Telus outages and service status in Netherhill, Saskatchewan

Problems in the last 24 hours in Netherhill, Saskatchewan

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Netherhill, Saskatchewan and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rhonda Shimes ✨ (@Simyfy) reported 8 minutes ago

  Bell is honestly terrible. I switched from TELUS after 10 years and the service from Bell makes me regret switching. They charged a payment from my acct without authorization

• 
  Matt Pisko (@MattPisko) reported 9 minutes ago

  I subscribe to Sportsnet through my TELUS television package. Every month I pay for your channels, yet because I live in Calgary and support the Vancouver Canucks, I am expected to purchase a full Sportsnet+ Premium subscription simply to watch out-of-market games.

• 
  Orange Cone (@CanadianPylon) reported 11 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport @Rogers @Bell Cancel with Telus. Horrific customer support/ understanding. They just cost me 80k on a mortgage renewal. My credit card for autopay had expired, and I missed it. I’ll own that. My account went 30 days over, and when I got that notification I immediately rectified it, paid in full, and put in an updated CC number. They outright refuse to take the late payment off my credit report for the mistake. I am 51 years old. NEVER one late payment ever. This dropped my credit score 86 points, and now on my upcoming mortgage renewal I cannot get the preferred banking rate as a result, and Telus outright refuses to help. I’ve been a loyal Telus customer for a decade paying 350+/month for all their service’s, and hold close to $100k in Telus stock and this is the treatment I am getting for an honest mistake. Use any other provider. I will make it my life’s mission to make sure nobody signs up with Telus going forward. Friends, family members and employees included. I’ve tagged Bell and Rogers on this so they can share it with others to use as marketing to win new customers and show how you don’t treat a long time customer.

• 
  Aaron 🇺🇦 🇨🇦🇲🇽 (@AaronYVR) reported 11 minutes ago

  @FanMontanaro It's worse. I pay for OneSoccer in my Telus subscription, and they didn't have the game. And even tough I've already paid thru Telus, I need a separate login and subscription on their website.

• 
  Katie Rago (@Bossmanrago) reported 12 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport between July 28 and today Aug 5 l have spoke to at least 8-9 Telus agents to resolve a problem . I've had agents diarize to call me back as follow up ... nothing. Any other business working like this would be bankrupt. Telus is the worst provider choice !!!

• 
  LET GO Habs (@habby44) reported 16 minutes ago

  Man @TELUS sucks for cable or internet trying to get answers on why your bill jumped $50 for no changes. They are like the friend you lent a $100 and can’t get a hold of!!!!

• 
  Johan N. (@rk8215) reported 18 minutes ago

  This is probably one of the most de-risking press releases from $AMPG to date. Why? $4M came from Telus, but the most important part is that $2M came from somewhere else. This means Amplitech has another customer placing multi-million dollar orders. Is this $AMZN, $IBM, Fujitsu Spain, or someone else? We will know soon. What makes this even better is that the $4M from Telus sits on top of the $5 to $7M that Fawad mentioned in the June interview. That means Telus has already exceeded the LOI with $9 to $11M. Customer concentration risk just got de-risked. So bullish! 🔥🚀

• 
  Hockey Dad (@Coach_JayH) reported 21 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport @TELUS out of the blue- you cancelled my service. No reason. Just cancel. Is this how you treat customers of 20+ years?

• 
  iPilot🅰️ (@OmniAeronautica) reported 22 minutes ago

  @bscholl $ASTS Blake Scholl Discovers AST’s Thesis, Then Forgets AST Exists Blake correctly identifies the hybrid terrestrial/satellite future, then skips enough due diligence to declare Starlink the “only good” satellite network while ignoring the company purpose-built for exactly that architecture. AST SpaceMobile has nearly 60 MNO relationships representing roughly 3 billion subscribers. AT&T and Verizon are strategic partners. Vodafone, Rakuten, Bell, TELUS and stc are partners. Vodafone, Orange, Telefónica and Deutsche Telekom, T-Mobile’s parent, are now conducting integration testing across Europe using ordinary smartphones and carrier spectrum. The fatal blow to Blake’s premise arrived three months before his post: AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon announced a technology-neutral D2D venture explicitly intended to support multiple satellite providers, preserve existing agreements and increase competition. The carriers’ published strategy is the opposite of surrendering themselves to an exclusive Starlink bottleneck. The products are not equivalent either. T-Mobile still advises using Starlink outdoors with a clear view of the sky and warns that coverage may be unavailable inside buildings, aircraft and other obstructed locations. AST’s giant phased arrays are designed to provide carrier-integrated broadband, including voice, video, apps and “one wall in” connectivity. AST is carrier-neutral infrastructure that aligns with MNOs instead of trying to subordinate them. Blake identified the future, ignored one of its central companies, contradicted the carriers’ actual strategy, and typed “QED?” as if kissing Elon’s *** were a substitute for due diligence.

• 
  Alex Maclean (@canmaclean42) reported 24 minutes ago

  @TaraArmstrongBC The bean counters and Wildfire operations are married but sleep in different rooms. The ministry is actually one of the poorer agencies of the government and sort of like the US marines there is rarely all the equipment and personell one wants but generally people are gung ho and will always make do. There are some internal skirmishes and rivalries like contract vs ministry firefighters, or between crews but generally it's friendly and all in all BC has one of the most professional and world class wildfire suppression systems. I can say that because I've been doing it for 10 years and have worked with firefighters from a dozen countries and half the provinces and territories. When it comes to finances it's a different world. For example some idiot thought it would be a great idea for Telus (the phone company) to do the ministries payroll, a universally hated arrangement by crews. After all on a slow year there are a thousand firefighters sitting around on base or doing make work projects on the governments dime. Why bother with additional funding, it doesn't buy votes. On a hot year one does what can be done with resources available until a state of emergency is declared and then the money rolls in and the millions flow. Probably costing considerably more than if sufficient crews and equipment were allocated in the first place. I'm not in management but the solution is probably in training and maintaining an additional 1000 ministry firefighters, expansion of the Para program, a few additional air assets and properly funding the type 2 and type 3 contract resources instead of a chronic loss of professional firefighters leaving the profession because there is no work or incentive to stay on a slow year. On a forest management perspective perhaps allowing green belts (natural fire breaks) to grow instead of spraying glyphosate (dries out the forest) for profit, or hiring enough Rangers to police the logging companies to get them to actually stay in line and manage the forests the way they pretend they do. Current logging practice drops water tables. But that's a conversation nobody wants to have