyWaffles (@SaugyWaffles3) reported 1 hour ago

  So I posted about a STEAL of a buy of an Erupt /10 Tidy Troll that we all know was underpriced at $150. Members of this community DMed the seller on WN and he retracted the sale. Let's be honest...we all knew it was steal and we knew it would be canceled but we hold our breath and pray. I am not saying it's right.... but what's worse is for the buyer to come to me. DM me asking to use my name to fight their battle for them because I am "a pretty big face in the community" But then when I say I feel for you but the only thing you can do is report the account, leave feedback, and post your story on socials I get blocked and told "I forgot your to big to understand common people problems I can’t just say oh well to good to be true I don’t have the resources as you and others to still get something if I want it peace out" Buddy, I just cleared out 5 figure debt by the grace of black cats...you don't know me like you think you do. Come to me to use my name, then block me when I am honest. I didn't ask for any one VF moment that I have had in my three years here. I am been one of the luckiest SOB's there are and I am well aware of that. I am forever grateful for the opportunities that I have had that started with me buying a TCG box on Ebay. But I am also tired of those moment being used against me. You don't know my life, my unshared struggles, the debts that were all hidden behind all the "wins" that the public eye saw. But you see a name you can use. Maybe the reflection needed is less on the uneducated ebay seller and on the buyer who wants to weaponize "community" and my name.