Cogeco outages and service status in Newtonville, Ontario

Problems in the last 24 hours in Newtonville, Ontario

The chart below shows the number of Cogeco reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Newtonville, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cogeco Issues Reports Near Newtonville, Ontario

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Newtonville and nearby locations:

• 
  Alise-Ann Glover (@aliseann_glover) reported 7 minutes ago from Port Hope, Ontario

  @cogeco Called your customer service team and it seems to be resolved.

• 
  Doug J (@RedRvn) reported 53 minutes ago from Port Hope, Ontario

  @cogeco why are we down in Oakville again?

Cogeco Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Hugh G Azzol (@MrTuffster) reported 6 seconds ago

  @cogeco Shoddy service like this from any provider will push more to go towards starlink

• 
  Mikey (@MikeyBGolfs) reported 57 seconds ago

  @SarahTreadaway @cogecohelps Seems to be a wide outage. Cogeco pretty much never acknowledges them either, on X or their website. Down for many in Petawawa after asking a few people in town.

• 
  Connor✝️ (@SportsDynamics9) reported 6 minutes ago

  @cogeco wifi down in cornwall is this server wide?

• 
  kait/POODY (@kitty_kattkait) reported 7 minutes ago

  @keithurbfan @cogecohelps NO ******* **** HAHAHAHAH did I say a cogeco employee did it on purpose or that they’re too ******* slow? No you **** all I said was the internet was down and where I was located you ****

• 
  O'bs 🇨🇦 (@obinson) reported 8 minutes ago

  Cogeco went down, others are over loaded as people grab hotspots. Or so someone posted on here.

• 
  end-of-suburbia Silverthorn (@endofsuburbia) reported 10 minutes ago

  @itsterki @MikeDoris @cogeco At least I could get my work done, meet my deadline tonight, and impress my client. Unless you have a better solution.

• 
  Dianne Williams (@SDM_1900) reported 11 minutes ago

  @cogeco Still problems!! Phone goes dead.

• 
  🇨🇦Canada United (@Charles65350398) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Reil76 @Bell Same here for years. Everytime i'll get. "I will send you a new reliever" Can i have a technician come out? "You dont need one" On to the service department. Within 2 seconds, it will cost you $75 dollars. I wiuld switch but Cogeco would have to dig up my driveway

• 
  Therese (@theresemacdona6) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Cogeco get back to me please. Internet going down several times last couple of days! Not happy. @Cogecohelps

• 
  Kini Surrco | Dividend data (@kinisurrco) reported 15 minutes ago

  @CDInewsletter Really appreciate the thoughtful reply and coming from you, it carries weight. I ran both Quebecor and Cogeco through the algorithm just now. And I am happy to see that your instincts mostly checkout :) : $QBR-B: 🟢 OPTIMAL | Quality 85, Opportunity 80. P/FFO 8.7x, ND/EBITDA 2.9x, 11.8% dividend CAGR. The model loves this one - Quality 85 is significantly higher than BCE (57) or Telus (58). The 2.2% yield is light, but total shareholder yield is 3.79% with buybacks. $CCA: 🟠 CAUTION | Quality 45, Opportunity 70. Yield 6.38%, P/FFO 1.5x. The $2.2B impairment on the U.S. segment (Breezeline) is flagged as a permanent structural problem, not temporary. The algorithm sees the value but doesn't trust the moat. The BCE management trust point is well taken. "The dividend is safe" → 42% cut a year later is exactly the kind of credibility gap no quantitative model captures. I should probably add some version of this. Thanks again 🇨🇦