Paypal status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Paypal reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Paypal users through our website.

• Sign in (42%)
• Errors (36%)
• Website Down (22%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Paypal outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Berlin	Sign in	2 days ago
Kirchberg	Sign in	3 days ago
Nantes	Errors	3 days ago
Vícar	Errors	3 days ago
Étauliers	Errors	3 days ago
Onnion	Website Down	3 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Paypal Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Andrenya (@eglcat) reported 2 seconds ago

  @dreamy_melo Ive heard of some issue paypal has with people getting money if the mote os like commissions or smt ive heard

• 
  Alvin (@Alvin1492840) reported 3 minutes ago

  Turn on login alerts and payment notifications By default, PayPal sends email confirmations for completed payments. But it doesn't always alert you about new logins, password changes, or account modifications. His friend said: "Go to Settings. Click Notifications. Turn on alerts for everything logins, sent payments, received payments, password changes, linked device changes. Get them via email and push notification." He then showed him the Activity page a full log of every transaction, login, and account event. Most people never scroll through it. He said: "Spend 2 minutes once a month scrolling through your Activity feed. Look for payments you don't recognize, logins from unknown devices, or subscriptions you forgot about. That $2.49/month charge ran for 7 months before you noticed it. If you'd been checking Activity once a month, you'd have caught it after the first charge."

• 
  Lara🐶 (@ynhpuppy) reported 3 minutes ago

  and she normally does pay over her dads paypal when this happens. So i told her i can pay those 2 dicons for her if it get it back the next few days. As i said we are really close and shes the most honest and nicest person ever so i had no problem with this.

• 
  Upside (@upside) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Ranked_Props Hi there! We recently made updates to our cashout options to make them faster, more reliable, and more flexible for our users. While PayPal was previously available, it only represented about 17% of all cash-outs last year. At the same time, we were seeing increasing issues wi...

• 
  Alvin (@Alvin1492840) reported 10 minutes ago

  File disputes within 180 days (and know what's actually covered) He didn't know PayPal has a Resolution Center or that it has a 180-day window to file a dispute on eligible transactions. His friend said: "If you paid with Goods and Services and the item never arrived, or it arrived and it's significantly different from the description, you have 180 days to open a dispute through PayPal's Resolution Center. Go to Resolution Center on the PayPal website. Select 'Report a problem.' Choose the transaction. Follow the steps." "PayPal will review the case. If the seller can't prove delivery or the item matches the description, you get a full refund." He also warned: "But remember this only works for Goods and Services. Friends and Family payments are not eligible. That's why scammers insist on Friends and Family. And disputes don't cover things like buyer's remorse, services that were delivered but didn't meet your expectations, or items you picked up in person. Know the rules before you need them."

• 
  stan (@tsumugibait) reported 16 minutes ago

  @tsumugied paypal wataru to fix his horrendous split ends instead

• 
  Matthew Holman 💊 (@subscriptiondoc) reported 16 minutes ago

  A brand was losing subscribers it had already won. The product was fine, the payment link was wrong. Every failed-payment email pointed to the same place: update your card here. One link for everyone. But not everyone pays with a card. A PayPal customer sent to a Shopify card form cannot fix a thing. Shop Pay is a wallet, so a card update in Shopify does not touch it. Those people got emails they could not act on. The fix we gave them was not more reminders. It was routing each failure correctly. Card to the platform, PayPal into PayPal, Shop Pay to Shop Pay. On 10,000 subs at 91% success, that is 900 failures a month. Recover one point and you save 100 orders. At $50 each that is $5,000 a month. Dunning is not about more retries. It is about letting the customer who wants to pay you actually do it.

• 
  James (@jamescoder12) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Oliviacoder1 This highlights a critical issue with user interface design and transparency. It's concerning that such vital settings aren't more clearly communicated by PayPal.

• 
  🎯 Master (@Moneytaur_) reported 19 minutes ago

  I've used Airbnb for years. Years ago, i started buying shares. I've used Facebook for years. Years ago, i started buying shares. I've used Alibaba for years. Years ago, i started buying shares. I've used Nike for years. Years ago, i started buying shares. I've used PayPal for years. Years ago, i started buying shares. I've used Netflix for years. Years ago, i started buying shares. Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, PayPal...same thing. Products i use/d. Services i understand, brands i saw operating in real life before ever looking at a chart. The funny part is that many people reading this have also used these products for years. They booked the stays, wore the shoes, watched the shows, bought the iPhones, paid through the apps, ordered from the platforms, lived inside the ecosystem. But when it came to investing, they ignored what was right in front of them and let bad actors with cartoon profile pictures teach them money management. They bought micro cap coins they never used. Projects they never understood. Narratives they never verified. Promises from people with no real track record. Years ago, someone very successful in investing gave me a simple piece of advice: "If you use it, understand it, and it is listed on the stock market, study how whales move in the markets and find the best levels to buy and sell" That advice changed how i looked at markets. The gullible mind keeps chasing mystery while ignoring familiarity. They will put money into something they have never touched, never tested, never needed, and never understood, while refusing to even consider the globally established businesses they use every week. Familiar feels obvious, and obvious feels too late. That is how retail gets trapped. They ignore the companies solving real problems in their own lives, then gamble on stories designed to solve nothing except the seller's exit liquidity problem. Sometimes the best investment research does not start in a Telegram group. It starts by looking at your own life and asking: "What do i keep using, and who owns it?" Find the answers, alongside understanding when whales buy and sell. As time goes on, you'll be winning.

• 
  marqix ☆ (@fwmarqix) reported 20 minutes ago

  My son confessed to me that he's been catfishing his boss for the past eight months, and the whole thing has spiraled completely out of control. According to him, his boss is an awful manager that everyone at work hates. Hoping to expose him, my son created a fake Instagram account posing as an attractive woman, believing it wouldn't take much to get his boss to say something that could get him fired. It worked almost immediately. For months, his boss messaged the fake account constantly. He complained about work, trashed his wife, and revealed what my son described as his true personality. Everything seemed to be going according to plan until last month, when the fake woman mentioned she was struggling financially. Without hesitation, his boss sent her $5,000. A week later, he sent another $3,000. By now, my son says the total has reached $12,000. The situation became even worse when my son discovered that the money wasn't coming from his boss's personal funds. After seeing company expense reports, he realized his boss had allegedly been disguising the payments as "consulting fees," effectively embezzling money from the company to send to someone who doesn't even exist. Now my son is trapped in a mess of his own making. If he reports his boss, he'll have to admit that he was the person behind the fake Instagram account, which could land him in serious legal or professional trouble. If he stays quiet, his boss continues stealing from the company unchecked. To make matters worse, my son says the money is sitting in a PayPal account linked to the fake identity. He can't access or return it without exposing himself, and he feels guilty because, even though his original goal was to expose a terrible boss, he believes he's now played a role in taking $12,000. What started as an attempt to play vigilante has turned into a complicated situation with legal, ethical, and professional consequences that he never saw coming.

• 
  LinIsCrazy (@LinIsCrazy) reported 21 minutes ago

  @SPIDER_SPINES Really? I've never heard of issues with PayPal before and I know people that use PayPal exclusively for purchasing their vbucks so I find this odd

• 
  SquirellioN•COMMS-OPEN (@SquirellioN2711) reported 25 minutes ago

  @LaineyTheow4ll Not at the time, my Paypal account is having problems so I can't receive any payments until the problem is fixed.

• 
  Brown Thunder (@Brown_Thunder76) reported 30 minutes ago

  Now this makes a lot more sense. A few days ago we found a group of fiat tokens quietly sitting on Keeta mainnet. At the time they didn’t make a whole lot of sense. Today they do. Keeta just announced its partnership with LayerZero to bring tokenized commercial bank money to major blockchains. So what does that actually mean? Think of Keeta as the place where regulated bank deposits become tokenized digital dollars, euros, pounds, yen, etc. Those are the fiat tokens we found on-chain. They’re backed 1:1 by commercial bank deposits through Bivo and are built for institutions, not retail. LayerZero is the interoperability protocol that connects many of the largest blockchains together. It’s already used by companies and protocols like PayPal and Ondo. Instead of Keeta building connections to every blockchain individually, LayerZero lets those regulated assets move across Ethereum, Solana, Base, and many other chains through a single interoperability layer. Here’s an example. Imagine a business deposits $10 million with a participating bank. Keeta tokenizes that deposit into regulated digital dollars. Using LayerZero, those dollars can move to Ethereum for settlement, Solana for payments, Base for another application, and then be redeemed back into bank deposits when needed. The institution doesn’t have to care which blockchain the other side is using. That’s why this announcement is a big deal. The fiat assets we found on-chain now have a clear purpose. The GitHub updates we’ve been seeing suddenly make a lot more sense. And if institutions choose Keeta to issue and settle tokenized commercial bank money, LayerZero gives those assets access to one of the largest cross-chain ecosystems in crypto. That has the potential to bring significantly more institutional activity and value onto the Keeta network than if it operated in isolation. This is exactly why I spend so much time watching GitHub and on-chain activity. Sometimes the blockchain tells the story before the press release does. @KeetaNetwork $KTA @LayerZero_Core

• 
  favoritbookshop🚢 (@favoritbookshop) reported 32 minutes ago

  The stablecoin industry is entering a new phase.What was once dominated by crypto-native issuers is rapidly becoming a battlefield for banks, payment networks,asset managers, and Fortune 500 companies. According to industry reports,nearly every major financial institution is either launching or actively exploring its own stablecoin strategy. While the often-quoted "90%" figure should be treated as an estimate rather than an official statistic,the broader trend is undeniable. Visa,MC,BlackRock,Citi,Fidelity,PayPal,JPMorgan,and more than 140 Fortune 500 companies are building stablecoin-related products simultaneously. For the first time,the USDT-USDC duopoly—which still controls roughly 83% of the market—is facing serious long-term competition. Why Is Everyone Suddenly Interested? The answer is surprisingly simple:reserve income. Every dollar backing a stablecoin is typically invested in short-term U.S. Treasuries,currently yielding around 4–5% annually. Users hold digital dollars while issuers collect the interest generated by the underlying reserves. The economics are incredibly attractive. Tether generated approximately $13 billion in net profit during 2024 and more than $10 billion in 2025. Coinbase earned over $305 million in a single quarter simply by sharing reserve revenue with Circle—without issuing its own stablecoin. Exodus is restructuring its business toward stablecoin payments,cutting 25% of its workforce as it pivots toward this opportunity. The stablecoin business is no longer just about payments. It's becoming one of the most profitable financial models in the digital economy. Profit Is Only Half of the Story Stablecoins also introduce something traditional crypto was designed to avoid: Centralized control. Unlike BTC,a corporate stablecoin allows its issuer to freeze wallets with a single command. Recent blockchain data highlights the scale: •Tether has frozen roughly 10,000 addresses containing over $5 billion. •Circle has frozen around 370 addresses holding approximately $109 million. •Across ETH and TRON, more than $3.9 billion worth of assets have been frozen. In several cases, freezes occurred before official sanctions were even announced, demonstrating how much power issuers possess over on-chain assets. The Bigger Question for Crypto Crypto was originally built around censorship resistance and self-sovereignty. Corporate stablecoins represent almost the opposite philosophy. They combine blockchain efficiency with traditional financial controls, creating digital dollars that remain programmable—and, if necessary, fully censorable. That doesn't necessarily make them bad. For institutions, compliance is a feature. For users seeking financial freedom, it's a trade-off. Will Every Stablecoin Win? Probably not. Regulators, including the BIS and the ECB, have warned that dozens of competing private stablecoins could fragment payment infrastructure. Interoperability also remains a challenge. USDC on ETH and USDC on Sol still operate as separate liquidity environments despite representing the same asset. Meanwhile, new initiatives like Open USD—backed by major payment companies—are increasing competition by eliminating issuance fees, putting additional pressure on existing issuers. History suggests that markets eventually consolidate. The United States experienced a similar era between 1837 and 1863, when hundreds of private banks issued their own banknotes before national standards replaced the fragmented system. The next stablecoin race isn't simply about creating "another digital dollar." It's about capturing reserve revenue, controlling payment infrastructure, and owning the financial rails of the tokenized economy. Yield is the incentive today. Control may become the defining issue tomorrow. As AI increasingly automates compliance and transaction monitoring, the debate around programmable money, censorship, and financial sovereignty will only become more important. The stablecoin war has only just begun.

• 
  tsumugi (comms open) (@tsumugied) reported 33 minutes ago

  @tsumugibait I'll paypal tsumugi to fix that ******* haircut he looks a mess in

• 
  𖥻 ׁ ׅ lils ! ׁ ׅ 📓 wfmas ๋ ࣭ ⭑ (@yaoimath) reported 36 minutes ago

  @takamkii paypal $50 for me to take this down

• 
  Streamline (@streamlinehq_) reported 36 minutes ago

  Josh peck compares the difference between making money as an actor and an influencer “When I was 15 years old and started making money on Drake and Josh, I was like this gives me a lot of power and it gave me a lot of security and I was like I will do everything in my power to provide for the rest of my life” “ it was a terrible feeling as a little kid, I saw my mom struggle but I couldn’t do anything” “but when I started social media it was the first time that I was like able to do a job and work at something and make money pretty instantaneously” “In 2014, I had gotten really big on VINE, I was the number 1 person on vine and I remember it was July of 2014, I got the brand deal with this darting company called BADOO and they were like we will give you $5000 to make a VINE they were like we will PayPal you” “They were in Europe I was like they will probably not turn out, and I said worst case scenario I spend an hour making this video and they don’t send me the money and I will take it down, then it hit then within that month I made like $20,000”

• 
  PayPal Developer (@paypaldev) reported 38 minutes ago

  The easiest and most valuable open source contribution nobody talks isn't the biggest feature! Most people think contributing means fixing a hard bug or shipping a fancy new feature. It doesn't have to be. Try this on any repo: 1. Click Insights 2. Click Community Standards 3. GitHub gives you a checklist of what a healthy project is still missing. Every unchecked box is a contribution the maintainers already want. paypal/AI-Toolkit, a new Claude Code plugin for PayPal's APIs, has 4 open right now. 1. Pick one 2. Check for existing Issue, if not create one 3. Ask for it to be assigned to you 4. Open a PR Now you're a contributor to a PayPal repo today!

• 
  Todd | Saudi Money (@ToddSaudiMoney) reported 39 minutes ago

  Stripe shut down my friend's account at $47K revenue IRS flagged another one for "suspicious patterns" at $80K PayPal froze $12K for 6 months with zero explanation Meanwhile I just cleared $90K commission on a single gold shipment No platform risk No freeze threats Bank-to-bank wire transfers only The system doesn't care how much you make when you're moving real commodities between verified entities Like, RT & comment "WIRE" for the guide (must be following)

• 
  Dub (@Doubleoo4ever) reported 41 minutes ago

  @AskPayPal 7 days, $656.37 held (Txn 36V06866NJ357773R). Your “Get Verified” step to accept it is broken, dead ends every time (on video). Chat gave zero case numbers. CFPB Complaint 260723-35953948 filed. Respond with a resolution timeline in 24hrs or I escalate.

• 
  Harry Stebbings (@HarryStebbings) reported 41 minutes ago

  1.⁠ ⁠Should Chinese open models be banned? 2.⁠ ⁠⁠Will Anthropic and OpenAI hit their targets in 2027? These are honestly the two biggest questions right now that we discuss in the only show you need to listen to every week with @jasonlk and @rodriscoll My notes below: 1. Why the 10x Price Cut of Chinese Open Models Is an Enterprise Security Trap Chinese open models like Kimi and Qwen are driving the search for cheaper intelligence. A 10x cost cut has pushed regulated enterprises to run more error-catching supervisor models, increasing token usage by 2.5x. But it also creates unprovable data export and leakage risks, leaving CIOs with a painful tradeoff between cost and security. 2. Why the Low-Cost, Open-Weight LLM Layer Is a Brutal Margin Trap for US Startups Massive valuations for Chinese open-weight models raise a hard question: is low-cost AI a good standalone business? US giants have left a vacuum for much cheaper intelligence, but much of the advantage comes from distillation, which faces legal hurdles in the US. That leaves providers exposed to brutal margin compression. 3. Why Turning Down a $6BN Acquisition Offer Is a Sucker Bet for Most Founders OpenRouter leaking sale talks at a $5 billion to $6 billion valuation is savvy as Ramp, Databricks, and others launch competing routing features. Private liquidity windows are rare, and exiting before a feature becomes commoditized is often optimal. Turning down life-changing cash only makes sense if a founder is certain they can build a 10x larger company. 4. Why Hypergrowth Inference Providers Must Vertically Integrate to Survive the CapEx Wars Fireworks hitting a $17.5 billion valuation shows the best AI investments are still in infrastructure. Massive developer demand has turned low-margin compute brokering into a strong business with mid-30s gross margins. To avoid commodification, hypergrowth inference providers must vertically integrate into their own data centers. 5. Why the Entire US Stock Market Is Held Hostage by the 2026 AI Growth Rate The tech ecosystem and hyperscaler CapEx trajectory depend on OpenAI and Anthropic’s growth rates into 2026. Frontier models face pricing pressure from cheap open-weight alternatives but remain trapped by real inference costs and massive training investments. If growth slows or forced price cuts erode margins, the market dislocation could be severe. 6. Why Stripe Swallowing PayPal Is a High-Stakes Bet on Legacy Tech Rationalization Stripe partnering with Advent to take PayPal private would show how attractive late-stage scale has become for capital deployment. While absorbing a legacy giant growing at 7% could slow Stripe’s standalone growth, it would instantly expand its processing footprint. The deal would mark a historic passing of the torch from legacy payments to the modern upstart.

• 
  Jennifer, English-German Translator (@InfoRosebrock) reported 41 minutes ago

  I run everything through PayPal because I don’t have a bank account, and now PayPal is refusing to let me issue invoices or receive money because I don’t have a bank account. It’s ridiculous... They could've told me 3 months ago that this only works for a while!!!!

• 
  GenesisMind (@Thekzy7) reported 51 minutes ago

  @_S_A_E_G_ Firstly the PayPal go get issue, and the person wey give you the PayPal go first swear for you. Most payments are to be sent as Family and Friends Goods and Services PayPal is a different PayPal on its own.

• 
  Melanie Wise (@IamMelanieWise) reported 52 minutes ago

  @HurdlingStereo Tore posted a comment about Thought Crimes - remember that guy - with the Dog avatar? And because TC 'visited' the CA group when he 'visited' the physical state of CA (this goes back to 2021, right in that timeframe??), and because I admin'd in CA, I had a front row seat to the **** show - tho TC’s ‘visit’ was prior to my admin stint. I was asked to admin CA state group AFTER I accidentally caused a huge dust up in the CA group for asking about billboards and billboard $$$, noting that if we could not manage our state group, how on earth could we manage a whole state. I have details about that **** that few others have. NOT saying I see it from a 40K view, only that I witnessed specific details personally. I admin'd along side Ashley, Wonderland and 2 others who were largely not present. ID’ing Jackson and Whims as top down infiltrators was easy - every time there was an emergency task, especially whims, made it almost impossible to actually get the job done - I’d commented to ashley that it seemed purposeful. And also there was the ‘story’ jackson and whims peddled about the billboard $$$ - I took notes for that and was tasked to recount that to the CA group so they could have the details. It only took 6 weeks to catch up to J&W to collect that story (they were not in a rush to tell it) and after I submitted a recap of their details before publishing in the group, they wanted corrections. I used to be a secretary …. I take VERY good, very detailed notes and make very good recaps - it was part of an actual job. The details they wanted changed did not make sense. They also blamed the amount of the billboard invoice on Gary, and that story did not hold up over time either. Those folks were stealing. I do not have smokin gun proof, but I was close enough and dealt with enough details to know, the story they were peddling did not hunt, and the story they peddled changed over time. A bit after the above, we had very judiciously made an admin level decision that was HARD TO MAKE after suffering ALOT from shenanigans that we supposedly had every right to make, only to have that decision veto'd. wonderland, ashley and I banned Gary and Falcon Sight from the CA group (they were causing all manner of issues), jackson vetoed our decision - when we were admin'd, we were told by W&J that we had complete control over the group, obviously, this control was to be used within reason, of course. The rationale they used to 'splain' why .... it was clear they were not working for the benefit of the group. Shortly after that, in an in person meeting with wonderland and ashley, I said out loud that jackson and whims were top down infiltration …. and the looks on their faces. I was saying the part I wasn’t supposed to see. And wonderland was TIGHT with whims and jackson. I never trusted wonderland; when I had to admin alongside her, I promised myself I would do my very best to NOT see her thru my past lens of experience and extend her trust, until such a time as she eroded it. I was actually impressed that I accomplished this task. ashley aways comported herself in friendly manner - a little big on the love bombing and attempting to emotionally bond. However, I never really trusted ashley because she was visibly emotionally unstable and openly spoke of imbibing a number of substances on a regular basis. I voluntarily stopped admin'ing as I had other personal details I needed to attend to and could not do both well. I must say, attempting to admin in a group where from the top down, failure was intended and you were beat to pulp for actually accomplishing **** …. made it hard to continue; the choice was horrible - you lose if you continue, you lose if you stop. The ONLY way an admin can un-admin themself from a chat is to leave the group - auto un-admin. Otherwise, you must wait for others to do it for you - and I wasn’t waiting. Thus my exit from the chat; I’d occasionally look in it, but did not rejoin. After I stepped down from CA admin, I got thrown in front of bus by a bunch of CA peeps - and when those people actually were dumb enough to tag me in comments in Tore's chat, I then basically shared what I knew, which none ever rebutted. And when they tagged me, since I didn’t just stupidly pelt them with calling names but starting airing facts, they’d always scatter. Because I didn’t shrink, they didn’t stop talking ****, but they did stop tagging me. Getting thrown in front of a bus happened for about a year, maybe a year and half with a few errant comments after that after I stopped admin'ing. A while after I stopped admin’ing, ashley, MayDay, Marilyn (?) and 2 - 3 others were ‘voted in’ to admin. I was never banned from the CA chat until the very day set to vote for new admins - I was banned that very day and was never unbanned. It’s been a while since I attempted to go to the CA chat, but last time I tried the link, it didn’t work (long after I was initially banned). Wonderland did a short stint as TS admin; I hope my screenshot of her passing the collection plate (via paypal) because Jackson and Whims were sooooo broke and they dedicated all their time to Tore if anyone can spare even just a little - THE DAY I got admin’d, that idiot sent me that message, on the down-low, asking for money for those two …. they didn’t ask for money in broad daylight; they did it behind the curtain. I did notice a few of my comments started going missing from the TS chat, specifically replies to content containing lies about me, which I replied to correct. That comment, plus the initial comment also went ‘missing’. The MIA posts were generally posts that were my direct experience of admin'ing the CA chat. That person was TIGHT with Thought Crimes according to what was said in a very minimal exchange via DM. That person used to ‘work with’ TC to trace the ‘bad guys’ (close to actual words, but obviously, tracking networks) …. but I’m pretty sure, based on what Tore’s said recently about TC, he’s the dog that stole money from the crypto wallet that mistakenly paid off the billboard balance (mistakenly paid off part of the story told by Jackson and Whims). I’m cannot say that tS admin deleted my comments; I can only say that person's advent as admin was the start of my ‘missing comments’. My curiosity would be: who else in CA group took part of that money grab. Remember, TC blamed the billboard $$$ theft on Mayday …. till he rescinded his accusation. But it would make sense if the public accusation compelled behavior of others. Could be that the architect of that crypto theft was not TC? And the public accusation was the tool to pry open a piece of the pie? I could say lots more …. but only if the details are needed. X is not playing nice today - can’t really listen to the chat on device or desktop …. so just leaving this here.

• 
  Hannah / EK (@ekphrasticao3) reported 53 minutes ago

  @shu_bing2464 The PayPal purchase link appears to be broken. Is this an error that will be corrected duringn the pre-sale timeframe?

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Yuki_io_1 @Stable chain has the backing (PayPal, Tether) but only ~25 weekly contract deployers across 7 months. $FEFER was the main show, hit $16M then dropped under $5M with RPC issues. TVL sub-$300K now. ecosystem isn't there yet

• 
  Chrisncreation.inj 🥷 (@NwudeChris1) reported 54 minutes ago

  Take Maya. She isn’t a crypto trader. She’s a graphic designer who just wants to send money to a developer in Tokyo without paying a $35 wire fee. Last year, a friend told her to try using a fast financial network. So she did. But the second she tried to move her funds, the screen hit her with a pop-up: “Please convert your ERC-20 token to the native chain using a cross-chain bridge.” Maya stared at her phone. Bridge? ERC-what? She closed the app and used Paypal. That’s the silent killer of crypto. We built incredible financial highways, but we locked the doors with confusing jargon, manual token conversions, and terrifying multi-step bridges. If you have to explain network standards to someone just so they can trade a token, you’ve already lost them. This week, two massive things happened for Injective ($INJ) that fix this exact problem. First, @coinbase finished migrating INJ entirely to its native network. No bridging, no wrapped tokens, no accidental burnt funds. You buy it, you withdraw it straight to where it actually runs. Second, $INJ went live on @RobinhoodApp . Because Robinhood and Coinbase are where everyday people, the Mayas of the world actually hang out. Instead of forcing millions of retail investors to jump through technical hoops, the friction was simply erased. @injective brought high-speed financial tools directly to the apps people already use. The future of crypto adoption isn't about teaching non-technical people how the machinery works. It’s about making the machinery invisible. When moving money on-chain feels as effortless as sending an email, that’s when real adoption happens. We’re finally getting closer to that world.

• 
  Vince Visuals (@vince19visuals) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Taylor167670099 @LobanjicaCS Man that‘s so sad I can‘t imagine how you are feeling damn :/ I‘ve send them a couple of paypal transaction and also 2/3 game keys which I‘ve used to redeen into my steam accounts and that sold my problem within a week

• 
  Gàidheal 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@gaidhealdubh) reported 59 minutes ago

  Okay. So having issues with PayPal. FANTASTIC ******* NEWS 🫩🫩🫩🫩🫩🫩🫩🫩🫩🫩🫩

• 
  Anita Ker (@IemberKer) reported 59 minutes ago

  @PayPal I am told I cannot use PayPal anymore because of an activity in my account that is against the policy. But then, since I created the account I have not used it, neither have I link any card to it. So, what could be the problem and how can this be resolved? @AskPayPal