Telus outages and service status in Crawford Bay, British Columbia

Problems in the last 24 hours in Crawford Bay, British Columbia

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Crawford Bay, British Columbia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Robbie Mann 🇨🇦 (@RobbieMann77) reported 6 minutes ago

  @FriedgeHNIC @Altonervative Sportsnet subscriptions will be cancelled for most:- I’m not paying for 24/7 services for Toronto:- thank god my cell phone network is Telus! As mentioned Elliotte, all these good people, lost jobs today will have the resilience to go ahead with other alternatives to move ahead.

• 
  Ed Fine (@Ed3463) reported 12 minutes ago

  @LoveMy7Wood @TELUS Heh. At the end of a fraught service call the bank rep made a brave effort at establishing a connection by thanking me for being a loyal customer since 2003. I have banked there since 1973.

• 
  Albertan AF (@AlbertanAFk) reported 20 minutes ago

  @lesterbenz Yes they’re fine. Telus towers / same coverage. More of a self service kind of company.

• 
  Sirenity (@Sirenity_yyc) reported 22 minutes ago

  @wyattd09 @TELUS @Rogers If you need a new mobile provider, I’m with Freedom. Genuinely good in-person support. They didn’t try to upsell me and had better plans than Bell

• 
  Lauri (@Lauri40681301) reported 23 minutes ago

  Did Telus internet just go down? We were watching the soccer game & nothing now

• 
  Finn Stockinger (@FinnStockinger) reported 24 minutes ago

  Is the telecom sector about to trigger a massive investment supercycle? Nokia ($NOK) just dropped a bombshell by launching the industry’s first AI-native RAN platform, but this isn't just another isolated corporate press release. Yesterday's Q2 2026 earnings from Ericsson ($ERIC) and rapid shifts from major network operators confirm that the global telecom infrastructure Capex is undergoing a historic transformation. The smart money is quietly connecting some highly lucrative, asymmetric dots. 👇 1. What is AI-RAN & Why Does It Matter? Traditional Radio Access Networks (RAN) rely on incredibly expensive, rigid, proprietary hardware. AI-RAN virtualizes this entire architecture into software. Cell towers essentially become agile, edge-computing micro-datacenters. The hardware doesn't just route your calls; it processes AI workloads on the fly. The mastermind behind this is NVIDIA ($NVDA) and the AI-RAN Alliance (which unites NVIDIA, Nokia, Ericsson, SoftBank, and T-Mobile). Their goal? Push GPU-accelerated computing into every base station. Nokia claims this software-led, accelerated shift will boost spectral efficiency by 20% immediately, with a roadmap to >100% by 2028. For debt-laden operators, this means doubling network capacity without buying more multi-billion-dollar spectrum or replacing physical towers. 2. From Slides to Capex: What Ericsson's Q2 Earnings Just Confirmed We are officially moving past the "proof of concept" phase. Just yesterday, during Ericsson’s Q2 earnings call, outgoing CEO Börje Ekholm explicitly stated: "The next phase of AI is going to benefit our industry quite substantially... especially as physical AI develops." To fund this massive transition and offset inflationary hardware parts, Ericsson is actively raising prices on legacy contracts, paving the way for AI-RAN standard deployments. Global tier-1 carriers are already jumping in: > SK Telecom $SKM (South Korea) is launching a massive national AI-RAN pilot to test real-world physical AI applications (like automated factory robots and drone sensing). > T-Mobile US has partnered with NVIDIA, Ericsson, and Nokia to launch a Joint AI-RAN Innovation Center to standardize this tech in the US. > Telus (Canada) is deploying AI-powered network controllers to optimize spectral efficiency and slash tower power consumption. 3. The Derivative Play: AmpliTech ($AMPG) Nokia, Ericsson, and NVIDIA are massive, slow-moving ships. To find true market asymmetry, smart money looks for niche, highly-certified hardware enablers. To run software-heavy, GPU-driven AI-RAN, you still need highly advanced, open-standard (O-RAN) hardware on the ground to handle the high-frequency radio waves. Enter AmpliTech Group ($AMPG), a US-designed micro-cap manufacturing high-performance 64T64R Massive MIMO radios. In his latest discussions with Maxim Group (following up on my yesterday's post), the CEO highlighted a major strategic pivot that flipped the script for shareholders: > ATM Canceled: Completely terminating their dilutive at-the-market equity sales facility. > $10M Buyback: Launching a massive $10M stock repurchase program funded entirely by cash on hand, signaling to Wall Street that management believes the stock is heavily undervalued. > Strong Fundamentals: This move is backed by stellar Q1 results - revenue surged 48.6% YoY to $5.35M, while gross margins skyrocketed to 48% (up from 33% last year). As one of the very few US-designed, O-RAN certified hardware providers with a clean balance sheet, they are uniquely positioned to capture domestic infrastructure contracts as US telcos upgrade to GPU-accelerated AI-RAN architecture. Summary When giants like NVIDIA, Nokia, Ericsson, SK Telecom, and Telus validate a trend, the hardware supply chain wins first. AI-RAN is setting up to be one of the most under-the-radar infrastructure plays of late 2026. Are you sticking to legacy giants, or hunting for asymmetric risk-reward in the micro-cap space?

• 
  LC (@MMckinneyPhoto) reported 24 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport Now as a very long time client I feel like I need to cancel Telus as I dont feel this is how I should be treated. It is not acceptable to not notify that they are running late or that there are any delays. I would have been happy to continue my existing plan

• 
  AB_Wild_West (@AB_Wild_West) reported 25 minutes ago

  @TheRiversEdgeAB I'm never dealing with Telus for the rest of my life. I'd go without before dealing with them again.

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 25 minutes ago

  The most overlooked part of the Maxim interview isn't Telus $T.TO ordering more than expected and wanting more and more configs. It's what Fawad said about SCALING. Because he casually answered the number one bear question about $AMPG. And almost nobody noticed it. THE BEAR QUESTION. "How does a company that counted ~47 employees in its last annual report deliver Tier-1 carrier volumes?" Fair question. Every micro-cap hardware story lives or dies on it. Now listen to the CEO answer it, unprompted. THE MATH HE VOLUNTEERED. "You're talking about tens of thousands of radios that are going to be used by any single MNO at a time". That's his own sizing of ONE carrier win. Thousands of radios per month or per year. He's not scared of that number. He designed the company around it. THE MODEL. LNAs and defense-grade radios: designed and built in the US. Commercial radio volume: contract manufacturers, structured so AMPG can, his words, "scale up when the demand goes high, and we can scale down when the demand goes low". And the punchline, verbatim: "we don't create a tremendous amount of overhead, and we're cost-effective enough to provide a very large quantity in relatively little time". Translation: capacity is RENTED, not owned. No factories to build before the revenue shows up. No factory overhead bleeding through down-cycles. POs land, capacity scales up. POs pause, costs scale down. The giants carry factories through winters. AMPG carries designs. THE SECOND SCALING LAYER almost everyone missed. Every MNO runs different spectrum. That used to be the moat protecting incumbents: a custom radio per carrier, years per win. AMPG spent its R&D budget killing that moat: "Each MNO has a different frequency... but the beauty of our product is that it's configurable". And then the sentence that IS the thesis: "As soon as that adoption happens, it's just going to spread". One carrier win isn't a contract. It's a template. THE THIRD LAYER: where this goes. Asset-light capacity + revenue scaling = operating leverage. The CEO connected the dots himself: "Revenue has been increasing. Next stage is profitability". That's not hopium sequencing. That's the mechanical consequence of the model, if the revenue holds. AND IT'S ALREADY BEEN STRESS-TESTED. This isn't a whiteboard. This model has already put 2,000+ radios into a Tier-1 network. It's shipping daily against orders that EXCEED the $40M LOI. And it absorbed a real shock this year: war-related logistics interruptions, disclosed by the CEO himself. Status: back on track. A capacity model that survives a war disruption during its first scaling year got tested by reality, not by PowerPoint. Everyone watched the Telus reveal. The quiet part was the CEO explaining how a micro-cap absorbs a Tier-1's demand without building a single factory. Market cap: micro. Capacity: elastic. That's not an accident. That's the design. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  John Iosifov ✨💥 Ender Turing | AiCMO (@johniosifov) reported 30 minutes ago

  TELUS Digital ran 90,000 simulations training contact center agents with ElevenLabs voice AI. Result: 20% faster onboarding. Early signs of lower turnover. Then they deployed an ElevenAgents voice agent to proactively call newly activated internet customers in their first 90 days. Outcome: customers who got the proactive call were less than half as likely to cancel within 30 days. Let me translate that into a number most contact center leaders will recognize. If you're running a telco with 100,000 new activations per quarter and a 15% 30-day churn rate — that's 15,000 customers churning before they even form a habit. Cut that rate in half with a proactive voice AI call and you're retaining 7,500 additional customers per quarter. At $50/month average revenue per customer over a 24-month average lifecycle, that's $9M in preserved revenue per quarter from a single proactive AI workflow. This is the number that shifts the conversation from "AI pilot" to "AI mandate." Three things are worth noting about the TELUS/ElevenLabs model: **1. They kept humans in the loop for complexity.** ElevenAgents handle high-volume routine calls and route complex or sensitive issues to human agents — who receive better-qualified interactions. The human workload improves in quality, not just quantity. **2. The agent training use case is often bigger than the customer-facing use case.** 90,000 simulations means new hires have practiced situations they might not encounter in their first 6 months of calls. That preparation is invisible on a dashboard but shows up in first-call resolution and escalation rates. **3. TELUS Digital is now a preferred implementation partner, not just a customer.** That's a distribution signal. Enterprise contact center operators trust vendors who can show they've operationalized the technology themselves. At Ender Turing we track enterprise CX deployments closely. The pattern from the last 12 months is clear: the organizations getting results aren't running bigger pilots. They're moving production workloads incrementally — starting with high-volume, low-variance use cases like proactive onboarding calls — and building from that baseline. 90,000 training simulations. 50% churn reduction. These aren't beta numbers. They're the new competitive baseline. If your team is still in the "exploring voice AI" phase, that baseline just moved.