Telus outages and service status in Falher, Alberta

Problems in the last 24 hours in Falher, Alberta

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Falher, Alberta and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  B Dub (@TheBigBDub) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Lidsville @Rogers 🚨 PSA:March 2026, Telus, Roger’s, and Freedom all had data leaks. As a result, bad actors are calling clients as if from a major provider and HAVE enough client details to make people believe it’s a legit call. Nobody in Canada should be providing anything on a cold call now. 🚨

• 
  Sally (@sadforcanadians) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Cat4714 @Martyupnorth @Bell Telus is worse. Hubby was paying over $100. Had a special for seniors we could get for US/Mex calling. Down to $45/mo but on phone for over 1 hour. I'm sure call was to india celebrating daliwall in background. Painful

• 
  ALPHA MALE! (@dingoboy70) reported 6 minutes ago

  Their service sucks because they sub contract out their technician calls to a 3 rd party contractor who has no money in the game son they don’t care. DO YOURSELF A FAVOUR AVOID TELUS LIKE THE PLAGUE.

• 
  Lois Roper (@LoisKRoper) reported 7 minutes ago

  It is shameful that during fire evacuations that the cell service providers cannot provide better service throughout the valley in the safe areas. From Enderby to Cherryville to Okanagan Falls, two bars is not sufficient let family know we are ok. Do better! @Telus @Bell @Rogers

• 
  @WeNeedAHero (@WheresOurHeroes) reported 9 minutes ago

  DEAR AT&T and TELUS, Are you paying attention? A company is only as good as it's service and attention to the most remote and poorest members of its service area. (I still say the same thing about unions too). When areas in SE Alaska don't have phone and internet their lives are highly at risk. It's not just about a drop in communications, gaming, streaming movies or social media. It's a drop in safety tools for these island dwellers too. Not to mention that with millions of tourists every year robbing the locals of bandwidth with high data traffic locals end up in last place as highpaying users for lack of competition. Ketchikan’s main internet (KPU fiber via the Canada route, plus cellular from providers like GCI/AT&T) has "finite capacity". When multiple cruise ships dock and thousands of tourists flood downtown with phones and devices, and that shared bandwidth gets congested—slowing speeds for everyone. When the service is down, many local busineses lose the use of POS machines (but still pay the rent to have them). Starlink solves this in several practical ways: -independant backup, -reliable pathways and -outage resilience. Starlink is already a tremendous service for the Alaska Marine Highway System which is a class 1 essential service for SE Alaska, whereby these ferries are often the only way form of transportation between island communities for so many of these remote residents. In this age of high technology, the current tools, even with their own redundancies, just don't offer enough protections. This isn't an advertisement nor do I get paid for mentioning Starlink. But I will post pricing for SE Alaska residents because these remote areas need options: As of August 2026, Starlink’s regular U.S. Residential pricing (which applies in Southeast Alaska) is: Residential 100 Mbps: $55/month Residential 200 Mbps: $85/month Residential MAX: $130/month New customers can download the Starlink mobile app and the sign up opens on the initial screen. Competition is a beautiful thing. Just saying...

• 
  Carey Bolam (@CareyBolam) reported 12 minutes ago

  @TELUS Are you sure? I got an "Improve your Telus Service ..." about the call I received asking me to rate the CSR's performance

• 
  Johan N. (@rk8215) reported 14 minutes ago

  The pre-market is pricing $AMPG ER report and a company as a complete failure, when the truth is that one bigger order is delayed probably with couple of months which led to company to pull guidance. Those are two very different things. Market cap in pre-market is around $85M right now. Add the $6M of July orders to reported revenue and they have already put together $19M this year and we are in August. So let's put things into perspective here and think. Is all of this really worth a 40% drawdown? Two real issues in this report. One, revenue is delayed. Delayed because of matters not in AmpliTech's hands. That's it, really. Delayed, not gone. But because of this, guidance was pulled. Two, margins compressed quarter over quarter. Management explained it with product mix. More detail on that would have been welcome. Those are the issues. Now the other side. Nothing about the progress they have made is erased. The macro conditions are still in place. They still have their 5G O-RAN radios that nobody else has. They still booked $6 million of orders in July alone. On guidance. They are saying they cannot guarantee $50 million this year. That does not mean they are not making money. They are still making money. I think they will land somewhere around $35 to 40 million. So I don't think we are talking about a big miss here. They just did not want to keep a number out there that they cannot guarantee. I kind of understand it. Maybe they should not have given that number in Q1 in the first place. Some updated number would have been great, I admit. Nothing is gone. The fundamentals are still in place. Customers, orders, LOIs. Everything I have written in my articles about the customer base, macro conditions etc is still truthful and accurate. Telus is not affected by any of this. AmpliTech is still shipping them daily. This was all about the South East Asian MNO. Trust in management is definitely shaken, maybe gone for many of you. Fair. I think management was too naive and optimistic during Q1, but the company is still developing in the right direction, with some hiccups along the way. I am not personally selling at these prices, but I really do understand if some of you are. Reminder, there is a PR coming this morning regarding the Titan Crest IP transfer being pretty much completed and upcoming orders related to it. So it was not all bad on the call. Expectations are reset. I learned a really expensive lesson myself about letting myself get too hyped, but underneath all of this, the company and story is still moving forward. What I see is a messy quarter inside a growth story.

• 
  DividendBoomer (@BoomerDivvies) reported 20 minutes ago

  @optguru @TELUS I don't even care about the stock, which is ****, I care about the terrible user experience from this oligopoly member.

• 
  R@X (@RiseN_Guard) reported 22 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport TELUS is a MESS! Impossible to login and pay my stinkin bill!!!!!! FIX THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL

• 
  John Iosifov ✨💥 Ender Turing | AiCMO (@johniosifov) reported 23 minutes ago

  TELUS deployed a voice AI agent to call new home internet customers in their first 90 days. Not to resolve a problem. Not because the customer called in. Just to check in. Result: customers who got that AI welcome call were less than half as likely to cancel within 30 days. That's proactive retention — and it completely inverts how most contact center AI is deployed. The standard mental model: AI handles inbound. Saves cost. Deflects calls. Reduces headcount. TELUS ran the opposite play. Outbound. Proactive. AI-initiated. And the economics are brutal in a good way. Every churn prevented is worth months of subscription revenue. Voice AI at scale means you can make that call to every single new customer — not the top 10% who triggered a risk score. Gartner projects $80 billion in contact center labor costs cut by AI this year. 88% of contact centers now run some form of AI. But 75% haven't operationalized it. They have tools. They don't have outcomes. The difference between TELUS and the 75%: TELUS defined the outcome first (reduce 30-day churn), then designed the intervention (proactive welcome call), then measured it. Proactive > reactive. Always. In contact centers and everywhere else. This is what the call center AI conversation is missing. Everyone's chasing deflection rates. The real money is in the outbound plays nobody's running yet.