1. Home
  2. โฏ
  3. Companies
  4. โฏ
  5. Cogeco
  6. โฏ
  7. Forest
Cogeco

Cogeco outages and service status in Forest, Ontario

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Cogeco generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Forest, including 0 direct reports.

Cogeco offers cable television, internet and home phone service. Cogeco service homes and businesses in multiple areas, mainly in Ontario and Quebec.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Forest, Ontario

The chart below shows the number of Cogeco reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Forest, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Cogeco. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cogeco Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Amanda90097805
    Amanda (@Amanda90097805) reported

    @cogeco Mine going strong sorry I never went with the Mobil service I can't say if the money would be in my bank I wish it was like the billing way how I can with you guys

  • edworthy37
    Dogder16 (@edworthy37) reported

    @cogeco No internet connection problem here yet

  • milky1004123
    Bharat๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ(Modi Ka Parivar) (@milky1004123) reported

    @cogeco Any update on the internet restoration in Oakville, my work is getting heavily impacted? Please provide the service restoration time

  • Rexraptor19921
    Rexraptor (@Rexraptor19921) reported

    @cogeco outage again in Kingston. This is absolutely ridiculous. 3rd outage in less than a week. They make us pay a premium just so we have 3 outages in less than two weeks. We better get compensation for this BS. Fix your internet. #cogecooutage

  • Ciel2114
    Ciel21 โ™ ๏ธโ™ฆ๏ธโ™ฃ๏ธ๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ (@Ciel2114) reported

    @MamaStyles77 @cogeco @cogecohelps Steven, Sandra or whoever is on right now, help Member get her service or funds restored. She could not make calls during hospital trip this week. That is concerning. Do better.

  • cliffmathew
    Clifford Mathew (@cliffmathew) reported

    @MrTuffster @AMGoudreau85 @cogeco This cable vandalism excuse doesn't hold water. They lost service across multiple provinces. They have no redundancy.

  • ezrock_tor
    kevin (@ezrock_tor) reported

    Your service is down in Oakville,no phone support ๐Ÿคฌ @cogeco

  • Reil76
    ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆWayne๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@Reil76) reported

    @shoegirl68 @Bell Ya Iโ€™d switched to cogeco for awhile, and then bell sucked me back with a deal too good to turn down.

  • Tiger_JY
    Kevin K (@Tiger_JY) reported

    @cogeco Could you check if there is an outage in Oakville? I lost internet 2 hours ago and it hasnโ€™t come back online yet.

  • kinisurrco
    Kini Surrco | Dividend data (@kinisurrco) reported

    @CDInewsletter Really appreciate the thoughtful reply and coming from you, it carries weight. I ran both Quebecor and Cogeco through the algorithm just now. And I am happy to see that your instincts mostly checkout :) : $QBR-B: ๐ŸŸข OPTIMAL | Quality 85, Opportunity 80. P/FFO 8.7x, ND/EBITDA 2.9x, 11.8% dividend CAGR. The model loves this one - Quality 85 is significantly higher than BCE (57) or Telus (58). The 2.2% yield is light, but total shareholder yield is 3.79% with buybacks. $CCA: ๐ŸŸ  CAUTION | Quality 45, Opportunity 70. Yield 6.38%, P/FFO 1.5x. The $2.2B impairment on the U.S. segment (Breezeline) is flagged as a permanent structural problem, not temporary. The algorithm sees the value but doesn't trust the moat. The BCE management trust point is well taken. "The dividend is safe" โ†’ 42% cut a year later is exactly the kind of credibility gap no quantitative model captures. I should probably add some version of this. Thanks again ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ