Telus outages and service status in Egmont, British Columbia

Problems in the last 24 hours in Egmont, British Columbia

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Egmont, British Columbia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dennis Van Raalte (@dvanraalte) reported 5 minutes ago

  @TELUS @TELUSsupport How do I sign a contract with you for you to go and increase my rates after 8 months? Someone better reach out and correct this. Brutal service. @TELUSBusiness

• 
  Edmonton Lilly (@BabyGirlWife) reported 8 minutes ago

  @TELUS @TELUSsupport Your customer service sucks. You came in UNIVITED and upgraded us to fiberoptics. Which is causing PROPERTY DAMAGE!!!! But your AI DOESE NOT HAVE A WAY TO RESOLVE PROPERTY DAMAGE! THERE IS A ******* SINKHOLE AROUND YOUR POST!!!! #propertydamage

• 
  John Iosifov ✨💥 Ender Turing | AiCMO (@johniosifov) reported 9 minutes ago

  Three things contact center leaders are measuring instead of deflection: **1. Resolution quality score** — Did the customer's problem actually get solved? Not "was the call ended" but "did the issue recur within 7 days?" **2. Post-interaction sentiment delta** — How did the customer feel after AI vs. human? TELUS found that proactive AI outreach (before the customer calls to cancel) had sentiment scores 34% higher than reactive deflection. **3. Revenue at risk per interaction** — Tag calls by customer segment. A 3-year enterprise contract holder calling about billing deserves a different AI routing decision than a trial user with a password reset.

• 
  Kurt Rowland (@ruhbarb19) reported 11 minutes ago

  @FringedCanuck @Starlink Interesting as I had Starlink for several years and never an issue. Telus ran fiber optic out past our place and offered a great price.. so we sucked in and got hooked up. We have been having issues with it cutting in and out the past few days. Strange coincidence

• 
  DB Steiger (@DBSteiger) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Bell You have proved time and again that you don't actually care. The DM's go nowhere, solve nothing, and never escalate things to where they need to be. Pretending to ride in on white horse going "WELL ACTUALLY!" doesn't help. I gave up using Bell in favor of the slightly less horrid Telus, and at least I can get service when I call them. Hell, even that reply sounds like it was AI written. I have zero faith in your company left, and at 41 I hold a long grudge. It would take something significant to change my mind, after the hell you caused me.

• 
  Shawn Tock (@TockShawn) reported 15 minutes ago

  @RogersHelps @rogers: 15 hours with no internet, using my @telus phone as a hotspot. At 8 am, you said it'd take 4 hours to fix. Then 4-6 hours. Then the Rogers outage page kept extending the resolution time by an hour. Now an agent told me 24 hours. WTF? Unacceptable.

• 
  kidgreen42 (@kidgreen42) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Ayan604 @TELUS @TELUSsupport You’re an idiot if you think that was actually telus

• 
  @WeNeedAHero (@WheresOurHeroes) reported 16 minutes ago

  DEAR AT&T and TELUS, Are you paying attention? A company is only as good as it's service and attention to the most remote and poorest members of its service area. (I still say the same thing about unions too). When areas in SE Alaska don't have phone and internet their lives are highly at risk. It's not just about a drop in communications, gaming, streaming movies or social media. It's a drop in safety tools for these island dwellers too. Not to mention that with millions of tourists every year robbing the locals of bandwidth with high data traffic locals end up in last place as highpaying users for lack of competition. Ketchikan’s main internet (KPU fiber via the Canada route, plus cellular from providers like GCI/AT&T) has "finite capacity". When multiple cruise ships dock and thousands of tourists flood downtown with phones and devices, and that shared bandwidth gets congested—slowing speeds for everyone. When the service is down, many local busineses lose the use of POS machines (but still pay the rent to have them). Starlink solves this in several practical ways: -independant backup, -reliable pathways and -outage resilience. Starlink is already a tremendous service for the Alaska Marine Highway System which is a class 1 essential service for SE Alaska, whereby these ferries are often the only way form of transportation between island communities for so many of these remote residents. In this age of high technology, the current tools, even with their own redundancies, just don't offer enough protections. This isn't an advertisement nor do I get paid for mentioning Starlink. But I will post pricing for SE Alaska residents because these remote areas need options: As of August 2026, Starlink’s regular U.S. Residential pricing (which applies in Southeast Alaska) is: Residential 100 Mbps: $55/month Residential 200 Mbps: $85/month Residential MAX: $130/month New customers can download the Starlink mobile app and the sign up opens on the initial screen. Competition is a beautiful thing. Just saying...

• 
  Johan N. (@rk8215) reported 16 minutes ago

  The pre-market is pricing $AMPG ER report and a company as a complete failure, when the truth is that one bigger order is delayed probably with couple of months which led to company to pull guidance. Those are two very different things. Market cap in pre-market is around $85M right now. Add the $6M of July orders to reported revenue and they have already put together $19M this year and we are in August. So let's put things into perspective here and think. Is all of this really worth a 40% drawdown? Two real issues in this report. One, revenue is delayed. Delayed because of matters not in AmpliTech's hands. That's it, really. Delayed, not gone. But because of this, guidance was pulled. Two, margins compressed quarter over quarter. Management explained it with product mix. More detail on that would have been welcome. Those are the issues. Now the other side. Nothing about the progress they have made is erased. The macro conditions are still in place. They still have their 5G O-RAN radios that nobody else has. They still booked $6 million of orders in July alone. On guidance. They are saying they cannot guarantee $50 million this year. That does not mean they are not making money. They are still making money. I think they will land somewhere around $35 to 40 million. So I don't think we are talking about a big miss here. They just did not want to keep a number out there that they cannot guarantee. I kind of understand it. Maybe they should not have given that number in Q1 in the first place. Some updated number would have been great, I admit. Nothing is gone. The fundamentals are still in place. Customers, orders, LOIs. Everything I have written in my articles about the customer base, macro conditions etc is still truthful and accurate. Telus is not affected by any of this. AmpliTech is still shipping them daily. This was all about the South East Asian MNO. Trust in management is definitely shaken, maybe gone for many of you. Fair. I think management was too naive and optimistic during Q1, but the company is still developing in the right direction, with some hiccups along the way. I am not personally selling at these prices, but I really do understand if some of you are. Reminder, there is a PR coming this morning regarding the Titan Crest IP transfer being pretty much completed and upcoming orders related to it. So it was not all bad on the call. Expectations are reset. I learned a really expensive lesson myself about letting myself get too hyped, but underneath all of this, the company and story is still moving forward. What I see is a messy quarter inside a growth story.

• 
  Claire Rattée (@ClaireRattee) reported 18 minutes ago

  Northwest B.C. cannot continue to be one cut cable away from losing critical communications. Following yet another widespread telecommunications outage on August 2, reportedly caused by copper cable theft, I have written to the Minister of Citizens’ Services asking what the Province is doing to improve the resilience and reliability of our telecommunications infrastructure. When these outages happen, the consequences go far beyond inconvenience. Residents can lose access to emergency information, businesses can’t process transactions, families can’t communicate, and entire communities can be left without reliable access to essential services. After the major outage in May, my office raised concerns with both TELUS and the Province about the lack of redundancy in Northwest B.C. and asked what was being done to prevent another widespread disruption. Months later, we are still waiting for meaningful answers, and now it has happened again. Copper theft is a growing problem, but whether an outage is caused by theft, wildfire, severe weather or infrastructure failure, our communities should not be left so vulnerable to a single point of failure. I’m asking the Province for clear answers on redundancy, infrastructure investment, emergency connectivity, and what steps are being taken with telecommunications providers to ensure Northwest communities can stay connected when something goes wrong. Reliable telecommunications are essential infrastructure, and Northwest B.C. deserves the same level of reliability and resiliency as the rest of the province.