1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Shaw
  4. Wabasca-Desmarais
Shaw

Shaw outages and service status in Wabasca-Desmarais, Alberta

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Shaw generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Wabasca-Desmarais, including 0 direct reports.

Shaw offers broadband internet, TV and phone services to businesses and individuals. Shaw mainly serves clients in British Columbia and Alberta.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Wabasca-Desmarais, Alberta

The chart below shows the number of Shaw reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Wabasca-Desmarais, Alberta and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Shaw. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Shaw Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • DJcraw4d
    DeeJayCee (@DJcraw4d) reported

    @Shawhelp is internet and cable currently down in south surrey and Whiterock?

  • Alex_Deggs
    Alex Deggs (@Alex_Deggs) reported

    @Shawhelp I can no longer access the Xfinity app to view my security cameras ever since this single sign on update. I have tried different devices and it’s the same. It keeps taking me back to the sign in page after entering my credentials. Please help asap

  • bc_2025_vision
    bc_2027 (@bc_2025_vision) reported

    @Shawhelp We really need wait times & callback from Rogers with Shaw support. We had this for > 10 years before it was stopped. Now TELUS has these services and Rogers with Shaw does not. @Rogers Customer service should not be a hardship on hold … no clue whether we will wait hours😟

  • jsam10983741
    Lt (Retired LAPD) Frank Columbo 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇨🇦 (@jsam10983741) reported

    @RhonaRaskin @RogersHelps @Shawhelp I feel your pain. I’ve had cell issues for some time. It’s not my phone but Roger’s. Text messages are delayed and/or I don’t receive them. And my phone defaults to Edmonton time? When I dealt with Shaw previously issues were better resolved and promptly.

  • SmileyYYC
    Bella Bee  (@SmileyYYC) reported

    @Shawhelp I was asked during a technical support call to stay on the line for a quick survey. Tanya decided not to provide that

  • JenniferKingsb6
    Jennifer & Devina “The Ginja Ninja” 🇨🇦❤️🇺🇦 (@JenniferKingsb6) reported

    @Shawhelp Yes, but that’s not the point. The point is releasing an app that doesn’t support iOS 26.4.2 - and thereby angering EVERY customer who has an Apple device. Fix it ASAP, and ensure future updates work for everyone before releasing it.

  • MaryPChipman
    Ugabug (@MaryPChipman) reported

    @Shawhelp Now that there's no cable anymore, is the TV signal going to cut out whenever - like now? Our WiFi was fine.

  • GuyBarnabe
    Guy_Barnabe (@GuyBarnabe) reported

    @Shawhelp problems with ABC this morning in Winnipeg: XRE-031 37 This channel is temporarily unavailable…. Tried on multiple terminals and via Rogers watch-online website…

  • superdaddoo
    D (@superdaddoo) reported

    @TELUS - Help us! @ShawInfo has had saturated nodes and been overcharging our community for internet. I pay for 2gbps and get between 280mbps - 800mbps starting at 3:00 pm with further degradation into late evening. No ETA for new infrastructure. Need Fibre here ASAP.

  • LesIsMore1
    Les Stelmach 🇨🇦🇺🇦 (@LesIsMore1) reported

    @slackerman10 @Shawhelp Any company (telcos, banks, util, etc) whose phone line REGULARLY says “we are experiencing higher than normal call volumes” is just short-staffing. They are optimizing cost over service. What is the maximum tolerance for a customer, etc. it’s obviously worse for oligopoly