Telus outages and service status in Châteauguay, Quebec

Problems in the last 24 hours in Châteauguay, Quebec

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Châteauguay, Quebec and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports Near Châteauguay, Quebec

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Châteauguay and nearby locations:

• 
  Politics, Sports (@Trumpismme) reported 31 minutes ago from Dollard-Des Ormeaux, Quebec

  As usual Ezra's in the money. If i were a telus customer of be changing companies asap.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Trish Maisonville (@macidpm) reported 33 seconds ago

  They have a list of TELUS mobility clients. When they call me, they don't mention Rogers, only Telus and say "calling from telus, as a longtime customer we see that you ... " So these learning tools should be shared w those responsible for protecting my privacy at TELUS

• 
  Alex Maclean (@canmaclean42) reported 6 minutes ago

  @TaraArmstrongBC The bean counters and Wildfire operations are married but sleep in different rooms. The ministry is actually one of the poorer agencies of the government and sort of like the US marines there is rarely all the equipment and personell one wants but generally people are gung ho and will always make do. There are some internal skirmishes and rivalries like contract vs ministry firefighters, or between crews but generally it's friendly and all in all BC has one of the most professional and world class wildfire suppression systems. I can say that because I've been doing it for 10 years and have worked with firefighters from a dozen countries and half the provinces and territories. When it comes to finances it's a different world. For example some idiot thought it would be a great idea for Telus (the phone company) to do the ministries payroll, a universally hated arrangement by crews. After all on a slow year there are a thousand firefighters sitting around on base or doing make work projects on the governments dime. Why bother with additional funding, it doesn't buy votes. On a hot year one does what can be done with resources available until a state of emergency is declared and then the money rolls in and the millions flow. Probably costing considerably more than if sufficient crews and equipment were allocated in the first place. I'm not in management but the solution is probably in training and maintaining an additional 1000 ministry firefighters, expansion of the Para program, a few additional air assets and properly funding the type 2 and type 3 contract resources instead of a chronic loss of professional firefighters leaving the profession because there is no work or incentive to stay on a slow year. On a forest management perspective perhaps allowing green belts (natural fire breaks) to grow instead of spraying glyphosate (dries out the forest) for profit, or hiring enough Rangers to police the logging companies to get them to actually stay in line and manage the forests the way they pretend they do. Current logging practice drops water tables. But that's a conversation nobody wants to have

• 
  Uptimus (@UptimusApp) reported 7 minutes ago

  Aug 10 at 15:34 UTC: Telus website incident update. Recovery monitoring was interrupted again as community reports of outages and slow performance returned. Status is now investigating.

• 
  John Iosifov ✨💥 Ender Turing | AiCMO (@johniosifov) reported 7 minutes ago

  TELUS deployed a voice AI agent to call new home internet customers in their first 90 days. Not to resolve a problem. Not because the customer called in. Just to check in. Result: customers who got that AI welcome call were less than half as likely to cancel within 30 days. That's proactive retention — and it completely inverts how most contact center AI is deployed. The standard mental model: AI handles inbound. Saves cost. Deflects calls. Reduces headcount. TELUS ran the opposite play. Outbound. Proactive. AI-initiated. And the economics are brutal in a good way. Every churn prevented is worth months of subscription revenue. Voice AI at scale means you can make that call to every single new customer — not the top 10% who triggered a risk score. Gartner projects $80 billion in contact center labor costs cut by AI this year. 88% of contact centers now run some form of AI. But 75% haven't operationalized it. They have tools. They don't have outcomes. The difference between TELUS and the 75%: TELUS defined the outcome first (reduce 30-day churn), then designed the intervention (proactive welcome call), then measured it. Proactive > reactive. Always. In contact centers and everywhere else. This is what the call center AI conversation is missing. Everyone's chasing deflection rates. The real money is in the outbound plays nobody's running yet.

• 
  NonA Vtuber 🩵👓🎀 (@nonanewgame) reported 15 minutes ago

  OK TELUS SECURITY WTF????? I'D LIKE TO GET THIS OVERWITH SO I CAN STREAM AND THEN PLAY D&D WITHOUT INTERRUPTIONS

• 
  Helgrim (@Bonemantle) reported 15 minutes ago

  @VanIsleInvestor I figure I can make back the extra $100/month I lost in the dividend cut by cancelling my internet Telus internet service and land line and going with JUTE and VOIP. I will have to pay an extra $150 in cancellation fees but will make over $1000 in savings for the rest of the year.

• 
  Ransom (@RansomBailey) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Jonesing4truth @koodo Koodo is a trash company that would have gone out of business if Telus hadn’t bought them. Do not use them. Absolutely no customer service.

• 
  iPilot🅰️ (@OmniAeronautica) reported 20 minutes ago

  @bscholl $ASTS Blake Scholl Discovers AST’s Thesis, Then Forgets AST Exists Blake correctly identifies the hybrid terrestrial/satellite future, then skips enough due diligence to declare Starlink the “only good” satellite network while ignoring the company purpose-built for exactly that architecture. AST SpaceMobile has nearly 60 MNO relationships representing roughly 3 billion subscribers. AT&T and Verizon are strategic partners. Vodafone, Rakuten, Bell, TELUS and stc are partners. Vodafone, Orange, Telefónica and Deutsche Telekom, T-Mobile’s parent, are now conducting integration testing across Europe using ordinary smartphones and carrier spectrum. The fatal blow to Blake’s premise arrived three months before his post: AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon announced a technology-neutral D2D venture explicitly intended to support multiple satellite providers, preserve existing agreements and increase competition. The carriers’ published strategy is the opposite of surrendering themselves to an exclusive Starlink bottleneck. The products are not equivalent either. T-Mobile still advises using Starlink outdoors with a clear view of the sky and warns that coverage may be unavailable inside buildings, aircraft and other obstructed locations. AST’s giant phased arrays are designed to provide carrier-integrated broadband, including voice, video, apps and “one wall in” connectivity. AST is carrier-neutral infrastructure that aligns with MNOs instead of trying to subordinate them. Blake identified the future, ignored one of its central companies, contradicted the carriers’ actual strategy, and typed “QED?” as if kissing Elon’s *** were a substitute for due diligence.

• 
  Johan N. (@rk8215) reported 21 minutes ago

  The pre-market is pricing $AMPG ER report and a company as a complete failure, when the truth is that one bigger order is delayed probably with couple of months which led to company to pull guidance. Those are two very different things. Market cap in pre-market is around $85M right now. Add the $6M of July orders to reported revenue and they have already put together $19M this year and we are in August. So let's put things into perspective here and think. Is all of this really worth a 40% drawdown? Two real issues in this report. One, revenue is delayed. Delayed because of matters not in AmpliTech's hands. That's it, really. Delayed, not gone. But because of this, guidance was pulled. Two, margins compressed quarter over quarter. Management explained it with product mix. More detail on that would have been welcome. Those are the issues. Now the other side. Nothing about the progress they have made is erased. The macro conditions are still in place. They still have their 5G O-RAN radios that nobody else has. They still booked $6 million of orders in July alone. On guidance. They are saying they cannot guarantee $50 million this year. That does not mean they are not making money. They are still making money. I think they will land somewhere around $35 to 40 million. So I don't think we are talking about a big miss here. They just did not want to keep a number out there that they cannot guarantee. I kind of understand it. Maybe they should not have given that number in Q1 in the first place. Some updated number would have been great, I admit. Nothing is gone. The fundamentals are still in place. Customers, orders, LOIs. Everything I have written in my articles about the customer base, macro conditions etc is still truthful and accurate. Telus is not affected by any of this. AmpliTech is still shipping them daily. This was all about the South East Asian MNO. Trust in management is definitely shaken, maybe gone for many of you. Fair. I think management was too naive and optimistic during Q1, but the company is still developing in the right direction, with some hiccups along the way. I am not personally selling at these prices, but I really do understand if some of you are. Reminder, there is a PR coming this morning regarding the Titan Crest IP transfer being pretty much completed and upcoming orders related to it. So it was not all bad on the call. Expectations are reset. I learned a really expensive lesson myself about letting myself get too hyped, but underneath all of this, the company and story is still moving forward. What I see is a messy quarter inside a growth story.

• 
  The Bull Whisperer (@Thebullwhisper) reported 26 minutes ago

  @L9FRIENDLYSTYLE Maybe not, we'll see eventually. Court concluded BMI didn't have an unrestricted right to the Zillnk IP when it transferred it onward. There's a reason why the Telus relationship slipped by a couple of months, so far nothing mentioned as to why it slipped except "Titan shipments were delayed." Isn't it odd that the BMI - Titan - AMPG transfer happened the same day, AMPG claiming good faith, not knowing the IP was in arbitration? Good faith might be true. But imo that's a display of extraordinary bad due diligence from ampg "we didn't know about the arbitration." It might be a winner down the road, they got orders and multiple legs of their business to carry them. This Telus leg, related to the Titan IP transfer is looking weak at the moment though. No matter how many orders been placed, being able to deliver is what matters.