1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. Cogeco
  6. ❯
  7. Rawdon
Cogeco

Cogeco outages and service status in Rawdon, Quebec

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Cogeco generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Rawdon, including 0 direct reports.

Cogeco offers cable television, internet and home phone service. Cogeco service homes and businesses in multiple areas, mainly in Ontario and Quebec.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Rawdon, Quebec

The chart below shows the number of Cogeco reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Rawdon, Quebec and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Cogeco. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cogeco Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • blairs1
    Blair (@blairs1) reported

    @cogeco appreciate you trying to get my business back but don’t think sending your door to door sales people out with the worst air quality is the way to go. Cc: @cogecohelps

  • Davidschonitz
    D.S (@Davidschonitz) reported

    Anything happen affecting the Kawartha Lakes region? My entire network is down and on top of that, customer support numbers don't work and account logins are unoperative as well. @cogeco

  • friskybusinesz
    Jay S🐬 (@friskybusinesz) reported

    @Lesley_Bergen @cogeco Cogeco sucks. Their customer service is atrocious

  • altimaguy11
    fore_not_four 𝒲𝒾𝓁𝓁𝒾𝒢𝓂 POPS π’Ÿπ“‡π“Šπ“‚π“‚π‘œπ“ƒπ’Ή (@altimaguy11) reported

    @LaciMarieKnight The CRTC controls all in Canada & creates regional monopolies , allowing companies to continue giving poor service at high prices. Bell Canada is the worst of the worst with Cogeco and Rogers close behind. They render only services they have to give while controlling what we see.

  • Allan_Gao12
    Allan Gao (@Allan_Gao12) reported

    @cogeco I cancelled my internet service after my contract had expired, but you deliberately violated CRTC rules and charged me a $75 early cancellation fee. I emailed you about this issue, but you have ignored us. Do you regularly treat your customers this way and deliberately overcharge

  • PWindsor2
    PWindsor (@PWindsor2) reported

    @MIHomeYGK Thanks for the posting. I have been trying to contact Cogeco for 1 hour trying to get info but line is always busy. Any idea how long outage?

  • DavideVaracall2
    davide (@DavideVaracall2) reported

    My Wi-Fi is not working it’s been slow the whole week @cogeco

  • asharpe004
    CRASH (@asharpe004) reported

    @cogeco What’s the image showing? Is this one wire damage responsible for the issues in numerous cities?

  • MamaStyles77
    MamaStyles (@MamaStyles77) reported

    If anyone needs help @nejsnave They can message me and I can compile names etc and send to Jen.I don’t have call service thanks @cogeco but my data is good!

  • kinisurrco
    Kini Surrco | Dividend data (@kinisurrco) reported

    @CDInewsletter Really appreciate the thoughtful reply and coming from you, it carries weight. I ran both Quebecor and Cogeco through the algorithm just now. And I am happy to see that your instincts mostly checkout :) : $QBR-B: 🟒 OPTIMAL | Quality 85, Opportunity 80. P/FFO 8.7x, ND/EBITDA 2.9x, 11.8% dividend CAGR. The model loves this one - Quality 85 is significantly higher than BCE (57) or Telus (58). The 2.2% yield is light, but total shareholder yield is 3.79% with buybacks. $CCA: 🟠 CAUTION | Quality 45, Opportunity 70. Yield 6.38%, P/FFO 1.5x. The $2.2B impairment on the U.S. segment (Breezeline) is flagged as a permanent structural problem, not temporary. The algorithm sees the value but doesn't trust the moat. The BCE management trust point is well taken. "The dividend is safe" β†’ 42% cut a year later is exactly the kind of credibility gap no quantitative model captures. I should probably add some version of this. Thanks again πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦