Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (57%)
• Errors (24%)
• Sign in (19%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Da Nang	Sign in	6 hours ago
Chhindwāra	Sign in	1 day ago
Puteaux	Website Down	6 days ago
New Delhi	Website Down	6 days ago
Paris	Website Down	9 days ago
Vigo	Website Down	11 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rawkzor (@ChromeShinobi) reported 21 seconds ago

  @reddit_lies Accurate straight down to the reddit ban because hurt feelings. Pure cinema.

• 
  Classic Hex (@DoomerCoomer) reported 2 minutes ago

  @succubitch_penn "unknowingly" it wouldn't be unknowing though would it, especially since HE COVERS TTRPG SCAMS also, even if it wasn't a crime, it would be morally wrong for him to steal that money, it would destroy his image as the guy who "takes down scammers" by regurgitating reddit posts

• 
  Blonde Emergency MD 🇵🇸 (@blondemedSJW) reported 4 minutes ago

  @GamerEMDoc The issue for me really was not him being a marine and four tours, but then going back to work for Blackwater?? He also had some Reddit posts where he described how much he liked killing people in combat. Apart from the tattoo there was so much other stuff.

• 
  Command (@moon_or_doom) reported 7 minutes ago

  Buttercoin — The Original Crypto Legend Buttercoin (2013–2015) was a Bitcoin exchange that aimed to be the NASDAQ of Bitcoin — a full order book trading platform with institutional-grade infrastructure. Open-source, high-volume, Wall Street-ready. The Thesis Bitcoin needs a real exchange. Not a broker. Full order books. Institutional liquidity. A trading engine that Wall Street can trust. Founded by Cedric Dahl and Bennett Hoffman. Y Combinator S13 batch — same batch as Coinbase. Two companies. Same thesis. Wildly different outcomes. The Run - 2013 — YC S13. Raised $1.6M from Google Ventures (Kevin Rose), Floodgate, Initialized Capital, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian. - 2014 — Wedbush Securities invested. First Bitcoin company to ever get Wall Street backing. This was a big deal. - 2015 — Shut down. The official reason: "loss of interest in Bitcoin from venture capital firms." Why It Died Too early. Bitcoin in 2013–2015 wasn't ready for institutional adoption. No ETFs. No custody solutions. No regulatory clarity. The thesis was spot on — just 5 to 8 years ahead of its time. The Irony Coinbase — same YC batch, same vision — went public at $86 billion. Buttercoin shut down with 4 employees. Two companies. Same starting line. One became the face of crypto. The other became a what could have been. --- Why It Matters Now (RH Chain 2026) The Buttercoin token on Robinhood Chain is a nostalgia play — reviving one of crypto's earliest and most respected names. Like how GME and AMC tokens tapped into meme stock lore, Buttercoin taps into OG crypto history. Narrative: "The legend was right in 2013. Now it's back on Robinhood Chain." And I don't know who made this, he seems very lazy; 0xCCF72360Ec38675692306fe92E842024aadE2B78 But i'm aped. Not financial advice. Just respect the lore.

• 
  Eeveebeingcute/Doomhiker (@eeveebeingcute) reported 10 minutes ago

  @bdquinn Extremely common on tiktok and Reddit, too. Lots of people really mad at completely made up things. Actually a serious problem

• 
  Lenin’s pal 🔻 (@DR0WN3DFISH) reported 12 minutes ago

  Just had the most annoying coworker convo of all time. He refused to answer any opinion based questions bcs “what value do they have if we’re not working to arrive to prove reality?” Literally just thinks no opinion has value, everything needs to be factual science. Holy reddit!

• 
  chidy chidy bang bang (@kusayi27) reported 13 minutes ago

  @HighschoolMelo Recently came across a post on reddit They even have a wikipedia page for NE fetish but that page was taken down. Lol

• 
  Larry Dallas (@BartFurley) reported 16 minutes ago

  @mary_willatt @TheBreakdownAB The thing that made me upset was the accusation by Farkas that I was manufacturing rage. There were over 5000 upvotes on Reddit and I got 700 likes on my post here and I was told it was a nothing. It seems thousands of people were upset she did this. SO that is my issue.

• 
  BeingInvested (@0xbeinginvested) reported 16 minutes ago

  A 18 YEAR OLD COLLEGE STUDENT IS CLOSING $19,000 A WEEK IN WEB DESIGN CONTRACTS FROM HER BEDROOM. SHE HAS NEVER WRITTEN A LINE OF HTML. She does not know how to set up a domain. She does not have a portfolio. Her entire agency is one Google Maps tab and a Claude subscription. She runs a move that the rest of the cold-calling internet hasn't figured out yet. Most agencies spend hours building pitch decks, hunting down leads, and begging for 15-minute discovery calls. They show up to meetings with promises. She shows up with the answer already built. Every morning at 9 AM, she opens Google Maps. She searches "nail salon" or "barbershop." She filters for businesses with a 4.7 rating or higher, hundreds of reviews, but no website listed. There are millions of them. Local businesses that are drowning in foot traffic but completely invisible online. She clicks on one. "Natural Nails & Lashes." She highlights every piece of information on their Google profile — the address, the operating hours, the owner's name, and five of the best customer reviews. She copies it all and drops it into Claude. She adds one line: "Write a prompt for an AI website builder using this data. Make it a professional, aesthetic, luxury website. Include the reviews." Claude spits out a master prompt. She copies it, opens Webild io, and pastes it in. She waits exactly two minutes. The AI builder generates a fully functional, multi-page website. It has a luxury aesthetic. It has the salon's actual address. It has a "Book Online" button. It has a testimonials section featuring real quotes from their actual customers. It looks like a $5,000 custom build from a boutique agency. It took her eight minutes and cost zero dollars. Then, she picks up the phone. She doesn't pitch. She doesn't ask for a meeting. *"Hey, I noticed you didn't have a website, so I built you one this morning. Are you near a computer? It takes 30 seconds to look at it."* The owner says sure. She shares her screen. The owner is staring at a beautiful, functional website with their own business name on it. They see their own customers' reviews. They see their own address. They don't have to imagine what the agency might build in six weeks. They are looking at the finished product right now. She says: *"I can transfer the domain to you and have this live by tomorrow morning. It's $2,000."* Done. She closes 5 to 6 of these a week. $10,000 to $12,000 in weekly revenue. The 6th deal last week came because the 5th owner showed the demo to his brother-in-law who owns a landscaping company. Real web developers are complaining on Reddit that the market is dead and clients won't pay for quality anymore. Agencies are spending thousands on ads to get a single lead. She is ignoring all of them. She figured out the one truth of the modern internet: the most expensive part of a service business isn't the service. It's the pitch. When you can build the finished product in 8 minutes for free, you don't need to pitch anymore. You just need to show it to them. The market is pricing web design like it still takes a team of four people six weeks to build. She is pricing it like it takes two minutes. The gap between those two realities is where she is making $12,000 a week. And the businesses she calls have no idea she's just the screen.

• 
  Xanthus Holdings (@xanthusholdings) reported 21 minutes ago

  🦅 Xanthus Market Predictor — 2026-07-09 📊 REGIME: Distribution — reduce, raise cash · Score 29.1/100 · 43% invested / 57% cash 🎭 CONTRARIAN: Neutral (F&G 42.3429, VIX 16.9, RSI(QQQ) 47.8625) 🤖 AI-labs book read: mean 24m +40% 🧠 AI COUNCIL — 🔴 RISK-OFF (high agreement) Unanimous risk-off across all three seats, and the committee concurs. The core case is asymmetry, not apocalypse: ridge offers a thin +0.62% while the correction forecaster flags 75.5/100 with an expected -5.7% air-pocket — roughly nine-to-one skew down. Composite 29.1 places us squarely in regime C distribution, and SBDV's distribution component at 94.8 confirms breadth is hollowing beneath index highs. Crucially, this is a positioning/vol-plumbing risk, NOT credit: HY OAS at 2.67% (-0.69σ) and a normal curve say the macro plumbing is fine. Gemini's real-yield argument is real but secondary — 2.3% real 10Y is a slow structural drag, not a 5-10d catalyst. The live tail is Iran/oil toward $80 plus 'ceasefire over' headlines against IVTS 0.849 complacency. Verdict: de-risk toward ~43% invested, trim crowded high-beta tech, hold quality, and buy cheap index hedges while vol is underpriced. Don't add. ↔ vs quant: CONFIRM. Composite 29.1, correction 75.5, SBDV 66.3 all align with seats; committee adopts quant's 43% invested target directly. 📣 24h X/Reddit/news: 24h X/WSB/Reddit: heavy Iran-oil chatter, energy longs vs tech shorts, sentiment tilting defensive but no capitulation yet ahead of housing data. 👀 Watch: Iran/US escalation and WTI $80 breakout · SBDV breadth / distribution component 94.8 for further deterioration · IVTS 0.849 complacency — any VIX term-structure inversion signals the dip starting Committee: • Claude (risk) — risk-off: Distribution regime with negative asymmetry; violent -5.7% air-pocket outweighs thin 0.62% edge — de-risk. • Gemini (macro) — risk-off: Restrictive real rates and severe breadth deterioration compel a sharp reduction in long-duration tech exposure. • Grok (catalyst/social) — risk-off: SBDV 66 + Iran tensions = distribution intact Advisory only — not investment advice. #AlphaForge #investing #macro

• 
  Ahnaf Shahriar Muiz (@AhnafSMuiz) reported 25 minutes ago

  @victor_bigfield I think should try reddit, reddit is a platform where people already stay with problems, pick and build solutions.

• 
  𐡀 (@Xyleniqq) reported 25 minutes ago

  I've been answering questions on Reddit pretending to be a lawyer and someone is using my advice in an actual court case. I'm not a lawyer. But I've watched a lot of Law & Order. Two years ago, I started browsing r/legaladvice. People post their legal problems. Other people give advice. Most of the advice is terrible. So I started commenting. I'd write things like: "You need to file a motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction." I had no idea what that meant. But it sounded right. People thanked me. "This is so helpful!" "You just saved me thousands in legal fees!" I kept doing it. I'd use legal terms I'd heard on TV. "Tort." "Statute of limitations." "Habeas corpus." I'd Google things to make sure I sounded legit. Then last week, I got a DM. "Hi. I used your advice in my case. We won. Thank you so much." I panicked. Me: "What case?" Them: "The landlord dispute. You told me to cite breach of implied warranty of habitability. The judge ruled in my favor." Me: "That's great." Them: "I told my lawyer about you. He wants to know if you do consultations." Me: "I'm not taking new clients." Them: "That's okay. I already referred three people to you." Oh no. I got three more DMs. People asking for legal advice. One person wanted me to review a contract. Another wanted me to represent them in small claims court. Me: "I can't represent you. I'm not licensed in your state." Them: "What state are you licensed in?" Me: "I have to go." I stopped commenting on r/legaladvice. But people still message me. Last week: "Are you still practicing? I need help with a custody case." Me: "I'm retired." Them: "You're only 50." Me: "Early retirement." I deleted my account. Made a new one. Now I only comment on r/cooking. It's safer.

• 
  Cleo Fee ✨ (@eehpoelc3) reported 25 minutes ago

  @polinkisses 1/. Yes. I’ve been on reddit those last few months on many Bridgerton subs including the Polin sub and I’m sad seeing on X other so called Polin fans dragging it down. Maybe some prefer Nic or Luke but doesn’t mean they hate the other. This place is the only sub which try to be

• 
  Alexis Ohanian 🗽 (@alexisohanian) reported 28 minutes ago

  @intro Reddit grew for years on basically zero marketing spend. The product was the marketing. If you're buying growth, you're paying a tax on a product people don't love yet. Fix that first.

• 
  Rocking_Adi (@RSYcore) reported 35 minutes ago

  @LoyalYashFan A small tip which will work : Turn on aeroplane mood and then off ... Install reddit , login with different email and then enjoy 🗿

• 
  Amine Obeidat (@aminegrows) reported 35 minutes ago

  You can steal any company’s entire marketing strategy in one afternoon here’s exactly how 👇 step 1: go to meta ad library search their brand name filter by active ads anything running 30+ days is making them money screenshot everything step 2: go to tiktok creative centre search their brand or product category filter by top performing write down the first line of every video that stops you scrolling step 3: go to their reddit or trustpilot read every complaint read every 5 star review the complaints tell you what they’re failing at the reviews tell you what’s actually converting step 4: claude prompt “here are 10 ads from [competitor], 20 customer reviews, and 15 complaints. what emotional trigger appears in everything they do. what are they never saying that their customers keep asking for” step 5: that gap they’re not talking about is your entire content strategy step 6: brief 5 ugc creators around that gap not your product the thing your competitor’s audience wants and isn’t getting step 7: run it against their audience watch your cpa you just turned their budget, their testing, and their customer data into your competitive advantage for free in one afternoon comment “reverse” and i’ll send you the full doc with the exact prompts we use to do this for vc-backed clients

• 
  darmaclivinglife (@darmac95934198) reported 36 minutes ago

  I would say, MYOB. Parents decide. Educate them. And yourselves (government) Six months after Australia became the first country to implement a wide-ranging ban on social media for kids, the ban has proved ineffectual. Yet rather than rethinking its approach, Australia’s government is doubling down. The law, which took effect last December, bars children under 16 from having accounts on 10 platforms: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat, Kick, Reddit, Threads, Twitch, and X (formerly Twitter). The legislation put the burden on tech companies to verify the age of their users and to demonstrate their compliance to a new government regulatory agency. Since the law went into force, the platforms deactivated, removed or restricted more than 5 million accounts. But a March report from the government’s eSafety regulator showed that many Australian minors were able to sign up with new log-ins. A survey published last month in the BMJ medical journal similarly found that 85 percent of Australian kids under 16 were still using the age-restricted accounts. Many were able to bypass age restrictions, some set up fake accounts and a few used VPNs to obscure their location. “Little evidence was found of immediate substantive reductions in reported social media use by adolescents under 16 years,” the authors concluded.

• 
  tamimbuilds (@tamimbuilds) reported 36 minutes ago

  How I use Reddit to market without getting banned: 1. Search "[problem] + android app + reddit" on Google 2. Find threads where people are actively asking for solutions 3. Write a genuinely helpful reply explaining HOW to solve the problem 4. Mention your app ONLY as one option among others 5. Never use a shortened link — type the full app name Got my first 2 sales this way. Zero ad spend. Save this for later.

• 
  HOSEX🚢 (@gramhand) reported 36 minutes ago

  @PerceptronNTWK @CryptoCoinShow Reddit sold your data for $200M+ You got nothing. Perceptron built the fix 800K nodes, live paying clients, and humans actually earning The decentralized AI data network is here

• 
  Abhishek Kaushik (@slaybuilder) reported 37 minutes ago

  So the real battlefield in 2026 isn't just your website's SEO. It's the Reddit threads your buyers are already reading — and the AI models are already citing. The problem: doing this well by hand is brutal. Wrong subreddit, wrong tone, wrong pace — and mods (or Reddit's spam filters) catch you fast. That's the actual bottleneck. Not effort. Targeting + voice + consistency.

• 
  lyudmila (@alhaitao) reported 38 minutes ago

  I need to calm down im so mad at everyone. Mad at my dumbass coworker mad at seal fans online mad at Reddit lets go make some buldak mama

• 
  Himani Choudhary (@himani1904) reported 40 minutes ago

  Hey @nothingsupport , . My Nothing Phone (3) drops dead instantly at 5%. Multiple users on Reddit are reporting the exact same voltage drop issue. I just bought the phone 20 days ago and no resolve Please escalate this kindly fix it for me and other users. @nothing @nothing

• 
  TheValueist (@TheValueist) reported 42 minutes ago

  $NVDA $MU $SNDK $LITE Agentic *** and the Real Investment Edge: Reducing Bias and Workflow Friction The most important takeaway from Annie Duke's talk is not simply that investors should quit more often. The deeper thought is that professional investors operate inside two constraints that quietly damage decision quality: cognitive bias and limited bandwidth. Bias makes it hard to abandon, resize, or reverse a prior decision once capital, reputation, time, and identity are attached. Bandwidth constraints make it hard to continuously re-underwrite every position against new facts, new prices, new opportunity costs, and new portfolio risks. Agentic *** matters because it can reduce both types of friction at the same time. It does not make humans unbiased. It does not replace the PM. It does not eliminate judgment. But it can materially improve the decision environment around the PM. The PM still owns judgment, risk, sizing, temperament, and final decision-making. The value of Agentic *** is that it can create a decision-discipline layer around the PM: a system that continuously records what was believed, checks what has changed, highlights disconfirming evidence, and forces the current holding case to compete with the best use of capital today. The edge is not that the machine has perfect foresight. The edge is that the PM is no longer making every decision against memory, emotion, inertia, and time pressure alone. The entry decision in investing is often the easy part. Not easy in an absolute sense, but easier psychologically. Before the position exists, the PM is more neutral. He can research the company, build the model, identify the variant perception, map upside/downside, define catalysts, size the risk, and debate the idea with the team. The decision is forward-looking. The position has not yet become part of his P&L, reputation, or identity. Once the position is in the book, the decision environment changes. The PM is no longer just analyzing a security. He is also defending a prior decision. He has capital attached to the idea. He has a memo, a model, meetings, management conversations, channel checks, internal debates, and prior conviction embedded in the position. At that point, the question can subtly shift from, "What is the best use of capital today?" to, "How do I defend the decision I already made?" That is where alpha leaks. The exit is often harder than the entry because it requires the PM to separate current evidence from prior attachment. A position that began as an earnings acceleration thesis can quietly become a "strategic asset" thesis. A valuation reset can become "temporary multiple compression." A missed catalyst can become "the market is not giving them credit yet." A broken estimate path can become "management is sandbagging." A stock that should be re-underwritten can remain in the book simply because it has always been in the book. This is how cognitive bias compounds in real portfolios. Sunk cost makes prior effort feel relevant to the future decision. The endowment effect makes the existing position feel more valuable because it is already owned. Loss aversion makes selling a loser feel like admitting failure. Confirmation bias makes supportive evidence easier to find than disconfirming evidence. Anchoring keeps the PM mentally tied to entry price, prior valuation, or old upside/downside. Status quo bias allows positions to survive because nothing has forced a new decision. Thesis drift lets the reason for owning change without a formal re-underwrite. The human brain is not built to mark every prior belief to market every day with perfect objectivity. Even very good investors are vulnerable because the problem is not intelligence. The problem is that investing decisions are made under uncertainty, time pressure, emotional pressure, and information overload. The PM has too many positions to monitor, too many inputs to process, too many competing demands, and too little time to constantly rebuild the underwriting from first principles. That is why Agentic *** is such a powerful tool for investing. Its value is not just better summaries or faster memos. Its value is that it can reduce the negative impact of cognitive bias and workflow friction at the same time. It can make belief revision easier, faster, and less emotionally loaded. It can make daily re-underwriting realistic. It can make the fresh-capital question unavoidable. The fresh-capital question is simple: If I had no position today, would I buy this security right now, at this price, at this size, against every other available use of capital? That question is brutally clarifying. It separates ownership from opportunity. It separates defending the past from underwriting the future. It separates "I still like the company" from "this is still the best risk-adjusted use of capital." A PM who asks that question consistently will make cleaner decisions than a PM who lets the existing book become the default answer. Agentic *** makes it significantly easier to ask that question across every position, every day. A customized system can maintain a live thesis ledger for each holding: the original underwriting, variant perception, expected catalysts, upside/downside, key assumptions, sizing rationale, time horizon, trim criteria, add criteria, exit criteria, and the evidence that would prove the thesis wrong. Then, as new information arrives, the system can compare the current fact pattern against the original case. Did the catalyst happen? Did it slip? Did the estimate path improve or deteriorate? Did management change its language? Did competitors say something inconsistent with the thesis? Did sell-side revisions confirm or challenge the model? Did the stock move because fundamentals improved, or because factor exposure moved? Did the risk/reward improve, or did the PM simply become more emotionally attached? These are the questions that should be asked continuously, but in a traditional workflow they are often asked inconsistently because people are busy. This is where Agentic *** reduces work overload and time-constraint friction. Filings, earnings transcripts, conference presentations, sell-side notes, estimate revisions, channel checks, competitor commentary, news, regulatory updates, customer commentary, technical papers, X narratives, Reddit chatter, options data, factor moves, portfolio exposures, and prior internal memos can all be ingested, summarized, compared, and routed to the right decision context far faster than a human team can do manually. The speed increase can be enormous, and in many workflows it feels exponential because the system is not merely reading faster; it is connecting more inputs to more decisions at the same time. That speed matters because investing is not just about having the right idea. It is about updating quickly when the facts change. A PM with faster information processing has more flexibility to change his ideas and thoughts without becoming reactive or undisciplined. Changing your mind becomes less like admitting failure and more like following a live evidence process. That psychological shift matters because some of the best investment decisions are not original insights. They are timely revisions. Agentic *** can also make the internal challenge function more systematic. One agent can maintain the bull thesis. One can argue the bear case. One can audit the original underwriting. One can track disconfirming evidence. One can monitor risk, sizing, liquidity, factor exposure, and drawdown. One can ask the fresh-capital question. One can maintain the post-mortem and calibration ledger. The point is not to outsource conviction. The point is to create a repeatable adversarial process that does not disappear when the team is busy, tired, emotionally invested, or overloaded. In real investment teams, the challenge function is inconsistent. Sometimes analysts push back. Sometimes they do not. Sometimes the PM wants to hear the bear case. Sometimes he does not. Sometimes a position is re-underwritten rigorously. Sometimes it survives because nothing has forced the conversation yet. Agentic *** can make that process systematic. Every material position can have a daily or weekly re-underwriting cadence. Every major price move can trigger a structured review. Every earnings call can be compared against the original thesis. Every estimate revision can be routed to the holdings it impacts. Every catalyst miss can require a formal decision: thesis intact, thesis delayed, thesis impaired, or thesis broken. This is how Agentic *** reduces the damage from behavioral bias. It does not make humans unbiased. It makes bias easier to detect. It makes thesis drift harder to hide. It makes stale positions more visible. It makes disconfirming evidence harder to ignore. It makes opportunity cost explicit. It makes the act of quitting less emotional because the quit criteria were defined before the PM became emotionally attached to the position. That last point is crucial. The option to quit has value only if the investor is willing to exercise it. Agentic *** can help by making quitting a pre-underwritten action rather than an emotional capitulation. Before entering a position, the PM can define: if these facts change, I exit; if these facts change, I trim; if these facts change, I add; if this catalyst does not occur by this date, I re-underwrite; if upside/downside compresses below this threshold, I recycle capital; if my reason for owning changes, I must write a new thesis. Pre-commitment is powerful because it is made before the position becomes part of the PM's identity. It is much easier to define exit criteria when the decision is still analytical than when the stock is down, the team is frustrated, the market is moving, and the PM feels judged. Agentic *** can preserve those original commitments and bring them back into the decision process at exactly the moment when human psychology is most likely to ignore them. Importantly, Agentic *** should not only push exits. That would be a crude and dangerous interpretation. The goal is not hyperactivity. The goal is better decision quality. Sometimes the right answer is to sell. Sometimes the right answer is to trim. Sometimes the right answer is to do nothing. Sometimes the right answer is to add because price has moved more than fundamentals. Sometimes the system should warn that the PM is treating macro or factor drawdown as thesis impairment when the company-specific evidence has not changed. Good decision infrastructure should improve both quitting and staying. The other major benefit is calibration. Agentic *** can keep a permanent record of forecasts, assumptions, catalysts, decision rationales, overrides, and outcomes. Over time, it can show a PM where he systematically leaks alpha. Does he sell winners too early? Does he hold losers too long? Does he underreact to estimate cuts? Does he overreact to short-term price action? Does he trust management teams too much? Does he confuse multiple expansion with thesis validation? Does he cut positions because of volatility right before the thesis pays off? Does he ignore opportunity cost because he likes the company? Most investors remember their process selectively. A calibration ledger does not. It creates accountability to the actual decision record, not the story the investor later tells himself. This is where Agentic *** becomes more than a productivity tool. It becomes a learning system that helps the PM identify recurring behavioral errors and workflow bottlenecks. The PM can then improve not only individual decisions, but the investment process itself. The real investment edge from Agentic *** is not that it makes conviction easier. Conviction is already easy. The edge is that it makes belief revision easier. It compresses the time between new information and updated judgment. It makes daily re-underwriting possible. It separates current evidence from prior attachment. It creates adversarial review on demand. It turns exits into a structured process. It preserves the original thesis and measures whether the current thesis is still the same thesis. It forces every position to compete against the best available alternative use of capital today. That is the overall takeaway. Agentic *** reduces the negative impact of cognitive bias by making belief revision, disconfirming-evidence review, thesis tracking, and pre-committed exit discipline systematic. Agentic *** reduces work overload and time-constraint friction by processing new information dramatically faster and routing it into the right investment context. Together, those two benefits improve decision quality. The PM still decides. But the PM is no longer debating against memory, emotion, inertia, and information overload. He is debating against a cleaner record: what we believed, why we believed it, what has changed, what has not changed, what the market is now pricing, what the evidence says today, and what the best alternative use of capital is. That is a much better decision environment. And in investing, a better decision environment is often where the next unit of alpha comes from. Source: Annie Duke clip shared by @GoshawkTrades on X, captured X note/media bundle from post 2075030928825721101

• 
  Tariff Is A Tax YOU pay for (@HershAlan) reported 49 minutes ago

  I think the failure of AI at this point is because our collective knowledge is not great enough yet. We may have another 50 or 100 years to go before it is ready. For now, it will only dumb us down because our collective knowledge is polluted by Wiki, blogs and Reddit.

• 
  Derrick Heavener (@yappingautist) reported 51 minutes ago

  @TheDiablix @DelusionPosting Reddit atheists just hate Christianity. That's the whole problem. They don't care about any other religion, only Christianity.

• 
  Sienna Foxx 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@MzSiennaFoxx) reported 52 minutes ago

  Inspired by a post on Reddit: Ladies, what is the silliest/pettiest reason you've ever broken up with someone? Subbies, what's the most pathetic/embarrassing reason someone has ever broken up with you? I'll go first: He used my Kerastase shampoo as body wash. He had to go.

• 
  Agustin Escoda (@AgusEscoda) reported 56 minutes ago

  Reddit works, but only if you do it backwards from how everyone tries it: Become a real member first, comment, post, build karma. Then drop value poststhat happen to mention your app. For example search "best app for (problem)" on Reddit. Someone's already waiting for your answer in a 6-month-old thread.

• 
  Kefayatullah Khadem (@kefayatkhadim) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Mahere_Fluxera @bymarcoperez @nthntrvls Yeah business accounts skip the 12 tester requirement, that part is right. Same goes for personal accounts opened before November 2023, they're grandfathered in too. For anyone stuck on a newer personal account, the reddit testing subs work but the drop off rate is rough since people install and forget. Prime Test Lab is another route, they handle the 12 testers for the full 14 days on real devices so you don't have to chase people down.

• 
  Nicolas Croft (@nicolasfrcts) reported 57 minutes ago

  @rainbow_geisha @FiGGYZOfficial Yes, I sent you that link so you could participate in case you hadn't already. I can confirm that Reddit isn't working (only one person seems to have made it onto the leaderboard), and the referrals are showing an error 🥲

• 
  Inverted Vibe Curve (@VibesBankRate) reported 57 minutes ago

  That may be true in general, but there were some clear signs here! Notably, that he had been accused of domestic violence a month ago, that a former partner described him fantasizing about ****** a home invader, and his pretty terrible Reddit history.