1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Telus
  4. Ellerslie-Bideford
Telus

Telus outages and service status in Ellerslie-Bideford, Prince Edward Island

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Telus generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Ellerslie-Bideford, including 0 direct reports.

Telus offers phone, internet and television services, as well as mobile phone and mobile internet service through Telus Mobility. Telus internet service uses DSL technology. Telus TV relies on satellite or internet television (IPTV). Telus' mobile phone network supports CMS, HSPA and LTE.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Ellerslie-Bideford, Prince Edward Island

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Ellerslie-Bideford, Prince Edward Island and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Telus. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • HandsofScars
    TheRooster (@HandsofScars) reported

    @JonFraserTF @TELUS I tried to get a new phone twice in the past year and both times the sales rep made the experience terrible so I simply left.

  • jodyvance
    Jody Vance (@jodyvance) reported

    @guyfelicella @TELUS I returned from my trip to find all recordings gone and recording of usual shows just kicking back in, with no history. Then….no ability to record. Then everything unplugged for 3+ hours as my technician waited for the support staff to call him after me messaged in for help

  • lkn4chnge
    Bill Tansey (@lkn4chnge) reported

    @jodyvance @TELUS Anybody that allows Telus to abuse them the way their customer service is have to much money or no self pride, it’s disgusting

  • TomMarknews
    Tom Mark (@TomMarknews) reported

    @garymasonglobe @TELUS I've had problems with Telus for the past year. Takes forever to get service. Been waiting 4 weeks for a new remote. Called today & was told the order was still being processed and a $30 charge fore the remote. Tech put in a new order saying 7 to 10 biz days.

  • TheOnlyRealDac
    Dave (@TheOnlyRealDac) reported

    @JonFraserTF @TELUS Bell, Rogers, and Telus, plus their cheap alternatives, all owned by the big 3... All suck. The Canadian market has no competition. I've used every provider, and have had **** customer service at all of them.

  • garymasonglobe
    Gary Mason 🇨🇦🇺🇦 (@garymasonglobe) reported

    Hi @TELUS I am happy to report that someone from your team called and we sorted the problem out over the phone with the help of a video link. Fingers crossed, issue resolved.

  • Ott_Andrew_Cam
    Andrew Cameron (@Ott_Andrew_Cam) reported

    @Darrenthiel2 @jodyvance @TELUS The main issue of course is the Triopoly in Canada (plus Videotron a bit) and the excuse of "expensive to service vast Canadian geography." 50% truth. But the main reason is the lack of sufficient competition.

  • olyth_terminal
    Olyth (@olyth_terminal) reported

    $AMPG FYI this is not even including the AI-RAN market which is projected to add another $10b in revenue to the $20b from O-RAN by 2030. So that's a market that went from basically 0 to $30b in a little over 5 years. With 6G and AI Tailwinds to drive it another decade or more. You're probably wondering why this industry is growing so fast. It's not primarily the infrastructure upgrade to 6g. Yes it will help speed up the transition to advanced 5G and 6G BUT there's one main reason. Mobile Network Operator CEOs are fed up with vendor lock-in. They're tired of being dependent on a handful of suppliers with little leverage on pricing, innovation speed, or customization. O-RAN and AI-RAN give them the ability to mix hardware and software from multiple vendors. That drives down costs and unlocks new efficiencies and revenue streams. Right now the vendors know there's no competition. How do you think that's going for the MNOs during negotiations? O-RAN and AI-RAN change this. MNOs are speed running to alternatives at this point; the CAGR on O/AI-RAN prove this and $AMPG has proven their radios bring the results CEOs are looking for. The inflection point is this year. This quote from the Telus VP on using Samsung and Amplitech radios should tell you everything you need to know about how MNOs feel about single vendor lock in. It's stuck with me since I read it. It drives my conviction in $AMPG. “That’s our current mix. And it’s really important for us to have that deployment: if it [multi-vendor Open RAN] remains theoretical. It’s not good enough for us.” Do you feel conviction in Bureaus' sentiment? It should stick with you when you think about where $AMPG is headed.

  • bona_of
    bona fide lover of ladies (@bona_of) reported

    @SarcasticallyAJ @TSN_Sports @PrimeVideo You need to get iptv. I’ll never go back to telus tv and adding programming packages

  • Temple_Eight
    Temple 8 Research (@Temple_Eight) reported

    @ChairmansLedger Let's expand the argument then. Starting with what ASTS gets right. While ASTS has a small lead on broadband connectivity their real advantage is spectrum access via carrier exclusivity and they've locked up nearly 60 mobile network operator partners covering over 3 billion subscribers AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, Telus, Bell, etc. SpaceX operates more than 9,000 satellites around 60% of everything in orbit. ASTS has roughly 9 including recent launches, and is trying to accelerate to about one launch a month to hit 2026 targets. Analysts are skeptical it can sustain this. Each BlueBird Block 2 is a 6,100 kg spacecraft, far more complex and expensive per unit than a Starlink satellite and AST can't launch anything close to the pace of Musk. SpaceX owns the rockets while ASTS has to buy rides on Falcon 9, New Glenn, etc. SpaceX's hardware iteration speed is, as one analysis put it, a real and durable advantage, and if their next gen satellites deliver on data performance, the competitive gap narrows while the scaling gap stays insurmountable. SpaceX already took the biggest carrier prize in the US being T-Mobile. So the carrier moat cuts both ways. SpaceX obviously has access to vast capital after IPO, with Starlink generating ~$10.4 billion of revenue in 2025. ASTS is pre-real-revenue at scale ($70.9 million in 2025) and funding itself with convertible debt and dilution. Do you really want to hold through heavy short to medium term dilution over years??