Telus outages and service status in Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, British Columbia
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- Telus generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, including 0 direct reports.
Telus offers phone, internet and television services, as well as mobile phone and mobile internet service through Telus Mobility. Telus internet service uses DSL technology. Telus TV relies on satellite or internet television (IPTV). Telus' mobile phone network supports CMS, HSPA and LTE.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, British Columbia
The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, British Columbia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Telus. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Telus Issues Reports Near Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, British Columbia
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Squamish-Lillooet Regional District and nearby locations:
-
christina p π¨π¦ (@c_l_prevost) reported from Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, British Columbia@TELUS No service in Pemberton BC right now?
-
christina prevost π¨π¦ (@c_l_prevost) reported from Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, British ColumbiaSo people are supposed to work from home but @TELUS is not working. No wifi. No customer service #nowifi #telus #workfromhome #noexcuses
Telus Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Olyth (@olyth_terminal) reported$AMPG FYI this is not even including the AI-RAN market which is projected to add another $10b in revenue to the $20b from O-RAN by 2030. So that's a market that went from basically 0 to $30b in a little over 5 years. With 6G and AI Tailwinds to drive it another decade or more. You're probably wondering why this industry is growing so fast. It's not primarily the infrastructure upgrade to 6g. Yes it will help speed up the transition to advanced 5G and 6G BUT there's one main reason. Mobile Network Operator CEOs are fed up with vendor lock-in. They're tired of being dependent on a handful of suppliers with little leverage on pricing, innovation speed, or customization. O-RAN and AI-RAN give them the ability to mix hardware and software from multiple vendors. That drives down costs and unlocks new efficiencies and revenue streams. Right now the vendors know there's no competition. How do you think that's going for the MNOs during negotiations? O-RAN and AI-RAN change this. MNOs are speed running to alternatives at this point; the CAGR on O/AI-RAN prove this and $AMPG has proven their radios bring the results CEOs are looking for. The inflection point is this year. This quote from the Telus VP on using Samsung and Amplitech radios should tell you everything you need to know about how MNOs feel about single vendor lock in. It's stuck with me since I read it. It drives my conviction in $AMPG. βThatβs our current mix. And itβs really important for us to have that deployment: if it [multi-vendor Open RAN] remains theoretical. Itβs not good enough for us.β Do you feel conviction in Bureaus' sentiment? It should stick with you when you think about where $AMPG is headed.
-
Btaylor (@Btaylor81140) reported@jodyvance @TELUS If Novus services your area, try them. Their customer service is incredible and Iβve only had one issue in two years. It was resolved in minutes.
-
Dr. Billy Canada (@billycanada) reported@gatorgar Think long-term. In 3 to 4 years you won't be getting your phone service from AT&t or Telus or Bell or Rogers or whatever you'll get it from starlink. The AI that you use will be in starlink satellites. The taxi you take will be a robo taxi from Tesla. Tesla robots will be mowing your lawn too
-
Howard Macleod (@howard_macleod) reported@JonFraserTF @Nanceasaurus @TELUS I dumped Telus after 20 years of complete incompetence, went to Starlink and never looked back.
-
ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reportedWhy do I compare $AMPG ($0.2B) to $KEEL ($3.5B), $DGXX ($0.6B) and $NBIS ($66B)? Fair question. And the answer is bigger than people think, because AMPG isn't just in the same trend as these. It's actually more diversified than any of them. Let me explain properly. Start with what they share. They're all plays on the same thing: the physical infrastructure of the AI era. Not the models, not the apps. The actual hardware and buildout AI runs on. That's the layer that quietly captures the money while everyone argues about chatbots. $NBIS, $KEEL and $DGXX are neoclouds. They sell AI compute out of data centers. You need somewhere to run all this AI, so they build and rent the GPU infrastructure. Picks and shovels for the cloud side. Here's how I think about $AMPG: same idea, but on the tower instead of the data center. That's what AI-RAN means. The cell tower stops being a dumb relay and becomes an intelligent edge node, computing AI right where the data is created, in real time, because some decisions can't wait for a round-trip to a distant data center. And the tower can't do any of it without a radio. AMPG makes the only American 64T64R Massive MIMO radio that open AI-RAN runs on. If a neocloud is the physical layer of cloud AI, AMPG is the physical layer of edge AI. Honest framing: today a neocloud sells recurring compute and AMPG sells radio hardware, so the analogy is about where this is heading, the tower as the next edge data center, not a claim it's already an identical business. Same megatrend, earlier in its arc. But here's where AMPG actually pulls ahead of a pure neocloud play. It isn't a one-trick bet. While the neoclouds live or die on a single thesis, AMPG has multiple real legs underneath it. β Zero debt. β $20M cash. β $200M market cap. β 48% gross margins. β Leg 1, the revenue engine that exists right now: Telus. AMPG's radio is already deployed at a Tier-1 carrier, and on the last call the COO said they "continue to receive orders against that LOI" and projected Q2 "definitely much higher than Q1.". That's real, recurring, shipping revenue. A lot of these pure AI-infra names are still pre-revenue or burning cash. AMPG is selling product today at 48% gross margins. β Leg 2, space. AMPG makes the low-noise amplifiers that are the "ears" of satellites. It shipped prototypes to a "Fortune 50 satellite systems provider" building a LEO constellation, and the only Fortune 50 doing that is Amazon with Kuiper, which then showed up on AMPG's customer wall. (Honest framing: the wall confirms Amazon as a customer, the LEO link is my deduction, not a disclosed deal.) With SpaceX now public, the whole space sector just got validated, and AMPG is the picks-and-shovels under it. β Leg 3, quantum. AMPG makes the cryogenic amplifiers superconducting quantum computers need for qubit readout, with proof-of-concept units shipped to names like IBM and Google. Optionality, not revenue yet, but real and patented and American. β Leg 4, defense. Lockheed, Northrop, L3Harris, Boeing, NASA on the customer wall. Relationships that take years of qualification to earn. So put it together. AMPG is in the exact same AI-infrastructure megatrend everyone loves the neoclouds for, except it also has real shipping revenue, a Tier-1 carrier ramping, space exposure, quantum optionality, and a defense business, all at a sub-$1B cap, debt-free, with 48% margins. That's the part that breaks the lazy argument. When someone says AMPG "already ran 135%" while cheering NBIS or DGXX up 160-190%, they're judging it by the chart, not the thesis. And on the thesis, AMPG isn't behind these names. It's the same trade, with more legs, earlier, and cheaper. They picked the data center. I'm adding the tower. And the tower happens to also touch space, quantum and defense. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. π‘
-
Canada Goose π¨π¦ (@CanadaGoose911) reportedTelus is the worst
-
Heidi McCulloch (@HeidiMcCulloch) reportedI made the worst decision ever moving my home internet to @TELUS - and canβt even fix it because app has been down for 2 weeks and son hold with customer service now at 57 minutes. @TELUSsupport
-
Temple 8 Research (@Temple_Eight) reportedI hope the $ASTS boys like dilution because you're going to need a lot of it to fund your ambitions. While ASTS has a small lead on broadband connectivity their real advantage is spectrum access via carrier exclusivity and they've locked up nearly 60 mobile network operator partners covering over 3 billion subscribers AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, Telus, Bell, etc. SpaceX operates more than 9,000 satellites around 60% of everything in orbit. ASTS has roughly 9 including recent launches, and is trying to accelerate to about one launch a month to hit 2026 targets. Analysts are skeptical it can sustain this. Each BlueBird Block 2 is a 6,100 kg spacecraft, far more complex and expensive per unit than a Starlink satellite and AST can't launch anything close to the pace of Musk. SpaceX owns the rockets while ASTS has to buy rides on Falcon 9, New Glenn, etc. SpaceX's hardware iteration speed is, as one analysis put it, a real and durable advantage, and if their next gen satellites deliver on data performance, the competitive gap narrows while the constellation scale gap stays insurmountable. SpaceX already took the biggest carrier prize in the US being T-Mobile. So the carrier moat cuts both ways. SpaceX obviously has access to vast capital after IPO, with Starlink generating ~$10.4 billion of revenue in 2025. ASTS is pre-real-revenue at scale ($70.9 million in 2025) and funding itself with convertible debt and dilution. Do the bulls have an answer to this?
-
VanCity!!! (@VanCityPaez) reported@for_vaughan @TELUSsupport There's a reason so many of my neighbours have switched from Telus to Rogers. The customer service is horrible, and their plans suck.
-
Richard von Stauffenberg (@RickvonStauff) reported@CanadasLeafs @LeafsPassion85 Bell & Rogers are my only 2 real choices where I'm at. I hate both of them. If I had the option to get Telus, I'd never, ever get Rogers or Bell again. I'd even take Cogeco over both of them. But, I really want Telus to come to Atlantic Canada.