Telus outages and service status in Golden Lake, Ontario

Problems in the last 24 hours in Golden Lake, Ontario

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Golden Lake, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Michael Bentley (@MPBentley) reported 6 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport I've tried to connect with you via your online tools. I got a call back but it was gibberish, no one was actually there. Please text me for my phone number and then maybe you can help me with my faulty Telus equipment

• 
  Genes 🇨🇦 Back To Being Grateful,Oh Canada 🇨🇦 (@creativewaves) reported 8 minutes ago

  The CRTC has again issued warnings to Bell Canada and Telus Corp. over recently introduced fees the regulator says could be in violation of its new policy prohibiting telecoms from charging customers when they activate, change or cancel plans.

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 15 minutes ago

  Why do I compare $AMPG ($0.2B) to $KEEL ($3.5B), $DGXX ($0.6B) and $NBIS ($66B)? Fair question. And the answer is bigger than people think, because AMPG isn't just in the same trend as these. It's actually more diversified than any of them. Let me explain properly. Start with what they share. They're all plays on the same thing: the physical infrastructure of the AI era. Not the models, not the apps. The actual hardware and buildout AI runs on. That's the layer that quietly captures the money while everyone argues about chatbots. $NBIS, $KEEL and $DGXX are neoclouds. They sell AI compute out of data centers. You need somewhere to run all this AI, so they build and rent the GPU infrastructure. Picks and shovels for the cloud side. Here's how I think about $AMPG: same idea, but on the tower instead of the data center. That's what AI-RAN means. The cell tower stops being a dumb relay and becomes an intelligent edge node, computing AI right where the data is created, in real time, because some decisions can't wait for a round-trip to a distant data center. And the tower can't do any of it without a radio. AMPG makes the only American 64T64R Massive MIMO radio that open AI-RAN runs on. If a neocloud is the physical layer of cloud AI, AMPG is the physical layer of edge AI. Honest framing: today a neocloud sells recurring compute and AMPG sells radio hardware, so the analogy is about where this is heading, the tower as the next edge data center, not a claim it's already an identical business. Same megatrend, earlier in its arc. But here's where AMPG actually pulls ahead of a pure neocloud play. It isn't a one-trick bet. While the neoclouds live or die on a single thesis, AMPG has multiple real legs underneath it. ✅ Zero debt. ✅ $20M cash. ✅ $200M market cap. ✅ 48% gross margins. ➟ Leg 1, the revenue engine that exists right now: Telus. AMPG's radio is already deployed at a Tier-1 carrier, and on the last call the COO said they "continue to receive orders against that LOI" and projected Q2 "definitely much higher than Q1.". That's real, recurring, shipping revenue. A lot of these pure AI-infra names are still pre-revenue or burning cash. AMPG is selling product today at 48% gross margins. ➟ Leg 2, space. AMPG makes the low-noise amplifiers that are the "ears" of satellites. It shipped prototypes to a "Fortune 50 satellite systems provider" building a LEO constellation, and the only Fortune 50 doing that is Amazon with Kuiper, which then showed up on AMPG's customer wall. (Honest framing: the wall confirms Amazon as a customer, the LEO link is my deduction, not a disclosed deal.) With SpaceX now public, the whole space sector just got validated, and AMPG is the picks-and-shovels under it. ➟ Leg 3, quantum. AMPG makes the cryogenic amplifiers superconducting quantum computers need for qubit readout, with proof-of-concept units shipped to names like IBM and Google. Optionality, not revenue yet, but real and patented and American. ➟ Leg 4, defense. Lockheed, Northrop, L3Harris, Boeing, NASA on the customer wall. Relationships that take years of qualification to earn. So put it together. AMPG is in the exact same AI-infrastructure megatrend everyone loves the neoclouds for, except it also has real shipping revenue, a Tier-1 carrier ramping, space exposure, quantum optionality, and a defense business, all at a sub-$1B cap, debt-free, with 48% margins. That's the part that breaks the lazy argument. When someone says AMPG "already ran 135%" while cheering NBIS or DGXX up 160-190%, they're judging it by the chart, not the thesis. And on the thesis, AMPG isn't behind these names. It's the same trade, with more legs, earlier, and cheaper. They picked the data center. I'm adding the tower. And the tower happens to also touch space, quantum and defense. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  Temple 8 Research (@Temple_Eight) reported 17 minutes ago

  I hope the $ASTS boys like dilution because you're going to need a lot of it to fund your ambitions. While ASTS has a small lead on broadband connectivity their real advantage is spectrum access via carrier exclusivity and they've locked up nearly 60 mobile network operator partners covering over 3 billion subscribers AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, Telus, Bell, etc. SpaceX operates more than 9,000 satellites around 60% of everything in orbit. ASTS has roughly 9 including recent launches, and is trying to accelerate to about one launch a month to hit 2026 targets. Analysts are skeptical it can sustain this. Each BlueBird Block 2 is a 6,100 kg spacecraft, far more complex and expensive per unit than a Starlink satellite and AST can't launch anything close to the pace of Musk. SpaceX owns the rockets while ASTS has to buy rides on Falcon 9, New Glenn, etc. SpaceX's hardware iteration speed is, as one analysis put it, a real and durable advantage, and if their next gen satellites deliver on data performance, the competitive gap narrows while the constellation scale gap stays insurmountable. SpaceX already took the biggest carrier prize in the US being T-Mobile. So the carrier moat cuts both ways. SpaceX obviously has access to vast capital after IPO, with Starlink generating ~$10.4 billion of revenue in 2025. ASTS is pre-real-revenue at scale ($70.9 million in 2025) and funding itself with convertible debt and dilution. Do the bulls have an answer to this?

• 
  jodi birdsall (@jay_elbee) reported 17 minutes ago

  @jodyvance @guyfelicella @TELUS A friend had issues. She said that the equipment was old and somehow there was a glitch that allowed a customer in Alberta to delete their recordings. It was a mess. She eventually switched to Rogers. She’s much happier, cheaper too. I have Rogers. It’s ok. Usually a reboot fixes

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 20 minutes ago

  @OnlyKlans1 @napoleon21st Yes, I talk about the negatives as well. But you have to keep in mind that I deliberately kept it simple and easy to understand, rather than making it long and boring. There are plenty of people who have written much longer theses. The biggest risk was that, as you'll see on Reddit and other places, AmpliTech's customer was believed to be a "declining" company linked to EchoStar. The names are hidden behind "tier 1 MNO...", but the VP of Telus named Amplitech in a random article that nobody saw. After the CSI work, we've realized it's actually Telus, which is using AmpliTech alongside Samsung and is still in the middle of its rollout. Only about 15% has been completed so far, with the remaining 85% still to go, and they intend to keep using AmpliTech going forward.

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 21 minutes ago

  Why are $AMPG, $IREN and $ONDS my highest-conviction positions right now? One word: timeline. With all three, I have a fallback. I know that if a trade goes against me, I don't panic. I just wait. Because these are companies I'd be happy to hold for a year regardless. That's what conviction actually is: the ability to sit still. Take $AMPG as the example. It's embedded across five of the biggest trends in tech at once: defense, space, AI-RAN (its radio ran on NVIDIA's platform in a world-first demo), drones (the company just confirmed it works with drone makers), and even quantum (shipped to IBM). One company. One core skill, pulling a faint signal out of noise. Aimed at five megatrends. And then there's what management has actually said on the record: ➟ They said Q2 should come in much higher than Q1. ➟ They said they're seeing growing demand. ➟ They said new carrier deals are expected this quarter (Q2) or next (Q3). ➟ I know TELUS is their main customer and they're expanding fast. 48% gross margins, 0 debt. So I'm not sitting here hoping. I'm holding a company that's executing, backed by management guidance, sitting under multiple megatrends, while it's still cheap. That's the whole point of conviction. It's not about never being red. It's about knowing what you own so well that red days don't move you, because you understand the timeline and you have the patience to let it play out. Do the work. Build the conviction. Then let time do its job. Not financial advice. I'm long $IREN, $AMPG, $ONDS. DYOR. 📡

• 
  Alison (@alialison54321) reported 22 minutes ago

  @garymasonglobe @TELUS Telus is the worst.

• 
  Sunshine (@sonnyk10124espn) reported 25 minutes ago

  @jodyvance @TELUS Pixalating, freezing, and service going out during sports games. Should be telus slogan

• 
  Adam (@adam212121m) reported 27 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS They are all like this. But Telus is absolutely the worst - Rogers - previously Shaw is getting very very close though