Telus outages and service status in Netherhill, Saskatchewan

Problems in the last 24 hours in Netherhill, Saskatchewan

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Netherhill, Saskatchewan and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Olyth (@olyth_terminal) reported 6 minutes ago

  $AMPG FYI this is not even including the AI-RAN market which is projected to add another $10b in revenue to the $20b from O-RAN by 2030. So that's a market that went from basically 0 to $30b in a little over 5 years. With 6G and AI Tailwinds to drive it another decade or more. You're probably wondering why this industry is growing so fast. It's not primarily the infrastructure upgrade to 6g. Yes it will help speed up the transition to advanced 5G and 6G BUT there's one main reason. Mobile Network Operator CEOs are fed up with vendor lock-in. They're tired of being dependent on a handful of suppliers with little leverage on pricing, innovation speed, or customization. O-RAN and AI-RAN give them the ability to mix hardware and software from multiple vendors. That drives down costs and unlocks new efficiencies and revenue streams. Right now the vendors know there's no competition. How do you think that's going for the MNOs during negotiations? O-RAN and AI-RAN change this. MNOs are speed running to alternatives at this point; the CAGR on O/AI-RAN prove this and $AMPG has proven their radios bring the results CEOs are looking for. The inflection point is this year. This quote from the Telus VP on using Samsung and Amplitech radios should tell you everything you need to know about how MNOs feel about single vendor lock in. It's stuck with me since I read it. It drives my conviction in $AMPG. “That’s our current mix. And it’s really important for us to have that deployment: if it [multi-vendor Open RAN] remains theoretical. It’s not good enough for us.” Do you feel conviction in Bureaus' sentiment? It should stick with you when you think about where $AMPG is headed.

• 
  TypeVFuture (@TypeVFuture) reported 6 minutes ago

  The BC government is investing 63 million to provide high-speed internet to 4,000 rural homes? It is planning to go through Telus which uses Starlink for in-flight services on Westjet. Why doesn't the government directly contract Starlink to provide those 4,000 homes the most reliable internet service on the planet for a fraction of the cost? No logic. We need to change that. 63 million is nuts!

• 
  Infokid (@Infokid1Infokid) reported 8 minutes ago

  @garymasonglobe @TELUS We had a problem at work on Sunday with Shaw. Resolved in 3 hours. TELUS sucks.

• 
  Cynthia🤝🇨🇦🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌈🌲🇺🇦 (@Tintie4) reported 8 minutes ago

  @garymasonglobe @TELUS Telus is terrible, my sister went back to Rogers Shaw. I left them too years ago. No one is perfect but at least it is ok.

• 
  Richard (@VanCityRich) reported 9 minutes ago

  @TELUS @xrtsdhndvbh1 Still down!!! Fix it.

• 
  Dave (@TheOnlyRealDac) reported 11 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS Bell, Rogers, and Telus, plus their cheap alternatives, all owned by the big 3... All suck. The Canadian market has no competition. I've used every provider, and have had **** customer service at all of them.

• 
  Craig (@Craig391913943) reported 12 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS Curios to know what happened with the bring it back. We had horrible experience with that as well

• 
  Brick$d (@lofiParlour) reported 16 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS @TELUSBusiness has charged me $220 to break my contract after 7 years and still haven’t cancelled my service or the fees. I haven’t been in my business space since April. I’m certainly going to reconsider my other business contract with them

• 
  Gerald Andrew Krook (@GeraldKrook27) reported 17 minutes ago

  Canadians 🇨🇦 if you subscribe to Roger's. Have an internet or cell phone plan Cancel it. Change providers. This is required as a statement against the removal of Hockey Night in Canada 🇨🇦 Roger's doesn't care about tradition or you. Just profits. BELL AND TELUS ARE BETTER OPTIONS

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 19 minutes ago

  Was it too late to buy $AXTI or $SIVE at $30, after they'd already run 600%? The answer is obvious: no, it wasn't. The people who stayed out "because it had already gone up too much" missed most of the move. Lately people ask me "Is it too late to buy $AMPG"? I haven't sold a single share. And that alone answers the question. Because if I truly believed it was too late to buy, what I'd really be telling you is that it's time to sell. They're the same sentence with a different face. "Too late to buy" and "time to sell" mean exactly the same thing. And I'm not selling. So I can't tell you it's too late without my own actions calling me a liar. Here's what people get backwards. "Late" and "early" feel like they're about the price. About the chart. About whether you caught the move or missed it. They're not. Not for a company at this stage. It comes down to one thing only: whether you trust what the company actually is. Think about AXTI and SIVE. The people who sold or never entered "because it had already run 600%" were staring at the chart, not the business. The ones who held or bought were looking at the thesis. If you trusted the company, $30 was just a stop on a much longer road. If you didn't, you thought it was late, and you'd have thought it was late at any price. Because that's the trap: if you don't trust the company, it was late at $3, it's late at $8, and it'll still feel late at $20. The chart was never your real question. Your real question was always whether you believed in it, just disguised as "timing". So instead of asking me about timing, ask yourself whether you believe the thesis. Let me tell you why I do. This is the only American company commercializing the 64T64R AI-RAN radio, the physical hardware the open AI-RAN future runs on. It's already deployed at Telus, a Tier-1 carrier. It's a Strategic Partner in the DoD-funded Open6G hub, in the top tier next to NVIDIA, Dell and Qualcomm, with its radio already tested alongside NVIDIA's Aerial software. That's not a meme. That's a real position in a layer the US is actively trying to re-shore for national security. Underneath that sits a real business: 48% gross margins, debt-free, revenue growing fast, defense primes and NASA on the customer wall. And stacked on top, for free, genuine optionality in quantum and in space. The kind of upside you don't even pay for at this valuation. I won't insult you by pretending it's risk-free. It isn't. There's customer concentration, there's dilution, there's execution risk. I've said all of it openly. A company is never a sure thing. But "is it too late" was never the question that matters. The question that matters is this: do you understand this company well enough to hold it through the noise, the FUD, the red days, and the people screaming that you're late? Because that conviction is the only thing that decides whether you actually capture the story or get shaken out halfway. So here's my honest answer, the one I can stand behind: It's late if you don't trust the company. It's early if you do. And the only person who can answer which one you are is you. Do the work. Read the filings. Build your own conviction, or don't. But don't outsource it to a chart, and don't outsource it to me. I just know which side I'm on. And I haven't sold a share. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡