Telus outages and service status in Port Renfrew, British Columbia

Problems in the last 24 hours in Port Renfrew, British Columbia

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Port Renfrew, British Columbia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Salman (@salmanesmaili) reported 45 seconds ago

  Hey @TELUS @TELUSsupport Today I spent over 50 minutes on the phone just to add ONE channel to my TV package. It’s 2026. We have AI agents, autonomous vehicles, and instant digital banking. Yet a basic account change still requires nearly an hour with customer service. This isn’t a technology problem—it’s a customer experience problem. Do better. #TelecomMonopoly #LackOfCompetition Cc: @CRTCeng

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 2 minutes ago

  This is the most important framing of $AMPG I've seen, and it's the distinction almost everyone misses. And, obviously, comes from a guy called "calm". Let me build on it, because once you see the full picture, it's hard to unsee. Everyone wants to call today a short squeeze. But the point here is sharper: a squeeze fades, a re-rating doesn't. If today was purely shorts covering, it's mechanical. They buy back, the pressure releases, and it bleeds out over the next few days. Nothing fundamental changed. But if today was the market starting to recognize the actual business, that's a completely different animal. That's a beginning, not a ******. And the reason I lean toward the second is simple: look at what the shorts are actually betting against. For months their thesis was that AMPG wouldn't execute, that revenue wouldn't show up, that it keeps drifting lower. The problem is the opposite kept happening, and the last earnings call made that impossible to ignore. Let me walk through it. Start with the core. AMPG is the only American company commercializing the 64T64R Massive MIMO AI-RAN radio, the physical layer open AI-RAN runs on. Already deployed at Telus, a Tier-1 carrier. Right beside Samsung. 2 out of 5 radios from TELUS. 48% gross margins, up from 33%. Debt-free. That alone breaks the "won't execute" thesis. Then the call got louder. COO Jorge Flores on Telus (detective): "We continue to receive orders against that LOI as well". And on the quarter: "We are projecting Q2 to be definitely much higher than Q1." Q1 was already $5.35M, up 48.6%. So the ramp the bears said wouldn't materialize is not only materializing, it's accelerating. Then CEO Fawad Maqbool dropped the part nobody's pricing. On new carriers: "We've had very productive discussions with major MNOs, and it's more likely they'll go straight to POs, no LOIs. We'll be announcing those in the next quarter or so." . Major operators, plural, potentially skipping the letter-of-intent stage and going straight to firm purchase orders. That's a stronger commitment than how Telus even started. And then he pointed abroad: "Our success being the largest O-RAN deployment in America is helping us reach further into Europe and other areas of the world.". That's not empty talk. AMPG already signed a 5-year supplier agreement with Fujitsu Spain covering Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The international runway is already open. Also, working closely with UK funded hub, being the only american one there. Now stack the optionality on top, the parts you don't even pay for at this valuation. Quantum: AMPG makes the cryogenic amplifiers that superconducting quantum computers need for qubit readout, and has shipped proof-of-concept units to names like IBM and Google. Honest framing: optionality, not revenue yet, and it serves the superconducting branch specifically. But it's real, patented, and American. Space: back in December 2024, AMPG shipped prototype amplifiers to an unnamed "Fortune 50 satellite systems provider" building a LEO constellation, tens of thousands of units expected. The only Fortune 50 building its own LEO network is Amazon, with Project Kuiper. Then Amazon showed up on AMPG's customer wall. Honest framing again: the wall confirms Amazon is a customer, not specifically that it's the LEO buyer, that link is my deduction. But the breadcrumbs stack cleanly, and with SpaceX now public, the entire space sector just got validated. So put it all together. This isn't a meme pump. It's a company that has spent months stacking catalysts: a flagship carrier deployment, accelerating revenue, expanding margins, new carriers near firm POs, a European channel opening, and free optionality in quantum and space. With customers like: 🔹 NVIDIA 🔹 Amazon 🔹 IBM 🔹 Boeing 🔹 Lockheed Martin 🔹 Northrop Grumman 🔹 L3Harris 🔹 NASA Eventually the market stops ignoring that. That's why the shorts are in real trouble. They're not fighting momentum anymore. They're short against improving fundamentals on multiple fronts at once, and time now works against them. Every quarter of execution makes their thesis weaker, not stronger. Honest caveat: a re-rating isn't guaranteed, and one green day doesn't confirm it. The CEO's PO and Europe comments are forward-looking, his words, not signed deals yet, so watch for the actual PRs. The real test is whether this holds and builds, or fades like a pure cover. But the framing is right. A squeeze is a moment. A re-rating is a trend. Shorts betting against a falling story is one trade. Shorts betting against a company that's actually getting better, across telecom, defense, space and quantum, is a completely different and far more dangerous one. I think we might be watching the second one begin. Still sub $1B. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  Mattitude (@Mattitude80) reported 4 minutes ago

  @garymasonglobe @TELUS They are the worst I have come across. A few years back it took my countless hours on hold and 6 months of repeated calls to setup a new business land line. It's almost as if their staff get paid by making simple tasks as hard as possible

• 
  Aidan Sloan (@SluaghainO) reported 5 minutes ago

  @jabo_vancouver @TELUS Telus honestly just sucks in general

• 
  Gary Mason 🇨🇦🇺🇦 (@garymasonglobe) reported 7 minutes ago

  It seems @TELUS is fine with its business clients waiting three weeks to get a problem fixed. Imagine running a business and having to face that situation. Is Telus going to reimburse me for the three weeks I won't have service they are suppose to provide?

• 
  Dp (@Dpietro83) reported 8 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS They raised my internet bill brim $80 to $180 and were charging me for a product I wasn't even receiving. After arguing with loyalty for an hour they now call me every night when I ask them to stop. Horrid service

• 
  🆒 Chris Parry (@ChrisParry) reported 10 minutes ago

  @garymasonglobe @TELUS Telus doesn't want your busiess. I use @heybabbl - local, way cheaper, no contracts, service without call centers

• 
  Dr. Billy Canada (@billycanada) reported 11 minutes ago

  @gatorgar Think long-term. In 3 to 4 years you won't be getting your phone service from AT&t or Telus or Bell or Rogers or whatever you'll get it from starlink. The AI that you use will be in starlink satellites. The taxi you take will be a robo taxi from Tesla. Tesla robots will be mowing your lawn too

• 
  Jon Fraser (@JonFraserTF) reported 16 minutes ago

  @marconiese @TELUS I didn't fall for anything. I weighed the options and at the time it worked for me. My company wouldn't reimburse me for a new phone outright, but they had not issue with the lease.

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 16 minutes ago

  @DVLT146025 This is exactly it, and it's the most underrated skill in this whole game. A manipulated pump and a real multibagger look identical on the chart. Same vertical candles, same volume spike, same "it already ran too much" comments. The chart literally cannot tell you which one you're holding. The only thing that separates them is what's underneath. A pump has a story and nothing behind it. A multibagger has a chart that's finally catching up to a business that was already real. And that's the work most people skip. They argue about the candle instead of reading the filings. With $AMPG, the difference shows up the moment you actually dig in. 48% gross margins, up from 33%. Debt-free. Revenue growing triple digits. The only American 64T64R AI-RAN radio, deployed at Telus, a Strategic Partner in a DoD-funded hub. Defense primes and NASA as customers. A CEO guiding margins higher because the heavy investment is behind them. None of that is chart noise. That's a company. A manipulated stock can't survive due diligence. It falls apart the second you look closely. AMPG gets stronger the closer you look. That's the whole tell. The people scared off by "it already moved" never opened the hood. The ones who did know exactly which category this is. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡