Telus outages and service status in Goulais River, Ontario

Problems in the last 24 hours in Goulais River, Ontario

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Goulais River, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  308Dave (@real308dave) reported 8 minutes ago

  @ElliottWolfeJ I thought I’d never say this, but I’ll be switching to Telus. Rogers can just go back and stay in Toronto.

• 
  LC (@MMckinneyPhoto) reported 8 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport Now as a very long time client I feel like I need to cancel Telus as I dont feel this is how I should be treated. It is not acceptable to not notify that they are running late or that there are any delays. I would have been happy to continue my existing plan

• 
  Zenith Zalapski (@nitwitschool) reported 11 minutes ago

  @RoneelkRo In my area it’s Telus and they don’t give a single **** about upgrading us beyond 2010 era internet so my only choice is Elon, which is a surprisingly good service as much as it pains me.

• 
  don't chew with your mouth open (@kFaNsUpAfLy) reported 12 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport @TELUS if there is a known issue with @SamsungMobile phones not receiving calls, pls issue a statement rather than leave customers with no resolution.

• 
  Alberta (@AlbertaCanada60) reported 13 minutes ago

  @TheRiversEdgeAB Telus internet sucks.

• 
  Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 (@Tablesalt13) reported 15 minutes ago

  "this stock is down 25%!" Sure, but the holder also got 17% paid out in cash, so they're only down around 8%. and it tanked because the underlying crashed. (telus, rogers etc). Im betting they bottomed and they will trade sideways. Thats the bet.

• 
  Dragon Was Slayed (@522IntoOvertime) reported 17 minutes ago

  @patersonjeff @JayJanower @Rogers Another example of why quasi monopolies are so bad for consumers... there's no accountability for ****** customer service, because there's no real alternative (try getting through to a human at Telus 🙄)

• 
  Marie Boyce (@MarieBoyce7) reported 19 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport @TELUS I am so ******* tired of your stupid AI bot that takes 10 min around in circles to get anywhere when you call. It’s bad enough I have to talk to gawd damn people in another country who don’t speak ENGLISH about MY SERVICES.

• 
  Catherine Calder (@Loricatty) reported 20 minutes ago

  @alleria_eh Bloody idiot. Here is a PARTIAL list. You are using most. X itself Your Canadian internet provider, such as Telus, Rogers, Bell, or Shaw, routes traffic over an internet backbone that uses equipment, software, and services from numerous U.S companies Apple (if using an iPhone or iPad). Google (if using Android, Chrome, Gmail, or Google DNS). Qualcomm (chips in many Android phones). Intel or AMD (if using a PC). Microsoft (Windows, Edge, Outlook, OneDrive, etc.). NVIDIA (graphics hardware in many computers). Visa or Mastercard (if paying for X Premium or making online purchases). PayPal (if used for payments). Cloudflare (many websites, including services connected to X, rely on it). Amazon Web Services (AWS) (many internet services depend on AWS, even if X itself does not). Oracle (enterprise software and cloud infrastructure used across the internet). Cisco (networking equipment carrying internet traffic). Meta (if they also use Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, or Threads). Adobe (if editing photos before posting). OpenAI (if using ChatGPT to write posts). GoDaddy (if they own a website linked from their X profile). Verisign (operates key internet infrastructure for .com and .net domains).

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 20 minutes ago

  The most overlooked part of the Maxim interview isn't Telus $T.TO ordering more than expected and wanting more and more configs. It's what Fawad said about SCALING. Because he casually answered the number one bear question about $AMPG. And almost nobody noticed it. THE BEAR QUESTION. "How does a company that counted ~47 employees in its last annual report deliver Tier-1 carrier volumes?" Fair question. Every micro-cap hardware story lives or dies on it. Now listen to the CEO answer it, unprompted. THE MATH HE VOLUNTEERED. "You're talking about tens of thousands of radios that are going to be used by any single MNO at a time". That's his own sizing of ONE carrier win. Thousands of radios per month or per year. He's not scared of that number. He designed the company around it. THE MODEL. LNAs and defense-grade radios: designed and built in the US. Commercial radio volume: contract manufacturers, structured so AMPG can, his words, "scale up when the demand goes high, and we can scale down when the demand goes low". And the punchline, verbatim: "we don't create a tremendous amount of overhead, and we're cost-effective enough to provide a very large quantity in relatively little time". Translation: capacity is RENTED, not owned. No factories to build before the revenue shows up. No factory overhead bleeding through down-cycles. POs land, capacity scales up. POs pause, costs scale down. The giants carry factories through winters. AMPG carries designs. THE SECOND SCALING LAYER almost everyone missed. Every MNO runs different spectrum. That used to be the moat protecting incumbents: a custom radio per carrier, years per win. AMPG spent its R&D budget killing that moat: "Each MNO has a different frequency... but the beauty of our product is that it's configurable". And then the sentence that IS the thesis: "As soon as that adoption happens, it's just going to spread". One carrier win isn't a contract. It's a template. THE THIRD LAYER: where this goes. Asset-light capacity + revenue scaling = operating leverage. The CEO connected the dots himself: "Revenue has been increasing. Next stage is profitability". That's not hopium sequencing. That's the mechanical consequence of the model, if the revenue holds. AND IT'S ALREADY BEEN STRESS-TESTED. This isn't a whiteboard. This model has already put 2,000+ radios into a Tier-1 network. It's shipping daily against orders that EXCEED the $40M LOI. And it absorbed a real shock this year: war-related logistics interruptions, disclosed by the CEO himself. Status: back on track. A capacity model that survives a war disruption during its first scaling year got tested by reality, not by PowerPoint. Everyone watched the Telus reveal. The quiet part was the CEO explaining how a micro-cap absorbs a Tier-1's demand without building a single factory. Market cap: micro. Capacity: elastic. That's not an accident. That's the design. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡