Telus outages and service status in Paspebiac, Quebec

Problems in the last 24 hours in Paspebiac, Quebec

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Paspebiac, Quebec and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  mc sw@gs (@McSwagg3r4) reported 35 seconds ago

  @Apple & @TELUS … Why do I pay thousands for your phones, and hundreds per month to get the worst service in the world? My US phone is $30/month and has like $0 dead spots. I’m going to badger my MP & MLA

• 
  Dave (@TheOnlyRealDac) reported 5 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS Bell, Rogers, and Telus, plus their cheap alternatives, all owned by the big 3... All suck. The Canadian market has no competition. I've used every provider, and have had **** customer service at all of them.

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 6 minutes ago

  Why do I compare $AMPG ($0.2B) to $KEEL ($3.5B), $DGXX ($0.6B) and $NBIS ($66B)? Fair question. And the answer is bigger than people think, because AMPG isn't just in the same trend as these. It's actually more diversified than any of them. Let me explain properly. Start with what they share. They're all plays on the same thing: the physical infrastructure of the AI era. Not the models, not the apps. The actual hardware and buildout AI runs on. That's the layer that quietly captures the money while everyone argues about chatbots. $NBIS, $KEEL and $DGXX are neoclouds. They sell AI compute out of data centers. You need somewhere to run all this AI, so they build and rent the GPU infrastructure. Picks and shovels for the cloud side. Here's how I think about $AMPG: same idea, but on the tower instead of the data center. That's what AI-RAN means. The cell tower stops being a dumb relay and becomes an intelligent edge node, computing AI right where the data is created, in real time, because some decisions can't wait for a round-trip to a distant data center. And the tower can't do any of it without a radio. AMPG makes the only American 64T64R Massive MIMO radio that open AI-RAN runs on. If a neocloud is the physical layer of cloud AI, AMPG is the physical layer of edge AI. Honest framing: today a neocloud sells recurring compute and AMPG sells radio hardware, so the analogy is about where this is heading, the tower as the next edge data center, not a claim it's already an identical business. Same megatrend, earlier in its arc. But here's where AMPG actually pulls ahead of a pure neocloud play. It isn't a one-trick bet. While the neoclouds live or die on a single thesis, AMPG has multiple real legs underneath it. ✅ Zero debt. ✅ $20M cash. ✅ $200M market cap. ✅ 48% gross margins. ➟ Leg 1, the revenue engine that exists right now: Telus. AMPG's radio is already deployed at a Tier-1 carrier, and on the last call the COO said they "continue to receive orders against that LOI" and projected Q2 "definitely much higher than Q1.". That's real, recurring, shipping revenue. A lot of these pure AI-infra names are still pre-revenue or burning cash. AMPG is selling product today at 48% gross margins. ➟ Leg 2, space. AMPG makes the low-noise amplifiers that are the "ears" of satellites. It shipped prototypes to a "Fortune 50 satellite systems provider" building a LEO constellation, and the only Fortune 50 doing that is Amazon with Kuiper, which then showed up on AMPG's customer wall. (Honest framing: the wall confirms Amazon as a customer, the LEO link is my deduction, not a disclosed deal.) With SpaceX now public, the whole space sector just got validated, and AMPG is the picks-and-shovels under it. ➟ Leg 3, quantum. AMPG makes the cryogenic amplifiers superconducting quantum computers need for qubit readout, with proof-of-concept units shipped to names like IBM and Google. Optionality, not revenue yet, but real and patented and American. ➟ Leg 4, defense. Lockheed, Northrop, L3Harris, Boeing, NASA on the customer wall. Relationships that take years of qualification to earn. So put it together. AMPG is in the exact same AI-infrastructure megatrend everyone loves the neoclouds for, except it also has real shipping revenue, a Tier-1 carrier ramping, space exposure, quantum optionality, and a defense business, all at a sub-$1B cap, debt-free, with 48% margins. That's the part that breaks the lazy argument. When someone says AMPG "already ran 135%" while cheering NBIS or DGXX up 160-190%, they're judging it by the chart, not the thesis. And on the thesis, AMPG isn't behind these names. It's the same trade, with more legs, earlier, and cheaper. They picked the data center. I'm adding the tower. And the tower happens to also touch space, quantum and defense. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  Craig T. Miller (@cckcmiller) reported 7 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport how bad is your support that I cannot find a phone number to call support. Telus assist is a joke and anytime I have gotten into your support queue it has been a joke.

• 
  Ehrmantraut Capital (@EhrmantrautCap_) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Palmersfortune The fundamentals on the company are strong. This is not merely hype, but a rally sustained by strong fundamentals and real catalysts (such as $NVDA diclosed as a customer & the Telus article that resurfaced).

• 
  Temple 8 Research (@Temple_Eight) reported 9 minutes ago

  I hope the $ASTS boys like dilution because you're going to need a lot of it to fund your ambitions. While ASTS has a small lead on broadband connectivity their real advantage is spectrum access via carrier exclusivity and they've locked up nearly 60 mobile network operator partners covering over 3 billion subscribers AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, Telus, Bell, etc. SpaceX operates more than 9,000 satellites around 60% of everything in orbit. ASTS has roughly 9 including recent launches, and is trying to accelerate to about one launch a month to hit 2026 targets. Analysts are skeptical it can sustain this. Each BlueBird Block 2 is a 6,100 kg spacecraft, far more complex and expensive per unit than a Starlink satellite and AST can't launch anything close to the pace of Musk. SpaceX owns the rockets while ASTS has to buy rides on Falcon 9, New Glenn, etc. SpaceX's hardware iteration speed is, as one analysis put it, a real and durable advantage, and if their next gen satellites deliver on data performance, the competitive gap narrows while the constellation scale gap stays insurmountable. SpaceX already took the biggest carrier prize in the US being T-Mobile. So the carrier moat cuts both ways. SpaceX obviously has access to vast capital after IPO, with Starlink generating ~$10.4 billion of revenue in 2025. ASTS is pre-real-revenue at scale ($70.9 million in 2025) and funding itself with convertible debt and dilution. Do the bulls have an answer to this?

• 
  Baynish (@bbassit4eva) reported 10 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS I was a 30-year TELUS customer; with great service. Then I moved to an older home. TELUS said it was impossible for them to connect me to WiFi. Rogers connected me. I canceled Telus. Telus wanted $700 because I broke my contract! They finally backed off after 3 phone calls!

• 
  ThePodDog (@PadDawg) reported 12 minutes ago

  Hey People don't ever get a 3rd party like Telus to have control over things like your heating and air conditioning. I put in for a cancelation of service for the end of the month and I thought it was on good terms. Wrong. They shut everything down 2 hours later. No warning

• 
  ^-^ (@JesseGraham_) reported 13 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS That’s really too bad. I’ve just recently had a fantastic experience with @TELUS support. Above and beyond. Maybe you just had someone on their bad day!

• 
  Dan Harris (@danharriscan) reported 16 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @WitchsBeFlockin @TELUS They all like it when people bundle because it's harder to ditch them if one of the three services goes to ****. They used to compete on better customer service. Now, they DGAF because for every customer they lose due to bad service they gain from someone else's bad service.