1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Cogeco
  4. Wiarton
Cogeco

Cogeco outages and service status in Wiarton, Ontario

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Cogeco generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Wiarton, including 0 direct reports.

Cogeco offers cable television, internet and home phone service. Cogeco service homes and businesses in multiple areas, mainly in Ontario and Quebec.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Wiarton, Ontario

The chart below shows the number of Cogeco reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Wiarton, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Cogeco. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cogeco Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • notnarr
    narr 🌴 (@notnarr) reported

    @mscranny @kwebber14 @cogeco Bell is bottom of the barrel slop. The slowest and least reliable wifi in Canada hands down. I’ve tried every wifi in my area and Cogeco has been the best besides all these dumb outages

  • Ciel2114
    Ciel21 ♠️♦️♣️💜🇨🇦🍁 (@Ciel2114) reported

    @cogecohelps Hi, Sandra! The other member is in east Hamilton and had no Cogeco service since yesterday around noon. There was an issue in finding restoration of service time or cause of disruption with your app. @JTkksmom

  • eppigy
    eppigy (@eppigy) reported

    @cogeco what’s up with the network in eastern Ontario? Expected up time!? Even your site is down.

  • extremeXmetal
    💀extremeXmetal💀 (@extremeXmetal) reported

    @alancross Cogeco seems like the only provider having problems. Every other provider seems normal.

  • kitty_kattkait
    kait (@kitty_kattkait) reported

    @catacombsboss @keithurbfan @cogecohelps I said it once I’ll said it again so maybe your retarded *** can understand the person who cut the line is the one who caused the damage, but Cogeco are the ones tasked with the response. Whose “fault” it is is a matter of perspective. Kindly get a ******* life no one asked you

  • Prophet12_ca
    Scott Miller 🇨🇦 (@Prophet12_ca) reported

    Is #cogeco down right now? When will it be back up? Any reports?

  • Friendshipgal
    Kathy (@Friendshipgal) reported

    @cogecohelps @Tim_Larry31 It's major, web site & cogeco phones are down. Any idea when it wil1 be back

  • richardp
    Richard P (@richardp) reported

    @candacelynnxo @cogecohelps Down for me in Port Hope. With the website down I guess it is a Cogeco wide issue.

  • danmearle
    Dan Earle he/him (@danmearle) reported

    @cogeco what is up with service outages today in Georgetown/Halron Hills? I get there was a storm yesterday, but what is the cause for the outage today? It’s just came back, but was out for over an hour.

  • kinisurrco
    Kini Surrco | Dividend data (@kinisurrco) reported

    @CDInewsletter Really appreciate the thoughtful reply and coming from you, it carries weight. I ran both Quebecor and Cogeco through the algorithm just now. And I am happy to see that your instincts mostly checkout :) : $QBR-B: 🟢 OPTIMAL | Quality 85, Opportunity 80. P/FFO 8.7x, ND/EBITDA 2.9x, 11.8% dividend CAGR. The model loves this one - Quality 85 is significantly higher than BCE (57) or Telus (58). The 2.2% yield is light, but total shareholder yield is 3.79% with buybacks. $CCA: 🟠 CAUTION | Quality 45, Opportunity 70. Yield 6.38%, P/FFO 1.5x. The $2.2B impairment on the U.S. segment (Breezeline) is flagged as a permanent structural problem, not temporary. The algorithm sees the value but doesn't trust the moat. The BCE management trust point is well taken. "The dividend is safe" → 42% cut a year later is exactly the kind of credibility gap no quantitative model captures. I should probably add some version of this. Thanks again 🇨🇦