Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (65%)
• Errors (25%)
• Sign in (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Lübeck, Hansestadt	Website Down	2 days ago
Craiova	Website Down	2 days ago
Nanaimo	Website Down	2 days ago
Chicago	Website Down	2 days ago
Pāhoa	Website Down	2 days ago
Pittsboro	Website Down	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Eli (@EliPrincePepe) reported 2 minutes ago

  @clairlemon See your first problem is Reddit. That is all.

• 
  Kevan MacGee (@kevanmacgee) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ASalvadorini @Nithin_00000000 It was an ordeal, 3 hours of trial & error. This is a hacky fix though, I won't get security updates. Others on reddit say they have both, others say they only can have 1.23 if they uninstall 2.0. Even uninstalling 2.0, MY 1.23 auto updates to 2.0 no matter what.

• 
  henry (@DemNationalist) reported 8 minutes ago

  I hate this so much. I saw this happen with reddit fandoms. “No no no, people on MY side can’t be lunatics, they must be plants to make us look bad”. Yes, actually, people on your side can JUST be crazy. It happens. Take responsibility and disavow. Whats the issue with that?

• 
  recctfull (@recctfull) reported 13 minutes ago

  @TheGadgetFreakk @Reazeeer Someone on Reddit opened them up and through the driver's serial number he found out that said drivers are Chinese mass produced drivers for live 50$ which have terrible quality and are prone to break fast. Fact is that that audio64 is heavily overpriced. (1)

• 
  Riley (@RileyEatsGood) reported 22 minutes ago

  @ATenaciousDad @BigBoris_2 Ah, so you'd rather push up your proverbial glasses condescendingly while refusing to offer valid and constructive evidence for your own beliefs. You could've just said that. Reddit is down the hall, pronouns.

• 
  Benzinga (@Benzinga) reported 24 minutes ago

  A borrower on Reddit sparked a major discussion after revealing they were struggling with nearly $89,000 in credit card debt despite cutting almost every non-essential expense. The person said they lost their job two years ago and returned to work at a much lower income, forcing them to make only minimum payments. Their debt reportedly grew from about $40,000 to nearly $89,000, largely due to interest and the difficulty of staying current. They said they may no longer be able to make minimum payments and are worried about lawsuits or wage garnishment in California. The poster said their budget is already stripped down to basics: mortgage, utilities, gas, insurance, groceries and work-related expenses. They said they have no vacations, no luxury spending, no expensive hobbies and have canceled nearly every subscription. What surprised commenters was the income. The borrower later said they bring in about $10,000 per month, but expenses are around $10,000 to $10,100. That shifted the conversation, with some questioning how someone earning roughly $120,000 a year could still be unable to gain ground. Others urged the borrower to contact creditors, ask about hardship programs, explore nonprofit repayment plans or consider debt settlement options. The bigger takeaway: high income does not automatically fix a debt spiral if interest costs, fixed expenses and cash flow pressure are already out of control.

• 
  LIKENG| REDDIT MARKETING (@patye91) reported 24 minutes ago

  Someone just messaged me after burning more than $1k/mo on Reddit ads with zero results. Her boss wanted numbers and she was panicking. I asked one question: "Do you have any organic reach?" "No." She said. She avoided organic because she thought her boss would think she wasn't working if she wasn't running ads. But here's the thing about Reddit — REDDITORS ABSOLUTELY HATE BEING SOLD TO. The only way to actually move product there is to Show up in the comments. Answer questions. Solve problems. Be useful. NO AD WILL DO THAT FOR YOU. The rule on every platform is the same: Start organic. Then pour money behind what's already working. On Reddit, Twitter, LinkedIn — the comments section is where the real money is. So instead of investing your time and budget on Reddit ads you better spend hours every day to Scroll, Drop value without dropping the links. Stop buying attention. EARN IT!

• 
  Saeed Anwar (@saen_dev) reported 24 minutes ago

  Mining Reddit and forums for pain is good research but the gap is usually between "complaining about it" and "willing to pay to fix it." That filter is where most micro-SaaS ideas fall apart.

• 
  vera 🐇 (@bluebirddarling) reported 24 minutes ago

  She was like “hold up I’m going on Reddit to see if they were gay” I was like girl put that down u have me. N then I briefed her dw

• 
  Patrick Byrne (@PatrickByr47244) reported 25 minutes ago

  I've cancelled my Premium Basic subscription because I was getting more "views" on the free version, and I have no interest in Veblen goods, prefering value for money. I tried my article about the bankers taking £40 BILLION of our money, on Reddit, "r/AskEconomics" and - guess what? It was removed on the grounds of breaching rule V. which bans "soapboxing" and loaded questions. Judge for yourself. I have made a few updates in the article, to better explain my argument. If after reading what I have said, you still disbelieve that the bankers could have gatekeepers across social media, preserving their "golden goose," that is your inalienable right: I would like to offer my first post, on a subject which has troubled me for several years. I have now constructed a paradigm which makes sense of the inscrutable UK economy, and it requires the visualisation of the UK economy as two separate and distinct financial entities, with two different types of money. 1. The general economy, the one which includes M1, M2, M3 etc. and which I think of as the main, or primary economy, where we spend money to live. 2. The other, secondary economy, is a banking one, where digital money is created with the stroke of a computer key, and none of it appears in the UK money supply figures, because there is nothing to buy in the digital-money-creating-economy. It is only when digitally created money is transferred, in the form of bank loans, mortgages or student loans, from the banking sector - where it was created - into the real economy of M1, M2 etc. that the money changes from being digital, to becoming real, and the money supply automatically increases to include it. I do understand that commercial banks operate in the real economy but when they create money there are strict financial regulations and accounting mechanics dictating exactly how this money is controlled and deployed. “Commercial banks create new money through lending, but they cannot use this self-created money to buy arbitrary assets, fund their own operating expenses, or purchase corporate buildings. When a bank creates money, it does so by simultaneously writing a loan asset and a deposit liability on its balance.” ChatGBT This is easy in the UK where some 90% of all financial transactions are cashless. Sometime later, when the loan is repaid in full, the amount recorded under "loans receivable" has, in the bank's accounts, been reduced to zero, and it could be said that the "created money has disappeared." This - to me - "myth," that the created money disappears, is a controversial one that has been presented to me as a fact (which I did not understand), and to which I have been unable to articulate a sound challenge; until now. The problem was, and still is, that the repayment of the loan has, indeed, cleared the original loan creation, but, those same loan repayments - which cleared the "loans receivable" account at the bank, have ended up securely in the same bank's deposits. The amount of the loan has moved from the primary economy into the secondary, or banking- digital-money-creation sector, and the rules, above, state that the money cannot be used to buy arbitrary assets.. Our clever banking forebears overcame the problem with a sublime solution. They created a "reserve fund" at the Bank of England, they even called it their "reserve account" and used it as a receptacle for all real economy money that ends up, somehow, in the secondary, or digital economy. The money held in the reserve account does not count towards the money supply and this effectively "hides" the problem of the permanent transfer of real money into the digital economy. And yet we, the taxpayers, pay interest worth £40 BILLION A YEAR to the bankers, ostensibly for keeping their money in this reserve account. If you ask AI who owns this money it says: “Since the 2008 crisis, the BoE created large amounts of reserves during quantitative easing. When the BoE bought government bonds, it credited commercial banks’ reserve accounts with newly created central bank money.” AI got this information from Hansard. But why did QE result in the commercial banks receiving £875 billion paid into the BoE reserve account? The following, are the words used by the BoE to describe QE on its website: “The money we used to buy bonds when we were doing QE did not come from government taxation or borrowing. Instead, like other central banks, we can create money digitally in the form of ‘central bank reserves’.” So, if the BoE created the money digitally, why did the commercial banks get credited? The BoE were buying government bonds from the Debt Management Office, which is an Executive Agency of HM Treasury, in order to move extra money into the treasury, to help pay for the Banking collapse and the Covid pandemic. These two quotes, one from AI, sourced from Hansard, and one from the BoE website are mutually exclusive, they cannot both be correct. Returning to the subject of this article, the "BoE reserve account" neatly resolves the problem with "real money" leaking into the "digital economy," and uses this fund to balance commercial bank accounts each day, a laudable undertaking, but at what cost to the nation. Your instinct will be to think, they wouldn't do this, but please bear in mind that until recently UK university "economics courses," including my own master's course, were teaching that banks used the money in their deposit accounts to make loans, the so-called "fractional reserve banking," this is simply untrue. Banks create loans with digital money and transfer it into the real economy as a loan. Why did the universities do that? What were they helping to hide? My issue on all of this is: why are we paying interest to the banks on digital money that doesn't exist in the UK money supply and which the owner cannot spend on arbitrary assets? Of course they can't spend it, it is in the secondary, or digital-money-creation-economy, you can only spend money in the real economy, the digital economy is for creating money and lending it into the real economy. Interest is to compensate someone for lending money which could be earning income from trading. Money in the BoE reserve account cannot trade. This is our money – we own the BoE - and it would transform the UK economy. We could, for example raise the tax-free allowance immediately to around £25,000 per year. With potential huge increases in UK productivity.

• 
  The Kekkery (@TheKekkery) reported 26 minutes ago

  @SuburbanWarlord @DelusionPosting Reddit has an ad campaign on youtube targeted towards kids that says "parents who get you" trying to entice kids to join so they can be actively groomed by ****, twinks, ***** and trannies. Because any very middle of the road REASONABLE reply gets down voted to hell and degens up

• 
  Just Your Average Bear (@Jester_Alby13) reported 34 minutes ago

  @LijGWAc82jwx9b @lady_valor_07 To be fair, the hurdles are being made by their own. If the tiktok/reddit obsessed weren't so busy trying to one up women or "fight the chuds", the more normal down to earth trans people wouldn't be getting so much flak

• 
  above average pa’ja enjoyer (@tayseye) reported 36 minutes ago

  @ilydigitalangel trust me i’m the last person who would ever believe a reddit post. and yes this is very bad misinformation to spread because it’ll lead to another hate train and EVERYBODY will get pulled down INCLUDING manon. in case you haven’t noticed but this fandom isn’t ******* normal

• 
  Charles Reding (@CharlesReding67) reported 37 minutes ago

  @socket_wench @sircalebhammer Reddit is down the hall and to the left buddy

• 
  Z 🐆 (@Zforever97) reported 38 minutes ago

  @OWHistory @caffeineai I agree, the marketing need to start honestly, just ICP people are using this, you can tell by checking how twitter followers never goes up instead goes down, also no one talks on reddit as they do with replit. Also customer support damn it, no startup succeed without that!

• 
  SerialPillock (@SerialPillock) reported 39 minutes ago

  @ShitpostGate Reddit has a similarly genius new feature. When Google etc. went to ****, we had to start adding "reddit" to searches to get a human (not journo/empty SEO) answer. Now Reddit has an AI which trawls through the human answers and greets you with a broken robot version ... \o_O/

• 
  Loganix (@loganix) reported 39 minutes ago

  a lot of teams are running ai visibility campaigns that treat it like a single channel they optimize it isn't "what is loganix" gets answered by what reddit and review sites say about us our own site has minimal say here "best link building service" gets answered by listicles, comparison posts, and third-party placements our own site has even less say why? gemini actively ignores first-party content for category queries chatgpt still uses official sites, but mostly to verify what it learned elsewhere the citation volume comes from off-domain either way every citation type here is workable brand citations get built where ai models look for entity context: wikipedia, reddit, structured listings, and reviews category citations get built by earning your way into the listicles, comparison posts, and /news/ placements ai pulls from on buyer queries informational citations follow once those layers exist the model trusts what your domain claims after the rest of the signal is built ai visibility is a distribution problem the work compounds across the network of places that talk about you

• 
  Kate The Great🏳️‍⚧️ (@BerkleyKat27551) reported 39 minutes ago

  holy hell mainstream trans reddit is to toxic. girls post on there saying, "I fell terrible, i dont pass". i really relate. and all the responses are, "youre probably just mistaken you probably pass perfectly!!)" like😦 girl friend a LOT of us do not pass. We are not imagining it

• 
  psionics (@psionics13) reported 42 minutes ago

  @reddit_lies @nikitabier If you think they're only in it for the money and not working to decimate western culture... I think reddit is bleeding into your thought process

• 
  Joshua Waxman (@waxmanj) reported 42 minutes ago

  @ClayTravis That “moderate” is single handedly responsible for the elimination of Roe v. Wade and numerous incompetent cabinet members. I’d rather have someone who used bad judgment on Reddit and in a tattoo parlor ten years ago then Susan Collins’ judgment on big issues

• 
  Rizki Salminen💜 (@tilehopper) reported 42 minutes ago

  So the solution is to use genAI that is more expensive, more resources intensive, and mostly relied on reddit or other community-sourced sources that are now seeing 1000x server bills due to AI scrappers. Sound logic.

• 
  naomi 🐀🌈 (@spaceolympicz) reported 43 minutes ago

  @JimJones69_ girl that's not a source that's a Reddit comment from two years ago. You cannot be talking abt taking down maga when you don't know how to fact check

• 
  Olami Lekan (@RealOlamius) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Joost_Boer Your branding is honestly better than a lot of projects I see. The product is likely not the problem. The thing is, the right communities haven’t gotten there yet.” “Reddit is good for that because people trust recommendations more than traditional promotion.”

• 
  Krupal Chaudhary (@workwithkrupal) reported 48 minutes ago

  This Reddit thread called “how not to run an AI company” isn’t actually about bad engineering. It's about what happens when AI demand breaks infrastructure in real time. This is what the system looks like right now: -> Multiple Claude products showing repeated outages over 90 days -> Uptime fluctuating between 98–99%, but with visible instability spikes -> API, Code, Console, and enterprise tools all degrading differently under load -> Users split between “this is normal scaling” and “this is unacceptable for paid infra” And here’s the part people miss that this isn’t model failure. The AI still works. The system around it doesn’t stay stable under continuous demand. So you get this weird reality where: 1. The intelligence is state-of-the-art 2. The availability feels early stage startup 3. The usage feels enterprise critical And those three things don’t coexist cleanly yet. This is why these threads always look chaotic. Users think “this is broken” Engineers think “this is scaling” Companies think “this is success” And all of them are correct because the real bottleneck in AI right now isn’t capability. its predictability under load.

• 
  ****** Critic (@m1r3p01x) reported 49 minutes ago

  help reddit no matter how many entrenched sinecure machines i join they keep selling me down the river for fringe benefits for the established old timers

• 
  MultiBaggers Capital (@MultiBaggerss) reported 52 minutes ago

  🚨I added to $RDDT today. Reddit is down 37% YTD and it’s easily a $200+ stock. 91.5% gross margin. 7 consecutive quarter of 60% sales growth. Out of all US tech companies, only ONE has this full combo at the same time: • 40%+ revenue growth • 30%+ FCF and EBITDA margins • tiny capex • 91.5% gross margin Look, I don’t enjoy buying beaten-down stocks—I’m all-in on AI hardware plays—but $RDDT is straight-up a gold mine here.

• 
  Insanegamer52 (@insanegamer52) reported 54 minutes ago

  AI search results are less reliable than 2010 Wikipedia We will all be scrolling down to find that human written reddit post from 4 years ago

• 
  Brian Alex (@RealBrianAlex) reported 55 minutes ago

  @enigmatic_notes Buddy you’re on the wrong app Reddit is two apps down

• 
  War Veteran 213 (@213_war72625) reported 58 minutes ago

  @uhBails @Gxmerr I still cannot get on. I’m also hearing people on Reddit also have the same issues as well

• 
  J. Greenriver (@JGreenriver) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Mr_Sallykins @GreeneMan6 Okay, I think I understand the problem now with beauty and mediocrity.. you're the sort of fellow who spends his time on reddit discussing the finer details on definitions aren't you? You do not accept objective truth and you think it's all up for litigation basically.