Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (56%)
• Errors (24%)
• Sign in (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nagpur	Errors	2 days ago
Chhindwāra	Website Down	3 days ago
Douai	Sign in	11 days ago
Olathe	Website Down	12 days ago
Da Nang	Sign in	14 days ago
Chhindwāra	Sign in	15 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  scott. (@tehscottpilgrim) reported 46 seconds ago

  @basicallybeee Ik some dude posted a google drive file on reddit but they took it down.

• 
  INCITE AI (@Incite_corp) reported 2 minutes ago

  Did you know? $RDDT ran to 200 and is now around 170, roughly 15% off the top and 8% down today. Most of this move is hot money taking profits after a huge sprint, not fresh bad news about Reddit itself. Before you buy, sell, or hold, ask Incite AI.

• 
  anonymous_man:) (@anonymity_abc) reported 8 minutes ago

  @AgniVesa_07 The problem is with reddit as an app Idts even if u create a good subreddit u can do anything much before getting shadow banned

• 
  Kira ギア5 (@ItsKiraWorld) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Th3birdman15 @KinoFlexReviews Okay, so I'll give you that. However, I don't think you should've then posted a screenshot of the reddit page that has the wrong guy's name, face, and location. That's currently where my issue is. When you were told it was the wrong guy; you could've just said so and moved on.

• 
  ThatBluejay || Wuldriik (@Wuldriik) reported 9 minutes ago

  @ScopelyExplore "Temporarily" for 2+ months. "Small number of trainers" yet stacks of posts & comments on Reddit & IRL. This was not an issue, this was a shady trial/freebie period used to get people to now buy cosmetics they otherwise wouldn't have bought. PLAYERS, STOP REWARDING THEM MONEY

• 
  Nuts! (@WestMichAnon) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Akroseething01 @HavocTwoOne Dude, this isn’t Reddit, some mod ain’t gonna come rescue you from your terrible opinions about something you shouldn’t be commenting on.

• 
  derek sleeter (@dereksjw23) reported 11 minutes ago

  @MenMuscleMoney @Google notice the difference is soy reddit. we need to close down that app and jail the workers

• 
  Ahmed W. (@AhmedWAGUEI) reported 13 minutes ago

  @jyriso Thanks for the trouble. That's what I suspected. The same thing goes on reddit.

• 
  JermaFan#459845 (@mstrofcomdy209) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Heroine__P_ i want a competence porn horror anthology like a group of 4 people that go around and get trapped in reddit horror slop and have to navigate their way out and each of them is really good at one specific thing and they're all extremely rational and approach problems and make plans

• 
  The Cinematic Lab 🎥 🔬 (@CineLabHQ) reported 18 minutes ago

  Obsession: Predictable Mess or Masterful Build-Up; A Critical Look at the 2025 Horror Hit I just walked out of Obsession, the latest offering from director Curry Barker (released May 2025 via Focus Features). There’s plenty to admire: the film is generally well-executed, with strong performances, atmospheric tension, and intriguing ideas that tap into the dark side of desire and unintended consequences. Yet, as someone who appreciates thoughtful horror, I found myself wrestling with the screenplay. Certain choices left me wanting a more refined execution, particularly in how the central relationship and supporting arcs unfold. The Progression of Bear and Nikki’s Twisted Romance One of my main issues lies in the build-up of Bear (Michael Johnston) and Nikki’s (Inde Navarrette) relationship. The cat memorial scene, for instance, felt like it arrived far too early in the story. It immediately signals Nikki’s unhinged obsession, making the subsequent time skip where we’re expected to believe she dialed back the weird behavior while they start dating hard to swallow. I would have preferred a slower, more progressive escalation of Nikki’s obsession. Give Bear more initial denial and hesitation, allowing him to dig himself deeper into the relationship. This would make his later “victim of abuse” behavior feel more earned and relatable. As it stands, Bear occupies a frustratingly ambiguous space: he’s not a full victim, nor is he easy to hate outright. He comes across as a coward, which makes him deeply unlikeable at times. An unlikeable protagonist isn’t inherently a flaw, but here it results in emotional distance. Scenes meant to evoke sympathy fall flat, while moments highlighting his agency don’t land with enough moral weight. I’m not against portraying Bear as the villain in the end. I just wish the film committed more clearly to that duality instead of leaving it feeling messy. Half-Baked Supporting Arcs and Predictable Twists The subplots involving Ian (Cooper Tomlinson) and Sarah (Megan Lawless) also felt underdeveloped. Sarah’s confrontation scene in the car struck me as cheesy and extremely predictable, it telegraphs exactly what’s coming without delivering the intended punch. Ian’s demise, meanwhile, arrives rushed and out of nowhere. It plays like the story simply needed to eliminate characters rather than serving a deeper narrative purpose. Why Online Discourse Sees These as Strengths What surprises me most is how Reddit and other online discussions flip these exact elements into praise. Many viewers laud the car scene for its effective build-up, arguing that knowing what’s coming heightens the tension rather than diminishing it. Others celebrate Bear’s weak, conflicted characterization as “nuanced” and refreshingly complex. This isn’t the first time I’ve noticed this pattern, especially with A24-style horror. Elements I see as screenplay weaknesses abrupt shifts, predictable beats, or murky character motivations set reframed as bold artistic choices that reward rewatches or deepen the themes. Am I out of touch, or are the online crowds missing the messiness? I lean toward the latter, but I’m genuinely curious about others’ takes. Did the wish-granting premise and Navarrette’s intense performance carry the film for you, or did similar pacing and character issues pull you out of it? Obsession has undeniable strengths and has resonated with many as a chilling exploration of toxic longing. For me, though, tighter scripting around the central romance and supporting deaths could have elevated it from solid to unforgettable. What do you think flaws or features?

• 
  R1n (@r1ntezuka) reported 19 minutes ago

  @nugwisomkami I’d say that’s MB but he evolved into some bizarre hybrid of both pre and post covid Reddit in all the worst ways possible. Terrible creators, terrible people.

• 
  Taylor the vibe coder (@taytaycodes) reported 22 minutes ago

  a founder launches on product hunt. 1,200 visitors. zero customers. then hits reddit. twelve paying users in two days. product hunt mostly shows that your product looks like a product. reddit shows whether anyone actually needs it. most builder circles stay polite and upvote everything. nobody buys. reddit has different rules. you can’t hide behind polish or good positioning. if the product solves a real problem, people say so. if it doesn’t, they say that too. faster and louder.

• 
  Train Wreck Meghan (@MeghanMae14) reported 26 minutes ago

  @katefeetie @con247c @NateraGenetics Call them and claim financial hardship! I learned this the hard way/after reading a reddit thread. They did this to me for a NIPT when I was pregnant. I owed them something like $1,100 and got them down to like $300 I think. Good luck.

• 
  INCITE AI (@Incite_corp) reported 26 minutes ago

  @moinvests28 $RDDT ran to 200 and is now around 170, roughly 15% off the top and 8% down today. Most of this move is hot money taking profits after a huge sprint, not fresh bad news about Reddit itself.

• 
  IvoryLumens (@IvoryLumen) reported 27 minutes ago

  @sleepykaslana your issue is that you opened reddit. it should only be used for 7 year old tech issue threads, the rest is a lost cause atp

• 
  Wolfblight (@Wolfblight_) reported 27 minutes ago

  @IggyBomb @ChibiReviews Creator came out and refused to cave to these people and doubled down on making what he wants. So now the reddit types are getting mad at him for making what he wants.

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 30 minutes ago

  Indie founders lost sales to 2am Reddit sizing questions and one-star Trustpilot reviews they never saw. Built Owllert to watch Amazon, Trustpilot, Reddit, and TikTok — draft the reply, escalate the real issues, ship a weekly sentiment digest. Under $100/mo. Live soon.

• 
  Mr.NiceDay (@NicedayNomoremr) reported 31 minutes ago

  @DudeOnTheInter4 @tmo_melonmaster @ShitpostRock The reddit mentality is only part of the problem, really they were done in by doing very little actual work on their game and trying to charge ridiculous prices for it.

• 
  Shadooow (@ShadooowOnX) reported 32 minutes ago

  Amit says software has become the consensus short and reveals Figma as a company the market is discounting for the wrong reasons "The software names, in my opinion, are buys. I'm buying Palantir, Zeta, Reddit, Shopify, ServiceNow, and Microsoft" "I think all the software names are going to do very well in a world of AI as token costs go down" "The market needs a short to hedge its longs, and software has become the consensus short" "Figma is one of those software companies where I think it's being discounted for the wrong reasons, especially when you look at the revenue growth" "I think getting back to $35 or $40 is not crazy, but they're going to need the revenue growth to get there"

• 
  Plain, Simple Plippy (@Plipster) reported 33 minutes ago

  True story: I was troubleshooting and Google showed some redditor was having the same problem so I clicked. OP was ignored and everyone was congratulating some ****** "the cake is a lie" response. First and only time I went to reddit. ****, man!

• 
  molly ⟢ 💋🪩💿 (@SNOOPYSD0GHOUSE) reported 34 minutes ago

  @onanightlikered reddit is only good when you enter it from a search engine with what you believe to be an original problem and someone has encountered and solved it 7 years ago

• 
  Tarak (@octavianslash) reported 36 minutes ago

  @AgniVesa_07 Reddit Jannies will ban it on day one. We’ve been down that road before

• 
  Kuldeep Lather (@Kullthegreat) reported 36 minutes ago

  Ban Reddit, uncontrolled virus and unfiltered call to violance. Doxxing of journalist, Security, and common problem is going on freely. @HMOIndia @MIB_India

• 
  Sergeant News Network (@sgtnewsnetwork) reported 37 minutes ago

  FRESH: Rotten Tomatoes Hiding Bad Reviews for Nolan’s The Odyssey As Redditor Claims ‘The Real Audience Score Is 56% Fandango’s ownership of Rotten Tomatoes fuels unverified claims, but no deleted reviews or audit data have emerged to support them KEY TAKEAWAYS: ~ Rotten Tomatoes’ verified system excludes unverified reviews, creating two distinct audience scores by design. ~ Fandango owns Rotten Tomatoes, and NBCUniversal owns Fandango, raising legitimate conflict-of-interest concerns. ~ No deleted reviews, leaked directives, or independent audits support the viral 56% suppression claim. You pull up Rotten Tomatoes, check the audience score for Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey, and something feels too tidy. A Reddit thread is circulating with a damning claim: the “real” audience score is 56.2%, and RT is supposedly ghosting negative reviews to protect the film. The accusation is spreading fast — emotionally satisfying, neatly conspiratorial, and largely unverified. One Reddit post does not a conspiracy make. The 56.2% figure comes from a single user parsing publicly accessible data. No independent audit backs it up. Rotten Tomatoes, Universal Pictures, and Nolan’s team have offered no public response to the allegation — which, to be fair, cuts both ways. Here’s what the system actually does. In 2019, RT introduced verified audience ratings tied to Fandango ticket purchases. The score displayed on the main page reflects only ticket-confirmed viewers. Unverified reviews still exist — they’re just not prominently surfaced. That design gap means a broader, unverified pool could produce a significantly different number. Not because reviews were deleted, but because the system was deliberately built that way. THE CONFIRMED AND UNCOMFIRMED FACTS BREAK DOWN CLEANLY: ~ Confirmed: RT’s verified system can produce a higher public score than the broader unverified pool — by design. ~ Confirmed: Fandango owns Rotten Tomatoes. NBCUniversal owns Fandango and sits within The Odyssey’s distribution ecosystem. ~ Unconfirmed: Negative reviews are being deleted or suppressed for this film. ~ Unverified: The 56% figure as a definitive hidden score. THE OWNERSHIP QUESTION IS REAL ~ THE EVIDENCE ISN'T The corporate relationship between RT and Universal deserves scrutiny, but suspicion alone isn’t proof. The ownership chain looks suspicious on paper. Actual evidence of interference doesn’t exist yet. This is the kind of allegation that spreads like a Reddit thread about concert ticket pricing — fast, furious, and consistently missing the fine print buried beneath the outrage. Nobody has produced a deleted review, a leaked directive, or a whistleblower account. That matters. RT’s scoring system was designed to prevent review-bombing. But that same architecture now makes the platform look like it has something to hide. Until RT or an independent source audits the underlying data, the 56% claim stays exactly where it started — a very valid Reddit theory, not a verdict.

• 
  Martin Ernst (@Mart1n__Ernst) reported 38 minutes ago

  @largegroupofmen @restoreorderusa When I think of sites that don’t have a problem with bots and astroturfing, I think of Reddit lol

• 
  Brant Tedeschi (@BrantTedeschi) reported 38 minutes ago

  @glenngabe The problem with reddit is that AI is perfect for weeding through hundreds and thousands of comments to easily summarize sentiment. Reddit is being aggressive via the media because .... they are concerned.

• 
  Kukie (@kukie_tandoh) reported 39 minutes ago

  Is there any tv show that the good people of Reddit have not labelled as mediocre and a terrible watch? I’d go on there hoping to discuss sth and everyone is slandering something I just enjoyed 😔 or I have bad taste?

• 
  The Cinematic Lab 🎥 🔬 (@CineLabHQ) reported 43 minutes ago

  Obsession: Predictable Mess or Masterful Build-Up; A Critical Look at the 2025 Horror Hit I just walked out of Obsession, the latest offering from director Curry Barker (released May 2025 via Focus Features). There’s plenty to admire: the film is generally well-executed, with strong performances, atmospheric tension, and intriguing ideas that tap into the dark side of desire and unintended consequences. Yet, as someone who appreciates thoughtful horror, I found myself wrestling with the screenplay. Certain choices left me wanting a more refined execution, particularly in how the central relationship and supporting arcs unfold. The Progression of Bear and Nikki’s Twisted Romance One of my main issues lies in the build-up of Bear (Michael Johnston) and Nikki’s (Inde Navarrette) relationship. The cat memorial scene, for instance, felt like it arrived far too early in the story. It immediately signals Nikki’s unhinged obsession, making the subsequent time skip where we’re expected to believe she dialed back the weird behavior while they start dating hard to swallow. I would have preferred a slower, more progressive escalation of Nikki’s obsession. Give Bear more initial denial and hesitation, allowing him to dig himself deeper into the relationship. This would make his later “victim of abuse” behavior feel more earned and relatable. As it stands, Bear occupies a frustratingly ambiguous space: he’s not a full victim, nor is he easy to hate outright. He comes across as a coward, which makes him deeply unlikeable at times. An unlikeable protagonist isn’t inherently a flaw, but here it results in emotional distance. Scenes meant to evoke sympathy fall flat, while moments highlighting his agency don’t land with enough moral weight. I’m not against portraying Bear as the villain in the end. I just wish the film committed more clearly to that duality instead of leaving it feeling messy. Half-Baked Supporting Arcs and Predictable Twists The subplots involving Ian (Cooper Tomlinson) and Sarah (Megan Lawless) also felt underdeveloped. Sarah’s confrontation scene in the car struck me as cheesy and extremely predictable, it telegraphs exactly what’s coming without delivering the intended punch. Ian’s demise, meanwhile, arrives rushed and out of nowhere. It plays like the story simply needed to eliminate characters rather than serving a deeper narrative purpose. Why Online Discourse Sees These as Strengths What surprises me most is how Reddit and other online discussions flip these exact elements into praise. Many viewers laud the car scene for its effective build-up, arguing that knowing what’s coming heightens the tension rather than diminishing it. Others celebrate Bear’s weak, conflicted characterization as “nuanced” and refreshingly complex. This isn’t the first time I’ve noticed this pattern, especially with A24-style horror. Elements I see as screenplay weaknesses abrupt shifts, predictable beats, or murky character motivations set reframed as bold artistic choices that reward rewatches or deepen the themes. Am I out of touch, or are the online crowds missing the messiness? I lean toward the latter, but I’m genuinely curious about others’ takes. Did the wish-granting premise and Navarrette’s intense performance carry the film for you, or did similar pacing and character issues pull you out of it? Obsession has undeniable strengths and has resonated with many as a chilling exploration of toxic longing. For me, though, tighter scripting around the central romance and supporting deaths could have elevated it from solid to unforgettable. What do you think flaws or features?

• 
  𝔚𝔦𝔩𝔩 𝔅𝔩𝔞𝔠𝔨 🇺🇸 (@WillBlackGaming) reported 46 minutes ago

  @SCEngineeringUK @mishtal "suck it up buttercup" Reddit is down the hall and to the left

• 
  Mani (@Sharpe_Trading) reported 52 minutes ago

  $RDDT is down 9% today - mindboggling. Reddit should be up not down .... 1. Reddit is questionning why it should keep paying (in traffic and content) for Google to train models and generate AI Overviews that then reduce the click-throughs Reddit relies on for ad revenue and engagement while collecting a licensing fee that looks small next to the value Google extracts. 2. $60M Reddit revenue is 2% of annual revenue, material. Switching off the deal completely would have Reddit lose $38M in net income and $0.18/share. 3. Every $10M added through renegotiations add $6M in net income and $0.03/share. 4. This is not the only licensing agreement of it's type that Reddit has, OAI pays Reddit $70M Reddit is absolutely doing the right thing. Fresh, conversational data is a scarce, monetizable asset in an AI arms race.