Cogeco outages and service status in Lambton Shores, Ontario
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- Cogeco generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Lambton Shores, including 0 direct reports.
Cogeco offers cable television, internet and home phone service. Cogeco service homes and businesses in multiple areas, mainly in Ontario and Quebec.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Lambton Shores, Ontario
The chart below shows the number of Cogeco reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Lambton Shores, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Cogeco. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Cogeco Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
π¨π¦ Make It Home YGK (@MIHomeYGK) reportedMassive Cogeco outage affecting internet connections and retail POS services, also causing collateral slowdown of other data services as large numbers of customers attempt to temporarily switch to personal cellphone hotspots.
-
MamaStyles (@MamaStyles77) reported9 hours this week alone on hold as a terminally ill customer.Complaints made to @CCTS_CPRST and @CRTCeng About Cogeco mobile.Their licence to operate should be removed. How Iβve been treated for 4 months is disgusting. I want my 4 months of money back .My 25 hours of time back
-
π¨π¦Wayneπ¨π¦ (@Reil76) reported@shoegirl68 @Bell Ya Iβd switched to cogeco for awhile, and then bell sucked me back with a deal too good to turn down.
-
urskims (@Urstrulykarims) reported@cogeco Oakville north since 2pm down, customer support not connecting , chatbot useless . Bad customer support .
-
Allan Gao (@Allan_Gao12) reported@cogeco I cancelled my internet service after my contract ended, yet you charged me a $75 early cancellation fee in violation of CRTC rules. I emailed you, but you ignored me. Is this how you treat your customers?
-
Bob Loblaw (@Avocado26430508) reportedHey @cogeco! What happened to my install today? Lost half a days pay. Never left the house. Tech couldn't be bothered to ring doorbell, knock on door or call. Now being told the easiest I can get an install is August 5th. 2hrs to finally get through to a supervisor. Brutal
-
fck your fascist pancakes (@dubsy54321) reported@cogeco how do I get on your do not disturb list? I'm not interested in your service and your salespeople just keep showing up here every few months. I want to be left alone thank you.
-
Stevey Hotcakes (@SteveyHotcakes) reported@RKTCATS @cogecohelps Very poor customer service on this, Cogeco. Has been out for a very long time with zero updates.
-
Kelly Demorest (@DemorestKe48215) reported@Reil76 @Bell I have Cogeco. I switched from Bell. When you have problems, they're all the same. ***. Just saying
-
Kini Surrco | Dividend data (@kinisurrco) reported@CDInewsletter Really appreciate the thoughtful reply and coming from you, it carries weight. I ran both Quebecor and Cogeco through the algorithm just now. And I am happy to see that your instincts mostly checkout :) : $QBR-B: π’ OPTIMAL | Quality 85, Opportunity 80. P/FFO 8.7x, ND/EBITDA 2.9x, 11.8% dividend CAGR. The model loves this one - Quality 85 is significantly higher than BCE (57) or Telus (58). The 2.2% yield is light, but total shareholder yield is 3.79% with buybacks. $CCA: π CAUTION | Quality 45, Opportunity 70. Yield 6.38%, P/FFO 1.5x. The $2.2B impairment on the U.S. segment (Breezeline) is flagged as a permanent structural problem, not temporary. The algorithm sees the value but doesn't trust the moat. The BCE management trust point is well taken. "The dividend is safe" β 42% cut a year later is exactly the kind of credibility gap no quantitative model captures. I should probably add some version of this. Thanks again π¨π¦