Telus outages and service status in Hartney, Manitoba

Problems in the last 24 hours in Hartney, Manitoba

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Hartney, Manitoba and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  🆒 Chris Parry (@ChrisParry) reported 5 minutes ago

  @garymasonglobe @TELUS Telus doesn't want your busiess. I use @heybabbl - local, way cheaper, no contracts, service without call centers

• 
  Suleiman Damji (@SullyCanuck87) reported 9 minutes ago

  @jodyvance @TELUS Switch to Rogers Telus sucks *****

• 
  Olyth (@olyth_terminal) reported 12 minutes ago

  $AMPG FYI this is not even including the AI-RAN market which is projected to add another $10b in revenue to the $20b from O-RAN by 2030. So that's a market that went from basically 0 to $30b in a little over 5 years. With 6G and AI Tailwinds to drive it another decade or more. You're probably wondering why this industry is growing so fast. It's not primarily the infrastructure upgrade to 6g. Yes it will help speed up the transition to advanced 5G and 6G BUT there's one main reason. Mobile Network Operator CEOs are fed up with vendor lock-in. They're tired of being dependent on a handful of suppliers with little leverage on pricing, innovation speed, or customization. O-RAN and AI-RAN give them the ability to mix hardware and software from multiple vendors. That drives down costs and unlocks new efficiencies and revenue streams. Right now the vendors know there's no competition. How do you think that's going for the MNOs during negotiations? O-RAN and AI-RAN change this. MNOs are speed running to alternatives at this point; the CAGR on O/AI-RAN prove this and $AMPG has proven their radios bring the results CEOs are looking for. The inflection point is this year. This quote from the Telus VP on using Samsung and Amplitech radios should tell you everything you need to know about how MNOs feel about single vendor lock in. It's stuck with me since I read it. It drives my conviction in $AMPG. “That’s our current mix. And it’s really important for us to have that deployment: if it [multi-vendor Open RAN] remains theoretical. It’s not good enough for us.” Do you feel conviction in Bureaus' sentiment? It should stick with you when you think about where $AMPG is headed.

• 
  Temple 8 Research (@Temple_Eight) reported 13 minutes ago

  I hope the $ASTS boys like dilution because you're going to need a lot of it to fund your ambitions. While ASTS has a small lead on broadband connectivity their real advantage is spectrum access via carrier exclusivity and they've locked up nearly 60 mobile network operator partners covering over 3 billion subscribers AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, Telus, Bell, etc. SpaceX operates more than 9,000 satellites around 60% of everything in orbit. ASTS has roughly 9 including recent launches, and is trying to accelerate to about one launch a month to hit 2026 targets. Analysts are skeptical it can sustain this. Each BlueBird Block 2 is a 6,100 kg spacecraft, far more complex and expensive per unit than a Starlink satellite and AST can't launch anything close to the pace of Musk. SpaceX owns the rockets while ASTS has to buy rides on Falcon 9, New Glenn, etc. SpaceX's hardware iteration speed is, as one analysis put it, a real and durable advantage, and if their next gen satellites deliver on data performance, the competitive gap narrows while the constellation scale gap stays insurmountable. SpaceX already took the biggest carrier prize in the US being T-Mobile. So the carrier moat cuts both ways. SpaceX obviously has access to vast capital after IPO, with Starlink generating ~$10.4 billion of revenue in 2025. ASTS is pre-real-revenue at scale ($70.9 million in 2025) and funding itself with convertible debt and dilution. Do the bulls have an answer to this?

• 
  AJ Punk (@SilentSnow89) reported 14 minutes ago

  @DWOMB Telus. They were having hardware problems with TSN this afternoon.

• 
  Jordan Levitt (@JordanLevitt2) reported 19 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS The problem is that you will not get better customer service from Bell or Rogers... Been through all of them.

• 
  Wes (@AFKnownWes) reported 28 minutes ago

  @jodyvance @TELUS It’s bigger than you think. Under new CRTC guidelines, all of Canadas Telecom’s are to switch to an App based service system. All staff are going to be canned, no more call centres. Rogers is ****** too!

• 
  TELUS (@TELUS) reported 29 minutes ago

  @esSpyderMonkey Because TELUS TV+ streams live TV, we are legally bound by CRTC broadcast loudness laws (-24 LUFS), while apps like YouTube master their audio much 'hotter' (-14 LUFS). To fix the gap on Apple TV, try going to Settings > Video and Audio > turn on 'Reduce Loud Sounds'

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 32 minutes ago

  Most of this map is noise to the average investor. But one name is quietly sitting on the layer everything else depends on, and almost nobody sees it. That name is $AMPG. The one that I think will do a parabolic move like $SIVE or $AAOI. Let me tell you the whole story. Look at where it sits: Connectivity & RF. The re-shored, certified domestic alternative for 5G, SATCOM and defense. One name in its lane. Here's why that lane is the one almost nobody is pricing correctly. Look at every other layer on this list. Photonics. Compute. Physical AI. Drones. Space. Energy. Every single one of them, at some point, has to move its signal somewhere. Data has to travel. And the layer that moves it through the air is RF, the radio. It's the connective tissue under the entire map. No radio, nothing else talks to anything. Now the problem that makes this a thesis and not just a product. America does not make its own radios. The companies that build the RF backbone of modern networks are all foreign: Nokia (Finland), Ericsson (Sweden), Samsung (Korea). The Chinese ones, Huawei and ZTE, are banned outright on national-security grounds. So the most powerful country on Earth, about to wire its economy, its defense and its AI into a wireless network, depends on other countries for the physical layer it runs on. That is a strategic vulnerability. Washington knows it. That's the gap $AMPG fills. AmpliTech is the only American company that designs and commercializes a 64T64R Massive MIMO O-RAN radio. That's the highest-capacity radio configuration in the modern stack, and it's the physical hardware that open AI-RAN runs on. Not the only one on Earth, Nokia and Ericsson make them too. The only American one. In a decade defined by re-shoring critical tech, that single word, American, is the whole point. And this isn't a pitch deck. It's already real. It's deployed at Telus, a Tier-1 North American carrier, running on live Open RAN sites alongside Samsung. It's a Strategic Partner in Open6G, the wireless hub funded by the US Department of Defense and run by Northeastern, sitting in the top partner tier right next to NVIDIA, Dell and Qualcomm. Its radio was the physical unit in the world's first open-source Massive MIMO AI-RAN demo, running with NVIDIA's Aerial software. And it was the only American-designed 64T64R radio to pass multi-vendor interoperability at the O-RAN ALLIANCE Global PlugFest. Then look at who shows up on its customer wall: NVIDIA, Amazon, IBM, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, L3Harris, NASA. You do not land defense primes by accident. Those relationships take years of qualification before you're even in the room. That's a moat you can't fake. Now the fundamentals, because a thesis needs a business under it. 48% gross margins, up from 33%. Debt-free. $50M revenue guidance for the year (and they hit their prior guide, they don't have a habit of underdelivering). And managament promised even more. Real backlog, real LOIs. This is a company that already makes money doing this, today, with the radio. And stacked on top, for free, two pieces of optionality. AI-RAN, where towers become intelligent edge nodes, the demo with NVIDIA points at exactly where this goes. And quantum, where AMPG makes the cryogenic amplifiers superconducting quantum computers need for qubit readout (it's delivered proof-of-concept units to names like IBM and Google). I'll be honest about both: optionality, not the core thesis. Cheap call options on top of a real business, not the reason to own it. Here's the honest framing that actually makes this stronger, not weaker. $AMPG is not a chokepoint nobody can replace. AI runs without it. Other radio makers exist. I won't pretend it's irreplaceable, because it isn't. What it is, is the sovereign alternative. The American option in a layer the US increasingly refuses to outsource That's a strategic preference backed by policy and funding, not a technical monopoly. And strategically favored can re-rate a sub-$1B company just as hard as technically indispensable can. And the timing isn't subtle. The US just restricted its most advanced AI models from all foreign nationals, even allies. When a country starts walling off its critical tech from its own friends, it tells you exactly how it's going to treat the physical layer its AI economy runs on. It's going to want that made at home. So in a map full of chokepoints and physical inputs, $AMPG is the layer that moves the signal, re-shored, certified, and American. The screens get the attention. The infrastructure gets the returns. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  JABO Vancouver (@jabo_vancouver) reported 32 minutes ago

  @SluaghainO @TELUS Nah, the Telus internet is down here.