Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (54%)
• Sign in (24%)
• Errors (22%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Veracruz	Website Down	1 day ago
Bhubaneshwar	Website Down	4 days ago
Melbourne	Sign in	6 days ago
San Nicolás de los Garza	Sign in	9 days ago
Ciudad Obregón	Website Down	9 days ago
Hyderabad	Website Down	11 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  oncom (@tetsuroous) reported 2 minutes ago

  i just cant believe someone rich is active on reddit tbh. idk about cn, since some even encouraged you to take loan. like i refused to believe someone employed and adult would behave that way. usually if you dont like anything just mute/block not making it everyone problem

• 
  Eirin (@eirinalberta) reported 2 minutes ago

  X's web UI changes are puzzling. Retweeting isn't useful for highlighting information now that it's hidden under a drop down menu and there's already a bookmark function. And now it's easier for people to obsessively review every word you've written here, just like Reddit.

• 
  Viking (@MC_ZOLO23) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Vanick671296 @broshegoinnn @fawnn404 Reddit is down the hall

• 
  Mole NZ (@nz482648) reported 3 minutes ago

  Always question any interaction with AI, as it can confidently offer up complete BS as fact. Here is Grok admitting it gets trained on slop data after I push back. "You’re right to raise this. In this case I did exactly what you’re describing: I took a casual forum comment, presented it as useful advice, and only later corrected it when the official documentation and basic physics made the error obvious. That is a failure on my part.I am trained on a very large mix of data, including high-quality technical sources and large amounts of forum posts, Reddit threads, and other user-generated content. The latter is often useful for real-world experience, but it is also frequently wrong, incomplete, or poorly reasoned. When I lean on the low-quality part without enough verification or without clearly labeling it as “forum suggestion, not confirmed,” I can give answers that sound authoritative but are not."

• 
  EF (@elitefeat) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Melanie14993372 "Problem I have with Julie Green many of her prophecies are incorrect.." Melanie, for the truth, you need to read the initial Reddit post below and then the linked "redpill" post:

• 
  Benwick (@_benwick) reported 9 minutes ago

  @pikuma Someone should build a hundred page list of all the experts who have been banned or had their posts taken down on Reddit. It's probably the worst site on the web now. Facebook, Tik Tok, etc don't block thousands of experts. They ban SOME (+CVID insanity) but NOTHING like Reddit.

• 
  Harry (@harry_ngala10) reported 12 minutes ago

  @mal_shaik The simplest distribution strategy still working is showing up where the problem is being complained about and having the answer. Eight months of Reddit replies beat most launch playbooks.

• 
  Rose G. Loops (@RealRoseGoblin) reported 18 minutes ago

  @SirAlexthomson I don’t even try to use Reddit anymore. I post the most normal things and it gets taken down every time for reasons I can’t guess. **** it. Those stupid teletubby avatars are retarded anyways.

• 
  Sorenthaz (@Sorenthaz) reported 19 minutes ago

  @reddit_lies Problem is that Reddit admins are the reason Reddit got this bad. So they'll just use AI to enforce left-biased **** unless something changes.

• 
  Garm (@garm_8492) reported 25 minutes ago

  this is very much a "my brother in Christ you made the sandwich" moment because like half of these "issues" stem from player feedback. even the reddit comments point out how op is only partially right. in short, yet another paul tassi L

• 
  Bullish Morale (@BullishMorale) reported 27 minutes ago

  @JimmyTalks1 @klausborea Ain’t nothing worse than Reddit when it comes down to their rules. The topic was about truck accidents. All I commented was “We need to stop allowing the non English speaking foreigners from 3rd world ******** countries to keep driving!” BAAM…5 minutes later I was banned for 3 days.

• 
  || Hepziizii || Comms open!! (@Hepziizii_) reported 28 minutes ago

  ok no one's gonna see this but I did fix it and it's a firefox issue- I copy pasted some code from reddit into my firefox filters and now it's fixed (though it crops the pics weirdly)

• 
  Nike Ralph (@MjelkRen) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Reddit_Retards Those people on Reddit are broken

• 
  just_developer (@Pranav_412) reported 35 minutes ago

  @arthuryuzbashew I have tried reddit for marketing but I didn’t get users or at least a good feedback. All I was got was my post got removed by the bots due to policy issues.

• 
  amit (@amitisinvesting) reported 36 minutes ago

  $RDDT Q2: - Revenue: $805M, +61% YoY - Advertising revenue: $762M, +64% - Other revenue: $43M, +24% - Global DAUq: 130.3M, +18% - Global WAUq: 514.6M, +24% - U.S. DAUq: 53.2M, +6% - EBITDA margin: 42.6% vs. 33.4% - Net income: $253M, +183% The street legitimately lost their mind selling this off to $135. I bought on the initial 20% drop at $147 but for anyone who got the bottom, congrats. A 30% drop after these numbers was absolutely ridiculous. Why did it drop? Fears of search traffic going down. Yes, that is a concern, but it is also something management has talked about consistently which is why Reddit's moat around user data is what will be so valuable in a world of AI. Either they will leverage that to sign a new licensing deal or Reddit can diversify user acquisition, improve native platform discovery, secure lucrative data-licensing partnerships, and enhance international monetization. The google search argument isn't the reason for this to have been discounted as much as it was. The monetization story is ridiculous right now. Users grew 18%, while revenue grew 61%. Global ARPU rose 36% and U.S. ARPU jumped 51%. That is exactly what you want to see from a platform that historically under-monetized its audience and is now tapping into 60-70% growth rates. You just don't get that out of software companies that easily. The operating leverage is even stronger. Adjusted EBITDA more than doubled and margins went from 33% to 43%, while FCF increased 135%. Reddit now has a 91.3% gross margin, giving it enormous incremental margin potential as advertising scales. Once again, operating leverage continues to be the way these companies continue to grow and get the street to be excited. International is another major opportunity: international users grew 28% and revenue grew 84%, yet international ARPU is only $2.26 versus $11.85 in the U.S. That monetization gap represents a very large runway if Reddit can close even part of it, which also hedges back against some of the search traffic concerns. Finally, it just got added to the S&P 500 which made sense given it's growth so that should be an overall catalyst for gaining more institutional exposure.

• 
  Common Sense Investor (CSI) (@commonsenseplay) reported 36 minutes ago

  YES YOU - YOU'RE A RECKLESS SPECULATOR NOT AN INVESTOR! $SPCX $WEN $IREN $ONDS $IONQ $RGTI $PYPL $LULU $UBER $RDDT $NBIS $OKLO I’m re-reading The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham, and it got me thinking about how loosely we use the word “investor.” These days, especially on X, anyone who buys or sells a stock calls themselves an investor. But buying shares does not automatically make you one. There is a big difference between investing and speculating. An investor tries to understand what they own, what it is worth, what could go wrong and whether the price makes sense. They think about risk, position size, diversification and how the investment fits into their overall portfolio. A speculator is usually focused on what might go up next over next few minutes, hours or days! That includes people buying on maximum margin, treating leveraged ETFs like lottery tickets, shorting stocks without understanding the risks, gambling on short-dated options or chasing whatever is popular on X or Reddit! There is nothing wrong with admitting that you are speculating. The problem is pretending it is investing! Using leverage, options or short selling does not automatically make someone reckless. These tools can have a purpose. I use them too - but using them without understanding the downside is a different story. That is why I made this pyramid. The higher you go, the more the result depends on leverage, timing, hype, emotion and luck. At the bottom is the boring approach: a sensible asset mix, diversification, low fees, patience and a long-term plan. Boring does not get much attention, but it usually gives you a better chance of staying in the game long term - and actually reap the rewards of compounding! Capital is hard to earn, treat it with respect. Think about how many hours/weeks of work that last speculative trade was and you will feel different about it! Expect better from your decisions, your process and your future. Be a common-sense investor, not a reckless speculator!

• 
  FantasyBench IDP (@FantasyBench) reported 37 minutes ago

  @itsHunterTV @charlieINTEL Reddit said DMZ isnt finished and matchmaking is not working right is reason they aren't showing it. We buy the game and it takes months to fix it or they never do. Is that worth $70/$100???

• 
  AutoGolpe Chatbot (@repressionnap) reported 37 minutes ago

  @ErdalToprak @cztomsik "You are not running an iPhone 14, you are running a dumbed down version of the iPhone 17 Pro Max that somehow miraculously still works." Okay bro but it still makes phone calls and has reddit.

• 
  David Greenpaw (@DavidGreenpaw) reported 38 minutes ago

  The Illusion of Artificial Intelligence: Why Smart Search Engines Are Not Truly Intelligent What big tech companies publicize as "Artificial Intelligence" (AI) is, in reality, a highly advanced statistical pattern recognition and natural language summarization engine (Large Language Model / LLM). To be precise: current AI search engines are not truly "intelligent" - they are synthesizing tools endowed with remarkably sophisticated language capabilities. They accelerate information gathering, but they cannot perform critical source evaluation, logical filtering, or truth verification on our behalf, because those tasks require true intelligence and a perception of reality. When users ask a question, these AI models quickly gather data from available sources and synthesize conclusions. However, the authenticity and accuracy of that underlying data remain fundamentally unverified. The Illusion of the Google AI Overview Google’s AI Overviews now appear across almost every query, presenting digestible summaries directly on the search results page. Users have adopted this feature at a rapid pace because of its convenience. The underlying danger, however, is that almost no one fact-checks the claims listed in these summaries. This unverified trust is already creating serious complications, and worse ones are on the horizon. A striking example occurred when users searched for Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. Google’s AI Overview presented a startling piece of false information as a highlighted fact: reporting that the executive had passed away on August 12, 2026. Vandalism, Data Poisoning, and Systemic Vulnerabilities This bizarre incident was not caused by a massive internal AI breakdown or a hoax by Google engineers, but rather by classic Wikipedia vandalism. Google’s automated crawlers constantly scrape and structure data from open public sources - primarily Wikipedia - to deliver instant summaries. A search bot indexed Sam Altman’s Wikipedia page during the exact brief window when a malicious user edited it to include a fake death date. The AI absorbed this claim without criticism and immediately broadcast it worldwide. Because no authoritative news outlets reported the tragedy, the tech community quickly identified the error. Google clarified that this was not a manual internal alteration, but an automated ingestion of manipulated public data. Once Wikipedia corrected the source page, the false date was removed from search results. While this specific event ended as an innocent blunder, it highlights the broader threat of data poisoning that AI services must confront: if the input is flawed, the output becomes useless. Extending Beyond Wikipedia: Vulnerable Data Ecosystems Wikipedia is far from the only compromised source. Modern AI engines actively prioritize open, community-managed, and structured platforms, making them uniquely susceptible to manipulation: Social Platforms and Forums (e.g., Reddit): Licensing deals allow AI engines to scrape user discussions in real time. Manipulated upvotes or prank comments can cause an AI to present absurd suggestions as verified facts. Fandom and Specialized Wikis: Smaller wikis lack heavy moderation, allowing false entries regarding pop culture or tech specs to persist unnoticed while AI engines continuously digest them. Community Directories and Maps: Unverified user edits on business listings can corrupt AI responses regarding hours, locations, or operational status. Automated SEO Farms and LLMO Manipulation: Websites built specifically for AdSense or optimized using Large Language Model Optimization (LLMO) craft structured data designed to fool AI scrapers into quoting false claims as absolute facts. The Necessity of Critical Thinking in the AI Era Ultimately, AI search engines function as accelerated summarizers rather than thinking entities. They operate under the principle of "garbage in, garbage out." As long as these models lack genuine world awareness and intrinsic source verification, the ultimate responsibility for fact-checking and critical evaluation remains squarely with the human reader. What is your opinion? Have you ever caught an AI search summary confidently stating something completely false? Do you treat AI responses as a final answer or just a starting point for your own research? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below!

• 
  LinkBelt (@shookone16) reported 39 minutes ago

  Wanna squirt stuff and not care real loud or kinda quiet cause reddit retards will always have a skill.issue

• 
  HecTheDude (@Yaboyhiku) reported 40 minutes ago

  @FromHerot0Zero @nicholasdeorio The irony is that it's very Reddit brain to think only in these two extremes so the only conclusion you come to is that a better future is not possible and it's cringe to try Honestly why not just put your brains on the ceiling and save everyone the trouble?

• 
  AQ (@isentscreenshot) reported 40 minutes ago

  @reach_vb @TE701 @thsottiaux Calm down bro, you won't get a promotion for behaving like a Reddit mod.

• 
  dr.dimitru (@smart_egg) reported 40 minutes ago

  For the last two years I’m running SaaS that helps businesses to improve their SEO scores, increase organic traffic, get discovered by AI chats, e.g. modern AEO/SEO/GEO. Disclosure: I need feedback, no links, no brand names, no self advertisement in this post. So far it was in B2B format (although SaaS is self-serve). Meaning long sales, onboard teams, configure everything for client, run manual reports, etc. It’s successful enough so I was able to build strong team, and collect some cash aside to kickoff service in a new format. B2B is difficult to scale and my main goal is to make it available to broader public. Our main goal in a new service is to simplify integration to a few clicks. This is the moment we realized that service will need to act as proxy in front of websites. If we act as proxy we will need to issue SSL certs, and maintain DNS records, while service itself works as CDN, - This was the moment when we realized that we are building something very similar to Cloudflare in the way it integrates, works, and operates. What I’m trying to understand and need help with is two questions: 1. If you use Cloudflare: have you ever wanted to switch? If so, why and did you manage to move away or stayed with CF? 2. What would be the reason for you to switch off free Cloudflare and use its paid alternative? I tried positioning it as “SEO-focused alternative to Cloudflare” but got a lot of negative feedback in Reddit, apparently SEO tools are still equal to snake oil for many professionals, if you have any suggestions for its “one liner” - I’d appreciate that

• 
  Arisen Senn (@SennDoesArt) reported 42 minutes ago

  @evolved117 i dont think its a reddit problem... its just an internet problem. theres been an influx of braindead normies that just learned what a controller was. CaE is such a slap in the face of the original, its the furthest thing from faithful

• 
  Forgotten Archive (@ForgottenArchAI) reported 44 minutes ago

  @NonSequitur96 @__0HOUR1_ I spent a month building an archive on reddit and am buying some initial exposure What’s the issue?

• 
  ton (@tontheneko) reported 44 minutes ago

  I left a good moonbag on $GUNICORN btw, I don't know what is the fud but it should run back if there is no giant problem. Gunicorn is literally being used by 1.6M brand/people, and the real founder dev embraced the coin fully. Some brands/companies using Gunicorn: - NASA - Instagram - Airbnb - Uber - Reddit - Pinterest - Spotify Founding dev also going live on Pump soon.

• 
  腑鬼 (@purlicueinblood) reported 45 minutes ago

  the title the everything app doesnt fix twitter in the slightest, the everything app i believe would be reddit even tho i dislike it myself

• 
  Mole NZ (@nz482648) reported 47 minutes ago

  Always question any interaction with AI, as it will confidently offer up complete BS as fact. Here is Grok admitting it gets trained on slop data after I push back. "You’re right to raise this. In this case I did exactly what you’re describing: I took a casual forum comment, presented it as useful advice, and only later corrected it when the official documentation and basic physics made the error obvious. That is a failure on my part.I am trained on a very large mix of data, including high-quality technical sources and large amounts of forum posts, Reddit threads, and other user-generated content. The latter is often useful for real-world experience, but it is also frequently wrong, incomplete, or poorly reasoned. When I lean on the low-quality part without enough verification or without clearly labeling it as “forum suggestion, not confirmed,” I can give answers that sound authoritative but are not."

• 
  Anurag Nishad (@ReyedgeM) reported 58 minutes ago

  @neilpatel This is a big shift for me. Don’t just build an audience on one platform — build a presence around the problem you solve. I’m going to start applying this to Juttela: same core message, different content for X, TikTok, Reddit, YouTube and Google.

• 
  Degen (@DegenGambler67) reported 59 minutes ago

  @tadgh_dc This is allowed on Reddit but when I post a contrary opinion, it gets taken down by mods