Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (64%)
• Errors (25%)
• Sign in (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Indio	Website Down	1 hour ago
Rosenau	Errors	15 hours ago
Pélissanne	Sign in	3 days ago
Adelaide	Website Down	7 days ago
Brisbane	Website Down	9 days ago
Bengaluru	Website Down	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jonah 📦 (@jonahhodges_) reported 9 minutes ago

  Brands can tell in 5 seconds if you've done your homework or you're spray-and-praying. The RESEARCH is the pitch. Before contacting any brand, I run through 4 things: Pull every 1-3 star review on their Amazon listing. That's unfiltered product feedback the brand already knows about but hasn't fixed. Check Reddit and Instagram comments for what customers keep asking for that the brand isn't delivering. Look at the listing itself: broken images, no A+ content, 20 unauthorized resellers leeching off the buy box. Map every complaint to a service I can fix. Each one becomes a pitch statement. Example: Reviews say "packaging always arrives damaged" and "different item arrived from seller" My pitch: "I'll help clean supply chain, and forecast inventory so you never run out again." You're not asking to buy products. You're showing up as the person who already identified the problem. That's the whole difference.

• 
  tryst.link (@WeAreTryst) reported 10 minutes ago

  @tsraynajames @NicoleKnightUSA We're currently active here and on Reddit. The first point of call is to send in a support ticket. But if you have any issues with your ticket or questions you can also reach out to us via DMs.

• 
  broken💎shaders (@brokenshaders) reported 11 minutes ago

  @madsmadsdk I prefer spending 2 weeks building something high quality and guiding the dumb LLMs. And yes, Codex is faster BUT NOT BETTER than me. That's the issue. I don't think speed is *everything* especially seeing how all the brainlets on X/Reddit prioritize speed over everything.

• 
  RTS (@chrisrts1) reported 11 minutes ago

  @TeamYouTube I even reinstalled the app and still the same. Some reports on Reddit as well with the same issue. I am using an iPhone 17 pro with the latest software.

• 
  Grubster (@Grubster10246) reported 13 minutes ago

  @RadioGenoa How much you wanna bet that the people who burned Teslas are complaining that this is terrible and targeted hate on Reddit rn. I’d bet on it.

• 
  Shookbyava (@SuperCB_TV) reported 15 minutes ago

  @tiktokcreators My account ShookByAva was permanently banned in error. My previous two misinformation strikes are over 90 days old and my latest video was clearly entertainment/creepy theory content. I was simply reading creepy ufo stories and theories off of Reddit hints me saying OP AKA ORIGINAL POSTER. according to TikTok’s guidelines misinformation is something that causes harm to individuals or society and I do not think creepy ufo stories cause harm to either I’ve submitted an appeal but it was denied and I have submitted feedback tickets I would appreciate a manual review of this recent violation that cause my ban and of the past two violations. These bans are obviously made and decided by bots because of the fact there is no misinformation in a scary story that is obviously for entertainment purposes. Thank you.

• 
  . (@Animeberollin) reported 15 minutes ago

  @drewthewild_ Yes, it’s reasonable to believe the opposite, but it’s not reasonable, not specifically talking about you, but other Stan’s believe that the girls are the issue. The girls were talking ****. Believe these Reddit posts, which are lies to get attention. Stan’s are gullible.

• 
  Cacodad (@Cacodadd) reported 17 minutes ago

  @SimpTheotokos @ElGranSenglar You’re on the wrong side of an 80/20 issue, everyone except here and Reddit hate you guys

• 
  Jakob Musk (@JakobMusk) reported 18 minutes ago

  Remember when Elon Musk asked his legion of followers to defend him on Reddit and I did so… my Tesla was vandalized in the process (thanks to those that helped me fix it quickly)

• 
  Shivam Pandey (@taken_shivam) reported 24 minutes ago

  @NikunjG55759310 @rahuls100788 @iitroorkee Cheating has definitely happened. In 2023, a guy named Shivam yadav from PW cheated his way into IIT Bombay CSE. He couldn’t even solve basic problems at the university, failed his first semester, and his friends later exposed him on Reddit. He is now in his third year.

• 
  ArgarthanCunnyClaimer1984 (@UncleUpskirt01) reported 26 minutes ago

  @anime_viral @DARTHMALL821918 @HazzyRail reddit is literally an anti site. the discord server was literally taken over by project moon fans and hoyotards. you'd know this if you were actually part of the community. Also remind me again who put down the cdawg collab?

• 
  Walker (@WalPerMott) reported 28 minutes ago

  @shir0wan Yeah that's about it. They've been treated with kids gloves for a long time. Like 98% of Reddit has strict 0 tolerance policy against anything critical of trans. It's bubble parent syndrome. A child raised protect from everything breaks down when entering the wider world

• 
  Runner of my Squad (@HomeWithTheKids) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Elliesmommyy23 Gah reddit and the baby apps are all terrible for stuff like this!!! They're echo chambers too and you DO get in trouble for speaking up. I got some warning from my 9/25 baby bump group for saying no to having a progressive mom safe space thing.

• 
  beaverlover99 (@shdd07) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Pastrytime Too bad this has been an issue for almost a decade now. I was in high school when I heard league reddit moderation was bad and I’m a working adult now. No ones gonna do anything about it, nothing’s gonna happen, GG’s.

• 
  Gary Tanashian - Notes From the Rabbit Hole (@NFTRHgt) reported 33 minutes ago

  I just went down a Reddit rabbit hole filled with CFPs discussing "prospecting" for clients. Talking about what accounts are too small, what higher N/W accounts to focus on and service. It sounds like they are talking about marks. I think the average CFP sees you as meat.

• 
  Edward🦁 (@Edward_590) reported 35 minutes ago

  @pure2dlove Literally just reddit tier nonsense. The British also burn down new York and Boston (this has zero impact on the north cuz plot armor)

• 
  I am proud to be 4 years old forever (@tortureallwom3n) reported 35 minutes ago

  The side of my breasts is very itchy and I keep scratching and drawing blood. This issue doesn’t seem serious enough for a doctor but the alternative is posting my tits on Reddit which I’m not going to do

• 
  Andrew — e/acc (@astralmatrix) reported 36 minutes ago

  The writing style is confident, compressed, mildly theatrical, and aggressively conversational — it is trying to sound like a devastating back-of-the-envelope takedown, not like a careful technical analysis. The strongest feature is the pacing. The author begins with short, declarative claims — “Each Tintin satellite … is 400kg,” “The total # of launches needed is 546,” “you need 110 F9s per year” — and then keeps stacking assumptions, calculations, and conclusions, one after another, with very little breathing room. That creates momentum, and, rhetorically, it gives the impression that the conclusion is inescapable: the numbers are piling up, the logistical problem is obvious, and anyone who has not noticed it is asleep at the wheel. The post also uses parentheses constantly, often to insert caveats, qualifications, miniature side arguments, and sarcastic commentary: “assuming that the first comes online in 2020, and the constellation is finished by 2025 (the official date is the ‘mid 2020s’)” “SLC-4E (Brownsville maybe, but a polar launch from there would GRAZE the Mexican coast — I have a feeling they won’t be happy about that...)” “minimum (almost certainly unrealistic)” The effect is energetic, but also cluttered — the prose repeatedly interrupts itself, and each sentence feels like it is trying to contain the main argument, the footnotes, the rebuttal to an imagined objection, and the punchline, all at once. The author clearly wants to appear as though they have anticipated every counterargument before anyone can raise it. There is also a deliberate use of capitalization and italics as pressure tactics: “Let’s be VERY optimistic.” “EXACTLY 400 kg” “minimum” “almost certainly physically impossible” These choices are not subtle — they tell the reader where to feel skepticism, where to notice absurdity, and where to accept that the author has already made generous concessions. It is less analytical than prosecutorial: the author is building a case, emphasizing favorable evidence, and tightening the rhetorical screws. The sarcastic cadence becomes more obvious near the end: “Sounds easy, right?” “I don’t think building the satellites will be the issue, Elon...” “No one at SpaceX did these back-of-the envelope calculations, and asked Elon — maybe it was a little ambitious?” Those lines are doing most of the emotional work. The post is framed as analysis, but the actual voice is closer to a smug forum monologue — knowledgeable enough to sound authoritative, impatient enough to be entertaining, and eager to imply that the professionals involved have overlooked something embarrassingly basic. The most distinctive habit is the way the author keeps front-loading concessions, and then using them to strengthen the eventual conclusion: “Let’s be VERY optimistic.” “We’ll also assume it launches first Jan. 1, 2019, and put the finished launch date at Dec 30, 2027.” “This means 8–9 FH launches per year. Sounds easy, right?” This is an effective rhetorical pattern: offer assumptions that seem unusually favorable, calculate the supposedly best-case outcome, then argue that even the best case is implausible. It gives the post the structure of a reductio ad absurdum — although, stylistically, it is presented with enough sarcasm that the reader is encouraged to enjoy the demolition rather than audit every premise carefully. The weakness is that the post often confuses rapid accumulation with clarity. Several sentences are overloaded, particularly this one: “Let’s be VERY optimistic. Every satellite will be launched on an expendable Falcon Heavy, each satellite will be EXACTLY 400 kg (unlikely, you need payload mass margin, and likely fuel from having a lower satellite orbit), we’ll ignore whether each satellite can actually fit in the payload fairing, we’ll ignore launch inclination entirely…” That sentence is doing too much — it contains assumptions, caveats, dismissals, parentheticals, and transitions, and it keeps extending itself through commas rather than organizing the ideas. The breathless style supports the author’s exasperated tone, but it makes the logic harder to verify. A more rigorous version would separate the assumptions into a compact list, show the arithmetic cleanly, and reserve the sarcasm for the conclusion. There is also some awkward phrasing, and some grammar that feels improvised rather than edited: “No one at SpaceX did these back-of-the envelope calculations, and asked Elon…” That should probably be something like: “Did no one at SpaceX run these back-of-the-envelope calculations and ask Elon whether the plan might be a little ambitious?” The original sentence is understandable, but grammatically loose. Overall, the style is classic Reddit technical skepticism — dense with numbers, heavy with caveats, performatively generous to the opposing case, increasingly sarcastic as it proceeds, and written to make the reader feel that an enormous institutional blind spot has been exposed by one person with a calculator. It is readable, and persuasive at a glance, but it is also self-satisfied, overstuffed, and more interested in landing the conclusion than in presenting the cleanest possible argument.

• 
  Usman Farooq (@UsmanFarooq19) reported 37 minutes ago

  @StubHub This is unacceptable. My ticket sold at the wrong price because of a listing/pricing mishap, and I’m seeing other sellers on Reddit complain about similar issues. Do not penalize me for a platform/pricing problem. Escalate this NOW, review the sale immediately. @nyknicks

• 
  Nyakeruma (@ThisNyakeruma) reported 37 minutes ago

  @omarvvvr For any builder, reddit is broad because it encourages specificity of a problem to be solved. Let's connect, builders!.

• 
  kocer (@kocer_eth) reported 38 minutes ago

  $60k IN 90 DAYS IS THE LOUD PART. the useful part is what AI changes in dropshipping: it kills the slow testing loop. old way: find product → write copy → make creatives → build page → launch ads → wait → manually rewrite everything new way: use AI to create 20 angles before you spend real money not “AI prints money” more like: 1. scrape pain points from reviews, Reddit, TikTok comments, Amazon questions 2. turn those into product angles, not generic ad copy 3. generate 10 hooks per angle: problem, demo, comparison, objection, before/after 4. make ugly fast creatives first, not perfect brand ads 5. build a landing page around the winning pain point, not around the product description 6. launch tiny tests, kill losers fast, feed winners back into the prompt 7. repeat until one product has actual signal that’s the real arbitrage here. most people see “AI dropshipping” and think the secret is a magic store builder. it isn’t. the store is the easy part now. the hard part is still demand, margin, shipping time, refunds, ad account risk, supplier quality, and whether your creative actually makes someone stop scrolling. AI helps because it lets one person test more ideas per day than a small team could test manually. but the $60k number needs proof before anyone copies the playbook blindly. what I’d copy is the operating loop: research → angle → creative → page → small test → kill/iterate if you can run that loop 5x faster, you don’t need to believe every income screenshot. you just need one product where the market answers with real orders.

• 
  🤡👑 (@joker609king) reported 45 minutes ago

  @Cernovich You complain about Christians being 'too nice' 'weak' etc, yet your first reaction to them raising problems with your choose your own adventure church of one Protestantim is to call them fake and 'i dont debate'. Ok then. Yet you apparantly know enough to figure out what makes a fake Christian AND post about it, despite not attending and joining a church, having very weird beliefs, and not submitting to a priest (unlike me). You calling me and others 'fake' therefore has zero impact, because you have zero knowledge or authority - I put you in the same tier as a reddit athiest on religion.

• 
  Ethan Dobbins (@Ethan__Dobbins) reported 46 minutes ago

  $0-$1m dropshipping - day 17​ Hey pookies, product test #3 is officially ready to go…​ … the product page is genuinely strides better than my competitor who's pushing numbersssss not because of fancier design tho, but because the unique mechanism is explained with the level of specificity stage 4 audiences actually require​ i honestly think that's the main reason 99% of dropshippers can't make a product work they refuse to get into the weeds enough​ As an example, if i was marketing my ecom program right now to dropshippers​ The ai written slop would say, "you've watched youtube videos, taken a course, set up your facebook ads, made some AI image ads, and it's not working, that's why you need my AI branded dropshipping system"​ But there’s no way in Davy Jones's locker that ad will ever work on a real dropshipper​ because if you've actually put your ***** in the dropshipping mouse trap for years​ you read that copy and immediately know the marketer has never actually done the real thing​ But the ad that DOES land on me is one that calls me out by name without naming me​ "you've tried Shrine, you've tried Elixir, you've changed your ad account or pixel because your cpm was too high, you've blamed Meta for underperforming this month, you've blamed the product, you've second guessed your criteria and your prompts"​ THAT level of specificity reads my mind​ now you can introduce the mechanism: "you've heard of AI branded dropshipping before, but the other systems are running outdated prompts on the wrong tools…​ …mine uses agents that do the deep research and surface the exact details your audience uses so your ads speak directly to your customer"​ then back it with real proof, real results, real testimonials​ now i've handled the objections and related to the specific pain​ while showing why my version of a familiar mechanism is structurally different​ that's how trust gets built​ specificity = trust. emotion = trust​ calling out the exact thoughts they have in their head at 1am while staring at ads manager = trust​ because generic copy that you don’t even realize is generic is why your ads flop​ that was my entire focus on this product ​ Not to just write "here's why other supplements don't work"​ i wrote how dog owners actually feel when they're watching their dog suffer​ the depression of "i guess this is just part of pet ownership," the resignation, the guilt of having spent money on 4 different products that didn't move the needle​ then i called out those limiting beliefs and challenged them​ ended up with about 3x more copy on the page than my main competitor​ Now ik i’m a 10/10 on understanding the dropshipping audience because i've lived it for 8 years​ but i'd estimate i'm about a 6/10 on understanding the dog supplement audience right now​ still more reddit threads to read, more amazon reviews to dig through, more forums to surface​ but if this product shows early signs of life, i'll go deeper, no question​ The product is in the best possible position i can give it on a first test​ ads launched​ native style format for both angles, 2 formats per mass desire, 2 mass desires total​ natives because that's what wins in this specific niche based on the swipe study​ PST ad account so they kicked off at 7am pst​ $25 per ad set, $100/day total, all traffic to the same heavy PDP which is basically functioning as both an advertorial and a listicle given how much copy is on it lol​ offer is solid, social proof is believable, mechanism is layered, copy is hyper specific if i do say so myself​ At the gym today, your boy hit some shoulders and tris​ for anyone wondering how i actually lift, i'm fully Dorian Yates pilled​ 2 working sets to true failure per exercise​ if you need more sets on the same machine then you're just leaving reps on the table, full stop​ This methodology easily turns a 90 minute workout into a 45 minute one with better results​ Now once i hit 7 reps clean on any weight, i bump it up the next session​ i genuinely despise going past 7 reps unless i've maxed out the machine waiting for the Gym 2.0 of that machine to drop​ Hit 193 on the scale today, the tortamaxxing is finally working ​ trying to get back to a 9:30 bedtime, which is why this post is shorter than usual​ tomorrow is intentionally a slower day​ a few obligations in my other business to clean up​ then planning to study Hollow Socks since everyone's been pointing them out​ curious to see if there's a layer of their funnel or creative that translates to what i'm doing​ this product needs 2-3 days of breathing room before i make any decisions anyway​ see you in the next one pookies

• 
  stellar (@OkStellar) reported 48 minutes ago

  @G_Thinkers @MintyJane85 Agree in every single way. Reddit community used to be bad when the dev server used to be invite only cus the Reddit is where I went when I first started, but they’ve gotten better from what I’ve seen when I pop in there every once in a while

• 
  johannes (@year3004) reported 53 minutes ago

  GTM software has a success problem: if it works, it stops working. The pitch is always the same – take what people do manually, automate it, and scale it like there's no tomorrow. But if everyone succeeds, the game resets to zero. A process everyone can scale infinitely is worth exactly nothing. We already ran this experiment. It was called SEO. Search results are now utter bullshit, and the last trusted source on the internet is Reddit – a bunch of NPCs arguing with LLMs. Every public channel gets trashed to the bottom the moment it gets popular. Google and Meta solved it with a bidding system, but Clay or cold email systems don't have that luxury.

• 
  kitty! 💚 (@swantonbmbshell) reported 53 minutes ago

  @prettylilego I just saw everyone screaming crying throwing up abt this on Reddit, like I was a couple months ago when NO ONE was having the same problem ksgshs especially opening trade tables

• 
  CaliforniaRepublic38 (@1974Palaces) reported 54 minutes ago

  @glenn_tunes If nothing else , this group mentality on every single issue makes you look very immature. This place is turning into Reddit smh

• 
  Alex "The Hoch" Hochberger, MBA (@the_hoch) reported 55 minutes ago

  The early Internet was wild. Crazy collectives on oddballs on USENET, MUDS, etc. On the early web, you could go down rabbit holes browsing everywhere. Lots was porn, but niche hobbies were everywhere. Google changed everything. Their link centric algorithm changed everything. For years the Pre-Google Internet provided the link popularity that mattered, but a few generations of content later and the commercial spammed out Internet arrived. BBSes lost to well linked and crawlable sites. And that is what AI was trained on. Great language skills. Fakes human communication well. Unable to separate expert content from Reddit rants. The knowledge graph keeps getting bigger and stupider. When you had to learn HTML by hand to build web pages they were geeky and knowledgeable. They were niche, but knowledgable. Each model gets dumber over time. Each new model is getting better at some raw technical skills, but dumber.

• 
  Evan Phillips (@evnphillips) reported 56 minutes ago

  @julienvm Only real issue with that Reddit post is the title/conclusion.

• 
  Asian Mum Riot (@asianmomriot) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Capitalists1776 @DudespostingWs None of this ever happened (most of these Reddit posts are fictions). It's therefore less about what happened in the story and more about what was happening in his head when he sat down to write it. If I were asked to write a story about me frollicking in a fountain to attract a dude, I wouldn't add children into the story. Would you?