1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Telus
  4. Mount Forest
Telus

Telus outages and service status in Mount Forest, Ontario

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Telus generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Mount Forest, including 0 direct reports.

Telus offers phone, internet and television services, as well as mobile phone and mobile internet service through Telus Mobility. Telus internet service uses DSL technology. Telus TV relies on satellite or internet television (IPTV). Telus' mobile phone network supports CMS, HSPA and LTE.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Mount Forest, Ontario

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Mount Forest, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Telus. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • RansomBailey
    Ransom (@RansomBailey) reported

    @Jonesing4truth @koodo Koodo is a trash company that would have gone out of business if Telus hadn’t bought them. Do not use them. Absolutely no customer service.

  • UptimusApp
    Uptimus (@UptimusApp) reported

    Aug 10 at 15:34 UTC: Telus website incident update. Recovery monitoring was interrupted again as community reports of outages and slow performance returned. Status is now investigating.

  • canmaclean42
    Alex Maclean (@canmaclean42) reported

    @TaraArmstrongBC The bean counters and Wildfire operations are married but sleep in different rooms. The ministry is actually one of the poorer agencies of the government and sort of like the US marines there is rarely all the equipment and personell one wants but generally people are gung ho and will always make do. There are some internal skirmishes and rivalries like contract vs ministry firefighters, or between crews but generally it's friendly and all in all BC has one of the most professional and world class wildfire suppression systems. I can say that because I've been doing it for 10 years and have worked with firefighters from a dozen countries and half the provinces and territories. When it comes to finances it's a different world. For example some idiot thought it would be a great idea for Telus (the phone company) to do the ministries payroll, a universally hated arrangement by crews. After all on a slow year there are a thousand firefighters sitting around on base or doing make work projects on the governments dime. Why bother with additional funding, it doesn't buy votes. On a hot year one does what can be done with resources available until a state of emergency is declared and then the money rolls in and the millions flow. Probably costing considerably more than if sufficient crews and equipment were allocated in the first place. I'm not in management but the solution is probably in training and maintaining an additional 1000 ministry firefighters, expansion of the Para program, a few additional air assets and properly funding the type 2 and type 3 contract resources instead of a chronic loss of professional firefighters leaving the profession because there is no work or incentive to stay on a slow year. On a forest management perspective perhaps allowing green belts (natural fire breaks) to grow instead of spraying glyphosate (dries out the forest) for profit, or hiring enough Rangers to police the logging companies to get them to actually stay in line and manage the forests the way they pretend they do. Current logging practice drops water tables. But that's a conversation nobody wants to have

  • LongshoreCowboy
    North American (@LongshoreCowboy) reported

    @JayGenXer I have another year of a "contract" with @TELUS. I will be cancelling it, paying their bullshit penalty and moving to @Starlink by mid-September. I suggest every Canadian who hates this bill does the same. Once a Musk company offers cellular service, it switches too. I am so done with fascist Canada.

  • kidgreen42
    kidgreen42 (@kidgreen42) reported

    @Ayan604 @TELUS @TELUSsupport You’re an idiot if you think that was actually telus

  • venusxedus
    BB28 (@venusxedus) reported

    @Ayan604 @TELUS @TELUSsupport Telus keeps spamming me with calls too but I never pick up because I just assume it’s a scam… almost one every day

  • chinoalemano
    ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported

    My two biggest fears about $AMPG were the biggest MNO and the margins. That's why I lowered my exposure and positioned myself publicly for $DGXX's earnings. Yet, at these prices, AMPG is very attractive. I think this is an overreaction. It reminds me of $FLNC. Yesterday's report confirmed the "problem" with the Asian program. Last call, they said: "timing delays due to customer deployment schedules and overseas supply chain factors". Yesterday's Titan Crest filing says: "substantial delays in developing its products". That's where I suspected the $70M+ program was going to be in trouble, discussed it with my friends, and shared my insights about it. Today's call: "We do not have any cancellations of orders, or we do not have any changes in the LOIs. The forecast timing has changed". "Particularly within one of our international 5G programs. So this shift is affecting the timing on the follow-on purchase orders associated with that deployment overseas". It's a timing issue. Nobody cancelled. My conclusion is that those problems will eventually get solved, but that OREX's LOI was delayed (the biggest MNO) because Titan Crest. Who knows how long it takes. Thesis didn't change. That's exactly why they pulled guidance: because they can't date the fix. Painful, but honest. The $40M (North American MNO) program is Telus. No problems there. In fact, they've been ordering MORE than the LOI. On margins, last call they told us: "We do not expect margin improvement to be perfectly linear quarter to quarter, especially during a ramp-up phase, but improving gross margin remains one of our key operating priorities". So I understand margins will eventually climb (especially with the 64T64R and everything AI-RAN). My fear was how the market would take a margin reduction when it printed. It printed. The market did what I feared. Both things will get solved and it will stabilize. Same thing happened with Fluence. I bought at $12.60. Euphoria traders ran it to $15. That's what happened with AMPG lately. Lots of euphoria. Lots of likes. Lots of tourists. Then FLNC dropped from $15 to $10 in premarket. Everyone who read "margin cut" hit sell. Market opened. It went back to $15. Now it sits around $13, more or less stabilized. I think something similar just happened to AMPG. All that attention, all those posts with hundreds of likes... that's tourist capital. The tourists saw the margin compression and overreacted. Was it a bad earnings report? Definitely. So was Fluence's. Was it THAT bad? No. Eventually it recovers and stabilizes. And the game, same as Fluence, is watching whether the next reports recover margins and put a date on the product problem. The thesis is the same. The clock is longer. Not financial advice. Still long $AMPG. Long $DGXX. DYOR.

  • TELUSsupport
    TELUS Support (@TELUSsupport) reported

    @Ayan604 That is completely unacceptable, and I am sorry you had that experience Andy. This sounds like a spammer or scammer spoofing our caller ID to pretend to be TELUS. Our team would never speak to anyone like that. To block fake calls like this for good, check out our TELUS Call Control feature.

  • johniosifov
    John Iosifov ✨💥 Ender Turing | AiCMO (@johniosifov) reported

    TELUS deployed a voice AI agent to call new home internet customers in their first 90 days. Not to resolve a problem. Not because the customer called in. Just to check in. Result: customers who got that AI welcome call were less than half as likely to cancel within 30 days. That's proactive retention — and it completely inverts how most contact center AI is deployed. The standard mental model: AI handles inbound. Saves cost. Deflects calls. Reduces headcount. TELUS ran the opposite play. Outbound. Proactive. AI-initiated. And the economics are brutal in a good way. Every churn prevented is worth months of subscription revenue. Voice AI at scale means you can make that call to every single new customer — not the top 10% who triggered a risk score. Gartner projects $80 billion in contact center labor costs cut by AI this year. 88% of contact centers now run some form of AI. But 75% haven't operationalized it. They have tools. They don't have outcomes. The difference between TELUS and the 75%: TELUS defined the outcome first (reduce 30-day churn), then designed the intervention (proactive welcome call), then measured it. Proactive > reactive. Always. In contact centers and everywhere else. This is what the call center AI conversation is missing. Everyone's chasing deflection rates. The real money is in the outbound plays nobody's running yet.

  • AlexBC997
    Alex (@AlexBC997) reported

    @brettdrc Telus was never admired. Not that I remember.