Telus outages and service status in Port Hardy, British Columbia
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- Telus generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Port Hardy, including 0 direct reports.
Telus offers phone, internet and television services, as well as mobile phone and mobile internet service through Telus Mobility. Telus internet service uses DSL technology. Telus TV relies on satellite or internet television (IPTV). Telus' mobile phone network supports CMS, HSPA and LTE.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Port Hardy, British Columbia
The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Port Hardy, British Columbia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Telus. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Live Outage Map Near Port Hardy, British Columbia
The most recent Telus outage reports came from the following cities: Port Hardy.
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Phone | 2 months ago |
|
|
Internet | 3 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Telus Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Joel - coffee/acc (@JoelDeTeves) reportedHe's right, but letting Cohere and Telus grift taxpayers isn't going to fix it
-
Alexander Grant (@bk1022) reported@PsudoMike Okay. Although I guess I'd say there is no longer an incentive to buy hardware from Telus. Telus's best customer retention pricing is still worse than BestBuy, let alone other places.
-
john bennett (@35yearsasailor) reported@JonFraserTF @TELUS I’m with Koodo the cheap arm of Telus and find the service great never had a problem
-
Charles @ Victoria (@CharlesVic50) reportedCanada's CRTC needs to push much harder to bring Bell, Telus & Rogers into communication line over their extra fees and poor customer service while 'providing' some of the highest cellphone and internet fees in the entire world.
-
ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reportedI haven't sold a single $AMPG share. Not one. And I'm not going to. Strategic critical key component (US knows and funds Open6G). I watched what $AXTI and $SIVE did to the people who sold too soon, relentless FUD all the way up, and then the real move happened without them. I'm not making that mistake here. Not for a few bucks more or few bucks less. Not for a comment section. Not for a wiggle on the chart. And Ehrmantraut just laid out exactly why my conviction is what it is. Look at what he showed: ~4.4x forward sales on management's $50M guide, and remember, they guided $25M for 2025 and delivered it. They don't underdeliver. And seems they will close EVEN MORE DEALS. Said by MANAGAMENT on the earnings call. Gross margins at 48% and climbing. Real revenue across AI-RAN/5G, quantum, SATCOM and defense. Active Telus LOIs and POs, with an estimated $300M+ cumulative from Telus alone through 2029. For a sub-$1B micro-cap, those numbers are absurd. He's right: There are billion-dollar companies with far worse fundamentals. So if people want to ring the register and leave, by all means, leave. I genuinely don't mind whose hands I hold next to. Because this was never just a fundamentals story. It's bigger than that. AMPG is the only American company that designs and commercializes the 64T64R Massive MIMO AI-RAN radio, the physical layer the entire AI-RAN future has to run on. Inside the DoD-funded Open6G hub. Already defense-qualified: Lockheed, Northrop, L3Harris, Boeing. And in a world where every other radio giant is foreign; Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung, Huawei... AMPG is America's answer. That's not a meme. That's critical national infrastructure. Open6G. Edge AI. That will control EVERYTHING in the next years. Everything. And it's the only Made in USA. Elite fundamentals AND a strategic moat the U.S. can't afford to lose. That's the combination almost no micro-cap ever has. That's why I'm not selling a share. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR.
-
NK (@786110bsmla) reportedto a customer is in the millions or more,over time. I called Scotiabank and they said call Telus. I called Telus and they said call Scotiabank. Pass the buck, till the customer gets tired and gives up. I am letting everyone know because of the principle of this situation.
-
BCTallTrees (@BcTall) reported@Angelahvn They installed Telus fiber here but it still has very SLOW periods. I'm still trying to figure it out (there's some online guidance on using a separate router downstream of the one Telus provides, for one)
-
Jody Vance (@jodyvance) reported@guyfelicella @TELUS I returned from my trip to find all recordings gone and recording of usual shows just kicking back in, with no history. Then….no ability to record. Then everything unplugged for 3+ hours as my technician waited for the support staff to call him after me messaged in for help
-
Temple 8 Research (@Temple_Eight) reported@ChairmansLedger Let's expand the argument then. Starting with what ASTS gets right. While ASTS has a small lead on broadband connectivity their real advantage is spectrum access via carrier exclusivity and they've locked up nearly 60 mobile network operator partners covering over 3 billion subscribers AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, Telus, Bell, etc. SpaceX operates more than 9,000 satellites around 60% of everything in orbit. ASTS has roughly 9 including recent launches, and is trying to accelerate to about one launch a month to hit 2026 targets. Analysts are skeptical it can sustain this. Each BlueBird Block 2 is a 6,100 kg spacecraft, far more complex and expensive per unit than a Starlink satellite and AST can't launch anything close to the pace of Musk. SpaceX owns the rockets while ASTS has to buy rides on Falcon 9, New Glenn, etc. SpaceX's hardware iteration speed is, as one analysis put it, a real and durable advantage, and if their next gen satellites deliver on data performance, the competitive gap narrows while the scaling gap stays insurmountable. SpaceX already took the biggest carrier prize in the US being T-Mobile. So the carrier moat cuts both ways. SpaceX obviously has access to vast capital after IPO, with Starlink generating ~$10.4 billion of revenue in 2025. ASTS is pre-real-revenue at scale ($70.9 million in 2025) and funding itself with convertible debt and dilution. Do you really want to hold through heavy short to medium term dilution over years??
-
Olyth (@olyth_terminal) reported$AMPG FYI this is not even including the AI-RAN market which is projected to add another $10b in revenue to the $20b from O-RAN by 2030. So that's a market that went from basically 0 to $30b in a little over 5 years. With 6G and AI Tailwinds to drive it another decade or more. You're probably wondering why this industry is growing so fast. It's not primarily the infrastructure upgrade to 6g. Yes it will help speed up the transition to advanced 5G and 6G BUT there's one main reason. Mobile Network Operator CEOs are fed up with vendor lock-in. They're tired of being dependent on a handful of suppliers with little leverage on pricing, innovation speed, or customization. O-RAN and AI-RAN give them the ability to mix hardware and software from multiple vendors. That drives down costs and unlocks new efficiencies and revenue streams. Right now the vendors know there's no competition. How do you think that's going for the MNOs during negotiations? O-RAN and AI-RAN change this. MNOs are speed running to alternatives at this point; the CAGR on O/AI-RAN prove this and $AMPG has proven their radios bring the results CEOs are looking for. The inflection point is this year. This quote from the Telus VP on using Samsung and Amplitech radios should tell you everything you need to know about how MNOs feel about single vendor lock in. It's stuck with me since I read it. It drives my conviction in $AMPG. “That’s our current mix. And it’s really important for us to have that deployment: if it [multi-vendor Open RAN] remains theoretical. It’s not good enough for us.” Do you feel conviction in Bureaus' sentiment? It should stick with you when you think about where $AMPG is headed.