Telus outages and service status in Saint John West, New Brunswick

Problems in the last 24 hours in Saint John West, New Brunswick

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Saint John West, New Brunswick and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports Near Saint John West, New Brunswick

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Saint John West and nearby locations:

• 
  Robert Jones (@cbcjones) reported 4 minutes ago from Saint John West, New Brunswick

  There’s also agreement on a Telus issue covering Dennis Oland’s phone communications and another agreement on the issue of cell phone tower neighbours.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Hillaria (@HillariaBankz) reported 35 seconds ago

  I have a conspiracy theory that internet/cable providers in Canada are tampering with people’s service to get them to pay for upgrades or switch services. No reason @TELUS should be this stinky

• 
  Ritz (@4evrCanada) reported 2 minutes ago

  @MLArajchouhan I emailed you re TELUS cutting my bro off. He has no access to phone, food, 911, his daughters, or medical emergencies. Telus refused my help because "I'm not authorized on account." FIX IT!

• 
  Jody Vance (@jodyvance) reported 3 minutes ago

  Today was NOT the day to FAIL my TV viewing, again @telus.

• 
  Heidi McCulloch (@HeidiMcCulloch) reported 3 minutes ago

  I made the worst decision ever moving my home internet to @TELUS - and can’t even fix it because app has been down for 2 weeks and son hold with customer service now at 57 minutes. @TELUSsupport

• 
  Dan Harris (@danharriscan) reported 6 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @WitchsBeFlockin @TELUS They all like it when people bundle because it's harder to ditch them if one of the three services goes to ****. They used to compete on better customer service. Now, they DGAF because for every customer they lose due to bad service they gain from someone else's bad service.

• 
  Corey Herscu (@coreyherscu) reported 8 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS Their voice network simply doesn’t work, I found, and when it did, it was crackly & distorted.

• 
  1rhodesian (@JohnKir43886910) reported 9 minutes ago

  @bcbluecon Telus sucks as well. They all start you at a reduced rate and then keep jacking it up. Try Starlink if you can.

• 
  Puckerglen (@puckerglen) reported 10 minutes ago

  @garymasonglobe @TELUS Gary.... Rogers/Shaw are even worse Their teck's find so many ways to **** their customers....and STILL get paid. Ive met a few that've told me their tricks and laugh about it. And then getting in touch with customer service...merry-go-round Its deplorable

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 17 minutes ago

  Why do I compare $AMPG ($0.2B) to $KEEL ($3.5B), $DGXX ($0.6B) and $NBIS ($66B)? Fair question. And the answer is bigger than people think, because AMPG isn't just in the same trend as these. It's actually more diversified than any of them. Let me explain properly. Start with what they share. They're all plays on the same thing: the physical infrastructure of the AI era. Not the models, not the apps. The actual hardware and buildout AI runs on. That's the layer that quietly captures the money while everyone argues about chatbots. $NBIS, $KEEL and $DGXX are neoclouds. They sell AI compute out of data centers. You need somewhere to run all this AI, so they build and rent the GPU infrastructure. Picks and shovels for the cloud side. Here's how I think about $AMPG: same idea, but on the tower instead of the data center. That's what AI-RAN means. The cell tower stops being a dumb relay and becomes an intelligent edge node, computing AI right where the data is created, in real time, because some decisions can't wait for a round-trip to a distant data center. And the tower can't do any of it without a radio. AMPG makes the only American 64T64R Massive MIMO radio that open AI-RAN runs on. If a neocloud is the physical layer of cloud AI, AMPG is the physical layer of edge AI. Honest framing: today a neocloud sells recurring compute and AMPG sells radio hardware, so the analogy is about where this is heading, the tower as the next edge data center, not a claim it's already an identical business. Same megatrend, earlier in its arc. But here's where AMPG actually pulls ahead of a pure neocloud play. It isn't a one-trick bet. While the neoclouds live or die on a single thesis, AMPG has multiple real legs underneath it. ✅ Zero debt. ✅ $20M cash. ✅ $200M market cap. ✅ 48% gross margins. ➟ Leg 1, the revenue engine that exists right now: Telus. AMPG's radio is already deployed at a Tier-1 carrier, and on the last call the COO said they "continue to receive orders against that LOI" and projected Q2 "definitely much higher than Q1.". That's real, recurring, shipping revenue. A lot of these pure AI-infra names are still pre-revenue or burning cash. AMPG is selling product today at 48% gross margins. ➟ Leg 2, space. AMPG makes the low-noise amplifiers that are the "ears" of satellites. It shipped prototypes to a "Fortune 50 satellite systems provider" building a LEO constellation, and the only Fortune 50 doing that is Amazon with Kuiper, which then showed up on AMPG's customer wall. (Honest framing: the wall confirms Amazon as a customer, the LEO link is my deduction, not a disclosed deal.) With SpaceX now public, the whole space sector just got validated, and AMPG is the picks-and-shovels under it. ➟ Leg 3, quantum. AMPG makes the cryogenic amplifiers superconducting quantum computers need for qubit readout, with proof-of-concept units shipped to names like IBM and Google. Optionality, not revenue yet, but real and patented and American. ➟ Leg 4, defense. Lockheed, Northrop, L3Harris, Boeing, NASA on the customer wall. Relationships that take years of qualification to earn. So put it together. AMPG is in the exact same AI-infrastructure megatrend everyone loves the neoclouds for, except it also has real shipping revenue, a Tier-1 carrier ramping, space exposure, quantum optionality, and a defense business, all at a sub-$1B cap, debt-free, with 48% margins. That's the part that breaks the lazy argument. When someone says AMPG "already ran 135%" while cheering NBIS or DGXX up 160-190%, they're judging it by the chart, not the thesis. And on the thesis, AMPG isn't behind these names. It's the same trade, with more legs, earlier, and cheaper. They picked the data center. I'm adding the tower. And the tower happens to also touch space, quantum and defense. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  Temple 8 Research (@Temple_Eight) reported 23 minutes ago

  I hope the $ASTS boys like dilution because you're going to need a lot of it to fund your ambitions. While ASTS has a small lead on broadband connectivity their real advantage is spectrum access via carrier exclusivity and they've locked up nearly 60 mobile network operator partners covering over 3 billion subscribers AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, Telus, Bell, etc. SpaceX operates more than 9,000 satellites around 60% of everything in orbit. ASTS has roughly 9 including recent launches, and is trying to accelerate to about one launch a month to hit 2026 targets. Analysts are skeptical it can sustain this. Each BlueBird Block 2 is a 6,100 kg spacecraft, far more complex and expensive per unit than a Starlink satellite and AST can't launch anything close to the pace of Musk. SpaceX owns the rockets while ASTS has to buy rides on Falcon 9, New Glenn, etc. SpaceX's hardware iteration speed is, as one analysis put it, a real and durable advantage, and if their next gen satellites deliver on data performance, the competitive gap narrows while the constellation scale gap stays insurmountable. SpaceX already took the biggest carrier prize in the US being T-Mobile. So the carrier moat cuts both ways. SpaceX obviously has access to vast capital after IPO, with Starlink generating ~$10.4 billion of revenue in 2025. ASTS is pre-real-revenue at scale ($70.9 million in 2025) and funding itself with convertible debt and dilution. Do the bulls have an answer to this?