Telus outages and service status in Strathmore, Alberta

Problems in the last 24 hours in Strathmore, Alberta

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Strathmore, Alberta and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Michael Lund (@Metro_Earth) reported 7 minutes ago

  @for_vaughan @TELUSsupport Yeah for over 5 years Telus has refused to fix our home setup or replace the equipment or even discount our bill for dropped service. The worst.

• 
  whatsittoya (@Murfam4) reported 8 minutes ago

  @StuntmanStu @jodyvance @TELUS They sold it. Took me 3 months to get someone to cancel it. Supposed to have kept same price for two years and they jacked it up by $10/month. Brutal.

• 
  Tom Mark (@TomMarknews) reported 8 minutes ago

  @garymasonglobe @TELUS I've had problems with Telus for the past year. Takes forever to get service. Been waiting 4 weeks for a new remote. Called today & was told the order was still being processed and a $30 charge fore the remote. Tech put in a new order saying 7 to 10 biz days.

• 
  𝐹𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑙𝑦 𝐵𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑎𝑛 (@BCFriendlyTodd) reported 14 minutes ago

  @jodyvance @TELUS It's trouble when it's trouble. Customer service requires weeks now somehow.

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 14 minutes ago

  Was it too late to buy $AXTI or $SIVE at $30, after they'd already run 600%? The answer is obvious: no, it wasn't. The people who stayed out "because it had already gone up too much" missed most of the move. Lately people ask me "Is it too late to buy $AMPG"? I haven't sold a single share. And that alone answers the question. Because if I truly believed it was too late to buy, what I'd really be telling you is that it's time to sell. They're the same sentence with a different face. "Too late to buy" and "time to sell" mean exactly the same thing. And I'm not selling. So I can't tell you it's too late without my own actions calling me a liar. Here's what people get backwards. "Late" and "early" feel like they're about the price. About the chart. About whether you caught the move or missed it. They're not. Not for a company at this stage. It comes down to one thing only: whether you trust what the company actually is. Think about AXTI and SIVE. The people who sold or never entered "because it had already run 600%" were staring at the chart, not the business. The ones who held or bought were looking at the thesis. If you trusted the company, $30 was just a stop on a much longer road. If you didn't, you thought it was late, and you'd have thought it was late at any price. Because that's the trap: if you don't trust the company, it was late at $3, it's late at $8, and it'll still feel late at $20. The chart was never your real question. Your real question was always whether you believed in it, just disguised as "timing". So instead of asking me about timing, ask yourself whether you believe the thesis. Let me tell you why I do. This is the only American company commercializing the 64T64R AI-RAN radio, the physical hardware the open AI-RAN future runs on. It's already deployed at Telus, a Tier-1 carrier. It's a Strategic Partner in the DoD-funded Open6G hub, in the top tier next to NVIDIA, Dell and Qualcomm, with its radio already tested alongside NVIDIA's Aerial software. That's not a meme. That's a real position in a layer the US is actively trying to re-shore for national security. Underneath that sits a real business: 48% gross margins, debt-free, revenue growing fast, defense primes and NASA on the customer wall. And stacked on top, for free, genuine optionality in quantum and in space. The kind of upside you don't even pay for at this valuation. I won't insult you by pretending it's risk-free. It isn't. There's customer concentration, there's dilution, there's execution risk. I've said all of it openly. A company is never a sure thing. But "is it too late" was never the question that matters. The question that matters is this: do you understand this company well enough to hold it through the noise, the FUD, the red days, and the people screaming that you're late? Because that conviction is the only thing that decides whether you actually capture the story or get shaken out halfway. So here's my honest answer, the one I can stand behind: It's late if you don't trust the company. It's early if you do. And the only person who can answer which one you are is you. Do the work. Read the filings. Build your own conviction, or don't. But don't outsource it to a chart, and don't outsource it to me. I just know which side I'm on. And I haven't sold a share. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  Chaykaverse (@chaykaverse) reported 15 minutes ago

  @jodyvance @TELUS It's about time. @TELUS is the worst company in Canada.

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 17 minutes ago

  Why do I compare $AMPG ($0.2B) to $KEEL ($3.5B), $DGXX ($0.6B) and $NBIS ($66B)? Fair question. And the answer is bigger than people think, because AMPG isn't just in the same trend as these. It's actually more diversified than any of them. Let me explain properly. Start with what they share. They're all plays on the same thing: the physical infrastructure of the AI era. Not the models, not the apps. The actual hardware and buildout AI runs on. That's the layer that quietly captures the money while everyone argues about chatbots. $NBIS, $KEEL and $DGXX are neoclouds. They sell AI compute out of data centers. You need somewhere to run all this AI, so they build and rent the GPU infrastructure. Picks and shovels for the cloud side. Here's how I think about $AMPG: same idea, but on the tower instead of the data center. That's what AI-RAN means. The cell tower stops being a dumb relay and becomes an intelligent edge node, computing AI right where the data is created, in real time, because some decisions can't wait for a round-trip to a distant data center. And the tower can't do any of it without a radio. AMPG makes the only American 64T64R Massive MIMO radio that open AI-RAN runs on. If a neocloud is the physical layer of cloud AI, AMPG is the physical layer of edge AI. Honest framing: today a neocloud sells recurring compute and AMPG sells radio hardware, so the analogy is about where this is heading, the tower as the next edge data center, not a claim it's already an identical business. Same megatrend, earlier in its arc. But here's where AMPG actually pulls ahead of a pure neocloud play. It isn't a one-trick bet. While the neoclouds live or die on a single thesis, AMPG has multiple real legs underneath it. ✅ Zero debt. ✅ $20M cash. ✅ $200M market cap. ✅ 48% gross margins. ➟ Leg 1, the revenue engine that exists right now: Telus. AMPG's radio is already deployed at a Tier-1 carrier, and on the last call the COO said they "continue to receive orders against that LOI" and projected Q2 "definitely much higher than Q1.". That's real, recurring, shipping revenue. A lot of these pure AI-infra names are still pre-revenue or burning cash. AMPG is selling product today at 48% gross margins. ➟ Leg 2, space. AMPG makes the low-noise amplifiers that are the "ears" of satellites. It shipped prototypes to a "Fortune 50 satellite systems provider" building a LEO constellation, and the only Fortune 50 doing that is Amazon with Kuiper, which then showed up on AMPG's customer wall. (Honest framing: the wall confirms Amazon as a customer, the LEO link is my deduction, not a disclosed deal.) With SpaceX now public, the whole space sector just got validated, and AMPG is the picks-and-shovels under it. ➟ Leg 3, quantum. AMPG makes the cryogenic amplifiers superconducting quantum computers need for qubit readout, with proof-of-concept units shipped to names like IBM and Google. Optionality, not revenue yet, but real and patented and American. ➟ Leg 4, defense. Lockheed, Northrop, L3Harris, Boeing, NASA on the customer wall. Relationships that take years of qualification to earn. So put it together. AMPG is in the exact same AI-infrastructure megatrend everyone loves the neoclouds for, except it also has real shipping revenue, a Tier-1 carrier ramping, space exposure, quantum optionality, and a defense business, all at a sub-$1B cap, debt-free, with 48% margins. That's the part that breaks the lazy argument. When someone says AMPG "already ran 135%" while cheering NBIS or DGXX up 160-190%, they're judging it by the chart, not the thesis. And on the thesis, AMPG isn't behind these names. It's the same trade, with more legs, earlier, and cheaper. They picked the data center. I'm adding the tower. And the tower happens to also touch space, quantum and defense. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  Jordan Levitt (@JordanLevitt2) reported 18 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS The problem is that you will not get better customer service from Bell or Rogers... Been through all of them.

• 
  The Entire Population of Canada (@ChefTannis) reported 19 minutes ago

  @TELUS My tsn went down right in the middle of the Spain match! In Vancouver, I completely missed the game . So upsetting, unacceptable @TELUSsupport

• 
  n (@noorrbit) reported 20 minutes ago

  WHY IS TELUS SERVICE SO *** @TELUS I beg u fix it it’s taking 5 years to load